Journalistic Discourse (ENG-304)​

FALL SEMESTER 2022

Name: Junaid Ali Raza
Contact: 03245937493

Course Contents:
Eqbal Ahmed

●​ Murder of Metropolis
●​ Feudal Culture & Violence
●​ Between Past and Future
●​ Selected essays on South Asia (Published by Oxford University Press, 2004)

Robert Fisk

●​ The Jargon Disease

●​ The Ship that Stands Upright at the Bottom of the Sea
●​ The Age of the Warrior: Selected Writings (Published by Forth Estate (Harper
Collins),2008)

William Dalrymple

●​ Lahore: Blood on the Tracks

●​ The Age of Kali (Published by Penguin, 1998)

Concepts:

●​ Discourse structure: sentence, dialogue

●​ Discourse: thematic development

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Journalistic Discourse
Journalistic discourse plays a vital role in shaping how news and information are
communicated, interpreted, and understood by audiences. It involves the study of
language, structure, and strategies used in journalism to present facts, opinions, and
narratives. This discourse is central to how societies form knowledge and engage with
events, making it an essential area of exploration in media and communication studies.

Before delving into journalistic discourse, it is essential to understand what journalism is,
what discourse means, and how the two concepts effectively combine to create this unique
and dynamic field of study that shapes public understanding and societal viewpoints.

Journalism is the process of reporting, writing, editing, and distributing news to inform the
public about current events. It involves gathering information from various sources,
verifying facts, and presenting them in an accessible format. The main goal of journalism is
to provide people with reliable information, helping them make informed decisions about
the world. Journalism can take various forms, including news articles, reports and
interviews across different media platforms such as print, television, radio, and online.

Discourse, in simple terms, refers to the way language is used to express ideas, share
information, and communicate meaning. It involves not only the words spoken or written
but also the context in which they are used, the structure of the communication, and the
factors that affect how messages are understood.

When we combine these two concepts journalism and discourse we get journalistic
discourse, which refers to the way language is used in journalism to present news and
information. It is shaped by the goals of journalism, such as informing, persuading, or
entertaining, and involves careful choices about language, tone, and structure to make the
message clear and engaging for the audience.

1. Features/Characteristics of journalistic Discourse:

Journalism plays a crucial role in informing the public and shaping their opinions. To
effectively communicate news, journalists follow certain principles that ensure the
information is clear, accurate, and engaging. These principles help create trust between the

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 1
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

media and the audience, providing a reliable source of information. Here are the key
characteristics of the journalistic Discourse:

1. Clarity and Objectivity: Journalism is all about clear and unbiased communication.
Journalists aim to present the facts without adding personal opinions or emotions. They
use simple language to make sure the audience understands the story. The goal is to give
readers accurate information and let them decide for themselves what to think. By being
objective, journalism helps build trust with the audience and ensures the news is reliable.

For example, during the election campaign between Imran Khan and Nawaz Sharif, a
news article would explain what each candidate said about their plans for the country. The
reporter would share facts about their speeches and promises without choosing one side.
This way, the readers can decide who they support based on the information given.

2. Conciseness: Journalistic writing values being brief and to the point. Stories focus on the
most important details and leave out unnecessary information. This way, readers can
quickly understand the main idea without getting overwhelmed. Journalists aim to give the
core message across in a few sentences, making sure their audience gets the facts fast.
Conciseness helps keep readers’ attention while delivering essential information efficiently.

For example, a news article about a local fire might quickly mention the location, the
number of people affected, and emergency services' response, rather than going into
excessive details about the history of the building or unrelated background.

3. Inverted Pyramid Structure: Journalists use the inverted pyramid to organize their
stories. In this method, information is arranged in descending order of importance or
newsworthiness. The most important information goes at the beginning, so readers know
the main points right away. This includes who, what, where, when, why, and how. After the
opening, details are added in order of less importance. This structure helps readers
understand the key points quickly, even if they don’t read the whole article.

For example, in a news story about an election result, the first paragraph would mention
the winner, the number of votes received, and the key issues. Following paragraphs would
include less essential details, such as reactions of candidates and voters. This helps readers
quickly understand the key facts before diving into additional information.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 2
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

4. Timeliness: Timeliness is crucial in journalism. News stories are about what’s happening
right now, and journalists work quickly to get the latest updates to the audience. Being
timely means delivering news while it’s still relevant. As events unfold, journalists update
their stories, making sure the audience gets the newest information. In this fast-paced
world, people rely on journalism to stay informed about what’s happening around them.

For example, a news outlet covering a sports match would give live updates during the
game, such as the score and key players, ensuring readers are kept up to date as the event
happens. This way, readers can follow the match in real time, even if they are unable to
watch it themselves, keeping them engaged and informed about the ongoing action.

5. Headlines and Lead: Headlines and leads are important parts of journalism. A headline
grabs the reader's attention and gives a preview of the story. The lead, usually the first few
sentences, provides the most important details, allowing readers to understand the key
points right away. These elements are designed to hook the audience, so they’re
encouraged to keep reading. A good headline and lead ensure the story is clear.

For example, a headline like "Government Approves New Education Policy" instantly
informs the reader of the main event, while the lead would provide key details, such as the
changes in the policy and its expected impact on students, all in the first few sentences.

6. Balance and Fairness: Journalistic writing focuses on fairness and balance. Reporters try
to show different sides of a story, giving equal attention to all viewpoints. This approach
helps readers get a full picture of the issue. Journalists avoid showing favoritism and
instead focus on providing all the facts. By being balanced and fair, journalism helps build
trust and ensures the audience is getting a truthful and well-rounded view of events.

For instance, in a report about a new tax policy, the journalist would include the
government’s explanation for the change, the criticism from opposition, businesses and
citizens, and the reactions from economic experts to provide a complete perspective.

In conclusion, journalistic discourse relies on clarity, conciseness, timeliness, and fairness

to deliver trustworthy and impactful stories. These principles ensure effective
communication, keeping readers informed and engaged in a fast-paced world.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 3
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

2. Media Discourse and Journalistic Discourse:

Journalistic Discourse and Media Discourse are closely related but distinct forms of
communication that significantly influence public opinion. While both involve the sharing of
information, they differ in their objectives, styles, and the platforms they use.

1. Journalistic Discourse:

Journalistic discourse refers to the communication style used by journalists to convey news
and information to the public. It is characterized by objectivity, accuracy, and adherence to
ethical standards. Journalists aim to present facts in a neutral and unbiased manner,
allowing the audience to form their own opinions. This form of discourse emphasizes
fairness, balance, and the verification of information before publication.

Example: A news article covering a political event might provide key facts, include quotes
from reliable sources, and aim to present an unbiased view of the situation, ensuring that
all sides are represented fairly and accurately.

2. Media Discourse:

Media discourse covers a broader range of communication within the media landscape. It
includes not only news reporting but also entertainment, advertising, and other types of
content creation. Unlike journalistic discourse, media discourse is often influenced by
factors such as commercial interests, audience preferences, and the need to engage
viewers. While some forms of media discourse maintain objectivity, others are shaped
more by entertainment values, marketing strategies, and the desire to capture attention.

Example: A popular TV show or social media post may present content designed to
entertain or engage viewers, often with less emphasis on neutrality or objectivity. This
could include sensational headlines or language to provoke reactions or attract views.

In summary, while both journalistic and media discourse share the goal of informing the
public, journalistic discourse is primarily focused on providing unbiased information,
whereas media discourse encompasses a wider array of content that can be influenced by
entertainment, commercial motives, and audience engagement.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 4
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Distinguishing Factors:

1. Purpose:

●​ Journalistic Discourse seeks to inform the public by presenting news and facts in a
neutral manner, aiming to provide accurate, unbiased information.
●​ Media Discourse includes various content, such as entertainment and advertising,
focusing on capturing attention, generating engagement, or influencing opinions.

2. Objectivity:

●​ Journalistic Discourse maintains objectivity, emphasizing fairness and balance in

presenting facts without inserting personal opinions.
●​ Media Discourse can be subjective and influenced by factors such as commercial
interests, audience preferences, or the need to entertain, often sacrificing neutrality.

3. Content:

●​ Journalistic Discourse primarily deals with news reporting, factual content, and
analysis, with an emphasis on accuracy and verification.
●​ Media Discourse encompasses a broader range of content, including news,
entertainment, advertisements often blending facts with entertainment.

4. Style and Tone:

●​ Journalistic Discourse uses a formal, clear, and professional tone to present

information without emotional influence or sensationalism.
●​ Media Discourse can have a more informal, conversational, or emotional tone,
especially on platforms for engagement, like social media or shows.

5. Audience Engagement:

●​ Journalistic Discourse typically aims to inform the public without expecting active
interaction, focusing on delivering facts.
●​ Media Discourse often encourages interaction, such as likes, comments, or shares,
aiming to engage and build a relationship with the audience.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 5
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Discourse Analysis
Discourse analysis is an umbrella term for a range of qualitative research approaches used
in analyzing the use of language in social contexts, focusing on how communication shapes
and is shaped by social structures, power relations, and cultural norms.

Discourse analysis is a qualitative research method used to analyze written, spoken, or

visual texts to understand their meaning, context, and impact. It examines how language is
used in communication and broader social and cultural frameworks influencing it. It
focuses on patterns of language use, such as word choice and sentence structure, and how
these influence or reflect social relationships, ideologies, and cultural norms. Discourse
analysis is widely applied in fields such as linguistics, sociology and cultural studies.

1. How to Conduct Discourse Analysis

Discourse analysis is a qualitative research method used to analyze written, spoken, or

visual texts to understand their meaning, context, and impact. It examines how language is
used in communication and broader social and cultural frameworks influencing it. There is
no clear method for conducting discourse analysis, as several approaches exist. However,
here are basic steps that can guide you in conducting a systematic discourse analysis.

1. Define the Research Question or Objective

The first step in discourse analysis is to clearly define the research question. This question
guides the entire analysis. A good question helps you focus on what you want to learn. For
example, if you’re interested in how language is used in advertising, you could ask, "How
do advertisers use language to persuade customers to buy products?" This question helps
you focus on advertisements and the techniques used to influence consumer behavior.

2. Select the Data Source

Next, you need to carefully choose the source of the discourse, or where your data will
come from. This can be advertisements, news articles, interviews, or even social media
posts. It’s important to choose a source that closely matches your research question. In this

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 6
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

case, you might choose to analyze TV commercials, magazine ads, or online ads to better
understand how they use language to persuade customers effectively.

3. Gather Data

Once you know where your data is coming from, you need to carefully collect it. This might
involve watching TV commercials, gathering print advertisements, or saving online ads. If
you're studying advertisements in magazines, you could collect ads from several different
editions over a period. Make sure to follow ethical guidelines and get permission if needed
when collecting data, especially for private or sensitive content.

4. Review the Data

Before you begin analyzing the data, spend time reading or viewing it carefully and
thoughtfully. The goal is to understand the content and identify any important motifs or
repetitions. You can take notes on anything that stands out, like repeated words, phrases,
or ideas. For example, you might notice that many advertisements use persuasive words
like "exclusive," "limited time," or "special offer" to create a sense of urgency.

5. Identify Key Themes or Patterns

After reviewing the data, look for common themes or patterns that appear consistently.
These might be specific words or topics that come up often. For example, in
advertisements, you might notice the frequent use of words like "luxury," "affordable," or
"limited edition" to emphasize the value of the product. Identifying these patterns will help
you better understand the persuasive strategies used by advertisers.

6. Analyze the Discourse

Now, it’s time to analyze the language itself. You’ll apply a method of analysis, such as
Critical Discourse Analysis. This involves looking closely at how words are used and what
they mean in context. For example, you might examine how the word "luxury" is used in
ads to appeal to customers' desires for status and superiority. This step helps uncover the
hidden meanings and the cultural influence behind the language used in advertisements.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 7
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

7. Contextualize the Findings

Once you’ve analyzed the data, it’s important to think about the broader context. This
means considering the social, cultural, or economic situation in which the language was
used. For example, advertisers often target specific groups of people based on age,
income, or interests. Understanding the context of an advertisement helps you interpret
how and why certain words or phrases were chosen to appeal to that audience.

8. Interpret and report the Results

Finally, you need to interpret your findings and share what you’ve learned. This involves
explaining what the language means and how it connects to your research question. For
example, if you found that ads often use phrases like "exclusive offer" to create urgency,
you might explain how this tactic encourages customers to act quickly and buy before the
deal expires. Be sure to provide examples from the data and summarize your findings.

2. Advantages of Discourse Analysis:

1.​ In-depth Understanding of Communication: Discourse analysis helps reveal how

language constructs meaning, identity, power dynamics, and social relationships in
communication, allowing for a deeper understanding of interaction.
2.​ Multidimensional Approach: It considers the context in which communication
occurs, such as cultural, historical, or social factors, providing a comprehensive view
of how language shapes and is shaped by these influences.
3.​ Explores Social and Power Structures: Discourse analysis is particularly useful in
examining power, ideologies, and inequalities embedded in language, highlighting
issues like sexism, racism, and class disparities in communication.
4.​ Reveals Hidden Ideologies: It uncovers underlying beliefs, ideologies, and
assumptions that are often implicit in language use, providing insights into how
dominant ideologies influence individuals and society.
5.​ Identifies Communication Strategies: It helps identify the strategies people use in
communication, such as persuasion, argumentation, and framing, providing insight
into how individuals and groups influence each other through language.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 8
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

3. Disadvantages of Discourse Analysis:

1.​ Subjectivity: Interpretation of discourse can be highly subjective, leading to

potential bias, as analysts may project their own views and assumptions onto the
data. This can affect the objectivity and reliability of the analysis.
2.​ Complexity and Time-Consuming: The analysis process can be complex, requiring
a deep understanding of linguistic and contextual elements. It can be
time-consuming and requires substantial expertise.
3.​ Lack of Standardization: There is no universally agreed-upon methodology for
conducting discourse analysis, which can make comparisons across studies difficult
and may lead to inconsistencies in findings.
4.​ Overemphasis on Language: By focusing primarily on language, discourse analysis
might overlook other factors, such as non-verbal cues, that also contribute
significantly to meaning and communication.
5.​ Difficulty in Measuring Impact: Assessing the practical impact of discourse on
social change or behavior can be challenging, as it involves many indirect and
complex factors, making it hard to draw clear, measurable conclusions.

4. When Should You Use Discourse Analysis

Discourse analysis is a qualitative research method that studies how language shapes and
is shaped by social contexts, power dynamics, and cultural influences. It goes beyond the
words themselves to uncover deeper meanings, ideologies, and social interactions. This
approach is used in fields like sociology, linguistics, and media studies to explore issues
related to identity, power, and social change. You might wonder when you should use
discourse analysis; this will be explored in the following paragraphs.

Discourse analysis is valuable when you need to understand the underlying structures of
communication, including how people use language in different contexts like media,
politics, or everyday conversation. It helps to uncover the patterns and strategies people
use in their communication, providing a deeper understanding of interaction.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 9
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

If you're interested in uncovering the hidden ideologies, cultural norms, and values
embedded in language, discourse analysis can be a powerful tool. It allows you to
investigate how certain beliefs and ideologies are communicated and reinforced through
language, especially in texts that influence public opinion or behavior.

Discourse analysis is useful for examining how people interact in various social settings. It
helps reveal how individuals use language to negotiate meaning, create relationships, and
resolve conflicts within groups, offering insight into social behaviors and dynamics.

Discourse analysis is particularly valuable when analyzing how language is used in the
media or political discourse. It can help identify how politicians, journalists, or media
outlets strategically frame issues, persuade audiences, or shape public opinion, highlighting
the powerful impact of language in shaping political and social agendas.

Discourse analysis can help in understanding how activists and social movements use
language to challenge dominant narratives, frame issues, and construct collective
identities, revealing how language is used as a tool for resistance and social change.

Finally, discourse analysis is valuable for exploring how language contributes to or resists
social change. It can be particularly useful in movements related to human rights,
environmental activism, or political reform, as it reveals how language plays a role in
shaping public attitudes and promoting social transformation.

In short, discourse analysis helps us understand how language shapes society, power, and
culture. It uncovers hidden meanings and patterns in communication, showing how
language influences identity, power, and social change in media, politics, and daily life.

5. Approaches to Discourse Analysis

There are many approaches in discourse analysis, each offering unique perspectives on
how language functions in society. However, the two major approaches are the
Language-in-Use approach and the Socio-Political approach. These approaches focus on
different aspects of language and communication, providing valuable insights into both
everyday interactions and the larger social and political context in which language
operates. Let's take a look at both of these approaches in detail.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 10
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

1. Language in Use Approach

The Language-in-Use approach focuses on how language is used in daily communication to

express meaning and achieve specific goals. It examines how people choose words,
phrases, and structures in different social situations. For example, in a job interview, a
candidate uses formal language to show professionalism and highlight relevant skills. This
approach helps us understand how language works in real-life interactions and how
meanings are shaped between speakers, whether in spoken or written form.

This approach also considers the role of context in language use, such as the setting,
people involved, their relationship, and the social environment. For example, the language
used by a teacher in a classroom is different from that used by friends chatting informally.
It examines how these factors influence language use and how meanings change
depending on the situation. By exploring the connection between language and context,
this approach helps us understand the flexibility of communication.

The Language-in-Use approach also highlights how language can be a tool for power and
influence. For instance, politicians often use persuasive language to shape public opinion
and rally support. The words they choose can affect how people think, feel, and act in
relation to certain issues. This approach helps us understand how language can be used
strategically to influence others in various social and political contexts.

This approach emphasizes that language is constantly evolving. New words and phrases
emerge over time, reflecting changes in society, technology, and culture. For example,
social media has introduced terms like "hashtag" and "viral," which have become part of
everyday language. By studying how language changes, the Language-in-Use approach
helps us understand how communication evolves alongside society.

Additionally, the Language-in-Use approach recognizes that language is not just about
sharing information, but also about building relationships, creating identities, and
expressing emotions. For example, when someone says “I’m so proud of you” to a friend, it
not only conveys a positive message but also strengthens their bond. It shows how
language is a key part of social life, shaping and reflecting cultural norms and values. By

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 11
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

analyzing everyday language, this approach reveals how communication plays a role in
social interactions and the hidden meanings behind our words.

2. Socio-Political Approach

The Socio-Political approach to discourse analysis examines how language is linked to

power, beliefs, and social structures. It focuses on how language influences, controls, or
challenges ideas in society. For example, in political speeches, leaders use language to
persuade the public to support policies. This approach looks at how language promotes
political beliefs, policies, and cultural norms, especially in politics, media, and public
discussions, revealing how language can support or challenge existing power structures.

The Socio-Political approach also explores how language shapes public opinion about
different groups. For example, calling protestors "rioters" instead of "activists" can create
negative perceptions. By analyzing these language choices, we can see how language
influences how society views certain groups.

An important part of the Socio-Political approach is studying how language reflects and
maintains social inequalities. Researchers examine how race, gender, class, or sexuality are
represented. For example, media coverage of a protest may focus on violence rather than
the protestors' demands, reinforcing stereotypes. By analyzing speeches, media, and
institutional communication, this approach helps us understand how language sustains
social and political inequalities and influences people's thoughts and actions.

The Socio-Political approach also examines how language can create social change.
Researchers study how social movements and activists use language to challenge powerful
ideas. For example, slogans like "Black Lives Matter" challenge racial inequalities and
highlight issues of injustice. This approach shows that language reflects society’s power but
can also be a tool for resistance and change. Through discourse analysis, we can learn how
language plays a role in social and political transformation.

