We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8
Directions: Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the
question.
Read the following passage.
Computers—as we know them—didn’t exist in 1950. Nonetheless, a British mathematician called
Allen Turning (sometimes called the father of computing) devised a test to try and determine
whether a machine was intelligent. The test is simple enough. People ask questions of “someone”
another room by typing them on a keyboard. They see responses printed on a screen. They can
ask anything they want. At the end of the session, they decide if their counterpart is a person or a
‘machine (in which case it passed the Turing Test). So far, no computer has, and that’s despite some
amazing achievements in the field of artificial intelligence (Al). According to one view, that’s
because the Turing Test is misrepresented. Turing didn’t design it to see whether a computer could
pass itself off as human (the basis of many Sci-fi films) but whether it could think as intelligently as.
a human. And that, of course, depends on how intelligent the questions are.
1. The author’s use of quotation marks around “someone” indicates that at least some of the
time, the person in question is:
A. obscure.
B. plural
C. unknown:
D. non-human,
292. The author's view of the Turing test can best be characterized as:
A. useful in limited circumstances.
B. only as good as the questions init.
C. now outdated by more sophisticated techniques.
D. of its time, and irrelevant in connection with Al.
3. The primary purpose of the passage is to:
‘A. describe the purpose and scope of the Turing Test.
B. explain that the Turing Testis often misrepresented.
C. discuss the origin and development of Al testing.
D. determine the effectiveness of the Turing Test.
Read the following interview and passage.
Passage 1
Interviewer:
Dr. Simons:
Interviewer:
Dr. Simons:
I'm joined by Dr. Simons of the University of Minnesota, who is calling for middle
and high schools in the U.S. to start at 9:00 or 10:00 a.m.
That's right. I'm a parent, and it’s a real concern. By the time kids get to high
school, 87% of them are sleep deprived. They tend to stay up two hours later than
they did when they were younger, but they are stil getting up for an 8:00 a.m.
school start time. We've just completed some research on this. It took three
years and while it covered just three states, we think the results are indicative.
We found that just shifting the start time by half an hour, to 8:30 a.m., kids had
noticeably better test scores, and schools saw a massive reduction in teenage car
accidents—down 70%.
‘And that simply has to do with not enough sleep?
Yes. It means kids get up late, sometimes miss early classes, come to school
without breakfast... They're drowsy and slow reacting behind the wheel and tired
and lackluster in class. If shifting the school day by 30 minutes stops all that, then
we have a duty to do it.
30Passage 2:
Teenagers undergo a shift in their internal body clocks which coincides with puberty. According to
The Parents’ Union itis related to melatonin production and circadian rhythm, and is a biological
change. Left to their own devices, therefore, teenagers will stay up till midnight and emerge
around 9:00 a.m. in the morning. By 10:00 a.m., they are awake and raring to go. That pattern
doesn’t fit with the typical school day, since most establishments start at 8:00 a.m. The American
Academy of Pediatrics, urging for a change in school start times, stated that, “Insufficient sleep
represents one of the most common, important, and potentially remediable health risks in
children, particularly in the adolescent population.” And, according to the University of Michigan
it leads to “lower academic achievement .. higher rates of absenteeism and tardiness, and
decreased readiness to learn.” Already 1,000 U.S. schools in seventy districts have opted for an
8:30 a.m, start time, but Oxford University, England, thinks that 10:00 a.m. would be even better.
They are currently doing randomized trials to find the optimum start time for sleepy teens on both
sides of the pond,
4. During the interview, what does Dr Simons imply about sleep deprivation?
A. Itis entirely preventable if parents were stricter about bedtimes.
B. It becomes worse and more widespread as children go up through the grades.
C. Schools should do more to make allowances for sleep deprived teenagers.
D. Car accidents would stop and test results would be perfect if a 10:00 a.m. start time were
adopted,
5. Passage 2 suggests that the mismatch between a teenager's wake-sleep cycle and the
organization of the school day is:
‘A. physiological in origin and should be accommodated with staggered school hours.
