UNIT - 5
APPLIED STATISTICS
Under the test of small zamples , we Shall consider
ome — {oltowing important tests are given below
1) t- test for means
2) F- test for yaviantes
3) Chi- squove test for goodness of fit
+- TEST FOR SINGLE MEAN
are ee
H), %2,....%n be the Small samples lie, ne 30)
dxawn from the normal population with mean and
yovionce 5° then the sample mean |Z. £ y; | and the
stondard deviation Het
then the test slatistie is ©
sin |
Tf p_be the population mean and n (<30) be a dawn
ample mean % avd standard diviation « , then the
tect stabisties is
b=
sin- | 7
The degrees af pusdom of thio slatisties is ven-!Properties OF _t- DISTRIBUTION
eee ES OF ee IBUTLCR =
1. The pdb of & distribution is 4ce) - (14 #1) , where
to mL eH | Fy de et
Sita Al{n-2 Sh
2. The values of +t vanies prom -2 to 0
3.TE has symmetrical about t=o0 and mean xno.
4. The vastance Of the E- distribution is greater than 4 but
tends to 4 as n>. As veo then e- distribution become
novmal .
5. The vasianee = v_ , if v>2 and Ka >! alunys -
v-2
APPLICATIONS (OR) USES OF |- DISTRIBUTION
4.70 test the signiticame ot a single mean.
2. To test the aignificance auijjwunce betwen the two
4ample means .
3. To beat the
table value of b, then veject Yo
PROBLEMS BASED ON _t- DISTRIBUTION :
@ Ten oil tins ave taken ftom an automatic pitting machine.
The mean wetgnt of the tin is 15:9 Kg and ie. 3 Cright tailed)
Caleulated value of t:
Test statishes t. Rf. 169 - M62 ay
sNin=1 1¥-2) Gy =
Table value of t for v = n-t=21 , degree of freedom at s-/-
level of aignificance = L¥2 (one tatled)
At 5+ tevel, calculated vatue of t > table value oft
i. Reject Ho
The. advertising campaign is successful.
OA Apave past manufacturer 1s making «spare parts with
axle diametex of 0.700 inch. A vandom sample of 10 parls
shows a méan dlamelue of p-7y2 Inch with a sD. of
Dou Inch . vanity whether the work tabulated value of t
+ Reject Ho
The preduct is not meeting the «pecitizations
® From ao lange population of unemployed youths , a vandom
sample of 25 ix table value of t
v+ Reject Ho :
The diffevene between the population mean ard
sample Mean are
aigniticant é
4S 4 confidence limite for mean fs % t boos x
FAS t 2.931% *
= 4s +1599
2 WS -1-5493, yisttsaa)
= (39.402, 43-093)
94+ econfidene mits tor mean Ho = Xt boo X—4
n=
Wes + sayy x3
Ib
= Ws t 22)
(urs 2.21, Urs + 2-21)
= (34.29, y3.41)© The nine items of ample had the Following values : us, 44,
5O, 52, 4%, 4%, 44,53 and si . Dow the mean of the nine
items attter aigniticantly from one ascumed population mean
of yes?
Solution:
Given: = 4, fle ues
= a : [ast gat SO+S2+494 4F4 4A4 53 +51]
= ANE Gutta
q
To ting : Sample $.D.
2
Method 4: S22 Sxd_ (2) = 22 _ oy
7 7 7
= [us?+ ux% 507+ sa 4 49% UF% ugh sa°45I7]
= 4a.
= 2419 - 2uIl. @001
= 6.09aq
Az 24bQg
Method 2. [x | @-%) |
us| -4l 1b-8F
Qt] -2-1 aus
so} 0-34 0-79
s2] 2-99 B3S
NB) oh ngs = (HRY = sy.87
yt] -20 yus
4a} -on 0-01
53| 3.99 1513
Si} 4 .9q 3:sFWKT, $22 Ze)" saa¥ = 6-09bbF
nv
-£ = (e0teey = 2-4bar
(ov)
Wet
S = SUew*_ SHY E-geats
nt (ie
Aloo 4°: (n-1)S? - 2X 695345 _ Loqusy
n
“. Ae Vooteet = 2-ubat
Null Hypothesis (Ho): There is no significance diHlerence blw
the population mean and sample mean (PE NES inches .
Altemative Hypothesis CHD: Be US inches
Calculated value of z
Test statishies ¢> Ko M 2 AVN FS ygycy
+ shina 2-4 bal TF
“TEL = Bye
leva of aignt ficonee = 9.31
At s 4 level, calculated value of t z table value of t
. Accept Ho
The difference of means is not sigrifieant
Table value of t for v=nt~9 . degree of freedom at si4. The wages of 10 workers token iat a trom-a factory
ove given ae:
wlages : 599, 592, S70, S49, 5¥2, SYR, Sx0, 572,596; 594 Ts it
possible that the mean unge be all workers of this factory
cold be R590. aw
Solution: eae
Given; 210, P=s?0,
» aL bres: Sere SHO 4568 + S424 S¥ETSIOT 672
1 + S464 sey]
+ SHO. oH
sere eevee eee se gels eee eer ee
To tind Sample sD (a er oe e
Methad 4: fea wg a
a Sat sar 2
- &3) ar 7 a th
7 gee
as [ove S38 4 sto% 563% s32"+ 543" S¥0's 57245404 Sal ]-(#)
S's S3184Ib _ (ste):
10
Ss B3IBYL- 33176
Bre 66-6 u..” eee tar
. Bz 9.099388 : See
METHOD = 205, 2% net eee ee os
| he | a-O*},
, SFB], 2h hey
sr] 4 he
sto| -b Bb
ser | -8 bywe
Bes (nO bt = 656
; gee : ae
. be Jos b = 809938
Null Hypothesis (Ho): No signifi cance diltitence beboeen. the population
mean and sample mean’.[= 580. i ‘
Altasenative Hypothesis a tae
| Galeulaled. volte of + 7
Feat alabishes | te Bek, _SH°590_ = 741542
ein 409q3a3/1q |,
. tl= b4@1sq2,
Table yalue of t for ven-l=4, fee of halon ot st
eve of significance = 9.26 .
