RESTRICTED

COUNTER UAV TECHNIQUES

A comprehensive study for Electronic Warfare Warriors
By
LT RL KAGULIRE

PART 1:
Introduction
UAVs, or drones, have emerged as pivotal tools in both civilian and military
domains. While they offer significant advantages in surveillance, delivery, and data
collection, they also present security risks for organizations and governments
worldwide. UAV countermeasures have become an important area of study due to
the increasing use of drones for malicious activities, including espionage,
smuggling, and military strikes on strategic assets and critical infrastructure.

Definition of Key terms

Key Terms in UAV Countermeasures and Techniques
1. UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle):
A drone or aircraft without a human pilot onboard, controlled remotely or
autonomously.
2. sUAV (Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle):
A category of UAVs typically under 55 pounds, including hobbyist and
commercial drones.
3. REDRONE / Counter-UAS (Unmanned Aerial Systems):
Technologies and strategies specifically designed to detect, track, and mitigate
threats posed by UAVs.

1
RESTRICTED
 RESTRICTED

4. Kinetic Countermeasures:
Physical means of neutralizing UAVs, such as shooting them down, capturing
them with nets, or using directed energy to disable them.
5. Electronic Warfare (EW):
The use of electromagnetic or directed energy to disrupt, disable, or control
UAVs by targeting their communication, navigation, or control systems.
6. Jamming:
Disrupting a UAV’s communication with its controller by overwhelming
its signal frequencies, typically in the 2.4 GHz and 5.8 GHz bands used by
most commercial drones.
7. GPS Spoofing:
A technique that sends fake GPS signals to mislead a UAV into believing it is in
a different location, causing navigation errors.
8. Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP):
A burst of electromagnetic energy that can disable UAVs by damaging
their electronic systems.
9. Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs):
Weapons like high-energy lasers or microwave devices that use focused energy to
physically damage or disable UAVs.
10. Laser Weapon System (LaWS):
A type of DEW that uses high-powered lasers to neutralize UAVs by overheating
their components.
11. Spoofing:
Sending false signals to mislead or confuse a UAV, often affecting its navigation
or causing it to lose control.
12. Hijacking:
Gaining unauthorized control of a UAV through cyberattacks, allowing an
adversary to take over its functions.
2
RESTRICTED
 RESTRICTED

13. Net Launchers:

Devices that fire nets to physically capture UAVs mid-flight, preventing them
from continuing their mission without destroying them.
14. Radar Systems:
Technologies that use radio waves to detect and track the location, speed, and
altitude of UAVs, often used as the first layer in detection systems.
15. Acoustic Sensors:
Devices that detect UAVs based on the unique sound signatures of their
propellers, often useful for low-flying, small drones.
16. Optical Sensors:
High-resolution cameras and infrared sensors that visually detect and track
UAVs, often used in combination with radar for better accuracy.
17. Dazzlers:
Optical devices that emit bright light to blind or disorient UAV cameras or
sensors, rendering them ineffective.
18. Geofencing:
A software feature that prevents UAVs from flying into restricted areas by
defining no-fly zones using GPS coordinates. Many consumer drones come
with built-in geofencing systems.
19. Swarm UAVs:
Multiple drones that operate together in a coordinated manner, often seen as a
challenging target for traditional countermeasures due to their numbers and
coordination.
20. Short-Range Air Defense Systems (SHORADS):
Systems designed to provide air defense against low-flying threats like UAVs
using surface-to-air missiles, anti-aircraft guns, or DEWs.

3
RESTRICTED
 RESTRICTED

21. Return-to-Home (RTH):

A safety feature in many consumer UAVs that automatically returns the drone
to its takeoff point when communication is lost, often triggered by jamming.
22. Cyber Countermeasures:
Techniques that exploit vulnerabilities in UAV software or networks, such as
hacking, hijacking, or manipulating control systems remotely.
23. Detection Systems:
Integrated systems combining radar, acoustic, optical, and RF sensors to detect
and classify UAV threats based on size, speed, and flight pattern.
24. RF (Radio Frequency) Analyzers:
Devices that monitor radio frequencies to detect UAV communication signals,
allowing detection of both the drone and its operator.
25. Non-Kinetic Countermeasures:
Non-physical means of disrupting or disabling UAVs, such as jamming,
spoofing, and cyberattacks, without physically destroying the drone.
26. Payload Disruption:
A countermeasure targeting the onboard systems or data links of a UAV to
disable its operational payload (e.g., camera, sensors, or explosives).
27. Autonomous UAVs:
Drones that can operate independently using pre-programmed algorithms or
artificial intelligence (AI), without direct human control.
28. AI-Powered Detection:
The use of artificial intelligence to improve UAV detection, tracking, and
identification, often by differentiating UAVs from other airborne objects like birds.
29. Counter Rocket, Artillery, and Mortar (C-RAM):
A defense system originally designed to detect and destroy incoming projectiles,
but it has been adapted to also counter UAV threats.

