Principles of Engineering Assignment
On
Design of Pumped Hydro Energy Storage System in the UK
By
Akintokun, Adegboyega Samuel
Student ID: 449004
Submitted to
Dr Sagar Jain
October 2024.
INTRODUCTION
Background
There has been a steady shift towards renewable energy in the UK over the past 30 years.
According to the Climate Change Act, the government plans to achieve Net Zero greenhouse gas
emissions by 2050 (David, L., 2024). However, renewable resources like wind and solar are not
constantly available, which makes it difficult to stabilize the energy supply. The current trajectory
towards Net Zero emissions is far from the target.
Figure 1: Current Path of Future Emissions vs. Path to Target
Pumped Storage Hydropower is one of the best renewable energy options that balances supply and
demand by storing surplus energy during low demand to release when there is high demand.
(BiGGAR Economics, 2023).
Aim:
This project aims to design a 1GW pumped hydro storage facility that can address the challenges in
energy storage while contributing to the UK’s renewable energy goals.
Objectives:
• Provide a schematic drawing of the proposed pumped hydro storage facility
• Discuss the engineering principles employed in the design
• Give some recommendations for future work
METHODOLOGY
Objective:
The primary objective of this design is to develop a schematic for pumped hydro energy storage that
is functional and efficient.
Requirement:
Power Output: 1 GW
Efficiency Target: >85%
Geographical considerations:
• Good topography for water retention.
• A site with a high head (this reduces the cost of reservoir and water conduit).
• The site should require minimal excavation.
• Proximity to the grid for reduced power transmission costs. (IHA, 2018, p23-26).
Compliance with international standards IEC61116, IEC62006, ISO9001, ISO14001, International
Commission on Large Dams (ICOLD), and World Bank EHS guidelines.
Design Calculations and Analysis
➢ Energy Output and Reservoir Capacity
The power output (P) of a hydroelectric facility is given by the equation:
𝑃 = 𝜂. 𝜌. 𝑔. 𝑄. 𝐻
Where:
• P is the power in watts (1 GW = 1 × 109 W),
• 𝜂 is the efficiency (typically 80% < 𝜂 < 90%),
• 𝜌 is the density of water (1000 kg/m3),
• 𝑔 is the acceleration due to gravity (9.81 m/s2),
• 𝑄 is the flow rate in cubic meters per second (m3/s),
• 𝐻 is the effective head (height difference between the upper and lower reservoirs) in meters.
Assumptions: Efficiency (𝜂) is assumed to be 85% and a target head (𝐻) of 500 meters (based on a
similar project – Coire Glas Pumped Storage Hydropower which has a head of approximately
500m).
Rearranging the equation to solve for the flow rate 𝑄:
𝑃
𝑄=
𝜂. 𝜌. 𝑔. 𝐻
Substituting the values into the equation:
1 × 109
𝑄=
0.85 . 1000 . 9.81 . 500
𝑄 ≈ 239.25 𝑚3 ⁄𝑠
i.e. To generate 1 GW of power with a 500 m head, the flow rate through the turbines must be
approximately 239.25 cubic meters per second.
Figure 2: Hydro Power vs. Volume Flow and Head Chart
The figure above shows that the calculation results are within the acceptable range for a 500m head.
➢ Reservoir Volume (V)
The required reservoir volume can only be estimated after calculating the amount of water needed
to be stored to generate electricity for a specific amount of time. For this project, it will be assumed
that the facility is expected to generate 1 GW for 6 hours.
𝐸 = 𝑃. 𝑡 = 𝜂. 𝜌. 𝑔. 𝑉. 𝐻
Where:
• 𝐸 is the energy in joules
𝐸 = 𝑃. 𝑡 = 1 × 109 . 6 × 3600
𝐸 = 2.16 × 1013 𝐽
• 𝑉 is the reservoir volume in cubic meters (m3).
Rearranging the equation to solve for the reservoir volume 𝑉:
𝐸
𝑉=
𝜂. 𝜌. 𝑔. 𝐻
Substituting the values into the equation:
2.16 × 1013
𝑉=
0.85 . 1000 . 9.81 . 500
𝑉 ≈ 5.17 × 106 𝑚3
i.e. To store enough water to generate 1 GW for 6 hours, the upper reservoir needs to have a
capacity of approximately 5.17 million cubic meters.
