Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region VII, Central Visayas
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFMANDAUE CITY
Plaridel.,St., Brgy Centro, Mandaue City

DRRM Comprehensive School Safety Evaluation Checklist-2024

Name of School: CASILI NIGHT HIGH SCHOOL Date:
School Head:
Division : MANDAUE CITY

RUBRICS SCALE:
(5)---VERY HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol excellently ahead of time or the set schedule of implementation ]
(4)---HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol satisfactory on time ]
(3)---MODERATE [ Has implemented the policy/protocol fairly and complied it late of the set schedule of implementation ]
(2)---LOW [ Has implemented the policy/protocol poorly and complied it very late of the set schedule of implementation ]
(1)---VERY LOW [ Failed to implemented the DRRM policy/protocol in school. ]

Means of Verification Rating Scale

Performance Indicator (PI) (MOV's)
Remarks/Intervention
5 4 3 2 1
1. The school has adopted/adapted/localized existing
* Localized School Policies
policies relating to DRRM in education/school. 0 0 0 0 0

2. The school has designated School DRRM Focal Person * Designation Order
0 0 0 0 0
 *SDRRM Core Team
3. The school has formed and functional School DRRM
Organizational Chart with defined
Team, consisting of personnel from different offices, with
membership and roles and
defined membership and roles and responsiblities. 0 0 0 0 0
responsibilities
4. Has a comprehensive School DRRM Plan, which includes * DRRM Plan with CCA and EiE
Climate Change Adaptation (CCA) and Education in measures *Conduct School-based
Emergencies(EiE) measures Orientation on CCA and EiE
0 0 0 0 0
*School-based Monitoring of Risk
5. Completed in covering Risk Assessment, Risk Reduction
Assessment, Risk Reduction and
and Rehabilation and Recovery
Rehabilation and Recovery 0 0 0 0 0
6. The students participated in the planning process of the
*SSG/SPG Participation
school-based DRRM. 0 0 0 0 ###

* Allocated Budget to DRRM related

7. Integrated DRRM into School Improvement Plan (SIP) Activities
0 0 0 0 ###

8. The School has complied the DRRM related questions in

* EBEIS School Profile in DRRM
the EMIS/EBEIS
0 0 0 0 ###

* DRRM Budget Proposal

9. Regular DRRM activities are supported by school budget *Annual School DRRM Plan
0 0 0 0 ###

10. Funding sources for inteventions in the aftermath of

*Annual School DRRM Plan
disaster or emergency exist and can easily be tapped. 0 0 0 0 ###
11. The school had partnership that could ber tapped to
support its DRRM programs and activities, including after *List of Stakeholders for DRRM
those after disaster 0 0 0 0 ###

12. Students participated in the conduct student-led school * Submitted Reports with Pictures &
watching and hazard mapping (DO 23,s. 2015) Captions
0 0 0 0 ###

13. Data collection and consolidation of programs and

* School DRRM Plan and
activities on DRRM, covering the 3 Pillars, to monitor results Accomplishment Report
and impact exist.
0 0 0 0 ###
 * EBEIS School Profile in DRRM
14. School buildings have been inventoried.
0 0 0 0 ###

15. School buildings have risk assessment. * Risk Assesment Reports

0 0 0 0 ###

16. Unsafe school buildings were identified * School DRRM Report

0 0 0 0 ###
17. Systems for monitoring and quality assurance of school
*National Audit of School Facilities
buildings exists. 0 0 0 0 ###
18. Financial resources are allocated for completion of
*List of Resources and Plan to
needed action to address unsafe school buildings within a address unsafe school buildings
specified period. 0 0 0 0 ###

19. Unsafe school buildings were given with appropriate

*Demolition Permit
action undertaken by the School Head (e.g. upgraded, *Letter of Request
retrofitted, non-usage, etc.). 0 0 0 0 ###

20. School has undertaken regular repair of minor classroom *Narrative Report with Photos with
(including) damages. Caption
0 0 0 0 ###
*Request Letter from the Classroom
21. Roles and responsibilities for maintenance are defined,
Adviser/ SPFC for School Facilities
documented and assigned. that needs repair. 0 0 0 0 ###

22. School Head has allotted budget for routine maintenance

of school facilities for safety and protect investments, with *AIP, CDR
transparent monitoring oversight at the school level.
0 0 0 0 ###

23. School Head had pre identified/prepositioned classroom

that are expected to be used as temporary evacuations *Site Development Plan
centers for disasters. 0 0 0 0 ###
24. School Head is clear with his/her roles and functions of
the school in camp management vis-à-vis the LGU and * Conduct Capacity Building on
DSWD as per Joint Memorandum Circular No. 1, s. 2013 " Camp management Plan for limited
Guidelines on Evacuation enter Coordination and use of schools as evacuation centers
Management" and RA 10821 " Children's Emergency Relief (ei. School EOC, DRRM teams
and Protection Act" and its corresponding IRR.
0 0 0 0 ###

25. Guidance and regulations on safe school site are strictly * Localized/School Based Policy
( e,i, designated parking area,
followed DRRM Emergency teams etc.)
0 0 0 0 ###

26. Guidance and regulations on resilient designed are * Localized/School Based Policy
( e,i, wearing of vet, Evacuation
strictly followed. Route, safety harness etc.)
0 0 0 0 ###
* Localized/School Based Policy (ei.
27. Guidance and regulations on resilient construction are PPE, Nos. of Manpower on-site,
followed. standy Safety Officer)
* Reports 0 0 0 0 ###
*Monitoring Report on Physical
28. New school site construction is monitored for compliance
Facilities if there's an on-going
in safe school site selection (if any). project 0 0 0 0 ###

29. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

*Logbook of Implementing Agency
in safe school design (if any).
0 0 0 0 ###

30. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

*Monitoring Logbook
in safe school construction (if any). 0 0 0 0 ###
31. School has contingency plan on the existing hazards of
the school campus/locality (vis-à-vis earthquake, typhoon, *DRRM Contingency Plan
COVID-19, floods, arm conflict, flooding, landslide etc.). 0 0 0 0 ###

32. School has available, accessible, and adequate first aid

*First Aid Kits per classroom
kit in every instructional classroom.
0 0 0 0 ###
33. School has at least 2 necessary and functioning
* Nos. of Fire
equipment, in case of a disaster (e.g. fire extinguisher, Extinguishers(functionable)
handheld /base radio, generator. Etc.).
0 0 0 0 ###

34. School has pre-identified spaces for putting up

Temporary Learning Spaces/Shelters in the aftermath of a *Site Development Plan
disaster 0 0 0 0 ###

* Identified TLS Area

35. School has ready resumption strategies and alternative
*Camp Management
delivery modes to ensure education continuity. plan
0 0 0 0 ###
36. Learners/students have completed the Family *Conducted the survey based
Earthquake Preparedness Plan; and school has reported DO#27_s. 2015 (Promoting Family
completion to DepEd DRRM at the Central Office/Regional Earthquake Preparedness)
Office * Consolidated Reports
0 0 0 0 ###

37. School has established a school personnel tracking * Localized Tracking system (e,i
system/protocol in the event of a disaster. goolge sheet etc.)
0 0 0 0 ###

38. School personnel trained to administer first aid to * Conduct Basic First Aider/BLS
students and personnel. Orientation to
0 0 0 0 ###

39. School has psychosocial interventions for personnel and * Conduct Basic Pyschological First
Aid to Learners and Teachers
students. * Narrative Reports 0 0 0 0 ###
* Updated School DRRM Plan and
40. School DRRM Plan and SIP with DRRM integration are
Budget Proposal to DRRM related
reviewed annually. Activities 0 0 0 0 ###

41. School conducted Brigada Eskwela to ensure safety and

*Brigada Eskwela Report
preparedness measures are in place.
0 0 0 0 ###
42. Students, teachers parents and other stakeholders *Attendance to Brigada Eskwela
participated in Brigada Eskwela. conducted
0 0 0 0 ###
43. School has established functional Early Warning System
to inform students and personnel of hazards and * Signages
*Planning for limited use of
emergencies (protocol, warning signs, devices, IEC), schools as evacuation centers,
considering national and LGU warning systems and during the school year
protocols. 0 0 0 0 ###

44. School conducted hazards-specific drill with participation

of stakeholders (BFP,Medic, LGU's, NGOs, community, PTA, *Narrative Report with Photos
alumni, and others). 0 0 0 0 ###
* Submitted Reports( NSED,
45. The students participated in the drills. National DRR Month, Fire
Prevention Month and etc.) 0 0 0 0 ###

* Localized/School-Based
46. School has evacuation plan procedures. Evacuation Plan Guidebook
0 0 0 0 ###
* Identified Family Reinification
47. School has a student-family reunification plan that is
Areas in school during emergencies
clearly disseminated to students, teachers and parents. occurs 0 0 0 0 ###

48. School Head participated DRRM trainings from division *DRRM Trainings participated for the
or region or partners. past three years
0 0 0 0 ###

49. School DRRM Team participated trainings from division *DRRM Trainings participated for the
or region or partners. past three years
0 0 0 0 ###

50. School has conducted awareness and capacity building *CB conducted for families and
for families and learners. learners
0 0 0 0 ###

51. School participated in the different DRRM/CCA/EIE

*Photos (e.i
activities of the LGU
0 0 0 0 ###

52. School take thermal scanning at the entrance/gate. *No.of thermal scanners/thermal guns
0 0 0 0 ###

53. Schools conducted regular pruning of trees(every 6 mos.

*Narrative report and photos
especially near to the school buildings. 0 0 0 0 ###
 * Request Letter to BFP
54. School conducted fire safety inspection every year in
* Recommendation Reports
coordination with Bureau of Fire (BFP). from BFP 0 0 0 0 ###
55. School has ample supply of alcohol, sodium hypochlorite
*Photos
or other disinfectants 0 0 0 0 ###

56. School has foot baths at strategic locations. *Photos

0 0 0 0 ###

57. School has СOVID-19 triage area. * Identified Building or Classroom

0 0 0 0 ###
* E-Updated Reports
58. School had isolation area. * Pictures 0 0 0 0 ###

59. School required the daily health symptoms questionnaire *QR Code/ Questionnaire on Health
to all personnel and stakeholders Safety Protocol
0 0 0 0 ###

60. School submitted 100% accurateness of the report on/or

*Soft Copies of DRRM Report
before date of submission.
0 0 0 0 ###
0 0 0 0 0

Legend: INTS : 0
Very High: 4.50 – 5.00 (90% - 100%)
High: 3.5 - 4.49 (70%-89%) RAGE : 0.00
Average: 2.50 – 3.49 (50% - 69%)
Low: 1.50 - 2.49 (30 % -49%) Percentage
Very Low: 0 - 1.49 (Below 30%)

Prepared by:

Designated School DRRM Coordinators

 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region VII, Central Visayas
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFMANDAUE CITY
Plaridel.,St., Brgy Centro, Mandaue City

DRRM Comprehensive School Safety Evaluation

Name of School:
School Head:
Division : MANDAUE CITY

RUBRICS SCALE:
(5)---VERY HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol excellentl
(4)---HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol satisfactory
(3)---MODERATE [ Has implemented the policy/protocol fairly
(2)---LOW [ Has implemented the policy/protocol poorly and complied it very late of th
(1)---VERY LOW [ Failed to implemented the DRRM policy/protocol in school.

Performance Indicator (PI)

1. The school has adopted/adapted/localized existing

policies relating to DRRM in education/school.

2. The school has designated School DRRM Focal Person

3. The school has formed and functional School DRRM

Team, consisting of personnel from different offices, with
defined membership and roles and responsiblities.

4. Has a comprehensive School DRRM Plan, which includes

Climate Change Adaptation (CCA) and Education in
Emergencies(EiE) measures
5. Completed in covering Risk Assessment, Risk Reduction
and Rehabilation and Recovery

6. The students participated in the planning process of the

school-based DRRM.

7. Integrated DRRM into School Improvement Plan (SIP)

 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region VII, Central Visayas
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFMANDAUE CITY
Plaridel.,St., Brgy Centro, Mandaue City

prehensive School Safety Evaluation Checklist-2024

Date:

he policy/protocol excellently ahead of time or the set schedule of implementation ]

cy/protocol satisfactory on time ]
he policy/protocol fairly and complied it late of the set schedule of implementation ]
y/protocol poorly and complied it very late of the set schedule of implementation ]
ted the DRRM policy/protocol in school. ]

Means of Verification Rating Scale

(MOV's) 5 4 3 2 1

* Localized School Policies

0 0 0 0 0

* Designation Order
0 0 0 0 0

*SDRRM Core Team Organizational

Chart with defined membership and
roles and responsibilities
0 0 0 0 0

* DRRM Plan with CCA and EiE

measures *Conduct School-based
Orientation on CCA and EiE
0 0 0 0 0

*School-based Monitoring of Risk

Assessment, Risk Reduction and
Rehabilation and Recovery
0 0 0 0 0

*SSG/SPG Participation
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Allocated Budget to DRRM related

Activities
0 0 0 0 FALSE
Remarks/Intervention
8. The School has complied the DRRM related questions in
the EMIS/EBEIS

9. Regular DRRM activities are supported by school budget

10. Funding sources for inteventions in the aftermath of

disaster or emergency exist and can easily be tapped.

11. The school had partnership that could ber tapped to

support its DRRM programs and activities, including after
those after disaster

12. Students participated in the conduct student-led school

watching and hazard mapping (DO 23,s. 2015)

13. Data collection and consolidation of programs and

activities on DRRM, covering the 3 Pillars, to monitor results
and impact exist.

14. School buildings have been inventoried.

15. School buildings have risk assessment.

16. Unsafe school buildings were identified

17. Systems for monitoring and quality assurance of school

buildings exists.

18. Financial resources are allocated for completion of

needed action to address unsafe school buildings within a
specified period.

19. Unsafe school buildings were given with appropriate

action undertaken by the School Head (e.g. upgraded,
retrofitted, non-usage, etc.).

20. School has undertaken regular repair of minor classroom

(including) damages.

21. Roles and responsibilities for maintenance are defined,

documented and assigned.

22. School Head has allotted budget for routine maintenance

of school facilities for safety and protect investments, with
transparent monitoring oversight at the school level.

23. School Head had pre identified/prepositioned classroom

that are expected to be used as temporary evacuations
centers for disasters.
* EBEIS School Profile in DRRM
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* DRRM Budget Proposal

*Annual School DRRM Plan
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Deed of Donation & DOA

* Letter of Intent 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*List of Stakeholders for DRRM

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Submitted Reports with Pictures &

Captions
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Conduct School-based evaluation

and monitoring using CSS Tool
*Pictures with Caption
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Year-round Inventory Reports (e.i.
Ramps, Fire Exit, etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Risk Assesment Reports

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Conducted building assessment

assigned engineers/implementers
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*National Audit of School Facilities

0 0 0 0 FALSE

*List of Resources and Plan to

address unsafe school buildings
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Demolition Permit
*Letter of Request
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Narrative Report with Photos with

Caption
0 0 0 0 FALSE
*Request Letter from the Classroom
Adviser/ SPFC for School Facilities
that needs repair. 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*AIP, SIP

0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Site Development Plan

0 0 0 0 FALSE
24. School Head is clear with his/her roles and functions of
the school in camp management vis-à-vis the LGU and
DSWD as per Joint Memorandum Circular No. 1, s. 2013 "
Guidelines on Evacuation enter Coordination and
Management" and RA 10821 " Children's Emergency Relief
and Protection Act" and its corresponding IRR.

25. Guidance and regulations on safe school site are strictly

followed

26. Guidance and regulations on resilient designed are

strictly followed.

27. Guidance and regulations on resilient construction are

followed.

28. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

in safe school site selection (if any).

29. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

in safe school design (if any).

30. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

in safe school construction (if any).

31. School has contingency plan on the existing hazards of

the school campus/locality (vis-à-vis earthquake, typhoon,
COVID-19, floods, arm conflict, flooding, landslide etc.).
32. School has available, accessible, and adequate first aid
kit in every instructional classroom.

33. School has at least 2 necessary and functioning

equipment, in case of a disaster (e.g. fire extinguisher,
handheld /base radio, generator. Etc.).

34. School has pre-identified spaces for putting up

Temporary Learning Spaces/Shelters in the aftermath of a
disaster

35. School has ready resumption strategies and alternative

delivery modes to ensure education continuity.

36. Learners/students have completed the Family

Earthquake Preparedness Plan; and school has reported
completion to DepEd DRRM at the Central Office/Regional
Office
* Conduct Capacity Building on
Camp management Plan for limited
use of schools as evacuation centers
(ei. School EOC, DRRM teams

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Localized/School Based Policy

( e,i, designated parking area,
DRRM Emergency teams etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Localized/School Based Policy

( e,i, VEST, Evacuation Route,
safety harness etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Localized/School Based Policy (ei.
PPE, Nos. of Manpower on-site,
standy Safety Officer)
* Reports 0 0 0 0 FALSE
*Monitoring Report on Physical
Facilities if there's an on-going
project 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Logbook of Implementing Agency

0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Monitoring Logbook
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*DRRM Contingency Plan

0 0 0 0 FALSE

*First Aid Kits per classroom

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Nos. of Fire
Extinguishers(functionable)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Site Development Plan

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Identified TLS Area

*Camp Management
plan
0 0 0 0 FALSE
*Conducted the survey based
DO#27_s. 2015 (Promoting Family
Earthquake Preparedness)
* Consolidated Reports
0 0 0 0 FALSE
37. School has established a school personnel tracking
system/protocol in the event of a disaster.

38. School personnel trained to administer first aid to

students and personnel.

39. School has psychosocial interventions for personnel and

students.

40. School DRRM Plan and SIP with DRRM integration are
reviewed annually.

41. School conducted Brigada Eskwela to ensure safety and

preparedness measures are in place.

42. Students, teachers parents and other stakeholders

participated in Brigada Eskwela.
43. School has established functional Early Warning System
to inform students and personnel of hazards and
emergencies (protocol, warning signs, devices, IEC),
considering national and LGU warning systems and
protocols.
44. School conducted hazards-specific drill with participation
of stakeholders (BFP,Medic, LGU's, NGOs, community, PTA,
alumni, and others).

45. The students participated in the drills.

46. School has evacuation plan procedures.

47. School has a student-family reunification plan that is

clearly disseminated to students, teachers and parents.

48. School Head participated DRRM trainings from division

or region or partners.

49. School DRRM Team participated trainings from division

or region or partners.

50. School has conducted awareness and capacity building

for families and learners.

51. School participated in the different DRRM/CCA/EIE

activities of the LGU

52. School take thermal scanning at the entrance/gate.

* Localized Tracking system (e,i
goolge sheet etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Conduct Basic First Aider/BLS

Orientation to
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Conduct Basic Pyschological First
Aid to Learners and Teachers
* Narrative Reports 0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Updated School DRRM Plan and
Budget Proposal to DRRM related
Activities 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Brigada Eskwela Report

0 0 0 0 FALSE
*Attendance to Brigada Eskwela
conducted
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Signages
*Planning for limited use of
schools as evacuation centers,
during the school year
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Narrative Report with Photos

0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Submitted Reports( NSED,
National DRR Month, Fire
Prevention Month and etc.) 0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Localized/School-Based
Evacuation Plan Guidebook
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Identified Family Reinification
Areas in school during emergencies
occurs 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*DRRM Trainings participated for the

past three years
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*DRRM Trainings participated for the

past three years
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*CB conducted for families and

learners
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Photos
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*No.of thermal scanners/thermal guns

0 0 0 0 FALSE
53. Schools conducted regular pruning of trees(every 6 mos.
especially near to the school buildings.

54. School conducted fire safety inspection every year in

coordination with Bureau of Fire (BFP).

55. School has ample supply of alcohol, sodium hypochlorite

or other disinfectants

56. School has foot baths at strategic locations.

57. School has СOVID-19 triage area.

58. School had isolation area.

59. School required the daily health symptoms questionnaire

to all personnel and stakeholders

60. School submitted 100% accurateness of the report on/or

before date of submission.

Legend:
Very High: 4.50 – 5.00 (90% - 100%)
High: 3.5 -- 4.49 (70%-89%)
Average: 2.50 –3.49 (50% - 69%)
Low: 1.50 - 2.49 (30 % -49%)
Very Low: 0 - 1.49 (Below 30%)

Prepared by:

Designated School DRRM Coordinators

*Narrative report and photos
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Request Letter to BFP
* Recommendation Reports
from BFP 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Photos
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Photos
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Identified Building or Classroom

0 0 0 0 FALSE
* E-Updated Reports
* Pictures 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*QR Code/ Questionnaire on Health

Safety Protocol
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Soft Copies of DRRM Report

0 0 0 0 FALSE
0 0 0 0 0

INTS : 0

RAGE : 0.00

Percentage
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region VII, Central Visayas
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFMANDAUE CITY
Plaridel.,St., Brgy Centro, Mandaue City

DRRM Comprehensive School Safety Evaluation Checklist-2024

Name of School: TINGUB NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Date:
School Head:
Division : MANDAUE CITY

RUBRICS SCALE:
(5)---VERY HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol excellently ahead of time or the set schedule of implementation ]
(4)---HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol satisfactory on time ]
(3)---MODERATE [ Has implemented the policy/protocol fairly and complied it late of the set schedule of implementation ]
(2)---LOW [ Has implemented the policy/protocol poorly and complied it very late of the set schedule of implementation ]
(1)---VERY LOW [ Failed to implemented the DRRM policy/protocol in school. ]

Means of Verification Rating Scale

Performance Indicator (PI) (MOV's)
Remarks/Intervention
5 4 3 2 1
1. The school has adopted/adapted/localized existing
* Localized School Policies
policies relating to DRRM in education/school. 0 0 0 0 0

2. The school has designated School DRRM Focal Person * Designation Order
0 0 0 0 0
*SDRRM Core Team
3. The school has formed and functional School DRRM
Organizational Chart with defined
Team, consisting of personnel from different offices, with
membership and roles and
defined membership and roles and responsiblities. 0 0 0 0 0
responsibilities
4. Has a comprehensive School DRRM Plan, which includes * DRRM Plan with CCA and EiE
measures
Climate Change Adaptation (CCA) and Education in *Conduct School-
Emergencies(EiE) measures based Orientation on CCA and EiE
0 0 0 0 0
*School-based Monitoring of Risk
5. Completed in covering Risk Assessment, Risk Reduction
Assessment, Risk Reduction and
and Rehabilation and Recovery
Rehabilation and Recovery 0 0 0 0 0
6. The students participated in the planning process of the
*SSG/SPG Participation
school-based DRRM. 0 0 0 0 ###

* Allocated Budget to DRRM related

7. Integrated DRRM into School Improvement Plan (SIP) Activities
0 0 0 0 ###

8. The School has complied the DRRM related questions in

* EBEIS School Profile in DRRM
the EMIS/EBEIS
0 0 0 0 ###

* DRRM Budget Proposal

9. Regular DRRM activities are supported by school budget *Annual School DRRM Plan
0 0 0 0 ###

10. Funding sources for inteventions in the aftermath of * Deed of Donation & DOA
disaster or emergency exist and can easily be tapped. * Letter of Intent
0 0 0 0 ###
11. The school had partnership that could ber tapped to
support its DRRM programs and activities, including after *List of Stakeholders for DRRM
those after disaster 0 0 0 0 ###

12. Students participated in the conduct student-led school * Submitted Reports with Pictures &
watching and hazard mapping (DO 23,s. 2015) Captions
0 0 0 0 ###

13. Data collection and consolidation of programs and *Conduct School-based evaluation
activities on DRRM, covering the 3 Pillars, to monitor results and monitoring using CSS Tool
and impact exist. *Pictures with Caption
0 0 0 0 ###
* Year-round Inventory Reports (e.i.
14. School buildings have been inventoried. Ramps, Fire Exit, etc.)
0 0 0 0 ###

15. School buildings have risk assessment. * Risk Assesment Reports

0 0 0 0 ###

* Conducted building assessment

16. Unsafe school buildings were identified assigned engineers/implementers
0 0 0 0 ###
17. Systems for monitoring and quality assurance of school
*National Audit of School Facilities
buildings exists. 0 0 0 0 ###
18. Financial resources are allocated for completion of
*List of Resources and Plan to
needed action to address unsafe school buildings within a address unsafe school buildings
specified period. 0 0 0 0 ###

