Direct Tax Test Series: MCQs & Descriptive
Direct Tax Test Series: MCQs & Descriptive
PART 1
On the basis of the facts given above, choose the most appropriate answer to
below, based on the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 –
(1) Is the action of the Assessing Officer in entering the business premises of
A Ltd. at 9 p.m. and continuing survey operations till 11 p.m. valid? Also,
www.fasttestseries.com APB
(3)
APB Marks
is the action of the Assessing officer in entering the business premises of B
Ltd. at 8.30 p.m. valid?
(a) Yes, the action of the Assessing Officer, in both cases, is valid.
(b) No, the action is not valid in both cases, as the Assessing Officer
cannot enter the premises of A Ltd. and B Ltd. after sunset.
(c) No, the action is not valid in the case of A Ltd., as the survey
operations continued beyond business hours. However, the action
of the Assessing officer in the case of B Ltd. is valid.
(d) The action of the Assessing Officer is valid in the case of A Ltd.
but not in the case of B Ltd. 2
(2) Is the action of the Assessing Officer in impounding and retaining books
of account and other documents of A Ltd. and B Ltd., after recording
reasons for doing so, valid, where he had not taken specific permission
from the Chief Commissioner for this action?
(a) No, the action of the Assessing Officer is not valid in the case of
both A Ltd. and B Ltd.
(b) Yes, the action of the Assessing Officer is valid in the case of both
A Ltd. and B Ltd.
(c) The action of the Assessing Officer is valid in the case of A Ltd.
but not in the case of B Ltd.
(d) The action of the Assessing Officer is valid in the case of B Ltd. but
not in case of A Ltd. 2
www.fasttestseries.com APB P.T.O.
(4)
APB Marks
(3) Can the Assessing Officer issue notice u/s 148 to A Ltd. in August, 2022,
in respect of A.Y.2019-20, A.Y.2020-21 and A.Y.2021-22, consequent to
survey conducted in the business premises of A Ltd?
(b) Yes, he can do so; compliances stipulated u/s 148A are not
necessary.
(c) Yes, he can do so, after following the compliances stipulated u/s
148A.
(d) Yes, he can do so with the prior approval of the specified authority
u/s 151 ; other compliances stipulated u/s 148A are not necessary. 2
(4) Would the action of the Assessing Officer in entering the premises of A
Ltd. at 9 p.m. and impounding and retaining books of account been valid
if he had surveyed A Ltd. only for the purpose of verifying whether tax
has been deducted/collected at source in accordance with the provisions of
the Income-tax Act, 1961?
(a) Yes, the action of the Assessing Officer in entering the premises
and impounding and retaining books of account would be valid.
(b) No, the action of the Assessing Officer in entering the premises at 9
p.m. and impounding and retaining books of account is not valid.
APB Marks
(d) The action of the Assessing Officer in entering the premises at 9
p.m. is valid but not the action of continuing the survey beyond 10
p.m. 2
(5) Can the Assessing Officer issue notice u/s 148 for bringing to tax income
escaping assessment in the case of C Ltd., without following the
compliances stipulated u/s 148A?
(a) Yes, he can do so with the prior approval of the specified authority
u/s 151.
(c) No, he cannot issue notice u/s 148, since the three-year time limit
from the end of the relevant assessment years has expired.
(d) No, he cannot issue notice, since “shares” do not fall within the
meaning of asset for invoking the extended time limit beyond three
years. 2
(6) Can the Assessing Officer issue notice under section 148 for bringing to
tax income escaping assessment in case of C Ltd., without following the
compliances stipulated u/s 148A, if the shares purchased in the P.Y.2016-
17 were of 30 lakhs instead of 28 lakhs, all other facts remaining the
same?
(a) Yes, he can do so, with the prior approval of the specified authority
www.fasttestseries.com APB P.T.O.
(6)
APB Marks
u/s 151
(c) No, he cannot issue notice u/s 148, since the three-year time limit
from the end of the relevant assessment years has expired.
(d) No, he cannot issue notice, since “shares” do not fall within the
meaning of asset for invoking the extended time limit beyond three
years. 2
2. Helpage is a charitable trust registered under section 12AB, with its main object
falling under the residuary clause “any other object of general public utility” .
During the P.Y.2022-23, it received 80 lakh as voluntary contributions. The
trust also borrowed 40 lakh on 1.7.2022 from Indian bank to purchase land for
construction of an office building from where it can carry out its functions. The
trust repaid principal of 10 lakh to Indian bank on 31.3.2023. The trust incurred
revenue expenditure of 17 lakh and capital expenditure of 60 lakh towards
purchase of land for construction of office building during the P.Y.2022-23. Out
of the revenue expenditure of 17 lakh, 15 lakh was paid during the P.Y.2022-
23 itself. Out of the remaining 2 lakh, 1 lakh was paid in April, 2023 and 1
lakh was paid in January, 2024. During the P.Y.2022-23, the trust also paid 3
lakh towards revenue expenditure incurred during the P.Y.2021-22 and 1 lakh
towards revenue expenditure incurred during the P.Y.2020 -21.
The trust also received 30 lakhs by way of corpus donations during the
P.Y.2022-23, out of which it deposited 25 lakhs in post office savings bank
www.fasttestseries.com APB
(7)
APB Marks
account (the balance in post office savings bank account after such deposit is 32
lakhs). The trust also withdrew 5 lakhs from post office savings bank account
and applied towards purchase of land for construction of office building.
The trust has donated to Eduaid, another trust registered under section 12AB with
main object of providing education to poor, 12 lakhs out of its current year
income. The trust has applied 2 lakh out of its current year income for medical
treatment of brother of the trustee, who met with an accident while working in his
factory.
On the basis of the facts given above, choose the most appropriate answer to
below, based on the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 -
(1) What would be the application of the trust for the P.Y.2022 -23 (excluding
unconditional accumulation of 15%), assuming that it has fulfilled the
relevant conditions stipulated under section 12A?
(a) 43 lakhs
(b) 55 lakhs
(c) 56 lakhs
(d) 60 lakhs 2
(2) If the trust does not get its accounts audited before the specified date
referred to in section 44AB, what would be the consequence?
(a) No deduction would be allowed if the trust fails get its accounts
audited before the specified date referred to in section 44AB.
(3) What is the amount of income which would be chargeable to tax under
section 115BBI for A.Y.2023-24?
(a) 2,00,000
(b) 5,00,000
(c) 7,00,000
(d) 12,00,000 2
(4) What is the quantum of penalty which can be levied under section
271AAE? Assume that the specified violation has occurred only once
during the P.Y.2022-23.
(a) 2,00,000
(b) 4,00,000
(c) 5,00,000
(d) 7,00,000 2
www.fasttestseries.com APB
(9)
APB Marks
(5) Assuming for the purpose of this MCQ, that the trust has receipts of 22
lakh from trade, commerce and business in P.Y.2022-23 while advancing
the object of general public utility, what is the tax consequence?
(a) The registration of the trust would be cancelled since it has violated
the stipulated condition for grant of exemption.
(b) The registration of the trust would not be cancelled though the trust
would be denied exemption for violating the stipulated condition.
