Global Perspectives on Learning Loss in Children Post-Coronavirus: Implications for
Equality and Recovery
Drew Edwards, Jasmine Mraz, Katie Rapp, Robin Villanueva, and Claire Kinoshita
Professor Linda Herrara
EPOL 523/EPSY 553
November 22, 2024
The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly disrupted education systems worldwide, unveiling and
exacerbating existing inequalities while introducing new challenges for learners of all ages. As
schools transitioned to remote learning, many children faced significant barriers, including
limited access to technology and reduced support from caregivers. This shift not only impacted
academic achievement, which we can note by lower test scores, but also had far-reaching
consequences for students' social skills, attention spans, and social-emotional development.
In many cases, the isolation of remote learning hindered opportunities for peer interaction,
critical for developing communication and collaboration skills. The lack of consistent social
engagement has led to increased anxiety and uncertainty among students, making it difficult for
them to navigate relationships and express their emotions effectively. Additionally, prolonged
screen time and the absence of structured classroom environments have contributed to
diminished attention spans, affecting students' ability to focus and engage with learning
materials.
As we explore the global context of learning loss due to the pandemic, it is essential to examine
how these educational disruptions have varied across different regions and socioeconomic
backgrounds. Understanding the multifaceted effects of the pandemic on children's learning
experiences will be crucial for developing targeted interventions that support not only academic
recovery but also the holistic development of learners in a post-COVID world.
We decided on this topic because of our shared experiences of working in education. We all have
seen firsthand the effects of the pandemic that our students, in all levels of education, are still
dealing with. Students have “attention difficulties and concentration problems…memory
impairments…an increase in distraction and difficulty with schoolwork characterized children's
cognitive development after the COVID-19 period” (Marfoli et al., 2024). In working with
children every day, our group members have seen how these changes to a student's cognitive
abilities have led to learning loss.
Childhood is a crucial period of mental and biological development. There is an important
connection between the environment—what our brains are exposed to and what we do with them
—and brain development (Bookheimer, 2017). As children’s environments changed—from
social classrooms prioritizing collaboration and interaction to isolation where those priorities
were no longer possible—their brain development shifted as well. “Accelerated brain maturation
as a result of chronic stress or adversity during development has been well documented. These
findings suggest that the lifestyle disruptions associated with the COVID-19 pandemic
lockdowns caused changes in brain biology…” (Corrigan et al., 2024).
Another consequence of the pandemic was the increased screen time for children. “Children
increased their screen time by nearly 2 hours per day after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic,
and an hour of that increase persisted even after some restrictions had eased” (Greene, 2023). If
you are a parent, or spend time around children with an iPad, you may have observed how screen
time can be addictive and influence behavior. You may have even seen these effects in yourself,
highlighting how impactful screen exposure can be. With an increase in screen time, people of all
ages can experience loss of social skills, behavioral problems, less or irregular sleep, obesity, and
even violence. Screen time can trigger the dopamine center of our brain, giving us pleasure and
creating a longing for more. The more rational side of our brain, the Prefrontal Cortex, is what
tells us to put away the screen. This area is not as developed in children, being one of the last
parts of the brain to fully develop. This constant battle between rationality and pleasure exhausts
the brain and leads to behavioral issues (ABC News, 2021).
While maybe not to the same magnitude, the learning and emotional loss caused by the pandemic
can be compared to that of global conflicts across the world. In both instances, children have had
to adapt to a sudden impediment to their education, which has caused a learning gap. Similarly,
both have had the additional barrier of having to worry about their safety and well-being more
than their education. This shared experience of instability can lead to impaired cognitive
development and a diminished priority and focus on learning, which can have life-long
consequences beyond just children’s educational careers. Furthermore, both situations leave
those most vulnerable—whether mentally, physically, or financially less able—at risk of being
hit the hardest.
The United States has a complex education system made up of almost 56 million K-12 students
(National Center for Education Statistics, 2020). In early Spring 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic
caused a shift to remote learning almost immediately. At the K-12 level, many schools were
unprepared for such a change in the middle of the school year and struggled to roll out resources
and training to adequately meet the needs of the families they serve. Due to the diversity in
programs across the country, responses to the pandemic in the following school year varied
greatly. Some schools remained remote, while others adopted a hybrid model or pushed for fully
in-person learning. The inconsistencies across regions created further disparities in educational
experiences, especially for marginalized groups.
At the federal level, there were a number of emergency relief measures that aimed to provide
support to schools and institutions. One such law, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic
Security (CARES) Act, passed in March 2020, set aside $13.5 billion for K-12 education in order
to aid with the transition to remote learning (U.S. Department of Education, 2020). These funds
were used to acquire technology such as laptops and Wi-Fi hotspots, support teachers in
transitioning to online teaching, and help ensure the continuity of educational services. The
Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act (CRRSA) and the American
Rescue Plan (ARP), passed in December 2020 and March 2021 respectively, provided additional
monetary support to online education efforts. Federal funding often conflicted with the goals of
the presidential administration. Former President Trump and some Republican state governors
wanted to resume in-person learning as quickly as possible, while the CDC advocated for a
gradual approach to prevent the spread of infection (Gavin et al., 2021). Local districts often
received limited guidance from local authorities and faced conflicting opinions from higher
authorities, leading to a difficult fall for many schools.
