Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views8 pages

Chapter 5-6

Uploaded by

Ashikur Rahman
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views8 pages

Chapter 5-6

Uploaded by

Ashikur Rahman
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

Chapter 05

Workers strees and negative employee behavior


Q. Defining worker stress
Worker stress is the tension or pressure employees feel when they can't manage job demands
effectively. It can come from heavy workloads, tight deadlines, or conflicts with coworkers.
Stress at work can make people feel anxious, tired, or frustrated, and may affect their
performance and health. If stress continues for a long time, it can lead to burnout or illness.
Both workers and companies need to manage stress by improving communication, offering
support, and promoting a healthy work-life balance.
Q. Sources of worker stress

Heavy Workloads

When employees are given too much work to complete within a limited time, it creates
pressure and stress. Constantly juggling multiple tasks or working long hours can lead to
exhaustion and decreased job satisfaction. Over time, the inability to manage large workloads
can cause chronic stress, negatively affecting both productivity and mental well-being.

Unrealistic Deadlines

Unrealistic expectations or tight deadlines can make employees feel overwhelmed, leading to
stress. When there isn’t enough time to complete tasks effectively, employees may rush, make
errors, or feel anxious about their performance. This pressure can reduce the quality of work
and harm morale.

Lack of Control

Workers who feel they have little say in how they do their jobs or make decisions often
experience stress. A lack of autonomy over work processes or being micromanaged can make
employees feel powerless or undervalued. This sense of helplessness can increase frustration
and lower job satisfaction.

Poor Work-Life Balance

When employees struggle to balance work demands with personal life, stress can build up.
Working excessive hours or being constantly available for work reduces time for relaxation,
family, and hobbies. This imbalance can lead to burnout, fatigue, and emotional strain,
affecting both personal and professional life.

Interpersonal Conflicts

Tensions or conflicts with colleagues or supervisors create a stressful work environment.


Disagreements, lack of support, or poor communication can lead to frustration and a toxic
workplace atmosphere. Chronic conflict may cause anxiety, making employees dread going to
work.
Job Insecurity

Fear of losing a job or uncertainty about the future of one’s position is a major source of stress.
Economic instability or organizational changes like downsizing can leave employees worried
about their job security. This anxiety can distract from their performance and negatively
impact mental health.

Inadequate Resources or Support

When employees don’t have the necessary tools, training, or support to do their jobs
effectively, stress levels can rise. Whether it’s a lack of proper equipment, unclear instructions,
or insufficient help from supervisors, inadequate resources can make work more difficult,
frustrating employees and hampering their productivity.

Q. How to mitigate workplace stress?

Promote Work-Life Balance

Encouraging employees to maintain a healthy balance between work and personal life helps
reduce stress. This can be achieved by offering flexible working hours, remote work options,
and ensuring employees take regular breaks and vacations. When employees have time to rest
and recharge, they are more productive and less prone to burnout.

Provide Clear Communication

Clear and open communication from management helps employees feel informed and
supported. When expectations, deadlines, and roles are clearly outlined, it reduces confusion
and uncertainty. Regular feedback and transparent communication also create a sense of trust,
lowering stress caused by miscommunication or lack of direction.

Encourage Autonomy

Giving employees control over how they complete their tasks helps them feel more empowered
and reduces feelings of helplessness. When employees can make decisions about their work,
set their own schedules, or prioritize tasks, they tend to feel more in control and less stressed.
Autonomy fosters creativity and job satisfaction.

Offer Supportive Leadership

Supportive leadership means managers who are approachable, listen to concerns, and offer
guidance when needed. When employees feel that their supervisors care about their well-
being, it creates a positive work environment. Regular check-ins, emotional support, and
recognition of hard work can help reduce the stress employees feel.

Provide Adequate Resources and Training

Ensuring that employees have the right tools, training, and resources to do their job effectively
is essential for reducing stress. When workers feel competent and well-equipped, they are more
confident and less likely to feel overwhelmed. Regular training and access to up-to-date
technology or resources are key to minimizing job-related frustrations.

Encourage a Positive Work Environment

Fostering a positive, collaborative, and inclusive workplace culture can help alleviate stress.
Encouraging teamwork, celebrating achievements, and promoting healthy work relationships
can reduce conflicts and improve morale. A supportive and friendly work environment makes
employees feel valued and less stressed.

Implement Stress Management Programs

Organizations can offer stress management programs, such as mindfulness workshops,


wellness initiatives, or employee assistance programs (EAPs). These programs provide tools
to help employees manage stress, improve mental health, and maintain a positive outlook.
Regular participation in such activities can lead to long-term reductions in stress

Q. Reasons of workplace stress.

Workplace stress can arise from a variety of factors, and understanding these reasons is crucial
for managing stress effectively. Here are some common causes of workplace stress:

Excessive Workload:

When employees are overloaded with work or face unrealistic deadlines, it often leads to
stress. The constant pressure to complete tasks quickly can result in burnout, reduced
productivity, and decreased job satisfaction. Over time, an unmanageable workload can
negatively impact both mental and physical health.