(c) The trust would be denied exemption and the entire income of the
trust would be chargeable to tax at the maximum marginal rate.
(d) Neither the registration of the trust would be cancelled nor would it
be denied exemption as it has not violated the stipulated condition. 2
3. Mr. Mahesh is found to be the owner of two gold chains of 50 gms each (value of
which is 1,45,000 each) during the financial year ending 31.3.2023 which are
not recorded in his books of account and he could not offer satisfactory
explanation for the amount spent on acquiring these gold chains. As per section
115BBE, Mr. Mahesh would be liable to pay tax of –
(a) 1,80,960
(b) 2,26,200
(c) 90,480
(d) 1,23,958 1
(a) No penalty is leviable under section 270A in the hands of either Mr.
Ganesh or Mr. Rajesh
5. XYZ Ltd. has failed to report an international transaction entered into by it with
PQR Inc., which is a specified foreign company in relation to XYZ Ltd. What
would be the penalty leviable in this case?
APB Marks
108 lakhs (Net of TDS) from domestic companies and 30 lakhs (gross) from a
foreign company in which it has 5% shareholding. What is the deduction, if any,
available to Gamma Ltd. in respect of such dividend?
7. Lima Ltd., a domestic company, purchases its own listed shares on 13th August,
2022. The consideration for buyback amounted to 23 lakh, which was paid on
the same day. The amount received by the company two years back for issue of
such shares determined in the manner specified in Rule 40BB was 17 lakh. The
additional income-tax payable by Lima Ltd. is –
(a) 1,02,960
(b) 1,04,832
(c) 1,39,776
(d) 1,37,280 2
8. Two tonnage tax companies X Ltd. and Y Ltd. are amalgamated to form a new
tonnage company Z Ltd., a qualifying company and the option for tonnage tax
scheme of X Ltd. has an unexpired period of 8 years and Y Ltd. has an unexpired
period of 6 years. For what period the special provisions of Chapter XII-G
www.fasttestseries.com APB P.T.O.
(12)
APB Marks
relating taxation of income shipping companies would apply to the new company
Z Ltd.?
(a) 8 years
(b) 6 years
(c) 7 years
(d) 10 years 2
www.fasttestseries.com APB
(13)
APB Marks
PART 2
Q.1 Sankar Ltd, engaged in the manufacture of footwear and leather products,
for the past 8 years, reported a net profit of *272 lakhs as per the statement
of profit and loss for the year ended 31st March, 2024. The company was
subject to tax audit u/s 44AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The net profit is
arrived at after debiting or crediting the following amounts:
(i) Depreciation charged on the basis of useful life of assets as per
Companies Act is ₹32 lakhs.
(ii) A sundry creditor whose amount of 32 lakhs was outstanding since
long time, has been settled for 26 lakhs on 31st March, 2024 based on
compromise settlement. The amount waived has been credited to the
statement of profit and loss.
(iii) Employers' contribution to EPF of 3 lakhs for the month of March,
2024 was deposited on 29th July, 2024.
(iv) Interest payments debited 30 lakhs (Includes interest on term loan of
*25 lakhs availed on 1-4-2023 at interest rate of 12% p.a towards
purchase of machinery during the year).
(v) Payment of 30 lakhs to A & Co., a subcontractor, for processing raw
leather without deduction of tax is debited to statement of profit &
loss. This amc.nt includes 20 lakhs for purchase of chemicals and 10
lakhs towards labour charges which is separately shown in bills
submitted.
Additional Information:
(1) The company has not made provision for an amount of 12 lakhs being
a fair estimate of the amount as payable to workers towards periodical
wage revision once in 3 years in respect of existing employees. The
www.fasttestseries.com APB
(15)
APB Marks
Q.2
1. PQR Ltd has two units - one engaged in manufacture of computer hardware
and the other involved in developing software. As a restructuring drive, the
company has decided to sell its software unit as a going concern by way of
slump sale for 385 Lakhs to a new company called S Ltd, in which it holds
74% of equity shares.
The Balance Sheet of PQR Ltd as on 31st March, 2024 being the date on
which software unit has been transferred, is given here under:--
Balance Sheet as on 31.03.2024
Liabilities In Lakhs Assets In Lakhs
Paid up Share Capital 300 Fixed Assets:
General Reserve 150 Hardware Unit 170
Share Premium 50 Software Unit 200
Revaluation Reserve 120 Debtors:
Current Liabilities: Hardware Unit 140
Hardware Unit 40 Software Unit 110
Software Unit 90 Inventories:
Hardware Unit 95
Software Unit 35
Total 750 Total 750
Following additional information is furnished by the management:
1. The software unit is in existence since May 2015
2. Fixed assets of software unit include Land which was purchased at 40
Lakhs in the year 2009 and revalued at 760 Lakhs as on March 31,
2024. The stamp duty value on 31.3.2024 is 55 lakhs.
3. Fixed Assets of Software unit mirrored at 140 Lakhs (200 Lakhs
Q.2
2. Mr. X received the following gifts/amounts during F.Y. 2023-24
(i) Gift of bullion worth 260,000/- on his birthday from his friend
(ii) Received a car from his cousin on payment of 21,00,000/-, FMV of
which was 24,00,000/-
(iii) Received cash gift of 18,000/- each from three of his friends A, B and
C on 24.09.2023
(iv) Acquired an office building on 22.11.2023 from his friend Q for a
consideration of 10 Lakhs, stamp value of which is 20 Lakhs.
(v) In respect of Land of Mr. X acquired by Railways in the year 2015, he
received the following amount on 25.12.2023 as interest on enhanced
compensation on the order of the court-
Relating to Previous Years
2020-21 1,45,000/-
2021-22 1,75,000/-
2022-23 1.10,000/-
You are required to compute the Income of Mr. X chargeable under
www.fasttestseries.com APB
(17)
APB Marks
the head "Income from other Sources" for A.Y. 2024-25, assuming
that he has no other income. 6
Q.3 M/s PRK LLP, a limited liability partnership, set up a unit in Special
Economic Zone (SEZ) on 1st April, 2019 to develop and export computer
software. The unit complied with all the conditions of section 10AA. The net
profit of the unit as per Statement of Profit & Loss for the year ended 31st
March, 2024 was 65 lakhs after debiting/crediting the following items:
(i) Profit on sale of import entitlement 9 lakhs.
(ii) Remuneration to its working partners * 58 lakhs.
(iii) Interest at the rate of 16% per annum on partners' capital 20 lakhs.
(iv) Donation to a political party 3 lakhs.
(v) Depreciation 17 lakhs.
Additional Information:
(i) Payment of remuneration to working partners and interest on capital
are authorized by the partnership deed.
(ii) Brought forward business loss from assessment year 2018-19 was 4
lakhs.
(iii) Unabsorbed depreciation brought forward from assessment year 2017-
18 was 35 lakhs.
(iv) Total export turnover was 45 crores and the sale proceeds in
convertible foreign exchange received in India by 30th September,
2024 was 38 crores. Total export turnover of 45 crores include
telecommunication charges of 5 crores attributable to delivery of
software. Sale proceeds realization of 38 crores also include such
telecommunication charges of 2 crores.
