INDORE INSTITUTE OF LAW

(AFFILIATED TO D.A.V.V. & BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA)

JURISPRUDENCE

TOPIC: Historical school of Jurisprudence

SUBMITTED BY:

Shashank pandey

BALLB 5th Semester

SUBMITTED TO:

Asst. professor Vishwajeet sir

ACADEMIC SESSION

2021-22

Enrolment Number: DL2000245 Roll No.:30440235

Date of Submission:
 CERTIFICATE

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT SHASHANK PANDEY OF BALLB 3rd SEM. HAS

SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED THE RESEARCH WORK IN [TOPIC] PARTIAL
FULFILMENT OF REQUIREMENTS FOR THE KNOWLEDGE OF GIVEN BY [NAME
OF FACULTY] PRESCRIBED BY INDORE INSTITUTE OF LAW.

THIS ASSIGNMENT IS THE RECORD OF AUTHENTIC WORK CARRIED OUT

DURING THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2021-22.

TEACHER’S SIGNATURE -----------------------------------------

DATE-------------------------
 DECLARATION

I HEREBY DECLARE THAT THE PROJECT WORK ENTITLED ORIGIN OF HINDU

LAW SUBMITTED FOR FULFILLING THE ESSENTIAL CRITERIA OF INDORE
INSTITUTE OF LAW, IS A RECORD OF AN ORIGINAL WORK DONE BY ME UNDER
THE GUIDANCE OF KUSUM JOSHI IN BALLB 5th SEM, INDORE INSTITUTE OF
LAW FOR THE ACADEMIC SESSION 2021-22.

NAME- SHASHANK PANDEY

BALLB

5th Semester
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I, SHASHANK PANDEY STUDENT OF BALLB 5 th SEMESTER WOULD LIKE TO

EXPRESS MY SPECIAL THANKS OF GRATITUDE TO MY PROFESSOR AND GUIDE
VISHWAJEET BHOKAR SIR WHO GAVE US THE GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY TO DO
THIS WONDERFUL ASSIGNMENT ON THE TOPIC HISTORICAL SCHOOL OF
JURISPRUDENCE. I AM SINCERELY GRATEFUL TO MY TEACHER FOR GUIDING
US AND PROVIDING THE RELEVANT INFORMATION AND THUS HELPING ME TO
COMPLETE THE PROJECT SUCCESSFULLY. I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO GIVE A
HEARTY THANKS TO MY PARENTS WHO SUPPORTED ME MORALLY AS WELL
AS ECONOMICALLY IN COMPLETION OF THIS ASSIGNMENT WITHOUT ANY
TYPE OF PROBLEM. I WOULD LIKE TO APPRECIATE AND THANK ALL MY
FRIENDS AND ALMA MATES FOR HELPING ME IN EVERY POSSIBLE MANNER IN
THE WAY OF COMPLETION OF MY PROJECT. LAST BUT NOT THE LEAST I
WANT TO THANK THE ALMIGHTY WHO MADE EVERYTHING POSSIBLE.
Contents
Introduction.............................................................................................6
The concept and meaning of Historical School of Jurisprudence............6
Reasons for the Origin of Historical School of Jurisprudence..................6
Jurists of Historical School of Jurisprudence............................................7
Montesquieu.....................................................................................................................................7
Savigny...............................................................................................................................................7
Basic Concept of Savigny’s Volksgeist................................................................................................8
Sir Henry Maine.................................................................................................................................9
Static and Progressive Society.........................................................................................................10
Georg Friedrich Puchta....................................................................................................................10

Conclusion............................................................................................. 12
Introduction

Jurisprudence is the theory and study of law. It studies the origin and concept of law. Law
has a very complex concept. Its understanding varies from people to people. Everyone has a
different understanding of the law. For example, a law student and lawyer understand the
law as a solution of every dispute. An ordinary citizen understands the purpose of the law is
to punish them.

Historical school of Jurisprudence argued that the law is the exaggerative form of social
custom, economic needs, conventions religious principles, and relations of the people with
society. The followers of this school argued that law is found not made. The historical school
doesn’t believe and support the idea of the natural school of law which believe that the
origin of law is from superior authority and have some divine relevance.

The concept and meaning of Historical School of Jurisprudence

With the changing needs and nature of persons, the law should be changed. The historical
school follows the concept of man-made laws. ‘Law is formulated for the people and by the
people’ means that the law should be according to the changing needs of the people. And
everyone understand their own need better than anyone else.

