Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
30 views28 pages

Pietsch, Bernard - New Perspectives On The Great Pyramid

Uploaded by

msonger8
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
30 views28 pages

Pietsch, Bernard - New Perspectives On The Great Pyramid

Uploaded by

msonger8
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 28

Introduction

There are no scholarly footnotes to the following exposition on the message


of the Great Pyramid. There is no appeal to historical analysis,
archaeological tradition, nor extra terrestrial intervention. The only
documentation offered is the stones of the Pyramid themselves; their
placement, dimensions and geometry are the sole demonstration. Our
objective will be to liberate the meaning from the stones and pursue the
course of reasoning revealed.

Superscript roman numerals in the text below are links to


notes in the appendix; please use your browser's Back
button to return after viewing a note.

The end result of this application, is the proposition that the designers of the
Great Pyramid had access to a supremely successful paradigm subsequently
lost to later generations. The Pyramid is the database of that lost paradigm.
As a library in stone, it is designed as a model of the galaxy,i the solar
system,ii the earth and ultimately the human being. It is a working metaphor
of astronomy, physics, biology, and earth science. The Pyramid is the
consummate demonstration of "as above, so below."
The best representation of the mind that informed the Pyramid resides in the
Pyramid itself. The Pyramid is the message; it is the model.It is the
demonstration of the architect’s ability to meld science, art and geometry
into a meaningful form. As a wonder of conceptual art, the Great Pyramid
organizes grand themes and tremendous ideas. It is the solution to a
problem. We must ask: How do we read it? What answers does it hold?
What problem does it solve?
In the service of sacred art, the architect's communication functions both as
statement and as dialogue. As statement, the Pyramid articulates through line
and measure. But the discovery of its meaning requires the interaction of the
observer with the form. It is the participation with the form that elevates the
investigator to the level of understanding.
The meaning of the Pyramid has always been apparent, but we have not
been able to translate the language of the medium. The language required to
decipher it will not be found in any book or dictionary in a library. But, with
due diligence and using tools similar to ours, anyone could recover the same
information we have found. The following pages introduce some of the
idiom necessary for conversing with the Pyramid’s architectural ideas.
Remarkably, once deciphered, the stones of the Pyramid will no longer be
necessary. The stones chronicle information commensurate with the nearest
pinecone or a blade of grass. Ultimately, this information is available to
everyone, everywhere, here and now. But before the fact, the Pyramid will
be both primer and directory. Read correctly, it will return us to the path we
left eons ago. Ironically, the reading of this ancient model and the
rediscovery of its attendant paradigm hold the key to the solution of many
modern enigmas.
How Do You Read?
The simplest reading of the Pyramid requires cataloging the stones in terms
of number and measure. Once the stony card catalog of the Pyramid is
assembled, the dimensions of height, width and depth of each stone can be
converted or translated into the metrology (measuring system) to which it
relates. Through the filter of measure, meaning becomes apparent.
The measuring system that evolves through this process we have referred to
elsewhere as the Essential Canon of Measure. The Canon is significant in
that it correlates universal cycles of many kinds: planetary periods, tidal
cycles, field precession, earth magnetism, plant growth patterns, human
physiological cycles. Knowledge of these very long periodicities requires
many, many generations of observation to formulate. But once recorded, any
generation in any age can access the database and recognize the long
term patterns. (For more information about how a metrology emerges out of
the patterns of natural events, refer to our page entry on The Essential Canon
of Measure.)
What Do You Read?
After measuring the individual stones, and cataloging the features of the
whole Pyramid itself, we will ask: "What observations, events or phenomena
do the stones represent? To what questions is the Pyramid the answer?"
Nothing Is Hidden
Contrary to the many commentaries on the Great Pyramid which speculate
about secrecy, mystery and magic, we will affirm that nothing in the
Pyramid is concealed, hidden or secret. The enigma of the Pyramid in fact,
resides more on the part of the observer than in the intention of the architect.
The language of the Pyramid is at once precise and lyric. To penetrate
its intended meaning one must perceive both science and art simultaneously.
In the language of the Pyramid, the integration of number, geometry and
metrology is so interrelated as to be holographic. To see one part clearly, the
whole must be surveyed, but before reaching that perspective, many details
must come into focus. As a result, our exposition may appear round about
and indirect, but as we progress the pieces of the puzzle and the logic of the
Pyramid will become clearer and the message will unfold as self-evident.
The builders were aware that every aspect of the world and the self ought to
harmonize with the universal order and that by truly understanding one thing
it is possible to understand all.
The finest instrument ever constructed by mankind reveals what he has in
him. In the largest sense, everything recorded inthe Pyramid is
recorded within the human organism. We are the one thing. Through this
paradox, the realization occurs: the solution to the Great Pyramid is not only
in the stones, but also in ourselves.
Why the Pyramid Was Built from the Top Down
Our expedition begins with a remark from Herodotus, 4th Century, BCE
Greek historian. Herodotus was one of the earliest Western sources to report
on the pyramids and culture of Egypt. (Among some, Herodotus’ accounts
earned him the title, "Father of History," among others the title "Father of
Liars," as he made many curious and whimsical statements.) He reports that
Egyptian temple priests told him that the top portion of the Pyramid was
built first, then the middle and lastly the part closest to the ground. Since
such a building could not be constructed top to bottom, what is the
inference?
Herodotus’ account is not about principles of engineering and construction.
It is a veiled referent to the concept which drives the form of the Pyramid.
"From the top-down" refers to the metaphysical notion of wholeness derived
from the Pyramid’s form. The Pyramid is more than the sum of its parts. The
"top" to which Herodotus’ refers is a perfect, ideal and nonexistential realm
—a sacred space that can only be indicated. The fact is that the Great
Pyramid has no physical pyramidian, apex or top. The dimensions of the
Pyramid do not geometrically support the extension and closure of an apex
point.iii The physical structure itself was designed to be truncated at the
206th course or level. Since the angles of the Pyramid are actually slightly
skewed,iv a pyramidal top is not an extension of the geometry of the actual
physical pyramid. It is an abstraction rendered from an idealized geometry.
It can only be conceptualized.
The purity of the indicated space above the physical top of the Pyramid is
not of this world. Each individual must recreate its existence. It is truly a
sacred space—eternal, incorruptible, and timeless. But its latent potential
must be supported in the world in order to be realized. The top is supported
by the base; but the base is subservient to the top. In order to extrapolate the
meaning of the non-existential top of the Pyramid, one must first understand
the "bottom" or physical aspect of the structure. We look now for the
function and meaning of the base of the Pyramid and its 206 stony courses,
before returning to the initiating geometry of its top.
How the Pyramid Got Its Courses
The physical layers of limestone blocks are called "courses." Now visible as
the exterior, the 206 courses represent singly and in order, the record
of time of a specific 206-year period of history.