Q.3
2. Nishant, a foreign national and a match referee came to India for T-20
matches and other match When he stayed in India, he also won a prize of
25,000 from horse racing in Delhi. He has no tournaments during the P.Y.
2023-24 for 45 days. He received 9.6 lakhs for T-20 matches in India. other
income in India during the year. Compute tax liability of Nishant for
Assessment Year 2024-25 if he opts for section 115BAC. 4
Q.4
1. M/s Mahan Charitable Trust in running an institution with hostel facility for
the orphan children. It is registered u/s 12AB.
(a) Voluntary contribution received during the year 150 lakhs. This
includes:
(i) Corpus donation 20 lakhs
(ii) Donation of 20 lakhs from Mr. Michael, a foreign donor,
which was received on 31-3-2024.
(b) Salary paid to teachers and administrative staff 40 lakhs.
(c) Other general expenses 10 lakhs include payment to grocery stores
of 30,000 by crossed cheque.
www.fasttestseries.com APB
(19)
APB Marks
(d) A land belonging to the Trust in a nearby village which was purchased
in the year 2022-23 for 5lakhs was sold for 10.50 lakhs and another
land adjacent to the Trust premises was purchased for 12 lakhs to be
used as playground for the children.
(e) Five laptops costing 50,000 each were purchased during the year for
teaching purposes.
(f) The Trust had accumulated 30 lakhs u/s 11(2) for 5 years in the
financial year 2019-20 for constructing a school building. Amount
spent for the said purpose till 31-3-2024 was 27 lakhs. The project is
completed with a saving in project cost.
(g) Two additional rooms measuring 1500 sq. ft each was constructed in
the existing hostel for the children. Cost of construction is ₹1200 per
sq. ft.
(h) It made a corpus donation of ₹20 lakhs to a charitable trust registered
u/s 12AB having similar objects.
Compute taxable income of Mahan Charitable Trust for the assessment year
2024-25. Support your answer with necessary working notes. 8
Q.4
2. Examine the applicability of provisions relating to deduction/collection of
tax at source in the [TCS RTP NOV-2023] following cases for the financial
year ended 31st March, 2024 as per provisions contained in the Income-tax
Act, 1961:
(I) Delta Ltd., an Indian company, which was incorporated on 1.4.2023
purchases coal from Phi Ltd., another Indian company, for? 75 lakhs
during the P.Y.2023-24, to manufacture steel. Delta Ltd. furnishes a
Q.5
1. Ajay, a non-resident Indian, has the following sources of income in India
during the previous year 2023-24:
Particulars
(i) Income from house property located in India 1,80,000
(computed)
(ii) Dividend from Indian Companies (Purchased 10,000
in Indian )
(iii) Interest on debentures of Indian company 1,00,000
(Subscribed in convertible foreign exchange)
Less: Interest on loan taken for purchase of 20,000 80,000
www.fasttestseries.com APB
(21)
APB Marks
debentures
(iv) Long-term capital gains on sale of debentures
subscribed in US $:
Cost in 04-05 4,00,000
Sale in 23-24 6,00,000
2,00,000
Less: Commission to brokers 6,000 1,94,000
Cost Inflation Index: F.Y. 2004-05-113; F.Y.2023-24-348
Compute the tax payable by Ajay for Assessment Year 2024-25, if he opts
for the provisions of
Chapter XII-A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Ignore the provisions of section
115BAC. 4
Q.5
2. On 1-4-2023, Vihaan Ltd., an Indian company, advanced a loan of 6 crores
to Yuvan Inc., a company resident in Singapore. As on the date of loan, the
book value of total assets in the books accordingly the value of assets had
increased by 2 crores. Yuvan Ltd. paid the entire loan along of Yuvan Inc.
was 4 crores. In the Financial Year 2022-23, Yuvan Inc. had revalued its
assets and with interest thereon on 31st August, 2023. During the Financial
Year 2023-24, Vihaan Ltd. Also entered into an agreement with Yuvan Inc.
to provide 20 thousand medical equipment's at a cost of 7,400 per unit. The
Assessing Officer treats them as associate enterprise and wants to re
compute the income of Vihaan Ltd. At arms' length price. You are required
to answer the following questions in this respect:
(1) Would Vihaan Ltd. And Yuvan Ltd. Be treated as associate
Q.5
3. M/s Global Architects Inc is a company incorporated in country F1. It is
engaged in the business of providing architectural design services all over
the world. It receives an offer from Lovely Resorts Pvt Ltd, an Indian
company, for design and development of resorts all over India.
India-F1 tax treaty provides that architectural services are technical services
and payment for the same to a company may be taxed in India. However, if
such professional services are provided by a firm or individual, then
payment for such services are taxable only if the firm has a fixed base in
India or stay of partners, employees in India exceed 180 days.
M/s Global Architects Inc forms a partnership firm with a third party
(director of the company) having only a nominal share in the F1. The firm
enters into an agreement to carry out the services in India. The company
seconded its trained manpower to the firm.
Thus, the partnership firm claimed the treaty benefit and no tax was paid in
India. Can such an arrangement be examined under GAAR? 3
www.fasttestseries.com APB
(23)
APB Marks
Q.5
4. State whether the following assessees have to file return of income and if so,
the due date for the assessment year 2024-25:
(i) A registered trade union having income from let out property of
1,00,000.
(ii) A public trust hospital having an aggregate annual receipt of 505 lacs
and availing exemption of 3,10,000 u/s 10(23C) (via) with total
income of ₹ 2,40,000 3
Q.6
1. MNO & Co., a non-resident entity based in London, owns and operates an
electronic facility throu which it effects online sale of goods manufactured
by it. The following are its receipts from the P.Y.2023-24-
Particulars Amount in
(a) Receipts from sale of goods to persons resident in India 145 lakhs
(b) Receipts from sale of goods to persons not resident in 99 lakhs
other parts of South-East Asia
Out of the said sum, 60 lakhs relates to receipts from
persons using internet protocol address located in
India.
Discuss the equalisation levy implications of such receipt in the hands of
MNO & Co., if –
(i) MNO & Co. has no permanent establishment in India
(ii) MNO & Co. has a permanent establishment in India, and the sale of
goods is effectively connected to the permanent establishment in India
Q.6
2. Mr. Chetan, an Indian citizen aged 51 years, left India on 1st April 2020 to
settle in Country Y. But owing to some personal unavoidable circumstances,
he returned back to India permanently on 1st June 2023.
He has a residential property in Country Y from which he earned an income
of $ 25,000 for the year ended 31st March 2024. He is eligible for basic
exemption limit of $ 8,000 and on balance income. he paid income tax
@20% in Country Y. The tax was paid on 10th May 2024 from his bank
account in India.
His income from business in India is 5,00,000 for the year ended on 31st
March 2024. He also received dividend amounting to 1,25,000 from an
Indian company and interest of * 11,500 on saving bank account with SBI,
during the year.
