Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views2 pages

Probs 2

Uploaded by

Batman Robin
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views2 pages

Probs 2

Uploaded by

Batman Robin
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Part III Maths Lent Term 2018

David Skinner [email protected]

Advanced Quantum Field Theory


Example Sheet 2

Please email me with any comments about these problems, particularly if you
spot an error. Problems with an asterisk (∗) may be more difficult.

1. Let H be the Hamiltonian of a quantum simple harmonic oscillator of unit mass in one
dimension, with frequency ω. Let H be the corresponding Hilbert space. Using standard
canonical quantum mechanics, compute the partition function Z(ω, β) = trH (e−βH ) in
units with ~ = 1.
Write this partition function in terms of a formal Euclidean worldline path integral over
the space of maps x : S 1 → R, making clear the role of β and the choice of action S[x].
Regularize this formal path integral by imposing a hard cut-off on the eigenvalues of
the quadratic operator in the wordline action. What is the regularized path integral
measure? Show that the regularized partition function is given by
N
"  2 #−1
AN Y 2πn
ZN (ω, β) = ω2 + .
ω β
n=1

where N labels the cut-off and AN is a constant that is independent of ω. [You need
not determine the value of AN .]
Consider the ratio
ZN (ω1 , β)
ZN (ω2 , β)
of regularized partition functions for harmonic oscillators of different frequencies. By
examining the zeros and poles of this ratio as a function of (ω1 , ω2 ), show that the limit

lim ZN (ω, β)
N →∞

agrees with your answer obtained earlier, up to an overall constant.

2. Consider the theory given by the action


Z
1 1 g λ
S[φ] = dd x ∂µ φ ∂ µ φ + m2 φ2 + φ3 + φ4 .
2 2 3! 4!
where φ is a real scalar field.

1
(a) Determine all connected one loop graphs, complete with their appropriate symme-
try factors, which contribute to

hφ(x)φ(y)i , hφ(x)φ(y)φ(z)i and hφ(x)φ(y)φ(z)φ(w)i ,

expressing your answer in terms of integrals over d-dimensional loop momenta.


[You are not required to evaluate the integrals.]
(b) Now set λ = 0 so that just the cubic interaction remains. Determine the momen-
R Q3 d ipi ·xi hφ(x )φ(x )φ(x )i to one loop
tum space correlation function i=1 d xi e 1 2 3
accuracy.

3. Let ψ i denote a (fermionic) Dirac spinor field transforming in the fundamental rep-
resentation of an SU(N ) gauge group, and let ψ̄j denote the Dirac conjugate spinor
transforming in the antifundamental. Let (Aµ )i j denote the gauge field for this inter-
action. Write down all possible SU(N ) gauge invariant local operators involving these
fields that are relevant or marginal near the Gaussian critical point, in the cases that
the space–time has dimension d = 4, d = 3 and d = 2.

4. Show that under the redefinition gi → gi0 (gj ) of the couplings of a theory at scale Λ, the
β-functions transform as
∂g 0
βi → βi0 = i βj .
∂gj
Show that in a theory with a single coupling g, the first two terms in the β–function
β(g) = ag 3 + cg 5 + O(g 7 ) are invariant under any coupling constant redefinition of the
form g → g 0 = g + O(g 3 ). Show that, in a neighbourhood of g = 0, it is possible to
choose this redefinition so as to remove all terms except these first two. [Hint: consider
setting g 0 (g) = g + g 3 f (g) where f (0) = 1.] What is the significance of this calculation?

5. Consider a four dimensional theory whose only couplings are a mass parameter m2 and
a marginally relevant coupling g.

(a) Write down generic expressions for the β-functions in such a theory to lowest
non–trivial order. (You should be able to identify the values of the classical contri-
butions to the β-functions, and the sign of the leading–order quantum correction
to β(g).)
(b) Sketch the RG flows for this theory.
(c) Suppose that g(Λ0 ) = 0.1 when the cut–off Λ0 is fixed at 105 GeV. If m2 (Λ0 ) is
measured to be 100 GeV, what value of m2 (Λ) would be needed at the higher scale
Λ = 1019 GeV?
(d) Suppose you changed your value of m2 (Λ) by one part in 1020 . What would be
the change in m2 (Λ0 )?

You might also like