Observe the various heights of the Pyramid’s courses—some courses are


measurably higher than others are. These variations are not unlike the thick
and thin patterns of tree rings.
On a day to day basis a tree biologically
responds to its environment—every woody
cell as it grows lays down in form its
response to temperature, moisture, and
dynamic changes. The tree is the living
record of environmental changes. Each ring
is the residual representation of a tree’s
annual history. So sensitive is a tree to
ambient environmental changes that a
dendrochronologist can actually detect the tree’s registration of the sunspot
cycle from the pattern of their successive rings.

So too, a simple crystal. The crystal is an accretion of molecules in time.


Each molecule of the crystal registers all the complex phenomena acting
upon it in the moment of its formation. The accumulation of calcium in a
coral reef has structure as do the hair, nails and skin of our own bodies. Each
is a living registry of cosmic history—Time in structure.
So too the courses of the Great Pyramid. Though artificially constructed, the
courses represent the record of the experience of the earth in its solar, lunar
and planetary environment. The influences and fluctuations experienced
during the particular 206-year period the Pyramid represents are minutely
detailed by the stone placements and measures. The height of each stone and
in turn each courses chronicles the successive events in a year of earth’s
history. Like the tree’s ring, the individual courses of the Pyramid are a
year’s record in structure—a static form representing the passage of time.
The priests of Egypt told Herodotus that there was a well "inside" the
Pyramid. We understand the veiled language to mean not that the well was
located within the Pyramid, but that the record of the variable depth of the
well was "in" the Pyramid—recorded in the various heights of the stones of
the 206 courses. Much like a tidal graph, each course, one course per year
represents one year of records of the tidal fluctuation of the water taken from
nearby Kephren’s Well behind the Sphinx.
Water: Universal Solution
Why would the measure of water be so important? Water is sensitive to
motion. It changes in response to motion. Water registers the cumulative
changes in a dynamic environment. As the tide in the sea, it responds to the
total contribution of the moon, the Sun and planets, and also to the subtle but
discernible contribution of the earth’s motion in space, its cosmodesic.v
Kephren’s Well, located to the West of the Sphinx, is fed by Nile waters
seeping through the semi-permeable limestone strata of the Giza Plateau. As
the Nile ebbs and flows, so too the depth of water in Kephren’s Well. (That
tidal effects are detectable in wells has been documented.) Variations in the
level of the water can be correlated with adjustments in the earth’s motion
due to the shifting positions of adjacent masses. As the moon and planets
parade in the space surrounding the earth and as the earth turns on its axis,
the levels of the well are the response in time to those changes.
Beginning on a precise date, the depth of the water in Kephren’s Well was
meticulously measured and recorded daily. A stone would later be formed to
represent the record of the water-derived formula. Beginning on the
northeast corner the stones cycle in sequence northwest, southwest,
southeast and back to northeast, around the perimeter of the Pyramid. Each
course represents one full year of tidal readings. Observe that the stones of
the first course are not uniform nor are they equal in height or length. They
gradually rise and decline in height by a very small but significant measure.
(Surveys show that in the first course on the north side, approximately 760
feet, a variance of approximately 2-cm was determined. This would correlate
with the time period January, February and March of 2900 BCE.) From this
pattern we can determine something about the overall harmonics and lunar
components of the planetary family. The irregular height of the stone
courses should correlate with other natural records formed during the 206-
year period which the Pyramid represents. Growth patterns in coral reefs,
core samples of glacial deposits, tree rings etc. formed or accumulated
during this period will also have registered subtle variations of the celestial
drama in their individual accretion. The elements of these various patterns
we will recognize in a comprehensive harmonic analysis beginning with the
date January 2nd, 2900 BCE.
January 2ND 2900 BC
Although the Great Pyramid may have been built at a later date, it was
designed to commemorate one particular moment in history. It is in fact a
huge benchmark on the earth and in time.
In surveyor’s language, a benchmark is a symbol placed on a permanent
landmark that has a known coordinate position. A benchmark is used as a
stationary reference point for determining the coordinates of other locations.
The Great Pyramid functions in much the same way. But unlike the static
benchmark of the surveyor, the Pyramid also functions as a working
memorial to an important instant in time. Its shape, dimensions, and internal
design communicate very specific information about where it is located on
the earth and in the cosmos as well in one single moment. That moment, we
hold was January 2nd, 2900 BCE, the beginning of the Great Pyramid’s
story.
Had we been there on the morning of that day, we would have observed a
spectacular display of bright objects in the eastern sky: Mercury, Venus,
Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn visibly aligned within a few degrees of one
another. In the Bible this event is alluded to in the Book of Job. In Chapter
38 God asks, "Where wast thou… when the morning stars sang together and
the sons of God shouted for joy?" On that day in 2900 BCE the major
planets appeared as morning "stars." This was a major astronomical event;
an extraordinary celestial co-incidence which would occur only once in eons
of time—an inspirational event. This was also the perfect opportunity to
begin the task of recording for posterity, the planetary choreography of the
next 206 years. 206 years would include seven full cycles of the planet
Saturn, a major player in the cosmology of the builders.
The builders knew that all biological and physical cycles, e.g., tides, weather
patterns, etc., are influenced by the earth’s proximity to other bodies in the
solar system. Knowledge of the movements of the planets through the
heavens was a key to understanding the cycles of the earth. Because the
outer planets move only a few degrees of arc per year, planetary alignments
occur over a long period of time. As the planets begin to converge in one
area of the heavens the earth begins to experience the increasing dynamic
effect of the alignment. With the planets approximately on the same line in
2900 BCE, it could be determined years later, just how far each had moved
from this position during its cyclic path around the Sun. The changes in the
positions of those planets would be recorded in the dimensions of the stone
courses of the Pyramid. The varying heights of the stones of the courses as
was said, were derived from and correlated to the daily measurements of the
water level of Kephren’s Well. The heights of the courses correspond, one
course per year, with the varying orbital and dynamic influences of the moon
and planets upon our earth.
We can observe the major effects of this powerful alignment of 2900 BCE in
the first course of stones. When we examine the heights of the courses we
can see that on the northeast corner, the first course has the greatest height,
indicating that the planets had their greatest affect on earth during the
beginning of the year 2900 BCE. Thereafter, as the planets dispersed from
their aligned positions, the earth experienced a declining impress. The
courses are like a huge card catalog in stone. We can go to any stone on any
course, and identify the day, month and year between 2900 and 2694 BCE,
which the stone represents. By invoking a simple formula, we can
extrapolate information about the position of the earth in orbit, about the
position of the moon, about the mean water level under the Pyramid at that
time, and more. This is what the courses are about.
For example, the height of the first course indicates that the level of the Nile
in 2900 BCE was about two and a half feet above mean water table level.
This represents a tremendous increase in the average level of water
especially considering it was spread out over the entire area of the Nile River
Valley. Quite plainly, that planetary alignment made a significant
contribution to the earth—but we may be sure that just as the stone courses
in the Pyramid decline in height, the effects of this alignment likewise came
about gradually and declined.
The Pyramid Base
The first course of stones is laid upon the limestone matrix of the Giza
plateau. Originally, four cornerstones were fitted into four rectangular
"sockets" (cavities), carved out of the native rock. Architecturally and
symbolically the Pyramid waslocked to the earth by these four corner
sockets which extend out of its foundation and link the Pyramid to the earth.
Each socket extends downward through the pavement, each to a different
depth below the Pyramid’s base. The cornerstones fit into the sockets and
the Pyramid conceptually "rests" upon them.

