Contentcode 2
Contentcode 2
Reference
Zhang, J., Dai, L., Zheng, J., and Wu, H., “Reflective Crack Propagation and Control in Asphalt Pavement
Widening,” Journal of Testing and Evaluation, Vol. 44, No. 2, 2016, pp. 838–846, doi:10.1520/
JTE20150220. ISSN 0090-3973
ABSTRACT
Manuscript received May 26, 2015; To investigate the reflective crack-propagation behavior and provide control techniques for
accepted for publication July 28, 2015;
asphalt pavements widening, the finite-element models were built to simulate the widened
published online September 1, 2015.
asphalt pavement with a latent joint. The developed finite-element model considered the
1
School of Traffic and Transportation
influence factors, including the loading modes (i.e., the symmetrical and unsymmetrical
Engineering, Changsha Univ. of Science
and Technology, Changsha 410114, loading modes), the thickness and modulus of the asphalt concrete surface, the modulus of
China (Corresponding author), the new and existing stabilized bases, and the sheet stiffness of the reinforced geosynthetic.
e-mail: [email protected]
The finite-element simulation results show that increasing the thickness or reducing the
2
School of Traffic and Transportation modulus of the asphalt concrete surface effectively delays the propagation speed of the
Engineering, Changsha Univ. of Science
and Technology, Changsha 410114, China. reflective cracks. The cracking potential reaches the minimum when the new and existing
3
bases have a uniform modulus. Additionally, geosynthetic reinforcement across the joints
Jiangxi Ganyue Expressway Co. Ltd,
Nanchang 330029, China. significantly reduces the stress concentration around the crack tip and slows down the
propagation of the reflective cracks. These benefits become greater when increasing the
sheet stiffness of the geosynthetic. Finally, an experimental study was conducted to
investigate the influence of the types of the asphalt overlay and the geosynthetic
reinforcement on the reflective crack-propagation behavior. The experimental results
indicate that the geosynthetic-reinforced structure with a lower modulus of the asphalt
concrete surface significantly increases the fatigue life of widened pavements, and the
polypropylene geotextile performs better than the glass-fiber grid in terms of the extension
of the fatigue life.
Keywords
asphalt pavement widening, reflective crack propagation, stress-intensity factors, geosynthetics
Copyright V
C 2015 by ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. 838
ZHANG ET AL. ON ASPHALT PAVEMENT WIDENING 839
Note: AC, CSM, and UM denote the asphalt concrete, cement stabilized
macadam, and unbound macadam, respectively. Number behind AC and
SMA of 13, 20, and 25 denote the aggregate size.
were 0.2, 0.5, 2, and 5. Different ratios of the depth of the crack
FIG. 6 Loading modes. and thickness of the surface, C/T, of 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8, other
values of modulus and thicknesses of the surface of 1000 MPa,
1400 MPa, 1600 MPa, 1800 MPa and 14 cm, 16 cm, 20 cm were
also considered during this simulation.
FIG. 7 Curves of K2 with different surface modulus: (a) symmetrical loading, and (b) unsymmetrical loading.
gradually with crack propagation. In addition, the absolute value for different moduli of the new base. With the increasing
of K2 increases rapidly with the increasing C/T. For example, K2 modulus of the new base, the absolute values of K2 increases
changes from 131.7 kPa m1/2 to 212.1 kPa m1/2 with a when C/T is less than 0.6 and decreases slightly when C/T is
surface thickness of 20 cm when C/T varies from 0.2 to 0.8. larger than 0.6.
From the above analysis, it can be concluded that the mod-
INFLUENCE OF MODULUS OF THE NEW AND ulus ratio of the new and existing bases rather than the modulus
EXISTING BASES of the new base determines the cracking potential of pavement
Fig. 9 shows K2 with the different modulus of the new base widening. Fig. 10 gives K2 of different modulus ratios of the new
under different loading modes. It can be seen from Fig. 9(a) that and existing bases. It is clear in Fig. 10(a) that the absolute val-
K2 is positive when the modulus of the new base is smaller than ues of K2 vary obviously for different modulus ratios under the
that of the existing base, and vice versa. When the modulus of symmetrical loading and they are close to zero regardless of
the new base is 1500 MPa, K2 approaches zero under the crack length when the modulus ratios of the new and existing
symmetrical loading. Because the absolute value of K2 denotes bases approach 1, which means that the cracking potential is
the cracking potential of a pavement widening, the cracking minimum when the existing and new bases have a uniform stiff-
potential decreases first and then increases with the increasing ness. It is observed from Fig. 10(b) that the absolute values of K2
modulus of the new base, and it reaches the minimum when the under the unsymmetrical loading are much larger than those
new and existing bases have a same modulus. Comparing with under the symmetrical loading and vary slightly with the
the results under the symmetrical loading, the absolute values of increasing modulus ratios for the same crack length. They also
K2 under the unsymmetrical loading, as shown in Fig. 9(b), are reach the minimum when the modulus ratios are 1. At the same
much larger and they increase rapidly with crack propagation time, the absolute values of K2 increase greatly with crack prop-
agation for the same modulus ratio. Because the difference of
modulus of the new and existing bases will lead to a differential
FIG. 8 Curves of K2 with different surface thicknesses.
