chp11 Part4 - Merged
chp11 Part4 - Merged
161 to 164
www.edutap.co.in
Companies Act 2013 -> Section 161 (1) – Appointment of Additional, Alternate and Nominee Director
Note: Please note that earlier we discussed in section 152 that all the directors need to be appointed in general
meeting except those for which otherwise is mentioned in the Act. Now Additional Director is such case which can
be appointed by Board of Directors without it being approved in general meeting
www.edutap.co.in
Companies Act 2013 -> Section 161 (2) – Appointment of Additional, Alternate and Nominee Director
Note: Please note that earlier we discussed in section 152 that all the directors need to be appointed in general
meeting except those for which otherwise is mentioned in the Act. Now Alternate Director is such case which can be
appointed by Board of Directors without it being approved in general meeting
Companies Act 2013 -> Section 161 (3) – Appointment of Additional, Alternate and Nominee Director
Note: Please note that earlier we discussed in section 152 that all the directors need to be appointed in general meeting
except those for which otherwise is mentioned in the Act. Now Nominee Director is such case which can be appointed by
Board of Directors without it being approved in general meeting
Companies Act 2013 -> Section 161 (4) – Appointment of Additional, Alternate and Nominee Director
Unless and until something else To appoint any person as director in the meeting of the
is mentioned in Articles, by board to fill the casual vacancy
default the board has powers
This must be approved in next annual general meeting
Casual Vacancy means sudden vacancy caused due to Disqualification, Removal, Death and resignation. In this office gets
vacated by the person before his/her term ends. Retirement is not a casual vacancy
Note: Please note that earlier we discussed in section 152 that all the directors need to be appointed in general meeting
except those for which otherwise is mentioned in the Act. Now Director in case of Casual Vacancy is such case which can be
appointed by Board of Directors without it being approved in same meeting but in next annual general meeting
Companies Act 2013 -> Section 162 – Appointment of Directors to be Voted Individually
Appointment of Directors to be Voted Individually Shall not apply to Private company, IFSC Public
Company and Fully owned Govt Company
At a general meeting of a company, a motion for the appointment of two or more persons as directors of the company by a
single resolution shall not be moved i.e. the voting for approval for appointment of 2 or more directors should not be
done in one go, it should be done separately for each director
Exception: The appointment of 2 or more directors can can be done in one go only if the prior approval has been taken for
it and while taking prior approval not even a single person raised objection
Any appointment done by violating above provision will not be a valid appointment
Concept Check
The board of the company gets its powers through special resolution to appoint which of the following directors?
1. Additional Director
2. Alternate Director
3. Nominee Director
4. Any of the above
Ans: Option 2
Ans: Option 4
Companies Act 2013 -> Section 163 – Option to Adopt Principle of Proportional Representation for Appointment of
Directors.
Option to Adopt Principle of Proportional Representation for Shall not apply to fully owned Govt.
Appointment of Directors Companies
First, please note that this is optional and not mandatory and if company opts for this then it must be mentioned in
articles of association
The articles of a company may provide for the appointment of not less than two-thirds of the total number of the
directors of a company in accordance with the principle of proportional representation
Term Explainer: Proportional representation is a system used to elect a country's government. If proportional
representation is used in an election, a political party that wins 10% of the vote, will win 10% of the seats in parliament
and a party that wins 20% of the vote, will win 20% of the seats
Companies Act 2013 -> Section 164(1) – Disqualifications for Appointment of Director
(d) he has been convicted by a court of any offence and has been sentenced to imprisonment for not less than six months,
but less than 7 years and a period of five years has not elapsed from the date of expiry of the sentence:
if a person has been convicted of any offence and sentenced to imprisonment for a period of seven years or more then he
shall not be eligible to be appointed as a director in any company;
(e) an order disqualifying him for appointment as a director has been passed by a court or Tribunal
(f) he has not paid any call money in respect of any shares of the company held by him, whether alone or jointly with
others, and six months have elapsed from the last day fixed for the payment of the call;
Companies Act 2013 -> Section 164(1) – Disqualifications for Appointment of Director
(g) He has been convicted of the offence dealing with related party transaction at any time during the last preceding
five years
(h) He has not complied with requirement of subsection(3) section 152 i.e. he is not having a DIN or if he an existing
director at the time of commencement of this act, then he has not applied for DIN
(i) Has not compiled with provision of subsection (1) of section 165 ( Section 165 is related to number of
directorships)
Companies Act 2013 -> Section 164(2) – Disqualifications for Appointment of Director
Then the director of this company which has done of the above things shall not be eligible to be re-appointed as a
director of this same company for a period of five years from the date on which the said company is doing such
defaults
Then the director of this company which has done of the above things shall not be eligible to be appointed as a
director of any other company for a period of five years from the date on which the said company is doing such
defaults
If someone else is appointed as a director in the company which has defaulted on above mentioned points shall not be
disqualified from existing position for a period of six months from the date of his appointment
Companies Act 2013 -> Section 164(4) – Disqualifications for Appointment of Director
Private Company can through by its articles provide for any disqualifications for appointment as a director in addition
to those specified in sub-sections (1) and (2):
Note: We have earlier studied the stringent conditions for appointment of Independent director, so for independent
director those are in addition to these requirements that we have studied in section 164
Concept Check
A person who has been imprisoned for 7 years or more cannot be appointed director till completion of ______years from
date of expiry of sentence
1. 5
2. 7
3. 8
4. NOTA
Ans: Option 4 (he is not eligible for lifetime if he has been imprisoned for 7 years or more)
The articles of a company may provide for the appointment of not less than two-thirds of the total number of the directors
of a company in accordance with the principle of proportional representation. Which company is exception to this?
