Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views2 pages

Xercise 1

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views2 pages

Xercise 1

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Exercise: VANET Communication and Routing Simulation

Objective:
Understand the principles of VANETs, including communication, routing protocols, and the
impact of mobility on network performance.

Instructions:

1. Introduction (15 minutes):


o Introduce the concept of VANETs: a network of vehicles and roadside
infrastructure that enables communication between vehicles (V2V) and
between vehicles and infrastructure (V2I).
o Discuss the common routing protocols used in VANETs, such as Geographic
Routing (GRE), AODV, DSR, and VANET-specific protocols like GPSR
(Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing).
o Explain the challenges of VANETs, including high mobility, dynamic
topology, and short communication range.
2. Task: Students will compare different routing protocols in a VANET context using
simulations. They will simulate vehicles moving on a road network and evaluate the
performance of various protocols under different scenarios.

Scenario 1:

o Simulation Setup: Simulate a highway scenario with 20 vehicles moving at


different speeds (30-120 km/h) in a 1000m x 1000m area.
o Routing Protocol: Implement the AODV protocol and evaluate the
performance for V2V communication between two vehicles.
o Task: Measure and record the following:
 Packet delivery ratio
 End-to-end delay
 Route discovery time
 Network throughput

Scenario 2:

o Simulation Setup: Increase the number of vehicles to 50, and simulate a city
environment with intersections and traffic lights. Set the vehicles to move at
lower speeds (10-50 km/h).
o Routing Protocol: Implement GPSR (Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing).
o Task: Measure and record the following:
 Packet delivery ratio
 Delay
 Routing overhead
 Scalability in dense environments

Scenario 3:

o Simulation Setup: Simulate a mixed environment with both V2V and V2I
communication, where vehicles communicate with roadside infrastructure like
traffic signals.
o Routing Protocol: Implement DSR (Dynamic Source Routing).
o Task: Measure and record:
 Packet delivery ratio
 End-to-end delay
 Communication range
 Effect of infrastructure communication
3. Questions for Students:
o Which routing protocol performed best in terms of packet delivery ratio and
why?
o How does the mobility of vehicles affect the performance of routing
protocols?
o What are the advantages and disadvantages of using AODV vs. GPSR in
urban and highway scenarios?
o In the context of V2I communication, how did the infrastructure (e.g., traffic
lights, sensors) contribute to network performance?
o How do vehicle density and mobility impact the scalability and efficiency of
VANET protocols?
4. Discussion (15 minutes):
o Have students compare the results of different scenarios and discuss their
findings.
o Encourage students to think about how VANETs can be applied in real-world
systems, such as smart cities, autonomous driving, or emergency vehicle
communication.
o Discuss potential improvements in VANET protocols and their future
evolution with the advent of 5G and beyond.

You might also like