Cascode
The cascode is a two-stage amplifier that consists of a common emitter stage feeding into a common base
stage when using bipolar junction transistors (BJTs)[1][2] or alternatively a common source stage feeding a
common gate stage when using field-effect transistors (FETs).
Because there is no direct coupling from the output to input, the Miller effect is eliminated, contributing to a
much higher bandwidth. Compared to a single amplifier stage, this combination may have one or more of
the following characteristics: higher input–output isolation, higher input impedance, high output impedance,
higher bandwidth.
History
The use of a cascode (sometimes verbified to cascoding) is a common technique for improving analog
circuit performance, applicable to both vacuum tubes and transistors. The name "cascode" was coined in an
article written by Frederick Vinton Hunt and Roger Wayne Hickman in 1939, in a discussion on the
application of voltage stabilizers.[3] They proposed a cascade of two triodes (the first one with a common
cathode setup, the second one with a common grid) as a replacement for a pentode, and so the name may be
assumed to be an abbreviation of "casc(aded triode amplifier having characteristics similar to, but less noisy
than, a single pent)ode".[4] Cascode circuits were employed in early television sets for the 'front-end' or
tuner because of their low noise and wider bandwidth.
Bipolar Junction Transistors have collector-base parasitic capacitance in the low picofarad to fractional
picofarad range. The Miller Effect means that when this capacitance is in the feedback path, it results in an
effective input capacitance that is multiplied by the stage gain: a feedback capacitance of only 1.0 pF in a
circuit with a voltage gain of 50 results in an effective input capacitance of 50 pF. While this can be
overcome in radio frequency circuits/tuned circuits by "neutralising" feedback in opposition, it is more
difficult to combat in wideband circuits such as video amplifiers, whose bandwidths range from analog
television (some 5 MHz for PAL), to at least 86 MHz in the older VGA format (UXGA, 1600 x 1200, 60
Hz refresh). Video amplifiers cannot operate to such high frequencies with any appreciable collector-base
feedback, so the cascode, with its very low effective feedback capacitance, is the design-of-choice for video
amplifiers in CRT-based monitors.
Operation
Figure 1 shows an example of a cascode amplifier with a common-source amplifier as the input stage driven
by a signal source, Vin . This input stage drives a common-gate amplifier as the output stage, with output
signal Vout.
As the lower FET conducts it changes the upper FET's source voltage, and the upper FET conducts due to
the changed potential between its gate and source.
The major advantage of this circuit arrangement stems from the placement of the upper field-effect transistor
(FET) as the load of the input (lower) FET's output terminal (drain). Because at operating frequencies the
upper FET's gate is effectively grounded, the upper FET's source voltage (and therefore the input
transistor's drain) is held at nearly constant voltage during operation. In
other words, the upper FET exhibits a low input resistance to the lower
FET, making the voltage gain of the lower FET very small, which
dramatically reduces the Miller effect feedback capacitance from the
lower FET's drain to gate. This loss of voltage gain is recovered by the
upper FET. Thus, the upper transistor permits the lower FET to operate
with minimal negative (Miller) feedback, improving its bandwidth.
The upper FET gate is electrically grounded, so charge and discharge of
the stray capacitance, Cdg , between drain and gate is simply through RD
and the output load (say Rout), and the frequency response is affected
only for frequencies above the associated RC time constant τ = Cdg
RD//Rout, namely f = 1/(2πτ), a rather high frequency because Cdg is
small. That is, the upper FET gate does not suffer from Miller Figure 1: N-channel class-A
cascode amplifier
amplification of Cdg .
If the upper FET stage were operated alone using its source as input node
(that is, common-gate (CG) configuration), it would have a good voltage gain and wide bandwidth.
However, its low input impedance would limit its usefulness to very low-impedance voltage drivers.
Adding the lower FET results in a high input impedance, allowing the cascode stage to be driven by a high-
impedance source.