19. Unsafe school buildings were given with appropriate

*Demolition Permit
action undertaken by the School Head (e.g. upgraded, *Letter of Request
retrofitted, non-usage, etc.). 0 0 0 0 ###

20. School has undertaken regular repair of minor classroom *Narrative Report with Photos with
(including) damages. Caption
0 0 0 0 ###
*Request Letter from the Classroom
21. Roles and responsibilities for maintenance are defined,
Adviser/ SPFC for School Facilities
documented and assigned. that needs repair. 0 0 0 0 ###

22. School Head has allotted budget for routine maintenance

of school facilities for safety and protect investments, with *AIP, SIP
transparent monitoring oversight at the school level.
0 0 0 0 ###

23. School Head had pre identified/prepositioned classroom

that are expected to be used as temporary evacuations *Site Development Plan
centers for disasters. 0 0 0 0 ###

24. School Head is clear with his/her roles and functions of

the school in camp management vis-à-vis the LGU and * Conduct Capacity Building on
DSWD as per Joint Memorandum Circular No. 1, s. 2013 " Camp management Plan for limited
Guidelines on Evacuation enter Coordination and use of schools as evacuation centers
Management" and RA 10821 " Children's Emergency Relief (ei. School EOC, DRRM teams
and Protection Act" and its corresponding IRR.
0 0 0 0 ###
25. Guidance and regulations on safe school site are strictly * Localized/School Based Policy
( e,i, designated parking area,
followed DRRM Emergency teams etc.)
0 0 0 0 ###

26. Guidance and regulations on resilient designed are * Localized/School Based Policy
( e,i, wearing of vet, Evacuation
strictly followed. Route, safety harness etc.)
0 0 0 0 ###
* Localized/School Based Policy (ei.
27. Guidance and regulations on resilient construction are PPE, Nos. of Manpower on-site,
followed. standy Safety Officer)
* Reports 0 0 0 0 ###

28. New school site construction is monitored for compliance *Monitoring Report on Physical
Facilities if there's an on-going
in safe school site selection (if any). project 0 0 0 0 ###

29. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

*Logbook of Implementing Agency
in safe school design (if any).
0 0 0 0 ###

30. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

*Monitoring Logbook
in safe school construction (if any). 0 0 0 0 ###
31. School has contingency plan on the existing hazards of
the school campus/locality (vis-à-vis earthquake, typhoon, *DRRM Contingency Plan
COVID-19, floods, arm conflict, flooding, landslide etc.). 0 0 0 0 ###

32. School has available, accessible, and adequate first aid

*First Aid Kits per classroom
kit in every instructional classroom.
0 0 0 0 ###

33. School has at least 2 necessary and functioning

* Nos. of Fire
equipment, in case of a disaster (e.g. fire extinguisher, Extinguishers(functionable)
handheld /base radio, generator. Etc.).
0 0 0 0 ###

34. School has pre-identified spaces for putting up

Temporary Learning Spaces/Shelters in the aftermath of a *Site Development Plan
disaster 0 0 0 0 ###

* Identified TLS Area

35. School has ready resumption strategies and alternative
*Camp Management
delivery modes to ensure education continuity. plan
0 0 0 0 ###
36. Learners/students have completed the Family *Conducted the survey based
Earthquake Preparedness Plan; and school has reported DO#27_s. 2015 (Promoting Family
completion to DepEd DRRM at the Central Office/Regional Earthquake Preparedness)
Office * Consolidated Reports
0 0 0 0 ###

37. School has established a school personnel tracking * Localized Tracking system (e,i
system/protocol in the event of a disaster. goolge sheet etc.)
0 0 0 0 ###

38. School personnel trained to administer first aid to * Conduct Basic First Aider/BLS
students and personnel. Orientation to
0 0 0 0 ###

39. School has psychosocial interventions for personnel and * Conduct Basic Pyschological First
Aid to Learners and Teachers
students. * Narrative Reports 0 0 0 0 ###
* Updated School DRRM Plan and
40. School DRRM Plan and SIP with DRRM integration are
Budget Proposal to DRRM related
reviewed annually. Activities 0 0 0 0 ###

41. School conducted Brigada Eskwela to ensure safety and

*Brigada Eskwela Report
preparedness measures are in place.
0 0 0 0 ###
42. Students, teachers parents and other stakeholders *Attendance to Brigada Eskwela
participated in Brigada Eskwela. conducted
0 0 0 0 ###
43. School has established functional Early Warning System
to inform students and personnel of hazards and * Signages
*Planning for limited use of
emergencies (protocol, warning signs, devices, IEC), schools as evacuation centers,
considering national and LGU warning systems and during the school year
protocols. 0 0 0 0 ###

44. School conducted hazards-specific drill with participation

of stakeholders (BFP,Medic, LGU's, NGOs, community, PTA, *Narrative Report with Photos
alumni, and others). 0 0 0 0 ###
* Submitted Reports( NSED,
45. The students participated in the drills. National DRR Month, Fire
Prevention Month and etc.) 0 0 0 0 ###

* Localized/School-Based
46. School has evacuation plan procedures. Evacuation Plan Guidebook
0 0 0 0 ###
* Identified Family Reinification
47. School has a student-family reunification plan that is
Areas in school during emergencies
clearly disseminated to students, teachers and parents. occurs 0 0 0 0 ###

48. School Head participated DRRM trainings from division

or region or partners.
0 0 0 0 ###

49. School DRRM Team participated trainings from division *DRRM Trainings participated for the
or region or partners. past three years
0 0 0 0 ###

50. School has conducted awareness and capacity building *CB conducted for families and
for families and learners. learners
0 0 0 0 ###

51. School participated in the different DRRM/CCA/EIE *Photos (e.i. SWM orientation, tree
activities of the LGU Planting
0 0 0 0 ###

52. School take thermal scanning at the entrance/gate. *No.of thermal scanners/thermal guns
0 0 0 0 ###

53. Schools conducted regular pruning of trees(every 6 mos.

*Narrative report and photos
especially near to the school buildings. 0 0 0 0 ###
* Request Letter to BFP
54. School conducted fire safety inspection every year in
* Recommendation Reports
coordination with Bureau of Fire (BFP). from BFP 0 0 0 0 ###
55. School has ample supply of alcohol, sodium hypochlorite
*Photos
or other disinfectants 0 0 0 0 ###

56. School has foot baths at strategic locations. *Photos

0 0 0 0 ###

57. School has СOVID-19 triage area. * Identified Building or Classroom

0 0 0 0 ###
* E-Updated Reports
58. School had isolation area. * Pictures 0 0 0 0 ###
59. School required the daily health symptoms questionnaire *QR Code/ Questionnaire on Health
to all personnel and stakeholders Safety Protocol
0 0 0 0 ###

60. School submitted 100% accurateness of the report on/or

*Soft Copies of DRRM Report
before date of submission.
0 0 0 0 ###
0 0 0 0 0

Legend: INTS : 0
Very High: 4.50 – 5.00 (90% - 100%)
High: 3.5 - 4.49 (70%-89%) Very High 0.00
Average: 2.50 – 3.49 (50% - 69%)
Low: 1.50 - 2.49 (30 % -49%) Percentage
Very Low: 0 - 1.49 (Below 30%)

Prepared by:

CLEM JOSEPH PAREJA

Designated School DRRM Coordinators
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region VII, Central Visayas
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFMANDAUE CITY
Plaridel.,St., Brgy Centro, Mandaue City

DRRM Comprehensive School Safety Evaluation Checklist-202

Name of School: MANDAUE CITY COMPREHENSIVE NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
School Head:
Division : MANDAUE CITY

RUBRICS SCALE:
(5)---VERY HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol excellently ahead of time or the set schedule of
(4)---HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol satisfactory on time ]
(3)---MODERATE [ Has implemented the policy/protocol fairly and complied it late of the set schedule of
(2)---LOW [ Has implemented the policy/protocol poorly and complied it very late of the set schedule
(1)---VERY LOW [ Failed to implemented the DRRM policy/protocol in school. ]

Means of Verification
Performance Indicator (PI) (MOV's)

1. The school has adopted/adapted/localized existing

* Localized School Policies
policies relating to DRRM in education/school.
2. The school has designated School DRRM Focal
* Designation Order
Person
3. The school has formed and functional School DRRM *SDRRM Core Team Organizational
Team, consisting of personnel from different offices, with Chart with defined membership and
defined membership and roles and responsiblities. roles and responsibilities

4. Has a comprehensive School DRRM Plan, which * DRRM Plan with CCA and EiE
includes Climate Change Adaptation (CCA) and measures *Conduct School-based
Education in Emergencies(EiE) measures Orientation on CCA and EiE
5. Completed in covering Risk Assessment, Risk
*School-based Monitoring of Risk
Reduction and Rehabilation and Recovery Assessment, Risk Reduction and
Rehabilation and Recovery

6. The students participated in the planning process of the

*SSG/SPG Participation
school-based DRRM.

* Allocated Budget to DRRM related

7. Integrated DRRM into School Improvement Plan (SIP) Activities
 ion
AUE CITY
ue City

Evaluation Checklist-2024
Date:

ad of time or the set schedule of implementation ]

lied it late of the set schedule of implementation ]

t very late of the set schedule of implementation ]
hool. ]

Rating Scale
Remarks/Intervention
5 4 3 2 1

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE
8. The School has complied the DRRM related questions
* EBEIS School Profile in DRRM
in the EMIS/EBEIS

9. Regular DRRM activities are supported by school * DRRM Budget Proposal

budget *Annual School DRRM Plan

10. Funding sources for inteventions in the aftermath of

* Deed of Donation & DOA
disaster or emergency exist and can easily be tapped.
* Letter of Intent
11. The school had partnership that could ber tapped to
support its DRRM programs and activities, including after *List of Stakeholders for DRRM
those after disaster

12. Students participated in the conduct student-led * Submitted Reports with Pictures &
school watching and hazard mapping (DO 23,s. 2015) Captions

13. Data collection and consolidation of programs and *Conduct School-based evaluation
activities on DRRM, covering the 3 Pillars, to monitor and monitoring using CSS Tool
results and impact exist. *Pictures with Caption

* Year-round Inventory Reports (e.i.

14. School buildings have been inventoried. Ramps, Fire Exit, etc.)

15. School buildings have risk assessment. * Risk Assesment Reports

* Conducted building assessment

16. Unsafe school buildings were identified assigned engineers/implementers

17. Systems for monitoring and quality assurance of

*National Audit of School Facilities
school buildings exists.

18. Financial resources are allocated for completion of

*List of Resources and Plan to
needed action to address unsafe school buildings within a address unsafe school buildings
specified period.

19. Unsafe school buildings were given with appropriate

*Demolition Permit
action undertaken by the School Head (e.g. upgraded, *Letter of Request
retrofitted, non-usage, etc.).

20. School has undertaken regular repair of minor *Narrative Report with Photos with
classroom (including) damages. Caption

*Request Letter from the Classroom

21. Roles and responsibilities for maintenance are
Adviser/ SPFC for School Facilities
defined, documented and assigned. that needs repair.
22. School Head has allotted budget for routine
maintenance of school facilities for safety and protect
*AIP, CDR
investments, with transparent monitoring oversight at the
school level.
23. School Head had pre identified/prepositioned
classroom that are expected to be used as temporary *Site Development Plan
evacuations centers for disasters.
0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE
24. School Head is clear with his/her roles and functions
of the school in camp management vis-à-vis the LGU and * Conduct Capacity Building on
DSWD as per Joint Memorandum Circular No. 1, s. 2013 Camp management Plan for limited
" Guidelines on Evacuation enter Coordination and use of schools as evacuation centers
Management" and RA 10821 " Children's Emergency (ei. School EOC, DRRM teams
Relief and Protection Act" and its corresponding IRR.

25. Guidance and regulations on safe school site are * Localized/School Based Policy
( e,i, designated parking area,
strictly followed DRRM Emergency teams etc.)

26. Guidance and regulations on resilient designed are * Localized/School Based Policy
( e,i, VEST, Evacuation Route,
strictly followed. safety harness etc.)

* Localized/School Based Policy (ei.

27. Guidance and regulations on resilient construction are PPE, Nos. of Manpower on-site,
followed. standy Safety Officer)
* Reports
*Monitoring Report on Physical
28. New school site construction is monitored for
Facilities if there's an on-going
compliance in safe school site selection (if any). project
29. New school site construction is monitored for
*Logbook of Implementing Agency
compliance in safe school design (if any).

30. New school site construction is monitored for

*Monitoring Logbook
compliance in safe school construction (if any).
31. School has contingency plan on the existing hazards
of the school campus/locality (vis-à-vis earthquake,
typhoon, COVID-19, floods, arm conflict, flooding, *DRRM Contingency Plan
landslide etc.).
32. School has available, accessible, and adequate first
*First Aid Kits per classroom
aid kit in every instructional classroom.

33. School has at least 2 necessary and functioning

* Nos. of Fire
equipment, in case of a disaster (e.g. fire extinguisher, Extinguishers(functionable)
handheld /base radio, generator. Etc.).

34. School has pre-identified spaces for putting up

Temporary Learning Spaces/Shelters in the aftermath of *Site Development Plan
a disaster

* Identified TLS Area

35. School has ready resumption strategies and
*Camp Management
alternative delivery modes to ensure education continuity. plan

36. Learners/students have completed the Family *Conducted the survey based
Earthquake Preparedness Plan; and school has reported DO#27_s. 2015 (Promoting Family
completion to DepEd DRRM at the Central Earthquake Preparedness)
Office/Regional Office * Consolidated Reports
0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE
37. School has established a school personnel tracking * Localized Tracking system (e,i
system/protocol in the event of a disaster. goolge sheet etc.)

38. School personnel trained to administer first aid to * Conduct Basic First Aider/BLS
students and personnel. Orientation to

* Conduct Basic Pyschological First

39. School has psychosocial interventions for personnel
Aid to Learners and Teachers
and students. * Narrative Reports
* Updated School DRRM Plan and
40. School DRRM Plan and SIP with DRRM integration
Budget Proposal to DRRM related
are reviewed annually. Activities

41. School conducted Brigada Eskwela to ensure safety

*Brigada Eskwela Report
and preparedness measures are in place.

42. Students, teachers parents and other stakeholders *Attendance to Brigada Eskwela
participated in Brigada Eskwela. conducted

43. School has established functional Early Warning

System to inform students and personnel of hazards and * Signages
*Planning for limited use of
emergencies (protocol, warning signs, devices, IEC), schools as evacuation centers,
considering national and LGU warning systems and during the school year
protocols.
44. School conducted hazards-specific drill with
participation of stakeholders (BFP,Medic, LGU's, NGOs, *Narrative Report with Photos
community, PTA, alumni, and others).
* Submitted Reports( NSED,
45. The students participated in the drills. National DRR Month, Fire
Prevention Month and etc.)

* Localized/School-Based
46. School has evacuation plan procedures. Evacuation Plan Guidebook

* Identified Family Reinification

47. School has a student-family reunification plan that is
Areas in school during emergencies
clearly disseminated to students, teachers and parents. occurs

48. School Head participated DRRM trainings from *DRRM Trainings participated for the
division or region or partners. past three years

49. School DRRM Team participated trainings from *DRRM Trainings participated for the
division or region or partners. past three years

50. School has conducted awareness and capacity *CB conducted for families and
building for families and learners. learners

51. School participated in the different DRRM/CCA/EIE

*Photos
activities of the LGU

52. School take thermal scanning at the entrance/gate. *No.of thermal scanners/thermal guns
0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE
53. Schools conducted regular pruning of trees(every 6
*Narrative report and photos
mos. especially near to the school buildings.

54. School conducted fire safety inspection every year in * Request Letter to BFP
* Recommendation Reports
coordination with Bureau of Fire (BFP). from BFP
55. School has ample supply of alcohol, sodium
*Photos
hypochlorite or other disinfectants

56. School has foot baths at strategic locations. *Photos

57. School has СOVID-19 triage area. * Identified Building or Classroom

* E-Updated Reports
58. School had isolation area. * Pictures

59. School required the daily health symptoms *QR Code/ Questionnaire on Health
questionnaire to all personnel and stakeholders Safety Protocol

60. School submitted 100% accurateness of the report

*Soft Copies of DRRM Report
on/or before date of submission.

Legend:
Very High: 4.50 – 5.00 (90% - 100%)
High: 3.5 -- 4.49 (70%-89%)
Average: 2.50 –3.49 (50% - 69%)
Low: 1.50 - 2.49 (30 % -49%)
Very Low: 0 - 1.49 (Below 30%)

ISIDRO JEFFREY A. GARCES

Designated School DRRM Coordinators
 0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE
0 0 0 0 0

INTS : 0

RAGE : 0.00

Percentage
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region VII, Central Visayas
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFMANDAUE CITY
Plaridel.,St., Brgy Centro, Mandaue City

DRRM Comprehensive School Safety Evaluation

Name of School:
School Head:
Division : MANDAUE CITY

RUBRICS SCALE:
(5)---VERY HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol excellentl
(4)---HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol satisfactory
(3)---MODERATE [ Has implemented the policy/protocol fairly
(2)---LOW [ Has implemented the policy/protocol poorly and complied it very late of th
(1)---VERY LOW [ Failed to implemented the DRRM policy/protocol in school.

Performance Indicator (PI)

1. The school has adopted/adapted/localized existing

policies relating to DRRM in education/school.

2. The school has designated School DRRM Focal Person

3. The school has formed and functional School DRRM

Team, consisting of personnel from different offices, with
defined membership and roles and responsiblities.

4. Has a comprehensive School DRRM Plan, which includes

Climate Change Adaptation (CCA) and Education in
Emergencies(EiE) measures
5. Completed in covering Risk Assessment, Risk Reduction
and Rehabilation and Recovery

6. The students participated in the planning process of the

school-based DRRM.

7. Integrated DRRM into School Improvement Plan (SIP)

 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region VII, Central Visayas
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFMANDAUE CITY
Plaridel.,St., Brgy Centro, Mandaue City

prehensive School Safety Evaluation Checklist-2024

Date:

he policy/protocol excellently ahead of time or the set schedule of implementation ]

cy/protocol satisfactory on time ]
he policy/protocol fairly and complied it late of the set schedule of implementation ]
y/protocol poorly and complied it very late of the set schedule of implementation ]
ted the DRRM policy/protocol in school. ]

Means of Verification Rating Scale

(MOV's) 5 4 3 2 1

* Localized School Policies

0 0 0 0 0

* Designation Order
0 0 0 0 0

*SDRRM Core Team Organizational

Chart with defined membership and
roles and responsibilities
0 0 0 0 0

* DRRM Plan with CCA and EiE

measures *Conduct School-based
Orientation on CCA and EiE
0 0 0 0 0

*School-based Monitoring of Risk

Assessment, Risk Reduction and
Rehabilation and Recovery
0 0 0 0 0

*SSG/SPG Participation
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Allocated Budget to DRRM related

Activities
0 0 0 0 FALSE
Remarks/Intervention
8. The School has complied the DRRM related questions in
the EMIS/EBEIS

9. Regular DRRM activities are supported by school budget

10. Funding sources for inteventions in the aftermath of

disaster or emergency exist and can easily be tapped.

11. The school had partnership that could ber tapped to

support its DRRM programs and activities, including after
those after disaster

12. Students participated in the conduct student-led school

watching and hazard mapping (DO 23,s. 2015)

13. Data collection and consolidation of programs and

activities on DRRM, covering the 3 Pillars, to monitor results
and impact exist.

14. School buildings have been inventoried.

15. School buildings have risk assessment.

16. Unsafe school buildings were identified

17. Systems for monitoring and quality assurance of school

buildings exists.

18. Financial resources are allocated for completion of

needed action to address unsafe school buildings within a
specified period.

19. Unsafe school buildings were given with appropriate

action undertaken by the School Head (e.g. upgraded,
retrofitted, non-usage, etc.).

20. School has undertaken regular repair of minor classroom

(including) damages.

21. Roles and responsibilities for maintenance are defined,

documented and assigned.

22. School Head has allotted budget for routine maintenance

of school facilities for safety and protect investments, with
transparent monitoring oversight at the school level.

23. School Head had pre identified/prepositioned classroom

that are expected to be used as temporary evacuations
centers for disasters.
* EBEIS School Profile in DRRM
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* DRRM Budget Proposal

*Annual School DRRM Plan
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Deed of Donation & DOA

* Letter of Intent 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*List of Stakeholders for DRRM

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Submitted Reports with Pictures &

Captions
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Conduct School-based evaluation

and monitoring using CSS Tool
*Pictures with Caption
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Year-round Inventory Reports (e.i.
Ramps, Fire Exit, etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Risk Assesment Reports

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Conducted building assessment

assigned engineers/implementers
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*National Audit of School Facilities

0 0 0 0 FALSE

*List of Resources and Plan to

address unsafe school buildings
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Demolition Permit
*Letter of Request
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Narrative Report with Photos with

Caption
0 0 0 0 FALSE
*Request Letter from the Classroom
Adviser/ SPFC for School Facilities
that needs repair. 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*AIP, CDR

0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Site Development Plan

0 0 0 0 FALSE
24. School Head is clear with his/her roles and functions of
the school in camp management vis-à-vis the LGU and
DSWD as per Joint Memorandum Circular No. 1, s. 2013 "
Guidelines on Evacuation enter Coordination and
Management" and RA 10821 " Children's Emergency Relief
and Protection Act" and its corresponding IRR.

25. Guidance and regulations on safe school site are strictly

followed

26. Guidance and regulations on resilient designed are

strictly followed.

27. Guidance and regulations on resilient construction are

followed.

28. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

in safe school site selection (if any).

29. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

in safe school design (if any).

30. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

in safe school construction (if any).

31. School has contingency plan on the existing hazards of

the school campus/locality (vis-à-vis earthquake, typhoon,
COVID-19, floods, arm conflict, flooding, landslide etc.).
32. School has available, accessible, and adequate first aid
kit in every instructional classroom.

33. School has at least 2 necessary and functioning

equipment, in case of a disaster (e.g. fire extinguisher,
handheld /base radio, generator. Etc.).

34. School has pre-identified spaces for putting up

Temporary Learning Spaces/Shelters in the aftermath of a
disaster

35. School has ready resumption strategies and alternative

delivery modes to ensure education continuity.

36. Learners/students have completed the Family

Earthquake Preparedness Plan; and school has reported
completion to DepEd DRRM at the Central Office/Regional
Office
* Conduct Capacity Building on
Camp management Plan for limited
use of schools as evacuation centers
(ei. School EOC, DRRM teams

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Localized/School Based Policy

( e,i, designated parking area,
DRRM Emergency teams etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Localized/School Based Policy

( e,i, VEST, Evacuation Route,
safety harness etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Localized/School Based Policy (ei.
PPE, Nos. of Manpower on-site,
standy Safety Officer)
* Reports 0 0 0 0 FALSE
*Monitoring Report on Physical
Facilities if there's an on-going
project 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Logbook of Implementing Agency

0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Monitoring Logbook
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*DRRM Contingency Plan

0 0 0 0 FALSE

*First Aid Kits per classroom

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Nos. of Fire
Extinguishers(functionable)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Site Development Plan

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Identified TLS Area

*Camp Management
plan
0 0 0 0 FALSE
*Conducted the survey based
DO#27_s. 2015 (Promoting Family
Earthquake Preparedness)
* Consolidated Reports
0 0 0 0 FALSE
37. School has established a school personnel tracking
system/protocol in the event of a disaster.

38. School personnel trained to administer first aid to

students and personnel.

39. School has psychosocial interventions for personnel and

students.

40. School DRRM Plan and SIP with DRRM integration are
reviewed annually.

41. School conducted Brigada Eskwela to ensure safety and

preparedness measures are in place.

