Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 18, Number 3—Summer 2004 —Pages 25– 46

The Capital Asset Pricing Model:

Theory and Evidence

Eugene F. Fama and Kenneth R. French

T he capital asset pricing model (CAPM) of William Sharpe (1964) and John
Lintner (1965) marks the birth of asset pricing theory (resulting in a
Nobel Prize for Sharpe in 1990). Four decades later, the CAPM is still
widely used in applications, such as estimating the cost of capital for firms and
evaluating the performance of managed portfolios. It is the centerpiece of MBA
investment courses. Indeed, it is often the only asset pricing model taught in these
courses.1
The attraction of the CAPM is that it offers powerful and intuitively pleasing
predictions about how to measure risk and the relation between expected return
and risk. Unfortunately, the empirical record of the model is poor—poor enough
to invalidate the way it is used in applications. The CAPM’s empirical problems may
reflect theoretical failings, the result of many simplifying assumptions. But they may
also be caused by difficulties in implementing valid tests of the model. For example,
the CAPM says that the risk of a stock should be measured relative to a compre-
hensive “market portfolio” that in principle can include not just traded financial
assets, but also consumer durables, real estate and human capital. Even if we take
a narrow view of the model and limit its purview to traded financial assets, is it

1
Although every asset pricing model is a capital asset pricing model, the finance profession reserves the
acronym CAPM for the specific model of Sharpe (1964), Lintner (1965) and Black (1972) discussed
here. Thus, throughout the paper we refer to the Sharpe-Lintner-Black model as the CAPM.

y Eugene F. Fama is Robert R. McCormick Distinguished Service Professor of Finance,

Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Kenneth R. French is
Carl E. and Catherine M. Heidt Professor of Finance, Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth
College, Hanover, New Hampshire. Their e-mail addresses are 具[email protected].
edu典 and 具[email protected]典, respectively.
26 Journal of Economic Perspectives

legitimate to limit further the market portfolio to U.S. common stocks (a typical
choice), or should the market be expanded to include bonds, and other financial
assets, perhaps around the world? In the end, we argue that whether the model’s
problems reflect weaknesses in the theory or in its empirical implementation, the
failure of the CAPM in empirical tests implies that most applications of the model
are invalid.
We begin by outlining the logic of the CAPM, focusing on its predictions about
risk and expected return. We then review the history of empirical work and what it
says about shortcomings of the CAPM that pose challenges to be explained by
alternative models.

The Logic of the CAPM

The CAPM builds on the model of portfolio choice developed by Harry

Markowitz (1959). In Markowitz’s model, an investor selects a portfolio at time
t ⫺ 1 that produces a stochastic return at t. The model assumes investors are risk
averse and, when choosing among portfolios, they care only about the mean and
variance of their one-period investment return. As a result, investors choose “mean-
variance-efficient” portfolios, in the sense that the portfolios 1) minimize the
variance of portfolio return, given expected return, and 2) maximize expected
return, given variance. Thus, the Markowitz approach is often called a “mean-
variance model.”
The portfolio model provides an algebraic condition on asset weights in mean-
variance-efficient portfolios. The CAPM turns this algebraic statement into a testable
prediction about the relation between risk and expected return by identifying a
portfolio that must be efficient if asset prices are to clear the market of all assets.
Sharpe (1964) and Lintner (1965) add two key assumptions to the Markowitz
model to identify a portfolio that must be mean-variance-efficient. The first assump-
tion is complete agreement: given market clearing asset prices at t ⫺ 1, investors agree
on the joint distribution of asset returns from t ⫺ 1 to t. And this distribution is the
true one—that is, it is the distribution from which the returns we use to test the
model are drawn. The second assumption is that there is borrowing and lending at a
risk-free rate, which is the same for all investors and does not depend on the amount
borrowed or lent.
Figure 1 describes portfolio opportunities and tells the CAPM story. The
horizontal axis shows portfolio risk, measured by the standard deviation of portfolio
return; the vertical axis shows expected return. The curve abc, which is called the
minimum variance frontier, traces combinations of expected return and risk for
portfolios of risky assets that minimize return variance at different levels of ex-
pected return. (These portfolios do not include risk-free borrowing and lending.)
The tradeoff between risk and expected return for minimum variance portfolios is
apparent. For example, an investor who wants a high expected return, perhaps at
point a, must accept high volatility. At point T, the investor can have an interme-
 Eugene F. Fama and Kenneth R. French 27

Figure 1
Investment Opportunities
E(R )
Mean-variance- a
efficient frontier
with a riskless asset

Minimum variance
frontier for risky assets
T

b g
Rf

s(R )

diate expected return with lower volatility. If there is no risk-free borrowing or

lending, only portfolios above b along abc are mean-variance-efficient, since these
portfolios also maximize expected return, given their return variances.
Adding risk-free borrowing and lending turns the efficient set into a straight
line. Consider a portfolio that invests the proportion x of portfolio funds in a
risk-free security and 1 ⫺ x in some portfolio g. If all funds are invested in the
risk-free security—that is, they are loaned at the risk-free rate of interest—the result
is the point R f in Figure 1, a portfolio with zero variance and a risk-free rate of
return. Combinations of risk-free lending and positive investment in g plot on the
straight line between R f and g. Points to the right of g on the line represent
borrowing at the risk-free rate, with the proceeds from the borrowing used to
increase investment in portfolio g. In short, portfolios that combine risk-free
lending or borrowing with some risky portfolio g plot along a straight line from R f
through g in Figure 1.2

2
Formally, the return, expected return and standard deviation of return on portfolios of the risk-free
asset f and a risky portfolio g vary with x, the proportion of portfolio funds invested in f, as

R p ⫽ xR f ⫹ 共1 ⫺ x兲R g ,

E共R p 兲 ⫽ xR f ⫹ 共1 ⫺ x兲E共R g 兲,

␴ 共R p 兲 ⫽ 共1 ⫺ x兲 ␴ 共R g 兲, x ⱕ 1.0,

which together imply that the portfolios plot along the line from R f through g in Figure 1.
28 Journal of Economic Perspectives

To obtain the mean-variance-efficient portfolios available with risk-free bor-

rowing and lending, one swings a line from R f in Figure 1 up and to the left as far
as possible, to the tangency portfolio T. We can then see that all efficient portfolios
are combinations of the risk-free asset (either risk-free borrowing or lending) and
a single risky tangency portfolio, T. This key result is Tobin’s (1958) “separation
theorem.”
The punch line of the CAPM is now straightforward. With complete agreement
about distributions of returns, all investors see the same opportunity set (Figure 1),
and they combine the same risky tangency portfolio T with risk-free lending or
borrowing. Since all investors hold the same portfolio T of risky assets, it must be
the value-weight market portfolio of risky assets. Specifically, each risky asset’s
weight in the tangency portfolio, which we now call M (for the “market”), must be
the total market value of all outstanding units of the asset divided by the total
market value of all risky assets. In addition, the risk-free rate must be set (along with
the prices of risky assets) to clear the market for risk-free borrowing and lending.
In short, the CAPM assumptions imply that the market portfolio M must be on
the minimum variance frontier if the asset market is to clear. This means that the
algebraic relation that holds for any minimum variance portfolio must hold for the
market portfolio. Specifically, if there are N risky assets,

共Minimum Variance Condition for M兲 E共Ri 兲 ⫽ E共RZM 兲

⫹ 关E共R M 兲 ⫺ E共R ZM 兲兴 ␤ iM , i ⫽ 1, . . . , N.

In this equation, E(R i ) is the expected return on asset i, and ␤ iM , the market beta
of asset i, is the covariance of its return with the market return divided by the
variance of the market return,

cov共Ri , RM 兲
共Market Beta兲 ␤iM ⫽ .
␴2 共RM 兲

The first term on the right-hand side of the minimum variance condition,
E(R ZM ), is the expected return on assets that have market betas equal to zero,
which means their returns are uncorrelated with the market return. The second
term is a risk premium—the market beta of asset i, ␤ iM , times the premium per
unit of beta, which is the expected market return, E(R M ), minus E(R ZM ).
Since the market beta of asset i is also the slope in the regression of its return
on the market return, a common (and correct) interpretation of beta is that it
measures the sensitivity of the asset’s return to variation in the market return. But
there is another interpretation of beta more in line with the spirit of the portfolio
model that underlies the CAPM. The risk of the market portfolio, as measured by
the variance of its return (the denominator of ␤ iM ), is a weighted average of the
covariance risks of the assets in M (the numerators of ␤ iM for different assets).
 The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Theory and Evidence 29

Thus, ␤ iM is the covariance risk of asset i in M measured relative to the average

covariance risk of assets, which is just the variance of the market return.3 In
economic terms, ␤ iM is proportional to the risk each dollar invested in asset i
contributes to the market portfolio.
The last step in the development of the Sharpe-Lintner model is to use the
assumption of risk-free borrowing and lending to nail down E(R ZM ), the expected
return on zero-beta assets. A risky asset’s return is uncorrelated with the market
return—its beta is zero—when the average of the asset’s covariances with the
returns on other assets just offsets the variance of the asset’s return. Such a risky
asset is riskless in the market portfolio in the sense that it contributes nothing to the
variance of the market return.
When there is risk-free borrowing and lending, the expected return on assets
that are uncorrelated with the market return, E(R ZM ), must equal the risk-free rate,
R f . The relation between expected return and beta then becomes the familiar
Sharpe-Lintner CAPM equation,

共Sharpe-Lintner CAPM兲 E共Ri 兲 ⫽ Rf ⫹ 关E共RM 兲 ⫺ Rf 兲]␤iM , i ⫽ 1, . . . , N.

In words, the expected return on any asset i is the risk-free interest rate, R f , plus a
risk premium, which is the asset’s market beta, ␤ iM , times the premium per unit of
beta risk, E(R M ) ⫺ R f .
Unrestricted risk-free borrowing and lending is an unrealistic assumption.
Fischer Black (1972) develops a version of the CAPM without risk-free borrowing or
lending. He shows that the CAPM’s key result—that the market portfolio is mean-
variance-efficient— can be obtained by instead allowing unrestricted short sales of
risky assets. In brief, back in Figure 1, if there is no risk-free asset, investors select
portfolios from along the mean-variance-efficient frontier from a to b. Market
clearing prices imply that when one weights the efficient portfolios chosen by
investors by their (positive) shares of aggregate invested wealth, the resulting
portfolio is the market portfolio. The market portfolio is thus a portfolio of the
efficient portfolios chosen by investors. With unrestricted short selling of risky
assets, portfolios made up of efficient portfolios are themselves efficient. Thus, the
market portfolio is efficient, which means that the minimum variance condition for
M given above holds, and it is the expected return-risk relation of the Black CAPM.
The relations between expected return and market beta of the Black and
Sharpe-Lintner versions of the CAPM differ only in terms of what each says about
E(R ZM ), the expected return on assets uncorrelated with the market. The Black
version says only that E(R ZM ) must be less than the expected market return, so the

3
Formally, if x iM is the weight of asset i in the market portfolio, then the variance of the portfolio’s
return is

␴ 2共R M 兲 ⫽ Cov共R M , R M 兲 ⫽ Cov 冉冘

N

i⫽1
冊
x iM R i , R M ⫽ 冘
N

i⫽1
x iM Cov共R i , R M 兲.
30 Journal of Economic Perspectives

premium for beta is positive. In contrast, in the Sharpe-Lintner version of the

model, E(R ZM ) must be the risk-free interest rate, R f , and the premium per unit of
beta risk is E(R M ) ⫺ R f .
The assumption that short selling is unrestricted is as unrealistic as unre-
stricted risk-free borrowing and lending. If there is no risk-free asset and short sales
of risky assets are not allowed, mean-variance investors still choose efficient
portfolios—points above b on the abc curve in Figure 1. But when there is no short
selling of risky assets and no risk-free asset, the algebra of portfolio efficiency says
that portfolios made up of efficient portfolios are not typically efficient. This means
that the market portfolio, which is a portfolio of the efficient portfolios chosen by
investors, is not typically efficient. And the CAPM relation between expected return
and market beta is lost. This does not rule out predictions about expected return
and betas with respect to other efficient portfolios—if theory can specify portfolios
that must be efficient if the market is to clear. But so far this has proven impossible.
In short, the familiar CAPM equation relating expected asset returns to their
market betas is just an application to the market portfolio of the relation between
expected return and portfolio beta that holds in any mean-variance-efficient port-
folio. The efficiency of the market portfolio is based on many unrealistic assump-
tions, including complete agreement and either unrestricted risk-free borrowing
and lending or unrestricted short selling of risky assets. But all interesting models
involve unrealistic simplifications, which is why they must be tested against data.

Early Empirical Tests

Tests of the CAPM are based on three implications of the relation between
expected return and market beta implied by the model. First, expected returns on
all assets are linearly related to their betas, and no other variable has marginal
explanatory power. Second, the beta premium is positive, meaning that the ex-
pected return on the market portfolio exceeds the expected return on assets whose
returns are uncorrelated with the market return. Third, in the Sharpe-Lintner
version of the model, assets uncorrelated with the market have expected returns
equal to the risk-free interest rate, and the beta premium is the expected market
return minus the risk-free rate. Most tests of these predictions use either cross-
section or time-series regressions. Both approaches date to early tests of the model.

Tests on Risk Premiums

The early cross-section regression tests focus on the Sharpe-Lintner model’s
predictions about the intercept and slope in the relation between expected return
and market beta. The approach is to regress a cross-section of average asset returns
on estimates of asset betas. The model predicts that the intercept in these regres-
sions is the risk-free interest rate, R f , and the coefficient on beta is the expected
return on the market in excess of the risk-free rate, E(R M ) ⫺ R f .
Two problems in these tests quickly became apparent. First, estimates of beta
 Eugene F. Fama and Kenneth R. French 31

for individual assets are imprecise, creating a measurement error problem when
they are used to explain average returns. Second, the regression residuals have
common sources of variation, such as industry effects in average returns. Positive
correlation in the residuals produces downward bias in the usual ordinary least
squares estimates of the standard errors of the cross-section regression slopes.
To improve the precision of estimated betas, researchers such as Blume
(1970), Friend and Blume (1970) and Black, Jensen and Scholes (1972) work with
portfolios, rather than individual securities. Since expected returns and market
betas combine in the same way in portfolios, if the CAPM explains security returns
it also explains portfolio returns.4 Estimates of beta for diversified portfolios are
more precise than estimates for individual securities. Thus, using portfolios in
cross-section regressions of average returns on betas reduces the critical errors in
variables problem. Grouping, however, shrinks the range of betas and reduces
statistical power. To mitigate this problem, researchers sort securities on beta when
forming portfolios; the first portfolio contains securities with the lowest betas, and
so on, up to the last portfolio with the highest beta assets. This sorting procedure
is now standard in empirical tests.
Fama and MacBeth (1973) propose a method for addressing the inference
problem caused by correlation of the residuals in cross-section regressions. Instead
of estimating a single cross-section regression of average monthly returns on betas,
they estimate month-by-month cross-section regressions of monthly returns on
betas. The times-series means of the monthly slopes and intercepts, along with the
standard errors of the means, are then used to test whether the average premium
for beta is positive and whether the average return on assets uncorrelated with the
market is equal to the average risk-free interest rate. In this approach, the standard
errors of the average intercept and slope are determined by the month-to-month
variation in the regression coefficients, which fully captures the effects of residual
correlation on variation in the regression coefficients, but sidesteps the problem of
actually estimating the correlations. The residual correlations are, in effect, cap-
tured via repeated sampling of the regression coefficients. This approach also
becomes standard in the literature.
Jensen (1968) was the first to note that the Sharpe-Lintner version of the

4
Formally, if x ip , i ⫽ 1, . . . , N, are the weights for assets in some portfolio p, the expected return and
market beta for the portfolio are related to the expected returns and betas of assets as

冘 冘
N N

E共R p 兲 ⫽ x ip E共R i 兲, and ␤pM ⫽ xip ␤pM .

i⫽1 i⫽1

Thus, the CAPM relation between expected return and beta,

E共R i 兲 ⫽ E共R f 兲 ⫹ 关E共R M 兲 ⫺ E共R f 兲兴 ␤ iM ,

holds when asset i is a portfolio, as well as when i is an individual security.

32 Journal of Economic Perspectives

relation between expected return and market beta also implies a time-series re-
gression test. The Sharpe-Lintner CAPM says that the expected value of an asset’s
excess return (the asset’s return minus the risk-free interest rate, R it ⫺ R ft ) is
completely explained by its expected CAPM risk premium (its beta times the
expected value of R Mt ⫺ R ft ). This implies that “Jensen’s alpha,” the intercept term
in the time-series regression,

共Time-Series Regression兲 Rit ⫺ Rft ⫽ ␣i ⫹ ␤iM 共RMt ⫺ Rft 兲 ⫹ ␧it ,

is zero for each asset.

The early tests firmly reject the Sharpe-Lintner version of the CAPM. There is
a positive relation between beta and average return, but it is too “flat.” Recall that,
in cross-section regressions, the Sharpe-Lintner model predicts that the intercept is
the risk-free rate and the coefficient on beta is the expected market return in excess
of the risk-free rate, E(R M ) ⫺ R f . The regressions consistently find that the
intercept is greater than the average risk-free rate (typically proxied as the return
on a one-month Treasury bill), and the coefficient on beta is less than the average
excess market return (proxied as the average return on a portfolio of U.S. common
stocks minus the Treasury bill rate). This is true in the early tests, such as Douglas
(1968), Black, Jensen and Scholes (1972), Miller and Scholes (1972), Blume and
Friend (1973) and Fama and MacBeth (1973), as well as in more recent cross-
section regression tests, like Fama and French (1992).
The evidence that the relation between beta and average return is too flat is
confirmed in time-series tests, such as Friend and Blume (1970), Black, Jensen and
Scholes (1972) and Stambaugh (1982). The intercepts in time-series regressions of
excess asset returns on the excess market return are positive for assets with low betas
and negative for assets with high betas.
Figure 2 provides an updated example of the evidence. In December of each
year, we estimate a preranking beta for every NYSE (1928 –2003), AMEX (1963–
2003) and NASDAQ (1972–2003) stock in the CRSP (Center for Research in
Security Prices of the University of Chicago) database, using two to five years (as
available) of prior monthly returns.5 We then form ten value-weight portfolios
based on these preranking betas and compute their returns for the next twelve
months. We repeat this process for each year from 1928 to 2003. The result is
912 monthly returns on ten beta-sorted portfolios. Figure 2 plots each portfolio’s
average return against its postranking beta, estimated by regressing its monthly
returns for 1928 –2003 on the return on the CRSP value-weight portfolio of U.S.
common stocks.
The Sharpe-Lintner CAPM predicts that the portfolios plot along a straight

5
To be included in the sample for year t, a security must have market equity data (price times shares
outstanding) for December of t ⫺ 1, and CRSP must classify it as ordinary common equity. Thus, we
exclude securities such as American Depository Receipts (ADRs) and Real Estate Investment Trusts
(REITs).
 The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Theory and Evidence 33

Figure 2
Average Annualized Monthly Return versus Beta for Value Weight Portfolios
Formed on Prior Beta, 1928 –2003
18
Average annualized monthly return (%)

16

14

12

10
Average returns
8 predicted by the
CAPM
6
0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.9

line, with an intercept equal to the risk-free rate, R f , and a slope equal to the
expected excess return on the market, E(R M ) ⫺ R f . We use the average one-month
Treasury bill rate and the average excess CRSP market return for 1928 –2003 to
estimate the predicted line in Figure 2. Confirming earlier evidence, the relation
between beta and average return for the ten portfolios is much flatter than the
Sharpe-Lintner CAPM predicts. The returns on the low beta portfolios are too high,
and the returns on the high beta portfolios are too low. For example, the predicted
return on the portfolio with the lowest beta is 8.3 percent per year; the actual return
is 11.1 percent. The predicted return on the portfolio with the highest beta is
16.8 percent per year; the actual is 13.7 percent.
Although the observed premium per unit of beta is lower than the Sharpe-
Lintner model predicts, the relation between average return and beta in Figure 2
is roughly linear. This is consistent with the Black version of the CAPM, which
predicts only that the beta premium is positive. Even this less restrictive model,
however, eventually succumbs to the data.

Testing Whether Market Betas Explain Expected Returns

The Sharpe-Lintner and Black versions of the CAPM share the prediction that
the market portfolio is mean-variance-efficient. This implies that differences in
expected return across securities and portfolios are entirely explained by differ-
ences in market beta; other variables should add nothing to the explanation of
expected return. This prediction plays a prominent role in tests of the CAPM. In
the early work, the weapon of choice is cross-section regressions.
In the framework of Fama and MacBeth (1973), one simply adds predeter-
mined explanatory variables to the month-by-month cross-section regressions of
34 Journal of Economic Perspectives

returns on beta. If all differences in expected return are explained by beta, the
average slopes on the additional variables should not be reliably different from
zero. Clearly, the trick in the cross-section regression approach is to choose specific
additional variables likely to expose any problems of the CAPM prediction that,
because the market portfolio is efficient, market betas suffice to explain expected
asset returns.
For example, in Fama and MacBeth (1973) the additional variables are
squared market betas (to test the prediction that the relation between expected
return and beta is linear) and residual variances from regressions of returns on the
market return (to test the prediction that market beta is the only measure of risk
needed to explain expected returns). These variables do not add to the explanation
of average returns provided by beta. Thus, the results of Fama and MacBeth (1973)
are consistent with the hypothesis that their market proxy—an equal-weight port-
folio of NYSE stocks—is on the minimum variance frontier.
The hypothesis that market betas completely explain expected returns can also
be tested using time-series regressions. In the time-series regression described
above (the excess return on asset i regressed on the excess market return), the
intercept is the difference between the asset’s average excess return and the excess
return predicted by the Sharpe-Lintner model, that is, beta times the average excess
market return. If the model holds, there is no way to group assets into portfolios
whose intercepts are reliably different from zero. For example, the intercepts for a
portfolio of stocks with high ratios of earnings to price and a portfolio of stocks with
low earning-price ratios should both be zero. Thus, to test the hypothesis that
market betas suffice to explain expected returns, one estimates the time-series
regression for a set of assets (or portfolios) and then jointly tests the vector of
regression intercepts against zero. The trick in this approach is to choose the
left-hand-side assets (or portfolios) in a way likely to expose any shortcoming of the
CAPM prediction that market betas suffice to explain expected asset returns.
In early applications, researchers use a variety of tests to determine whether
the intercepts in a set of time-series regressions are all zero. The tests have the same
asymptotic properties, but there is controversy about which has the best small
sample properties. Gibbons, Ross and Shanken (1989) settle the debate by provid-
ing an F-test on the intercepts that has exact small-sample properties. They also
show that the test has a simple economic interpretation. In effect, the test con-
structs a candidate for the tangency portfolio T in Figure 1 by optimally combining
the market proxy and the left-hand-side assets of the time-series regressions. The
estimator then tests whether the efficient set provided by the combination of this
tangency portfolio and the risk-free asset is reliably superior to the one obtained by
combining the risk-free asset with the market proxy alone. In other words, the
Gibbons, Ross and Shanken statistic tests whether the market proxy is the tangency
portfolio in the set of portfolios that can be constructed by combining the market
portfolio with the specific assets used as dependent variables in the time-series
regressions.
Enlightened by this insight of Gibbons, Ross and Shanken (1989), one can see
 Eugene F. Fama and Kenneth R. French 35

a similar interpretation of the cross-section regression test of whether market betas

suffice to explain expected returns. In this case, the test is whether the additional
explanatory variables in a cross-section regression identify patterns in the returns
on the left-hand-side assets that are not explained by the assets’ market betas. This
amounts to testing whether the market proxy is on the minimum variance frontier
that can be constructed using the market proxy and the left-hand-side assets
included in the tests.
An important lesson from this discussion is that time-series and cross-section
regressions do not, strictly speaking, test the CAPM. What is literally tested is
whether a specific proxy for the market portfolio (typically a portfolio of U.S.
common stocks) is efficient in the set of portfolios that can be constructed from it
and the left-hand-side assets used in the test. One might conclude from this that the
CAPM has never been tested, and prospects for testing it are not good because
1) the set of left-hand-side assets does not include all marketable assets, and 2) data
for the true market portfolio of all assets are likely beyond reach (Roll, 1977; more
on this later). But this criticism can be leveled at tests of any economic model when
the tests are less than exhaustive or when they use proxies for the variables called
for by the model.
The bottom line from the early cross-section regression tests of the CAPM,
such as Fama and MacBeth (1973), and the early time-series regression tests, like
Gibbons (1982) and Stambaugh (1982), is that standard market proxies seem to be
on the minimum variance frontier. That is, the central predictions of the Black
version of the CAPM, that market betas suffice to explain expected returns and that
the risk premium for beta is positive, seem to hold. But the more specific prediction
of the Sharpe-Lintner CAPM that the premium per unit of beta is the expected
market return minus the risk-free interest rate is consistently rejected.
The success of the Black version of the CAPM in early tests produced a
consensus that the model is a good description of expected returns. These early
results, coupled with the model’s simplicity and intuitive appeal, pushed the CAPM
to the forefront of finance.

Recent Tests

Starting in the late 1970s, empirical work appears that challenges even the
Black version of the CAPM. Specifically, evidence mounts that much of the varia-
tion in expected return is unrelated to market beta.
The first blow is Basu’s (1977) evidence that when common stocks are sorted
on earnings-price ratios, future returns on high E/P stocks are higher than pre-
dicted by the CAPM. Banz (1981) documents a size effect: when stocks are sorted
on market capitalization (price times shares outstanding), average returns on small
stocks are higher than predicted by the CAPM. Bhandari (1988) finds that high
debt-equity ratios (book value of debt over the market value of equity, a measure of
leverage) are associated with returns that are too high relative to their market betas.
36 Journal of Economic Perspectives

Finally, Statman (1980) and Rosenberg, Reid and Lanstein (1985) document that
stocks with high book-to-market equity ratios (B/M, the ratio of the book value of
a common stock to its market value) have high average returns that are not
captured by their betas.
There is a theme in the contradictions of the CAPM summarized above. Ratios
involving stock prices have information about expected returns missed by market
betas. On reflection, this is not surprising. A stock’s price depends not only on the
expected cash flows it will provide, but also on the expected returns that discount
expected cash flows back to the present. Thus, in principle, the cross-section of
prices has information about the cross-section of expected returns. (A high ex-
pected return implies a high discount rate and a low price.) The cross-section of
stock prices is, however, arbitrarily affected by differences in scale (or units). But
with a judicious choice of scaling variable X, the ratio X/P can reveal differences
in the cross-section of expected stock returns. Such ratios are thus prime candidates
to expose shortcomings of asset pricing models—in the case of the CAPM, short-
comings of the prediction that market betas suffice to explain expected returns
(Ball, 1978). The contradictions of the CAPM summarized above suggest that
earnings-price, debt-equity and book-to-market ratios indeed play this role.
Fama and French (1992) update and synthesize the evidence on the empirical
failures of the CAPM. Using the cross-section regression approach, they confirm
that size, earnings-price, debt-equity and book-to-market ratios add to the explana-
tion of expected stock returns provided by market beta. Fama and French (1996)
reach the same conclusion using the time-series regression approach applied to
portfolios of stocks sorted on price ratios. They also find that different price ratios
have much the same information about expected returns. This is not surprising
given that price is the common driving force in the price ratios, and the numerators
are just scaling variables used to extract the information in price about expected
returns.
Fama and French (1992) also confirm the evidence (Reinganum, 1981; Stam-
baugh, 1982; Lakonishok and Shapiro, 1986) that the relation between average
return and beta for common stocks is even flatter after the sample periods used in
the early empirical work on the CAPM. The estimate of the beta premium is,
however, clouded by statistical uncertainty (a large standard error). Kothari, Shan-
ken and Sloan (1995) try to resuscitate the Sharpe-Lintner CAPM by arguing that
the weak relation between average return and beta is just a chance result. But the
strong evidence that other variables capture variation in expected return missed by
beta makes this argument irrelevant. If betas do not suffice to explain expected
returns, the market portfolio is not efficient, and the CAPM is dead in its tracks.
Evidence on the size of the market premium can neither save the model nor further
doom it.
The synthesis of the evidence on the empirical problems of the CAPM pro-
vided by Fama and French (1992) serves as a catalyst, marking the point when it is
generally acknowledged that the CAPM has potentially fatal problems. Research
then turns to explanations.
 The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Theory and Evidence 37

One possibility is that the CAPM’s problems are spurious, the result of data
dredging—publication-hungry researchers scouring the data and unearthing con-
tradictions that occur in specific samples as a result of chance. A standard response
to this concern is to test for similar findings in other samples. Chan, Hamao and
Lakonishok (1991) find a strong relation between book-to-market equity (B/M)
and average return for Japanese stocks. Capaul, Rowley and Sharpe (1993) observe
a similar B/M effect in four European stock markets and in Japan. Fama and
French (1998) find that the price ratios that produce problems for the CAPM in
U.S. data show up in the same way in the stock returns of twelve non-U.S. major
markets, and they are present in emerging market returns. This evidence suggests
that the contradictions of the CAPM associated with price ratios are not sample
specific.

