Admin Theory
Admin Theory
INDEX
S.No. Description
[01] Vision and Mission of University
Vision, Mission, Program Educational Objectives (PEOs) and Program
[02] Learning Outcomes (PLOs)
Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs) and Mapping of Course Learning
[03] Outcomes with Program Learning Outcomes
[04] Academic Calendar
[05] Evaluation Scheme and Syllabus
[06] Signed copy of Time table (Faculty Member & Class)
[07] List of Students
Last Year External Result Analysis & New Target of Current Semester
o Criteria for Attainment levels
[08] o Previous Year Attainment (last three years)
o Target Attainment for Current Semester
[09] Lecture Plan with Text & Reference Books
[10] Unit wise Tutorial Sheets, Assignments & Quiz Questions
Previous 3 years University Question Papers with Solutions, Mid Term
[11] Examination & Model Question Papers with Solutions
Gap analysis in Mid Term Examination
o CO Specific Marks
[12] o Average CO Attainment & Weak Student Identification
o Remedial Actions for Slow Learners (As per Guidelines)
o Add on Programmes for advanced learners
[13] Final Sessional Marks (CT+TA+AT)
[14] Attendance Register/ Verified Attendance Sheet
[15] CLOs Feedback & Final Attainment (CLO & PLO)
Vision and Mission of University
VISION
“To be the most preferred global university for providing value-based quality education in a
research-driven, innovative environment that continuously adapts to meet the evolving needs for
sustainable nation-building”.
MISSION
“To transform the educational landscape by empowering individuals, embracing diversity,
developing creativity and critical thinking through personalised mentorship, collaborative research
and experiential learning. we endeavour to nurture responsible citizens by inculcating
entrepreneurial and ethical leadership skills to navigate the challenges of the future”.
Vision and Mission of Department
Amity School of Civil Services
Vision
To become a premier institution for public policy education, known for professionalism,
excellence in governance that develop leaders who emphasize innovation, research, critical thinking,
and ethical standards.
Mission
To develop proactive leaders with knowledge, skills and ethical foundation to tackle societal
challenges and excel in their careers. We emphasize experiential learning by inculcating a culture
conducive to educational excellence.
Program Educational Objectives (PEOs) for B.A. Administration
PO 2. Building Analytical and Critical Thinking Skills: Through coursework and practical
exercises, students will develop analytical and critical thinking skills necessary for evaluating public
policies, programs, and governance structures.
PO 5. Providing Practical Knowledge and Skills for Public Service: The program will equip
students with practical knowledge and skills required for careers in public service, including
budgeting, human resource management, public policy analysis, and program evaluation.
PO 6. Preparing Students for Civic Engagement and Social Responsibility: Students will be
encouraged to engage in civic activities and contribute positively to society by applying their
knowledge and skills to address social, economic, and political challenges facing communities.
PO 9. Facilitating Practical Experience through Internships and Fieldwork: The program will
provide opportunities for students to gain practical experience through internships, fieldwork, and
experiential learning activities, thereby bridging the gap between theory and practice.
Program Learning Outcomes are statements that describe what the students should be able to do at
the time of graduation. These are expected learning outcomes that will help the teacher to check for
understanding and learning achieved by our students both in and outside the class. The PSOs are
program specific.
Program Specific Outcomes During the program, the student should be able to
Graduates will possess the skills necessary to lead and manage public
sector organizations, including strategic planning, team building, and
Public Sector Leadership and conflict resolution, fostering effective and ethical governance.
Management
Administrative Law and Ethics Graduates will exhibit a strong understanding of administrative law
principles and ethical standards, enabling them to navigate legal
frameworks and uphold integrity and transparency in public
administration practices.
Policy Advocacy and Graduates will be proficient in advocating for policy changes,
Communication effectively communicating with stakeholders, and mobilizing support
for initiatives aimed at addressing public concerns and advancing the
public interest.