At sy» level, cabewlatid value of te. table. value of be
w. Aceept Ho ~~ eee
Thus the wuan wage of all» woorkune of the factory
could be $30". : ;3. Sandal powder i< packed into pacleeds ‘oy a mathivie
A random somple of (2 packels is drawn and their uoerghte
ave found. to ber Cin.eg-) 0-49 OFU8,.O-KE, 0-49 :,-0-44. 0-50,
OST, 0-4, 04S, O-F0, 0-51, 0-49: Test it the avinage
packing con be taken os Kg. :
sation: :
ak
Jee Dasssoaeke
To tind: Sample SDM ssa
i eee tee . Bee ee See
ae el fosetr O1Ug tH ONE + ONS ONG 10:50" O51
aster $0 -uQ%+ O.YO™+ O'S074 O-SI™+ 0-49?
are 298% _ (yay
2
4S = 0.24095 —0-2u0!
S62 'O0008' °° Pear Here ‘
+ = 0-012 2444S i
Nult Hypothesis tHe): Thue is no aigniti cane digjnens
behueen the populabionG «awyle mrdin uo
Albumative Hy pothesis Cu): PF OS . ay
Coloutated value of t
test statioties = Hp. 004-95 2 2 ay gog
Alf n-\ o01224t]in
2. Ie 2-F08DI3
Table value of & for ven-) =i dey vee of freedom at s-I-
level of signifi cance 22-20.
at st level, calowlated value of ¢ > table value of +
». Regect Yo
Average packing cannot be taken to be Or Ke
@. The average breakin: strength of the steel vods is
“pengied to be 1¥.5 (in units of 1000 %g)- To test this,
sample of 14 rods were tested and gave the telowing
vesulls: 15, 18, 16, 21, 19, oi, 14, 1F, 1S, IF, 20, 1%, IF, 18, Ls
the result of the expsaiment aignificant ? Also obtain
the 95 7% confidence interval tor the avenge breaking
strength :
Solution:
biven*s n-th, = IFS lin units of 1000 «g)
Zs sa, L[strarivtatiq¢ arr ize lgristlyt 20r arta]
n- WW
= 280 , 14. a7 yo
To tind: Sample S:D. 6
tat - Ge)". Se" _ aotvis zt IS 194 1B tor tty OIF HIF 1g? FISH
4 toot 19? 192+ .19%
sia a ~ (4. as Hoy
2°2 322, y2@sF| - 31B.84F520 = 555105)
4=L3S4Yy 233
Null Hype thesis (Ho): There is np signiticance ddigiwerne between
the populahion and sample muan. ps 'tS
Alternative Hypotinesi CHD: PFE.
colowlatd value of tb.
Test statistics t: _A-K | WEBS HYD ~ 14-5
41fnr 19244233 /Yjs
+ b= 06933352
Table value of t for v= n-4t=13 degree of freedom at $1
level of significance = 2-16.
At 5+ jevel, calewlated volue of t 2 table value of L.
-) Aceepk Ho
“The difference of means is not significant
as), eonfidance Limite of = K+ boos X
n-t
Se aay x L8Phy 288
13
= 14-5 70-3130 42
= (4-3 + o-s3002 , 5S -0-313042)
= (4913042, 1196058)a
“¢) TEST FOR DIFFERENCE. OF MEANS .
i {itt ae Et
Considit two independent Small nitna-2-
WORKING. RULE:
‘Write the sample size oy and na, means H,and %',
tandand deviation s and so
i) State nuw hypothesis Ho and albunabive Hypo treats Hy
Wi) Find the cateulabed value of by using test statist.
te U1 -% whine Ss msi=+ nese? and
> ning -2
SJnth Hi
COnsiden ttl tf it becomes nugative
Ww) Wat able value of +t for.vsnrm-2, degrees of Preedom
at s+ level of significance | : ee
¥) Condtusion: ia i e
‘ Ma 34 the. calculated value.of t < table value of t, acuept
He)
or.
“WY caleutated vawe of t » table value of t, vejeck Ho .PROBLEMS:
©} Samples of two typus of electric bulbs were tested tor length
ot whe ard. the fetlowing +
T
Type _[Sarele size] Sanple Mean} sD
pa 3 1234 hours | 36 hours
I # (036 hours
4D hous
Ts the diflurence in the mean sudpieturt to waxxant that
hype
I is supsnion to type I Megavding the length of Lite?
Souution :
Given m=4, OF ,
TH = 1234 , 2 =1036, 6=36, 62+4O
Null Hypothesis (Ho): Two types ot bulbs have same ute time .tord
Wise is no elanifieance le pycunce blu sample meavr ve, =p
ANucnative Hypotlwsis (Hi: fu >Hx (Type £ ig supinior thon Type
Coleulated value t:
Test cbatishs t- _%1-%
ee
sfare
wher 2. ms? 2h =p
fe bos mst ene | BSber ho esq osiq.
mith -2 att-2
- 8 =VibS4.0F64 = WO.F3 1%
Heme £ = _!2 30-1036
worsle frat -
ate
4.39243Table value of t for v= mtm-2 = 13 degrees of tveedom
for one tatled at sy level of significance =1:77.
