TUGAS UJI INFERENSIAL

Nama : Yusuf Maulana Syafi’ulloh

NIM : 0121028

1. Perbedaan rata-rata IPK mahasiswa laki-laki dan perempuan.

H0 : Tidak terdapat perbedaan rata-rata IPK mahasiswa laki-laki dan perempuan.
H1 : Terdapat perbedaan rata-rata IPK mahasiswa laki-laki dan perempuan.

JENIS KELAMIN
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
JENIS KELAMIN N Percent N Percent N Percent
IPK Laki-laki 16 100.0% 0 0.0% 16 100.0%
Perempuan 86 100.0% 0 0.0% 86 100.0%

Descriptives
JENIS KELAMIN Statistic Std. Error
IPK Laki-laki Mean 3.1263 .03760
95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 3.0461
Mean Upper Bound 3.2064
5% Trimmed Mean 3.1319
Median 3.1400
Variance .023
Std. Deviation .15042
Minimum 2.78
Maximum 3.37
Range .59
Interquartile Range .18
Skewness -.794 .564
Kurtosis .761 1.091
Perempuan Mean 3.3286 .01920
95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 3.2904
Mean Upper Bound 3.3668
5% Trimmed Mean 3.3336
Median 3.3500
Variance .032
Std. Deviation .17801
Minimum 2.83
Maximum 3.79
Range .96
Interquartile Range .27
 Skewness -.429 .260
Kurtosis .573 .514

Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
JENIS KELAMIN Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
*
IPK Laki-laki .129 16 .200 .953 16 .536
Perempuan .089 86 .092 .978 86 .146

Data tersebut berdistribusi NORMAL, karena :

Sig. Laki-laki = 0,2 > 0,05
Perempuan = 0,09 > 0,05

T-Test
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for Equality of t-test for Equality of
Variances Means

F Sig. t df
IPK Equal variances assumed .718 .399 -4.268 100
Equal variances not -4.793 23.553
assumed
Data tersebut bersifat HOMOGEN, karena :
Sig. 0,39 > 0,05
Independent Samples Test
t-test for Equality of Means
95% Confidence
Interval of the
Std. Error Difference
Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference Difference Lower
IPK Equal variances assumed .000 -.20235 .04741 -.29642
Equal variances not .000 -.20235 .04222 -.28958
assumed

Independent Samples Test

t-test for Equality of Means
95% Confidence Interval of the
Difference
Upper
IPK Equal variances assumed -.10829
Equal variances not assumed -.11513

Berdasarkan output di atas, diketahui sig. sebesar 0,000045 < 0,01. Jadi, ada perbedaan antara
rata-rata IPK mahasiswa laki-laki dan perempuan (H0 ditolak).
 2. Pengaruh metode evaluasi dengan nilai mata kuliah.
H0 : Tidak terdapat pengaruh antara metode evaluasi dengan nilai mata kuliah.
H1 : Terdapat pengaruh antara metode evaluasi dengan nilai mata kuliah.

Metode Evaluasi
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
Metode Evaluasi N Percent N Percent N Percent
Nilai Essay 25 100.0% 0 0.0% 25 100.0%
MCQ 25 100.0% 0 0.0% 25 100.0%

Descriptives
Metode Evaluasi Statistic Std. Error
Nilai Essay Mean 72.92 1.302
95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 70.23
Mean Upper Bound 75.61
5% Trimmed Mean 73.82
Median 75.00
Variance 42.410
Std. Deviation 6.512
Minimum 45
Maximum 80
Range 35
Interquartile Range 6
Skewness -3.471 .464
Kurtosis 14.803 .902
MCQ Mean 52.88 2.190
95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 48.36
Mean Upper Bound 57.40
5% Trimmed Mean 52.87
Median 57.00
Variance 119.943
Std. Deviation 10.952
Minimum 30
Maximum 75
Range 45
Interquartile Range 16
Skewness -.006 .464
Kurtosis -.371 .902
 Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Metode Evaluasi Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Nilai Essay .287 25 .000 .594 25 .000
MCQ .167 25 .072 .967 25 .559
Data tersebut berdistribusi TIDAK NORMAL, karena :
Sig. Essay = 0,00 < 0,05
MCQ = 0,55 > 0,05
Correlations
Metode Evaluasi Nilai
Spearman's rho Metode Evaluasi Correlation Coefficient 1.000 -.781**
Sig. (2-tailed) . .000
N 50 50
**
Nilai Correlation Coefficient -.781 1.000
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .
N 50 50

Berdasarkan output di atas, diketahui :

Sig. sebesar 0,00 < 0,05. Jadi, terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan antara metode evaluasi dan
nilai mata kuliah (H0 ditolak).
Koef. Korelasi -0,78 (hubungan sangat kuat) dan arah hubungan variabel negatif.

3. Perbedaan rata-rata Hb ibu hamil dan Hb normal.

H0 : Tidak terdapat perbedaan rata-rata antara Hb ibu hamil dan Hb normal.
H1 : Terdapat perbedaan rata-rata antara Hb ibu hamil dan Hb normal.

