Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
319 views46 pages

Module 1

Uploaded by

haitham.elwany
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
319 views46 pages

Module 1

Uploaded by

haitham.elwany
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 46

RSP Certification Refresher Course

Module 1: Foundations of Road Safety


Goals of the RSP Certification
• To recognize road safety as a profession
• To establish a recognized level of practice and
knowledge
• To incentivize safety education
• To support public safety initiatives such as Toward
Zero Deaths, Vision Zero, and Road to Zero
RSP Certification Background
• Developed by Transportation Professional Certification
Board (TPCB)
• Supported by many U.S.- and Canada-based
transportation- and safety-related organizations
• Administered by Castle Worldwide, a recognized
certification and licensure testing company
• Partially funded through Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) and National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA)
BASICS OF THE LEVEL 1
EXAM
Exam Structure
• Three (3) hours
• 75 multiple choice questions
• Questions are qualitative in nature
Content Outline
Foundations of Road Safety

Measuring Safety

Human Behavior and Road Safety

Solving Safety Problems

Implementing Road Safety Programs


List of References
• AASHTO Highway Safety Manual, • NCHRP Report 501 – Integrated
2010 Safety Management Process
• Road Safety Fundamentals • Human Factors In Traffic Safety, 3rd
• NHTSA Countermeasures That Work: Edition, Edited by Alison Smiley,
A Highway Safety Countermeasures Lawyers and Judges Publishing
Guide for State Highway Safety Company Inc., 2015
Offices, 2015 • NCHRP Report 500 – Guidance for
• ITE Traffic Engineering Handbook, 7th Implementation of the AASHTO
Edition, 2016 Strategic Highway Safety Plan
– A Guide for Addressing Run-Off-Road
• Crash Modification Factors Collisions – Volume 6
Clearinghouse – A Guide for Reducing Collisions Involving
• AAA Improving Traffic Safety in the Pedestrians – Volume 10
United States, The Journey Forward, – A Guide for Reducing Collisions at
Signalized Intersection – Volume 12
2007
– A Guide for Reducing Collisions Involving
Bicycles – Volume 18
• PIARC Road Safety Manual
RSP Certification Refresher Course
• July 24 – Foundations of Road Safety

