Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
51 views27 pages

Clark Project

Uploaded by

shamiah.muchesia
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
51 views27 pages

Clark Project

Uploaded by

shamiah.muchesia
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 27

Clark​ ​1

Brooke​ ​Clark
Graduate​ ​Student,​ ​Department​ ​of​ ​English
Fondren​ ​Library​ ​Research​ ​Award

Is​ ​there​ ​“something​ ​to​ ​save”?:​ ​Death​ ​and​ ​Hope​ ​in​ ​Afro-Pessimism,​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity,​ ​and​ ​the
late​ ​Baldwin

ABSTRACT

This​ ​paper​ ​explores​ ​the​ ​connections​ ​and​ ​dissensions​ ​between​ ​two​ ​fields​ ​of​ ​thought,​ ​which
scholars​ ​rarely​ ​discuss​ ​alongside​ ​each​ ​other:​ ​Afro-Pessimism​ ​and​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity.​ ​Through
interweaving​ ​Baldwin’s​ ​late​ ​nonfiction​ ​and​ ​interviews​ ​with​ ​these​ ​two​ ​fields,​ ​I​ ​ask​ ​theorists​ ​of
Afro-Pessimism​ ​and​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity​ ​questions​ ​concerning​ ​their​ ​understandings​ ​of​ ​death,
subjectivity,​ ​temporality,​ ​and​ ​hope.​ ​In​ ​doing​ ​so,​ ​I​ ​do​ ​not​ ​seek​ ​to​ ​compare​ ​these​ ​methodologies
against​ ​one​ ​another​ ​to​ ​fashion​ ​a​ ​hierarchy;​ ​rather​ ​I​ ​place​ ​these​ ​theories​ ​in​ ​conversation​ ​with​ ​one
another​ ​in​ ​the​ ​hopes​ ​to​ ​find​ ​how​ ​Afro-Pessimism’s​ ​logic​ ​can​ ​challenge​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity​ ​and
how​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity’s​ ​logic​ ​can​ ​further​ ​Afro-Pessimism.​ ​While​ ​these​ ​two​ ​theoretical​ ​fields​ ​are
immersed​ ​in​ ​death,​ ​negativity,​ ​irredeemability,​ ​and​ ​hopelessness,​ ​I​ ​use​ ​the​ ​insights​ ​of​ ​late
Baldwin​ ​to​ ​unfold​ ​Afro-Pessimism​ ​and​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity​ ​and​ ​then​ ​tie​ ​them​ ​together.​ ​Ultimately,
I​ ​argue​ ​that​ ​these​ ​modes​ ​of​ ​thought​ ​are​ ​anything​ ​but​ ​hopeless​ ​and​ ​assert​ ​that​ ​hope​ ​is​ ​located​ ​in
the​ ​intense,​ ​provocative,​ ​and​ ​generative​ ​power​ ​of​ ​their​ ​works​ ​themselves.
Clark​ ​2

Brooke​ ​Clark
Graduate​ ​Student,​ ​Department​ ​of​ ​English
Fondren​ ​Library​ ​Research​ ​Award

Is​ ​there​ ​“something​ ​to​ ​save”?:​ ​Death​ ​and​ ​Hope​ ​in​ ​Afro-Pessimism,​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity,​ ​and​ ​the
late​ ​Baldwin

There's​ ​a​ ​stench​ ​in​ ​the​ ​air,​ ​which,​ ​from​ ​this


distance​ ​underground,​ ​might​ ​be​ ​the​ ​smell​ ​either​ ​of
death​ ​or​ ​of​ ​spring—I​ ​hope​ ​of​ ​spring.​ ​But​ ​don't​ ​let​ ​me
trick​ ​you,​ ​there​ ​is​ ​a​ ​death​ ​in​ ​the​ ​smell​ ​of​ ​spring​ ​and
in​ ​the​ ​smell​ ​of​ ​thee​ ​as​ ​in​ ​the​ ​smell​ ​of​ ​me.
1
—​ ​Ralph​ ​Ellison’s​​ ​Invisible​ ​Man

In​ ​his​ ​June​ ​16,​ ​1984,​ ​interview​ ​with​ ​James​ ​Baldwin​ ​for​ ​The​ ​Village​ ​Voice​,​ ​Robert

Goldstein​ ​asks​ ​midway​ ​through​ ​their​ ​discussion,​ ​“Are​ ​you​ ​as​ ​apocalyptic​ ​about​ ​the​ ​prospects​ ​for
2
sexual​ ​reconciliation​ ​as​ ​you​ ​are​ ​about​ ​racial​ ​reconciliation?” ​ ​Baldwin​ ​replies,​ ​“Well,​ ​they​ ​join.

The​ ​sexual​ ​question​ ​and​ ​the​ ​racial​ ​question​ ​have​ ​always​ ​been​ ​entwined,​ ​you​ ​know.​ ​If​ ​Americans
3
can​ ​mature​ ​on​ ​the​ ​level​ ​of​ ​racism,​ ​then​ ​they​ ​have​ ​to​ ​mature​ ​on​ ​the​ ​level​ ​of​ ​sexuality.” ​ ​While​ ​this

quote​ ​is​ ​highly​ ​popular​ ​throughout​ ​Baldwin​ ​and​ ​race/sexuality​ ​scholarship,​ ​few​ ​critics​ ​cite

Goldstein’s​ ​question​ ​which​ ​elicits​ ​Baldwin’s​ ​response.​ ​This​ ​statement​ ​of​ ​Baldwin’s​ ​is​ ​quoted

excessively​ ​for​ ​its​ ​clarity​ ​and​ ​powerful​ ​assertion:​ ​race​ ​and​ ​sexuality​ ​are​ ​inseparable.​ ​However

accurate,​ ​I​ ​want​ ​to​ ​go​ ​beyond​ ​this​ ​point​ ​and​ ​consider​ ​the​ ​implications​ ​of​ ​Baldwin’s​ ​claim​ ​and

Goldstein’s​ ​question​ ​through​ ​the​ ​theoretical​ ​lens​ ​of​ ​Afro-Pessimism​ ​and​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity.

Here,​ ​race​ ​and​ ​sexuality​ ​are​ ​not​ ​just​ ​solely​ ​any​ ​race​ ​or​ ​any​ ​sexuality.​ ​Race​ ​and​ ​sexuality,

in​ ​general,​ ​are​ ​certainly​ ​connected.​ ​Yet,​ ​Goldstein’s​ ​question​ ​points​ ​to​ ​a​ ​particular​ ​sexuality​ ​and

a​ ​particular​ ​race—those​ ​that​ ​need​ ​to​ ​be​ ​reconciled.​ ​In​ ​effect,​ ​Goldstein’s​ ​use​ ​of​ ​“reconciliation”

1
​ ​Ralph​ ​Ellison,​ ​Invisible​ ​Man​ ​(New​ ​York:​ ​Vintage​ ​International,​ ​1995),​ ​580.
2
​ ​James​ ​Baldwin,​ ​James​ ​Baldwin:​ ​The​ ​Last​ ​Interview​ ​and​ ​Other​ ​Conversations​ ​(Brooklyn:​ ​Melville​ ​House,​ ​2014),
64.
3
​ ​Baldwin,​ ​James​ ​Baldwin:​ ​The​ ​Last​ ​Interview​ ​and​ ​Other​ ​Conversations​,​ ​64.
Clark​ ​3

glosses​ ​over​ ​the​ ​real​ ​subjects,​ ​as​ ​“sexual​ ​reconciliation”​ ​is​ ​sexual​ ​queerness​ ​and​ ​“racial

reconciliation”​ ​is​ ​blackness.​ ​Even​ ​if​ ​we​ ​exchange​ ​“reconciliation”​ ​for​ ​queerness​ ​and​ ​blackness,​ ​a

hierarchy​ ​of​ ​oppressions​ ​still​ ​persists​ ​in​ ​the​ ​question,​ ​measuring​ ​sexuality​ ​against​ ​race.​ ​In​ ​the

interest​ ​of​ ​connection​ ​rather​ ​than​ ​comparison,​ ​I​ ​want​ ​to​ ​ask​ ​questions,​ ​similar​ ​in​ ​topic​ ​to

Goldstein’s​ ​but​ ​with​ ​different​ ​aims:​ ​What​ ​does​ ​it​ ​mean​ ​to​ ​be​ ​apocalyptic​ ​about​ ​queerness​ ​and
4
blackness?​ ​Do​ ​blackness​ ​and​ ​queerness​ ​have​ ​similar​ ​or​ ​different​ ​apocalypses? ​ ​What​ ​is​ ​the

particular​ ​process​ ​of​ ​apocalypse​ ​for​ ​queerness?​ ​For​ ​blackness?​ ​What​ ​comes​ ​after​ ​the​ ​apocalypse

for​ ​both?​ ​Is​ ​there​ ​an​ ​aftermath​ ​at​ ​all​ ​to​ ​these​ ​apocalypses?​ ​As​ ​these​ ​apocalypses​ ​exist​ ​across

everyday​ ​incidents​ ​and​ ​the​ ​longue​ ​durée​,​ ​where​ ​can​ ​hope​ ​be​ ​found?​ ​Can​ ​hope​ ​be​ ​possible​ ​in​ ​the

apocalypses​ ​of​ ​blackness​ ​and​ ​queerness?​ ​If​ ​so,​ ​what​ ​can​ ​we​ ​do​ ​with​ ​this​ ​potential​ ​for​ ​hope​ ​in​ ​the

face​ ​of​ ​these​ ​seemingly​ ​inevitable​ ​apocalypses?​ ​And​ ​yet,​ ​what​ ​happens​ ​if​ ​hope​ ​is​ ​no​ ​longer

possible?

At​ ​the​ ​beginning​ ​of​ ​the​ ​interview,​ ​Baldwin​ ​notes,​ ​“The​ ​word​ ​‘gay’​ ​has​ ​always​ ​rubbed​ ​me
5
the​ ​wrong​ ​way.​ ​I​ ​never​ ​understood​ ​exactly​ ​what​ ​is​ ​meant​ ​by​ ​it.” ​ ​I​ ​aim​ ​to​ ​invest​ ​this​ ​“rub”:​ ​the

frictions​ ​and​ ​harmonies​ ​among​ ​blackness’s​ ​and​ ​queerness’s​ ​apocalypses​ ​and​ ​hopes.​ ​I​ ​ask

theorists​ ​of​ ​Afro-Pessimism​ ​and​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity​ ​these​ ​questions​ ​through​ ​particular​ ​moments​ ​in
6
Baldwin’s​ ​late​ ​nonfiction​ ​and​ ​interviews. ​ ​More​ ​specifically,​ ​I​ ​think​ ​through​ ​Afro-Pessimism’s

and​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity’s​ ​conceptions​ ​of​ ​death,​ ​subjectivity,​ ​temporality,​ ​and​ ​hope​ ​along​ ​with​ ​the

connections​ ​and​ ​dissensions​ ​between​ ​these​ ​theoretical​ ​lens.​ ​I​ ​use​ ​late​ ​Baldwin’s​ ​logic​ ​to​ ​unfold

4
​ ​I​ ​use​ ​apocalypse​ ​in​ ​the​ ​plural​ ​to​ ​note​ ​both​ ​black​ ​apocalypse​ ​and​ ​queer​ ​apocalypse,​ ​so​ ​that​ ​the​ ​apocalypse​ ​of
queerness​ ​does​ ​not​ ​conflate​ ​to​ ​the​ ​apocalypse​ ​of​ ​blackness​ ​and​ ​vice​ ​versa.
5
​ ​Baldwin,​ ​James​ ​Baldwin:​ ​The​ ​Last​ ​Interview​ ​and​ ​Other​ ​Conversations​,​ ​59.
6
​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity​ ​is​ ​somewhat​ ​a​ ​rephrasing​ ​of​ ​the​ ​antisocial​ ​thesis​ ​in​ ​queer​ ​theory.​ ​While​ ​the​ ​phrasing​ ​antisocial
thesis​ ​is​ ​more​ ​widely​ ​known,​ ​I​ ​use​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity,​ ​as​ ​this​ ​is​ ​the​ ​more​ ​contemporary​ ​label​ ​and​ ​emphasizes​ ​the
negativity​ ​with​ ​the​ ​theory.
Clark​ ​4

these​ ​theories​ ​to​ ​then​ ​tangle​ ​them​ ​together,​ ​in​ ​the​ ​hopes​ ​to​ ​see​ ​how​ ​their​ ​critical​ ​investments

challenge​ ​and​ ​further​ ​one​ ​another.​ ​In​ ​tracing​ ​Afro-Pessimism’s​ ​and​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity’s​ ​theories

of​ ​death,​ ​I​ ​hope​ ​to​ ​locate​ ​where​ ​the​ ​potentiality​ ​lies,​ ​where​ ​we​ ​can​ ​find​ ​hope.​ ​I​ ​do​ ​not​ ​use​ ​the

term​ ​“hope”​ ​in​ ​the​ ​context​ ​of​ ​Western​ ​liberal​ ​progressivity​ ​or​ ​utopic​ ​ends.​ ​I​ ​use​ ​hope,​ ​as​ ​a

signifier​ ​of​ ​the​ ​critical,​ ​physical,​ ​emotional,​ ​psychological,​ ​individual,​ ​communal,​ ​national,​ ​and

global​ ​work​ ​which​ ​Afro-Pessimism​ ​and​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity​ ​look​ ​toward​ ​with​ ​the​ ​unavoidable

imminence​ ​of​ ​death​ ​and​ ​with​ ​the​ ​seemingly​ ​unattainability​ ​of​ ​hope.​ ​In​ ​the​ ​vein​ ​of​ ​Baldwin’s

entwinement​ ​of​ ​race​ ​and​ ​sexuality,​ ​I​ ​entwine​ ​these​ ​theoretical​ ​modes​ ​with​ ​Baldwin’s

understandings​ ​not​ ​to​ ​compare​ ​but​ ​to​ ​engage​ ​the​ ​two.​ ​Like​ ​Fred​ ​Moten’s​ ​ensemble,​ ​Alexander

G.​ ​Weheliye’s​ ​assemblage,​ ​and​ ​Lauren​ ​Berlant​ ​and​ ​Lee​ ​Edelman’s​ ​theory-through-dialogue,​ ​this

project​ ​is​ ​about​ ​a​ ​collaborative​ ​conversation​ ​across​ ​fields​ ​and​ ​ways​ ​of​ ​being​ ​to​ ​see​ ​what​ ​this
7
“rub”​ ​is​ ​and​ ​where​ ​this​ ​“rub”​ ​will​ ​lead​ ​us.