This approach also looks at how language is used to establish authority. Leaders may use
formal language to appear more credible, making their views harder to challenge. Studying
this shows how language can reinforce power structures.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 12
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Stylistic/ Rhetorical Devices

Stylistic devices refer to the techniques and strategies used by speakers or writers to
enhance the effectiveness of their communication. These devices help convey meaning,
evoke emotions, create vivid images, and engage the audience. Here are key stylistic
devices commonly analyzed in discourse:

1. Metaphor: A way of comparing two things by saying one thing is another. For example,
"Time is a thief" means time steals moments, like a thief steals things. It helps make
complex ideas easier to understand by using something familiar.

2. Simile: A way of comparing two things using the words 'like' or 'as.' For example, "Her
smile is like sunshine" compares her smile to sunshine, showing how warm and bright it is
in a simple, clear, and effective way to understand.

3. Alliteration: The repetition of the same sound at the beginning of words close together.
For example, "Peter Piper picked a peck of pickled peppers." It makes phrases sound catchy
and fun, often used in poems, songs, and advertisements for emphasis.

4. Hyperbole: An exaggeration that isn’t meant to be taken literally. For example, "I’ve
waited a thousand years" means you’ve waited a long time, but it's an exaggeration to
show how impatient you are, creating a dramatic effect to emphasize emotions strongly.

5. Irony: When something happens that is the opposite of what you expect. For example, a
fire station burning down is ironic because fire stations are supposed to prevent fires. It
shows how things can be surprising or unexpected, often creating humor or reflection.

6. Personification: Giving human qualities to things that aren’t human. For example, "The
wind whispered through the trees" makes the wind sound like it’s talking, even though it’s
not. It helps make descriptions more interesting, vivid, and relatable to the reader.

7. Allusion: A reference to something else, like a book, event, or person, without directly
mentioning it. For example, "He was a real Romeo with the ladies" refers to the character
Romeo from Shakespeare, known for being romantic, without directly naming him.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 13
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

8. Euphemism: A softer or kinder way of saying something difficult or uncomfortable. For

example, "He passed away" is a more gentle way of saying someone died. It helps make
tough subjects easier to talk about, especially when addressing sensitive emotions.

9. Anaphora: Repeating a word or phrase at the beginning of sentences or clauses for

emphasis. For example, Martin Luther King Jr.’s "I have a dream" speech repeats "I have a
dream" to highlight his vision for equality and freedom, creating a powerful effect.

10. Rhetorical Question: A question that doesn’t need an answer because the answer is
obvious. For example, "Who doesn’t like ice cream?" implies that everyone likes ice cream,
so it doesn’t need a reply. It’s used to make a point or emphasize something.

11. Satire: Humor or criticism that points out problems in society or people, often in a
funny or exaggerated way. For example, cartoons like "The Simpsons" use satire to show
funny or exaggerated versions of real-life issues, helping people think critically about them.

12. Symbolism: Using something simple to stand for a bigger idea. For example, a dove is
often used to represent peace. It is a symbol that helps people understand a bigger idea,
like peace, without having to explain it in full detail.

13. Vivid Imagery: Descriptive language that creates a clear picture in your mind by using
details that appeal to the senses. For example, "The bright red apple tasted sweet and
crisp" lets you imagine the apple, making it feel real and lively in your mind.

14. Contrast: Showing the difference between two things to highlight their features. For
example, 'The city was busy, while the countryside was quiet' contrasts the noise and
activity of the city with the calm of the countryside to make both stand out.

15. Anecdote: A short, personal story shared to make a point or entertain. For example,
telling a story about a funny mistake you made can help others understand a lesson in a
more engaging, relatable, and memorable way that keeps attention.

These devices are essential in discourse analysis because they help uncover underlying
meanings, power dynamics, and social contexts in communication. They also highlight how
language choices can affect the tone, intention, and overall impact of the message being
conveyed to the audience, shaping perceptions and responses.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 14
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Thematization in Discourse Analysis

Thematization in discourse analysis refers to the way certain elements of a discourse are
given prominence or highlighted as the "theme" of a sentence or conversation. It plays a
crucial role in shaping how information is structured, making some parts of a message
stand out as more important or relevant than others. Thematization often involves moving
elements of a sentence to the beginning to establish them as the key topic of discussion,
setting the stage for the rest of the communication.

In discourse analysis, the theme is the starting point of a sentence, showing what it’s about.
It’s often the known or familiar information. The rheme follows the theme and provides
new or additional details. For example, in "The book was on the table," "The book" is the
theme, and "was on the table" is the rheme, giving more information. This structure helps
guide the listener's or reader's focus and ensures clarity in communication.

One key way to achieve thematization is through word order, especially fronting. This
means placing the theme, or main topic, at the beginning of a sentence to highlight it. This
shows the listener or reader what the focus is. For example, in "The cat jumped over the
fence," "The cat" is the theme, placed at the start, making the subject clear. Fronting helps
the theme stand out and makes the sentence more focused and easier to understand.

Repetition of key terms, synonyms, or related words ensures the theme stays central to the
discourse. This method reinforces the main idea and maintains coherence. For instance, in
discussing climate change, using terms like "global warming," "climate crisis," and "rising
temperatures" strengthens the focus on environmental issues.

Another way to achieve thematization is by introducing a theme with a question and then
addressing it immediately, which helps to focus the discourse. For example, "What is the
greatest threat today? It is climate change, affecting millions globally." This method engages
the audience and emphasizes the central idea effectively.

Thematic progression refers to how themes develop throughout discourse. In constant

theme progression, the same theme continues from one sentence to the next. In simple
linear progression, a new theme is introduced, and the previous rheme becomes the next

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 15
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

theme. These patterns help maintain coherence and logical flow in the conversation,
making it easier for the listener to follow the ideas.

Thematization plays both syntactic and pragmatic roles in communication. Syntactically, it

organizes sentence structure, guiding which parts of a sentence come first. Pragmatically, it
helps speakers emphasize certain ideas, framing the conversation in a way that highlights
their intentions. Thematization is a tool to manage the flow of information, ensuring that
important points stand out clearly to the audience.

Overall, thematization helps organize discourse by structuring information in a way that

aligns with the communicator's intentions and the listener's or reader's expectations. It
enhances clarity and coherence in communication, making it easier for the audience to
understand the flow and context of the conversation.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 16
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Sentences and Utterances as

Fundamental units of Discourse
In the study of discourse analysis, understanding the role of sentences and utterances is
essential for understanding communication. Sentences and utterances serve as
fundamental units of discourse, contributing to meaning-making in both spoken and
written forms of language. While these terms may seem interchangeable, they carry
distinct roles in discourse. This assignment explores the differences between sentences
and utterances, their significance, and how they function in communication.

A sentence is a grammatical unit composed of words that express a complete thought,

often containing a subject and a predicate. Sentences adhere to syntactic rules and provide
structure to communication, allowing individuals to express clear ideas. Sentences can
stand alone and are often punctuated with a period, question mark, or exclamation point.

Examples:

●​ "The sky is blue."

●​ "Are you coming to the party?"

An utterance refers to any spoken or written expression that conveys meaning, regardless
of its grammatical structure. Unlike sentences, utterances do not have to follow syntactic
rules or form complete thoughts. They can be incomplete sentences, fragments, or even
non-verbal sounds that contribute to the discourse. Utterances are contextual and derive
meaning based on the situation, speaker, and tone. For example, in the dialogue:

●​ "Are you coming to the party?"

●​ "Yes, I am coming..."

The first question is a structurally complete and grammatically sound sentence. However,
when spoken in context, the response becomes an utterance. While the sentence may be
grammatically correct, it is the context and delivery that turn it into an utterance, showing
how utterances function within a specific communicative context.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 17
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Sentences and utterances differ in several key aspects. Sentences follow grammatical rules
and express complete thoughts, while utterances can be fragmented or incomplete.
Sentences have fixed meanings in a structured context, whereas utterances rely on
context, tone, and non-verbal cues for interpretation. Sentences are punctuated with
periods or question marks, while utterances, especially in speech, are understood through
intonation without the need for punctuation.

Both sentences and utterances play crucial roles in discourse. Sentences provide clarity and
structure to communication, while utterances contribute to the flow and interaction
between speakers. In dialogue, utterances often serve as immediate responses to
questions or prompts, helping to maintain the continuity of the conversation. They are also
important in expressing emotions, uncertainties, or reactions. For example:

●​ Junaid: "What time is the meeting?"

●​ Abid: "I'm not sure."

In this dialogue, Junaid uses a sentence, while Abid responds with an utterance, reflecting
uncertainty and maintaining the flow of communication.

Sentences and utterances are vital in facilitating discourse, each with its distinct role. While
sentences are structured and grammatically complete, utterances serve as flexible,
context-dependent expressions that enhance communication. A comprehensive
understanding of both units helps in analyzing and interpreting language use in contexts.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 18
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Contextual and Formal links in

Discourse Analysis
In discourse analysis, the connections within communication are key to unlocking how
meaning is created and understood. Two powerful types of links, contextual links and
formal links, serve as the building blocks for analyzing how language comes together.
These links reveal how different elements of discourse relate to one another, offering a
clearer picture of how we interpret and navigate communication.

Contextual Links:

Contextual links are connections in a conversation or text that depend on the surrounding
situation, such as the social, cultural, or historical context. These links help us understand
the meaning of words or phrases based on what we already know about the situation. For
example, if a news article talks about a political event, we need to know what's happening
in politics to fully understand the article. A conversation between friends may also have
special meaning if we know about their past experiences or inside jokes.

Contextual links are important because they help us understand what’s being said beyond
the words themselves. They rely on shared knowledge or experiences to fill gaps and give
more meaning to a conversation or text. Without these links, much of what we say or write
might not make sense, as the context helps explain the true meaning behind words.

Formal Links:

Formal links are the connections in a text or conversation that help make it clear and easy
to follow. These links are created using words like conjunctions (e.g., "and," "but,"
"because") and pronouns (e.g., "he," "she," "they") to connect ideas or sentences. For
example, using "and" links two sentences, while "he" refers to a person mentioned earlier
in the text. These links make the conversation or text flow smoothly and logically.

Formal links are important because they make sure that the audience can follow along
easily. They help organize ideas clearly, so we don’t get confused or lost. By using formal

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 19
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

links, speakers and writers can make their message easier to understand and connect
ideas in a way that makes sense to everyone.

1. Interplay between Contextual and Formal Links:

The interplay between formal links and contextual links in discourse is essential for creating
coherence and conveying meaning effectively. Formal links, such as conjunctions,
pronouns, and other grammatical devices, help to maintain logical flow and connect ideas
within the text or conversation. They create structural cohesion, allowing the reader or
listener to follow the narrative smoothly.

On the other hand, contextual links provide deeper understanding by relying on external
factors like shared knowledge, cultural background, or the situation in which the
communication occurs. These links help interpret the meaning behind the formal
connections and fill in the gaps that formal links alone cannot address.

Together, formal links structure the conversation, while contextual links enrich the
communication, ensuring both clarity and depth in the exchange. The combination of these
links allows for a more complete and nuanced understanding of the discourse.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 20
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Grimes' concept of Staging in a Text

Grimes, the Canadian musician, artist, and producer, is known for her creative and
innovative approach to music and visuals. In her concept of "staging," she goes beyond
traditional limits, creating immersive experiences that involve both sound and visuals.
Grimes' staging carefully combines music, images, and storytelling to create a powerful
experience that engages the audience's senses.

In a literary text, Grimes' idea of "staging" refers to how an author arranges and presents
important elements like the story’s structure, point of view, character development, and
themes to build meaning. The way events are organized and how time and space are
handled can shape how readers understand the text. In this analysis, we will look at how
staging can affect the way a story unfolds and how it is interpreted.

One key part of staging in a literary text is how the narrative is organized. How the events
are arranged whether in a straightforward or non-linear order—can change how readers
perceive the plot. For example, a non-linear narrative might reveal key events later in the
story, creating suspense or changing how earlier events are understood.

The point of view (first person, third person, etc.) is an important part of staging. The
narrator’s perspective determines how the reader experiences the story. An unreliable
narrator can create confusion or uncertainty, while an all-knowing narrator provides a
clearer view of the events.

Grimes highlights the role of symbols and recurring themes in the text, as they help build
meaning. Objects, colors, and repeating images act as metaphors that add depth to the
story. For example, a symbol that appears throughout the text may hint at future events,
underline key themes, or give insight into a character's inner thoughts.

Grimes also points out the importance of how characters are placed and developed in the
story. How characters are introduced, the conflicts they face, and how they interact with
others all reveal important details about their personalities and motivations. The way a
character’s emotions and thoughts evolve can greatly affect the story’s meaning.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 21
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Another important part of Grimes' staging concept is how the story's time is structured.
How an author shifts between past, present, and future, or between different locations,
can build tension and increase the emotional impact of the story. Flashbacks, for example,
can provide important details that change how the reader understands the present events.

Grimes also explores how a text connects with other texts. In post-structuralist and
deconstructivist readings, the meaning of a text changes based on its relationship with
other cultural, historical, or literary works. In these cases, the staging goes beyond the text
itself and includes its place in a broader context.

Grimes’ concept of staging also involves carefully managing conflict within the text. Tension
is created through dialogue, action, and the way the story progresses. Characters are
positioned in ways that create dynamic conflict. This tension reveals struggles, differences
in beliefs, and emotional challenges, driving the exploration of important themes like
power, identity, and human relationships.

In conclusion, Grimes’ idea of staging in a literary text is key to shaping how readers
experience and understand a story. By organizing elements like character development,
narrative structure, point of view, and symbols, an author can guide the reader's emotional
journey. The way these elements are handled, along with the structure of time and space,
shapes the overall meaning of the text.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 22
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Anaphoric and Cataphoric relations

within text
Anaphoric and cataphoric relations are linguistic tools used to establish connections within
a text. These relations ensure cohesion and coherence by linking elements, either
backward or forward, within discourse. Understanding these connections helps readers
follow the flow of ideas and enhances clarity of communication. Writers rely on these
techniques to avoid unnecessary repetition and maintain a smooth narrative structure.

Anaphoric relations involve words or phrases, such as pronouns, that refer back to
something previously mentioned. For example, in the sentence "John lost his wallet, and he
was devastated," the pronoun he refers to John. This backward reference creates continuity
and helps maintain the flow of the text.

Anaphoric relations are particularly useful for reducing redundancy by avoiding repeated
mentions of the same entity. They are essential for building logical connections between
sentences, making the text more cohesive. Additionally, they enable readers to focus on
the progression of ideas without distraction from repetitive details.

Cataphoric relations, on the other hand, refer forward to something that appears later in
the text. For instance, in the sentence "Before entering the room, she took a deep breath,"
the pronoun she refers to the person introduced later. This forward reference creates
anticipation, often building suspense or drawing attention to upcoming details.

Cataphoric relations are particularly effective in storytelling, where suspense and intrigue
are key elements. They help create a sense of curiosity, encouraging readers to continue
engaging with the narrative to uncover the details.

Both anaphoric and cataphoric relations are essential for creating textual cohesion and
coherence. Anaphoric relations ensure that information flows logically by linking new
content to prior details, while cataphoric relations engage readers by prompting them to
anticipate what comes next. By alternating between these two types of references, writers
can add variety and dynamism to their work. Additionally, these relations influence how

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 23
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

readers process information. Anaphoric references support the recall of earlier details,
while cataphoric references encourage readers to focus on upcoming content.

Anaphoric relations often rely on personal pronouns (he, she, it), demonstrative pronouns
(this, that, these, those), or relative pronouns (who, which, that). Cataphoric relations
typically use pronouns, definite articles, or other referring expressions strategically placed
to pique interest before providing details. The careful use of these elements ensures that
the audience can easily follow the writer's intent. These tools also allow for a more dynamic
and interactive reading experience, as they draw readers into the unfolding narrative.

Mastering anaphoric and cataphoric relations is vital for effective communication. These
tools contribute to a text’s coherence, reduce redundancy, and engage the audience by
linking ideas. They are integral to achieving a professional writing style that resonates with
readers. Writers and speakers who use these relations can create more fluent, clear, and
compelling discourse, fostering better understanding and connection with their audience.

1. Co-References in the Text

Co-references in a text refer to the use of two or more expressions that refer to the same
person, thing, or idea. These expressions can be pronouns, noun phrases, or other terms
that share the same reference. Co-referencing is essential for maintaining clarity and flow
in writing. It also helps prevent redundancy by linking different parts of the text together.

For example:

1. Junaid studied hard for his exams. He believed that his efforts would pay off.

Here, "Junaid" and "He" are co-referential terms, both referring to the same person.

2. The teacher explained the lesson clearly. She gave us helpful examples.

In this case, "the teacher" and "She" are co-referential expressions referring to the same
person.

Co-referencing helps make the text more concise and avoids repetition. It contributes to
the coherence and cohesion of the writing.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 24
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Eqbal Ahmad (1933-1999)

Eqbal Ahmad (1933–1999) was a Pakistani scholar, political activist, and thinker who made
important contributions to understanding global politics, imperialism, and the effects of
colonialism. Born in British India, which became Pakistan, he studied in the United States,
where he learned about political science and international relations. His education helped
him see the bigger picture of how countries interact and how power influences the world.

Ahmad was a strong critic of imperialism, especially the actions of the United States. He
spoke out against colonialism and exploitation, believing in the right of people to govern
themselves. He opposed the Vietnam War and U.S. involvement in the Middle East, and he
also criticized the political situation in Pakistan, calling for democracy and human rights.

Throughout his life, Ahmad worked to promote global unity and justice. He believed that
the fight for justice was not limited to one country or region but was a worldwide cause. He
thought that to fight imperialism and exploitation, countries in the Global South needed to
cooperate, work together, and challenge powerful nations to create a fairer world. Ahmad
also emphasized the importance of social movements in fighting oppression.

As a scholar, Ahmad explored how colonialism affected countries after independence. His
books, like The Post-Colonial State and the Crisis of Identity and Islamic Identity and the
Secular State, examined how politics and culture were shaped by colonization. He argued
that many countries in the Global South were controlled by powerful nations and believed
these countries should unite and support each other.

Eqbal Ahmad’s work continues to influence both academics and activists. His ideas on
justice, anti-imperialism, and the rights of people in poorer countries are still important
today. His legacy reminds us to think critically about the world’s power structures and the
impact they have on people everywhere.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 25
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

1. Key Features of Eqbal Ahmad’s journalistic writings:

Eqbal Ahmad was a renowned Pakistani intellectual, writer, and activist known for his
journalistic writings that reflected his deep understanding of history, politics, and global
affairs. The key features of his journalistic writings include:

1. Critical Perspective on Imperialism and Colonialism: Eqbal Ahmad criticized Western

exploitation of weaker nations through imperialism and colonialism. He believed colonial
legacies shaped modern systems. His writings emphasized justice, freedom, and resistance
against domination by powerful nations to achieve global equality and fairness.

2. Focus on Justice and Human Rights:Eqbal Ahmad strongly advocated for justice and
human rights, particularly for marginalized communities. He addressed issues such as
poverty, inequality, and oppression, urging people to actively fight against these injustices.
His goal was to create a fairer, more compassionate world, both in Pakistan and globally.

3. Global Perspective: Ahmad addressed global issues like war and peace, emphasizing a
worldwide view. He criticized the interference of powerful nations in regions such as the
Middle East and South Asia. His writings analyzed how these actions caused harm,
promoting a better understanding of global power dynamics and their consequences.

4. Engagement with Pakistan’s Political and Social Issues: Eqbal Ahmad highlighted
Pakistan’s political instability, military involvement, and extremism. He called for
democratic governance and reforms to address these issues. His writings aimed to improve
lives by promoting stability, equality, and justice in the country’s systems.

5. Clarity and Accessibility: One of the most notable things about Ahmad’s writings was
that they were easy to read and understand. He avoided using difficult words, making his
work accessible to a wide audience. Even though his language was simple, his ideas were
deep and intelligent, appealing to both experts and ordinary readers.