4
RESTRICTED
 RESTRICTED

30. Forensic Analysis:

The post-capture study of a downed UAV to determine its origin, operator, or
mission, often used in counterintelligence and law enforcement contexts.

These terms form the foundation of modern UAV countermeasure strategies and
techniques, evolving to address the increasingly sophisticated drone threats.

History and Development of UAV Countermeasures

The development of UAV countermeasures has paralleled the rise of unmanned
aerial vehicles in both military and civilian applications. As drones became more
capable and accessible, the need to neutralize them in hostile or restricted
environments grew.
1. Early Developments (1980s-2000s):
- Military UAVs: Initially, UAV countermeasures focused on military-grade
drones. Early systems, such as anti-aircraft guns and Surface to Air Missile
defense systems, targeted large, slow-moving UAVs used for reconnaissance or
strike
missions.
After the September 11 attacks in USA, UAV technology grew rapidly in military
operations, especially in counterterrorism.
- Jamming and Interception: The earliest electronic countermeasures involved
jamming communication signals between drones and their operators, which
proved effective against rudimentary UAVs. The use of drones in conflict zones
like Afghanistan and Iraq prompted the development of early electronic warfare
techniques, such as jamming and radar-based detection, but these were mostly
targeted at larger military drones.
2. Increased Civilian UAV Use (2010s):
- Emergence of sUAVs: The proliferation of small commercial drones led to
new challenges. These drones, used for photography, smuggling, or espionage,
required innovative detection and neutralization methods.
5
RESTRICTED
 RESTRICTED

This period saw the development of jamming technologies targeting GPS and
radio frequencies used by consumer drones.
- Development of Specialized Systems: Companies began to create UAV-
specific countermeasures, such as net guns, RF jammers, and laser-based systems.
The focus expanded from military applications to civilian protection—airports,
prisons, and public events became targets of concern.
3. Modern Countermeasures (2020s-Present):
-Multi-layered defense systems combining radar, RF detection, optical sensors,
and AI for UAV identification and tracking have become standard.

-Cyber-based countermeasures, such as GPS spoofing and hacking, have

emerged to address the increased sophistication of drones.

-Legal frameworks by Governments worldwide have been implemented to

regulate drone use and the deployment of countermeasures, especially around
critical infrastructure and airspaces.
- Electronic Warfare: Advanced jamming, GPS spoofing, and
electromagnetic pulse (EMP) systems have become central in neutralizing UAV
threats without physical destruction.
- Drone Swarms and AI: As drone swarms emerged as a new threat,
countermeasures adapted to handle multiple drones simultaneously. AI-
driven
detection systems integrated radar, optical sensors, and acoustic detection for better
accuracy.
- Kinetic Solutions: New technologies such as directed-energy weapons (lasers)
and net-based systems like Sky Wall were developed for safe UAV capture or
destruction.
CONCLUSION
The evolution of UAV countermeasures continues to advance in response to the
growing complexity and capabilities of drones, with a focus on multi-layered
integration, AI, and non-destructive methods in order to with emphasis on detect,
disable, and neutralize small, fast-moving drones and drone swarms.

6
RESTRICTED
 RESTRICTED

PART 2: Composition of C-UAVs

Counter-UAV equipment encompasses a wide range of technologies and systems

designed to detect, track, and neutralize unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).
These systems can be divided into three primary categories:
-Detection systems.
-Neutralization systems.
-Support infrastructure.