Course Learning Outcomes
By the end of this study students should be able to Examine the theoretical underpinnings
that have shaped the practice of public administration. Evaluate the different theoretical frameworks
guiding public administration as a field of study and practice. Synthesize use of technology for
understanding its application in Administrative System.
1. Examine the Theoretical Underpinnings that Have Shaped the Practice of Public
Administration
Learning Outcome: Students will develop a deep understanding of the foundational theories
and philosophies that have influenced the development and practice of public administration.
o Skills Developed:
Learning Outcome: Students will critically evaluate and compare various theoretical
frameworks that form the basis of public administration as an academic discipline and a
practical field.
o Skills Developed:
Learning Outcome: Students will synthesize their knowledge of technology and understand
how it can be applied to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of administrative systems.
o Skills Developed:
Debate Competition √ √
Mock Parliament √ √
3. 05th August
Foundation Classes for Admission 2024 NA
2024 (Monday)
4. 29th August
Commencement of Odd Semester/Last Date Re- 29th July 2024
2024
Registration (Monday)
(Thursday)
6. 08th August
Parents Teacher Meeting
2024 NA
(Even Semester)
(Thursday)
8. 13th
12th August
Submission of NTCC Scheme by Faculty Guides September
2024 (Monday)
2024 (Friday)
9. 20th
19th August
NTCC Re-Briefing to the Students & Registration September
2024 (Monday)
2024 (Friday)
11. 27th
26th August
Faculty Guide allotment for students on portal September
2024 (Monday)
2024 (Friday)
12. Form Submission for Spl. Suppl Exam (Odd sem for Passout From 10th September to 13th
batch) September 2024
17. ESE DEC 2024 Question Paper Moderation & Submission 15th October 2024 (Tuesday)
23. Odd Semester Internal Marks Uploading on amizone 16th November 2024 (Saturday)
24. Last date of Odd Semester Examination Form Filling 18th November 2024 (Monday)
26. Last Teaching Date (Odd Semester) 19th November 2024 (Tuesday)
28. Fee Submission Notice to the Students 22nd November 2024 (Friday)
33. Departmental Meeting for Student Intake, Syllabus Review Before 7th January 2025
etc. (Tuesday)
34. Last Date of Result Submission (Odd Semester) 07th January 2024 (Tuesday)
35. Commencement of Even Semester 09th January 2025 (Thursday)
40. Submission of NTCC Scheme by Faculty Guides 24th January 2025 (Friday)
41. Last Date of Scrutiny Application (Odd Semester) 30th January 2025 (Thursday)
42. NTCC Re-Briefing to the Students & Registration 31st January 2025 (Friday)
44. Faculty Guide allotment for students on portal 06th February 2025 (Thursday)
48. Form Submission for Spl. Suppl Exam (Even sem for Passout From 04th March to 07th March
batch) 2025
49. ESE May 2025 Question Paper Submission by faculty 21st March 2025 (Friday)
50. ESE May 2025 Question Paper Moderation 28th March 2025 (Friday)
51. ESE May 2025 Question Paper Submission to HQ 2nd April 2025 (Wednesday)
53. Even Semester Examination Date Sheet 18th April 2025 (Thursday)
54. Fee Submission Notice to the Students (Odd Semester) 23rd April 2025 (Wednesday)
55. Even Semester Examination Form Filling 25th April 2025 (Friday)
57. Even Semester Internal Marks Uploading on Amizone 28th April 2025 (Monday)
58. Last Teaching Date
30th April 2025 (Wednesday)
(Even Semester)
63. Semester Break (Students) 26th July 2025 to 31st July 2025
64. Last Date of Result Submission (Even Semester) 09th June 2025 (Monday)
66. Last Date of Scrutiny Application (Even Semester) 30th June 2025 (Monday)
Syllabus
Module I: Introduction Meaning, Nature, Scope and significance of Public Administration. Evolution
of Public Administration: Contemporary Perspective Ecology of Administration- Social, Political,
Economic and Cultural Public and Private Administration Case Study: Public Private Partnership
Module II: Approaches of Public Administration Human Relation Movement – Elton Mayo Scientific
Management Theory: Frederick Taylor Bureaucratic Approach: Weber and Karl Marx Public Policy
Approach
Module III: Perspectives in Public Administration Chief Executive: Meaning, Types, Functions and
Role Line, Staff and Auxiliary Agencies Hierarchy & Unity of Command, Span of Control
Centralization and Decentralization, Delegation Supervision, Authority and Responsibility Control,
Co-ordination
Module IV: Emerging Trends New Public Administration New Public Management Globalization and
Public Administration Digital Public Administration Challenges and Opportunities
Evaluation Scheme
1. Attendance 5.00
Sl.