6. Interdisciplinary Approach: Eqbal Ahmad’s writings showed his knowledge in many

fields, such as history, sociology, economics, and politics. By combining these areas of
study, he was able to explain complicated topics in a well-rounded and detailed way. This
made his arguments richer and more meaningful.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 26
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

7. Ethical and Moral Vision: Ahmad’s work reflected his strong sense of right and wrong.
He believed that writers, thinkers, and activists should act responsibly and work toward
making the world a better, more just place for everyone. He always promoted values like
honesty, fairness, respect, compassion, and dignity for all people.

8. Critique of Religious and Political Extremism: Eqbal Ahmad was very critical of using
religion as a tool for political purposes. He also warned about the dangers of religious
extremism. His writings expressed his hope for a society that is modern, progressive, and
peaceful, where people respect each other’s beliefs and live in harmony.

9. Use of Historical Context: Ahmad often referred to historical events to help people
understand current problems. He believed that history holds valuable lessons for dealing
with today’s challenges. His writings were filled with examples from the past to make his
arguments stronger and easier to understand.

10. Advocacy for Nonviolence: Eqbal Ahmad admired the ideas of nonviolence and
peaceful resistance, inspired by leaders like Mahatma Gandhi. He opposed wars and
violence, urging countries to solve problems through negotiation. He believed that peace
was better than conflict and that nonviolence was a powerful way to bring change.

Eqbal Ahmad’s journalistic writings remain highly relevant for their intellectual rigor, moral
vision, and unwavering commitment to justice. His work continues to inspire those seeking
to understand and address the complexities of global and local issues.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 27
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Murder of a Metropolis
Analysis of the Article:
Eqbal Ahmad’s article gives a detailed look at the problems in Karachi in the 1990s. Ahmad
explores the multifaceted problems facing the city ranging from infrastructural decay, poor
governance, and corruption to the frustration of its citizens, many of whom are talented,
energetic, and hardworking professionals.

In this writing, Eqbal Ahmad discusses the issues facing Karachi, describing how the
government and other organizations have made the city a "hell on earth." Karachi is the
largest city and economic hub of Pakistan. It became the capital of the country in 1947 after
independence. Known for its charm, advanced infrastructure, and seaport, the city attracts
people from all over Pakistan who seek better education and employment opportunities.

Due to its vast population, Karachi faces numerous challenges. With everything available in
the city, every type of business has an office there. However, the large population also
brings with it various problems, including overcrowding, traffic, and inadequate services.
Eqbal Ahmad provides a detailed analysis of these issues, highlighting the difficulties that
the people of Karachi face in their daily lives.

1. Karachi's Struggles: The city faces many serious problems, such as bad smells, stagnant
rainwater, and uncollected garbage. The roads are flooded, cars get stuck, and there are
frequent power cuts. However, the people, like Mr. Hasan Jafri in the article, accepts these
everyday problems as part of their difficult life.

2. Frustrations of the People: Professionals in Karachi, such as architects and designers,

struggle to complete their work due to constant power failures and other daily challenges.
These problems are not only caused by bad weather but also by the lack of proper support
from the government and inefficient systems and infrastructure.

3. Economic and Political Issues: Despite Karachi contributing 40% of Pakistan’s total
revenue, the city is continuously neglected by both local and national governments. The
article strongly criticizes the city’s fragmented administration, which allows corruption and

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 28
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

exploitation to occur. Karachi’s potential for long-term growth is severely limited because of
the lack of proper infrastructure and bad governance practices.

4. Political and Social Problems: The city’s politics is described as disorganized, with local
politicians using ethnic differences to their advantage. This leads to division and makes it
harder for the city to improve. Even though Karachi has talented people and resources,
political corruption prevents it from growing.

5. The Irony: Ahmad compares Karachi’s situation to a fable where someone kills the goose
that lays golden eggs. Despite being an important city with great potential, Karachi is being
harmed by the same people who should be protecting it. The city’s bright future is at risk
because of mismanagement and corruption.

6. The City's Resilience: Despite all the problems, Karachi is a city full of energy and
resilience. People continue to work hard and try to live normal lives, despite the hardships
they face every day. There is a sense of endurance among the residents, as they adapt to
difficult conditions and find ways to survive.

7. The Struggle for Change: The article also reflects on the struggle for change in Karachi.
While the people and businesses continue to suffer greatly, the urgent need for change is
clear. However, due to corrupt leadership and lack of necessary resources, the possibility of
meaningful improvement seems far away. This highlights the frustration of a city that
knows its true potential but is held back by ineffective governance and mismanagement.

8. Hope for Karachi’s Future: Despite its problems, Karachi has potential for a brighter
future. Its hardworking people and economic importance can drive change. With honest
leadership, better governance, and teamwork, the city’s issues can be resolved. Karachi can
once again become a thriving, successful city, offering opportunities and hope to residents.

In conclusion, Ahmad’s article shows how Karachi is being hurt by poor management and
corruption. Even though the city has a lot of potential, its problems continue to grow
because of bad leadership. The article highlights the larger issues facing Pakistan, where
cities like Karachi struggle because of political instability and bad governance.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 29
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Themes of the Article

In "Murder of Metropolis," Eqbal Ahmad explores key themes, critically examining power
dynamics, authoritarianism, and resistance. The article highlights Karachi’s poor
infrastructure, social frustrations, political corruption, and the resilience of its people
amidst adversity. Let’s explore the central themes of the article in more detail.

1. Poor Infrastructure and Governance: Karachi’s infrastructure is in a state of disrepair,

with poorly maintained sewage systems, unreliable roads, and frequent power outages.
This is compounded by ineffective governance and bureaucratic inefficiencies, leaving
essential public services underdeveloped. The city’s residents are trapped in a cycle of
frustration, as their basic needs remain unmet.

2. Social and Economic Frustrations: Karachi's residents, especially professionals, endure

ongoing struggles due to systemic failures. Power outages, lack of reliable transportation,
and an unstable business environment contribute to widespread dissatisfaction. Despite
the city’s economic potential, these issues foster a sense of stagnation and cynicism. Many
feel their aspirations are hindered by persistent social and economic frustrations.

3. Political Mismanagement and Corruption: The article critiques Karachi's political

environment, emphasizing corruption and mismanagement. Local and national politicians
exploit the city's resources for personal gain, severely impacting infrastructure and public
services. This corruption undermines the social fabric, erodes public trust, and deepens the
divide between the government’s promises and the people’s realities.

4. Resilience: Despite the overwhelming challenges, the residents of Karachi demonstrate

remarkable resilience. While the city’s infrastructure is failing and services are unreliable,
the people persist. Their determination, even amidst adverse conditions, reflects the
unwavering spirit of Karachi’s citizens. This resilience ensures that, despite the city’s decay,
hope and strength remain among the population.

5. Contrast Between Potential and Reality: Karachi is a city of vast potential, with a
skilled workforce, strategic location, and significant contributions to the national economy.
However, this immense potential is stifled by poor governance, mismanagement, and

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 30
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

widespread corruption. The city remains unable to reach its true capacity, trapped in a
persistent cycle of decay that limits progress and growth.

6. Justice and Accountability: The article highlights the glaring lack of justice and
accountability in Karachi's governance. Corruption, mismanagement, and neglect prevent
the city from addressing its critical issues, such as unsafe infrastructure and inefficient
services. Residents remain powerless, unable to demand change. This lack of accountability
leaves Karachi's citizens frustrated, with no recourse for justice.

7. Authoritarianism: Karachi's political structure is fragmented, allowing powerful

individuals to manipulate and control governance. This decentralization weakens
accountability and fosters authoritarian control, stifling democratic progress. Corruption
thrives in this environment, preventing governance. The city's potential for growth and
development is hindered by authoritarian tendencies that dominate its political landscape.

8. Economic Inequality: Another key theme in the article is the growing economic
inequality in Karachi. Despite being the economic hub of Pakistan, the benefits of the city’s
wealth are not evenly distributed. A small elite controls much of the wealth, while many
residents face poverty and struggle to access basic services. This growing gap between the
rich and the poor exacerbates social unrest and inequality.

In conclusion, "Murder of Metropolis" by Eqbal Ahmad paints a stark picture of Karachi’s

struggles, highlighting its potential blocked by poor governance, corruption, and
authoritarian control. Despite these problems, the people of Karachi keep fighting to
survive. For the city to truly succeed, it needs major changes in how it is run.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 31
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Stylistic Devices in the Article

The article by Eqbal Ahmad uses various stylistic devices to convey the problems and
contradictions in Karachi. These devices help to create a vivid, relatable, and impactful
portrayal of the city, drawing attention to both its potential and the systemic issues that
prevent it from thriving. Here are some of the key devices:

1. Vivid Imagery: Ahmad uses vivid imagery to describe Karachi’s polluted environment,
highlighting the "foul and pungent" smells, "stagnant rainwater," and "uncleared garbage."
These images emphasize the city's neglected state, allowing readers to visualize the severe
decay. Describing Karachi as a "sewerage network" further emphasizes the overwhelming
urban decline, making the city's condition painfully clear.

2. Juxtaposition: The article uses juxtaposition to compare Karachi’s potential with its
overwhelming challenges. Although Karachi is Pakistan’s economic engine, it suffers from
deep mismanagement and neglect. Ahmad contrasts Karachi's vital contribution to national
revenue with the issues hindering growth. This highlights the city's potential while also
showing how leadership failures prevent the city from thriving.

3. Irony: Ahmad employs irony throughout the article, especially in his description of the
city's people. Despite grim conditions, residents remain "generally helpful" and manage to
smile, displaying resilience. Similarly, an American businessman’s cynicism about investing
in Karachi, despite its potential, highlights the irony. Karachi is full of promise, yet deeply
hindered by mismanagement and corruption.

4. Allusion: Ahmad uses allusion to refer to the "proverbial fool" who kills the golden
goose, illustrating how Karachi's leaders squander the city’s vast potential. This allusion
emphasizes how short-sighted decisions by politicians and bureaucrats are damaging the
city's future. Drawing on a well-known fable, Ahmad underscores the critical issue of
mismanagement and poor leadership decisions.

5. Metaphors: Ahmad uses metaphors, such as "Karachi is Pakistan's only metropolis,

commercial capital, and gateway to the world," to highlight the city's important economic
and cultural role. The metaphor "its will to live seems to be marked by a tragic insouciance"

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 32
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

portrays Karachi’s resilience despite its persistent and overwhelming problems. This
emphasizes the city’s strength while acknowledging the tragedy of neglect.

6. Contrast: Ahmad contrasts Karachi’s immense potential with the corruption and
mismanagement that limit its steady growth. Despite its significance, the city suffers from
political fragmentation, inefficiency, and widespread corruption. This contrast between
Karachi’s promise and the failure of its leadership reinforces the idea that the city’s serious
problems are largely self-inflicted. Poor management stifles its progress.

7. Repetition: Throughout the article, Ahmad emphasizes the main ideas about Karachi's
struggles and potential through repetition. By highlighting the city's mismanagement,
corruption, and resilience, he strengthens the argument that despite Karachi's critical role
in Pakistan’s economy, its future is at risk due to the failure of its leaders. The mention of
these themes ensures that the reader understands the seriousness of the situation.

8. Contrast in Tone: The article moves between feelings of hope and sadness. Ahmad
begins by highlighting Karachi's importance to the economy, showing its great potential for
growth. However, he quickly shifts to frustration and disappointment as he talks about the
deep mismanagement and widespread corruption. This change in tone highlights the gap
between the city's promise and its current situation.

9. Rhetorical Questions: Ahmad uses rhetorical questions to prompt the reader to think
critically about Karachi’s future. By asking, "How much longer will Karachi be able to
survive?" he challenges common beliefs and draws attention to the city’s critical situation.
This thought-provoking question highlights the urgent need for immediate action to
address the mismanagement and corruption preventing Karachi’s progress.

In short, Ahmad’s article uses vivid imagery, irony, juxtaposition, allusion, metaphor, and
repetition to highlight Karachi’s potential and its struggles. Despite its importance, the city
suffers from mismanagement, corruption, and neglect. The leadership's failure prevents
Karachi from flourishing, hindering its ability to thrive and reach its full potential.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 33
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Feudal Culture and Violence

Analysis of the Article:
Eqbal Ahmad's article explores the deep causes of violence in Pakistan, focusing on the
lasting impact of feudalism, especially in rural areas. He criticizes both the government and
intellectuals for failing to address violence or bring about the necessary social changes. The
article highlights how violence is common in society, including revenge, abuse of women,
child violence, and social injustice. It argues that the government’s inaction and cultural
neglect make these serious problems worse over time. Below is a simplified analysis of the
key themes and arguments presented:

1. Feudalism as a Cultural Force: Ahmad argues that although feudalism may not
dominate Pakistan's economy today, its cultural legacy is still very powerful. Feudalism has
become deeply ingrained in Pakistan’s social norms and values, where violence is often
used to maintain control and assert authority.

2. Hegemony of Feudal Culture: Intellectuals have largely ignored the influence of feudal
culture, which continues to shape societal norms. Feudal culture isn’t about economic
growth or ideology; it’s about control through violence. This culture influences
relationships, especially between the powerful and the powerless.

3. Prevalence of Revenge: Ahmad highlights how revenge is seen as a natural and

acceptable response in Pakistani society, especially related to personal, family, and tribal
honor. Revenge killings are widespread, and this normalization of violence reflects the
deep-rooted culture of revenge that perpetuates violence.

4. Violence Against Women: Ahmad discusses how wife-beating is accepted, even

considered a right, in many rural and urban areas. He also mentions the widespread
problem of rape, especially gang rape, and how societal neglect makes these issues worse.
The state's failure to respond properly perpetuates violence against women.

5. The Violence of Honor: Practices like Karo Kari, where women are killed in the name of
honor, are institutionalized in some regions. These practices reflect a broader culture that

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 34
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

justifies extreme violence to maintain familial and societal honor, often rooted in
patriarchal values that suppress women's autonomy and rights.

6. Physical Punishment and Abuse: Ahmad points out that child abuse, including physical
punishment, is widespread. Ahmad suggests that children who experience violence often
grow up to repeat these behaviors, leading to a cycle of violence. Religious schools
(madaris) are places where punishment is common, with some children even chained.

7. Hudood, Qisas, Diyat, and Blasphemy Laws: Ahmad criticizes laws introduced during
military rule, such as the Hudood Ordinances and Blasphemy laws. He argues that these
laws have harmed women and minorities and promoted outdated attitudes. He believes
the failure to repeal these laws shows a lack of commitment to societal reform.

8. State Inaction: Ahmad criticizes the government for failing to intervene and enforce
laws against practices like domestic violence, honor killings, and child abuse. The state's
inability or unwillingness to act allows violence to continue unchecked, further entrenching
harmful cultural norms and perpetuating suffering.

9. Legal Reforms and Their Neglect: While there have been calls for legal reforms,
particularly to protect women and minorities, no government has acted decisively. Ahmad
suggests that the lack of organized opposition to these practices is partly due to the
influence of conservative religious groups.

10. Responsibility for Change: Ahmad concludes by shifting responsibility for change to
the people of Pakistan, urging them to challenge systems of violence. While the
government's inaction plays a role, the lack of progressive opinion in society is to blame.
Without effort from intellectuals and the state, the culture of violence will persist.

Eqbal Ahmad’s article analyzes the deep-rooted culture of violence in Pakistan, attributing it
to feudalism, traditional practices, and the failure of the state and intelligentsia to address
these issues. He argues that revenge killings, domestic abuse, and mistreatment of women
and children persist due to historical power structures and inadequate reforms.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 35
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Themes of the Article

There are several key themes discussed in this article that provide insight into the complex
social issues in Pakistan. Each theme highlights an important aspect of the persistent
challenges faced by society, from the growing influence of feudal culture to the
normalization of violence and the oppression of women. Let's explore each in detail.

1. Feudal Culture and its Persistence: A major theme in the article is the lasting influence
of feudal culture in Pakistan, even though feudalism is no longer the dominant economic
force. The feudal mindset, centered around power, control, exploitation, and violence,
remains strong in society. Despite the weakening of feudalism, its cultural grip continues to
define societal interactions and norms.

2. Normalization of Violence in Society: One major theme is how violence is deeply

embedded in Pakistan's social fabric. Revenge, punishment, humiliation, and aggression
are seen as natural responses to conflict. Instead of resolving issues peacefully, the idea of
using force to restore honor, assert power, and achieve personal goals is widespread. This
normalization of violence reinforces its presence in everyday life.

3. Gender-Based Violence: A key theme in the article is the systemic violence that women
face in Pakistan. From domestic abuse to rape, honor killings, and social injustice, women
are often victims of gender-based violence. Cultural acceptance of these acts and the lack
of effective legal action mean that these injustices continue unchecked, perpetuating a
dangerous cycle of violence against women.

4. State Inaction and Failure to Enforce Laws: The failure of the state to protect its
citizens is another significant theme. The government’s inability to enforce laws against
violence allows harmful practices to persist. Despite the presence of laws, such as those
protecting women, the state’s negligence in executing them results in a climate where
violence continues to flourish unchecked.

5. Resistance to Legal Reforms: A critical theme discussed in the article is the resistance
to legal reforms, particularly in addressing laws that harm women and minorities. Despite
widespread recognition of the negative impact of laws like Hudood and Blasphemy, the

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 36
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

political system remains reluctant to change them due to pressure from conservative
religious groups, leaving these outdated laws intact.

6. Intellectual and Cultural Inaction: Another major theme is the failure of Pakistan’s
intellectuals and educated classes to challenge the culture of violence. Instead of
advocating for peaceful values and social reforms, many intellectuals remain passive. This
silence allows harmful cultural practices, rooted in violence and oppression, to persist,
hindering progress toward a more just and equal society.

7. Violence as a Tool of Social Control: A significant theme in the article is the use of
violence as a means to control and dominate people in rural areas. Feudal leaders rely on
physical force to maintain authority and assert power over their subjects. This use of
violence perpetuates a system of control, preventing social mobility and reinforcing existing
hierarchies of inequality and oppression.

8. Limited Access to Education: Another important theme in the article is the lack of
education, especially for women and disadvantaged groups. In many rural areas, there are
few schools or resources available, keeping people stuck in poverty and limiting their
opportunities. Without education, it's hard for individuals to improve their lives, and this
stops society from moving forward as a whole.

1. Disadvantages of Feudalism:

Feudalism has several disadvantages, especially when it persists in a society. Some key
drawbacks include:

1. Social Inequality: Feudalism creates a rigid and unfair system where a few people hold
most of the power and wealth. This leaves the majority of people in extreme poverty with
no opportunity to improve their lives. The rich get richer, while the poor stay stuck in their
low positions, leading to a deeply divided society of inequality.

2. Exploitation of Peasants: In feudalism, peasants work hard for landowners but often
don’t get fair pay or treatment. They are forced to work under difficult conditions with little
reward. This keeps them poor and trapped in their roles, with no chance to break free from
the cycle of hard labor and unfair treatment.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 37
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

3. Perpetuation of Violence: Feudalism encourages violence as a way to maintain control.

People often use force to solve problems, and this behavior becomes normal. As a result,
violence spreads throughout society, making it more common to use aggression rather
than peaceful methods to resolve conflicts, which harms the community as a whole.

4. Stagnation of Economic Growth: Feudal societies usually rely on farming and don’t
encourage new ideas or growth. The small group of landowners keeps things the same,
while most people stay poor and unable to move up. This lack of change limits progress,
and the economy doesn’t grow or improve for everyone.

5. Weak Governance: Feudal systems are often governed by local leaders, which weakens
the overall power of the country. These leaders sometimes ignore national laws and act on
their own, leading to confusion, corruption, and poor decision-making. Without strong
central leadership, the country struggles to grow and improve.

6. Cultural and Social Backwardness: Feudalism keeps old traditions alive, like treating
certain people as less important and using violence to solve problems. These outdated
beliefs prevent social progress and equality. Instead of moving forward, society stays stuck
in old ways, limiting everyone’s ability to live more freely and fairly.