The exchange rates of 1 $ on various dates is given below:
1.04.2023-74; 31.03.2024, 75; 10.05.2024 - 75.5;
Compute the net tax liability of Mr. Chetan in India for the assessment year
2024-25 on the assumption that there is no DTAA between India and
Country Y.
Assume that the assessee does not opt for the provisions of Section
115BAC. 5
www.fasttestseries.com APB
(25)
APB Marks
Q.6
3. Explain briefly the significant differences between the UN and OECD
Model Tax Convention. 2
Q.6
4. What are the ways in which hybrid mismatch arrangements are used to
achieve unintended double non-taxation or long-term tax deferral? 2
PART 1
On the basis of the facts given above, choose the most appropriate answer to
below, based on the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 –
(1) Is the action of the Assessing Officer in entering the business premises of
A Ltd. at 9 p.m. and continuing survey operations till 11 p.m. valid? Also,
www.fasttestseries.com APB
(3)
APB Marks
is the action of the Assessing officer in entering the business premises of B
Ltd. at 8.30 p.m. valid?
(a) Yes, the action of the Assessing Officer, in both cases, is valid.
(b) No, the action is not valid in both cases, as the Assessing Officer
cannot enter the premises of A Ltd. and B Ltd. after sunset.
(c) No, the action is not valid in the case of A Ltd., as the survey
operations continued beyond business hours. However, the action
of the Assessing officer in the case of B Ltd. is valid.
(d) The action of the Assessing Officer is valid in the case of A Ltd.
but not in the case of B Ltd.
Ans. (a) 2
(2) Is the action of the Assessing Officer in impounding and retaining books
of account and other documents of A Ltd. and B Ltd., after recording
reasons for doing so, valid, where he had not taken specific permission
from the Chief Commissioner for this action?
(a) No, the action of the Assessing Officer is not valid in the case of
both A Ltd. and B Ltd.
(b) Yes, the action of the Assessing Officer is valid in the case of both
A Ltd. and B Ltd.
(c) The action of the Assessing Officer is valid in the case of A Ltd.
but not in the case of B Ltd.
(d) The action of the Assessing Officer is valid in the case of B Ltd. but
not in case of A Ltd.
www.fasttestseries.com APB P.T.O.
(4)
APB Marks
Ans. (c) 2
(3) Can the Assessing Officer issue notice u/s 148 to A Ltd. in August, 2022,
in respect of A.Y.2019-20, A.Y.2020-21 and A.Y.2021-22, consequent to
survey conducted in the business premises of A Ltd?
(b) Yes, he can do so; compliances stipulated u/s 148A are not
necessary.
(c) Yes, he can do so, after following the compliances stipulated u/s
148A.
(d) Yes, he can do so with the prior approval of the specified authority
u/s 151 ; other compliances stipulated u/s 148A are not necessary.
Ans. (c) 2
(4) Would the action of the Assessing Officer in entering the premises of A
Ltd. at 9 p.m. and impounding and retaining books of account been valid
if he had surveyed A Ltd. only for the purpose of verifying whether tax
has been deducted/collected at source in accordance with the provisions of
the Income-tax Act, 1961?
(a) Yes, the action of the Assessing Officer in entering the premises
and impounding and retaining books of account would be valid.
(b) No, the action of the Assessing Officer in entering the premises at 9
p.m. and impounding and retaining books of account is not valid.
www.fasttestseries.com APB
(5)
APB Marks
p.m. is valid but not the action of impounding and retaining books
of account.
Ans. (b) 2
(5) Can the Assessing Officer issue notice u/s 148 for bringing to tax income
escaping assessment in the case of C Ltd., without following the
compliances stipulated u/s 148A?
(a) Yes, he can do so with the prior approval of the specified authority
u/s 151.
(c) No, he cannot issue notice u/s 148, since the three-year time limit
from the end of the relevant assessment years has expired.
(d) No, he cannot issue notice, since “shares” do not fall within the
meaning of asset for invoking the extended time limit beyond three
years.
Ans. (c) 2
(6) Can the Assessing Officer issue notice under section 148 for bringing to
tax income escaping assessment in case of C Ltd., without following the
compliances stipulated u/s 148A, if the shares purchased in the P.Y.2016-
17 were of 30 lakhs instead of 28 lakhs, all other facts remaining the
www.fasttestseries.com APB P.T.O.
(6)
APB Marks
same?
(a) Yes, he can do so, with the prior approval of the specified authority
u/s 151
(c) No, he cannot issue notice u/s 148, since the three-year time limit
from the end of the relevant assessment years has expired.
(d) No, he cannot issue notice, since “shares” do not fall within the
meaning of asset for invoking the extended time limit beyond three
years.
Ans. (a) 2
2. Helpage is a charitable trust registered under section 12AB, with its main object
falling under the residuary clause “any other object of general public utility” .
During the P.Y.2022-23, it received 80 lakh as voluntary contributions. The
trust also borrowed 40 lakh on 1.7.2022 from Indian bank to purchase land for
construction of an office building from where it can carry out its functions. The
trust repaid principal of 10 lakh to Indian bank on 31.3.2023. The trust incurred
revenue expenditure of 17 lakh and capital expenditure of 60 lakh towards
purchase of land for construction of office building during the P.Y.2022-23. Out
of the revenue expenditure of 17 lakh, 15 lakh was paid during the P.Y.2022-
23 itself. Out of the remaining 2 lakh, 1 lakh was paid in April, 2023 and 1
lakh was paid in January, 2024. During the P.Y.2022-23, the trust also paid 3
lakh towards revenue expenditure incurred during the P.Y.2021-22 and 1 lakh
towards revenue expenditure incurred during the P.Y.2020 -21.
www.fasttestseries.com APB
(7)
APB Marks
The trust also received 30 lakhs by way of corpus donations during the
P.Y.2022-23, out of which it deposited 25 lakhs in post office savings bank
account (the balance in post office savings bank account after such deposit is 32
lakhs). The trust also withdrew 5 lakhs from post office savings bank account
and applied towards purchase of land for construction of office building.
The trust has donated to Eduaid, another trust registered under section 12AB with
main object of providing education to poor, 12 lakhs out of its current year
income. The trust has applied 2 lakh out of its current year income for medical
treatment of brother of the trustee, who met with an accident while working in his
factory.
On the basis of the facts given above, choose the most appropriate answer to
below, based on the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 -
(1) What would be the application of the trust for the P.Y.2022 -23 (excluding
unconditional accumulation of 15%), assuming that it has fulfilled the
relevant conditions stipulated under section 12A?
(a) 43 lakhs
(b) 55 lakhs
(c) 56 lakhs
(d) 60 lakhs
Ans. (b) 2
(2) If the trust does not get its accounts audited before the specified date
referred to in section 44AB, what would be the consequence?
Ans. (d) 2
(3) What is the amount of income which would be chargeable to tax under
section 115BBI for A.Y.2023-24?
(a) 2,00,000
(b) 5,00,000
(c) 7,00,000
(d) 12,00,000
Ans. (c) 2
(4) What is the quantum of penalty which can be levied under section
271AAE? Assume that the specified violation has occurred only once
during the P.Y.2022-23.