1. Detection Systems
Detection systems are responsible for identifying and tracking UAVs, often
providing the first line of defense. The effectiveness of any counter-UAV solution
depends on the ability to accurately detect the presence of drones.
1.1 Radar Systems
Purpose: Radar systems use radio waves to detect and track UAVs by reflecting
signals off the drone's body.
Types:
- X-band radar: High-frequency radar used to detect small UAVs with low
radar cross-sections (RCS).
- C-band radar: A medium-range radar system, typically used to detect
larger UAVs.
Examples: Dedrone Drone Tracker
1.2 Acoustic Sensors
Purpose: Detect drones by analyzing the unique sound signatures of their
propellers.
Usage: These sensors are particularly useful for identifying low-flying small
drones or UAVs that evade radar.
7
RESTRICTED
 RESTRICTED

Examples: Drone Shield's Drone Sentry, which uses acoustic sensors alongside RF
detection.
1.3 Radio Frequency (RF) Sensors
Purpose: Detect UAVs by monitoring radio frequencies used for communication
between the drone and its operator, or the drone’s GPS signals.
Functionality: RF sensors can also triangulate the position of both the drone and its
operator based on signal strength.
Examples: GROZA-S C-UAV EW Station, Dedrone RF-100
1.4 Optical Sensors
Purpose: Cameras, including visual and infrared sensors, are used to visually detect
and identify UAVs, especially in environments where radar or RF detection might
fail.
Types:
- High-resolution optical cameras: Provide clear visuals for identifying UAVs
at long distances.
- Infrared cameras: Detect drones based on their heat signatures, useful
for nighttime or low-visibility conditions.
Examples: OEM of GROZA-S, Optical tracking systems in the Rheinmetall
Oerlikon Skyguard
1.5 AI-Enhanced Detection Systems
Purpose: These systems use artificial intelligence to enhance detection accuracy by
differentiating UAVs from birds, planes, or other airborne objects.
Functionality: AI can predict UAV flight paths, classify objects, and provide real-
time threat assessment.
Examples: Black Sage's Defense System uses AI to improve tracking efficiency.

8
RESTRICTED
 RESTRICTED

2. Counter/ Neutralization Systems

Once UAVs are detected, counter / neutralization systems engage to disable or

destroy the drone threat. These systems are categorized as kinetic (physical
destruction) or non-kinetic (electronic disruption).
2.1 Jamming Systems
- Purpose: Jammer systems disrupt the UAV’s communication and navigation
by emitting signals on the same frequencies used by the drone for control or
GPS positioning.
- Types:
- RF jammers: Block control signals (e.g., 2.4 GHz or 5.8 GHz frequencies).
- GPS jammers: Disrupt UAVs' GPS guidance, forcing them to lose
their navigation ability.
- Examples: KB RADAR’s GROZA-R and DroneShield’s DroneGun are
portable jamming systems that disrupts both RF control and GPS signals.

2.2 Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs)

- Purpose: Use focused energy, such as lasers or microwaves, to physically
disable a UAV by overheating or damaging its components.
- Types:
- High-energy lasers (HEL): Aim to destroy UAVs by burning through
their frames or disrupting sensors.
- High-power microwave (HPM): Affects UAV electronics by generating
a powerful electromagnetic pulse.
- Examples: The Raytheon HEL system.

9
RESTRICTED
 RESTRICTED

3. Support Infrastructure
Support infrastructure is a critical component of counter-UAV (C-UAV) systems,
ensuring that detection and neutralization technologies function efficiently.
It includes the necessary components for operational integration, data management,
system control, and logistical support.
This infrastructure forms the backbone of C-UAV systems, allowing for real-
time coordination, decision-making, and system optimization in various
environments, such as military bases, airports, or public spaces.

The key elements of the support infrastructure in counter-UAV systems are:

1. Command and Control (C2) Systems

Role:
Command and Control (C2) systems serve as the central hub for all detection,
tracking, and response activities in a C-UAV system. They integrate data from
various sensors and neutralization systems, allowing operators to monitor airspace,
assess threats, and deploy countermeasures.
Components:
- User Interface (UI):
A control station that displays real-time data, video feeds, and alerts from detection
systems. It allows operators to make quick decisions based on incoming UAV
information.
- Data Fusion:
Aggregates and analyzes data from multiple detection sources (radar, RF, optical,
acoustic, etc.), providing a cohesive and comprehensive view of the threat
landscape.

10
RESTRICTED
 RESTRICTED

- Automated Threat Assessment:

Uses artificial intelligence (AI) to assess UAV threat levels based on flight patterns,
size, speed, and payload, helping operators prioritize responses.
- Remote Monitoring:
Enables operators to monitor and control the system from remote locations,
providing flexibility in command and control.
Examples:
- Black Sage's Counter-UAS Command and Control Suite: Integrates multiple
sensor inputs and AI algorithms into a central platform for efficient UAV
threat assessment.
- DedroneTracker:
A unified interface for real-time threat monitoring, detection, and response
coordination across multiple C-UAV sensors.
- GROZA-S Station van and commander’s Laptop Counter-UAV Command
and Control Suite.

