Chemical Modification of Guar by Different Synthetic Vinyl Monomers for Enhancing Oil
Recovery under Severe Sandstone Reservoir Conditions
a, *
Samah A. M. Abou-alfitooh , F.I. El-Hosiny b, M.Ramzi a, E. M. Mansour a, Osama M. Elnaggar a,
A.N.El-hoshoudy a
a
Production Department, Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute (EPRI), Naser City, Cairo, Egypt.
b
Chemistry department, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Abassia, Cairo, Egypt.
S1
Figure S1: Molecular Structure of Guar Gum.
Figure S2: Mobility ratio effect on sweeping efficiency.
S2
K+
-
O
O S O
O
Initiation /600C
2 KSO4
.
O
(1)
O S O
O-
K+ CH2OH
O
OH H H
CH2
SO
. HC CH2
C
H
OH H
4 H2N O
O
+ + H OH
CH2
O O H H
O
H O H
OH OH
OH OH
H
O O
n
H H
CH2OH
CH2 O
O
H
OH H
CH2
HC CH2
OH H
C
Propagation H O
H2N
H OH
CH2
(2) O O O H H
O
H O H
OH OH
OH OH
H
NH2 O O
n
H H
H3C C O CH2OH
CH2C HCH2C O
l m
C O CH2
OCH3 O
OH H H
OH H
Termination H O
(3) H OH
CH2 H H
O
H O H
OH OH
OH OH
H
O O n
H H
CH2OH
methyl 5-amino-4-((((2R,3R,4S,5R,6S)-6-(((2R,3S,4R,5S,6S)-6-(((2R,3S,4R,5S,6S)-4,5-dihydroxy-2-(hydroxymethyl)-6-
methyltetrahydro-2H-pyran-3-yl)oxy)-4,5-dihydroxy-3-methoxytetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-yl)methoxy)-3,4,5-
trihydroxytetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-yl)methoxy)methyl)-2,2-dimethyl-5-oxopentanoate
GG-g-AM& MMA (3D- structure)
Figure
FigureS3:
S1:Grafting
GraftingGuar
Guarwith
withacrylamide and
acrylamide methyl
and methacrylate
methyl methacrylate
S3
K+
-
O
O S O
O
Initiation /600C .
2 KSO4
O
(1)
O S O
O-
K+ CH2OH
O
OH H H
CH2
. HC CH2
C O
H
OH H
SO4 H2N O
Si
+ + O
+ H OH
CH2
O O O O H H
O
H O H
OH OH
OH OH
H
O O
n
H H
CH2OH
CH2 O
H2C O
OH H H
CH2
HC CH2
CH
C O OH H
Propagation H O
H2N Si
O H OH
O O O O CH2
(2) H H
O
H O H
OH OH
OH OH
H
O O O
NH2
O n
H H
Si CH2OH
H3C C O
O
HCH2C CH2C HCH2C O
k l m
C O CH2
OCH3 O
OH H H
OH H
Termination H O
(3) H OH
CH2 H H
O
H O H
OH OH
OH OH
H
O O n
H H
CH2OH
methyl 5-amino-4-((((2R,3R,4S,5R,6S)-6-(((2R,3S,4R,5S,6S)-6-(((2R,3S,4R,5S,6S)-4,5-dihydroxy-2-(hydroxymethyl)-6-
methyltetrahydro-2H-pyran-3-yl)oxy)-4,5-dihydroxy-3-methoxytetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-yl)methoxy)-3,4,5-trihydroxytetrahydro-2H-
pyran-2-yl)methoxy)methyl)-2-methyl-5-oxo-2-(2-(triethoxysilyl)propyl)pentanoate
GG-g-AM, MMA&TEVS (3D- structure)
Figure S2: Grafting Guar with acrylamide, methyl methacrylate and Triethoxy vinyl silane.
Figure S4: Grafting Guar with acrylamide, methyl methacrylate, and triethoxyvinyl silane.