Intersections​ ​and​ ​Dissents:​ ​Black​ ​Studies​ ​and​ ​Queer​ ​Theory

Before​ ​discussing​ ​the​ ​particularities​ ​of​ ​Afro-Pessimism​ ​and​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity,​ ​definitions

of​ ​queerness​ ​and​ ​blackness,​ ​along​ ​with​ ​their​ ​general​ ​fields,​ ​are​ ​needed​ ​to​ ​place​ ​the​ ​overall

relationship​ ​between​ ​the​ ​two.​ ​Of​ ​course,​ ​queer​ ​theory​ ​arose​ ​as​ ​predominantly​ ​white​ ​in​ ​its​ ​subject

matter​ ​and​ ​considerations.​ ​Writers​ ​and​ ​theorists,​ ​such​ ​as​ ​Roderick​ ​A.​ ​Ferguson,​ ​Barbara

Christian,​ ​Evelynn​ ​Hammonds,​ ​E.​ ​Patrick​ ​Johnson,​ ​José​ ​Esteban​ ​Muñoz,​ ​Jasbir​ ​K.​ ​Puar,​ ​Kathryn

Bond​ ​Stockton,​ ​and​ ​Jack​ ​Halberstam,​ ​have​ ​attended​ ​to​ ​the​ ​field’s​ ​treatment​ ​of​ ​race​ ​“as​ ​an
8
addendum.” ​ ​However,​ ​more​ ​work​ ​needs​ ​to​ ​be​ ​done​ ​in​ ​this​ ​regard,​ ​for​ ​the​ ​whiteness​ ​of​ ​queer

7
​ ​See​ ​Fred​ ​Moten’s​ ​In​ ​the​ ​Break:​ ​The​ ​Aesthetics​ ​of​ ​the​ ​Black​ ​Radical​ ​Tradition,​ ​ ​Alexander​ ​G.​ ​Weheliye’s​ ​Habeas
Viscus:​ ​Racializing​ ​Assemblages,​ ​Biopolitics,​ ​and​ ​Black​ ​Feminist​ ​Theories​ ​of​ ​the​ ​Human​,​ ​and​ ​Lauren​ ​Berlant​ ​and
Lee​ ​Edelman’s​ ​Sex,​ ​or​ ​the​ ​Unbearable​.
8
​ ​José​ ​Esteban​ ​Muñoz,​ ​Disidentifications:​ ​Queers​ ​of​ ​Color​ ​and​ ​the​ ​Performance​ ​of​ ​Politics​ ​(Minneapolis:
University​ ​of​ ​Minnesota​ ​Press,​ ​1999),​ ​11.
Clark​ ​5

studies​ ​still​ ​persists.​ ​We​ ​see​ ​this​ ​most​ ​explicitly​ ​in​ ​the​ ​ways​ ​in​ ​which​ ​queer​ ​theory​ ​and​ ​queer​ ​of

color​ ​or​ ​black​ ​queer​ ​theory​ ​appear​ ​as​ ​separate​ ​entities​ ​in​ ​disciplinary​ ​categories​ ​and​ ​even​ ​indexes

of​ ​books.​ ​Even​ ​if​ ​one​ ​considers​ ​queer​ ​of​ ​color​ ​theory​ ​as​ ​a​ ​subfield​ ​of​ ​queer​ ​studies,​ ​the​ ​blackness

in​ ​the​ ​theory​ ​must​ ​be​ ​stated;​ ​otherwise,​ ​queer​ ​theory​ ​assumes​ ​whiteness.

A​ ​similar​ ​dynamic​ ​applies​ ​to​ ​black​ ​studies,​ ​for​ ​unless​ ​queer​ ​is​ ​stated​ ​in​ ​the​ ​title​ ​of​ ​black

studies​ ​or​ ​in​ ​one​ ​of​ ​its​ ​projects,​ ​heterosexuality​ ​prevails​ ​as​ ​the​ ​assumption.​ ​Homophobia​ ​in​ ​the

black​ ​community​ ​is​ ​certainty​ ​a​ ​partner​ ​in​ ​this,​ ​which​ ​has​ ​been​ ​thoroughly​ ​critiqued​ ​by​ ​Audre

Lorde,​ ​Barbara​ ​Smith,​ ​and​ ​other​ ​black​ ​feminist​ ​theorists.​ ​Similarly,​ ​systematic​ ​racism​ ​speaks​ ​to

queer​ ​theory’s​ ​white​ ​default.​ ​This​ ​is​ ​not​ ​to​ ​say​ ​that​ ​the​ ​black​ ​community​ ​is​ ​more​ ​homophobic

than​ ​others​ ​or​ ​that​ ​racism​ ​and​ ​homophobia​ ​are​ ​comparable​ ​injustices.​ ​The​ ​point​ ​is​ ​that​ ​social​ ​and

political​ ​discriminations​ ​penetrate​ ​these​ ​theoretical​ ​modes.​ ​The​ ​fields’​ ​focuses​ ​certainly

contribute​ ​to​ ​this​ ​issue,​ ​as​ ​queer​ ​theory​ ​attends​ ​to​ ​sexuality​ ​and​ ​black​ ​studies​ ​to​ ​race.​ ​The​ ​issue​ ​is

not​ ​the​ ​areas’​ ​concentrations​ ​but​ ​is​ ​the​ ​assumptions​ ​which​ ​underlie​ ​their​ ​projects​ ​and​ ​manifest​ ​in

their​ ​scholarship.​ ​In​ ​other​ ​words,​ ​queer​ ​theory​ ​and​ ​black​ ​studies​ ​have​ ​enacted​ ​the​ ​norm​ ​of​ ​the

other:​ ​queer​ ​as​ ​white​ ​and​ ​black​ ​as​ ​heterosexual.

These​ ​theories​ ​and​ ​communities​ ​at​ ​large​ ​still​ ​enact​ ​these​ ​norms,​ ​perhaps,​ ​on​ ​more​ ​subtle

levels​ ​or,​ ​perhaps,​ ​not​ ​so​ ​subtle​ ​registers.​ ​We​ ​witness​ ​this​ ​in​ ​one​ ​recent​ ​controversy​ ​concerning

the​ ​rainbow​ ​flag.​ ​In​ ​the​ ​summer​ ​of​ ​2017,​ ​the​ ​city​ ​of​ ​Philadelphia​ ​redesigned​ ​Gilbert​ ​Baker’s

original​ ​rainbow​ ​layout​ ​by​ ​adding​ ​two​ ​stripes​ ​to​ ​its​ ​rainbow—one​ ​black​ ​and​ ​one​ ​brown​ ​placed

above​ ​the​ ​rainbow.​ ​Philadelphia’s​ ​flag​ ​was​ ​a​ ​part​ ​of​ ​the​ ​city’s​ ​More​ ​Color​ ​More​ ​Pride​ ​campaign,

aiming​ ​to​ ​illustrate​ ​gay​ ​liberation’s​ ​need​ ​for​ ​and​ ​enactment​ ​of​ ​inclusivity.​ ​Despite​ ​the​ ​flag’s

intentions,​ ​its​ ​new​ ​design​ ​drew​ ​harsh​ ​criticism​ ​within​ ​the​ ​white​ ​gay​ ​community,​ ​as​ ​the​ ​critique
Clark​ ​6

followed​ ​that​ ​the​ ​rainbow​ ​flag​ ​already​ ​represents​ ​everyone,​ ​and,​ ​thus,​ ​there​ ​is​ ​no​ ​need​ ​to​ ​modify
9
it.

Again,​ ​we​ ​see​ ​this​ ​“rub”​ ​or,​ ​as​ ​Stockton​ ​notes,​ ​the​ ​“uniquely​ ​asymmetrical”​ ​quality
10
between​ ​and​ ​within​ ​black​ ​and​ ​queer. ​ ​Even​ ​considering​ ​all​ ​the​ ​brilliant​ ​work​ ​by​ ​those​ ​named

above​ ​and​ ​many​ ​others,​ ​the​ ​entwinement​ ​of​ ​queerness​ ​and​ ​blackness​ ​remains​ ​volatile​ ​territory.

In​ ​terms​ ​of​ ​my​ ​project,​ ​Afro-Pessimism​ ​and​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity​ ​are​ ​subfields​ ​within​ ​the​ ​realms​ ​of

black​ ​studies​ ​and​ ​queer​ ​theory.​ ​While​ ​they​ ​certainly​ ​possesses​ ​their​ ​own​ ​specific​ ​methodologies,

archives,​ ​and​ ​aims,​ ​these​ ​disciplinary​ ​subsets​ ​emerge​ ​from​ ​and​ ​operate​ ​within​ ​their​ ​broader

fields’​ ​pasts.​ ​In​ ​fact,​ ​these​ ​two​ ​practices​ ​came​ ​to​ ​be​ ​through​ ​critiquing​ ​assumptions​ ​within​ ​their

own​ ​disciplines,​ ​and​ ​entwining​ ​their​ ​critical​ ​work​ ​together​ ​offers​ ​us​ ​new​ ​ways​ ​to​ ​explore

blackness’s​ ​and​ ​queerness’s​ ​overlaps,​ ​divergences,​ ​and​ ​complications.

Definitions​ ​and​ ​Positionalities:​ ​Afro-Pessimism​ ​and​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity

With​ ​blackness​ ​and​ ​queerness,​ ​I​ ​do​ ​not​ ​use​ ​the​ ​terms​ ​interchangeably​ ​or​ ​suggest​ ​that​ ​one

always​ ​already​ ​references​ ​to​ ​the​ ​other.​ ​On​ ​the​ ​surface,​ ​blackness​ ​may​ ​appear​ ​solely​ ​to​ ​signify​ ​the

color​ ​of​ ​flesh,​ ​and​ ​queerness​ ​seems​ ​to​ ​only​ ​indicate​ ​a​ ​sex​ ​act​ ​of​ ​the​ ​flesh.​ ​While​ ​the​ ​body​ ​and,

thus,​ ​ontology​ ​are​ ​central​ ​to​ ​both,​ ​blackness​ ​goes​ ​far​ ​beyond​ ​just​ ​color,​ ​and​ ​queerness​ ​extends

that​ ​of​ ​just​ ​sex.​ ​Fred​ ​Moten’s​ ​study​ ​of​ ​black​ ​audio​ ​avant-garde​ ​and​ ​history,​ ​In​ ​the​ ​Break:​ ​The

Aesthetics​ ​of​ ​the​ ​Black​ ​Radical​ ​Tradition​,​ ​opens​ ​by​ ​defining​ ​blackness:​ ​“Blackness—the

extended​ ​movement​ ​of​ ​a​ ​specific​ ​upheaval,​ ​an​ ​ongoing​ ​irruption​ ​that​ ​anarranges​ ​every​ ​line—is​ ​a

9
​ ​See​ ​Nancy​ ​Coleman,​ ​“Redesigned​ ​Pride​ ​Flag​ ​Recognizes​ ​LGBT​ ​People​ ​of​ ​Color,”​ ​CNN.com​,​ ​last​ ​modified​ ​June
13,​ ​2017​ ​and​ ​accessed​ ​December​ ​1,​ ​2017,​ ​http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/13/health/new-pride-flag
-colors-trnd/index.html.
10
​ ​Kathryn​ ​Bond​ ​Stockton,​ ​Beautiful​ ​Bottom,​ ​Beautiful​ ​Shame:​ ​Where​ ​“Black”​ ​Meets​ ​“Queer”​ ​(Durham:​ ​Duke
University​ ​Press,​ ​2006),​ ​27.
Clark​ ​7

11
strain​ ​that​ ​pressures​ ​the​ ​assumption​ ​of​ ​the​ ​equivalence​ ​of​ ​personhood​ ​and​ ​subjectivity.”

Blackness​ ​continuously​ ​eradicates​ ​stability​ ​and​ ​coherency​ ​between​ ​human​ ​and​ ​subject.​ ​However,

blackness’s​ ​target​ ​for​ ​rupture​ ​is​ ​“specific”​ ​to​ ​Western​ ​ideology,​ ​which​ ​serves​ ​as​ ​the​ ​master​ ​voice

of​ ​and​ ​for​ ​subjects​ ​and,​ ​thus,​ ​regulates​ ​who​ ​is​ ​and​ ​is​ ​not​ ​a​ ​subject​ ​or​ ​human.​ ​For​ ​Moten,

blackness​ ​is​ ​not​ ​outside​ ​history​ ​or​ ​Western​ ​ideology​ ​but​ ​operates​ ​on​ ​a​ ​subaltern​ ​frequency​ ​within

these​ ​worlds,​ ​acting​ ​as​ ​a​ ​sonic​ ​modality​ ​to​ ​give​ ​an​ ​alternative,​ ​more​ ​encompassing​ ​and​ ​profound

account​ ​of​ ​beingness.

Afro-Pessimists​ ​take​ ​Moten’s​ ​definition​ ​and​ ​critique​ ​of​ ​Western​ ​hegemony​ ​a​ ​step​ ​further.

They​ ​position​ ​blackness​ ​or,​ ​more​ ​specifically,​ ​antiblackness​ ​as​ ​constitutive​ ​of​ ​Western​ ​thought,

politics,​ ​and​ ​society.​ ​Quoting​ ​Saidiya​ ​Hartman,​ ​Jared​ ​Sexton​ ​outlines​ ​Afro-Pessimism’s​ ​practice

and​ ​object​ ​of​ ​study:

This​ ​“afterlife​ ​of​ ​slavery,”​ ​as​ ​Saidiya​ ​Hartman​ ​terms​ ​it,​ ​challenges​ ​practitioners​ ​in​ ​the
field​ ​to​ ​question​ ​the​ ​prevailing​ ​understanding​ ​of​ ​a​ ​post-emancipation​ ​society​ ​and​ ​to
revisit​ ​the​ ​most​ ​basic​ ​questions​ ​about​ ​the​ ​structural​ ​conditions​ ​of​ ​antiblackness​ ​in​ ​the
modern​ ​world.​ ​To​ ​ask,​ ​in​ ​other​ ​words,​ ​what​ ​it​ ​means​ ​to​ ​speak​ ​of​ ​“the​ ​tragic​ ​continuity
between​ ​slavery​ ​and​ ​freedom”​ ​or​ ​“the​ ​incomplete​ ​nature​ ​of​ ​emancipation,”​ ​indeed​ ​to
12
speak​ ​of​ ​about​ ​a​ ​type​ ​of​ ​living​ ​on​ ​that​ ​survives​ ​after​ ​a​ ​type​ ​of​ ​death.