2. Communication Networks

Role:
Communication networks link various components of the C-UAV system,
enabling real-time data sharing between sensors, command centers, and
neutralization systems. These networks are essential for transmitting detection
alerts, sensor data, and control commands.
Components:
- Wired Networks:
Fiber-optic cables or Ethernet connections that provide fast, reliable
communication between detection systems and control centers.

11
RESTRICTED
 RESTRICTED

- Wireless Networks:
Secure RF or satellite communication networks used for transmitting data in real-
time across remote areas or mobile units.
- Secure Communication Protocols:
Encryption and secure communication channels to protect data transmission from
cyberattacks or interference, particularly in sensitive environments.

Examples:
- Military-grade mesh networks for battlefield use, which ensure seamless
communication between mobile units.
- Private 5G or LTE networks are often used in airport or urban environments to
ensure low-latency, high-speed data transmission between various components
of the C-UAV system.

3. Power Supply Systems

Role:
C-UAV systems require stable and uninterrupted power sources to ensure
continuous operation.
Power supply infrastructure provides the necessary energy for detection sensors,
neutralization systems, and command centers to function effectively, especially in
remote or hostile environments.
Components:
- Main Power Supply:
Connections to local power grids or backup generators for stationary C-UAV
installations.
- Backup Power Systems:
Uninterruptible power supplies (UPS) and backup generators to ensure system
operation during power outages or emergencies.
12
RESTRICTED
 RESTRICTED

- Mobile Power Units:

Portable batteries, solar power arrays, or mobile generators for C-UAV systems
deployed in field operations or temporary installations.
- Energy Storage Systems:
Advanced battery systems that store energy for use during peak times or in areas
with limited access to stable power sources.
Examples:
- Solar-powered sensors and radar units for remote border surveillance or
field operations.
- Portable UPS units for mobile counter-UAV setups in tactical environments.

4. Data Management and Storage Systems

Role:
Data management and storage systems collect and store information from detection
and tracking systems for analysis, reporting, and future use.
These systems support forensic analysis, system optimization, and performance
reviews.
Components:
- Cloud-based Storage:
Secure cloud platforms that store large volumes of detection and threat data,
allowing for scalable storage and remote access.
- On-Premise Servers:
Local data centers that securely store data in high-security installations,
particularly for sensitive or classified military or government use.
- Big Data Analytics:

13
RESTRICTED
 RESTRICTED

Platforms that analyze large data sets from detection systems, identifying patterns,
improving UAV detection algorithms, and optimizing countermeasure
effectiveness.
- Data Encryption:
Encryption technologies ensure the secure storage and transmission of sensitive
data collected by the C-UAV system.

Examples:
- AWS GovCloud or Microsoft Azure for cloud-based data storage in
government or commercial installations.
- On-premises data servers in military bases or critical infrastructure sites
to ensure high-security data handling.

5. Maintenance and Support Systems

Role:
Maintenance systems are essential for ensuring the continuous operation of C-UAV
systems by regularly servicing equipment, monitoring system health, and
upgrading software.
Components:
- Remote Diagnostics:
Tools and software that allow for the remote monitoring of system health,
identifying potential issues before they lead to system failure.
- Predictive Maintenance:
AI-driven analytics that predict system failures or performance degradation based
on operational data, ensuring timely repairs or upgrades.
- Regular Software Updates:
Regular updates to detection algorithms, radar systems, and command interfaces to
improve functionality and adaptability against new drone threats.
14
RESTRICTED
 RESTRICTED

- Field Support Teams:

Technicians or engineers who provide on-site maintenance, repairs, and upgrades
for deployed C-UAV systems, particularly in hostile or difficult-to-reach areas.
Examples:
- KB RADAR through its subsidiaries such as BSVT, provides ongoing
system support, diagnostics, and upgrades for deployed GROZA C-UAV
equipment.
- Raytheon’s Life Cycle Support Services: Provides ongoing system
support, diagnostics, and upgrades for deployed C-UAV equipment.
- AI-driven predictive maintenance systems that monitor radar performance and
alert operators when sensors or components need servicing.

6. Environmental Adaptation Systems

Role:
To ensure that C-UAV systems work effectively in diverse and challenging
environments, specialized infrastructure is required to adapt sensors and equipment
to different climates, terrains, and operational conditions.
Components:
- All-Weather Enclosures:
Protective casings and shelters that allow radar, RF, optical, and acoustic sensors to
function in harsh environmental conditions, such as rain, snow, extreme heat, or
sandstorms.
- Terrain-Adaptive Deployment:
Portable and easily adjustable mounting systems (e.g., masts, Jerks, leveling
systems, towers, mobile units) that enable deployment on uneven or
difficult terrain, such as mountains, deserts, or urban landscapes.
- Climate-Control Systems:
Air-conditioning or heating systems to protect sensitive electronic equipment from
15
RESTRICTED
 RESTRICTED

extreme temperature fluctuations that could affect performance.