At sv level, caleutated value of t > table value oft,
Acupt Ho
Thus type I is autinitely superstar thon type I
Int luigene bust of two groups of boys and girls gave the
folowing sHesults »
Group of 12 girlk: Mean = 94 , $.D.<10
voup of 3 boys: Mean =91 + Sp=n.
Examine if the arfloence of means ave aigntteant .
Solution:
Given: my=t2, no=B, DY = WY, Me =91 , oat, Kaen.
Null Hypothesis (Ho): No aignitreance ditlwene blw 2 sample
Mean. fe, bi spo
Aluanative Hypotnisis CHI: py + We
Caleuldted value of t:
Test statishes t- 1-2 _
Slant my
Where S*= Pisi®+ mss" oto ty 3:12" 30.4%
Mita -2 1249-2
S= Iyd
Hee b= _Su-ei _ ogee
43 fo
nua AS aTable value of t for v= air. -2=19
degree of treedom at
S+ level of Aigniticanee = 210
At s+ level , calutlated value of
. Aeetpt Ho
The difflaence of mean is not significant
t ¢toble value of b.
®] two independant samples f sine 16 ave taken from
novmal populations . The sample Means are 26 and to and.
vanltanves ave t and y nespectively. Ts the difference
betuuen the means significant 4
Solution:
Gtiyen: p= DoS , % =26, Xa clo, S¥, Ss 4
Null Hypothesis (He): Thane is no significance diffemence blw
the 2 sample means .i-e., Wy) =po
Altusanative Hypothesis (Hi: pre pa
Calculated value of t:
Test slatisties t= _% -%2
ieee
Slatin
white $?= mSi*t ase? | IF + ISH 5. gq2au
nitne-2 IStiS -2
$= 2WU2WtS
Hence t = 26-10
= 12-0506.
a. a
wars AE cats)Table value of & fov y= Mtm-2-0¢. degrees of freedom
at S+ level of aignificane = 2-05
At S+ level conetusion , calawlated + > table t
+ Reject Ho
Ditlanence of mean is aignit reant
The means of two Kamples
and 143-32
of sizes 4 and + ave I4b-yo
respectively. The sum of squares of the
deviations prom the mean ave 24.q4 and 19-43 reapectivaly.
fon the samples be tonsidined to have tome from the
normal populations of equal means.
Solution:
oiven: meq, Maes, FI9b-YD , 1B = 19.92, Sla-Xe)*= 2b-4y,
= big -He)*= 12-73
Ste 2 eu R) > Sl%2-K2)* ob-ay 4 9-73
eae tee eee eae
nitng -2 art -2
= 39-2621
- $= 1gooel
Nult Hypothesis (Ho): there is no 4ignificare ditfvere blw
the two éample Mean ie, Mi=pr
Alwmnative Hypothesis ¢Hid: flr # Ho
Caleulated value of t:
Ce Saas co El BC mae a
ice : fx
s hrs ree far L
calculated value of |tl= 2-b34g.Table value of t for v= mtm-2 =14 , degree of freedom *
at sx level of significance = 21US
At St tevel, eqleulated value of t > tabulated value of t
+ Reject Ho
The ditlerene of mean is agnificank .
The avanage — urmbut of axbitles produced by two machines
pt day ave 200 and 250 with
Table value of & for v= Mitme-2=48 , degree of freedom
at iy \evel of signifreance = 2.59
At $+ level, eatculated value of t > table value of t.
w Reject Ho
Thus both machirus ave not equally efficent .
NOTE: In the above problem , the sample sizes ave equal .
that is my =M =25 = nC aay) . Then tore eaponding test «statushe|
is
te Hp Le 200 -250 = -%.65049
S174 Ss? 2074052
Vv n= Vo as-
The following table gives the value of protein from
Kangeyam cow's mill and buffalos mitk By Using “t’ best
examine if these diffarenses ave significant.
couls milk. 140 14S 200 202 1ea5 125
Buppalors milk : 2:12 2.00 220 2-4Us 2.20 2.10
Soution:
Cet ou and a, be the values of protein from kangeyam
cows milk and buffalo’ milk .
Given: Ay=2b6, Mr=b.