42. Students, teachers parents and other stakeholders

participated in Brigada Eskwela.
43. School has established functional Early Warning System
to inform students and personnel of hazards and
emergencies (protocol, warning signs, devices, IEC),
considering national and LGU warning systems and
protocols.
44. School conducted hazards-specific drill with participation
of stakeholders (BFP,Medic, LGU's, NGOs, community, PTA,
alumni, and others).

45. The students participated in the drills.

46. School has evacuation plan procedures.

47. School has a student-family reunification plan that is

clearly disseminated to students, teachers and parents.

48. School Head participated DRRM trainings from division

or region or partners.

49. School DRRM Team participated trainings from division

or region or partners.

50. School has conducted awareness and capacity building

for families and learners.

51. School participated in the different DRRM/CCA/EIE

activities of the LGU

52. School take thermal scanning at the entrance/gate.

* Localized Tracking system (e,i
goolge sheet etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Conduct Basic First Aider/BLS

Orientation to
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Conduct Basic Pyschological First
Aid to Learners and Teachers
* Narrative Reports 0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Updated School DRRM Plan and
Budget Proposal to DRRM related
Activities 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Brigada Eskwela Report

0 0 0 0 FALSE
*Attendance to Brigada Eskwela
conducted
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Signages
*Planning for limited use of
schools as evacuation centers,
during the school year
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Narrative Report with Photos

0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Submitted Reports( NSED,
National DRR Month, Fire
Prevention Month and etc.) 0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Localized/School-Based
Evacuation Plan Guidebook
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Identified Family Reinification
Areas in school during emergencies
occurs 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*DRRM Trainings participated for the

past three years
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*DRRM Trainings participated for the

past three years
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*CB conducted for families and

learners
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Photos
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*No.of thermal scanners/thermal guns

0 0 0 0 FALSE
53. Schools conducted regular pruning of trees(every 6 mos.
especially near to the school buildings.

54. School conducted fire safety inspection every year in

coordination with Bureau of Fire (BFP).

55. School has ample supply of alcohol, sodium hypochlorite

or other disinfectants

56. School has foot baths at strategic locations.

57. School has СOVID-19 triage area.

58. School had isolation area.

59. School required the daily health symptoms questionnaire

to all personnel and stakeholders

60. School submitted 100% accurateness of the report on/or

before date of submission.

Legend:
Very High: 4.50 – 5.00 (90% - 100%)
High: 3.5 -- 4.49 (70%-89%)
Average: 2.50 –3.49 (50% - 69%)
Low: 1.50 - 2.49 (30 % -49%)
Very Low: 0 - 1.49 (Below 30%)

Prepared by:

Designated School DRRM Coordinators

*Narrative report and photos
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Request Letter to BFP
* Recommendation Reports
from BFP 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Photos
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Photos
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Identified Building or Classroom

0 0 0 0 FALSE
* E-Updated Reports
* Pictures 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*QR Code/ Questionnaire on Health

Safety Protocol
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Soft Copies of DRRM Report

0 0 0 0 FALSE
0 0 0 0 0

INTS : 0

RAGE : 0.00

Percentage
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region VII, Central Visayas
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFMANDAUE CITY
Plaridel.,St., Brgy Centro, Mandaue City

DRRM Comprehensive School Safety Evaluation

Name of School: LABOGON NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
School Head:
Division : MANDAUE CITY

RUBRICS SCALE:
(5)---VERY HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol excellentl
(4)---HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol satisfactory
(3)---MODERATE [ Has implemented the policy/protocol fairly
(2)---LOW [ Has implemented the policy/protocol poorly and complied it very late of th
(1)---VERY LOW [ Failed to implemented the DRRM policy/protocol in school.

Performance Indicator (PI)

1. The school has adopted/adapted/localized existing

policies relating to DRRM in education/school.

2. The school has designated School DRRM Focal Person

3. The school has formed and functional School DRRM

Team, consisting of personnel from different offices, with
defined membership and roles and responsiblities.

4. Has a comprehensive School DRRM Plan, which includes

Climate Change Adaptation (CCA) and Education in
Emergencies(EiE) measures
5. Completed in covering Risk Assessment, Risk Reduction
and Rehabilation and Recovery

6. The students participated in the planning process of the

school-based DRRM.

7. Integrated DRRM into School Improvement Plan (SIP)

 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region VII, Central Visayas
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFMANDAUE CITY
Plaridel.,St., Brgy Centro, Mandaue City

prehensive School Safety Evaluation Checklist-2024

IGH SCHOOL Date:

he policy/protocol excellently ahead of time or the set schedule of implementation ]

cy/protocol satisfactory on time ]
he policy/protocol fairly and complied it late of the set schedule of implementation ]
cy/protocol poorly and complied it very late of the set schedule of implementation ]
ted the DRRM policy/protocol in school. ]

Means of Verification Rating Scale

(MOV's) 5 4 3 2 1

* Localized School Policies

0 0 0 0 0

* Designation Order
0 0 0 0 0

*SDRRM Core Team Organizational

Chart with defined membership and
roles and responsibilities
0 0 0 0 0

* DRRM Plan with CCA and EiE

measures *Conduct School-based
Orientation on CCA and EiE
0 0 0 0 0

*School-based Monitoring of Risk

Assessment, Risk Reduction and
Rehabilation and Recovery
0 0 0 0 0

*SSG/SPG Participation
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Allocated Budget to DRRM related

Activities
0 0 0 0 FALSE
Remarks/Intervention
8. The School has complied the DRRM related questions in
the EMIS/EBEIS

9. Regular DRRM activities are supported by school budget

10. Funding sources for inteventions in the aftermath of

disaster or emergency exist and can easily be tapped.

11. The school had partnership that could ber tapped to

support its DRRM programs and activities, including after
those after disaster

12. Students participated in the conduct student-led school

watching and hazard mapping (DO 23,s. 2015)

13. Data collection and consolidation of programs and

activities on DRRM, covering the 3 Pillars, to monitor results
and impact exist.

14. School buildings have been inventoried.

15. School buildings have risk assessment.

16. Unsafe school buildings were identified

17. Systems for monitoring and quality assurance of school

buildings exists.

18. Financial resources are allocated for completion of

needed action to address unsafe school buildings within a
specified period.

19. Unsafe school buildings were given with appropriate

action undertaken by the School Head (e.g. upgraded,
retrofitted, non-usage, etc.).

20. School has undertaken regular repair of minor classroom

(including) damages.

21. Roles and responsibilities for maintenance are defined,

documented and assigned.

22. School Head has allotted budget for routine maintenance

of school facilities for safety and protect investments, with
transparent monitoring oversight at the school level.

23. School Head had pre identified/prepositioned classroom

that are expected to be used as temporary evacuations
centers for disasters.
* EBEIS School Profile in DRRM
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* DRRM Budget Proposal

*Annual School DRRM Plan
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Deed of Donation & DOA

* Letter of Intent 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*List of Stakeholders for DRRM

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Submitted Reports with Pictures &

Captions
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Conduct School-based evaluation

and monitoring using CSS Tool
*Pictures with Caption
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Year-round Inventory Reports (e.i.
Ramps, Fire Exit, etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Risk Assesment Reports

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Conducted building assessment

assigned engineers/implementers
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*National Audit of School Facilities

0 0 0 0 FALSE

*List of Resources and Plan to

address unsafe school buildings
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Demolition Permit
*Letter of Request
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Narrative Report with Photos with

Caption
0 0 0 0 FALSE
*Request Letter from the Classroom
Adviser/ SPFC for School Facilities
that needs repair. 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*AIP, CDR

0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Site Development Plan

0 0 0 0 FALSE
24. School Head is clear with his/her roles and functions of
the school in camp management vis-à-vis the LGU and
DSWD as per Joint Memorandum Circular No. 1, s. 2013 "
Guidelines on Evacuation enter Coordination and
Management" and RA 10821 " Children's Emergency Relief
and Protection Act" and its corresponding IRR.

25. Guidance and regulations on safe school site are strictly

followed

26. Guidance and regulations on resilient designed are

strictly followed.

27. Guidance and regulations on resilient construction are

followed.

28. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

in safe school site selection (if any).

29. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

in safe school design (if any).

30. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

in safe school construction (if any).

31. School has contingency plan on the existing hazards of

the school campus/locality (vis-à-vis earthquake, typhoon,
COVID-19, floods, arm conflict, flooding, landslide etc.).
32. School has available, accessible, and adequate first aid
kit in every instructional classroom.

33. School has at least 2 necessary and functioning

equipment, in case of a disaster (e.g. fire extinguisher,
handheld /base radio, generator. Etc.).

34. School has pre-identified spaces for putting up

Temporary Learning Spaces/Shelters in the aftermath of a
disaster

35. School has ready resumption strategies and alternative

delivery modes to ensure education continuity.

36. Learners/students have completed the Family

Earthquake Preparedness Plan; and school has reported
completion to DepEd DRRM at the Central Office/Regional
Office
* Conduct Capacity Building on
Camp management Plan for limited
use of schools as evacuation centers
(ei. School EOC, DRRM teams

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Localized/School Based Policy

( e,i, designated parking area,
DRRM Emergency teams etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Localized/School Based Policy

( e,i, VEST, Evacuation Route,
safety harness etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Localized/School Based Policy (ei.
PPE, Nos. of Manpower on-site,
standy Safety Officer)
* Reports 0 0 0 0 FALSE
*Monitoring Report on Physical
Facilities if there's an on-going
project 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Logbook of Implementing Agency

0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Monitoring Logbook
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*DRRM Contingency Plan

0 0 0 0 FALSE

*First Aid Kits per classroom

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Nos. of Fire
Extinguishers(functionable)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Site Development Plan

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Identified TLS Area

*Camp Management
plan
0 0 0 0 FALSE
*Conducted the survey based
DO#27_s. 2015 (Promoting Family
Earthquake Preparedness)
* Consolidated Reports
0 0 0 0 FALSE
37. School has established a school personnel tracking
system/protocol in the event of a disaster.

38. School personnel trained to administer first aid to

students and personnel.

39. School has psychosocial interventions for personnel and

students.

40. School DRRM Plan and SIP with DRRM integration are
reviewed annually.

41. School conducted Brigada Eskwela to ensure safety and

preparedness measures are in place.

42. Students, teachers parents and other stakeholders

participated in Brigada Eskwela.
43. School has established functional Early Warning System
to inform students and personnel of hazards and
emergencies (protocol, warning signs, devices, IEC),
considering national and LGU warning systems and
protocols.
44. School conducted hazards-specific drill with participation
of stakeholders (BFP,Medic, LGU's, NGOs, community, PTA,
alumni, and others).

45. The students participated in the drills.

46. School has evacuation plan procedures.

47. School has a student-family reunification plan that is

clearly disseminated to students, teachers and parents.

48. School Head participated DRRM trainings from division

or region or partners.

49. School DRRM Team participated trainings from division

or region or partners.

50. School has conducted awareness and capacity building

for families and learners.

51. School participated in the different DRRM/CCA/EIE

activities of the LGU

52. School take thermal scanning at the entrance/gate.

* Localized Tracking system (e,i
goolge sheet etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Conduct Basic First Aider/BLS

Orientation to
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Conduct Basic Pyschological First
Aid to Learners and Teachers
* Narrative Reports 0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Updated School DRRM Plan and
Budget Proposal to DRRM related
Activities 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Brigada Eskwela Report

0 0 0 0 FALSE
*Attendance to Brigada Eskwela
conducted
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Signages
*Planning for limited use of
schools as evacuation centers,
during the school year
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Narrative Report with Photos

0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Submitted Reports( NSED,
National DRR Month, Fire
Prevention Month and etc.) 0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Localized/School-Based
Evacuation Plan Guidebook
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Identified Family Reinification
Areas in school during emergencies
occurs 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*DRRM Trainings participated for the

past three years
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*DRRM Trainings participated for the

past three years
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*CB conducted for families and

learners
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Photos
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*No.of thermal scanners/thermal guns

0 0 0 0 FALSE
53. Schools conducted regular pruning of trees(every 6 mos.
especially near to the school buildings.

54. School conducted fire safety inspection every year in

coordination with Bureau of Fire (BFP).

55. School has ample supply of alcohol, sodium hypochlorite

or other disinfectants

56. School has foot baths at strategic locations.

57. School has СOVID-19 triage area.

58. School had isolation area.

59. School required the daily health symptoms questionnaire

to all personnel and stakeholders

60. School submitted 100% accurateness of the report on/or

before date of submission.

Legend:
Very High: 4.50 – 5.00 (90% - 100%)
High: 3.5 -- 4.49 (70%-89%)
Average: 2.50 –3.49 (50% - 69%)
Low: 1.50 - 2.49 (30 % -49%)
Very Low: 0 - 1.49 (Below 30%)

Prepared by:

MARK CARLO M. SENO

Designated School DRRM Coordinators
*Narrative report and photos
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Request Letter to BFP
* Recommendation Reports
from BFP 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Photos
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Photos
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Identified Building or Classroom

0 0 0 0 FALSE
* E-Updated Reports
* Pictures 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*QR Code/ Questionnaire on Health

Safety Protocol
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Soft Copies of DRRM Report

0 0 0 0 FALSE
0 0 0 0 0

INTS : 0

RAGE : 0.00

Percentage
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region VII, Central Visayas
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFMANDAUE CITY
Plaridel.,St., Brgy Centro, Mandaue City

DRRM Comprehensive School Safety Evaluation

Name of School:
School Head:
Division : MANDAUE CITY

RUBRICS SCALE:
(5)---VERY HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol excellentl
(4)---HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol satisfactory
(3)---MODERATE [ Has implemented the policy/protocol fairly
(2)---LOW [ Has implemented the policy/protocol poorly and complied it very late of th
(1)---VERY LOW [ Failed to implemented the DRRM policy/protocol in school.

Performance Indicator (PI)

1. The school has adopted/adapted/localized existing

policies relating to DRRM in education/school.

2. The school has designated School DRRM Focal Person

3. The school has formed and functional School DRRM

Team, consisting of personnel from different offices, with
defined membership and roles and responsiblities.

4. Has a comprehensive School DRRM Plan, which includes

Climate Change Adaptation (CCA) and Education in
Emergencies(EiE) measures
5. Completed in covering Risk Assessment, Risk Reduction
and Rehabilation and Recovery

6. The students participated in the planning process of the

school-based DRRM.

7. Integrated DRRM into School Improvement Plan (SIP)

 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region VII, Central Visayas
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFMANDAUE CITY
Plaridel.,St., Brgy Centro, Mandaue City

prehensive School Safety Evaluation Checklist-2024

Date:

he policy/protocol excellently ahead of time or the set schedule of implementation ]

cy/protocol satisfactory on time ]
he policy/protocol fairly and complied it late of the set schedule of implementation ]
y/protocol poorly and complied it very late of the set schedule of implementation ]
ted the DRRM policy/protocol in school. ]

Means of Verification Rating Scale

(MOV's) 5 4 3 2 1

* Localized School Policies

0 0 0 0 0

* Designation Order
0 0 0 0 0

*SDRRM Core Team Organizational

Chart with defined membership and
roles and responsibilities
0 0 0 0 0

* DRRM Plan with CCA and EiE

measures *Conduct School-based
Orientation on CCA and EiE
0 0 0 0 0

*School-based Monitoring of Risk

Assessment, Risk Reduction and
Rehabilation and Recovery
0 0 0 0 0

*SSG/SPG Participation
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Allocated Budget to DRRM related

Activities
0 0 0 0 FALSE
Remarks/Intervention
8. The School has complied the DRRM related questions in
the EMIS/EBEIS

9. Regular DRRM activities are supported by school budget

10. Funding sources for inteventions in the aftermath of

disaster or emergency exist and can easily be tapped.

11. The school had partnership that could ber tapped to

support its DRRM programs and activities, including after
those after disaster

12. Students participated in the conduct student-led school

watching and hazard mapping (DO 23,s. 2015)

13. Data collection and consolidation of programs and

activities on DRRM, covering the 3 Pillars, to monitor results
and impact exist.

14. School buildings have been inventoried.

15. School buildings have risk assessment.

16. Unsafe school buildings were identified

17. Systems for monitoring and quality assurance of school

buildings exists.

18. Financial resources are allocated for completion of

needed action to address unsafe school buildings within a
specified period.

19. Unsafe school buildings were given with appropriate

action undertaken by the School Head (e.g. upgraded,
retrofitted, non-usage, etc.).

20. School has undertaken regular repair of minor classroom

(including) damages.

21. Roles and responsibilities for maintenance are defined,

documented and assigned.

22. School Head has allotted budget for routine maintenance

of school facilities for safety and protect investments, with
transparent monitoring oversight at the school level.

23. School Head had pre identified/prepositioned classroom

that are expected to be used as temporary evacuations
centers for disasters.
* EBEIS School Profile in DRRM
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* DRRM Budget Proposal

*Annual School DRRM Plan
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Deed of Donation & DOA

* Letter of Intent 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*List of Stakeholders for DRRM

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Submitted Reports with Pictures &

Captions
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Conduct School-based evaluation

and monitoring using CSS Tool
*Pictures with Caption
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Year-round Inventory Reports (e.i.
Ramps, Fire Exit, etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Risk Assesment Reports

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Conducted building assessment

assigned engineers/implementers
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*National Audit of School Facilities

0 0 0 0 FALSE

*List of Resources and Plan to

address unsafe school buildings
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Demolition Permit
*Letter of Request
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Narrative Report with Photos with

Caption
0 0 0 0 FALSE
*Request Letter from the Classroom
Adviser/ SPFC for School Facilities
that needs repair. 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*AIP, CDR

0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Site Development Plan

0 0 0 0 FALSE
24. School Head is clear with his/her roles and functions of
the school in camp management vis-à-vis the LGU and
DSWD as per Joint Memorandum Circular No. 1, s. 2013 "
Guidelines on Evacuation enter Coordination and
Management" and RA 10821 " Children's Emergency Relief
and Protection Act" and its corresponding IRR.

25. Guidance and regulations on safe school site are strictly

followed

26. Guidance and regulations on resilient designed are

strictly followed.

27. Guidance and regulations on resilient construction are

followed.

28. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

in safe school site selection (if any).

29. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

in safe school design (if any).

30. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

in safe school construction (if any).

31. School has contingency plan on the existing hazards of

the school campus/locality (vis-à-vis earthquake, typhoon,
COVID-19, floods, arm conflict, flooding, landslide etc.).
32. School has available, accessible, and adequate first aid
kit in every instructional classroom.

33. School has at least 2 necessary and functioning

equipment, in case of a disaster (e.g. fire extinguisher,
handheld /base radio, generator. Etc.).

34. School has pre-identified spaces for putting up

Temporary Learning Spaces/Shelters in the aftermath of a
disaster

35. School has ready resumption strategies and alternative

delivery modes to ensure education continuity.

36. Learners/students have completed the Family

Earthquake Preparedness Plan; and school has reported
completion to DepEd DRRM at the Central Office/Regional
Office
* Conduct Capacity Building on
Camp management Plan for limited
use of schools as evacuation centers
(ei. School EOC, DRRM teams

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Localized/School Based Policy

( e,i, designated parking area,
DRRM Emergency teams etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Localized/School Based Policy

( e,i, VEST, Evacuation Route,
safety harness etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Localized/School Based Policy (ei.
PPE, Nos. of Manpower on-site,
standy Safety Officer)
* Reports 0 0 0 0 FALSE
*Monitoring Report on Physical
Facilities if there's an on-going
project 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Logbook of Implementing Agency

0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Monitoring Logbook
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*DRRM Contingency Plan

0 0 0 0 FALSE

*First Aid Kits per classroom

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Nos. of Fire
Extinguishers(functionable)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Site Development Plan

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Identified TLS Area

*Camp Management
plan
0 0 0 0 FALSE
*Conducted the survey based
DO#27_s. 2015 (Promoting Family
Earthquake Preparedness)
* Consolidated Reports
0 0 0 0 FALSE
emergency kits
37. School has established a school personnel tracking
system/protocol in the event of a disaster.

38. School personnel trained to administer first aid to

students and personnel.

39. School has psychosocial interventions for personnel and

students.

40. School DRRM Plan and SIP with DRRM integration are
reviewed annually.

41. School conducted Brigada Eskwela to ensure safety and

preparedness measures are in place.

42. Students, teachers parents and other stakeholders

participated in Brigada Eskwela.
43. School has established functional Early Warning System
to inform students and personnel of hazards and
emergencies (protocol, warning signs, devices, IEC),
considering national and LGU warning systems and
protocols.
44. School conducted hazards-specific drill with participation
of stakeholders (BFP,Medic, LGU's, NGOs, community, PTA,
alumni, and others).

45. The students participated in the drills.

46. School has evacuation plan procedures.

47. School has a student-family reunification plan that is

clearly disseminated to students, teachers and parents.

48. School Head participated DRRM trainings from division

or region or partners.

49. School DRRM Team participated trainings from division

or region or partners.

50. School has conducted awareness and capacity building

for families and learners.

51. School participated in the different DRRM/CCA/EIE

activities of the LGU

52. School take thermal scanning at the entrance/gate.

* Localized Tracking system (e,i
goolge sheet etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Conduct Basic First Aider/BLS

Orientation to
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Conduct Basic Pyschological First
Aid to Learners and Teachers
* Narrative Reports 0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Updated School DRRM Plan and
Budget Proposal to DRRM related
Activities 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Brigada Eskwela Report

0 0 0 0 FALSE
*Attendance to Brigada Eskwela
conducted
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Signages
*Planning for limited use of
schools as evacuation centers,
during the school year
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Narrative Report with Photos

0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Submitted Reports( NSED,
National DRR Month, Fire
Prevention Month and etc.) 0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Localized/School-Based
Evacuation Plan Guidebook
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Identified Family Reinification
Areas in school during emergencies
occurs 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*DRRM Trainings participated for the

past three years
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*DRRM Trainings participated for the

past three years
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*CB conducted for families and

learners
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Photos
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*No.of thermal scanners/thermal guns

0 0 0 0 FALSE
53. Schools conducted regular pruning of trees(every 6 mos.
especially near to the school buildings.

54. School conducted fire safety inspection every year in

coordination with Bureau of Fire (BFP).

55. School has ample supply of alcohol, sodium hypochlorite

or other disinfectants

56. School has foot baths at strategic locations.

57. School has СOVID-19 triage area.

58. School had isolation area.

59. School required the daily health symptoms questionnaire

to all personnel and stakeholders

60. School submitted 100% accurateness of the report on/or

before date of submission.

Legend:
Very High: 4.50 – 5.00 (90% - 100%)
High: 3.5 -- 4.49 (70%-89%)
Average: 2.50 –3.49 (50% - 69%)
Low: 1.50 - 2.49 (30 % -49%)
Very Low: 0 - 1.49 (Below 30%)

Prepared by:

Designated School DRRM Coordinators

*Narrative report and photos
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Request Letter to BFP
* Recommendation Reports
from BFP 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Photos
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Photos
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Identified Building or Classroom

0 0 0 0 FALSE
* E-Updated Reports
* Pictures 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*QR Code/ Questionnaire on Health

Safety Protocol
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Soft Copies of DRRM Report

0 0 0 0 FALSE
0 0 0 0 0

INTS : 0

RAGE : 0.00

Percentage
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region VII, Central Visayas
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFMANDAUE CITY
Plaridel.,St., Brgy Centro, Mandaue City

DRRM Comprehensive School Safety Evaluation

Name of School:
School Head:
Division : MANDAUE CITY

RUBRICS SCALE:
(5)---VERY HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol excellentl
(4)---HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol satisfactory
(3)---MODERATE [ Has implemented the policy/protocol fairly
(2)---LOW [ Has implemented the policy/protocol poorly and complied it very late of th
(1)---VERY LOW [ Failed to implemented the DRRM policy/protocol in school.

Performance Indicator (PI)

1. The school has adopted/adapted/localized existing

policies relating to DRRM in education/school.

2. The school has designated School DRRM Focal Person

3. The school has formed and functional School DRRM

Team, consisting of personnel from different offices, with
defined membership and roles and responsiblities.

4. Has a comprehensive School DRRM Plan, which includes

Climate Change Adaptation (CCA) and Education in
Emergencies(EiE) measures
5. Completed in covering Risk Assessment, Risk Reduction
and Rehabilation and Recovery

6. The students participated in the planning process of the

school-based DRRM.