(a) 2,00,000
(b) 4,00,000
(c) 5,00,000
www.fasttestseries.com APB
(9)
APB Marks
(d) 7,00,000
Ans. (a) 2
(5) Assuming for the purpose of this MCQ, that the trust has receipts of 22
lakh from trade, commerce and business in P.Y.2022-23 while advancing
the object of general public utility, what is the tax consequence?
(a) The registration of the trust would be cancelled since it has violated
the stipulated condition for grant of exemption.
(b) The registration of the trust would not be cancelled though the trust
would be denied exemption for violating the stipulated condition.
(c) The trust would be denied exemption and the entire income of the
trust would be chargeable to tax at the maximum marginal rate.
(d) Neither the registration of the trust would be cancelled nor would it
be denied exemption as it has not violated the stipulated condition.
Ans. (d) 2
3. Mr. Mahesh is found to be the owner of two gold chains of 50 gms each (value of
which is 1,45,000 each) during the financial year ending 31.3.2023 which are
not recorded in his books of account and he could not offer satisfactory
explanation for the amount spent on acquiring these gold chains. As per section
115BBE, Mr. Mahesh would be liable to pay tax of –
(a) 1,80,960
(b) 2,26,200
(d) 1,23,958
Ans. (b) 1
4. Mr. Ganesh and Mr. Rajesh, resident Indians born on 1.7.1962 and 1.4.1943,
respectively, have not furnished their returns of income for the P.Y.2022-23.
However, the total income assessed in respect of such year under section 144 is
8 lakhs and 5 lakhs, respectively. Is penalty leviable under section 270A, and if
so, what is the quantum of penalty?
(a) No penalty is leviable under section 270A in the hands of either Mr.
Ganesh or Mr. Rajesh
Ans. (d) 1
5. XYZ Ltd. has failed to report an international transaction entered into by it with
PQR Inc., which is a specified foreign company in relation to XYZ Ltd. What
would be the penalty leviable in this case?
www.fasttestseries.com APB
(11)
APB Marks
(b) 50% of tax payable on under-reported income
Ans. (d) 1
Ans. (c) 1
7. Lima Ltd., a domestic company, purchases its own listed shares on 13th August,
2022. The consideration for buyback amounted to 23 lakh, which was paid on
the same day. The amount received by the company two years back for issue of
such shares determined in the manner specified in Rule 40BB was 17 lakh. The
additional income-tax payable by Lima Ltd. is –
(b) 1,04,832
(c) 1,39,776
(d) 1,37,280
Ans. (c) 2
8. Two tonnage tax companies X Ltd. and Y Ltd. are amalgamated to form a new
tonnage company Z Ltd., a qualifying company and the option for tonnage tax
scheme of X Ltd. has an unexpired period of 8 years and Y Ltd. has an unexpired
period of 6 years. For what period the special provisions of Chapter XII-G
relating taxation of income shipping companies would apply to the new company
Z Ltd.?
(a) 8 years
(b) 6 years
(c) 7 years
(d) 10 years
Ans. (a) 2
www.fasttestseries.com APB
(13)
APB Marks
PART 2
Q.1 Sankar Ltd, engaged in the manufacture of footwear and leather products,
for the past 8 years, reported a net profit of *272 lakhs as per the statement
of profit and loss for the year ended 31st March, 2024. The company was
subject to tax audit u/s 44AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The net profit is
arrived at after debiting or crediting the following amounts:
(i) Depreciation charged on the basis of useful life of assets as per
Companies Act is ₹32 lakhs.
(ii) A sundry creditor whose amount of 32 lakhs was outstanding since
long time, has been settled for 26 lakhs on 31st March, 2024 based on
compromise settlement. The amount waived has been credited to the
statement of profit and loss.
(iii) Employers' contribution to EPF of 3 lakhs for the month of March,
2024 was deposited on 29th July, 2024.
(iv) Interest payments debited 30 lakhs (Includes interest on term loan of
*25 lakhs availed on 1-4-2023 at interest rate of 12% p.a towards
purchase of machinery during the year).
(v) Payment of 30 lakhs to A & Co., a subcontractor, for processing raw
leather without deduction of tax is debited to statement of profit &
loss. This amc.nt includes 20 lakhs for purchase of chemicals and 10
lakhs towards labour charges which is separately shown in bills
submitted.
Additional Information:
(1) The company has not made provision for an amount of 12 lakhs being
a fair estimate of the amount as payable to workers towards periodical
wage revision once in 3 years in respect of existing employees. The
www.fasttestseries.com APB
(15)
APB Marks
Particulars Amount ( )
Net profit as per the statement of profit 2,72,00,000
and loss
Add: Items debited but to be considered
separately or to be disallowed
(i) Depreciation charged as per Companies 32,00,000
Act, 2013
(iii) Employer's contribution to EPF Nill
[As per section 43B, employers'
contribution to EPF is allowable as
deduction, since the same has been
deposited on or before the 'due date' of
filing of return u/s 139(1) i.e.,
30.9.2024. Since the same has been
debited to statement of profit and loss,
no further adjustment is necessary]
(iv) Interest on term loan for purchase of 1,75,000
plant and machinery [25 lakhs x 12% x
7/12]
[As per the proviso to section 36(1)
(iii), interest paid in respect of capital
borrowed for acquisition of an asset for
the period from the date of borrowing
till the date on which such asset is first
put to use shall not be allowed as
deduction. Since the same has been
www.fasttestseries.com APB
(17)
APB Marks
not allowable as deduction as per section
36(1)(va)]
3,11,75,000
www.fasttestseries.com APB
(19)
APB Marks
Total Income (Rounded off) 2,39,89,380
Computation of tax payable by Sankar Ltd. for the A.Y. 2024-25
www.fasttestseries.com APB
(21)
APB Marks
1. The software unit is in existence since May 2015
2. Fixed assets of software unit include Land which was purchased at 40
Lakhs in the year 2009 and revalued at 760 Lakhs as on March 31,
2024. The stamp duty value on 31.3.2024 is 55 lakhs.
3. Fixed Assets of Software unit mirrored at 140 Lakhs (200 Lakhs
minus Land Value *60 Lakhs) is written down value of depreciable
assets as per books of account. However, the written down value of
these assets under section 43(6) of the Income Tax Act is 790 Lakhs
A. Ascertain the tax liability on Capital Gain which would arise
from Slump Sale to PQR Ltd., assuming it does not opt for
section 115BAA.
B. What would be your advice as a tax consultant to make tax -
savy, without changing the amount of sale consideration?