If one were to replace the upper FET with a typical inductive/resistive load and take the output from the
input transistor's drain (that is, a common-source (CS) configuration), the CS configuration would offer the
same input impedance as the cascode, but the cascode configuration would offer a potentially greater gain
and much greater bandwidth.
Stability
The cascode arrangement is also very stable. Its output is effectively isolated from the input both electrically
and physically. The lower transistor has nearly constant voltage at both drain and source, and thus there is
essentially "nothing" to feed back into its gate. The upper transistor has nearly constant voltage at its gate
and source. Thus, the only nodes with significant voltage on them are the input and output, and these are
separated by the central connection of nearly constant voltage and by the physical distance of two
transistors. Thus in practice there is little feedback from the output to the input. Metal shielding is both
effective and easy to provide between the two transistors for even greater isolation when required. This
would be difficult in one-transistor amplifier circuits, which at high frequencies would require
neutralization.
Biasing
As shown, the cascode circuit using two "stacked" FETs imposes some restrictions on the two FETs —
namely, the upper FET must be biased so its source voltage is high enough (the lower FET drain voltage
may swing too low, causing it to saturate). Ensurance of this condition for FETs requires careful selection
for the pair or special biasing of the upper FET gate, increasing cost.
The cascode circuit can also be built using bipolar transistors, or MOSFETs, or even one FET (or
MOSFET) and one BJT. This circuit arrangement was very common in VHF television tuners when they
employed vacuum tubes.
Advantages
The cascode arrangement offers high gain, high bandwidth, high slew rate, high stability, and high input
impedance. As a two-transistor circuit, the parts count is very low.
Disadvantages
The cascode circuit requires two transistors and requires a relatively high supply voltage. For the two-FET
cascode, both transistors must be biased with ample VDS in operation, imposing a lower limit on the supply
voltage.
Dual-gate version
A dual-gate MOSFET often functions as a "one-transistor" cascode. Common in the front ends of sensitive
VHF receivers, a dual-gate MOSFET is operated as a common-source amplifier with the primary gate
(usually designated "gate 1" by MOSFET manufacturers) connected to the input and the second gate
grounded (bypassed). Internally, there is one channel covered by the two adjacent gates; therefore, the
resulting circuit is electrically a cascode composed of two FETs, the common lower-drain-to-upper-source
connection merely being that portion of the single channel that lies physically adjacent to the border
between the two gates.
Mixer in superheterodyne receivers
A cascode circuit is very useful as a multiplying mixer circuit in superheterodyne receivers. At the lower
gate the RF signal is fed to the mixer, and at the upper gate the local oscillator signal is fed to the mixer.
Both signals are multiplied by the mixer, and the difference frequency, the intermediate frequency, is taken
from the upper drain of the cascode mixer.
This was further developed by cascoding whole differential-amplifier stages to form the balanced mixer,
and then the Gilbert cell double-balanced mixer.
Other applications
With the rise of integrated circuits, transistors have become cheap in terms of silicon die area. In MOSFET
technology especially, cascoding can be used in current mirrors to increase the output impedance of the
output current source.
A modified version of the cascode can also be used as a modulator, particularly for amplitude modulation.
The upper device supplies the audio signal, and the lower is the RF amplifier device.
A cascode may also be combined with a voltage ladder to form a high-voltage transistor. The input
transistor may be of any low-UCEO type, while the others, acting as stacked linear series voltage regulators,
should be able to withstand a considerable fraction of the supply voltage. Note that for a large output-
voltage swing, their base voltages should not be bypassed to
ground by capacitors, and the uppermost ladder resistor should be
able to withstand the full supply voltage. This shows that a linear
series voltage regulator is actually a current buffer with its input and
output designations swapped.
Two-port parameters
The cascode configuration can be represented as a simple voltage
amplifier (or more accurately, as a g-parameter two-port network)
by using its input impedance, output impedance, and voltage gain.