➢ Penstock Diameter (D)
The penstock diameter 𝐷 can be estimated by calculating the cross-sectional area (A) from its
relationship to the flow rate 𝑄 and flow velocity 𝑣
𝐷 2
𝑄 = 𝐴. 𝑣 = 𝜋. ( ) . 𝑣
2
Rearranging the equation to solve for the penstock diameter 𝐷:
4𝑄
𝐷=√
𝜋. 𝑣
Assumption: a flow velocity of 5m/s is used (ESHA, 2004)
Substituting the values into the equation:
4 × 239.25
𝐷=√
𝜋. 5
𝐷 ≈ 3.9 𝑚
i.e. The penstock requires a diameter of approximately 3.9 meters to handle the flow rate required
for the facility.
➢ Penstock Length and Head Losses
The head loss due to friction can be estimated using the Darcy-Weisbach equation:
𝐿 𝑣2
ℎ𝑓 = 𝑓. .
𝐷 2𝑔
Assumption: The length of the penstock is assumed to be 1km (it can vary based on the vertical and
horizontal distance between the reservoirs)
Where:
• 𝑓 is the friction factor (0.02 for smooth steel),
• 𝐿 is the length of the penstock (1000 m),
• 𝐷 is the penstock diameter (3.9 m),
• 𝑣 is the flow velocity (5 m/s),
• 𝑔 is the acceleration due to gravity (9.81 m/s2).
Substituting the values into the equation:
1000 52
ℎ𝑓 = 0.02 . .
3.9 2 . 9.81
ℎ𝑓 ≈ 3.24 𝑚
The head loss of approximately 3.24 meters due to friction can be considered negligible in the
design as it is relatively small when compared to the 500 m head.
➢ Turbine Selection
Pelton turbines will be used for this project as they operate efficiently for high heads (250 – 1000
m). The specific design can be flexible depending on the manufacturer as long as the flow
characteristics and power rating are specified to match the calculated flow rate of 239.25 m3/s.
TURBINE TYPE HEAD RANGE IN METERS
KAPLAN AND PROPELLER 1 < HN < 40
FRANCIS 25 < HN < 350
PELTON 50 < HN < 1300
CROSSFLOW 50 < HN < 200
TURGO 50 < HN < 250
Table 1: Range of heads for specific types of turbines. (Muhammad A. et al., 2014)
Multiple turbines will be used to distribute the flow and ensure redundancy. If each turbine has a
300 MW rating:
1 × 109
𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑏𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑠 = ≈ 3.33
300 × 106
Therefore, a minimum of four turbines should be used, each handling about 25% of the total flow.
➢ Pumps
The pump should be sized to handle the same flow rate of 239.25 m3/s to pump water back into the
upper reservoir when there is low demand. A reversible pump-turbine is used to do both pumping
and generation.
Pump Priming is important to increase pump responsiveness to grid demands as priming helps to
avoid cavitation which can hinder smooth transitioning between pumping and generating modes.
Safety Margins and Tolerances
Variations in operating conditions must be accounted for by including certain tolerances:
• Flow Rate: Due to seasonal variations in water availability and fluctuations in grid demand,
the penstock and turbine flow rates should be designed with a 10-15% tolerance to
accommodate such changes.
• Penstock Pressure: To ensure safety under surge conditions, the penstock should be made
to be able to withstand up to 25% more than the expected maximum operating pressure.
• Reservoir Capacity: Reservoir capacities should include up to an extra 15-20% volume for
heavier rainfall or water inflow beyond design specifications.
Environmental Impact Considerations
1. Dams with spillways
• Purpose: This is to prevent flooding downstream by ensuring there is no water
overflow, especially in seasons of high rainfall or unplanned water inflows.
• Environmental Impact: The nearby ecosystem is protected from erosion, flood risks,
or habitat destruction as excess water is channeled safely.
2. Fish Screen
• Purpose: This is a protective screen that prevents the destruction of aquatic
organisms by entering the turbine.
• Environmental Impact: Preservation of local biodiversity and aquatic life which is
crucial to the ecosystem.