Explanations: Irrational Pricing or Risk

Among those who conclude that the empirical failures of the CAPM are fatal,
two stories emerge. On one side are the behavioralists. Their view is based on
evidence that stocks with high ratios of book value to market price are typically
firms that have fallen on bad times, while low B/M is associated with growth firms
(Lakonishok, Shleifer and Vishny, 1994; Fama and French, 1995). The behavior-
alists argue that sorting firms on book-to-market ratios exposes investor overreac-
tion to good and bad times. Investors overextrapolate past performance, resulting
in stock prices that are too high for growth (low B/M) firms and too low for
distressed (high B/M, so-called value) firms. When the overreaction is eventually
corrected, the result is high returns for value stocks and low returns for growth
stocks. Proponents of this view include DeBondt and Thaler (1987), Lakonishok,
Shleifer and Vishny (1994) and Haugen (1995).
The second story for explaining the empirical contradictions of the CAPM is
that they point to the need for a more complicated asset pricing model. The CAPM
is based on many unrealistic assumptions. For example, the assumption that
investors care only about the mean and variance of one-period portfolio returns is
extreme. It is reasonable that investors also care about how their portfolio return
covaries with labor income and future investment opportunities, so a portfolio’s
return variance misses important dimensions of risk. If so, market beta is not a
complete description of an asset’s risk, and we should not be surprised to find that
differences in expected return are not completely explained by differences in beta.
In this view, the search should turn to asset pricing models that do a better job
explaining average returns.
Merton’s (1973) intertemporal capital asset pricing model (ICAPM) is a
natural extension of the CAPM. The ICAPM begins with a different assumption
about investor objectives. In the CAPM, investors care only about the wealth their
portfolio produces at the end of the current period. In the ICAPM, investors are
concerned not only with their end-of-period payoff, but also with the opportunities
38 Journal of Economic Perspectives

they will have to consume or invest the payoff. Thus, when choosing a portfolio at
time t ⫺ 1, ICAPM investors consider how their wealth at t might vary with future
state variables, including labor income, the prices of consumption goods and the
nature of portfolio opportunities at t, and expectations about the labor income,
consumption and investment opportunities to be available after t.
Like CAPM investors, ICAPM investors prefer high expected return and low
return variance. But ICAPM investors are also concerned with the covariances of
portfolio returns with state variables. As a result, optimal portfolios are “multifactor
efficient,” which means they have the largest possible expected returns, given their
return variances and the covariances of their returns with the relevant state
variables.
Fama (1996) shows that the ICAPM generalizes the logic of the CAPM. That is,
if there is risk-free borrowing and lending or if short sales of risky assets are allowed,
market clearing prices imply that the market portfolio is multifactor efficient.
Moreover, multifactor efficiency implies a relation between expected return and
beta risks, but it requires additional betas, along with a market beta, to explain
expected returns.
An ideal implementation of the ICAPM would specify the state variables that
affect expected returns. Fama and French (1993) take a more indirect approach,
perhaps more in the spirit of Ross’s (1976) arbitrage pricing theory. They argue
that though size and book-to-market equity are not themselves state variables, the
higher average returns on small stocks and high book-to-market stocks reflect
unidentified state variables that produce undiversifiable risks (covariances) in
returns that are not captured by the market return and are priced separately from
market betas. In support of this claim, they show that the returns on the stocks of
small firms covary more with one another than with returns on the stocks of large
firms, and returns on high book-to-market (value) stocks covary more with one
another than with returns on low book-to-market (growth) stocks. Fama and
French (1995) show that there are similar size and book-to-market patterns in the
covariation of fundamentals like earnings and sales.
Based on this evidence, Fama and French (1993, 1996) propose a three-factor
model for expected returns,

共Three-Factor Model兲 E共Rit 兲 ⫺ Rft ⫽ ␤iM 关E共RMt 兲 ⫺ Rft 兴

⫹ ␤ is E共SMB t 兲 ⫹ ␤ ih E共HML t 兲.

In this equation, SMB t (small minus big) is the difference between the returns on
diversified portfolios of small and big stocks, HML t (high minus low) is the
difference between the returns on diversified portfolios of high and low B/M
stocks, and the betas are slopes in the multiple regression of R it ⫺ R ft on R Mt ⫺ R ft ,
SMB t and HML t .
For perspective, the average value of the market premium R Mt ⫺ R ft for
1927–2003 is 8.3 percent per year, which is 3.5 standard errors from zero. The
 Eugene F. Fama and Kenneth R. French 39

average values of SMB t , and HML t are 3.6 percent and 5.0 percent per year, and
they are 2.1 and 3.1 standard errors from zero. All three premiums are volatile, with
annual standard deviations of 21.0 percent (R Mt ⫺ R ft ), 14.6 percent (SMB t ) and
14.2 percent (HML t ) per year. Although the average values of the premiums are
large, high volatility implies substantial uncertainty about the true expected
premiums.
One implication of the expected return equation of the three-factor model is
that the intercept ␣i in the time-series regression,

R it ⫺ R ft ⫽ ␣ i ⫹ ␤ iM 共R Mt ⫺ R ft 兲 ⫹ ␤ is SMB t ⫹ ␤ ih HML t ⫹ ␧ it ,

is zero for all assets i. Using this criterion, Fama and French (1993, 1996) find that
the model captures much of the variation in average return for portfolios formed
on size, book-to-market equity and other price ratios that cause problems for the
CAPM. Fama and French (1998) show that an international version of the model
performs better than an international CAPM in describing average returns on
portfolios formed on scaled price variables for stocks in 13 major markets.
The three-factor model is now widely used in empirical research that requires
a model of expected returns. Estimates of ␣i from the time-series regression above
are used to calibrate how rapidly stock prices respond to new information (for
example, Loughran and Ritter, 1995; Mitchell and Stafford, 2000). They are also
used to measure the special information of portfolio managers, for example, in
Carhart’s (1997) study of mutual fund performance. Among practitioners like
Ibbotson Associates, the model is offered as an alternative to the CAPM for
estimating the cost of equity capital.
From a theoretical perspective, the main shortcoming of the three-factor
model is its empirical motivation. The small-minus-big (SMB) and high-minus-low
(HML) explanatory returns are not motivated by predictions about state variables
of concern to investors. Instead they are brute force constructs meant to capture
the patterns uncovered by previous work on how average stock returns vary with size
and the book-to-market equity ratio.
But this concern is not fatal. The ICAPM does not require that the additional
portfolios used along with the market portfolio to explain expected returns
“mimic” the relevant state variables. In both the ICAPM and the arbitrage pricing
theory, it suffices that the additional portfolios are well diversified (in the termi-
nology of Fama, 1996, they are multifactor minimum variance) and that they are
sufficiently different from the market portfolio to capture covariation in returns
and variation in expected returns missed by the market portfolio. Thus, adding
diversified portfolios that capture covariation in returns and variation in average
returns left unexplained by the market is in the spirit of both the ICAPM and the
Ross’s arbitrage pricing theory.
The behavioralists are not impressed by the evidence for a risk-based expla-
nation of the failures of the CAPM. They typically concede that the three-factor
model captures covariation in returns missed by the market return and that it picks
40 Journal of Economic Perspectives

up much of the size and value effects in average returns left unexplained by the
CAPM. But their view is that the average return premium associated with the
model’s book-to-market factor—which does the heavy lifting in the improvements
to the CAPM—is itself the result of investor overreaction that happens to be
correlated across firms in a way that just looks like a risk story. In short, in the
behavioral view, the market tries to set CAPM prices, and violations of the CAPM
are due to mispricing.
The conflict between the behavioral irrational pricing story and the rational
risk story for the empirical failures of the CAPM leaves us at a timeworn impasse.
Fama (1970) emphasizes that the hypothesis that prices properly reflect available
information must be tested in the context of a model of expected returns, like the
CAPM. Intuitively, to test whether prices are rational, one must take a stand on what
the market is trying to do in setting prices—that is, what is risk and what is the
relation between expected return and risk? When tests reject the CAPM, one
cannot say whether the problem is its assumption that prices are rational (the
behavioral view) or violations of other assumptions that are also necessary to
produce the CAPM (our position).
Fortunately, for some applications, the way one uses the three-factor model
does not depend on one’s view about whether its average return premiums are the
rational result of underlying state variable risks, the result of irrational investor
behavior or sample specific results of chance. For example, when measuring the
response of stock prices to new information or when evaluating the performance of
managed portfolios, one wants to account for known patterns in returns and
average returns for the period examined, whatever their source. Similarly, when
estimating the cost of equity capital, one might be unconcerned with whether
expected return premiums are rational or irrational since they are in either case
part of the opportunity cost of equity capital (Stein, 1996). But the cost of capital
is forward looking, so if the premiums are sample specific they are irrelevant.
The three-factor model is hardly a panacea. Its most serious problem is the
momentum effect of Jegadeesh and Titman (1993). Stocks that do well relative to
the market over the last three to twelve months tend to continue to do well for the
next few months, and stocks that do poorly continue to do poorly. This momentum
effect is distinct from the value effect captured by book-to-market equity and other
price ratios. Moreover, the momentum effect is left unexplained by the three-factor
model, as well as by the CAPM. Following Carhart (1997), one response is to add
a momentum factor (the difference between the returns on diversified portfolios of
short-term winners and losers) to the three-factor model. This step is again legiti-
mate in applications where the goal is to abstract from known patterns in average
returns to uncover information-specific or manager-specific effects. But since the
momentum effect is short-lived, it is largely irrelevant for estimates of the cost of
equity capital.
Another strand of research points to problems in both the three-factor model
and the CAPM. Frankel and Lee (1998), Dechow, Hutton and Sloan (1999),
Piotroski (2000) and others show that in portfolios formed on price ratios like
 The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Theory and Evidence 41

book-to-market equity, stocks with higher expected cash flows have higher average
returns that are not captured by the three-factor model or the CAPM. The authors
interpret their results as evidence that stock prices are irrational, in the sense that
they do not reflect available information about expected profitability.
In truth, however, one can’t tell whether the problem is bad pricing or a bad
asset pricing model. A stock’s price can always be expressed as the present value of
expected future cash flows discounted at the expected return on the stock (Camp-
bell and Shiller, 1989; Vuolteenaho, 2002). It follows that if two stocks have the
same price, the one with higher expected cash flows must have a higher expected
return. This holds true whether pricing is rational or irrational. Thus, when one
observes a positive relation between expected cash flows and expected returns that
is left unexplained by the CAPM or the three-factor model, one can’t tell whether
it is the result of irrational pricing or a misspecified asset pricing model.

The Market Proxy Problem

Roll (1977) argues that the CAPM has never been tested and probably never
will be. The problem is that the market portfolio at the heart of the model is
theoretically and empirically elusive. It is not theoretically clear which assets (for
example, human capital) can legitimately be excluded from the market portfolio,
and data availability substantially limits the assets that are included. As a result, tests
of the CAPM are forced to use proxies for the market portfolio, in effect testing
whether the proxies are on the minimum variance frontier. Roll argues that
because the tests use proxies, not the true market portfolio, we learn nothing about
the CAPM.
We are more pragmatic. The relation between expected return and market
beta of the CAPM is just the minimum variance condition that holds in any efficient
portfolio, applied to the market portfolio. Thus, if we can find a market proxy that
is on the minimum variance frontier, it can be used to describe differences in
expected returns, and we would be happy to use it for this purpose. The strong
rejections of the CAPM described above, however, say that researchers have not
uncovered a reasonable market proxy that is close to the minimum variance
frontier. If researchers are constrained to reasonable proxies, we doubt they
ever will.
Our pessimism is fueled by several empirical results. Stambaugh (1982) tests
the CAPM using a range of market portfolios that include, in addition to U.S.
common stocks, corporate and government bonds, preferred stocks, real estate and
other consumer durables. He finds that tests of the CAPM are not sensitive to
expanding the market proxy beyond common stocks, basically because the volatility
of expanded market returns is dominated by the volatility of stock returns.
One need not be convinced by Stambaugh’s (1982) results since his market
proxies are limited to U.S. assets. If international capital markets are open and asset
prices conform to an international version of the CAPM, the market portfolio
42 Journal of Economic Perspectives

should include international assets. Fama and French (1998) find, however, that
betas for a global stock market portfolio cannot explain the high average returns
observed around the world on stocks with high book-to-market or high earnings-
price ratios.
A major problem for the CAPM is that portfolios formed by sorting stocks on
price ratios produce a wide range of average returns, but the average returns are
not positively related to market betas (Lakonishok, Shleifer and Vishny, 1994; Fama
and French, 1996, 1998). The problem is illustrated in Figure 3, which shows
average returns and betas (calculated with respect to the CRSP value-weight port-
folio of NYSE, AMEX and NASDAQ stocks) for July 1963 to December 2003 for ten
portfolios of U.S. stocks formed annually on sorted values of the book-to-market
equity ratio (B/M).6
Average returns on the B/M portfolios increase almost monotonically, from
10.1 percent per year for the lowest B/M group (portfolio 1) to an impressive
16.7 percent for the highest (portfolio 10). But the positive relation between beta
and average return predicted by the CAPM is notably absent. For example, the
portfolio with the lowest book-to-market ratio has the highest beta but the lowest
average return. The estimated beta for the portfolio with the highest book-to-
market ratio and the highest average return is only 0.98. With an average annual-
ized value of the riskfree interest rate, R f , of 5.8 percent and an average annualized
market premium, R M ⫺ R f , of 11.3 percent, the Sharpe-Lintner CAPM predicts an
average return of 11.8 percent for the lowest B/M portfolio and 11.2 percent for
the highest, far from the observed values, 10.1 and 16.7 percent. For the Sharpe-
Lintner model to “work” on these portfolios, their market betas must change
dramatically, from 1.09 to 0.78 for the lowest B/M portfolio and from 0.98 to 1.98
for the highest. We judge it unlikely that alternative proxies for the market
portfolio will produce betas and a market premium that can explain the average
returns on these portfolios.
It is always possible that researchers will redeem the CAPM by finding a
reasonable proxy for the market portfolio that is on the minimum variance frontier.
We emphasize, however, that this possibility cannot be used to justify the way the
CAPM is currently applied. The problem is that applications typically use the same

6
Stock return data are from CRSP, and book equity data are from Compustat and the Moody’s
Industrials, Transportation, Utilities and Financials manuals. Stocks are allocated to ten portfolios at the
end of June of each year t (1963 to 2003) using the ratio of book equity for the fiscal year ending in
calendar year t ⫺ 1, divided by market equity at the end of December of t ⫺ 1. Book equity is the book
value of stockholders’ equity, plus balance sheet deferred taxes and investment tax credit (if available),
minus the book value of preferred stock. Depending on availability, we use the redemption, liquidation
or par value (in that order) to estimate the book value of preferred stock. Stockholders’ equity is the
value reported by Moody’s or Compustat, if it is available. If not, we measure stockholders’ equity as the
book value of common equity plus the par value of preferred stock or the book value of assets minus
total liabilities (in that order). The portfolios for year t include NYSE (1963–2003), AMEX (1963–2003)
and NASDAQ (1972–2003) stocks with positive book equity in t ⫺ 1 and market equity (from CRSP) for
December of t ⫺ 1 and June of t. The portfolios exclude securities CRSP does not classify as ordinary
common equity. The breakpoints for year t use only securities that are on the NYSE in June of year t.
 Eugene F. Fama and Kenneth R. French 43

Figure 3
Average Annualized Monthly Return versus Beta for Value Weight Portfolios
Formed on B/M, 1963–2003
17
Average annualized monthly return (%)

10 (highest B/M)
16

15 9
8
14 7

6
13
Average returns 5 3
12 4 2
predicted by
11 the CAPM

10 1 (lowest B/M)

9
0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2

market proxies, like the value-weight portfolio of U.S. stocks, that lead to rejections
of the model in empirical tests. The contradictions of the CAPM observed when
such proxies are used in tests of the model show up as bad estimates of expected
returns in applications; for example, estimates of the cost of equity capital that are
too low (relative to historical average returns) for small stocks and for stocks with
high book-to-market equity ratios. In short, if a market proxy does not work in tests
of the CAPM, it does not work in applications.

Conclusions

The version of the CAPM developed by Sharpe (1964) and Lintner (1965) has
never been an empirical success. In the early empirical work, the Black (1972)
version of the model, which can accommodate a flatter tradeoff of average return
for market beta, has some success. But in the late 1970s, research begins to uncover
variables like size, various price ratios and momentum that add to the explanation
of average returns provided by beta. The problems are serious enough to invalidate
most applications of the CAPM.
For example, finance textbooks often recommend using the Sharpe-Lintner
CAPM risk-return relation to estimate the cost of equity capital. The prescription is
to estimate a stock’s market beta and combine it with the risk-free interest rate and
the average market risk premium to produce an estimate of the cost of equity. The
typical market portfolio in these exercises includes just U.S. common stocks. But
empirical work, old and new, tells us that the relation between beta and average
return is flatter than predicted by the Sharpe-Lintner version of the CAPM. As a
44 Journal of Economic Perspectives

result, CAPM estimates of the cost of equity for high beta stocks are too high
(relative to historical average returns) and estimates for low beta stocks are too low
(Friend and Blume, 1970). Similarly, if the high average returns on value stocks
(with high book-to-market ratios) imply high expected returns, CAPM cost of
equity estimates for such stocks are too low.7
The CAPM is also often used to measure the performance of mutual funds and
other managed portfolios. The approach, dating to Jensen (1968), is to estimate
the CAPM time-series regression for a portfolio and use the intercept (Jensen’s
alpha) to measure abnormal performance. The problem is that, because of the
empirical failings of the CAPM, even passively managed stock portfolios produce
abnormal returns if their investment strategies involve tilts toward CAPM problems
(Elton, Gruber, Das and Hlavka, 1993). For example, funds that concentrate on low
beta stocks, small stocks or value stocks will tend to produce positive abnormal
returns relative to the predictions of the Sharpe-Lintner CAPM, even when the
fund managers have no special talent for picking winners.
The CAPM, like Markowitz’s (1952, 1959) portfolio model on which it is built,
is nevertheless a theoretical tour de force. We continue to teach the CAPM as an
introduction to the fundamental concepts of portfolio theory and asset pricing, to
be built on by more complicated models like Merton’s (1973) ICAPM. But we also
warn students that despite its seductive simplicity, the CAPM’s empirical problems
probably invalidate its use in applications.

y We gratefully acknowledge the comments of John Cochrane, George Constantinides, Richard

Leftwich, Andrei Shleifer, René Stulz and Timothy Taylor.

7
The problems are compounded by the large standard errors of estimates of the market premium and
of betas for individual stocks, which probably suffice to make CAPM estimates of the cost of equity rather
meaningless, even if the CAPM holds (Fama and French, 1997; Pastor and Stambaugh, 1999). For
example, using the U.S. Treasury bill rate as the risk-free interest rate and the CRSP value-weight
portfolio of publicly traded U.S. common stocks, the average value of the equity premium R Mt ⫺ R ft for
1927–2003 is 8.3 percent per year, with a standard error of 2.4 percent. The two standard error range
thus runs from 3.5 percent to 13.1 percent, which is sufficient to make most projects appear either
profitable or unprofitable. This problem is, however, hardly special to the CAPM. For example, expected
returns in all versions of Merton’s (1973) ICAPM include a market beta and the expected market
premium. Also, as noted earlier the expected values of the size and book-to-market premiums in the
Fama-French three-factor model are also estimated with substantial error.
 The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Theory and Evidence 45

References

Ball, Ray. 1978. “Anomalies in Relationships Ann Arbor, Michigan: University Microfilms,
Between Securities’ Yields and Yield-Surrogates.” Inc.
Journal of Financial Economics. 6:2, pp. 103–26. Elton, Edwin J., Martin J. Gruber, Sanjiv Das
Banz, Rolf W. 1981. “The Relationship Be- and Matt Hlavka. 1993. “Efficiency with Costly
tween Return and Market Value of Common Information: A Reinterpretation of Evidence
Stocks.” Journal of Financial Economics. 9:1, from Managed Portfolios.” Review of Financial
pp. 3–18. Studies. 6:1, pp. 1–22.
Basu, Sanjay. 1977. “Investment Performance Fama, Eugene F. 1970. “Efficient Capital Mar-
of Common Stocks in Relation to Their Price- kets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work.”
Earnings Ratios: A Test of the Efficient Market Journal of Finance. 25:2, pp. 383– 417.
Hypothesis.” Journal of Finance. 12:3, pp. 129 –56. Fama, Eugene F. 1996. “Multifactor Portfolio
Bhandari, Laxmi Chand. 1988. “Debt/Equity Efficiency and Multifactor Asset Pricing.” Journal
Ratio and Expected Common Stock Returns: of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 31:4,
Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Finance. 43:2, pp. 441– 65.
pp. 507–28. Fama, Eugene F. and Kenneth R. French.
Black, Fischer. 1972. “Capital Market Equilib- 1992. “The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Re-
rium with Restricted Borrowing.” Journal of Busi- turns.” Journal of Finance. 47:2, pp. 427– 65.
ness. 45:3, pp. 444 –54. Fama, Eugene F. and Kenneth R. French.
Black, Fischer, Michael C. Jensen and Myron 1993. “Common Risk Factors in the Returns on
Scholes. 1972. “The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Stocks and Bonds.” Journal of Financial Economics.
Some Empirical Tests,” in Studies in the Theory of 33:1, pp. 3–56.
Capital Markets. Michael C. Jensen, ed. New York: Fama, Eugene F. and Kenneth R. French.
Praeger, pp. 79 –121. 1995. “Size and Book-to-Market Factors in Earn-
Blume, Marshall. 1970. “Portfolio Theory: A ings and Returns.” Journal of Finance. 50:1,
Step Towards its Practical Application.” Journal of pp. 131–55.
Business. 43:2, pp. 152–74. Fama, Eugene F. and Kenneth R. French.
Blume, Marshall and Irwin Friend. 1973. “A 1996. “Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing
New Look at the Capital Asset Pricing Model.” Anomalies.” Journal of Finance. 51:1, pp. 55– 84.
Journal of Finance. 28:1, pp. 19 –33. Fama, Eugene F. and Kenneth R. French.
Campbell, John Y. and Robert J. Shiller. 1989. 1997. “Industry Costs of Equity.” Journal of Finan-
“The Dividend-Price Ratio and Expectations of cial Economics. 43:2 pp. 153–93.
Future Dividends and Discount Factors.” Review Fama, Eugene F. and Kenneth R. French.
of Financial Studies. 1:3, pp. 195–228. 1998. “Value Versus Growth: The International
Capaul, Carlo, Ian Rowley and William F. Evidence.” Journal of Finance. 53:6, pp. 1975–999.
Sharpe. 1993. “International Value and Growth Fama, Eugene F. and James D. MacBeth. 1973.
Stock Returns.” Financial Analysts Journal. “Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical
January/February, 49, pp. 27–36. Tests.” Journal of Political Economy. 81:3,
Carhart, Mark M. 1997. “On Persistence in pp. 607–36.
Mutual Fund Performance.” Journal of Finance. Frankel, Richard and Charles M.C. Lee. 1998.
52:1, pp. 57– 82. “Accounting Valuation, Market Expectation,
Chan, Louis K.C., Yasushi Hamao and Josef and Cross-Sectional Stock Returns.” Journal of
Lakonishok. 1991. “Fundamentals and Stock Re- Accounting and Economics. 25:3 pp. 283–319.
turns in Japan.” Journal of Finance. 46:5, Friend, Irwin and Marshall Blume. 1970.
pp. 1739 –789. “Measurement of Portfolio Performance under
DeBondt, Werner F. M. and Richard H. Tha- Uncertainty.” American Economic Review. 60:4,
ler. 1987. “Further Evidence on Investor Over- pp. 607–36.
reaction and Stock Market Seasonality.” Journal Gibbons, Michael R. 1982. “Multivariate Tests
of Finance. 42:3, pp. 557– 81. of Financial Models: A New Approach.” Journal
Dechow, Patricia M., Amy P. Hutton and Rich- of Financial Economics. 10:1, pp. 3–27.
ard G. Sloan. 1999. “An Empirical Assessment of Gibbons, Michael R., Stephen A. Ross and Jay
the Residual Income Valuation Model.” Journal Shanken. 1989. “A Test of the Efficiency of a
of Accounting and Economics. 26:1, pp. 1–34. Given Portfolio.” Econometrica. 57:5, pp. 1121–
Douglas, George W. 1968. Risk in the Equity 152.
Markets: An Empirical Appraisal of Market Efficiency. Haugen, Robert. 1995. The New Finance: The
46 Journal of Economic Perspectives

Case against Efficient Markets. Englewood Cliffs, Price Performance.” Journal of Business. 73:3,
N.J.: Prentice Hall. pp. 287–329.
Jegadeesh, Narasimhan and Sheridan Titman. Pastor, Lubos and Robert F. Stambaugh.
1993. “Returns to Buying Winners and Selling 1999. “Costs of Equity Capital and Model Mis-
Losers: Implications for Stock Market Effi- pricing.” Journal of Finance. 54:1, pp. 67–121.
ciency.” Journal of Finance. 48:1, pp. 65–91. Piotroski, Joseph D. 2000. “Value Investing:
Jensen, Michael C. 1968. “The Performance of The Use of Historical Financial Statement Infor-
Mutual Funds in the Period 1945–1964.” Journal mation to Separate Winners from Losers.” Jour-
of Finance. 23:2, pp. 389 – 416. nal of Accounting Research. 38:Supplement,
Kothari, S. P., Jay Shanken and Richard G. pp. 1–51.
Sloan. 1995. “Another Look at the Cross-Section Reinganum, Marc R. 1981. “A New Empirical
of Expected Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance. Perspective on the CAPM.” Journal of Financial
50:1, pp. 185–224. and Quantitative Analysis. 16:4, pp. 439 – 62.
Lakonishok, Josef and Alan C. Shapiro. 1986. Roll, Richard. 1977. “A Critique of the Asset
Systemaitc Risk, Total Risk, and Size as Determi- Pricing Theory’s Tests’ Part I: On Past and Po-
nants of Stock Market Returns.“ Journal of Bank- tential Testability of the Theory.” Journal of Fi-
ing and Finance. 10:1, pp. 115–32. nancial Economics. 4:2, pp. 129 –76.
Lakonishok, Josef, Andrei Shleifer and Rob- Rosenberg, Barr, Kenneth Reid and Ronald
ert W. Vishny. 1994. “Contrarian Investment, Lanstein. 1985. “Persuasive Evidence of Market
Extrapolation, and Risk.” Journal of Finance. 49:5, Inefficiency.” Journal of Portfolio Management.
pp. 1541–578. Spring, 11, pp. 9 –17.
Lintner, John. 1965. “The Valuation of Risk Ross, Stephen A. 1976. “The Arbitrage Theory
Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in of Capital Asset Pricing.” Journal of Economic The-
Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets.” Review of ory. 13:3, pp. 341– 60.
Economics and Statistics. 47:1, pp. 13–37. Sharpe, William F. 1964. “Capital Asset Prices:
Loughran, Tim and Jay. R. Ritter. 1995. “The A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Condi-
New Issues Puzzle.” Journal of Finance. 50:1, tions of Risk.” Journal of Finance. 19:3, pp. 425–
pp. 23–51. 42.
Markowitz, Harry. 1952. “Portfolio Selection.” Stambaugh, Robert F. 1982. “On The Exclu-
Journal of Finance. 7:1, pp. 77–99. sion of Assets from Tests of the Two-Parameter
Markowitz, Harry. 1959. Portfolio Selection: Effi- Model: A Sensitivity Analysis.” Journal of Financial
cient Diversification of Investments. Cowles Founda- Economics. 10:3, pp. 237– 68.
tion Monograph No. 16. New York: John Wiley & Stattman, Dennis. 1980. “Book Values and
Sons, Inc. Stock Returns.” The Chicago MBA: A Journal of
Merton, Robert C. 1973. “An Intertemporal Selected Papers. 4, pp. 25– 45.
Capital Asset Pricing Model.” Econometrica. 41:5, Stein, Jeremy. 1996. “Rational Capital Budget-
pp. 867– 87. ing in an Irrational World.” Journal of Business.
Miller, Merton and Myron Scholes. 1972. 69:4, pp. 429 –55.
“Rates of Return in Relation to Risk: A Reexam- Tobin, James. 1958. “Liquidity Preference as
ination of Some Recent Findings,” in Studies in Behavior Toward Risk.” Review of Economic Stud-
the Theory of Capital Markets. Michael C. Jensen, ies. 25:2, pp. 65– 86.
ed. New York: Praeger, pp. 47–78. Vuolteenaho, Tuomo. 2002. “What Drives
Mitchell, Mark L. and Erik Stafford. 2000. Firm Level Stock Returns?” Journal of Finance.
“Managerial Decisions and Long-Term Stock 57:1, pp. 233– 64.
This article has been cited by:

1. Alfonso Guarino, Domenico Santoro, Luca Grilli, Rocco Zaccagnino, Mario Balbi. 202⒋ EvoFolio: a
portfolio optimization method based on multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. Neural Computing
and Applications 36:13, 7221-724⒊ [Crossref]
2. Bo Yan, Mengru Liang, Yinxin Zhao. 202⒋ Market sentiment and price dynamics in weak markets:
A comprehensive empirical analysis of the soybean meal option market. Journal of Futures Markets
44:5, 744-76⒍ [Crossref]
⒊ Tobias Kruse, Myra Mohnen, Misato Sato. 202⒋ Do Financial Markets Respond to Green
Opportunities?. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 11:3, 549-57⒍
[Crossref]
⒋ Steven D. Silver, Marko Raseta. 202⒋ Financial market shocks and portfolio rebalancing. Managerial
Finance 50:5, 944-96⒏ [Crossref]
⒌ Anu Krishnamurthy. Beyond Rationality 409-42⒎ [Crossref]
⒍ Yi Fang, Xin Zhou, Yi-Feng Wen, Qi-Lang Ou. 202⒋ Volume and stock returns in the Chinese
market. International Review of Financial Analysis 5, 10326⒌ [Crossref]
⒎ Fazıl Gökgöz, Canan Seyhan. 202⒋ Benchmarking asset pricing models in emerging markets: evidence
from Borsa Istanbul. Journal of Economic Studies 7. . [Crossref]
⒏ M Hashem Pesaran, Takashi Yamagata. 202⒋ Testing for Alpha in Linear Factor Pricing Models with
a Large Number of Securities. Journal of Financial Econometrics 22:2, 407-460. [Crossref]
⒐ MUHAMMAD RAMZAN KALHORO, SURESH KUMAR, KHALID AHMED, AMEET
KUMAR. 202⒋ DYNAMIC LINKAGES BETWEEN ECONOMIC POLICY UNCERTAINTY
AND STOCK MARKET INTEGRATION: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM SAARC REGION.
The Singapore Economic Review 47, 1-2⒎ [Crossref]
⒑ Zynobia Barson, Kwame Simpe Ofori, Peterson Owusu Junior, Kwabena G. Boakye, George Oppong
Appiagyei Ampong. 202⒋ Time-varying Connectedness Between ESG Stocks and BRVM Traditional
Stocks. Journal of Emerging Market Finance 93. . [Crossref]
⒒ Wim Voordeckers, Maria J. Martinez-Romero, Alfonso A. Rojo-Ramirez. 202⒋ Family governance
practices and the minimum required rate of return in privately held family firms. International
Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 37. . [Crossref]
⒓ Marco Molteni. 202⒋ Competition, over‐branching and bank failures during the Great Depression:
New evidence from Italy. The Economic History Review 910. . [Crossref]
⒔ Aleksander Mercik, Tomasz Słoński, Marta Karaś. 202⒋ Understanding crypto-asset exposure: An
investigation of its impact on performance and stock sensitivity among listed companies. International
Review of Financial Analysis 92, 103070. [Crossref]
⒕ Aso Abdullah, Sibel Yamak, Anna Korzhenitskaya, Roya Rahimi, Jeanette McClellan. 202⒋
Sustainable development: The role of sustainability committees in achieving ESG targets. Business
Strategy and the Environment 33:3, 2250-226⒏ [Crossref]
⒖ Jinghong Xu, Difan Guo, Zi’an Zhao, Shaoqiang Liu. 202⒋ How social media expedites the crisis
spillover effect: A case study of Tesla's recall event. Public Relations Review 50:1, 102432. [Crossref]
⒗ John D. Foppert. 202⒋ The discount rate differential required for harvesting-by-dice-rolling to
outperform optimal rotation planning. Forest Policy and Economics 160, 10315⒋ [Crossref]
⒘ ########## ######### ##### ###### ######### ###### ###### .2024 .###### ##### ####
####### ####### ###### ### ##. Tikrit Journal of Administrative and Economic Sciences 17:56, 1,
154-172. [Crossref]
⒙ Oktay Ozkan, Asima Saleem, Nasir Khan, Andrew Adewale Alola. 202⒋ Global impact of geopolitical
oil price uncertainty and associated commodity prices on clean energy stocks. Energy & Environment
1. . [Crossref]
⒚ Gaurav Khemka, Yifu Tang, Geoffrey J. Warren. 202⒋ Cascade model for Australian housing.
Australian Economic Papers 96. . [Crossref]
⒛ Deevarshan Naidoo, Peter Brian Denton Moores-Pitt, Joseph Olorunfemi Akande. 202⒋ The
exchange rates volatilities impact on the stock and real estate markets in South Africa. International
Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis 5. . [Crossref]
21. Weiqi Liu, Zuojun Wen. 202⒋ The Time Secret of Chinese A-Share Systematic Risk: Overnight and
Intraday. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 60:1, 99-1⒓ [Crossref]
22. Scott Alan Carson. 202⒋ Independent and major equity market and commodity return sources around
the time of hydraulic fracking and horizontal drilling revolution: a differences-in-decompositions
approach. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 33:1, 26-4⒋ [Crossref]
2⒊ Hasan Fallahgoul, Vincentius Franstianto, Xin Lin. 202⒋ Asset pricing with neural networks:
Significance tests. Journal of Econometrics 238:1, 10557⒋ [Crossref]
2⒋ Martina Kánová, Josef Drábek, Petar Ćurić, Andreja Pirc Barčić. 202⒋ Quantification of Expected
Return of Investment in Wood Processing Sectors in Slovakia. Forests 15:1, 7⒌ [Crossref]
2⒌ Youssef Louraoui. 202⒋ Impact of COVID-19 on Factor-Based Investment Strategies in the US
Equity Market. SSRN Electronic Journal 4. . [Crossref]
2⒍ Thilini V. Mahanama, Abootaleb Shirvani, Svetlozar Rachev, Frank J. Fabozzi. 202⒋ The Financial
Market of Indices of Socioeconomic Well-Being. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 17:1, 3⒌
[Crossref]
2⒎ Pham Dan Khanh, Le Quy Duong, Pham Vu Anh. 202⒋ Testing multifactor asset pricing models in
the stock market. Corporate and Business Strategy Review 5:1, 117-12⒍ [Crossref]
2⒏ Bruno Gašperov, Marko Đurasević, Domagoj Jakobovic. Finding Near-Optimal Portfolios
with Quality-Diversity 3-⒙ [Crossref]
2⒐ Giuseppe Travaglini, Giorgio Calcagnini, Alessandro Bellocchi. Consumption and Portfolio Rules
57-8⒌ [Crossref]
30. Georgios Kyriazopoulos. 202⒋ Mergers and acquisitions bank strategy against systematic risk before
the COVID-19 pandemic. Corporate and Business Strategy Review 5:2, 163-17⒋ [Crossref]
31. Hammad Siddiqi. 202⒋ Asset Pricing in the Resource-Constrained Brain. SSRN Electronic Journal
81. . [Crossref]
32. Ra’fat Jallad, Fatheyeh Hakam Najar. The Sustainability of Earnings and the Impact of Income
Smoothing on the Profitability of Companies: A Case of Palestine 987-99⒌ [Crossref]
3⒊ Yongkil Ahn, Alfred Qi Fan, Don Noh, Stella Y. Park. 202⒋ Retail Trading Intensity and the
Overnight-Intraday Return Gap. SSRN Electronic Journal 53. . [Crossref]
3⒋ Rana Palwishah, Muhammad Kashif, Mobeen Ur Rehman, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh Al-Faryan.
202⒋ Asymmetric liquidity risk and currency returns before and during COVID-19 pandemic.
International Review of Financial Analysis 91, 1029⒚ [Crossref]
3⒌ Udo Milkau. Konzepte für extreme Ereignisse 59-122. [Crossref]
3⒍ Stephen Penman. 202⒊ Accounting for Uncertainty. Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium,
ahead of print. [Crossref]
3⒎ А.А. Пріщенко. 202⒊ ПРИЙНЯТТЯ РІШЕНЬ В ТОЧКАХ БІФУРКАЦІЇ РОЗВИТКУ ФІНАНСОВО-
ЕКОНОМІЧНИХ СИСТЕМ: ПРИЧИНИ, НАСЛІДКИ, ШЛЯХИ ЗНИЖЕННЯ НЕВИЗНАЧЕНОСТІ.
Управління змінами та інновації :8, 35-42. [Crossref]
3⒏ Stefan Anchev, Nicha Lapanan. 202⒊ Investor Base Size and Underreaction-Consistent Stock Return
Anomalies. European Accounting Review 73, 1-3⒋ [Crossref]
3⒐ Yihuang Guo, Rui Zhao, Chunyan Gou. Mining Alpha Factors in Financial Markets using Multi-
Frequency Timing Residual Networks 2508-25⒔ [Crossref]
40. Darryl Biggar. 202⒊ A re-examination of the foundations of the cost of capital for regulatory purposes.
Journal of Regulatory Economics 64:1-3, 1-3⒊ [Crossref]
41. Sama Haddad. 202⒊ Global Financial Market Integration: A Literature Survey. Journal of Risk and
Financial Management 16:12, 49⒌ [Crossref]
42. Keith Davey, Raul Ochoa-Cabrero. 202⒊ Extended finite similitude and dimensional analysis for
scaling. Journal of Engineering Mathematics 143:1. . [Crossref]
4⒊ Gerda Kirpson, Martti Randveer, Nicolas Reigl, Karsten Staehr, Lenno Uusküla. 202⒊
Macroeconomic news and sovereign interest rate spreads before and during quantitative easing. Applied
Economics 3, 1-⒕ [Crossref]
4⒋ Mazhar Farid Chishti, Rizwana Bashir, Tanja Mancinelli, Rana Tanveer Hussain. 202⒊ Humanoid
psychological sentiments and enigma of investment. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences
39:4, 1260-127⒍ [Crossref]
4⒌ Daniel Andrei, Julien Cujean, Mungo Wilson. 202⒊ The Lost Capital Asset Pricing Model. Review
of Economic Studies 90:6, 2703-2762. [Crossref]
4⒍ Jan A. Kempkes, Francesco Suprano, Andreas Wömpener. 202⒊ An empirical evaluation of dynamic
approaches for estimating firms’ expected cost of equity capital. Financial Review 58:4, 859-88⒍
[Crossref]
4⒎ Godfred Aawaar, Louis Logogye, Daniel Domeher. 202⒊ Equity return volatility in Africa’s stock
markets: A dynamic panel approach. Cogent Economics & Finance 11:2. . [Crossref]
4⒏ Maya Jalloul, Mirela Miescu. 202⒊ Equity market connectedness across regimes of geopolitical risks:
Historical evidence and theory. Journal of International Money and Finance 137, 1029⒑ [Crossref]
4⒐ Georgios D. Karatzinis, Nikolaos A. Apostolikas, Yiannis S. Boutalis, George A. Papakostas.
202⒊ Fuzzy Cognitive Networks in Diverse Applications Using Hybrid Representative Structures.
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems 25:7, 2534-255⒋ [Crossref]
50. Siyuan Tang. 202⒊ Price limit performance: New evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China's
ChiNext market. International Review of Financial Analysis 89, 10274⒎ [Crossref]
51. Tilla IZSÁK, László MARÁK, Mihály ORMOS. 202⒊ EVALUATION OF SUPPORT VECTOR
MACHINE BASED STOCK PRICE PREDICTION. Applied Computer Science 19:3, 64-82.
[Crossref]
52. Viktor V. KURLYANDSKII, Aleksandr N. BILANENKO. 202⒊ Using a foreign exchange market
asset as a benchmark to assess investment risks in the stock market. Digest Finance 28:3, 271-28⒏
[Crossref]
5⒊ Yuhua Yu, Carola Salvi, Maxi Becker, Mark Beeman. 202⒊ Solving problems with an Aha! increases
risk preference. Thinking & Reasoning 1-22. [Crossref]
5⒋ Antony Millner, Geoffrey Heal. 202⒊ Choosing the Future: Markets, Ethics, and Rapprochement in
Social Discounting. Journal of Economic Literature 61:3, 1037-108⒎ [Abstract] [View PDF article]
[PDF with links]
5⒌ Bart Claassen, Lammertjan Dam, Pim Heijnen. 202⒊ Corporate financing policies, financial leverage,
and stock returns. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance 68, 101992. [Crossref]
5⒍ Daniel Andrei, Henry Friedman, N. Bugra Ozel. 202⒊ Economic uncertainty and investor attention.
Journal of Financial Economics 149:2, 179-2⒘ [Crossref]
5⒎ Maurizio Montone. 202⒊ Beta, value, and growth: Do dichotomous risk-preferences explain stock
returns?. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance 69, 10083⒋ [Crossref]
5⒏ Wei Liu, James Kolari, Seppo Pynnonen. The CAPM is Not Dead: It Works Better for Average Daily
Returns . [Crossref]
5⒐ Antonio Salvi, Felice Petruzzella, Nicola Raimo, Filippo Vitolla. 202⒊ Transparency in the
digitalization choices and the cost of equity capital. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets 15:4,
630-64⒍ [Crossref]
60. Luis R. Gómez-Mejia, Francesco Chirico, Geoffrey Martin, Massimo Baù. 202⒊ Best Among the
Worst or Worst Among the Best ? Socioemotional Wealth and Risk-Performance Returns for
Family and Non-family Firms Under Financial Distress. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 47:4,
1031-105⒏ [Crossref]
61. Jiawei Wang, Zhen Chen. 202⒊ Exploring Low-Risk Anomalies: A Dynamic CAPM Utilizing a
Machine Learning Approach. Mathematics 11:14, 32⒛ [Crossref]
62. Elliot Beck, Gianluca De Nard, Michael Wolf. 202⒊ Improved inference in financial factor models.
International Review of Economics & Finance 86, 364-37⒐ [Crossref]
6⒊ Sercan Demiralay, Gaye Gencer, Erhan Kilincarslan. 202⒊ Risk-return profile of environmentally
friendly assets: Evidence from the NASDAQ OMX green economy index family. Journal of
Environmental Management 337, 11768⒊ [Crossref]
6⒋ Ke Wang, Alexander Franks, Sang-Yun Oh. 202⒊ Learning Gaussian graphical models with latent
confounders. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 40, 1052⒔ [Crossref]
6⒌ Jun Kyung Auh, Wonho Cho. 202⒊ Factor-based portfolio optimization. Economics Letters 228,
11113⒎ [Crossref]
6⒍ ## #, ## #. 202⒊ #### ### ## ###### #### ## ##*. Korean Accounting Journal 32:3, 37-6⒎ [Crossref]
6⒎ Mutaju Isaack Marobhe, Pastory Dickson. 202⒊ Bearish conditions and volatility persistence during
COVID-19 can microchip stocks weather the storm?. Review of Behavioral Finance 15:4, 511-53⒊
[Crossref]
6⒏ Thomas Lindner, Jonas Puck, Giulia Stocco. 202⒊ Asymmetric risk perception and firm financing in
the institutional envelope. International Business Review 32:3, 10206⒎ [Crossref]
6⒐ Daniele G. Gioia, Jacopo Fior, Luca Cagliero. 202⒊ Early portfolio pruning: a scalable approach to
hybrid portfolio selection. Knowledge and Information Systems 65:6, 2485-250⒏ [Crossref]
70. Adrian Fuhrer, Thorsten Hock. 202⒊ Uncertainty in the Black–Litterman model: Empirical
estimation of the equilibrium. Journal of Empirical Finance 72, 251-27⒌ [Crossref]
71. Mao-Wei Hung, Andy Jia-Yuh Yeh. 202⒊ Stock market alphas help predict macroeconomic
innovations. Macroeconomic Dynamics 128, 1-3⒌ [Crossref]
72. Sudhansu Sekhar Nanda. A Systematic Review of the Literature on Financial Applications of
Predictive Analytics 60-81. [Crossref]
7⒊ Xunyuan Rui. 202⒊ Influencing factors of stock returns based on Fama–French model and intelligent
algorithm. Soft Computing 15. . [Crossref]
7⒋ Xiaolin Sun, Jun Ma, Haifeng Guo, Hailong Liu. 202⒊ The dynamic impacts of skewness on the risk–
return relationship in the dry bulk spot freight rates and FFAs. Applied Economics 55:18, 1991-200⒋
[Crossref]
7⒌ Ehab Yamani. 202⒊ Return–volume nexus in financial markets: A survey of research. Research in
International Business and Finance 65, 1019⒑ [Crossref]
7⒍ Azarya Putra Ari, Jordy Siwu, Merlyn Sari Sambur, Sisilia Kristiana Kawulur. 202⒊ The return
response on gold and crude oil during global geopolitical issues. The Contrarian : Finance, Accounting,
and Business Research 2:1, 12-⒘ [Crossref]
7⒎ Jiajing Yao. 202⒊ Empirical analysis on construction of mimicking factors and its effect on model
adequacy in the Fama-French three-factor model. BCP Business & Management 38, 164-17⒋
[Crossref]
7⒏ Michael Hasler, Charles Martineau. 202⒊ Explaining the Failure of the Unconditional CAPM with
the Conditional CAPM. Management Science 69:3, 1835-185⒌ [Crossref]
7⒐ Olivier Mesly. 202⒊ Irrational exuberance and deception — Why markets spin out of control. Journal
of Behavioral and Experimental Finance 37, 10070⒎ [Crossref]
80. Vasco Vendrame, Cherif Guermat, Jon Tucker. 202⒊ A conditional higher-moment CAPM.
International Review of Financial Analysis 86, 10252⒋ [Crossref]
81. Luyanda M.Q. Nsibande, Avani Sebastian. 202⒊ Is the environmental, social and corporate governance
score the missing factor in the Fama-French five-factor model?. South African Journal of Economic and
management Sciences 26:1. . [Crossref]
82. Xijing Huang, Ruizhe Zhang, Caiwei Lv, Fengyue Zhu. 202⒊ The Effectiveness of CAPM and Fama-
French Three-Factor Models in Healthcare and Real Estate Industries. BCP Business & Management
39, 459-46⒏ [Crossref]
8⒊ Viet Hoang Le, Hans-Jörg von Mettenheim, Stéphane Goutte, Fei Liu. 202⒊ News-based sentiment:
can it explain market performance before and after the Russia–Ukraine conflict?. The Journal of Risk
Finance 24:1, 72-8⒏ [Crossref]
8⒋ Hardeep Singh Mundi. 202⒊ Risk neutral variances to compute expected returns using data from
S&P BSE 100 firms—a replication study. Management Review Quarterly 73:1, 215-230. [Crossref]
8⒌ Naga Pillada, Sangeetha Rangasamy. 202⒊ An empirical investigation of investor sentiment and
volatility of realty sector market in India: an application of the DCC–GARCH model. SN Business
& Economics 3:2. . [Crossref]
8⒍ Ludovic Calès, Apostolos Chalkis, Ioannis Z. Emiris, Vissarion Fisikopoulos. 202⒊ Practical volume
approximation of high-dimensional convex bodies, applied to modeling portfolio dependencies and
financial crises. Computational Geometry 109, 1019⒗ [Crossref]
8⒎ Ingolf Dittmann, Maurizio Montone, Yuhao Zhu. 202⒊ Wage gap and stock returns: Do investors
dislike pay inequality?. Journal of Corporate Finance 78, 102322. [Crossref]
8⒏ Joseph Emmanuel Tetteh, Christopher Boachie. 202⒊ Are the saving decision patterns of bank
customers also clouded by psychological biases? Evidence from Ghana. Review of Behavioral Finance
15:1, 1-⒙ [Crossref]
8⒐ Anton Gerunov. Standard Risk Metrics 41-7⒐ [Crossref]
90. Konstantin B. Kostin, Philippe Runge, Leyla E. Mamedova. 202⒊ Validity of the Fama-French Three-
and Five-Factor Models in Crisis Settings at the Example of Select Energy-Sector Companies during
the COVID-19 Pandemic. Mathematics 11:1, 4⒐ [Crossref]
91. Meng-Horng Lee, Chee-Wooi Hooy, Robert Brooks. 202⒊ A New Measure for Idiosyncratic Risk
Based on Decomposition Method. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 16:1, 4⒊ [Crossref]
92. Jorge Armando Bedoya-Cadavid, Ángela María Lanzas-Duque, Harold Salazar. 202⒊ WACC for
Electric Power Transmission System Operators: The Case of Colombia. Energies 16:2, 96⒋ [Crossref]
9⒊ Afees A. Salisu, Idris Adediran, Philip C. Omoke, Jean Paul Tchankam. 202⒊ Gold and tail risks.
Resources Policy 80, 10315⒋ [Crossref]
9⒋ Joaquim Miranda Sarmento. Taxation in Finance 87-1⒒ [Crossref]
 9⒌ James W. Kolari, Seppo Pynnönen. The Zero-Beta CAPM 85-10⒋ [Crossref]
9⒍ James W. Kolari, Seppo Pynnönen. Multifactor Models 139-15⒋ [Crossref]
9⒎ Pengfei Sun, Yuhui Wang, Yumu Wang. Analysis of Chinese and American Banking Stocks Based on
CAPM Model 578-58⒍ [Crossref]
9⒏ Massimiliano Neri. The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Dead and Kicking 209-22⒌ [Crossref]
9⒐ Matteo Maggiolo, Oleg Szehr. 202⒊ Overfitting in Portfolio Optimization. SSRN Electronic Journal
61. . [Crossref]
100. Benedicto Kulwizira Lukanima. The Cost of Equity 339-40⒐ [Crossref]
101. Sarbjit Singh, Kulwinder Singh Parmar, Jatinder Kaur. Forecasting volatility in the stock market data
using GARCH, EGARCH, and GJR models 207-2⒛ [Crossref]
102. Adam Patterson. Valuation Versus Pricing: A Conceptual and Practical Guide to Estimate Economic
Value for Early-Stage Companies Via DCF 67-102. [Crossref]
10⒊ Hui Qi Zhang. The Impact of Different Phases of COVID-19 on the Airline, Financial Services, and
Healthcare Industry 1713-1721. [Crossref]
10⒋ Volker Ziemann. Portfoliotheorie und CAPM 15-2⒐ [Crossref]
10⒌ Ronald Ravinesh Kumar, Peter Josef Stauvermann, Shasnil Avinesh Chand. Investment analysis based
on portfolio optimization: A case of Fiji's stock market . [Crossref]
10⒍ Celso Brunetti, Nathan Foley-Fisher, Stephane Verani. 202⒊ Measuring Interest Rate Risk
Management by Financial Institutions. SSRN Electronic Journal 110. . [Crossref]
10⒎ Álvaro Cartea, Mihai Cucuringu, Qi Jin. 202⒊ Correlation Matrix Clustering for Statistical Arbitrage
Portfolios. SSRN Electronic Journal 53. . [Crossref]
10⒏ Armen V. Papazian. The Risk and Time Value of Money 11-2⒎ [Crossref]
10⒐ Hwagyun Kim, John Leonardy. 202⒊ Beta X Forecast Dispersion. SSRN Electronic Journal 55. .
[Crossref]
1⒑ Michael Gropper. 202⒊ Lawyers Setting the Menu: The Effects of Litigation Risk on Employer-
Sponsored Retirement Plans. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
1⒒ Gary Smith, Margaret Smith. Investing ⒌0—Factor Models, Algorithms, and Chasing Alpha 85-102.
[Crossref]
1⒓ Tom P. Davis. High Mathematics Meets High Finance 1-32. [Crossref]
1⒔ James W. Kolari, Wei Liu, Seppo Pynnönen. Multifactor Asset Pricing Models 43-5⒌ [Crossref]
1⒕ James W. Kolari, Wei Liu, Seppo Pynnönen. Net Long Portfolio Performance Analyses 149-16⒏
[Crossref]
1⒖ James W. Kolari, Wei Liu, Seppo Pynnönen. The Future of Investment Practice, Artificial Intelligence,
and Machine Learning 237-24⒎ [Crossref]
1⒗ Marco Molteni. 202⒊ Financial Development, Overbanking, and Bank Failures During the Great
Depression: New Evidence From Italy. SSRN Electronic Journal 72. . [Crossref]
1⒘ Stefan Anchev, Nicha Lapanan. 202⒊ Stock Market Participation and Accounting Information. SSRN
Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
1⒙ Xiangqi Ma. 2022. Optimal Portfolio with Pension under Three Models: Mean-Variance, CAPM and
FF3F. BCP Business & Management 35, 723-72⒐ [Crossref]
1⒚ Haidar Alqadhib, Nada Kulendran, Lalith Seelanatha. 2022. Impact of COVID-19 on mutual fund
performance in Saudi Arabia. Cogent Economics & Finance 10:1. . [Crossref]
1⒛ Daitri Tiwary, Khanindra Ch. Das, Jagdish Shettigar, Pooja Misra. 2022. Exchange Rate Volatility and
Financial Stress: Evidence from Developing Asia. Journal of Emerging Market Finance 21:4, 355-38⒋
[Crossref]
121. Si Ying Zhang. 2022. Are investors sensitive to climate-related transition and physical risks? Evidence
from global stock markets. Research in International Business and Finance 62, 1017⒑ [Crossref]
122. Zhen He, Fergal O’Connor, Jacco Thijssen. 2022. Identifying proxies for risk-free assets: Evidence
from the zero-beta capital asset pricing model. Research in International Business and Finance 63,
10177⒌ [Crossref]
12⒊ José Clemente Jacinto Ferreira, Ana Paula Matias Gama, Luiz Paulo Fávero, Ricardo Goulart Serra,
Patrícia Belfiore, Igor Pinheiro de Araújo Costa, Marcos dos Santos. 2022. Economic Performance
and Stock Market Integration in BRICS and G7 Countries: An Application with Quantile Panel Data
and Random Coefficients Modeling. Mathematics 10:21, 40⒔ [Crossref]
12⒋ Hector O. Zapata, Supratik Mukhopadhyay. 2022. A Bibliometric Analysis of Machine Learning
Econometrics in Asset Pricing. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 15:11, 53⒌ [Crossref]
12⒌ Thorsten Hens, Fatemeh Naebi. 2022. Behavioral heterogeneity in the CAPM with evolutionary
dynamics. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 32:5, 1499-1521. [Crossref]
12⒍ Michael V Klibanov, Aleksander A Shananin, Kirill V Golubnichiy, Sergey M Kravchenko. 2022.
Forecasting stock options prices via the solution of an ill-posed problem for the Black–Scholes
equation. Inverse Problems 38:11, 11500⒏ [Crossref]
12⒎ Daniel Broby. 2022. The use of predictive analytics in finance. The Journal of Finance and Data Science
8, 145-161. [Crossref]
12⒏ Harald Puhr, Jakob Müllner. 2022. Foreign to all but fluent in many: The effect of multinationality
on shock resilience. Journal of World Business 57:6, 101370. [Crossref]
12⒐ Irene Fafaliou, Maria Giaka, Dimitrios Konstantios, Michael Polemis. 2022. Firms’ ESG reputational
risk and market longevity: A firm-level analysis for the United States. Journal of Business Research
149, 161-17⒎ [Crossref]
130. Yundi Gao, Zhenyu Hu. 2022. The Comparison between CAPM and FF3 Model: Evidence from
America. BCP Business & Management 26, 462-46⒎ [Crossref]
131. Yuhao Lin, Jiacheng Qing, Xinyuan Wang. 2022. Does the Sci-Tech Innovation Board Make the
Chinese Market Better? From the Perspective of the Factor Model. BCP Business & Management 26,
580-58⒏ [Crossref]
132. Marco Lazzarino, Jenny Berrill, Aleksandar Šević. 2022. The importance of distinguishing between
precious and industrial metals when investing in mining stocks. Resources Policy 78, 102802. [Crossref]
13⒊ Seza Danışoğlu, Baki Cem Sahin. 2022. Ambiguity and asset pricing: An empirical investigation for
an emerging market. International Review of Financial Analysis 77, 10233⒏ [Crossref]
13⒋ Xiang Lin, Martin Thomas Falk. 2022. Nordic stock market performance of the travel and leisure
industry during the first wave of Covid-19 pandemic. Tourism Economics 28:5, 1240-125⒎ [Crossref]
13⒌ Dafydd Mali, Hyoung-Joo Lim. 2022. Does relative (absolute) efficiency affect capital costs?. Annals
of Operations Research 315:2, 1037-1060. [Crossref]
13⒍ Joseph Falzon, Elaine Bonnici. 2022. Does it pay to be a faithful investor? A risk-based approach
performance analysis of Islamic funds vs UCITS schemes. Islamic Economic Studies 29:2, 100-1⒙
[Crossref]
13⒎ Pin-Te Lin. 2022. Intertemporal Risk-Return Relationship in Housing Markets. Journal of Real Estate
Research 44:3, 331-35⒋ [Crossref]
13⒏ Yen-Sheng Lee. 2022. Representative Bias and Pairs Trade: Evidence From S&P 500 and Russell 2000
Indexes. SAGE Open 12:3, 21582440221120⒊ [Crossref]
13⒐ Kwamie Dunbar, Johnson Owusu-Amoako. 2022. Cryptocurrency returns under empirical asset
pricing. International Review of Financial Analysis 82, 1022⒗ [Crossref]
140. Giovanni Catello Landi, Francesca Iandolo, Antonio Renzi, Andrea Rey. 2022. Embedding
sustainability in risk management: The impact of environmental, social, and governance ratings
on corporate financial risk. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 29:4,
1096-110⒎ [Crossref]
141. Francesco Bravo. 2022. Misspecified semiparametric model selection with weakly dependent
observations. Journal of Time Series Analysis 43:4, 558-58⒍ [Crossref]
142. Ron Alquist, Benjamin R. Chabot, Ram Yamarthy. 2022. The price of property rights: Institutions,
finance, and economic growth. Journal of International Economics 137, 10359⒋ [Crossref]
14⒊ James W. Kolari, Jianhua Z. Huang, Hilal Anwar Butt, Huiling Liao. 2022. International tests of the
ZCAPM asset pricing model. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money 79,
10160⒎ [Crossref]
14⒋ Aidan Vining, Mark Moore, Claude Laurin. 2022. Listed public–private enterprises: stock market
information, agency costs and productive efficiency outcomes. International Journal of Public Sector
Management 35:4, 388-40⒐ [Crossref]