These disadvantages show how feudalism can negatively impact the social, political, and
economic fabric of a society, preventing progress and promoting inequality.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 38
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Stylistic Devices in the Article

This article presents a deep analysis of the culture of violence in Pakistan, particularly
rooted in feudal traditions. Stylistically, the piece employs several notable devices:

1. Contrast: Ahmad compares feudal culture with modern ideas driven by consumerism.
He shows how old systems from feudalism still have power, while today's educated people
focus on Western values and don't create new cultural ideas. This sharp contrast highlights
how feudal values continue to affect society even as Pakistan changes in other ways,
causing a deep divide between the past and present.

2. Rhetorical Questions: Ahmad asks rhetorical questions to make readers think critically
about the lack of study on feudalism and its role in violence. He points out that no real
research has been done on how feudalism controls culture, social structures, and society.
This lack of investigation shows how important issues are being ignored in Pakistan,
preventing any real progress in solving these deep-rooted problems over time.

3. Repetition: Ahmad repeats words like "violence," "feudal," and "lawlessness" to stress
his main point effectively. The repetition makes it clear how violence is a constant and
pervasive problem in Pakistan. It helps readers understand how deeply violence is tied to
culture, daily life, and society, and how it affects many areas of life, from families to
government, creating a cycle of fear, oppression, and instability.

4. Metaphors: Ahmad uses words like "whipping boy" and "hegemon" to describe
feudalism’s role in Pakistan. "Whipping boy" shows that feudalism is blamed for violence,
while "hegemon" means it controls cultural values and societal norms. These metaphors
explain that, even though things have changed, feudalism still has a lot of power in
Pakistan, influencing decisions, shaping policies, and holding back progress.

5. Imagery: Ahmad uses strong images, like "tortured and chained" families and "victims in
the thousands," to make readers feel the seriousness of violence in Pakistan. These vivid
pictures help readers understand how bad the situation is and make them realize the need
for urgent action to stop the harm being done to people, evoking strong emotions of
empathy, urgency, and anger at the injustices.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 39
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

6. Allusion: Ahmad makes allusions to historical events like colonialism and Partition to
show why violence continues in Pakistan. He connects the past to present problems,
showing how the effects of colonialism still shape society. These references help readers
understand why certain issues, like violence, are still so common today, as the scars of
history continue to impact current generations.

7. Formal Tone: The article uses a serious, formal tone to show how important the topic is.
This style makes Ahmad’s argument stronger and gives him credibility. It encourages
readers, especially educated ones, to think deeply about the issues of violence, human
rights, and social justice in Pakistan and consider how to make things better, prompting a
sense of responsibility to act for change.

8. Irony: Ahmad points out the irony in how the government does nothing about the
problems of violence and human rights. While people know about the issues like rape and
violence against women, the government still does not take action. This irony shows how
there is a big gap between what is recognized as wrong and what is actually done to fix it,
highlighting the failure of leadership and accountability.

In conclusion, Ahmad’s use of stylistic devices like contrast, repetition, and metaphor
effectively highlights the persistence of feudal culture and its link to violence in Pakistan.
The failure of the state to enforce laws and promote nonviolent values keeps this harmful
culture alive, urging the need for urgent societal change.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 40
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Between Past and Future

Analysis of the Article:
The article by Eqbal Ahmad presents a critical analysis of how history is manipulated and
distorted, particularly in South Asia and the Muslim world, to serve contemporary political
and religious agendas. Below is a breakdown of the key themes and arguments in the text:

1. Relationship with the Past and Future: In the article, Eqbal Ahmad talks about how
people often have a wrong relationship with the past and future. He says that those who
praise the past without understanding it fail to recreate its greatness. On the other hand,
people who look at the past critically can learn lessons from it. These lessons can help them
shape a better future, preserving the good aspects of the past for today.

2. Distorted Views of History in South Asia: Ahmad discusses how political groups in
South Asia change history to fit their needs. For example, Muslims and Hindus glorify
leaders like Aurangzeb and Shivaji, using them to create divisions. These distorted views of
history take focus from real problems, like the decline of statehood and the rise of
European powers. Instead of learning from history, people use it to support arguments.

3. Pakistan’s Ignorance of History: Ahmad criticizes Pakistan for ignoring history,

especially during Zia-ul-Haq’s rule. He says Pakistan’s government has purposely changed
history to serve its agenda. This is seen in the curriculum, where Islamic history is reduced
to rules and rituals, without teaching its deeper meanings. Ahmad points out that students
in Pakistan often don’t know key events and fail to understand them properly.

4. Consequences of Ignoring History: Ahmad argues that ignoring history leads to

problems. Without understanding the past, societies cannot move forward. He believes
that in Pakistan and other countries once colonies, people are kept in the dark about their
history. This lack of understanding prevents progress and creates a gap between what
actually happened in the past and how it’s used today by political groups.

5. Politics and the Distortion of History: Ahmad explains how politics influences how
history is told. Political groups use history to push their beliefs and create a past that suits
their needs. This made-up version of history gives people a false sense of hope and

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 41
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

identity, especially when unhappy with their current situation. Ahmad argues this is a way
to escape reality, where important lessons from history are hidden under political lies.

6. The Decline of the Muslim World: Ahmad discusses how the Muslim world has failed to
address reasons for its decline. Reformers like Syed Ahmed Khan tried to tackle these
issues, but later generations didn’t follow through. Ahmad attributes this stagnation to
politics, where governments and movements hindered intellectual growth, preventing
progress. This neglect of the past has left the region stuck in a cycle of political problems.

7. Learning from History to Avoid Mistakes: He also highlights the importance of

learning from history to avoid repeating past mistakes and failures. Ahmad emphasizes
that history should be studied critically to understand why certain things worked and
others didn’t. This helps societies avoid errors, learn valuable lessons, and build a better
future informed by past successes and failures.

8. The Dangers of Distorted History: Finally, Ahmad warns about the dangers of using
distorted histories for political purposes. He argues that when history is manipulated, it
leads to confusion, division, and conflict. This can prevent societies from uniting and
moving forward. Ahmad calls for an honest, thoughtful approach to history, one that
acknowledges its complexity and helps create a more hopeful and united future.

To pen off we can say that Eqbal Ahmad's "Between Past and Future" serves as a
thought-provoking exploration of the intricate relationship between history and the future.
Ahmad's analytical depth and commitment to justice make this article a compelling read for
those seeking a nuanced understanding of how the past informs our present choices and
shape the potential paths we may take in the future.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 42
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Themes of the Article

In this essay, Eqbal Ahmad delves into the manipulation of history by political and religious
movements, focusing on its impact on societies in South Asia. He explores how distorting
history can shape identities, create divisions, and hinder intellectual growth. Ahmad
stresses the importance of a critical understanding of history for societal progress. Let’s
explore each theme discussed in this article in detail in the coming paragraphs.

1. Ironic Relationship Between Past and Future: A main theme in the article is the ironic
link between the past and future. Societies that have a clear idea of the future look at the
past critically, learning valuable lessons from it. On the other hand, societies unsure about
the future tend to romanticize or twist history, which often leads to failure and
misunderstanding. How we view the future affects how we see the past.

2. Glorification and Distortion of History: A major theme is the glorification and

distortion of history, especially in South Asia. Political and religious groups often rewrite
history to create a sense of identity and separation. Figures like Aurangzeb and Shivaji are
presented as symbols of strength, ignoring their historical context. These distorted
narratives divide people, promoting a sense of pride and victimhood based on myths.

3. Manipulation of History by Political and Religious Movements: The article talks

about how political and religious movements change history to support their beliefs and
agendas. In South Asia, both Hindu and Muslim groups create exaggerated versions of
history, causing division. This twist on history makes conflicts worse by focusing on
mythical stories of the past, ignoring the true events that actually happened over time.

4. Historical Neglect in Pakistan: A key theme is historical neglect in Pakistan. Political

regimes often discourage research and promote distorted versions of history. Important
Islamic events and figures are oversimplified or erased. This results in an education system
lacking a deep, critical understanding of the past, which severely hinders the development
of national identity and intellectual progress in the country.

5. Islamic History and Education: Another major theme is the state of Islamic history and
education in Pakistan. The education system focuses on rituals, not deeper spiritual or
intellectual aspects of Islam. This shallow understanding limits students' exposure to key

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 43
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

historical events and philosophical debates that shaped Islamic thought. The lack of this
knowledge prevents a well-rounded understanding of Islamic history.

6. Impact of Politics on Historical Discourse: A central theme is the influence of politics

on history. Political regimes use history to strengthen their power and suppress opposition.
In Pakistan, Ziaul Haq's regime distorted Islamic history to justify authoritarianism. These
manipulations prevent intellectual growth and create a narrative disconnected from reality,
using the past for political control instead of understanding it.

7. Role of the Past in Shaping Present-Day Identities: The role of the past in shaping
present-day identities is a major theme. When people face dissatisfaction with the present,
they idealize or invent a glorious past to create a sense of hope and identity. This process,
often seen in political or religious movements, allows groups to focus on an imagined past,
using it as a source of strength and inspiration for the future.

8. Education as a Tool for Understanding History: Ahmad stresses the importance of

education in understanding history. A balanced curriculum with diverse perspectives helps
students analyze history critically, resist political influences, and contribute to progress.
Education should encourage critical thinking and open discussions, equipping students
with skills to address challenges and nurturing informed, active citizens.

9. The Dangers of Forgetting History: Ahmad warns that forgetting history leads to
repeated mistakes and societal decline. When societies fail to engage critically with their
past, they miss opportunities to learn, resulting in cycles of failure. This neglect weakens
identity and disconnects people from their roots. Ahmad calls for a conscious effort to
analyze history for a better future.

In conclusion, Eqbal Ahmad emphasizes the need for a critical understanding of history to
prevent manipulation and distortion by political and religious movements. He highlights
how misinterpreting history can harm societal progress and identity. Ahmad urges a
deeper engagement with the past to foster unity, intellectual growth, and a better future.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 44
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Stylistic Devices in the Article

Eqbal Ahmad uses different stylistic devices in "Between the Past and Future" to make his
discussion on history, politics, society, and the chance for real change more powerful.
These devices help him express his views on how history is twisted, how politics control it,
and why we need a more truthful understanding of the past.

1. Irony: The article highlights the ironic relationship between the past and future. Those
who idealize and try to recreate the past often fail, while those who critically study it can
learn valuable lessons. This shows that while the past can offer insights, it must be
understood within its historical context. The contrast highlights how an uncritical view of
history limits progress and hinders the ability to understand present and future challenges.

2. Juxtaposition: Ahmad contrasts how different groups, such as Hindus and Muslims,
view their shared history. He compares the glorification of figures like Aurangzeb and
Shivaji to their actual historical roles, revealing how these interpretations distort reality.
This juxtaposition highlights how selective historical narratives can fuel division and conflict
rather than fostering understanding and unity.

3. Metaphor: Ahmad uses "inverted history" as a metaphor to describe how Pakistan’s

government distorts historical facts to suit political agendas. This manipulation prevents
serious historical inquiry and encourages a biased understanding of the past. The
metaphor serves to illustrate how political leaders use history as a tool to maintain control
and influence public opinion.

4. Pathos: The article appeals to readers' emotions by describing how history is

manipulated for political purposes, causing harm to societal understanding. Ahmad evokes
sympathy for those who are misled by distorted historical narratives, showing the
emotional impact of political exploitation of history. The emotional tone underscores the
urgency of addressing these misrepresentations.

5. Rhetorical Questions: Ahmad uses rhetorical questions to provoke thought and critique
political manipulation of history. For example, he asks how isolated, illegitimate rulers
manipulate history to justify their actions. These questions challenge readers to consider

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 45
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

how power structures use historical narratives to control and influence public opinion,
prompting deeper reflection on the issue.

6. Allusion: Ahmad alludes to significant historical events and figures, like Syed Ahmed
Khan and the Khawarij, to illustrate the ongoing relevance of historical inquiry. These
allusions provide context to his argument that understanding history is crucial for
addressing contemporary challenges. They also highlight the intellectual contributions of
past figures in shaping modern society.

7. Anaphora: Ahmad employs anaphora, repeating the phrase "The past..." at the start of
several sentences, to emphasize its importance in shaping political and social realities. This
repetition creates a rhythmic structure that reinforces the central argument, highlighting
how societies relate to and interpret history in different ways. By repeating the phrase, he
draws attention to the ongoing role the past plays in influencing contemporary issues.

8. Contrast: Ahmad contrasts the critical and uncritical approaches to history, emphasizing
how societies that engage deeply with their past can progress, while those that romanticize
or distort history fall into cycles of ignorance, division, and societal decay. This contrast
underlines the article's central message about the importance of a reflective, thoughtful
approach to history for a more informed and better future.

These devices help create a compelling critique of how history is manipulated for political
ends, particularly in post-colonial societies like Pakistan and India.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 46
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Selected Essays on South Asia

Selected Essays on South Asia (2004) by Eqbal Ahmad, published by Oxford University
Press, is a compilation of his writings on South Asia's political, social, and cultural issues.
Ahmad addresses colonial legacies, global power dynamics, and the region's conflicts,
particularly between India and Pakistan. His essays explore the challenges of identity,
development, and modernization in South Asia. Known for intellectual rigor, Ahmad's work
remains influential in understanding the complexities and history of the region.

Analysis of the Essays:

Eqbal Ahmad, a well-known intellectual, political activist, and scholar, presents a collection
of essays in Selected Essays on South Asia (2004). These essays focus on important issues
in South Asia, like politics, history, identity, and society of the region. Ahmad’s work gives us
a critical look at South Asia’s complex and often troubled political situation.

In his essays, Ahmad talks about the effects of colonialism on South Asia and how these
effects continue to shape the region's politics even after independence. He criticizes the
political systems that were built after countries in the region became independent. He
argues that the new leaders in these countries were often influenced by colonial powers
and sometimes did not solve the problems that were affecting ordinary people.

Ahmad also looks at major historical events, like the partition of India and the rise of
political violence. He believes that the political leaders in South Asia made decisions that
often hurt the common people. Instead of focusing on what was best for everyone, they
often focused on their own power and interests.

One of the key themes in Ahmad’s essays is how South Asia interacts with the rest of the
world, especially with powerful countries. He talks about how the U.S., Soviet Union, India,
Pakistan, and China have all influenced the politics of South Asia. He examines issues like
the Kashmir conflict and nuclear weapons, showing how foreign countries, especially the
U.S., made the situation worse in the region.

Ahmad is particularly critical of how religion has played a big role in politics. He discusses
how the Kashmir issue has become a conflict not just over land, but also over religion. He

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 47
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

points out how political leaders in the region have often used religion to manipulate people
for their own benefit. He also criticizes how foreign countries have played a part in making
the problem more complicated.

Ahmad’s essays also explore the cultural and social problems in South Asia. He talks about
how nationalism (the strong belief in one’s own nation) and religious fundamentalism (strict
religious beliefs that affect politics) have become powerful forces in the region. He also
looks at how globalization (the process of the world becoming more connected) has
impacted the traditional cultures of South Asia.

Ahmad discusses how people in South Asia focus on identity, whether based on religion,
language, or ethnicity. This focus on identity politics has created divisions. Ahmad argues
that this divisiveness is dangerous, and instead of focusing on differences, South Asians
should recognize their shared history and culture. He believes the region should have a
more inclusive approach to identity, accepting each other despite differences.

Ahmad’s writing is clear and intellectually challenging. He has a unique ability to discuss
complex topics in a way that’s easy for readers to understand. His style is engaging, making
his ideas interesting and accessible to a wide audience. Whether academic, policymaker, or
reader, Ahmad’s writing speaks to all. Even though he is critical, he offers solutions and
ways forward, rather than criticizing without hope.

Ahmad’s essays are important for understanding the politics, history, and culture of South
Asia. His critiques of political leaders and foreign involvement offer valuable insights into
the region’s conflicts. At the same time, his calls for a more just, inclusive, and fair South
Asia resonate with those seeking peace, stability, progress, and social equality. Ahmad’s
work reminds us that while South Asia faces many challenges, there is hope for a better,
more prosperous future if the region adopts the right approach.

In conclusion, Selected Essays on South Asia, Eqbal Ahmad, a strong critique of the region’s
politics, history, and culture. His work helps readers understand complex issues and
challenges. By examining political power, foreign intervention, and cultural identity, Ahmad
outlines a path toward a more peaceful, inclusive future for South Asia.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 48
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Themes of the Essays

The major themes in Eqbal Ahmad’s Selected Essays on South Asia revolve around critical
political, historical, and cultural issues affecting South Asia. These themes not only analyze
the region's past and present but also offer insights into potential future paths. Below are
some of the key themes explored in the essays:

1. Colonialism and Its Lasting Impact: A central theme in Ahmad’s essays is the
continuing impact of colonialism on South Asia. He examines how the colonial era shaped
political structures, economies, and societies, and how its legacy still affects the region
today. Ahmad argues that even after independence, many South Asian countries retained
political and economic systems influenced by colonial powers.

2. Post-Colonial Political Systems: Ahmad critiques the political systems that emerged
after South Asian countries gained independence. He argues these systems often ignored
the needs of ordinary people, with leaders more focused on maintaining power than
solving social, economic, and political issues. Ahmad also notes that many post-colonial
governments adopted Western models, disregarding South Asia’s unique context.

3. Role of Foreign Powers: Ahmad examines the involvement of foreign powers, especially
the U.S., in South Asia’s conflicts. He highlights how foreign intervention, particularly during
the Cold War, worsened regional tensions. Ahmad critiques U.S. involvement in Afghanistan
and Pakistan, along with support for authoritarian regimes, arguing that foreign powers
treated South Asia as a pawn, causing instability.

4. Religious and Ethnic Conflict: Ahmad explores how religion and ethnicity have been
used to create divisions in South Asia. He focuses on the Kashmir conflict, which has
become both a religious and territorial dispute. Ahmad warns against the dangers of
religious and ethnic nationalism, which can lead to violence and discrimination. He stresses
the need to avoid manipulating identity for political gain, as it undermines unity.

5. Nationalism and Identity Politics: Ahmad critiques the rise of nationalism and identity
politics in South Asia, particularly in India and Pakistan. He discusses how focusing on
national identity tied to religion or ethnicity has led to conflicts. Ahmad argues that identity

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 49
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

politics often overshadows important social issues like poverty and education. He calls for
an inclusive understanding of South Asian identity, embracing diversity and shared history.

6. Globalization and Cultural Change: Ahmad examines the effects of globalization on

South Asian cultures. While recognizing some benefits, like economic growth, he critiques
the negative impacts, including the erosion of traditional practices and the rise of
consumerism. Ahmad highlights how Western values, influencing everything from culture
to economy, threaten South Asia’s heritage, leading to a loss of identity and traditions.

7. Secularism vs. Religious Fundamentalism: Ahmad contrasts secularism with the rise of
religious fundamentalism in South Asia. He discusses how secular values are challenged by religious
movements gaining power, particularly in India and Pakistan. Ahmad warns that this growing
influence of religion in politics creates tensions and divides society. He stresses the importance of
secularism to maintain harmony and prevent division.

8. Economic Development and Inequality: Ahmad discusses the challenges of economic

development in South Asia, highlighting the region's persistent inequalities. While acknowledging the
economic growth in some areas, he points out that this growth has not benefited all groups equally.
Ahmad critiques the gap between the rich and the poor, urging policies that promote inclusive
economic growth for all communities.

9. Social Justice and Inequality: Throughout his essays, Ahmad emphasizes the need for
social justice in South Asia. He critiques the deep-rooted inequalities in the region,
particularly related to class, caste, gender, and opportunity. Ahmad stresses that political
leaders must address these issues to build a just and equitable society. He highlights the
importance of education and participation in creating change.