No. Roll No Student Name
1 A462174523001 VISHAL SEN
2 A462174523002 YASH PANDEY
3 A462174523003 MANISHA KUMARI
4 A462174523004 SHUBHAM KUMAR SINGH
5 A462174523005 TANIYA SAHU
6 A462174523006 PRIMA SINGH
7 A462174523007 AYUSH RAJ
A462174523008 SAMEERA FAIZ
8
A462174523009 KHUSHI NAGVANSHI
9
A462174523011 SHALINI SHAMYA
10
A462174523012 RICHA KUMARI
11
A462174523014 SANDHYA RANI
12
A462174523015 ADITYA KUMAR
13
14 A462174523016 AYUSH RAJ
A462174523017 MAYANK BHARTI
15
A462174523018 DEVRANJAN SINGH
16
17 A462174523019 SHRISTEE
A462174523020 TRIPTI KUMARI
18
A462174523021 ANKITA KUMARI
19
A462174523022 VIDHU RAJVARDHAN
20
A462174523023 MD DANISH ALAM
21
A462174523024 MUSKAN KUMARI
22
A462174523025 PRIYANKA SINHA
23
24 A462174523026 ARADHYA
A462174523029 ADITYA RAJ ARVIND
25
26 A462174523030 AASHI ROY
Last Year External Result Analysis & New Target of Current Semester
Lecture Plan with Text & Reference Books
1 M. Laxmikanth (2011), Public Administration, New Delhi: McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited.
2 Book Camila Stivers (1993) Gender Images In Public Administration, California : Sage
3 Book Mohit Bhattacharya (2016), New Horizons of Public Administration, New Delhi: Jawahar Publishers
&D
4 Book Pravin Kumar Jha and Shambhu Nath Dubey (2017), Administration and Public Policy, New Delhi:
MKM Pub
5 Book Sylvia Walby (1997) Theorising Patriarchy, Oxford: Basil Blackwell
6 Book U. Medury (2010) Public administration in the Globalization Era, New Delhi: Orient Black Swan
7 Book Nicholas Henry, Public Administration and Public Affairs, Prentice Hall, 1999
8 Book T. Dye, (1984) Understanding Public Policy, 5th Edition. U.S.A: Prentice Hall
9 Book Surendra Munshi and Biju Paul Abraham [Eds.](2004) Good Governance, Democratic Societies And
Global
10 Book M. Laxmikanth (2011), Public Administration, New Delhi: McGraw Hill Education (India) Private
Limit
11 Book Camila Stivers (1993) Gender Images In Public Administration, California : Sage
12 Book Mohit Bhattacharya (2016), New Horizons of Public Administration, New Delhi: Jawahar Publishers
13 Book Pravin Kumar Jha and Shambhu Nath Dubey (2017), Administration and Public Policy, New Delhi:
MKM Pub
14 Book Sylvia Walby (1997) Theorising Patriarchy, Oxford: Basil Blackwell
15 Book U. Medury (2010) Public administration in the Globalization Era, New Delhi: Orient Black Swan
16 Book Nicholas Henry, Public Administration and Public Affairs, Prentice Hall, 1999
17 Book T. Dye, (1984) Understanding Public Policy, 5th Edition. U.S.A: Prentice Hall
18 Book Surendra Munshi and Biju Paul Abraham [Eds.](2004) Good Governance, Democratic Societies And
Globa
19 IGNOU Notes
20 e-pathsala Notes
Unit wise Tutorial Sheets, Assignments & Quiz Questions
Module: I
Meaning, Significance and importance Approaches to the study of Public Administration -
Ecological, StructuralFunction, Public-Choice, Critical Theory Administrative Behaviour - Decision making,
Communication, Leadership Case Study
Tutorials:
Tutorials:
1. Yehezkel Dror: Ideas on Policy Sciences
Overview: Yehezkel Dror was an Israeli policy scientist known for his contributions to the field of
policy sciences. He emphasized the importance of using scientific methods in policy analysis and
advocated for policy-making to be more systematic, rational, and evidence-based.
