ch01 Intro Barbour
ch01 Intro Barbour
Humans and the world around us Natural resources: vital to human (& all life) survival
Natural resources = substances and energy sources needed for
• Humans change the environment, often in ways not fully survival and other uses
understood
• We (and all life) depend completely on the environment for
survival
- Increased wealth, health, mobility, leisure time
- But, natural systems have been degraded
- i.e., depletion, pollution, erosion and species extinction
- Environmental changes threaten long-term health and survival
• Environmental science is the study of: • Renewable resources:
- How the natural world works - Perpetually available: sunlight, wind, wave energy
- Renew themselves over short periods: timber, water, soil, hot springs
- How the environment affects humans (and other life forms) - These can be destroyed if used faster than renewed (unsustainably)
and vice versa • Nonrenewable resources: can be depleted
- Oil, coal, minerals, ancient ground water, some soil
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings: modified by kg 2009 Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings: modified by kg 2009
1
Garrett Hardin’s Tragedy of the Commons (1968)
Question
Which is closest to your sense or viewpoint?
•Example of cows grazing on common meadow
•Resource users will increase use until the resource is
A. Human population will continue to grow; technology
gone
will solve problems that arise (cornucopian viewpoint)
•=> Unregulated exploitation leads to resource destruction
B. Human population will continue to grow; disaster will
occur with many deaths (Neo-Malthusian viewpoint)
•Applies to any common ownership: e.g. Soil, air, water,
forests, fish, buffalos
C. Humans will learn to control our population;
•Basically privatizes profit and socializes loss!
standards of living will continue to increase
•Solution?
D. Humans will learn to control our population, but
somewhat too late; standards of living will decline
• Governmental regulations?
• Private ownership?
E. Other, or no viewpoint at this time
• Voluntary organization to enforce responsible use?
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings: modified by kg 2009 Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings: modified by kg 2009
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings: modified by kg 2009 Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings: modified by kg 2009
2
Environmental science is not environmentalism The nature of science
• Mathematics is the main modeling tool: numbers are • The test results either support or
reject the hypothesis; scientists must be
key, testability is key, reproducibility is key
willing to give up their ideas when
experiments show they are wrong.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings: modified by kg 2009 Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings: modified by kg 2009
3
Experiments test the validity of a hypothesis The scientific process is part of a larger process
Manipulative experiments yield the Natural or correlational tests show
strongest evidence (can prove causality) real-world complexity
• But, lots of things can’t be • Causality not proven so much • The scientific process
manipulated more evidence needed. Counter- includes peer review,
examples are important. publication, and debate
• A consistently supported
hypothesis becomes a
theory, a well-tested and
widely accepted
explanation
• With enough data, a
paradigm shift – a
change in the dominant
view – can occur
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings: modified by kg 2009 Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings: modified by kg 2009
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings: modified by kg 2009 Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings: modified by kg 2009
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings: modified by kg 2009 Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings: modified by kg 2009
4
Ecological footprints are not all equal Methods of the Past have not been optimal
• The ecological footprints of
countries vary greatly •Input is amount of resources used (causes depletion)
•Output is waste afterward (usually causes pollution)
- The U.S. footprint is
almost 5 times greater •In the past effort has focused on dealing with output
than the world’s average since pollution/toxics has been main concern. Increasing
input was taken for granted as standards of living rose.
- Developing countries have •In future reducing input may be best method: reduces
much smaller footprints
than developed countries both depletion and pollution. But will comfort level of
humans go down?
- Example: U.S. uses 25% •Conflict between developing and developed regions.
of the world’s energy, but
only contains 5% of the
people. We use 5 times
our “fair” share of energy.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings: modified by kg 2009 Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings: modified by kg 2009
5
The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Our energy choices will affect our future
• A comprehensive scientific assessment of the • The lives we live today are due to fossil fuels
condition of the world’s ecological systems • Machines
• Major findings: • Chemicals
• Transportation
• Humans have drastically altered ecosystems
• Products
• These changes have contributed to human well- • Fossil fuels were created millions of years ago and
being and economic development, but at a cost are a one-time bonanza; supplies will certainly
• Environmental degradation could get much worse decline
• Degradation can be reversed, but it requires much We have used up ½ of the world’s oil supplies; how
work will we handle this imminent fossil fuel shortage?
• Check out www.millenniumassessment.org
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings: modified by kg 2009 Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings: modified by kg 2009
Sustainability: a goal for the future But how to move towards sustainability?
• Humans seem never to have done it! (tragedy of the
commons)
• How can humans live within the planet’s means? • Idea: Regulations requiring paying true costs (e.g. fees
- Humans cannot exist without functioning natural systems for clean-up, carbon dioxide emission, habitat
destruction, resource depletion, etc., adjusted to motivate
• Sustainability change (how to set prices and avoid black markets?)
- Leaves future generations with a rich and full Earth
• Idea: Policies to change technologies, reduce usage,
- Conserves the Earth’s natural resources
- Maintains fully functioning ecological systems
substitute resources with less impact (e.g. solar energy,
recycled paper, local agriculture, home insulation, etc.)
• Sustainable development: the use of resources to satisfy current • Policies to reduce human population (e.g. educate
needs without compromising future availability of resources women, reduce poverty, make contraceptives available)
- May require substantial changes to the ways things are done;
but humans have made many large changes in the past ( horses • Individual efforts (do they matter? Example of redwood)
to cars, end of slavery, women’s rights, electronic • Will these things happen? Will they be enough?
communication, etc.)
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings: modified by kg 2009 Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings: modified by kg 2009
6
Conclusion QUESTION: Review
The term “environment” includes
• Environmental science helps us understand our
relationship with the environment and informs our a) Animals and plants
attempts to solve and prevent problems. b) Oceans and rivers
c) Soil and atmosphere
• Identifying a problem is the first step in solving it
d) All of the above are included in this term
• Solving environmental problems can move us towards
health, longevity, peace and prosperity
- Environmental science can help us find balanced
solutions to environmental problems
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings: modified by kg 2009 Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings: modified by kg 2009
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings: modified by kg 2009 Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings: modified by kg 2009
7
2. Do you consider yourself a cornucopian or a 3. For a theory to be "scientific" it must
neo-Malthusian? a. be proven true
b. be testable, i.e. be able to be proven false
A. Cornucopian
c. be widely accepted by the majority of the population
B. Neo-Malthusian d. be widely accepted by the majority of other
C. In between scientists
D. Don’t know e. be able to explain a wide variety of phenomena
E. Don’t care
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings: modified by kg 2009 Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings: modified by kg 2009
QUESTION: Interpreting Graphs and Data QUESTION: Interpreting Graphs and Data
According to this graph, what has happened to the What happens if test results reject
population over the last 500 years? a hypothesis?
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings: modified by kg 2009 Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings: modified by kg 2009
QUESTION: Review
Which of the following is correct about the term
“environmentalism”?
a) It is very science-oriented
b) It is a social movement to protect the environment
c) It usually does not include advocacy for the
environment
d) It involves scientists trying to solve environmental
problems
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings: modified by kg 2009