14⒌ Jessie Y. Zhu, Wally Smieliauskas. 2022. Evidence on the Economic Consequences of Marriage
Equality and LGBT Human Rights. Journal of Business Ethics 178:1, 57-70. [Crossref]
14⒍ Lorne N. Switzer, Nabil El Meslmani, Xinkai Zhai. 2022. IPO Performance and the Size Effect:
Evidence for the US and Canada. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance 10174⒋
[Crossref]
14⒎ Kam Fong Chan, Terry Marsh. 2022. Asset pricing on earnings announcement days. Journal of
Financial Economics 144:3, 1022-1042. [Crossref]
14⒏ Muhammad Suhail Rizwan, Ghufran Ahmad, Dawood Ashraf. 2022. Systemic risk, Islamic banks, and
the COVID-19 pandemic: An empirical investigation. Emerging Markets Review 51, 100890. [Crossref]
14⒐ Jian Zhang, Jie Li. 2022. Factorized estimation of high‐dimensional nonparametric covariance models.
Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 49:2, 542-56⒎ [Crossref]
150. Asgar Ali, Hajam Abid Bashir. 2022. Bibliometric study on asset pricing. Qualitative Research in
Financial Markets 14:3, 433-460. [Crossref]
151. Mabekebeke Segojane, Godfrey Ndlovu. 2022. An Investigation of the Beta Anomaly in Emerging
Markets: A South African Case. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 15:5, 2⒕ [Crossref]
152. Ruhana Zareen Gofran, Andros Gregoriou, Lawrence Haar. 2022. Impact of Coronavirus on liquidity
in financial markets. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money 78, 101561.
[Crossref]
15⒊ James Chong. 2022. A trading strategy with dual-beta estimates. Managerial Finance 48:5, 720-732.
[Crossref]
15⒋ Christian-Oliver Ewald, Erik Haugom, Leslie Kanthan, Gudbrand Lien, Pariya Salehi, Ståle Størdal.
2022. Salmon futures and the Fish Pool market in the context of the CAPM and a three-factor model.
Aquaculture Economics & Management 26:2, 171-191. [Crossref]
15⒌ Alessandra Insana. 2022. Does systematic risk change when markets close? An analysis using stocks’
beta. Economic Modelling 109, 105782. [Crossref]
15⒍ Danny Zhao‐Xiang Huang. 2022. Environmental, social and governance factors and assessing firm
value: valuation, signalling and stakeholder perspectives. Accounting & Finance 62:S1, 1983-20⒑
[Crossref]
15⒎ Elena Shakina, Iuliia Naidenova, Angel Barajas. 2022. Shadow prices for intangible resources. Journal
of Intellectual Capital 23:3, 666-68⒍ [Crossref]
15⒏ Rodrigo Gonçalves Novais, Peter Wanke, Jorge Antunes, Yong Tan. 2022. Portfolio Optimization
with a Mean-Entropy-Mutual Information Model. Entropy 24:3, 36⒐ [Crossref]
15⒐ Jolanta Bijańska, Krzysztof Wodarski, Aneta Aleksander. 2022. Analysis of the Financing Options for
Pro-Ecological Projects. Energies 15:6, 214⒊ [Crossref]
160. James W. Kolari, Jianhua Z. Huang, Wei Liu, Huiling Liao. 2022. Further Tests of the ZCAPM
Asset Pricing Model. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 15:3, 13⒎ [Crossref]
161. Afees A. Salisu, Rangan Gupta, Qiang Ji. 2022. Forecasting oil prices over 150 years: The role of tail
risks. Resources Policy 75, 10250⒏ [Crossref]
162. Florin Cornel Dumiter, Florin Marius Turcaș. 2022. Theoretical and empirical underpinnings
regarding stock market forecasts and predictions. Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad – Economics
Series 32:1, 1-⒚ [Crossref]
16⒊ Alida Monaco. 2022. Divestment and greenhouse gas emissions: an event-study analysis of university
fossil fuel divestment announcements. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment 72, 1-2⒐ [Crossref]
16⒋ Faruk Balli, Md Iftekhar Hasan Chowdhury, Anne de Bruin. 2022. Transition to Islamic equities:
Systematic risk and Shari'ah compliance. Global Finance Journal 51, 100552. [Crossref]
16⒌ Lehlohonolo Letho, Grieve Chelwa, Abdul Latif Alhassan. 2022. Cryptocurrencies and portfolio
diversification in an emerging market. China Finance Review International 12:1, 20-50. [Crossref]
16⒍ Vanita Tripathi, Ritu Sapra, Rishabh Gupta. 2022. Are Fama–French Factors Relevant? A Sub-
Sectorial Analysis. IIMS Journal of Management Science 13:1, 89-1⒒ [Crossref]
16⒎ Dandan Zheng, Shusheng Ding, Tianxiang Cui, Huan Jin. 2022. Real Economy Effects on
Consumption-Based CAPM. Mathematics 10:3, 360. [Crossref]
16⒏ Francisco Vergara-Solana, Daniel Peñalosa-Martinell, Daniel Skerritt, Annie Mejaes, German Ponce-
Diaz, Fernando Aranceta-Garza, Fernando González-Laxe, Juan Carlos Seijo, U. Rashid Sumaila.
2022. Volatility and vulnerability in Mexican fisheries and aquaculture: Enhancing resilience via public
policy. Marine Policy 136, 10488⒏ [Crossref]
16⒐ Wen Zhang, Shaoshan Yan, Jian Li, Xin Tian, Taketoshi Yoshida. 2022. Credit risk prediction of
SMEs in supply chain finance by fusing demographic and behavioral data. Transportation Research
Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 158, 1026⒒ [Crossref]
170. Pi-Chun Hsu, Tsai-Jung Tsai, Tsai-yi Wang. Dynamic Financial Analysis for Performance Evaluation
in the Property Insurance Industry 560-56⒍ [Crossref]
171. Gerson de Souza Raimundo Júnior, Rafael Baptista Palazzi, Ricardo de Souza Tavares, Marcelo Cabus
Klotzle. 2022. Market Stress and Herding: A New Approach to the Cryptocurrency Market. Journal
of Behavioral Finance 23:1, 43-5⒎ [Crossref]
172. Steven D. Silver, Marko Raseta, Alina Bazarova. 2022. Dynamics of Phase Transitions in Expectations
for Financial Markets: An Agent-Based, Multicomponent Model. Journal of Behavioral Finance 23:1,
92-10⒌ [Crossref]
17⒊ Steve Keen. Economic Failures of the IPCC Process 161-182. [Crossref]
17⒋ Karolina Siemaszkiewicz. Investment in the Polish Real Estate Market – Housing “Beta” Coefficient
213-22⒋ [Crossref]
17⒌ Tobias Glas. An Asset Pricer’s Toolkit 7-2⒋ [Crossref]
17⒍ Ashenafi Fanta, Michael Graham, Daniel Asante-Amponsah. Structured Finance in Africa 373-40⒋
[Crossref]
17⒎ Qingquan Tony Zhang, Beibei Li, Danxia Xie. An Introduction to Quantitative Portfolio Management
and Risk Management 3-⒕ [Crossref]
17⒏ Jinhui Wei, Qingzhen Xu, Chengying He. 2022. Deep learning of predicting closing price through
historical adjustment closing price. Procedia Computer Science 202, 379-38⒋ [Crossref]
17⒐ Armen V. Papazian. Finance: A Value Paradigm and Equations Without Space 17-4⒏ [Crossref]
180. Armen V. Papazian. Integrating Impact into Value 171-191. [Crossref]
181. Konstantin B. Kostin, Philippe Runge, Michel Charifzadeh. 2022. An Analysis and Comparison
of Multi-Factor Asset Pricing Model Performance during Pandemic Situations in Developed and
Emerging Markets. Mathematics 10:1, 142. [Crossref]
182. Boris Korenak, Nikola Stakić. 2022. Investment performance attribution of the U.S. small-size value
mutual funds using Fama-French five-factor model. International Review :1-2, 17-2⒊ [Crossref]
18⒊ Cheng Zhao, Xiaohui Liu, Jie Zhou, Yuefeng Cen, Xiaomin Yao. 2022. GCN-based stock relations
analysis for stock market prediction. PeerJ Computer Science 8, e105⒎ [Crossref]
18⒋ Bill Jiang. Size Effect 103-1⒘ [Crossref]
18⒌ Bill Jiang. Volatility Effect 173-18⒊ [Crossref]
18⒍ Glen Lehman. Ontology and Reflection: The Internalist and Externalist Debate 11-⒙ [Crossref]
18⒎ Glen Lehman. Thinking About the Ontology of Social and Environmental Accounting and
Management 19-31. [Crossref]
18⒏ Thomas Sikes. 2022. Regulated Inequity: How Regulators’ Acceptance of Flawed Financial Analysis
Inflates the Profit of Public Utility Companies in the United States. SSRN Electronic Journal 52. .
[Crossref]
18⒐ Mao Guan, Xiao-Yang Liu. 2022. Explainable Deep Reinforcement Learning for Portfolio
Management: An Empirical Approach. SSRN Electronic Journal 18. . [Crossref]
190. Elliot Beck, Gianluca De Nard, Michael Wolf. 2022. Improved Inference in Financial Factor Models.
SSRN Electronic Journal 52. . [Crossref]
191. Tarun K. Mukherjee, Yuxin Huang, Wei Wang. 2022. Labor Protection and Financing Decisions of
Chinese Firms. SSRN Electronic Journal 31. . [Crossref]
192. Samuel G. B. Johnson, David Tuckett. 2022. Narrative expectations in financial forecasting. Journal
of Behavioral Decision Making 35:1. . [Crossref]
19⒊ Xiang Gao, Kees Koedijk, Maurizio Montone, Zhan Wang. 2022. The Prospect Capital Asset Pricing
Model: Theory and Empirics. SSRN Electronic Journal 74. . [Crossref]
19⒋ Federico Bastianello. 2022. Time-Series and Cross-Section of Risk Premia Expectations: A Bottom-
Up Approach. SSRN Electronic Journal 107. . [Crossref]
19⒌ Abhijeet Ghadge, Sarat Kumar Jena, Sachin Kamble, Dheeraj Misra, Manoj Kumar Tiwari. 2021.
Impact of financial risk on supply chains: a manufacturer-supplier relational perspective. International
Journal of Production Research 59:23, 7090-710⒌ [Crossref]
19⒍ James Ming Chen. 2021. This Is the Way the World Ends, Not With a Bang but Bonds and Bullets.
Frontiers in Climate 3. . [Crossref]
19⒎ Ali Habibnia, Esfandiar Maasoumi. 2021. Forecasting in Big Data Environments: An Adaptable and
Automated Shrinkage Estimation of Neural Networks (AAShNet). Journal of Quantitative Economics
19:S1, 363-381. [Crossref]
19⒏ Gabriel Augusto de Carvalho, Hudson Fernandes Amaral, Juliano Lima Pinheiro, Laíse Ferraz Correia.
2021. The pricing of anomalies using factor models: a test in Latin American markets. Revista
Contabilidade & Finanças 32:87, 492-50⒐ [Crossref]
19⒐ Mounir Sarraj, Anouar Ben Mabrouk. 2021. The Systematic Risk at the Crisis—A Multifractal Non-
Uniform Wavelet Systematic Risk Estimation. Fractal and Fractional 5:4, 13⒌ [Crossref]
200. Olivier Mesly. 2021. Buy Now and Pay (Dearly) Later: Unraveling Consumer Financial Spinning.
International Journal of Financial Studies 9:4, 5⒌ [Crossref]
201. Xingchen Wan, Jie Yang, Slavi Marinov, Jan-Peter Calliess, Stefan Zohren, Xiaowen Dong. 2021.
Sentiment correlation in financial news networks and associated market movements. Scientific Reports
11:1. . [Crossref]
202. Rim Zouari-Hadiji, Yamina Chouaibi. 2021. Corporate ethical behavior and the cost of equity capital:
evidence from the world’s most ethical companies. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting 19:5,
939-96⒋ [Crossref]
20⒊ Mao Guan, Xiao-Yang Liu. Explainable deep reinforcement learning for portfolio management 1-⒐
[Crossref]
20⒋ Qingyuan Han, Steve Keen. 2021. Aggregate excess demand on wall street. Heliyon 7:11, e0835⒌
[Crossref]
20⒌ Mikuláš Pýcha. 2021. Fair Insurance Cover for Export Credit Under OECD Pricing Framework.
Prague Economic Papers 30:5, 509-52⒏ [Crossref]
20⒍ Robin Maximilian Stetzka, Stefan Winter. 2021. How rational is gambling?. Journal of Economic
Surveys 1. . [Crossref]
20⒎ Indranil Ghosh, Tamal Datta Chaudhuri, Esteban Alfaro-Cortés, Matías Gámez Martínez, Noelia
García Rubio. 2021. Estimating the relative effects of raw material prices, sectoral outlook and market
sentiment on stock prices. Resources Policy 73, 10215⒏ [Crossref]
20⒏ Nebat Galo Mugenda, Tobias Olweny, Joshua M. Wepukhulu. 2021. Value Risk Premium and Stock
Returns in Kenya: Exploring the Moderating Effect of Investor Sentiment. Journal of Accounting and
Finance in Emerging Economies 7:3, 777-78⒎ [Crossref]
20⒐ Emie Famieza Zainudin, Hafiza Aishah Hashim, Shahnaz Ismail. 2021. The effect of the imposition
of a public reprimand on the stock price of companies in Malaysia. Journal of Financial Crime 28:4,
1232-124⒊ [Crossref]
2⒑ Daniel O Cajueiro, Saulo B Bastos, Camila C Pereira, Roberto F S Andrade. 2021. A model of indirect
contagion based on a news similarity network. Journal of Complex Networks 9:⒌ . [Crossref]
2⒒ Marcello Basili, Carlo Zappia. 2021. Financial markets and Keynes’s long-term expectations.
Cambridge Journal of Economics 45:5, 1047-106⒎ [Crossref]
2⒓ J E Woods. 2021. The safety of speculation …. Cambridge Journal of Economics 45:5, 1069-109⒎
[Crossref]
2⒔ Brandon Flores, Blessing Ofori-Atta, Andrey Sarantsev. 2021. A stock market model based on CAPM
and market size. Annals of Finance 17:3, 405-42⒋ [Crossref]
2⒕ Glen Lehman, Chris Mortensen. 2021. Finance, Nature and Ontology. Topoi 40:4, 715-72⒋
[Crossref]
2⒖ Gregory Price, Warren Whatley. 2021. Did profitable slave trading enable the expansion of empire?:
The Asiento de Negros, the South Sea Company and the financial revolution in Great Britain.
Cliometrica 15:3, 675-7⒙ [Crossref]
2⒗ James Ming Chen. 2021. The Capital Asset Pricing Model. Encyclopedia 1:3, 915-93⒊ [Crossref]
2⒘ Jamshid Karimov, Faruk Balli, Hatice Ozer‐Balli, Anne de Bruin. 2021. Firm‐level political risk and
Shari’ah compliance: equity capital cost and payouts policy. Accounting & Finance 61:3, 4639-466⒎
[Crossref]
2⒙ Seong K. Byun, Zhilu Lin, Siqi Wei. 2021. Are U.S. firms using more short-term debt?. Journal of
Corporate Finance 69, 1020⒓ [Crossref]
2⒚ Alibey KUDAR. 2021. OTOREGRESIF ARBİTRAJ FİYATLAMA VE SERMAYE
VARLIKLARINI FİYATLANDIRMA MODELLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI:
TÜRKİYE’DEKİ BANKACILIK SEKTÖRÜ İÇİN BİR UYGULAMA. Finansal Araştırmalar ve
Çalışmalar Dergisi 13:25, 637-64⒏ [Crossref]
2⒛ Suman Saha, Junbin Gao, Richard Gerlach. Stock Movement Prediction on Ex-Dividend Day Using
Event Specific Features and Machine Learning Techniques 1-⒑ [Crossref]
221. Jordan Bowes, Marcel Ausloos. 2021. Financial Risk and Better Returns through Smart Beta
Exchange-Traded Funds?. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 14:7, 28⒊ [Crossref]
222. Kam Fong Chan, Terry Marsh. 2021. Asset prices, midterm elections, and political uncertainty.
Journal of Financial Economics 141:1, 276-29⒍ [Crossref]
22⒊ Tong Zhao. An Empirical Study of China's Broad ESG Partial Equity Hybrid Fund 51-5⒎ [Crossref]
22⒋ Abdul Qoyum, Rizqi Umar Al Hashfi, Alyta Shabrina Zusryn, Hadri Kusuma, Ibnu Qizam. 2021.
Does an Islamic-SRI portfolio really matter? Empirical application of valuation models in Indonesia.
Borsa Istanbul Review 21:2, 105-12⒋ [Crossref]
22⒌ Christoph Merkle, Christoph J. Sextroh. 2021. Value and momentum from investors’ perspective:
Evidence from professionals’ risk-ratings. Journal of Empirical Finance 62, 159-17⒏ [Crossref]
22⒍ Joel M. Vanden. 2021. Equilibrium asset pricing and the cross section of expected returns. Annals of
Finance 17:2, 153-18⒍ [Crossref]
22⒎ Shaoping Wang, Lu Yu, Qing Zhao. 2021. Do factor models explain stock returns when prices behave
explosively? Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 67, 10153⒌ [Crossref]
22⒏ Xuanwu Yue, Qiao Gu, Deyun Wang, Huamin Qu, Yong Wang. 2021. iQUANT: Interactive
Quantitative Investment Using Sparse Regression Factors. Computer Graphics Forum 40:3, 189-200.
[Crossref]
22⒐ Semen Yu. BOGATYREV. 2021. Simulation of emotional differences in the structured query language
for databases of financial markets. Financial Analytics: Science and Experience 14:2, 156-17⒊ [Crossref]
230. Yiannis Karavias, Stella Spilioti, Elias Tzavalis. 2021. Investor sentiment effects on share price
deviations from their intrinsic values based on accounting fundamentals. Review of Quantitative Finance
and Accounting 56:4, 1593-1621. [Crossref]
231. Emanuel Kohlscheen, Előd Takáts. 2021. What can commercial property performance reveal about
bank valuations?. Journal of International Money and Finance 113, 102350. [Crossref]
232. Catalin Dragomirescu-Gaina, Dionisis Philippas, Mike G. Tsionas. 2021. Trading off accuracy for
speed: Hedge funds' decision-making under uncertainty. International Review of Financial Analysis 75,
10172⒏ [Crossref]
23⒊ Sergei Yu. BOGATYREV. 2021. Looking into bubbles in financial markets and the emotional side
of corporate forecast completion through modeling in the structured query language of financial
databases. Finance and Credit 27:4, 833-850. [Crossref]
23⒋ Muhammad Imran, Mengyun Wu, Linrong Zhang, Yun Zhao, Noor Jehan, Hee Cheol Moon. 2021.
Market Premium and Macroeconomic Factors as Determinants of Industry Premium: Evidence from
Emerging Economies. Complexity 2021, 1-⒒ [Crossref]
23⒌ Vu Tuan Chu, Trang Hanh Lam Pham. 2021. Zero leverage and product market competition. SN
Business & Economics 1:⒋ . [Crossref]
23⒍ MICHAEL UNGEHEUER, MARTIN WEBER. 2021. The Perception of Dependence, Investment
Decisions, and Stock Prices. The Journal of Finance 76:2, 797-84⒋ [Crossref]
23⒎ Thorsten Hens, Fatemeh Naebi. 2021. Behavioural heterogeneity in the capital asset pricing model
with an application to the low-beta anomaly. Applied Economics Letters 28:6, 501-50⒎ [Crossref]
23⒏ Sergei Yu. BOGATYREV. 2021. The sentiment analysis method in finance: The psychological-
financial index. Finance and Credit 27:3, 561-58⒋ [Crossref]
23⒐ Ade Imam Muslim, Doddy Setiawan. 2021. Information Asymmetry, Ownership Structure and Cost
of Equity Capital: The Formation for Open Innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology,
Market, and Complexity 7:1, 4⒏ [Crossref]
240. . Bibliography 264-272. [Crossref]
241. Karl-Heinz Tödter, Gerhard Ziebarth. 2021. Lifetime Cost of Living and Effective Prices: Theory
and Evidence for Germany. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 241:1, 29-6⒐ [Crossref]
242. Chaochao Jia, Weimin Pan, Lixian Li. Two Branch Risk Factors Model for Stock Prediction 361-36⒍
[Crossref]
24⒊ Nadia Anjum, Suresh Kumar Oad Rajput. 2021. Forecasting Islamic equity indices alpha. International
Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management 14:1, 183-20⒊ [Crossref]
24⒋ Brittany Tarufelli, Brian Snyder, David Dismukes. 2021. The Potential Impact of the U.S. Carbon
Capture and Storage Tax Credit Expansion on the Economic Feasibility of Industrial Carbon Capture
and Storage. Energy Policy 149, 11206⒋ [Crossref]
24⒌ Ze Zhang, Zilai Tang. 2021. Examination and Interpretation of the Quantitative Validity in China’s
Corporate-based Urban Network Analysis. Chinese Geographical Science 31:1, 41-5⒊ [Crossref]
24⒍ Alfonso A. Rojo-Ramírez. 2021. Rendimiento mínimo del inversor-propietario. El caso de la empresa
pyme familiar. Small Business International Review 5:1, e28⒎ [Crossref]
24⒎ Volker Ziemann. Portfolio Theory and CAPM 15-2⒏ [Crossref]
24⒏ James W. Kolari, Wei Liu, Jianhua Z. Huang. Cross-Sectional Tests of the ZCAPM 159-19⒌
[Crossref]
24⒐ Steve Keen. Burying Samuelson’s Multiplier-Accelerator and Resurrecting Goodwin’s Growth Cycle
in Minsky 495-5⒚ [Crossref]
250. Giuseppe Galloppo. Performance 43-150. [Crossref]
251. Harold L. Vogel. Rationality Rules 317-37⒐ [Crossref]
252. Olivier Dessaint, Jacques Olivier, Clemens A Otto, David Thesmar. 2021. CAPM-Based Company
(Mis)valuations. The Review of Financial Studies 34:1, 1-6⒍ [Crossref]
25⒊ Suman Saha, Junbin Gao, Richard Gerlach. 2021. Stock Ranking Prediction Using List-Wise
Approach and Node Embedding Technique. IEEE Access 9, 88981-8899⒍ [Crossref]
25⒋ James Ming Chen. 2021. The Capital Asset Pricing Model. SSRN Electronic Journal 23. . [Crossref]
25⒌ Sergio Copiello. 2021. Economic viability of building energy efficiency measures: a review on the
discount rate. AIMS Energy 9:2, 257-28⒌ [Crossref]
25⒍ Jhumur Sengupta. Application of Econometrics in Business Research 137-15⒐ [Crossref]
25⒎ Konstantin Kostin, Philippe Runge, Ronald Adams. 2021. Investment strategies in pandemic
situations: An analysis and comparison of prospective returns between developed and emerging
markets. Strategic Management 26:1, 34-52. [Crossref]
25⒏ İbrahim Ethem Güney, Abdullah Kazdal, Doruk Küçüksaraç, Muhammed Hasan Yılmaz. Exchange
Rate Sensitivity of Firm Value: Evidence from Nonfinancial Firms Listed on Borsa Istanbul 141-16⒌
[Crossref]
25⒐ Marcel Aloy, Floris Laly, Sébastien Laurent, Christelle Lecourt. Modeling Time-Varying Conditional
Betas. A Comparison of Methods with Application for REITs 229-26⒋ [Crossref]
260. James W. Kolari, Wei Liu, Jianhua Z. Huang. Capital Asset Pricing Models 25-52. [Crossref]
261. James W. Kolari, Wei Liu, Jianhua Z. Huang. Synopsis of Asset Pricing and the ZCAPM 261-28⒌
[Crossref]
262. Muhammad Suhail Rizwan, Ghufran Ahmad, Dawood Ashraf. 2021. Systemic Risk in Dual-Banking
Systems during the COVID-19 Pandemic. SSRN Electronic Journal 33. . [Crossref]
26⒊ James Ming Chen. 2021. This Is the Way the World Ends, Not with a Bang but Bonds and Bullets.
SSRN Electronic Journal 54. . [Crossref]
26⒋ Luis R. Gomez-Mejia, Francesco Chirico, Geoffrey Martin, Massimo Baù. 2021. Best Among the
Worst or Worst Among the Best? Socioemotional Wealth and Risk-Performance Returns for Family
and Non-Family Firms Under Financial Distress. SSRN Electronic Journal 18. . [Crossref]
26⒌ Maurizio Montone, Remco C.J. Zwinkels. 2021. Risk, return, and sentiment in a virtual asset market.
SSRN Electronic Journal 129. . [Crossref]
26⒍ Andy Yeh. 2021. Stock Market Alphas Help Predict Macroeconomic Innovations. SSRN Electronic
Journal 19. . [Crossref]
26⒎ Mario Situm. 2021. Determination of expected cost of equity with the CAPM: Theoretical extension
using the law of error propagation. Managerial and Decision Economics 42:1, 77-8⒋ [Crossref]
26⒏ Mingyi Hua. 2021. Decrypting the Digital Economy: The Digital Alpha and Its Origins. SSRN
Electronic Journal 110. . [Crossref]
26⒐ Rai Imtiaz Hussain, Shahid Bashir, Shahbaz Hussain. 20⒛ Financial Sustainability and Corporate
Social Responsibility Under Mediating Effect of Operational Self-Sustainability. Frontiers in
Psychology 11. . [Crossref]
270. Fabio B. Gaertner, Asad Kausar, Logan B. Steele. 20⒛ Negative accounting earnings and gross
domestic product. Review of Accounting Studies 25:4, 1382-140⒐ [Crossref]
271. Terrence Hendershott, Dmitry Livdan, Dominik Rösch. 20⒛ Asset pricing: A tale of night and day.
Journal of Financial Economics 138:3, 635-662. [Crossref]
272. Augustin Landier, David Thesmar. 20⒛ Earnings Expectations during the COVID-19 Crisis*. The
Review of Asset Pricing Studies 10:4, 598-6⒘ [Crossref]
27⒊ Matthew Wang, Yi-Hong Lin, Ilya Mikhelson. 20⒛ Regime-Switching Factor Investing with
Hidden Markov Models. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 13:12, 3⒒ [Crossref]
27⒋ Yuan Hu, Abootaleb Shirvani, W. Brent Lindquist, Frank J. Fabozzi, Svetlozar T. Rachev. 20⒛
Option Pricing Incorporating Factor Dynamics in Complete Markets. Journal of Risk and Financial
Management 13:12, 321. [Crossref]
27⒌ Balázs Csillag, Gábor Neszveda. 20⒛ A gazdasági várakozások hatása a tőzsdei momentumstratégiára.
Közgazdasági Szemle 67:11, 1093-11⒒ [Crossref]
27⒍ Ganggang Guo, Yulei Rao, Feida Zhu, Fang Xu. 20⒛ Innovative deep matching algorithm for stock
portfolio selection using deep stock profiles. PLOS ONE 15:11, e024157⒊ [Crossref]
27⒎ Jonas Puck, Igor Filatotchev. 20⒛ Finance and the multinational company: Building bridges between
finance and global strategy research. Global Strategy Journal 10:4, 655-67⒌ [Crossref]
27⒏ Chariton Chalvatzis, Dimitrios Hristu-Varsakelis. 20⒛ High-performance stock index trading via
neural networks and trees. Applied Soft Computing 96, 10656⒎ [Crossref]
27⒐ Chinh Duc Pham, Le Tan Phuoc. 20⒛ An augmented capital asset pricing model using new
macroeconomic determinants. Heliyon 6:10, e0518⒌ [Crossref]
280. Saad Faysal, Mahdi Salehi, Mahdi Moradi. 20⒛ The impact of ownership structure on the cost of
equity in emerging markets. Management Research Review 43:10, 1221-123⒐ [Crossref]
281. Lin Chen, Junbo Wang, Chunchi Wu, Hongquan Zhu. Divergent Opinion, Trading Information,
and Stock Price Co-movements 1-21. [Crossref]
282. Michael Curran, Adnan Velic. 20⒛ The CAPM, National Stock Market Betas, and Macroeconomic
Covariates: a Global Analysis. Open Economies Review 31:4, 787-8⒛ [Crossref]
28⒊ Jamshid Karimov, Faruk Balli, Hatice Ozer Balli, Anne de Bruin. 20⒛ Shari'ah compliance
requirements and the cost of equity capital. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 62, 10134⒐ [Crossref]
28⒋ Ali Boloorforoosh, Peter Christoffersen, Mathieu Fournier, Christian Gouriéroux. 20⒛ Beta Risk
in the Cross-Section of Equities. The Review of Financial Studies 33:9, 4318-436⒍ [Crossref]
28⒌ Vanita Tripathi, Priti Aggarwal. 20⒛ Is value premium sector-specific? Evidence from India.
Managerial Finance 46:12, 1605-162⒏ [Crossref]
28⒍ Tong Zhang. Stock Picking Strategy Based on Exploration of Chip Distribution Indicators 276-282.
[Crossref]
28⒎ Lerzan Aksoy, Sabine Benoit, Shreekant G. Joag, Jay Kandampully, Timothy Lee Keiningham, An
L. Yan. 20⒛ Enterprise feedback management (EFM): what lies beyond the hype?. Journal of Service
Management 32:1, 53-6⒐ [Crossref]
28⒏ Patricia Sepúlveda Orejuela, María Dolores Guerrero-Baena, José A. Gómez-Limón. 20⒛
Desempeño económico-financiero de los distintos modelos empresariales en el sector del aceite de
oliva en España. Revista de Estudios Empresariales. Segunda Época :1, 227-24⒏ [Crossref]
28⒐ Chinh Duc Pham, Le Tan Phuoc. 20⒛ Is estimating the Capital Asset Pricing Model using monthly
and short-horizon data a good choice?. Heliyon 6:7, e0433⒐ [Crossref]
290. Myrthe van Dieijen, Abhishek Borah, Gerard J. Tellis, Philip Hans Franses. 20⒛ Big Data Analysis
of Volatility Spillovers of Brands across Social Media and Stock Markets. Industrial Marketing
Management 88, 465-48⒋ [Crossref]
291. Yingyi Hu, Tiao Zhao, Lin Zhang. 20⒛ Noise trading, institutional trading, and opinion divergence:
Evidence on intraday data in the Chinese stock market. International Review of Economics & Finance
68, 74-8⒐ [Crossref]
292. Wei Kang Loo. 20⒛ Predictability of HK-REITs returns using artificial neural network. Journal of
Property Investment & Finance 38:4, 291-30⒎ [Crossref]
29⒊ A. S. Shaghikyan, H. N. Hayrapetyan. 20⒛ Equity Crowdfunding in the Eurasian Economic Union
(EAEU). Finance: Theory and Practice 24:3, 45-5⒐ [Crossref]
29⒋ Philippe Dupuy, Michel Albouy, Christophe Bonnet, Safwan Mchawrab. 20⒛ Cash Holdings and
