Chapter 3
Assessing Psychological Disorders
Clinical assessment
Systematic evaluation and measurement
- Psychological
- Biological
- Social
Diagnosis
Degree of fit between symptoms and diagnostic criteria
Purpose
Understanding the individual
Predicting behaviour
Treatment planning
Evaluating outcomes
Funnel analogy
Broad, multidimensional start
Narrows to specific problems
Key Concepts in Assessment
Reliability
Degree of consistency of a measurement
Example: ‘Agreement’ between two different testing times or between
two different evaluators
Validity
Does the test measure what it is supposed to?
Several types:
- Concurrent: Comparison of results of one assessment with
another measure known to be valid
- Predictive: How well the assessment predicts outcomes
- Construct: Degree to which test or item measures the
unobservable construct it claims to measure (e.g. depression)
Standardisation
Consistent use of techniques
Provides normative population data
Examples of things that are kept constant
- Administration procedures
- Scoring
- Evaluation of data
The Clinical Encounter
Clinical encounter
Assesses multiple domains
- Presenting problem
- Current and past behaviour
- Detailed history
- Attitudes and emotions
Most common clinical assessment method
Structured or semi structured.
Example of semi structured interview: Anxiety Disorders Interview
Schedule for DSM-5 (ADIS-5) has modules pertaining to anxiety, mood
and related disorders, designed to assess DSM-5 criteria.
Mental State Examination
Mental state examination
General appearance
Cognition
Mood and affect
Reality testing and organisation
Behaviour
Physical Examination
Physical examinations can be helpful in diagnosing mental health problems
Understand or rule out physical aetiologies
- Toxicities
- Medication side effects
- Allergic reactions
- Metabolic conditions
Behavioural Assessment
Behavioural observation
Identification and observation of target behaviours
- Target behaviour: Behaviour of interest (e.g. something that needs
to be increased or decreased)
Direct observation conducted by assessor (e.g. therapist) or by individual
or loved one
Goal: Determine the factors that are influencing target behaviours
The ABCs of observation
- Antecedents
- Behaviour
- Consequences
When individual observes self, it is called self-monitoring
May be informal or formal (e.g. using established rating scales)
The problem of reactivity
- Simply observing a behaviour may cause it to change due to the
individual’s knowledge of being observed
Psychological Testing
Psychological testing
Specific tools for assessment of:
- Cognition
- Emotion
- Behaviour
Include specialised areas such as personality and intelligence
Psychological Testing: Projective Tests
Projective tests
Rooted in psychoanalytic tradition
Used to assess unconscious processes
Project aspects of personality onto ambiguous test stimuli
Require high degree of inference in scoring and interpretation
Examples
The Rorschach inkblot test; Thematic Apperception Test (TAT)
Strengths
May be useful icebreakers
One way to gather qualitative data
Criticisms
Hard to standardise
Reliability and validity data tend to be mixed
Objective Tests and Personality Inventories
Objective tests
Roots in empirical tradition
Test stimuli are less ambiguous
Require minimal clinical inference in scoring and interpretation
Personality inventories
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)
Extensive reliability, validity and normative database
Psychological Testing
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory
567 items (MMPI-2)
True/false responses
Example item: ‘I would like to be a singer’.
Interpretation
- Individual scales
- Profiles
Psychological Testing and Objective Tests
Intelligence tests
Nature of intellectual functioning and IQ
- Originally developed as a measure of degree to which children’s
performance diverged from others in their grade
The deviation IQ
- Compare a person’s scores against those of other people who are
the same age
Verbal and performance domains
Neuropsychological Testing
Purpose and goals
Assess broad range of skills and abilities
Goal is to understand brain-behaviour relations
Examples
The Luria-Nebraska and Halstead-Reitan batteries
Designed to assess for brain damage
Test diverse skills ranging from grip strength to sound recognition,
attention, concentration
Problems with neuropsychological tests
False positives: Mistakenly show a problem where there is none
False negatives: Fail to detect a problem that is present
Neuroimaging and Brain Structure
Neuroimaging: Pictures of the brain
Two objectives
- Understand brain structure
- Understand brain function
Neuroimaging of brain structure
Computerised axial tomography (CAT or CT scan)
- Utilises X-rays
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
- Utilises strong magnetic fields
- Better resolution than CT scan
Positron emission tomography (PET)
Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)
Both involve injection of radioactive isotopes
- Isotopes react with oxygen, blood and glucose in the brain
Functional MRI (fMRI) – brief changes in brain activity
Neuroimaging Advantages and Disadvantages
Chief advantage:
Yield detailed information
Lead to better understanding of brain structure and function
Disadvantages:
Still not well understood
Expense
Lack adequate norms
Limited clinical utility
Psychophysiological Assessment
Purpose
Assesses brain structure, function and activity of the nervous system
Psychophysiological assessment domains
Electroencephalogram (EEG) – brain-wave activity
- ERP – Event-related potentials = brain response to a specific
experience (e.g. hearing a tone)
Heart rate and respiration – cardiorespiratory activity
Electrodermal response and levels – sweat gland activity
Uses of routine psychophysiological assessment
Disorders involving a strong physiological component
Examples
PTSD, sexual dysfunctions, sleep disorders
Headache and hypertension
Diagnosing Psychological Disorders: Foundations in
Classification
Diagnostic classification
Classification is central to all sciences
Assignment to categories based on shared attributes or relations
Idiographic strategy
What is unique about an individual’s personality, cultural background or
circumstances?