For​ ​Afro-Pessimism,​ ​slavery​ ​not​ ​only​ ​continues​ ​to​ ​live;​ ​it​ ​literally​ ​and​ ​figuratively​ ​fleshes​ ​out

the​ ​West.​ ​For​ ​instance,​ ​freedom​ ​is​ ​not​ ​just​ ​liberation​ ​or​ ​independence.​ ​Freedom​ ​is​ ​a​ ​Western

concept​ ​which​ ​comes​ ​to​ ​exist​ ​through​ ​its​ ​enforcement​ ​of​ ​antiblackness.​ ​This​ ​“revist[ing]​ ​of​ ​the

most​ ​basic​ ​questions”​ ​concerning​ ​ontology,​ ​slavery,​ ​freedom,​ ​life,​ ​death,​ ​and​ ​survival​ ​is​ ​where

Afro-Pessimism​ ​lays​ ​and​ ​does​ ​its​ ​groundwork.​ ​In​ ​effect,​ ​asking​ ​“What​ ​is​ ​freedom?”​ ​is​ ​not​ ​a

11
​ ​Fred​ ​Moten,​ ​In​ ​the​ ​Break:​ ​The​ ​Aesthetics​ ​of​ ​the​ ​Black​ ​Radical​ ​Tradition​ (​ Minneapolis:​ ​University​ ​of​ ​Minnesota
Press,​ ​2003),​ ​1.
12
​ ​Jared​ ​Sexton,​ ​“The​ ​Social​ ​Life​ ​of​ ​Social​ ​Death:​ ​On​ ​Afro-Pessimism​ ​and​ ​Black​ ​Optimism,”​ ​InTensions​ ​Journal​ ​5
(Fall/Winter​ ​2011):​ ​23.​ ​Saidiya​ ​Hartman,​ ​Lose​ ​Your​ ​Mother:​ ​A​ ​Journey​ ​Along​ ​the​ ​Atlantic​ ​Slave​ ​Route​ ​(New​ ​York:
Macmillan,​ ​2007),​ ​6.
Clark​ ​8

question​ ​solely​ ​about​ ​definition,​ ​but​ ​a​ ​question​ ​about​ ​on​ ​what​ ​“grammar​ ​of​ ​suffering”—“the
13
grammar​ ​of​ ​assumptions​ ​regarding​ ​the​ ​ontology​ ​of​ ​suffering”—was​ ​this​ ​definition​ ​established.

Additionally,​ ​Afro-Pessimism​ ​returns​ ​to​ ​terms,​ ​which​ ​are​ ​usually​ ​taken​ ​as​ ​universally

understood,​ ​for​ ​universal​ ​understanding​ ​is​ ​Western​ ​understanding.​ ​More​ ​simply,​ ​the​ ​universal​ ​is

the​ ​West,​ ​and​ ​the​ ​West​ ​forms​ ​through​ ​antiblackness.​ ​Frank​ ​B.​ ​Wilderson​ ​III​ ​discusses​ ​the​ ​ways

in​ ​which​ ​universality​ ​speaks​ ​to​ ​Western​ ​violence​ ​against​ ​blackness.​ ​In​ ​Red,​ ​White,​ ​and​ ​Black:

Cinema​ ​and​ ​the​ ​Structure​ ​of​ ​U.S.​ ​Antagonisms​,​ ​Wilderson’s​ ​finds​ ​that​ ​“Black​ ​positionality”​ ​is

the​ ​locus​ ​of​ ​Afro-Pessimism’s​ ​analytics​ ​and,​ ​thus,​ ​catalyzes​ ​these​ ​interrogations​ ​of​ ​“the​ ​most
14
basic​ ​questions.” ​ ​In​ ​doing​ ​so,​ ​Wilderson​ ​asserts​ ​that​ ​Afro-Pessimism​ ​“shits​ ​on​ ​the​ ​inspiration
15
of​ ​the​ ​personal​ ​pronoun​ ​we​.” ​ ​This​ ​“​we​”​ ​signifies​ ​Western​ ​ideas​ ​of​ ​universal​ ​inclusivity,​ ​but​ ​as

Afro-Pessimism​ ​argues,​ ​antiblackness​ ​functions​ ​as​ ​the​ ​basis​ ​for​ ​Western​ ​ideology​ ​and

community,​ ​this​ ​“​we​”​ ​is​ ​predicated​ ​not​ ​on​ ​the​ ​exclusion​ ​of​ ​black​ ​bodies​ ​but​ ​on​ ​the​ ​psychological

and​ ​physical​ ​trauma​ ​and​ ​suffering​ ​of​ ​them.

From​ ​the​ ​first​ ​question​ ​of​ ​his​ ​interview​ ​with​ ​Goldstein,​ ​Baldwin​ ​takes​ ​on​ ​this​ ​“​we​”​ ​of​ ​the

West​ ​and,​ ​more​ ​particularly,​ ​of​ ​America.​ ​To​ ​begin​ ​the​ ​interview,​ ​Goldstein​ ​asks​ ​Baldwin,​ ​“Do
16
you​ ​feel​ ​like​ ​a​ ​stranger​ ​in​ ​gay​ ​America?” ​ ​This​ ​initial​ ​inquiry​ ​signals​ ​his​ ​desired​ ​topic​ ​of

discussion:​ ​Baldwin’s​ ​personal​ ​take​ ​on​ ​sexuality.​ ​Baldwin’s​ ​reply​ ​begins,​ ​“Well,​ ​first​ ​of​ ​all​ ​I​ ​feel

like​ ​a​ ​stranger​ ​in​ ​America​ ​from​ ​almost​ ​every​ ​conceivable​ ​angle​ ​except,​ ​oddly​ ​enough,​ ​as​ ​a​ ​black

person.​ ​The​ ​word​ ​‘gay’​ ​has​ ​always​ ​rubbed​ ​me​ ​the​ ​wrong​ ​way.​ ​I​ ​never​ ​understood​ ​exactly​ ​what​ ​is

13
​ ​Frank​ ​B.​ ​Wilderson​ ​III,​ ​Red,​ ​White,​ ​and​ ​Black:​ ​Cinema​ ​and​ ​the​ ​Structure​ ​of​ ​U.S.​ ​Antagonisms​ ​(Durham:​ ​Duke
University​ ​Press,​ ​2010),​ ​6​ ​and​ ​5.
14
​ ​Wilderson,​ ​Red,​ ​White,​ ​and​ ​Black​,​ ​58.
15
​ ​Ibid.,​ ​143.
16
​ ​Baldwin,​ ​James​ ​Baldwin:​ ​The​ ​Last​ ​Interview​ ​and​ ​Other​ ​Conversations​,​ ​59.
Clark​ ​9

17
meant​ ​by​ ​it.” ​ ​Before​ ​commenting​ ​on​ ​the​ ​word​ ​“gay,”​ ​Baldwin​ ​calls​ ​himself​ ​“a​ ​black​ ​person,”

which​ ​is​ ​not​ ​one​ ​of​ ​the​ ​reasons​ ​that​ ​he​ ​feels​ ​“like​ ​a​ ​stranger​ ​in​ ​America.”​ ​On​ ​the​ ​surface,​ ​his

remark​ ​seems​ ​contradictory,​ ​considering​ ​America’s​ ​racism​ ​undoubtedly​ ​exists​ ​before,​ ​in,​ ​and

after​ ​the​ ​time​ ​of​ ​this​ ​interview.​ ​Is​ ​Baldwin’s​ ​comment​ ​that​ ​a​ ​black​ ​person​ ​is​ ​a​ ​stranger​ ​in

America​ ​contrary​ ​to​ ​America’s​ ​racism?​ ​In​ ​other​ ​words,​ ​is​ ​racism​ ​or,​ ​more​ ​specifically,

antiblackness​ ​a​ ​stranger​ ​in​ ​America?​ ​For​ ​Baldwin​ ​and​ ​Afro-Pessimists,​ ​the​ ​answer​ ​is​ ​a

resounding,​ ​ongoing,​ ​reverberating​ ​“No.”​ ​Baldwin’s​ ​reply​ ​points​ ​to​ ​how​ ​antiblackness​ ​is​ ​no

stranger,​ ​outsider,​ ​or​ ​alien​ ​to​ ​America​ ​but​ ​structures​ ​the​ ​nation.​ ​Baldwin’s​ ​articulation​ ​of​ ​racism

as​ ​non-stranger​ ​in​ ​America​ ​follows​ ​Afro-Pessimism’s​ ​evisceration​ ​of​ ​“the​ ​personal​ ​pronoun​ ​we.​”

The​ ​West,​ ​America,​ ​and​ ​“​we​”​ ​exist​ ​and​ ​maintain​ ​themselves​ ​through​ ​antiblackness.​ ​What​ ​are​ ​we

do​ ​with​ ​Baldwin’s​ ​rub​ ​with​ ​“gay”​ ​and​ ​“gay​ ​America”?

The​ ​term​ ​“gay”​ ​rubs​ ​Baldwin​ ​“the​ ​wrong​ ​way”​ ​partially​ ​due​ ​to​ ​its​ ​investment​ ​in​ ​Western

identitarianism.​ ​Thus,​ ​antiblackness​ ​structures​ ​“gay”​ ​and​ ​especially​ ​“gay​ ​America,”​ ​as​ ​they​ ​are

referential​ ​of​ ​the​ ​West​ ​and,​ ​in​ ​effect,​ ​antiblackness.​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity​ ​also​ ​has​ ​a​ ​problem​ ​with​ ​the

way​ ​“gay”​ ​and​ ​“gay​ ​America”​ ​rubs​ ​it.​ ​Why​ ​is​ ​“gay”​ ​used​ ​in​ ​conjunction​ ​with​ ​America,​ ​when

antiblackness​ ​is​ ​already​ ​suggested​ ​by​ ​naming​ ​the​ ​nation?​ ​Firstly,​ ​“gay​ ​America”​ ​places​ ​gay​ ​as

inconsistent​ ​with​ ​America,​ ​locating​ ​gay​ ​outside​ ​the​ ​nation​ ​and,​ ​in​ ​turn,​ ​marking​ ​gay​ ​as

exceptional​ ​to​ ​America.​ ​At​ ​the​ ​same​ ​time,​ ​the​ ​phrase​ ​implies​ ​a​ ​relationship​ ​between​ ​gay​ ​and

America.​ ​Gay​ ​becomes​ ​a​ ​sexuality​ ​of​ ​and​ ​for​ ​the​ ​nation.​ ​Queer​ ​theorists,​ ​especially​ ​those​ ​on​ ​the

side​ ​of​ ​negativity,​ ​would​ ​push​ ​against​ ​Goldstein’s​ ​phrasing​ ​and,​ ​like​ ​Afro-Pessimism,​ ​locate​ ​and

17
​ ​Ibid.
Clark​ ​10

explore​ ​the​ ​“most​ ​basic”​ ​presumptions​ ​underlying​ ​“gay​ ​America”​ ​and​ ​the​ ​community​ ​this​ ​phrase

fosters.

Firstly,​ ​scholars​ ​use​ ​the​ ​term​ ​“queer”​ ​rather​ ​than​ ​“gay”​ ​to​ ​reference​ ​sexualities​ ​that

extend​ ​beyond​ ​that​ ​of​ ​(white)​ ​male-to-male​ ​desire.​ ​Additionally,​ ​even​ ​suggesting​ ​the​ ​possibility

of​ ​“gay​ ​America”​ ​implies​ ​that​ ​queer​ ​sex​ ​can​ ​be​ ​normalized​ ​and​ ​sanctioned​ ​by​ ​the​ ​country.​ ​While

some​ ​scholars​ ​of​ ​queer​ ​studies​ ​strive​ ​for​ ​“gay​ ​America”​ ​to​ ​become​ ​reality,​ ​theorists​ ​of​ ​Queer

Negativity​ ​contest​ ​this​ ​desire.​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity​ ​resists​ ​normalization​ ​and​ ​institutionalization,​ ​as
18
they​ ​define​ ​queerness​ ​by​ ​the​ ​radical​ ​nature​ ​of​ ​its​ ​queer​ ​sex. ​ ​Thus,​ ​normalizing​ ​or​ ​institutional

ventures,​ ​such​ ​as​ ​the​ ​right​ ​to​ ​marry​ ​and​ ​to​ ​participate​ ​in​ ​the​ ​military,​ ​follow​ ​LGBTQ+​ ​activism

rather​ ​than​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity’s​ ​aims.​ ​In​ ​other​ ​words,​ ​Queer​ ​Negativists​ ​find​ ​that​ ​queer,​ ​emptied

of​ ​its​ ​revolutionary​ ​political​ ​and​ ​sexual​ ​charge,​ ​would​ ​be​ ​“gay​ ​America.”​ ​In​ ​effect,​ ​“gay

America”​ ​may​ ​be​ ​possible,​ ​but​ ​“queer​ ​America”​ ​is​ ​the​ ​antithesis​ ​of​ ​queerness​ ​itself.

Queer​ ​Negativity​ ​began​ ​as​ ​and​ ​is​ ​most​ ​often​ ​termed​ ​the​ ​antisocial​ ​turn​ ​in​ ​queer​ ​theory.​ ​In

2006,​ ​PMLA​ ​published​ ​a​ ​roundtable​ ​discussion​ ​entitled​ ​“The​ ​Antisocial​ ​Thesis​ ​in​ ​Queer

Theory,”​ ​which​ ​collected​ ​views​ ​from​ ​senior​ ​scholars,​ ​such​ ​as​ ​Robert​ ​L.​ ​Caserio,​ ​Lee​ ​Edelman,

Jack​ ​Halberstam,​ ​José​ ​Esteban​ ​Muñoz,​ ​and​ ​Tim​ ​Dean,​ ​on​ ​queerness’s​ ​antisociality.​ ​While

diverse​ ​in​ ​its​ ​archives,​ ​methodologies,​ ​and​ ​objectives,​ ​the​ ​debate​ ​among​ ​these​ ​theorists

frequently​ ​condense​ ​to​ ​questions​ ​concerning​ ​either​ ​queer’s​ ​“political​ ​negativity”​ ​or​ ​“queer
19
utopianism.” ​ ​Similar​ ​to​ ​Hartman’s,​ ​Sexton’s,​ ​and​ ​Wilderson’s​ ​critique​ ​of​ ​Moten’s​ ​use​ ​of

18
​ ​In​ ​contemporary​ ​queer​ ​scholarship,​ ​the​ ​definition​ ​of​ ​queerness​ ​has​ ​surpassed​ ​that​ ​of​ ​just​ ​sex​ ​and​ ​sexuality.
Theorists​ ​now​ ​use​ ​queer​ ​in​ ​discussions​ ​on​ ​aesthetics,​ ​ecology,​ ​psychology,​ ​age,​ ​animal,​ ​objects​ ​and​ ​many​ ​other
objects​ ​of​ ​study.​ ​For​ ​my​ ​project,​ ​I​ ​use​ ​queer​ ​in​ ​relation​ ​to​ ​sex​ ​and​ ​sexuality.​ ​Additionally,​ ​while​ ​the​ ​field​ ​of​ ​queer
studies​ ​may​ ​be​ ​considered​ ​institutionalized,​ ​as​ ​it​ ​is​ ​a​ ​visible​ ​and​ ​recognized​ ​discipline,​ ​I​ ​am​ ​referring​ ​to​ ​the​ ​notion​ ​of
queer,​ ​signifying​ ​its​ ​resistance​ ​toward​ ​institutional​ ​forms.
19
​ ​Robert​ ​L.​ ​Caserio,​ ​Lee​ ​Edelman,​ ​Jack​ ​Halberstam,​ ​José​ ​Esteban​ ​Muñoz,​ ​and​ ​Tim​ ​Dean,​ ​“The​ ​Antisocial​ ​Thesis​ ​in
Queer​ ​Theory,”​ ​PMLA​ ​121,​ ​No.​ ​3​ ​(May​ ​2006):​ ​821.
Clark​ ​11

blackness,​ ​Edelman​ ​denounces​ ​queer​ ​utopianism​ ​because​ ​it​ ​fails​ ​to​ ​recognize​ ​“that​ ​organization

depends​ ​on​ ​internal​ ​antagonism,​ ​on​ ​the​ ​self-constituting​ ​tension​ ​of​ ​negativity​ ​that​ ​forms​ ​of
20
liberal​ ​utopianism.” ​ ​Altogether,​ ​negativity​ ​is​ ​not​ ​outside​ ​or​ ​alternative​ ​to​ ​the​ ​social​ ​but​ ​is

structurally​ ​essential​ ​to​ ​it,​ ​and​ ​queer​ ​negativity​ ​reads​ ​this​ ​construction​ ​through​ ​sexuality​ ​and​ ​sex

acts.