compressive deformation, which can in turn quicken crack
propagation, the new base with a uniform modulus with the
existing base, which can be measured in field before pavement
widening, should be designed.
FIG. 9 Curves of K2 with different modulus of the new base: (a) symmetrical loading, and (b) unsymmetrical loading.
FIG. 10 Curves of K2 with different modulus ratios of the new and existing bases: (a) symmetrical loading, and (b) unsymmetrical loading.
FIG. 11 Curves of rx with different crack lengths: (a) symmetrical loading, and (b) unsymmetrical loading.
844 Journal of Testing and Evaluation
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The writers are grateful for the financial support from the
National High Technology Research and Development Program
of China (2012AA112504), National Natural Science Founda-
tion of China (51108048, 51478054) and Jiangxi Communica-
tions Department Program (2013C0011). The efforts of
Xiaoming Huang, Professor of the Transportation School of
TEST RESULTS AND ANALYSIS
Southeast University, are highly appreciated.
Fig. 14 gives the cycles of the initial and terminal crack rate of
crack propagation. C and S denote the asphalt overlays with the
common and SBS asphalt binder; N, P, and G represent no rein-
References
forcement, reinforcements using polypropylene geotextile and
glass-fiber grid. For example, CP denotes an asphalt overlay [1] Van Meurs, A. N. G., Van Den Berg, A., Venmans, A. A.
M., Zwanenburg, C. Z., and Van, M. A., “Embankment
with the common asphalt binder, which is reinforced using
Widening With the Gap-Method,” Twelfth European Con-
polypropylene geotextile. ference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering,
It is clear from Fig. 14 that reinforcements across the joint F. B. J. Barends, J. Lindenberg, H. J. Luger, L. de Quelerij,
can increase the number of cycles of the initial and terminal and A. Verruijt, Eds., Rotterdam, The Netherlands, June
crack and reduce the propagation rate regardless of the types of 7–10, 1999, pp. 1133–1138.
overlays. The fatigue life (i.e., number of cycles of terminal [2] Zhang, J. H., “Analysis of Deformation Behavior of
Expressway Widening Engineering Under Different Foun-
crack) of the common and SBS asphalt overlay can be improved
dation Treatments,” Rock Soil Mech., Vol. 32, No. 4, 2011,
up to 4.5 and 1.3 times, 4.4 and 1.3 times using polypropylene pp. 1216–1222 (in Chinese).
geotextile and glass-fiber grid when compared with the unrein- [3] Zhang, J. H. and Zheng, J. L., “Evaluation of Foundation
forced overlay, respectively. The corresponding rate of crack Treatment Effect in Road Widening,” GeoHunan: Chal-
propagation can be reduced to 78 % and 26 %, 78 % and 25 %. lenges and Recent Advances in Pavement Technologies and
Transportation Geotechnics, Changsha, Hunan, August
Accordingly, reinforcements can increase the fatigue life and
3–6, 2009, pp. 133–140.
delay the crack propagation, and the polypropylene geotextile [4] Zhang, J. H. and Huang, X. M., “Numerical Analysis of
performs better than the glass-fiber grid. In addition, the SBS Geosynthetic-Reinforced Embankments of the Road
asphalt overlay is much more effective to extend the fatigue life Widening,” 2nd International Geo-changsha Conference,
of the pavement widened than the common asphalt overlay. Changsha, Hunan, November 28–30, 2007, pp. 441–446.
[5] Huang, X. M. and Wang, H., “Comparison Between
Responses of Reinforced and Unreinforced Embankments
Conclusions Due to Road Widening,” J. Central South Univ., Vol. 16,
No. 5, 2009, pp. 857–864.