One of the greatest disparities exposed by the COVID-19 pandemic was the digital divide in the
United States. At the time of school shutdowns, approximately 14% of U.S. households with
school-aged children lacked high-speed internet, and 17% did not have access to a desktop or
laptop computer (NTIA, 2020). These barriers to access were particularly pronounced in rural
areas, where broadband internet access was limited. In other districts, the capacity for schools to
distribute devices to students was also constrained, with many lacking the infrastructure to
deliver devices equitably. As a result, students from lower-income families, students of color, and
students in rural areas experienced greater challenges in accessing remote education.
Globally, the percentage of children unable to read and understand a simple text by age 10
increased from 53% to about 70% during the pandemic. Students lost between 0.6 and 0.9 years
of learning due to school closures and disruptions. In some regions, such as South Asia and Latin
America, schools remained closed for more than 200 days in many areas. Vulnerable groups
around the world—including girls, children with disabilities, and children in rural areas—dealt
with disproportionate difficulties accessing remote education (World Bank, 2021). In countries
like Liberia, 43% of children did not return to school when they reopened in December 2020. In
South Africa, the number of children not attending school tripled from March 2020 to July 2021.
Similarly, in Uganda, one in ten children did not return to the classroom (World Economic
Forum, 2022).
The COVID-19 pandemic also had an impact on children’s social-emotional development and
mental health. The World Bank (2021) stated that students reported more anxiety, depression,
and social isolation due to school closures. Teachers observed declining motivation and
engagement from students and faced challenges reintegrating them into classroom environments.
Socialization is necessary for children to learn how to regulate their emotions, develop empathy,
and feel a connection to others. Losing out on nearly a year of school impacted many children's
ability to socialize and learn essential skills.
The comparison of learning losses between U.S. students and their global counterparts
underscores both shared challenges and divergent experiences. While U.S. students experienced
significant setbacks, their access to resources and recovery programs positions them for potential
recovery. Conversely, students in low- and middle-income countries faced more severe
disruptions, compounded by systemic inequities and limited resources.
The pandemic revealed major differences in access to education worldwide, especially in digital
learning. In sub-Saharan Africa, 89% of students didn’t have home internet and had to rely on
radio-based lessons, which were less effective than online platforms. Girls in countries like
Uganda faced even greater challenges, such as increased responsibilities at home, which caused
many to drop out of school (World Economic Forum, 2022). Bridging the digital divide and
providing extra support for disadvantaged groups is essential for fair educational outcomes.
Marginalized groups were hit the hardest by learning loss during the pandemic. In Liberia, 43%
of children did not return to school after they reopened. In India, many girls dropped out because
they had to take on more household chores. Other vulnerable groups, like children in rural areas
and those with disabilities, struggled even more to access education, showing the need for
targeted help during crises (World Bank, 2021).
The pandemic also exposed weaknesses in how education systems respond to emergencies:
In Ethiopia, radio and television programs were the primary modes of remote learning,
but their reach was limited. A UNESCO report noted that these programs struggled to
engage a significant portion of the student population, particularly in rural areas where
access to electricity and devices was a challenge (UNESCO, 2020).
In Mexico, the lack of teacher training for online instruction made it difficult to maintain
student engagement. A study by the World Bank highlighted that many teachers were
unprepared for the sudden shift to remote teaching, which reduced the effectiveness of
online education during the pandemic (World Bank, 2021).
These examples show that education systems need to be more flexible, inclusive, and equipped
with better tools and technologies to keep learning going during crises.
The pandemic also showed the importance of countries working together to address educational
inequalities. South Korea successfully utilized advanced digital platforms for remote learning,
offering a model for other nations to follow (UNESCO, 2021). In Honduras, international
funding, including support from organizations such as the World Bank, helped schools reopen
safely and provided catch-up programs for students who fell behind during closures (World
Bank, 2021). Sharing strategies and pooling resources globally remain critical for supporting
education systems' recovery and building resilience against future crises.
Finland's proactive approach to teacher training highlights the importance of preparing educators
to adapt to changing circumstances, making the country a leading example in building resilient
education systems. Finland’s response to the challenges posed by COVID-19 emphasizes the
critical role of teacher training in ensuring continuity, equity, and innovation in education during
times of crisis (Finnish National Agency for Education, 2021; UNESCO, 2022).
