See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/356592279 Service

Quality And Its Impact On Customer Satisfaction

Thesis · March 2021

DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.17089454
Travis Vu on 28 November 2021. The user has
requested enhancement of the downloaded file.
CITATIONS
READS
13 146,975

1 author:

Travis Vu
University of Northampton
8 PUBLICATIONS 13 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by

 ASSIGNMENT 2
Name: VU NGUYEN KHANH
DUY Student ID: 19406544
Module: Business Dissertation

Lecturer: Ms. Marta

Submission Date: 19th April 2021
Service Quality And Its Impact On
Customer Satisfaction
Word count: 10114 words

23rd March 2021

 2
ABSTRACT

Service quality and customer satisfaction have been widely recognized as fundamental drivers in
the formation of purchase intentions. The concepts are important for companies to gain
long-term competitive advantage and retain customers. Several scholar articles suggests there is
a critical relationship between these two variables, which is also a critical determination of
brand equity and customer loyalty. This study will clarify its nature by empirically assessing on
the effects of service quality on customer's perceptions and satisfaction. This study will use the
SERVQUAL model and other measurement methods to examine and analyze the case.
Divergent methodologies are conducted to examine the distinct antecedent causes and
consequential effects. Key findings will be based on the conceptual framework and five
dimensions: assurance, tangibles, responsiveness, reliability, and empathy. According to
research, customers are not satisfied with unprofessional service providers, unorganized
schedule, and pricing that do not meet expectations. Results of the research will be backed up
with statistical evidence and discussed comprehensively. Moreover, further research should be
considered to gather more information that were not accessible due to the limitations of this
study.
 3

TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
1.1. Research Background
1.2. Significance and Purpose of Study
1.3. Research Aims and Objectives
1.4. Research Questions
1.5. Hypothesis
1.6. Study Limitations
1.7. Structure of the Thesis

CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1. Service Quality
2.1.1. Service Quality Standards
2.1.2. Service Quality Measurement
2.1.3. Service Quality Management
 2.1.4. Service Quality Dimensions
2.1.5. Characteristics of Service
2.1.6. SERVQUAL
2.1.7. Service Quality Gap
2.2. Customer Satisfaction
2.3. Customer Perception
2.4. Customer Loyalty
2.5. Improving Customer Service
2.6. Brand Equity
2.7. Brand Equity Pyramid
2.8. Brand Equity Measurement
2.9. Conceptual Framework

CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3.1. Research Introduction
3.1.1. Research Onion
3.2. Research Philosophy
3.2.1. Positivism and Interpretivism
3.2.2. Inductive and Deductive Research Approach
3.2.3. Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods 3.3.
Research Paradigm
3.3.1. Research Strategy
3.3.2. Research Choices
3.3.3. Time Horizon
3.3.4. Data Collection
3.3.5. Research Instrument

4
3.4. Research Design
3.5. Validity and Reliability Analysis
3.6. Research Ethics
3.7. Data Analysis Procedure

CHAPTER 4: ANALYSIS AND RESULTS

4.1. Demographics and Cross Tabulations
4.2. Hypothesis Testing
4.3. Findings and Discussions

CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION
5.1. Recommendations, Implications, and Future Research
5.2. Conclusion

REFERENCES

APPENDIXES
APPENDIX 1. DECLARATION FORM
APPENDIX 2. ETHICAL FORM

Chapter 1

INTRODUCTION
 6
1.1. Research Background

In today's modern, competitive, and globalized business world, the key point to sustain a
competitive advantage lies in the quality of service that companies could provide, which in turn
will result in effective customer retention (Shemwell et al., 1998). What is more, a winning
strategy entails the necessity to build positive relationship with target customers and delivering
superior value over competitors (Kotler, 2009). An organization with high levels of service
quality will exceed customer expectations, yet remain to increase long term economic
competitiveness and profitability. Service quality's contemporary conceptualization has its
origins in the perceived expectancy-disconfirmation paradigm. The definition is a
multidimensional concept, different scholars interpret and evaluate the term differently (Ismail,
2009). Notable scholars such as Juwaheer and Parasuraman highlight that assurance, tangibility,
empathy, reliability, and responsiveness were among the paramount features (Johnson, 2006).
First, assurance tends to be referred to competence, credibility, and security of service (Ross,
2003). Second, tangibility is usually viewed as the appearance in terms of good equipment,
personnel, facilities, and communication materials (Sentosa, 2013). Third, empathy is the care,
understanding, and attention towards the customer (Raza, 2012). Fourth, reliability means the
ability and implemented promise from the service providers to deliver dependably and
accurately (Osman, 2013). Lastly, responsiveness is frequently seen as the willingness to provide
service in various situations.

Certain improvements could be achieved through reshaping operational processes, identifying

the underlying issues systematically, thereby establishing reliable a valid measures of
performance outcomes. Subjective aspects of customer service are measured depending on the
conformity of expected results and included benefits. Several successful organizations not only
offer services to satisfy customers but also delight and surprise them, exceeding their
expectations. Service quality is directly related to three other elements, including service
potential, service process, and service result; for instance, worker's qualifications, delivery
speed, and customer satisfaction respectively. Service quality and customer satisfaction are
undoubtedly correlated as two crucial concepts in the marketing theory and practice (Mackoy,
1996). Fulfilling customers' expectation is a challenging process, especially for organizations
with a broad customer base. Of course it is impossible to avoid the possible differences between
perceptions and expectations (Wilson, 2008). In fact, to know what the customers truly need is a
significant tool to maximize profit and enhance reputation. The process is similar to a chain of
activities, sequential and parallel, that organizations take into careful consideration. Relying on
this perspective, perceived service quality represent a value judgement of the overall
organization before and after, with the equation SQ=P-E (P stands for perceived performance; E
for perceived expectations). In other words, service quality plays an intermediary role in
determining previous and current perceptions.

1.2. Significance and Purpose of Study

Despite the nature of the relationship, not much was known about the role of service quality in
forecasting research literature and variables. Many argued that this is often neglected due to
over-

7
emphasizing on internal properties of the service quality system. Here they employed a basic
correlation method in order to examine respondent attitudes according to the features, but
ignoring to measure the size of the relationship and its effect between service quality dimensions
and the following outcomes (May, 2018). Subsequently, the studies shown did not illustrate
adequate findings in order to be used as guidelines for practitioners. The nature of the research
has to be thoroughly explored since the findings are not enough to formulate strategic action
plans and improve the implementation of service quality. Several management programs
revealed that if service providers are able to properly implement quality, there would be a
positive impact on individual behavior and attitude of employees and stakeholders as well
(Ismail, 2009).

Today's free economy focus explicably on the satisfaction scale and loyalty rate of customers
(Magi, 1996). There is a need for ongoing customer research and engagement to evaluate
attitudes, purchasing decisions, consumption habits and trends because the business process is
dynamic and customer satisfaction varies (Agbor, 2011). The importance of service quality does
not merely demonstrate through customer loss but doing it correctly will bring substantial
benefits, such as reducing operating costs, narrowing buying barriers and boosting sales
(Sherman, 2019). It requires more time and money to attract new customers as opposed to
retaining established ones. According to Chidambaram and Ramachandvan, customer's aim to
buy is a considerable strategic factor for companies to assess their strengths and weaknesses in
delivering goods and services within the supply chain.

Through recent years, the matter of service quality has gained much concern among industries
like healthcare, finance, and retail. Companies are searching for ways to distinguish themselves
from rivals through the services they provide. However, threats and risks are involved as this
leads to more complex situations (Reichheld, 1990). The topic of this paper is vital to propose a
suitable methodology, tackle the shortcomings, and provide practical proof about the effects of
service quality on the overall organizational performance based on extensive articles. In
addition, during the research, the paper will identify any shortages there might be in attaining
successful service quality and give suggestions on how it can be improved.

1.3. Research Aims and Objectives

This dissertation paper was structured to elaborate relevant theoretical and empirical evidence to
support the research hypotheses and conceptual framework. Next, to show the research approach
and executive methods, describing the procedure for conducting the study. Finally, to discuss the
analysis, results, and summarize a conclusion.

Therefore, the business dissertation concentrates on the objectives listed below:

1. To investigate the various factors that affect customer loyalty and satisfaction
2. To investigate the various factors that affect service quality and brand equity
3. To identify issues within service quality and measure its impact
4. To give recommendations and strategies to improve service quality

8
1.4. Research Questions
The dissertation topic states: "Service Quality and its Impact on Customer Satisfaction",
with the research questions as follow:

RQ1. Which aspects of the service provided affect customer loyalty?

RQ2. Which features of the service provided affect customer satisfaction?
RQ3. In what ways the service quality can be strengthen?
RQ4. In what ways can companies increase customer satisfaction, loyalty, and brand equity?
RQ5. How to measure the gap between customer's expectations and service delivery
outcome?

1.5. Hypothesis

Null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis will be tested out to see whether there is a remarkable
relationship between the variables.

Null Hypothesis:
1. There is no significant relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction. 2.
There is no significant relationship between service quality and customer loyalty. 3. There is
no significant relationship between service quality and brand equity. 4. There is no significant
relationship between perceived service quality and delivery outcome.

Alternative Hypothesis:
1. There is significant relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction. 2.
There is significant relationship between service quality and customer loyalty. 3. There is
significant relationship between service quality and brand equity. 4. There is significant
relationship between perceived service quality and delivery outcome.