7. Integrated DRRM into School Improvement Plan (SIP)

 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region VII, Central Visayas
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFMANDAUE CITY
Plaridel.,St., Brgy Centro, Mandaue City

prehensive School Safety Evaluation Checklist-2024

Date:

he policy/protocol excellently ahead of time or the set schedule of implementation ]

cy/protocol satisfactory on time ]
he policy/protocol fairly and complied it late of the set schedule of implementation ]
y/protocol poorly and complied it very late of the set schedule of implementation ]
ted the DRRM policy/protocol in school. ]

Means of Verification Rating Scale

(MOV's) 5 4 3 2 1

* Localized School Policies

0 0 0 0 0

* Designation Order
0 0 0 0 0

*SDRRM Core Team Organizational

Chart with defined membership and
roles and responsibilities
0 0 0 0 0

* DRRM Plan with CCA and EiE

measures *Conduct School-based
Orientation on CCA and EiE
0 0 0 0 0

*School-based Monitoring of Risk

Assessment, Risk Reduction and
Rehabilation and Recovery
0 0 0 0 0

*SSG/SPG Participation
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Allocated Budget to DRRM related

Activities
0 0 0 0 FALSE
Remarks/Intervention
8. The School has complied the DRRM related questions in
the EMIS/EBEIS

9. Regular DRRM activities are supported by school budget

10. Funding sources for inteventions in the aftermath of

disaster or emergency exist and can easily be tapped.

11. The school had partnership that could ber tapped to

support its DRRM programs and activities, including after
those after disaster

12. Students participated in the conduct student-led school

watching and hazard mapping (DO 23,s. 2015)

13. Data collection and consolidation of programs and

activities on DRRM, covering the 3 Pillars, to monitor results
and impact exist.

14. School buildings have been inventoried.

15. School buildings have risk assessment.

16. Unsafe school buildings were identified

17. Systems for monitoring and quality assurance of school

buildings exists.

18. Financial resources are allocated for completion of

needed action to address unsafe school buildings within a
specified period.

19. Unsafe school buildings were given with appropriate

action undertaken by the School Head (e.g. upgraded,
retrofitted, non-usage, etc.).

20. School has undertaken regular repair of minor classroom

(including) damages.

21. Roles and responsibilities for maintenance are defined,

documented and assigned.

22. School Head has allotted budget for routine maintenance

of school facilities for safety and protect investments, with
transparent monitoring oversight at the school level.

23. School Head had pre identified/prepositioned classroom

that are expected to be used as temporary evacuations
centers for disasters.
* EBEIS School Profile in DRRM
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* DRRM Budget Proposal

*Annual School DRRM Plan
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Deed of Donation & DOA

* Letter of Intent 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*List of Stakeholders for DRRM

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Submitted Reports with Pictures &

Captions
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Conduct School-based evaluation

and monitoring using CSS Tool
*Pictures with Caption
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Year-round Inventory Reports (e.i.
Ramps, Fire Exit, etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Risk Assesment Reports

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Conducted building assessment

assigned engineers/implementers
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*National Audit of School Facilities

0 0 0 0 FALSE

*List of Resources and Plan to

address unsafe school buildings
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Demolition Permit
*Letter of Request
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Narrative Report with Photos with

Caption
0 0 0 0 FALSE
*Request Letter from the Classroom
Adviser/ SPFC for School Facilities
that needs repair. 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*AIP, SIP

0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Site Development Plan

0 0 0 0 FALSE
24. School Head is clear with his/her roles and functions of
the school in camp management vis-à-vis the LGU and
DSWD as per Joint Memorandum Circular No. 1, s. 2013 "
Guidelines on Evacuation enter Coordination and
Management" and RA 10821 " Children's Emergency Relief
and Protection Act" and its corresponding IRR.

25. Guidance and regulations on safe school site are strictly

followed

26. Guidance and regulations on resilient designed are

strictly followed.

27. Guidance and regulations on resilient construction are

followed.

28. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

in safe school site selection (if any).

29. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

in safe school design (if any).

30. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

in safe school construction (if any).

31. School has contingency plan on the existing hazards of

the school campus/locality (vis-à-vis earthquake, typhoon,
COVID-19, floods, arm conflict, flooding, landslide etc.).
32. School has available, accessible, and adequate first aid
kit in every instructional classroom.

33. School has at least 2 necessary and functioning

equipment, in case of a disaster (e.g. fire extinguisher,
handheld /base radio, generator. Etc.).

34. School has pre-identified spaces for putting up

Temporary Learning Spaces/Shelters in the aftermath of a
disaster

35. School has ready resumption strategies and alternative

delivery modes to ensure education continuity.

36. Learners/students have completed the Family

Earthquake Preparedness Plan; and school has reported
completion to DepEd DRRM at the Central Office/Regional
Office
* Conduct Capacity Building on
Camp management Plan for limited
use of schools as evacuation centers
(ei. School EOC, DRRM teams

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Localized/School Based Policy

( e,i, designated parking area,
DRRM Emergency teams etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Localized/School Based Policy
( e,i, VEST, Evacuation Route,
safety harness etc.) 0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Localized/School Based Policy (ei.
PPE, Nos. of Manpower on-site,
standy Safety Officer)
* Reports 0 0 0 0 FALSE
*Monitoring Report on Physical
Facilities if there's an on-going
project 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Logbook of Implementing Agency

0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Monitoring Logbook
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*DRRM Contingency Plan

0 0 0 0 FALSE

*First Aid Kits per classroom

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Nos. of Fire
Extinguishers(functionable)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Site Development Plan

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Identified TLS Area

*Camp Management
plan
0 0 0 0 FALSE
*Conducted the survey based
DO#27_s. 2015 (Promoting Family
Earthquake Preparedness)
* Consolidated Reports
0 0 0 0 FALSE
37. School has established a school personnel tracking
system/protocol in the event of a disaster.

38. School personnel trained to administer first aid to

students and personnel.

39. School has psychosocial interventions for personnel and

students.

40. School DRRM Plan and SIP with DRRM integration are
reviewed annually.

41. School conducted Brigada Eskwela to ensure safety and

preparedness measures are in place.

42. Students, teachers parents and other stakeholders

participated in Brigada Eskwela.
43. School has established functional Early Warning System
to inform students and personnel of hazards and
emergencies (protocol, warning signs, devices, IEC),
considering national and LGU warning systems and
protocols.
44. School conducted hazards-specific drill with participation
of stakeholders (BFP,Medic, LGU's, NGOs, community, PTA,
alumni, and others).

45. The students participated in the drills.

46. School has evacuation plan procedures.

47. School has a student-family reunification plan that is

clearly disseminated to students, teachers and parents.

48. School Head participated DRRM trainings from division

or region or partners.

49. School DRRM Team participated trainings from division

or region or partners.

50. School has conducted awareness and capacity building

for families and learners.

51. School participated in the different DRRM/CCA/EIE

activities of the LGU

52. School take thermal scanning at the entrance/gate.

* Localized Tracking system (e,i
goolge sheet etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Conduct Basic First Aider/BLS

Orientation to
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Conduct Basic Pyschological First
Aid to Learners and Teachers
* Narrative Reports 0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Updated School DRRM Plan and
Budget Proposal to DRRM related
Activities 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Brigada Eskwela Report

0 0 0 0 FALSE
*Attendance to Brigada Eskwela
conducted
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Signages
*Planning for limited use of
schools as evacuation centers,
during the school year
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Narrative Report with Photos

0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Submitted Reports( NSED,
National DRR Month, Fire
Prevention Month and etc.) 0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Localized/School-Based
Evacuation Plan Guidebook
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Identified Family Reinification
Areas in school during emergencies
occurs 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*DRRM Trainings participated for the

past three years
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*DRRM Trainings participated for the

past three years
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*CB conducted for families and

learners
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Photos
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*No.of thermal scanners/thermal guns

0 0 0 0 FALSE
53. Schools conducted regular pruning of trees(every 6 mos.
especially near to the school buildings.

54. School conducted fire safety inspection every year in

coordination with Bureau of Fire (BFP).

55. School has ample supply of alcohol, sodium hypochlorite

or other disinfectants

56. School has foot baths at strategic locations.

57. School has СOVID-19 triage area.

58. School had isolation area.

59. School required the daily health symptoms questionnaire

to all personnel and stakeholders

60. School submitted 100% accurateness of the report on/or

before date of submission.

Legend:
Very High: 4.50 – 5.00 (90% - 100%)
High: 3.5 -- 4.49 (70%-89%)
Average: 2.50 –3.49 (50% - 69%)
Low: 1.50 - 2.49 (30 % -49%)
Very Low: 0 - 1.49 (Below 30%)

Prepared by:

JOSE S. REGIDOR
Designated School DRRM Coordinators
*Narrative report and photos
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Request Letter to BFP
* Recommendation Reports
from BFP 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Photos
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Photos
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Identified Building or Classroom

0 0 0 0 FALSE
* E-Updated Reports
* Pictures 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*QR Code/ Questionnaire on Health

Safety Protocol
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Soft Copies of DRRM Report

0 0 0 0 FALSE
0 0 0 0 0

INTS : 0

RAGE : 0.00

Percentage
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region VII, Central Visayas
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFMANDAUE CITY
Plaridel.,St., Brgy Centro, Mandaue City

DRRM Comprehensive School Safety Evaluation

Name of School: TABOK NHS
School Head: BELLA VERDA M. OLIVEROS
Division : MANDAUE CITY

RUBRICS SCALE:
(5)---VERY HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol excellentl
(4)---HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol satisfactory
(3)---MODERATE [ Has implemented the policy/protocol fairly
(2)---LOW [ Has implemented the policy/protocol poorly and complied it very late of th
(1)---VERY LOW [ Failed to implemented the DRRM policy/protocol in school.

Performance Indicator (PI)

1. The school has adopted/adapted/localized existing

policies relating to DRRM in education/school.

2. The school has designated School DRRM Focal Person

3. The school has formed and functional School DRRM

Team, consisting of personnel from different offices, with
defined membership and roles and responsiblities.

4. Has a comprehensive School DRRM Plan, which includes

Climate Change Adaptation (CCA) and Education in
Emergencies(EiE) measures
5. Completed in covering Risk Assessment, Risk Reduction
and Rehabilation and Recovery

6. The students participated in the planning process of the

school-based DRRM.

7. Integrated DRRM into School Improvement Plan (SIP)

 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region VII, Central Visayas
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFMANDAUE CITY
Plaridel.,St., Brgy Centro, Mandaue City

prehensive School Safety Evaluation Checklist-2024

Date:
S

he policy/protocol excellently ahead of time or the set schedule of implementation ]

cy/protocol satisfactory on time ]
he policy/protocol fairly and complied it late of the set schedule of implementation ]
y/protocol poorly and complied it very late of the set schedule of implementation ]
ted the DRRM policy/protocol in school. ]

Means of Verification Rating Scale

(MOV's) 5 4 3 2 1

* Localized School Policies

0 0 0 0 0

* Designation Order
0 0 0 0 0

*SDRRM Core Team Organizational

Chart with defined membership and
roles and responsibilities
0 0 0 0 0

* DRRM Plan with CCA and EiE

measures *Conduct School-based
Orientation on CCA and EiE
0 0 0 0 0

*School-based Monitoring of Risk

Assessment, Risk Reduction and
Rehabilation and Recovery
0 0 0 0 0

*SSG/SPG Participation
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Allocated Budget to DRRM related

Activities
0 0 0 0 FALSE
Remarks/Intervention
8. The School has complied the DRRM related questions in
the EMIS/EBEIS

9. Regular DRRM activities are supported by school budget

10. Funding sources for inteventions in the aftermath of

disaster or emergency exist and can easily be tapped.

11. The school had partnership that could ber tapped to

support its DRRM programs and activities, including after
those after disaster

12. Students participated in the conduct student-led school

watching and hazard mapping (DO 23,s. 2015)

13. Data collection and consolidation of programs and

activities on DRRM, covering the 3 Pillars, to monitor results
and impact exist.

14. School buildings have been inventoried.

15. School buildings have risk assessment.

16. Unsafe school buildings were identified

17. Systems for monitoring and quality assurance of school

buildings exists.

18. Financial resources are allocated for completion of

needed action to address unsafe school buildings within a
specified period.

19. Unsafe school buildings were given with appropriate

action undertaken by the School Head (e.g. upgraded,
retrofitted, non-usage, etc.).

20. School has undertaken regular repair of minor classroom

(including) damages.

21. Roles and responsibilities for maintenance are defined,

documented and assigned.

22. School Head has allotted budget for routine maintenance

of school facilities for safety and protect investments, with
transparent monitoring oversight at the school level.

23. School Head had pre identified/prepositioned classroom

that are expected to be used as temporary evacuations
centers for disasters.
* EBEIS School Profile in DRRM
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* DRRM Budget Proposal

*Annual School DRRM Plan
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Deed of Donation & DOA

* Letter of Intent 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*List of Stakeholders for DRRM

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Submitted Reports with Pictures &

Captions
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Conduct School-based evaluation

and monitoring using CSS Tool
*Pictures with Caption
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Year-round Inventory Reports (e.i.
Ramps, Fire Exit, etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Risk Assesment Reports

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Conducted building assessment

assigned engineers/implementers
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*National Audit of School Facilities

0 0 0 0 FALSE

*List of Resources and Plan to

address unsafe school buildings
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Demolition Permit
*Letter of Request
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Narrative Report with Photos with

Caption
0 0 0 0 FALSE
*Request Letter from the Classroom
Adviser/ SPFC for School Facilities
that needs repair. 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*AIP, SIP

0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Site Development Plan

0 0 0 0 FALSE
24. School Head is clear with his/her roles and functions of
the school in camp management vis-à-vis the LGU and
DSWD as per Joint Memorandum Circular No. 1, s. 2013 "
Guidelines on Evacuation enter Coordination and
Management" and RA 10821 " Children's Emergency Relief
and Protection Act" and its corresponding IRR.

25. Guidance and regulations on safe school site are strictly

followed

26. Guidance and regulations on resilient designed are

strictly followed.

27. Guidance and regulations on resilient construction are

followed.

28. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

in safe school site selection (if any).

29. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

in safe school design (if any).

30. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

in safe school construction (if any).

31. School has contingency plan on the existing hazards of

the school campus/locality (vis-à-vis earthquake, typhoon,
COVID-19, floods, arm conflict, flooding, landslide etc.).
32. School has available, accessible, and adequate first aid
kit in every instructional classroom.

33. School has at least 2 necessary and functioning

equipment, in case of a disaster (e.g. fire extinguisher,
handheld /base radio, generator. Etc.).

34. School has pre-identified spaces for putting up

Temporary Learning Spaces/Shelters in the aftermath of a
disaster

35. School has ready resumption strategies and alternative

delivery modes to ensure education continuity.

36. Learners/students have completed the Family

Earthquake Preparedness Plan; and school has reported
completion to DepEd DRRM at the Central Office/Regional
Office
* Conduct Capacity Building on
Camp management Plan for limited
use of schools as evacuation centers
(ei. School EOC, DRRM teams

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Localized/School Based Policy

( e,i, designated parking area,
DRRM Emergency teams etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Localized/School Based Policy

( e,i, VEST, Evacuation Route,
safety harness etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Localized/School Based Policy (ei.
PPE, Nos. of Manpower on-site,
standy Safety Officer)
* Reports 0 0 0 0 FALSE
*Monitoring Report on Physical
Facilities if there's an on-going
project 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Logbook of Implementing Agency

0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Monitoring Logbook
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*DRRM Contingency Plan

0 0 0 0 FALSE

*First Aid Kits per classroom

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Nos. of Fire
Extinguishers(functionable)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Site Development Plan

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Identified TLS Area

*Camp Management
plan
0 0 0 0 FALSE
*Conducted the survey based
DO#27_s. 2015 (Promoting Family
Earthquake Preparedness)
* Consolidated Reports
0 0 0 0 FALSE
37. School has established a school personnel tracking
system/protocol in the event of a disaster.

38. School personnel trained to administer first aid to

students and personnel.

39. School has psychosocial interventions for personnel and

students.

40. School DRRM Plan and SIP with DRRM integration are
reviewed annually.

41. School conducted Brigada Eskwela to ensure safety and

preparedness measures are in place.

42. Students, teachers parents and other stakeholders

participated in Brigada Eskwela.
43. School has established functional Early Warning System
to inform students and personnel of hazards and
emergencies (protocol, warning signs, devices, IEC),
considering national and LGU warning systems and
protocols.
44. School conducted hazards-specific drill with participation
of stakeholders (BFP,Medic, LGU's, NGOs, community, PTA,
alumni, and others).

45. The students participated in the drills.

46. School has evacuation plan procedures.

47. School has a student-family reunification plan that is

clearly disseminated to students, teachers and parents.

48. School Head participated DRRM trainings from division

or region or partners.

49. School DRRM Team participated trainings from division

or region or partners.

50. School has conducted awareness and capacity building

for families and learners.

51. School participated in the different DRRM/CCA/EIE

activities of the LGU

52. School take thermal scanning at the entrance/gate.

* Localized Tracking system (e,i
goolge sheet etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Conduct Basic First Aider/BLS

Orientation to
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Conduct Basic Pyschological First
Aid to Learners and Teachers
* Narrative Reports 0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Updated School DRRM Plan and
Budget Proposal to DRRM related
Activities 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Brigada Eskwela Report

0 0 0 0 FALSE
*Attendance to Brigada Eskwela
conducted
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Signages
*Planning for limited use of
schools as evacuation centers,
during the school year
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Narrative Report with Photos

0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Submitted Reports( NSED,
National DRR Month, Fire
Prevention Month and etc.) 0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Localized/School-Based
Evacuation Plan Guidebook
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Identified Family Reinification
Areas in school during emergencies
occurs 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*DRRM Trainings participated for the

past three years
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*DRRM Trainings participated for the

past three years
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*CB conducted for families and

learners
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Photos
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*No.of thermal scanners/thermal guns

0 0 0 0 FALSE
53. Schools conducted regular pruning of trees(every 6 mos.
especially near to the school buildings.

54. School conducted fire safety inspection every year in

coordination with Bureau of Fire (BFP).

55. School has ample supply of alcohol, sodium hypochlorite

or other disinfectants

56. School has foot baths at strategic locations.

57. School has СOVID-19 triage area.

58. School had isolation area.

59. School required the daily health symptoms questionnaire

to all personnel and stakeholders

60. School submitted 100% accurateness of the report on/or

before date of submission.

Legend:
Very High: 4.50 – 5.00 (90% - 100%)
High: 3.5 -- 4.49 (70%-89%)
Average: 2.50 –3.49 (50% - 69%)
Low: 1.50 - 2.49 (30 % -49%)
Very Low: 0 - 1.49 (Below 30%)

Prepared by:

LICAR P. MANAGO
Designated School DRRM Coordinators
*Narrative report and photos
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Request Letter to BFP
* Recommendation Reports
from BFP 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Photos
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Photos
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Identified Building or Classroom

0 0 0 0 FALSE
* E-Updated Reports
* Pictures 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*QR Code/ Questionnaire on Health

Safety Protocol
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Soft Copies of DRRM Report

0 0 0 0 FALSE
0 0 0 0 0

INTS : 0

RAGE : 0.00

Percentage
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region VII, Central Visayas
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFMANDAUE CITY
Plaridel.,St., Brgy Centro, Mandaue City

DRRM Comprehensive School Safety Evaluation Checklist-202

Name of School: DON GERARDO Ll. OUANO MEMORIAL NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
School Head:
Division : MANDAUE CITY

RUBRICS SCALE:
(5)---VERY HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol excellently ahead of time or the set schedule of imp
(4)---HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol satisfactory on time ]
(3)---MODERATE [ Has implemented the policy/protocol fairly and complied it late of the set schedule of imp
(2)---LOW [ Has implemented the policy/protocol poorly and complied it very late of the set schedule of i
(1)---VERY LOW [ Failed to implemented the DRRM policy/protocol in school. ]

Means of Verification
Performance Indicator (PI) (MOV's)

1. The school has adopted/adapted/localized existing

* Localized School Policies
policies relating to DRRM in education/school.

2. The school has designated School DRRM Focal Person * Designation Order

3. The school has formed and functional School DRRM *SDRRM Core Team Organizational
Team, consisting of personnel from different offices, with Chart with defined membership and
defined membership and roles and responsiblities. roles and responsibilities

4. Has a comprehensive School DRRM Plan, which includes * DRRM Plan with CCA and EiE
Climate Change Adaptation (CCA) and Education in measures *Conduct School-based
Emergencies(EiE) measures Orientation on CCA and EiE
5. Completed in covering Risk Assessment, Risk Reduction
*School-based Monitoring of Risk
and Rehabilation and Recovery Assessment, Risk Reduction and
Rehabilation and Recovery

6. The students participated in the planning process of the

*SSG/SPG Participation
school-based DRRM.

* Allocated Budget to DRRM related

7. Integrated DRRM into School Improvement Plan (SIP) Activities

8. The School has complied the DRRM related questions in

* EBEIS School Profile in DRRM
the EMIS/EBEIS

* DRRM Budget Proposal

9. Regular DRRM activities are supported by school budget *Annual School DRRM Plan
ines
cation
ayas
NDAUE CITY
ndaue City

ty Evaluation Checklist-2023
Date:

ead of time or the set schedule of implementation ]

plied it late of the set schedule of implementation ]

it very late of the set schedule of implementation ]
hool. ]

Rating Scale
Remarks/Intervention
5 4 3 2 1

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE
10. Funding sources for inteventions in the aftermath of
* Deed of Donation & DOA
disaster or emergency exist and can easily be tapped.
* Letter of Intent
11. The school had partnership that could ber tapped to
support its DRRM programs and activities, including after *List of Stakeholders for DRRM
those after disaster

12. Students participated in the conduct student-led school * Submitted Reports with Pictures &
watching and hazard mapping (DO 23,s. 2015) Captions

13. Data collection and consolidation of programs and *Conduct School-based evaluation
activities on DRRM, covering the 3 Pillars, to monitor results and monitoring using CSS Tool
and impact exist. *Pictures with Caption

* Year-round Inventory Reports (e.i.

14. School buildings have been inventoried. Ramps, Fire Exit, etc.)

15. School buildings have risk assessment. * Risk Assesment Reports

* Conducted building assessment

16. Unsafe school buildings were identified assigned engineers/implementers

17. Systems for monitoring and quality assurance of school

*National Audit of School Facilities
buildings exists.

18. Financial resources are allocated for completion of

*List of Resources and Plan to
needed action to address unsafe school buildings within a address unsafe school buildings
specified period.

19. Unsafe school buildings were given with appropriate

*Demolition Permit
action undertaken by the School Head (e.g. upgraded, *Letter of Request
retrofitted, non-usage, etc.).

20. School has undertaken regular repair of minor classroom *Narrative Report with Photos with
(including) damages. Caption

*Request Letter from the Classroom

21. Roles and responsibilities for maintenance are defined,
Adviser/ SPFC for School Facilities
documented and assigned. that needs repair.

22. School Head has allotted budget for routine maintenance

of school facilities for safety and protect investments, with *AIP, SIP
transparent monitoring oversight at the school level.

23. School Head had pre identified/prepositioned classroom

that are expected to be used as temporary evacuations *Site Development Plan
centers for disasters.

24. School Head is clear with his/her roles and functions of

the school in camp management vis-à-vis the LGU and * Conduct Capacity Building on
DSWD as per Joint Memorandum Circular No. 1, s. 2013 " Camp management Plan for limited
Guidelines on Evacuation enter Coordination and use of schools as evacuation centers
Management" and RA 10821 " Children's Emergency Relief (ei. School EOC, DRRM teams
and Protection Act" and its corresponding IRR.

25. Guidance and regulations on safe school site are strictly * Localized/School Based Policy
( e,i, designated parking area,
followed DRRM Emergency teams etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE
26. Guidance and regulations on resilient designed are * Localized/School Based Policy
( e,i, VEST, Evacuation Route,
strictly followed. safety harness etc.)