10. Peace and Regional Cooperation: Lastly, Ahmad advocates for peace and regional
cooperation in South Asia. He calls for greater collaboration between South Asian
countries, particularly India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh, to resolve conflicts and improve
conditions. Ahmad argues that the region’s problems are interconnected, and lasting peace
can only be achieved if countries work together to address challenges.

These themes highlight Ahmad’s understanding of South Asia’s complexities. His essays
provide valuable insights into the region's struggles and encourage readers to seek
solutions for a peaceful, just, and inclusive future.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 50
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Stylistic Devices Used in the Essays

In his essays, Eqbal Ahmad uses a variety of stylistic devices to enrich his arguments and
engage the reader effectively. These devices help convey complex ideas in a relatable and
thought-provoking manner, allowing readers to connect deeply with the issues discussed.
Through his skilled use of language, Ahmad brings attention to important political, social,
and cultural themes in South Asia. Key stylistic devices used in the essays are:

1. Metaphor: Ahmad uses metaphors to simplify complex ideas. For example, he calls
colonialism a "dark shadow" still hanging over South Asia, symbolizing how the impact of
colonialism still influences political, social, and economic structures, even after the region
gained independence, hindering the growth of local identities and traditions.

2. Repetition: Ahmad repeats key phrases to emphasize his central themes. The phrase
"the urgent need for justice" frequently appears when discussing inequality, reinforcing
how crucial it is to address these systemic issues in South Asia’s political, social, and
economic structures for a fairer, more inclusive society.

3. Irony: Ahmad uses irony to highlight contradictions. He criticizes post-colonial

governments for adopting Western political systems, pointing out the irony that they
continue colonial structures instead of addressing the needs of the local population,
thereby ignoring the region's unique challenges and cultural contexts.

4. Rhetorical Questions: Ahmad uses rhetorical questions to make readers think. When
discussing the Kashmir conflict, he asks, "How long will the people of Kashmir suffer
because of decisions made by foreign powers?" This question forces readers to consider
the ongoing consequences of foreign influence in the region.

5. Allusion: Ahmad references historical events to give context to his arguments. He

alludes to the partition of India and Pakistan, showing how the Kashmir conflict is deeply
tied to religious, territorial, and historical disputes, offering readers a deeper, more
nuanced understanding of the region’s ongoing struggles and divisions.

6. Tone: Ahmad’s tone changes depending on the topic. When addressing religious
fundamentalism, his tone is cautionary, warning readers about the dangers of mixing

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 51
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

religion with politics, which could divide societies, spark violence, and ultimately threaten
harmony and peace in the region’s increasingly multicultural societies.

7. Anaphora: Ahmad uses anaphora to emphasize his arguments. In his critiques of

nationalism, he repeats the phrase "Nationalism divides, nationalism isolates, nationalism
breeds conflict," emphasizing how excessive nationalism can harm society, create divisions,
and overshadow the region's diverse and inclusive cultural heritage.

8. Anecdote: Ahmad uses anecdotes to make political issues more relatable. By sharing
personal stories, such as those of families impacted by war, he humanizes political
struggles, helping readers emotionally connect with the urgency of creating lasting peace
and reducing the devastating effects of conflict.

9. Alliteration: Ahmad uses alliteration to create a rhythmic flow that draws attention to
key ideas. For example, "political power, poverty, and personal pain" emphasizes how
political issues, economic inequality, and social suffering are intertwined, highlighting the
challenges South Asia faces in overcoming these systemic problems.

10. Imagery: Ahmad uses vivid imagery to describe social and political struggles. He paints
a powerful picture of the inequality in South Asia, like "luxurious buildings rising from the
ashes of poverty," making the stark disparity between rich and poor more real, tangible,
and emotionally impactful for the thoughtful reader.

In conclusion, Eqbal Ahmad’s use of stylistic devices enhances the depth and clarity of his
arguments. Metaphors, repetition, irony, and other techniques effectively engage readers,
helping them connect with the complex issues he discusses. These devices reinforce his
messages about justice, peace, and social unity.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 52
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Robert Fisk (1946-2020)

Robert Fisk (1946–2020) was a renowned British journalist and author known for his
extensive reporting on the Middle East. He worked as a foreign correspondent for The
Independent for decades and was recognized for his in-depth coverage of wars, conflicts,
and political developments in the region. Fisk's work often challenged mainstream
narratives, and he was a controversial figure for his outspoken views.

Robert Fisk was one of the few Western journalists to interview Osama bin Laden. He
conducted three interviews with the al-Qaeda leader during the 1990s, which provided rare
insights into bin Laden's ideology and warnings about future attacks. Fisk first met him in
1993 in Sudan and later in 1996 and 1997 in Afghanistan.

Fisk covered major events such as the Lebanese Civil War, the Iranian Revolution, the Gulf
War, the Iraq War, and the Syrian Civil War. His reporting highlighted the complexities of
the region and the human cost of conflict.

He authored several insightful and influential books, including Pity the Nation: Lebanon at
War and The Great War for Civilisation: The Conquest of the Middle East, which remain
highly significant works on Middle Eastern history, conflicts, and politics.

Fisk won numerous prestigious and global awards for his fearless journalism but also faced
significant criticism for his alleged biases and divisive opinions. He was a polarizing yet
respected figure, admired for his unwavering courage and criticized by some for his
controversial approach to sensitive and complex issues.

Fisk's legacy endures as a journalist who was deeply committed to uncovering truths about
the world's most volatile regions, even when it brought him under scrutiny.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 53
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

1. Key Features of Robert Fisk’s journalistic writings:

Robert Fisk, a renowned British journalist, was known for his powerful and in-depth
reporting, particularly from conflict zones. His journalistic writings are characterized by the
following key features:

1. Firsthand Accounts and Eyewitness Reporting: Fisk’s writing was based on his own
experiences. He would often go directly to places affected by war and report from there.
This allowed him to share real stories from people living through these events. His
reporting felt genuine and helped readers understand the true effects of war.

2. In-depth Analysis: Fisk’s work didn’t just tell what happened; he explained why it
happened. He looked at the history, politics, and culture behind conflicts. His reports didn’t
just focus on the surface, but also on the deeper issues that shaped the events. This helped
readers see the bigger picture.

3. Critical of Western Powers: Fisk often pointed out the problems with the actions of
Western countries, especially the US and the UK. He didn’t shy away from criticizing their
role in causing or making wars worse. He believed that these countries often ignored the
suffering of ordinary people in their pursuit of power.

4. Empathy for Ordinary People: Fisk cared deeply about the people affected by war. His
writing focused on their struggles, pain, and survival. Instead of just talking about soldiers
or politicians, he gave voice to the everyday people caught in these difficult situations. His
empathy allowed readers to connect with their experiences.

5. Controversial and Fearless: Fisk was never afraid to speak his mind, even when his
views were controversial. He didn’t follow the usual paths and often questioned what
others were saying. His willingness to go against popular opinions and tell difficult truths
made his work stand out, even if it sometimes upset others.

6. Personal Narrative: Fisk didn’t just report on events from a distance; he shared his own
feelings and thoughts about the situations he witnessed. His personal reflections helped
make his stories more real and emotional. By opening up about his experiences, he
allowed readers to connect with both the events and his own human response.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 54
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

7. Rich Literary Style: Fisk’s writing was not only informative but also beautiful to read. He
used powerful words and images to describe the scenes and emotions he was writing
about. This made his stories feel alive, and readers could easily imagine themselves in the
places he described. His style helped bring the conflicts he covered to life.

8. Independent and Unaligned: Fisk never took sides or followed a specific group. He
wasn’t influenced by politics or media companies. He believed in telling the truth, no matter
what. This made his work trustworthy, as readers knew he was speaking without bias or
outside influence. His independence gave his reporting credibility.

9. Long-form Reporting: Fisk preferred writing long, detailed articles that covered stories
fully. Instead of just giving a quick summary, he took the time to explore all aspects of the
events he reported on. His long articles gave readers a complete understanding of the
issues, which shorter reports didn’t always provide.

10. Focus on Accountability: Fisk believed that those responsible for war crimes and
suffering should be held accountable. His reporting often focused on exposing these
wrongdoings and calling for justice. He didn’t just report events; he demanded that the
people who caused harm be held responsible for their actions.

These features contributed to Fisk's reputation as one of the most respected and influential
journalists of his time.

2. Argumentative Style of Robert Fisk:

Robert Fisk's argumentative style of writing was distinctive and powerful, built on several
key elements that made his work stand out. Here’s a breakdown of the main characteristics
of his argumentative approach:

1. Challenging Authority and Power: Fisk often questioned the actions of powerful
governments, especially from Western countries. He criticized how their involvement in
wars made things worse for people. He argued that these countries ignored the harm they
caused. Fisk wanted readers to rethink and understand the impact of these governments.

2. Focus on Human Impact: Fisk focused on the real-life effects of war on everyday
people. He showed how wars hurt innocent civilians, causing pain and loss. He argued that

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 55
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

political leaders should care more about the suffering of regular people. His writing made
readers think about the human side of conflicts, not just politics.

3. Use of Evidence and Personal Experience: Fisk backed up his arguments with evidence
from his own experiences. He reported directly from places affected by war, using real
stories from the people he met. This made his writing more convincing because readers
could see that his views came from the truth of what he saw and heard.

4. Moral and Ethical Appeals: Fisk often made moral arguments, asking what is right and
fair. He pointed out that while Western countries claimed to support freedom and
democracy, their actions often supported dictators or caused harm. His writing asked
readers to think about whether these actions were just, calling for a change in thinking.

5. Critical of Media Narratives: Fisk was critical of the way the media reported on wars,
especially when influenced by government views. He argued that the media often showed
only one side of the story, leaving out important details. Fisk wanted readers to understand
the full picture and see the complexities of wars.

6. Combining Passion with Objectivity: Fisk’s arguments were based on both strong
emotion and careful facts. He felt deeply for the people suffering in wars, but he made sure
his reporting was based on truth. This mix of passion and facts made his writing powerful,
as readers could trust the information while also feeling the emotional impact.

7. Revealing Hidden Truths: Fisk worked hard to uncover truths that others often kept
hidden. He showed how governments and powerful groups tried to cover up their
wrongdoings, especially in wars. His investigations revealed uncomfortable facts, pushing
readers to face the harsh realities behind the conflicts that were happening in the world.

8. Long-Form Journalism: Fisk was known for writing long, in-depth articles that provided
a complete view of the stories he covered. Instead of just summarizing events, he explored
all angles, offering detailed background information. This approach allowed readers to fully
understand complex issues, giving them a deeper perspective.

Through these elements, Robert Fisk’s argumentative style became a unique blend of sharp
criticism, moral insight, and well-supported facts, all aimed at challenging the status quo
and shedding light on global injustices.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 56
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

The Jargon Disease

Analysis of the Article:
In this article, Robert Fisk explores how modern language, especially in business, academia,
and politics, has become filled with jargon and euphemisms. He critiques how certain
words and phrases have lost their original meaning, instead being used to sound more
impressive or avoid confronting uncomfortable truths. Through humor and irony, Fisk
points out the absurdity of this kind of language and its negative impact on clear
communication. This discourse analysis will break down the key points in Fisk’s article,
highlighting how he uses language to criticize the overuse of complicated and vague terms.

Fisk starts by talking about an invitation to give a lecture at a university. The topic of the
lecture seemed unclear, so he turned it down. This shows that he dislikes language that
sounds confusing and doesn’t really mean anything. Fisk’s tone is critical and a bit funny,
helping to show his frustration with language that looks smart but isn’t clear.

Fisk criticizes the use of the word "excellence" in business. He believes the term has lost its
real meaning and is now used to sound important. He thinks people use phrases like
"Quality and Excellence" to seem impressive, but they don’t stand for anything. Fisk points
out how these words are used to make things look better, especially in business.

Fisk talks about how companies use words like "outsourcing" and "downsizing" to make
bad actions sound better. For example, firing people is called "downsizing," and giving work
to someone else is called "outsourcing." He says these words hide the truth and make
tough decisions seem easier to accept. Fisk is criticizing how companies use language to
avoid dealing with the real consequences of their actions.

Fisk then makes fun of the word "workshop," which used to mean a place to work with your
hands but now is used for boring meetings. He criticizes terms like "cultural sensitivity" and
"core issues," which make things sound complicated but don’t really explain anything. This
shows how academic language can make simple ideas harder to understand, and Fisk uses
humor to highlight how these words are used just to sound important.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 57
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Fisk jokes about the term "social animators," used to describe refugees helping in a crisis.
He thinks this term takes away from the real work these people are doing and makes it
sound less serious. Fisk is showing how certain words are used to hide the truth about
difficult situations, making them seem less important or real.

Fisk also criticizes phrases like "environmental externalities" and "seeking closure," which
he feels don’t explain anything clearly. These words are used to avoid answering tough
questions or facing the truth. Fisk thinks these words hide from reality, and he uses
examples to show how people use complicated language to avoid responsibility.

Fisk points out that some phrases, like "tipping point" and "big picture," are overused and
don’t mean much. He also jokes about confusing words like "bonding" with "bondage,"
showing how language can get confusing and lose meaning. Fisk says people use these
trendy words to sound smart, but they don’t explain anything.

Fisk talks about how language is changing to avoid offending people, like saying "Happy
Holiday" instead of "Merry Christmas." He thinks this makes language feel fake and less
honest. In his opinion, these changes in language are making communication less real and
more about avoiding offense, rather than saying what people actually mean.

Fisk ends by saying that words are losing their real meaning. He mentions the famous line
from Hamlet, "Words, words, words," to show that language is no longer used to express
real ideas. He believes that people are using words just to sound good, but they are losing
their true power to communicate. Fisk’s final point is that language is becoming less
meaningful because it’s used to avoid the truth rather than to express it.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 58
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Themes of the Article

Language is key to communication, but it can sometimes make things more confusing. In
his article, Robert Fisk explains how words like jargon, buzzwords, and unclear phrases
often complicate understanding. He believes this kind of language can create distance,
avoid important issues, and reinforce power imbalances. Fisk points out how these
patterns stop meaningful conversations and lead to confusion or manipulation. Now, let’s
look at each theme discussed in the article.

1. Criticism of Jargon: One central theme of the article is the criticism of complex
language. The author argues that jargon, like “Quality and Excellence,” often clouds the
message rather than clarifying it, causing a disconnect between the speaker and the
audience. By using complicated terms, the real message becomes unclear, making it harder
for people to understand and engage with what is being communicated.

2. Jargon as Escape: Another theme the author explores is how jargon serves as a way to
escape reality. Terms like "closure" and "healing" are used to avoid confronting deeper
issues. This allows people to avoid responsibility or difficult conversations, thus avoiding
accountability for their actions. Such language becomes a shield, preventing people from
engaging in honest reflection or taking responsibility for their mistakes.

3. Lack of Clarity and Precision: A recurring theme in the article is the lack of clarity and
precision in modern language. The author points out that terms like "social animators"
serve to confuse rather than inform. This makes it difficult for people to engage with the
information being presented and often leads to misunderstanding. Vague terms weaken
the message, leaving the audience unsure about the true meaning or intent.

4. Power Dynamics: The author discusses how language reinforces power dynamics.
Phrases like "key player" or "impact" inflate one’s importance, keeping others in a lower
position. Such language shifts focus from the work to the status of those involved, creating
an unbalanced power structure. This manipulation of language maintains control, with
emphasis on titles and influence rather than actions or contributions.

5. Corporate and Bureaucratic Language: One major focus is the way corporate and
bureaucratic language hides the true nature of actions. The use of words like "downsizing"

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 59
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

(firing employees) or "outsourcing" (hiring others for labor) hides the negative effects of
such decisions. This allows companies and governments to avoid facing the consequences
of their actions and minimize public backlash.

6. Use of Language for Self-Importance: A recurring theme is how language is sometimes

used to boost personal importance. Terms like "key speaker" are used to elevate one’s
status without real substance behind it. It becomes less about meaningful contributions
and more about building a personal image, distracting from genuine expertise. This tactic
shifts the focus from real achievements to the individual’s inflated self-perception.

7. Language as a Way to Control: Another key theme is how language is used to maintain
control. The author suggests that complex terms are often used in politics or business to
hide the truth, keeping those in power from being held accountable. This creates an
environment where people are more easily manipulated and less likely to question the
status quo, further strengthening power imbalances and manipulation.

8. Loss of Meaning and Purpose: Finally, the author highlights a significant theme – the
loss of meaning and purpose in modern language. Overuse of vague or fashionable terms
weakens the real message and leads to confusion. The result is a breakdown in effective
communication, where words no longer convey their intended meanings and may even
mislead the listener, leaving them unsure about the message's true intent.

To sum up, Robert Fisk shows how language, when used poorly, can make things harder to
understand, avoid accountability, and give more power to some people. Using vague terms
and jargon weakens communication and stops meaningful conversations. If we focus on
using clear and simple language, we can make sure that our words bring people together
instead of causing confusion.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 60
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Stylistic Devices in the Article

The article employs various rhetorical and stylistic devices to convey its critique of
contemporary language use, particularly the jargon and euphemisms prevalent in
corporate, political, and humanitarian discourse. Some key devices include:

1. Irony: The article uses irony to point out how ridiculous some phrases are, like calling
refugees “social animators” or the weather “environmental externalities.” These terms
sound complex, but they are used to make simple ideas seem more complicated,
highlighting the disconnect between language and meaning in modern communication. It
reflects the absurdity of using complicated language for simple concepts.

2. Hyperbole: The writer uses hyperbole to exaggerate how meaningless words like "key
players" and "workshops" are. These overstatements make it clear that the language used
is inflated to create a false sense of importance. This exaggeration emphasizes the way
certain phrases are used excessively to make things sound more significant than they really
are, amplifying the criticism of modern jargon.

3. Metaphor: A metaphor is used when the writer calls fancy language a “disease.” This
metaphor shows that this language spreads and harms communication. It suggests that
the use of overly complicated words is a negative trend, affecting clear thinking and
understanding by making ordinary ideas seem more difficult or pretentious than they really
are. It demonstrates how this “disease” stifles effective communication.

4. Juxtaposition: The writer uses juxtaposition to compare terms like "downsizing" (firing
employees) and "outsourcing" (hiring someone else). By showing how these words hide
their true meaning, the writer makes it clear that the language used in business and politics
often masks the truth. This contrast exposes the way these words distort reality, drawing
attention to the manipulation of language.

5. Allusion: A reference to Hamlet is used to emphasize that modern language is just

"words, words, words" with no real meaning behind them. This allusion to Shakespeare
shows how language can sometimes be empty and meaningless, just like the meaningless
buzzwords often used in modern business and political discussions that confuse instead of
clarifying. It highlights how words often fail to communicate effectively.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 61
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

6. Anecdote: Personal stories are shared to make the criticism of fancy language more
relatable. The writer shares real-life experiences to show how confusing and unnecessary
these words can be. These anecdotes help readers see the real-world effects of using
language that hides the truth, making the article's message more engaging and tangible.
This also emphasizes how everyday people face the confusion caused by such jargon.

7. Repetition: The writer uses repetition to highlight overused phrases like “seeking
closure” or “moving on.” By repeating these terms, the writer emphasizes how they have
lost their meaning. This repetition shows how language becomes watered down and
meaningless when it is used too often, helping readers see how overused terms create a
lack of clarity. The repetitive use underscores the lack of genuine communication.

8. Satire: The entire article is a satire making fun of the overuse of fancy language. The
writer mocks how people use words to sound important, even when the words don’t add
real value. This satirical tone helps readers understand how language can be misused to
make simple ideas sound complicated and unnecessarily sophisticated. It ridicules the
absurdity of modern corporate and political language.

