Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
63 views33 pages

Chapter 6 - Determining System Requirements

Uploaded by

Mohammad Wadee
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
63 views33 pages

Chapter 6 - Determining System Requirements

Uploaded by

Mohammad Wadee
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 33

Analysis

Part 1 -Determining System Requirements

1
Learning Objectives
After completing this lesson, students should be able to:
 Describe options for designing and conducting interviews and develop a
plan for conducting an interview to determine system requirements.
 Explain the advantages and pitfalls of observing workers and analyzing
business documents to determine system requirements.
 Explain how computing can provide support for requirements
determination.
 Participate in and help plan a Joint Application Design session.
 Use prototyping during requirements determination.
 Describe contemporary approaches to requirements determination.

2
Performing Requirements Determination

FIGURE 6-1
Systems development life cycle with analysis phase highlighted 3
The Process of Determining Requirements

Good Systems Analyst Characteristics:


Impertinence—question everything

Impartiality—consider all issues to find the best organizational solution


Relax constraints—assume anything is possible
Attention to details—every fact must fit
Reframing—challenge yourself to new ways

4
Deliverables and Outcomes

Deliverables for Requirements Determination:


From interviews and observations
interview transcripts, observation notes, meeting minutes

From existing written documents

mission and strategy statements, business forms, procedure manuals, job descriptions,

training manuals, system documentation, flowcharts

From computerized sources

Joint Application Design session results, CASE repositories, reports from existing systems,

displays and reports from system prototype


Traditional Methods for Determining Requirements

Interviewing individuals
Interviewing groups
Observing workers
Studying business documents
Interviewing and Listening

One of the primary ways analysts gather information about an information systems project
An interview guide is a document for developing, planning and conducting an interview.

6
Guidelines for Effective Interviewing

Plan the interview.


 Prepare interviewee: appointment, priming questions.

 Prepare agenda, checklist, questions.


Listen carefully and take notes (tape record if permitted).
Review notes within 48 hours.
Be neutral.
Seek diverse views.

7
Interviewing and Listening (Cont.)

FIGURE 6-2 Typical interview guide


8
Choosing Interview Questions

 Each question in an interview guide can include both verbal and non-
verbal information.

Open-ended questions: questions that have no pre-specified answers

Closed-ended questions: questions that ask those responding to


choose from among a set of specified responses

9
Interviewing Guidelines

Don’t phrase a question in a way that implies a right or wrong answer.


Listen very carefully.
Type interview notes within 48 hours after the interview.
Don’t set expectations about the new system unless you know these will be deliverables.
Seek a variety of perspectives from the interviews.

10
Nominal Group Technique (NGT)

A facilitated process that supports idea generation by groups


Process
Members come together as a group, but initially work separately.

Each person writes ideas.

Facilitator reads ideas out loud, and they are written on a blackboard or flipchart.

Group openly discusses the ideas for clarification.

Ideas are prioritized, combined, selected, reduced.

Used to complement group meetings or as part of JAD effort

11
Directly Observing Users

 Direct Observation
Watching users do their jobs
Used to obtain more firsthand and objective measures of employee interaction
with information systems
Can cause people to change their normal operating behavior
Time-consuming and limited time to observe

12
Analyzing Procedures and Other Documents

Document Analysis
Review of existing business documents
Can give a historical and “formal” view of system requirements
Types of information to be discovered:
Problems with existing system
Opportunity to meet new need

13
Analyzing Procedures and Other Documents (Cont.)

Types of information to be discovered:


Organizational direction
Names of key individuals
Values of organization
Special information processing circumstances
Reasons for current system design
Rules for processing data

14
Analyzing Procedures and Other Documents (Cont.)

Useful document: Written work procedure


For an individual or work group
Describes how a particular job or task is performed
Includes data and information used and created in the process
Formal Systems: the official way a system works as described in
organizational documentation (i.e. work procedure)