16
RESTRICTED
 RESTRICTED

Examples:
- MIL-SPEC (Military Standard) enclosures designed to withstand
extreme weather conditions for radar and RF systems.
- Deployable towers or vehicles like the Mercedes Benz Sprinter onto which the
GROZA-S Station is mounted, are used to transport and set up detection equipment
in rugged or remote environments.

7. Legal and Regulatory Support

Role:
Legal infrastructure is crucial for ensuring that C-UAV systems comply with
national and international regulations concerning drone detection, neutralization,
and the use of certain technologies (e.g., RF jamming or directed energy weapons).
Components:
-Regulatory Compliance Systems:
Ensures that C-UAV operations conform to aviation laws, including rules set by
civil aviation authorities (e.g., CAA, FAA, EASA) regarding drone operation and
airspace control.
- Licensing for RF Jamming and Spoofing:
Obtaining the necessary licenses to use RF-jamming or GPS-spoofing
technologies, which may be restricted in certain regions.
-Legal Support Teams:
Lawyers or legal advisors specializing in drone regulation, airspace management,
and the use of countermeasures in civilian environments.
Examples:
- Regulatory guidelines from the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) and Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA) that govern the use of C-UAV systems in Uganda
and U.S. airspace respectively.

17
RESTRICTED
 RESTRICTED

-International agreements on the use of RF-jamming technologies to avoid

interference with civilian or commercial communication systems.
CONCLUSION:
Support infrastructure is an essential part of the counter-UAV ecosystem, ensuring
that detection, neutralization, and control technologies operate efficiently and
effectively. This infrastructure ensures that C-UAV systems can be deployed in
diverse environments, stay operational under challenging conditions, and provide
secure, real-time data for threat assessment and response.

18
RESTRICTED
 RESTRICTED

PART 3: Principles of Detecting UAVs

The detection of UAVs (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles) is critical to counter-drone

strategies and involves using multiple technologies to identify, track, and classify
drones in real-time.
Since UAVs vary in size, speed, and purpose, different detection methods are
combined to ensure reliable identification and mitigation.
Here are the primary principles involved in detecting UAVs:

1. Radar Detection
Principle:
Radar detection operates by emitting radio waves that bounce off objects and
return to the radar system. The time taken for the signal to return and its changes
provide information about the object's distance, speed, and size.
Application to UAV Detection:
- Drones' small size and low flight altitude pose challenges, but advanced
radar systems, especially high-frequency radars (X-band), can detect UAVs with
low radar cross-sections (RCS).
- Doppler radar is particularly effective for distinguishing drones from
other objects like birds, as it detects motion and velocity patterns.
Advantages:
- Effective for long-range detection.
- Can detect multiple drones simultaneously, including at high altitudes and
fast speeds.
Challenges:
- Small commercial drones may evade detection if their RCS is too low.
- Clutter from natural objects (e.g., birds, trees) can lead to false positives.

19
RESTRICTED
 RESTRICTED

Examples:
Systems like the Thale’s EagleSHIELD or ELTA’s Drone Guard use radar for
precise drone detection.

2. Acoustic Detection
Principle:
Acoustic sensors detect UAVs by capturing and analyzing the sound frequencies
emitted by their propellers and motors.
Each type of drone has a unique sound signature based on its design and
propulsion system.
Application to UAV Detection:
- These systems are effective for detecting small, low-flying drones by listening
for the characteristic sound of rotors.
- Acoustic detection works well in environments with minimal background noise
or in locations where radar systems are less effective.
Advantages:
- Useful for detecting drones in urban areas or dense environments where
radar may not be practical.
- Can detect UAVs that rely on stealth technology, as these drones often
make distinct noises.
Challenges:
- Highly dependent on environmental conditions. Wind, rain, and ambient
noise can interfere with sound-based detection.
- Limited range (typically within a few hundred meters).
Examples:
DroneShield's DroneSentry integrates acoustic sensors with RF and optical systems
for comprehensive detection.