* Localized/School Based Policy (ei.

27. Guidance and regulations on resilient construction are PPE, Nos. of Manpower on-site,
followed. standy Safety Officer)
* Reports
28. New school site construction is monitored for compliance *Monitoring Report on Physical
Facilities if there's an on-going
in safe school site selection (if any). project
29. New school site construction is monitored for compliance
*Logbook of Implementing Agency
in safe school design (if any).

30. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

*Monitoring Logbook
in safe school construction (if any).

31. School has contingency plan on the existing hazards of

the school campus/locality (vis-à-vis earthquake, typhoon, *DRRM Contingency Plan
COVID-19, floods, arm conflict, flooding, landslide etc.).
32. School has available, accessible, and adequate first aid
*First Aid Kits per classroom
kit in every instructional classroom.

33. School has at least 2 necessary and functioning

* Nos. of Fire
equipment, in case of a disaster (e.g. fire extinguisher, Extinguishers(functionable)
handheld /base radio, generator. Etc.).

34. School has pre-identified spaces for putting up

Temporary Learning Spaces/Shelters in the aftermath of a *Site Development Plan
disaster

* Identified TLS Area

35. School has ready resumption strategies and alternative
*Camp Management
delivery modes to ensure education continuity. plan

36. Learners/students have completed the Family *Conducted the survey based
Earthquake Preparedness Plan; and school has reported DO#27_s. 2015 (Promoting Family
completion to DepEd DRRM at the Central Office/Regional Earthquake Preparedness)
Office * Consolidated Reports

37. School has established a school personnel tracking * Localized Tracking system (e,i
system/protocol in the event of a disaster. goolge sheet etc.)

38. School personnel trained to administer first aid to * Conduct Basic First Aider/BLS
students and personnel. Orientation to

39. School has psychosocial interventions for personnel and * Conduct Basic Pyschological First
Aid to Learners and Teachers
students. * Narrative Reports
* Updated School DRRM Plan and
40. School DRRM Plan and SIP with DRRM integration are
Budget Proposal to DRRM related
reviewed annually. Activities

41. School conducted Brigada Eskwela to ensure safety and

*Brigada Eskwela Report
preparedness measures are in place.

42. Students, teachers parents and other stakeholders *Attendance to Brigada Eskwela
participated in Brigada Eskwela. conducted
0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE
43. School has established functional Early Warning System
to inform students and personnel of hazards and * Signages
*Planning for limited use of
emergencies (protocol, warning signs, devices, IEC), schools as evacuation centers,
considering national and LGU warning systems and during the school year
protocols.
44. School conducted hazards-specific drill with participation
of stakeholders (BFP,Medic, LGU's, NGOs, community, PTA, *Narrative Report with Photos
alumni, and others).
* Submitted Reports( NSED,
45. The students participated in the drills. National DRR Month, Fire
Prevention Month and etc.)

* Localized/School-Based
46. School has evacuation plan procedures. Evacuation Plan Guidebook

* Identified Family Reinification

47. School has a student-family reunification plan that is
Areas in school during emergencies
clearly disseminated to students, teachers and parents. occurs

48. School Head participated DRRM trainings from division *DRRM Trainings participated for the
or region or partners. past three years

49. School DRRM Team participated trainings from division *DRRM Trainings participated for the
or region or partners. past three years

50. School has conducted awareness and capacity building *CB conducted for families and
for families and learners. learners

51. School participated in the different DRRM/CCA/EIE

*Photos
activities of the LGU

52. School take thermal scanning at the entrance/gate. *No.of thermal scanners/thermal guns

53. Schools conducted regular pruning of trees(every 6 mos.

*Narrative report and photos
especially near to the school buildings.
* Request Letter to BFP
54. School conducted fire safety inspection every year in
* Recommendation Reports
coordination with Bureau of Fire (BFP). from BFP
55. School has ample supply of alcohol, sodium hypochlorite
*Photos
or other disinfectants

56. School has foot baths at strategic locations. *Photos

57. School has СOVID-19 triage area. * Identified Building or Classroom

* E-Updated Reports
58. School had isolation area. * Pictures

59. School required the daily health symptoms questionnaire *QR Code/ Questionnaire on Health
to all personnel and stakeholders Safety Protocol

60. School submitted 100% accurateness of the report on/or

*Soft Copies of DRRM Report
before date of submission.

Legend:
Very High: 4.50 – 5.00 (90% - 100%)
 0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE
0 0 0 0 0

INTS : 0
 High: 3.5 -- 4.49 (70%-89%)
Average: 2.50 –3.49 (50% - 69%)
Low: 1.50 - 2.49 (30 % -49%)
Very Low: 0 - 1.49 (Below 30%)

Prepared by:

MA. NERISSA B. DARANTINAO

Designated School DRRM Coordinators
 RAGE : 0.00

Percentage 90%-100%
VERY HIGH
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region VII, Central Visayas
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFMANDAUE CITY
Plaridel.,St., Brgy Centro, Mandaue City

DRRM Comprehensive School Safety Evaluation

Name of School:
School Head:
Division : MANDAUE CITY

RUBRICS SCALE:
(5)---VERY HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol excellentl
(4)---HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol satisfactory
(3)---MODERATE [ Has implemented the policy/protocol fairly
(2)---LOW [ Has implemented the policy/protocol poorly and complied it very late of th
(1)---VERY LOW [ Failed to implemented the DRRM policy/protocol in school.

Performance Indicator (PI)

1. The school has adopted/adapted/localized existing

policies relating to DRRM in education/school.

2. The school has designated School DRRM Focal Person

3. The school has formed and functional School DRRM

Team, consisting of personnel from different offices, with
defined membership and roles and responsiblities.

4. Has a comprehensive School DRRM Plan, which includes

Climate Change Adaptation (CCA) and Education in
Emergencies(EiE) measures
5. Completed in covering Risk Assessment, Risk Reduction
and Rehabilation and Recovery

6. The students participated in the planning process of the

school-based DRRM.

7. Integrated DRRM into School Improvement Plan (SIP)

 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region VII, Central Visayas
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFMANDAUE CITY
Plaridel.,St., Brgy Centro, Mandaue City

prehensive School Safety Evaluation Checklist-2024

Date:

he policy/protocol excellently ahead of time or the set schedule of implementation ]

cy/protocol satisfactory on time ]
he policy/protocol fairly and complied it late of the set schedule of implementation ]
y/protocol poorly and complied it very late of the set schedule of implementation ]
ted the DRRM policy/protocol in school. ]

Means of Verification Rating Scale

(MOV's) 5 4 3 2 1

* Localized School Policies

0 0 0 0 0

* Designation Order
0 0 0 0 0

*SDRRM Core Team Organizational

Chart with defined membership and
roles and responsibilities
0 0 0 0 0

* DRRM Plan with CCA and EiE

measures *Conduct School-based
Orientation on CCA and EiE
0 0 0 0 0

*School-based Monitoring of Risk

Assessment, Risk Reduction and
Rehabilation and Recovery
0 0 0 0 0

*SSG/SPG Participation
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Allocated Budget to DRRM related

Activities
0 0 0 0 FALSE
Remarks/Intervention
8. The School has complied the DRRM related questions in
the EMIS/EBEIS

9. Regular DRRM activities are supported by school budget

10. Funding sources for inteventions in the aftermath of

disaster or emergency exist and can easily be tapped.

11. The school had partnership that could ber tapped to

support its DRRM programs and activities, including after
those after disaster

12. Students participated in the conduct student-led school

watching and hazard mapping (DO 23,s. 2015)

13. Data collection and consolidation of programs and

activities on DRRM, covering the 3 Pillars, to monitor results
and impact exist.

14. School buildings have been inventoried.

15. School buildings have risk assessment.

16. Unsafe school buildings were identified

17. Systems for monitoring and quality assurance of school

buildings exists.

18. Financial resources are allocated for completion of

needed action to address unsafe school buildings within a
specified period.

19. Unsafe school buildings were given with appropriate

action undertaken by the School Head (e.g. upgraded,
retrofitted, non-usage, etc.).

20. School has undertaken regular repair of minor classroom

(including) damages.

21. Roles and responsibilities for maintenance are defined,

documented and assigned.

22. School Head has allotted budget for routine maintenance

of school facilities for safety and protect investments, with
transparent monitoring oversight at the school level.

23. School Head had pre identified/prepositioned classroom

that are expected to be used as temporary evacuations
centers for disasters.
* EBEIS School Profile in DRRM
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* DRRM Budget Proposal

*Annual School DRRM Plan
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Deed of Donation & DOA

* Letter of Intent 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*List of Stakeholders for DRRM

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Submitted Reports with Pictures &

Captions
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Conduct School-based evaluation

and monitoring using CSS Tool
*Pictures with Caption
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Year-round Inventory Reports (e.i.
Ramps, Fire Exit, etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Risk Assesment Reports

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Conducted building assessment

assigned engineers/implementers
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*National Audit of School Facilities

0 0 0 0 FALSE

*List of Resources and Plan to

address unsafe school buildings
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Demolition Permit
*Letter of Request
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Narrative Report with Photos with

Caption
0 0 0 0 FALSE
*Request Letter from the Classroom
Adviser/ SPFC for School Facilities
that needs repair. 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*AIP, SIP

0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Site Development Plan

0 0 0 0 FALSE
24. School Head is clear with his/her roles and functions of
the school in camp management vis-à-vis the LGU and
DSWD as per Joint Memorandum Circular No. 1, s. 2013 "
Guidelines on Evacuation enter Coordination and
Management" and RA 10821 " Children's Emergency Relief
and Protection Act" and its corresponding IRR.

25. Guidance and regulations on safe school site are strictly

followed

26. Guidance and regulations on resilient designed are

strictly followed.

27. Guidance and regulations on resilient construction are

followed.

28. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

in safe school site selection (if any).

29. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

in safe school design (if any).

30. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

in safe school construction (if any).

31. School has contingency plan on the existing hazards of

the school campus/locality (vis-à-vis earthquake, typhoon,
COVID-19, floods, arm conflict, flooding, landslide etc.).
32. School has available, accessible, and adequate first aid
kit in every instructional classroom.

33. School has at least 2 necessary and functioning

equipment, in case of a disaster (e.g. fire extinguisher,
handheld /base radio, generator. Etc.).

34. School has pre-identified spaces for putting up

Temporary Learning Spaces/Shelters in the aftermath of a
disaster

35. School has ready resumption strategies and alternative

delivery modes to ensure education continuity.

36. Learners/students have completed the Family

Earthquake Preparedness Plan; and school has reported
completion to DepEd DRRM at the Central Office/Regional
Office
* Conduct Capacity Building on
Camp management Plan for limited
use of schools as evacuation centers
(ei. School EOC, DRRM teams

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Localized/School Based Policy

( e,i, designated parking area,
DRRM Emergency teams etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Localized/School Based Policy

( e,i, VEST, Evacuation Route,
safety harness etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Localized/School Based Policy (ei.
PPE, Nos. of Manpower on-site,
standy Safety Officer)
* Reports 0 0 0 0 FALSE
*Monitoring Report on Physical
Facilities if there's an on-going
project 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Logbook of Implementing Agency

0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Monitoring Logbook
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*DRRM Contingency Plan

0 0 0 0 FALSE

*First Aid Kits per classroom

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Nos. of Fire
Extinguishers(functionable)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Site Development Plan

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Identified TLS Area

*Camp Management
plan
0 0 0 0 FALSE
*Conducted the survey based
DO#27_s. 2015 (Promoting Family
Earthquake Preparedness)
* Consolidated Reports
0 0 0 0 FALSE
37. School has established a school personnel tracking
system/protocol in the event of a disaster.

38. School personnel trained to administer first aid to

students and personnel.

39. School has psychosocial interventions for personnel and

students.

40. School DRRM Plan and SIP with DRRM integration are
reviewed annually.

41. School conducted Brigada Eskwela to ensure safety and

preparedness measures are in place.

42. Students, teachers parents and other stakeholders

participated in Brigada Eskwela.
43. School has established functional Early Warning System
to inform students and personnel of hazards and
emergencies (protocol, warning signs, devices, IEC),
considering national and LGU warning systems and
protocols.
44. School conducted hazards-specific drill with participation
of stakeholders (BFP,Medic, LGU's, NGOs, community, PTA,
alumni, and others).

45. The students participated in the drills.

46. School has evacuation plan procedures.

47. School has a student-family reunification plan that is

clearly disseminated to students, teachers and parents.

48. School Head participated DRRM trainings from division

or region or partners.

49. School DRRM Team participated trainings from division

or region or partners.

50. School has conducted awareness and capacity building

for families and learners.

51. School participated in the different DRRM/CCA/EIE

activities of the LGU

52. School take thermal scanning at the entrance/gate.

* Localized Tracking system (e,i
goolge sheet etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Conduct Basic First Aider/BLS

Orientation to
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Conduct Basic Pyschological First
Aid to Learners and Teachers
* Narrative Reports 0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Updated School DRRM Plan and
Budget Proposal to DRRM related
Activities 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Brigada Eskwela Report

0 0 0 0 FALSE
*Attendance to Brigada Eskwela
conducted
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Signages
*Planning for limited use of
schools as evacuation centers,
during the school year
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Narrative Report with Photos

0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Submitted Reports( NSED,
National DRR Month, Fire
Prevention Month and etc.) 0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Localized/School-Based
Evacuation Plan Guidebook
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Identified Family Reinification
Areas in school during emergencies
occurs 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*DRRM Trainings participated for the

past three years
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*DRRM Trainings participated for the

past three years
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*CB conducted for families and

learners
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Photos
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*No.of thermal scanners/thermal guns

0 0 0 0 FALSE
53. Schools conducted regular pruning of trees(every 6 mos.
especially near to the school buildings.

54. School conducted fire safety inspection every year in

coordination with Bureau of Fire (BFP).

55. School has ample supply of alcohol, sodium hypochlorite

or other disinfectants

56. School has foot baths at strategic locations.

57. School has СOVID-19 triage area.

58. School had isolation area.

59. School required the daily health symptoms questionnaire

to all personnel and stakeholders

60. School submitted 100% accurateness of the report on/or

before date of submission.

Legend:
Very High: 4.50 – 5.00 (90% - 100%)
High: 3.5 -- 4.49 (70%-89%)
Average: 2.50 –3.49 (50% - 69%)
Low: 1.50 - 2.49 (30 % -49%)
Very Low: 0 - 1.49 (Below 30%)

Prepared by:

Designated School DRRM Coordinators

*Narrative report and photos
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Request Letter to BFP
* Recommendation Reports
from BFP 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Photos
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Photos
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Identified Building or Classroom

0 0 0 0 FALSE
* E-Updated Reports
* Pictures 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*QR Code/ Questionnaire on Health

Safety Protocol
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Soft Copies of DRRM Report

0 0 0 0 FALSE
0 0 0 0 0

INTS : 0

RAGE : 0.00

Percentage
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region VII, Central Visayas
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFMANDAUE CITY
Plaridel.,St., Brgy Centro, Mandaue City

DRRM Comprehensive School Safety Evaluation

Name of School: MAGUIKAY HIGH SCHOOL
School Head:
Division : MANDAUE CITY

RUBRICS SCALE:
(5)---VERY HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol excellentl
(4)---HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol satisfactory
(3)---MODERATE [ Has implemented the policy/protocol fairly
(2)---LOW [ Has implemented the policy/protocol poorly and complied it very late of th
(1)---VERY LOW [ Failed to implemented the DRRM policy/protocol in school.

Performance Indicator (PI)

1. The school has adopted/adapted/localized existing

policies relating to DRRM in education/school.

2. The school has designated School DRRM Focal Person

3. The school has formed and functional School DRRM

Team, consisting of personnel from different offices, with
defined membership and roles and responsiblities.

4. Has a comprehensive School DRRM Plan, which includes

Climate Change Adaptation (CCA) and Education in
Emergencies(EiE) measures
5. Completed in covering Risk Assessment, Risk Reduction
and Rehabilation and Recovery

6. The students participated in the planning process of the

school-based DRRM.

7. Integrated DRRM into School Improvement Plan (SIP)

 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region VII, Central Visayas
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFMANDAUE CITY
Plaridel.,St., Brgy Centro, Mandaue City

prehensive School Safety Evaluation Checklist-2024

OL Date:

he policy/protocol excellently ahead of time or the set schedule of implementation ]

cy/protocol satisfactory on time ]
he policy/protocol fairly and complied it late of the set schedule of implementation ]
y/protocol poorly and complied it very late of the set schedule of implementation ]
ted the DRRM policy/protocol in school. ]

Means of Verification Rating Scale

(MOV's) 5 4 3 2 1

* Localized School Policies

0 0 0 0 0

* Designation Order
0 0 0 0 0

*SDRRM Core Team Organizational

Chart with defined membership and
roles and responsibilities
0 0 0 0 0

* DRRM Plan with CCA and EiE

measures *Conduct School-based
Orientation on CCA and EiE
0 0 0 0 0

*School-based Monitoring of Risk

Assessment, Risk Reduction and
Rehabilation and Recovery
0 0 0 0 0

*SSG/SPG Participation
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Allocated Budget to DRRM related

Activities
0 0 0 0 FALSE
Remarks/Intervention
8. The School has complied the DRRM related questions in
the EMIS/EBEIS

9. Regular DRRM activities are supported by school budget

10. Funding sources for inteventions in the aftermath of

disaster or emergency exist and can easily be tapped.

11. The school had partnership that could ber tapped to

support its DRRM programs and activities, including after
those after disaster

12. Students participated in the conduct student-led school

watching and hazard mapping (DO 23,s. 2015)

13. Data collection and consolidation of programs and

activities on DRRM, covering the 3 Pillars, to monitor results
and impact exist.

14. School buildings have been inventoried.

15. School buildings have risk assessment.

16. Unsafe school buildings were identified

17. Systems for monitoring and quality assurance of school

buildings exists.

18. Financial resources are allocated for completion of

needed action to address unsafe school buildings within a
specified period.

19. Unsafe school buildings were given with appropriate

action undertaken by the School Head (e.g. upgraded,
retrofitted, non-usage, etc.).

20. School has undertaken regular repair of minor classroom

(including) damages.

21. Roles and responsibilities for maintenance are defined,

documented and assigned.

22. School Head has allotted budget for routine maintenance

of school facilities for safety and protect investments, with
transparent monitoring oversight at the school level.

23. School Head had pre identified/prepositioned classroom

that are expected to be used as temporary evacuations
centers for disasters.
* EBEIS School Profile in DRRM
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* DRRM Budget Proposal

*Annual School DRRM Plan
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Deed of Donation & DOA

* Letter of Intent 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*List of Stakeholders for DRRM

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Submitted Reports with Pictures &

Captions
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Conduct School-based evaluation

and monitoring using CSS Tool
*Pictures with Caption
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Year-round Inventory Reports (e.i.
Ramps, Fire Exit, etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Risk Assesment Reports

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Conducted building assessment

assigned engineers/implementers
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*National Audit of School Facilities

0 0 0 0 FALSE

*List of Resources and Plan to

address unsafe school buildings
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Demolition Permit
*Letter of Request
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Narrative Report with Photos with

Caption
0 0 0 0 FALSE
*Request Letter from the Classroom
Adviser/ SPFC for School Facilities
that needs repair. 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*AIP, SIP

0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Site Development Plan

0 0 0 0 FALSE
24. School Head is clear with his/her roles and functions of
the school in camp management vis-à-vis the LGU and
DSWD as per Joint Memorandum Circular No. 1, s. 2013 "
Guidelines on Evacuation enter Coordination and
Management" and RA 10821 " Children's Emergency Relief
and Protection Act" and its corresponding IRR.

25. Guidance and regulations on safe school site are strictly

followed

26. Guidance and regulations on resilient designed are

strictly followed.

27. Guidance and regulations on resilient construction are

followed.

28. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

in safe school site selection (if any).

29. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

in safe school design (if any).

30. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

in safe school construction (if any).

31. School has contingency plan on the existing hazards of

the school campus/locality (vis-à-vis earthquake, typhoon,
COVID-19, floods, arm conflict, flooding, landslide etc.).
32. School has available, accessible, and adequate first aid
kit in every instructional classroom.

33. School has at least 2 necessary and functioning

equipment, in case of a disaster (e.g. fire extinguisher,
handheld /base radio, generator. Etc.).

34. School has pre-identified spaces for putting up

Temporary Learning Spaces/Shelters in the aftermath of a
disaster

35. School has ready resumption strategies and alternative

delivery modes to ensure education continuity.

36. Learners/students have completed the Family

Earthquake Preparedness Plan; and school has reported
completion to DepEd DRRM at the Central Office/Regional
Office
* Conduct Capacity Building on
Camp management Plan for limited
use of schools as evacuation centers
(ei. School EOC, DRRM teams

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Localized/School Based Policy

( e,i, designated parking area,
DRRM Emergency teams etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Localized/School Based Policy

( e,i, VEST, Evacuation Route,
safety harness etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Localized/School Based Policy (ei.
PPE, Nos. of Manpower on-site,
standy Safety Officer)
* Reports 0 0 0 0 FALSE
*Monitoring Report on Physical
Facilities if there's an on-going
project 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Logbook of Implementing Agency

0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Monitoring Logbook
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*DRRM Contingency Plan

0 0 0 0 FALSE

*First Aid Kits per classroom

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Nos. of Fire
Extinguishers(functionable)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Site Development Plan

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Identified TLS Area

*Camp Management
plan
0 0 0 0 FALSE
*Conducted the survey based
DO#27_s. 2015 (Promoting Family
Earthquake Preparedness)
* Consolidated Reports
0 0 0 0 FALSE
37. School has established a school personnel tracking
system/protocol in the event of a disaster.

38. School personnel trained to administer first aid to

students and personnel.

39. School has psychosocial interventions for personnel and

students.

40. School DRRM Plan and SIP with DRRM integration are
reviewed annually.

41. School conducted Brigada Eskwela to ensure safety and

preparedness measures are in place.

42. Students, teachers parents and other stakeholders

participated in Brigada Eskwela.
43. School has established functional Early Warning System
to inform students and personnel of hazards and
emergencies (protocol, warning signs, devices, IEC),
considering national and LGU warning systems and
protocols.
44. School conducted hazards-specific drill with participation
of stakeholders (BFP,Medic, LGU's, NGOs, community, PTA,
alumni, and others).

45. The students participated in the drills.

46. School has evacuation plan procedures.

47. School has a student-family reunification plan that is

clearly disseminated to students, teachers and parents.

48. School Head participated DRRM trainings from division

or region or partners.

49. School DRRM Team participated trainings from division

or region or partners.

50. School has conducted awareness and capacity building

for families and learners.

51. School participated in the different DRRM/CCA/EIE

activities of the LGU

52. School take thermal scanning at the entrance/gate.

* Localized Tracking system (e,i
goolge sheet etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Conduct Basic First Aider/BLS

Orientation to
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Conduct Basic Pyschological First
Aid to Learners and Teachers
* Narrative Reports 0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Updated School DRRM Plan and
Budget Proposal to DRRM related
Activities 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Brigada Eskwela Report

0 0 0 0 FALSE
*Attendance to Brigada Eskwela
conducted
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Signages
*Planning for limited use of
schools as evacuation centers,
during the school year
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Narrative Report with Photos

0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Submitted Reports( NSED,
National DRR Month, Fire
Prevention Month and etc.) 0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Localized/School-Based
Evacuation Plan Guidebook
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Identified Family Reinification
Areas in school during emergencies
occurs 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*DRRM Trainings participated for the

past three years
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*DRRM Trainings participated for the

past three years
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*CB conducted for families and

learners
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Photos
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*No.of thermal scanners/thermal guns

0 0 0 0 FALSE
53. Schools conducted regular pruning of trees(every 6 mos.
especially near to the school buildings.

54. School conducted fire safety inspection every year in

coordination with Bureau of Fire (BFP).

55. School has sample supply of alcohol, sodium

hypochlorite or other disinfectants

56. School has foot baths at strategic locations.

57. School has СOVID-19 triage area.

58. School had isolation area.

59. School required the daily health symptoms questionnaire

to all personnel and stakeholders

60. School submitted 100% accurateness of the report on/or

before date of submission.