9. Parody: The article acts as a parody of the exaggerated use of corporate and political
jargon. By mimicking the absurd phrases used by professionals, the writer highlights how
these words have become empty and meaningless. The parody adds humor to the critique,
making the absurdity of such language more apparent and relatable for the reader. This
lighthearted imitation makes the criticism more impactful.

10. Imagery: The writer uses imagery to paint a picture of how overcomplicated language
clouds simple ideas. Descriptions like "downsize" and "outsourcing" are used to create a
visual contrast between what these terms suggest and what they actually mean. This helps
readers grasp how words are twisted to sound more sophisticated than they are. It allows
readers to visually imagine the distortions created by such language.

These rhetorical and stylistic devices work together to create a sharp, humorous critique of
modern language practices, calling attention to the manipulation and misrepresentation of
language in contemporary society.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 62
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

The Ship that Stands Upright at the

Bottom of the Sea
Analysis Of the Essay:
Robert Fisk's essay "The Ship that Stands Upright at the Bottom of the Sea" is a powerful
and emotional reflection on the damage caused by war, especially focusing on the 1982
Lebanon War. Fisk uses strong images, criticizes political leaders who cause war, and looks
deeply at the human cost of fighting. Through these elements, he gives readers a clearer
understanding of the horrible effects of war.

One of the most powerful parts of Fisk's essay is how he uses symbols and metaphors. The
"ship that stands upright at the bottom of the sea" is not just about a ship, but it represents
the lasting damage that war leaves behind. Just as a ship can remain stuck at the bottom of
the sea, unreachable and hidden, the effects of war remain even after the fighting ends.
Fisk shows how the destruction caused by war whether in the land, in people’s minds, or in
their hearts doesn’t go away. It’s still there, even if it’s hard to see.

The metaphor of the ship also brings up the idea of stillness. The ship standing upright in
the sea is stuck, and the stillness represents the way the aftermath of war is often ignored.
Even though the war may be over, the damage continues to affect people, and this can be
hard for society to deal with. Fisk uses the image to remind us that the real consequences
of war aren’t always visible, but they are always there.

Fisk is known for criticizing the political systems and leaders who cause wars, and in this
essay, he does exactly that. He uses the image of the ship to show how pointless and
terrible war is, making readers think about the selfish reasons political leaders go to war.
He questions why certain governments, especially in the West and the Middle East, push
for war when it only causes pain and destruction for ordinary people.

Fisk criticizes how powerful countries often intervene in the Middle East, making the
situation worse for their own interests. He points out that the leaders of these countries
rarely care about the suffering of the people who are caught in the middle of the violence.
By using the metaphor of the ship, Fisk shows how political leaders might talk about war in

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 63
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

terms of winning or gaining power, but they ignore the human lives lost or damaged. This is
a key part of his argument that wars are not fought for noble reasons, but for selfish gains,
and the true cost of war is never truly calculated.

At its heart, Fisk’s essay is about the suffering that war brings to people. Fisk doesn’t just
tell us the facts about the Lebanon War; he takes us into the emotional pain of those who
lived through it. He describes how war changes people’s lives forever, causing loss,
sadness, and trauma. The feelings of survivors and their lives are central to the essay.

Through this focus on human suffering, Fisk challenges the way wars are often talked
about in politics or the media. When wars are discussed, the human cost is often forgotten
or ignored. Instead, we hear about political reasons, military strategies, and territorial
gains. But Fisk reminds us that the real price of war is not measured in land or power, it's
measured in people’s lives, relationships broken, and long-lasting scars survivors carry.

Fisk’s essay invites readers to think deeply about how war affects individuals, families, and
communities. The trauma that war leaves doesn’t easily go away, and it can be passed
down from generation to generation. By focusing on this emotional impact, Fisk forces us
to see the war not just as a political event, but as a tragedy that touches everyone involved.

Fisk also brings out the strange and confusing nature of war, showing how lives are
destroyed for reasons that often make no sense at all. The image of the ship that "stands
upright at the bottom of the sea" is puzzling and unclear, which fits with the idea that war is
often nonsensical and hard to understand. The ship is stuck, standing in a place where it
can’t be reached or fixed. This symbolizes how the damage caused by war can feel
impossible to repair or even fully understand.

This idea of war being absurd connects to the philosophy of absurdism, which argues that
life and suffering often lack meaning or clear reason. Fisk’s essay shows that war is
sometimes pointlessly fought for unclear goals or without real understanding. The people
who suffer in wars, like those affected by the ship in the metaphor, may never fully
understand why it happened or how it could have been avoided. This confusion and
helplessness are key to understanding the essay's deeper message.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 64
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Fisk’s writing style is emotional and uses vivid descriptions to make readers feel the weight
of war. He goes beyond just telling about the war, allowing us to experience it emotionally.
His writing emphasizes the human cost of war, encouraging deep reflection on its
emotional impact, rather than just political aspects.

The structure of the essay is not traditional; it doesn't follow a simple order. Instead, it
jumps between different ideas and emotions, just like how the experience of war is not
clear or straightforward. This structure helps convey the chaos and confusion that comes
with war. It shows that, like the ship at the bottom, war leaves people feeling trapped, lost,
and unable to move forward. Fisk’s style and structure make the essay thought-provoking.

In conclusion, Robert Fisk's "The Ship that Stands Upright at the Bottom of the Sea" uses
powerful imagery, critiques of political leaders, and a focus on human suffering to explore
war’s consequences. The metaphor of the ship symbolizes war’s hidden but lasting effects.
Fisk challenges readers to recognize the human cost of war, urging reflection on its true
cost and a call for more compassion and understanding in the world.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 65
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Themes of the Essay

The essay "Ships That Stand Upright at the Bottom of the Sea" by Robert Fisk is a reflective
piece exploring themes related to war, human suffering, and the complex consequences of
conflict. Below are some of the key themes:

1. The Lasting Impact of War: Fisk’s essay talks about how the effects of war last after it is
over. He uses the image of a "ship that stands upright at the bottom of the sea" to show
that even though the fighting stops, the damage continues. The emotional and physical
pain stays with people for years. The people who survived the war carry these scars,
affecting their lives for a long time.

2. Human Suffering and Loss: Fisk explains the deep suffering that war brings to people.
War causes people to lose their loved ones, homes, and hopes for the future. The pain and
sadness people feel do not go away after the war ends. Although leaders might talk about
war as a way to solve problems, they often forget about the emotional hurt that ordinary
people face. This pain stays with people for a long time.

3. Critique of Political Leaders and Power Structures: Fisk talks about how political
leaders and powerful people often cause wars for their own benefit. He points out that
these leaders do not think about the pain and loss their decisions cause. While politicians
focus on goals, it is the everyday people who suffer. Fisk believes leaders should be held
responsible for causing harm and destroying innocent lives by pushing countries into war.

4. The Destruction of Identity and Culture: Fisk talks about how war destroys people's
sense of who they are. When war happens, communities lose traditions, buildings, and
sense of identity. War not only breaks things but also changes how people feel about their
culture. After the war, people must try to rebuild their identity while dealing with emotional
damage. The loss of culture and traditions is one of the worst things caused by war.

5. Hope and the Possibility of Recovery: Even though war causes harm, Fisk gives hope.
He uses the image of the ship stuck at the bottom of the sea to show that recovery is
possible, even after things seem lost. Though the damage from war is deep, people can
heal and rebuild with time and effort. By understanding the past and the pain caused by
war, it is possible to start fresh, rebuild communities, and make a better future.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 66
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

6. The Illusion of War as a Solution: Fisk challenges the idea that war is a solution to
problems. By referring to the ship stuck at the bottom of the sea, he shows that people
often believe war will solve conflicts, but it doesn’t. Instead of fixing issues, war creates
more problems and leads to lasting destruction. War causes suffering and does not solve
political, social, or economic problems. Fisk believes war makes things worse.

7. The Cycle of Revenge and Retaliation: Fisk talks about how war leads to a
never-ending cycle of revenge and retaliation. One side fights back for things that
happened in the past, causing more violence. This cycle of revenge keeps going, making the
conflict last longer and causing more suffering. Each time one side takes revenge, it
deepens the hatred, making it harder for peace. This cycle prevents resolution.

8. The Destructive Nature of Nationalism: Fisk explains the dangers of nationalism in

causing wars. Nationalism is when people are so proud of their country that they are willing
to fight for it. This leads to an “us vs. them” attitude, where people believe their country is
better than others. Fisk warns that extreme nationalism makes people ignore the human
cost of war. It leads to division, hatred, and stops people from working toward peace.

9. The Impact of War on Future Generations: Fisk talks about how war affects not just
the people who live through it but also the generations that come after. Children born
during or after a war are influenced by the pain their parents went through. They grow up
with the emotional scars from the war, carrying the fear, sadness, and hardship of the past.
War doesn’t just affect the survivors; it hurts those who grow up in a world shaped by war.

10. The Role of Media in War: Fisk talks about how the media can change how we see war.
He says that the media often makes war look simple or even heroic, leaving out the true
pain and destruction. When the media only shows one side of the story, it can trick people
into thinking war is the answer. By controlling the story, the media can influence how
people think and feel about war, helping keep wars going.

Through these profound themes, Fisk invites readers to reflect on the immense human
cost of war, the moral complexity of international intervention, and the lasting impact of
violence on individuals, communities, and societies.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 67
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Stylistic Devices used in the Essay

In "The Ship that Stands Upright at the Bottom of the Sea," Robert Fisk uses rhetorical and
stylistic devices to strengthen his argument and engage the reader. These techniques
enhance the emotional impact of his message and encourage readers to reflect on the
long-term consequences of war. Some key devices include:

1. Metaphor: Fisk uses the metaphor of a "ship that stands upright at the bottom of the
sea" to show how war’s effects last long after the fighting ends: the sunken ship represents
how war may seem to solve problems, but it leaves behind lasting harm, sadness, and
destruction. This metaphor highlights how war causes suffering for everyone involved.

2. Imagery: Fisk uses strong imagery to describe the consequences of war: he paints
pictures of the destruction of homes, lives, and communities. His words help the reader
visualize the damage caused by conflict, making the emotional pain of war more real and
powerful. This imagery helps people understand the lasting harm war does to societies.

3. Irony: Fisk’s essay uses irony to criticize the common belief that war can bring peace: he
shows that war, instead of solving problems, often causes even more harm, suffering, and
damage. The irony is in how people believe violence can solve issues, but war only makes
things worse, showing that violence is not a real solution.

4. Juxtaposition: Fisk compares the idealized belief that war can bring peace with the
harsh reality of its aftermath: by putting these ideas together, he highlights the difference
between how war is often shown and the true destruction it causes. This comparison helps
us understand that war does not provide real solutions, only harm and loss.

5. Repetition: Fisk repeats certain phrases like “the ship that stands upright” and “the
bottom of the sea” to emphasize that war’s effects last long after the fighting ends: this
repetition makes the reader understand that the damage caused by war doesn’t disappear
quickly and affects people for years. The repeated words underline the lasting harm of war.

6. Allusion: Fisk refers to past wars, especially in the Middle East, to make his argument
stronger and clearer: these references help readers connect the essay’s ideas to real

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 68
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

events, making the message more urgent and relatable. By mentioning actual conflicts, Fisk
makes the dangers and consequences of war feel more real and important for the reader.

7. Pathos: Fisk appeals to the reader’s emotions by describing the terrible pain of people
affected by war, especially innocent civilians: his powerful words make readers feel the hurt
of those suffering in conflict. This emotional connection encourages the reader to think
about the morality of war and the real cost it has on people’s lives and well-being.

8. Rhetorical Questions: Fisk uses rhetorical questions to make readers think deeply
about their beliefs on war: by asking questions like “What is the purpose of war?” he makes
readers think about the problems and contradictions of fighting. These questions help the
reader reflect on the true consequences of war and whether it solves anything.

9. Anaphora: Fisk uses anaphora, where he repeats phrases like “war does not,” to stress
his points about the failure of war: the repetition creates a rhythm that draws attention to
the negative effects of war. By saying the same thing multiple times, he makes it clear that
war never solves problems but only leads to more pain and destruction.

10. Hyperbole: Fisk uses hyperbole, or exaggeration, to show how massive and destructive
war is: by describing the effects of war as extreme and widespread, he helps readers
understand how much damage war really causes. This exaggeration makes the reader feel
the urgency and seriousness of the situation, helping them grasp the full impact of conflict.

These stylistic and rhetorical devices help Fisk convey the destructive nature of war, its
long-lasting effects, and the false hope that it offers as a solution. By skillfully employing
these techniques, Fisk deepens the reader's understanding of the complexities and
tragedies of war, making his message both compelling and thought-provoking.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 69
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

The Age of the Warrior: Selected

Writings
The Age of the Warrior: Selected Writings (published by Forth Estate, 2008) is a collection of
essays by journalist Robert Fisk. Fisk, known for his extensive reporting from the Middle
East, presents writings that explore the complexities and conflicts in the region, shedding
light on the impacts of war, politics, and historical narratives. His work often delves into the
human cost of these conflicts, offering a poignant, first-hand perspective. This book
provides insight into Fisk's career and his understanding of global political dynamics,
particularly in the context of the Middle East.

Analysis of the Book:

The Age of the Warrior: Selected Writings by Robert Fisk is a powerful collection of his
writings that explores the complicated and often painful history of the Middle East. Fisk, a
journalist with decades of experience reporting from war zones, gives readers a detailed
and personal view of the region's conflicts. Here's an analysis of the book in simpler
language:

A main theme in the book is the effect of war on regular people. Fisk focuses on civilians
caught in conflicts. While politicians and armies make decisions from afar, it's the ordinary
people who suffer most. Fisk tells their stories in a way that makes readers feel the
emotional and physical pain these people experience. His writing shows the damage war
causes, not just to buildings, but to people's lives.

Fisk talks about the role of the media in shaping how people think about war. He believes
that the news shows a simplified or biased version of events, one that supports
government actions. This means the real pain and suffering that people face is often
ignored. Fisk writes against this type of reporting and aims to show what’s happening on
the ground. He believes journalists should tell the truth about the horrors of war, rather
than repeating stories told by politicians.

Fisk is critical of how Western countries, especially the United States and the United
Kingdom, get involved in the Middle East. He looks at wars like the Iraq War and the impact

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 70
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

of earlier conflicts, arguing that these countries often make things worse rather than
better. In his opinion, Western governments disguise their true motives like gaining power
or control under the idea of helping people or bringing democracy. He doesn’t accept these
interventions are for good reasons and points out the harm they cause.

An important idea in Fisk’s work is understanding history to make sense of present-day

conflicts. He explains that many problems in the Middle East are the result of past events,
such as colonialism and decisions made by foreign powers. To understand tensions today,
it’s crucial to know the history behind them. Fisk shows that the past is always present in
people’s minds, and mistakes of the past continue to affect how things unfold in the future.

Fisk reflects on what it means to be a journalist. He knows that as a reporter, he has a

responsibility not just to tell the news, but to do so truthfully and help people understand
what’s going on. He struggles with whether journalism can change anything in a world
where power and violence control everything. But he remains committed to telling the
stories of those who suffer, even if it’s hard to see how it will matter.

Fisk’s writing style is unique. He doesn’t just report facts; he tells stories that draw readers
into the experience of being there. He describes people and places in a way that makes
them feel real, and his deep understanding of the region shows in every article. His goal is
not just to inform but to make readers feel what people in the Middle East are going
through. He uses storytelling to show the human side of politics and war, making his work
both a record of history and a call to action.

The Age of the Warrior is more than just a collection of articles; it’s a powerful commentary
on the Middle East, war, and the role of the West in these conflicts. Fisk’s writing challenges
the way we think about these issues. He gives a voice to the people most affected by war
and power struggles, showing that behind every conflict are real human stories. His work
encourages readers to question the official stories they hear and to understand the deeper
causes of violence in the Middle East.

This book is essential for anyone who wants to better understand the Middle East and the
global issues that influence it. Fisk’s honest and empathetic approach offers a window into
the lives of those who are too often ignored in discussions about war and politics. It’s a
thought-provoking read that invites us to think critically about the world around us.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 71
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Themes of the Book

The Age of the Warrior: Selected Writings by Robert Fisk is a collection of the renowned
journalist’s writings, focusing on his coverage of war and conflict in the Middle East. Key
themes explored in this book include:

1. The Human Cost of War: Fisk’s writings emphasize the devastating impact of war on
individuals and societies. He details the harrowing experiences of civilians caught in
conflict, offering personal accounts and reflections on the toll war takes on human life and
dignity. His work sheds light on the often overlooked suffering of ordinary people who bear
the brunt of political and military decisions, often at great cost.

2. Political and Military Corruption: Throughout the book, Fisk criticizes the actions of
both Western powers and Middle Eastern governments, highlighting how political and
military leaders often exploit conflicts for their own gain, contributing to prolonged violence
and suffering. He underscores the way such corruption perpetuates cycles of violence,
often at the expense of the very populations they claim to protect.

3. The Role of Journalism in War: As a journalist who witnessed and reported from the
frontlines, Fisk reflects on the role of the media in shaping public perception of war and the
responsibility of reporters to tell the truth, even when it is uncomfortable. He examines the
challenges faced by journalists in maintaining objectivity and integrity in conflict zones,
often risking their own safety to report the reality of war.

4. The Middle East Conflict: A central theme is the complex and ongoing conflicts in the
Middle East, particularly the Lebanese Civil War, the Iraq War, and the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict. Fisk’s writings provide a critical perspective on these conflicts, challenging
mainstream narratives and offering insights into their historical and political contexts. He
stresses the need to understand the region’s history to grasp the roots of its struggles.

5. Ideological and Religious Conflict: Fisk explores how ideological and religious divides
play a central role in fueling conflicts in the Middle East. He touches upon the sectarian
tensions between Sunni and Shia Muslims, the rise of radical groups, and the influence of
religion in shaping political identities and wars. He also examines how these divides are
often manipulated by political leaders to further their own agendas.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 72
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

6. Western Interventionism: A critical theme in Fisk’s work is the role of Western powers,
particularly the United States and Britain, in intervening in Middle Eastern conflicts. He
critiques foreign policies that worsen instability, pointing to the disastrous consequences of
military interventions like the Iraq War and Afghanistan invasion. Fisk questions the
motives, focusing on economic and geopolitical interests.

7. The Failure of Diplomacy: Fisk often expresses skepticism toward diplomatic efforts
aimed at resolving conflicts in the Middle East, particularly those brokered by Western
powers. He argues that these peace efforts often fail to address the root causes of the
violence and are frequently undermined by biased interests, political agendas, or the lack
of genuine commitment to lasting peace.

8. The Impact of War on Identity: Another theme that runs through Fisk’s work is the way
war alters and shapes personal and collective identities. Whether it’s the identity of nations,
communities, or individuals, Fisk explores how conflict forces people to reevaluate their
beliefs, allegiances, and understandings of the world. This theme is closely tied to the idea
of memory and the way in which societies remember and interpret the events of war.

9. The Tragedy of the 'Other': Throughout the book, Fisk reflects on the concept of "the
other" the way people from different cultures, especially in the Middle East, are often
dehumanized and reduced to stereotypes in Western media. He challenges this view by
humanizing the people affected by war, providing them with voices and stories that
contradict the one-dimensional portrayals often seen in the media.

10. The Resilience of the Human Spirit: Amid the pain and destruction, Fisk also focuses
on the strength and resilience of people who face the struggles of war. He tells stories of
regular people who manage to survive, rebuild, and stay hopeful even when everything
seems against them. This theme shows the lasting ability of humans to survive, care for
each other, and stick together, even in the hardest times.