3. Underground cabling
• Purpose: To transmit the electricity generated by the facility to the grid without
risking wildlife or the landscape.
• Environmental Impact: There is reduced visual impact and birds are exposed to
fewer hazards. Habitat disruption that could occur from above-ground power lines is
avoided.
4. Emergency shut-off valves
• Purpose: This allows emergency stop to water flow when equipment fails or any
other crisis.
• Environmental Impact: This prevents erosion and flooding due to a sudden
fluctuation in water level that can be caused by equipment failure.
Component Layout and Connections
• Penstock Layout: The penstock begins as a single large tunnel at the upper reservoir and
travels downward. This main penstock tunnel then splits into four branches near the
powerhouse, each feeding one of the four turbines. This split design allows each turbine to
receive a controlled flow of water and allows for the management of individual turbines.
• Turbines and Generators: Inside the powerhouse, each branch connects to a dedicated
turbine, and each turbine has its generator. This setup allows for the independent operation
of each turbine and provides flexibility in energy generation, especially useful during
varying load demands.
• Return Flow Layout: After passing through the turbines, the water flow is channeled
through four separate branches, which then converge back into a tunnel leading to the lower
reservoir. This layout supports efficient water flow management and minimizes
backpressure on individual turbines.
• Water Flow Path: Water is channeled from the upper reservoir through the main penstock,
splitting into four paths before entering each turbine. Once water has passed through the
turbines, it exits via the branch conduits and reconverges into the return tunnel, ultimately
reaching the lower reservoir.
• Flow Control Mechanisms: To manage the water flow effectively, control valves are
placed before the split in the main penstock and at the exit points of each turbine. These
valves help regulate the water flow rate, pressure, and distribution, providing flexibility in
response to operational needs and safety requirements.
• Transmission Line Connections: Each turbine’s generator outputs electricity that is
channeled through individual transmission lines, which converge into a common
transmission route leading to the grid. The power lines from each generator can be designed
to combine at a substation before connecting to the grid, facilitating centralized control and
monitoring.
Figure 3: Layout of Pumped HydroStorage Facility
Figure 4: Schematic Drawing of the Pumped Hydro Energy Storage.
CRITICAL DISCUSSION ON ENGINEERING PRINCIPLES USED IN DESIGN
1. Bernoulli’s Principle
1 1
𝑝1 + 𝜌𝑉1 2 + 𝜌𝑔ℎ1 = 𝑝2 + 𝜌𝑣2 2 + 𝜌𝑔ℎ2 = 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡
2 2
1
This states that in a steady, incompressible flow, the sum of kinetic energy (2 𝜌𝑣 2 ), potential
energy (𝜌𝑔ℎ), and pressure energy (𝑝) per unit volume remains constant along a streamline.
This knowledge is utilized in the design as it helps to understand the behavior of water flow
from the upper reservoir, converting the potential energy gained (from height) into kinetic
energy (velocity) which drives the turbine efficiently by utilizing changes in pressure and
velocity.
The design of the penstock uses changes in velocity and pressure to deliver maximum
energy output. During pumping, Bernoulli’s principle also helps to optimize water flow
back into the upper reservoir.
2. Continuity Equation
𝐴1 𝑣1 = 𝐴2 𝑣2
This states that the product of cross-sectional area (A) and velocity (v) remains constant
along a streamline. This implies that if a uniform cross-sectional area can be maintained
along the stream, the flow velocity will also remain unchanged and hence fluctuations are
avoided.
3. Darcy-Weisbach Equation
𝐿 𝑣2
ℎ𝑓 = 𝑓. .
𝐷 2𝑔
This equation was earlier applied to determine the head loss in the penstock due to friction.
It helps in selecting the optimal dimensions for length (𝐿), diameter (𝐷), and material with
the appropriate friction factor (𝑓) that can minimize energy losses for the required flow
velocity (𝑣).
4. Torque and Rotational Dynamics
Torque is generated when the water hits the turbine blades with force which in turn, rotates
the turbine shaft. With this knowledge, the blade angles are adjusted to maximize the torque
generated for efficient energy transfer to the generator.
Also, using principles from rotational dynamics, the design is made in such a way that the
rotational speed of the turbine matches the operating range of the generator as there is
optimal power output and minimized energy loss when they are in sync.