110
RESTRICTED
 RESTRICTED

3. Radio Frequency (RF) Detection

Principle:
RF detection systems monitor the radio frequencies used for communication
between the UAV and its operator or GPS signals used for navigation.
These systems passively listen for emissions in known frequency bands (e.g., 2.4
GHz, 5.8 GHz) commonly used by commercial drones.
Application to UAV Detection:
- RF systems can triangulate the position of both the UAV and its controller
by detecting the RF signal strength.
- Many drones rely on specific frequency bands for remote control and telemetry;
detecting these emissions enables early identification.
Advantages:
- Can detect both the drone and the operator's location.
- Passive detection; does not interfere with UAV operations, which allows
stealthy monitoring.
Challenges:
- Not effective against fully autonomous drones that do not rely on
RF communication.
- Encrypted or frequency-hopping signals can make detection difficult.
Examples:
GROZA-S Station and Dedrone RF-100 are examples of passive RF sensor
systems used to detect UAVs in sensitive areas.

20
RESTRICTED
 RESTRICTED

4. Optical Detection (EO/IR Sensors)

Principle:
Optical detection involves using cameras to visually identify UAVs. This includes
both electro-optical (EO) sensors, which capture visual images, and infrared (IR)
sensors, which detect heat signatures.
Application to UAV Detection:
-High-resolution cameras can track drones visually in daylight, especially at low
altitudes or in confined environments like urban areas.
-Infrared cameras can detect UAVs based on their heat emissions, particularly
useful in low-light or nighttime conditions.
-Automated video analysis using AI and machine learning helps distinguish
between UAVs and other airborne objects, such as birds or airplanes.
Advantages:
- Provides a visual confirmation of the drone's presence, crucial for identification
and threat assessment.
- Effective for both daytime (EO) and nighttime (IR)
surveillance. Challenges:
- Limited range, especially for small drones.
- Environmental conditions (fog, smoke, rain) can obstruct optical sensors.
Examples:
Systems like the EOM of GROZA-S and Rheinmetall Oerlikon Skyguard integrate
optical sensors to complement radar systems.

21
RESTRICTED
 RESTRICTED

5. Combined Multi-Sensor Detection

Principle:
Multi-sensor detection involves combining various technologies (radar, RF,
acoustic, optical) into a single integrated platform.
Each sensor type complements the weaknesses of the others, providing a more
comprehensive detection system.
Application to UAV Detection:
- By integrating multiple sensors, the system increases detection
reliability, accuracy, and the ability to classify UAVs more precisely.
- Multi-sensor fusion is particularly useful in urban areas or high-threat
environments where drones might attempt to evade a single detection
method.
Advantages:
- Significantly reduces false positives by cross-verifying data from
different sensors.
- Capable of detecting and classifying drones of all sizes, speeds, and
altitudes, including swarm attacks.
Challenges:
- High cost and complexity of integrating multiple systems.
- Requires advanced processing power and software for sensor fusion and
accurate classification.
Examples:
-KB RADAR’s GROZA-S integrates radar, RF, Electro-Optical (EO) and Infrared
(IR) Detection into a comprehensive UAV detection and neutralization system.
-Dedrone’s DroneTracker integrates radar, RF, optical, and acoustic sensors into a
comprehensive UAV detection and neutralization system.

22
RESTRICTED
 RESTRICTED

6. AI and Machine Learning-Based Detection

Principle:
Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) algorithms analyze data
from multiple sensors to enhance the accuracy and speed of UAV detection.
AI is used for real-time classification, threat prediction, and flight path analysis.
Application to UAV Detection:
- AI systems can differentiate between UAVs and other objects (e.g., birds,
planes) by learning the patterns of each.
- ML can adapt over time, improving its accuracy by continuously processing
data from UAV detection events.
- AI systems can also predict UAV flight paths, improving interception
and neutralization response times.
Advantages:
- Reduces the workload on human operators by automating detection,
classification, and tracking.
- Continuously improves through learning, making it adaptable to new
drone models and flight behaviors.
Challenges:
- Requires large datasets for accurate training, which might not always be
available for certain drone types.
- High computational demand for real-time processing of large amounts of
sensor data.
Examples:
Black Sage Technologies incorporates AI-powered detection systems to improve
tracking and classification efficiency.