Since the cornerstones were plundered long ago, only empty sockets remain.
But no information is missing—empty spaces cannot be stolen! It is the floor
of the sockets, which contain the important information. From the
dimensions of the four corner sockets and particularly the depths of the
sockets, a universal cyclic pattern emerges. We recognize this pattern in all
of nature: it corresponds to the average cycle,vi to the various energy states
of the electron, even to the pattern of the normal heartbeat recorded by the
electrocardiograph. When translated into days, the measure of the depths of
the four corner sockets closely resemble the various periods of time ascribed
to human biological rhythms.vii Cheops is grounded in the most fundamental
aspects of Nature, just as we humans are rooted to the earth by our biological
cycles and rhythms. This is the first indication that the Great Pyramid is
indeed a model of man. The message is: Man is "locked" to the earth through
his biology and that biology is cosmically correlated with his planetary
evolution. This is the primary understanding.
Where in the Universe are We?
The Pyramid courses detail the record of earth’s local response to
astronomical influences over a 206-year period. Generations of observers
would have been necessary to amass the extraordinary base of astronomical
information indicated by the various features of the stones. Generations of
observers were also needed to compile the record of water levels, which
became the database for the course heights.
Constructed as a cosmic marker for future generations, the Pyramid had to
incorporate a reference to the largest framework possible. To be sure, the
alignment of the major planets in 2900 was a major astronomical event but
there were deeper celestial co-incidents, which made that year even more
memorable. To appreciate the precision with which the Pyramid is aligned
with those events, a bit of celestial orientation is required.
To the medieval world, long after the age of the pyramids, earth was
pictured as the center of the universe. All else revolved around us. In time,
as the stars failed to perform as predicted by calculation, one picture concept
replaced another. Humankind’s viewpoint expanded and an earth-centered
framework gave way to a sun-centered system. Today (even though there are
unreconciled difficulties in our modern cosmology) the sphere or vault of the
heavens is conventionally viewed from any of the three following
perspectives, each successively larger than the last.
The first framework is oriented in relation to the earth’s rotation every 24
hours on its axis, the imaginary line or pole pointing in the direction of the
then north polar referent position. (Modernly that position is near Polaris,
which we call the North Star.) If this framework were part of our address in
the universe, it would be used to give us our position here on earth.
The second framework or picture concept has the earth and planets revolving
around the Sun along a great nearly flat plane called the ecliptic. It takes
earth one year to circuit the path of the ecliptic. If this framework were used
as part of our address in the cosmos, it would be used to designate what
season or part of the orbit around the Sun, earth was in at any particular
time.
The third and largest part of our address has to do with the position of the
whole solar system in the galaxy—the Milky Way—a vast spiraling mass of
stars and systems rotating on its axis once every 226 million calendar years.
We contend that it was known to the builder almost 5,000 years
ago, where on the earth the Pyramid was located, where in the solar system
AND where in the galaxy. The design and position of the Great Pyramid
indicate that the architect of Cheops utilized all three of the above
frameworks and one other. This fourth framework is a living, moving,
changing framework. It is simultaneously the largest framework we can
conceive and the most immediate. It is magnetic.viii
Our thesis presumes that the missing link between the science of today and
that of the Pyramid builders (and other ancient architects) is the knowledge
and use of a magnetic framework. The implications create as radical a shift
in outlook as was Copernicus’ to Ptolemy’s.
The magnetic value of a location is integral to the selection of sites chosen
as "sacred" in earliest times. Monuments were linked with the heavens by
astronomical alignments, and to the earth by identification with their
magnetic orientation. Modernly this orientation is defined as the magnetic
dip and declination of the earth’s magnetic field. The dip and declination
values of any location are constantly progressing westward, so that marking
a location at a specific time would have been an important feature of the
monument as marker. Although conventionally little is really understood
about the earth’s magnetism (or about magnetism in general) we are
confident that what is about to be suggested will prove out empirically and
be seen to be at the core of the science which produced the Great Pyramid.
Without going into great detail here, we can begin to observe some very
interesting things about the earth’s magnetic field by looking at a magnetic
grid of the earth as identified on a modern magnetic Dip and Declination
map. If you had one before you, you would notice that unlike the even,
geometrical lines of geographic latitude and longitude, magnetic dip lines
are curved and wiggley.
These lines represent the angle at which a magnetized, balanced needle
hangs with respect to the vertical at any location. From our position here in
Santa Rosa, California, the angle of "dip" is presently about 62°.
Santa Rosa shares the same dip latitude as Cape Kennedy, Florida, even
though our geographic latitudes are quite different. Likewise, Seattle,
Washington shares the same dip latitude as Washington, DC and Edinburgh,
Scotland. Each has quite a different geographic latitude.
Notice that geographic coordinates are for the most part an imaginary
construct—they don’t exist. But natural phenomena like the movement of
the jet stream, migration paths of birds, animals and insects seem to occur
along magnetic latitudes. The dip needle responds according to its magnetic
latitude. Things "happen" in magnetic coordinates. This observation leads us
to believe that all living organisms are basically magnetic beings. Birds,
worms, fishes and people are sensitive to subtle changes in magnetic
orientation. This has been proved. Beyond being merely sensitive to
magnetics, we hope to demonstrate scientifically that Nature, on a grand
scale, is organized magnetically. We are magnetic beings living on a
magnetically oriented planet in a magnetically interacting universe. The
ancients were attuned to this and included the knowledge of their magnetic
bearings in their architecture.
The rate of the astronomical precession of the equinoxes is about 71.7 years
per degree. We hold that this value can also be associated with the
progression of the earth’s magnetic readings. By rotating the earth’s
magnetic field back at the rate of 71.7 years per degree to account for
precession, we would find that 4,881 years ago the magnetic dip value on the
Giza Plateau in Egypt would have 51° 51’ 14".