At​ ​the​ ​same​ ​time,​ ​sexuality​ ​does​ ​not​ ​solely​ ​act​ ​as​ ​a​ ​lens​ ​for​ ​theorists​ ​of​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity,
21
but​ ​it​ ​is​ ​the​ ​location​ ​for​ ​the​ ​most​ ​potent​ ​“undoing”​ ​of​ ​one’s​ ​self. ​ ​Queer​ ​Negativists​ ​follow​ ​Leo

Bersani’s​ ​view​ ​of​ ​sexuality​ ​in​ ​his​ ​landmark​ ​essay,​ ​“Is​ ​the​ ​Rectum​ ​a​ ​Grave?”​ ​In​ ​his​ ​piece,​ ​Bersani

forgoes​ ​queer​ ​sex’s​ ​or​ ​even​ ​sex’s​ ​redeemability​ ​or​ ​optimist​ ​possibility​ ​by​ ​psychoanalytically
22
mapping​ ​sexuality’s​ ​powerful​ ​“self-shattering”​ ​effects​ ​on​ ​the​ ​already-divided​ ​subject. ​ ​Robyn

Wiegman’s​ ​recent​ ​review​ ​of​ ​the​ ​queer​ ​theory’s​ ​turn​ ​to​ ​negativity​ ​notes​ ​how​ ​Bersani’s​ ​thesis

stripped​ ​sexuality​ ​of​ ​repressive​ ​understandings,​ ​for​ ​he​ ​“conceiv[ed]​ ​of​ ​sexuality​ ​as​ ​resistant​ ​to
23
the​ ​imperative​ ​to​ ​socialize​ ​our​ ​conception​ ​of​ ​it.” ​ ​From​ ​this,​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity​ ​arose​ ​and​ ​found

one​ ​of​ ​its​ ​primary​ ​voices​ ​in​ ​Edelman’s​ ​polemic,​ ​No​ ​Future:​ ​Queer​ ​Theory​ ​and​ ​the​ ​Death​ ​Drive​.

Employing​ ​Lacan,​ ​Edelman​ ​theorizes​ ​his​ ​concept​ ​of​ ​“reproductive​ ​futurism”​ ​which​ ​is

heteronormativity’s​ ​ideology​ ​based​ ​around​ ​the​ ​family’s​ ​and,​ ​more​ ​importantly,​ ​the​ ​Child’s
24
futurity​ ​and​ ​locates​ ​“the​ ​possibility​ ​of​ ​queer​ ​resistance”​ ​“outside​ ​the​ ​political​ ​domain.”

Queerness​ ​is​ ​“outside”​ ​the​ ​(heteronormative)​ ​social​ ​because​ ​queer​ ​bodies​ ​are​ ​non-reproductive

20
​ ​Ibid.
21
​ ​Robyn​ ​Wiegman,​ ​“Sex​ ​and​ ​Negativity;​ ​or,​ ​What​ ​Queer​ ​Theory​ ​Has​ ​for​ ​You,”​ ​Cultural​ ​Critique​ ​95​ ​(Winter​ ​2017):
220.
22
​ ​Leo​ ​Bersani,​ ​“Is​ ​the​ ​Rectum​ ​a​ ​Grave?”​ ​October​ ​43,​ ​“AIDS:​ ​Cultural​ ​Analysis/Cultural​ ​Activism”​ ​(Winter​ ​1987):
217.
23
​ ​Wiegman,​ ​220.
24
​ ​Lee​ ​Edelman,​ ​No​ ​Future:​ ​Queer​ ​Theory​ ​and​ ​the​ ​Death​ ​Drive​ ​(Durham:​ ​Duke​ ​University​ ​Press,​ ​2004),​ ​2.
Clark​ ​12

and,​ ​thus,​ ​cannot​ ​participate​ ​in​ ​heteronormative​ ​relations​ ​and​ ​futures​ ​established​ ​by​ ​sexual

reproduction.

Yet,​ ​the​ ​social​ ​works​ ​to​ ​position​ ​the​ ​queer​ ​as​ ​“outside”​ ​its​ ​realm,​ ​which​ ​is​ ​structurally

similar​ ​to​ ​Afro-Pessimism’s​ ​account​ ​of​ ​the​ ​West’s​ ​formation​ ​through​ ​and​ ​by​ ​antiblackness.​ ​In

Sex,​ ​or​ ​the​ ​Unbearable​,​ ​Edelman​ ​along​ ​with​ ​Lauren​ ​Berlant​ ​further​ ​this​ ​point​ ​by​ ​recognizing

how​ ​queerness,​ ​negativity,​ ​and​ ​queer​ ​negativity​ ​are​ ​not​ ​merely​ ​“outside”​ ​the​ ​social​ ​but
25
“intrinsic”​ ​to​ ​it. ​ ​As​ ​heteronormativity​ ​rules​ ​the​ ​social,​ ​they​ ​make​ ​the​ ​point​ ​that​ ​queer​ ​bodies​ ​are

politically,​ ​socially,​ ​and​ ​ontologically​ ​negative​ ​beings.​ ​Subsequently,​ ​the​ ​idea​ ​of​ ​“gay

America”—a​ ​nation-building​ ​type​ ​of​ ​queerness—requires​ ​the​ ​queer​ ​to​ ​be​ ​not​ ​only​ ​normalized

but​ ​productive​ ​in​ ​the​ ​heteronormative​ ​sexual,​ ​social,​ ​and​ ​political​ ​senses.​ ​In​ ​other​ ​words,​ ​the

possibility​ ​of​ ​“gay​ ​America”​ ​requires​ ​a​ ​future​ ​which​ ​is​ ​not​ ​only​ ​unreachable​ ​to​ ​queer​ ​bodies​ ​but

also,​ ​as​ ​Edelman​ ​argues,​ ​is​ ​illusory​ ​to​ ​all.​ ​For​ ​Edelman​ ​and​ ​other​ ​Queer​ ​Negativists,​ ​the​ ​future​ ​is

an​ ​ever-deferred​ ​temporality,​ ​a​ ​“fantasy”​ ​which​ ​sustains​ ​the​ ​fantasy​ ​of​ ​heteronormativity’s
26
“stability,”​ ​“coherence,”​ ​and​ ​“order.”​ ​ ​ ​In​ ​effect,​ ​“gay​ ​America”​ ​is​ ​an​ ​unattainable​ ​and

undesirable​ ​ideal​ ​for​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity,​ ​as​ ​it​ ​not​ ​only​ ​enacts​ ​a​ ​future​ ​but​ ​enacts​ ​a​ ​future​ ​based​ ​on

institutional​ ​integration​ ​and​ ​nationalist​ ​profits.

Death:​ ​Afro-Pessimism’s​ ​Ontological​ ​Battle​ ​and​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity’s​ ​Driving​ ​Force

Discussing​ ​Afro-Pessimism’s​ ​and​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity’s​ ​conceptions​ ​of​ ​death​ ​seems​ ​to​ ​echo
27
the​ ​narrator​ ​of​ ​Ralph​ ​Ellison’s​ ​Invisible​ ​Man​:​ ​“The​ ​end​ ​was​ ​in​ ​the​ ​beginning.” ​ ​While​ ​Ellison’s

narrator​ ​refers​ ​to​ ​the​ ​narrative​ ​construction​ ​of​ ​his​ ​telling,​ ​his​ ​statement​ ​certainly​ ​translates​ ​to

Queer​ ​Negativity​ ​and​ ​Afro-Pessimism,​ ​as​ ​the​ ​end​ ​or​ ​death​ ​serves​ ​as​ ​a​ ​beginning​ ​for​ ​these

25
​ ​Lauren​ ​Berlant​ ​and​ ​Lee​ ​Edelman,​ ​Sex,​ ​or​ ​the​ ​Unbearable​ ​(Durham:​ ​Duke​ ​University​ ​Press,​ ​2014),​ ​xiii.
26
​ ​Edelman,​ ​No​ ​Future​,​ ​7.
27
​ ​Ellison,​ ​571.
Clark​ ​13

thinkers​ ​too.​ ​These​ ​theorists​ ​turn​ ​to​ ​death​ ​is​ ​not​ ​purely​ ​an​ ​end​ ​or​ ​beginning;​ ​rather​ ​this​ ​turn

speaks​ ​to​ ​endings,​ ​beginnings,​ ​and,​ ​ultimately,​ ​an​ ​ongoing​ ​ontological​ ​state​ ​for​ ​black​ ​and/or

queer​ ​bodies.​ ​Death​ ​marks​ ​the​ ​starting​ ​point​ ​of​ ​these​ ​conversations,​ ​since​ ​coherent​ ​subjectivity,

humanity,​ ​and​ ​even​ ​life​ ​are​ ​not​ ​guarantees​ ​for​ ​blackness​ ​and​ ​queerness.​ ​Seeing​ ​that​ ​the

ontologies​ ​of​ ​blackness​ ​and​ ​queerness​ ​do​ ​not​ ​and​ ​cannot​ ​afford​ ​to​ ​take​ ​life​ ​as​ ​inherent​ ​to​ ​all

beings,​ ​scholars​ ​of​ ​Afro-Pessimism​ ​and​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity​ ​must​ ​interrogate​ ​Western​ ​ideologies​ ​to

show​ ​the​ ​constructed​ ​nature​ ​of​ ​innateness​ ​and​ ​inheritance.​ ​Without​ ​political,​ ​social,​ ​economic,​ ​or

any​ ​recognized​ ​form​ ​of​ ​subjectivity,​ ​living​ ​is​ ​no​ ​longer​ ​a​ ​promise.​ ​Thus,​ ​death​ ​is​ ​who,​ ​where,

and​ ​what​ ​thinkers​ ​of​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity​ ​and​ ​Afro-Pessimism​ ​must​ ​lead​ ​their​ ​explorations​ ​and

questions,​ ​for​ ​death’s​ ​before​ ​(humanity,​ ​subjecthood)​ ​and​ ​after​ ​(inheritance,​ ​continuance)​ ​are​ ​not

constituents​ ​for​ ​being​ ​queer​ ​and/or​ ​black.​ ​While​ ​their​ ​interests​ ​overlap,​ ​these​ ​theories​ ​tackle

subjectivity​ ​and​ ​the​ ​future​ ​in​ ​differing​ ​ways.​ ​Their​ ​divergences​ ​push​ ​against​ ​theories​ ​of​ ​the​ ​other,

subsequently​ ​furthering​ ​the​ ​considerations​ ​and​ ​possibilities​ ​of​ ​each.

Toward​ ​the​ ​end​ ​of​ ​his​ ​essay,​ ​“Down​ ​at​ ​the​ ​Cross:​ ​Letter​ ​from​ ​a​ ​Region​ ​in​ ​My​ ​Mind,”

Baldwin​ ​reads​ ​humanity​ ​through​ ​death,​ ​as​ ​a​ ​way​ ​to​ ​motivate​ ​readers​ ​to​ ​think​ ​about​ ​death​ ​but​ ​not

become​ ​paralyzed​ ​by​ ​it:

Perhaps​ ​the​ ​whole​ ​root​ ​of​ ​our​ ​trouble,​ ​the​ ​human​ ​trouble,​ ​is​ ​that​ ​we​ ​will​ ​sacrifice​ ​all​ ​the
beauty​ ​of​ ​our​ ​lives,​ ​will​ ​imprison​ ​ourselves​ ​in​ ​totems,​ ​taboos,​ ​crosses,​ ​blood​ ​sacrifices,
steeples,​ ​mosques,​ ​races,​ ​armies,​ ​flags,​ ​nations,​ ​in​ ​order​ ​to​ ​deny​ ​the​ ​fact​ ​of​ ​death,​ ​which
is​ ​the​ ​only​ ​fact​ ​we​ ​have.​ ​It​ ​seems​ ​to​ ​me​ ​that​ ​one​ ​ought​ ​to​ ​rejoice​ ​in​ ​the​ ​fact​ ​of
death—ought​ ​to​ ​decide,​ ​indeed,​ ​to​ ​earn​ ​one’s​ ​death​ ​by​ ​confronting​ ​with​ ​passion​ ​the
28
conundrum​ ​of​ ​life.

For​ ​Baldwin,​ ​death​ ​is​ ​a​ ​centralizing​ ​nucleus​ ​for​ ​the​ ​living,​ ​but​ ​through​ ​psychological​ ​and

religious​ ​powers,​ ​the​ ​living​ ​attempt​ ​to​ ​evade​ ​not​ ​only​ ​death​ ​itself​ ​but​ ​“the​ ​fact​”​ ​of​ ​it.​ ​We​ ​should

28
​ ​James​ ​Baldwin,​ ​The​ ​Fire​ ​Next​ ​Time​ ​(New​ ​York:​ ​Vintage​ ​International,​ ​1993),​ ​91-92.
Clark​ ​14

“rejoice”​ ​in​ ​this​ ​fact,​ ​Baldwin​ ​says,​ ​because​ ​evacuating​ ​death​ ​from​ ​life​ ​empties​ ​life​ ​of​ ​its

“beauty.”​ ​Here,​ ​one​ ​should​ ​also​ ​“​earn​ ​one’s​ ​death”​ ​by​ ​intensely​ ​encountering​ ​and​ ​interrogating

“the​ ​conundrum​ ​of​ ​life.”​ ​While​ ​Afro-Pessimism​ ​and​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity​ ​do​ ​not​ ​advocate​ ​for

“rejoic[ing]”​ ​for​ ​or​ ​in​ ​death,​ ​Baldwin’s​ ​attention​ ​to​ ​“the​ ​fact​ ​of​ ​death”​ ​speaks​ ​to​ ​issue​ ​of

ontology​ ​and​ ​subjecthood​ ​in​ ​black​ ​and/or​ ​queer​ ​death.