Key Features:
o Policy as a Science: Dror believed that policy should be treated like a scientific discipline,
where decisions are based on empirical data and objective analysis.
o Decision-Making Process: He emphasized the need for decision-makers to understand the
long-term impacts of their choices and focus on efficiency and outcomes.
o Multidisciplinary Approach: Dror promoted a multidisciplinary approach to policy
sciences, drawing from economics, sociology, political science, and other fields to formulate
comprehensive policies.
o Adaptive and Innovative: Dror’s work highlighted the need for continuous adaptation in
policy formation to keep pace with social, economic, and technological changes.
2. William Ouchi: Theory ‘Z’
Overview: William Ouchi introduced Theory Z, which combines elements from Japanese and
American management practices. It is focused on long-term employment, collective decision-making,
and employee involvement in the organization.
Key Features:
o Long-Term Employment: Ouchi’s Theory Z emphasizes the benefits of long-term employee
retention, which creates a stable and loyal workforce.
o Collective Decision-Making: Encourages a participative management style where employees
at all levels are involved in the decision-making process.
o Holistic Organizational Culture: Theory Z values the holistic development of employees,
focusing on both professional and personal growth.
o Trust and Cooperation: Builds trust between management and employees to foster
collaboration and reduce tensions.
Implications for Management: This theory advocates for balancing individual responsibility with
organizational goals, fostering strong organizational commitment and performance.
3. Peter Drucker: Knowledge-Based Organization
Overview: Peter Drucker is known for his contributions to management theory, and his ideas on the
Knowledge-Based Organization are central to understanding modern management in the
information age.
Key Features:
o Knowledge as a Key Resource: Drucker recognized that in the modern economy, knowledge
is the most important resource for organizations, more so than physical labor or capital.
o Decentralization and Empowerment: Knowledge-based organizations should empower
individuals and encourage decentralized decision-making, as knowledge is distributed
throughout the organization.
o Continuous Learning: Drucker emphasized the need for constant innovation and learning to
maintain a competitive advantage in a knowledge-driven economy.
o Leadership and Knowledge: Leaders in knowledge-based organizations should foster an
environment of continuous improvement and encourage knowledge sharing among
employees.
Implications: Knowledge-based organizations should focus on training, collaboration, and creating
systems that facilitate knowledge flow and innovation.
4. Douglas McGregor: Managerial Theories of ‘X’ & ‘Y’
Overview: Douglas McGregor introduced Theory X and Theory Y in his book The Human Side of
Enterprise. These theories describe two different views of employee motivation and management.
o Theory X: Assumes that employees inherently dislike work, need to be controlled, and avoid
responsibility. Managers following Theory X tend to be authoritarian and directive.
o Theory Y: Assumes that employees are self-motivated, enjoy work, and can be trusted to
take responsibility. Managers following Theory Y focus on empowerment and participative
decision-making.
Key Features:
o Theory X: Focuses on control, strict supervision, and external motivation (e.g., rewards or
punishments).
o Theory Y: Focuses on autonomy, trust, and intrinsic motivation, emphasizing that employees
can be creative, self-disciplined, and responsible when given the right environment.
Implications: McGregor suggested that Theory Y is more appropriate for modern organizations, as it
leads to higher job satisfaction, creativity, and productivity.