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
Hb Normal N Percent N Percent N Percent
Hb Hamil 1 14 100.0% 0 0.0% 14 100.0%
2 16 100.0% 0 0.0% 16 100.0%

Descriptives
Hb Normal Statistic Std. Error
Hb Hamil 1 Mean 10.86 .097
95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 10.65
Mean Upper Bound 11.07
5% Trimmed Mean 10.90
Median 11.00
Variance .132
 Std. Deviation .363
Minimum 10
Maximum 11
Range 1
Interquartile Range 0
Skewness -2.295 .597
Kurtosis 3.792 1.154
2 Mean 12.25 .144
95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 11.94
Mean Upper Bound 12.56
5% Trimmed Mean 12.17
Median 12.00
Variance .333
Std. Deviation .577
Minimum 12
Maximum 14
Range 2
Interquartile Range 0
Skewness 2.375 .564
Kurtosis 5.314 1.091

Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Hb Normal Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Hb Hamil 1 .510 14 .000 .428 14 .000
2 .480 16 .000 .507 16 .000
Data tersebut berdistribusi TIDAK NORMAL, karena :
Sig. 1 (<12) = 0,00 < 0,05
2 (≥12) = 0,00 < 0,05
Binomial Test
Exact Sig. (2-
Category N Observed Prop. Test Prop. tailed)
Hb Hamil Group 1 <= 11 14 .47 .50 .856
Group 2 > 11 16 .53
Total 30 1.00

Berdasarkan output di atas, diketahui sig. sebesar 0,856 > 0,05. Jadi, ada perbedaan antara
rata-rata Hb ibu hamil dan Hb normal (H0 ditolak).
 4. Hubungan Tinggi Fundus Uteri (TFU) dan Berat Badan Lahir (BBL).
H0 : Tidak terdapat hubungan antara Tinggi Fundus Uteri (TFU) dan Berat Badan
Lahir (BBL).
H1 : Terdapat hubungan antara Tinggi Fundus Uteri (TFU) dan Berat Badan Lahir
(BBL).

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
Tinggi Fundus Uteri N Percent N Percent N
Berat Badan 26 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1
28 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 2
29 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1
30 7 100.0% 0 0.0% 7
31 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1
32 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 5
33 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 3
35 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 3
36 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1
37 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1
a,b,c,d,e
Descriptives
Tinggi Fundus Uteri Statistic Std. Error
Berat Badan 28 Mean 2725.00 275.000
95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound -769.21
Mean Upper Bound 6219.21
5% Trimmed Mean .
Median 2725.00
Variance 151250.000
Std. Deviation 388.909
Minimum 2450
Maximum 3000
Range 550
Interquartile Range .
Skewness . .
Kurtosis . .
30 Mean 3071.43 120.937
95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 2775.51
Mean Upper Bound 3367.35
5% Trimmed Mean 3079.37
Median 3100.00
 Variance 102380.952
Std. Deviation 319.970
Minimum 2500
Maximum 3500
Range 1000
Interquartile Range 400
Skewness -.706 .794
Kurtosis 1.022 1.587
32 Mean 3220.00 86.023
95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 2981.16
Mean Upper Bound 3458.84
5% Trimmed Mean 3216.67
Median 3200.00
Variance 37000.000
Std. Deviation 192.354
Minimum 3000
Maximum 3500
Range 500
Interquartile Range 350
Skewness .590 .913
Kurtosis -.022 2.000
33 Mean 3466.67 88.192
95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 3087.21
Mean Upper Bound 3846.12
5% Trimmed Mean .
Median 3500.00
Variance 23333.333
Std. Deviation 152.753
Minimum 3300
Maximum 3600
Range 300
Interquartile Range .
Skewness -.935 1.225
Kurtosis . .
35 Mean 3333.33 202.759
95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 2460.93
Mean Upper Bound 4205.73
5% Trimmed Mean .
Median 3300.00
Variance 123333.333
 Std. Deviation 351.188
Minimum 3000
Maximum 3700
Range 700
Interquartile Range .
Skewness .423 1.225
Kurtosis . .
a,c,e,f,g
Tests of Normality
Shapiro-Wilkb
Tinggi Fundus Uteri Sig.
Berat Badan 28
30 .909
32 .928
33 .637
35 .843
Data tersebut berdistribusi NORMAL, karena :
Sig. 30 = 0,9 > 0,05
32 = 0,9 > 0,05
33 = 0,6 > 0,05
35 = 0,8 > 0,05
Correlations
Tinggi Fundus
Berat Badan Uteri
Berat Badan Pearson Correlation 1 .751**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 25 25
**
Tinggi Fundus Uteri Pearson Correlation .751 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 25 25

Berdasarkan output di atas, diketahui :

Sig. sebesar 0,00 < 0,05. Jadi, terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara TFU dan BBL (H 0
ditolak).
Koef. Korelasi 0,75 (hubungan kuat) dan arah hubungan variabel positif.