Lack of Control:

Employees often feel stressed when they have little control over their work environment or
decision-making processes. This lack of autonomy can lead to feelings of helplessness, as
individuals may feel unable to influence the outcome of their work or workplace policies.
Being micromanaged or not given enough freedom can also intensify stress levels.

Poor Work-Life Balance:

Long hours, frequent overtime, and bringing work home can blur the boundaries between
personal life and work, leaving little time for relaxation or personal activities. When employees
can't strike a healthy work-life balance, it often results in stress, exhaustion, and resentment
toward their job.

Role Ambiguity and Conflict:

Unclear job expectations or conflicting demands from different supervisors or departments can
create confusion and anxiety. Employees who are unsure about their responsibilities or receive
contradictory instructions may feel constantly on edge, unsure of whether they are meeting
expectations.
Lack of Support:

Employees who feel unsupported by their managers or colleagues are more likely to
experience stress. A lack of feedback, recognition, or guidance can make workers feel isolated
and undervalued. Conversely, a supportive work environment fosters resilience against stress.

Job Insecurity:

The fear of losing a job or not having stable employment can lead to significant stress.
Economic downturns, company restructures, or downsizing can cause employees to worry
about their financial stability and future, leading to anxiety and distraction at work.

Workplace Conflict:

Tension between colleagues, supervisors, or teams can create a hostile work environment.
Conflicts over resources, differences in work styles, or personality clashes can contribute to
stress, particularly if there are no mechanisms in place for resolving disputes constructively.

Poor Working Conditions:

Physical aspects of the workplace, such as noise, inadequate lighting, poor ventilation, or
uncomfortable seating, can cause physical discomfort and stress. Similarly, unsafe working
environments or a lack of necessary resources can make employees feel vulnerable and
anxious.

Each of these factors can significantly contribute to workplace stress, affecting not only
individual well-being but also organizational productivity and morale. Addressing these issues
is key to creating a healthier, more supportive work environment.

Chapter 06
Communicatio in the workplace
Q. What is communication?
Communication is the process of exchanging information, ideas, thoughts, and feelings
between individuals or groups. It involves a sender transmitting a message through a medium,
such as speech, writing, gestures, or visual cues, to a receiver who interprets and responds to
it. Effective communication is essential for understanding, collaboration, and building
relationships in both personal and professional contexts. It can take many forms, including
verbal (spoken or written), non-verbal (body language, facial expressions), and digital (emails,
texts, social media). Clear and effective communication ensures that messages are understood
as intended, reducing misunderstandings and promoting efficiency.
Q. Communication process.
The communication process is a step-by-step sequence that involves the transmission of a
message from a sender to a receiver. This process includes several key elements that ensure
effective communication. Here’s a breakdown of each stage:

Sender (Encoder)

The communication process begins with the sender, who initiates the message. The sender has
an idea, thought, or information they wish to communicate. They are responsible for crafting
the message in a way that is understandable to the receiver.

Message

The message is the core information, idea, or thought being communicated. It can be verbal,
written, or non-verbal. The effectiveness of the message depends on its clarity, relevance, and
how well it’s structured to reach the intended audience.

Encoding

Encoding is the process by which the sender translates their thoughts or information into a
form that can be communicated, such as words, symbols, images, or body language. It’s crucial
for the sender to encode the message clearly to minimize the chances of misinterpretation.

Channel (Medium)

The channel refers to the medium through which the message is transmitted from the sender
to the receiver. It can be face-to-face conversation, email, phone call, text, or any other mode
of communication. The choice of channel can affect how the message is received and
interpreted.

Receiver (Decoder)

The receiver is the individual or group to whom the message is directed. The receiver’s
responsibility is to interpret (or decode) the message. Their ability to understand the message
depends on their knowledge, experience, and relationship with the sender.

Decoding

Decoding is the process by which the receiver interprets the sender's message. The receiver
analyzes and tries to make sense of the message based on the information provided, context,
and their personal understanding. Miscommunication can occur if the message is not decoded
as intended.

Feedback

Feedback is the response from the receiver to the sender. It can be verbal or non-verbal and
indicates whether the message was understood correctly. Feedback allows for clarification if
the message was misunderstood and helps the sender know that their communication was
effective.

Noise

Noise refers to any interference or barriers that distort or disrupt the message during the
communication process. It can be physical (like background sounds), psychological (such as
preconceptions or emotions), or semantic (misunderstanding of words or phrases). Noise can
affect how well the message is received and understood.

The communication process is cyclical, as feedback allows for continuous exchange and
improvement of understanding between sender and receiver. Ensuring clarity at each step
reduces misunderstandings and enhances the effectiveness of the communication.

