India Urban Infrastructure 2006 Report
India Urban Infrastructure 2006 Report
The views expressed in the report are those of the individual authors and not the institution they are affiliated to or that of
3iNetwork.
INDIA INFRASTRUCTURE REPORT 2006
Urban Infrastructure
3iNetwork
Infrastructure Development Finance Company
Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad
Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur
1
1
YMCA Library Building, Jai Singh Road, New Delhi 110001
With offices in
Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece
Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore
.
South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam
Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press
in the UK and in certain other countries
Published in India
by Oxford University Press, New Delhi
You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover
and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer
ISBN-13: 978-0-19-567874-1
ISBN-10: 0-19-567874-5
T
he history of a nation is created by milestone events, which dramatically change the way society is organized, governed,
and bequeathed to the next generation. In the times to come the 74th Constitutional Amendment (74th CAA 1992) of
the Indian Constitution will probably be documented as one such event. It recognized municipalities as constitutional
bodies forming the third tier of the federal polity of India. This decentralization initiative, while offering immense opportunities
also poses formidable challenges. First mooted by the Rural–Urban Relationship Committee constituted by the Government
of India in 1963, and deliberated over for nearly thirty years, this recommendation finally culminated in the constitutional
amendment in 1992. While building blocks such as municipal accounting reforms and e-Governance have gradually emerged,
not much else has changed since then. The Fifth Pay Commission award, in fact, postponed reforms in the governance of
urban local bodies. The Eleventh and the Twelfth Finance Commissions, bound by the Constitution, initiated transfer of
funds from the central government to local bodies—a standard practice followed in all federal forms of governments—to
ensure that ULBs are able to finance the provision of minimum physical infrastructure required for basic civic life.
The constitutional amendment has altered the governance structure of the country though the actual devolution of power
is at various stages of implementation. The central government has taken a path-breaking step in formulating the Jawaharlal
Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JNNURM), the fruition of which could witness the development of urban infrastructure
at an accelerated pace. This in itself is not sufficient to obliterate the dualism within the urbanization experience of
India. Ambitions of the rural population, the youth, the educated, and the skilled workers cannot even begin to be catalysed
unless all towns with 50,000-plus population get at least clean drinking water, wastewater networks, and proper solid waste
management facilities.
We need to expand physical infrastructure—roads, ports, airports, railways, drinking water and wastewater networks, and
above all electrical power—to satisfy the aspirations and rising expectations of our citizens. Much of the existing infrastructure
is old, worn and, overworked. It needs to be rebuilt, refurbished, and maintained. The implementation of the JNNURM and the
National Urban Transport Policy can usher a silent revolution into the life of even the most marginalized citizen of urban India.
What telecommunication has achieved in the last fifteen years could not have been envisioned way back in July 1991. Though
the changes unfolding in the physical infrastructure space may not be as dramatic, their impact will be even more far-reaching.
I would like to congratulate all the contributors who, under the aegis of the 3iNetwork, have produced this comprehensive
report on urbanization trends, governance of local bodies, and urban planning. The present standards of urban services make
bleak reading. However, this report is not about where we are but, more importantly, about how we can do better.
I trust that readers will find this report as interesting and informative as the previous ones in this series. I earnestly hope that
this report will enrich the dialogue and debate that help us as a nation make choices and decisions that will improve the living
conditions of our citizens and provide greater avenues for employment to the young, educated, skilled, and unskilled workers
of our country.
RAJIV B. LALL
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Anupam Rastogi
W
ritings on urban issues are inevitably influenced by the personal experiences of the authors. This report has benefited
from first hand impressions and experiences of many citizens of urban India apart from the authors who finally
contributed to it. I would like to acknowledge the invaluable inputs from those who helped me in conceptualizing,
planning, writing, and preparing this report without holding them responsible for any errors or omissions.
I would like to thank Nasser Munjee who germinated the idea of looking at infrastructure from an urban perspective and
participated in some of the deliberations. My former colleagues Piyush Tiwari, Shubhagato Dasgupta, and Partha Mukhopadhyay
spent hours preparing the framework for this report. Compared to the earlier issues of the India Infrastructure Report, this
report took much longer to plan out but telecommunication made seamless convergence amongst us, possible. Sebastian
Morris, Ajay Pandey, Prem Kalra, and Partha Mukhopadhyay helped in drawing up the detailed scheme of the report. I
would like to thank Sebastian Morris, especially, for making valuable suggestions on academics, practitioners, and policymakers
who could contribute in writing the theme chapters. I would like to thank Urjit Patel, who entrusted the responsibility of
putting the report together to me.