• July 30 – Measuring Safety

• August 7 – Human Behavior and Road Safety

• August 14 – Solving Traffic Problems

• August 28 – Implementing Road Safety Programs


RSP Certification Refresher Course
What this course is What this course isn’t
• Information to remind you • Secret, insider information
about what you’ve about the RSP Certification
forgotten • The only thing you need to
• A helpful guide to prioritize do for preparation
your study efforts • A resource to guarantee a
“pass”
FOUNDATIONS OF ROAD
SAFETY
Definition of Road Safety
• Safety → Absence of danger or risk
• Road Safety → Data, performance measures,
and decision-making tools used to reduce
fatalities and serious injuries within the
roadway environment
• A continuum concept
Definition of Road Safety
• Resources for defining comprehensive road
safety
– Leading technical publications
– Organizations that fund safety programs and
implementation efforts
– General interest non-profit groups
– Interest-based organizations
Evidence-Based Road Safety
• Safe on paper vs. safe in reality
– Nominal safety: absolute, based on design criteria
and standards
– Substantive safety: based on long-term data
trends
Evidence-Based Road Safety
Crash Causation and Severity
• Important elements of crash causation
– Statistical rarity
– Elements of randomness
– Deterministic vs. Stochastic factors
• Causality is very rarely based on a single factor
Crash Causation and Severity
Crash Causation and Severity
• Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale (% Probability of Death)
– 0: No injury (0)
– 1: Minor (0)
– 2: Moderate (1-2)
– 3: Serious (8-10)
– 4: Severe (5-50)
– 5: Critical (5-50)
– 6: Maximum/Fatal (100)
• MAIS assigns the highest individual score to the crash
• Difficult to estimate injury severities and probability of death
Crash Causation and Severity
• KABCO Scale for Injury Severity
– K: Fatal injury
– A: Incapacitating injury
– B: Non-incapacitating evident injury
– C: Possible injury
– O: No Injury/Property Damage Only
• Crash likelihood and severity dependent on:
– Roadway/Environment
– Human behavior and characteristics
– Vehicle
Crash Causation and Severity
• Crash types with greatest likelihood of fatality or serious
injury:
– Head-on crashes
– Run-off-road crashes
– Intersection crashes
– Crashes between a motorized vehicle and pedestrian or bicyclist
– Motorcyclist crashes
– Crashes involving a large truck or bus
Road User Characteristics
• Types of road users
– Passenger vehicle operators
– Large vehicle/truck operators
– Motorcyclists
– Bicyclists
– Pedestrians
• Safety-related factors to consider with these groups
– Roadway geometric design
– Traffic control
– Visibility
– Risk perception
Road User Characteristics
• Roadways are built and operated with a design driver in mind
• High-risk user groups
– Elderly drivers
• Failure to yield when turning left
• Failure to yield when entering a roadway at non-intersections
• Failure to yield to a vehicle approaching from the right
• Issues with judging speed/distance
• Selective attention, distraction risks
– Young and/or novice drivers
• Dangerous behaviors, increased risk-taking
• Influence of passengers
• Alcohol
• Licensing
Road User Characteristics
• Driving Task Model
– Control
– Guidance
– Navigation
Road User Characteristics
• Activities/characteristics for (un)safe driving
– Vision
– Attention and information processing
– Visual search pattern
– Perception-reaction time
– Driver expectation
– Behavioral adaptation
– Driver impairments
Road Safety Partners
• Multidisciplinary stakeholder teams assist with:
– Overall community goals
– Initial problem identification
– Countermeasure selection
– Countermeasure effectiveness
Road Safety Partners
Emergency • fire
• ambulance/medical
Services • law enforcement
Public • general public, special interest groups
• pedestrian/bicyclist groups
• adjacent landowners, homeowner associations
• merchants, local chamber of commerce if applicable
• commercial vehicle/freight groups/Agricultural groups
• parish/community councils
• civic societies, conservation groups, and heritage groups
Government • metropolitan planning organizations
• state department of transportation
• regional transportation officials
• local transportation agencies
• contracted engineering service
• school officials
• transit agencies
• maintenance personnel
Road Safety Partners
Approaches to Road Safety
Management
• Definition
– Identifying current and potential safety issues
– Devising appropriate
treatments/countermeasures
– Implementing treatments
– Evaluating treatment effectiveness
Approaches to Road Safety
Management
• Site-Level Safety Management → Focusing on
high-priority locations
• System-Level Safety Management → focusing
on issues affecting the broad transportation
system
• Systemic vs. Systematic Safety
Approaches to Road Safety
Management
• 4 E’s Approach
– Engineering
– Enforcement
– Education
– Emergency Response
Approaches to Road Safety
Management
Haddon Matrix
Approaches to Road Safety
Management
• Safe Systems Approach
– Strong link to Vision Zero
– Human error is inevitable
– Focus on minimizing impact energies associated
with a crash
– Roadways should be designed to make crashes:
• Avoidable
• Otherwise, survivable
Economic Analysis of Safety
• Traditional tradeoffs with safety
– Cost
– Mobility
– Accessibility
– Environment
Economic Analysis of Safety
• Estimating safety impact of treatments
– Crash Modification Factor → A multiplicative
factor to compute expected number of crashes
after implementing a countermeasure
– Safety Performance Function → An equation
used to predict the average number of crashes per
year at a location as a function of exposure and
roadway characteristics
Economic Analysis of Safety
• Monetizing Crash Costs
– Economic Costs → Monetary impacts of crashes
including goods and services related to the crash
response, property damage, and medical costs
– Quality Adjusted Life Years → Intangible costs
due to a non-fatal injury (i.e., % of full quality of
life lost)
Economic Analysis of Safety
• HSM Crash Costs (2016 dollars)
Economic Analysis of Safety
• Present Value of Benefits & Costs
1+𝑖 𝑛−1
𝑃𝑉 = 𝐴 ∗
𝑖∗ 1+𝑖 𝑛
Where
– PV = present value of safety benefits
– A = annual benefit (i.e., monetary value of crashes
prevented)
– i = discount rate
– n = service life of the treatment/countermeasure
Economic Analysis of Safety
• Example: a city plans to install a traffic signal and
expects $475,000 of annual benefit due to crash
reductions. With a service life of 10 years and
discount rate of 4%, estimate the present value of
benefits from the signal