Nomothetic strategy
Often used when identifying a specific psychological disorder, to make a
diagnosis
Terminology of classification systems
Taxonomy – classification in a scientific context
Nosology – taxonomy in psychological/ medical phenomena
Nomenclature – labels in a nosological system (e.g. ‘panic disorder’,
‘depressive disorder’)
Categorical and dimensional approaches
Classical (or pure) categorical approach – strict categories (e.g. you either
have social anxiety disorder or you don’t)
Dimensional approach – classification along dimensions (e.g. different
people have varying amounts of anxiety in social situations)
Prototypical approach – combines classical and dimensional views
Widely used classification systems
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
- Updated every 10 to 20 years
- Current edition (released May 2013): DSM-5
- Previous edition called DSM-IV-TR
ICD-10
- International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10)
- Published by the World Health Organization (WHO)
History of the DSM
Prior to 1980, diagnoses were made based on biological or
psychoanalytic theory
Introduction of DSM-III in 1980 revolutionised classification
- Classification newly relied on specific lists of symptoms,
improving reliability and validity
- Diagnoses classified along five ‘axes’ describing types of problems
(e.g. disorder categories, health problems, life stressors)
DSM-IV introduced in 1994
- Eliminated previous distinction between psychological and organic
mental disorders
- Reflected appreciation that all disorders are influenced by both
psychological and biological factors
DSM-IV-TR (‘text revision’ of DSM-IV) incorporated new research and
slightly altered criteria accordingly
History of the DSM
DSM-IV introduced in 1994
- Eliminated previous distinction between psychological and organic
mental disorders
- Reflected appreciation that all disorders are influenced by both
psychological and biological factors
DSM-IV-TR (‘text revision’ of DSM-IV) incorporated new research and
slightly altered criteria accordingly
Basic characteristics
- Removed axial system
- Clear inclusion and exclusion criteria for disorders
- Disorders are categorised under broad headings
- Empirically grounded, prototypic approach to classification
Adding New Diagnoses
New disorder labels are created when groups of individuals are identified
whose symptoms are not adequately explained by existing labels
Example: Premenstrual dysphoric disorder
- New disorder in DSM-5
- Relatively rare and severe emotional disturbance present during the
majority of premenstrual phases
Example of new disorder that did not make it into the DSM-5: Mixed
anxiety–depression
- Insufficient research to justify the creation of a new label
Unresolved Issues in DSM-5
The problem of comorbidity
Defined as two or more disorders for the same person
High comorbidity is extremely common
Emphasises reliability, maybe at the expense of validity (i.e. may
artificially ‘split’ diagnoses that are very similar)
Dimensional classification:
DSM was intended to move towards a more dimensional approach, but
critics say it does not improve much from DSM-IV
Labelling issues and stigmatisation
Some labels have negative connotations and may make patients less
likely to seek treatment
Summary of Clinical Assessment and Diagnosis
Clinical assessment and diagnosis
Aims to fully understand the client
Aids in understanding and relieving human suffering
Based on reliable, valid and standardised information
Chapter 6
OUTLINE
Somatic Symptom and Related Disorders
- Somatic symptom disorder
- Illness anxiety disorder
- Psychological factors affecting medical condition
- Conversion disorder
- Functional somatic syndromes
Dissociative Disorders
- Depersonalisation–derealisation disorder
FOCUS QUESTIONS
What are the features of somatic symptom disorders?
How are somatic symptom disorders managed?
What are the features of dissociative disorders?
How do dissociative disorders develop?