The collection of essays and articles in The Age of the Warrior paints a stark and often
painful picture of the effects of war and the political machinations behind it, urging readers
to consider the human consequences of conflict.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 73
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Stylistic Devices used in the Book

In The Age of the Warrior: Selected Writings by Robert Fisk, several stylistic and rhetorical
devices are used to convey his views on politics, war, and human rights. Fisk’s writing often
combines powerful imagery and sharp critique to highlight the human cost of conflict. Here
are some prominent devices:

1. Vivid Imagery: Fisk paints a clear picture of the harsh realities of war. For example,
when he describes Beirut during the Lebanese Civil War, he writes about “streets full of
broken buildings, the loud sound of bombs, the thick smoke filling the air, and the cries of
frightened people,” making it easy for the reader to imagine the scene.

2. Irony: Fisk uses irony to show how Western governments say one thing but do the
opposite. For instance, he talks about how the West criticizes Syria’s human rights but
supports other countries that treat their people badly, like Egypt. This highlights how often
the actions of powerful countries don’t match their words.

3. Anecdotes: Fisk shares personal stories to make the reader understand the human side
of war. One story is about a family in Iraq whose house was destroyed by an airstrike. The
family’s grief and the destruction they face highlight the emotional toll of the conflict. This
personal account helps readers feel the pain and loss caused by war, making it more real.

4. Juxtaposition: Fisk often compares the lives of politicians and regular people to show
the big gap between them. For example, he contrasts the comfortable lives of diplomats in
Baghdad with the struggles of ordinary Iraqis who live in fear of bombings. This comparison
helps the reader see the unfairness and suffering caused by political decisions.

5. Repetition: Fisk highlights the unfairness of Western foreign policies by repeatedly

emphasizing how these countries often ignore the devastating impact on innocent people.
He ensures that readers fully understand the hypocrisy in the West’s approach, where
political and economic interests are prioritized over human lives and rights.

6. Rhetorical Questions: Fisk uses questions that don’t expect answers to make the reader
think critically. For example, he asks, “How many innocent lives are worth the cost of a war

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 74
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

that brings so much suffering?” This question challenges the reader to think about whether
the reasons for going to war are truly justified or worth the human toll it takes.

7. Metaphor: Fisk compares war to a "beast" that destroys everything in its way. He talks
about how Afghanistan is “eaten up by war,” emphasizing its relentless nature. This makes
war sound like a powerful, unstoppable force that consumes everything, showing how it
ruins everything it touches, leaving nothing untouched.

8. Allusion: Fisk refers to past events to explain what’s happening today. For example, he
talks about the Sykes-Picot Agreement, which was made by Western countries during
colonial times. By mentioning this, he helps readers understand why the Middle East has so
many problems today, as these past decisions shaped the region’s future.

9. Satire: Fisk uses humor and exaggeration to criticize political leaders. He mocks the idea
of bringing “freedom” to Iraq, showing how instead of peace, the war caused more harm.
By highlighting the gap between the promised outcomes and the tragic reality, this satirical
tone helps show the foolishness of the reasons given for going to war.

10. Climactic Structure: Fisk builds his stories to create strong emotional moments. For
example, when he talks about the aftermath of a bombing, he first describes the
destruction and then reveals the faces of the people who are hurt or killed. This builds up
to a powerful final image that shows the true cost of war.

These rhetorical devices help Fisk convey his message with emotional depth and
intellectual rigor, making his critique of war and politics both compelling and
thought-provoking. Through his use of vivid imagery, irony, and personal anecdotes, he
draws readers into the harsh realities he describes.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 75
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

William Dalrymple (1965 - Present)

William Dalrymple is a renowned historian, author, and journalist known for his works on
the history and culture of South Asia, the Middle East, and the Islamic world. His writing
style combines thorough historical research with engaging storytelling.

Though born in Scotland, Dalrymple has lived in India for many years. His close connection
to the country informs his writing and gives him a unique perspective on its history and
culture. Dalrymple's works often highlight underexplored aspects of Indian history,
emphasizing the complexities of colonial rule and the syncretic nature of Indian society.

Dalrymple is the author of several acclaimed books, including City of Djinns, White
Mughals, The Last Mughal, and Return of a King. These books explore colonial history,
Mughal India, and interactions between the East and West.

His works often delve deeply into the cultural, religious, and historical complexities of the
diverse regions he studies, focusing on intriguing topics like the decline of powerful
empires, colonial encounters, and fascinating cross-cultural relationships.

Dalrymple has deservedly won numerous prestigious awards for his acclaimed books, such
as the Duff Cooper Prize and the esteemed Hemingway Prize. He is also notably a
co-founder of the world-famous Jaipur Literature Festival, one of the largest and most
celebrated literary festivals in the entire world.

William Dalrymple's legacy is his skill in bringing history to life with engaging stories.
Through his books and the Jaipur Literature Festival, he has helped people understand
Indian history and culture better, inspiring readers around the world.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 76
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Lahore: Blood on the Tracks

Analysis of the Article:
The article Lahore: Blood on Track by William Dalrymple offers a deep reflection on the
traumatic aftermath of the Partition of India in 1947, focusing on the personal and shared
horrors experienced during that time. Through the first-hand accounts of Abdul Majeed
and Khawaja Bilal, Dalrymple paints a clear picture of the chaos, violence, and
displacement that marked the Partition.

Dalrymple begins by introducing Abdul Majeed, an elderly man whose life was forever
changed by Partition. His story is emotional, recalling the loss of both parents and the
separation from his brother during the migration. His account reminds readers of the
harshness of the Partition and the personal pain it caused families. These personal stories
help readers understand the emotional and human cost of historical events.

The article then shifts to the view of Khawaja Bilal, a station master who witnessed the
horrors at Lahore Station during the chaos of Partition. Bilal’s descriptions of the violence,
killing, and mass deaths on the platforms give a frightening look at how the Partition
turned everyday places like train stations into sites of unimaginable suffering. The station,
once a symbol of connection, becomes a symbol of the brutal division caused by Partition.

The article also emphasizes the role of the railways in enabling the largest migration in
human history. The irony is pointed out that the railways, once a unifying force for India,
became a tool of division during the Partition. Dalrymple reflects on how the transportation
system, which had once connected people, became a means of mass displacement,
contributing to widespread violence and dislocation.

The language used in the article, with words like "slaughter," "carnage," "corpses," and
"dying screams," shapes the reader's understanding of the violence that took place. The
writing is not neutral but carries emotional weight, reflecting the brutal and dehumanizing
nature of the Partition. The strong descriptions of death and destruction create a feeling of
victimhood and suffering, which affects how readers view the historical event.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 77
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Dalrymple points out that the horrors of Partition are not just memories from the past but
are still felt today, affecting relations between India and Pakistan. The article shows how
the legacy of the Partition continues to harm the relationship between the two countries,
with unresolved wounds from the past still affecting present-day issues.

The discourse in Lahore: Blood on Track frames the Partition as a deeply traumatic event
through the use of personal narratives and vivid descriptions. By focusing on individual
stories, Dalrymple shifts the focus from a purely historical event to a human tragedy,
highlighting the lasting emotional toll.

Dalrymple’s vivid imagery and emotional storytelling create a strong sense of urgency,
making the suffering from Partition feel real. This approach bridges past and present,
suggesting the horrors still haunt India and Pakistan’s collective memory. By focusing on
personal stories, he invites readers to confront the human consequences, emphasizing
that the trauma of Partition is not just a chapter but a persistent legacy shaping relations.

The article also subtly critiques the colonial legacy by highlighting the role of the
British-built railway system in both uniting and dividing India. The Latin motto "tam bello
quam pace" ("better peace than war") on the silver shovel marking the foundation of the
railway station contrasts sharply with the violence that followed. This adds to the idea that
colonial systems, which were meant to unite, also played a role in causing division.

The article concludes by reflecting on the lasting effect of Partition on the old rail line from
Lahore to Delhi, which once represented unity and connection but now stands mostly
unused. This serves as a symbol of the division and the long-lasting separation caused by
the Partition between the two nations.

In conclusion, Lahore: Blood on Track is a powerful reflection on the human cost of

Partition, showing both the immediate horrors of the event and the long-lasting effects on
the relationship between India and Pakistan. Through moving personal stories and
historical context, Dalrymple highlights the deep and lasting trauma caused by this division.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 78
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Themes of the Article

The article reflects on the traumatic aftermath of the Partition of India in 1947, when the
country was divided into India and Pakistan. This division led to mass violence,
displacement, and the loss of identity for millions. Through the personal accounts of Abdul
Majeed and Khawaja Bilal, the narrative highlights the deep scars left by Partition that
continue to affect both nations today. The major themes of this article include:

1. The Horrors of Partition: One of the major themes of the article is the extreme violence
and suffering caused by the Partition of India in 1947. People were violently separated from
their families and homes, experiencing loss and trauma. The mass violence left deep scars
that have haunted both India and Pakistan for decades, continuing to shape the
relationship between the two nations.

2. Human Suffering and Loss: A significant theme in the article is the deep human
suffering during Partition, illustrated through the stories of Abdul Majeed and Khawaja
Bilal. Abdul lost both parents on the same day, while Khawaja witnessed endless violence at
Lahore Station. Families were torn apart, and people had to endure unimaginable pain and
loss. These personal stories highlight the widespread grief caused by the division.

3. The Role of Railways in Partition: A critical theme of the article is the role of railways in
Partition. Once a symbol of connection, the railways became a vehicle for migration during
Partition. Trains facilitated the movement of millions, but they also became sites of violence
and fear. Many people died on these trains, and they became instruments of separation.
The mass migration made the widespread violence and division even more severe.

4. Ongoing Effects of Partition: The impact of Partition continues to affect relations

between India and Pakistan. The violence and division left scars that have not healed. Over
fifty years later, the memories of Partition still influence political and social interactions.
Tensions between the two countries persist, with old wounds continuously reopened by
political decisions and ideological conflicts.

5. Mass Immigration: A major theme in the article is the largest migration in history
caused by Partition, with millions moving across newly created borders. Trains, often
overcrowded and dangerous, facilitated this mass movement. Many people died during the

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 79
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

migration, and families were separated. The fear, violence, and trauma experienced during
this mass immigration continue to affect and shape lives today.

6. Violence: Violence during Partition was brutal and widespread, with killings, rapes, and
destruction affecting both soldiers and civilians. Abdul Majeed and Khawaja Bilal recall
horrific scenes, such as bodies on trains and constant death. This violence left deep scars
on the collective memory of both nations and continues to impact the relationship between
India and Pakistan today.

7. Identity and Displacement: A significant theme is the displacement and loss of identity
during Partition. People, like Abdul Majeed, were forced to leave their homes, culture, and
families behind. This disruption created a deep sense of loss and changed their identity.
The forced migration of millions during Partition had psychological impacts, leaving a
generation grappling with the absence of their true sense of belonging.

8. Religious and Ethnic Tensions: Partition intensified religious and ethnic tensions
between Hindus and Muslims. The divide between the two communities led to violent
clashes, massacres, and a deepening mistrust. The violence that erupted during Partition
heightened the animosity and set the stage for future conflicts. These divisions continue to
affect the relationship between India and Pakistan even today.

9. The Failure of Leadership and Political Decisions: The leadership during Partition
failed to effectively manage the mass migration and violence. Political decisions made
without proper planning left millions unprotected. Leaders failed to anticipate the chaos
that would follow the Partition, resulting in the suffering of innocent people. These poor
decisions contributed to the pain and division that still affect India and Pakistan.

In conclusion, the article emphasizes the lasting pain caused by the 1947 Partition of India.
It highlights the violence, displacement, and loss experienced by millions, illustrated
through personal stories like those of Abdul Majeed and Khawaja Bilal. Themes of mass
migration, religious tensions, and poor political decisions continue to impact the
relationship between India and Pakistan, shaping their present.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 80
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Stylistic Devices in the Article

This article contains several stylistic and rhetorical devices that enhance its emotional
impact and convey the horrors of Partition. Here are some of the key devices:

1. Imagery: The vivid descriptions, like "hundreds of corpses scattered in the river bed...
being eaten by crows, dogs, and kites," create powerful images that immerse the reader in
the reality of Partition. These images stir strong emotions, letting the reader feel the horror
and despair of the violence and deaths. The gruesome scene leaves an unforgettable
impression of the devastation and inhumanity.

2. Rhetorical Questions: The writer’s rhetorical question, "So you lost both your parents
on the same day?" highlights Abdul Majeed’s unimaginable loss. It encourages the reader to
reflect on the cruelty of Partition, urging them to consider the reality of such an experience
and deepening their emotional connection to his suffering. This question forces the reader
to confront the extreme nature of his personal tragedy.

3. Metaphor: The phrase "Pakistan's birth pangs had also been India's Holocaust" is a
powerful metaphor that compares the violent creation of Pakistan to a genocide. This
comparison emphasizes the suffering of both nations, portraying Partition as a historical
trauma similar to one of the most devastating events in human history, thus highlighting
the pain it caused and its far-reaching effects.

4. Allusion: The mention of the silver shovel used by Lord John Lawrence in 1859, with its
Latin motto "tam bello quam pace" ("better peace than war"), alludes to the peaceful
intentions behind the railway project. The irony lies in how these same railways, originally
built to unite India, were later used to divide it, resulting in violence, suffering, and massive
loss of life, ultimately highlighting the unintended consequences of good intentions.

5. Irony: The phrase "better peace than war" carries an ironic twist. The railways, meant to
promote peace and unity in India, ended up playing a major role in the violent division
during Partition. This irony highlights how something meant to bring people together
became a tool for mass displacement, bloodshed, and horrific violence. In this way, the
railways, once symbols of connection, turned into instruments of division and tragedy.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 81
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

6. Hyperbole: The statement "The biggest migration in human history" is an exaggeration

meant to emphasize the huge scale of displacement during Partition. This hyperbole shows
how unprecedented and overwhelming the migration was, stressing the extent of the
disruption caused by the mass movement of people across borders and its profound
impact on both countries and their societies.

7. Contrast: The sharp contrast between the peaceful, orderly life before Partition and the
chaos and violence that followed highlights the devastating impact of the event. The
once-beautiful Lahore Station, a symbol of peace, is now remembered for mass violence,
death, and human suffering, showing the drastic changes in the lives of millions because of
Partition and its aftermath, leaving scars that still endure today.

8. Pathos: The article appeals to the reader’s emotions, especially through Abdul Majeed’s
story of losing his parents and witnessing death. His tale of suffering, walking through
scenes of cholera, loss, violence, and destruction, creates sympathy and makes the reader
emotionally connect with the human tragedy. Pathos is used to make the events feel more
personal, drawing empathy from the reader and evoking deeper emotional responses.

In conclusion, the article uses various rhetorical devices like imagery, irony, and pathos to
convey the horrors of Partition. These techniques deepen the emotional impact,
highlighting the immense suffering of individuals and the lasting consequences of the
event. The writer engages the reader’s emotions, creating a lasting impression of the
tragedy and its far-reaching effects on both nations.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 82
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

1. Key Features of William Dalrymple ’s journalistic

writings:
William Dalrymple is a British historian, writer, and journalist known for his deep and
nuanced explorations of South Asian history and culture. His journalistic writings are
characterized by several distinct features:

1. Historical and Cultural Depth: William Dalrymple's writing is based on deep research
about South Asia’s history. He blends historical facts with cultural insights to explain how
past events shape current issues. His work helps readers connect the dots between history
and the present, offering a rich understanding of the region's complexity.

2. Exploration of Cultural and Religious Diversity: Dalrymple explores South Asia’s

cultural and religious diversity. He writes about religions, including Hinduism, Islam, and
Sikhism, and their roles in shaping the region. By discussing how these religions interact, he
helps readers appreciate the complexity and challenges of living in such a society.

3. First-Hand Experiences and Travel Writing: Dalrymple’s travels in South Asia shape
much of his work. He writes about what he directly sees and experiences, which brings
authenticity to his stories. His travel writing helps readers visualize the places he visits and
understand the cultures he encounters, making his stories feel real and immersive.

4. Empathy and Humanism: Dalrymple’s writing emphasizes empathy for the people he
writes about. He highlights personal stories, focusing on ordinary people’s struggles and
resilience. This approach makes topics more relatable, allowing readers to connect
emotionally with the subjects of his articles and better understand their circumstances.

5. Focus on Colonial and Post-Colonial Themes: Dalrymple often addresses the lasting
effects of British colonial rule in South Asia. He explores how colonialism still influences
politics, culture, and society today. His work encourages readers to think about the impact
of imperialism, showing how history continues to shape South Asian nations.

6. Narrative-Driven Journalism: Dalrymple’s writing uses storytelling to bring history to

life. By blending personal experiences with historical facts, he creates engaging narratives
that are both informative and captivating, helping readers connect emotionally and
understand history through relatable, meaningful stories.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 83
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

7. Political Commentary and Analysis: Dalrymple provides insightful commentary on

political issues in South Asia. He writes about nationalism, religious tensions, and regional
conflicts, often connecting them to historical events. His analysis helps readers understand
how past events influence challenges, offering a deeper understanding of the landscape.

8. Focus on Preservation of Heritage: Dalrymple is passionate about preserving South

Asia’s cultural heritage. He often writes about threats to historical sites and monuments,
urging people to protect them. His work highlights the importance of safeguarding cultural
treasures, raising awareness about the need to respect and conserve the region’s history.

9. Critique of Western Perspectives: Dalrymple challenges Western views of South Asia,

highlighting when they are oversimplified or misunderstood. He provides a balanced
perspective, urging readers to rethink stereotypes and assumptions, offering a more
complex and nuanced understanding of the region’s realities.

10. Elegance and Clarity in Writing: Dalrymple’s writing is clear, accessible, and elegant.
Even when discussing complex historical and political topics, he keeps his language simple
and engaging. His straightforward style allows readers from all backgrounds to enjoy and
learn from his work, making his articles appealing to a wide range of audiences.

Dalrymple’s journalistic work offers a unique blend of historical exploration, personal

reflection, and political analysis. His ability to bring the past and present together through
vivid narratives and insightful commentary makes his writings a significant contribution to
contemporary journalism, history, and cultural understanding.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 84
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

The Age of Kali

Summary of the Book:
The Age of Kali is a collection of essays and travelogues in which William Dalrymple
explores the cultural, political, and social complexities of South Asia. The title refers to Kali
Yuga, the Hindu concept of a dark age marked by decay, serving as a thematic backdrop.
Dalrymple traverses India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka, documenting the grandeur and chaos of
the region. The essays explore themes of violence, corruption, tradition, modernity, and
decline, offering a mix of historical insight and contemporary observation..

Synopsis by Chapters:

1. The Age of Kali: (Patna, 1998)

This chapter talks about caste violence in Bihar, focusing on the 1992 massacre of
upper-caste people in Barra by lower castes. It also discusses the controversial arrest of
Anand Mohan Singh and his unique way of doing politics. Laloo Prasad Yadav’s leadership,
political maneuvering, and the rise of violence in Patna are also thoroughly explained.

2. In the Kingdom of Avadh: (Lucknow, 1998)

Dalrymple writes about the decline of Lucknow’s rich culture, especially its once-thriving
traditions of poetry, music, and courtly manners. He talks about the significant role of
Tawaifs (courtesans) in preserving this cultural heritage. Interviews with poets like Mushtaq
Naqvi show how this heritage is gradually disappearing due to modern influences.

3. The City of Widows: (Vrindavan, Uttar Pradesh, 1997)

This chapter shows the difficult lives of widows in Vrindavan, who go there after their
husbands die. Dalrymple talks about how systems meant to help these women are corrupt.
He describes how they are often exploited and ignored by society. The women’s suffering is
compounded by a lack of support and ingrained societal disregard for their well-being.

4. Warrior Queen: (Gwalior, 1993)

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 85
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

The focus is on Vijayaraje Scindia, a powerful political leader and co-founder of the
Bharatiya Janata Party. The chapter also discusses the history of Gwalior’s Jai Vilas Palace
and its cultural significance. It looks at the Babri Mosque controversy and growing tensions
between communities, highlighting the increasing polarization in Indian society.