23
RESTRICTED
 RESTRICTED

7. Electro-Optical (EO) and Infrared (IR) Detection

Principle:
Electro-Optical (EO) detection uses visible light cameras, while Infrared (IR)
detection identifies heat signatures emitted by UAVs.
Application to UAV Detection:
- EO/IR sensors are effective in both daylight and night conditions,
providing detailed visual confirmation of UAV presence.
- EO sensors provide high-resolution images, useful in clear weather conditions.
- IR sensors detect UAVs based on their heat signatures, particularly effective
in low-light environments or against stealth UAVs.
Advantages:
- High visual confirmation, especially in short-range scenarios.
- Effective at all times of the day, and in various weather conditions, especially
in combination with radar.
Challenges:
- Poor performance in bad weather (rain, fog, snow) or when there are temperature
variations between the UAV and its environment.
Examples:
EO/IR sensors are frequently integrated into multi-sensor platforms, such as those
provided by KB RADAR and FLIR Systems.
CONCLUSION:
Each of these detection principles plays a vital role in countering UAV threats.
Depending on the environment, threat level, and type of UAV, different methods
can be employed alone or in combination to provide a comprehensive UAV
detection strategy. Combining these systems with AI-powered algorithms
significantly enhances detection accuracy and speed, ensuring early identification
and effective countermeasures.

24
RESTRICTED
 RESTRICTED

PART 4: Counter UAV Technologies

1. Classification of UAV Threats
Before implementing countermeasures, understanding the type of UAV threat is
essential:
-Small UAVs (sUAVs): These are typically hobbyist drones or small commercial
drones, often used for surveillance or delivering payloads.
- Large UAVs: Military-grade drones with enhanced capabilities like long-
range flights, large payloads, or sophisticated sensors.
- Swarm UAVs: Multiple drones operating simultaneously in a
coordinated fashion, often used for overwhelming defense systems.

2. UAV Countermeasure Approaches

2.1 Kinetic Countermeasures and Destructive Methods
Kinetic methods involve physically neutralizing the UAVs, using force or impact-
based solutions. These can be particularly effective against sUAVs but may be
challenging against swarms or highly maneuverable drones.
- Anti-Aircraft Guns & Missiles:
Conventional weapons can be deployed against UAVs. Short-range air-defense
systems (SHORADS) like the C-RAM (Counter Rocket, Artillery, and Mortar)
systems are optimized for neutralizing low-flying UAVs.
- Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs):
High-energy lasers or microwave systems can disable UAVs by overheating their
components. For example, the U.S. Navy's Laser Weapon System (LaWS) has been
demonstrated as effective against UAVs.
- Projectile Systems: Newer systems like Sky Wall use net launchers to capture
drones mid-air. This method can safely capture UAVs without damaging their
infrastructure, making them useful for forensic analysis.

25
RESTRICTED
 RESTRICTED

2.2 Electronic Countermeasures/ Non-Destructive Methods

Electronic countermeasures target the communication, control, or navigation
systems of drones. These methods are non-destructive and particularly
useful against remotely piloted UAVs.
- Jamming:
By jamming the control frequencies (usually in the 2.4 GHz or 5.8 GHz bands for
commercial drones), the UAV loses its communication link with the operator, often
triggering the drone’s return-to-home (RTH or RTB) feature or causing it to hover
or land. Systems like KB RADAR’s GROZA-S and Drone Shield’s Drone Gun
offer this capability.
- GPS Spoofing:
GPS spoofing misleads the UAV into thinking it is in a different location,
causing navigation errors and potential crashes.
This method has been demonstrated in several academic and military tests, like
the hijacking of the “White Rose of Drachs” yatch in 2013 and the Iranian
downing of a U.S. RQ-170 drone in 2011.
- Electromagnetic Pulses (EMP):
EMP devices can disable UAVs by generating a pulse that fries their electronic
systems. Although still largely experimental, this method shows promise in
disabling large groups of drones simultaneously.

2.3 Cyber Countermeasures

Cyber countermeasures exploit vulnerabilities in UAVs' software, networks, or
communication systems.
- Hijacking & Re-routing:
Researchers have demonstrated how drones with weak security protocols can be
hijacked, allowing operators to take control of the UAV. In 2012, a group of
Texas researchers hacked into a drone using GPS spoofing and other cyber
techniques.

26
RESTRICTED
 RESTRICTED

- Payload Disruption:
UAVs with complex onboard systems can be disabled by attacking their control
systems, navigation algorithms, or even data links with ground stations.
This is typically done through software vulnerabilities, often requiring specialized
knowledge of drone architecture.