On​ ​Wilderson’s​ ​site​ ​Incognergo.org​,​ ​he​ ​has​ ​a​ ​page​ ​devoted​ ​to​ ​outlining

Afro-Pessimism’s​ ​definition​ ​and​ ​aim,​ ​and​ ​the​ ​first​ ​line​ ​of​ ​his​ ​piece​ ​reads:​ ​“Rather​ ​than​ ​celebrate

Blackness​ ​as​ ​a​ ​cultural​ ​identity,​ ​Afro-Pessimism​ ​theorizes​ ​it​ ​as​ ​a​ ​position​ ​of​ ​accumulation​ ​and
29
fungibility​ ​(Saidiya​ ​Hartman);​ ​that​ ​is​ ​a​ ​condition—or​ ​relation—of​ ​ontological​ ​death.”

Blackness​ ​within​ ​itself​ ​is​ ​death.​ ​Like​ ​“the​ ​personal​ ​pronoun​ ​we​,”​ ​death​ ​is​ ​Westernized​ ​concept​ ​as

well​ ​as​ ​ontology.​ ​Frantz​ ​Fanon,​ ​a​ ​psychiatrist​ ​and​ ​philosopher​ ​whose​ ​work​ ​catalyzed

Afro-Pessimism,​ ​writes,​ ​“Ontology—once​ ​it​ ​is​ ​finally​ ​admitted​ ​as​ ​leaving​ ​existence​ ​by​ ​the
30
wayside—does​ ​not​ ​permit​ ​us​ ​to​ ​understand​ ​the​ ​being​ ​of​ ​the​ ​black​ ​man.” ​ ​The​ ​West

overdetermines​ ​blackness’s​ ​affinity​ ​with​ ​death​ ​by​ ​inventing​ ​blackness​ ​along​ ​with​ ​major

philosophical​ ​modes​ ​to​ ​determine​ ​blackness​ ​as​ ​“ontological​ ​death.”​ ​No​ ​matter​ ​how​ ​the​ ​coin​ ​is

flipped—to​ ​blackness​ ​or​ ​death—the​ ​sides​ ​no​ ​longer​ ​matter,​ ​as​ ​they​ ​are​ ​the​ ​same​ ​under​ ​the

Western​ ​regime.​ ​And​ ​yet,​ ​blackness​ ​still​ ​signifies​ ​the​ ​real​ ​or,​ ​more​ ​precisely,​ ​the​ ​physical​ ​deaths

of​ ​blackness,​ ​those​ ​of​ ​countless​ ​unnamed​ ​slaves​ ​and​ ​those​ ​of​ ​black​ ​bodies​ ​throughout​ ​history

which​ ​have​ ​suffered​ ​and​ ​continue​ ​to​ ​suffer​ ​at​ ​the​ ​hands​ ​of​ ​the​ ​West.

Returning​ ​to​ ​Sexton’s​ ​statement​ ​quoting​ ​Hartman,​ ​Afro-Pessimism​ ​engages​ ​with​ ​the

“afterlife​ ​of​ ​slavery,”​ ​signifying​ ​major,​ ​irredeemable​ ​deaths​ ​by​ ​slavery​ ​preceding​ ​this

29
​ ​Frank​ ​Wilderson​ ​III,​ ​“Afro-Pessimism”​ ​last​ ​modified​ ​2008.​ ​incognegro.org/afro_pessimism.html.
30
​ ​Frantz​ ​Fanon,​ ​Black​ ​Skin,​ ​White​ ​Masks​,​ ​trans.​ ​Charles​ ​Lam​ ​Markmann​ ​(New​ ​York:​ ​Grove​ ​Press,​ ​1967),​ ​ ​110.
Clark​ ​15

31
“afterlife”—”a​ ​type​ ​of​ ​living​ ​on​ ​that​ ​survives​ ​after​ ​a​ ​type​ ​of​ ​death.” ​ ​This​ ​survival​ ​is​ ​not​ ​one​ ​of

redemption,​ ​as​ ​Afro-Pessimism​ ​renounces​ ​the​ ​idealism​ ​of​ ​reparative​ ​readings.​ ​However,​ ​Sexton

complicates​ ​blackness’s​ ​“ontological​ ​death”​ ​by​ ​furthering​ ​Baldwin’s​ ​point​ ​concerning​ ​life​ ​and

death’s​ ​relation​ ​and​ ​relationality:​ ​“Rather​ ​than​ ​approaching​ ​(the​ ​theorization​ ​of)​ ​social​ ​death​ ​and

(the​ ​theorization​ ​of)​ ​social​ ​life​ ​as​ ​an​ ​‘either/or’​ ​proposition,​ ​then,​ ​why​ ​not​ ​attempt​ ​to​ ​think​ ​them
32
as​ ​a​ ​matter​ ​of​ ​‘both/and’?” ​ ​Instead​ ​of​ ​life​ ​and​ ​death​ ​being​ ​based​ ​on​ ​difference,​ ​life​ ​and​ ​death

can​ ​co-exist​ ​and​ ​do​ ​so,​ ​as​ ​black​ ​bodies​ ​continue​ ​to​ ​life​ ​within​ ​the​ ​social​ ​despite​ ​and​ ​alongside

their​ ​ongoing​ ​social​ ​death.​ ​Hartman’s​ ​“afterlife​ ​of​ ​slavery”​ ​does​ ​not​ ​signify​ ​slavery’s​ ​passing;

rather​ ​it​ ​attends​ ​to​ ​the​ ​black​ ​lives​ ​lived​ ​within​ ​a​ ​world​ ​forever​ ​marked​ ​by​ ​and​ ​maintained​ ​through

slavery.​ ​Hartman’s​ ​afterlife​ ​of​ ​slavery,​ ​Sexton’s​ ​social​ ​death,​ ​and​ ​Wilderson’s​ ​ontological​ ​death,

however​ ​different​ ​in​ ​their​ ​conceptions​ ​of​ ​death,​ ​all​ ​find​ ​that​ ​blackness​ ​carries​ ​on​ ​the​ ​traumatic

past​ ​of​ ​slavery.​ ​As​ ​Sexton​ ​notes,​ ​“[B]lack​ ​life​ ​is​ ​not​ ​social,​ ​or​ ​rather​ ​that​ ​black​ ​life​ ​is​ ​lived​ ​in
33
social​ ​death​.” ​ ​Thus,​ ​black​ ​bodies​ ​are​ ​living​ ​within​ ​an​ ​ongoing​ ​death​ ​of​ ​and​ ​in​ ​the​ ​past​ ​that​ ​has

yet​ ​to​ ​conclude.

Through​ ​Bersani​ ​and​ ​Edelman,​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity​ ​takes​ ​on​ ​“the​ ​fact​ ​of​ ​death”​ ​by​ ​means​ ​of

the​ ​death​ ​drive.​ ​Bersani’s​ ​employs​ ​Freud’s​ ​use​ ​of​ ​the​ ​concept,​ ​while​ ​Edelman​ ​holds​ ​to​ ​Lacan.

For​ ​Freud​ ​and​ ​Lacan,​ ​the​ ​death​ ​drive​ ​marks​ ​one’s​ ​drive,​ ​psychologically​ ​and​ ​behaviorally,

toward​ ​death,​ ​in​ ​contrast​ ​to​ ​the​ ​drive​ ​toward​ ​sex,​ ​reproduction,​ ​and​ ​survival.​ ​Opposing​ ​the​ ​death

drive’s​ ​traditional​ ​psychoanalytic​ ​connotations,​ ​Bersani​ ​and​ ​Edelman​ ​connect​ ​the​ ​death​ ​drive​ ​to

sex,​ ​and​ ​in​ ​particular,​ ​queer​ ​sex.​ ​Edelman​ ​asserts,​ ​“[A]s​ ​the​ ​inarticulable​ ​surplus​ ​that​ ​dismantles

the​ ​subject​ ​from​ ​within,​ ​the​ ​death​ ​drive​ ​names​ ​what​ ​the​ ​queer,​ ​in​ ​the​ ​order​ ​of​ ​the​ ​social,​ ​is​ ​called

31
​ ​Sexton,​ ​“The​ ​Social​ ​Life​ ​of​ ​Social​ ​Death,”​ ​23.
32
​ ​Ibid.,​ ​22.
33
​ ​Ibid.,​ ​29.
Clark​ ​16

34
forth​ ​to​ ​figure:​ ​the​ ​negativity​ ​opposed​ ​to​ ​every​ ​form​ ​of​ ​social​ ​viability.” ​ ​The​ ​queer​ ​finds​ ​itself

against​ ​all​ ​sociality​ ​and​ ​immersed​ ​in​ ​negativity,​ ​a​ ​specific​ ​negativity​ ​that​ ​tends​ ​toward​ ​death​ ​and

sex​ ​rather​ ​than​ ​toward​ ​death​ ​but​ ​not​ ​sex.​ ​The​ ​connection​ ​between​ ​death​ ​and​ ​sex​ ​emerges​ ​from

queer​ ​bodies’​ ​inability​ ​to​ ​sexually​ ​reproduce​ ​and,​ ​thus,​ ​inability​ ​to​ ​productively​ ​engage​ ​in​ ​the

social.​ ​Death​ ​for​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity​ ​is​ ​not​ ​grounded​ ​in​ ​ontological​ ​questions​ ​like​ ​Afro-Pessimism.

Rather​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity​ ​finds​ ​death​ ​most​ ​potent​ ​in​ ​questions​ ​of​ ​temporality:​ ​the​ ​concept​ ​of​ ​not

having​ ​a​ ​future.​ ​The​ ​queer​ ​bodies​ ​literally​ ​and​ ​figuratively​ ​embody​ ​the​ ​unattainability​ ​and,​ ​in

turn,​ ​fantasy​ ​of​ ​futurity.​ ​Edelman​ ​also​ ​notes,​ ​“[A]​ ​death​ ​drive​ ​movement,​ ​a​ ​back​ ​and​ ​forth​ ​that
35
betrays​ ​the​ ​insistence​ ​of​ ​something​ ​we​ ​can​ ​never​ ​resolve,​ ​get​ ​beyond,​ ​or​ ​make​ ​peace​ ​with.”

Queerness’s​ ​enactment​ ​of​ ​no​ ​future—death—is​ ​certainly​ ​that​ ​something​ ​we​ ​are​ ​not​ ​able​ ​to

“make​ ​peace​ ​with”​ ​because​ ​the​ ​idea​ ​of​ ​resolution​ ​or​ ​reparation​ ​is​ ​dependent​ ​on​ ​a​ ​future​ ​that

queerness​ ​cannot​ ​and​ ​directly​ ​refuses​ ​to​ ​fix,​ ​whether​ ​for​ ​the​ ​better​ ​or​ ​worse​ ​unreachable​ ​future.

Subjectivity:​ ​Afro-Pessimism’s​ ​Problem​ ​and​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity’s​ ​Failure​ ​to​ ​See​ ​It

While​ ​it​ ​may​ ​be​ ​obvious​ ​in​ ​their​ ​titles,​ ​Afro-Pessimism​ ​and​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity​ ​both

abstain​ ​from​ ​optimism,​ ​as​ ​it​ ​stems​ ​from​ ​prejudicial​ ​exclusion​ ​and​ ​fantasy.​ ​Each​ ​interrogate​ ​the

work​ ​of​ ​reparative​ ​readings​ ​or​ ​“reconciliation,”​ ​not​ ​to​ ​forgo​ ​hope​ ​or​ ​life​ ​but​ ​to​ ​generate​ ​more

productive​ ​and​ ​pragmatic​ ​understandings​ ​of​ ​black​ ​and​ ​queer​ ​processes​ ​of​ ​survival.​ ​Both​ ​question

subjectivity​ ​as​ ​a​ ​way​ ​to​ ​interrogate​ ​optimism’s​ ​promotion​ ​of​ ​the​ ​subject​ ​as​ ​inherently​ ​good.​ ​In

the​ ​vein​ ​of​ ​asking​ ​“the​ ​most​ ​basic​ ​questions,”​ ​Afro-Pessimism​ ​refuses​ ​to​ ​assume​ ​that​ ​blackness

possesses​ ​subjectivity,​ ​personhood,​ ​and​ ​even​ ​humanness.​ ​In​ ​fact,​ ​their​ ​work​ ​actively​ ​shows​ ​that

34
​ ​Edelman,​ ​No​ ​Future​,​ ​9.
35
​ ​Berlant​ ​and​ ​Edelman,​ ​28.
Clark​ ​17

blackness​ ​can​ ​never​ ​be​ ​a​ ​subject​ ​or​ ​human​ ​under​ ​Western​ ​thought.​ ​Instead,​ ​as​ ​Hortense​ ​J.

Spillers’s​ ​pathbreaking​ ​essay​ ​“Mama's​ ​Baby,​ ​Papa's​ ​Maybe:​ ​An​ ​American​ ​Grammar​ ​Book”

asserts,​ ​blackness​ ​is​ ​flesh:​ ​“that​ ​zero​ ​degree​ ​of​ ​social​ ​conceptualization​ ​that​ ​does​ ​not​ ​escape
36
concealment​ ​under​ ​the​ ​brush​ ​of​ ​discourse,​ ​or​ ​the​ ​reflexes​ ​of​ ​iconography.” ​ ​Flesh​ ​marks​ ​a

being’s​ ​ontology​ ​before​ ​ideologies​ ​or​ ​discourses​ ​encounter​ ​it.