15
Analyzing Procedures and Other Documents (Cont.)

 Informal Systems: the way a system actually works (i.e. interviews, observations)
Useful document: Business form
Used for all types of business functions
Explicitly indicates what data flow in and out of a system and data necessary for the
system to function
Gives crucial information about the nature of the organization

16
Analyzing Procedures and Other Documents (Cont.)

Potential Problems with Procedure Documents:


May involve duplication of effort
May have missing procedures
May be out of date
May contradict information obtained through interviews

17
Analyzing Procedures and Other Documents (Cont.)

FIGURE 6-4
An invoice form from
Microsoft Excel

18
Analyzing Procedures and Other Documents (Cont.)

Useful document: Report


Primary output of current system
Enables you to work backwards from the report to the data
needed to generate it
Useful document: Description of current information system

19
Contemporary Methods for
Determining System Requirements
Joint Application Design (JAD)
Brings together key users, managers, and systems analysts
Purpose: collect system requirements simultaneously from key people
Conducted off-site

Group Support Systems


Facilitate sharing of ideas and voicing of opinions about system requirements

 End Result
Documentation detailing existing system
Features of proposed system

20
Joint Application Design (JAD)

FIGURE 6-6 Illustration of the typical room layout for a JAD

21
Joint Application Design (Cont.)

JAD Participants:
Session Leader: facilitates group process
Users: active, speaking participants
Managers: active, speaking participants
Sponsor: high-level champion, limited participation
Systems Analysts: should mostly listen
Scribe: record session activities
IS Staff: should mostly listen

22
Contemporary Methods for
Determining System Requirements

CASE tools
Used to analyze existing systems
Help discover requirements to meet changing business conditions
System prototypes
Iterative development process
Rudimentary working version of system is built
Refine understanding of system requirements in concrete terms

23
Using Prototyping During
Requirements Determination
Quickly converts requirements to working version of system
Once the user sees requirements converted to system, will ask
for modifications or will generate additional requests

Figure 6-7
The prototyping methodology
24
Using Prototyping During
Requirements Determination (Cont.)

Most useful when:


User requests are not clear.
Few users are involved in the system.
Designs are complex and require concrete form.
There is a history of communication problems between analysts and users.
Tools are readily available to build prototype.

25
Using Prototyping During
Requirements Determination (Cont.)

Drawbacks
Te ndency to avoid formal documentation
Difficult to adapt to more general user audience
Sharing data with other systems is often not considered
Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) checks are often bypassed

26
Radical Methods for Determining
System Requirements
Business Process Reengineering (BPR): search for and implementation of
radical change in business processes to achieve breakthrough
improvements in products and services
Goals
Reorganize complete flow of data in major sections of an organization.
Eliminate unnecessary steps.
Combine steps.
Become more responsive to future change.

27
Disruptive Technologies

Information systems must be applied to radically improve business processes.


Disruptive technologies are technologies that enable the breaking of long-
held business rules that inhibit organizations from making radical business
changes.

28
Disruptive Technologies (Cont.)

29
Agile Methodologies

Continual user involvement


Replace traditional SDLC waterfall with iterative analyze–
design–code–test cycle
Agile usage-centered design
Focuses on user goals, roles, and tasks

30
Continual User Involvement

FIGURE 6-9
The iterative analysis–design–code–test cycle

31
Agile Usage-Centered Design Steps

Gather group of programmers, analysts, users, testers, facilitator.


Document complaints of current system.
Determine important user roles.
Determine, prioritize, and describe tasks for each user role.
Group similar tasks into interaction contexts.
Associate each interaction context with a user interface for the
system, and prototype the interaction context.
Step through and modify the prototype.

32
Summary

In this chapter you learned how to:

Describe interviewing options and develop interview plan.

Explain advantages and pitfalls of worker observation and document analysis.

Explain how computing can support requirements determination.

Participate in and help plan Joint Application Design sessions.

Use prototyping during requirements determination.

Describe contemporary approaches to requirements determination

33

You might also like