Somatic Symptom Disorders
Somatic symptom disorders = excessive or maladaptive response to
physical symptoms or health concerns
Soma = body
- Preoccupation with health or symptoms
- Physical complaints
- Usually no identifiable medical condition
Types of disorders
- Somatic symptom disorder
- Illness anxiety disorder
- Psychological factors affecting medical condition
- Conversion disorder
- Factitious disorder
First identified by French doctor who noticed patients coming to him
with numerous complaints with no medical basis
Formerly called Briquet’s syndrome
Presence of one or more somatic symptoms
- Symptom is often medically unexplained
Excessive thoughts, feelings and behaviours related to the symptoms
(e.g. excessive thoughts about seriousness of the symptom, frequent
complaints and requests for help, health-related anxiety, excessive
research)
Substantial impairment in social or occupational functioning
DSM-5 Criteria: Somatic Symptom Disorder
A. One or more somatic symptoms that are distressing and/or result in
significant disruption of daily life.
B. Excessive thoughts, feelings and behaviours related to the somatic
symptoms or associated health concerns as manifested by at least one of
the following:
1. Disproportionate and persistent thoughts about the seriousness of
one’s symptoms.
2. High level of health-related anxiety.
3. Excessive time and energy devoted to these symptoms or health
concerns.
C. Although any one symptom may not be continuously present, the state of
being symptomatic is persistent (typically more than six months).
Specify if: With predominant pain (previously pain disorder): This specifier is
for individuals whose somatic complaints predominantly involve pain.
Specify current severity: Mild: Only one of the symptoms in Criterion B is
fulfilled.
Moderate: Two or more of the symptoms specified in Criterion B are fulfilled.
Severe: Two or more of the symptoms specified in Criterion B are fulfilled, plus
there are multiple somatic complaints (or one very severe somatic symptom).
Somatic Symptom Disorder
Statistics
- Relatively rare condition
- Onset usually in adolescence
- More likely to affect unmarried women from lower socioeconomic
groups
- Runs a chronic course
Research to date is limited due to recent redefinition of the disorder in
DSM-5
Illness Anxiety Disorder
Very similar to DSM-IV hypochondriasis
Clinical description:
- Severe anxiety about the possibility of having or acquiring a
serious disease
- Actual symptoms are either very mild or absent
- Strong disease conviction
- Medical reassurance does not seem to help
DSM-5 Criteria: Illness Anxiety Disorder
A. Preoccupation with fears of having or acquiring a serious illness.
B. Somatic symptoms are not present or, if present, are only mild in
intensity. If another medical condition is present or there is a high risk for
developing a medical condition (e.g. strong family history is present), the
preoccupation is clearly excessive or disproportionate.
C. There is a high level of anxiety about health, and the individual is easily
alarmed about personal health status.
D. The individual performs excessive health-related behaviours (e.g.
repeatedly checks his or her body for signs of illness) or exhibits
maladaptive avoidance (e.g. avoids doctors’ appointments and hospitals).
E. Illness preoccupation has been present for at least six months, but the
specific illness that is feared may change over that period of time.
F. The illness-related preoccupation is not better explained by another
mental disorder, such as somatic symptom disorder, generalised anxiety
disorder or obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Specify whether: Care-seeking type: Medical care, including physician visits or
undergoing tests and procedures, is frequently used. Care-avoidant type:
Medical care is rarely used. From American Psychiatric Association. (2013).
Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC.
Illness Anxiety Disorder
Affects approximately % 4-6 the general population
Affects all ages approximately equally
Often comorbid with anxiety and mood disorders
Culturally Specific Disorders
Koro = Fear in some Asian cultures of genitals retracting into the abdomen
Dhat = Symptoms (e.g. dizziness, fatigue) attributed to semen loss in some
Indian cultures
Kyol goeu = “Wind overload” among Khmer people of Cambodia.