51° 51’14" is a magical angle. It a nexus of pure math and geometry, a point
where magnetics and geographics synchronistically coincide. For example:
Treating Cheops as a geometrically perfect pyramid (which for important
reasons it is not) and slicing it from the top so as to intersect the middle of
two opposite sides, we can extract a plane triangle with two angles of 51°
51’ 14" at its base. The third angle is 76° 17’ 32" at the apex.
This angle, or the "top" of the Pyramid, read as a geographic latitude,
coincides with the latitude of the earth’s magnetic pole. The designer of the
Pyramid, in making Cheops a model of the earth, utilized both geographic
and magnetic systems and must have had precise knowledge of where both
the geographic and magnetic poles were located.
By not finishing the Pyramid to a point at the top, the architect provided the
observer with an opportunity to participate in his Art—to participate in the
discovery of the unseen, and to participate in completing the Pyramid. Just
as a good teacher will provide a context to lead the student to discover his
own answers, the architect left all the indications necessary for the
observer/participant to carry his experience of the Pyramid one step further.
By not forcing a closure at the top of Cheops, the architect gave us a truly
sacred space from which to learn that the perfect cannot be consigned to the
realm of the tangible world, but it can be implied conceptually.
To complete the Pyramid we must first square off the base and extend the
slope angle of 51° 51’ 14" to its geometric apex. By doing so, the missing
top is created. We can fulfil that which is not, by projecting that which is
indicated by pattern.
Another meaningful coincidence occurs when one face (side) of the Pyramid
is taken as a plane triangle. The two base angles are 58° 17'. 5817 is also the
number of inchesix from the base to the apex—484 feet to the theoretical
"top" of the Pyramid (which exists only in perfect geometry).
A second synchronicity is exposed when it is noticed that the height of the
Pyramid reduced to .00000484 is the mathematical representation for the
tangent of one second of arc, the smallest unit of angular measure. Cheops,
the largest structure in the world simultaneously incorporates in its height,
the smallest unit of earth measure. The juxtaposition of the macro with the
micro, the eternal with the instantaneous is a signature characteristic of the
Pyramid builder.
The Pyramid juxtaposes the physical with the metaphysical, the existential
with the essential. The physical Pyramid with its 206 courses is not
symmetrical for a very important reason. Because it is a representation of the
physical world and 206 years of real earth history and the physical world is
not symmetrical. It is mutable, variable and subject to the vagaries of time.
Nature wiggles and dances and is in a state of constant process and change.
The Pyramid, to be an accurate model of man and earth, had to have a
provision for that which is beyond itself and in the process of becoming. The
stone courses of Cheops are about its history, but the "top" of the Pyramid
represents the potentiality of the entire structure.
The Casing Stone Mantle
The architect provided for the indelibility of the Pyramid in several ways.
First by having the face of every casing stone, over 22 acres of them,
inscribed with the angle of the Pyramid: 51° 51’14". Secondly by setting the
corner stones of the base in sockets (cavities) which were carved out of the
bedrock upon which the Pyramid rests. If the corner stones were removed
(and they were) the sockets would remain. Empty space cannot be stolen.
The remnants indicate what was intended. Had every stone of every course
of Cheops been removed and nothing remained, with just one single casing
stone and the knowledge of the four corner positions, we could reconstruct
the outer geometry of the entire Pyramid.
By creating a model which extends beyond the corporeal world and placing
the information in a form that could not be destroyed, the architect
succeeded in designing an enduring statement. Did he anticipate the decay of
civilization that would eventually permit the plundering of the greatest
structure ever built? Might he have foreseen that the once perfect outer
casing stones enclosing the exterior of the Pyramid would be quarried
centuries later to build the palaces and shrines of Cairo?
We propose that the architect elected not to make the casing stones inter-
locking, that he anticipated the inevitable decline of civilization, and that he
foresaw a time when the polished casing stones would attract the predatory
nature of a less reverent society.
The architect also provided the solution for those in the future who would
lose the continuity of knowledge with the past. Once the smooth outer
surface of the Great Pyramid was pillaged, the raw data for a science, was
uncovered. The limestone courses, the 206 years of records beneath the
casing contain the information that could lead humanity back to an attitude
of harmony and integration with the planet.
Ironically, on one level the despoiling of the casing was a raping of the
Pyramid. On another, it was a fertilization. The act of defiling Cheops by
penetration of its mantle, actually exposed the dormant knowledge available
in its courses. By stripping the casing, another aspect of the Pyramid was
revealed—the Pyramid would take on new life, new meaning and new
purpose. Removing the mantle was like opening the doors to a sealed
library. The contents therein could potentially spark the generation of a new
civilization. Learning to read from that library is our task.
"The upper portion of the Pyramid was finished first,
then the middle, and finally the part which was lowest
and nearest the ground." —Herodotus
As discussed previously, the "upper portion" of the Pyramid, its non-existent
pyramidian, informs the "lower" Pyramid. It is the container of the
metaphysical levels, the perfected information and the potential of the
physical Pyramid. The middle portion, the courses of stone and the inner
chambers catalog the realm of the celestial world—the cycles, rhythms and
harmonics of the various members of the solar family.
The lowest portion, nearest the ground—the corner sockets and chambers
carved out of bedrock infer the most elemental patterns of the earth’s body
itself. Characterized by an idealized wave motif, we recognize the profile of
the socket depths as the patterns of the human heartbeat, the ebb and flow of
the tides and the four levels of the electron in relation to its primary, etc.
Again Herodotus’ statement does not address principles of engineering, but
the theoretical perspective necessary to animate the design of the building
before it was built.
The initiation of the stone Pyramid begins with understanding the space that
would be occupied beyond the 206th course—the space of the metaphysical
pyramidian. In order to place the smallest details of the Pyramid in proper
order, the largest view is necessary. To reiterate, the sacred can only
be indicated. The sacred must be beyond corruption and the limitations of
the corporeal. But the virtue of the space above the Pyramid is intimately
connected to the nature of the physical Pyramid, its body of stone.
Without the integrity of the base, the purity of the top would not be available
to us. In order to be directed by one’s potential, or by an organizing power
beyond the physical, one must be both grounded in the physical
(understanding) and open to his or her "higher" levels (intuition).
While standing on the top of the Pyramid, supported by the 206 courses
below, we may entertain the realm of the impossible, unlimited and perfect
domain above. The geometry of the top demonstrates the virtuosity of the
ideological.
When contemplating the whole Pyramid, there are at least
three categories of information to consider. The first reading uses the
measures taken literally and precisely. Numerous engineers, astronomers
and scholarsx have devoted lifetimes to measuring and documenting the
various and complex features of the Pyramid. This literal level informs us
most about the 206-year period, which the Pyramid reports. The individual
measures of the stones relate to specific periods of time. For example, the
actual dimensions of the sides of the base are not equal nor are they square.
However, the side lengths takenliterally, as they are actually measured, do
have meaning. If the perimeter of the base intends the year, then one side
represents one quarter of the year. We noticed that the four sides of the
Pyramid are not exactly the same. But neither are the quadrants of the solar
orbit. Each is proportionately different. The four side lengths of the base
represent the four quadrants of the year—winter, spring, summer, fall. The
builders were not in error, they were precise.
Because the irregular sides of the base do not in fact permit the closure to a
perfect pyramidian at the apex of the Pyramid, another fascinating detail