Legend:
Very High: 4.50 – 5.00 (90% - 100%)
High: 3.5 -- 4.49 (70%-89%)
Average: 2.50 –3.49 (50% - 69%)
Low: 1.50 - 2.49 (30 % -49%)
Very Low: 0 - 1.49 (Below 30%)

Prepared by:

JEMIMAH HALLIL S. BALLONO

Designated School DRRM Coordinators
*Narrative report and photos
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Request Letter to BFP
* Recommendation Reports
from BFP 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Photos
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Photos
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Identified Building or Classroom

0 0 0 0 FALSE
* E-Updated Reports
* Pictures 0 0 0 0 FALSE

*QR Code/ Questionnaire on Health

Safety Protocol
0 0 0 0 FALSE

*Soft Copies of DRRM Report

0 0 0 0 FALSE
0 0 0 0 0

INTS : 0

RAGE : 0.00

Percentage
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region VII, Central Visayas
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFMANDAUE CITY
Plaridel.,St., Brgy Centro, Mandaue City

DRRM Comprehensive School Safety Evaluation Checklist-2024

Name of School:
School Head:
Division :Mandaue City

RUBRICS SCALE:
(5)---VERY HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol excellently ahead of time or the set schedule of imp
(4)---HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol satisfactory on time ]
(3)---MODERATE [ Has implemented the policy/protocol fairly and complied it late of the set schedule of imp
(2)---LOW [ Has implemented the policy/protocol poorly and complied it very late of the set schedule of i
(1)---VERY LOW [ Failed to implemented the DRRM policy/protocol in school. ]

Means of Verification
Performance Indicator (PI) (MOV's)

1. The school has adopted/adapted/localized existing

* Localized School Policies
policies relating to DRRM in education/school.

2. The school has designated School DRRM Focal Person * Designation Order

3. The school has formed and functional School DRRM *SDRRM Core Team Organizational
Team, consisting of personnel from different offices, with Chart with defined membership and
defined membership and roles and responsiblities. roles and responsibilities

4. Has a comprehensive School DRRM Plan, which includes * DRRM Plan with CCA and EiE
Climate Change Adaptation (CCA) and Education in measures *Conduct School-based
Emergencies(EiE) measures Orientation on CCA and EiE
5. Completed in covering Risk Assessment, Risk Reduction
*School-based Monitoring of Risk
and Rehabilation and Recovery Assessment, Risk Reduction and
Rehabilation and Recovery

6. The students participated in the planning process of the

*SSG/SPG Participation
school-based DRRM.

* Allocated Budget to DRRM related

7. Integrated DRRM into School Improvement Plan (SIP) Activities

8. The School has complied the DRRM related questions in

* EBEIS School Profile in DRRM
the EMIS/EBEIS

* DRRM Budget Proposal

9. Regular DRRM activities are supported by school budget *Annual School DRRM Plan
 ines
ucation
ayas
NDAUE CITY
ndaue City

ety Evaluation Checklist-2024

Date:

ahead of time or the set schedule of implementation ]

e]
mplied it late of the set schedule of implementation ]
ed it very late of the set schedule of implementation ]
school. ]

Rating Scale
Remarks/Intervention
5 4 3 2 1

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE
10. Funding sources for inteventions in the aftermath of
* Deed of Donation & DOA
disaster or emergency exist and can easily be tapped.
* Letter of Intent
11. The school had partnership that could ber tapped to
support its DRRM programs and activities, including after *List of Stakeholders for DRRM
those after disaster

12. Students participated in the conduct student-led school * Submitted Reports with Pictures &
watching and hazard mapping (DO 23,s. 2015) Captions

13. Data collection and consolidation of programs and *Conduct School-based evaluation
activities on DRRM, covering the 3 Pillars, to monitor results and monitoring using CSS Tool
and impact exist. *Pictures with Caption

* Year-round Inventory Reports (e.i.

14. School buildings have been inventoried. Ramps, Fire Exit, etc.)

15. School buildings have risk assessment. * Risk Assesment Reports

* Conducted building assessment

16. Unsafe school buildings were identified assigned engineers/implementers

17. Systems for monitoring and quality assurance of school

*National Audit of School Facilities
buildings exists.

18. Financial resources are allocated for completion of

*List of Resources and Plan to
needed action to address unsafe school buildings within a address unsafe school buildings
specified period.

19. Unsafe school buildings were given with appropriate

*Demolition Permit
action undertaken by the School Head (e.g. upgraded, *Letter of Request
retrofitted, non-usage, etc.).

20. School has undertaken regular repair of minor classroom *Narrative Report with Photos with
(including) damages. Caption

*Request Letter from the Classroom

21. Roles and responsibilities for maintenance are defined,
Adviser/ SPFC for School Facilities
documented and assigned. that needs repair.

22. School Head has allotted budget for routine maintenance

of school facilities for safety and protect investments, with *AIP, SIP
transparent monitoring oversight at the school level.

23. School Head had pre identified/prepositioned classroom

that are expected to be used as temporary evacuations *Site Development Plan
centers for disasters.

24. School Head is clear with his/her roles and functions of

the school in camp management vis-à-vis the LGU and * Conduct Capacity Building on
DSWD as per Joint Memorandum Circular No. 1, s. 2013 " Camp management Plan for limited
Guidelines on Evacuation enter Coordination and use of schools as evacuation centers
Management" and RA 10821 " Children's Emergency Relief (ei. School EOC, DRRM teams
and Protection Act" and its corresponding IRR.

25. Guidance and regulations on safe school site are strictly * Localized/School Based Policy
( e,i, designated parking area,
followed DRRM Emergency teams etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE
26. Guidance and regulations on resilient designed are * Localized/School Based Policy
( e,i, VEST, Evacuation Route,
strictly followed. safety harness etc.)

* Localized/School Based Policy (ei.

27. Guidance and regulations on resilient construction are PPE, Nos. of Manpower on-site,
followed. standy Safety Officer)
* Reports
28. New school site construction is monitored for compliance *Monitoring Report on Physical
Facilities if there's an on-going
in safe school site selection (if any). project
29. New school site construction is monitored for compliance
*Logbook of Implementing Agency
in safe school design (if any).

30. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

*Monitoring Logbook
in safe school construction (if any).

31. School has contingency plan on the existing hazards of

the school campus/locality (vis-à-vis earthquake, typhoon, *DRRM Contingency Plan
COVID-19, floods, arm conflict, flooding, landslide etc.).
32. School has available, accessible, and adequate first aid
*First Aid Kits per classroom
kit in every instructional classroom.

33. School has at least 2 necessary and functioning

* Nos. of Fire
equipment, in case of a disaster (e.g. fire extinguisher, Extinguishers(functionable)
handheld /base radio, generator. Etc.).

34. School has pre-identified spaces for putting up

Temporary Learning Spaces/Shelters in the aftermath of a *Site Development Plan
disaster

* Identified TLS Area

35. School has ready resumption strategies and alternative
*Camp Management
delivery modes to ensure education continuity. plan

36. Learners/students have completed the Family *Conducted the survey based
Earthquake Preparedness Plan; and school has reported DO#27_s. 2015 (Promoting Family
completion to DepEd DRRM at the Central Office/Regional Earthquake Preparedness)
Office * Consolidated Reports

37. School has established a school personnel tracking * Localized Tracking system (e,i
system/protocol in the event of a disaster. goolge sheet etc.)

38. School personnel trained to administer first aid to * Conduct Basic First Aider/BLS
students and personnel. Orientation to

39. School has psychosocial interventions for personnel and * Conduct Basic Pyschological First
Aid to Learners and Teachers
students. * Narrative Reports
* Updated School DRRM Plan and
40. School DRRM Plan and SIP with DRRM integration are
Budget Proposal to DRRM related
reviewed annually. Activities

41. School conducted Brigada Eskwela to ensure safety and

*Brigada Eskwela Report
preparedness measures are in place.

42. Students, teachers parents and other stakeholders *Attendance to Brigada Eskwela
participated in Brigada Eskwela. conducted
0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE
43. School has established functional Early Warning System
to inform students and personnel of hazards and * Signages
*Planning for limited use of
emergencies (protocol, warning signs, devices, IEC), schools as evacuation centers,
considering national and LGU warning systems and during the school year
protocols.
44. School conducted hazards-specific drill with participation
of stakeholders (BFP,Medic, LGU's, NGOs, community, PTA, *Narrative Report with Photos
alumni, and others).
* Submitted Reports( NSED,
45. The students participated in the drills. National DRR Month, Fire
Prevention Month and etc.)

* Localized/School-Based
46. School has evacuation plan procedures. Evacuation Plan Guidebook

* Identified Family Reinification

47. School has a student-family reunification plan that is
Areas in school during emergencies
clearly disseminated to students, teachers and parents. occurs

48. School Head participated DRRM trainings from division *DRRM Trainings participated for the
or region or partners. past three years

49. School DRRM Team participated trainings from division *DRRM Trainings participated for the
or region or partners. past three years

50. School has conducted awareness and capacity building *CB conducted for families and
for families and learners. learners

51. School participated in the different DRRM/CCA/EIE

*Photos
activities of the LGU

52. School take thermal scanning at the entrance/gate. *No.of thermal scanners/thermal guns

53. Schools conducted regular pruning of trees(every 6 mos.

*Narrative report and photos
especially near to the school buildings.
* Request Letter to BFP
54. School conducted fire safety inspection every year in
* Recommendation Reports
coordination with Bureau of Fire (BFP). from BFP
55. School has ample supply of alcohol, sodium hypochlorite
*Photos
or other disinfectants

56. School has foot baths at strategic locations. *Photos

57. School has СOVID-19 triage area. * Identified Building or Classroom

* E-Updated Reports
58. School had isolation area. * Pictures

59. School required the daily health symptoms questionnaire *QR Code/ Questionnaire on Health
to all personnel and stakeholders Safety Protocol

60. School submitted 100% accurateness of the report on/or

*Soft Copies of DRRM Report
before date of submission.

Legend:
Very High: 4.50 – 5.00 (90% - 100%)
 0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE
0 0 0 0 0

INTS : 0
 High: 3.5 -- 4.49 (70%-89%)
Average: 2.50 –3.49 (50% - 69%)
Low: 1.50 - 2.49 (30 % -49%)
Very Low: 0 - 1.49 (Below 30%)

Prepared by:

Designated School DRRM Coordinator

 RAGE : 0.00

Percentage
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region VII, Central Visayas
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFMANDAUE CITY
Plaridel.,St., Brgy Centro, Mandaue City

DRRM Comprehensive School Safety Evaluation Checklist-2024

Name of School: TIPOLO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Date:
School Head:
Division : MANDAUE CITY

RUBRICS SCALE:
(5)---VERY HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol excellently ahead of time or the set schedule of implementation ]
(4)---HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol satisfactory on time ]
(3)---MODERATE [ Has implemented the policy/protocol fairly and complied it late of the set schedule of implementation ]
(2)---LOW [ Has implemented the policy/protocol poorly and complied it very late of the set schedule of implementation ]
(1)---VERY LOW [ Failed to implemented the DRRM policy/protocol in school. ]

Means of Verification Rating Scale

Performance Indicator (PI) (MOV's)
Remarks/Intervention
5 4 3 2 1
1. The school has adopted/adapted/localized existing
* Localized School Policies
policies relating to DRRM in education/school.
0 0 0 0 0

2. The school has designated School DRRM Focal Person * Designation Order
0 0 0 0 0

3. The school has formed and functional School DRRM *SDRRM Core Team Organizational
Team, consisting of personnel from different offices, with Chart with defined membership and
defined membership and roles and responsiblities. roles and responsibilities
0 0 0 0 0
4. Has a comprehensive School DRRM Plan, which includes * DRRM Plan with CCA and EiE
Climate Change Adaptation (CCA) and Education in measures *Conduct School-based
Emergencies(EiE) measures Orientation on CCA and EiE
0 0 0 0 0
5. Completed in covering Risk Assessment, Risk Reduction
*School-based Monitoring of Risk
and Rehabilation and Recovery Assessment, Risk Reduction and
Rehabilation and Recovery
0 0 0 0 0 Attach summary of risk assessment

6. The students participated in the planning process of the

*SSG/SPG Participation
school-based DRRM.
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Allocated Budget to DRRM related

7. Integrated DRRM into School Improvement Plan (SIP) Activities
0 0 0 0 FALSE

8. The School has complied the DRRM related questions in

* EBEIS School Profile in DRRM
the EMIS/EBEIS
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* DRRM Budget Proposal

9. Regular DRRM activities are supported by school budget *Annual School DRRM Plan
0 0 0 0 FALSE

10. Funding sources for inteventions in the aftermath of

disaster or emergency exist and can easily be tapped. * Deed of Donation & DOA
* Letter of Intent 0 0 0 0 FALSE
11. The school had partnership that could ber tapped to
support its DRRM programs and activities, including after *List of Stakeholders for DRRM
those after disaster 0 0 0 0 FALSE

12. Students participated in the conduct student-led school * Submitted Reports with Pictures &
watching and hazard mapping (DO 23,s. 2015) Captions
0 0 0 0 FALSE

13. Data collection and consolidation of programs and *Conduct School-based evaluation
activities on DRRM, covering the 3 Pillars, to monitor results and monitoring using CSS Tool
and impact exist. *Pictures with Caption
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Year-round Inventory Reports (e.i.
14. School buildings have been inventoried. Ramps, Fire Exit, etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

15. School buildings have risk assessment. * Risk Assesment Reports

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Conducted building assessment

16. Unsafe school buildings were identified assigned engineers/implementers
0 0 0 0 FALSE

17. Systems for monitoring and quality assurance of school

*National Audit of School Facilities
buildings exists.
0 0 0 0 FALSE

18. Financial resources are allocated for completion of

*List of Resources and Plan to
needed action to address unsafe school buildings within a address unsafe school buildings
specified period.
0 0 0 0 FALSE

19. Unsafe school buildings were given with appropriate

*Demolition Permit
action undertaken by the School Head (e.g. upgraded, *Letter of Request
retrofitted, non-usage, etc.).
0 0 0 0 FALSE

20. School has undertaken regular repair of minor classroom *Narrative Report with Photos with
(including) damages. Caption
0 0 0 0 FALSE
*Request Letter from the Classroom
21. Roles and responsibilities for maintenance are defined,
Adviser/ SPFC for School Facilities
documented and assigned. that needs repair. 0 0 0 0 FALSE

22. School Head has allotted budget for routine maintenance

of school facilities for safety and protect investments, with *AIP, SIP
transparent monitoring oversight at the school level.
0 0 0 0 FALSE

23. School Head had pre identified/prepositioned classroom

that are expected to be used as temporary evacuations *Site Development Plan
centers for disasters. 0 0 0 0 FALSE
24. School Head is clear with his/her roles and functions of
the school in camp management vis-à-vis the LGU and * Conduct Capacity Building on
DSWD as per Joint Memorandum Circular No. 1, s. 2013 " Camp management Plan for limited
Guidelines on Evacuation enter Coordination and use of schools as evacuation centers
Management" and RA 10821 " Children's Emergency Relief (ei. School EOC, DRRM teams
and Protection Act" and its corresponding IRR.
0 0 0 0 FALSE

25. Guidance and regulations on safe school site are strictly * Localized/School Based Policy
( e,i, designated parking area,
followed DRRM Emergency teams etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

26. Guidance and regulations on resilient designed are * Localized/School Based Policy
( e,i, VEST, Evacuation Route,
strictly followed. safety harness etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Localized/School Based Policy (ei.
27. Guidance and regulations on resilient construction are PPE, Nos. of Manpower on-site,
followed. standy Safety Officer)
* Reports 0 0 0 0 FALSE

28. New school site construction is monitored for compliance *Monitoring Report on Physical
Facilities if there's an on-going
in safe school site selection (if any). project 0 0 0 0 FALSE

29. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

*Logbook of Implementing Agency
in safe school design (if any).
0 0 0 0 FALSE

30. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

*Monitoring Logbook
in safe school construction (if any). 0 0 0 0 FALSE

31. School has contingency plan on the existing hazards of

the school campus/locality (vis-à-vis earthquake, typhoon, *DRRM Contingency Plan
COVID-19, floods, arm conflict, flooding, landslide etc.). 0 0 0 0 FALSE

32. School has available, accessible, and adequate first aid

*First Aid Kits per classroom
kit in every instructional classroom.
0 0 0 0 FALSE

33. School has at least 2 necessary and functioning

* Nos. of Fire
equipment, in case of a disaster (e.g. fire extinguisher, Extinguishers(functionable)
handheld /base radio, generator. Etc.).
0 0 0 0 FALSE

34. School has pre-identified spaces for putting up

Temporary Learning Spaces/Shelters in the aftermath of a *Site Development Plan
disaster 0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Identified TLS Area

35. School has ready resumption strategies and alternative
*Camp Management
delivery modes to ensure education continuity. plan
0 0 0 0 FALSE
36. Learners/students have completed the Family *Conducted the survey based
Earthquake Preparedness Plan; and school has reported DO#27_s. 2015 (Promoting Family
completion to DepEd DRRM at the Central Office/Regional Earthquake Preparedness)
Office * Consolidated Reports
0 0 0 0 FALSE

37. School has established a school personnel tracking * Localized Tracking system (e,i
system/protocol in the event of a disaster. goolge sheet etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

38. School personnel trained to administer first aid to * Conduct Basic First Aider/BLS
students and personnel. Orientation to
0 0 0 0 FALSE

39. School has psychosocial interventions for personnel and * Conduct Basic Pyschological First
Aid to Learners and Teachers
students. * Narrative Reports 0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Updated School DRRM Plan and
40. School DRRM Plan and SIP with DRRM integration are
Budget Proposal to DRRM related
reviewed annually. Activities 0 0 0 0 FALSE

41. School conducted Brigada Eskwela to ensure safety and

*Brigada Eskwela Report
preparedness measures are in place.
0 0 0 0 FALSE
42. Students, teachers parents and other stakeholders *Attendance to Brigada Eskwela
participated in Brigada Eskwela. conducted
0 0 0 0 FALSE
43. School has established functional Early Warning System
to inform students and personnel of hazards and * Signages
*Planning for limited use of
emergencies (protocol, warning signs, devices, IEC), schools as evacuation centers,
considering national and LGU warning systems and during the school year
protocols. 0 0 0 0 FALSE

44. School conducted hazards-specific drill with participation

of stakeholders (BFP,Medic, LGU's, NGOs, community, PTA, *Narrative Report with Photos
alumni, and others). 0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Submitted Reports( NSED,
45. The students participated in the drills. National DRR Month, Fire
Prevention Month and etc.) 0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Localized/School-Based
46. School has evacuation plan procedures. Evacuation Plan Guidebook
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Identified Family Reinification
47. School has a student-family reunification plan that is
Areas in school during emergencies
clearly disseminated to students, teachers and parents. occurs 0 0 0 0 FALSE

48. School Head participated DRRM trainings from division *DRRM Trainings participated for the
or region or partners. past three years
0 0 0 0 FALSE

49. School DRRM Team participated trainings from division *DRRM Trainings participated for the
or region or partners. past three years
0 0 0 0 FALSE

50. School has conducted awareness and capacity building *CB conducted for families and
for families and learners. learners
0 0 0 0 FALSE

51. School participated in the different DRRM/CCA/EIE

*Photos
activities of the LGU
0 0 0 0 FALSE

52. School take thermal scanning at the entrance/gate. *No.of thermal scanners/thermal gun
0 0 0 0 FALSE
53. Schools conducted regular pruning of trees(every 6 mos.
*Narrative report and photos
especially near to the school buildings. 0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Request Letter to BFP
54. School conducted fire safety inspection every year in
* Recommendation Reports
coordination with Bureau of Fire (BFP). from BFP 0 0 0 0 FALSE
55. School has ample supply of alcohol, sodium hypochlorite
*Photos
or other disinfectants 0 0 0 0 FALSE

56. School has foot baths at strategic locations. *Photos

0 0 0 0 FALSE

57. School has СOVID-19 triage area. * Identified Building or Classroom

0 0 0 0 FALSE
* E-Updated Reports
58. School had isolation area. * Pictures 0 0 0 0 FALSE

59. School required the daily health symptoms questionnaire *QR Code/ Questionnaire on Health
to all personnel and stakeholders Safety Protocol
0 0 0 0 FALSE

60. School submitted 100% accurateness of the report on/or

*Soft Copies of DRRM Report
before date of submission.
0 0 0 0 FALSE
0 0 0 0 0

Legend: OINTS : 0
Very High: 4.50 – 5.00 (90% - 100%)
High: 3.5 -- 4.49 (70%-89%) ERAGE : 0.00
Average: 2.50 –3.49 (50% - 69%)
Low: 1.50 - 2.49 (30 % -49%) Percentage
Very Low: 0 - 1.49 (Below 30%)

Prepared by:

WILLIAM B. JAYAG, JR.