Ans. Name of the Assessee: PQR Ltd
Financial Year: 2023-24
Computation of Capital Gains
Particulars In Lakhs
Full Value of Consideration (FMV on the date of 385
Transfer)
Less: Transfer Expenses Nil
Net Consideration - 385
Less: Cost of Acquisition [Net-worth: Note 1] (185)
Long Term Capital Gain - 200
Tax Liability on LTCG @20% u/s 112 (200 x 20%) 40
Add: Surcharge @7% on Tax 2.80
42.80
www.fasttestseries.com APB
(23)
APB Marks
accruing as a result of transfer by way of slump sale
[value of the monetary consideration received]
[FMV2]
Full value of consideration [Higher of FMV1 or 385
FMV2]
2. Calculation of Net-worth of Software Unit
Particulars In Lakhs
Depreciable Assets (WDV as per Income Tax Act) 90
Land + 40
Debtors + 110
Inventory + 35
Total Assets 275
Less: Current Liability - (90|)
Net-worth 185
Possible Tax Planning Aspects:
1. Since the transfer is on slump Sale, the benefit of indexation is not
available. If the transfer of software unit is on item-wise basis, then
land could be eligible for indexation benefit.
2. PQR Ltd may acquire remaining 26% of the equity shares in S Ltd in
which case it will become a 100% subsidiary. Transfer of Capital
Asset by the parent company to a 100% subsidiary company would
not be regarded as transfer. However, this relationship must be
retained for a period of at least 8 years from the date of transfer.
3. PQR may think about demerger of software unit to get benefit of sec
47 of the Income tax Act. 8
www.fasttestseries.com APB
(25)
APB Marks
as the aggregate FMV of bullion exceeds 50,000/-
(ii) Since car is not included in the definition of property, NIL
therefore the difference of ₹3 Lakhs between FMV and
purchase price of car is non- taxable under section
56(2)(x)
(iii) Cash gift received from friends is taxable u/s 56(2)(x), 54,000
since its aggregate value exceeds 50,000/- (18,000 x 3)
(iv) Immovable property (office building) purchased for 10,00,000
inadequate consideration is taxable u/s 56(2)(x).
Therefore, the difference of 10 Lakhs between stamp
duty value and purchase price of building is taxable u/s
56(2)(x)
(v) As per section 145B, interest received during the year on 2,15,000
enhanced compensation shall be deemed to be the
Income of the year in which such interest is received
irrespective of the method of accounting followed by the
Assessee. Hence, the interest received by Mr. X is
taxable in P.Y. 2023-24 ( 1,45,000+ 1,75,000 +
1,10,000 4,30,000)
Less: Deduction u/s 57 @ 50% of 4,30,000 (2,15,000)
Income from Other Sources 13,29,000
6
Q.3 M/s PRK LLP, a limited liability partnership, set up a unit in Special
Economic Zone (SEZ) on 1st April, 2019 to develop and export computer
software. The unit complied with all the conditions of section 10AA. The net
profit of the unit as per Statement of Profit & Loss for the year ended 31st
www.fasttestseries.com APB
(27)
APB Marks
A.Y.2024-25
(under the regular provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961)
Particulars Amount (in Amount (in
) )
Net profit as per Statement of Profit & Loss 65,00,000
Add: Items debited but to be considered
separately or to be disallowed
- Remuneration to its working partners 58,00,000
- Interest@16% p.a. on partners' capital 5,00,000
(Interest on capital account would be fully
allowed to the extent of 12%, since the
same is authorized by the partnership deed.
Thus, interest in excess of 12% i.e., 20
lakhs/16% x 4% would be disallowed)
- Donation to a political party [not allowed 3,00,000
as deduction as per section 37(1) while
computing business income, since it is not
incurred wholly and exclusively for the
business]
- Depreciation 17,00,000 83,00,000
1,48,00,000
Less: Permissible expenditure and
allowances
-Depreciation allowable as per Income-tax 26,00,000
Rules, 1962
-Unabsorbed depreciation u/s 32(2) 35,00,000 61,00,000
www.fasttestseries.com APB
(29)
APB Marks
Less: Profits from sale of import entitlement
[business income which are in the nature of
ancillary profits, do not constitute profit
'derived from business for the purpose of 9,00,000
exemption u/s 10AA] 24,90,000
Export Turnover [ 38 crores 2 crores, being 36 crores
telecommunication charges included therein.
Telecommunication charge' not includible in
export turnover]
Total Turnover [45 crores 5 crores, being 40 crores
telecommunication charges included therein.
Since telecommunication charges has been
excluded from export turnover, the same has
to be excluded from total turnover also]
Less: Deduction u/s 80GGC
[Donation to political party [allowable as
deduction u/s 80GGC, assuming the
donation made otherwise than by way of
cash] 3,00,000
Total Income 4,49,000
Tax liability
Tax@30% 1,34,700
Add: Health and education cess@4% 5,388
Tax Liability 1,40,088
Tax Liability (rounded off) 1,40,090
Computation of adjusted total income of M/s PRK LLP and Alternate
www.fasttestseries.com APB
(31)
APB Marks
losses shall also apply while determining the income for the purpose of
computing deduction u/s 10AA. If this view is considered, the deduction u/s
10AA has to be computed after deducting brought forward business losses of
₹ 4,00,000 from the profits of SEZ. In such case, the deduction u/s 10AA
would be 18,81,000 [( 20,90,000 x 36 crores/* 40 crores) x 100%], total
income would be 8,09,000, tax liability as per normal provisions would be
2,52,410. Alternate minimum tax liability would remain same. However,
AMT credit to be carried forward would be ₹ 2,65,150] 10
Q.3
2. Nishant, a foreign national and a match referee came to India for T-20
matches and other match When he stayed in India, he also won a prize of
25,000 from horse racing in Delhi. He has no tournaments during the P.Y.
2023-24 for 45 days. He received 9.6 lakhs for T-20 matches in India. other
income in India during the year. Compute tax liability of Nishant for
Assessment Year 2024-25 if he opts for section 115BAC.
Ans. The Calcutta High Court in Indcom v. CIT (TDS)(2011) has held that
‘match referee' would not fall within the meaning of "sportsmen" to attract
the provisions of section 115BBA. Therefore, although the payments made
to non-resident 'match referee' are "income" which has accrued and arisen in
India, the same are not taxable under the provisions of section 115BBA.
Particulars
Tax@30% u/s 115BB on winnings of ₹25,000 from horse races 7,500
Tax on ₹9,60,000 at the rates in force
Upto 3,00,000 Nill
3,00,001-6,00,000 @5% 15,000
www.fasttestseries.com APB
(33)
APB Marks
completed with a saving in project cost.
(g) Two additional rooms measuring 1500 sq. ft each was constructed in
the existing hostel for the children. Cost of construction is ₹1200 per
sq. ft.
(h) It made a corpus donation of ₹20 lakhs to a charitable trust registered
u/s 12AB having similar objects.
Compute taxable income of Mahan Charitable Trust for the assessment year
2024-25. Support your answer with necessary working notes.
Ans. Computation of total income of M/s. Mahan Charitable Trust for the
A.Y.2024-25
Particulars
Voluntary contributions received during the year 1,50,00,000
Less: Corpus Donation (Note - 1) 20,00,000
Income from property held under trust [Capital Gains 1,30,00,000
from sale of land (10.50 lakhs - 5 lakhs)] 5,50,000
Less: 15% of income eligible for being set apart 1,35,50,000
without any condition 20,32,500
1,15,17,500
Less: Amount applied for charitable purposes
Salary paid to teachers and administrative staff 40,00,000
General expenses [10,00,000 30,000, payment by 9,70,000
crossed cheque disallowed due to section 40A(3)]
Capital gains re-invested in purchase of land for the 5,50,000
purpose of the trust deemed to be applied for
charitable purposes [10.50 lakhs - 5 lakhs]
Excess of purchase price of new land over sale 1,50,000
consideration of old land treated as application of
Particulars
1. It is assumed that the Mahan Charitable trust has invested/deposited
such contribution in modes specified u/s 11(5).