Hs Soy. WS? 2192
o 6
a= ~ BOF. seg
Sas
ne=]
my Xe (m-ni) | Cx 50F | (t-29 | Cava
rq aa -0-02 0-0004 | -0.053 | 0.003364
45, | 0 0:03 | 0.0009 |-0.172 |o.o31684
2 2:2 [0:02 |0.00b4 |0-022 |o.c00ue4
2.02 | 2.us Ol 0-01 0.242 |0.043434
as 2.0 -O-0F |0-004% | Gor9 |o.c004ay
Las | a “0.0% | 9°00U% | -0.073 [o.00K084
O:02%5 O60 34 |
Se BOUT) + F bad? ODES + ON EOAW _ H.o1y 554
SSA SME eer eRaieke De 0 § =
ni+ne -2 btb-2
$= OQa25
Nutt Hypothesis (Ho): There is no aignifieance di Henene Uw
the two sample means fey Mie Ma
alttnative Hypothesis CH): fy + Ha
Colouated value of t
bs Ha iieve |. | _béo soe 1 3.4993
$7, . AL
Tit Oll4395 Ste
+ lel= 3-42.93
Table value of t for y= mt O-2 =10 , degrees of Creedom
at s+ tevel of significance = 2.33 «
At sv levd, calculated vawe of t > table wlue of &
2 Refeck Ho :
The diflazence of means is significant :~
the fellowing frqures vefen to observation in 2 indeperdunt
aowples - : Ee :
Somple rT : 25 380 29 84 24 20.13 32 22 3g
Semple I + 4O 3y 22' § Sf 40 30.23 34 'I¢
Avalyse whethex the samples have been dvawn from the
populations of equal means +
Sotution: :
let ou and %2 be the values of Sample r and sample I
vespectively,
Given: M=10,n2=10;
Ti = Sey _ 2bb
He = SH. 28) ogy
10
No
[a [ee [em | coat | Cm | ee i
25 40 whe 2-56 Wg IUbbt
30 | 34 aq | Sb} 6.4 Bua
28 22 by 9b ~bl 3Hal
34 8 ty Su#6 | -20) | 4O4-O1
ay 3 ob bb 2.4 aut
20 4o -bb usse | 0g (Wher
1B 30 13.6 | igy.ag fo 1% 3-61
32 23 sy 24:16 -s4 26-01
22.) sb | Wb! ate Pel 62.41
32 Vt Wey 124-96. | -IEt- 123-24
266 231 J 4 Bb. Y : 932-9S22 3 um) 4 E-Pub ut aang
= 91-6999
nitne-2
!O+HO -2
S=4.030@
Null Hypothesis (Ho): There is no atgnitieane diffrence blw
the two sample Means ‘.e., Mi=pe2
Albxnative Hypothesis CH: [ly Mo.
Coleulated value of E:
Test statistics t= _Si- %
Slat m
wi ltl = 0-3F124.
= ~O-SFI2Yy
Table value of t forv=nitn.-2-19 degree of feedomat sr
level of significance = 2.10
At s+ level, calculated value of + < table value oft .
- Aceept Ho
‘Thus the amples have been dvawn from the population
of equal means.
In cevtain e%patiment to eompave two types of pig, foods A
and ® , the following results Of increase in weignls were
Obstaved in pigs -
Pig No YL 2usB gees & 8 Tetel
Inurease in Food A : 49 53 S51 52 4% SO 52 53 uot
wh. in Ib: FOoD @: 52 SS S2 53 5p 54 54 5B 423Assuming that the two samples of pigs ave Independint, can
we indude that Food B Is bettin than Food At
Solution:
let 9 and a2 be the values of Food A & Food ® respectively,
tiven + m3, M223;
H 2 2%, YOR Lsoses ; %- B%2, 423 -so.ees
m 3 Mn 3
a He | em | teemer| Cwm) |ta-e)*
44 52 -1.9%5 [3.515625 | -0.975 jo.tb5625
53 55 aioe |4-s15625| ot25 [4515625
st 52 plas |o-01s625 | -D-375 [0-%5b25
52 BS blog | 1265625 | o105 0-015b25
ue 50 3.975 |!8.015625 |-2.9F5 [3.065695
50 Sy -0.375 |0-%65625 | 1-125 [2056 25
52 54 tios |iaese25 | te9 | .obseos
53. 53. 2125 | 4.515625) 0-25 |oolsees
yor 423 30-375 16.995,
> 2
ss Z Gur dil ys len Wa)", 30-995 16875 swore
nite -2 849-2
o. SFt-Bubs
Null Hypothesis (Ho): Twte % nD algniteance diferente blu the
two sample means .Le., fli=po
Aluanative Hypothesia Hid: pr epee.Caleulated value ob:
50945-5975. _' oy igeg
Test statistiés t: _ % ae
: i q —
j 6 fark 18ybg x + 7
co ltle 2.1654
Table value of t for V=nitn2-2=1y degree of freedom at s/-
revel of aigniticance =1-¥b . ee
At 54 level , caleulated value of & > table value of t-.
ws Regeet Ho te
‘Thus food B. is bettir. than food. A-.
A group of 10 vats fed on diet A and anotnn gvoup vf 3 vale
fed on dieb .B veeprdid the following: ineuase in woetght (gma) |
Died PA ities terra tere ieeeee me eee Eee Het EEE) |
Det B: 2 S 6 8 10 t 2°28 \
Does is shows suputiority of diet A over, diek & 7
Solution:
let a) and x2 be values of Diet A and Diet @: respectively.
Given > miziD, N= Bs
ee Se, BB yy; Me Zoe Ws
nm 8
21i | oem | Com | (om) | Oe mD*
Ss 2 ay 1% 3 4q
6 s OY O-tb aos 4
g 6b be 2.56 t \
' 3 “5-4 24.16 3 a
12 10 Sb 31.36 5 as
1 -2.y 5.46 “4 16
3 2 -3-4 1. 56 3 di
2-6 & #6 3 4
6 “Oy Outb
10 db 12-%
by 40 102-4 32
Se = (uur te Ge-GF 102-0782 sos
nite -2 5 1048-2
+. $= 3.39485
Nutl Hypothesis CHO): There is no significance dittxwence blu the
two sample means je, hi= He
Alwanative Hypothesis CM): fa > fa
Caleutated value of E:
Test stabishes t= _5i-% . __b4-S | o.acasag
5 34d.
she asauss| te
Table value of t for v= ntne-22tb degree of treedom at s.
level of significance = (45.
