Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views4 pages

Discourse Analysis

The document discusses various types of cohesion that provide connections between clauses and sentences in a text, including reference, substitution, ellipsis, and conjunctive relations. It also examines different types of reference and how they contribute to cohesion, as well as how ellipsis and substitution are used.

Uploaded by

cami.scrt
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views4 pages

Discourse Analysis

The document discusses various types of cohesion that provide connections between clauses and sentences in a text, including reference, substitution, ellipsis, and conjunctive relations. It also examines different types of reference and how they contribute to cohesion, as well as how ellipsis and substitution are used.

Uploaded by

cami.scrt
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

APUNTES DISCOURSE ANALYSIS

1. TOPIC 1

Types of cohesion:
- Reference – identification of people/things
- Substitution & ellipsis – economy device/taking something out
- Conjunctive relations – connect events through the logic of
time/cause/comparison/addition
- Lexical cohesion – cohesion through vocabulary/related meanings

2. TOPIC 2

 Cohesion of a text  a text-forming connections between clauses and sentences,


related to meaning
 Textual cohesion  semantic connections between an element in the text and some
other element.

Items having the same situational referent: co-reference (Mary – she)


Item belonging to the same class, but not the same situational referent: co-classification (I
play the cello. My husband does, too.)
Items belonging to the same general field of meaning: co-extension (hot vs. cold, boy vs.
man; cousin vs. brother, etc.)
Items are whole messages which are connected through logical relations (when, because, but,
consequently, etc.): organic relations
Items are connected in conversation: question followed by answer, offer by acceptance,
order by compliance: adjacency pairs.

Structural cohesion:
- Parallelism - repeating of sentences with a similar structure): Mary saw John.
- Theme-Rheme and Given-New – structure of sentences: (Mary saw John. John
wanted to ignore her. His ignorance hurt Mary very much). Mary is the Theme-
Rheme, because something is going to be said about her. A participant!!

Co-referential or co-classificational cohesive links A and B  A is an implicit coding


device; it is interpreted only by referring to another source:
Omission/ellipsis  “lying on the floor” possible question: where is the dog?
Substitution  my axe is too blunt; I have to get another one.

Lexical cohesion  cohesion based on relations between the meanings of full/lexical words.
Hyponymy.
Organic relations  logical relation between one sentence and another. F. e., first… next…
(succession in an argument – internal conjunction)

3. TOPIC 3

Different types of reference.

NOT the same  “my mum is a teacher” because mum =/= teacher; “the teacher is very
cute” teacher = cute.
Text reference  “Everyone was celebrating. This was a cool moment” A participant.
Comparative reference  another cat, smallest cat…
Possessive reference  his cat, he has a cat…
Circumstance of time/space  demonstrative adverbs – here, there, now…
Generic and specific reference  whole category or concrete (Slovene citizens – two
Slovene people)

Identity chain  all the mentions of a participant or related participants.


- Presenting reference – participant is mentioned for the 1st time
- Presuming reference – to track participant, identification.

4. TOPIC 4

- Context of culture/share knowledge – homophoric reference (the Sun, the Moon…)


- Context of situation/immediate situation – exophotic (give me that knife)
- Co-text/going back or forward in the text – endophora; can be anaphora (looking
back) or cataphora (looking forward)
- Self-identification – elements pointing to themselves – esphora
- Bridging – referring indirectly; a cohesive item is a specific expression which is
preceded by its hypernym in the identity chain: “he bought some flowers; roses were
the best”
o When an expression is said and then the hypernym, is direct: roses  plant.
o Between parts and wholes: branch  tree  branch

5. TOPIC 5

Ellipsis & substitution


- Nominal ellipsis – the noun is left out: “she asked for the eggs if there were any”.
o Modifiers become headword: “four other people went there, then another
four”.
- Clausal ellipsis (whole or partial)  verbal ellipsis, involves the omission of the
whole of part of the clause
o Wh-ellipsis – whole: “What was that? A boat”; or partial “if we don’t do it,
who will?” “What have you been doing? Taking a shower”
o Yes/no ellipsis – whole: “have you finished? Yes”; or partial: “Are you here?
Yes, I am”

6. TOPIC 6

Nominal substitution  one/s functions as the head of the nominal phrase. Can be substitute
for any countable noun: “I’ve got a sofa, the other one was ugly”.

Uses of ONE
- As a numeral or substitute: “where are forks? There is one on the table (numeral)
and the other one (replacement) in the kitchen”.
- The same: “he said that he loved her. I said the same” (I said that I loved her).

Clausal substitution
- Yes-no context
o Whole – so & not “if so, if not” – “is he going to be ok? I think so/prob not”
o Partial – so, nor & neither – “I love them. – So did I”
o Verbal ellipsis – “does it hurt? Not anymore; it did last night”
- WH-context
o Whole – negative ‘not’ positive ‘so’ – “This is not right – why not?”
o Partial – substituted by ‘not’ – “you shouldn’t go there – why not go there?”

7. TOPIC 7

Conjunction  involves logical semantic relations between clauses or sentences. Are


expressed by linking words. Can be realized as a verb, noun, adjective or adjunct 
metaphorical – linking words: afterwards, and then, for example…

4 types of conjuction
- Additive  and, besides, moreover, in addition
- Temporal  and meanwhile, while, at the same time
- Comparative (similarity, contrast) like, as, whereas, in contrast…
- Casual
o Reason: because, as, since
o Purpose: so that, to this end
o Condition: if, then, otherwise
o Concession: although, in spite of, but…
o Manner: by, thereby, thus…

Explicit  marked by a linking word – “she is exhausted because she works hard”
Implicit  not marked – “I’d like to stop. I am tired”
8. TOPIC 8

Conjunctive relation

Temporal relations
- Successive: “after going to uni, we waited”
- Simultaneous: “while the dog is being judged, we hope he behaves well”

Metaphorical realization – conj. As a verb or noun – “our tabling the dogs was followed by
the judge handling them”
Cohesive realization – between sentences – “the judge handled the dog. Previously we’d
tabled them”

Internal temporal relations: to organize arguments or info in the text – first, second, next…

Causal relations: express causes/consequences happening outside the text


- Manner – how did you win? By training hard
- Reason – why did you win? Because we trained hard
- Based on the nature of the effect (consequence):
o Reason
o Condition
o Negative condition
o Negative purpose
- Counterfactual condition “if we had prepared well, we would have won”
o Factual cond. Possible  if we try, we’ll won
o Factual cond. Certain  as long as we enter,, we’ll win
o Manner
o Reason
o Condition
o Purpose

Metaphorical expression of cause – use of nouns & verbs like enable, cause, trigger, reason,
root…

9. TOPIC 9 (+conjunctions)
10. TOPIC 10

You might also like