I would also like to thank Amitabh Kundu, Olivier Toutain, P.U. Asnani, Prem Kalra, Shaleen Singh, Pragya Jaswal, Laveesh
Bhandari, Shubhagato Dasgupta, Lee Baker, Chetan Vaidya, O.P. Mathur, Partha Mukhopadhyay, Kala Sridhar, and Jim Hogan
who participated in a meeting on 26 May 2005 at NIPFP, New Delhi. I am grateful to Professor Om Mathur, who organized
the meeting at a very short notice and extended warm hospitality to all the participants. The Writer’s Workshop held at IIT
Kanpur on 2–3 September 2005 was organized by Prem Kalra who worked tirelessly to manage last minute snafus. I would like
to thank Sandeep, Kundan, Sunil Sharma, and S. K. Khullar, who worked diligently behind the scenes to make the workshop a
success. The workshop at IITK also benefited from the participation of Sanjay Jadhav, Neeraj Gupta, A. K. Saxena, Binayak
Rath, Avinash K. Agarwal, Anil Kumar Sagar, David Foster, and K. Mukundan. Rajiv Shekhar deserves special thanks for
making off-campus dinner arrangements and innocently providing to all participants first hand experience of urban dualism
that exists not only at national level but within a city as well! The pathetic condition of network infrastructures such as
electricity and water has led some enterprising people to build islands of uninterrupted water and power supply within the
city which serve as happy retreats for urban dwellers.
On behalf of 3iNetwork, I would like to thank HUDCO who sponsored the workshop. P.S. Rana and R. Goel of HUDCO
continuously extended their support to the report. We are thankful to Asian Development Bank and USAID for extending
financial support. Alex K. Jorgensen and Debashish Bhattacharjee of Asian Development Bank took keen interest in the
coverage of the report and we are thankful to them for their active support. Rebecca Black of USAID needs special mention
here as she extended full support to us and also helped in getting information on the projects being carried out under the aegis
of USAID in many urban areas.
I am also grateful to all the authors who, despite their busy schedules, participated in the workshop and maintained time
schedules of the many drafts their write-ups had to go through. I would like to be excused for troubling and reminding them
of their commitments using various channels of communication.
viii Acknowledgements
This report could not have seen light of the day without the skilled editing of Shreemoyee Patra. She provided a valuable
link in translating technical writing and some firmly held convictions of authors into simple language accessible to a wider
audience. She braved the acute power cuts of Delhi in the months of September and October 2005 to turn in quality work
within a tight timeline.
Thanks are also due to Gracinda Rodrigues who helped me in preparing this report right from the beginning. As a
versatile executive assistant, she undertook a host of tasks from organizing travel, meetings, and workshops to preparing graphs,
tables, figures, and printing with a ready smile. Almost all authors recognize her voice without having met her even once.
Clearly we have much to thank modern day telecommunications which has taken firm roots in our office lives in a short span
of five years.
Finally, I am thankful to the editors at Oxford University Press, who once again accepted the stiff schedule in bringing this
report in time.
ANUPAM RASTOGI
CONTENTS
Anupam Rastogi
List of Tables xi
List of Boxes and Figures xiii
List of Abbreviations and Acronyms xvii
5. URBAN FINANCE 82
Om Prakash Mathur
Functional Jurisdiction of Municipalities 83 • Revenue Base of Municipalities 84 • Size of the Municipal
Sector 85 • Revenue-based Performance 87 • Transfer-based Performance 89 • Scale and Structure of
Municipal Expenditure 90 • Revenue–Expenditure Balance 91 • Urban Initiatives and Municipal
Performance 93 • Municipal Finances in the Context of SFCs 98 • Devolution by Central Finance
Commissions 100 • Way Forward 102
Annexe 103
References 105
1.1 Project Outlays and Incentive Payments under APDRP as on 31 May 2005 7
1.2 Status of NHDP as on 31 August 2005 10
1.3 Projects under Implementation as on 31 August 2005 10
1.4 BOT Projects with Negative Grants 10
1.5 Structure of Project Finance under JNNURM by Source of Assistance (per cent) 21
2.1 Growth of Million Plus Cities of 1991 during 1990s 28
2.2 Pattern of Urbanization and Growth of Urban Population across States/UTs 31