1.6. Study Limitations

This dissertation paper is limited due to certain factors. These flaws could be the result of time
constraints, unavailability of resources, and lack of material utilization. Plus, another limitation
is the small sample size, making it difficult to maximize reliability in information gathering. The
research would be more accurate if there is a larger population for survey and data collection,
expanding the scope. In addition, this paper generally focusses on the broader picture of the
economy rather than precisely tap into a niche market. Nevertheless, these limitations are not
seen as critical but recommended for future studies.

1.7. Structure of the Thesis

The disposition of this dissertation consists of five parts, and is organized as follow: Chapter 1 is
the brief introduction and overview about the study research. Chapter 2 is the main body
covering in-depth theoretical discussions about service quality and customer satisfaction;
including a conceptual framework and visual infographics. Chapter 3 examines on research
methodologies
9
and the process plan. Chapter 4 analyzes different aspects of the findings, including SERVPERF
and SERVQUAL. Last but not least, chapter 5 shows conclusion, following by references and
appendixes respectively.
 10

Chapter 2
 LITERATURE REVIEW

11
2.1. Service Quality

Service quality is generally referred to the output of service delivery system, which is linked to
consumer satisfaction, perception, and opinions that are formed based on various contributing
factors and references. The interest on this issue has grown extensively over the last decade. It
has become a very popular field for academic and scholarly research (Zeithmal, 2000). A great
amount of models and theories have been developed to address and highlight this matter.
Scientific and technological innovations made way for the generation of quality, the more
frequency the less gap. These quality gaps will be further discussed later in the paper (Bhargava,
N.D.). In some cases, the best service efforts can be criticized because of the customer's bad
mood, according to direct service providers such as waitresses. It is recognized that the practice
in influencing customer may be affected by their psychological and physical conditions.
Therefore, the degree of discrepancy between the normative expectations of customers and the
perceptions at the state of time may alter (Parasuraman etal., 1994).

There are numerous measures and definitions of service quality without a single consensus
(Eshghi et al., 2008). Service quality is a complex construct that incorporates multiple attributes
which may change rapidly and dramatically, which will then facilitate precise measurement
(Karatepe, 2013). Consumers experience and perceive quality during the process whilst
providers attain and define them. The total delivery process is then evaluated, especially with
those that is constantly repeated, and will gradually maintain long-term customer relations if
performed accurately. When designing the process, a key element which is quality will
influence the volume of demand for the specific product or customer profile. The impact of
quality service on financial indicators and profit should not be underestimate. Quality-based
strategy is sustainable and excellent; must be viewed as a strategic force as it can significantly
increase market share, drive growth, and pose a barrier to those that seek to replicate.

Studies have shown the quality of service is a critical success point for commercial and retail
banks to win over one another (Kheng et al., 2005). As they daily perform face-to-face
interaction with customers, banks must maintain a professional environment at all times.
Bankers are trained to acknowledge the relationship between the two variables of service
quality and customer satisfaction in order to develop a competitive edge by tackling both
tangible and intangible aspects. In turn, the banks' revenue will increase in the long run
(Parasuraman et al., 1988). To be more specific, in order to have an effective marketing strategy,
these firms need to understand the minds of their target customers when choosing a service
provider. For instance, the name, reliability, reputation, physical facilities and other criteria. If
marketers can truly understand the assessment attributes, the presentation process will be much
more efficient and simpler to manage (Toelle, 2006). In today's world, one viral video clip of
poor service quality can absolutely destroy the business reputation. Word of mouth can spread at
an extremely fast pace and the amount of customer loss would be overwhelming (Ananth et al.,
2011). There are businesses who accidentally made a slight mistake in their front-line service
delivery, leading to the public's boycott and bankruptcy. Hence, service quality is considered an
important concept not only for

12
brokerage and insurance firms within the financial sector, but also in education, tourism,
hospitality, and any other high involvement industries (Saghier, 2013).

2.1.1. Service Quality Standards

Service quality is a structure of corporate culture which should set and manifest the values,
regulations, and standards. Concretizing in this direction will define the specific parameters of
customer's attitude (Ronzina, 2010). These may include the usage of speech formulas and
vocabulary, gestures and facial expressions, proxemics, appearance, environment, speed of
response and security. Moreover, if external and internal factors are consciously specific
regarding content, they become subtler when developing service quality. These factors are
characteristics of target client groups, features of the premises, and norms of human rights such
as the law of consumer protection. Furthermore, it also comprises of the core mission, vision,
and values along with characteristics of goods and services offered by the organization. Service
quality depend greatly on what is called Organization Standards, or OS. The table below
illustrates the functions of organization standards between three major community groups:
employers, employees, and customers.
Employers Employees Customers
 Organization standards Organization standards The presence of
help to attract clients contribute to the efficiency organization standards is a
through competitive and effectiveness of guarantee of quality.
services and enhance working process.
customer loyalty. The presence of
Organization standards organization standards add
Organization standards help contribute to self joy and
to position the company in development and mainly eagerness to the
the market, ensure work for the cohesion of buying process.
credibility, and manage the team.
staff more
efficiently.

Figure 1 - Organization Standards Table (Archakova, 2013)

Quality standards were developed to improve product conformance initially in manufacturing

and supply chain but now imply to all areas of the business because all functional procedures
are interdependent. Subsequently, quantifiable standards are created to maintain these sets called
benchmarks which can be measured, monitored and regulated to meet requirements.
International corporations' quality systems are likely to match the British Standards Institutes
(BSI) guidelines. Quality should not be restrictive but adds value to customer service, leading to
better corporate performance. There are two types of customer-defined standards: hard and soft.
Hard standards judge on observable and countable things through auditing while soft standards
deals with opinion and belief based that require to be documented using perceptual measures
(Bhargava, N.D.). The service provider should form a clear description of objectives and
circulate them to relevant people. They should constantly update mechanism to review the
documented policies regarding

13
how the service will be approached. The fundamental quality process needs to cover procedures,
frameworks, communication, and training within the workplace. It can be summarized into eight
steps. First, define quality in the organization, do market research both internally and externally.
Then, develop a precise competitive analysis, judging actual performance in relation to
benchmark standards. Next, propose a strategy to eliminate quality gaps through the
implementation of proper programs. The final step is to monitor and control the performance
regularly.
Figure 2 (Stejerean, 2016)

2.1.2. Service Quality Measurement

Tangible products tend to possess objectivity in ways measurement adherence to concrete

specifications, which is typically performed by quality control function and assurance. However,
services are intangible and thus the quality is based on subjective evaluation on personal
viewpoints, making the measurement process challenging (Stejerean, 2016). To overcome this
problem, a structured approach is essential; and the most widely-used metric is SERVQUAL
(Pascal, 2016). Organizations can use several methods to monitor their quality of service
including conducting customer surveys to know whether the customers might have any
dissatisfaction about the process. These questionnaires will allow customers to elicit their
opinions and rate honestly about the personnel. Henceforth, the management team can take
action

14
to eradicate the deficiencies. Similarly, companies should also pay close attention to customer
feedback in forms of compliments, complaints or suggestions. This method will eventually
reveal the root causes and can prevent them from recurring. The service unit should have a solid
plan for staff training operations and use available resources effectively to become more
flexible and innovative over time.

2.1.3. Service Quality Management

Service quality management encompasses several different procedures, consisting of
maintenance and monitoring system for the long-term goals in regards to services offered to
customers to track developments and measure its efficiency (Veyrat, 2016). Differentiation may
be based on factors like the urgency of the task, duration of service transaction, or payment of
premium pricing. It is said that unoccupied time feels longer than occupied time. In other words,
customers should have something to do at least while waiting for the services, or it can cause a
detrimental experience, leading to anger and irritation. Besides, research had shown that
customers that are provided in advanced the estimated length of anticipated wait or their relative
position in the waiting queue will result in more positive outcomes as they have accepted to do
so. When having a clear understanding of the rules and priorities in the service delivery process
beforehand, the customers are more enforced and easygoing. In spite of that, the waiting queue
must be equitable on a first come first served basis, unless there is a separate section for
prioritized clients. Similarly, customers will always expect a reasonable explanation when the
service is taking too long to operate. Customer service department should be justifiable in
communicating cases of unexpected delays (Bhargava, N.D.).

2.1.4. Service Quality Dimensions

Figure 3 - Five Service Dimensions Customers care about (Alan, N.D.)

15
Customer perception does not come from a single factor but from a host of contributing factors
that service marketers should evaluate accordingly. In the literature article 'Competing on Eight
Dimensions of Quality', author David Garvin identified eight dimensions applicable to quality
of service, which are aesthetics, durability, conformance, features, reliability, serviceability,
performance, and perceived prestige. Later on, in a refinement, Parasuram and two others
declared that there are only five dimensions to be superior, namely: assurance, empathy,
tangibles, reliability, and responsiveness.
Assurance is how companies build confidence and inspire trust, referring to knowledge and
courtesy of personnel and their ability to adapt these methods. This dimension is especially
crucial for high risk services due to the uncertainties involved. For example, investment
companies dealing with securities and funds, property and construction companies, legal affairs,
or surgical clinics demand high assurance as buyers lend their faith in the service. As prior
evaluation may be beyond customer's capabilities, many will opt to search for reviews from
previous customers. Satisfaction of one customer will affect the latter and therefore it is crucial
to maintain high quality service at all times. According to Osman and Ramayah, assurance and
empathy had the highest influence upon customer satisfaction in the banking industry of
Malaysia (Lau, 2013).