B. a perfectly natural part of the shift toward adulthood and can be medically controlled
C. now well documented and it behooves governments to mandate starting half an hour later.
D. easily remedied, but requires data from randomized trials in England to be accurate,
6. Compared to the interview, the article has an advantage, in that:
A. itincorporates several different points of view.
B. the information it gives can be verified.
C. it introduces evidence from multiple expert sources.
D. a written article does not convey the writer's opinion.
a17. Which choice best states the relationship between the two passages?
‘A. Passage 2 provides scientific refutation for the perspective offered in Passage 1.
B, Passage 2 illustrates the practical difficulties of a proposal made in Passage 1.
C. Passage 2 takes issue with the primary argument of Passage 1.
D. Passage 2 offers an explanation for a phenomenon mentioned in Passage 1.
Read the following passage
Aside from competition and predation, there are three types of symbiotic relationships in nature.
In parasitism, the organism, (such as a flea or mistletoe) benefits, while the host (a dog or a tree)
suffers. In commensalism, while the organism derives some benefit, the host is unaffected: it
neither benefits nor suffers. In mutualism, both parties get something out of the
relationship. Pseudomyrmex ants, for example, live in acacia trees. The trees contain sugar-
bearing veins which the ants tap for food, and clusters of thorns which provide shelter. In return,
the bijou bodyguards defend the tree against herbivores. They exude a venom which is toxic (and
painful), thus discouraging browsing on the leaves. They also, according to new research by the
‘Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, provide protection against microbial pathogens—plant
diseases caused by bad bacteria. Apparently they carry good bacteria on their legs; as these rub
against the acacia’s leaves, they destroy the bad bacteria and help keep the plant in good shape.
8, Based on the passage, a barnacle which attaches itself to shark, taking advantage of scraps
of food left from the shark's prey, provides a clear example of which type of symbiotic
relationship?
‘A. Competition, as the barnacle is competing for food from the same source as the shark.
B. Parasitism, as the barnacle uses the shark as a host and gives nothing in return.
C. Commensalism, as the shark is indifferent to the barnacle and derives no harm from it.
D. Mutualism, because the barnacle cleans up after the shark and feeds on its leftovers.
9. What is the effect of the expression bijou bodyguards on the passage?
A. Itmakes a serious scientific passage more acces:
le to a general audience.
B. It introduces a light-hearted tone to what would otherwise be a dry, academic text.
C. It suggests the author is amused at the thought of something so small protecting something.
so large,
D. Itadds a touch of mockery to the passage, suggesting that symbiotic relationships can exist
in unlikely places.
3210. Compared to ants, that tap a vein to gain sustenance, herbivores graze on acacia leaves devoid
of ant protection and are portrayed as:
A. cunning.
B, leisurely.
C. haphazard,
D. unfortunate.
33ANSWERS
Informational Text - Proficient
Quiz 2
The passage says: “People ask questions of “someone” in another room,” and later
that “they decide if their counterpart is a person or a machine,” so the “someone” is,
sometimes a machine (a computer). (A) is incorrect because the “someone” is
‘obscured (meaning hidden) rather than obscure (mysterious). (B) is incorrect because
the passage doesn’t suggest a single person could be asking questions of multiple
intelligences. (C) is incorrect because while the person in the other room may well be
unknown to the questioner, that isn’t why the author put quotation marks around
“someone.” Rather, it indicates that the author could have written “someone or
something.”
The author concludes the passage with his/her opinion, introduced by “of course,”
which is that whether computers can think as intelligently as a human “depends on
how intelligent the questions are.” (A) is incorrect because the author limits the
test’s usefulness purely to the quality of the questions. (C) is incorrect as no more
sophisticated tests are mentioned. (0) is incorrect because the test was devised
before there were computers.
The purpose of the passage is to describe the purpose of the test (what itis designed
to do) and its scope (the range of what it can do). (B) is incorrect because the author
writes: “According to one view, that's because the Turing Test is misrepresented.”
(C)is incorrect because the development of Al testing is not discussed. (0) is incorrect
because the focus of the passage is not on how good the test is when it is used for its
proper purpose—we only know that a computer hasn’t passed yet—but to describe
‘what itis supposed to do and how it works.