(1) The cracking potential of the widened pavement [6] Lytton, R. L., “Use of Geotextiles for Reinforcement and
increases regardless of the loading modes with the Strain Relief in Asphalt Concrete,” Geotext. Geomembr.,
increasing surface modulus, decreasing surface thick- Vol. 8, No. 3, 1989, pp. 217–237.
ness, and crack propagation. Accordingly, decreasing the [7] Phipps, J., Scott, E., and Nodes, P. E., “Geotextile Fabrics
Under an Asphalt Concrete Overlay to Retard Reflective
modulus or increasing the thickness of asphalt concrete
Cracking,” Construction Report, Oregon State Highway
surface can improve the fatigue life of widened pavement
Division, Salem, OR, 1992.
and retard the propagation of the reflective cracks. [8] Mobasher, B., Mamlouk, M. S., and Lin, H. M., “Evaluation
(2) The ratios of the modulus of the new and old bases of Crack Propagation Properties of Asphalt Mixtures,”
rather than the modulus of the new base affect the crack- J. Transport. Eng., Vol. 123, No. 5, 1997, pp. 405–413.
ing potential. The cracking potential achieves the mini- [9] Goulias, D. G. and Ishai, I., “Experimental System for
mum when the modulus of the new and old bases is the Simulating Crack Propagation in Asphalt Pavements and
846 Journal of Testing and Evaluation
Effectiveness of Geosynthetics in Crack Retardation,” Analysis of Pavements With Cracks,” Road. Mater. Pave-
J. Test Eval., Vol. 27, No. 2, 1999, pp. 106–113. ment Des., Vol. 7, No. 4, 2006, pp. 417–455.
[10] Cleveland, G. S., Lytton, R. L., and Button, J. W., “Using [17] Seong, H. S., Glaucio, H. P., and William, G. B.,
Pseudostrain Damage Theory to Characterize Reinforcing “Simulation of Crack Propagation in Asphalt Concrete
Benefits of Geosynthetic Materials in Asphalt Concrete Using an Intrinsic Cohesive Zone Model,” J. Eng. Mech.,
Overlays,” Transport. Res. Rec., Vol. 1849, 2003, Vol. 132, No. 11, 2006, pp. 1215–1223.
pp. 202–211. [18] Wang, H. N., Zhang, C., Yang, L., and You, Z. P.,
[11] Sobhan, K. and Tandon, V., “Mitigating Reflection “Study on the Rubber-Modified Asphalt Mixtures’s
Cracking in Asphalt Overlays Using Geosynthetic Rein- Cracking Propagation Using the Extended Finite-Element
forcements,” Road Mater. Pavement Des., Vol. 9, No. 3, Method,” Constr. Build. Mater., Vol. 47, 2013,
2008, pp. 367–387. pp. 223–230.
[12] Virgili, A., Canestrari, F., Grilli, A., and Santagata, F. A., [19] Wang, H. and Wang, J., “Numerical Analysis of Surface
“Repeated Load Test on Bituminous Systems Reinforced Crack Propagation in Flexible Pavements Using XFEM
by Geosynthetics,” Geotext. Geomembr., Vol. 27, 2009, pp. and Cohesive Zone Model,” Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol.,
187–195. Vol. 7, No. 3, 2014, pp. 178–184.
[13] de Souza Correia, N. and de Souza Bueno, B., “Effect of Bi- [20] Luo, X., Luo, R., and Lytton, R. L., “Energy-Based Crack
tuminous Impregnation on Nonwoven Geotextiles Tensile Initiation Criterion for Viscoelastoplastic Materials With
and Permeability Properties,” Geotext. Geomembr., Vol. Distributed Cracks,” J. Eng. Mech., Vol. 141, No. 2, 2015,
29, No. 2, 2011, pp. 92–101. pp. 1–14.
[14] Im, S., Ban, H., and Kim, Y. R., “Characterization of [21] Han, J. and Gabr, M. A., “Numerical Analysis of
Mode-I and Mode-II Fracture Properties of Fine Geosynthetic-Reinforced and Pile-Supported Earth Plat-
Aggregate Matrix Using a Semicircular Specimen forms Over Soft Soil,” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng.,
Geometry,” Constr. Build. Mater., Vol. 52, 2014, Vol. 128, No. 5, 2002, pp. 44–53.
pp. 413–421. [22] Nicolas, M. and Ted, B., “Extended Finite-Element Method
[15] Fereidoon, M. N., Alireza, N., Saeed, T., and Shahab, F., for Cohesive Crack Growth,” Eng. Fract. Mech., Vol. 69,
“Effect of Using Geosynthetics on Reflective Crack Pre- No. 7, 2002, pp. 813–833.
vention,” Int. J. Pavement Eng., Vol. 16, No. 6, 2015, [23] Zhang, J. H., “Deformation Behavior and Differential
pp. 477–487. Settlement Limitation of Expressway Widening on Soft
[16] Birgisson, B., Wang, J. L., Roque, R., and Sangpetngam, B., Soil Foundation,” Ph.D. dissertation, Southeast University,
“A Viscoelastic Displacement Discontinuity Method for Nanjing, 2006 (in Chinese).