the Selection Effect in the Eurozone. Finance Vol. 41:2, 53-10⒍ [Crossref]
29⒌ Naji Massad, Jørgen Vitting Andersen. 20⒛ Defining an intrinsic “stickiness” parameter of stock
price returns. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 547, 12446⒋ [Crossref]
29⒍ Seong Mi Bae, Hyoung‐Tae An, Jong Dae Kim. 20⒛ Mediators Linking Information Quality and
the Cost of Equity Capital*. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies 49:3, 410-43⒎ [Crossref]
29⒎ Nisa Vinodkumar, Hadeel Khalid AlJasser. 20⒛ Financial evaluation of Tadawul All Share Index
(TASI) listed stocks using Capital Asset Pricing Model. Investment Management and Financial
Innovations 17:2, 69-7⒌ [Crossref]
29⒏ Jie Qin. 20⒛ Regret-based capital asset pricing model. Journal of Banking & Finance 114, 10578⒋
[Crossref]
29⒐ Hoang Thanh Hanh, Le Thi Viet Nga, Dinh Tran Ngoc Huy, Luong Minh Lan, Pham Minh Dat.
20⒛ The Quantified Analysis of Causes of Market Risk Fluctuations in the Group of Construction,
Real Estate and Construction Material Companies in Vietnam During and After the Global
Crisis 2007-20⒒ WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT 16,
189-19⒎ [Crossref]
300. Saejoon Kim, Soong Kim. 20⒛ Index tracking through deep latent representation learning.
Quantitative Finance 20:4, 639-652. [Crossref]
301. Benjamin Pfister, Manfred Schwaiger, Tobias Morath. 20⒛ Corporate reputation and the future
cost of equity. Business Research 13:1, 343-38⒋ [Crossref]
302. Panagiotis Anastasiadis, Efthimios Katsaros, Anastasios-Taxiarchis Koutsioukis, Athanasios Pandazis.
20⒛ Performance-Risk Nexus of Global Low-Rated ETFs During the QE-Tapering Period. Studies
in Business and Economics 15:1, 194-2⒒ [Crossref]
30⒊ Yehui Wang, Jianxu Liu, Yuxuan Tang, Songsak Sriboonchitta. 20⒛ Housing Risk and Its Influence
on House Price: An Expected Utility Approach. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2020, 1-⒗
[Crossref]
30⒋ Anastasia Simmet, Winfried Pohlmeier. 20⒛ The CAPM with Measurement Error: ‘There’s life in
the old dog yet!’. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 240:4, 417-45⒊ [Crossref]
30⒌ O. E. Medvedeva, A. I. Artemenkov. 20⒛ THEORETICAL BASES OF ECONOMIC
MEASUREMENT OF VALUE IN THE CONDITIONS OF GLOBAL TECHNOLOGICAL
SHIFTS AND CRISES. NEWEST METHODOLOGICAL BASE (PART 2). Vestnik Universiteta
:1, 114-1⒛ [Crossref]
30⒍ Damian Shaw-Williams, Connie Susilawati. 20⒛ A techno-economic evaluation of Virtual Net
Metering for the Australian community housing sector. Applied Energy 261, 114271. [Crossref]
30⒎ Semra Bank, Evrim Erdogan Yazar, Ugur Sivri. 20⒛ The portfolios with strong brand value: More
returns? Lower risk?. Borsa Istanbul Review 20:1, 64-7⒐ [Crossref]
30⒏ Prince Worzie. 20⒛ FACTORS AFFECTING INVESTMENT DECISIONS AMONG LISTED
FIRMS IN THE NAIROBI SECURITIES EXCHANGE. International Journal of Engineering
Technologies and Management Research 7:2, 124-142. [Crossref]
30⒐ Mehmet Levent ERDAŞ. 20⒛ DEVELOPING A PORTFOLIO OPTIMIZATION MODEL
BASED ON LINEAR PROGRAMMING UNDER CERTAIN CONSTRAINTS: AN
APPLICATION ON BORSA ISTANBUL 30 INDEX. TESAM Akademi Dergisi 7:1, 115-141.
[Crossref]
3⒑ Fenghua Wen, Nan Wu, Xu Gong. 20⒛ China's carbon emissions trading and stock returns. Energy
Economics 86, 10462⒎ [Crossref]
3⒒ Filippo Vitolla, Antonio Salvi, Nicola Raimo, Felice Petruzzella, Michele Rubino. 20⒛ The impact
on the cost of equity capital in the effects of integrated reporting quality. Business Strategy and the
Environment 29:2, 519-52⒐ [Crossref]
3⒓ Le Tan Phuoc, Chinh Duc Pham. 20⒛ The systematic risk estimation models: A different
perspective. Heliyon 6:2, e03371. [Crossref]
3⒔ Shea D. Chen, Andrew E. B. Lim. 20⒛ A Generalized Black–Litterman Model. Operations Research
18. . [Crossref]
3⒕ Andres F. Cantillo. 20⒛ Production commitments and the financial foundations of specialized
economies. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 43:1, 90-1⒒ [Crossref]
3⒖ Oussama Tilfani, Paulo Ferreira, My Youssef El Boukfaoui. 20⒛ Multiscale optimal portfolios using
CAPM fractal regression: estimation for emerging stock markets. Post-Communist Economies 32:1,
77-1⒓ [Crossref]
3⒗ Duane W Rockerbie, Stephen T. Easton. Contract Options for Buyers and Sellers of Talent 53-6⒎
[Crossref]
3⒘ Stefan Behringer. Die Entwicklung der angelsächsischen Unternehmensbewertung –
kapitalmarktorientierter Ansatz 79-102. [Crossref]
3⒙ Nguyen Huu Anh, Nguyen La Soa, Ha Hong Hanh. 20⒛ Environmental accounting practices and
cost of capital of enterprises in Vietnam. Cogent Economics & Finance 8:1, 179096⒋ [Crossref]
3⒚ Kam Fong Chan, Terry Marsh. 20⒛ Asset Pricing around Earnings Announcement Days. SSRN
Electronic Journal 62. . [Crossref]
3⒛ Hasan A Fallahgoul, Vincentius Franstianto. 20⒛ Towards Explaining Deep Learning: Significance
Tests for Multi-Layer Perceptrons. SSRN Electronic Journal 12. . [Crossref]
321. Augustin Landier, David Thesmar. 20⒛ Earnings Expectations in the COVID Crisis. SSRN
Electronic Journal 24. . [Crossref]
322. Anne M. Tucker, Yusen Xia, Susan Smelcer. 20⒛ It Ain’t Just What Funds Disclose (It's The Way
That They Do It). SSRN Electronic Journal 35. . [Crossref]
32⒊ Majeed Simaan. 20⒛ Working with CRSP/COMPUSTAT in R: Reproducible Empirical Asset
Pricing. SSRN Electronic Journal 1. . [Crossref]
32⒋ Emanuel Kohlscheen, Előd Takáts. 20⒛ What Can Commercial Property Performance Reveal about
Bank Valuations?. SSRN Electronic Journal 32. . [Crossref]
32⒌ Phuong Duong, Jinghui Liu, Ian Eddie. 20⒛ New financial regulatory philosophy: A paradigm shift
in securities market supervision. Corporate Ownership and Control 17:4, 8-⒘ [Crossref]
32⒍ Tolulope Latunde, Lukman Shina Akinola, Damilola Deborah Dare. 20⒛ Analysis of capital asset
pricing model on Deutsche bank energy commodity. Green Finance 2:1, 20-3⒋ [Crossref]
32⒎ Tarana Azimova. Challenges in Estimation of Beta 79-9⒏ [Crossref]
32⒏ Luis Javier Sanchez-Barrios, Benedicto Kulwizira Lukanima, Natalia Hernandez-Vargas, Luis Ricardo
Almanza Herazo. Estimating the CAPM Beta for Public and Private Firms 99-12⒌ [Crossref]
32⒐ Ahmad Aref Almazari. Valuation of Banking Sector 175-200. [Crossref]
330. Sandra Andraszewicz. Stock Markets, Market Crashes, and Market Bubbles 205-231. [Crossref]
331. Ron Alquist, Benjamin Remy Chabot, Ram Yamarthy. 20⒛ The Price of Property Rights:
Institutions, Finance, and Economic Growth. SSRN Electronic Journal 113. . [Crossref]
332. Anouar Ben Mabrouk. 20⒛ Wavelet-based systematic risk estimation: application on GCC stock
markets: the Saudi Arabia case. Quantitative Finance and Economics 4:4, 542-59⒌ [Crossref]
33⒊ Hammad Siddiqi. 20⒛ Resource Allocation in the Brain and the Capital Asset Pricing Model. SSRN
Electronic Journal 81. . [Crossref]
33⒋ Stefan Anchev, Nicha Lapanan. 20⒛ Investor Base Size and Stock Return Anomalies. SSRN
Electronic Journal 73. . [Crossref]
33⒌ Jakob Thomä, Michael Hayne, Nikolaus Hagedorn, Clare Murray, Rebecca Grattage. 20⒚ The
alignment of global equity and corporate bonds markets with the Paris Agreement. Journal of Applied
Accounting Research 20:4, 439-45⒎ [Crossref]
33⒍ Marc Schaffer. 20⒚ The role of competition, innovation, and regulation on financial intermediary
risk. Managerial Finance 45:12, 1580-1600. [Crossref]
33⒎ Marília Cordeiro Pinheiro, André Luiz Marques Serrano. 20⒚ Analysis of the impact of Fies on
the stock returns from the higher education sector. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças 30:81, 368-380.
[Crossref]
33⒏ Tomislav Gelo, Željko Vrban, Dalibor Pudić. 20⒚ Allowed Revenue of Network System Operators
in the Croatian Energy Sector and Interest Rate Changes on the Croatian Capital Market. Zagreb
International Review of Economics and Business 22:s2, 73-91. [Crossref]
33⒐ Saurabh Gupta, Saumitra N. Bhaduri. 20⒚ Skin in the game – investor behavior in asset pricing, the
Indian context. Review of Behavioral Finance 11:4, 373-392. [Crossref]
340. Babak Jafarizadeh, Reidar B. Bratvold. 20⒚ Exploration economics: taking opportunities and the
risk of double-counting risk. Mineral Economics 32:3, 323-33⒌ [Crossref]
341. Liping Liu. 20⒚ The reducibility of matrix sweeping operations: A computational issue in linear
belief functions. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 114, 226-24⒎ [Crossref]
342. Sabine Elmiger. 20⒚ CAPM-anomalies: quantitative puzzles. Economic Theory 68:3, 643-66⒎
[Crossref]
34⒊ Levan Efremidze, Darrol J. Stanley, Abraham Park, Nikolai Wasilewski. 20⒚ Empirical
implementation of entropy risk factor model: A test on Chilean peso. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics
and its Applications 532, 12183⒍ [Crossref]
34⒋ Joanne Hamet, Frantz Maurer. 20⒚ Valeur intrinsèque et valeur temps de la recherche en sciences
de gestion. Revue Française de Gestion 45:284, 103-12⒊ [Crossref]
34⒌ Natalia Bailey, George Kapetanios, M. Hashem Pesaran. 20⒚ Exponent of Cross-sectional
Dependence for Residuals. Sankhya B 81:S1, 46-102. [Crossref]
34⒍ Tzu-Lun Huang. 20⒚ Is the Fama and French five-factor model robust in the Chinese stock market?.
Asia Pacific Management Review 24:3, 278-28⒐ [Crossref]
34⒎ Yang, Nguyen. 20⒚ Skewness Preference and Asset Pricing: Evidence from the Japanese Stock
Market. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 12:3, 14⒐ [Crossref]
34⒏ Nesrin ÖZKAN. 20⒚ q-Faktör Modelinin Borsa İstanbul’da Geçerliliğinin Test Edilmesi. Eskişehir
Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 14:2, 441-45⒍ [Crossref]
34⒐ Anwar Hasan Abdullah Othman, Syed Musa Alhabshi, Razali Haron. 20⒚ The effect of symmetric
and asymmetric information on volatility structure of crypto-currency markets. Journal of Financial
Economic Policy 11:3, 432-450. [Crossref]
350. Shaun Cox, James Britten. 20⒚ The Fama-French five-factor model: Evidence from the
Johannesburg Stock Exchange. Investment Analysts Journal 48:3, 240-261. [Crossref]
351. Richard A. Michelfelder, Pauline Ahern, Dylan D'Ascendis. 20⒚ Decoupling impact and public
utility conservation investment. Energy Policy 130, 311-3⒚ [Crossref]
352. Johan Knif, James W. Kolari, Gregory Koutmos, Seppo Pynnönen. 20⒚ Measuring the relative return
contribution of risk factors. Journal of Asset Management 20:4, 263-272. [Crossref]
35⒊ Jana Šimáková, Daniel Stavárek, Tomáš Pražák, Marie Ligocká. 20⒚ Macroeconomic factors and
stock prices in the food and drink industry. British Food Journal 121:7, 1627-1641. [Crossref]
35⒋ Shijun Wang, Baocheng Zhu, Lintao Ma, Yuan Qi. A Riemannian Primal-dual Algorithm Based on
Proximal Operator and its Application in Metric Learning 1-⒏ [Crossref]
35⒌ Ricardo Méndez Romero, Hernán Rocha Pavés. 20⒚ ANÁLISIS DE LOS FONDOS DE
PENSIONES EN CHILE: PERIODO 2011-20⒙ Multidisciplinary Business Review 12:1, 1-⒐
[Crossref]
35⒍ Thomas Gramespacher, Armin Bänziger. 20⒚ The Bias in Two-Pass Regression Tests of Asset-
Pricing Models in Presence of Idiosyncratic Errors with Cross-Sectional Dependence. Review of Pacific
Basin Financial Markets and Policies 22:02, 19500⒓ [Crossref]
35⒎ Muhammad Adnan Arshad, Saira Munir, Bashir Ahmad, Muhammad Waseem. 20⒚ Do factors
matter for predicting high-risk stock returns? Comparison of single-, three- and five-factor CAPM.
International Journal of Financial Engineering 06:02, 19500⒖ [Crossref]
35⒏ Qianwei Ying, Tahir Yousaf, Qurat ul Ain, Yasmeen Akhtar, Muhammad Shahid Rasheed. 20⒚ Stock
Investment and Excess Returns: A Critical Review in the Light of the Efficient Market Hypothesis.
Journal of Risk and Financial Management 12:2, 9⒎ [Crossref]
35⒐ Malik Shahzad Shabbir, Iftikhar Muhammad. 20⒚ The dynamic impact of foreign portfolio
investment on stock prices in Pakistan. Transnational Corporations Review 11:2, 166-17⒏ [Crossref]
360. Semra Bank, Evrim Erdogan Yazar, Ugur Sivri. 20⒚ Can social media marketing lead to abnormal
portfolio returns?. European Research on Management and Business Economics 25:2, 54-62. [Crossref]
361. Roberto Savona, Cesare Orsini. 20⒚ Taking the right course navigating the ERC universe. Journal
of Asset Management 20:3, 157-17⒋ [Crossref]
362. Defeng Yang, Zhanqing Wang, Fangmin Lu. 20⒚ The Influence of Corporate Governance
and Operating Characteristics on Corporate Environmental Investment: Evidence from China.
Sustainability 11:10, 273⒎ [Crossref]
36⒊ Salman Ahmed Shaikh, Mohd Adib Ismail, Abdul Ghafar Ismail, Shahida Shahimi, Muhammad
Hakimi Mohd. Shafiai. 20⒚ Cross section of stock returns on Shari’ah -compliant stocks: evidence
from Pakistan. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management 12:2,
282-302. [Crossref]
36⒋ Nilanjana Chakraborty, Mohammed M Elgammal, David McMillan. 20⒚ Rational functions: an
alternative approach to asset pricing. Applied Economics 51:20, 2091-21⒚ [Crossref]
36⒌ Khaled Elkhal. 20⒚ Business uncertainty and financial leverage: should the firm double up on risk?.
Managerial Finance 45:4, 536-54⒋ [Crossref]
36⒍ Nordine Abidi, Burcu Hacibedel, Mwanza Nkusu. 20⒚ Frontier and Emerging Markets: A
Perspective from Portfolio Flows and Financial Integration. Journal of Banking and Financial Economics
1/2019:11, 19-4⒌ [Crossref]
36⒎ Benjamin R. Auer, Tobias Hiller. 20⒚ Can cooperative game theory solve the low‐risk puzzle?.
International Journal of Finance & Economics 24:2, 884-88⒐ [Crossref]
36⒏ Sergio Bravo. 20⒚ The Corporate Life Cycle and the Cost of Equity. Journal of Business Valuation
and Economic Loss Analysis 14:1. . [Crossref]
36⒐ Yang Ning, Liu Chun Wah, Luo Erdan. 20⒚ Stock price prediction based on error correction model
and Granger causality test. Cluster Computing 22:S2, 4849-485⒏ [Crossref]
370. Marisa Basten, Antonio Sánchez Serrano. 20⒚ European banks after the global financial crisis: a new
landscape. Journal of Banking Regulation 20:1, 51-7⒊ [Crossref]
371. Moting Su, Zongyi Zhang, Ye Zhu, Donglan Zha. 20⒚ Data-Driven Natural Gas Spot Price
Forecasting with Least Squares Regression Boosting Algorithm. Energies 12:6, 109⒋ [Crossref]
372. Henry Leung, Jeffrey Tse, P. Joakim Westerholm. 20⒚ CEO traders and corporate acquisitions.
Journal of Corporate Finance 54, 107-12⒎ [Crossref]
37⒊ José Roberto Ferreira Savoia, José Roberto Securato, Daniel Reed Bergmann, Fabiana Lopes da
Silva. 20⒚ Comparing results of the implied cost of capital and capital asset pricing models for
infrastructure firms in Brazil. Utilities Policy 56, 149-15⒏ [Crossref]
37⒋ Jaromír Antoch, Jan Hanousek, Marie Hušková, Jiří Trešl. 20⒚ Detection of Changes in Panel Data:
Change in Fama-French Model Parameters for Selected European Stocks During the Financial Crisis.
Politická ekonomie 67:1, 3-⒚ [Crossref]
37⒌ Octávio Valente Campos, Ana Carolina Vasconcelos Colares, Renata Turola Takamatsu, José Roberto
de Souza Francisco. 20⒚ Precificação de ativos: análise do fator book-to-market após o deemed cost.
Revista Catarinense da Ciência Contábil 18, 1-⒗ [Crossref]
37⒍ Mukail Aremu Akinde, Eriki Peter, Ochei Ailemen Ikpefan. 20⒚ Growth versus value investing:
a case of Nigerian Stock Market. Investment Management and Financial Innovations 16:1, 30-4⒌
[Crossref]
37⒎ Lanh Tran. How Annualized Wavelet Trading “Beats” the Market 124-13⒎ [Crossref]
37⒏ Dorota Witkowska. Is the Three-Factor Better Than Single-Factor Capital Asset Pricing Model?
Case of Polish Capital Market 225-23⒏ [Crossref]
37⒐ Alessandro Vercelli. The Emergence of Modern Financial Economics 61-91. [Crossref]
380. Susann Ihlau, Hendrik Duscha. Grundlagen der Unternehmensbewertung 17-1⒖ [Crossref]
381. Manfred Gilli, Dietmar Maringer, Enrico Schumann. Optimization problems in finance 219-22⒏
[Crossref]
382. . Bibliography 599-60⒏ [Crossref]
38⒊ Anh Phong Nguyen, Hoang Anh Nguyen, Thi Hong Minh Ho, Phu Thanh Ngo. 20⒚ Risk
and returns of different foreign ownership portfolios: Evidence from Vietnam stock market. Cogent
Economics & Finance 7:1, 15894⒓ [Crossref]
38⒋ Babak Mahdavi-Damghani. 20⒚ Data-Driven Models & Mathematical Finance: Opposition or
Apposition?. SSRN Electronic Journal 89. . [Crossref]
38⒌ Sassan Zaker. 20⒚ How Wealth Management Lost Clients in Translation. SSRN Electronic Journal
65. . [Crossref]
38⒍ Anne M. Tucker, Yusen Xia. 20⒚ Investing in the Dark: Investment Company Disclosure Qualities,
Content & Compliance. SSRN Electronic Journal 70. . [Crossref]
38⒎ Michael Hasler, Charles Martineau. 20⒚ The CAPM Holds. SSRN Electronic Journal 19. .
[Crossref]
38⒏ Michael Thicke. 20⒙ Market epistemology. Synthese 195:12, 5571-559⒋ [Crossref]
38⒐ Sabri Boubaker, Taher Hamza, Javier Vidal-García. 20⒙ Financial distress and equity returns: A
leverage-augmented three-factor model. Research in International Business and Finance 46, 1-⒖
[Crossref]
390. Madhavi Latha Challa, Venkataramanaiah Malepati, Siva Nageswara Rao Kolusu. 20⒙ Forecasting
risk using auto regressive integrated moving average approach: an evidence from S&P BSE Sensex.
Financial Innovation 4:1. . [Crossref]
391. Patrick O’Sullivan. 20⒙ The Capital Asset Pricing Model and the Efficient Markets Hypothesis:
The Compelling Fairy Tale of Contemporary Financial Economics. International Journal of Political
Economy 47:3-4, 225-252. [Crossref]
392. Keshav Sahadev, Michael Ward, Chris Muller. 20⒙ The impact of reference-day risk on beta
estimation and a proposed solution. Investment Analysts Journal 47:4, 327-342. [Crossref]
39⒊ JONGSEOK LIM. 20⒙ A Study on the Estimation of the Cost of Equity Capital and Performance for
Listed Logistics Service Providers based on CAPM. Korean Journal of Logistics 26:3, 17-32. [Crossref]
39⒋ Fang Zhang, Hong Fang, Xu Wang. 20⒙ Impact of Carbon Prices on Corporate Value: The Case
of China’s Thermal Listed Enterprises. Sustainability 10:9, 332⒏ [Crossref]
39⒌ Marta Olivia Rovedder de Oliveira, Aline Armanini Stefanan, Mauri Leodir Lobler. 20⒙ Brand
equity, risk and return in Latin America. Journal of Product & Brand Management 27:5, 557-572.
[Crossref]
39⒍ John L. Glascock, Ran Lu-Andrews. 20⒙ The Asymmetric Conditional Beta-Return Relations of
REITs. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 57:2, 231-24⒌ [Crossref]
39⒎ I. Ferguson. 20⒙ Discount rates for corporate forest valuations. Australian Forestry 81:3, 142-14⒎
[Crossref]
39⒏ Alfonso A. Rojo Ramírez, Maria J. Martínez Romero. 20⒙ Required and obtained equity returns in
privately held businesses: the impact of family nature—evidence before and after the global economic
crisis. Review of Managerial Science 12:3, 771-801. [Crossref]
39⒐ Matevž Skočir, Igor Lončarski. 20⒙ Multi-factor asset pricing models: Factor construction choices
and the revisit of pricing factors. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money
55, 65-80. [Crossref]
400. Serge Darolles, Christian Francq, Sébastien Laurent. 20⒙ Asymptotics of Cholesky GARCH models
and time-varying conditional betas. Journal of Econometrics 204:2, 223-24⒎ [Crossref]
401. Tomer Shushi. 20⒙ Stein’s lemma for truncated elliptical random vectors. Statistics & Probability
Letters 137, 297-30⒊ [Crossref]
402. Masato Sasaki, Anas Laamrani, Mitsuo Yamashiro. 20⒙ An interactive genetic algorithm for
portfolio optimization considering the decision maker’s preference. Journal of Information and
Optimization Sciences 39:4, 989-100⒏ [Crossref]
40⒊ Lucas Bretschger, Filippo Lechthaler. 20⒙ Stock performance and economic growth: lessons
from the Japanese case. Macroeconomics and Finance in Emerging Market Economies 11:2, 195-2⒘
[Crossref]
40⒋ Geeta Lakshmi. 20⒙ Gekko and black swans: Finance theory in UK undergraduate curricula. Critical
Perspectives on Accounting 52, 35-4⒎ [Crossref]
40⒌ Christophe Schinckus. 20⒙ Pataphysics of finance: An essay of visual epistemology. Critical
Perspectives on Accounting 52, 57-6⒏ [Crossref]
40⒍ C. Janse van Rensburg, J.D. Krige. 20⒙ Paying the High Price of Active Management: A New Look
at Unit Trust Fees. Studies in Economics and Econometrics 42:1, 23-40. [Crossref]
40⒎ Milica Radović, Snežana Radukić, Vladimir Njegomir. 20⒙ The Application of the Markowitz’s
Model in Efficient Portfolio Forming on the Capital Market in the Republic of Serbia. Economic
Themes 56:1, 17-3⒋ [Crossref]
40⒏ Huu T. Huynh, Yi Su, Gunnar Lucko, Richard C. Thompson. Beta Index and Complexity in
Schedule Performance Measurement 471-480. [Crossref]
40⒐ Pablo Koch-Medina, Jan Wenzelburger. 20⒙ Equilibria in the CAPM with non-tradeable
endowments. Journal of Mathematical Economics 75, 93-10⒎ [Crossref]
4⒑ Jae Wook Song, Bonggyun Ko, Woojin Chang. 20⒙ Analyzing systemic risk using non-linear
marginal expected shortfall and its minimum spanning tree. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its
Applications 491, 289-30⒋ [Crossref]
4⒒ Harold L. Vogel. Rationality Rules 219-26⒐ [Crossref]
4⒓ Toan Luu Duc Huynh, Sang Phu Nguyen, Duy Duong. Pricing Assets with Higher Co-moments
and Value-at-Risk by Quantile Regression Approach: Evidence from Vietnam Stock Market 953-98⒍
[Crossref]
4⒔ Stefan Behringer. Kennzahlen im Konzerncontrolling 89-13⒊ [Crossref]
4⒕ Fengmin Xu, Meihua Wang, Yu-Hong Dai, Dachuan Xu. 20⒙ A sparse enhanced indexation model
with chance and cardinality constraints. Journal of Global Optimization 70:1, 5-2⒌ [Crossref]
4⒖ Massimo Guidolin, Manuela Pedio. Multivariate GARCH and Conditional Correlation Models
229-26⒍ [Crossref]
4⒗ Bruce D. McNevin, Joan Nix. 20⒙ The beta heuristic from a time/frequency perspective: A wavelet
analysis of the market risk of sectors. Economic Modelling 68, 570-58⒌ [Crossref]
4⒘ Muhammad Hafidz Anuwar, Maheran Mohd Jaffar. The standardized credit rating grade for
Malaysian listed companies in Bursa Malaysia 020060. [Crossref]
4⒙ Fred Sporta. 20⒙ The Distressing Effect of Non-Performing Assets to Asset Quality for Commercial
Banks in Kenya. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT 3:6, 71-8⒊ [Crossref]
4⒚ Wei Liu, James W. Kolari, Seppo Pynnonen. 20⒙ CAPM Beta Lives for Expected Returns. SSRN
Electronic Journal 14. . [Crossref]
4⒛ Deng-Ta Chen. 20⒙ : CAPM (Security Prices in Mean-Variance Equilibrium: A Further Study on
CAPM). SSRN Electronic Journal 447. . [Crossref]
421. Jessie Y. Zhu, Wally Smieliauskas. 20⒙ Evidence on the Economic Consequences of Marriage
Equality and LGBT Human Rights. SSRN Electronic Journal 5. . [Crossref]
422. Alex R. Horenstein. 20⒙ Leverage and Performance Metrics in Asset Pricing. SSRN Electronic
Journal 53. . [Crossref]
42⒊ Kesh Sahadev, Mike Ward, Chris Muller. 20⒙ A Volume-Weighted-Average-Price (VWAP) Method
for Estimating Beta in the Context of Reference-Day Risk. SSRN Electronic Journal 22. . [Crossref]
42⒋ Malcolm McLelland. 20⒙ CAPM Failure in Private Equity Valuation and the Alternative APT
Method. SSRN Electronic Journal 73. . [Crossref]
42⒌ Malcolm McLelland. 20⒙ International Cost of Capital Estimation: The No-Arbitrage Method.
SSRN Electronic Journal 73. . [Crossref]
42⒍ Keshav Sahadev, Mike Ward, Chris Muller. 20⒙ A Volume-Weighted-Average-Price (VWAP)
Method for Estimating Beta in the Context of Reference-Day Risk. SSRN Electronic Journal 22. .
[Crossref]
42⒎ Zhichuan Frank Li, Dylan Minor, Jun Wang, Chong Yu. 20⒙ A Learning Curve of the Market:
Chasing Alpha of Socially Responsible Firms. SSRN Electronic Journal 134. . [Crossref]
42⒏ Natalia Bailey, George Kapetanios, M. Hashem Pesaran. 20⒙ Exponent of Cross-Sectional
Dependence for Residuals. SSRN Electronic Journal 31. . [Crossref]
42⒐ Gonul Colak, Dimitrios Gounopoulos, Panagiotis Loukopoulos, Georgios Loukopoulos. 20⒙ Local
Policy Risk and IPO Performance. SSRN Electronic Journal 51. . [Crossref]
430. Lisa R. Goldberg, Alex Papanicolaou, Alexander Shkolnik. 20⒙ Better Betas. SSRN Electronic
Journal 9. . [Crossref]
431. Weihao Han. 20⒙ Persistence and Performance of Chinese Mutual Funds. SSRN Electronic Journal
8. . [Crossref]
432. Daniel Andrei, Henry L. Friedman, N. Bugra Ozel. 20⒙ The Impact of Business and Economics
News on Investor Attention. SSRN Electronic Journal 28. . [Crossref]
43⒊ Ross Kingwell, Quenten Thomas, David Feldman, Imma Farré, Brad Plunkett. 20⒙ Traditional farm
expansion versus joint venture remote partnerships. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource
Economics 62:1, 21-4⒋ [Crossref]
43⒋ Todd D. Gerarden, Richard G. Newell, Robert N. Stavins. 20⒘ Assessing the Energy-Efficiency
Gap. Journal of Economic Literature 55:4, 1486-152⒌ [Abstract] [View PDF article] [PDF with links]
43⒌ Bogdan Negrea, Mihai Toma. 20⒘ Dynamic CAPM under ambiguity—An experimental approach.
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance 16, 22-32. [Crossref]
43⒍ José María Díez-Esteban, Conrado Diego García-Gómez, Félix Javier López-Iturriaga, Marcos
Santamaría-Mariscal. 20⒘ Corporate risk-taking, returns and the nature of major shareholders:
Evidence from prospect theory. Research in International Business and Finance 42, 900-9⒒ [Crossref]
43⒎ Yinqiao Li, Renée Spigt, Laurens Swinkels. 20⒘ The impact of FinTech start-ups on incumbent
retail banks’ share prices. Financial Innovation 3:1. . [Crossref]
43⒏ Diego Broz, Gastón Milanesi, Daniel Alejandro Rossit, Diego Gabriel Rossit, Fernando Tohmé. 20⒘
Forest management decision making based on a real options approach: An application to a case in
northeastern Argentina. Forestry Studies 67:1, 97-10⒏ [Crossref]
43⒐ Serdar Neslihanoglu, Vasilios Sogiakas, John H. McColl, Duncan Lee. 20⒘ Nonlinearities in the
CAPM: Evidence from Developed and Emerging Markets. Journal of Forecasting 36:8, 867-89⒎
[Crossref]
440. Hung-Chi Li, Syouching Lai, James A. Conover, Frederick Wu, Bin Li. Stock Returns and Financial