By requiring teachers to hold advanced qualifications and equipping them with strong
pedagogical and digital skills, Finland laid a solid foundation for its education system even
before the pandemic. The rapid scaling of teacher training programs during the COVID-19 crisis
demonstrated the country’s ability to respond effectively to immediate challenges, from
transitioning to remote learning to addressing the mental health needs of students (European
Commission, 2021; OECD, 2021).
Post-pandemic, Finland continues to prioritize teacher development, focusing on lessons learned
from the disruptions. Its emphasis on advanced digital pedagogy, socio-emotional support for
students, adaptive teaching practices, and collaboration among educators ensures that its
education system remains flexible and future-ready (World Bank, 2022).
The results of Finland's investments are evident not only in the improved capacity of its teachers
but also in the resilience of its education system as a whole. Finland has shown that prioritizing
teacher training is not only a response to immediate crises but also a strategy for building long-
term educational stability and equity (Finnish National Agency for Education, 2021).
Other nations can learn from Finland’s example by recognizing that investing in educators is
investing in the future of students and society. By integrating technology, fostering teacher
collaboration, and addressing socio-emotional learning, education systems worldwide can
become more adaptable to crises, ensuring that no child is left behind regardless of
circumstances.
COVID-19 learning loss shows the importance of focusing on basic skills, making education fair
for disadvantaged groups, and preparing schools to handle future disruptions. To achieve this, we
need to invest in digital tools, train teachers, and support students' overall growth. This will help
ensure that all children have equal chances to learn, no matter the challenges they face.
References (APA Style)
Alban Conto, C., Akseer, S., Dreesen, T., Kamei, A., Mizunoya, S., & Rigole, A. (2021).
Potential effects of COVID-19 school closures on foundational skills and country responses for
mitigating learning loss. International Journal of Educational Development, 87, 102434.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102434
Engzell, P., Frey, A., & Verhagen, M. (2020). Learning inequality during the COVID-19
pandemic. University of Oxford, Mimeo. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/ve4z7
Kuhfeld, M., & Tarasawa, B. (2020). The COVID-19 slide: What summer learning loss can tell
us about the potential impact of school closures on student academic achievement. NWEA
Research Brief. https://www.nwea.org/research/publication/the-covid-19-slide/
UNESCO, UNICEF, & The World Bank. (2020). What have we learned? Overview of findings
from a survey of ministries of education on national responses to COVID-19. UNESCO.
https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse/nationalresponses
Marfoli, A., Speziale, G., Del Prete-Ferrucci, G., Cole, H., De Sandi, A., Mellace, D., Chieffo,
D., Barbieri, S., Priori, A., Dell’Osso, B., Pravettoni, G., & Ferrucci, R. (2024, August 14). The
impact of COVID-19 on neuropsychological and emotional-behavioral development in a group
of 8- and 9-year-old children. Journal of Clinical Medicine.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm23083234
Bookheimer, S. Y. [UCLA Health]. (2017, April 6). How does a child’s brain develop|Susan Y.
Bookheimer PHD|UCLAMDChat [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=vpXrgJ5aj_4
Corrigan, N. M., Kuhl, P. K., & Rokem, A. (2024, September 9). COVID-19 lockdown effects on
adolescent brain structure suggest accelerated maturation that is more pronounced in females
than in males. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,
121(36), e231234567. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39250666/
Greene, J. (2023, July 6). Children’s pandemic screen time rose nearly 2 hours per day. Kaiser
Permanente Division of Research.
https://divisionofresearch.kaiserpermanente.org/blog/2023/02/15/childrens-pandemic-screen-
time-rose/
ABC News. (2021, March 19). Consequences for kids' endless screen time [Video]. YouTube.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bCCDGZyC0I
National Center for Education Statistics. (2022). 2022 long-term trend assessment results: The
Nation’s Report Card. https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/highlights/ltt/2022/
World Economic Forum. (2022, November). COVID-19’s impact on education: Worst for the
most vulnerable. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2022/11/covid19-education-impact-legacy/
Engzell, P., Frey, A., & Verhagen, M. (2020). Learning inequality during the COVID-19
pandemic. University of Oxford, Mimeo. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/ve4z7
World Bank. (2021). The state of the global education crisis: A path to recovery. World Bank
Report. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/b491b9f2-8ba8-58e2-
89bf-134fa450ccce/content
https://www.weforum.org/stories/2022/11/covid19-education-impact-legacy/
UNICEF. (2021). COVID-19 and school closures: One year of education disruption. UNICEF.
https://data.unicef.org/resources/one-year-of-covid-19-and-school-closures/
Finnish National Agency for Education. (2021). Education and training during the COVID-19
pandemic in Finland. Retrieved from https://www.oph.fi/en
UNESCO. (2022). Building resilient education systems: Lessons from COVID-19. Retrieved
from https://en.unesco.org/
European Commission. (2021). Teacher education and professional development in Finland:
Lessons from the pandemic. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/education/
World Bank. (2022). Post-pandemic education strategies: Teacher training for resilient systems.
Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/