2. If the trust exercises the option to apply the donations received from
Mr. Michael on 31.3.2023 atleast 2 months before the due date of
filing of return u/s 139(1) in the form 9A, the income would be
deemed to have been applied for charitable purposes in the A.Y.2024-
25. However, such amount should be applied before the end of the
3. previous year 2024-25. As per the Supreme Court ruling in CIT v
Programme for Community Organisation (2001), 15% of gross
receipts would be eligible for accumulation u/s 11(1)(a)
8
www.fasttestseries.com APB
(35)
APB Marks
Q.4
2. Examine the applicability of provisions relating to deduction/collection of
tax at source in the [TCS RTP NOV-2023] following cases for the financial
year ended 31st March, 2024 as per provisions contained in the Income-tax
Act, 1961:
(I) Delta Ltd., an Indian company, which was incorporated on 1.4.2023
purchases coal from Phi Ltd., another Indian company, for? 75 lakhs
during the P.Y.2023-24, to manufacture steel. Delta Ltd. furnishes a
declaration that such coal is used to manufacture steel and not for
trading. What are the TCS/TDS implications on such transaction, if
Delta Ltd.'s turnover was 12 crores in the P.Y.2023-24; and Phi Ltd.'s
annual turnover ranges between? 16 crores and 18 crores in the last
few years?
Would your answer change if Delta Ltd. was incorporated on 1.4.2022
and its turnover in the P.Y.2022-23 is 10 crores?
(II) Sigma Ltd., a car manufacturer, sold the following cars to the car
dealers, Epsilon Ltd. and Omega Ltd., in the P.Y.2023-24-
Dealer Particulars of cars sold Value
Epsilon Ltd. 10 cars of the value 12 lakhs each 120 lakhs
Omega Ltd. 8 cars of the value of 10 lakhs each 80 lakhs
The turnover in the P.Y.2022-23 of Sigma Ltd. is 12 crores, Epsilon
Ltd. is? 14 crores and Omega Ltd. is 9 crores.
Ans. (i) As per section 206C(1A), since Delta Ltd., a resident buyer, has
furnished a declaration that coal is used for manufacturing steel and
not for trading, Phi Ltd. is not required to collect tax at source u/s
206C(1). In case of goods covered u/s 206C(1) but exempted u/s
www.fasttestseries.com APB
(37)
APB Marks
Omega Ltd.
The second step is to examine whether the provisions of section 194 Q
would be attracted in the hands of the dealers, namely, Epsilon Ltd.
and Omega Ltd. Since the turnover of Epsilon Ltd. in the P.Y.2021-22
exceeds 10 crore and the value of cars purchased from Sigma Ltd. in
the P.Y.2022-23 exceeds 50 lakhs, Epsilon Ltd. has to deduct
[email protected]% of 70 lakhs (i.e., 120 lakhs - 50 lakhs), at the time of credit
to the account of Sigma Ltd. or at the time of payment, whichever is
earlier. However, Omega Ltd. is not required to deduct tax at source
u/s 194Q, since its turnover in the P.Y.2021-22 does not exceed 10
crores.
The third step is to examine whether the provisions of section
206C(1H) would be attracted in the hands of Sigma Ltd. Sigma Ltd.'s
turnover for P.Y.2021 -22 exceeds 10 crores and the value of cars sold
to Epsilon Ltd. and Omega Ltd. exceed 50 lakhs each. Hence, it falls
within the meaning of "seller" u/s 206C(1H). Accordingly, in respect
of sale of cars to Omega Ltd., Sigma Ltd. is required to collect
[email protected]% of 30 lakhs (i.e., 80 lakhs - 50 lakhs) at the time of receipt.
However, no tax is to be collected by Sigma Ltd. from Epsilon Ltd.,
since the transaction has already been subject to TDS u/s 194Q in the
hands of Epsilon Ltd. 6
Q.5
1. Ajay, a non-resident Indian, has the following sources of income in India
during the previous year 2023-24:
Particulars
APB Marks
Tax on Dividend taxable for NR as per section 2,000
115A (10,000 x 20%)
Tax on balance income of 1,80,000 Nill 41,400
Add: HEC@4% 1,556
Total tax liability (rounded off) 43,060
Notes:
(1) Computation of total income of Mr. Ajay for the A.Y. 24-25 as per
provisions of Chapter XII-A
Particulars
Income from house property (computed) 1,80,000
Capital Gains on sale of debentures
Sale consideration 6,00,000
Less: Commission to brokers 6,000
Net sale consideration 5,94,000
Cost of acquisition (Refer Note 2) 4,00,000
Long term capital gain 1,94,000
Dividend income received from Indian companies 10,000
Interest on debentures of Indian company 1,00,000
(Refer Note 3)
Total Income 4,84,000
(2) As per section 115D, the indexation benefit would not be available for
calculating cost of acquisition for computing long term capital gains
under Chapter XII-A.
(3) No expenditure is allowed to be deducted from the interest on
debentures being the investment income as per the provisions of
section 115D. Therefore, interest on loan taken for purchase of
Q.5
2. On 1-4-2023, Vihaan Ltd., an Indian company, advanced a loan of 6 crores
to Yuvan Inc., a company resident in Singapore. As on the date of loan, the
book value of total assets in the books accordingly the value of assets had
increased by 2 crores. Yuvan Ltd. paid the entire loan along of Yuvan Inc.
was 4 crores. In the Financial Year 2022-23, Yuvan Inc. had revalued its
www.fasttestseries.com APB
(41)
APB Marks
assets and with interest thereon on 31st August, 2023. During the Financial
Year 2023-24, Vihaan Ltd. Also entered into an agreement with Yuvan Inc.
to provide 20 thousand medical equipment's at a cost of 7,400 per unit. The
Assessing Officer treats them as associate enterprise and wants to re
compute the income of Vihaan Ltd. At arms' length price. You are required
to answer the following questions in this respect:
(1) Would Vihaan Ltd. And Yuvan Ltd. Be treated as associate
enterprises for the purpose of transfer pricing adopted by the
Assessing Officer? If yes, why?'.
(2) Calculate the arm's length price of Vihaan Ltd. Which sells the same
equipment's at the rate of * 9,000 per unit to Y Ltd. and at the rate of *
9,500 per unit to X LLP (both of them are unrelated parties in respect
of Vihaan Ltd.). Vihaan Ltd. Is not a wholesale dealer.
(3) What are the options available to Vihaan Ltd. in respect of such
increase in transfer price by income tax authorities, if Vihaan Ltd.
Accepts such transfer price?