Again,​ ​as​ ​the​ ​West’s​ ​constitution​ ​depends​ ​on​ ​antiblackness,​ ​the​ ​subject—a​ ​Western

creation—excludes​ ​blackness.​ ​In​ ​a​ ​1969​ ​interview​ ​titled,​ ​“Disturber​ ​of​ ​the​ ​Peace:​ ​James

Baldwin—An​ ​Interview,”​ ​Eve​ ​Auchincloss​ ​and​ ​Nancy​ ​Lynchy​ ​ask​ ​Baldwin​ ​about​ ​the​ ​Negro,

and​ ​Baldwin’s​ ​reply​ ​redirects​ ​the​ ​conversation​ ​to​ ​the​ ​issue​ ​of​ ​terminology:

Interviewers:​ ​Can​ ​a​ ​Negro​ ​ever​ ​talk​ ​about​ ​anything​ ​but​ ​being​ ​a​ ​Negro?
Baldwin:​ ​I​ ​get​ ​so​ ​tired​ ​of​ ​black​ ​and​ ​white,​ ​you​ ​know,​ ​so​ ​tired​ ​of​ ​talking​ ​about​ ​it,
especially​ ​when​ ​you​ ​can’t​ ​get​ ​anything​ ​across.​ ​What​ ​you​ ​have​ ​to​ ​do,​ ​I​ ​suppose,​ ​is​ ​invest
the​ ​vocabulary​ ​with​ ​something​ ​it​ ​doesn’t​ ​contain​ ​yet​.​ ​Don’t​ ​you​ ​see​ ​what​ ​I’m​ ​trying​ ​to
do?​ ​I’m​ ​trying​ ​to​ ​find​ ​another​ ​word​ ​besides​ ​Negro​ ​to​ ​say​ ​what​ ​I​ ​mean,​ ​and​ ​I​ ​can’t​ ​use
37
tragedy.

Baldwin​ ​addresses​ ​the​ ​difficulty​ ​of​ ​talking​ ​about​ ​one’s​ ​experience​ ​and​ ​positionality,​ ​when​ ​the

language​ ​available​ ​is​ ​structured​ ​around​ ​the​ ​exclusion​ ​of​ ​that​ ​experience.​ ​In​ ​other​ ​words,​ ​Negro​ ​is

the​ ​Western​ ​term​ ​used​ ​to​ ​describe​ ​Baldwin​ ​and​ ​his​ ​experience,​ ​but​ ​the​ ​constructed​ ​identity​ ​of​ ​the

Negro​ ​fails​ ​to​ ​“get​ ​anything​ ​across”​ ​that​ ​he​ ​desire​ ​to​ ​communicate.​ ​Afro-Pessimism’s​ ​critique​ ​of

Western​ ​thought​ ​and​ ​language​ ​becomes​ ​apparent​ ​in​ ​Baldwin’s​ ​trouble​ ​with​ ​articulating​ ​himself

through​ ​“vocabulary​ ​with​ ​something​ ​it​ ​doesn’t​ ​contain​ ​yet.”​ ​Here,​ ​blackness​ ​operates​ ​similarly

to​ ​Negro;​ ​language​ ​cannot​ ​encapsulate​ ​these​ ​states​ ​of​ ​being,​ ​especially​ ​considering​ ​the

vocabulary’s​ ​source.

36
​ ​Hortense​ ​J.​ ​Spillers,​ ​“Mama's​ ​Baby,​ ​Papa's​ ​Maybe:​ ​An​ ​American​ ​Grammar​ ​Book,”​ ​Diacritics​ ​17,​ ​No.​ ​2,​ ​“Culture
and​ ​Countermemory:​ ​The​ ​"American"​ ​Connection”​ ​(Summer​ ​1987):​ ​67.
37
​ ​Baldwin,​ ​James​ ​Baldwin:​ ​The​ ​Last​ ​Interview​ ​and​ ​Other​ ​Conversations​,​ ​81(emphasis​ ​added).
Clark​ ​18

Why​ ​does​ ​Baldwin​ ​refuse​ ​to​ ​use​ ​“tragedy”​ ​as​ ​a​ ​substitute​ ​term​ ​for​ ​Negro?​ ​Firstly,

nothing​ ​can​ ​substitute​ ​the​ ​term​ ​Negro​ ​or​ ​blackness,​ ​as​ ​they​ ​are​ ​overdetermined​ ​by​ ​their

ontological,​ ​historical,​ ​temporal,​ ​sexual,​ ​linguist,​ ​social,​ ​and​ ​political​ ​significances.​ ​Fanon​ ​notes

the​ ​excessiveness​ ​tied​ ​to​ ​blackness:​ ​“I​ ​discovered​ ​my​ ​blackness,​ ​my​ ​ethnic​ ​characteristics;​ ​and​ ​I

was​ ​battered​ ​down​ ​by​ ​tom-toms,​ ​cannibalism,​ ​intellectual​ ​deficiency,​ ​fetishism,​ ​racial​ ​defects,
38
slave-ships,​ ​and​ ​above​ ​all​ ​else,​ ​above​ ​all:​ ​“Sho’​ ​good​ ​eatin.’” ​ ​Fanon’s​ ​discovery​ ​of​ ​blackness​ ​is

really​ ​his​ ​discovery​ ​of​ ​the​ ​West’s​ ​view​ ​of​ ​him.​ ​Western​ ​language—blackness,​ ​Negro,​ ​and

tragedy—rely​ ​upon​ ​antiblackness​ ​or,​ ​more​ ​precisely,​ ​is​ ​contingent​ ​upon​ ​“batter[ing]​ ​down”

blackness​ ​with​ ​exorbitant​ ​symbolic​ ​meaning,​ ​so​ ​that​ ​it​ ​is​ ​emptied​ ​of​ ​personhood​ ​through​ ​its

overflow​ ​of​ ​referents.​ ​However,​ ​this​ ​referential​ ​spillage​ ​does​ ​not​ ​arise​ ​from​ ​blackness​ ​itself.

Quoting​ ​Ronald​ ​A.T.​ ​Judy,​ ​Wilderson​ ​asserts,​ ​“[T]he​ ​Negro​ ​is​ ​a​ ​symbol​ ​that​ ​cannot​ ​‘enable​ ​the
39
representation​ ​of​ ​meaning​ ​[because]​ ​it​ ​has​ ​no​ ​referent.’” ​ ​The​ ​Western​ ​hegemony​ ​generates​ ​this

referential​ ​overproduction​ ​with​ ​blackness.​ ​In​ ​doing​ ​so,​ ​the​ ​West​ ​uses​ ​antiblackness​ ​to​ ​define

subjectivity​ ​and,​ ​ultimately,​ ​life,​ ​so​ ​that​ ​the​ ​West​ ​appears​ ​coherent​ ​and​ ​stable​ ​and​ ​blackness

seems​ ​irrational​ ​and​ ​violently​ ​erratic.​ ​Within​ ​this​ ​space​ ​of​ ​blackness’s​ ​no-referential​ ​state,

Afro-Pessimism​ ​challenges​ ​Western​ ​referential​ ​lineages​ ​regarding​ ​the​ ​connections​ ​among​ ​body,

human,​ ​consciousness,​ ​and​ ​subjectivity​ ​because​ ​these​ ​links​ ​not​ ​only​ ​do​ ​not​ ​apply​ ​to​ ​blackness
40
but​ ​also​ ​are​ ​predicated​ ​on​ ​undeterminable​ ​“grammar​ ​of​ ​suffering”​ ​experienced​ ​by​ ​black​ ​bodies.

Ultimately,​ ​Baldwin’s​ ​and​ ​Afro-Pessimism’s​ ​challenge​ ​of​ ​language​ ​leads​ ​to​ ​the​ ​challenge

of​ ​subjectivity.​ ​How​ ​does​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity​ ​handle​ ​the​ ​problematic​ ​implications​ ​of​ ​the​ ​West’s

38
​ ​Fanon,​ ​112.
39
​ ​Wilderson,​ ​Red,​ ​White,​ ​and​ ​Black​,​ ​39.​ ​Ronald​ ​A.T.​ ​Judy,​ ​(​Dis)Forming​ ​the​ ​American​ ​Canon:​ ​African-Arabic
Slave​ ​Narratives​ ​and​ ​the​ ​Vernacular​ ​(Minneapolis:​ ​University​ ​of​ ​Minnesota​ ​Press,​ ​1993),​ ​107.
40
​ ​Wilderson,​ ​Red,​ ​White,​ ​and​ ​Black​,​ ​6.
Clark​ ​19

language​ ​and​ ​sense​ ​of​ ​self?​ ​Put​ ​simply,​ ​it​ ​is​ ​not​ ​their​ ​question,​ ​for​ ​these​ ​theorists​ ​use​ ​Western

language​ ​and​ ​philosophy​ ​to​ ​articulate​ ​and​ ​support​ ​their​ ​projects.​ ​The​ ​role​ ​of​ ​the​ ​West​ ​in​ ​their

archives​ ​and​ ​terminology​ ​goes​ ​largely​ ​unnoticed.​ ​This​ ​lack​ ​of​ ​questioning​ ​is​ ​partially​ ​due​ ​to​ ​their

interest​ ​in​ ​Western​ ​formations​ ​of​ ​the​ ​social,​ ​but​ ​again,​ ​the​ ​Western​ ​qualities​ ​of​ ​these​ ​formations

remain​ ​unstated.​ ​Additionally,​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity​ ​presumes​ ​the​ ​subjectivity​ ​and​ ​human​ ​status​ ​of

bodies.​ ​By​ ​returning​ ​to​ ​Bersani’s​ ​point​ ​of​ ​sexuality’s​ ​“self-shattering”​ ​effects,​ ​we​ ​find​ ​that​ ​the

self,​ ​in​ ​some​ ​manner,​ ​exists​ ​before​ ​this​ ​sexuality-induced​ ​shattering​ ​occurs.​ ​While​ ​Queer

Negativity​ ​regards​ ​the​ ​self​ ​as​ ​undone,​ ​it​ ​fails​ ​to​ ​ask:​ ​do​ ​queer​ ​bodies​ ​have​ ​selves​ ​or​ ​subjectivities

from​ ​the​ ​start?;​ ​what​ ​determines​ ​one’s​ ​having​ ​of​ ​subjecthood?;​ ​and​ ​what​ ​is​ ​the​ ​connections

among​ ​flesh,​ ​body,​ ​human,​ ​personhood,​ ​and​ ​subject?

For​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity​ ​and​ ​Afro-Pessimism,​ ​universal​ ​inclusivity​ ​is​ ​a​ ​fictitious​ ​liberal

ideal​ ​striving​ ​for​ ​reparative​ ​understandings.​ ​Both​ ​fields​ ​note​ ​the​ ​pitfalls​ ​of​ ​desiring​ ​racial​ ​and

sexual​ ​reconciliation.​ ​Like​ ​Afro-Pessimism,​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity​ ​refuses​ ​the​ ​fantasy​ ​of​ ​universality.

And​ ​yet,​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity​ ​recognizes​ ​this​ ​universality​ ​as​ ​a​ ​symptom​ ​of​ ​neoliberalism​ ​rather​ ​than

Western​ ​thought.​ ​If​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity​ ​refuses​ ​inclusivity,​ ​then​ ​the​ ​notion​ ​that​ ​all​ ​beings​ ​have

subjectivity​ ​would​ ​fall​ ​short.​ ​At​ ​the​ ​same​ ​time,​ ​subjecthood​ ​and​ ​its​ ​ontological​ ​entanglements

with​ ​body,​ ​human,​ ​and​ ​self​ ​remain​ ​knotted​ ​together​ ​for​ ​Queer​ ​Negativists.​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity​ ​and

queer​ ​theory​ ​overall​ ​find​ ​a​ ​challenge​ ​in​ ​asking​ ​“the​ ​most​ ​basic​ ​questions”​ ​like​ ​Afro-Pessimism.

Yet,​ ​this​ ​does​ ​not​ ​mean​ ​this​ ​task​ ​is​ ​impossible.​ ​By​ ​interrogating​ ​the​ ​very​ ​existence​ ​of

subjectivity,​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity​ ​may​ ​find​ ​a​ ​clearer​ ​image​ ​of​ ​their​ ​aims.​ ​Edelman​ ​urges​ ​us​ ​to​ ​treat

futurity​ ​as​ ​the​ ​fantasy​ ​and​ ​radically​ ​reside​ ​in​ ​the​ ​present​ ​and​ ​just​ ​that.​ ​Dismantling​ ​institutions​ ​to

just​ ​erect​ ​new​ ​ones​ ​requires​ ​a​ ​future​ ​to​ ​work​ ​and​ ​look​ ​toward.​ ​Thus,​ ​Edelman​ ​argues,​ ​“[T]he​ ​aim
Clark​ ​20

of​ ​queer​ ​negativity​ ​is​ ​rather​ ​to​ ​hammer​ ​[institutions​ ​and​ ​other​ ​normalizing​ ​entities]​ ​into​ ​the​ ​dust”
41
and​ ​leave​ ​them​ ​as​ ​that. ​ ​If​ ​subjectivity,​ ​self,​ ​and​ ​humanness​ ​are​ ​the​ ​cornerstones​ ​of​ ​Western

thought,​ ​refusing​ ​to​ ​take​ ​them​ ​as​ ​givens​ ​would​ ​certainty​ ​destabilize​ ​the​ ​powers​ ​that​ ​be.​ ​In​ ​effect,

Queer​ ​Negativity’s​ ​recognition​ ​of​ ​subjectivity​ ​as​ ​a​ ​privileged​ ​promise​ ​rather​ ​than​ ​a​ ​guarantee

would​ ​already​ ​do​ ​the​ ​work​ ​it​ ​pursues—to​ ​leave​ ​neoliberal​ ​Western​ ​ideologies​ ​in​ ​“the​ ​dust.”

Temporality:​ ​Afro-Pessimism’s​ ​Boundless​ ​Past​ ​and​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity’s​ ​No​ ​Future

Afro-Pessimism​ ​and​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity​ ​locate​ ​negativity​ ​in​ ​different​ ​temporal​ ​registers.

Afro-Pessimism​ ​discusses​ ​the​ ​ways​ ​in​ ​which​ ​slavery’s​ ​past​ ​is​ ​unending,​ ​as​ ​slavery​ ​marks​ ​all

time​ ​and​ ​all​ ​blackness​ ​that​ ​follows​ ​it.​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity​ ​lays​ ​its​ ​interest​ ​in​ ​the​ ​future​ ​or,​ ​more

specifically,​ ​the​ ​fantasy​ ​of​ ​it.​ ​Queerness​ ​aims​ ​to​ ​embody​ ​a​ ​constant​ ​state​ ​of​ ​radical​ ​presentism,​ ​in

order​ ​to​ ​avoid​ ​falling​ ​into​ ​the​ ​illusion​ ​of​ ​the​ ​future.​ ​These​ ​temporal​ ​focuses​ ​appear​ ​to​ ​be​ ​the

antithesis​ ​of​ ​the​ ​other—blackness​ ​with​ ​ongoing​ ​past,​ ​queerness​ ​with​ ​a​ ​nonexistent​ ​future—yet

queerness’s​ ​treatment​ ​of​ ​time​ ​may​ ​benefit​ ​blackness’s​ ​temporal​ ​understandings.