2.4 Radar and Detection Systems

Detection is the first step in implementing a countermeasure strategy.
Modern detection systems include radar, cameras, acoustic sensors, and RF
analyzers. These systems work in tandem to identify, track, and classify
UAVs.
- Radar Systems:
Advanced radar systems like ELTA’s Drone Guard are specifically designed
for drone detection. These systems can track multiple UAVs at various altitudes
and speeds, differentiating them from birds or other aerial objects.
- Acoustic Detection:
Acoustic sensors can pick up the unique sound signatures of UAVs' propellers.
Companies like Dedrone offer acoustic and RF-based detection platforms to track
and mitigate UAV threats.
- Optical Sensors:
High-resolution cameras and infrared sensors can visually identify UAVs,
especially at low altitudes. Optical tracking systems are often combined with radar
for better accuracy.

27
RESTRICTED
 RESTRICTED

2.5 Non-Kinetic Soft-Kill Methods

These methods disable UAVs without physically harming the drone, relying on
advanced electronic warfare techniques.
- Spoofing and Jamming:
As mentioned earlier, these are highly effective and non-destructive methods.
Systems like Cerbair provide commercial-grade spoofing and jamming tools.
- Dazzlers:
Optical dazzlers blind UAVs’ cameras or sensors, making them ineffective. These
can also disrupt the operator's view from FPV (First-Person View) systems.
- Geofencing:
Many UAVs, particularly commercial drones, have built-in geofencing
technology that prevents them from entering restricted airspace. Organizations can
use this as a proactive security measure to deter UAV flights over sensitive areas
like airports or military bases.

28
RESTRICTED
 RESTRICTED

3. UAV Countermeasure Technologies and Systems

Several companies and government agencies have developed specialized UAV
countermeasure systems, ranging from small portable devices to large-scale
installations.
-GROZA-S Counter UAV Electronic warfare Station:
This EW system by KB RADAR is designed for searching, detecting, direction
finding, positioning, tracking, jamming, spoofing and video recording of UAVs.
It comes with a GROZA-R jamming Riffle and GROZA-O operator finder.
- Drone Shield:
Drone Shield offers a range of drone detection and mitigation products, including
the Drone Gun, which is capable of jamming drone communications and
navigation systems.
- Sky Wall:
The Sky Wall system uses a net launcher to capture drones. It’s particularly
useful for law enforcement or military operations where the drone needs to be
captured for analysis.
- Battelle Drone Defender:
Battelle’s system uses radio frequencies to disrupt UAVs' control and navigation.
It's been widely deployed in military and governmental contexts.
- DEDRONE:
DEDRONE provides RF, acoustic, and optical drone detection solutions and has
worked extensively with airports, military bases, and urban areas.

29
RESTRICTED
 RESTRICTED

4. Legal and Regulatory Considerations

The use of UAV countermeasures is regulated in many jurisdictions. In the
United States, for example, private individuals or companies cannot legally jam
drones due to FCC regulations.
Only specific government entities like the military or Department of Homeland
Security are authorized to deploy jammers or take down drones in restricted
airspace.
Different countries have adopted varying regulations for UAV countermeasures,
depending on security priorities, privacy concerns, and the rapid advancement of
UAV technologies.

5. Future Trends and Challenges

- Autonomous Drone Swarms:
As drone swarms become more prevalent, existing countermeasures may struggle
to keep up. Systems need to be adaptive and capable of handling multiple, fast-
moving threats.
- AI-Powered Detection:
Artificial Intelligence is being integrated into detection and identification systems,
enabling faster and more accurate differentiation between UAVs and other objects.

- Cybersecurity of UAVs:
As drones become more integrated with 5G and IoT, ensuring the cybersecurity
of these systems will be crucial. Researchers are working on more sophisticated
ways to hijack, manipulate, or disable malicious drones through digital attacks.

30
RESTRICTED
 RESTRICTED

Resources for Further Study

1. “Counter-UAS Technology”
An in-depth review of existing counter-UAV technologies and future
trends. (https://www.mitre.org/publications/technical-papers/counter-uas-
technologies- and-approaches)

2. “Electronic Warfare Against Drones”

A comprehensive report on electronic warfare techniques against UAVs.
(https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2599.html):

3. “UAV Threats and Countermeasures”

An article discussing the NATO perspective on UAV threats and global
countermeasures
(https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2021/07/12/uavs-an-emerging-threat-to-
global-security/index.html)

4. “Drone Security and Surveillance”

A technical paper exploring drone security issues and modern surveillance
techniques.
(https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8822015)

5. For video demonstrations of counter-drone systems in action, Watch

YouTube channels such as Defense Updates
(https://www.youtube.com/c/DefenseUpdates)

©RL Kagulire Oct 24

31
RESTRICTED