ST.

LOUISE DE MARILLAC COLLEGE OF SORSOGON

HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
Sorsogon City

Daily Journal
Guide questions for entries in the daily journal:
What I did… What questions do I have…

What surprised me… What I learned…

Reflection on Instruction and Student Learning

Student Teacher: Subject/ Course:
Lesson Topic: Date of Observation:

Direction to the teacher: Please reflect on teaching and learning that occurred while you are being
observed, and respond to each of the following prompts. Attach examples, if available.

1. What were the objectives of this lesson? How well do you think your students understood the overall
purpose and relevance of the lesson?

2. What effect did your teaching strategies have in terms of promoting student learning in keeping your
students meaningfully engaged?

3. Why was the content of the lesson appropriate for the students, and how effective did you organize
this content?

4. How did you assess student learning during the lesson? What were the results?

5. Did you make any adjustments during the lesson? Why or why not?

6. What types of feedback did or will you provide to the students regarding their performance, and why?

7. In what way(s) and to what extent did the classroom environment impact your instruction and student
learning, either negatively or positively?

8. What decisions did you make regarding subsequent instruction from the students, and why?

9. What did you learn as a result of teaching this lesson?

 ST. LOUISE DE MARILLAC COLLEGE OF
SORSOGON
Burgos St., Talisay, Sorsogon City
STUDENT TEACHING FORM 101

CHECKLIST OF STUDENT TEACHER, DAILY TEACHING PERFORMANCE

Name of Student Teacher:

Grade and Subject Taught:
School:
Cooperating Teacher:
Date:

CRITERIA RATING (75-100%)

A. Personal Appearance (10%)
1. Well-poised
2. Properly groomed
3. Free of mannerisms
4. Pleasant Disposition
B. Lesson Planning (10%)
1. Lesson plan contains relevant and appropriate activities
2. Lesson plan is well-written requiring minimum or no revision
3. Neatness and proper format are observed
4. Lesson plan is submitted on time

C. Preparation and Utilization of Instructional Materials (10%)

1. Instructional materials are appropriate for the activities given
2. Visual materials are clear, neat and attractive
3. Instructional materials used show teacher's creativity and resourcefulness
4. Instructional materials are utilized properly and effectively

D. Classroom Management (10%)

1. Plays attention to routine matters
2. Handle disciplinary problems effectively
3. Motivates and keeps students' attention and interest

E. Guiding Teaching and Learning Experiences (60%)

1. Make effective introduction and motivation
2. Gives clear directions and logical explanations
3. Has a mastery of subject matter
4. Strategies well-planned and executed
5. Board work is well-done
6. Asks appropriate questions
7. Uses appropriate questioning techniques
8. Provides varied learning tasks
9. Gives incidental teaching when necessary
10. Focuses student's attention on important points in the lesson
11. Guides students in summarizing main ideas/concepts learned
12. Handles wrong answers tactfully
13. Provides appropriate reinforcement
14. Conduct written evaluation efficiently
15. Present homework/agreement properly
REMARKS:

Cooperating Teacher
 ST. LOUISE DE MARILLAC COLLEGE OF
SORSOGON
Burgos St., Talisay, Sorsogon City
STUDENT TEACHING FORM 102

GUIDE TO OBSERVATION IN DEMONSTRATION TEACHING

Name of Student Teacher:

Date:
Grade and Subject Taught:
Cooperating Teacher:
School:

RATING
1. LESSON PLAN (75 – 100%)
A. Were the objectives stated in the Behavioral Terms?
B. Was there congruence between:
1. Objectives and subject matter?
2. Objectives and teaching procedure?
3. Objectives and formative test?
4. Objectives and assignment?

II. TEACHING METHOD

A. Was the method used suited to the student's needs and capabilities?
B. Was the teacher creative enough to adapt his methods to the student's capability?
C. Was there more pupil activity rather than teacher activity?
D. Did the teacher make use of visual aids and example to illustrate his lesson?
E. Did the teacher make effective use of the formative test after teaching?

III. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT

A. Did the teacher have a systematic way of checking:
1. Attendance?
2. Assignment or homework?
3. Practice exercises?
4. Group work?
5. Passing in and out of the room?
6. Correcting, distributing and collecting papers?

IV. COMMUNICATION SKILLS

A. Did the teacher speak clearly and loudly enough to be heard by the class?
B. Did the teacher use the correct pronunciation and grammar in speaking?
C. Was the teacher able to elicit the correct answer from the student
through skillful questioning?
D. Was the board work of the teacher free from errors in grammar and spelling?
E. Was the teacher's handwriting on the board and lesson plan legible
enough to be read and understood?
V. TEACHER'S PERSONALITY
A. Is the teacher neat and well-groomed?
B. Is the teacher free from mannerisms that tend to disturb the student's attention?