2.3 Average monthly per capita expenditure and Percentage Poor in Different Size Class of Cities/Towns 33
3.1 Service Decline under Status Quo 53
3.2 Responsibilities of Main Urban Service Providers in Bangalore 54
5.1 Internal Resource Generation 87
5.2 Municipal Own Revenues 88
5.3 Role of Transfers in Municipal Finances 90
5.4 Per Capita Revenue Expenditure 91
5.5 Octroi in the Finances of Municipalities, 2001–2 92
5.6 Correlation Coefficients 93
5.7 Municipal Bonds 96
5.8 Devolution System and Recommendations by State Finance Commissions 100
6.1 Personal versus Public Vehicles per 1000 population in India 108
6.2 Share of Buses in Total Motor Vehicles in India 108
6.3 Air Pollution Levels 108
6.4 Fare Structure for Public Bus Services 111
6.5 Performance Parameters of Select Public Bus Services and all Urban Bus Services 111
6.6 Responsibilities of the Government or a Public Agency 112
6.7 Agencies Responsible for Different Aspects of Urban Transport 114
6.8 Projections of Urban Population in India 115
6.9 Projected Number of Trips in 2021 Compared to 1994 115
6.10 Projected Travel Demand for Different Categories of Cities 115
6.11 Preference Pattern of Modes of Transport in Delhi and Mumbai, 2005 117
7.1 Distribution of all Urban Households (per cent) per Major Source of Water for States and
Union Territories 131
7.2 Access to Sanitation Facilities for the Major Indian States for Urban Households (per cent) (1998) 132
7.3 Access to Drinking Water and Toilet Facilities for Urban Households Across City Sizes (1991) 134
7.4 Access to Water and Sanitation Facilities for Urban Households Living in Slums (per cent) (2002) 135
xii Tables
BOXES
1.1 Wireless Broadband Technologies 4
1.2 Deluge in Mumbai 16
1.3 Implementation of e-Governance in Municipalities 18
1.4 Model Municipal Law to Enable Urban Reforms 19
2.1 Urban Land Ceiling Act (ULCA) and its Impact 34
2.2 Impact of Density Controls on Land Markets in Mumbai 35
3.1 Twelfth Schedule of the Constitution of India 43
3.2 Implementation of the 74th Constitution Amendment Act 44
3.3 More Revenue and Infrastructure do not Mean Better Services: Bangalore 53
4.1 Core Functions of Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) in the USA 61
4.2 Metropolitan Planning Organization in Texas 62
4.3 Realities of Urban Land 63
4.4 Understand the social disparities: Mapping of ‘Shadow Areas’ 66
4.5 Land use zoning in Bangalore Master Plan 2015 68
4.6 Development of a Metropolitan Spatial Data Infrastructure (MSDI) for ‘Greater Bangalore’ 69
4.7 Coordinated Planning Schemes 72
4.8 Institutional Arrangements for Land Use in Ludhiana, Punjab 73
4.9 Town Planning Schemes: Land Pooling and Reconstitution—an Opportunity for Infrastructure
Provision in an Equitable Manner 75
4.10 Innovative Tools Involving FAR Management 77
4.11 Local Area level Plans 80
5.1 International Comparisons of Local Government Revenues 86
5.2 Increasing Municipal Revenues: Case of Indore 94
5.3 Market-based Financing for Smaller- and Medium-sized ULBs: The Cases of Tamil Nadu and Karnataka 97
6.1 Congestion Charging 118
6.2 The Vehicle Quota System of Singapore 118
6.3 Sustainable Transport Fuels for Urban Transport 120
6.4 Vehicular Pollution Issues in India 121
6.5 Choice of Mass Rapid Transit Technology 122
6.6 Recent International Trends in the Supply of Urban Public Transport 124
6.7 London Buses 124
6.8 The Transmilenio Bus Rapid Transit System in Bogota, Colombia 125
xiv Boxes and Figures
FIGURES
1.1 Cellular Mobile Growth and Effective Charge per Minute 3
1.2 Rural, Urban and Total Teledensity 5
2.1 Percentage and Growth Rate of Urban Population since 1901 27
2.2 Number of Towns in Different Size Categories 29
2.3 Proportion of Urban Population in Different Size Categories 29
2.4 Annual Population Growth Rates in Different City/Town Size Categories 30
2.5 Annual Population Growth Rate in Different Categories of Urban Centres 30
3.1 Plan Outlays and spending by Central Government on Urban Water and Sanitation Sector 48
3.2 Centrally Sponsored Schemes for Urban Sector 49
3.3 Various Delivery Modes to Fund Urban Sector Schemes 50
3.4 Water Delivery (hrs/day) in Select Indian Cities since 1980s 51
3.5 International Comparison of Water Availability and Delivery per day 51
3.6 Projection of Urban Population in India by 2030 51
3.7 Sectoral Contribution to GDP, 1960–2005 51
Boxes and Figures xv