emerges out of the precision of its design. For example:
Viewing the Pyramid from the top course down, as from an aerial
photograph, superimpose the square of the top course (imagining it to be the
original 206th ) over the larger square of the base. A tiny incongruity of
alignment can be detected. The corners of the two bases are slightly skewed.
Looking down from the top, a small but perceptible spiraling of the corners
can be reckoned—about 2° 51’ 39". What is the inference? In 206 courses,
the builder accounted for the amount of precession of the equinoxes which
would occur in the 206 years of time the courses represent. At a rate of
approximately one degree of precession per 72 years, in 206 years we would
expect a divergence of 2.86111° or 2° 51’ 39"—the amount the top platform
is rotated from the base. The rigor is in the details. (See diagram in appendix
entry iv.)
The second category of reading the Pyramid utilizes intuited or perfect
measures and angles indicated by the physical. The character of the
information is mathematical and geometric; it represents the eternal,
mechanical and unchanging relationships of pi and phi, circle to square, etc.
(The interpretations of historical pyramidologistsxi are numerous and
interesting. We will not reiterate their findings here, as there are ample
publications elsewhere. What we intend to introduce is other than those
standard models and geometries.)
From our own observations, a simple illustration: In a perfect case, the
height of the pyramidian would be 27.7777 feet. The reciprocal of this
number (1 divided by 27.7777) times 10,000 is 360, meaning: the part
indicates the whole. The rarefied empty space of the theoretical top, is a
realm wherein numbers only indicate.xii One number may point to many
possibilities, but none exactly.
A third category, which we will explore, integrates the conceptual with the
dynamics of the physical world. From this approach we collect the
knowledge gained intuitively from the sacred space and reintroduce it back
into the dynamic world. This approach uses the data of the moment in its
formulation. It utilizes both the detail of the actual and the extrapolation of
the indicated.
Here the inquirer must actively engage with the measures. The measures
suggest means, but it is up to the observer to extrapolate the implication of
the mean to present time. Knowledge of the instant is what we are seeking.
What is happening right now? What influences are acting upon us? In what
direction are we headed?
The simplest, most responsive instrument to the vagaries of the moment is
the pendulum. The pendulum is the most direct expression of this moment. It
is the applied key. The one-second pendulum drives the Pyramid’s geometry
and is the source of the Pyramid’s metrology.
Historically, conventional metrology has correlated length relative to its
utility in forming space and distance, i.e. volume and linear measure.
Entering into new territory, we propose that the original Pyramid metrology
also invoked the dimension of Time. That metrology emerged from the
correlation of units of length with the time of swing of the length as a
pendulum. By using a functioning pendulum, a unit of length could be
exercised to indicate a unit of time. The use of this simple device confirms
that other dimensions of information were encoded in the architectural
dimensions of the Pyramid. Any length may simultaneously represent a
distance and a period of time. This single factor is the most significant
achievement of the ancient builder, and the most overlooked criterion of
modern archaeology. In every metrological observation the question ought
to be asked’ "What is the Time of this measure?"
"Man fears Time, but Time fears the Pyramid."xiii
By using time as the fundamental dynamic of metrology, a proper unit of
measure becomes oracular. It is no coincidence that the number of inches in
the base perimeter of the Great Pyramid divided by 100 represents the
number of days in the year.xiv Nor that the height in feet to the theoretical
top of the Pyramid is the same number divided by 10 million, as the number
of the tangent of one second of arc. xv The Pyramid simultaneously
symbolizes one year, one second of arc,xvi one rotation of the galaxy,xvii and
one second of time.xviii
The introduction of the one-second pendulum, gives new meaning to the
definition of the inch. When time is inserted into the equation, controversies
surrounding lengths and measures, become less tenable. Regarding sacred
measure, units of length are no longer arbitrary nor historically derived.
They are time dependent. Time becomes the initiating factor, not culture. All
dimensions appeal to time.
The inch of the Pyramid is not exactly the conventional inch used today—
but very close. Close enough for conversation. The quality of the inch used
in the Pyramid however is vastly distinct. When knowledgeable critics
exclaim "But, the Egyptians didn’t have the inch!" They are both correct and
incorrect. Actually it is we who do not possess the inch nor the knowledge of
Time, not with the magnitude possessed by the pyramid builders.
We cannot say where the inch came from, as the historical origins of
metrology were lost ages ago. What comes down to us modernly is a variety
of units from many cultures with multiple applications loosely or obscurely
related. We are proposing that the metrology of the Great Pyramid
originated from a single genus and that all the measures derived from a
single harmonious system. In this system all units inter-relate cohesively—
not randomly, not arbitrarily. Each is abstracted from phenomena observed
in the Natural order as process.
In "heaven", where metrology is the pure instrument of the "gods", each unit
of measure refers to an event in the universe. In this heavenly or
metaphysical realm, any single unit is a portal to any other unit because all
units access the one thing. In a perfect metrology the one and the all are
simultaneous. The smallest is synchronous with the largest.
But in an imperfect world, perfection is but closely approximated. The
universe of being is always subject to change and deformation. The
application of the perfect to the sensible world is used only as a measure of
departure from the pure. Hence we arrive at terms like the Mean Solar Day
or the Mean Sidereal Day. There is no such day in actuality—all the days are
slightly different—but we can gage by the standard figure of the mean, how
any single day varies. 1440 minutes of the mean solar day is a perfect
metrological/astronomical application. The day of today, is something else,
maybe more minutes, maybe less. Nonetheless, we recognize in number
form, the indicator of the Mean Solar Day.
Because we are not inventing but re-covering this metrology, it is complex
to expose the linear derivation of a single unit. The measures seem
incestuous in their inter-relatedness, but by circumnavigating we can suggest
the direction from which they seem to derive.
A Second from the Heart
Our premise is that all units of measurement are derived from human
physiology. The rhythms and cycles of the body are an expression of cosmic
process. (See previous discourse on Sources of Measure. Necessary to this
discussion is the presupposition that the builders utilized the 360-degree
circle and its attendant hours, minutes and seconds of sexigesimal notation.)
Metaphorically speaking, the balanced or authentic "heart" of an evolved
individual, beats 60 cycles per minute. The "true heart" presumes the second
of time. During one second of time, the rotation of the earth will have
progressed through 1500 Canon feetxix of arc on the equator. (Notice how we
jumped from a small unit, one second, to a large unit, the earth’s equator,
and from time to linear measure.) When the heart beats 3.4418888 times the
earth will have rotated through 5,162.8333 feet on the equator. This distance
and time relate to the duration of one completed breath. (5,162.83333 feet is
also 50.900 seconds of arc on the equator. Celestially 50.90 represents the
number of seconds of arc the equinoxes precess in one year.) In one day of
the sacred year of 360 days, there would be 25,461.6 breaths.
Astronomically this is the same as the number of sacred years in the
precessional cycle of the equinoxes: 25,461.6 sacred years. (By the calendar
this translates to 25,825.8+ earth/solar years.) One can only marvel at the
congruence of such a system and at the length of time which would be
required to accumulate or calculate such observations.
Following the line of synchronicity:
 Using the perfect heart beat as the second of time, there would
be 87,636 heart beats in one sacred day.
 In the sacred year (360 days of 24hr 20min 36sec) there
are 8,763.6 hours.
 In the precessional cycle of 25,825.8 calendar years, there
are 876.36 orbits of the planet Saturn. (The relevance of Saturn or
Kronos figures strongly in the whole system. Refer to sections Saturn
Source of Measure and The Well Tempered Solar System.)
 In one rotation of the galaxy, there are 8763.6 precessional cycles.