COMMENTS /SUGGESTIONS:

RATING: RATED BY:

 ST. LOUISE DE MARILLAC COLLEGE OF SORSOGON
Burgos St., Talisay, Sorsogon City

STUDENT TEACHING FORM

103

COLLEGE STUDENT TEACHING SUPERVISOR'S EVALUATION FORM

Name of Student Teacher:

Course/Major:
Cooperating School:

Directions: Please use the scale below to rate the student-teacher’s performance for each item.

1 (95-100) – Excellent
2 (90-94) – Highly Satisfactory
3 (85-89) – Satisfactory
4 (80-84) – Fairly Satisfactory
5 (75-79) – Needs Improvement

I. Personal Qualities

Adaptability
Enthusiasm
Initiative
Punctuality
Dependability
Self-confidence
Emotional Maturity
Friendliness
Optimism
Personal Appearance
Positive attitude toward others
Organized business-like manner

II. Professional Attributes and Relationships

Evidence of Professional growth and development

Knowledge of subject matter
Creativity ability and leadership
Willingness to participate in co-curricular and community activities
Knowledge and use of innovative strategies in teaching
Practice of professional ethics
Cooperative attitude with school leaders
Working relations with parents

Average Rating:
 ST. LOUISE DE MARILLAC COLLEGE OF
SORSOGON HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
Sorsogon City

EVALUATION TOOL FOR CLASSROOM OBSERVATION

Name of Instructor: Date:

Subject: Time:
Subject Matter:

Methodology/Strategy/Approach:
Lecture Debate
Cooperative/Team Learning/Group Role Play
Demonstration Lesson Creative Writing
Laboratory Method Discussion
others:

Description 5 4 3 2 1
A. Teacher
1. Appearance and composure
2. Articulation & Modulation of voice
3. Choice and expression of word
4. Mastery of subject matter
5. Ability to ask questions
6. Organization of subject matter
7. Presentation of subject matter
8. Creativity in presenting the subject matter
9. Provision for individual differences
10. Ability to connect materials to the broader aspects of the
subject 11 Ability to arouse interest
12. Ability to control/manage the class
B. Students
13. Class Attention
14. Class response
C. General Observation
15. Rapport between teacher and students
16. Class interaction
17. Discussion technique
18. Use of visual aids/instructional aids
19. Values Integration
20. Punctual in beginning and ending class
TOTAL: RATING:

Visual Aid/Material:
Maps Pictures Blackboard Others

Other Comments:

Descriptive Rating:
1 = Excellent 2 = Superior or Very Good 3 = Good
4 = Fair 5 = Unsatisfactory

Rating: Total score divided by 20

Conference: Observed by: Date:

Instructor's Signature:
 ST. LOUISE DE MARILLAC COLLEGE OF
SORSOGON HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
Sorsogon City

Student Teacher Ratings by Cooperating Teacher

Student Teacher: Grade:

Cooperating Teacher: School:
Field Supervisor: Subject(s): Date:

NOTE: Cooperating Teacher will complete once during first week of student teaching; once
during each week (of 2 weeks) of full classroom control, and once during last week of student
teaching (Total of 4 forms).

Directions: Please rate the intern on the following statements using a four (4) point scale.
(4) = strongly agree (3) = agree (2) = disagree (1) = strongly disagree

4 3 2 1
Instruction
1. Plans instruction to achieve selected objectives.
2. Organizes instruction to take into account cultural diversity.
3. Organizes instruction to take into account other individual differences.
4. Obtains and uses information about students in planning for instruction.
5. Plans instruction to enhance learning.
6. Creates a classroom environment that is conducive to learning
7. Communicates clearly with students.
8. Demonstrates a repertoire of teaching methods
9. Monitors student learning
10. Uses appropriate techniques to increase student motivation for learning
11. Makes learning relevant to students' backgrounds and needs.
12. Demonstrates mastery of content taught
13. Utilizes appropriate assessment techniques.
14. Adapts assessment for students with special needs.
15. Manages classroom interactions effectively
16. Demonstrates effective use of technology in instruction.
17. Maximizes instructional time.
Professionalism
18. Uses limited materials and resources effectively.
19. Develops mentoring relationships with students.
20. Seeks opportunities for professional growth.
21. Demonstrates an understanding of school-community relationships.
22. Operates within the ethical and legal guidelines for teachers.
23. Works cooperatively with other teachers.
Communication
24. Communicates with students to increase intrinsic motivation for
learning.
25. Communicates effectively with parents.
26. Communicates effectively with instructional teams.

COMMENTS: (If more room is needed, please continue on the back and indicate here.)

Signature of Cooperating Teacher Signature of Student Teacher