5. P.F. Drucker: Management by Objectives (MBO)
Overview: Management by Objectives (MBO) is a management strategy developed by Peter
Drucker. It emphasizes setting clear and measurable objectives at every level of the organization to
improve performance and align employees with organizational goals.
Key Features:
o Goal Setting: MBO focuses on setting specific, measurable, and time-bound goals for
individuals and teams within the organization.
o Employee Involvement: Employees participate in the goal-setting process, which enhances
motivation and ownership of outcomes.
o Performance Evaluation: Performance is evaluated based on the achievement of these
objectives, with regular progress reviews.
o Alignment of Goals: Ensures that individual, team, and organizational goals are aligned,
creating a unified direction for the organization.
Implications: MBO helps organizations focus on results and accountability, encouraging better
performance and clearer communication between managers and employees.
Assignments:
1. Assignment 1: Yehezkel Dror’s Ideas on Policy Sciences
o Write an essay discussing Yehezkel Dror’s ideas on the role of policy sciences in governance.
Explain how his approach could improve policy-making in a democratic society and discuss
the advantages of using a scientific approach to policy analysis.
2. Assignment 2: Theory Z in Practice
o Write a detailed case study of an organization that has successfully implemented William
Ouchi’s Theory Z. Discuss the impact on employee motivation, organizational culture, and
overall performance. If possible, contrast it with organizations that follow more traditional
management theories (e.g., Theory X).
3. Assignment 3: Knowledge-Based Organizations
o Discuss Peter Drucker’s concept of a Knowledge-Based Organization. How has this
concept influenced modern organizations in the tech industry? Provide examples of
organizations that embody the principles of knowledge-based management, focusing on their
strategies for knowledge sharing and innovation.
4. Assignment 4: Theory X vs. Theory Y
o Analyze a real-world organization or management situation through the lens of McGregor’s
Theory X and Theory Y. Identify which theory is more prevalent in that organization and
provide recommendations for how management can adopt a more effective leadership style.
5. Assignment 5: Management by Objectives (MBO) in the Public Sector
o Write an analysis of how Management by Objectives (MBO) could be applied in the public
sector. Identify potential challenges and benefits of implementing MBO in a government
agency, and suggest how performance can be effectively measured in a public administration
setting.
Quizzes:
1. Multiple-Choice Quiz on Management and Policy Theories
1. Yehezkel Dror emphasized the importance of which of the following in policy-making?
o A) Political ideology
o B) Scientific approach and evidence-based decision making
o C) Public opinion
o D) Bureaucratic processes
o Answer: B) Scientific approach and evidence-based decision making
2. Theory Z emphasizes:
o A) Individual decision-making and autonomy
o B) Long-term employment, collective decision-making, and employee involvement
o C) High levels of formal authority and control
o D) Employee competition and merit-based rewards
o Answer: B) Long-term employment, collective decision-making, and employee involvement
3. Peter Drucker’s concept of a Knowledge-Based Organization stresses the importance of:
o A) Increasing physical capital
o B) Knowledge as the primary resource for achieving organizational goals
o C) Centralized decision-making
o D) Limited employee involvement in decision-making
o Answer: B) Knowledge as the primary resource for achieving organizational goals
4. McGregor’s Theory X assumes that:
o A) Employees are self-motivated and seek responsibility
o B) Employees dislike work and need to be closely supervised
o C) Employees are highly creative and should be given autonomy
o D) Employees will naturally work harder if they are given positive reinforcement
o Answer: B) Employees dislike work and need to be closely supervised
5. Management by Objectives (MBO) involves:
o A) Setting clear, measurable goals and involving employees in the goal-setting process
o B) Relying solely on leadership to dictate the organization's direction
o C) Emphasizing employee autonomy without oversight
o D) Reducing performance evaluations to annual reviews
o Answer: A) Setting clear, measurable goals and involving employees in the goal-setting
process
2. True or False
1. Theory Z is based on the idea that employees should be treated as resources that can be easily
replaced.