Christina​ ​Sharpe’s​ ​In​ ​the​ ​Wake:​ ​On​ ​Blackness​ ​and​ ​Being​ ​directly​ ​tackles​ ​black​ ​bodies’

inheritance​ ​of​ ​slavery’s​ ​trauma.​ ​Sharpe’s​ ​uses​ ​the​ ​term​ ​“wake”​ ​to​ ​temporally​ ​and​ ​spatially

indicate​ ​the​ ​time​ ​of​ ​slavery’s​ ​beginning​ ​to​ ​the​ ​contemporary​ ​moment,​ ​as​ ​slavery’s​ ​presence​ ​is

still​ ​felt​ ​and​ ​subjected​ ​on​ ​black​ ​bodies.​ ​With​ ​this,​ ​she​ ​notes,​ ​“In​ ​the​ ​wake,​ ​the​ ​past​ ​that​ ​is​ ​not​ ​past

reappears,​ ​always,​ ​to​ ​rupture​ ​the​ ​present,”​ ​and​ ​refers​ ​to​ ​Michel-Rolph​ ​Trouillot’s​ ​concept​ ​of​ ​the
42
past​ ​as​ ​“a​ ​position,”​ ​and​ ​“[t]hus,​ ​in​ ​no​ ​way​ ​can​ ​we​ ​identify​ ​the​ ​past​ ​as​ ​past.” ​ ​Under

Afro-Pessimism,​ ​both​ ​blackness​ ​and​ ​“pastness”​ ​are​ ​positions​ ​rather​ ​than​ ​bounded​ ​categories​ ​or

​ ​Edelman,​ ​“The​ ​Antisocial​ ​Thesis​ ​in​ ​Queer​ ​Theory,”​ ​822.


41
42
​ ​Christina​ ​Sharpe,​ ​In​ ​the​ ​Wake:​ ​On​ ​Blackness​ ​and​ ​Being​ ​(Durham:​ ​Duke​ ​University​ ​Press,​ ​2016),​ ​9.​ ​Michel-Rolph
Trouillot,​ ​Silencing​ ​the​ ​Past:​ ​Power​ ​and​ ​the​ ​Production​ ​of​ ​History​ ​(Boston:​ ​Beacon​ ​Press,​ ​1997),​ ​15.
Clark​ ​21

43
limited​ ​systems​ ​of​ ​knowledge. ​ ​Further​ ​into​ ​her​ ​monograph,​ ​Sharpe​ ​summarizes​ ​the​ ​state​ ​of

“Black​ ​positionality”​ ​in​ ​terms​ ​of​ ​slavery’s​ ​“singularity”:

In​ ​the​ ​United​ ​States,​ ​slavery​ ​is​ ​imagined​ ​as​ ​a​ ​singular​ ​event​ ​even​ ​as​ ​it​ ​changed​ ​over​ ​time
and​ ​even​ ​as​ ​its​ ​duration​ ​expands​ ​into​ ​supposed​ ​emancipation​ ​and​ ​beyond.​ ​But​ ​slavery
was​ ​not​ ​singular;​ ​it​ ​was,​ ​rather,​ ​a​ ​singularity—a​ ​weather​ ​event​ ​or​ ​phenomenon​ ​likely​ ​to
occur​ ​around​ ​a​ ​particular​ ​time,​ ​or​ ​date,​ ​or​ ​set​ ​of​ ​circumstances.​ ​Emancipation​ ​did​ ​not
make​ ​free​ ​Black​ ​life​ ​free;​ ​it​ ​continues​ ​to​ ​hold​ ​us​ ​in​ ​that​ ​singularity.​ ​The​ ​brutality​ ​was​ ​not
44
singular;​ ​it​ ​was​ ​the​ ​singularity​ ​of​ ​antiblackness.

Singularity,​ ​for​ ​Sharpe,​ ​does​ ​not​ ​imply​ ​a​ ​singular​ ​entity,​ ​for​ ​she​ ​uses​ ​the​ ​physics​ ​definition​ ​of​ ​the

term,​ ​which​ ​connotes​ ​“a​ ​point​ ​or​ ​region​ ​of​ ​infinite​ ​mass​ ​density​ ​at​ ​which​ ​space​ ​and​ ​time​ ​are

infinitely​ ​distorted​ ​by​ ​gravitational​ ​forces​ ​and​ ​which​ ​is​ ​held​ ​to​ ​be​ ​the​ ​final​ ​state​ ​of​ ​matter​ ​falling
45
into​ ​a​ ​black​ ​hole.” ​ ​There​ ​is​ ​more​ ​than​ ​an​ ​afterlife​ ​to​ ​slavery;​ ​there​ ​is​ ​also​ ​an​ ​infinite​ ​state​ ​of

“brutality”​ ​and​ ​death​ ​fleshed​ ​out​ ​in​ ​anti/blackness.​ ​Black​ ​bodies​ ​inherit​ ​the​ ​trauma​ ​of​ ​slavery,​ ​an

infinitely​ ​transforming​ ​and​ ​existing​ ​death,​ ​which​ ​simultaneously​ ​extends​ ​and​ ​collapses​ ​time​ ​and

space​ ​to​ ​find​ ​itself​ ​in​ ​“the​ ​singularity​ ​of​ ​antiblackness.”

What​ ​if​ ​we​ ​were​ ​to​ ​apply​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity’s​ ​forgoing​ ​of​ ​the​ ​future​ ​to​ ​Afro-Pessimism?

Baldwin​ ​has​ ​words​ ​to​ ​help​ ​situate​ ​this​ ​question.​ ​In​ ​her​ ​1979​ ​interview​ ​with​ ​Baldwin​ ​titled,

“James​ ​Baldwin:​ ​No​ ​Gain​ ​for​ ​Race​ ​Relations,”​ ​Hollie​ ​I.​ ​West​ ​writes,​ ​“Baldwin​ ​is​ ​nearly​ ​as

articulate​ ​in​ ​his​ ​speech​ ​as​ ​in​ ​his​ ​celebrated​ ​writing.​ ​And​ ​on​ ​this​ ​day​ ​his​ ​words​ ​have​ ​painted​ ​a

paradox.​ ​All​ ​during​ ​the​ ​interview​ ​he​ ​has​ ​said​ ​he’s​ ​an​ ​optimist.​ ​So​ ​why​ ​is​ ​he​ ​voicing​ ​such
46
pessimism?” ​ ​To​ ​that,​ ​Baldwin​ ​responses:​ ​“It’s​ ​a​ ​contradiction…​ ​When​ ​I​ ​say​ ​I’m​ ​not​ ​a

pessimist,​ ​I​ ​mean​ ​that​ ​I​ ​don’t​ ​consider​ ​that​ ​everything​ ​is​ ​lost​ ​even​ ​though​ ​I​ ​don’t​ ​see​ ​how​ ​we’re

43
​ ​Referring​ ​back​ ​to​ ​Wilderson’s​ ​observation​ ​that​ ​Afro-Pessimism​ ​concentrates​ ​on​ ​“Black​ ​positionality.”
44
​ ​Sharpe,​ ​106.
45
​ ​Sharpe,​ ​106,​ ​quoting​ ​Merriam-Webster​ ​Online​.
46
​ ​James​ ​Baldwin,​ ​Conversations​ ​with​ ​James​ ​Baldwin​,​ ​eds.​ ​Fred​ ​L.​ ​Standley​ ​and​ ​Louis​ ​H.​ ​Pratt​ ​(Jackson:​ ​University
Press​ ​of​ ​Mississippi,​ ​1989),​ ​172.
Clark​ ​22

47
going​ ​to​ ​have​ ​a​ ​future​ ​or​ ​even​ ​present.” ​ ​While​ ​Baldwin​ ​says​ ​he​ ​is​ ​not​ ​a​ ​pessimist​ ​because​ ​he

does​ ​not​ ​believe​ ​“that​ ​everything​ ​is​ ​lost,”​ ​he​ ​remains​ ​unsure​ ​about​ ​what​ ​the​ ​current​ ​moment​ ​and

the​ ​time​ ​to​ ​come.​ ​Baldwin’s​ ​statement​ ​does​ ​necessarily​ ​suggest​ ​that​ ​he​ ​entirely​ ​aligns​ ​with

Queer​ ​Negativity’s​ ​disavowal​ ​of​ ​the​ ​future.​ ​At​ ​the​ ​same​ ​time,​ ​his​ ​apprehension​ ​toward​ ​futurity

speaks​ ​to​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity,​ ​as​ ​Baldwin​ ​questions​ ​the​ ​possibility​ ​of​ ​a​ ​future​ ​and​ ​worth​ ​of​ ​striving

toward​ ​it.

With​ ​Afro-Pessimism’s​ ​focus​ ​on​ ​the​ ​past​ ​of​ ​slavery​ ​rupturing​ ​all​ ​that​ ​comes​ ​after​ ​it,​ ​what

would​ ​happen​ ​to​ ​the​ ​inheritance​ ​of​ ​slavery​ ​if​ ​the​ ​future​ ​was​ ​treated​ ​as​ ​fantasy?​ ​This​ ​is​ ​definitely

easier​ ​asked​ ​than​ ​theorized.​ ​This​ ​is​ ​not​ ​to​ ​say​ ​that​ ​Afro-Pessimism​ ​is​ ​invested​ ​in​ ​maintaining​ ​the

inheritance​ ​of​ ​slavery​ ​because​ ​their​ ​thinkers​ ​currently​ ​do​ ​not​ ​view​ ​the​ ​future​ ​as​ ​an​ ​ever-deferred

temporality.​ ​By​ ​its​ ​logic,​ ​Afro-Pessimism​ ​partially​ ​supports​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity’s​ ​concept​ ​of​ ​the

future​ ​as​ ​illusion​ ​maintain​ ​the​ ​continuance​ ​of​ ​the​ ​social​ ​because​ ​asserting​ ​no​ ​future​ ​undermines

Western​ ​ideologies.​ ​My​ ​aim​ ​is​ ​not​ ​to​ ​critique​ ​Afro-Pessimism’s​ ​understanding​ ​of​ ​the​ ​past​ ​as​ ​a

position​ ​and​ ​slavery​ ​as​ ​an​ ​non-concluded,​ ​traumatic​ ​event.​ ​I​ ​think​ ​playing​ ​with​ ​the​ ​notion​ ​of​ ​the

future​ ​as​ ​fantasy,​ ​which​ ​is​ ​integral​ ​to​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity,​ ​may​ ​afford​ ​Afro-Pessimism​ ​another

articulation​ ​of​ ​the​ ​“afterlife​ ​of​ ​slavery”​ ​and​ ​may​ ​allow​ ​slavery​ ​to​ ​be​ ​stripped​ ​of​ ​its​ ​inherited

status.

How​ ​would​ ​Afro-Pessimism’s​ ​theorizations​ ​of​ ​slavery’s​ ​“singularity”​ ​change​ ​if​ ​the​ ​future

is​ ​seen​ ​as​ ​fantasy?​ ​On​ ​the​ ​surface,​ ​Afro-Pessimism​ ​does​ ​not​ ​engage​ ​with​ ​the​ ​future,​ ​yet​ ​for

slavery’s​ ​“singularity”​ ​to​ ​have​ ​its​ ​infinite,​ ​boundless​ ​impact​ ​in​ ​and​ ​on​ ​time,​ ​it​ ​needs​ ​a​ ​future​ ​for

this​ ​to​ ​transpire.​ ​Taking​ ​the​ ​future​ ​as​ ​nonexistent​ ​would​ ​alter​ ​the​ ​continuance​ ​of​ ​slavery’s

47
​ ​Baldwin,​ ​Conversations​ ​with​ ​James​ ​Baldwin​,​ ​172-3.
Clark​ ​23

afterlives.​ ​However,​ ​saying​ ​that​ ​the​ ​future​ ​is​ ​a​ ​fantasy​ ​does​ ​not​ ​preclude​ ​time​ ​from​ ​progressing;

consequently,​ ​naming​ ​the​ ​future​ ​as​ ​fantasy​ ​would​ ​not​ ​automatically​ ​rid​ ​slavery’s​ ​marker​ ​from

time.​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity’s​ ​call​ ​for​ ​no​ ​future​ ​functions​ ​as​ ​a​ ​complete​ ​dismantlement​ ​of​ ​the​ ​social,

West,​ ​and​ ​anything​ ​that​ ​needs​ ​a​ ​future​ ​to​ ​be​ ​recognizable​ ​and​ ​coherent.​ ​Claiming​ ​a​ ​similar

polemic​ ​against​ ​futurity​ ​may​ ​be​ ​a​ ​way​ ​for​ ​Afro-Pessimism​ ​to​ ​tackle​ ​and​ ​work​ ​toward​ ​undoing

slavery’s​ ​“singularity,”​ ​not​ ​to​ ​forget​ ​slavery’s​ ​cruelty​ ​but​ ​to​ ​halt​ ​its​ ​continuance​ ​of​ ​violence​ ​on

black​ ​bodies​ ​for​ ​the​ ​West.

Hope:​ ​The​ ​Work​ ​of​ ​Afro-Pessimism’s​ ​and​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity’s​ ​“Rub”

While​ ​in​ ​dialogue​ ​with​ ​Edelman,​ ​Berlant​ ​takes​ ​note​ ​of​ ​their​ ​practice’s​ ​limitations:​ ​“As

with​ ​sex​ ​and​ ​politics,​ ​theory​ ​is​ ​that​ ​to​ ​which​ ​we​ ​look​ ​both​ ​to​ ​disturb​ ​things​ ​and​ ​to​ ​repair​ ​them.
48
But​ ​Lee​ ​and​ ​I​ ​begin​ ​with​ ​problems​ ​that​ ​are​ ​not​ ​reparable​ ​by​ ​theory​ ​or,​ ​perhaps,​ ​by​ ​anything.”

These​ ​irresolvable​ ​“problems”​ ​of​ ​death,​ ​subjectivity,​ ​temporality,​ ​and​ ​hope​ ​are​ ​just​ ​a​ ​few

irredeemable​ ​and​ ​undeterminable​ ​issues​ ​within​ ​Afro-Pessimism​ ​and​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity.​ ​While​ ​a

problem’s​ ​irreparability​ ​would​ ​usually​ ​suggest​ ​hopelessness,​ ​Afro-Pessimism​ ​and​ ​Queer

Negativity​ ​locate​ ​the​ ​most​ ​productive​ ​hope​ ​in​ ​these​ ​hopeless​ ​endeavors.​ ​We​ ​see​ ​this​ ​near​ ​the​ ​end

of​ ​Black​ ​Skin,​ ​White​ ​Masks​,​ ​as​ ​Fanon​ ​states,​ ​“In​ ​a​ ​savage​ ​struggle​ ​I​ ​am​ ​willing​ ​to​ ​accept
49
convulsions​ ​of​ ​death,​ ​invincible​ ​dissolution,​ ​but​ ​also​ ​the​ ​possibility​ ​of​ ​the​ ​impossible.” ​ ​Despite

their​ ​monikers​ ​of​ ​pessimism​ ​and​ ​negativity,​ ​Afro-Pessimism​ ​and​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity​ ​interrogate

“the​ ​impossible”​ ​to​ ​see​ ​“the​ ​possibility”​ ​within​ ​it.​ ​Thus,​ ​hope​ ​is​ ​not​ ​traceable​ ​to​ ​one​ ​of​ ​their

focuses​ ​or​ ​methods;​ ​it​ ​is​ ​instilled​ ​in​ ​the​ ​practices​ ​themselves.