1 + 0.04 10 − 1
𝑃𝑉 = $475,000 ∗ 10
= $3,852,675
0.04 ∗ 1 + 0.04
Economic Analysis of Safety
• Net Present Value
𝑁𝑃𝑉 = 𝑃𝑉𝐵 − 𝑃𝑉𝐶
– Considers total value of benefits and costs
– If NPV > 0, the treatment is economically feasible
– Higher NPVs more cost efficient
– Downside: biased towards larger projects
Economic Analysis of Safety
• Benefit/Cost Ratio
𝐵𝐶𝑅 = 𝑃𝑉𝐵ൗ𝑃𝑉𝐶
– Ratio of benefits to costs
– If BCR > 1, the treatment is economically feasible
– Higher BCRs more cost efficient
– Downside: ignores project scale
Economic Analysis of Safety
• Incremental Benefit/Cost Ratio (IBCR)
𝑃𝑉𝐵𝐴 − 𝑃𝑉𝐵𝐵
𝐼𝐵𝐶𝑅 =
𝑃𝑉𝐶𝐴 − 𝑃𝑉𝐶𝐵
– Used to compare multiple treatments
– Rank treatments by cost, work up the list
– For two treatments: if IBCR > 1, discard treatment B;
otherwise discard A
– Last remaining treatment is most cost efficient
Economic Analysis of Safety
• An agency has the following alternatives for an intersection to
improve safety, the present value of costs and benefits over a
10-year period:
Treatment PVB PVC
Roundabout $500,000 $150,000
Traffic Signal $600,000 $300,000
Four-Way Stop $100,000 $25,000

Which treatment should the agency select?


Economic Analysis of Safety
1. Calculate IBCR for 4-Way Stop vs. Roundabout:
𝑃𝑉𝐵𝐴 − 𝑃𝑉𝐵𝐵 $100𝑘 − $500𝑘
𝐼𝐵𝐶𝑅 = = = 3.2
𝑃𝑉𝐶𝐴 − 𝑃𝑉𝐶𝐵 $25𝑘 − $150𝑘

2. Since 3.2 > 1, discard 4-way stop and keep the roundabout

3. Calculate IBCR for Roundabout vs. Traffic Signal:


𝑃𝑉𝐵𝐴 − 𝑃𝑉𝐵𝐵 $500𝑘 − $600𝑘
𝐼𝐵𝐶𝑅 = = = 0.7
𝑃𝑉𝐶𝐴 − 𝑃𝑉𝐶𝐵 $150𝑘 − $300𝑘

4. Since 0.7 < 1, keep the roundabout (final selection)


Economic Analysis of Safety
• Cost Effectiveness Index (CEI)
𝐶𝐸𝐼 = 𝑃𝑉𝐶ൗ𝐶𝑅
– Where CR = total crash reduction
– Used where value of benefits is difficult to quantify
– Estimate CR using CMFs and SPFs
– Lower CEIs are better
– Ignores injury severity and monetary benefits
Road Safety Culture
• Road safety culture → each road user’s
choices and the attitudes of society towards
transportation safety
• Speeding and speed-related attitudes are one
of the biggest safety culture elements
• On-road vs. off-road elements
Road Safety Culture
• Strategies for implementing a positive agency safety
culture:
– Improved access to safety data and safety analysis tools for agency
employees
– Building and maintaining organizational knowledge of road safety
– Building and maintaining communications tools across an organization
– Implementing comprehensive, formalized road safety management
policies and procedures
– Working internally and with external partners to facilitate ongoing
road safety research
– Ongoing evaluation of program effectiveness
Future Trends in Safety Policy and
Technology
• Active transportation • Transportation, safety
• Graduated driver and health
licensing • Law enforcement
• Driver impairment • Dilemma zone
• Strategic agency protection
reorganization • Immigrant and elderly
• Driver distraction populations
• Accessibility vs. mobility • Equity

You might also like