Distress Risk: Evidence from the Asian-Pacific Markets 123-15⒏ [Crossref]
441. Marc K. Chan, Simon Kwok. 20⒘ Risk-sharing, market imperfections, asset prices: Evidence from
China’s stock market liberalization. Journal of Banking & Finance 84, 166-18⒎ [Crossref]
442. Márcio André Veras Machado, Robert Faff, Suelle Cariele de Souza e Silva. 20⒘ Applicability of
Investment and Profitability Effects in Asset Pricing Models. Revista de Administração Contemporânea
21:6, 851-87⒋ [Crossref]
44⒊ Turan G. Bali, Robert F. Engle, Yi Tang. 20⒘ Dynamic Conditional Beta Is Alive and Well in the
Cross Section of Daily Stock Returns. Management Science 63:11, 3760-377⒐ [Crossref]
44⒋ David G. Carmichael. 20⒘ Adjustments within discount rates to cater for uncertainty—Guidelines.
The Engineering Economist 62:4, 322-33⒌ [Crossref]
44⒌ Gastón Silverio Milanesi. 20⒘ Valuación de empresas: enfoque integral para mercados emergentes e
inflacionarios. Estudios Gerenciales 33:145, 377-390. [Crossref]
44⒍ Júlio Lobão, Cristiano Pereira. 20⒘ Psychological barriers in stock market indices: Evidence from
four southern European countries. Cuadernos de Economía 40:114, 268-27⒏ [Crossref]
44⒎ Matheus Duarte Valente Vieira, Vinicius Mothé Maia, Marcelo Cabús Klotzle, Antonio Carlos
Figueiredo. 20⒘ Modelo de Cinco Fatores de Risco: precificando carteiras setoriais no mercado
acionário brasileiro. Revista Catarinense da Ciência Contábil 16:4⒏ . [Crossref]
44⒏ Ikrame Ben Slimane, Makram Bellalah, Hatem Rjiba. 20⒘ Time-varying beta during the 2008
financial crisis – evidence from North America and Western Europe. The Journal of Risk Finance 18:4,
398-431. [Crossref]
44⒐ Karen Paul. 20⒘ The effect of business cycle, market return and momentum on financial performance
of socially responsible investing mutual funds. Social Responsibility Journal 13:3, 513-52⒏ [Crossref]
450. Sara Aghakhani, Reda Alhajj, Jon Rokne, Philip Chang. An Effective LmRMR for Financial Variable
Selection and its Applications 535-54⒊ [Crossref]
451. Diana Milena Carmona Muñoz, Marcos Vera Leyton. 20⒘ Evaluación de los factores de riesgo en
los activos de renta variable que conforman el índice S&P MILA 40 : aplicación del modelo de tres
factores de Fama y French en el periodo 2009-20⒔ Revista Finanzas y Política Económica 9:2, 301-3⒘
[Crossref]
452. Daniel Botero Guzman, Jhon Alexis Díaz Contreras. 20⒘ Análisis de la relación rentabilidad-riesgo
en el mercado accionario internacional para un mundo parcialmente integrado. Ensayos de Economía
27:51, 109-12⒋ [Crossref]
45⒊ Christoph Kaserer, Matthias X. Hanauer. 20⒘ 25 Jahre Fama-French-Modell: Erklärungsgehalt,
Anomalien und praktische Implikationen. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik 18:2, 98-1⒗ [Crossref]
45⒋ Abel Rodríguez, Ziwei Wang, Athanasios Kottas. 20⒘ Assessing systematic risk in the S&P500 index
between 2000 and 2011: A Bayesian nonparametric approach. The Annals of Applied Statistics 11:2. .
[Crossref]
45⒌ Jill A. Brown, Anne Anderson, Jesus M. Salas, Andrew J. Ward. 20⒘ Do Investors Care About
Director Tenure? Insights from Executive Cognition and Social Capital Theories. Organization Science
28:3, 471-49⒋ [Crossref]
45⒍ Chandana Shahi, Sherrill Shaffer. 20⒘ CAPM and the changing distribution of historical returns.
Applied Economics Letters 24:9, 639-642. [Crossref]
45⒎ Kwanglim Seo, Ellen Eun Kyoo Kim, Amit Sharma. 20⒘ Examining the determinants of long-term
debt in the US restaurant industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management
29:5, 1501-15⒛ [Crossref]
45⒏ Kevin E. Dow, Marcia Weidenmier Watson, Vincent J. Shea. 20⒘ Riding the waves of technology
through the decades: The relation between industry-level information technology intensity and the
cost of equity capital. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 25, 18-2⒏ [Crossref]
45⒐ Xiao-Ping Steven Zhang, Fang Wang. 20⒘ Signal Processing for Finance, Economics, and
Marketing: Concepts, framework, and big data applications. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 34:3,
14-3⒌ [Crossref]
460. Joseph Nyangon, John Byrne, Job Taminiau. 20⒘ An assessment of price convergence between
natural gas and solar photovoltaic in the U.S. electricity market. WIREs Energy and Environment
6:⒊ . [Crossref]
461. Federico Etro, Elena Stepanova. 20⒘ Art Auctions and Art Investment in the Golden Age of British
Painting. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 64:2, 191-22⒌ [Crossref]
462. Gaëlle Lenormand, Lionel Touchais. 20⒘ L’impact de l’IFRS 8 sur le coût des capitaux propres.
Management & Avenir N° 92:2, 133-152. [Crossref]
46⒊ Devi Lusyana, Mohamed Sherif. 20⒘ Shariah -compliant investments and stock returns: evidence
from the Indonesian stock market. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research 8:2, 143-160.
[Crossref]
46⒋ Vance Lesseig, Janet D. Payne. 20⒘ The precision of asset beta estimates. International Journal of
Managerial Finance 13:2, 213-22⒋ [Crossref]
46⒌ Guillaume Coqueret. 20⒘ Empirical properties of a heterogeneous agent model in large dimensions.
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 77, 180-201. [Crossref]
46⒍ Zarah Puspitaningtyas. 20⒘ Estimating systematic risk for the best investment decisions on
manufacturing company in Indonesia. Investment Management and Financial Innovations 14:1, 46-5⒋
[Crossref]
46⒎ Vijay Gondhalekar, Kevin Lehnert. Financial Performance and the Competitive Effects of Corporate
Social Responsibility 1-21. [Crossref]
46⒏ Danielle Claire Sanderson, Steven Devaney. 20⒘ Occupier satisfaction and its impact on investment
returns from UK commercial real estate. Journal of Property Investment & Finance 35:2, 135-15⒐
[Crossref]
46⒐ Ching-Ping Wang, Hung-Hsi Huang, Jin-Sheng Hu. 20⒘ Reverse-Engineering and Real Options–
Adjusted CAPM in the Taiwan Stock Market. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 53:3, 670-68⒎
[Crossref]
470. Supriya Maheshwari, Raj Singh Dhankar. 20⒘ Momentum anomaly: evidence from the Indian stock
market. Journal of Advances in Management Research 14:1, 3-22. [Crossref]
471. Bin Mei. 20⒘ Investment returns of US commercial timberland: insights into index construction
methods and results. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 47:2, 226-23⒊ [Crossref]
472. Shaista Arshad. Investigating the Integration 85-1⒙ [Crossref]
47⒊ Raquel J. Fonseca. Capital Asset Pricing Model—A Structured Robust Approach 385-392. [Crossref]
47⒋ Efundem Agboraw, Aled Jones. Finance and Natural Resource Constraints 41-91. [Crossref]
47⒌ Imad A. Moosa, Vikash Ramiah. The Rise and Fall of Neoclassical Finance 1-2⒌ [Crossref]
47⒍ Mª José Martínez Romero, Alfonso A. Rojo Ramírez. 20⒘ Socioemotional wealth’s implications in
the calculus of the minimum rate of return required by family businesses’ owners. Review of Managerial
Science 11:1, 95-1⒙ [Crossref]
47⒎ . Bibliography 315-32⒏ [Crossref]
47⒏ Numan Ülkü. 20⒘ Monday effect in Fama–French’s RMW factor. Economics Letters 150, 44-4⒎
[Crossref]
47⒐ Richard C. Thompson, Yi Su, Gunnar Lucko. 20⒘ Measuring Project Performance Inspired by
Stock Index. Procedia Engineering 196, 706-7⒔ [Crossref]
480. Steven R. Ratner. 20⒘ Compensation for Expropriations in a World of Investment Treaties: Beyond
the Lawful/Unlawful Distinction. American Journal of International Law 111:1, 7-5⒍ [Crossref]
481. Ricardo G. Barcelona. Doing the Managerial Flexibility Maths 455-472. [Crossref]
482. Arun Muralidhar, Robert Savickas, Tzu-Jui Mao. 20⒘ Asset Pricing Anomalies: Two Hedge Factors
with Negative Risk Premia Embedded in Portfolios!. SSRN Electronic Journal 12. . [Crossref]
48⒊ Pablo Fernandez. 20⒘ Finanzas y Economma Financiera (Finance and Financial Economics). SSRN
Electronic Journal 32. . [Crossref]
48⒋ Pablo Fernandez. 20⒘ Finance and Financial Economics: A Debate About Common Sense and
Illogical Models. SSRN Electronic Journal 32. . [Crossref]
48⒌ Kulab Jamar. 20⒘ Property Funds and REITs in Thailand: A CAPM Investigation. SSRN Electronic
Journal 2. . [Crossref]
48⒍ Ming Li Chew, Sahil Puri. 20⒘ Using Natural Language Processing Techniques for Stock Return
Predictions. SSRN Electronic Journal 5. . [Crossref]
48⒎ Seung C. Ahn, Alex R. Horenstein. 20⒘ Asset Pricing and Excess Returns Over the Market Return.
SSRN Electronic Journal 81. . [Crossref]
48⒏ Gevorg Hunanyan. 20⒘ The Systematic Risk of Short-Sale Restrictions. SSRN Electronic Journal
45. . [Crossref]
48⒐ Mike Ward, Chris Muller, Pravin Semnarayan. 20⒘ Negative Investment Returns in a Developing
Market Context. SSRN Electronic Journal 69. . [Crossref]
490. Eben Otuteye. 20⒘ Re-Evaluating the Value of Modern Portfolio Theory and Asset Pricing Models
Based on Behavioral Insights from Benjamin Graham's Value Investing Paradigm. SSRN Electronic
Journal 38. . [Crossref]
491. Min Deng. 20⒘ Death of the Capital Asset Pricing Model. SSRN Electronic Journal 6. . [Crossref]
492. Eben Otuteye, Mohammad Siddiquee. 20⒘ A Critique of Modern Portfolio Theory and Asset
Pricing Models Based on Behavioral Insights from Benjamin Graham's Value Investing Paradigm.
SSRN Electronic Journal 38. . [Crossref]
49⒊ Jose Maria Diez Esteban, Conrado DiegoGarcca-GGmez, FFlix J. LLpez-Iturriaga, Marcos
Santamarra-Mariscal. 20⒘ Corporate Risk-Taking, Returns and the Nature of Major Shareholders:
Evidence from Prospect Theory. SSRN Electronic Journal 34. . [Crossref]
49⒋ Samuel Johnson, David Tuckett. 20⒘ Narrative Decision-Making in Investment Choices: How
Investors Use News About Company Performance. SSRN Electronic Journal 8. . [Crossref]
49⒌ Johnny Kang, Tom B. Parker, Scott Radell, Ralph Smith. 20⒘ Reach for Safety. SSRN Electronic
Journal 51. . [Crossref]
49⒍ Arun Muralidhar. 20⒘ A Very Simple Goals - and Risk-Based Asset Pricing Model (or Asset Pricing
with Heterogeneous Investors). SSRN Electronic Journal 80. . [Crossref]
49⒎ Eben Otuteye, Mohammad Siddiquee. 20⒘ Buffett's Alpha: Further Explanations from Behavioral
Value Investing Perspective. SSRN Electronic Journal 42. . [Crossref]
49⒏ Imran Riaz Malik, Attaullah Shah. 20⒘ Single Stock Futures and Their Impact on Risk
Characteristics of the Underlying Stocks: A Dynamic CAPM Approach. SSRN Electronic Journal
59. . [Crossref]
49⒐ James Ming Chen. 20⒘ Baryonic Beta Dynamics: An Econophysical Model of Systematic Risk.
SSRN Electronic Journal 9. . [Crossref]
500. Antonio Amendola, Dennis Marco Montagna, Mario Maggi. 20⒘ Analysis of Equity β
Principal Components in Low Risk Framework: New Results and Prospectives. SSRN Electronic
Journal 77. . [Crossref]
501. Yehuda (Yud) Izhakian. 20⒘ Knight Meets Sharpe: Capital Asset Pricing under Ambiguity. SSRN
Electronic Journal 77. . [Crossref]
502. Pieter Klaassen, Idzard van Eeghen. 20⒘ Bank Capital Allocation and Performance Management
under Multiple Capital Constraints. SSRN Electronic Journal 4. . [Crossref]
50⒊ Jessie Y. Zhu, Wally Smieliauskas. 20⒘ Evidence on the Economic Consequences of Marriage
Equality and LGBT Human Rights. SSRN Electronic Journal 5. . [Crossref]
50⒋ Gastón Silverio Milanesi. 20⒘ DESCUENTO DE FLUJO DE FONDOS E INFLACIÓN PARA
LA VALORACIÓN DE EMPRESAS EN DOS MONEDAS. Semestre Económico 20:44, 189-2⒙
[Crossref]
50⒌ Prashant Das, Gabrielle Bodenmann. Minimizing the Cost of Capital in Hotel Investments 191-20⒎
[Crossref]
50⒍ Emon Kalyan Chowdhury. 20⒘ Functioning of Fama-French Three-Factor Model in Emerging
Stock Markets: An Empirical Study on Chittagong Stock Exchange, Bangladesh. Journal of Financial
Risk Management 06:04, 352-36⒊ [Crossref]
50⒎ José Carlos de Souza Santos, Elias Cavalcante Filho. 20⒘ Investing on the CAPM Pricing Error.
Technology and Investment 08:01, 67-82. [Crossref]
50⒏ Daniel Andrei, Julien Cujean, Mungo Ivor Wilson. 20⒘ The Lost Capital Asset Pricing Model.
SSRN Electronic Journal 53. . [Crossref]
50⒐ Wei Liu, James W. Kolari. 20⒘ Do Multi-Factors Proxy More Efficient Market Indexes?. SSRN
Electronic Journal 77. . [Crossref]
5⒑ David J. Moore. 20⒗ A look at the actual cost of capital of US firms. Cogent Economics & Finance
4:1, 123362⒏ [Crossref]
5⒒ Igor Deplano, Giovanni Squillero, Alberto Tonda. 20⒗ Anatomy of a portfolio optimizer under a
limited budget constraint. Evolutionary Intelligence 9:4, 125-13⒍ [Crossref]
5⒓ Eric Le Fur, Hachmi Ben Ameur, Benoit Faye. 20⒗ Time-Varying Risk Premiums in the Framework
of Wine Investment. Journal of Wine Economics 11:3, 355-37⒏ [Crossref]
5⒔ Mareike Hornung, Robert Luther, Peter Schuster. 20⒗ Retrievability bias in explaining the hurdle
rate premium puzzle. Journal of Applied Accounting Research 17:4, 440-45⒌ [Crossref]
5⒕ Remmer Sassen, Anne-Kathrin Hinze, Inga Hardeck. 20⒗ Impact of ESG factors on firm risk in
Europe. Journal of Business Economics 86:8, 867-90⒋ [Crossref]
5⒖ Marie-Claude Beaulieu, Marie-Hélène Gagnon, Lynda Khalaf. 20⒗ Less is more: Testing financial
integration using identification-robust asset pricing models. Journal of International Financial Markets,
Institutions and Money 45, 171-190. [Crossref]
5⒗ Te-Feng Chen, San-Lin Chung, Wei-Che Tsai. 20⒗ Option-Implied Equity Risk and the Cross
Section of Stock Returns. Financial Analysts Journal 72:6, 42-5⒌ [Crossref]
5⒘ W. D. Chen, H. C. Li. 20⒗ Wavelet decomposition of heterogeneous investment horizon. Journal
of Economics and Finance 40:4, 714-73⒋ [Crossref]
5⒙ Brad M. Barber, Xing Huang, Terrance Odean. 20⒗ Which Factors Matter to Investors? Evidence
from Mutual Fund Flows. Review of Financial Studies 29:10, 2600-2642. [Crossref]
5⒚ Nicholas G. Hall. Research and Teaching Opportunities in Project Management 329-38⒏ [Crossref]
5⒛ Thomas Lindner, Jakob Muellner, Jonas Puck. 20⒗ Cost of Capital in an International Context:
Institutional Distance, Quality, and Dynamics. Journal of International Management 22:3, 234-24⒏
[Crossref]
521. Richard J. Agnello. 20⒗ Do U.S. paintings follow the CAPM? Findings disaggregated by subject,
artist, and value of the work. Research in Economics 70:3, 403-4⒒ [Crossref]
522. Celine Gimet, Sandra Montchaud. 20⒗ What Drives European Football Clubs’ Stock Returns and
Volatility?. International Journal of the Economics of Business 23:3, 351-390. [Crossref]
52⒊ Robert F. Engle. 20⒗ Dynamic Conditional Beta. Journal of Financial Econometrics 14:4, 643-66⒎
[Crossref]
52⒋ Claes Fornell, Forrest V. Morgeson, G. Tomas M. Hult. 20⒗ Stock Returns on Customer Satisfaction
Do Beat the Market: Gauging the Effect of a Marketing Intangible. Journal of Marketing 80:5, 92-10⒎
[Crossref]
52⒌ Rajesh H Acharya, Anver C Sadath. 20⒗ On the interaction between energy price and firm size in
Indian economy. OPEC Energy Review 40:3, 300-3⒖ [Crossref]
52⒍ Paul Windolf. 20⒗ Riding the Bubble: Financial Market Crises in Twenty-Two OECD Countries.
Journal of Economic Issues 50:3, 788-8⒔ [Crossref]
52⒎ SWARN CHATTERJEE, AMY HUBBLE. 20⒗ DAY-OF-THE-WEEK EFFECT IN US
BIOTECHNOLOGY STOCKS — DO POLICY CHANGES AND ECONOMIC CYCLES
MATTER?. Annals of Financial Economics 11:02, 165000⒏ [Crossref]
52⒏ Syed Jawad Hussain Shahzad, Saniya Khalid, Saba Ameer. 20⒗ CAPM estimates: Can data frequency
and time period lend a hand?. International Journal of Financial Engineering 03:02, 16500⒙ [Crossref]
52⒐ Mohammad Iftekhar Khan, Amit Banerji. 20⒗ Corporate Governance and Foreign Investment in
India. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance 9:1, 19-4⒊ [Crossref]
530. Robert East. 20⒗ Bias in the evaluation of research methods. Marketing Theory 16:2, 219-231.
[Crossref]
531. ##, ###. 20⒗ Why Do Some Asset Pricing Models Perform Poorly? Evidence from Irrationality,
Transaction Costs, and Missing Factors. Seoul Journal of Business 22:1, 1-6⒋ [Crossref]
532. Won Kang, Jungsoon Shin. 20⒗ Derivation of Corporate Debt Pricing Model and Its Empirical
Implications. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies 45:3, 439-462. [Crossref]
53⒊ Carmine De Franco, Bruno Monnier, Ksenya Rulik. 20⒗ Factor Exposure of Alternative Beta
Strategiesacross Market Regimes. The Journal of Index Investing 7:1, 78-91. [Crossref]
53⒋ . Index 331-33⒏ [Crossref]
53⒌ . References 319-322. [Crossref]
53⒍ Amabile Millani Rebeschini, Ricardo P. C. Leal. 20⒗ Stock Fund Returns and Macroeconomic
Variables in Brazil. Latin American Business Review 17:2, 139-161. [Crossref]
53⒎ Christian Fieberg, Armin Varmaz, Thorsten Poddig. 20⒗ Covariances vs. characteristics: what does
explain the cross section of the German stock market returns?. Business Research 9:1, 27-50. [Crossref]
53⒏ Iman Mirzadeh, Bjorn Birgisson. 20⒗ Evaluation of Highway Projects under Government Support
Mechanisms Based on an Option-Pricing Framework. Journal of Construction Engineering and
Management 142:⒋ . [Crossref]
53⒐ Mathijs Cosemans, Rik Frehen, Peter C. Schotman, Rob Bauer. 20⒗ Estimating Security Betas
Using Prior Information Based on Firm Fundamentals. Review of Financial Studies 29:4, 1072-11⒓
[Crossref]
540. Hakan Bilir. 20⒗ Finansal Varl?klar? Fiyatlama Modelinin Analizi. International Journal of Finance
& Banking Studies (2147-4486) 5:2, 58-72. [Crossref]
541. Dawood Ashraf. 20⒗ Does Shari’ah Screening Cause Abnormal Returns? Empirical Evidence from
Islamic Equity Indices. Journal of Business Ethics 134:2, 209-22⒏ [Crossref]
542. Marshall L. Stocker. 20⒗ The price of freedom: A Fama–French freedom factor. Emerging Markets
Review 26, 1-⒚ [Crossref]
54⒊ . References 549-561. [Crossref]
54⒋ Ton van den Bremer, Frederick van der Ploeg, Samuel Wills. 20⒗ The Elephant In The Ground:
Managing Oil And Sovereign Wealth. European Economic Review 82, 113-131. [Crossref]
54⒌ Ran Leshem, Lisa R. Goldberg, Alan Cummings. 20⒗ Optimizing Value. The Journal of Portfolio
Management 42:2, 77-8⒐ [Crossref]
54⒍ Ran Leshem, Lisa R Goldberg, Alan Cummings. 20⒗ Optimizing Value. The Journal of Portfolio
Management . [Crossref]
54⒎ Pertti Lahdenperä. 20⒗ Preparing a framework for two-stage target-cost arrangement formulation.
International Journal of Managing Projects in Business 9:1, 123-14⒍ [Crossref]
54⒏ Nikodem Szumilo, Pascal Gantenbein, Werner Gleißner, Thomas Wiegelmann. 20⒗ Predicting
uncertainty: the impact of risk measurement on value of real estate portfolios. Journal of Property
Research 33:1, 1-⒘ [Crossref]
54⒐ Jean-Luc Besson, Michel M. Dacorogna, Paolo de Martin, Michael Kastenholz, Michael Moller. How
Much Capital Does a Reinsurance Need? 235-25⒊ [Crossref]
550. Arlie O. Petters, Xiaoying Dong. Capital Market Theory and Portfolio Risk Measures 151-20⒏
[Crossref]
551. Julius Hemminki, Vesa Puttonen. Fundamental Indexation in Europe 323-330. [Crossref]
552. Les Coleman. Current Paradigm: Neoclassical Investment Theory 15-2⒏ [Crossref]
55⒊ Mihály Ormos, Dusán Timotity. 20⒗ Generalized asset pricing: Expected Downside Risk-based
equilibrium modeling. Economic Modelling 52, 967-980. [Crossref]
55⒋ Peter C. Dawson. 20⒗ Is Opportunity Cost Synonymous with Cost of Capital and Required Rate of
Return?: Untangling the Present Value Discount Rate. SSRN Electronic Journal 63. . [Crossref]
55⒌ Somayeh Moazeni. 20⒗ Risk-Averse Dynamic Arbitrage in Illiquid Markets. SSRN Electronic
Journal 1. . [Crossref]
55⒍ John L. Glascock. 20⒗ The Asymmetric Conditional Beta-Return Relations of REITs. SSRN
Electronic Journal 63. . [Crossref]
55⒎ Gregory Gadzinski, Markus Schuller, Andrea Vacchino. 20⒗ The Global Capital Stock. A Proxy for
the Unobservable Global Market Portfolio. SSRN Electronic Journal 44. . [Crossref]
55⒏ James Ming Chen. 20⒗ Baryonic Beta Dynamics: Splitting the Atom of Systematic Risk. SSRN
Electronic Journal 587. . [Crossref]
55⒐ Paul Schneider, Christian Wagner, Josef Zechner. 20⒗ Low Risk Anomalies?. SSRN Electronic
Journal 98. . [Crossref]
560. Stefano Dova. 20⒗ From the CAPM to Fama-French: A Road Paved with Leverage. SSRN Electronic
Journal 43. . [Crossref]
561. Nadiyah Amatul Haq, Alvina Syafira Fauzia, Anggun Puspita Khoirunnisa. 20⒗ Promoting
Sustainable Financial System in Indonesia Towards SRI-KEHATI Index. SSRN Electronic Journal
18. . [Crossref]
562. Sabin Bikram Panta, Niranjan Phuyal, Rajesh Sharma, Gautam Vora. 20⒗ The Cross-Section of
Stock Returns: An Application of Fama-French Approach to Nepal. Modern Economy 07:02, 223-231.
[Crossref]
56⒊ Nordine Abidi, Burcu Hacibedel, Mwanza Nkusu. 20⒗ Changing Times for Frontier Markets: A
Perspective from Portfolio Investment Flows and Financial Integration. IMF Working Papers 16:177,
1. [Crossref]
56⒋ Elena N. Asparouhova, Peter Bossaerts. 20⒗ Competitive Off-Equilibrium: Theory and Experiment.
SSRN Electronic Journal 115. . [Crossref]
56⒌ Iman MIRZADEH, Bjorn BIRGISSON. 20⒖ ACCOMMODATING ENERGY PRICE
VOLATILITY IN LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS OF ASPHALT PAVEMENTS. JOURNAL
OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT 22:8, 1001-100⒏ [Crossref]
56⒍ David Geltner. 20⒖ Real Estate Price Indices and Price Dynamics: An Overview from an Investments
Perspective. Annual Review of Financial Economics 7:1, 615-63⒊ [Crossref]
56⒎ F. Echterling, B. Eierle, S. Ketterer. 20⒖ A review of the literature on methods of computing the
implied cost of capital. International Review of Financial Analysis 42, 235-252. [Crossref]
56⒏ G. van Vuuren, R. Yacumakis. 20⒖ Hedge Fund Performance Evaluation Using the Kalman Filter.
Studies in Economics and Econometrics 39:3, 1-2⒋ [Crossref]
56⒐ Aris Spanos, Deborah G. Mayo. 20⒖ Error statistical modeling and inference: Where methodology
meets ontology. Synthese 192:11, 3533-355⒌ [Crossref]
570. Ozan Kocadağlı, Rıdvan Keskin. 20⒖ A novel portfolio selection model based on fuzzy goal
programming with different importance and priorities. Expert Systems with Applications 42:20,
6898-69⒓ [Crossref]
571. Gustavo A. Marrero, Luis A. Puch, Francisco J. Ramos-Real. 20⒖ Mean-variance portfolio methods
for energy policy risk management. International Review of Economics & Finance 40, 246-26⒋
[Crossref]
572. Fabian T. Lutzenberger. 20⒖ Multifactor Models and their Consistency with the ICAPM: Evidence
from the European Stock Market. European Financial Management 21:5, 1014-1052. [Crossref]
57⒊ C. A. Valle, N. Meade, J. E. Beasley. 20⒖ Factor neutral portfolios. OR Spectrum 37:4, 843-86⒎
[Crossref]
57⒋ F. Echterling, B. Eierle. 20⒖ Mean reversion adjusted betas used in business valuation practice: a
research note. Journal of Business Economics 85:7, 759-792. [Crossref]
57⒌ Marcelo Sandoval, Santiago Grijalva. Future grid business model innovation: A prosumer-based cost-
benefit framework for valuation of Distributed Energy Resources 450-45⒌ [Crossref]
57⒍ . Bibliography 443-44⒌ [Crossref]
57⒎ Nazeeruddin Mohammad, Dawood Ashraf. 20⒖ The market timing ability and return performance
of Islamic equities: An empirical study. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 34, 169-18⒊ [Crossref]
57⒏ Yasser Alhenawi. 20⒖ On the interaction between momentum effect and size effect. Review of
Financial Economics 26:1, 36-4⒍ [Crossref]
57⒐ Martin Širůček, Lukáš Křen. 20⒖ Application of Markowitz Portfolio Theory by Building Optimal
Portfolio on the US Stock Market. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis
63:4, 1375-138⒍ [Crossref]
580. Harry S. Marmer. 20⒖ Fire! Fire! Is U.S. Low Volatility a Crowded Trade?. The Journal of Investing
24:3, 17-3⒎ [Crossref]
581. K. J. Barnard, M. B. Bunting. 20⒖ Value and size investment strategies during the global financial
crisis: evidence from the South African equity market. South African Journal of Accounting Research
29:2, 177-19⒍ [Crossref]
582. Richard A. Michelfelder. 20⒖ Empirical analysis of the generalized consumption asset pricing model:
Estimating the cost of capital. Journal of Economics and Business 80, 37-50. [Crossref]
58⒊ Ruggiero Cavallo, R. Preston Mcafee, Sergei Vassilvitskii. 20⒖ Display Advertising Auctions with
Arbitrage. ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation 3:3, 1-2⒊ [Crossref]
58⒋ Seungho Baek, John F.O. Bilson. 20⒖ Size and value risk in financial firms. Journal of Banking &
Finance 55, 295-32⒍ [Crossref]
58⒌ Yuntaek Pae, Navid Sabbaghi. 20⒖ Equally weighted portfolios vs value weighted portfolios: Reasons
for differing betas. Journal of Financial Stability 18, 203-20⒎ [Crossref]
58⒍ Shweta Bajpai, Anil K. Sharma. 20⒖ An Empirical Testing of Capital Asset Pricing Model in India.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 189, 259-26⒌ [Crossref]
58⒎ Roger Buckland, Julian Williams, Janice Beecher. 20⒖ Risk and regulation in water utilities: a cross-
country comparison of evidence from the CAPM. Journal of Regulatory Economics 47:2, 117-14⒌
[Crossref]
58⒏ Lin Chen, Lu Qin, Hongquan Zhu. 20⒖ Opinion divergence, unexpected trading volume and stock
returns: Evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance 36, 119-12⒎ [Crossref]
58⒐ Philippe Bertrand, Vincent Lapointe. 20⒖ How performance of risk-based strategies is modified
by socially responsible investment universe?. International Review of Financial Analysis 38, 175-190.
[Crossref]
590. Hersh Shefrin. 20⒖ Investors' Judgments, Asset Pricing Factors and Sentiment. European Financial
Management 21:2, 205-22⒎ [Crossref]
591. Jan Bastin. 20⒖ Volatility Effect: An Application on the German Stock Market. Český finanční a
účetní časopis 2015:1, 36-5⒋ [Crossref]
592. Peter C. Dawson. 20⒖ The capital asset pricing model in economic perspective. Applied Economics
47:6, 569-59⒏ [Crossref]
59⒊ Jan Doppegieter. The Capital Asset Pricing Model 1-⒋ [Crossref]
59⒋ Cherry Muijsson, Ed Fishwick, Steve Satchell. The Low Beta Anomaly and Interest Rates 305-32⒏
