toring ri Snes B66 an 8,0) inet ancat dependences 8-6, ¢-> ABE, ie Aalst eyo ames hel he awigssemetitrae! so Rae tad Rens cous eth toe RFDSare [AB G--AEBEABE-"F) tether 34D 2nd ig Now ey oye lst Fb threaten par dependences, young eco bt Rot pr) egegcton en GEaF meant nae oot more pra teem ancsua eats ‘su 4p) 0 224, We, AL), A AE WS) oo; ore nten heehee “rvs TS peti rl wi ones ai ied nl Rds caneby Ton Thar 2 Read operon, REO) Not ute aprons I Tysplcedbeo T, tare no WER deendency, nF aependeny Sone ge ako antes T, pace eT, Spal nlesaeasttintore 12_14_15_ 13 cane pace ampere out 5 ase) = Sot TETRIS MTeante sacedanyuere out 5 pass = SC Tetle l esigs = 5 5= 10 e o;: Cone in ng ey a, 2, nd ae a) So =‘hepa tty wh the many ommanmagstmintontip=nasiumnostdtcenteepecea erin cnty athe any. Tl, nm pebeensin “ot ome ‘Consider aration RIA, withthe FD's{AB6-r BE and D> AB} Then find the number of superrys of Rist " “ Ca cama A superkey isa combination of columas that uniquely identifies any re ‘Within @eatona database management system (RDBMS) tbl. “ere, Candidate keys are (DC, ABC). Therefore No.of super keys = 2S-2) #245-3) -2"S-4) Sr42=10 ‘oa nn ge ein nmap eth tt © erent OO on retort eo: © 5 Fran(lexs)— 2) 1 we conver the below E ~ R model ino relational mode, the maximum umber of tuples possible i elation Teaches is wet Professor Couse | ener crs ‘Here, | professor can teach I course and 1 couse can be taught by mile teachers So, couverted relational mode wll contain to tables 1. Professor (Pi, Pname,.. (ther atibutes), Cid) // Assuming column ane for example, Pid isthe Primary Key and Cid isthe Foreign Key 2. Conrse (Cid, Cuame,.. (other atibues) )/ Cid isthe Primary Key Now as Cid isa foreign Key in Professors table, rules of Cid in couse table will boa subset of tuples oF ed in professors able. Hence maximum aumber of tuples sequal othe tuples in Profesor able. ev etitnse @_—_weeeertnesineresrsmumbertupesin couseWatson ae wia eAR > €,€°4) eescampensit BEM: Men chan erate © "i vestitrsc wasn, pnt pening depen © reverse tpn een © tertvete rb ith tiptoe: For given FD's {AB->C, CA} , CK= {AB, BC} INF , 2NF and 3NF is satisfied and. C-> A is violating BCNF rule so ‘decompose the relation Here, we can decompose the relation into 4-different types. (Casel: RI(AB) R2 (BC) itis not LLJ, DP but satisfies BCNF condition. ‘Case2; RAB) R2 (AC) itis not LLJ, DP but satisfies BCNF condition. ‘Case3: RAC) R2 (BC) itis LLI and satisfying BCNF conditions but itis not DP. ‘Cased: RI(ABC) R2(AC) it is LL nad DP but it is not satisfying BCNF conditions. ome the table an ure geno “henaichotefooningsttene we core? W glondgzstep prin bee reat 1 gland zene iret o- ——— Seventeen as Comet opon lute and teste aga ili aed stats and enh nd wee© [eat verre #2) iia © [Yee [Ye em. scees 2) © [Pee [Perm oes 2) om] alert a mg aaa (Bhar tet ano Fevanabes es any many edt an at wat earth apg cesar 8, om cabernet Conse 2a th einige. encom, tpn Rad Deh hefooning ona eden {eamane-> carte i> aane er me, a> Rd) ithecnatasesredsigne uit ong eas (cane care (rg cnmnexo 15 (eames 0) ‘hen wats eset emaon Dat ene staat (Coons aye) wth D5 extant] "2p cantons car nF pd carte Co) 13 Coons pl ot wth (creme, ne =p oo] an phen) ‘enn mocurhecnes ries Tops prey bee nada ep Daten tren ar orireive epson hee tie ode arta) gest pny ey elt ae omen a > totes tn ot ening er oma o- concn ‘nto cre le, er, eae may WM he en A aac te porto easyer {ho herstaon se oc wea stat en hat cant ay har ated th Pinay ay arena ne epntecy are eset oer at ‘Thou oe sowed to aces fro a ofa rer They hae ting igo sane datas oly ing gh for {ome endo ros ata Vth te caret earn DEMS wih seta he vensent (Ose ‘ome opionSohne: Ot Searty Dn seer propery in DBMS ge the poverto provide lifer ee fcc const erent pepe © weston eects om saan nna Reston RABCo}nth O5[A2B 5,620 DoAtheoen eecmgend esvoretans RL ndsz cht sige ‘oat tnomalem nd SOF adonsnenton samy Theshene rer tanto decmoertnens eRe thet of ates © zee © xnR-u © nore @ BnR=9 “erent -ifar maleneccooomnosenn arlene rts Nib bythe camped ts anni stheconen sre Irottea inate ie aemozod ste Non eno ean RlshaNt js Bross mmestrbaee ena ‘nee Hees aneconpontionaes eM Foreconpostontbely RIE"? “ore tn | Joweranseloreny fit dtinaictngin more oneaatonss'sterand isting nny one anitiswitenineeresn theca been tomy Owen OQ men OH m0 am, et 1 amen rer YO14 