Fear that wind cannot circulate effectively through the body
Dizziness, weakness, fatigue and trembling are seen as signs of this
illness
Causes of Somatic Symptom Disorders
Consistent overreaction to physical signs and sensations
Cause is unlikely to be found in isolated biological or psychological
factors
Genetic component is present
May have learnt from family to focus anxiety on physical sensations
Three additional factors that may contribute to aetiology
- Stressful life events
- Illness in family during childhood
- Benefits of illness (e.g. sympathy, attention)
Schematic presentation: Somatic Symptom Disorders
Example: Causes of Illness Anxiety Disorder
Somatic Symptom Disorder and Antisocial Personality Disorder
Findings from family and genetic studies: Link between severe forms of
somatic symptom disorder and antisocial personality disorder
Shared features
- Often begin early in life
- Chronic and difficult to treat
- More common in lower socioeconomic groups
- Linked to substance abuse and interpersonal problems
Shared feature: disinhibition/impulsivity
- Individuals with somatic symptom disorder impulsively seek
sympathy and other benefits of illness
Different manifestations of impulsivity
- Somatic symptom disorder: dependence
- Antisocial personality disorder: aggression
Gender difference
- ASPD much more common in males
- SSD more common in females
Management of Somatic Symptom Disorders
Limited research to date
Mild cases of illness anxiety disorder may benefit from detailed education
and some reassurance from medical professionals
Cognitive-behavioural therapy can effectively treat illness anxiety
disorder
Antidepressants may be helpful
‘Gatekeeper’ physician assigned to limit excessive use of medical
services
Reduce supportive consequences of illness
- E.g. family members stop providing attention
Psychological Factors Affecting Medical Condition
Diagnostic label useful for clinicians
Indicates that psychological variables may be impacting a general
medical issue
Examples:
- Patient’s concentration difficulties make it difficult to take
medication on time
- Patient fails to comply with medical advice due to being in denial
about diagnosis
Conversion Disorder
Full name: Conversion disorder (functional neurological symptom
disorder)
Key feature: Altered motor or sensory function that is inconsistent with
neural/medical conditions and not better explained by another disorder
- Often suggestive of neurological problem, but no such problem is
detected
Must cause significant distress/impairment
May display indifferent attitude towards symptoms (la belle indifference)
Functioning may be mostly normal
Not deliberately faking symptoms for the purpose of concrete gains
(malingering)
DSM-5 Criteria Summary: Conversion Disorder
Conversion Disorder
Rare condition, with a chronic intermittent course
Often comorbid with anxiety and mood disorders
Seen primarily in females
Onset usually in adolescence
Common in some cultural and/or religious groups
Conversion Disorder: Causes
Not well understood
Freudian psychodynamic view is still common, though unsubstantiated
- Past trauma or unconscious conflict is ‘converted’ to a more
acceptable manifestation, i.e. physical symptoms
Primary/secondary gains
- Freud thought primary gain was the escape from dealing with a
conflict
- Secondary gains: Attention, sympathy, etc.
Sociocultural factors
- More common in lower education, lower SES
- Patients likely to adopt symptoms with which they are already
familiar
Conversion Disorder: Management
If onset after a trauma, may need to process trauma or treat posttraumatic
symptoms
Remove sources of secondary gain
Reduce supportive consequences of talking about physical symptoms
Factitious Disorders
Purposely faking physical symptoms
May actually induce physical symptoms or just pretend to have them
No obvious external gains
- Only external gain may be benefit of ‘sick role’ (e.g. sympathy)
- Distinguished from malingering, in which physical symptoms are
faked for the purpose of achieving a concrete objective (e.g. getting
paid time off, avoiding military service)
DSM-5 Criteria Summary: Factitious Disorder
Factitious Disorder Imposed on Another
Formerly known as Munchausen’s syndrome by proxy
Inducing symptoms in another person
- Typically a caregiver induces symptoms in a dependent (e.g. child)
Purpose = receive attention or sympathy
Factitious Disorder Imposed on Another: Atypical Child Abuse
An Overview of Dissociative Disorders
Severe alterations or detachments from reality
Affect identity, memory or consciousness
Depersonalisation – distortion in perception of one’s body or experience
(e.g. feeling like your own body isn’t real)
Derealisation – losing a sense of the external world (e.g. sense of living in
a dream)
Types of DSM-5 dissociative disorders
- Depersonalisation–derealisation disorder
- Dissociative amnesia
- Dissociative trance disorder
- Dissociative identity disorder
Depersonalisation–Derealisation Disorder
Recurrent episodes in which a person has sensations of unreality
of one’s own body or surroundings
Feelings dominate and interfere with life functioning
Only diagnosed if primary problem involves depersonalisation
and derealisation
- Similar symptoms may occur in the context of other
disorders, including panic disorder and PTSD
DSM-5 Criteria Summary: Depersonalisation–Derealisation
Disorder
Depersonalisation–Derealisation Disorder
Facts and statistics:
High comorbidity with anxiety and mood disorder
1–3% of the population
Onset is typically in adolescence
Usually runs a lifelong chronic course
Having a history of trauma makes this disorder more likely to manifest
Treatment:
Research is very scarce
No systematic research on psychological treatments
Trial of antidepressant (fluoxetine) showed no effect above placebo
Dissociative Amnesia