Empathy relates to individualized attention and care to each customer, making the best effort to
see and acknowledge their viewpoint. Reliability is the dimension with the highest influence on
customer's perception of quality. It is increasingly important in sectors like airlines, to fulfill
promises about service provision, pricing and problem resolution (Wilson et al., 2008). If the
first delivery is unsuccessful, the provider enter the phase called 'Recovery' with higher
expectations due to the initial failure, yet more likely to come under scrutiny. It should maintain
a record of error-free as it is one of the most significant role in conventional service (Yang et al.,
2004). Time after time, delivery will become more reliable, helping the service provider to fully
meet customer expectations even at the lowest level.

Responsiveness is simply the willingness to provide prompt service in different scenarios, just
like a hotel's customer service system. As customers often have special requests, queries, or
complaints; the service provider, especially front-line employees, should be aware and equipped
to respond smartly. This dimension requires the ability to customize, communicate, innovate,
and focus on the notion of flexibility through training (Johnston, 1997). Tangibles are basically
physical facilities, materials, and equipment that are multifunctional and represents the
organization's appearance (Fitzsimmons, 2001). This dimension serves as the 'face' of the
organization and its workforce, particularly to new customers (Davis et al., 2003). Companies
should use this dimension to signal quality within the first thirty seconds and enhance their
image (Wilson et al., 2008).

16
2.1.5. Characteristics of Service

Search qualities are attributes that exist before the service or product is purchased by consumers;
elements such as price, color, or style. Experience qualities are attributes that only takes place
after or during the delivery process. Credence qualities are attributes found in education,
advertising, accounting, or even funeral services as these are difficult to evaluate. Take a
consulting agency as an example, few customers have the knowledge to judge whether the
service provider actually did a good job. There are four main characteristics to distinguish
services from products. There has been debates surrounding the acceptance of scholars on using
these as a basis to examine customers' behavior and develop marketing strategies. It is important
to establish these characteristics to the extent which reflect consumers' perspective. One,
intangibility introduces the idea of selling and promoting services which cannot be seen, smelt,
touched, tasted, or heard before the purchase to appeal the senses (Regan, 1963). Subsequently,
service providers cannot rely on product-based strategy where the buyer alternatively evaluate
prior to the purchase. Two, inseparability enables consumers to shape performance and service
quality, reflecting simultaneous delivery and consumption stages (Gronroos, 1978). In other
words, physical goods are manufactured and distributed through multiple resellers whilst
services are inseparable from its provider. The provider's presence would become an
indispensable part of the service just like a cab driver and taxi service. As a result, organizations
need to develop technical competence and task-related interpersonal skills to input in human
resources. Three, heterogeneity highlights the potential for high variability and is sometimes a
problematic criterion for high labor content (Zeithmal et al., 1985). Throughout the day,
performance may become less efficient, and services offered vary depending on the providers'
mental or physical conditions. A nail salon staff may be working slower in the evening after a
tiring long day, as opposed to morning hours. Similarly, types of customers also differ among
themselves and the idea of heterogeneity arises so that companies should make an effort to
please the most number of customers as possible with high and consistent quality. Four,
perishability means that services cannot be produced and stored for later consumption or
transferred to a future period (Rathmell, 1966). Services are acts that occurs simultaneously thus
tend to go waste and perish on the absence of consumption. In some cases, management issues
may be posed to organizations due to the inability to regulate sufficient supply with demand
during peak hours at banks, restaurants, or train stations. To solve this problem, companies
should try to utilize the capacity effectively without deteriorating the balance between demand
and supply.

2.1.6. SERVQUAL

SERVQUAL is a multidimensional instrument used for research purposes, designed to capture

the perceptions and expectations of customers. The diagnostic value of SERVQUAL is
supported by models which forms the conceptual framework for scale development. As
mentioned earlier, it is built based on the expectancy and disconfirmation paradigm. The
instrument has become the
17
dominant and most widely applied measurement scale in all areas of service quality and a
variety of contexts and robust cultural settings (Cook et al., 2002). Despite attracting some
criticism from researchers, its myriad of context-specific applications contribute an outstanding
amount of long standing interests for organizations (Brady et al., 2001). The SERVQUAL model
was first developed in 1988 by A. Parasuraman, L. Berry, and V. Zeithaml and implemented
into American companies with the initial emphasis on quality systems development (Robinson,
1999). During that phase, service measurement was not easily quantifiable and seemed abstract.
However, the importance of the model was noticed overtime to give a competitive edge and had
serious impact on the US market in the early 1990s. The SERVQUAL model has proved to be a
consistent and reliable qualitative analysis tool where observed quality is measured through
environmental and generic components (Gronroos, 2005). Thus perceived quality is different
from objective quality which involves objective assessment on the basis of measurable and
verifiable predetermined standards (Zeithaml, 1988). The SERVQUAL questionnaire,
comprised of 22 questions, has been described as the top standardized method to measure
service quality. It is popular among today's organizations as part of a broader conceptualization
in analyzing customers.

Figure 4 - SERVQUAL-22 Questionnaires (Fripp, N.D.)

18
Figure 5 - Simplified Model of Service Quality (Higgs, 2017)
The model of service quality, often known as the gaps model, is a framework that identifies the
core dimensions of service quality, expose shortcomings and propose a measurement scale for
SERVQUAL. In simple terms, it is an external analysis comparing and contrasting customers'
needs in relation to their actual experience. Because of that, instead of focusing on the
measuring system or business perceptions, it is vital to take into account customers' needs.

2.1.7. Service Quality Gap

In the center of the SERVQUAL model is the pattern of expectancy, showing the gaps as
difference between perceptions and outcomes. When expectations of received service delivery
exceeds perceptions, quality is deemed low and vice versa. The model set forth five gaps that
reflect a discrepancy between a variety of aspects. Only gap 1 is measurable while gaps 2 to 5
cannot be done so, but instead possess diagnostic value (Heerru, 2018).

The first gap is consumer expectation versus management perception. Companies may not
always understand what is necessary to achieve high level of satisfaction. This gap arises when
the service provider fails to deliver what the consumers had expected. It is also a result due to
insufficient communication between the two parties and a lack of understanding. For example,
hotel managers may focus too much on in-house facilities and services while guests are more
concerned about staff responsiveness and room services. This knowledge gap can be improved

19
greatly through extensive market research with comprehensive studies, conducting surveys,
panels or even direct interviews in order to reduce the layers between customer and
administrative contact channels.
The second gap is management perception versus service quality specification. Sometimes
organizations may have identified what consumers want but still could not deliver the service
accordingly to a set standard due to market conditions, management indifference or resource
constraints (Lapaas, 2019). This gap arises when there is comprehension between service
providers and consumers but inadequately designed service, unsystematic process, or
inappropriate physical evidence led to poor quality service. In order to solve the policy-practice
gap, companies should be specific with their plans with clear standards, adjust performance to
meet objectives, update, monitor, and articulating service levels.

The third gap is service quality specifications versus service delivery. Although companies may
have guidelines in customer care, these do not assure quality performance. Employees play a
major role in affecting this gap as it is the consequence of ambiguity, role conflicts, lack of job
fit, poor supervision, and improper training. Technical breakdowns and malfunctions also
contribute to the cause. Recruiting the right employees is crucial, given that service is still
largely human-functioned rather than robotics in many cases. Companies should review
operations and HR departments to ensure specifications are achievable and develop a
well-structured onboarding program to cultivate a customer-centric environment, increasing
productivity and retention.

The fourth gap is service delivery versus external communications. Customers and the public are
highly influenced by organizational statements through representatives and advertisements.
Organizations sometimes neglect to inform customers about the hidden efforts to influence their
perceptions. Companies should avoid the propensity to overpromise or exaggerations through
false marketing (Lapaas, 2019). In short, all communication methods including digital materials
should be honest, accurate, and realistic.

The fifth gap is expected service versus perceived service gap. The key to ensure service quality
is by exceeding or at least meeting the consumers' judgement through the context of service
delivery. This gap might be the result of underlying issues from other gaps, or a reflection of
error and misinterpretation; thus cannot be blocked directly without removing the previous
ones.

In Grönroos' Perceived Service Quality model, expectations are images, communications, word
of mouth, and experience as functional and technical quality features. From the model, Grönroos
shows the means to narrow the gap although there are practical applications with factors
contributing to each side of the gap. By managing customers' expectations, service provider can
affect both sides of the gap, meaning that clear marketing strategies with effective process will
have a positive effect on the perception gap.

20
Figure 6 - Grönroos Perceived Service Quality Model

2.2. Customer Satisfaction

Customer satisfaction is basically how happy the customers are with the services provided and
can be determined through surveys and ratings to understand their needs and make adjustments
where relevant (Machirori et al., 2011). Industrial firms, government bodies, service companies,
and nonprofit organizations all have one thing in common that is the main focus to satisfy the
customers (Broetzmann, 1995). Customer satisfaction is studied and debated regularly in
literature antecedents (Chidambaram, 2012). The considerations extend from physical to
psychological and normative aspects (Javadin et al., 2012). There is no doubt that customer
satisfaction and service quality are positively related constructs (Baker et al., 2000). Conversely,
several studies confirmed that service quality is a determinant of customer satisfaction regardless
whether they were cumulative or transaction oriented (Cronin et al., 1992). The two dispute
concepts are the ultimate goals of service providers (Awan et al., 2011). Nevertheless, it is
important to note that customer satisfaction is a much wider concept not just based on specific
dimensions (Wilson et al., 2008). Service quality is an evaluation over a long period hence is an
antecedent component of customer satisfaction (Ree, 2010). Both developing and developed
economies are affected by liberalization and globalization and the pressure of satisfaction are
forcing organizations to adapt rapidly to maintain competitive advantage (Forsythe, 2012). To
gain and protect market share in the long run, organizations must have strategies to ensure
customer satisfaction (Tsoukatos, 2006). Researches have shown that customer dissatisfaction
and negative judgements had led to several destructive effects on profit (Munusamy, 2006).
Some argued that satisfaction is the end product of perception (Karatepe et al., 2005).