5. Stress-Strain Analysis
𝑃𝑅
𝜎=
𝑡
The stress (𝜎) in the penstock is related to the internal pressure (𝑃), radius (𝑅) and wall
thickness (𝑡), by the formula above for Hoop Stress in thin-walled pressure vessels. Hence,
the wall thickness used must be able to withstand fluctuating pressure without fatigue.
Similarly, the stress in the turbine blades is related to the in-plane force 𝑃, plate width 𝑤,
and plate thickness 𝑡, by the formula below:
𝑃
𝜎=
(𝑤𝑡)
Therefore, increasing the plate width or thickness has a reducing effect on the stress
however, they should be within design considerations.
High tensile steel is also employed so it can withstand intense pressure from the water
without deformation.
6. Principle of Thermal Expansion
Temperature change can lead to the expansion or contraction of materials and ultimately,
structural stress over time. Considering this, the material used should be of low thermal
expansivity. FEA (Finite Element Analysis) is also used to determine stress points and
examine the thermal cycle of the material in consideration to ensure it can withstand the
maximum stress.
7. Corrosion Resistance
To minimize structural degradation, stainless steel is used due to its high natural resistance
to corrosion. Epoxy-coated steel can also be used.
8. Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) Control
PID controllers help to match the grid demand by adjusting the turbine speed and valve
positions accordingly.
9. Sustainable Design
Incorporating design elements like a fish screen helps to prevent fish from entering the
turbine thereby protecting the ecosystem and promoting long-term environmental health.
SUMMARY
The pumped hydro energy storage project integrates different engineering principles to develop a
resilient structure with sustainability and optimal energy efficiency. Hydraulic principles were used
to ensure consistent flow and minimize head loss. Mechanical engineering uses rotational dynamics
to optimize the performance of the turbine blades. Material selection utilizes stress analysis and
chemical engineering principles like corrosion prevention. Flow and demand balance is maintained
using control engineering principles in PID controllers. Environmental engineering also ensures
sustainable design measures like fish screens and spillways allow ecosystem preservation.
Recommendations for Future Work
• As the electricity source used for pumping from the lower to the higher reservoir can allow
the Pumped storage to indirectly contribute to GHG emissions (although little) if the source
is of fossil origin, Pumped storage can be designed to operate during low-demand periods
and using excess renewable energy from sources like wind or solar to have perfectly net
zero emissions.
• Filtration systems can be incorporated into the design for increased efficiency of the turbine
blades as small sediments that can impact the operations are already filtered out before
intake.
• Composite or Self-healing material alternatives can be explored. This will increase the
lifespan of the components and reduce maintenance costs. More research can still be done to
identify better materials for varying environmental conditions.
• Artificial intelligence can be used in the control systems to balance flow according to energy
demand with greater precision than the PID controllers.
Knowledge Gaps
• Pumped storage hydro energy systems have been in the UK for only around a century so
there is not much knowledge on the long-term impact of these systems on the environment.
• Additional research for extreme climates. Analyzing thermal stress for such conditions can
help in developing materials that are more resilient.
REFERENCES
1. David, L. (2024). Navigating the Path to Net Zero: a closer look at the UK’s low-carbon and
renewable energy economy. Cambridge Industrial Innovation Policy. 2024, May 28.
Navigating the path to Net Zero: a closer look at the UK's low-carbon and renewable energy
economy - Cambridge Industrial Innovation Policy
2. The Economic Impact of Pumped Storage Hydro. BiGGAR Economics. 2023, May. pp 6.
3. IHA (2018). Hydropower Sustainability Guidelines
4. ESHA (2004). Guide on How to Develop a Small Hydropower Plant. pp 114.
5. Muhammad A., Saeed B., Talal A., & Noor R. (2014). Modelling and Analysis of a Very
Low Head Kaplan Turbine Runner Blades for Rural Area of Punjab. International Journal
of Scientific & Engineering Research, Vol. 5 (7):905. DOI: 10.14299/ijser.2014.07.006
6. J.L. Gordon & D.G. Murray. Material Selection for Penstocks. Hydro Review Fall. 1985. pp
80.
7. UNIDO (2019). Small Hydropower Technical Guidelines