The Great Book of Earth Measures


The equator can be likened to a Great Book, as the largest earthbound
figures reside in its circumference. The following Canon designations will
manifest in several forms throughout our discourse, sometimes removed by
decimal places, sometimes veiled by the filter of other units of measure.
The physical base of the Pyramid, 36,515 inches, is a magical number.
Divided by 100 and taken sexigesimally it would be365.15 or 365¼
representing 365 and ¼ days of the calendar year. The figure of 365.15 will
be used as the Pyramid ¼ for the calendar year from here on. The base,
representing the year, can be divided by many numbers reflecting
meaningful values:
For example:
 The Pyramid represents a model of the earth. The circumference of
the earth by Pyramid reckoning is 131,454,000 pyramid-feet.xx The
Pyramid’s perimeter, 36,515 inches or 3,042.91666 feet, is exactly
one half minute of arc on the earth’s equator.

 The wedding of geometry with astronomical time evolves the number


of calendar days in earth’s year (365.15) to its sacred counterpart of
360 days/degrees. By applying the transformational ratio
of 1.014305555 to 365.15, the earth and whole solar family become
available to proportionate timing, and many unobserved
synchronicities between the planets are revealed.
(1.014305555 is the transformational constant referred to as K,
introduced in "Saturn Source of Measure" andreiterated in the "Well
Tempered Solar System" sections of this page.)

 The base (36515) divided by the number of breaths in one heart beat
(3.441888) mentioned above yields the number 10,609—the orbit of
Saturn in sacred days.

 Near the southwest cornerstone on the base of the Pyramid a


"chiseled" line extends to the west a length of17.47572816 inches.
Used as a divisor of the base’s perimeter it yields the number of hours
in the orbit of the planet Mercury.xxii The reciprocal of this length: 1
÷ 17.47572816 x 1000 = 57.22222, the number of sacred earth days
(360/year) it takes Mercury to rotate 360 degrees.xxiii 17.47572816 x
100 is also the number of years it takes to rotate the galaxy 1 degree
of arc. (As a unit, 17.47572816 inches unlocks many ancient Hebrew
temple artifacts. It is a significant measure and appears frequently in
Egyptian astronomical and architectural configurations. We consider
it a viable candidate for the lost Hebrew Remen.)

 36515 ÷ 25 = 1460.6 the number of minutes in the sacred day of 24


hours 20 minutes and 36 seconds.

 365.15 days x 1440 the number of minutes in the mean solar day
equals 525816 minutes in one sacred year. 525816 ÷ 100
= 5258.16 the number for the feet in the canon mile. 525816 in its
many forms is another regular in the lineup of ancient measures which
doubles both as a linear notation and as a time indicator. As 5.25816 +
360 = a suitable representation for the astronomical/solar year of
365.25816 days.
 The significance of 5258.16 emerges definitively when it is observed
that during the time that it takes a 10 foot pendulum to beat once, the
planet has rotated through 5258.16 feet or 1 Canon mile on its
equator.

Using Canon measures, the earth’s circumference would have at the


equator:
 25,000 miles. (5258.16 feet/mile) In scale this number corresponds
to the Sacred Cubit of 25 inches.
 1,577,448,000 Canon inches.
 131,454,000 feet.
 200,000 Furlongs (657.27feet/furlong)
 101.430555 feet to the second of arc.
xxiv
See that divided by 100 = K.
xxv
 6085.8333 feet to the minute of arc.
xxvi
 69.4444 miles to one degree of arc.
 21,909,000 Fathoms (6 feet/fathom)