21
Figure 7 - Customer Satisfaction Diagram (Wilson, 2008)

A review of Yi in 1991 states that customer satisfaction may be defined either as a process or an
outcome (Grigoroudis et al., 2010). The measurement of satisfaction has been explored by
several theorists through Total Quality Management (TQM). It shows that quality improvement
could not rely only on internal standards and metrics of the organizations but more on customer
feedback. What is more, quality should be manifested in ways to be perceptible to the total
number of customers (Siskos, 2010). Measuring satisfaction is beneficial because it improves
continuous and systematic efforts to communicate with the total clientele.

2.3. Customer Perception

Customer perception encompasses the way customers make decisions, interpret and select a
service provider. In turn, it reflects what they think and feel about the brand, and their advocacy
efforts, the extent to which they will make referrals. Their impressions and awareness is shaped
by different variables, including direct and indirect offering interactions. A report from Survey
Monkey shows that over 55% more consumers pay attention to the organizations' message after
they have been trusting it for some time. According to Forbes, fostering positive perceptions can
grow a loyal and sustainable customer base. Perception lies on personal internal factors like
moods, beliefs, and expectations (Keevy, 2011). Good customer perception attracts more
possibilities and opportunities as it enriches the value of the overall business. Moreover,
substitution costs are significantly reduced, which is a crucial plus point especially in this
technological era where anything can be easily replaced. Advancement in technology makes it
easy to switch between services when consumers feel unsatisfied with the current. In luxury
retail, high-end customers are committed to the brand itself not usability, price, or any other
external factors (Zach, 2019).

22
A study by Arokiasamy in 2012 assessed over 200 students in their level of satisfaction with the
university's service quality. The results showed similar results with strong correlation between
two variables, highlighting the importance of educational services in enhancing students'
attendance and eagerness to study. A pair of researchers conducted a random survey among 540
department store shoppers through the telephone to investigate their opinion about the
relationship with the store. Surprisingly, the empathy dimension was indicated the strongest
influential factor concerning satisfaction (Brady et al., 2001). In another study based in Taiwan,
passengers awaiting at the airport revealed that initial perceptions set the thresholds for services
to be encountered (Harvey, 1998). The study outcome was applied to diagnose strategies to
diminish the gaps. A study by Jang and Ho in 2012 showed that customers highly evaluate the
physical setting and surrounding environment, admitting them to influence behavioral intents
such as returning or word of mouth (Angelo, 2011). As the global economy is becoming more
severe, customers are starting to be aware of price. As a result, retail businesses are dynamic and
have to face volatile conditions (Devi et al., 2009).

2.4. Customer Loyalty

According to Rare Consulting, a whopping 85% of customers said their loyalty stemmed from
the happiness, likeability and trust for the company (Chambers, 2020). Focusing on improving
customer loyalty is one of the best investments as it substantially decreases operating costs,
reduce time and efforts to seek for new customers and of course, higher profits (Lister, 2019).
The average conversion rate is approximately 65% for existing customers while only 10% for
new ones (Ehrenberg, 2000). An investigation on internet banking and ecommerce clients
supported the view that higher levels of satisfaction equals higher loyalty rate (Chinomona et al.,
2014). However, satisfied customers do not mean they are loyal customers, unless they see long
term values and rewards (Huff, 2007). Here, logical and cognitive reasons for recurring buyers
outnumbered the emotional and affective reasons. Apart from a firm knowledge base to classify
and observe data, it is important to track customer retention through a reliable a system of
metrics and make accurate calculations based on processed information (Oechsli, 2002).

2.5. Improving Customer Service

No matter how proactive the organization is, it is impossible to see all issues without honest
feedback. Whether through email, phone calls, website, or survey, it is important to collect as
much opinion as possible, preventing customers from voicing their displeasure on social medias
(Tim, 2018). Moreover, through offering a lenient and straightforward refund policy, huge
amount of trust will be earned, making the purchasing experience more risk-free as customers
are always looking for a guarantee. Another point is, many organizations struggle to establish
coordination effectively; hence implementing smart CRM platforms would streamline their
workforce processes. However, CRM software alone cannot compensate the shortcomings as
service providers must acquire adequate communication and problem solving skills (Sharma,
2018). IKEA is one of the best example for advanced customer service as they provide in-house
facilities for specific customers. Most recently, they've input augmented reality apps, allowing

23
customers to virtually design and arrange their furniture. Another example is Google, providing
top notch quality service to customers and immeasurable impact on employee experience. The
trend shows that the more satisfying the customers are, the more the employees are willing to
work for that company.

2.6. Brand Equity

Brand equity is one of the most important concepts in marketing and development, which can be
defined as the overall belief associated with the brand or its total value (Smith, et al., 2007).
Brand equity can also be assumed to be the customers' perspective attached to a brand (Wood,
2000). Academic literatures have been studying on brand equity from the perspective of
information economics and cognitive psychology. The former states that a strong brand name is
a credibility while the latter states that other features drive attribute perceptions and consumer
awareness (Feldwick, 1996). Positive brand equity brings significant value to organizations as
they can be transferred among different product lines, increasing sales, revenue, and market
share as they become more widely recognized and preferred. Additionally, customers are
willing to pay higher price for products even when competitors sell for less, enabling more
profit per sale. It has been empirically demonstrated the importance of brand equity in price
structure determination. Businesses with positive brand equity can charge premium prices just
like haute couture fashion houses in the apparel industry. For instance, when Apple release a
new model, customers around the world line up several hours waiting for a product that could
be found cheaper elsewhere. One reason to their success is that Apple has amassed a staggering
amount of positive brand equity, translating to greater profit margins (Berry, 2000). In figure 8
below, David Aaker highlights ten attributes that can be used to assess the brand's strengths and
recommends to track each one separately.

Figure 8 - Aaker's Brand Equity Model (Aaker, 1991)

24
2.7. Brand Equity Pyramid

The brand equity pyramid is original known as the Keller's Brand Equity model, developed by
Kevin Lane Keller. It is also known as the CBBE, Customer Based Brand Equity model. The
idea behind the concept is in order to build strong brand equity, organizations must first shape
consumers' perceptions, opinions, and feelings through six building blocks that are
subconsciously asked by customers. Step one is to make the brand identity stand out by aligning
perceived values for consumers to be aware of. The goal is to create brand salience, ensuring
perceptions are recognized. Step two involves building brand meaning through performance,
characteristics, and imagery, to meet customers' needs on a social and psychological level. The
goal is to identify and communicate what the brand stands for, its mission, vision, plus any
future considerations such as going green and sustainability initiatives. Customer's needs can be
met directly through practical experiences or indirectly through word of mouth and marketing
channels. Step three is brand response in accordance of consumers' judgments about categories
like brand superiority, credibility, and quality. The model describes six positive feelings,
including fun, excitement, social approval, warmth, security, and self-respect (Duberg, 2021).
Step four is brand resonance, involves developing a deep relationship with customers. It is
considered the most difficult to attain yet most desirable as a strong connection should be
established through repeat purchases and active engagement and support.

Figure 9 - Brand Equity Pyramid Model (Hayes, 2021)

2.8. Brand Equity Measurement

Brand equity metrics measures the value of the brand, embodies a promise about quality,
performance, and other dimensions over the competitors. Bill Moran, an executive in marketing
field, has derived an index of brand equity, composed of three factors: Durability in customer
25
loyalty and retention, relative pricing ratio, and effective market share (Daye, 2016). According
to Aaker, information of certain proprietary brand assets is required to be collected from
consumers when measuring brand equity (Berry, 2000). Enhanced performance and efficiency in
marketing is the outcome of high brand equity. A study analyzed the mediating effects of
customer satisfaction in the hospitality industry using the structural equation modeling approach,
and shows that ideal self-congruence and physical quality significantly contributed to customer
satisfaction.

Companies could try to ask questions about the customer's purchase history and future intent to
repurchase as brand awareness is an emotional-based metric. NPS, or Net Promoter Score, is a
methodology that can drive loyalty by providing insights on emotional connection between the
brand and customers (Svensson, 2006). Conjoint analysis is a survey-based statistical technique
used to reveal decision making processes and measure the value of brand features (Toor, 2020).
Customer preference aspects can be measured through sales data, surveys and focus groups
(David, 2020). Financial metrics are directly tied to the performance of sales and related
indicators, which can be measured by average transaction value or rate of sustained growth
(Howell et al., 2005). Output metrics are based on marketing activity and the results produced,
can be measured through sales lift, ROI of distribution channels, market share, and the rate of
customer acquisition (Pica, 2019).

2.9. Conceptual Framework

Lethinen viewed service quality as a process with input and output on technical and functional
aspects (Agrawal, 2007). The definitions of service quality point out two major theories: first,
quality is dependent on perceptions and expectations; second, those are distinctive from
satisfaction which is more inclusive of situational and personal factors besides the quality
delivered (Arokiasamy, 2012).