S4
* Mechanism of reaction
Based on OH groups of guar gum that serve as active sites, the grafting copolymerization
reaction occurred. There are different odds for grafting of vinyl monomers with guar gum as
shown in Scheme S1. Firstly, K2S2O8 dissociates to give (SO4–*) which reacts with water to give
(*OH). Both (SO4–*) and (*OH) attack the guar to form a free radical site on it. ( *OH) also acts
with vinyl monomers to produce free radicals. The activated monomer molecules associate with
the biopolymer's free-radical sites, and the copolymerization takes place. The reaction further
propagates where swollen sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) micelles serve as a meeting place for
monomers and the initiator. However, the reaction is stopped either by a reaction between *OH
and the free radical of the backbone or by a reaction between two activated chains[1, 2].
S5
Where, M* = monomer free radical; R-O* = Backbone free radical of biopolymer (guar)
Scheme S1. Copolymerization mechanism of guar gum with different vinyl monomers
S6
Figure S5: 1H-NMR of guar gum and its two modifications.
S7
The 1H-NMR spectrum of native guar gum shows chemical shifts at δ (ppm) = 4.65 (s) for
anomeric protons and broad chemical shifts at δ (ppm) = 3.5– 4 (m) due to sugar protons. The
1
H-NMR spectrum of GG-g-AM& MMA displays additional chemical shifts at δ (ppm) = 7.06
(s, 2H, -CONH2); 3.38 (s, 3H, terminal -CH3 group in COOCH 3); 1.24 (s, 6H, terminal -CH3
groups in -C(CH3)2-) chemical shifts at δ (ppm) = 2.1- 4.9 correspond to (-OH & -CH2) groups
of anhydro mannose units of guar. The 1H-NMR spectrum of GG-g-AM, MMA&TEVS
displays chemical shifts at δ (ppm) = 3.82 (d, 2H, -OCH 2CH3) that present in
triethoxyvinylsilane; 3.73 (s, 3H, terminal -CH3 group in COOCH 3). The chemical shift at δ
(ppm) = 7.1 related to (-CH=CH2) indicates the reaction of a complete monomer.
S8
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure S6: GPC of (a)-guar gum, (b)- GG-g-AM& MMA, and (c)- GG-g-AM, MMA&TEVS.
S9
Table S1: Ionic composition of synthetic brine solution.
Dissolved ions Concentration, ppm
Na+ 49409
K+ 1991
Ca2+ 2075
Mg2+ 5687
SO4-2 2206
- 18632
HCO3
Total Dissolved Salts (TDS) 80000
Table S2: Physical properties of crude oil
Physical properties Value
Average molecular weight, g/mol 186.69
Density at 60 0F, g/cc 0.8236
API gravity at 60 0F 40.13
Kinematic viscosity, CSt at 120 0F 2.44
at 180 0F 1.74
Dynamic viscosity, CP at 120 0F 1.96
at 120 0F 1.43
Flash point, 0C 3.0
Pour point, 0C 30.0
S10
Table S3: Conditions of polymer flooding.
Parameters Value
Pore volume (PV), cc 360
Bulk volume (VB), cc 1368
Porosity (%) 26.3
Injected oil volume, cc 270
Initial water saturation (SWi), % 25
Residual oil saturation (Sor), % 25
Initial oil saturation (Soi), % 75
Displacement temperature, 0C 90
Brine salinity, ppm 80000
Displacement Pressure, psi 1500.0
Brine injection rate, cc/h 10.0
Oil phase injection rate, cc/h 5.0
S11
Table S4: Permeability and mobility ratio of native guar and its two modifications.
Water Water permeability Water permeability
Oil
Parameters permeability (GG-g-AM& (GG-g-AM,
permeability
(Native guar) MMA) MMA&TEVS)
Vol, cc 7 4.5 4.3 3.27
Time, s 180 180 180 180
q, cc/s 0.03888 0.025 0.02388 0.01816
Water vis,
11 17 20 1.97
cp
L, cm 32.5 32.5 32.5 32.5
A, cm2 14.687 14.687 14.687 14.687
(ΔP), bar 13.8 14.5 18.5 10
Kr 68.59451658 64.859141 57.1484536 7.91939
M 1.551212162 0.949066751 0.710802546
References
[1] H. Naguib, Journal of Polymer Research. 9 (2002) 207-211.
[2] T. Yoshida, K. Hattori, Y. Sawada, Y. Choi, T. Uryu, Journal of Polymer Science Part A:
Polymer Chemistry 34 (1996) 3053-3060.
S12