Dr Simons says that: “By the time kids get to high school, 87% of them are sleep-
deprived,” which suggests that a significant number are sleep deprived before they
reach high school, but things just get worse as kids get older. (A) is incorrect because
the passage doesn’t say anything about parents being stricter: Dr Simons just says
he's a parent and he’s concerned. (C) is incorrect because Dr Simons doesn’t say
schools should make more allowances—such as being lenient about tardiness or poor
erades—but that they should alter start times. (0) is incorrect because Dr Simons
doesn’t suggest perfection would result, just that car accidents would be reduced and
grades would improve.
34The passage says that the shift in teenagers’ timing is related to “melatonin
production and circadian rhythm and is a biological change.” That means itis.
physiological and beyond a teenager's ability to control—so schools need to offer
staggered start times because they can change—teenagers can't. (B) is incorrect
because while perfectly natural, the passage doesn’t suggest controlling it with
medication. (C) is incorrect because although the passage indicates there is alot of
scie
fic evidence available, it doesn't say government should force schools to start
30 minutes later—rather it suggests research is ongoing and that two hours later
might be better. (0) is incorrect because while school start times could be changed, it,
would not necessarily be “easy” (2 family could have child in Grade 3 starting at 8.00
a.m. one in Grade 5 starting at 9.00 a.m, and one in Grade 8 starting at 10.00 a.m.)
and is not dependent on data from England,
The advantage of the article is that it can gather evidence from multiple sources,
whereas the interviewer is talking to one expert from one university—a single source.
(A) is incorrect because the article has a single point of view (the author's) but
explains what other people say about the issue (multiple sources). (B) is incorrect
because both spoken and written information can be verified—the only difference is
when, (0) is incorrect because a written article can convey the author's opinion as
well as the spoken word.
Passage 2 differs from Passage 1 in that in the interview the problem is stated
(teenagers wake up late and it leads to accidents and academic underachievement),
‘The article restates that, but also explains why. (A) is incorrect because the science
it explains and confirms it.
(8) is incorrect because the proposal in Passage 1 is to start schools 30 minutes later,
in Passage 2 doesn’t refute the perspective in Passage 1:
and Passage 2 suggests longer than that, but points to the practical difficulties of
getting teenagers to change their behavior—not changing start times. (C) is incorrect
because Passage 2 doesn’t take issue with the primary argument—delay school
starting time for teenagers—it just suggests half an hour may not be enough
The passage explains that in commensalism, the host doesn’t suffer, but the organism
benefits. Since the shark is “indifferent to the barnacle and derives no harm from it”
but the barnacle gets a surface to attach to and can mop up leftovers from the
shark's dinner, then it is a commensal relationship. (A) is incorrect because the
barnacle isn’t competing for food with the shark but takes advantage from the fact
that sharks are messy eaters. (B) is incorrect, because only in mutualism is something,
given in return; in parasitism, the barnacle would have to take something from the
shark or harm it in some way, and it doesn’t. (0) is incorrect, because the shark
doesn’t benefit from the barnacle consuming microscopic pieces of fish or blood in
the seawater surrounding them both after the shark has been feeding.
35,10.
The passage isa dry, fairly academic scientific text, which the author lightens by
referring to the ants as bijou bodyguards. (A) is incorrect because it doesn’t open up
the text to the general reader: that would require use on non-scientific terms,
simpler language, and so on. (C) is incorrect because although the author might well
be amused, the question is what effect does the phrase have on the passage not
the author. (0) is incorrect because the phrase is more cute than contemptuous, so it
isn’t mocking or derisory.
By describing the herbivores as “browsing’,” the passage suggests that they are more
haphazard in their search for food. The ants go straight to a vein and tap the sugar—
the grazing animals wander from place to place looking for food, sometimes
unsuccessfully. (A) is incorrect because “browsing” doesn’t suggest cunning. (B) is
incorrect because browsing in terms of animals feeding means grazing, but it is easy
to be misled by the leisurely connotations of the verb browse which also means to
look through casually. (D) is incorrect because only those plants which have ants
‘would mean the animals were unfortunate (because they'd be stung).
36