At
s+ tevel, calculated value of t < tabulated value of t
- Aceept Ho [pitloreme is not aignthicant ]
We cannot eonchide that Dret A ia Aupevior to Dret 8.29
" Achool boys were given atest in statistics. They were
given, @ months tution and a test was conducted at
the end of it . Do the mavks give evidence that the
students have benefited by the extra coaching ?
Boys cea 2 3 4 5 6 F BAwW UH
Marks in Ttest : 23 20 14 at 12 20 19 IF 23 le 1q
Marks in atest ; 24 1 22 19 20 22 20 20 23 20 19
Solution:
Since the data ave correlated. 1.2.,Marks obtain b the
Nl Atudents in © best (before coaching) and in the © test
(aftev coaching) are correlated.
let ai and yj; be the marks obtained by the boys before
and after coaching. We will use t test for single mean of the
Paived data. tet d= wy , then d =a-g (on zd.
a 4 |dsa-y | Ga @-a*
23 24 = 0.09041 0.00826
20 a 1 2.0902! 4.3419,
1Q 22 s A-4090F 3.644 b2
2 12 3 44-0909) (6.73554
1g 20 2 0.90409 | 0-82644
20 22 -2 -0.20909 | 0.22644
1g 20 =a -0-90909 | 0.8264U4
1% 20 “3 -1.90904 | 3.64b02
23, 23 ° 1.09041 1.19008
16 20 “4 ~2.90909| 8.422
1a 13 u 2.09021 4 SFF
“2 4Yy.90904@
a= Za . -12
7 I
$?= 2G@dY_ yy-a0doy
4490904
n-1 Het
1. &FQMNUES
Null Hypothesis (Ho): There is no significarne difference blur the
Marks obtained by the same set of students
Alwamative Hypothesis (Hi): Ditlenence is significant .
Test slatistre t-_d . _-2I0 2-1. 40433
svi QUES)
. Ith = 1-40%33
Table value of t for v= -1=10 degrees of freedom at 5/-
level of aignificarne = 2.93.
At sy level , calculated value of t 2 table value oft.
*. Accept Ho
Ditteverce is not signitieant .
ie, The students have not benefited by ¢oa.ching .
Memory capacity of 4 $2)
a
The degrees of freedom of this statistics is ve(m-l,m2-2)
APPLICATIONS (or) USES OF F-TEST
It is used to test whether two independent samples
hove been dvawn from the nermal populations vith
same vaviances o> (ory
W It is used to test whether the bwo independent
estimates of the population variance are homogenous ov not.
WORKING RULE:
write the samples size mand Me , variances 62 and $7
li) Stake null hypothesis (Hc) and altexnative hypothe sis(H)ii) Find the calewated value of F by using test tatiatre
2
fy ae (et 45):
Sr
w) Write table value of F for v= ort, m-2) degrees ot
freedom at sx tevel of aignificarne.
v) Con clusion :
U) TF caleutated value of F < table value of F , ateept Ho
Cor)
WW) If catculated value of F > table value ofF, reyect Ho
PROBLEMS:
© Two yandom samples gave the following results :
Sample] Sixe |Mean| sum 0! squares of deviations from
the man
ba to 1s qo
Tr m | oy (09
Test whether the difference between the variances iS
aignittcank at sy 2
Solution:
Given : M=10, Maria, = (-2)F = Qo , = la-maY = 108
Ss Ele
7 = (as -®a 108. a.91¢2
oe
n2-
33r
Null Hypothesis Lo) on? = o®
Altevnative Hypothesis CH: oh? & oy?
calculated value of F:
Since $1? > $2") then F- test becomes
iene = elo: i
= = bOl8s2
5° 4919.2
Table value of F for (mit, 92-1) = (4, degrees of treedom
at sy level of aignttreance = 2.90.
At sy tevel , calenlated value of F < table value of F
vs Aceepk Ho
-. The vavianues of samples are not signitveant .
@ In a sample of 3 obsewations , the cum of the squares}
of deviation of the sample values from the sample mean
was W-S and in another
was found to be 101.4 .
variames ts significant.
Aample of lo observations ,it
Test, whether the diffevene of
Solution:
Given: m=, Da=10, = (a-R)= W-S , S (X2- Kad 101-4
B= Ztu-T)?_ qu
niet re * t
$.° = 2 (w2-GF_ ont
Ma-l ig‘Nutt “Hypothesis (Ho): aj? oa
Alternative Hypothesis CH): o> 4 on% °
Caleulatedl vatue of Fs eee
Since Si? >S.%, the: F best becomes .
F: SP ges eed
7 roe PS8FA
Table value of F tor (nr-t, ng=l) = (4/10) degrees of 'treedom *:
at s+ level of significance. = 314,
eee Heer EEE nacre mene ee eee ct
At 5+ level, eae value ol: Fé table value of F
st “. Aceept Ho
“The variances ‘ot samples ave nok vigil feant .
woe tat der be ane i :
® ™m a sample of: iw.-observations the sum of ‘squares:
o+ deviations of. thes sample values from the’ sample mean
was 120 and in: another sample of--12- observations jit was,
found to be 3ty, Test,. whether the signi fieance ob-vavianees~
is significant at 57 level 2
Solution:
Given: m210, M2=l2, & Ou-%)
120, 5 (ta-&a)*= B14.
2
SP = Sc te 120 = 13.338
sees (Pe
orl
Sp = Elat2-%2)* |
Mo-t - aNull Hy pothesis (Ho): 27? = o3*
Alternative Hypothesis CH: <1? 4 3”
calewlated value of F:
Sine $7 > 5:7, then F test becomes
Table value ofF for (mint,na-) = (1,9) degrees of freedom
at sy level of signifi cance =a.