These parameters are related to the corresponding g-parameters
below.[5] Other useful properties not considered here are circuit
bandwidth and dynamic range.
High-voltage stack
BJT cascode: low-frequency small-signal
parameters
The idealized small-signal equivalent circuit can be constructed for the
circuit in figure 2 by replacing the current sources with open circuits
and the capacitors with short circuits, assuming they are large enough
to act as short circuits at the frequencies of interest. The BJTs can be
represented in the small-signal circuit by the hybrid-π model.[6]
Definition Expression
Figure 2: BJT Cascode using
Voltage
ideal current sources for DC bias
gain
and large coupling capacitors to
Input ground and to the AC signal
resistance source; capacitors are short
circuits for AC
Output
resistance
MOSFET cascode: low-frequency small-signal parameters
Similarly, the small-signal parameters can be derived for the MOSFET version, also replacing the MOSFET
by its hybrid-π model equivalent. This derivation can be simplified by noting that the MOSFET gate current
is zero, so the small-signal model for the BJT becomes that of the MOSFET in the limit of zero base
current:
where VT is the thermal voltage.[7]
Figure 3: MOSFET Cascode
using ideal voltage sources for
DC gate bias and a DC current
source as active load. Since
each MOSFET transistor has
gate and source connected, this
configuration is valid only for
discrete 3-terminal components.
Definition Expression
Voltage gain
Input resistance
Output resistance
The combination of factors gmrO occurs often in the above formulas, inviting further examination. For the
bipolar transistor this product is (see hybrid-pi model):
In a typical discrete bipolar device the Early voltage VA ≈ 100 V and the thermal voltage near room
temperature is VT ≈ 25 mV, making gmrO ≈ 4000, a rather large number.
From the article on hybrid-pi model, we find for the MOSFET in the active mode:
At the 65-nanometer technology node, ID ≈ 1.2 mA/μ of width, supply voltage is VDD = 1.1 V; Vth ≈ 165
mV, and Vov = VGS -Vth ≈ 5%VDD ≈ 55 mV. Taking a typical length as twice the minimum, L = 2 Lmin =
0.130 μm and a typical value of λ ≈ 1/(4 V/μm L), we find 1/λ ≈ 2 V, and gmrO ≈ 110, still a large
value.[8][9] The point is that because gmrO is large almost regardless of the technology, the tabulated gain
and the output resistance for both the MOSFET and the bipolar cascode are very large. That fact has
implications in the discussion that follows.
Low-frequency design
The g-parameters found in the above
formulas can be used to construct a
small-signal voltage amplifier with the
same gain, input and output resistance
as the original cascode (an equivalent
circuit). This circuit applies only at
frequencies low enough that the
transistor parasitic capacitances do not
matter. The figure shows the original
cascode (Fig. 1) and the equivalent
voltage amplifier or g-equivalent two-
port (Fig. 4). The equivalent circuit
allows easier calculations of the
behavior of the circuit for different
drivers and loads. In the figure a
Thévenin equivalent voltage source
with Thévenin resistance RS drives the
amplifier, and at the output a simple
Fig. 4 Top: Small-signal BJT cascode using hybrid-pi model Bottom:
load resistor RL is attached. Using the
Equivalent circuit for BJT cascode using amplifier low-frequency
equivalent circuit, the input voltage to parameters
the amplifier is (see Voltage divider):
which shows the importance of using a driver with resistance RS << Rin to avoid attenuation of the signal
entering the amplifier. From the above amplifier characteristics, we see that Rin is infinite for the MOSFET
cascode, so no attenuation of input signal occurs in that case. The BJT cascode is more restrictive because
Rin = rπ2 .
In a similar fashion, the output signal from the equivalent circuit is
In low-frequency circuits, a high voltage gain is typically desired, hence the importance of using a load with
resistance RL >> Rout to avoid attenuation of the signal reaching the load. The formulas for Rout can be
used either to design an amplifier with a sufficiently small output resistance compared to the load or, if that
cannot be done, to decide upon a modified circuit, for example, to add a voltage follower that matches the
load better.