1. Private Company
2. All Unlisted Public Companies
3. All Listed Companies
4. Government Companies
Ans: Option 4
Thanks
Chapter XI of Companies Act – Appointment and Qualification of Directors
165 to 168
www.edutap.co.in
Companies Act 2013 -> Section 165 (1) – Number of Directorships
A person can be a director (including alternate directorship) in maximum of 20 companies subject to that he can be a
director in maximum of 10 Public companies
Note:
When we count directorship of max in 20 companies then dormant companies must not be included
For the limit of directorship of max 10 in public companies, directorship in private companies that are either holding or
subsidiary company of a public company shall be included.
Companies Act 2013 -> Section 165 (2) – Number of Directorships
Number of Directorships
Number of Directorships
Number of Directorships
A person is director in 20 companies, out of which 9 are public and rest are private. Among the private companies in this
case how many at maximum would be subsidiaries of Public companies
1. 1
2. 3
3. 10
4. 11
Ans: Option 1
A person is a director in 23 companies, out of which 8 are public, 7 are dormant and all dormant are private. Assuming no
private company is subsidiary of public company then in how many more private companies he can become a director
1. 1
2. 2
3. 3
4. 4
Ans: Option 4
Concept Check
Duties of Directors
1. A director of a company shall act in accordance with the articles of the company.
2. A director of a company shall act in good faith in order to promote the objects of the company for the benefit of its
members, and in the best interests of the company, its employees, the shareholders, the community and for the
protection of environment.
3. A director of a company shall not involve in a situation in which he may have a direct or indirect interest that conflicts,
or possibly may conflict, with the interest of the company.
4. A director of a company shall not achieve or attempt to achieve any undue gain or advantage either to himself or to
his relatives, partners, or associates and if such director is found guilty of making any undue gain, he shall be liable to
pay an amount equal to that gain to the company.
5. A director of a company shall not assign his office and any assignment so made shall be void.
Penalty
If a director of the company contravenes the provisions of this section such director shall be punishable with fine
Min of one lakh rupees, but which may extend to five lakh rupees.
Companies Act 2013 -> Section 167 (1)– Vacation of Office of Director
2. He absents himself from all the meetings of the Board of Directors held during a period of twelve months with or
without seeking leave of absence of the Board
3. He acts in contravention of the provisions of section 184 relating to entering into contracts or arrangements in which he
is directly or indirectly interested (Section 184 is about that directors disclose his interest in other companies)
4. He fails to disclose his interest in any contract or arrangement in which he is directly or indirectly interested, in
contravention of the provisions of section 184
5. He is convicted by a court of any offence and sentenced to imprisonment for not less than six months
Private Company can also add conditions to what is specified in subsection(1) of this section related to vacation of
director
Concept Check
Concept Check
Which of the section deals with provisions regarding number of directorship a director can hold?
1. 164
2. 165
3. 166
4. 167
Ans: Option 2
What is the maximum period a director can abstain from attending meetings to prevent himself from being forced to vacate
the office of director
1. Period of 12 months without taking approval from board
2. Period of 18 months with approval of board
3. Period of 2 years in case of serious illness and taking approval from board
4. Period of 12 months with or without taking approval from board
Ans: Option 4
Thanks
Chapter XI of Companies Act – Appointment and Qualification of Directors
169 to 172
www.edutap.co.in
Companies Act 2013 -> Section 168 (1)– Resignation of Director
The director who has resigned can himself also forward a copy of his resignation along with detailed reasons for the
resignation to the Registrar within thirty days of resignation using FORM DIR 11
The foreign director can authorize in writing a practicing-chartered accountant or cost accountant in practice or
company secretary in practice or any other resident director of the company to sign Form DIR-11 and file the same on
his behalf intimating the reasons for the resignation.