Figure 10 & 11 - Average Expectation and Perception Score and SERVQUAL Index per
Dimension (Datta et al.2017)

26
Figure 12 - Conceptual Framework of Research (Agrawal, 2007)

27

Chapter 3
 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

28
3.1. Research Introduction

This chapter will discuss and outline the methods, approaches, and tools that are going to be
undertaken for data collection, sampling, analysis, and justification. Accuracy and credibility are
two vital variables to validate the study (Slater, 2018). The purpose of this research is to clarify
the relationship between customer satisfaction and service quality through developing scientific
theories and ideas. Systematic investigation is the formal term to represent the cyclical process
of forming hypothesis, design appropriate methods, collect data and analyze findings.
Exploratory research is conducted around undefined issues, aiming to gain a clearer
understanding of the problem's nature without providing a conclusive answer. Instead, it enables
researchers to conduct further in-depth investigation later on. Descriptive research describes the
characteristics, focusing on 'how' and 'what', to expand the overall knowledge about the problem.
Explanatory research is casual which determines the interaction of variables, identifying causes
and effects based on practical experiments.

3.1.1. Research Onion

Peeling Saunder's Research Onion is designed to provide the methodological basis to conduct
the study research (Sahay et al., 2016).
Figure 13 - Research Onion (Melnikovas, 2018)

3.2. Research Philosophy

The study will engage critical realism research philosophy, a belief about how data about a case
should be gathered and analyzed. It focuses on statistical facts obtained which will then
influence respondents' interpretations (Johnson et al., 2010). Additionally, it separates entities
from
29
perceptions meanwhile assuming that these realism approaches to possess an independent
existence from underlying principles (Phillips, 1987). Epistemology means what is known to be
true while doxology means what is believed to be true (Ragab et al., 2017). There is a slight
difference between the two terms where epistemology encompasses various philosophies
(Zukauskas et al., 2017).

3.2.1. Positivism and Interpretivism

The common juxtaposition of quantitative and qualitative research approach usually fades out
the fact that qualitative itself encompasses two traditions known as positivism and
interpretivism. Positivist identify qualitative data with propositions for examination in other
circumstances whilst interpretivist combine data whose manifestations are associated with a
specific case. This dissertation will highlight the key features and fundamental differences
between two propositions and offer suggestion for a combination of both into actual
sociological research (Lin, 2005).
Meta-theoretical Positivism Interpretivism
Assumptions
 Ontology Researcher and reality Researcher and reality
are separate are inseparable
Epistemology Objective reality exists Knowledge is
beyond human mind intentionally constituted
through
experience

Research Object Research object has Research object is

inherent qualities that interpreted in light of
exist meaning structure of
independently of the researcher's experience
researcher
Method Statistics and content analysis Hermeneutics,
phenomenology, etc.
Theory of Truth Correspondence theory of Truth as intentional
truth: One-to-one mapping fulfillment: Interpretations
between research of research object match
statements and reality experience of object

Validity Certainty, data truly Defensible knowledge claims

measures reality
Reliability Replicability, research Interpretive awareness,
results can be reproduced researchers recognize and
address implications of
their subjectivity

Figure 14 - Positivism and Interpretivism (Sandberg, N.D.)

Positivism is a philosophical theory claiming that knowledge is based on the properties of

phenomena and their relations. Hypotheses generated and examined using quantitative analysis
30
and statistical methods, through direct observation and empirical research. Positivists prefer
using structured questionnaires and social surveys to have high levels of reliability and
representativeness. They stress the importance of comparative methods on a large scale to
uncover social patterns and hidden correlations within society. It is the belief that social science
can be as rigorously scientific as natural sciences. Positivists argue for objectivity, value-free,
generalizable data, while criticizing that interpretivists could not see beyond personal
experiences and biases. Hence, verified data derived from sensory experience, or empirical
evidences, are interpreted with logical reasoning.

Interpretivism, on the other hand, holds that human knowledge is socially constructed, not
objective, but transmitted through personal discourses, life experiences, and ideas. They are
sometimes referred to negativists or anti-positivists, whom declare that social realm can't be
studied with natural scientific investigation, but require a different epistemology. Interpretivists
support the qualitative approach through conducting unstructured interviews or participant
observations. From that philosophic perspective, interpretivism are aware of the concepts and
language of the research that might shape the perceptions of society (Soleymani, 2017).
According to them, people do not always react to external factors but are intricate and complex,
having their own reasons for actions thus scientific conclusions are not accurate nor appropriate.
This viewpoint states that it is not possible to form valid causal predictions about the social
world (Alharasheh, 2019).

3.2.2. Inductive and Deductive Research Approach

This paper will explain systematically how qualitative data can be analyzed using inductive and
deductive approaches. These approaches in data analysis are critical as they offer theoretical
orientation to practice. It is not uncommon to combine these two into a large study (Streefkerk,
2019). In short, the key difference between deductive and inductive reasoning is that one aims at
testing existing theory while the other aims at developing a theory respectively. Deductive
reasoning moves from broad generalizations to specific observations and inductive reasoning
vice versa (Azungah, 2018).

Inductive research approach is used when there is little to no existing theory to a test nor
literature on a topic. The three stages are observation, pattern recognition, and theory
development. For instance: elephants depend on water to survive, mammals depend on water to
live, therefore all biological creature depend on water to exist. General conclusions and
grounded theories are drawn from what is seen, allowing flexibility, closer to context.
Nevertheless, findings on the basis of inductive research cannot be proven, and so may be
invalidated.

Figure 15 - Inductive Stages (Gabriel, 2013)

31
Deductive research approach draws conclusions from initial premises, major and minor,
following the syllogism logic of expressed in classical literature. In other words, it formulates
specific hypotheses on the foundation of practical and theoretical knowledge before
experimented. For instance: Socrates is a man, all men are mortal, therefore Socrates is mortal.
The three stages are hypothesis formulation based on existing theory, data collection, and result
analysis. It is important to note that deductive research always start with a theory, or a result of
inductive research. As is it strongly associated to logical positivism, deduction approach in
social research is considered more appealing (Conger, et al., 2007). A limitation is that
conclusions of this type can only be accepted if all terms and premises are clear and true.
Figure 16 - Deductive Stages (Gabriel, 2013)

3.2.3. Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods

Qualitative research method is a case study that induces hypotheses from data, associated with
terms like complexity, subjectivity and context; while quantitative research method is a
generalization that begins with hypotheses, associated with terms like objectivity and
replicability.
Quantitative Research Qualitative Research
Focuses on testing hypotheses and theories Focuses on exploring ideas and
formulating theory
Analyzed through statistics and mathematics Analyzed through summarization
and interpretation
Expressed in numbers, graphs, tables Expressed in words
Concerned with behavior Concerned with meaning
Closed or multiple choice questions Open-ended questions

Figure 17 - Qualitative vs Quantitative (Streefkerk, 2019)

On the one hand, qualitative research is creative and interpretive as various techniques can be
applied to thematic analysis, discourse analysis, and content analysis (Glaser et al., 1967). It is a
method that enables data collection freely through interviews, direct observations, focus groups,
to the analysis of artifacts, cultural records and documents (Braun et al., 2006). Furthermore,
other types of qualitative research include diary accounts, ethnography, forums, visual materials,
or personal experience (Denzin et al., 1994). Results from qualitative methods express how
people perceive realities and how they react in consequence. Because of this, it is often applied

32
in areas of psychology, philosophy, and social science, primarily used to gain an in-depth
understanding of thoughts, opinions, and dig deeper into the issue (Farnsworth, 2019).

On the other hand, quantitative research allows numerical data to be collected and uncovered
across a larger population. Statistics can be descriptive or inferential, and variables are predicted,
and controlled throughout the process. Quantitative method aims to establish general laws,
ultimately relies on the context. It is mostly used in physical and natural environments like
biology, chemistry, physics, engineering, finance, computer science, and medical (McLeod,
2019).
Qualitative Quantitative

Conceptual Concerned with human Concerned with

behavior, understanding discovering facts about
and perspective. phenomena.
Assumes a negotiated Assumes measureable
dynamic reality. and fixed reality.
Methodological Data collected through Data collected through
observation, analyzed measurement,
and reported. analyzed, compared,
and reported.

Figure 18 - Qualitative vs. Quantitative (Minchiello et al., 1990)

3.3. Research Paradigm

Research paradigm is a model that considers the research standard based on verified practice,
allowing the structure to become the base for investigation (Kuhn, 2012). This study analyzes on
the contrasting views among service quality, customer loyalty, satisfaction, and brand equity
within the epistemological pattern. Deductive approach was employed in this study as
hypotheses were tested against empirical framework, and in the light of existing theoretical
developments.

3.3.1. Research Strategy

This study will propose a survey to conduct the research because it offers flexibility to
investigate precise areas of interest and allows direct questions about customers' perceptions
and subjective attitudes. The study will be using qualitative research methods to review
literature articles and collect data (Tjora, 2018). Surveys are commonly used in academic,
private, and government sectors as it is less time consuming but offers large quantity of
information. Additionally, the ease to efficiently compare findings and make inductive
evaluations for discussion is what makes this methodology beneficial. Questionnaires will be
distributed to various respondents at random settings. It will focus on the five SERVQUAL
dimensions, with a rating scale with 1 being strongly disagree and 5 strongly agree. In order to
assess the effectiveness, primary data are used as resource and the study will examine on how
the independent variable, which is service quality, affect customer satisfaction, the dependent
variable.
33
Theory
 Hypothesis

Data Collection

Findings

Hypotheses confirmed or rejected

Revision of theory

Figure 18 - Process of Deduction Research (Bryman et al., 2008)

3.3.2. Research Choices

This research exerts the mono method of qualitative approach and implies a single technique to
collect secondary source of data. Considering lack of access to high population and time
restriction, qualitative research approach is more appropriate for an in-depth investigation on
consumers' personalities, needs, and expectations.

3.3.3. Time Horizon

Since the research is restrained to a specific time frame, data can only be gathered relatively on a
short time period. Thus, this study will apply a cross-sectional time horizon. The aim of this
study is to present testable results that compromise and evaluated through attitudinal measures.
Overall, the study will seek to provide a snapshot of customers' attitudes towards quality of
service in organizations, and elucidate the effect of service quality upon customer satisfaction.