7) acl ryan re ae 15rd esc ‘emcee Wo wea tutte Yrs be aid rere area le Sie ‘mn ttn may aatan thar equa recess rat be he ate a we Re e000oo. Initially the value of x is 1. Perform operation x = x ~ | and value of x is 2. This value is read by ‘tansaction TJ, which is read by T2 and so on, If transaction TO fails, rollback the transactions T1,T2,T3,T4....Tu-ly because the transaction TI reads uncommitted value x from TO, so to get, correct result, T1,T2,T3,T4...Th-1 have to be rolled back and to get the original value of x= 1, transaction TO is also rolled back. so finally all'n' transactions are rolled back. Comet poe an Consider the following schema and relational algebra query. ‘Student (Sid, Sname, Sage) Course (Cid, CourseName, Credit) Enrolled (Sid, Cid) Hag( Student) ~ Rag(Oagancs (COUSE) M Enrolled) ‘Which of the following is correct about relational algebra Q” © west saco nie cntintoton cnet tens sabes Manto esterase cotesnateton oss wih eer nor aos "Ssloredt Estas) What the above SQL query prints? select count(*) Consider the following able: cid [marks 1 [io 2 [0 3 [so 1 [so 5 [so Comet opon‘The SQL query is selecting the exam mark which is exactly inthe middle, i.e, median of the marks, ow, sph gbes wnt osetia Emenee on, 04. Bet sins oer Semctds tos: SLLEToept ROM Emp WHERE SMa’ GROUP BY De RANG NG [Sa > (SELECT ESN FROME, Thecututuitbe © wees th argent opis antag the ration Oars avnge ye aoe anesthe nes etheepatn © reser trae sn sma ene emai anette oon © reser stale cml mer tan te eget etn “erent Fotonrosatectig tent thm 208 Sconsqonrosetig oestrone Intention tint ANB. foecancrmie te aie by eng honoring AN. ew ee) ‘Consider a table R (A.B,C,D.E) with functional dependencies as : AGB BoC D-E ‘Table is decomposed as D={ RI (A,B) ,R2 (B,C) ,R3 (DE) }. ‘Thea decomposition is© rn sg ante errr pertain, Comet opon Admonpetensoast (nn str ocompesetaer sapere longa (tletacot attest nan sold be hey nat ketone, wecanertycetio Alt) Fa) ALT) = 9 en © _ etter tts ress ttc pig “aoc ey thy contented outs srcal caeera tht Dt theo te ety th ly Sa elngag tome bees cho terpenes he roslyn the aearRol seater lure amber oleyrerAbsouthe miata! lye Sethe ag tase mre ta the imam ube hye renee eds Tetal Weleda orth ‘eta areola he one depend -=Y9-02 wD = 1 The cecompaton toh ‘vt © rhe nt seen roering on) han ene pri met opion Given , sot of dependencies X > ¥ , ¥ > Z, Z > Wand W > Y and the table is decomposed into (x.y) , (yz) and (y:). Lossless property is satisfied since intersection of (xy) (2) is y and y+ = xyz which is superkey for (y.2) hence we can merge them Then intersection (x,y2) and (0) is y+ = yw since Y¥--> Z and Z > WHence the given decomposition is lossless. For dependency preservation , we have to write all the direct and implied dependencies for each of the subrelations.Lers write for each of the sub-relation one by one. a) For (x.y) X > Yidiect) 'b) For (y.2) : ¥ > Z(direct) ,Z > Y¢implied from Z > W and WY) €) For (w.y) : W > Y(direct), ¥ > Wimplied from ¥ > Z and Z > W) ‘Now for checking the dependency preservation , we have to check from the original FD set whether each of the FDs are satisfied from the FDs which arethere in the subrelations. ‘Now X--> ¥,¥ > Zand W-—-> ¥ are also there in subrelations 50 n0 concern here. For Z.--> W,, we have found the implied dependencies Z > ¥ and ¥ > W from which we can obtain Z ~> W-Hence this FD is also satisfied in the subrelation Hence the given decomposition is dependency preservation also, rhe ane teetering om panes ta ae inrawaiNiakswhere a end stans ea © mre, es comet opion {Aten hat pean princi a pr a ence carck prin ‘ashes acinar wtntystanacen vt render ou ter tans et er oe sat adit ene, i tetrad er orate te acon, hens arta {aman we ans and ny peeing acon drm i ern an ico bt cn eect ant hoctvea te arene a rey sc sed ch. he te ote tice ances ont te tong ala Mth logit rh rn =~ = = ~~ EECERE RPE EEEE Lung esther 17, 49,5 2d ag nh pened aren he eo ‘erg heer th cer 5,4, 25 4a dg ee opps oe etna tate eo om ef Comet opon tant tether tpt nee ering 15nd 25 es chng the te src ay te dng amine “riers src chang When ing edbrcon lbp nee seen eon thea 7 | ‘eer enn 9209472 Fly hen 1 etm ebro pbs tee wontons iy thera ee. otanet ering nadine o015,825and ils hong teste When ree at mate wit sng he eo Eiatee hens acelin cei oon intact he dle it chargthe ered