At sy level, calculated value of F < table value of F
» Accept Ho
The variances of sample are not signiticant .
@ Two rovdom «amples of 11 and 4 items show the standard
deviations of their weights as 0-8 and 0-5 respectively.
Assuming that the weight distributions are normal. Test the
hype thesis that the true varlances ave equal, against
the alternative hypothesis that they are nol.
Solution
Given: moi, M2=9 4 $508, S2=0'5
eae fuse = wlost _ or0y
-e 10 =
2 2 2.
So = Mase” 2 4.0.5) _ o.gins
Me-! 3
Null Hy pothesis (Ho): oj? = og?
Alternative Hypothesis (Hi): ej + oa
ee| calculated value of F :
Since Si? > $1 , then F- test be comes
Fe O-F0y
0.29125
rd = 2.503)
Table value of F for (n-1, n2-1) = (10,3) degrees of freedom
at 5» level of significance = 3:35.
At sv level, calculated value oF ¢ tabulated value of F
. Adupt Ho
-. Variances oF sample ave not significant -
© Wwo independent ampes of sizes 6 and 5 from a
normal population had the following values of the variables
Sample I ro 0B NE Stay
sample Z: le 14 13 te 19
De the estimates of the population variances ditter signihicantly at
er level?
soluHion:
let o% ond %2 be the values of sample I and sample
Given: 2S, Da=b;
cya ieee = Bu. e Ho = 2% = MW iy
x eee s @e Te onl
a Ae eee oah | (aca) | e220"
13 Io Ib OF Ole
13 4 l 2b bt
2 | 12 4 34 | sb
's 16 t 1 Ou ote
2 13 “2 4 1b 9.56
Vy ° °
sy g2 26 212= Cw-u)*= 26 and s(x-me) = 212.
Se Eee Ki 2b _ gn
ment i _ Sane
= lata -52)* 24 _ 5.5
n2-t s q
Null Hypothesis (Ho): 71? = og?
Alternative Hypothesis CH): 7? 4 es?
Gleulated value of F:
since Si? $37, then F test be wmes
2
Fe $2). $3 ~)01403.
$2? 2
a
Table value of F for (m2-1, m-I) = (4,5) degrees of freedom
at si level of significance ~ S19.
At sy evel , calewated value of F < table value ob F
‘. Aceept Ho
Samples came from populations of equal vaviance .
@® Two \andom «amples drawn from sizs ¢ and # had
following values ot the variables,
Sample A 9 fie k3)- Ut 7 jie ty
Sample B: 10 12 10 14 4 B 10
‘Do the estimate of population variame differ aigniPreantly -
Solution
Let 2% and % be the values of sample IL and
sample IL respectively.Given: m=S, M2=b.
oy | 2 | e- | e-my | (M-%2) amy]
9 | 10 |-2.45 |4.5025]-0-4296]0-193%
i) (2 -O-FS | 0.5625] 1.5714 2.U63%
3° | to | tas | 1-562 ]-0-4286]o183%
Uo} iy | -0-45 }o.sb25] 3.5714 fi2%suq
is | q 3.25 110.5625] -1-4286 | 2.0409
4 @ | -245 [4.5625 |-2.u286/5.9981
12 | tO | 0.25 | 0.5625 |-0-y2 26] 0.193%
14 2.25 |5.0625
ay | 43 33'S 23.9143
He By Ws es 5 Mer Sas L 32. oueee
3 :
no
EHP = 33-5 and = (ua-RE)*= 23-7143
$= Su -_ 33-5 y gsss!
ni-t 7
2
$a = W-FIU9 _ a.qsoa¢
6
Null Hypothesis (Ho). 2° = os
Alter native. Hypothes Is CHI): 09? a5?
Since $2 > $2 , the caleulated value of F-test poeormes
i “F357!
Fe ge = ee = 12108
os 3.95239
Table value of F for (ni-1, 02-1) =C46) degrees of Freedom
at sy level of signi Freante 24-21oy
At Ss? level culated value of F< table: value of F
Accept Ho : :
fe Samptes came from the population ot equal Hanantes
|
oe a i |
@ Two rardom Zs ‘dain from’ two normal populations
have _ the values ag, below: HEE
Sample, T° 2.19 re [18 99° 20 98 14 oy 26 ‘ ;
Sample) ir: 28 32 4O 3% 20 as yo on wt us 30 36
Obtain the estimate ‘of the ‘Variance ‘ot the population land.
test whe they the ta populakions have same “Variances 2:
Sdution:.
Let ‘ain ms be the values of sample x and. sample T
vespectively'
Given that: M's 4, mete.
B= Zor. 194 ol ssh ) Gee Bae y22 cac.yuez.
- my a ‘ m7 Ie
[ou [ae [ami | -aid] wie [tame
19) 28° | -2.556) 6-5331 |-F-teb¥ [51.3016
te [32 [-us56 foo yse|-B.lobF | toro2a fs,
1h | 4d |-5-556 Ia, gray 4.9333 (23, 3408
| ag | 3e | uN 1-333 | 3:30!
‘ o-uuy [AS251 | rite lay aye
23 fas | 4uy fOl44! [ores foots
Prq | 40 l-o.ssb | 2-085!-| 43235 | 93-3008 Ei
Al ap” b-S33! |-4.-1LeF |5).3616
: Ee wt a _ 5-47.31 }5.33323 | 34.0274
: “ys RY Ne yan’ | 93333 lau. vane poare
30°] 7 ~S:1ObF lap aqua].