o Answer: False
2. According to McGregor’s Theory Y, managers should focus on controlling employees and limiting
their decision-making power.
o Answer: False
3. Management by Objectives (MBO) is primarily concerned with setting clear objectives and
measuring performance based on the achievement of those objectives.
o Answer: True
4. Yehezkel Dror proposed that policy-making should be based on intuition rather than scientific
research.
o Answer: False
5. In Theory X, managers assume that employees are inherently lazy and need to be closely supervised.
o Answer: True
Module: IV
Critical Social Theory New Public Service Post Modernism and Structuralism Administrative
Theory: A Critical Review
Tutorials:
4. Structuralism looks at how underlying structures shape cultural and social behavior, including
language.
o Answer: True
Not Applicable
AMITY UNIVERSITY, PATNA
FACULTY OF CIVIL SERVICES - AMITY SCHOOL OF CIVIL SERVICES - Administrative Theory
Session: 2024-25 CO Calculation for:
Sub.Name Administrative Theory Question No
Faculty/Deptt. Amity School of Civil Services (ASCS) PART-A (ATTEMPT ALL) PART-B (ATTEMPT ANY TWO) PART-C Total CO WEIGHTAGE
Sub. Code PP 213 Question No. 1(a) 1(b) 1(c) 1(d) 1(e) 2(1) 2(2) 2(3) 3 Marks
Total
Year/ Section 2nd Year/ 3rd Sem CO Mapped CLO1 CLO1 CLO1 CLO1 CLO1 CLO2 CLO2 CLO2 CLO3 CLO1 CLO2 CLO3 Attempt
Faculty Dr Diwakar
Assigned Marks 2 2 2 2 2 5 5 5 10 30 Total Marks Obt. Marks Total Marks Obt. Marks Total Marks Obt. Marks
Status (P/ A/ D)
Name Kumar Jha
S.No. RollNo Student Name Marks Obtained M.O. CO Attained Marks
A462174523001 VISHAL SEN 27.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 9.0 10.0 8.0 30.0
1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 5.0 8.0
A462174523002 YASH PANDEY 10.0 10.0 4.0 10.0 3.0 10.0 3.0 30.0
1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 3.0
o CO Specific Marks
2
A462174523003 MANISHA
3 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 7.0 25.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 8.0 10.0 7.0 30.0
KUMARI
A462174523004 SHUBHAM
4 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 23.0 10.0 9.0 10.0 8.0 10.0 6.0 30.0
KUMAR SINGH
A462174523005 TANIYA SAHU 12.0 10.0 4.0 10.0 4.0 10.0 4.0 30.0
5 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 4.0
A462174523006 PRIMA SINGH 20.0 10.0 7.0 10.0 7.0 10.0 6.0 30.0
6 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 4.0 6.0
A462174523007 AYUSH RAJ 20.0 10.0 7.0 10.0 7.0 10.0 6.0 30.0
7 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 6.0
A462174523008 SAMEERA FAIZ 27.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 9.0 10.0 8.0 30.0
8 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 5.0 8.0
A462174523009 KHUSHI
9 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 6.0 17.0 10.0 6.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 6.0 30.0
NAGVANSHI
A462174523011 SHALINI SHAMYA 20.0 10.0 8.0 10.0 7.0 10.0 5.0 30.0
10 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
A462174523012
o Remedial Actions for Slow Learners
11 RICHA KUMARI 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 4.0 9.0 28.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 9.0 10.0 9.0 30.0
A462174523014 SANDHYA RANI 24.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 7.0 10.0 7.0 30.0
12 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 3.0 7.0