The basic source of the Historical School of Jurisprudence is the habits an custom of people
which changes according to their needs and requirement. It is also called the continental
school of Jurisprudence.

This school rejects the ideas of formation of law by judges and the origin from some divine
relevance. In the words of Salmond, “That branch of legal philosophy which is termed
historical jurisprudence is the general portion of legal history. It bears the same relation of
to legal history at large as analytical jurisprudence bears the systematic exposition of the
legal system. It deals, in the first place, with the general principles governing the origin and
development of law, and with the influences that affect the law. It deals, in the second
place, with the origin and development of those legal conceptions and principles which are
so essential in their nature as to deserve a place in the philosophy of law- the same
conceptions and principles, that is to say, which are dealt with in another manner and from
another point of view by analytical jurisprudence. Historical jurisprudence is the history of
the first principles and conceptions of the legal system.”

Reasons for the Origin of Historical School of Jurisprudence

The Historical School believe that law is made from people according to their changing
needs. Habits and customs are the main sources of the Historical School of Jurisprudence.
According to Dias, Historical school arose as a reaction against the natural law theories.

The reasons for the emergence of this school are:

It came as a reaction to the natural school of law.

Natural school of law believes that the law is originated from some divine power. Natural
law is also called the Eternal law. It exists since the beginning of the world. It is closely
associated with the morality and intention of God. Indian constitution has some relevance
of the natural law in its articles.

Historical school of Jurisprudence focuses on the formation of law by people not by some
divine origin.

It opposes the ideology of the analytical school of jurisprudence.

Analytical school of jurisprudence is also called Austinian School. It is established by John

Austin. The subject matter of Analytical school of Jurisprudence is positive law. It focuses on
the origin of law the judges, state and legislators. Historical School laid emphasis on the
formation of law by people through customs and habits, not by the judges and superior
authority.

Jurists of Historical School of Jurisprudence

Montesquieu
According to Sir Henry Maine, the 1st Jurist to adopt the historical method of understanding
the legal institution was Montesquieu. He laid the foundation of the historical school in
France. According to him, it is irrelevant to discuss whether the law is good or bad because
the law depends on social, political and environmental conditions prevailing in society.
Montesquieu concluded that the “law is the creation of the climate, local situation, accident
or imposture”. He was of the view that law must change according to changing needs of the
society. He did not establish any theory or philosophy of the relation between the law and
society. He suggested that the law should answer the needs of the place and should change
according to time, place and needs of the people.

One of the best-known works of Montesquieu was his book ‘The Spirit of laws’. In this book,
he represents his beliefs in political Enlightenment ideas and suggests how the laws are
required to modify according to the needs of people and society.

Savigny
Savigny is regarded as a father of the Historical school. He argued that the coherent nature
of the legal system is the usually due to the failure to understand its history and origin.
According to h im, the law is “ a product of times the germ of which like the germ of State,
exists in the nature of men as being made for society and which develops from this germ
various forms, according to the environing the influences which play upon it.”

Savigny believes that the law cannot be borrowed from outside. And the main source of law
is the consciousness of the people.
He was of the view that the law of the state grows with the strengthening of the state
nationality and law dies or fade away when nationality loosens its strength in the state.

Friedmann concludes the Savigny’s theory

Law is like language which eventually grows.

Law cannot be of universal validity nor be constructed on the basis of certain rational
principles or eternal principles.

Law is sui generis. Savigny argued that law is like the language having its own national
character. So, it can’t be universally applied and varies according to the people. He
mentioned this in the self-written pamphlets “Vom Berufunserer Zeit für Gesetzgebungand
Rechtswissenschaft (On the Vocation of Our Age for Legislation and Jurisprudence).”

Law is found or discovered not made. It can’t be made artificially like the invention of an
object.

Law is found on the basis of consciousness, customs and beliefs of the people.

Basic Concept of Savigny’s Volksgeist

Volksgeist means “national character”. According to Savignty’s Volksgesit, the law is the
product of general consciousness of the people or will. The concept of Volksgeist was served
as a warning against the hasty legislation and introduce the revolutionary abstract ideas on
the legal system. Unless they support the general will of the people.

Basically, Savigny was of the view that law should not be found from deliberate legislation
but should be made and arises out of the general consciousness of the people.