Companies Act 2013 -> Section 168 (2)– Resignation of Director
The resignation of a director shall take effect from the date on which the notice is received by the company or the date, if
any, specified by the director in the notice, whichever is later:
But the director even after his resignation remains liable for the offences that occurred during his tenure
Companies Act 2013 -> Section 168 (3)– Resignation of Director
Form DIR-11 is used by which of the following entity to inform registrar regarding the resignation of Director
1. Company
2. Board of Directors
3. Director himself who has resigned
4. Any of them
Ans: Option 3
Companies Act 2013 -> Section 169 (1)– Removal of Director
Removal of Director
Term Explainer
What are directors appointed by Tribunal: Tribunal is a body that settles disputes related to companies. Now if tribunal
in certain cases feel that it needs to appoint director(s) to the company who can report to tribunal regarding the
function of the company then tribunal can appoint such directors
Companies Act 2013 -> Section 169 (1)– Removal of Director
Removal of Director
A company can remove a director By Passing an ordinary Resolution before the expiry of his
term after giving him an opportunity to present his case
More Exceptions:
Removal of Director
A company can remove a director By Passing an ordinary Resolution before the expiry of his
term after giving him an opportunity to present his case
More Exceptions:
A special notice shall be required to remove a The company shall forward a copy of notice related to the
director under this section, or to appoint resignation of director to the director who is to be
somebody in place of a director so removed removed
A vacancy created by the removal of a director under this section may be filled by the appointment of another director in his place at the
meeting at which he is removed subject to that special notice was served for the same
A director so appointed shall hold office till the date up to which his predecessor would have held office if he had not been removed.
If the vacancy is not filled as mentioned above it may be filled as a casual vacancy as discussed in subsection (4) of section 161 subject to
that the director removed shall not be appointed as the director again
Concept Check
An independent director who has been appointed for the first time in a company
1. Cannot be removed
2. Can be removed by passing a ordinary resolution
3. Can be removed by passing a special resolution
4. Can be removed just by board of directors
Ans: Option 2
Who all are exempted from being removed as a director from company?
1. Directors appointed by Tribunal
2. Directors appointed under optional scheme where the company has availed itself of the option given to it under section
163 to appoint not less than two thirds of the total number of directors according to the principle of proportional
representation.
3. Independent directors appointed for the second term
4. Both 1 and 2
5. All of the above
Ans: Option 4
Companies Act 2013 -> Section 170 – Registration of Directors and Key Management Personnel
Registration of Directors and Key Management Personnel Not applicable in case of government
company
A Every company shall keep at its registered office a register containing such particulars of its directors and key
managerial personnel which shall include the details of securities held by each of them in the company or its holding,
subsidiary, subsidiary of company’s holding company or associate companies
A return containing the particulars of appointment of new director or key managerial personnel and if there are changes
in details of existing director or key Management Personnel, shall be filed with the Registrar in Form DIR-12 within thirty
days of such appointment or change, as the case may be.
Exception:
In case of IFSC public company or IFSC private company, the details of new director or key managerial personnel or
change in details of existing director or key Management Personnel shall be filed in 60 days instead of 30 days
Companies Act 2013 -> Section 171 – Member Right to Inspect
If access to register is refused or if copy on request is not provided with in 30 days, then aggrieved party can make a
request to the Registrar and registrar can then direct the company to comply immediately
Companies Act 2013 -> Section 172 – Penalty where no penalty is provided
For violation of certain sections, no penalty has bee mentioned, in such cases the penalty shall be
The company and every officer of the company who is in default shall be liable to a penalty of fifty thousand rupees, and
in case of continuing failure, with a further penalty of five hundred rupees for each day during which such failure
continues, subject to a maximum of
What is the penalty in such cases where no specific penalty has been defined?
1. Min fine of five thousand rupees and maximum up to five lakh rupees
2. Min fine of five thousand rupees and maximum up to ten lakh rupees
3. Min fine of fifty thousand rupees and maximum up to five lakh rupees
4. Min fine of ten thousand rupees and maximum up to two lakh rupees
5. None of the above
Answer: Option 5
Thanks