Before proceeding to the King’s Chamber we direct our attention once again
to the reports of our friend Herodotus. In Book II Euterpe, Herodotus tells of
the wondrous complex of pyramids and temples he saw in Egypt. He tells us
that details of the Egyptian mysteries "shall not pass his lips" and that he
will divulge only as much as can be done "without impiety " and "only when
compelled to do so by the course of the narrative." Having promised the
temple priests not to reveal all that he had been told his whole account is
rich in metaphor, allusion and veiled references.
In Section 148, he describes how the pyramids "surpass description and are
equal to a number of the greatest works of the Greeks, but the Labyrinth
surpasses the pyramids." This Labyrinth has "12 roofed courts with gates
exactly opposite one another, six looking north and six to the south." He
goes on to say that a single wall surrounds the entire building and that there
are two different sorts of chambers throughout—"half underground, and half
above ground, the later built upon the former; the whole number of these
chambers is 3000 in all." Herodotus himself saw the "upper" chambers and
"found them to excel all other human productions." He continues, "The
passages through the houses, and varied windings of the paths across the
courts excited me in infinite admiration as I passed from the courts into
chambers, and from the chambers into colonnades, and from colonnades into
fresh houses, and again from these into courts unseen before. The roof was
throughout of stone, like the walls; and the walls were carved all over with
figures; every court was surrounded with a colonnade which was built of
white stones exquisitely fitted together. At the corner of the Labyrinth stands
a pyramid, forty fathoms high, with large figures engraved on it, which is
entered by a subterranean passage." Of the "lower" chambers he could only
speak from report, since the "keepers could not be got to show them since
(as he was told) they "contained the sepulchres of the kings who built the
Labyrinth."
The Labyrinth is also a representation of the heavens, the 12 houses of the
zodiac, and the division of the sphere into degrees, minutes and seconds. Of
the two different sorts of chambers, half above ground (night sky) and half
below ground (day) Herodotus could only observe those above ground. The
single wall "surrounding" the entire building we take as the equator. The
"Pyramid on the corner 40 fathoms high" is entered by a "subterranean"
passage. What is this Pyramid? What does it represent? We know it has
"large figures engraved on it", so the number will be a large one. Since the
Pyramid is at the "corner" of the labyrinth and its height is given in fathoms,
let us take one-fourth of the earth’s circumference, a large figure, in
fathoms:
21909000 fathoms in equator = 5477250.
4
We now recognize this number: 5477250  1000= 5477.250 as inches to the
206th course of Cheops Pyramid.
For the "subterranean passage" we divide 5477.25 by 10,000, take the
reciprocal and multiply by two:
1 = 1.825733717 x 2 = 3.651467 x 10,000 = 36514.67 inches,
.547725
closely approximating the number representing the base of Cheops and the
number of the solar year. The Pyramid is "entered" at its perimeter.
The "wall which surrounds the entire building" may also be seen as the
seconds of arc in the circle: 1,296,000. Herodotus says the Labyrinth is
divided into 3,000 chambers, thus:
1,296,000 = 432xxvii
3,000
Also see that half of the chambers are above ground. One half of the number
of seconds in the mean solar day is 43200.
432 x 100 is also the ratio of the base of the Pyramid to the equator:
1,577,448,000 inches in circumference = 43200
36515 inches perimeter of Cheops
The Tremenos Wall surrounding the Great Pyramid is 42,300 inches in
length.
The square root of .432 is .657267069 which times 100 is a close
approximation to the perfect furlong of 657.27 feet.
Converting Cheop’s height (5477.2") to fathoms (72"/fathom) we get
76.072238 fathoms.xxviii Even though there is no pyramid 40 fathoms high,
let’s find the ratio between Cheops’ and Herodotus’ pyramids:
76.072238 fathoms of Cheops = 1.90180595 x 1/X = .525816
40 fathoms of Herodotus
Shifting the decimal we again find 5258.16 the ancient canon designation for
the feet in the mile and as 525816 minutes in the sacred year. Entering the
Pyramid by a "subterranean passage" connotes accessing sacred information
by an indirect route.
Of the two different sorts of chambers Herodotus describes half as
"underground" and "the whole number (of chambers) is 3000." The latitude
of the Great Pyramid is very nearly 30 degrees. Synchronistically we find a
co-incident relationship between the square root of 3,000 (underground) and
the indicated height of Cheops (above ground.)
 3000 = 54.77225 x 100 = 5477.2 inches, the height of the Pyramid.
By taking the reciprocal of the height:
5477.2 x 1/X = 1.825733717 x 2 x 100,000,000 = 36514.67433
36514.67433 approximates the base of Cheops’ Pyramid: 36515 inches.
"The later (upper) built upon the former (lower)…" The height above ground
is derived from the perimeter of the base—"under ground."
The pyramid "40 fathoms in height" is a reference to the Third pyramid
Mycerinus. 40 fathoms is 240 feet. Though not 40 fathoms high, Mycerinus
does have a slope length of nearly 288 feet. This is a reference veiled
by scale, as 40 fathoms is2880 inches.
Another method for entering the Labyrinth through the pyramid on the
corner is to recognize that the perimeter of the third pyramid, Mycerinus is
1422.266092 feet. The perimeter divided by 4 gives a mean side length of
355.566523 feet. The Labyrinth of the heavens is entered by a figure
embedded in the number of the length of the side of the pyramid, the
difference between the mean solar and sidereal days: 3’ 55", three minutes
55 seconds.
Expressing Mycerinus perimeter in inches and dividing by 10,000 derives:

1422.266092 x 12 = 17067.1931 = 1.70671931.


The common log of: 1.7067193110 = 50.90017909 being the seconds of arc
of precession per year in the precessional cycle of the equinoxes. The
knowledge that the equinoxes move through the "houses" of the zodiac
would be the result of eons of astronomical observation and according to
Herodotus, an accomplishment well worthy of note.
The heavens are a labyrinth of time, timing, cycles, signs and portents. Man
finds his measure in the stars, and in the planets. From the heavens he
acquires the measure of the self, for the labyrinth is also the maze within us,
and the ‘thread’ which guides us is connected to everything in the universe.
The human body, which evolved on a pulsating planet animated by the
rhythms of the firmament, plays out the music of the spheres on its
exquisitely tuned physiology. The planets are both above us and in us. In the
next section we’ll revisit familiar figures of measure as they reappear in their
celestial roles and in the Pyramid—the planetary harmonics of our solar
family. To be continued…

APPENDIX
[i] Though built at a later time, the design of the pyramid is linked to a precise time and date,
signifying an instant in the rotation of the Galaxy. The pyramid commemorates an alignment, on
earth and in time with the celestial position of the pole of the Galaxy. Orientation with the Galactic
Pole fixes the angle of the Grand Gallery and its location within the pyramid. The alignment from
the Great Step of the Grand Gallery toward the Galactic Pole would have gone through the earth
at the precise moment. Three blocking stones at the base of the First Ascending Passageway
were placed to indicate that "the way is blocked".
[ii] The Pyramid models the solar system in the stones of the King’s Chamber floor. Here 20
rectangular blocks lay out the Canon values for periods of the first six planets and Earth’s Moon.
In an upcoming section titled The Well-Tempered Solar System /I> the lengths, areas and
volumes of the stones will be accorded as a table of the elements of the planets as conceived by
the pyramid architect.

[iii] It shows the measurements of the lengths of the base sides of the pyramid, each side a
different length. These measures are derived from Flinders Petri’s survey and the measures are
from the very corners of the four cornerstones. Every pyramid study we have seen fails to take
this uniqueness off length into account. Most authors average-out the lengths and produce
identical lengths for the four sides. They contend that the pyramid builders "meant" for the sides
to be identical. This is the grossest of distortions.

