Results
Contingency Tables
Contingency Tables
A Offline Online Total
Male 16 9 25
Female 13 12 25
Total 29 21 50
χ² Tests
Value df p
χ² 0.739 1 0.390
N 50
Proportion Test (N Outcomes)
Proportions - A
Level Count Proportion
Male 25 0.500
Female 25 0.500
χ² Goodness of Fit
χ² df p
0.00 1 1.000
Contingency Tables
Contingency Tables
B Male Female Total
Offline % of total 32.0 % 26.0 % 58.0 %
Online % of total 18.0 % 24.0 % 42.0 %
Total % of total 50.0 % 50.0 % 100.0 %
χ² Tests
Value df p
χ² 0.739 1 0.390
Likelihood ratio 0.741 1 0.389
N 50
Comparative Measures
95% Confidence Intervals
Value Lower Upper
Log odds ratio 0.495 -0.637 1.63
[3]
Nominal
Value
Contingency coefficient 0.121
Contingency Tables
Contingency Tables
. . . Total
. . . .
. . . .
Total . . .
χ² Tests
Value df p
χ² . . .
N .
References
[1] The jamovi project (2023). jamovi. (Version 2.4) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from https://www.jamovi.org.
[2] R Core Team (2022). R: A Language and environment for statistical computing. (Version 4.1) [Computer software]. Retrieved from
https://cran.r-project.org. (R packages retrieved from CRAN snapshot 2023-04-07).
[3] Meyer, D., Zeileis, A., Hornik, K., Gerber, F., & Friendly, M. (2023). vcd: Visualizing Categorical Data. [R package]. Retrieved from
https://cran.r-project.org/package=vcd.