Designated School DRRM Coordinators
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Plaridel.,St., Brgy Centro, Mandaue City
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFMANDAUE CITY
Plaridel.,St., Brgy Centro, Mandaue City

DRRM Comprehensive School Safety Evaluation Checklist-2024

Name of School: CANDUMAN NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Date:
School Head:
Division : MANDAUE CITY

RUBRICS SCALE:
(5)---VERY HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol excellently ahead of time or the set schedule of implementation ]
(4)---HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol satisfactory on time ]
(3)---MODERATE [ Has implemented the policy/protocol fairly and complied it late of the set schedule of implementation ]
(2)---LOW [ Has implemented the policy/protocol poorly and complied it very late of the set schedule of implementation ]
(1)---VERY LOW [ Failed to implemented the DRRM policy/protocol in school. ]

Means of Verification Rating Scale

Performance Indicator (PI) (MOV's)
Remarks/Intervention
5 4 3 2 1
1. The school has adopted/adapted/localized existing
* Localized School Policies
policies relating to DRRM in education/school.
0 0 0 0 0

2. The school has designated School DRRM Focal Person * Designation Order
0 0 0 0 0

3. The school has formed and functional School DRRM *SDRRM Core Team Organizational
Team, consisting of personnel from different offices, with Chart with defined membership and
defined membership and roles and responsiblities. roles and responsibilities
0 0 0 0 0
4. Has a comprehensive School DRRM Plan, which includes * DRRM Plan with CCA and EiE
Climate Change Adaptation (CCA) and Education in measures *Conduct School-based
Emergencies(EiE) measures Orientation on CCA and EiE
0 0 0 0 0
5. Completed in covering Risk Assessment, Risk Reduction
*School-based Monitoring of Risk
and Rehabilation and Recovery Assessment, Risk Reduction and
Rehabilation and Recovery
0 0 0 0 0

6. The students participated in the planning process of the

*SSG/SPG Participation
school-based DRRM.
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Allocated Budget to DRRM related

7. Integrated DRRM into School Improvement Plan (SIP) Activities
0 0 0 0 FALSE

8. The School has complied the DRRM related questions in

* EBEIS School Profile in DRRM
the EMIS/EBEIS
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* DRRM Budget Proposal

9. Regular DRRM activities are supported by school budget *Annual School DRRM Plan
0 0 0 0 FALSE

10. Funding sources for inteventions in the aftermath of

disaster or emergency exist and can easily be tapped. * Deed of Donation & DOA
* Letter of Intent 0 0 0 0 FALSE
11. The school had partnership that could ber tapped to
support its DRRM programs and activities, including after *List of Stakeholders for DRRM
those after disaster 0 0 0 0 FALSE

12. Students participated in the conduct student-led school * Submitted Reports with Pictures &
watching and hazard mapping (DO 23,s. 2015) Captions
0 0 0 0 FALSE

13. Data collection and consolidation of programs and *Conduct School-based evaluation
activities on DRRM, covering the 3 Pillars, to monitor results and monitoring using CSS Tool
and impact exist. *Pictures with Caption
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Year-round Inventory Reports (e.i.
14. School buildings have been inventoried. Ramps, Fire Exit, etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

15. School buildings have risk assessment. * Risk Assesment Reports

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Conducted building assessment

16. Unsafe school buildings were identified assigned engineers/implementers
0 0 0 0 FALSE

17. Systems for monitoring and quality assurance of school

*National Audit of School Facilities
buildings exists.
0 0 0 0 FALSE

18. Financial resources are allocated for completion of

*List of Resources and Plan to
needed action to address unsafe school buildings within a address unsafe school buildings
specified period.
0 0 0 0 FALSE
19. Unsafe school buildings were given with appropriate
*Demolition Permit
action undertaken by the School Head (e.g. upgraded, *Letter of Request
retrofitted, non-usage, etc.).
0 0 0 0 FALSE

20. School has undertaken regular repair of minor classroom *Narrative Report with Photos with
(including) damages. Caption
0 0 0 0 FALSE
*Request Letter from the Classroom
21. Roles and responsibilities for maintenance are defined,
Adviser/ SPFC for School Facilities
documented and assigned. that needs repair. 0 0 0 0 FALSE

22. School Head has allotted budget for routine maintenance

of school facilities for safety and protect investments, with *AIP, SIP
transparent monitoring oversight at the school level.
0 0 0 0 FALSE

23. School Head had pre identified/prepositioned classroom

that are expected to be used as temporary evacuations *Site Development Plan
centers for disasters. 0 0 0 0 FALSE

24. School Head is clear with his/her roles and functions of

the school in camp management vis-à-vis the LGU and * Conduct Capacity Building on
DSWD as per Joint Memorandum Circular No. 1, s. 2013 " Camp management Plan for limited
Not Applicable
Guidelines on Evacuation enter Coordination and use of schools as evacuation centers
Management" and RA 10821 " Children's Emergency Relief (ei. School EOC, DRRM teams
and Protection Act" and its corresponding IRR.
0 0 0 0 FALSE

25. Guidance and regulations on safe school site are strictly * Localized/School Based Policy
( e,i, designated parking area,
followed DRRM Emergency teams etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

26. Guidance and regulations on resilient designed are * Localized/School Based Policy
( e,i, VEST, Evacuation Route,
strictly followed. safety harness etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Localized/School Based Policy (ei.
27. Guidance and regulations on resilient construction are PPE, Nos. of Manpower on-site, Not Applicable
followed. standy Safety Officer)
* Reports 0 0 0 0 FALSE

28. New school site construction is monitored for compliance *Monitoring Report on Physical
Facilities if there's an on-going Not Applicable
in safe school site selection (if any). project 0 0 0 0 FALSE

29. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

*Logbook of Implementing Agency Not Applicable
in safe school design (if any).
0 0 0 0 FALSE

30. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

*Monitoring Logbook Not Applicable
in safe school construction (if any). 0 0 0 0 FALSE

31. School has contingency plan on the existing hazards of

the school campus/locality (vis-à-vis earthquake, typhoon, *DRRM Contingency Plan
COVID-19, floods, arm conflict, flooding, landslide etc.). 0 0 0 0 FALSE

32. School has available, accessible, and adequate first aid

*First Aid Kits per classroom
kit in every instructional classroom.
0 0 0 0 FALSE

33. School has at least 2 necessary and functioning

* Nos. of Fire
equipment, in case of a disaster (e.g. fire extinguisher, Extinguishers(functionable)
handheld /base radio, generator. Etc.).
0 0 0 0 FALSE

34. School has pre-identified spaces for putting up

Temporary Learning Spaces/Shelters in the aftermath of a *Site Development Plan
disaster 0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Identified TLS Area

35. School has ready resumption strategies and alternative
*Camp Management
delivery modes to ensure education continuity. plan
0 0 0 0 FALSE
36. Learners/students have completed the Family *Conducted the survey based
Earthquake Preparedness Plan; and school has reported DO#27_s. 2015 (Promoting Family
completion to DepEd DRRM at the Central Office/Regional Earthquake Preparedness)
Office * Consolidated Reports
0 0 0 0 FALSE

37. School has established a school personnel tracking * Localized Tracking system (e,i
system/protocol in the event of a disaster. goolge sheet etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

38. School personnel trained to administer first aid to * Conduct Basic First Aider/BLS
students and personnel. Orientation to
0 0 0 0 FALSE

39. School has psychosocial interventions for personnel and * Conduct Basic Pyschological First
Aid to Learners and Teachers
students. * Narrative Reports 0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Updated School DRRM Plan and
40. School DRRM Plan and SIP with DRRM integration are Budget Proposal to DRRM related
reviewed annually. Activities 0 0 0 0 FALSE

41. School conducted Brigada Eskwela to ensure safety and

*Brigada Eskwela Report
preparedness measures are in place.
0 0 0 0 FALSE
42. Students, teachers parents and other stakeholders *Attendance to Brigada Eskwela
participated in Brigada Eskwela. conducted
0 0 0 0 FALSE
43. School has established functional Early Warning System
to inform students and personnel of hazards and * Signages
*Planning for limited use of
emergencies (protocol, warning signs, devices, IEC), schools as evacuation centers,
considering national and LGU warning systems and during the school year
protocols. 0 0 0 0 FALSE

44. School conducted hazards-specific drill with participation

of stakeholders (BFP,Medic, LGU's, NGOs, community, PTA, *Narrative Report with Photos
alumni, and others). 0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Submitted Reports( NSED,
45. The students participated in the drills. National DRR Month, Fire
Prevention Month and etc.) 0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Localized/School-Based
46. School has evacuation plan procedures. Evacuation Plan Guidebook
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Identified Family Reinification
47. School has a student-family reunification plan that is
Areas in school during emergencies
clearly disseminated to students, teachers and parents. occurs 0 0 0 0 FALSE

48. School Head participated DRRM trainings from division *DRRM Trainings participated for the
or region or partners. past three years
0 0 0 0 FALSE

49. School DRRM Team participated trainings from division *DRRM Trainings participated for the
or region or partners. past three years
0 0 0 0 FALSE

50. School has conducted awareness and capacity building *CB conducted for families and
for families and learners. learners
0 0 0 0 FALSE

51. School participated in the different DRRM/CCA/EIE

*Photos
activities of the LGU
0 0 0 0 FALSE

52. School take thermal scanning at the entrance/gate. *No.of thermal scanners/thermal guns
0 0 0 0 FALSE

53. Schools conducted regular pruning of trees(every 6 mos.

*Narrative report and photos
especially near to the school buildings. 0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Request Letter to BFP
54. School conducted fire safety inspection every year in
* Recommendation Reports
coordination with Bureau of Fire (BFP). from BFP 0 0 0 0 FALSE
55. School has ample supply of alcohol, sodium hypochlorite
*Photos
or other disinfectants 0 0 0 0 FALSE

56. School has foot baths at strategic locations. *Photos

0 0 0 0 FALSE

57. School has СOVID-19 triage area. * Identified Building or Classroom

0 0 0 0 FALSE
* E-Updated Reports
58. School had isolation area. * Pictures 0 0 0 0 FALSE

59. School required the daily health symptoms questionnaire *QR Code/ Questionnaire on Health
to all personnel and stakeholders Safety Protocol
0 0 0 0 FALSE

60. School submitted 100% accurateness of the report on/or

*Soft Copies of DRRM Report
before date of submission.
0 0 0 0 FALSE
0 0 0 0 2

Legend: OINTS : 2
Very High: 4.50 – 5.00 (90% - 100%)
High: 3.5 -- 4.49 (70%-89%) ERAGE : 0.03
Average: 2.50 –3.49 (50% - 69%)
Low: 1.50 - 2.49 (30 % -49%) Percentage
Very Low: 0 - 1.49 (Below 30%)

Prepared by:

JAY-AR T. SOCIAS
Designated School DRRM Coordinators
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region VII, Central Visayas
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFMANDAUE CITY
Plaridel.,St., Brgy Centro, Mandaue City

DRRM Comprehensive School Safety Evaluation Checklist-2024

Name of School: BANILAD NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Date:
School Head:
Division : MANDAUE CITY

RUBRICS SCALE:
(5)---VERY HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol excellently ahead of time or the set schedule of implementation ]
(4)---HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol satisfactory on time ]
(3)---MODERATE [ Has implemented the policy/protocol fairly and complied it late of the set schedule of implementation ]
(2)---LOW [ Has implemented the policy/protocol poorly and complied it very late of the set schedule of implementation ]
(1)---VERY LOW [ Failed to implemented the DRRM policy/protocol in school. ]

Means of Verification Rating Scale

Performance Indicator (PI) (MOV's)
Remarks/Intervention
5 4 3 2 1
1. The school has adopted/adapted/localized existing
* Localized School Policies
policies relating to DRRM in education/school.
0 0 0 0 0

2. The school has designated School DRRM Focal Person * Designation Order
0 0 0 0 0

3. The school has formed and functional School DRRM *SDRRM Core Team Organizational
Team, consisting of personnel from different offices, with Chart with defined membership and
defined membership and roles and responsiblities. roles and responsibilities
0 0 0 0 0
4. Has a comprehensive School DRRM Plan, which includes * DRRM Plan with CCA and EiE
Climate Change Adaptation (CCA) and Education in measures *Conduct School-based
Emergencies(EiE) measures Orientation on CCA and EiE
0 0 0 0 0
5. Completed in covering Risk Assessment, Risk Reduction
*School-based Monitoring of Risk
and Rehabilation and Recovery Assessment, Risk Reduction and
Rehabilation and Recovery
0 0 0 0 0

6. The students participated in the planning process of the

*SSG/SPG Participation
school-based DRRM.
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Allocated Budget to DRRM related

7. Integrated DRRM into School Improvement Plan (SIP) Activities
0 0 0 0 FALSE

8. The School has complied the DRRM related questions in

* EBEIS School Profile in DRRM
the EMIS/EBEIS
0 0 0 0 FALSE

* DRRM Budget Proposal

9. Regular DRRM activities are supported by school budget *Annual School DRRM Plan
0 0 0 0 FALSE

10. Funding sources for inteventions in the aftermath of

disaster or emergency exist and can easily be tapped. * Deed of Donation & DOA
* Letter of Intent 0 0 0 0 FALSE
11. The school had partnership that could ber tapped to
support its DRRM programs and activities, including after *List of Stakeholders for DRRM
those after disaster 0 0 0 0 FALSE

12. Students participated in the conduct student-led school * Submitted Reports with Pictures &
watching and hazard mapping (DO 23,s. 2015) Captions
0 0 0 0 FALSE

13. Data collection and consolidation of programs and *Conduct School-based evaluation
activities on DRRM, covering the 3 Pillars, to monitor results and monitoring using CSS Tool
and impact exist. *Pictures with Caption
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Year-round Inventory Reports (e.i.
14. School buildings have been inventoried. Ramps, Fire Exit, etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

15. School buildings have risk assessment. * Risk Assesment Reports

0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Conducted building assessment

16. Unsafe school buildings were identified assigned engineers/implementers
0 0 0 0 FALSE

17. Systems for monitoring and quality assurance of school

*National Audit of School Facilities
buildings exists.
0 0 0 0 FALSE

18. Financial resources are allocated for completion of

*List of Resources and Plan to
needed action to address unsafe school buildings within a address unsafe school buildings
specified period.
0 0 0 0 FALSE

19. Unsafe school buildings were given with appropriate

*Demolition Permit
action undertaken by the School Head (e.g. upgraded, *Letter of Request
retrofitted, non-usage, etc.).
0 0 0 0 FALSE

20. School has undertaken regular repair of minor classroom *Narrative Report with Photos with
(including) damages. Caption
0 0 0 0 FALSE
*Request Letter from the Classroom
21. Roles and responsibilities for maintenance are defined,
Adviser/ SPFC for School Facilities
documented and assigned. that needs repair. 0 0 0 0 FALSE

22. School Head has allotted budget for routine maintenance

of school facilities for safety and protect investments, with *AIP, SIP
transparent monitoring oversight at the school level.
0 0 0 0 FALSE
23. School Head had pre identified/prepositioned classroom
that are expected to be used as temporary evacuations *Site Development Plan
centers for disasters. 0 0 0 0 FALSE

24. School Head is clear with his/her roles and functions of

the school in camp management vis-à-vis the LGU and * Conduct Capacity Building on
DSWD as per Joint Memorandum Circular No. 1, s. 2013 " Camp management Plan for limited
Guidelines on Evacuation enter Coordination and use of schools as evacuation centers
Management" and RA 10821 " Children's Emergency Relief (ei. School EOC, DRRM teams
and Protection Act" and its corresponding IRR.
0 0 0 0 FALSE

25. Guidance and regulations on safe school site are strictly * Localized/School Based Policy
( e,i, designated parking area,
followed DRRM Emergency teams etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

26. Guidance and regulations on resilient designed are * Localized/School Based Policy
( e,i, VEST, Evacuation Route,
strictly followed. safety harness etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Localized/School Based Policy (ei.
27. Guidance and regulations on resilient construction are PPE, Nos. of Manpower on-site,
followed. standy Safety Officer)
* Reports 0 0 0 0 FALSE

28. New school site construction is monitored for compliance *Monitoring Report on Physical
Facilities if there's an on-going
in safe school site selection (if any). project 0 0 0 0 FALSE

29. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

*Logbook of Implementing Agency
in safe school design (if any).
0 0 0 0 FALSE

30. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

*Monitoring Logbook
in safe school construction (if any). 0 0 0 0 FALSE

31. School has contingency plan on the existing hazards of

the school campus/locality (vis-à-vis earthquake, typhoon, *DRRM Contingency Plan
COVID-19, floods, arm conflict, flooding, landslide etc.). 0 0 0 0 FALSE

32. School has available, accessible, and adequate first aid

*First Aid Kits per classroom
kit in every instructional classroom.
0 0 0 0 FALSE

33. School has at least 2 necessary and functioning

* Nos. of Fire
equipment, in case of a disaster (e.g. fire extinguisher, Extinguishers(functionable)
handheld /base radio, generator. Etc.).
0 0 0 0 FALSE

34. School has pre-identified spaces for putting up

Temporary Learning Spaces/Shelters in the aftermath of a *Site Development Plan
disaster 0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Identified TLS Area

35. School has ready resumption strategies and alternative
*Camp Management
delivery modes to ensure education continuity. plan
0 0 0 0 FALSE
36. Learners/students have completed the Family *Conducted the survey based
Earthquake Preparedness Plan; and school has reported DO#27_s. 2015 (Promoting Family
completion to DepEd DRRM at the Central Office/Regional Earthquake Preparedness)
Office * Consolidated Reports
0 0 0 0 FALSE

37. School has established a school personnel tracking * Localized Tracking system (e,i
system/protocol in the event of a disaster. goolge sheet etc.)
0 0 0 0 FALSE

38. School personnel trained to administer first aid to * Conduct Basic First Aider/BLS
students and personnel. Orientation to
0 0 0 0 FALSE

39. School has psychosocial interventions for personnel and * Conduct Basic Pyschological First
Aid to Learners and Teachers
students. * Narrative Reports 0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Updated School DRRM Plan and
40. School DRRM Plan and SIP with DRRM integration are Budget Proposal to DRRM related
reviewed annually. Activities 0 0 0 0 FALSE

41. School conducted Brigada Eskwela to ensure safety and

*Brigada Eskwela Report
preparedness measures are in place.
0 0 0 0 FALSE
42. Students, teachers parents and other stakeholders *Attendance to Brigada Eskwela
participated in Brigada Eskwela. conducted
0 0 0 0 FALSE
43. School has established functional Early Warning System
to inform students and personnel of hazards and * Signages
*Planning for limited use of
emergencies (protocol, warning signs, devices, IEC), schools as evacuation centers,
considering national and LGU warning systems and during the school year
protocols. 0 0 0 0 FALSE

44. School conducted hazards-specific drill with participation

of stakeholders (BFP,Medic, LGU's, NGOs, community, PTA, *Narrative Report with Photos
alumni, and others). 0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Submitted Reports( NSED,
45. The students participated in the drills. National DRR Month, Fire
Prevention Month and etc.) 0 0 0 0 FALSE

* Localized/School-Based
46. School has evacuation plan procedures. Evacuation Plan Guidebook
0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Identified Family Reinification
47. School has a student-family reunification plan that is
Areas in school during emergencies
clearly disseminated to students, teachers and parents. occurs 0 0 0 0 FALSE

48. School Head participated DRRM trainings from division *DRRM Trainings participated for the
or region or partners. past three years
0 0 0 0 FALSE

49. School DRRM Team participated trainings from division *DRRM Trainings participated for the
or region or partners. past three years
0 0 0 0 FALSE

50. School has conducted awareness and capacity building *CB conducted for families and
for families and learners. learners
0 0 0 0 FALSE
51. School participated in the different DRRM/CCA/EIE
*Photos
activities of the LGU
0 0 0 0 FALSE

52. School take thermal scanning at the entrance/gate. *No.of thermal scanners/thermal guns
0 0 0 0 FALSE

53. Schools conducted regular pruning of trees(every 6 mos.

*Narrative report and photos
especially near to the school buildings. 0 0 0 0 FALSE
* Request Letter to BFP
54. School conducted fire safety inspection every year in
* Recommendation Reports
coordination with Bureau of Fire (BFP). from BFP 0 0 0 0 FALSE
55. School has ample supply of alcohol, sodium hypochlorite
*Photos
or other disinfectants 0 0 0 0 FALSE

56. School has foot baths at strategic locations. *Photos

0 0 0 0 FALSE

57. School has СOVID-19 triage area. * Identified Building or Classroom

0 0 0 0 FALSE
* E-Updated Reports
58. School had isolation area. * Pictures 0 0 0 0 FALSE

59. School required the daily health symptoms questionnaire *QR Code/ Questionnaire on Health
to all personnel and stakeholders Safety Protocol
0 0 0 0 FALSE

60. School submitted 100% accurateness of the report on/or

*Soft Copies of DRRM Report
before date of submission.
0 0 0 0 FALSE
0 0 0 0 0

Legend: OINTS : 0
Very High: 4.50 – 5.00 (90% - 100%)
High: 3.5 -- 4.49 (70%-89%) RAGE : 0.00
Average: 2.50 –3.49 (50% - 69%)
Low: 1.50 - 2.49 (30 % -49%) Percentage
Very Low: 0 - 1.49 (Below 30%)

Prepared by:

MARIA KIMBERLY D. LOPEZ

Designated School DRRM Coordinators
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region VII, Central Visayas
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFMANDAUE CITY
Plaridel.,St., Brgy Centro, Mandaue City

DRRM Comprehensive School Safety Evaluation Checklist-20

Name of School: CABANCALAN NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
School Head:
Division : MANDAUE CITY

RUBRICS SCALE:
(5)---VERY HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol excellently ahead of time or the set schedule of imp
(4)---HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol satisfactory on time ]
(3)---MODERATE [ Has implemented the policy/protocol fairly and complied it late of the set schedule of imp
(2)---LOW [ Has implemented the policy/protocol poorly and complied it very late of the set schedule of i
(1)---VERY LOW [ Failed to implemented the DRRM policy/protocol in school. ]

Means of Verification
Performance Indicator (PI) (MOV's)

1. The school has adopted/adapted/localized existing

* Localized School Policies
policies relating to DRRM in education/school.

2. The school has designated School DRRM Focal Person * Designation Order

3. The school has formed and functional School DRRM *SDRRM Core Team Organizational
Team, consisting of personnel from different offices, with Chart with defined membership and
defined membership and roles and responsiblities. roles and responsibilities

4. Has a comprehensive School DRRM Plan, which includes * DRRM Plan with CCA and EiE
Climate Change Adaptation (CCA) and Education in measures *Conduct School-based
Emergencies(EiE) measures Orientation on CCA and EiE
5. Completed in covering Risk Assessment, Risk Reduction
*School-based Monitoring of Risk
and Rehabilation and Recovery Assessment, Risk Reduction and
Rehabilation and Recovery

6. The students participated in the planning process of the

*SSG/SPG Participation
school-based DRRM.
 * Allocated Budget to DRRM related
7. Integrated DRRM into School Improvement Plan (SIP) Activities

8. The School has complied the DRRM related questions in

* EBEIS School Profile in DRRM
the EMIS/EBEIS

* DRRM Budget Proposal

9. Regular DRRM activities are supported by school budget *Annual School DRRM Plan

10. Funding sources for inteventions in the aftermath of

* Deed of Donation & DOA
disaster or emergency exist and can easily be tapped.
* Letter of Intent
11. The school had partnership that could ber tapped to
support its DRRM programs and activities, including after *List of Stakeholders for DRRM
those after disaster

12. Students participated in the conduct student-led school * Submitted Reports with Pictures &
watching and hazard mapping (DO 23,s. 2015) Captions

13. Data collection and consolidation of programs and *Conduct School-based evaluation
activities on DRRM, covering the 3 Pillars, to monitor results and monitoring using CSS Tool
and impact exist. *Pictures with Caption

* Year-round Inventory Reports (e.i.

14. School buildings have been inventoried. Ramps, Fire Exit, etc.)

15. School buildings have risk assessment. * Risk Assesment Reports

* Conducted building assessment

16. Unsafe school buildings were identified assigned engineers/implementers

17. Systems for monitoring and quality assurance of school

*National Audit of School Facilities
buildings exists.

18. Financial resources are allocated for completion of

*List of Resources and Plan to
needed action to address unsafe school buildings within a address unsafe school buildings
specified period.

19. Unsafe school buildings were given with appropriate

*Demolition Permit
action undertaken by the School Head (e.g. upgraded, *Letter of Request
retrofitted, non-usage, etc.).

20. School has undertaken regular repair of minor classroom *Narrative Report with Photos with
(including) damages. Caption

*Request Letter from the Classroom

21. Roles and responsibilities for maintenance are defined,
Adviser/ SPFC for School Facilities
documented and assigned. that needs repair.
22. School Head has allotted budget for routine maintenance
of school facilities for safety and protect investments, with *AIP, SIP
transparent monitoring oversight at the school level.

23. School Head had pre identified/prepositioned classroom

that are expected to be used as temporary evacuations *Site Development Plan
centers for disasters.

24. School Head is clear with his/her roles and functions of

the school in camp management vis-à-vis the LGU and * Conduct Capacity Building on
DSWD as per Joint Memorandum Circular No. 1, s. 2013 " Camp management Plan for limited
Guidelines on Evacuation enter Coordination and use of schools as evacuation centers
Management" and RA 10821 " Children's Emergency Relief (ei. School EOC, DRRM teams
and Protection Act" and its corresponding IRR.

25. Guidance and regulations on safe school site are strictly * Localized/School Based Policy
( e,i, designated parking area,
followed DRRM Emergency teams etc.)

26. Guidance and regulations on resilient designed are * Localized/School Based Policy
( e,i, VEST, Evacuation Route,
strictly followed. safety harness etc.)

* Localized/School Based Policy (ei.

27. Guidance and regulations on resilient construction are PPE, Nos. of Manpower on-site,
followed. standy Safety Officer)
* Reports
*Monitoring Report on Physical
28. New school site construction is monitored for compliance
Facilities if there's an on-going
in safe school site selection (if any). project
29. New school site construction is monitored for compliance
*Logbook of Implementing Agency
in safe school design (if any).

30. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

*Monitoring Logbook
in safe school construction (if any).

31. School has contingency plan on the existing hazards of

the school campus/locality (vis-à-vis earthquake, typhoon, *DRRM Contingency Plan
COVID-19, floods, arm conflict, flooding, landslide etc.).
32. School has available, accessible, and adequate first aid
*First Aid Kits per classroom
kit in every instructional classroom.

33. School has at least 2 necessary and functioning

* Nos. of Fire
equipment, in case of a disaster (e.g. fire extinguisher, Extinguishers(functionable)
handheld /base radio, generator. Etc.).
34. School has pre-identified spaces for putting up
Temporary Learning Spaces/Shelters in the aftermath of a *Site Development Plan
disaster

* Identified TLS Area

35. School has ready resumption strategies and alternative
*Camp Management
delivery modes to ensure education continuity. plan

36. Learners/students have completed the Family *Conducted the survey based
Earthquake Preparedness Plan; and school has reported DO#27_s. 2015 (Promoting Family
completion to DepEd DRRM at the Central Office/Regional Earthquake Preparedness)
Office * Consolidated Reports

37. School has established a school personnel tracking * Localized Tracking system (e,i
system/protocol in the event of a disaster. goolge sheet etc.)