[Crossref]
59⒌ Maurício Vasconcellos Leão Lyrio, Wlademir Prates, Marcus Vinícius Andrade de Lima, Rogério João
Lunkes. 20⒖ Análise da implementação de uma estratégia de investimento em ações baseada em um
instrumento de apoio à decisão. Contaduría y Administración 60:1, 113-14⒊ [Crossref]
59⒍ Usman Ayub, Syed Zulfiqar Ali Shah, Qaisar Abbas. 20⒖ Robust analysis for downside risk in
portfolio management for a volatile stock market. Economic Modelling 44, 86-9⒍ [Crossref]
59⒎ Josanco Floreani, Maurizio Polato, Andrea Paltrinieri, Flavio Pichler. Credit Quality, Bank
Provisioning and Systematic Risk in Banking Business 1-3⒋ [Crossref]
59⒏ Federico Beltrame, Daniele Previtali, Luca Grassetti. The Estimation of Banks’ Cost of Capital
through the Capital at Risk Model: An Empirical Investigation across European Banks 35-6⒌
[Crossref]
59⒐ Nuraini Ismail, Mohd Tahir Ismail, Samsul Ariffin Abdul Karim, Firdaus Mohamad Hamzah.
Modeling and forecasting the volatility of Islamic unit trust in Malaysia using GARCH model 05000⒐
[Crossref]
600. Michael Olbrich, Tobias Quill, David J. Rapp. 20⒖ Business Valuation Inspired by the Austrian
School. Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis 10:1, 1-4⒊ [Crossref]
601. Sven Carlin. 20⒖ A Real Value Risk Estimation Model for an Emerging Market. SSRN Electronic
Journal 56. . [Crossref]
602. Todd Gerarden, Richard G. Newell, Robert N. Stavins. 20⒖ Assessing the Energy-Efficiency Gap.
SSRN Electronic Journal 101. . [Crossref]
60⒊ Christian-Oliver Ewald, Pariya Salehi. 20⒖ Salmon Futures and the Fish Pool Market in the Context
of the CAPM and the Fama & French Three-Factor Model. SSRN Electronic Journal 8. . [Crossref]
60⒋ John Griffin. 20⒖ Risk Premia and Knightian Uncertainty in an Experimental Market Featuring a
Long-Lived Asset. SSRN Electronic Journal 4. . [Crossref]
60⒌ Danilo Tilloca. 20⒖ A Risk-Neutral Approach for the Evaluation of Commercial Loans. SSRN
Electronic Journal 44. . [Crossref]
60⒍ Todd Gerarden, Richard G. Newell, Robert N. Stavins. 20⒖ Assessing the Energy-Efficiency Gap.
SSRN Electronic Journal 101. . [Crossref]
60⒎ Ran Leshem, Lisa R. Goldberg, Alan Cummings. 20⒖ Optimizing Value. SSRN Electronic Journal
39. . [Crossref]
60⒏ Daniel Felix Ahelegbey. 20⒖ The Econometrics of Networks: A Review. SSRN Electronic Journal
105. . [Crossref]
60⒐ Piotr Wisniewski. 20⒖ The Valuation of Social Media Public Companies: There Is a Method to
This Madness!. SSRN Electronic Journal 18. . [Crossref]
6⒑ MMrio Correia Fernandes. 20⒖ An Application of Risk-Return Metrics on Public-Private
Partnerships: The Case of Portuguese Road Sector. SSRN Electronic Journal 29. . [Crossref]
6⒒ Marc K. Chan, Simon Kwok. 20⒖ The Effect of Risk Sharing on Asset Prices: Natural Experiment
from the Chinese Stock Market Liberalization. SSRN Electronic Journal 55. . [Crossref]
6⒓ Christoph Becker, Wolfgang M. Schmidt. 20⒖ Value, Size, Momentum and the Average Correlation
of Stock Returns. SSRN Electronic Journal 31. . [Crossref]
6⒔ Brandes Institute. 20⒖ Redefining Risk and Return in Common Stock Investment. SSRN Electronic
Journal 14. . [Crossref]
6⒕ Pablo Fernandez. 20⒖ CAPM: An Absurd Model. Business Valuation Review 34:1, 4-2⒊ [Crossref]
6⒖ Marie-Claude Beaulieu, Jean-Marie Dufour, Lynda Khalaf. 20⒖ Identification-Robust Factor
Pricing: Canadian Evidence. L'Actualité économique 91:1-2, 235-252. [Crossref]
6⒗ Marcus Schulmerich, Yves-Michel Leporcher, Ching-Hwa Eu. Modern Portfolio Theory and Its
Problems 101-17⒊ [Crossref]
6⒘ Dennis Schlegel. Background: Cost-of-Capital in the Finance Literature 9-70. [Crossref]
6⒙ Virginie Coudert, Karine Hervé, Pierre Mabille. 20⒖ Internationalization Versus Regionalization in
the Emerging Stock Markets. International Journal of Finance & Economics 20:1, 16-2⒎ [Crossref]
6⒚ Petros Messis, Achilleas Zapranis. 20⒕ Asset pricing with time-varying betas for stocks traded on
S&P 500. Applied Economics 46:36, 4508-45⒙ [Crossref]
6⒛ Myuran Rajaratnam, Bala Rajaratnam, Kanshukan Rajaratnam. 20⒕ A novel equity valuation and
capital allocation model for use by long-term value-investors. Journal of Banking & Finance 49,
483-49⒋ [Crossref]
621. Petros Messis, Achilleas Zapranis. 20⒕ Herding towards higher moment CAPM, contagion of
herding and macroeconomic shocks: Evidence from five major developed markets. Journal of Behavioral
and Experimental Finance 4, 1-⒔ [Crossref]
622. Claudio Morana. 20⒕ Insights on the global macro-finance interface: Structural sources of risk factor
fluctuations and the cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Empirical Finance 29, 64-7⒐
[Crossref]
62⒊ Robin Zorzi, Bettina Friedl. 20⒕ The Optimal Hedge Ratio — An Analytical Decision Model
Considering Periodical Accounting Constraints. Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies
17:04, 145002⒋ [Crossref]
62⒋ Aidan Parkinson, Peter Guthrie. 20⒕ Evaluating the energy performance of buildings within a value
at risk framework with demonstration on UK offices. Applied Energy 133, 40-5⒌ [Crossref]
62⒌ Marek Kolodziej, Robert K. Kaufmann, Nalin Kulatilaka, David Bicchetti, Nicolas Maystre. 20⒕
Crude oil: Commodity or financial asset?. Energy Economics 46, 216-22⒊ [Crossref]
62⒍ Janick Christian Mollet, Andreas Ziegler. 20⒕ Socially responsible investing and stock performance:
New empirical evidence for the US and European stock markets. Review of Financial Economics 23:4,
208-2⒗ [Crossref]
62⒎ Sangwon Suh, Wonho Song, Bong-Soo Lee. 20⒕ A new method for forming asset pricing factors
from firm characteristics. Applied Economics 46:28, 3463-3482. [Crossref]
62⒏ Pei-Tha Gan. 20⒕ The precise form of financial integration: Empirical evidence for selected Asian
countries. Economic Modelling 42, 208-2⒚ [Crossref]
62⒐ Mario Filiasi, Giacomo Livan, Matteo Marsili, Maria Peressi, Erik Vesselli, Elia Zarinelli. 20⒕ On
the concentration of large deviations for fat tailed distributions, with application to financial data.
Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2014:9, P09030. [Crossref]
630. Terry Benzschawel,, Liang Fu,, Austin Murphy. 20⒕ An Empirical Analysis of Segmented Pricing
of Bond Systematic Risk. Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital 47:3, 439-46⒋ [Crossref]
631. Carolin Fritzsche,, Lars Vandrei. 20⒕ Keiner will sie haben – Theoretische Ursachen für
Immobilienleerstand. Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital 47:3, 465-48⒊ [Crossref]
632. Mary E. Barth, Eric C. So. 20⒕ Non-Diversifiable Volatility Risk and Risk Premiums at Earnings
Announcements. The Accounting Review 89:5, 1579-160⒎ [Crossref]
63⒊ Richard A. Michelfelder. 20⒕ Asset characteristics of solar renewable energy certificates: market
solution to encourage environmental sustainability. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment 4:3,
280-29⒍ [Crossref]
63⒋ J. Augusto Felício, Irina Ivashkovskaya, Ricardo Rodrigues, Anastasia Stepanova. 20⒕ Corporate
governance and performance in the largest European listed banks during the financial crisis. Innovar
24:53, 83-9⒏ [Crossref]
63⒌ Duc Hung Tran. 20⒕ Multiple corporate governance attributes and the cost of capital – Evidence
from Germany. The British Accounting Review 46:2, 179-19⒎ [Crossref]
63⒍ Urs von Arx, Andreas Ziegler. 20⒕ The effect of corporate social responsibility on stock
performance: new evidence for the USA and Europe. Quantitative Finance 14:6, 977-991. [Crossref]
63⒎ Austin Murphy, Liang Fu, Terry Benzschawel. 20⒕ An Empirical Examination of Ex AnteEstimates
of the Market Risk Premium. The Journal of Investing 23:2, 51-5⒏ [Crossref]
63⒏ Debasish Majumder. 20⒕ Asset pricing for inefficient markets: Evidence from China and India. The
Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 54:2, 282-291. [Crossref]
63⒐ . Bibliography 1213-123⒏ [Crossref]
640. Yi-Cheng Shih, Sheng-Syan Chen, Cheng-Few Lee, Po-Jung Chen. 20⒕ The evolution of capital
asset pricing models. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 42:3, 415-44⒏ [Crossref]
641. Kao-Yi Shen, Min-Ren Yan, Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng. 20⒕ Combining VIKOR-DANP model for
glamor stock selection and stock performance improvement. Knowledge-Based Systems 58, 86-9⒎
[Crossref]
642. Madhu Acharyya, Chris Brady. 20⒕ Designing an Enterprise Risk Management Curriculum for
Business Studies: Insights From a Pilot Program. Risk Management and Insurance Review 17:1,
113-13⒍ [Crossref]
64⒊ Christoph Schwarzbach, Frederik Kunze, Norman Rudschuck, Torsten Windels. 20⒕ Stock
investments for German life insurers in the current low interest environment: more homework to do.
Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft 103:1, 45-6⒊ [Crossref]
64⒋ Ekaterina Svetlova. 20⒕ Modelling Beyond Application: Epistemic and Non-epistemic Values in
Modern Science. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 28:1, 79-9⒏ [Crossref]
64⒌ Katsiaryna Salavei Bardos, Dev Mishra. 20⒕ Financial restatements, litigation and implied cost of
equity. Applied Financial Economics 24:1, 51-71. [Crossref]
64⒍ Stefan Behringer. Kennzahlen im Konzerncontrolling 89-132. [Crossref]
64⒎ Hersh Shefrin. Distinguishing Rationality and Bias in Prices: Implications from Judgments of Risk
and Expected Return 7-4⒐ [Crossref]
64⒏ Alfonso A. Rojo-Ramírez. 20⒕ Privately Held Company Valuation and Cost of Capital. Journal of
Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis 9:1, 1-21. [Crossref]
64⒐ Pablo Koch-Medina, Jan Wenzelburger. 20⒕ Equilibria in the CAPM with Nontradeable
Endowments. SSRN Electronic Journal 59. . [Crossref]
650. Arun Muralidhar, Kazuhiko Ohashi, Sung Hwan Shin. 20⒕ The Relative Asset Pricing Model: The
Third Dimension. SSRN Electronic Journal 67. . [Crossref]
651. Robert F. Engle. 20⒕ Dynamic Conditional Beta. SSRN Electronic Journal 102. . [Crossref]
652. Ian Kaplan. 20⒕ Value Factors Do Not Forecast Returns for S&P 500 Stocks. SSRN Electronic
Journal 68. . [Crossref]
65⒊ Marcio Andre Veras Machado, MMrcia Reis Machado. 20⒕ Liquidity and Asset Pricing: Evidence
from the Brazilian Market. SSRN Electronic Journal 20. . [Crossref]
65⒋ Myuran Rajaratnam, Christo J. Auret, Robert William Vivian. 20⒕ Bashing Barmy Banks:
Rethinking Bank Valuation Models Post the Global Financial Crisis (GFC). SSRN Electronic Journal
14. . [Crossref]
65⒌ Abel Rodriguez, Ziwei Wang, Athanasios Kottas. 20⒕ Assessing Systematic Risk in the S&P500
Index between 2000 and 2011: A Bayesian Nonparametric Approach. SSRN Electronic Journal 1. .
[Crossref]
65⒍ Roberto Savona, Cesare Orsini. 20⒕ Taking the Right Course Navigating the ERC Universe. SSRN
Electronic Journal 91. . [Crossref]
65⒎ William R. Pratt, Gokce Soydemir, Elena Bastida. 20⒕ Global Convergence of Health Care
Financing in OECD Countries: An Equilibrium Based Asset Pricing Approach. SSRN Electronic
Journal 22. . [Crossref]
65⒏ Arun Muralidhar. 20⒕ Modern Prospect Theory: The Missing Link Between Modern Portfolio
Theory and Prospect Theory. SSRN Electronic Journal 27. . [Crossref]
65⒐ ZZlia Cazalet, Thierry Roncalli. 20⒕ Facts and Fantasies About Factor Investing. SSRN Electronic
Journal 77. . [Crossref]
660. Yasser Alhenawi. 20⒕ On the Interaction between Momentum Effect and Size Effect. SSRN
Electronic Journal 9. . [Crossref]
661. Paola De Santis, Carlo Drago. 20⒕ Systematic Risk Asymmetry of the American Real Estate
Securities: Some New Econometric Evidences. SSRN Electronic Journal 117. . [Crossref]
662. David Geltner. 20⒕ Real Estate Price Indices and Price Dynamics: An Overview from an Investments
Perspective. SSRN Electronic Journal 19. . [Crossref]
66⒊ Siti Hajar Nadrah Mohamad Ghouse, Noryati Ahmad. 20⒕ Conceptual Paper of the Trading
Strategy: Dogs of the Dow Theory (Dod). SSRN Electronic Journal 25. . [Crossref]
66⒋ Lynda Khalaf. 20⒕ L’économétrie et l’évidence fallacieuse : erreurs et avancées. L'Actualité économique
90:1, ⒌ [Crossref]
66⒌ René Aïd. A Review of Optimal Investment Rules in Electricity Generation 3-40. [Crossref]
66⒍ Nicholas Apergis, James E. Payne. 20⒕ Resurrecting the size effect: Evidence from a panel nonlinear
cointegration model for the G7 stock markets. Review of Financial Economics 23:1, 46-5⒊ [Crossref]
66⒎ Stefan Lutz, Daniel Kleinfeldt. 20⒔ Risk as Determinant of Income and Cross-border Pricing of
Multinational Enterprises. Studies in Microeconomics 1:2, 185-2⒓ [Crossref]
66⒏ Andrew Walsh. 20⒔ Core–Satellite Strategies: Combining Stability and Opportunity in an ETF
Portfolio. The Journal of Index Investing 4:3, 50-5⒊ [Crossref]
66⒐ Andrés Mauricio Gómez Sánchez, José Gabriel Astaiza Gómez. 20⒔ Ciclo económico y prima por
riesgo en el mercado accionario colombiano. Ecos de Economía 17:37, 109-12⒋ [Crossref]
670. Antonina Waszczuk. 20⒔ Do local or global risk factors explain the size, value and momentum
trading pay-offs on the Warsaw Stock Exchange?. Applied Financial Economics 23:19, 1497-150⒏
[Crossref]
671. Shima Lashgari, Jurgita Antuchevičienė, Alireza Delavari, Omid Kheirkhah. 20⒔ BEYOND CAPM:
AN INNOVATIVE FACTOR MODEL TO OPTIMIZE THE RISK AND RETURN TRADE-
OFF. Journal of Business Economics and Management 15:4, 615-630. [Crossref]
672. Andreas Ehrenmann, Yves Smeers. 20⒔ Risk adjusted discounted cash flows in capacity expansion
models. Mathematical Programming 140:2, 267-29⒊ [Crossref]
67⒊ Bastiaan Pluijmers, Imke Hollander, Ramon Tol, Dimitris Melas. 20⒔ On the Commonality of
Characteristics of Managed Volatility Portfolios. The Journal of Investing 22:3, 86-9⒏ [Crossref]
67⒋ Stefan Lutz. 20⒔ Risk premia in multi-national enterprises. The North American Journal of Economics
and Finance 25, 293-30⒌ [Crossref]
67⒌ Markus Ampenberger, Thomas Schmid, Ann-Kristin Achleitner, Christoph Kaserer. 20⒔ Capital
structure decisions in family firms: empirical evidence from a bank-based economy. Review of
Managerial Science 7:3, 247-27⒌ [Crossref]
67⒍ YongHee Kim, MinChung Kim, John W. O'Neill. 20⒔ Advertising and Firm Risk: A Study of the
Restaurant Industry. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing 30:5, 455-470. [Crossref]
67⒎ M.-C. Beaulieu, J.-M. Dufour, L. Khalaf. 20⒔ Identification-Robust Estimation and Testing of the
Zero-Beta CAPM. The Review of Economic Studies 80:3, 892-92⒋ [Crossref]
67⒏ Paulo Augusto P. Britto, Carlos Henrique Rocha. 20⒔ Determinação do valor da tarifa-leilão do
serviço de transporte de passageiros por ônibus: um modelo alternativo. Journal of Transport Literature
7:3, 177-191. [Crossref]
67⒐ Will Gans, Beat Hintermann. 20⒔ Market Effects of Voluntary Climate Action by Firms: Evidence
from the Chicago Climate Exchange. Environmental and Resource Economics 55:2, 291-30⒏ [Crossref]
680. Jaspal Singh, Kiranpreet Kaur. 20⒔ Testing the Performance of Graham’s Net Current Asset Value
Strategy in Indian Stock Market. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation 9:2,
171-17⒐ [Crossref]
681. John H. Hall, Wim Westerman. Basic Risk Adjustment Techniques in Capital Budgeting 215-23⒐
[Crossref]
682. Robert B. Durand, Rick Newby, Leila Peggs, Michelle Siekierka. 20⒔ Personality. Journal of
Behavioral Finance 14:2, 116-13⒊ [Crossref]
68⒊ Pertti Lahdenperä. 20⒔ Determining ‘the most economically advantageous tender’ based on capability
and fee-percentage criteria. Journal of Public Procurement 13:4, 409-44⒍ [Crossref]
68⒋ Nicholas C. Barberis. 20⒔ Thirty Years of Prospect Theory in Economics: A Review and Assessment.
Journal of Economic Perspectives 27:1, 173-19⒍ [Abstract] [View PDF article] [PDF with links]
68⒌ L. Peter Jennergren. 20⒔ Firm Valuation with Bankruptcy Risk. Journal of Business Valuation and
Economic Loss Analysis 8:1. . [Crossref]
68⒍ Jian Zhou. 20⒔ Conditional market beta for REITs: A comparison of modeling techniques. Economic
Modelling 30, 196-20⒋ [Crossref]
68⒎ Nicolai Striewe, Nico Rottke, Joachim Zietz. 20⒔ The Impact of Institutional Ownership on REIT
Performance. Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management 19:1, 17-30. [Crossref]
68⒏ Arun Muralidhar, Kazuhiko Ohashi, Sung Hwan Shin. 20⒔ LDI: Does it Turn CAPM into RAPM?.
SSRN Electronic Journal 19. . [Crossref]
68⒐ Marcio Andre Veras Machado, Otavio Ribeiro de Medeiros. 20⒔ Does the Liquidity Effect Exist in
the Brazilian Stock Market?. SSRN Electronic Journal 20. . [Crossref]
690. Argiro Svingou. 20⒔ Cross-Sectional Analysis of Stock Returns in Athens Stock Exchange for the
Period 2004-20⒒ SSRN Electronic Journal 9. . [Crossref]
691. Issam S. Strub. 20⒔ Tail Hedging Strategies. SSRN Electronic Journal 62. . [Crossref]
692. Gueorgui I. Kolev. 20⒔ Two Gold Return Puzzles. SSRN Electronic Journal 52. . [Crossref]
69⒊ Philippe Bertrand, Vincent Lapointe. 20⒔ Socially Responsible Investment Performance: Impacts of
Weighting by Capitalization. SSRN Electronic Journal 17. . [Crossref]
69⒋ Peter C. Dawson. 20⒔ An Economic Analysis of the Competitive Risk-Return Paradigm. SSRN
Electronic Journal 39. . [Crossref]
69⒌ Eben Otuteye, Mohammad Siddiquee. 20⒔ Redefining Risk: Propositions to Motivate a Re-
Examination of the Standard Risk vs. Return Relationship in Common Stock and Bond Portfolio
Management. SSRN Electronic Journal 14. . [Crossref]
69⒍ Sabine Elmiger. 20⒔ Can CRRA Preferences Explain CAPM-Anomalies in the Cross-Section of
Stock Returns?. SSRN Electronic Journal 9. . [Crossref]
69⒎ Deling Chen. 20⒔ Empirical Analysis of Stock Returns of Banks in China's A-Share Markets. SSRN
Electronic Journal 2. . [Crossref]
69⒏ Muthucattu Thomas Paul, Fosuhene Akua Asarebea. 20⒔ Validity of the Capital Assets Pricing
Model: Evidence from the Indian Companies The NSE India. SSRN Electronic Journal 7. . [Crossref]
69⒐ Jialiu Lu. 20⒔ The CAPM: A Reformulation. SSRN Electronic Journal 31. . [Crossref]
700. Kevin Kurt Robinson. 20⒔ Technical Analysis: Does Recent Market Data Substantiate the Efficient
Market Hypothesis?. SSRN Electronic Journal 27. . [Crossref]
701. Dinh Tran Ngoc Huy. 20⒔ The risk level of Vietnam non-banking investment and financial services
industry under financial leverage during and after the global crisis 2007-20⒒ Risk Governance and
Control: Financial Markets and Institutions 3:3, 48-5⒌ [Crossref]
702. Imad A. Moosa. 20⒔ The Capital Asset Pricing Model ( CAPM ): The History of a Failed
Revolutionary Idea in Finance? Comments and Extensions. Abacus 49:S1, 62-6⒏ [Crossref]
70⒊ Joseph A. Cerniglia, Petter N. Kolm, Frank J. Fabozzi. Cross‐Sectional Factor‐Based Models and
Trading Strategies . [Crossref]
70⒋ Hans Marius Eikseth, Snorre Lindset. 20⒓ Are taxes sufficient for CAPM rejection?. Applied
Economics Letters 19:18, 1813-18⒗ [Crossref]
70⒌ Michael McKenzie, Ólan T. Henry. 20⒓ The determinants of short selling: evidence from the Hong
Kong equity market. Accounting & Finance 52:s1, 183-2⒗ [Crossref]
70⒍ Mohamed El Hedi Arouri, Duc Khuong Nguyen, Kuntara Pukthuanthong. 20⒓ An international
CAPM for partially integrated markets: Theory and empirical evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance
36:9, 2473-249⒊ [Crossref]
70⒎ Moshe Levy. 20⒓ On the Spurious Correlation Between Sample Betas and Mean Returns. Applied
Mathematical Finance 19:4, 341-360. [Crossref]
70⒏ Feng-jun Liu. An examination of CAPM based on data from Shenzhen Stock Exchange 1560-156⒍
[Crossref]
70⒐ S. Maier, A. Street. Model for the economic feasibility of energy recovery from municipal solid waste
in Brazil 1-⒑ [Crossref]
7⒑ Saumya Ranjan Dash, Jitendra Mahakud. 20⒓ Investor sentiment, risk factors and stock return:
evidence from Indian non‐financial companies. Journal of Indian Business Research 4:3, 194-2⒙
[Crossref]
7⒒ Tony Chieh‐Tse Hou. 20⒓ Return persistence and investment timing decisions in Taiwanese
domestic equity mutual funds. Managerial Finance 38:9, 873-891. [Crossref]
7⒓ Iftekhar Hasan, Heiko Schmiedel, Liang Song. 20⒓ Returns to Retail Banking and Payments.
Journal of Financial Services Research 41:3, 163-19⒌ [Crossref]
7⒔ Raul Leote de Carvalho, Xiao Lu, Pierre Moulin. 20⒓ Demystifying Equity Risk–Based Strategies:
A Simple Alpha plus Beta Description. The Journal of Portfolio Management 38:3, 56-70. [Crossref]
7⒕ Xiao Lu, Pierre Moulin. 20⒓ Demystifying Equity Risk–Based Strategies: A Simple Alpha plus
Beta Description. The Journal of Portfolio Management 12030823370600⒐ [Crossref]
7⒖ Manfred Gilli, Enrico Schumann. 20⒓ Heuristic optimisation in financial modelling. Annals of
Operations Research 193:1, 129-15⒏ [Crossref]
7⒗ Amit Goyal. 20⒓ Empirical cross-sectional asset pricing: a survey. Financial Markets and Portfolio
Management 26:1, 3-3⒏ [Crossref]
7⒘ Mohamed El Hedi Arouri, Philippe Foulquier. 20⒓ Financial market integration: Theory and
empirical results. Economic Modelling 29:2, 382-39⒋ [Crossref]
7⒙ Alexandros Kostakis, Kashif Muhammad, Antonios Siganos. 20⒓ Higher co-moments and asset
pricing on London Stock Exchange. Journal of Banking & Finance 36:3, 913-922. [Crossref]
7⒚ Melih Madanoglu, Murat Kizildag, Ersem Karadag. 20⒓ Estimating Cost of Equity in the Restaurant
Industry: What IS Your Required Rate of Return?. The Journal of Hospitality Financial Management
20:1, 57-7⒋ [Crossref]
7⒛ Roger Dayala. 20⒓ The Capital Asset Pricing Model: A Fundamental Critique. Business Valuation
Review 31:1, 23-3⒋ [Crossref]
721. Konstantinos A. Chrysafis. 20⒓ Corporate investment appraisal with possibilistic CAPM.
Mathematical and Computer Modelling 55:3-4, 1041-1050. [Crossref]
722. Yannick Malevergne, Didier Sornette. Multi‐moment Method for Portfolio Management: Generalised
Capital Asset Pricing Model in Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Markets 166-19⒊ [Crossref]
72⒊ . Bibliography 273-27⒍ [Crossref]
72⒋ . References 321-32⒐ [Crossref]
72⒌ Zhi Da, Re-Jin Guo, Ravi Jagannathan. 20⒓ CAPM for estimating the cost of equity capital:
Interpreting the empirical evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 103:1, 204-2⒛ [Crossref]
72⒍ Woraphon Wattanatorn, Termkiat Kanchanapoom. 20⒓ Oil Prices and Profitability Performance:
Sector Analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 40, 763-76⒎ [Crossref]
72⒎ Fernando Gómez-Bezares, Luis Ferruz, María Vargas. 20⒓ Can we beat the market with beta? An
intuitive test of the CAPM. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting / Revista Española de Financiación
y Contabilidad 41:155, 333-352. [Crossref]
72⒏ Mary E. Barth, Eric C. So. 20⒓ Non-Diversifiable Volatility Risk and Risk Premiums at Earnings
Announcements. SSRN Electronic Journal 44. . [Crossref]
72⒐ Giuseppe Marzo. 20⒓ A Theory-of-The-Firm Perspective on Discount Rates Formulation in
Investment Valuation. SSRN Electronic Journal 9. . [Crossref]
730. Jun Yuan, Leonard MacLean, Kuan Xu, Yonggan Zhao. 20⒓ How Do Local Markets Respond to
Global Risk Factor Differently in Various Market Regimes? A Study of Country Exchange Traded
Funds. SSRN Electronic Journal 61. . [Crossref]
731. Matthias Xaver Hanauer, Christoph Kaserer, Marc Steffen Rapp. 20⒓ Risikofaktoren und
Multifaktormodelle für den Deutschen Aktienmarkt (Risk Factors and Multi-Factor Models for the
German Stock Market). SSRN Electronic Journal 45. . [Crossref]
732. Min Bai. 20⒓ Short-Selling Status and Asset-Pricing Models. SSRN Electronic Journal 9. .
[Crossref]
73⒊ Mike Ward, Chris Muller. 20⒓ Empirical Testing of the CAPM on the Johannesburg Stock
Exchange. SSRN Electronic Journal 61. . [Crossref]
73⒋ M. Hashem Pesaran, Takashi Yamagata. 20⒓ Testing CAPM with a Large Number of Assets. SSRN
Electronic Journal 44. . [Crossref]
73⒌ Zvika Afik, Yaron Lahav. 20⒓ Risk Transfer Valuation in Advance Pricing Agreements between
Multinational Enterprises and Tax Authorities. SSRN Electronic Journal 26. . [Crossref]
73⒍ Lord Mensah, R. K. Avuglah, Vincent Dedu. 20⒓ Asset Allocation on the Ghana Stock Exchange.
SSRN Electronic Journal 18. . [Crossref]
73⒎ Gohar G. Stepanyan. 20⒓ Revisiting Firm Life Cycle Theory for New Directions in Finance. SSRN
Electronic Journal 81. . [Crossref]
73⒏ Myuran Rajaratnam, Balakanapathy Rajaratnam, Kanshukan Rajaratnam. 20⒓ Mauling Mr. Market:
Valuing Equity Capital of Businesses by Long-Term Value-Investors. SSRN Electronic Journal 33. .
[Crossref]
73⒐ David Nanigian. 20⒓ Capitalizing on the Greatest Anomaly in Finance with Mutual Funds. SSRN
Electronic Journal 67. . [Crossref]
740. Saumya Ranjan Dash. 20⒓ Does Sentiment Risk Persist as Priced Risk Factor? A Multifactor
Approach for Stock Return. SSRN Electronic Journal 5. . [Crossref]
741. Stefan Lutz. 20⒓ Risk Premia in Multi-National Enterprises. SSRN Electronic Journal 18. .
[Crossref]
742. Arun Muralidhar, Sung Hwan Shin. 20⒓ The Relative Asset Pricing Model Incorporating Liabilities
and Delegation to CIOs: Version 0.1. SSRN Electronic Journal jou_vol[1].xmlText. . [Crossref]
74⒊ Thierry Roncalli, Guillaume Weisang. 20⒓ Risk Parity Portfolios with Risk Factors. SSRN Electronic
Journal 52. . [Crossref]
74⒋ Roman Brückner, Patrick Lehmann, Richard Stehle. 20⒓ In Germany the CAPM is Alive and Well.
SSRN Electronic Journal 44. . [Crossref]
74⒌ Nicholas Barberis. 20⒓ Thirty Years of Prospect Theory in Economics: A Review and Assessment.
SSRN Electronic Journal 46. . [Crossref]
74⒍ Fabian Echterling, Brigitte Eierle. 20⒓ Implied Cost of Capital Under Heterogeneous Expectations.
SSRN Electronic Journal 18. . [Crossref]
74⒎ javed bin kamal. 20⒓ Optimal Portfolio Selection in Ex Ante Stock Price Bubble and Furthermore
Bubble Burst Scenario from Dhaka Stock Exchange with Relevance to Sharpe’s Single Index Model.
SSRN Electronic Journal 31. . [Crossref]