Ans. (1) Two enterprises are deemed to be associated enterprises as per section
92A(2)(c), if a loan advanced by one enterprise to the other enterprise
constitutes not less than 51% of the book value of total assets of the
other enterprise. Since Vihaan Ltd., an Indian company, advanced
loan of an amount of 6 crores to Yuvan Inc., a Singapore company,
which is 150% of the book value of the total assets of Yuvan Inc. (i.e.,
150% of 4 crores), Vihaan Ltd. and Yuvan Inc. are deemed to be
associated enterprises.
(2) Vihaan Ltd. sells equipments at the rate of ₹9,000 per unit to Y Ltd.
and at 9,500 per unit to X LLP, Chapter 29: Transfer Pricing both of
www.fasttestseries.com APB
(43)
APB Marks
amounts to 77,57,568. 4
Q.5
3. M/s Global Architects Inc is a company incorporated in country F1. It is
engaged in the business of providing architectural design services all over
the world. It receives an offer from Lovely Resorts Pvt Ltd, an Indian
company, for design and development of resorts all over India.
India-F1 tax treaty provides that architectural services are technical services
and payment for the same to a company may be taxed in India. However, if
such professional services are provided by a firm or individual, then
payment for such services are taxable only if the firm has a fixed base in
India or stay of partners, employees in India exceed 180 days.
M/s Global Architects Inc forms a partnership firm with a third party
(director of the company) having only a nominal share in the F1. The firm
enters into an agreement to carry out the services in India. The company
seconded its trained manpower to the firm.
Thus, the partnership firm claimed the treaty benefit and no tax was paid in
India. Can such an arrangement be examined under GAAR?
Ans. It is obvious that there was no commercial necessity to create a separate firm
except to obtain the tax benefit. The firm was only on paper as the
manpower was drawn from the company. The firm did not have any
commercial substance. Moreover, it is a case of treaty abuse. Hence, GAAR
may be invoked to disregard the firm and tax payment for architectural
services as fee for technical services. However, the rate of tax on such
payment shall be as applicable under the treaty, if more beneficial. 3
Q.6
1. MNO & Co., a non-resident entity based in London, owns and operates an
electronic facility throu which it effects online sale of goods manufactured
by it. The following are its receipts from the P.Y.2023-24-
Particulars Amount in
(a) Receipts from sale of goods to persons resident in India 145 lakhs
www.fasttestseries.com APB
(45)
APB Marks
(b) Receipts from sale of goods to persons not resident in 99 lakhs
other parts of South-East Asia
Out of the said sum, 60 lakhs relates to receipts from
persons using internet protocol address located in
India.
Discuss the equalisation levy implications of such receipt in the hands of
MNO & Co., if –
(i) MNO & Co. has no permanent establishment in India
(ii) MNO & Co. has a permanent establishment in India, and the sale of
goods is effectively connected to the permanent establishment in India
Would your answer change if out of the receipts in (b) above, only 45 lakhs
relates to receipts from persons using internet protocol address located in
India?
Ans. The Finance Act, 2020 has inserted new section 165A in the Finance Act,
2016 providing for equalisation levy@2% on the amount of consideration
received or receivable by an e-commerce operator from e- commerce supply
or services made or provided or facilitated by it, inter alia, to a person
resident in India and a person who buys such goods or services or both using
internet protocol address located in India. MNO & Co. is an e-commerce
operator since it is a non-resident owning and operating an electronic facility
for online sale of goods and provision of services.
(i) MNO & Co. has no permanent establishment in India
In this case, the gross receipts of the e-commerce operator from the e-
commerce supply and services facilitated is 2.05 crore
Particulars Amount in
(a) Receipts from sale of goods to persons resident in 145 lakhs
Q.6
2. Mr. Chetan, an Indian citizen aged 51 years, left India on 1st April 2020 to
settle in Country Y. But owing to some personal unavoidable circumstances,
he returned back to India permanently on 1st June 2023.
He has a residential property in Country Y from which he earned an income
of $ 25,000 for the year ended 31st March 2024. He is eligible for basic
www.fasttestseries.com APB
(47)
APB Marks
exemption limit of $ 8,000 and on balance income. he paid income tax
@20% in Country Y. The tax was paid on 10th May 2024 from his bank
account in India.
His income from business in India is 5,00,000 for the year ended on 31st
March 2024. He also received dividend amounting to 1,25,000 from an
Indian company and interest of * 11,500 on saving bank account with SBI,
during the year.
The exchange rates of 1 $ on various dates is given below:
1.04.2023-74; 31.03.2024, 75; 10.05.2024 - 75.5;
Compute the net tax liability of Mr. Chetan in India for the assessment year
2024-25 on the assumption that there is no DTAA between India and
Country Y.
Assume that the assessee does not opt for the provisions of Section
115BAC.
Ans. Mr. Chetan is a resident in India for A.Y.2024-25, since his stay in India in
the P.Y.2023-24 is for 304 days which exceeds the minimum required stay
of 182 days in that previous year. Also, his stay in India is for 1461 days
(i.e., 365 days each in P.Y.2015-16 to P.Y.2019-20 + 1 day for leap year)
during the last seven years (which exceeds the minimum specified
requirement of 730 days in the immediately preceding seven years) and he
has been resident in 7 years (P.Y.2013-14 to P.Y.2019-20) out of 10 years
immediately preceding P.Y.2023-24.
Hence, he is resident and ordinarily resident in India for A.Y.2024-25.
Accordingly, his global income would Chapter 31: Double Taxation Relief
(DTAA) be subject to tax. He would, however, be entitled for deduction
under section 91 in respect of doubly taxed income earned in Country Y.
www.fasttestseries.com APB
(49)
APB Marks
Net Tax Liability 2,35,802
Net Tax liability (rounded off) 2,35,800
Working Note: Calculation of deduction under section 91
Particulars
Average rate of tax in India [i.e., 4,14,302/
19,52,890x100] 21.21%
Average rate of tax in country Y [20% of $ 17,000 13.60%
($ 25,000 - $8,000)=$3,400/$ 25,000 x 100 =
13.6%
Doubly taxed income
Income from house property 13,12,500
Deduction u/s 91 on 13,12,500 @13.60% (being 1,78,500
the lower of average Indian tax rate (21.21%) and
foreign tax rate (13.60%)]
5
Q.6
3. Explain briefly the significant differences between the UN and OECD
Model Tax Convention.
Ans. OECD Model is essentially a model treaty between two developed nations
whereas UN Model is a model convention between a developed country and
a developing country.
Further, OECD Model advocates the residence principle, i.e., it lays
emphasis on the right of state of residence to tax the income, whereas the
UN Model is a compromise between the source principle and residence
principle, giving more weight to the source principle as against the residence
principle. 2
Q.6
4. What are the ways in which hybrid mismatch arrangements are used to
achieve unintended double non-taxation or long-term tax deferral?
Ans. Hybrid mismatch arrangements are sometimes used to achieve unintended
double non-taxation or long-term tax deferral in one or more of the
following ways -
(1) Creation of two deductions for a single borrowal;
(2) Generation of deductions without corresponding income inclusions;
(3) Misuse of foreign tax credit; and
(4) Participation exemption regimes. 2
www.fasttestseries.com APB