The earlier estimate showed that the cascode output resistance is very large. The implication is that many
load resistances will not satisfy the condition RL >> Rout (an important exception is driving a MOSFET as
the load, which has infinite low frequency input impedance). However, the failure to satisfy the condition
RL >> Rout is not catastrophic because the cascode gain also is very large. If the designer is willing, the
large gain can be sacrificed to allow a low load resistance; for RL << Rout the gain simplifies as follows:
.
This gain is the same as that for the input transistor acting alone. Thus, even sacrificing gain, the cascode
produces the same gain as the single-transistor transconductance amplifier, but with wider bandwidth.
Because the amplifiers are wide bandwidth, the same approach can determine the bandwidth of the circuit
when a load capacitor is attached (with or without a load resistor). The assumption needed is that the load
capacitance is large enough that it controls the frequency dependence, and bandwidth is not controlled by
the neglected parasitic capacitances of the transistors themselves.
High-frequency design
At high frequencies, the parasitic capacitances of the transistors (gate-to-drain, gate-to-source, drain-to body,
and bipolar equivalents) must be included in the hybrid-π models to obtain an accurate frequency response.
The design goals also differ from the emphasis on overall high gain as described above for low-frequency
design. In high frequency circuits, impedance matching at the input and output of the amplifier is typically
desired in order to eliminate signal reflections and maximize power gain. In the cascode, the isolation
between the input and output ports is still characterized by a small reverse transmission term g12 , making it
easier to design matching networks because the amplifier is approximately unilateral.
References
1. Phillip A. Laplante (2005). Comprehensive Dictionary of Electrical Engineering (Second ed.).
Boca Raton: CRC Press. p. 97. ISBN 0-8493-3086-6.
2. S. W. Amos; Roger S. Amos (2002). Newnes Dictionary of Electronics (https://archive.org/det
ails/newnesdictionary00amos_749) (Fourth ed.). Oxford: Newnes. pp. 46 (https://archive.org/
details/newnesdictionary00amos_749/page/n54). ISBN 0-7506-4331-5.
3. Hunt, Frederick Vinton; Hickman, Roger Wayne (1939). "On Electronic Voltage Stabilizers"
(http://www.tubezone.net/pdf/diagrams/regulator.pdf) (PDF). Review of Scientific Instruments.
10 (1): 6. doi:10.1063/1.1751443 (https://doi.org/10.1063%2F1.1751443). Retrieved
20 March 2016.
4. "Cathode Ray", "The Cascode and its Advantages for Band III Reception", Wireless World,
vol. 61, p. 397 (August 1955).
5. In the g-parameter two-port, g12 is the reverse current gain. When no such feedback occurs,
g12 = 0, and the network is called unilateral.
6. Paul R. Gray; Paul J. Hurst; Stephen H. Lewis; Robert G. Meyer; et al. (2001). Analysis and
Design of Analog Integrated Circuits (http://worldcat.org/isbn/0471321680) (Fourth ed.). New
York: Wiley. pp. 206–208. ISBN 0-471-32168-0.
7. Paul R. Gray; Paul J. Hurst; Stephen H. Lewis; Robert G. Meyer; et al. (2001). Analysis and
Design of Analog Integrated Circuits (http://worldcat.org/isbn/0471321680) (Fourth ed.). New
York: Wiley. pp. 208–211. ISBN 0-471-32168-0.
8. R. Jacob Baker (2010). CMOS Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation, Third Edition (http://c
mosedu.com). New York: Wiley-IEEE. pp. 297–301. ISBN 978-0-470-88132-3.
9. W. M. C. Sansen (2006). Analog Design Essentials (http://worldcat.org/isbn/0387257462).
Dordrecht: Springer. p. 13 (§0124). ISBN 0-387-25746-2.
Electronics portal
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cascode&oldid=1214769866"