3.3.4. Data Collection

According to Rutkowski, secondary data is easy and cost-efficient however many argues that
primary data is a better fit for research at hand because it is customized to the specific aim of the
34
study (Creswell, 2003). This dissertation utilizes both primary and secondary data collection
methods to create a broad picture of the problem. However, the major source will be secondary
data, for the sake of strengthening the research insights. To conduct the survey, we will first get
permission from the respondents and their commitment to answer truthfully. Questions are open
ended and incognito; thus the interviewees could share their thoughts freely without biases.
Questionnaires will provide relevant and detailed information on certain aspects. Besides, with
the support of secondary data such as scientific journals, archival case studies and online
sources, it will maximize the effectiveness of the research.

3.3.5. Research Instrument

For primary data collection, survey and questionnaire will be used, consisting of roughly 30
closed and open-ended questions, a few multiple choice and Likert scale related to the topic of
satisfaction, loyalty, brand equity, service delivery. Respondents have the choice to answer as
much as they want and give any additional notes if necessary. In case primary data is unable due
to insufficient raw materials, secondary research may become the main source of this study to
reduce cost and simplify accessibility (Ruggiano, 2019). Secondary data may be retrieved and
accumulated from publications and previous studies. With that, it will aid in idea structuring and
develop new concepts and directions for the research. The one disadvantage with secondary data
is the difficulty to analyze, as there are no clear guidelines of report (Bashir et al., 2008).
Condensation of data is a critical step to handle information but should avoid making typical
conclusions nor reject anomalies and exceptions.

3.4. Research Design

Research design provides a blueprint of methodologies in order to perform analysis and achieve
outcomes. The study uses exploratory research approach, outlining the study aspects and facts
that are already available. Several systems to measure direct customer satisfaction provide
analysis of particular issues from different perspectives that fit operations and structure. After
identify the attributes, it is important to design a good sampling plan before conducting the
research (Mattson, 2009). However, regardless of how well the plan is designed or how effective
the research carried out, the findings could be misleading if the problem is not correctly
identified, meaning there are still uncertainties about the hypotheses. It is possible to first
conduct a pre-test study or pilot study to verify the understanding of respondents and edit the
draft if needed.

Sampling provide a range of methods to reduce data needed for study by only considering data
from a specific subset rather than the general population as a whole (Saunders et al., 2012). Two
techniques are probability and non-probability, with the chances of selection known and
unknown, respectively. This study will use the non-probability technique as respondents will be
selected at random, convenient of accessibility. Sampling is one of the most useful factor which
will determine research accuracy and the final results (Singh, 2018).

35
Figure 19 - Research Design (Quan et al., N.D.)

3.5. Validity and Reliability Analysis

The strength of qualitative research is validity, and many sources of information will give more
objective and fair outcomes. It is concerned about whether the findings truly answer the research
questions. To measure validity, information was gathered from authentic sources prior to the
research. Validity of this study appears to be high, as key words and specified articles were
thoroughly examined. Reliability is the degree to which research measures are free from
fallacies, referring to the consistency and stability of the techniques (George et al., 2003). It
concerns transparency of raw data and whether similar observations will be reached by other
researchers.

3.6. Research Ethics

In order to commence this research, approval was obtained by the institution's lecturer and the
University of Northampton (see Declaration form - Appendix 1). Relevant ethical form is signed
and attached in the dissertation paper (see Ethics form - Appendix 2). Next, all information from
online resources, journals, and books used in the thesis are referenced with the authors' names
and dates. Although the research mostly consists of secondary data, any primary data from
respondents will be treated with confidentiality by their consent.

36
3.7. Data Analysis Procedure
After defining the questions, measurement priorities should be clearly set, regarding unit of
measure, time frame, and other factors. During the analysis steps, advanced tools and software
can be extremely useful to efficiently review and interpret information (Dillard, 2017). Last but
not least, before reporting the findings, it is critical to assess the collected data to be reliable and
valid and fully understand the procedures. The analysis breaks down data to clarify the
relationship between component parts and its nature (Saunders et al., 2012). This study uses both
descriptive and inferential statistics to analyze data, in form of literature review, tables, and
graphs to present the results.

Figure 20 - Data Classification (Agbor, 2011)

37

Chapter 4
 ANALYSIS AND RESULTS

38
4.1. Demographics and Cross Tabulations

This section will discuss the relationship between variables through descriptive analysis.
Although direct interviews cannot be conducted, the research gathered statistical data by
reviewing previous articles and similar case studies. First, within the tangibles dimension, the
findings showed a relationship between customer satisfaction and the perception of equipment
and materials being up-to-date. In addition, customers tend to be more satisfied when physical
facilities are new and pleasant-looking. According to research, ignoring the requests or not
willing to help confused customers is a strong drawback. Customers are more convinced about
the assurance dimension of the service if they have good impressions and receive support from
employees. By not showing enough attention, service providers accidentally expose lack of
knowledge on consumers' needs.
Figure 21 - Regression Analysis Between Service Quality Variables and Customer Satisfaction
(Fida et al., 2020)

39

Figure 22 - Correlation Analysis Between Service Quality, Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty
(Fida et al., 2020)
4.2. Hypothesis Testing

Four null and alternative hypotheses have been identified and investigated throughout the
research, stated earlier in chapter 1. Supported with evidence, the final results determined
positive relations of service quality against all variables including customer satisfaction,
customer loyalty, and brand equity. However, hypothesis 4 (Ho4) cannot be confirmed entirely
nor rejected due to the variance in expectations and perceptions of each individual customer.

H1: There is significant relationship between service quality and customer

satisfaction. H1: There is significant relationship between service quality and
customer loyalty. H1: There is significant relationship between service quality and
brand equity.

Ho4: There could be significant relationship between perceived service quality and delivery
outcome.

4.3. Findings and Discussions

Empirical findings from the research were collected, analyzed, and arranged logically; those not
relevant to research aims and objectives were removed. This section summarizes and arrange the
findings into subsections. Firstly, over half respondents and customers said they are generally
happy with the services most of the time, especially those within their daily routine like the
supermarket, and do not mind too much about top notch quality. They are more likely to expect
high quality service in banks, hotels, and hospitals. Fast and simple process, positive attitude,
and polite communication will lead to satisfaction. Interestingly, restaurants that treat guests
well received a 48% higher return rate. Nevertheless, certain elements can break the barrier such
as errors in operations, faulty equipment, or lack of knowledge by the service providers.

40
Price is another important factor in determining customer satisfaction. Organizations must not
charge high price for an average quality service. Findings showed that the majority of customers
are very price sensitive and evaluate the service based on their expenditure. Huge number of
researches highlighted that male customers are easier to please, as opposed to female. Service
providers should pay closer attention to the demands of female customers as gender difference in
marketing should not be neglected. Several empirical evidences abound to support the view that
gender makes a different in the buying process. If possible, companies should offer differentiated
service channels, such as a hair salon, to effectively tackle this issue. Employees should seek to
assess and treat customers exclusively, similar to high-end stores, and communicate frequently.

The study indicates that customer satisfaction and loyalty are lead indicators of organizational
performance in the long-term. Organizations which failed to improve their service quality loose
a substantial amount of existing customers. Customers are likely to stay loyal with companies
that provide services at affordable price yet high value. Nevertheless, just like how satisfied
customers does not equal loyal ones, loyalty itself does not guarantee there will be word of
mouth references. As a result, service should have a unique selling point that exceeds customer
expectations, which there will be stronger incentives to recommend others. Surveys are one of
the most effective way to generate ideas for quality improvement, but should not be based on
flawed methods.

Figure 23 - Estimated Model (Rita et al., 2019)

41

Chapter 5

CONCLUSION
 42
5.1. Recommendations, Implications, and Future Research

Figure 24 - Service Quality Satisfaction Level (Ndubsisi, 2005)

Organizations are recommended to view the studies when needing to improve service quality
and marketing strategies. Customer's attitudes drive satisfaction and behavior, which will
gradually develop into loyalty. Companies should be aware of environmental differences in
ideology and cultural value, thereby providing customized services instead of standard (Abdel,
2015). Another recommendation is to schedule the workload rather to traditional schedules,
meaning to be responsive and flexible when there are high demands. Majority of customers
shared that prolonged waiting periods and disordered personnel are the common irritations.
Results from the study had led to a revised theoretical framework. In order to get a holistic view
of the case, it is prudent to perform further research, focusing on aspects that have not yet been
discovered due to limitations. Besides from inadequacy of information and other shortcomings,
the thesis is still systematic and comprehensive.

5.2 Conclusion

Through the summarization of the findings, hypotheses results, the relationship between
variables are proven clear, and that brand equity has a significant impact on customer
perceptions. With the aim of analyzing service quality, the research implemented cross-sectional
time horizon, using deduction and qualitative approach. A theoretical model has been developed
to measure and discuss the concepts. In conclusion, the dissertation has given evidence as to
how service quality affects customer satisfaction and loyalty.

43

REFERENCES
Agrawal, V. et al., (2007). A Conceptual Framework on Review of E-Service Quality in Banking Industry.
International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering, 8(12). doi:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1337655

Ahmad, S. & Papastathopoulos, A. (2019). Measring Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction of the Small
and Medium Sized Hotels (SMSHs) Industry: Lessons from United Arab Emirates (UAE). Tourism Review,
70(3), 349-370. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-10-2017-0160

Akter, S. et al., (2010). Service Quality of Health Platforms: Development and Validation of a Hierarchical
Model Using PLS. Electron Markets, 20(3), 209-227. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-010-0043-x

Al-Azzam, A. (2015). The Impact of Service Quality Dimensions on Customer Satisfaction: A Field Study of
Arab Bank in Irbid City, Jordan. European Journal of Business and Management, 7(15).

