1
a, It has created a global economic system and has seen those living in
extreme poverty around the world fall by one billion people. Also by 2023,
there will be 5.3 billion people will due to globalization.
b, Two problems caused by the increased globalisation are unequal economic
growth and increased risk of international crime, including terrorism.
c, Instability for businesses with prices and currencies change, while
globalization brings many good things to the economy, it also has some bad
consequences. For example, businesses face great financial risks, price
fluctuations can impact customers' ability to pay, reduce demand or change
consumer trends.
d, The globalisation is an important national issue beacuse it bring both
negative and positive to our future. With the negative side, it’s unfair on
worker and the environment. Our manufacturing jobs be lost and will lead to
an increased need for unemployment benefits and retraining. On the other
hand, most of people see fast travel, mas communication and quicl access
through internet, this is a most benefits of globalisation to the world .
ssmarkets, allowing bussinesses to expand and access larger customer
bases. The weaknesses of the argument that businesses and governments
will need to solve environmental problems together or many things else not
only the problem about envirnoment.
B ‘Globalisation helps us understand other cultures.’, I think it is true to some
extent. People are now more mobile and can visit different places.
Technology, like the internet, helps us stay in touch and explore.
a, One prediction from Daan's statement is that "the gap between the rich
and the rest will continue to grow." This is a prediction because it refers to a
future event based on observed trends and reasoning.
b, Gabriella’s statement may be seen as a vested interrest because her
father owns a large sustainable energy company from globalisation. As she
mentioned, large companies expanding into other countries can create jobs
and opportunities.
c, Daan’s or Babriella’s argument depends on the perspective of each person
- Daan’s argument: Daan presents a critical view of globalization,
emphasizing its negative impact on workers, the environment, and
inequality. His argument is compelling if we consider social and
environmental concerns, especially labor exploitation. He supports his
views with concrete examples, such as the loss of manufacturing jobs
and the environmental damage caused by transportation.
- Gabriella's Argument: Gabriella cites the benefits of globalization, such
as economic growth, poverty reduction, and technological
advancement. Her argument is aimed at those who value
development. She acknowledges the problems of globalization but
proposes solutions, such as improving leadership, which makes her
position balanced and forward-looking.
4,
‘We should increase employment by encouraging globalization.’ I don't
entirely agree with this view, but I don't think it's wrong either.
Globalization opens up more job opportunities and lifts people out of
poverty, as Gabriella points out. Workers can gain new skills, increasing
their employability globally. This is getting people out of poverty and
providing countries with energy to develop further. In the opposing
argument, as Daan’s argument he think it could increases the
transportation of goods and harmful emissions from fossil fuels around the
world. Also globalisation often shifts jobs from one country to another,
leading to job losses in higher-wage countries. . Large companies will
continue to take advantage of tax rules and cheap labour around the
world to make a profit.