5. East of Eton: (Lucknow, 1997)

This chapter tells the story of a teacher’s murder at Lucknow’s La Martiniere College in
1997, showing the colonial influence on education. It also looks at how politics affects
students, especially in violent unions at the University of Lucknow. Dalrymple explores how
political tensions infiltrate institutions, leading to student activism and violence.

6. The Sad Tale of Bhanwari Devi: (Jaipur, 1994)

The story is about Bhanwari Devi, a courageous social worker who was gang-raped because
she tried to stop child marriages. The chapter shows the failure of the justice system and
the indifference of politicians. Dalrymple includes views of people who doubted her story,
highlighting the deep societal divide and the systemic disregard for women's rights.

7. Caste Wars: (Jodhpur, Rajasthan, 1990)

Dalrymple discusses caste politics through the story of Rajiv Goswami, a student who
burned himself to protest reservation policies. The chapter explains how caste divisions
affect people and cause conflict. It highlights the tension, violence, and divisions linked to
these issues, shedding light on the struggles of marginalized communities.

8. Sati Mata: (Jaipur, 1997)

This chapter talks about Roop Kanwar, an 18-year-old woman who burned herself on her
husband’s funeral pyre in 1987. Dalrymple explores how some communities still support
this ancient practice. He interviews villagers and shares the history of sati in India,
reflecting on its cultural and religious roots that continue to influence attitudes.

9. Two Bombay Portraits: (Mumbai, 1992-1993)

The first part talks about Indian pop culture, focusing on rapper Baba Sehgal and the
significant changes in the music industry. The second part discusses how Mumbai’s media

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 86
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

and high society often focus on sexual themes, reflecting on their influence in shaping
societal norms. Dalrymple also interviews author Shobhaa De about her bold writing style.

10. Bangalore and the Fast-Food Invaders: (Bangalore, 1997)

This chapter shows how globalization is rapidly changing Bangalore, starting with protests
by farmers against Kentucky Fried Chicken due to its foreign presence and influence. It
discusses the cultural shifts within the city’s elite, the growing impact of foreign trade, and
the ongoing controversy surrounding Miss World 1996 in Bangalore.

11. At the Court of the Fish-eyed Goddess: (Madurai, 1998)

Dalrymple visits the Meenakshi Temple and writes about the worship of the fish-eyed
goddess, Minakshi. He explains how education and faith mix among the elite of the area,
highlighting the blend of tradition and modernity. Ancient stories like Silappatikaram are
linked with. The chapter explores the cultural significance of the temple in the region.

12. Under the Char Minar: (Hyderabad, 1998)

The author interviews Mir Moazam Husain, whose family served in the Nizam’s government
for generations. The chapter looks at Hyderabad’s rich history, including Operation Polo,
which merged it with India. Dalrymple also discusses local black magic practices and
contrasts the city’s past glory with its present.

13. Parashakti: (Cochin, 1993)

This chapter is about the worship of the goddess Parashakti in Kerala. It follows Venugopal,
a retired engineer, as he explains the beliefs behind the rituals. The rituals are deeply
rooted in local culture and are central to the community's spiritual life. Dalrymple visits the
Chottanikkara temple and learns about the local traditions and faith.

14. At Donna Georgina's: (Goa, 1993)

Dalrymple explores the history of Portuguese rule in Goa through the story of Donna
Georgina, an elderly aristocrat. She recalls the old world charm that Goa once held. The
chapter also talks about the 1961 Indian annexation of Goa and the arrival of hippie
tourists. It reflects on the cultural changes happening in Goa.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 87
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

15. Up the Tiger Path: (Jaffna, Sri Lanka, 1990)

This chapter is about the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), focusing on their military
structure. Dalrymple talks to female and young soldiers in training camps. He also writes
about India’s involvement and the withdrawal of its peacekeeping forces. The chapter
highlights the region's enduring conflict.

16. The Sorcerer’s Grave: (Réunion, 1998)

The chapter is set in Réunion, where Indian and French cultures mix. Dalrymple writes
about local legends, including the story of Olivier Levasseur’s grave, believed to have
mystical powers. The chapter explores the island’s unique spiritual and cultural history. It
also touches on the lingering effects of colonialism.

17. Imran Khan - Out for a Duck: (Lahore, 1989 & 1996)

Dalrymple meets Imran Khan during two phases of his life: first as a cricket star and later as
a new politician. The chapter discusses his journey from sports to politics. It also gives
insights into the early days of his political party, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf. The personal and
political transformations are explored in depth.

18. On the Frontier: (Peshawar, 1989)

This chapter looks at the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa region, focusing on its arms trade and
opium economy. Dalrymple writes about Alexander the Great’s connection to the area. He
also interviews locals involved in the Afghan war’s supply chain. The impact of global
politics on the region is also examined.

19. Blood on the Tracks: (Lahore, 1997)

This chapter reflects on the Partition of India, focusing on the trauma and violence during
mass migrations. Dalrymple interviews a retired railway employee who shares his
experiences of that time. The chapter shows how deeply Partition affected people’s lives. It
uncovers personal stories of loss and survival.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 88
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

20. Benazir Bhutto - Mills & Boon in Karachi: (Karachi, 1994)

Dalrymple interviews Benazir Bhutto and her mother, Nusrat Bhutto, giving a glimpse of
their personal and political lives. He writes about their influence in Pakistan. The title refers
to Benazir’s love for Mills & Boon romance novels, showing a lighter side to her personality.
It also highlights the tension between personal life and political duty.

To pen off we may say that, The Age of Kali by William Dalrymple is a collection of essays
exploring South Asia’s complex culture, politics, and society. Through 20 chapters,
Dalrymple looks at important topics like caste violence, gender inequality, and the effects
of globalization. Dalrymple also looks at historical events, political figures like Imran Khan
and Benazir Bhutto, and the challenges facing countries like India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka.
It reflects on the region’s issues through personal stories and historical insights.

Analysis of the Book:

The Age of Kali by William Dalrymple explores the challenges and changes in South Asia.
Dalrymple writes about his travels to India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka, highlighting the
struggles, beauty, and confusion in these countries. The book's title refers to Kali Yuga in
Hinduism, a time of darkness and problems. This concept helps explain the book's themes,
where Dalrymple discusses how society faces many difficulties, from violence to corruption.

Throughout the book, one key theme is the decline of society. Dalrymple highlights caste
violence in Bihar, where caste groups clash, revealing divisions. He also describes the harsh
lives of widows in Vrindavan, abandoned by their families after their husbands' deaths,
facing suffering and neglect. Dalrymple emphasizes that issues like violence and injustice
have persisted for a long time and remain unresolved, urging they need to be addressed.

Dalrymple also talks about cultural changes happening in South Asia. In cities like Lucknow,
Bangalore, and Goa, he looks at how old traditions are being replaced by new influences.
For example, in Lucknow, there was once a strong culture of poetry and music, but this is
fading away because of modern changes. Similarly, in Bangalore, he discusses how the city
is changing due to globalization, with foreign companies and fast food becoming.

At the same time, Dalrymple also writes about the persistence of old practices, such as the
custom of sati (where a widow would burn herself on her husband's funeral pyre) and black

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 89
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

magic. These ancient traditions show how some parts of society are slower to change, even
when the rest of the world is moving forward.

The book also provides a look at the political side of South Asia. Dalrymple writes about
political figures like Benazir Bhutto, the former Prime Minister of Pakistan. He interviews
her and her mother, giving readers a glimpse into their personal and political lives. He
shows how Bhutto struggled to balance her life with her duties as a politician.

Dalrymple also talks about Imran Khan, who was once a cricket star and later became a
politician. By looking at their lives, Dalrymple gives us insight into the challenges of
leadership in South Asia, where politics is often complicated and full of tension.

Dalrymple focuses on the human side of serious issues like violence, politics, and
corruption. For example, he discusses Bhanwari Devi, a woman attacked for trying to stop
child marriages, showing how the justice system failed her. He also highlights the women in
Vrindavan, who face hardship yet survive. These personal stories remind us that behind
larger issues, real people are affected by them.

In The Age of Kali, Dalrymple explores South Asia's social and political issues through
personal stories, focusing on caste violence, gender inequality, and corruption. He
highlights overlooked struggles, like the lives of widows in Vrindavan and caste tensions in
Bihar. His storytelling challenges perceptions, illustrating the clash between traditional
values and modern changes. Dalrymple's narrative encourages readers to rethink the
region's challenges and evolving dynamics of power and culture.

Overall, The Age of Kali is an important book for anyone who wants to understand South
Asia. Dalrymple does a great job of mixing history, culture, and politics to give a full picture
of the region. His writing is both thoughtful and emotional, showing the struggles people
face, but also their strength and resilience. Through his travels, Dalrymple helps readers
see the problems of South Asia in a way that is both honest and empathetic.

The book is a valuable resource for anyone interested in learning more about this part of
the world, and it provides a deep look at a region full of complexity and change.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 90
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Themes of the Book

The themes of The Age of Kali are complex, reflecting the harsh realities of South Asia in
the late 20th century. Dalrymple’s exploration offers a view of the region’s social, political,
and cultural dynamics. Through vivid storytelling and keen observations, he provides
insight into South Asia's challenges. Here are primary themes explored in the book:

1. Impact of Violence and Political Corruption: Dalrymple explores how violence and
corruption intertwine in South Asian societies, where political failures often lead to
widespread instability. He critiques the role of caste, religion, and politics in fueling
violence, emphasizing the deep scars left on vulnerable communities, highlighting the
urgent need for reform and the pursuit of justice and lasting stability.

2. Tension Between Tradition and Modernity: Dalrymple delves into the conflict between
traditional customs and the pressures of modernity. The book showcases how globalization
challenges centuries-old practices, with technology and Western ideals often clashing with
cultural heritage. It explores how communities struggle to preserve tradition while adapting
to changing global influences, highlighting cultural transformation.

3. Social Injustice and Marginalization: Social injustice and marginalization are central
themes, focusing on caste and gender discrimination. Dalrymple highlights the struggles of
marginalized communities, such as widows in Vrindavan, to reveal the deep-rooted social
inequalities. He calls for systemic change, emphasizing the need for social reforms to uplift
these communities and promote greater equality and justice.

4. Colonial Legacy and Its Impact: Dalrymple examines the lasting effects of British
colonialism on South Asia, particularly in shaping modern political and social systems. The
colonial legacy of division along religious and ethnic lines continues to influence
contemporary issues. Dalrymple urges reflection on the long-term consequences of
colonialism and its role in ongoing conflicts in the region.

5. Religious and Cultural Identity: Religion deeply shapes individual and community
identity in South Asia. Dalrymple explores how religious affiliations drive social divisions,
with Hindu-Muslim tensions being a recurring theme. The book examines how religion

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 91
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

intertwines with cultural identity, shaping national politics and personal lives, raising
questions about the role of religion in modern South Asian society.

6. Regional Conflicts and Their Consequences: The book focuses on the ongoing regional
conflicts, such as the India-Pakistan rivalry and the Sri Lankan civil war. These conflicts,
driven by ethnic, political, and religious factors, have caused immense human suffering.
Dalrymple emphasizes the need for understanding these struggles to promote peace,
highlighting the consequences for everyday lives.

7. Economic Pressures of Globalization: Dalrymple addresses the economic challenges

posed by globalization in South Asia, where multinational companies and Western
consumer culture reshape local economies. While some benefit from growth, the book
highlights growing inequality and the displacement of traditional industries. Dalrymple
raises concerns about balancing progress with cultural preservation and economic equity.

8. Historical Legacy and Its Relevance: The importance of understanding history is

central to Dalrymple’s narrative. He reflects on key events like the Partition of India,
demonstrating how historical trauma continues to shape current issues. By understanding
history’s impact, Dalrymple urges readers to reflect on how past struggles influence
present-day conflicts and the pursuit of reconciliation.

9. Gender and Social Structures: Dalrymple explores the challenges women face within
patriarchal South Asian societies. Through stories of resilience, he highlights how
gender-based barriers restrict freedom and opportunity. The book calls for social change,
urging an end to systemic gender inequalities. Dalrymple advocates for creating more
inclusive spaces for women to thrive and succeed.

10. The Quest for Personal and Cultural Identity: Dalrymple touches on the personal
and cultural identity journey in South Asia. He examines how individuals balance traditional
values with modern influences, particularly in a globalized world. The book highlights the
struggles people face while maintaining cultural identity amidst change, illustrating the
ongoing search for self-definition and belonging in society.

In conclusion, The Age of Kali provides insightful reflections on South Asia’s complexities,
highlighting tensions between tradition and modernity, urging contemplation of its future.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 92
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Stylistic Devices Used in the Book

In The Age of Kali, William Dalrymple skillfully uses a variety of stylistic and rhetorical
devices to make his narrative more engaging, insightful, and impactful. These devices help
readers connect with the diverse cultural, political, and social themes he explores
throughout South Asia. Some of the prominent devices include:

1. Vivid Imagery: William Dalrymple uses strong and clear descriptions to help readers
vividly imagine the places and people he encounters in South Asia. His detailed descriptions
of the sights, sounds, and smells in each location make the reader feel as though they are
right there, truly experiencing the atmosphere. This use of vivid imagery brings the region’s
culture and history vividly to life.

2. Anecdotes: Throughout the book, Dalrymple shares personal stories he gathers from
the people he meets during his travels. These anecdotes provide real-life examples of how
people are personally affected by political and social issues. By sharing these stories,
Dalrymple makes the complicated issues in South Asia feel more personal and relatable,
thus helping the reader understand them better.

3. Contrast: Dalrymple often compares the rich history and culture of South Asia with the
struggles and difficulties that many people face today. By showing this striking difference,
he highlights how ancient traditions are slowly disappearing or being replaced by new,
modern ideas. This contrast helps the reader think more deeply about the challenges
South Asia faces in today’s rapidly changing world.

4. Irony: Irony is a technique Dalrymple often uses to show the contradictions within
society. He describes situations where what people say or do doesn’t match what actually
happens, creating a sense of surprise. For example, he highlights how some social or
political actions have unexpected and ironic results. By using irony, Dalrymple encourages
readers to think about the deeper meanings behind these situations and their implications.

5. First-Person Perspective: The book is written in the first person, meaning Dalrymple
shares his own thoughts, feelings, and experiences as he travels through South Asia. This
makes the book more personal and engaging for the reader. By showing his own reactions

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 93
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

to what he sees and hears, Dalrymple creates a connection with the reader, making the
journey through the region feel more real and immediate.

6. Historical Allusions: Dalrymple often refers to past events or historical figures to

explain the current state of South Asia. By connecting history to the present, he gives
readers a better understanding of how past events shape the issues the region faces today.
These references help explain why certain problems still exist and provide important
cultural and political background information to the reader.

7. Symbolism: One of the key symbols in Dalrymple’s book is the concept of Kali Yuga,
which comes from Hindu beliefs. Kali Yuga is a time of darkness, destruction, and decay in
the world. Dalrymple uses this symbol to explain the struggles and challenges he sees in
South Asia, comparing the region’s social and political issues to the problems described in
this dark age. It adds a deeper, more profound meaning to his observations and analysis.

8. Narrative Structure: The book is made up of different essays that each explore a
different topic related to South Asia’s complexities. This structure helps Dalrymple focus on
a variety of issues, from politics to culture, allowing the reader to see the many sides of the
region. Although each essay is separate, together they create a bigger, more
comprehensive picture of South Asia’s deep complexities and challenges.

These stylistic and rhetorical devices work together to create a rich and engaging story that
helps readers connect with both the personal and political issues in South Asia's culture
and society. By using these techniques, Dalrymple encourages readers to think carefully
about the region's challenges and the bigger picture of human life.

Q. What is the significance of the Age of Kali in Modern

Era?
The concept of Kali Yuga often referred to as the "Age of Kali" originates from Hindu
cosmology and is considered the fourth and final age in a cycle of four ages (Yugas). Kali
Yuga is characterized by a decline in morality, virtue, and social order, where ignorance,
corruption, and destruction predominate. The term "Kali" refers to the demon of strife and
discord, and Kali Yuga represents an era marked by spiritual decay and ethical degradation.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 94
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

The significance of Kali Yuga in the modern era or contemporary times is multilayered,
reflecting both a historical-cultural understanding and the social-political conditions that
shape today’s world. This ancient concept can be viewed through several lenses.

In the modern world, we can see a growing lack of moral values. Many people are
becoming more focused on personal wealth and success, often at the expense of honesty
and fairness. Corruption is widespread in politics and business, and ethics are ignored.
Families, which once played an important role in teaching values, are facing challenges.
This shift shows how Kali Yuga’s age of moral decline is reflected in today’s society.

Today, many cultural traditions and spiritual practices are being forgotten. With the rise of
technology and globalization, younger generations are focusing more on material wealth
and success rather than spiritual growth and connection. People are drifting away from
practices that once helped maintain cultural bonds. This loss of spiritual connection and
heritage mirrors Kali Yuga, where societies move away from tradition and moral values.

In today’s world, we see a lot of political, social, and religious conflict. People seem more
divided, with strong disagreements over beliefs, politics, and social issues. This division is
made worse by social media, where people often live in echo chambers that reinforce
views. These divides lead to unrest and tensions, which are part of the chaos predicted in
Kali Yuga. The focus on differences instead of unity brings more conflict.

While technology allows us to communicate easily, it has also led to a lack of real human
connection. Many people spend so much time on their phones or computers that they lose
meaningful face-to-face interactions. This creates feelings of loneliness and disconnection,
even though we are more "connected" than ever before. In Kali Yuga, the loss of deep
personal connections is seen as a sign of the world’s decline, and modern technology
contributes to this by pushing people further apart emotionally.

One of the most important issues today is the destruction of the environment. The world
faces challenges like climate change, pollution, and loss of wildlife. Human activities, such
as cutting down trees and wasting resources, are harming the planet. This destruction is

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 95
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

similar to the decline and decay described in Kali Yuga. If we don’t act now to protect the
environment, we could face worse damage in the future, and the earth may not recover.

Today, there are many struggles in society related to politics and social issues.
Governments often seem more interested in helping the rich and powerful, while the poor
and vulnerable suffer. People protest against unfair systems, but the change is slow. Kali
Yuga’s predictions of social imbalance and exploitation are reflected in today’s world. This
inequality creates division and makes life difficult for many, showing the need for social
and political change to make the world more just and equal for all.

Even though Kali Yuga suggests a time of chaos and destruction, there is hope for change.
People are working to solve problems like climate change, inequality, and injustice. Activists
are speaking out for environmental protection, equality, and social justice. These efforts
give hope that, despite the challenges of Kali Yuga, humanity can still work together to
make the world better. Change is possible when people act with purpose.

In conclusion, Kali Yuga represents the challenges of moral decline, environmental damage,
and social unrest in today's world. Despite these difficulties, there is hope for change.
Through collective action and a commitment to restoring balance, humanity can overcome
these challenges and create a more ethical, just, and connected society.

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 96
 Journalistic Discourse ENG-304 (BS English 5th Semester)

Exploring journalistic Discourse

Thank you for taking the time to read through my notes on journalistic discourse. I
sincerely hope that you found them to be informative and beneficial.

Compiling these notes involved significant effort and research, as understanding the
nuances of journalistic discourse and its impact required careful consideration. I made
sure to gather information from various sources like Google, AI, YouTube, and other
credible platforms to present the material as clearly and understandably as possible.

As I continue to learn and grow, your prayers, encouragement, and support mean the
world to me, so kindly keep me in your prayers 🤲🏻. I truly value your feedback and
suggestions to improve these notes further. If you need any help or clarification, feel
free to reach out. I’m always here to assist you in any way I can.

I wish you all the best in your studies and endeavors in the field of journalistic
discourse.

Best wishes 🤗
Junaid Ali Raza

Name: Junaid Ali Raza

Contact: 03245937493
Government Graduate College Zafarwal 97