[iv] Diagram (exaggerated for illustration) representing the skewness of the aris edges as seen
from the top of the pyramid looking down. Since the Pyramid courses are one for each year, we
should expect that in 206 years the diagonal of the Pyramid on the topmost course (presently
only 202 courses remain) will be shifted by about 2° 51.666’ representing the amount of the
precession of the equinoxes in the 206 year period.
[v] Gravity is not Attraction. Water in its fluidity is able to readjust to any changes in motion.
Picture a glass of water tilting right. The left side climbs the left side of the glass. Because the
earth is participant in the celestial dance of all the planets and especially the proximity of the
moon, the earth’s motion or vector is constantly shifting. Water on the planet sloshes, as in the
glass. The record of this shloshing is an apparent response to the conventionally called "attraction
to a distant mass."
When the framework considerations are attended, it can be shown that what appears to be
"attraction" is the result of Earth’s changing acceleration/deceleration relative to a constant
cosmic increase in velocity. The notion of an "attraction" can only be supported by observation in
a local setting. The failure to acknowledge the macrocosmic acceleration leads to an assumption
of attraction.
Although the discipline of contemporary science is committed to the notion of "attraction," there
has never been an adequate explanation for "gravity" as an "attractive force". Framework
manipulations, curved space or mathematical "displacements" of values attempting to explain
attraction are finally unsatisfying. Worst of all, hypotheses about gravity fail to be adequately
demonstrated.
"Attraction" is not necessary in the dynamics suggested here. What can be shown, as relevant to
all motion, is the expansion and acceleration of all local framework elements, toward the direction
of the star Regulus, i.e. the hidden attractor. More on this critical point later.
[vi] The measurements of the four corner sockets are translated into graph form, thus:
All natural cycles and rhythms have a form quite similar to this idealized graph. If we identify it
with the tides then the 23 inch SW cornerstone is correlated with the plus high tidal phase, the
39.9 inch SE correlates with the low-low phase, the 28.5 inch depth of the NE with the minus-high
phase and the 32.8 inch depth of the NW to the plus-high phase as shown. The chart depicts a
universal mean of all cycles. In reality every cycle departs from this universal mean and this
departure is what the stone courses and heights detail in fact.
[vii] The measurement of each one of these stones relates to the four functions in man which
Jung calls the intuitive (the NE corner), the intellect or thinking, (NW), the feeling or emotional
(SW), and the relational or sensational (the SE cornerstone). This systematics complements the
four directions of the Indian Medicine Wheel—North, intuition; East, interrelationships; South,
passion and will; West, thinking and introspection. The systematic is also complimented by the
astrological attributes of water, air, fire and earth. Note: There is also a fifth socket located very
close to the Southeast corner within the perimeter of the base. The timbre of its geometry relates
to the wood of the I Ching and to the notion of synchronicity in Jungian Psychology. The
geometry and mathematics of the corner sockets themselves are a textbook of psychology. The
rendering of that model is beyond the scope of this present general exposition and will be
elucidated elsewhere.
[viii] From here on our use of the term "magnetic" will have a special and noncoventional
definition. The observation of the plus and minus activities of the magnet will be expanded from a
local to a universal viewpoint. The conventional terms of "attraction" and "repulsion" are provincial
notions promoted by local (meaning close-up) observation. When the factor of time is given its
proper place in experimental equations it will be seen that "attraction" is a misnomer. It would be
more accurate to state that objects, when seen in the continuum of time, become more closely
aligned in their cosmodesic path. One object does not cause another to move toward it. Rather,
both moving independently but in the same vector, converge. The science of magnetics cannot
be considered separate of the affects of time and motion. More on this critical point will be
addressed elsewhere.
[ix] Recall that our use of the term "inch" is a special case. However for the ease of the reader we
will continue to refer to this special unit as an inch. The Canon Inch of the ancient builder
integrates time and the performance of the pendulum. Albeit approximates the conventional inch
in length, the Canon Inch is categorically quite distinct. It is the unit which harmonizes all
metrological divergences. More detail can be found on the section regarding theCannon of
Measure.
[x] Smythe, Greaves, Taylor, Lockyer, Borchardt, to name a few.
[xi] Edgar, Davidson and Aldersmith, many others.
[xii] Another example: the height of the pyramid to the top of the 206th course (456.4375 feet) is
intuitively suggested by the same "number" but of inches in one half the base side: 4564.375".
[xii] Ancient Arabic saying.
[xiv] The perimeter of the Pyramid is 36515 inches.
[xv] The height to the theoretical apex of the Pyramid would be 484.4444 feet. The tangent of one
second of arc is .0000048444444.
[xvi] The Remen (17.47572816"), one form of the cubit, is part of the geometry of the SW corner.
As the length of a rectangular space on the edge of the socket, it is found "outside" the pyramid.
The rectangle extends to the edge of the sloping stone of bedrock on the edge and borders the
perimeter line of the pyramid’s base on the side This rectangle has a width of one Remen. We
call this geometry "The Keystone". It is located outside the pyramid and unlocks the stones within.
The number of the Remen is also associated with the planet Mercury, an important element of the
system. One divided by the Remen x 1000 is 57.22222. Taken as days this signifies the rotation
period of Mercury. The degrees in the circle divided by the number of the Remen is the number of
the common cubit as inches: 360  17.47572816 = 20.6 inches. The Remen number x 10 is the
number of years it takes the galaxy to rotate through one second of arc: 174.7572816 years.
[xvii] Years in one rotation of the galaxy, 223 million cannon years (360 days/year) divided by 100
= 2.23 million stones in Cheops approximately.
[xviii] The length of the base side of the pyramidian is 43.56127497 feet. 43.561274972 =
1897.584677 square feet in the base of the pyramidian. The indicated height of the pyramidian is
27.70787383 feet. Using these dimensions to find cubic volume, (square of base x height divided
by 3) we derive a cubic volume for the pyramidian of 17526.01227 cubic feet. The natural
logarithm of this volume is
9.771441472 = The number of inches in a one second pendulum. The initiation of the perfect top
is derived from the length in inches of the 1-second pendulum. Note also that the number of feet
on the base side of the pyramidian x 12 = 522.7352997 inches. The common logarithm of this
number is 2.718281828, the base of natural logarithms.
[xix] The conventional figure is approximately 1521+/- feet Earth’s rotation at the equator in one
second of time. The sacred figure of 1500 feet derives from 1521.451  K. Using 1500 ft/sec
yields an Earth circumference of 25,000 Canon miles of 5258.16 feet per mile.
[xx] The Clarke Spheroid is approximately 24,901 miles of 5280 feet or 131,481,141.7 feet. A
difference of about 5 miles in the total circumference, when compared to the Canon figure of
25,000 miles of 5258.16 ft/mile
[xxi] 365.15  360 = 1.01430555
[xxii] 36515  17.47572816 = 2089.469444 hours in Mercury’s orbit.
[xxiii] Said differently: When Mercury rotates through one degree of its circumference, Earth has
rotated 57.2222 degrees. (During this interval, Venus has rotated through 14.30555 minutes of
arc of its circumference.)
14.30555 ÷ 1000 + 1 = 1.01430555 or  )
[xxiv] Modern geodetic survey reckons 101.454333 feet/second of arc—a difference of .0237 feet.
[xxv] Modern geodetic survey reckons 6087.26 feet/minute of arc—less than 1.5 feet difference
per minute.
[xxvi] Modern geodetic survey reckons approximately 69.17 miles/degree (5280 feet/ mile)—a
difference of about 85 feet/degree relative to Canon measure.
[xxvii] 432 is a frequent referent in ancient writings: the Hindu cycle of the KaliYug is 432,000
years long. Both Persian and Biblical mythology, evoke 432. "His days shall be as 120 years."
360 x 120 = 43200.
[xxviii] 76.072238 x 10 is 760.72238 as feet indicates the mean side of Cheops’ base:
760.7291667 feet.

You might also like