Alharahsheh, H. & Plus, A. (2019). A Review of Key Paradigms: Positivism vs. Interpretivism. Global
Academic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(3), 39-43.

Almasi, N. & Khorasgani, N. (2018). Investigation of the Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence and
Effectiveness of Educational Administration in City of Isfahan. Humanities & Social Sciences Review, 6(1), 19-
24. doi: https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2018.614

Almeqdadi, F. (2018). The Effects of Using an Interactive Software (GSP) on UAE Students' Attitudes Towards
Geometry. American Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(1), 22-28.

Alonso, B. et al., (2018). Modelling User Perception of Taxi Service Quality. Transport Policy, 63, 157-164.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.12.011
Alsamydai, M. (2016). Adaptation of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to the Use of Mobile Banking
Services, 2016-2018.

Anderson, E. et al., (1993). The Antecedents and Consequences of Customer Satisfaction for Firms. Marketing
Science, 12(2), 125-143.

Archakova, A. (2013), 'Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction. Case study: Company X', Theseus [Online].
Available at: <https://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/65503/Archakova_Asya.pdf> (Accessed on 14th
March)

Arlen, C. (N.D.), 'The 5 Service Dimensions All Customers Care About', Service Performance [Online].
Available at: <https://www.serviceperformance.com/the-5-service-dimensions-all-customers-care-about/>
(Accessed on 6th March)

Azungah, T. (2018). Qualitative Research: Deductive and Inductive Approaches to Data Analysis. Qualitative
Research Journal, 18(4), 383-400. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-D-18-00035

Berkley, B. & Gupta, A. (1994). Improving Service Quality With Information Technology. International
Journal of Information Management, 14(2), 109-121. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0268-4012(94)90030-2

44
Bhargava, V. (N.D.), 'Service Quality', Business Management Ideas [Online]. Available at:
<https://www.businessmanagementideas.com/service-marketing/service-quality/20971> (Accessed on 2nd
March)

Black, G. et al., (2014). Service Characteristics' Impact On Key Service Quality Relationships: A Meta
Analysis. Journal of Services Marketing, 28(4), 276-291. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-12-2012-0261

Bienstock, C. et al., (1997). Measuring Physical Distribution Service Quality. Journal of the Academy of
Marketing Science, 25(1), 31-44.

Brady, K. & Cronin, J. (2001). Some New Thoughts on Conceptualizing Perceived Service Quality: A
Hierachical Approach. Journal of Marketing, 65, 34-39.

Carr, L. (1994). The Strengths and Weaknesses of Quantitative and Qualitative Research: What Method for
Nursing? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 20(4), 716-721.

Chambers, S. (N.D.), 'Customer Perception and How to Manage It Effectively', Help Scout [Online]. Available
at: <https://www.helpscout.com/blog/customer-perception/> (Accessed on 11th Match)

Chambers, S. (2020), 'The Importance of Cusotmer Loyalty', NiceReply [Online]. Available at:
<https://www.nicereply.com/blog/the-importance-of-customer-loyalty/> (Accessed on 15th March)

Chand, S. (N.D.), '7 Important Characteristics of Services', Your Article Library [Online]. Available at:
<https://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/marketing/7-important-characteristics-of-services/30016> (Accessed on
5th March)

Collier, J. & Bienstock, C. (2014). A Conceptual Framework for Measuring E-Service Quality. Creating and
Delivering Value in Marketing, 158-162. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11848-2_52

Cortese, C. (2019), '20 Examples of Companies With the Best Customer Service', Bluleadz [Online]. Available
at: <https://www.bluleadz.com/blog/companies-with-the-best-customer-service> (Accessed on 13th March)

Dabholkar, P. et al., (2000). A Comprehensive Framework for Service Quality: An Investigation of Critical
Conceptual and Measurement Issues Through a Longitudinal Study. Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 139-173. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(00)00029-4

Datta, K. & Vardhan, J. (2017). A SERVQUAL-Based Framework for Assessing Quality of International
Branch campuses in UAE: A Management Students' Perspective. Sage Journals. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016676294

Dillard, J. (N.D.), 'The Data Analysis Process: 5 Steps To Better Decision Making', Big Sky Associates [Online].
Available at: <https://www.bigskyassociates.com/blog/bid/372186/The-Data-Analysis-Process-5-Steps-To
Better-Decision-Making> (Accessed on 17th March)

Dotchin, J. & Oakland, J. (1994). Total Quality Management in Services: Part 3: Distinguishing Perceptions of
Service Quality. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 11(4), 6-28. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1108/02656719410057926

Duberg, O. (N.D.), 'Using the Brand Equity Pyramid to Build a Powerful Customer-Centric Brand', Frontify
[Online]. Available at: <https://www.frontify.com/en/brand-equity/using-the-brand-equity-pyramid-to-build-a
powerful-customer-centric-brand/> (Accessed on 13th March)
45
Elliott, C. (2018), 'These Companies Have The Best Customer Service', Forbes [Online]. Available at:
<https://www.forbes.com/sites/christopherelliott/2018/07/11/these-companies-have-the-best-customer-service
heres-why/?sh=2fb582eab80a> (Accessed on 18th March)

Emin, B. & Boller, G. (1992). An Empirical Assessment of the SERVQUAL Scale. Journal of Business
Research 24, 253-268.

Ennew, T. & Binks, M. (1996). The Impact of Service Quality and Service Characteristics on Customer
Retnetion: Small Businesses and their Banks in the UK. British Journal of Management, 7(3), 219-230. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.1996.tb00116.x

Farnsworth, B. (2019), 'Qualitative vs Quantitative Research - What Is the Difference?', IMotions [Online].
Available at: <https://imotions.com/blog/qualitative-vs-quantitative-research/> (Accessed on 18th March)

Fen, Y. & Lian, K. (2005). Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction: Antecedents of Customers' Repatronage
Intentions. Sunway Academic Journal, 4, 60-73.

Fida, B. et al., (2020). Impact of Service Quality on Customer Loyalty and Customer Satisfaction in Islamic
Banks in the Sultanate of Oman. SAGE Jounals. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020919517

Gabriel, D. (2013), 'Inductive and Deductive Approaches to Research, Deborah Gabriel [Online]. Available at:
<https://deborahgabriel.com/2013/03/17/inductive-and-deductive-approaches-to-research/> (Accessed on 10th
March)

Grönroos, C. (1984). A Service Quality Model and Its Marketing Implications. European Journal of Marketing,
18, 36-44.

Grönroos, C. (1993). A Service Quality Model and Its Marketing Implications. European Journal of Marketing,
18(4), 36-44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000004784
Hawker, K. (2019), 'Keller's Brand Equity Model - What It Is & How to Use It', Medium [Online]. Available at:
<https://medium.com/@keatonhawker/kellers-brand-equity-model-what-it-is-how-to-use-it-84e42d562299>
(Accessed 18th March)

Hayes, A. (2021), 'Brand Equity' Investopedia [Online]. Available at:

<https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/brandequity.asp#:~:text=Brand%20equity%20refers%20to%20a,superi
or%20in%20quality%20and%20reliability> (Accessed on 16th March)

James, C. (1990). Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality: An Assessment of SERVQUAL Dimensions.

Journal of Retailing, 66, 33-35.

Johnson, R. et al., (1995). Measuring Service Quality: A Systems Approach. Journal of Services Marketing,
9(5), 6-19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/08876049510100272

Kaynama, S. (2000). A Proposal to Assess the Service Quality of Online Travel Agencies: An Exploratory
Study. Journal of Professional Services Marketing, 21, 63-88.

Lapaas (2019), 'Gap Model of Service Quality (5 Gap Model) Understand your Customer Better', Lapaas
[Online]. Available at: <https://lapaas.com/gap-model-of-service-quality/> (Accessed on 9th March)\

46
Lin, A. (2005). Bridging Positivist and Interpretivist Approaches to Qualitative Methods. Policy Studies
Journal, 26(1), 162-180. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1998.tb01931.x

Lister, M. (2019), '5 Ways to Earn & Build Customer Loyalty', WordStream [Online]. Available at:
<https://www.wordstream.com/blog/ws/2016/11/10/customer-loyalty> (Accessed on 11th March)

Parasuraman, A. et al., (1991). Understanding Customer Expectations of Service. Sloan Management Review,
32(3).

Parasuraman, A. et al., (1985). A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and its Implications for Future
Research. Journal of Marketing, 41-50.

Pascal (2016), '9 Practical Methods for Measuring Service Quality', Userlike [Online]. Available at:
<https://www.userlike.com/en/blog/measuring-service-quality> (Accessed on 3rd March)

Polyakova, O. & Mirza, M. (2015). Perceived Service Quality Models: Are They Still Relevant? The Marketing
Review, 15(1), 59-82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1362/146934715X14267608178721

Rasli, A. et al., (2012). Perception of Service Quality in Higher Education: Perspective of Iranian Students of
Malaysian Universities. International Journal of Economics and Management, 6 201-220.

Rita, P. et al., (2019). The Impact of E-Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction on Customer Behavior in
Online Shopping. ScienceDirect, 5(10), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02690

Saleh, F. & Ryan, C. (1991). Analyzing Service Quality in the Hospitality Industry Using The SERVQUAL
Model. Service Industries Journal, 11(3), 324-345.

