TOPIC 1
THE CONCEPT OF AUDIT AND OTHER ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENTS
The objective of an audit: of financial statements is to enable the auditor to
express an opinion on whether the financial statements are prepared, in all
material respects, in accordance with an applicable financial reporting
framework. (ISA 200)
The objectives of an auditor: are to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material (significant)
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, in order to enable them to express
an opinion on whether the financial statements are prepared, in all material
respects, in accordance with an applicable financial reporting framework
ACCOUNTABILITY, STEWARDSHIP AND AGENCY
Auditor
Adds
Measure credibility
performanc Prepar
e Financial e
statements
Appoin
Shareholde t Manageme
rs nt
Ow Manag
n Compan e
y
LIMITATIONS OF THE AUDIT AND MATERIALITY
The assurance given by auditors is limited by the fact that auditors use
judgement in deciding what audit procedures to use and what conclusions
to draw, and also by the limitations of every audit.
i. Auditing is objective. Judgement has to be made
ii. Audit report has inherent limitations
iii. Audit report can be used along time after the end of the reporting
period
iv. Audit evidence sometimes indicates what is possible nor certain
v. Limitations in accounting and control systems
vi. Not all items in the financial statements are tested
Elements of an assurance engagement
i. Three party relationship:
The three parties are the intended user, the responsible party (management)
and the practitioner (auditor).
ii. Subject matter
The data to be evaluated that has been prepared by the responsible
party. It can take many forms, including financial performance (eg
historical financial information), non-financial performance (eg key
performance indicators), processes (eg internal controls) and
behaviour (eg compliance with laws and regulations).
iii. Criteria
The subject matter is evaluated or measured against criteria in order
to reach an opinion.
iv. Evidence
Sufficient (quantity) appropriate (quality) evidence needs to be
gathered to support the required level of assurance.
v. Report
A written report containing the practitioner’s opinion is issued to the
intended user, in the form appropriate to a reasonable assurance
engagement or a limited assurance engagement.
Examples of assurance engagements
i. A review of the effectiveness of an entity’s internal control
ii. A review of cash flow forecasts which will be
presented to a bank to obtain funding
iii. A review of threats which could affect the
business’s ability to continue as a going concern
iv. Statutory audit (financial statement audit) – external audit
v. A review of an entity’s financial results for the first half of the year
(interim audit)
vi. A review of an entity’s compliance with:
a. Corporate governance
b. Environmental issues
c. Contracts
APPROACH TO CONDUCTING ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENTS
Assurance engagements should be performed according to the following
process:
i. Agree scope of work to be performed with the client
ii. Formalize the terms of the engagement in a contract (engagement
letter)
iii. Plan the work required based on the risk and level of assurance
required
iv. Obtain sufficient appropriate evidence on which to base the
conclusion
v. Perform overall review and form opinion
vi. Issue assurance report to the client as per pre-agreed format
BENEFITS OF ASSURANCE REPORT
An assurance report provides the following benefits to the users of
information:
• Provides an independent opinion from an external source that
enhances the credibility of the information.
• Reduces management bias.
• Relevance of information is improved because of the expertise and
knowledge of the assurance firm.
• Any non-standard or modified opinion (Negative report) draws
attention to risk.
LEVELS OF ASSURANCE
i. Absolute assurance (100%)
ii. Reasonable Assurance Engagements
A reasonable assurance engagement provides a high, but not absolute level of
assurance.
In order to give reasonable assurance, a significant amount of testing and
evaluation is required to support the practitioner’s conclusion.
The external audit is therefore a key example of a reasonable assurance
engagement.
The conclusion formed in any report relating to a reasonable assurance
engagement would usually be expressed in a positive form, for
example:
‘In our opinion internal control is effective, in all material respects, based on
XYZ criteria.’
iii. Limited Assurance Engagements
Limited assurance is a lower level of assurance. The nature, timing and
extent of the procedures carried out by the practitioner in a limited
assurance engagement would be limited compared with what is required in
a reasonable assurance engagement. Nevertheless, the procedures
performed should be planned to obtain a level of assurance which is
meaningful, in the practitioner’s professional judgement.
For a limited assurance engagement, the conclusion conveys whether,
based on the procedures performed and evidence obtained, a matter(s) has
come to the practitioner’s attention to cause the practitioner to believe the
subject matter information is materially misstated.
This would usually be expressed in a negative form of words, for example:
‘Based on our work described in this report, nothing has come to our
attention that causes us to believe that internal control is not effective, in all
material respects, based on XYZ criteria.’
Definition of terms
True: Information is factual and conforms with reality. In addition, the
information conforms with required standards and law. The financial
statements have been correctly extracted from the books and records.
Fair: Information is free from discrimination and bias and in compliance
with expected standards and rules. The accounts should reflect the
commercial substance of the company’s underlying transactions.
Present fairly: The financial statements show a true and fair view. They are
factual and free from bias.