A462174523015 ADITYA KUMAR 20.0 10.0 8.0 10.0 7.0 10.0 5.0 30.0
13 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 4.0 3.0 5.0
A462174523016 AYUSH RAJ 18.0 10.0 7.0 10.0 6.0 10.0 5.0 30.0
14 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 5.0
A462174523017
Add on Programmes for advanced learners
15 MAYANK BHARTI 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 14.0 10.0 4.0 10.0 6.0 10.0 4.0 30.0
A462174523018 DEVRANJAN
16 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 3.0 7.0 22.0 10.0 8.0 10.0 7.0 10.0 7.0 30.0
SINGH
A462174523019 SHRISTEE 27.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 9.0 10.0 8.0 30.0
17 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 5.0 8.0
A462174523020 TRIPTI KUMARI 24.0 10.0 9.0 10.0 8.0 10.0 7.0 30.0
18 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 7.0
A462174523021
Gap analysis in Mid Term Examination
19 ANKITA KUMARI 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 30.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 30.0
A462174523022 VIDHU
20 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 14.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 4.0 30.0
RAJVARDHAN
A462174523023
21 MD DANISH ALAM 22.0 10.0 8.0 10.0 7.0 10.0 7.0
o Average CO Attainment & Weak Student Identification
Status (P/ A/ D)
Sub. Code PP 213
Year/ Section 2nd Year/ 3rd Sem CLO1 CLO2 CLO3
CLO1 CLO2 CLO3
Faculty Name Dr Diwakar Kumr Jha W =SLOW LEARNERS CLO1 CLO2 CLO3
S.No. RollNo Student Name %age weightage attained %age attainment < 60%
1 A462174523001 VISHAL SEN 0 100.0% 90.0% 80.0%
2 A462174523002 YASH PANDEY 0 40.0% 30.0% 30.0% W W W Y Y Y
A462174523003 MANISHA
0
3 KUMARI 100.0% 80.0% 70.0%
A462174523004 SHUBHAM
KUMAR 0
4 SINGH 90.0% 80.0% 60.0%
5 A462174523005 TANIYA SAHU 0 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% W W W Y Y Y
6 A462174523006 PRIMA SINGH 0 70.0% 70.0% 60.0%
7 A462174523007 AYUSH RAJ 0 70.0% 70.0% 60.0%
A462174523008 SAMEERA
0
8 FAIZ 100.0% 90.0% 80.0%
A462174523009 KHUSHI
0
9 NAGVANSHI 60.0% 50.0% 60.0% W Y
A462174523011 SHALINI
0
10 SHAMYA 80.0% 70.0% 50.0% W Y
A462174523012 RICHA
0
11 KUMARI 100.0% 90.0% 90.0%
A462174523014 SANDHYA
0
12 RANI 100.0% 70.0% 70.0%
A462174523015 ADITYA
0
13 KUMAR 80.0% 70.0% 50.0% W Y
14 A462174523016 AYUSH RAJ 0 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% W Y
A462174523017 MAYANK
0
15 BHARTI 40.0% 60.0% 40.0% W W Y Y
A462174523018 DEVRANJAN
0
16 SINGH 80.0% 70.0% 80.0%
17 A462174523019 SHRISTEE 0 100.0% 90.0% 80.0%
A462174523020 TRIPTI
0
18 KUMARI 90.0% 80.0% 70.0%
A462174523021 ANKITA
0
19 KUMARI 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
A462174523022 VIDHU
0
20 RAJVARDHAN 50.0% 50.0% 40.0% W W W Y Y Y
A462174523023 MD DANISH
0
21 ALAM 80.0% 70.0% 70.0%
A462174523024 MUSKAN
0
22 KUMARI 100.0% 70.0% 70.0%
A462174523025 PRIYANKA
0
23 SINHA 100.0% 90.0% 80.0%
24 A462174523026 ARADHYA 0 70.0% 60.0% 60.0%
A462174523029 ADITYA RAJ
0
25 ARVIND 90.0% 60.0% 50.0% W Y
26 A462174523030 AASHI ROY 0 80.0% 50.0% 40.0% W W Y Y
Extra classes have been conducted for week students. They have been given assignments and provided with
study materials.
For the Advanced learners they have been asked to write papers on different government programmes.
Final Sessional Marks (CT+TA+AT)
Attendance Register/ Verified Attendance Sheet
Attached as Annexure
CLOs Feedback & Final Attainment (CLO & PLO)