Q. Disturbing elements of communication.


Although this model represents communication as a simple and relatively foolproof process,
the effective flow of information from sender to receiver can break down at many points. The
sender can have difficulty in encoding the message, making comprehension by the receiver
difficult. For example, a supervisor might tell an employee, “I would really like you to try to
make this deadline,” when what she really means is that the deadline must be met, with no
exceptions. On the other side, the receiver may inaccurately decode the message and interpret
it in a way wholly different from what the sender had in mind. For example, the employee
might interpret the “deadline” statement to mean that the supervisor has now turned entire
responsibility for the project over to him and will no longer be available to help meet the
deadline. A poor choice of channel may also result in a breakdown of effective
communication. For example, giving a coworker lengthy and detailed instructions about a
work task over the telephone rather than in writing may lead to inadequate performance of the
job. Furthermore, the work environment may provide any number of distractions that can
disrupt the communication process, such as competing conversations, loud machinery, or
inconsistent or contradictory messages. Such distractions are collectively called noise. Noise
may also refer to psychological factors such as biases, perceptual differences, or selective
attention, all of which make it difficult for persons to communicate with and to understand one
another. For example, psychological noise can occur when the receiver ignores the sender
because of a belief that the sender “has nothing important to say.”
Noise physical or psychological distractions that disrupt the effective flow of communication
Research on the Communication Process
Much of the research on the communication process in work settings has focused on factors
that can increase or decrease its effectiveness. Among the factors that can affect the flow of
communication from sender to receiver are source factors, channel factors, and audience
factors.
Source Factors
Source factors are characteristics of the sender—the source of the message—that can facilitate
or detract from the effective flow of communication. One such factor is the status of the source,
which can affect whether potential receivers attend to a message. Generally, the higher the
organizational status of the sender, the more likely the communication will be listened to and
acted on. For example, messages from the president or owner of a company are usually given
top priority. (“When the boss talks, people listen.”)
Source Factors characteristics of the sender that influence the effectiveness of a
communication
Another source factor is the credibility, or believability, of the sender. If the source is trusted,
particularly if someone is in a supervisory or leadership role, it is more likely that the message
will receive proper attention (Mackenzie, 2010). Variables such as the expertise, knowledge,
and reliability of the source (e.g., Has this person provided truthful information in the past?)
contribute to the credibility of the sender (O’Reilly & Roberts, 1976). Employees learn which
sources can be trusted and pay closest attention to their messages. Research suggests that a
sender’s communication style is also important. For instance, more expressive and more
organized trainers tended to do a better job of imparting learning to trainees (Towler &
Dipboye, 2001). A final source factor is the encoding skills of the sender, or the source’s ability
to translate an abstract message into some sort of shared code, usually the written or spoken
language, so that it can be clearly conveyed to the receiver. For example, the communication
skills of a CEO may be critical when she or he is trying to articulate the company’s vision or
goals for the future. In short, these skills include the abilities to speak and write clearly and to
select the appropriate channel for transmitting information. Generally, the better the encoding
skills of the sender, the smoother and more effective is the flow of communication.
Channel Factors
Channel factors, which are positive or negative characteristics related to the vehicle through
which the message is communicated, can also influence the effectiveness of the
communication process. Selection of the proper channel can have an important effect on the
accurate flow of communication. For example, using a visual device such as a chart or graph
to present complex information on sales and profit figures is likely to be a more effective
channel than the spoken word. The channel selected can also affect the impact of the message.
For example, a face-to-face reprimand from a supervisor might carry more weight than the
same reprimand conveyed over the telephone. Whenever possible, using multiple channels to
present complicated information will increase the likelihood that it will be attended to and
retained. Research on organizational communication has focused on specific types, or
“genres,” of messages, such as business letters, memos, or group meetings (Yates &
Orlikowski, 1992). In one study, it was found that persons higher in the organizational
hierarchy had a preference for more formal modes of written communication (word-processed
letters and memos) over more informal, handwritten messages (Reinsch & Beswick, 1995).
Another study has found that managers are indicating a growing preference for using e-mail
to communicate messages, even in situations such as responding to another’s telephone
message, or when the recipient is in an office just down the hall (Markus, 1994).
Channel Factors characteristics of the vehicle of transmission of a message that affect
communication
Semantic problems are common channel factors that can lead to a breakdown in
communication. These difficulties occur because different people may interpret the meanings
of certain words differently. For example, if your work supervisor tells you that you are doing
a “good” job, you may infer that your performance is well above average. However, if the
supervisor defines “good” as work that is barely passable (but really he expects “excellent,”
“superior,” or “outstanding” performance), you may be missing the meaning of the message.
Semantic problems may arise through the use of technical language, or jargon, the special
Audience Factors
Audience factors are elements related to the receiver, such as the person’s attention span and
perceptual abilities, which can facilitate or impair the communication process. For example, it
is important that training information be presented at a level that matches the audience’s ability
to perceive and process that information, or much of the communication may be lost.
Moreover, it is critical to consider the attention span of the target audience. Although all-day
classroom training sessions might be appropriate for management trainees who are used to
such long sessions, the attention of assembly-line workers might be lost after an hour’s lecture
because of their unfamiliarity with this format.
Audience Factors characteristics of the receiver that influence the effectiveness of a
communication The receiver’s relationship to the sender can also affect the communication
process. For example, if the receiver is subordinate to the sender, the message may be better
attended to because the receiver is supposed to listen to superiors. If, however, the situation is
reversed, a message from a lower-ranking organizational member may not receive much
attention from a higher-ranking employee.

You might also like