Samen, A. et al., (2013). Mobile SERVQUAL: A Comparative Analysis of Customers' and Managers'
Perceptions. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 30, 403-425.
Shahid, M. et al., (2018). Impact of Self-Service Technology (SST) Service Quality on Customer Loyalty and
Behaviorl Intention: The Mediating Role of Customer Satisfaction. Cogent Business & Management, 5(1), 1-23.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2018.1423770

Sharma, G. (2018), '4 Strategies to Help Improve Your Customer Service Standards', Social Media Today
[Online]. Available at: <https://www.socialmediatoday.com/news/4-strategies-to-help-improve-your-customer
service-standards/529799/> (Accessed on 15th March)

Sherman, F. (2019), 'Why Is Quality in Customer Service Important?', BizFluent [Online]. Available at:
<https://bizfluent.com/about-5437915-quality-customer-service-important.html> (Accessed on 2nd
March)

Siah, J. et al., (2018). Service Quality of Self-Checkout Technology in Malaysian Hypermarket: A Case Study
in Johor. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering, 10(2), 8-11.

Singh, S. (2018), 'Sampling Techniques', Towards Data Science [Online]. Available at:
<https://towardsdatascience.com/sampling-techniques-a4e34111d808> (Accessed on 19th March)

Soleymani, S. (2017), 'Positivism vs. Interpretivism In Research', Medium [Online]. Available at:
<https://saber.medium.com/positivism-vs-interpretivism-in-research-1299e4a6877a> (Accessed on 15th
March)

47
Stejerean, C. (2016), 'Measuring and Improving Service Quality', Medium [Online]. Available at:
<https://medium.com/@offbytwo/measuring-and-improving-service-quality-a1dfc1c72efe> (Accessed on 3rd
March)

Streefkerk, R. (2019), 'Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning', Scribbr [Online]. Available at:
<https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/inductive-deductive
reasoning/#:~:text=The%20main%20difference%20between%20inductive,reasoning%20the%20other%20wa
y %20around.> (Accessed on 17th March)

Streefkerk, R. (2021), 'Qualitative vs. Quantitative Reseach', Scribbr [Online]. Available at:
<https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/qualitative-quantitative
research/#:~:text=Quantitative%20research%20deals%20with%20numbers%20and%20statistics%2C%20while
%20qualitative%20research,ideas%20and%20experiences%20in%20depth> (Accessed on 20th March)

Svensson, G. (2006), 'The Interactive Interface of Service Quality: A Conceptual Framework', European
Business Review, 18(3), 243-257. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/09555340610663755

Tim (2018), '19 Great Customer Service Tips To Improve Your Customer Satisfaction', Retently [Online].
Available at: <https://www.retently.com/blog/customer-service-tips/> (Accessed on 2nd March)

Toor, M. (2020), '7 Proven Ways to Measure Brand Equity', XMBlog [Online]. Available at:
<https://www.qualtrics.com/blog/brand-equity-measure/> (Accessed on 6th March)

Unknown (2018), 'The Five Dimensions of Service Quality Measured Marketing Essay', UKEssays [Online].
Available at: < https://www.ukessays.com/essays/marketing/the-five-dimensions-of-service-quality-measured
marketing-essay.php> (Accessed on 10th March)
Unknown (2013), 'Service Quality Gap Model', Verint Connect [Online]. Available at:
<https://community.verint.com/b/customer-engagement/posts/service-quality-gap-model> (Accessed on 7th
March)

Unknown (2019), '6 Ways to Measure Brand Equity and How to Build It', Pica9 [Online]. Available at:
<https://www.pica9.com/blog/measure-brand-equity> (Accessed on 10th March)

Veyrat, P. (2016), 'How to Improve Service Quality Management Through Processes', Heflo [Online]. Available
at: <https://www.heflo.com/blog/quality-improvement/service-quality-management/> (Accessed on 5th March)

Wellington, E. (N.D.) '8 Companies with Exceptional Customer Service + Helpful Tips', Help Scout [Online].
Available at: <https://www.helpscout.com/helpu/exceptional-customer-service-companies/> (Accessed on 14th
March)

Zach (2019), 'What Is Customer Perception', Discuss.io [Online]. Available at: <https://www.discuss.io/what-is
customer-perception/> (Accessed on 12th March)

Zeithaml, V. et al., (1996). The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality. Journal of Marketing, 31-46.

Zhang, Y. (2019), 'Why Customer Perception Matters and How to Improve it? HapticMedia [Online]. Available
at: <https://hapticmedia.com/blog/customer
perception/#:~:text=Customer%20perception%20encompasses%20the%20way,how%20they%20feel%20about
%20them> (Accessed on 8th March)

48
APPENDIX 1 - DECLARATION FORM

Faculty Business & Law

Department of Strategy, Marketing and Economics

Declaration of Original Authorship

Name: VU NGUYEN KHANH DUY

Course: BACHELOR OF ARTS (HONORS) BUSINESS STUDIES YEAR 3 SEP INTAKE

Dissertation Title: SERVICE QUALITY AND ITS IMPACT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

In submitting this dissertation, I confirm that:

(i) The material contained within this dissertation is all my own work. Where the work of others has been drawn
upon (for example books; articles; unpublished papers including the work of staff and students; non-book
materials such as videos and audio recordings; electronic publications on disk, CD-ROM on the internet), it has
been acknowledged and properly referenced using Harvard notation.
(ii) The work has not already been accepted in substance for any other degree and is not being concurrently
submitted in substance for any degree other than the one on which i am currently registered.

(iii) My original (primary) data has been seen by, and discussed with, my dissertation supervisor.

(iv) I have downloaded an electronic version of this dissertation to Turn-it-in having made allowance for any
confidentiality issues.

(v) If I consider any part of this work to be CONFIDENTIAL - I have detailed on the next page which parts are
confidential.
Signed: VU NGUYEN KHANH DUY

Date: 24/03/2021

49
APPENDIX 2 - ETHICAL FORM

THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTHAMPTON

Faculty Business & Law

STUDENT PROJECT / DISSERTATION ETHICAL REVIEW

SECTION A:
Project Title: Service Quality and its impact on Customer Satisfaction

Student: Vu Nguyen Khanh Duy

Student number: 19406544

Course: Bachelors of Arts (Honors) Business Studies Year 3 Sep Intake

Supervisor: Ms. Marta

Project start date: March 1 2021

SECTION B: PROJECT OUTLINE

Issue Please provide sufficient detail for your supervisor to assess strategies used
to address ethical issues in the research proposal
Aim / objectives of • To investigate the various factors that affect customer loyalty and
the study satisfaction
These need to be • To investigate the various factors that affect service quality and brand
clearly stated and in equity
accord with the title of • To identify issues within service quality and measure its impact •
the study. To give recommendations and strategies to improve service quality
(Sensitive subject
areas which might
involve
distress to the
participants will be
referred to the Course
Approval Panel).

Brief overview of • Gathering data and statistics from secondary sources: articles, journals,
research case studies
methodology The • Information are critically analyzed and summarized
methodology only • Primary survey cannot be conducted due to lack of
needs to be explained resources • Deductive and qualitative approach implemented
in sufficient detail to • Necessary diagrams, tables, charts, graphs, are included
show the approach
used (e.g. survey)
and explain the
research methods to
be used during the
study.

Does your study Not Applicable

require any
premission for
study?
If so, please give details.

Participants Not Applicable

Please outline who
will participate in
your
research. If your
research involves
vulnerable
groups (e.g.
children, adults
with learning

50
disabilities), it must
be reffered to the
Course Assessment
Panel.
 Access to Not Applicable
Participants Please
give details about
how participants will
be identified and
contacted.

How will your data Not Applicable

be recorded and
stored?

Confidentiality Not Applicable

Please outline the level
of confidentiality you
will offer respondents
and how this will be
respected. You should
also outline about who
will have access to the
data and how it will be
stored. (This should be
included on information
sheet.)

Anonymity Not Applicable

Do you intend to offer
anonymity? If so,
please indicate how
this will be achieved.

Could the research Not Applicable

induce psychological
stress or anxiety,
cause harm or
negative
consequences for the
participants (beyond
the risks encountered
in normal life)?
If yes, you should
outline what support
there will be for
participants.

SECTION C - SUMMARY OF ETHICAL ISSUES

Please give a summary of the ethical issues and any action that will be taken to address the issue(s).

In order to commence this research, approval from the module supervisor and institution (University of
Northampton) will be obtained. Any favouritism and objectivity will be avoided.
 51
SECTION D - ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST

Please supply to your supervisors copies of all relevant supporting documentation electronically. If this is
not available electronically, please provide explanation and supply hard copy.

I have included the following documents:

Information sheet Not applicable

Consent form Not applicable

Letters Not applicable

Questionnaire Not applicable

Interview schedule Not applicable

SECTION E - STATEMENT BY STUDENT

I confirm that the information I have given in this form on ethical issues is correct.

Signature VU NGUYEN KHANH DUY Date: 24/03/2021

Affirmation by Supervisor
I have read the Ethical Review Checklist, and I can confirm that, to the best of my understanding, the
information presented by the student is correct and appropriate to allow an informed judgement on whether
further ethical approval is required.

Signature Date:

SECTION F - SUPERVISOR RECOMMENDATION ON THE PROJECT'S ETHICAL STATUS

Having satisfied myself of the accuracy of the project's ethical statement, I believe that the appropriate action

is:

The project proceeds in its present form

The project proposal needs further assessment under the appropriate

Course Approval Panel

The project needs to be returned to the student for modification prior

to further action

52

View publication stats