3b 03323 |p. bauy
hay fier Jo: 134-9214 2YF- 6664)
S ElousaF = 184.2219 and = be-X2)*= 3y%..b008 "
IbttF '
+ = (% Ri) gut -beee.
nat a "
Null Hypothesis (Ho): ae . ot
Altwerative oo td: ge
= ‘BI. bob!
mr
Since 82" > 5/2, the cdleulated F- testers |
= 31-606) : peat oe ‘
= ee = 1}. 92421 i
Si” Taare nM
Table vatue of F -Cna-t,-ni-i) = (1,9) degree of freedom at
Sy level of signifi eainée = 3.32,
At 5+ tevel, calculated value of F €'table value of F :
os Aeeept Ho
+, Samples came’ fvom -populakion:: of equal variances .
@. Two vandom samples gave’ the Following .dato:
Sample size Size Mean Variance
4 "4 ab 12
2 " 1e's os) |
Com we eonclude that , two samples can be drawn trom the
4ame novrhal’ population’? Hee
Solution : . tee
A “norenal ‘population “has two parametins mean pp and
vavianee o”. It we test the independent samples have been.
dvawn | tom - the sayngle normal ‘population , then the tollousirg
L—tests ave nuded.
W) bo test the population means are equal Cusing t-test
for the diffevence ot means)
Wi) to test the varlances ave equal Cusiing F. test toy
the difteverces of variances).
Before we use t-test, populations should have same
vaviantes . Thus we «stant F- test bivst.
To apply F-test:
Given: m=3, Mest, Sra l2 , g 029.5
2
Sie msi? S202 pa71y3 0; S*s Bs
Null Hypo thesis (Wo) : o%= 23%
Allusmative Hypothesis (Hi) 1 a” $ o5*
Since So > SP, the caleulated F-test becomes,
Fe S. 295 _ 9.0062
Si? U3FiGs
Table value of F for (M-!, min!) = Uo, ¥) degree of freedom at
sy evel ot significance = 3by.
At s+ level, calculated value of F < table value of F
Accept Ho
Somples came from the populations of equal variance
[Nove : x4 F-test toiled , then t-test should not be used ]
%To apply t- test:
Givn: mss, N2=N, Go, MW= 1S, S32 , 4022-5
Null Hypothesis (Ho): nto signiticame diflerene between 2 sample
means tes, fi =H2
Altuandtive Hypo thesis CH): Me BE
Calowlated value of t=
Test statistic t= _M-% _
w
3H
“4
3h
2 2 2
Where $°= msp+ mo® - GUr2) + (2-5) _ gigoas
Noth -2 19-2
vo SE LUFT
Hence E+ _ b= jb-5 _ -J0-081q4
: [ap
lurtag 3 + 1
- lel 10-05146 -
Table value of t for v=mitn:-2 = 1%, degrees of freedom at
sy. level of significance +911)
At 5+ level, calculated value of £ Stable value of §
+ Reyeek Ho
The difference of mean is significant
5. The two samples have not been dvawn from the same
novmal — poputations.@. A normal population has two parameters mean pe and
vastance o*. So use apply t- best for equality of means
and F-test for equality of variances «
z Sum of squares of deviatiors|
Semple | Sixt | Mean) oe he meant
! 12 1y 109
2 10 15 0)
Sdution :
A normal population has two parameters mean 2 and.
veviare o* 0 we apply t- test for equality of means and.
F- best tov equality of variances
to apply F-test:
Given: msi, M=10, stb, Re HiS, S&S (a-m)* = 108,
ECoa-%2)*= 90
2, ot
SPs = Ou- a) lo
s Ss 94-9192
nt ue
3,72 = boa- Gay a0
Ne-l sete ot
Null Hype thes is (Hod: 2 = a5?
Alnative Hypo thesig oh): a7? 45%
Since $i Slate Ma) AL 2 ies
Mo-l 8 oe
Null Hypothesis (Ho)! 27% = at ”
Attetnative Hypothesis Cr
Since $17 > $2”
» the ¢ealeulated F-test beeomes
Fe $* _ 20
= 22 2k
2 ines 4021
Table value of F for (nimi, na-() = (9,9) degrees of Freecom
at 5% level of significame = 3.33 me
At 5+ jevel, calculated value of F « table value of F°
w. Accept Ho
Thus, the samples came from the: populations of equal variance
Furthuy , we apply E test for their means. Bub, in the given
Problem the means ave not given. So we cannot apply t-test
for this problem.@. the nicotine cont ent
given below
Sample I: 21 2y
sample IZ : 22 oF
can you say that the
population ?
Satution:
let % and x2 be the values of sampler and sample 1.
into bvo samples of tobacco are
25 2 3%
22 30 31 36
two samples came from the ae etl = Petes
r
| ae | (m-R)_ | mi | Cx-mad | Cx)
ol 22 “3b (2-9 -7 44
oy | ov | Ob 0-36 -2 4
o5 | 2 Oy Ok et 1
at | 30 | wy 146 ! 1
oe] a | 24 5-46 2 4
3b ud
123 | #4 212 108
2
= Go-M) earn
To apy F- test :
and = (%2-Xe)” +103
ste Elu-mt _ 5.5
m1 F :
Null Hypothesis (Hp): 7122 <3
Altundtive Hypotinesis (Hi): 1? #3™
atSine %* > SP, the calculated Ftest be tomes
fp. SE, Bb .worss
: te
Table value of F for (m-1, mnt) > (s,4) degrees of freedom at
St level of signifi cance =b.26
AL s+ level , caleutated value of F < table value of F.