Criticism of Savigny’s View

The views of Savigny were criticized by many jurists:

Charles Allen
Charles Allen criticized Savigny’s view that law should be found or based on the customs.
Allen was of the view that customs are not the outcome of common consciousness of
people. But they are the outcome of the interest of a powerful and strong of a ruling class.
For example, slavery which was recognized and prevailed in certain societies by the
powerful classes of society.

Prof. Stone

Prof. Stone criticized the Savigny and says that he (Savigny) ignored the efficiency of the
legislation and planned law and social change. And over emphasized on the consciousness
of people.
For example, In India, the abolition of Sati and widow’s remarriage are brought in to change
because of powerful and effective legislation.

Sir Henry Maine

Sir Henry Maine was the founder of the English Historical School of Law. Savigny’s views of
Historical school was carried forward in England by Sir Henry Maine.

Major Works by Sir Henry Maine

 The first work of Maine ‘Ancient Law’ was published in 1861.

 He also wrote Village Communities (1871),
 Early History of Institutions (1875)
 Dissertations of Early Law and Custom (1883).

Maine studied the Indian legal system deeply as he was law member in the Council of the
Governor–General of India b/w 1861 to 1869. Maine’s ideas were incorporated by the best
things in the theories of Savigny and Montesquieu and he avoided what was abstract and
unreal Romanticism.

Maine favored legislation and codification of law, unlike Savigny.

Maine describes the development of law in four stages:

First stage

Rulers are believed to be acting under divine inspiration. And the laws are made on the
commands of the rulers. For example, Themistes of ancient Greek. The judgment of the king
was considered to be the judgment of God or some divine body. King was merely an
executor of judgments of God, not the law-maker.

Second stage

Then the commands of King converted into customary law. The custom prevails in the ruler
or majority class. Customs seems to have succeeded to the right and authorities of the king.

Third stage

The knowledge & administration of customs goes into the hands of a minority, Due to the
weakening of the lawmaking power of the original law-makers like Priests the knowledge of
customs goes into the hands of a minority class or ordinary class. And the ruler is
superseded by a minority who obtain control over the law.

Fourth stage

In the fourth and last stage, the law is codified and promulgated.
Static and Progressive Society

Static societies

Societies which does not progress and develop their legal structure after the fourth stage of
development of law are Static society. Static societies don’t progress beyond the era of
codes.

Progressive Society

Societies which go on progressing after the fourth stage of development of law are
Progressive Societies. They develop their laws with the help of these instruments:

Legal Fiction
Legal Fiction changes the law according to the needs of the society without making any
change in the letters of the law. Legal fiction harmonizes the legal order but made the law
difficult to understand.

Equity

According to Maine, “Equity is a body of rules existing by the side of the original civil law &
founded on distinct principles”. Equity helps to remove rigidity and injustice.

Legislation

The legislation is the most effective and desirable method of legal change. Laws will be
enacted and became operative officially.

Georg Friedrich Puchta

Puchta was a German Jurist. He was a disciple of Savigny and a great jurist of Historical
school of Jurisprudence. Georg Friedrich Puchta’s ideas were more logical and improved
than Savigny’s ideas. He traced the development and evolution of law from the very
beginning. His ideas mainly focused on the situation when conflict arises between general
will and individual will. In the conflict between general will and individual will, the state
came into existence. And find out the midway to resolve the conflict.

The main concept of Puchta’s ideas was that “neither the people nor the state alone can
make and formulate laws”. Both State and individual are the sources of law.

Contribution of Puchta

Puchta gave twofold aspects of human will and origin of the state.
Despite some points of distinction Puchta and Savigny, he improved the views of Savigny
and made them more logical.
Conclusion

Historical School of Jurisprudence describes the origin of law. This school argues that the
law was found not made. The main source of law is Kings Judgment, Customs and habits.
Jurists like Montesquieu, Savigny, Sir Henry Maine, and Georg Friedrich Puchta are the
supporter of the Historical School of Jurisprudence. According to Sir Henry Maine,
Montesquieu was the first jurist of Historical school. Sir Henry Maine was the jurist of
English Historical School. He was more logical and accept the concept of Codification and
legislation.

Savigny was the father of Historical school. He argued that Law is like language and have a
national character. Law is not universal. While Puchta improved the ideas of Savigny and
argued that both state and people are equally important and source of law.