38. School personnel trained to administer first aid to * Conduct Basic First Aider/BLS
students and personnel. Orientation to

39. School has psychosocial interventions for personnel and * Conduct Basic Pyschological First
Aid to Learners and Teachers
students. * Narrative Reports
* Updated School DRRM Plan and
40. School DRRM Plan and SIP with DRRM integration are
Budget Proposal to DRRM related
reviewed annually. Activities

41. School conducted Brigada Eskwela to ensure safety and

*Brigada Eskwela Report
preparedness measures are in place.

42. Students, teachers parents and other stakeholders *Attendance to Brigada Eskwela
participated in Brigada Eskwela. conducted

43. School has established functional Early Warning System

to inform students and personnel of hazards and * Signages
*Planning for limited use of
emergencies (protocol, warning signs, devices, IEC), schools as evacuation centers,
considering national and LGU warning systems and during the school year
protocols.
44. School conducted hazards-specific drill with participation
of stakeholders (BFP,Medic, LGU's, NGOs, community, PTA, *Narrative Report with Photos
alumni, and others).
* Submitted Reports( NSED,
45. The students participated in the drills. National DRR Month, Fire
Prevention Month and etc.)

* Localized/School-Based
46. School has evacuation plan procedures. Evacuation Plan Guidebook
 * Identified Family Reinification
47. School has a student-family reunification plan that is
Areas in school during emergencies
clearly disseminated to students, teachers and parents. occurs

48. School Head participated DRRM trainings from division *DRRM Trainings participated for the
or region or partners. past three years

49. School DRRM Team participated trainings from division *DRRM Trainings participated for the
or region or partners. past three years

50. School has conducted awareness and capacity building *CB conducted for families and
for families and learners. learners

51. School participated in the different DRRM/CCA/EIE

*Photos
activities of the LGU

52. School take thermal scanning at the entrance/gate. *No.of thermal scanners/thermal guns

53. Schools conducted regular pruning of trees(every 6 mos.

*Narrative report and photos
especially near to the school buildings.
* Request Letter to BFP
54. School conducted fire safety inspection every year in
* Recommendation Reports
coordination with Bureau of Fire (BFP). from BFP
55. School has ample supply of alcohol, sodium hypochlorite
*Photos
or other disinfectants

56. School has foot baths at strategic locations. *Photos

57. School has СOVID-19 triage area. * Identified Building or Classroom

* E-Updated Reports
58. School had isolation area. * Pictures

59. School required the daily health symptoms questionnaire *QR Code/ Questionnaire on Health
to all personnel and stakeholders Safety Protocol

60. School submitted 100% accurateness of the report on/or

*Soft Copies of DRRM Report
before date of submission.

Legend:
Very High: 4.50 – 5.00 (90% - 100%)
High: 3.5 -- 4.49 (70%-89%)
Average: 2.50 –3.49 (50% - 69%)
Low: 1.50 - 2.49 (30 % -49%)
Very Low: 0 - 1.49 (Below 30%)
Prepared by:

GAYFRED A. COMIROS
Designated School DRRM Coordinators
on Checklist-2024
Date:

he set schedule of implementation ]

e set schedule of implementation ]

the set schedule of implementation ]

Rating Scale
Remarks/Intervention
5 4 3 2 1

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 FALSE
0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE
0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE
0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE
 0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE
0 0 0 0 0

OINTS : 0

ERAGE : 0.00

Percentage
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region VII, Central Visayas
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFMANDAUE CITY
Plaridel.,St., Brgy Centro, Mandaue City

DRRM Comprehensive School Safety Evaluation Checklist-2024

Name of School: BASAK NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
School Head: JEROME G. VELASCO
Division :Mandaue City

RUBRICS SCALE:
(5)---VERY HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol excellently ahead of time or the set schedule of imp
(4)---HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol satisfactory on time ]
(3)---MODERATE [ Has implemented the policy/protocol fairly and complied it late of the set schedule of imp
(2)---LOW [ Has implemented the policy/protocol poorly and complied it very late of the set schedule of i
(1)---VERY LOW [ Failed to implemented the DRRM policy/protocol in school. ]

Means of Verification
Performance Indicator (PI) (MOV's)

1. The school has adopted/adapted/localized existing

* Localized School Policies
policies relating to DRRM in education/school.

2. The school has designated School DRRM Focal Person * Designation Order

3. The school has formed and functional School DRRM *SDRRM Core Team Organizational
Team, consisting of personnel from different offices, with Chart with defined membership and
defined membership and roles and responsiblities. roles and responsibilities

4. Has a comprehensive School DRRM Plan, which includes * DRRM Plan with CCA and EiE
Climate Change Adaptation (CCA) and Education in measures *Conduct School-based
Emergencies(EiE) measures Orientation on CCA and EiE
5. Completed in covering Risk Assessment, Risk Reduction
*School-based Monitoring of Risk
and Rehabilation and Recovery Assessment, Risk Reduction and
Rehabilation and Recovery

6. The students participated in the planning process of the

*SSG/SPG Participation
school-based DRRM.

* Allocated Budget to DRRM related

7. Integrated DRRM into School Improvement Plan (SIP) Activities

8. The School has complied the DRRM related questions in

* EBEIS School Profile in DRRM
the EMIS/EBEIS

* DRRM Budget Proposal

9. Regular DRRM activities are supported by school budget *Annual School DRRM Plan
 ines
ucation
ayas
NDAUE CITY
ndaue City

ety Evaluation Checklist-2024

Date: AUGUST 2, 2024

ahead of time or the set schedule of implementation ]

e]
mplied it late of the set schedule of implementation ]
ed it very late of the set schedule of implementation ]
school. ]

Rating Scale
Remarks/Intervention
5 4 3 2 1

0 0 1 0 0

0 1 0 0 0

0 0 1 0 0

0 0 1 0 0

0 0 1 0 0

0 1 0 0 FALSE

1 1 0 0 FALSE

0 1 0 0 FALSE

0 1 0 0 FALSE
10. Funding sources for inteventions in the aftermath of
* Deed of Donation & DOA
disaster or emergency exist and can easily be tapped.
* Letter of Intent
11. The school had partnership that could ber tapped to
support its DRRM programs and activities, including after *List of Stakeholders for DRRM
those after disaster

12. Students participated in the conduct student-led school * Submitted Reports with Pictures &
watching and hazard mapping (DO 23,s. 2015) Captions

13. Data collection and consolidation of programs and *Conduct School-based evaluation
activities on DRRM, covering the 3 Pillars, to monitor results and monitoring using CSS Tool
and impact exist. *Pictures with Caption

* Year-round Inventory Reports (e.i.

14. School buildings have been inventoried. Ramps, Fire Exit, etc.)

15. School buildings have risk assessment. * Risk Assesment Reports

* Conducted building assessment

16. Unsafe school buildings were identified assigned engineers/implementers

17. Systems for monitoring and quality assurance of school

*National Audit of School Facilities
buildings exists.

18. Financial resources are allocated for completion of

*List of Resources and Plan to
needed action to address unsafe school buildings within a address unsafe school buildings
specified period.

19. Unsafe school buildings were given with appropriate

*Demolition Permit
action undertaken by the School Head (e.g. upgraded, *Letter of Request
retrofitted, non-usage, etc.).

20. School has undertaken regular repair of minor classroom *Narrative Report with Photos with
(including) damages. Caption

*Request Letter from the Classroom

21. Roles and responsibilities for maintenance are defined,
Adviser/ SPFC for School Facilities
documented and assigned. that needs repair.

22. School Head has allotted budget for routine maintenance

of school facilities for safety and protect investments, with *AIP, SIP
transparent monitoring oversight at the school level.

23. School Head had pre identified/prepositioned classroom

that are expected to be used as temporary evacuations *Site Development Plan
centers for disasters.

24. School Head is clear with his/her roles and functions of

the school in camp management vis-à-vis the LGU and * Conduct Capacity Building on
DSWD as per Joint Memorandum Circular No. 1, s. 2013 " Camp management Plan for limited
Guidelines on Evacuation enter Coordination and use of schools as evacuation centers
Management" and RA 10821 " Children's Emergency Relief (ei. School EOC, DRRM teams
and Protection Act" and its corresponding IRR.

25. Guidance and regulations on safe school site are strictly * Localized/School Based Policy
( e,i, designated parking area,
followed DRRM Emergency teams etc.)
0 0 1 0 FALSE

0 1 0 0 FALSE

0 1 0 0 FALSE

0 0 1 0 FALSE

0 1 0 0 FALSE

0 0 1 0 FALSE

0 1 0 0 FALSE

0 0 1 0 FALSE

0 0 1 0 FALSE

0 0 0 1 FALSE

1 0 0 0 FALSE

1 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 1 0 FALSE

1 0 0 0 FALSE

0 1 0 0 FALSE

0 0 1 0 FALSE
26. Guidance and regulations on resilient designed are * Localized/School Based Policy
( e,i, VEST, Evacuation Route,
strictly followed. safety harness etc.)

* Localized/School Based Policy (ei.

27. Guidance and regulations on resilient construction are PPE, Nos. of Manpower on-site,
followed. standy Safety Officer)
* Reports
28. New school site construction is monitored for compliance *Monitoring Report on Physical
Facilities if there's an on-going
in safe school site selection (if any). project
29. New school site construction is monitored for compliance
*Logbook of Implementing Agency
in safe school design (if any).

30. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

*Monitoring Logbook
in safe school construction (if any).

31. School has contingency plan on the existing hazards of

the school campus/locality (vis-à-vis earthquake, typhoon, *DRRM Contingency Plan
COVID-19, floods, arm conflict, flooding, landslide etc.).
32. School has available, accessible, and adequate first aid
*First Aid Kits per classroom
kit in every instructional classroom.

33. School has at least 2 necessary and functioning

* Nos. of Fire
equipment, in case of a disaster (e.g. fire extinguisher, Extinguishers(functionable)
handheld /base radio, generator. Etc.).

34. School has pre-identified spaces for putting up

Temporary Learning Spaces/Shelters in the aftermath of a *Site Development Plan
disaster

* Identified TLS Area

35. School has ready resumption strategies and alternative
*Camp Management
delivery modes to ensure education continuity. plan

36. Learners/students have completed the Family *Conducted the survey based
Earthquake Preparedness Plan; and school has reported DO#27_s. 2015 (Promoting Family
completion to DepEd DRRM at the Central Office/Regional Earthquake Preparedness)
Office * Consolidated Reports

37. School has established a school personnel tracking * Localized Tracking system (e,i
system/protocol in the event of a disaster. goolge sheet etc.)

38. School personnel trained to administer first aid to * Conduct Basic First Aider/BLS
students and personnel. Orientation to

39. School has psychosocial interventions for personnel and * Conduct Basic Pyschological First
Aid to Learners and Teachers
students. * Narrative Reports
* Updated School DRRM Plan and
40. School DRRM Plan and SIP with DRRM integration are
Budget Proposal to DRRM related
reviewed annually. Activities

41. School conducted Brigada Eskwela to ensure safety and

*Brigada Eskwela Report
preparedness measures are in place.

42. Students, teachers parents and other stakeholders *Attendance to Brigada Eskwela
participated in Brigada Eskwela. conducted
0 0 1 0 FALSE

0 0 1 0 FALSE

0 1 0 0 FALSE

0 0 1 0 FALSE

0 0 1 0 FALSE

0 1 0 0 FALSE

0 0 1 0 FALSE

1 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 1 0 FALSE

0 0 1 0 FALSE

0 0 1 0 FALSE

0 1 0 0 FALSE

0 0 1 0 FALSE

0 0 1 0 FALSE

0 0 1 0 FALSE

0 1 0 0 FALSE

1 0 0 0 FALSE
43. School has established functional Early Warning System
to inform students and personnel of hazards and * Signages
*Planning for limited use of
emergencies (protocol, warning signs, devices, IEC), schools as evacuation centers,
considering national and LGU warning systems and during the school year
protocols.
44. School conducted hazards-specific drill with participation
of stakeholders (BFP,Medic, LGU's, NGOs, community, PTA, *Narrative Report with Photos
alumni, and others).
* Submitted Reports( NSED,
45. The students participated in the drills. National DRR Month, Fire
Prevention Month and etc.)

* Localized/School-Based
46. School has evacuation plan procedures. Evacuation Plan Guidebook

* Identified Family Reinification

47. School has a student-family reunification plan that is
Areas in school during emergencies
clearly disseminated to students, teachers and parents. occurs

48. School Head participated DRRM trainings from division *DRRM Trainings participated for the
or region or partners. past three years

49. School DRRM Team participated trainings from division *DRRM Trainings participated for the
or region or partners. past three years

50. School has conducted awareness and capacity building *CB conducted for families and
for families and learners. learners

51. School participated in the different DRRM/CCA/EIE

*Photos
activities of the LGU

52. School take thermal scanning at the entrance/gate. *No.of thermal scanners/thermal guns

53. Schools conducted regular pruning of trees(every 6 mos.

*Narrative report and photos
especially near to the school buildings.
* Request Letter to BFP
54. School conducted fire safety inspection every year in
* Recommendation Reports
coordination with Bureau of Fire (BFP). from BFP
55. School has ample supply of alcohol, sodium hypochlorite
*Photos
or other disinfectants

56. School has foot baths at strategic locations. *Photos

57. School has СOVID-19 triage area. * Identified Building or Classroom

* E-Updated Reports
58. School had isolation area. * Pictures

59. School required the daily health symptoms questionnaire *QR Code/ Questionnaire on Health
to all personnel and stakeholders Safety Protocol

60. School submitted 100% accurateness of the report on/or

*Soft Copies of DRRM Report
before date of submission.

Legend:
Very High: 4.50 – 5.00 (90% - 100%)
 1 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 1 0 FALSE

1 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 1 0 FALSE

0 0 1 0 FALSE

1 0 0 0 FALSE

1 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 1 0 FALSE

0 0 1 0 FALSE

0 0 1 0 FALSE

1 0 1 0 FALSE

0 0 1 0 FALSE

0 1 0 0 FALSE

0 0 1 0 FALSE

0 0 1 0 FALSE

0 0 0 1 FALSE

0 0 1 0 FALSE

0 1 0 0 FALSE
55 64 99 4 0

INTS : 222
 High: 3.5 -- 4.49 (70%-89%)
Average: 2.50 –3.49 (50% - 69%)
Low: 1.50 - 2.49 (30 % -49%)
Very Low: 0 - 1.49 (Below 30%)

Prepared by:

WILSON E. CARAAT
Designated School DRRM Coordinator
 RAGE : 3.70

Percentage
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region VII, Central Visayas
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFMANDAUE CITY
Plaridel.,St., Brgy Centro, Mandaue City

DRRM Comprehensive School Safety Evaluation Checklist-20

Name of School: CANDUMAN NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
School Head:
Division : MANDAUE CITY

RUBRICS SCALE:
(5)---VERY HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol excellently ahead of time or the set schedule of imp
(4)---HIGH [ Has implemented the policy/protocol satisfactory on time ]
(3)---MODERATE [ Has implemented the policy/protocol fairly and complied it late of the set schedule of imp
(2)---LOW [ Has implemented the policy/protocol poorly and complied it very late of the set schedule of i
(1)---VERY LOW [ Failed to implemented the DRRM policy/protocol in school. ]

Means of Verification
Performance Indicator (PI) (MOV's)

1. The school has adopted/adapted/localized existing

* Localized School Policies
policies relating to DRRM in education/school.

2. The school has designated School DRRM Focal Person * Designation Order

3. The school has formed and functional School DRRM *SDRRM Core Team Organizational
Team, consisting of personnel from different offices, with Chart with defined membership and
defined membership and roles and responsiblities. roles and responsibilities

4. Has a comprehensive School DRRM Plan, which includes * DRRM Plan with CCA and EiE
Climate Change Adaptation (CCA) and Education in measures *Conduct School-based
Emergencies(EiE) measures Orientation on CCA and EiE
5. Completed in covering Risk Assessment, Risk Reduction
*School-based Monitoring of Risk
and Rehabilation and Recovery Assessment, Risk Reduction and
Rehabilation and Recovery

6. The students participated in the planning process of the

*SSG/SPG Participation
school-based DRRM.
 * Allocated Budget to DRRM related
7. Integrated DRRM into School Improvement Plan (SIP) Activities

8. The School has complied the DRRM related questions in

* EBEIS School Profile in DRRM
the EMIS/EBEIS

* DRRM Budget Proposal

9. Regular DRRM activities are supported by school budget *Annual School DRRM Plan

10. Funding sources for inteventions in the aftermath of

* Deed of Donation & DOA
disaster or emergency exist and can easily be tapped.
* Letter of Intent
11. The school had partnership that could ber tapped to
support its DRRM programs and activities, including after *List of Stakeholders for DRRM
those after disaster

12. Students participated in the conduct student-led school * Submitted Reports with Pictures &
watching and hazard mapping (DO 23,s. 2015) Captions

13. Data collection and consolidation of programs and *Conduct School-based evaluation
activities on DRRM, covering the 3 Pillars, to monitor results and monitoring using CSS Tool
and impact exist. *Pictures with Caption

* Year-round Inventory Reports (e.i.

14. School buildings have been inventoried. Ramps, Fire Exit, etc.)

15. School buildings have risk assessment. * Risk Assesment Reports

* Conducted building assessment

16. Unsafe school buildings were identified assigned engineers/implementers

17. Systems for monitoring and quality assurance of school

*National Audit of School Facilities
buildings exists.

18. Financial resources are allocated for completion of

*List of Resources and Plan to
needed action to address unsafe school buildings within a address unsafe school buildings
specified period.

19. Unsafe school buildings were given with appropriate

*Demolition Permit
action undertaken by the School Head (e.g. upgraded, *Letter of Request
retrofitted, non-usage, etc.).

20. School has undertaken regular repair of minor classroom *Narrative Report with Photos with
(including) damages. Caption

*Request Letter from the Classroom

21. Roles and responsibilities for maintenance are defined,
Adviser/ SPFC for School Facilities
documented and assigned. that needs repair.
22. School Head has allotted budget for routine maintenance
of school facilities for safety and protect investments, with *AIP, SIP
transparent monitoring oversight at the school level.

23. School Head had pre identified/prepositioned classroom

that are expected to be used as temporary evacuations *Site Development Plan
centers for disasters.

24. School Head is clear with his/her roles and functions of

the school in camp management vis-à-vis the LGU and * Conduct Capacity Building on
DSWD as per Joint Memorandum Circular No. 1, s. 2013 " Camp management Plan for limited
Guidelines on Evacuation enter Coordination and use of schools as evacuation centers
Management" and RA 10821 " Children's Emergency Relief (ei. School EOC, DRRM teams
and Protection Act" and its corresponding IRR.

25. Guidance and regulations on safe school site are strictly * Localized/School Based Policy
( e,i, designated parking area,
followed DRRM Emergency teams etc.)

26. Guidance and regulations on resilient designed are * Localized/School Based Policy
( e,i, VEST, Evacuation Route,
strictly followed. safety harness etc.)

* Localized/School Based Policy (ei.

27. Guidance and regulations on resilient construction are PPE, Nos. of Manpower on-site,
followed. standy Safety Officer)
* Reports
*Monitoring Report on Physical
28. New school site construction is monitored for compliance
Facilities if there's an on-going
in safe school site selection (if any). project
29. New school site construction is monitored for compliance
*Logbook of Implementing Agency
in safe school design (if any).

30. New school site construction is monitored for compliance

*Monitoring Logbook
in safe school construction (if any).

31. School has contingency plan on the existing hazards of

the school campus/locality (vis-à-vis earthquake, typhoon, *DRRM Contingency Plan
COVID-19, floods, arm conflict, flooding, landslide etc.).
32. School has available, accessible, and adequate first aid
*First Aid Kits per classroom
kit in every instructional classroom.

33. School has at least 2 necessary and functioning

* Nos. of Fire
equipment, in case of a disaster (e.g. fire extinguisher, Extinguishers(functionable)
handheld /base radio, generator. Etc.).
34. School has pre-identified spaces for putting up
Temporary Learning Spaces/Shelters in the aftermath of a *Site Development Plan
disaster

* Identified TLS Area

35. School has ready resumption strategies and alternative
*Camp Management
delivery modes to ensure education continuity. plan

36. Learners/students have completed the Family *Conducted the survey based
Earthquake Preparedness Plan; and school has reported DO#27_s. 2015 (Promoting Family
completion to DepEd DRRM at the Central Office/Regional Earthquake Preparedness)
Office * Consolidated Reports

37. School has established a school personnel tracking * Localized Tracking system (e,i
system/protocol in the event of a disaster. goolge sheet etc.)

38. School personnel trained to administer first aid to * Conduct Basic First Aider/BLS
students and personnel. Orientation to

39. School has psychosocial interventions for personnel and * Conduct Basic Pyschological First
Aid to Learners and Teachers
students. * Narrative Reports
* Updated School DRRM Plan and
40. School DRRM Plan and SIP with DRRM integration are
Budget Proposal to DRRM related
reviewed annually. Activities

41. School conducted Brigada Eskwela to ensure safety and

*Brigada Eskwela Report
preparedness measures are in place.

42. Students, teachers parents and other stakeholders *Attendance to Brigada Eskwela
participated in Brigada Eskwela. conducted

43. School has established functional Early Warning System

to inform students and personnel of hazards and * Signages
*Planning for limited use of
emergencies (protocol, warning signs, devices, IEC), schools as evacuation centers,
considering national and LGU warning systems and during the school year
protocols.
44. School conducted hazards-specific drill with participation
of stakeholders (BFP,Medic, LGU's, NGOs, community, PTA, *Narrative Report with Photos
alumni, and others).
* Submitted Reports( NSED,
45. The students participated in the drills. National DRR Month, Fire
Prevention Month and etc.)

* Localized/School-Based
46. School has evacuation plan procedures. Evacuation Plan Guidebook
 * Identified Family Reinification
47. School has a student-family reunification plan that is
Areas in school during emergencies
clearly disseminated to students, teachers and parents. occurs

48. School Head participated DRRM trainings from division *DRRM Trainings participated for the
or region or partners. past three years

49. School DRRM Team participated trainings from division *DRRM Trainings participated for the
or region or partners. past three years

50. School has conducted awareness and capacity building *CB conducted for families and
for families and learners. learners

51. School participated in the different DRRM/CCA/EIE

*Photos
activities of the LGU

52. School take thermal scanning at the entrance/gate. *No.of thermal scanners/thermal guns

53. Schools conducted regular pruning of trees(every 6 mos.

*Narrative report and photos
especially near to the school buildings.
* Request Letter to BFP
54. School conducted fire safety inspection every year in
* Recommendation Reports
coordination with Bureau of Fire (BFP). from BFP
55. School has ample supply of alcohol, sodium hypochlorite
*Photos
or other disinfectants

56. School has foot baths at strategic locations. *Photos

57. School has СOVID-19 triage area. * Identified Building or Classroom

* E-Updated Reports
58. School had isolation area. * Pictures

59. School required the daily health symptoms questionnaire *QR Code/ Questionnaire on Health
to all personnel and stakeholders Safety Protocol

60. School submitted 100% accurateness of the report on/or

*Soft Copies of DRRM Report
before date of submission.

Legend:
Very High: 4.50 – 5.00 (90% - 100%)
High: 3.5 -- 4.49 (70%-89%)
Average: 2.50 –3.49 (50% - 69%)
Low: 1.50 - 2.49 (30 % -49%)
Very Low: 0 - 1.49 (Below 30%)
Prepared by:

JAY-AR T. SOCIAS
Designated School DRRM Coordinators
on Checklist-2024
Date:

he set schedule of implementation ]

e set schedule of implementation ]

the set schedule of implementation ]

Rating Scale
Remarks/Intervention
5 4 3 2 1

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 FALSE
0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE
0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE
0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE
 0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE

0 0 0 0 FALSE
0 0 0 0 0

OINTS : 0

ERAGE : 0.00

Percentage