*, Accept Ho
. Samples came trom the populakion of equal variances .
To apply E- best
Se uw) Z toa-mP _ an24108 . y.956
Mit M9 -2 S+b-2
. Sz 3884
Null Hypothesis Cte): No signitieane difference bho two sample
Mean . i.e. Wie M2
Alternative Hypothesis a: pe pe
Calculated vatue of t:
Eel eee eth aai yo Agivg
bet ,
Sait s¥a94 [Eat
“MELE LN,
Table value of & for y= mtm-2= 4 degrees of freedom
at sy jevd of aigni Hieance 22-26.
84g”
At sr tevd; calculated! ame Obt Te table? value ofE\: >
vs Aceepe Ho i
The two samples: nave been-dvawn from amé population’ >
Thus the amples have been davawn from same normal. i.
poputation .
welt ead : ye ‘ ie
pace seiae ee es fee ‘
A bel weed,
wedi, be et 4 2 ioant
3h a | i
rites ty % en : aed * each :
may4g 4
pint 4 a ’ tekCHI-SQUARE TEST OF GOODNESS OF FIT.
Tt O; and & Ci+1,2,... n) be the set of observed
lexpurimnental) and expected (theoretical) frequencies then x? is
defined as
eek [s 2 Ei
ot Ej
In general, the umber ot degrees Of freedom v is the tolal
Tumber of chservations less than the umber ob independent
constvainsts imposed on the chservaHons. Tho v= -K.
where K is the oumbs« of independent constraints in a set
of dota of a co«ervations.
Nore :
\. The degrees of freedom for fitting a Binomial distribution
WB n-l,
2. The degrees otf fveedom for Tilting @ Poisson distribution
i neo.
3. The degrees a freedom for fitting a Movmal distribution,
is nd.
4. Ip x0 ,then obsewed and expectid frequencies coineide
5. If X* dtstvibution , mean= v and vakianee =2v.
“PROBLEMS :
1. The fellowing table gives the number of aiveratt acadents that
oceummed dusing the seven dai of the week . Find whether
the acetdents ave uni forerty distvibuted over the week.ays -of the weer :'Mon Tue wed Thun” Fre. Sat Gan.
Number of oéeidents : IH 0 sR. I th IS ads asl
ace acta ai ees
Solution:
Nutt Nypotiesi Ute): The ascents . axe. unetormly distributed over
the week. ve
Based on aull hypothesis , the expected freuercies ot the
accidents on eath of these days ave Se cet
Let 0 be “the ob sevved. fepeny. oe & be the enpeded,
Frequency, table, becomes. a Sve
ole | w-e* men
meat rae fate Po Oe | Os take oat
ta] oy it Liy2ee
2 | y & jo.2gset |... rae :
tay 4 Oibwage ise eee ce
iS} oy ! O-0F14S ‘
yoy Oo | oe
fk 214296 .
eee 3
~ Caléulated. value of Xe xf 214296
Table value: of xX? for ven-l<5, degrees cl. freedom ak Sv.
level of aigniticame =ior.
Since , calculated value of x 2 table value of xt. 1.
vee *. Accept Ho + 2 ‘
+. The odes ave eee dated over week@. The table given the numbur of alrenapt acudenls that
Ocuunted dusming the various days of the week Test
uhether the accidents ave uniformly distribubed over week
Day of the week : Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
Numbur of accidents : 14 132 ny 18 1h
Sdution:
Null Hypothesis (Ho): The aeudenks ave uniformly diavibubed
over week.
Based on null hypothesis , the expectid pequencies of the
acudents on each of these days are BL ety
let © be the observed frequeny and © be expectd frequerny
the table becomes,
3
[ole [wer | OO
") ty 0 oe)
18 | 1y 1b 114286
12] 1y 4 0.285741
i Ob4u286 | -. Caleulated value of x*
IS fay ' 0.07143 Ps o©-ey
ww o o e
2-1h29b = 21U28b
Table value of x*> v= n-1=5 degvees of freedom at sv. level
of aignificanee = Lox
Calculated value of x*> table value of x*
* Reject Ho
Table value of x*
w Reject Ho
The die is biased.
@Tn 120 throws of a single die, the following distribution of
faus were obtained.
Faves ree 2 3 4 5, b Total
Frequency : 30 a5 1g 10 22 Is 1so
=Compute the statistic you woul use to test whethue the
sesulls constituted Heputations of equal probability . Use
chi- Squave test.
Solution :
Nult Hypothesis (Ho): Die is unbtased.
The expected frequeney for ¢ath face of | to bare 120 - 20
let © be obsuwed Hequerey and E be expectid frequency , the]
table becomes
ole |to-er| SF
30] 20 100 5.00 |
P| i207) 2 tee ». caleulated value of x*= z(ex)
w] 20] 4 0.20 a
to} 20 | 100 5.00 = I2.80
22/20] 4 0.25
ws | 20| 25 125
(2-90
Table value of x* for v=n-1=5 degvees of freedom at S/
level of signiticanee = 11.0%
Since , cateulated value of x* > Toble value of x*
fy Reject Ho
Henee , the die is unbtased
© the numbur of acuidenls happened for a paxtrenlar chy
in the 5 plas of highway ave 12, 5.10, 6, #. Test whether
tne atcidente ave uniformly distvibuted on. any day
6oution:
Null Hypothesis tHe): The accidenls ave uniformly distributed
on a given day .