48
​ ​Berlant​ ​and​ ​Edelman,​ ​71.
49
​ ​Fanon,​ ​218.
Clark​ ​24

In​ ​his​ ​manifesto-like​ ​piece,​ ​Sexton’s​ ​“Afro-Pessimism:​ ​The​ ​Unclear​ ​World”​ ​ends​ ​with:

“If​ ​Afro-Pessimism​ ​strikes​ ​a​ ​nerve,​ ​confusing​ ​the​ ​bounds​ ​of​ ​the​ ​intramural​ ​and​ ​the​ ​extramural​ ​in

the​ ​process,​ ​then​ ​it​ ​is​ ​not​ ​unrelated​ ​to​ ​a​ ​certain​ ​conjuring​ ​of​ ​spirit,​ ​or​ ​attitude,​ ​of​ ​those​ ​still
50
willing​ ​to​ ​fight​ ​for​ ​what​ ​is​ ​right​ ​and​ ​necessary​ ​rather​ ​than​ ​simply​ ​in​ ​the​ ​immediate​ ​interest.” ​ ​In

Sex,​ ​or​ ​the​ ​Unbearable​,​ ​Berlant​ ​concludes​ ​her​ ​theory-through-dialogue​ ​practice​ ​with​ ​Edelman

by​ ​noting,​ ​“Structural​ ​consistency​ ​is​ ​a​ ​fantasy;​ ​the​ ​noise​ ​of​ ​relation’s​ ​impact,​ ​inducing

incompletion​ ​where​ ​it​ ​emerges,​ ​is​ ​the​ ​overwhelming​ ​condition​ ​that​ ​enables​ ​the​ ​change​ ​that,
51
within​ ​collaborative​ ​action,​ ​can​ ​shift​ ​lived​ ​worlds.” ​ ​Sharpe’s​ ​In​ ​the​ ​Wake​ ​opens​ ​with​ ​questions

concerning​ ​how​ ​“to​ ​tend​ ​to”​ ​Black​ ​people​ ​and​ ​their​ ​dead,​ ​and​ ​her​ ​answer​ ​is,​ ​“It​ ​means​ ​work.​ ​It​ ​is

work:​ ​hard​ ​emotional,​ ​physical,​ ​and​ ​intellectual​ ​work​ ​that​ ​demands​ ​vigilant​ ​attendance​ ​to​ ​the
52
needs​ ​of​ ​the​ ​dying,​ ​to​ ​ease​ ​their​ ​way,​ ​and​ ​also​ ​to​ ​the​ ​needs​ ​of​ ​the​ ​living.”

Here​ ​are​ ​the​ ​ultimate​ ​“rubs”:​ ​these​ ​contacts,​ ​connections,​ ​and​ ​collaborations​ ​across

Afro-Pessimist​ ​and​ ​Queer​ ​Negativist​ ​thought.​ ​Sexton’s​ ​call​ ​for​ ​“those​ ​still​ ​willing​ ​to​ ​fight,”

Edelman’s​ ​and​ ​Berlant’s​ ​call​ ​for​ ​world-shifting​ ​“collaborative​ ​action,”​ ​and​ ​Sharpe’s​ ​call​ ​for

“hard​ ​emotion,​ ​physical,​ ​and​ ​intellectual​ ​work”​ ​all​ ​see​ ​hope​ ​in​ ​these​ ​attitudes​ ​and​ ​actions.​ ​By

putting​ ​these​ ​fields​ ​in​ ​direct​ ​conversation​ ​with​ ​one​ ​another,​ ​we​ ​see​ ​how​ ​Afro-Pessimism’s​ ​and

Queer​ ​Negativity’s​ ​conceptions​ ​of​ ​death,​ ​subjectivity,​ ​and​ ​temporality​ ​all​ ​relate​ ​and​ ​complicate

one​ ​other,​ ​fashioning​ ​larger​ ​conversations,​ ​projects,​ ​and​ ​work​ ​to​ ​be​ ​done.

Near​ ​the​ ​beginning​ ​of​ ​Red,​ ​White,​ ​and​ ​Black​,​ ​Wilderson​ ​points​ ​to​ ​Baldwin’s​ ​essay​ ​“The

Black​ ​Boy​ ​Looks​ ​at​ ​the​ ​White​ ​Boy,”​ ​to​ ​emphasize​ ​how​ ​the​ ​structure​ ​between​ ​whiteness​ ​and

blackness​ ​precludes​ ​blackness​ ​from​ ​empathy.​ ​He​ ​quotes​ ​this​ ​line​ ​from​ ​Baldwin:​ ​“There​ ​is​ ​a

50
​ ​Jared​ ​Sexton,​ ​“Afro-Pessimism:​ ​The​ ​Unclear​ ​Word,”​ ​Rhizomes​,​ ​19​ ​(2016):​ ​paragraph​ ​35.
51
​ ​Berlant​ ​and​ ​Edelman,​ ​125.
52
​ ​Sharpe,​ ​10.
Clark​ ​25

difference​ ​between​ ​Norman​ ​and​ ​myself​ ​in​ ​that​ ​I​ ​think​ ​he​ ​still​ ​imagines​ ​that​ ​he​ ​has​ ​something​ ​to
53
save,​ ​whereas​ ​I​ ​have​ ​never​ ​had​ ​anything​ ​to​ ​lose.” ​ ​While​ ​Wilderson’s​ ​reads​ ​this​ ​as​ ​a​ ​“barring”

of​ ​blackness​ ​from​ ​empathy,​ ​I​ ​think​ ​Baldwin’s​ ​statement​ ​forces​ ​us​ ​to​ ​ask​ ​generally:​ ​Is​ ​there
54
“something​ ​to​ ​save”?​ ​and​ ​Is​ ​there​ ​“anything​ ​to​ ​lose”? ​ ​Afro-Pessimism​ ​and​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity

extensively​ ​chronicle​ ​the​ ​physical,​ ​emotional,​ ​psychological,​ ​sexual,​ ​political,​ ​and​ ​social​ ​losses

tied​ ​to​ ​blackness​ ​and​ ​queerness.​ ​Through​ ​their​ ​engagements​ ​with​ ​loss,​ ​death,​ ​irredeemability,

pessimism,​ ​negativity,​ ​and​ ​hopelessness,​ ​Afro-Pessimism​ ​and​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity​ ​both​ ​find

“something​ ​to​ ​save”​ ​in​ ​the​ ​act​ ​of​ ​saving.​ ​In​ ​other​ ​words,​ ​these​ ​fields​ ​work​ ​to​ ​save​ ​current

understandings​ ​of​ ​saving,​ ​redemption,​ ​and​ ​reparability​ ​through​ ​their​ ​refusal​ ​to​ ​save​ ​the​ ​social

and​ ​West​ ​from​ ​themselves.​ ​Instead,​ ​Afro-Pessimism​ ​and​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity​ ​work​ ​through​ ​the

hopeless​ ​to​ ​find​ ​hope​ ​in​ ​the​ ​very​ ​act​ ​of​ ​their​ ​work.​ ​Whether​ ​dead​ ​or​ ​living,​ ​being​ ​or​ ​subject,​ ​an

ongoing​ ​past​ ​or​ ​nonexistent​ ​future,​ ​Afro-Pessimism​ ​and​ ​Queer​ ​Negativity​ ​“rub”​ ​against,

alongside,​ ​and​ ​across​ ​one​ ​another,​ ​hoping​ ​through​ ​their​ ​work​ ​to​ ​make​ ​impossibility​ ​possible​ ​and

possibility​ ​impossible.

​ ​James​ ​Baldwin,​ ​Nobody​ ​Knows​ ​My​ ​Name: More​ ​Notes​ ​of​ ​a​ ​Native​ ​Son​ ​(New​ ​York:​ ​Vintage​ ​International,​ ​1961),
53

172.
54
​ ​Wilderson,​ ​Red,​ ​White,​ ​and​ ​Black​,​ ​12.
Clark​ ​26

Bibliography

Baldwin,​ ​James.​ ​Conversations​ ​with​ ​James​ ​Baldwin​.​ ​Eds.​ ​Fred​ ​L.​ ​Standley​ ​and​ ​Louis​ ​H.​ ​Pratt.
Jackson:​ ​University​ ​Press​ ​of​ ​Mississippi,​ ​1989.

———.​ ​James​ ​Baldwin:​ ​The​ ​Last​ ​Interview​ ​and​ ​Other​ ​Conversations​.​ ​Brooklyn:​ ​Melville
House,​ ​2014.

———.​ ​Nobody​ ​Knows​ ​My​ ​Name: More​ ​Notes​ ​of​ ​a​ ​Native​ ​Son​.​ ​New​ ​York:​ ​Vintage
International,​ ​1961.

———.​ ​The​ ​Fire​ ​Next​ ​Time​.​ ​New​ ​York:​ ​Vintage​ ​International,​ ​1993.

Berlant,​ ​Lauren,​ ​and​ ​Lee​ ​Edelman,​ ​Sex,​ ​or​ ​the​ ​Unbearable​.​ ​Durham:​ ​Duke​ ​University​ ​Press,
2014.

Bersani,​ ​Leo.​ ​“Is​ ​the​ ​Rectum​ ​a​ ​Grave?”​ ​October​ ​43,​ ​“AIDS:​ ​Cultural​ ​Analysis/Cultural
Activism”​ ​(Winter​ ​1987):​ ​197-222.

Caserio,​ ​Robert​ ​L.​ ​and​ ​Lee​ ​Edelman,​ ​Jack​ ​Halberstam,​ ​José​ ​Esteban​ ​Muñoz,​ ​and​ ​Tim​ ​Dean.
“The​ ​Antisocial​ ​Thesis​ ​in​ ​Queer​ ​Theory.”​ ​PMLA​ ​121,​ ​No.​ ​3​ ​(May​ ​2006):​ ​819-28.

Coleman,​ ​Nancy.​ ​“Redesigned​ ​Pride​ ​Flag​ ​Recognizes​ ​LGBT​ ​People​ ​of​ ​Color.”​ ​CNN.com​.​ ​Last
modified​ ​June​ ​13,​ ​2017.​ ​Accessed​ ​December​ ​1,​ ​2017,
http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/13/health/new-pride-flag​ ​-colors-trnd/index.html.

Edelman,​ ​Lee.​ ​No​ ​Future:​ ​Queer​ ​Theory​ ​and​ ​the​ ​Death​ ​Drive​.​ ​Durham:​ ​Duke​ ​University​ ​Press,
2004.

Ellison,​ ​Ralph.​ ​Invisible​ ​Man​.​ ​New​ ​York:​ ​Vintage​ ​International,​ ​1995.

Fanon,​ ​Frantz.​ ​Black​ ​Skin,​ ​White​ ​Masks​.​ ​Trans.​ ​Charles​ ​Lam​ ​Markmann.​ ​New​ ​York:​ ​Grove
Press,​ ​1967.

Hartman,​ ​Saidiya.​ ​Lose​ ​Your​ ​Mother:​ ​A​ ​Journey​ ​Along​ ​the​ ​Atlantic​ ​Slave​ ​Route​.​ ​New​ ​York:
Macmillan,​ ​2007.

Moten,​ ​Fred.​ ​In​ ​the​ ​Break:​ ​The​ ​Aesthetics​ ​of​ ​the​ ​Black​ ​Radical​ ​Tradition.​ ​Minneapolis:
University​ ​of​ ​Minnesota​ ​Press,​ ​2003.
Clark​ ​27

Muñoz,​ ​José​ ​Esteban.​ ​Disidentifications:​ ​Queers​ ​of​ ​Color​ ​and​ ​the​ ​Performance​ ​of​ ​Politics.
Minneapolis:​ ​University​ ​of​ ​Minnesota​ ​Press,​ ​1999.

Sexton,​ ​Jared.​ ​“Afro-Pessimism:​ ​The​ ​Unclear​ ​Word,”​ ​Rhizomes​,​ ​19​ ​(2016).

———.​ ​“The​ ​Social​ ​Life​ ​of​ ​Social​ ​Death:​ ​On​ ​Afro-Pessimism​ ​and​ ​Black​ ​Optimism,”​ ​InTensions
Journal​ ​5​ ​(Fall/Winter​ ​2011):​ ​1-47.

Sharpe,​ ​Christina.​ ​In​ ​the​ ​Wake:​ ​On​ ​Blackness​ ​and​ ​Being​.​ ​Durham:​ ​Duke​ ​University​ ​Press,​ ​2016.

Spillers,​ ​Hortense​ ​J.​ ​“Mama's​ ​Baby,​ ​Papa's​ ​Maybe:​ ​An​ ​American​ ​Grammar​ ​Book.”​ ​Diacritics
17,​ ​No.​ ​2,​ ​“Culture​ ​and​ ​Countermemory:​ ​The​ ​"American"​ ​Connection”​ ​(Summer​ ​1987):
64-81.

Stockton,​ ​Kathryn​ ​Bond.​ ​Beautiful​ ​Bottom,​ ​Beautiful​ ​Shame:​ ​Where​ ​“Black”​ ​Meets​ ​“Queer.”
Durham:​ ​Duke​ ​University​ ​Press,​ ​2006.

Trouillot,​ ​Michel-Rolph.​ ​Silencing​ ​the​ ​Past:​ ​Power​ ​and​ ​the​ ​Production​ ​of​ ​History​.​ ​Boston:
Beacon​ ​Press,​ ​1997.

Wiegman,​ ​Robyn.​ ​“Sex​ ​and​ ​Negativity;​ ​or,​ ​What​ ​Queer​ ​Theory​ ​Has​ ​for​ ​You.”​ ​Cultural​ ​Critique
95​ ​(Winter​ ​2017):​ ​219-43.

Wilderson​ ​III,​ ​Frank​ ​B.​ ​“Afro-Pessimism”​ ​last​ ​modified​ ​2008.


incognegro.org/afro_pessimism.html.

———.​ ​Red,​ ​White,​ ​and​ ​Black:​ ​Cinema​ ​and​ ​the​ ​Structure​ ​of​ ​U.S.​ ​Antagonisms​.​ ​Durham:​ ​Duke
University​ ​Press,​ ​2010.

You might also like