74⒏ Juan Mascareñas. 20⒓ Gestión De Carteras Ii: Modelo De Valoración De Activos (Portfolio
Management II: Capital Asset Pricing Model). SSRN Electronic Journal 47. . [Crossref]
74⒐ Wilson N. Sy. 20⒓ Scale and Competition in Australian Superannuation. SSRN Electronic Journal
3. . [Crossref]
750. Yi-Jang Yu. 20⒓ The Asset Pricing System. Modern Economy 03:05, 473-480. [Crossref]
751. Pauline M. Ahern, Frank J. Hanley, Richard A. Michelfelder. 20⒒ New approach to estimating
the cost of common equity capital for public utilities. Journal of Regulatory Economics 40:3, 261-27⒏
[Crossref]
752. Steve Keen. 20⒒ Debunking Macroeconomics. Economic Analysis and Policy 41:3, 147-16⒎ [Crossref]
75⒊ Akhilesh Chandra, Alan Reinstein. 20⒒ Investment appeal of small growth stocks. Advances in
Accounting 27:2, 308-3⒘ [Crossref]
75⒋ Mathijs A. van Dijk. 20⒒ Is size dead? A review of the size effect in equity returns. Journal of Banking
& Finance 35:12, 3263-327⒋ [Crossref]
75⒌ A Charteris, B Strydom. 20⒒ An Examination of the Volatility of South African Risk-Free Rate
Proxies: A Component Garch Analysis. Studies in Economics and Econometrics 35:3, 49-6⒋ [Crossref]
75⒍ Andreas Ziegler, Timo Busch, Volker H. Hoffmann. 20⒒ Disclosed corporate responses to climate
change and stock performance: An international empirical analysis. Energy Economics 33:6, 1283-129⒋
[Crossref]
75⒎ Ajit Dayanandan, Han Donker. 20⒒ Oil prices and accounting profits of oil and gas companies.
International Review of Financial Analysis 20:5, 252-25⒎ [Crossref]
75⒏ Fengjun Liu. Can the Industry Index Become Another Market Variable? Empirical Evidence from the
Listed Banks in Shanghai Stock Exchange 315-3⒚ [Crossref]
75⒐ S. Paulo. 20⒒ The South African Companies Act of 2008 (SACA2008), and the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act
of 2002. International Journal of Law and Management 53:5, 340-35⒋ [Crossref]
760. Gerald Spindler. 20⒒ Behavioural Finance and Investor Protection Regulations. Journal of Consumer
Policy 34:3, 315-33⒍ [Crossref]
761. Liu Feng-jun, Li Fei. Empirical study of investment performance on listed banks from Shanghai Stock
Exchange based on one-quarter holding period 932-93⒎ [Crossref]
762. Norliza Muhamad Yusof, Maheran Mohd. Jaffar. Predicting the credit risk through Merton model
162-16⒍ [Crossref]
76⒊ TAEJUN (DAVID) LEE, ERIC HALEY, TAI WOONG YUN, WONJUN CHUNG. 20⒒
US Retirement Financial Services Advertising's Financial Information Provisions, Communication
Strategies and Judgmental Heuristic Cues. Journal of Consumer Affairs 45:3, 391-4⒙ [Crossref]
76⒋ Baibing Li, Xiangkang Yin. 20⒒ Information and capital asset pricing. The European Journal of
Finance 17:7, 505-52⒊ [Crossref]
76⒌ Cristian Diego Albuja, Fabio Gallo Garcia, Luiz Maurício Franco Moreiras, Elmo Tambosi Filho.
20⒒ Onde investir nos BRICS? Uma análise sob o prisma da organização industrial. Revista de
Administração de Empresas 51:4, 349-36⒐ [Crossref]
76⒍ Mohamed El Hedi Arouri. 20⒒ Does crude oil move stock markets in Europe? A sector investigation.
Economic Modelling 28:4, 1716-172⒌ [Crossref]
76⒎ Konstantinos Kassimatis. 20⒒ Risk Aversion with Local Risk Seeking and Stock Returns: Evidence
from the UK Market. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 38:5-6, 713-73⒐ [Crossref]
76⒏ Duc Hung Tran. 20⒒ Corporate Governance und Eigenkapitalkosten - Bestandsaufnahme
des Schrifttums unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Informationsaspektes und
Forschungsperspektiven. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 81:5, 551-58⒌ [Crossref]
76⒐ Tanja Hribernik, Uroš Vek. 20⒒ Mutual Fund Performance in Slovenia: An Analysis of Mutual
Funds with Investment Policies in Europe and the Energy Sector. South East European Journal of
Economics and Business 6:1, 61-6⒐ [Crossref]
770. Simon Huston, Clive Warren, Peter Elliott. 20⒒ Elixir or delusion. Journal of Property Investment
& Finance 29:1, 49-5⒏ [Crossref]
771. . Bibliography 563-57⒍ [Crossref]
772. Robert B. Durand, Yihui Lan, Andrew Ng. 20⒒ Conditional beta: Evidence from Asian emerging
markets. Global Finance Journal 22:2, 130-15⒊ [Crossref]
77⒊ Amir Amel-Zadeh. 20⒒ The Return of the Size Anomaly: Evidence from the German Stock Market.
European Financial Management 17:1, 145-182. [Crossref]
77⒋ Michael A. Crain. 20⒒ A Literature Review of the Size Effect. SSRN Electronic Journal 5. . [Crossref]
77⒌ Marie-Claude Beaulieu, Jean-Marie Dufour, Lynda Khalaf. 20⒒ Identification-Robust Estimation
and Testing of the Zero-Beta CAPM. SSRN Electronic Journal 14. . [Crossref]
77⒍ Mohammad Ali Tareq, Saburo Horimoto. 20⒒ Can We Use Historical Mean Returns?. SSRN
Electronic Journal 28. . [Crossref]
77⒎ Alfonso A. Rojo Rojo-Ramirez, Salvador Cruz-Rambaud Cruz-Rambaud, Juana Alonso Canadas.
20⒒ A Note on the Operating Return of a Company Under Modigliani-Miller Assumptions. SSRN
Electronic Journal 60. . [Crossref]
77⒏ Lammertjan Dam, Pim Heijnen. 20⒒ Asset Pricing with Fixed Asset Supply. SSRN Electronic
Journal 45. . [Crossref]
77⒐ Maria de Lourdes Trevino. 20⒒ Time Varying Arbitrage Pricing Factors in the Mexican Stock
Market. SSRN Electronic Journal 5. . [Crossref]
780. Baitshepi Tebogo. 20⒒ Valuing Securities and Managing Portfolios Under Uncertainty: A Reminder
of the Underlying Assumptions. SSRN Electronic Journal 25. . [Crossref]
781. Myuran Rajaratnam, Balakanapathy Rajaratnam, Kanshukan Rajaratnam. 20⒒ Murdering Mr.
Market: An Equity Valuation and Capital Allocation Model for Long-Term Value-Investors. SSRN
Electronic Journal 81. . [Crossref]
782. Linda H. Chen, Lucia Silva Gao. 20⒒ The Pricing of Climate Risk. SSRN Electronic Journal 47. .
[Crossref]
78⒊ Stefan Lutz. 20⒒ Simultaneous Determination of Market Value and Risk Premium in the Valuation
of Firms. SSRN Electronic Journal 5. . [Crossref]
78⒋ Muhammad Hanif, Abubakar Javaid Dar. 20⒒ Comparative Testing of Capital Asset Pricing Model
(CAPM) and Shari’a Compliant Asset Pricing Model (SCAPM): Evidence from Karachi Stock
Exchange - Pakistan. SSRN Electronic Journal 18. . [Crossref]
78⒌ Tony Berrada, Reda Jürg Messikh, Gianluca Oderda, Olivier V. Pictet. 20⒒ Beta-Arbitrage
Strategies: When Do They Work, and Why?. SSRN Electronic Journal 9. . [Crossref]
78⒍ Alfonso A. Rojo Rojo-Ramirez, Juana Alonso Canadas, Salvador Cruz-Rambaud Cruz-Rambaud.
20⒒ Discount Rate and Cost of Capital: Some More about the Puzzle. SSRN Electronic Journal
46. . [Crossref]
78⒎ Nagendra Marisetty. 20⒒ An Empirical Study on CAPM with Respect to NSE NIFTY Stocks.
SSRN Electronic Journal 18. . [Crossref]
78⒏ Maurizio Montone. 20⒒ The Puzzling Countercyclicality of the Value Premium: Empirics and a
Theory. SSRN Electronic Journal 69. . [Crossref]
78⒐ Martin Grandes, Demian T. Panigo, Ricardo A. Pasquini. 20⒑ On the estimation of the cost of
equity in Latin America. Emerging Markets Review 11:4, 373-38⒐ [Crossref]
790. Young-Soon Hwang, Hong-Ghi Min, Judith A. McDonald, Hwagyun Kim, Bong-Han Kim. 20⒑
Using the credit spread as an option-risk factor: Size and value effects in CAPM. Journal of Banking
& Finance 34:12, 2995-300⒐ [Crossref]
791. Ravi Jagannathan, Ernst Schaumburg, Guofu Zhou. 20⒑ Cross-Sectional Asset Pricing Tests.
Annual Review of Financial Economics 2:1, 49-7⒋ [Crossref]
792. Maria Elena De Giuli, Mario Alessandro Maggi, Claudia Tarantola. 20⒑ Bayesian outlier detection
in Capital Asset Pricing Model. Statistical Modelling 10:4, 375-390. [Crossref]
79⒊ Yash Pal Taneja. 20⒑ Revisiting Fama French Three-Factor Model in Indian Stock Market. Vision:
The Journal of Business Perspective 14:4, 267-27⒋ [Crossref]
79⒋ Marie-Claude Beaulieu, Jean-Marie Dufour, Lynda Khalaf. 20⒑ Asset-pricing anomalies and
spanning: Multivariate and multifactor tests with heavy-tailed distributions. Journal of Empirical
Finance 17:4, 763-782. [Crossref]
79⒌ Olivier Brandouy, Walter Briec, Kristiaan Kerstens, Ignace Van de Woestyne. 20⒑ Portfolio
performance gauging in discrete time using a Luenberger productivity indicator. Journal of Banking
& Finance 34:8, 1899-19⒑ [Crossref]
79⒍ S. Paulo. 20⒑ The United Kingdom's Companies Act of 2006 and the capital asset pricing model.
International Journal of Law and Management 52:4, 253-26⒋ [Crossref]
79⒎ Chen Jianbao, Xu Yanping, Cheng Tingting. Quantile Regression Analysis of Cross-Section Returns
in Chinese Stock Market 169-172. [Crossref]
79⒏ Christophe Schinckus. 20⒑ Semiotics of Financial Marketplace. Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics
22:4, 317-33⒊ [Crossref]
79⒐ Erlend Kvaal. 20⒑ The Discount Rate of IAS 36 – A Comment. Accounting in Europe 7:1, 87-9⒌
[Crossref]
800. Shinn‐Shyr Wang, Kyle W. Stiegert, Tirtha P. Dhar. 20⒑ Strategic Pricing Behavior under Asset
Value Maximization. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie
58:2, 151-170. [Crossref]
801. S. Paulo. 20⒑ The UK Companies Act of 2006 and the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002. International
Journal of Law and Management 52:3, 173-181. [Crossref]
802. Kurt Niquidet. 20⒑ Equity pricing in the forest sector: evidence from North American stock markets.
Canadian Journal of Forest Research 40:5, 943-952. [Crossref]
80⒊ Michail Koubouros, Dimitrios Malliaropulos, Ekaterini Panopoulou. 20⒑ Long-run cash flow and
discount-rate risks in the cross-section of US returns. The European Journal of Finance 16:3, 227-24⒋
[Crossref]
80⒋ JEFFREY A. BUSSE, AMIT GOYAL, SUNIL WAHAL. 20⒑ Performance and Persistence in
Institutional Investment Management. The Journal of Finance 65:2, 765-790. [Crossref]
80⒌ Stuart Hyde, Mohamed Sherif. 20⒑ Tests of the conditional asset pricing model: further evidence
from the cross‐section of stock returns. International Journal of Finance & Economics 15:2, 198-2⒒
[Crossref]
80⒍ . References 159-16⒌ [Crossref]
80⒎ S. Paulo. 20⒑ Hamada's equation, the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002 and the UK Companies Act of
200⒍ International Journal of Law and Management 52:1, 54-6⒊ [Crossref]
80⒏ Alain A. Vertès. Axes of Development in Chemical and Process Engineering for Converting Biomass
to Energy 491-521. [Crossref]
80⒐ . Risk Equals Uncertainty 43-5⒊ [Crossref]
8⒑ Caroline Fohlin, Steffen Reinhold. 20⒑ Common stock returns in the pre-WWI Berlin Stock
Exchange. Cliometrica 4:1, 75-9⒍ [Crossref]
8⒒ Frank Sortino. The Big Picture 1-⒓ [Crossref]
8⒓ Cherif Guermat, Mark C. Freeman. 20⒑ A net beta test of asset pricing models. International Review
of Financial Analysis 19:1, 1-⒐ [Crossref]
8⒔ Knut Sandberg Eriksen, Svenn Jensen. 20⒑ The cost of second best pricing and the value of risk
premium. Research in Transportation Economics 30:1, 29-3⒎ [Crossref]
8⒕ Herbert Kalthoff, Uwe Vormbusch. Representing and Modelling: The Case of Portfolio Management
174-18⒏ [Crossref]
8⒖ Syou-Ching Lai, Hung-Chih Li, James A. Conover, Frederick Wu. O-score financial distress risk
asset pricing 51-9⒋ [Crossref]
8⒗ Mathijs Cosemans, Rik G. P. Frehen, Peter C. Schotman, Rob Bauer. 20⒑ Estimating Security Betas
Using Prior Information Based on Firm Fundamentals. SSRN Electronic Journal 95. . [Crossref]
8⒘ Reda Jürg Messikh, Gianluca Oderda. 20⒑ A Proof of the Outperformance of Beta Arbitrage
Strategies. SSRN Electronic Journal 19. . [Crossref]
8⒙ Kenneth Monroe Norton, MBA, DBA, Pan G. Yatrakis. 20⒑ The Effects of Cultural Differences
on Knowledge Assets and U.S. MNCS' Firms Value: A Three-Valuation Model Approach. SSRN
Electronic Journal 226. . [Crossref]
8⒚ Matthias Thomas, Daniel Piazolo, Sebastian Michael Gläsner. 20⒑ Analyzing the Changing Risk and
Return Structure of German Open-Ended Funds Using Semivariance Based Performance Measures.
SSRN Electronic Journal 13. . [Crossref]
8⒛ Zhi Da, Re J. Guo, Ravi Jagannathan. 20⒑ CAPM for Estimating the Cost of Equity Capital:
Interpreting the Empirical Evidence. SSRN Electronic Journal 61. . [Crossref]
821. George Bragues. 20⒑ The Politics of Financial Markets: An Introductory Discussion. SSRN
Electronic Journal 17. . [Crossref]
822. Pierre Hereil, Philippe Mitaine, Nicolas Moussavi, Thierry Roncalli. 20⒑ Mutual Fund Ratings and
Performance Persistence. SSRN Electronic Journal 25. . [Crossref]
82⒊ Haim Levy. 20⒑ The CAPM is Alive and Well: A Review and Synthesis. European Financial
Management 16:1, 43-71. [Crossref]
82⒋ S. Trevis Certo, Tim R. Holcomb, R. Michael Holmes. 200⒐ IPO Research in Management and
Entrepreneurship: Moving the Agenda Forward. Journal of Management 35:6, 1340-137⒏ [Crossref]
82⒌ Bartley J. Madden. Applying a Systems Mindset to Stock Valuation 43-6⒍ [Crossref]
82⒍ Christophe Schinckus. 200⒐ Economic uncertainty and econophysics. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics
and its Applications 388:20, 4415-442⒊ [Crossref]
82⒎ Claes Fornell, Sunil Mithas, Forrest V. Morgeson. 200⒐ Commentary —The Economic and Statistical
Significance of Stock Returns on Customer Satisfaction. Marketing Science 28:5, 820-82⒌ [Crossref]
82⒏ Stefan Veith, Jörg R. Werner, Jochen Zimmermann. 200⒐ Capital market response to emission rights
returns: Evidence from the European power sector. Energy Economics 31:4, 605-6⒔ [Crossref]
82⒐ Moawia Alghalith. 200⒐ Alternative theory of asset pricing. Journal of Asset Management 10:2, 73-7⒋
[Crossref]
830. Marie-Claude Beaulieu, Jean-Marie Dufour, Lynda Khalaf. 200⒐ Finite sample multivariate tests
of asset pricing models with coskewness. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 53:6, 2008-2021.
[Crossref]
831. Jean-Luc Besson, Michel M Dacorogna, Paolo de Martin, Michael Kastenholz, Michael Moller. 200⒐
How Much Capital Does a Reinsurance Need?. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and
Practice 34:2, 159-17⒋ [Crossref]
832. Ric Thomas, Robert Shapiro. 200⒐ Managed Volatility: A New Approach to Equity Investing. The
Journal of Investing 18:1, 15-2⒊ [Crossref]
83⒊ C. Emre Alper, Oya Pinar Ardic, Salih Fendoglu. 200⒐ THE ECONOMICS OF THE
UNCOVERED INTEREST PARITY CONDITION FOR EMERGING MARKETS. Journal of
Economic Surveys 23:1, 115-13⒏ [Crossref]
83⒋ Jørgen Vitting Andersen. Investment Decision Making in Finance, Models of 4971-498⒊ [Crossref]
83⒌ Ekaterina Svetlova. Theoretical Models as Creative Resources in Financial Markets 121-13⒌
[Crossref]
83⒍ Andreas Ziegler, Timo Busch, Volker H. Hoffmann. 200⒐ Corporate Responses to Climate Change
and Financial Performance: The Impact of Climate Policy. SSRN Electronic Journal 22. . [Crossref]
83⒎ Haim Levy. 200⒐ Behavioral Economics and Asset Pricing. SSRN Electronic Journal 21. . [Crossref]
83⒏ Markus Ampenberger, Thomas Schmid, Ann-Kristin Achleitner, Christoph Kaserer. 200⒐ Capital
Structure Decisions in Family Firms - Empirical Evidence from a Bank-Based Economy. SSRN
Electronic Journal 18. . [Crossref]
83⒐ Pablo Fernandez. 200⒐ Betas Used by Professors: A Survey with 2,500 Answers. SSRN Electronic
Journal 24. . [Crossref]
840. Pablo Fernandez, Vicente J. Bermejo. 200⒐ Betas Used by Companies and Professors in Europe: A
Survey. SSRN Electronic Journal 29. . [Crossref]
841. Marius Bausys. 200⒐ The Performance of Minimum Variance Portfolios in the Baltic Equity Markets.
SSRN Electronic Journal 27. . [Crossref]
842. Rafał Wolski. 200⒐ The Influence of Negative Beta Assets on the Empirical SML in the Polish
Capital Market. Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia 8:1, 140-15⒊ [Crossref]
84⒊ Sudipta Basu. 200⒏ Panel on Big Unanswered Questions in Accounting—Synopsis. Accounting
Horizons 22:4, 449-451. [Crossref]
84⒋ Brian J. Jacobsen, Xiaochun Liu. 200⒏ China's segmented stock market: An application of
the conditional international capital asset pricing model. Emerging Markets Review 9:3, 153-17⒊
[Crossref]
84⒌ Andy Lockett, Rory P. O'Shea, Mike Wright. 200⒏ The Development of the Resource-based View:
Reflections from Birger Wernerfelt 1. Organization Studies 29:8-9, 1125-1141. [Crossref]
84⒍ Chyi Lin Lee, Jon Robinson, Richard Reed. 200⒏ Listed property trusts and downside systematic
risk sensitivity. Journal of Property Investment & Finance 26:4, 304-32⒏ [Crossref]
84⒎ Lerzan Aksoy, Bruce Cooil, Christopher Groening, Timothy L. Keiningham, Atakan Yalçın. 200⒏
The Long-Term Stock Market Valuation of Customer Satisfaction. Journal of Marketing 72:4,
105-122. [Crossref]
84⒏ D. Sornette, V.F. Pisarenko. 200⒏ Properties of a simple bilinear stochastic model: Estimation and
predictability. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 237:4, 429-44⒌ [Crossref]
84⒐ Anusha Chari, Peter Blair Henry. 200⒏ Firm-specific information and the efficiency of investment.
Journal of Financial Economics 87:3, 636-65⒌ [Crossref]
850. Fernando de Holanda Barbosa. 200⒏ Banco Nacional: jogo de Ponzi, PROER e FCVS. Revista de
Economia Política 28:1, 97-1⒖ [Crossref]
851. Dimo Dimov, Gordon Murray. 200⒏ Determinants of the Incidence and Scale of Seed Capital
Investments by Venture Capital Firms. Small Business Economics 30:2, 127-152. [Crossref]
852. Julius Hemminki, Vesa Puttonen. 200⒏ Fundamental indexation in Europe. Journal of Asset
Management 8:6, 401-40⒌ [Crossref]
85⒊ Chyi Lee, Jon Robinson, Richard Reed. 200⒏ Downside Beta and the Cross-sectional Determinants
of Listed Property Trust Returns. Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management 14:1, 49-62. [Crossref]
85⒋ Herbert Kimura, Leonardo Cruz Basso, Eduardo Kazuo Kayo. 200⒏ The Interplay between Strategy
and Finance. SSRN Electronic Journal 29. . [Crossref]
85⒌ Hendri Adriaens, Bas Donkers, Bertrand Melenberg. 200⒏ The CAPM with Endogenous Beliefs.
SSRN Electronic Journal 86. . [Crossref]
85⒍ Vanita Tripathi. 200⒏ Company Fundamentals and Equity Returns in India. SSRN Electronic Journal
30. . [Crossref]
85⒎ Bartley J. Madden. 200⒏ Applying a Systems Mindset to Stock Valuation. SSRN Electronic Journal
44. . [Crossref]
85⒏ Vanita Tripathi. 200⒏ Company Fundamentals and Equity Returns in India. SSRN Electronic Journal
30. . [Crossref]
85⒐ Najah Attig, Omrane Guedhami, Dev R. Mishra. 200⒏ Multiple Large Shareholders, Control
Contests, and Implied Cost of Equity. SSRN Electronic Journal 16. . [Crossref]
860. Peter Christoffersen, Kris Jacobs, Gregory Vainberg. 200⒏ Forward-Looking Betas. SSRN Electronic
Journal jou_vol[1].xmlText. . [Crossref]
861. Ron Bird, Lorenzo Casavecchia. 200⒎ Sentiment and Financial Health Indicators for Value and
Growth Stocks: The European Experience. The European Journal of Finance 13:8, 769-79⒊ [Crossref]
862. Michael J. Mauboussin. 200⒎ The Wisdom and Whims of the Collective. CFA Institute Conference
Proceedings Quarterly 24:4, 1-⒏ [Crossref]
86⒊ Peter Blair Henry. 200⒎ Capital Account Liberalization: Theory, Evidence, and Speculation. Journal
of Economic Literature 45:4, 887-93⒌ [Abstract] [View PDF article] [PDF with links]
86⒋ Moshe Levy. 200⒎ Conditions for a CAPM equilibrium with positive prices. Journal of Economic
Theory 137:1, 404-4⒖ [Crossref]
86⒌ Gerhard Kristandl, Nick Bontis. 200⒎ The impact of voluntary disclosure on cost of equity capital
estimates in a temporal setting. Journal of Intellectual Capital 8:4, 577-59⒋ [Crossref]
86⒍ Marie-Claude Beaulieu, Jean-Marie Dufour, Lynda Khalaf. 200⒎ Multivariate Tests of Mean–
Variance Efficiency With Possibly Non-Gaussian Errors. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 25:4,
398-4⒑ [Crossref]
86⒎ Sven Husmann, Andreas Stephan. 200⒎ On estimating an asset's implicit beta. Journal of Futures
Markets 27:10, 961-97⒐ [Crossref]
86⒏ Arvind Pai, David Geltner. 200⒎ Stocks Are from Mars, Real Estate Is from Venus. The Journal of
Portfolio Management 33:5, 134-14⒋ [Crossref]
86⒐ Maik Eisenbeiss, Göran Kauermann, Willi Semmler. 200⒎ Estimating Beta-Coefficients of German
Stock Data: A Non-Parametric Approach. The European Journal of Finance 13:6, 503-522. [Crossref]
870. Michael E. Drew, Alastair Marsden, Madhu Veeraraghavan. 200⒎ Does Idiosyncratic Volatility
Matter? New Zealand Evidence. Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies 10:03, 289-30⒏
[Crossref]
871. Y. Malevergne, D. Sornette. 200⒎ Self-consistent asset pricing models. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics
and its Applications 382:1, 149-171. [Crossref]
872. Richard Saito, Rodrigo de Losso da Silveira Bueno. 200⒎ Fundamentos teóricos e empíricos de
apreçamento de ativos. Revista de Administração de Empresas 47:2, 81-8⒌ [Crossref]
87⒊ Robert R. Prechter, Wayne D. Parker. 200⒎ The Financial/Economic Dichotomy in Social Behavioral
Dynamics: The Socionomic Perspective. Journal of Behavioral Finance 8:2, 84-10⒏ [Crossref]
87⒋ Michail Koubouros, Ekaterini Panopoulou. 200⒎ Intertemporal Market Risks and the Cross–Section
of Greek Average Returns. Journal of Emerging Market Finance 6:2, 203-22⒎ [Crossref]
87⒌ Malcolm Baker, Jeffrey Wurgler. 200⒎ Investor Sentiment in the Stock Market. Journal of Economic
Perspectives 21:2, 129-151. [Abstract] [View PDF article] [PDF with links]
87⒍ Beverly J. Hirtle, Kevin J. Stiroh. 200⒎ The return to retail and the performance of US banks. Journal
of Banking & Finance 31:4, 1101-113⒊ [Crossref]
87⒎ Graham Bornholt. 200⒎ Extending the capital asset pricing model: the reward beta approach.
Accounting & Finance 47:1, 69-8⒊ [Crossref]
87⒏ Najet Rhaiem ., Saloua Ben Ammou ., Anouar Ben Mabrouk .. 200⒎ Estimation of Capital Asset
Pricing Model at Different Time Scales Application to French Stock Market. The International Journal
of Applied Economics and Finance 1:2, 79-8⒎ [Crossref]
87⒐ Roland Burgman, Göran Roos. 200⒎ The importance of intellectual capital reporting: evidence and
implications. Journal of Intellectual Capital 8:1, 7-51. [Crossref]
880. Madhusudan Karmakar. 200⒎ Asymmetric Volatility and Risk-return Relationship in the Indian Stock
Market. South Asia Economic Journal 8:1, 99-1⒗ [Crossref]
881. Yu Xiao. 200⒎ Chinese Stock Market Systematic Risk#An Empirical Study. SSRN Electronic Journal
1981. . [Crossref]
882. Magdalena Morgese Borys. 200⒎ Testing Multi-Factor Asset Pricing Models in the Visegrad
Countries. SSRN Electronic Journal 12. . [Crossref]
88⒊ Peter Christoffersen, Kris Jacobs, Gregory Vainberg. 200⒎ Forward-Looking Betas. SSRN Electronic
Journal jou_vol[1].xmlText. . [Crossref]
88⒋ Peter Blair Henry. 200⒎ Capital Account Liberalization: Theory, Evidence, and Speculation. SSRN
Electronic Journal 46. . [Crossref]
88⒌ Joon Chae, Cheol Won Yang. 200⒎ Why an Asset Pricing Model Fails to Explain the Cross Section
of Stock Returns in the Korean Market'. SSRN Electronic Journal 77. . [Crossref]
88⒍ Malcolm P. Baker, Jeffrey A. Wurgler. 200⒎ Investor Sentiment in the Stock Market. SSRN Electronic
Journal 7. . [Crossref]
88⒎ Martin Grandes. 200⒎ The Cost of Equity Beyond Capm: Evidence from Latin American Stocks
(1986-2004). SSRN Electronic Journal 17. . [Crossref]
88⒏ Baibing Li, Xiangkang Yin. 200⒎ Information and Capital Asset Pricing. SSRN Electronic Journal
53. . [Crossref]
88⒐ Kevin J. Stiroh. 200⒍ New Evidence on the Determinants of Bank Risk. Journal of Financial Services
Research 30:3, 237-26⒊ [Crossref]
890. Christine A. Botosan. 200⒍ Disclosure and the cost of capital: what do we know?. Accounting and
Business Research 36:sup1, 31-40. [Crossref]
891. Holger Daske, Günther Gebhardt. 200⒍ Zukunftsorientierte Bestimmung von Risikoprämien
und Eigenkapitalkosten für die Unternehmensbewertung. Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für
betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung 58:4, 530-551. [Crossref]
892. Michelle L. Barnes, Jose A. Lopez. 200⒍ Alternative measures of the Federal Reserve Banks’ cost of
equity capital. Journal of Banking & Finance 30:6, 1687-17⒒ [Crossref]
89⒊ Holger Daske. 200⒍ Economic Benefits of Adopting IFRS or US-GAAP - Have the Expected Cost
of Equity Capital Really Decreased?. Journal of Business Finance <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&"/
> Accounting, ahead of print06042803541700⒏ [Crossref]
89⒋ Holger Daske. 200⒍ Economic Benefits of Adopting IFRS or US-GAAP - Have the Expected Cost
of Equity Capital Really Decreased?. Journal of Business Finance <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&"/
> Accounting 33:3-4, 329-37⒊ [Crossref]
89⒌ Holger Daske, Günther Gebhardt, Stefan Klein. 200⒍ Estimating the Expected Cost of Equity Capital
Using Analysts’ Consensus Forecasts. Schmalenbach Business Review 58:1, 2-3⒍ [Crossref]
89⒍ Graham N. Bornholt. 200⒍ Extending the CAPM: The Reward Beta Approach. SSRN Electronic
Journal 5. . [Crossref]
89⒎ Graham N. Bornholt. 200⒍ Expected Utility and Mean-Risk Asset Pricing Models. SSRN Electronic
Journal 5. . [Crossref]
89⒏ Peter L. Bernstein. 200⒌ Capital Ideas: From the Past to the Future. Financial Analysts Journal 61:6,
55-5⒐ [Crossref]
89⒐ Sudipta Basu. 200⒌ Discussion—The Effect of Risk on Price Responses to Unexpected Earnings.
Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 20:4, 483-49⒋ [Crossref]
900. Ho-Chuan (River) Huang *, Pei-Shan Wu. 200⒌ Tests of the CAPM with structural instability and
asymmetry. Applied Financial Economics Letters 1:5, 321-32⒎ [Crossref]
901. Michelle L. Barnes, Jose A. Lopez. 200⒌ Alternative Measures of the Federal Reserve Banks' Cost
of Equity Capital. SSRN Electronic Journal 39. . [Crossref]
902. Michelle L. Barnes, Jose A. Lopez. 200⒌ Alternative Measures of the Federal Reserve Banks' Cost
of Equity Capital. SSRN Electronic Journal 76. . [Crossref]
90⒊ Vijay Gondhalekar, C.R. Narayanaswamy, Sridhar Sundaram. The Long-Term Risk Effects of the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) on the Financial Services Industry 361-37⒎ [Crossref]