Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

Scribd
Upload
12 views5 pages

3 Dscannernotes

The document provides an overview of various 3D scanners tested in May 2015, highlighting their features, accuracy, and usability. The Creaform Handyscan700 is the most expensive but requires targets, while the Creaform GoScan50 is noted as the best tested for its ease of use and accuracy without targets. Other models like the Artec Eva and Faro Freestyle have specific limitations in processing speed and accuracy, making them less favorable for certain applications.

Uploaded by

Abhinand Rajeev S
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
12 views5 pages

3 Dscannernotes

The document provides an overview of various 3D scanners tested in May 2015, highlighting their features, accuracy, and usability. The Creaform Handyscan700 is the most expensive but requires targets, while the Creaform GoScan50 is noted as the best tested for its ease of use and accuracy without targets. Other models like the Artec Eva and Faro Freestyle have specific limitations in processing speed and accuracy, making them less favorable for certain applications.

Uploaded by

Abhinand Rajeev S
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Scanner notes

May 2015

Creaform Handyscan700
Most expensive of all scanners presented here.
Seems to be targeted at close accurate features of smaller objects.
Requires targets.

Modified by Geomatic software

Result in SolidWorks
Creaform goscan50 (Best tested)

Capable of accurate scans, includes a calibration plate and does not need targets.
Easy to use, better software feel than others.
Object range 300mm to 3m. Creates point cloud and meshes, solid models possible with additional software.
Requires no alignment or post-processing steps.
Feels more solid than the Artec.

Result in SolidWorks
Artec Eva (Second choice)

Longest (slowest) processing times of all units tested.


Creates mesh as well as point clouds.
Seems to have issues with holes.
Wide distance range from under 1/2m to 1m.
Fan unit a problem for field work and sensitive to lighting conditions.

Untrained result in SolidWorks

Result in SolidWorks
Mantis Vision F5

Output during scanning is just 2D and only point cloud.

NDI Vicrascan

Single laser scanner, not as accurate as other models tested.


Scanning times are longer than other models tested.
Needs to scan in three axes (two at 90 degrees and one at 45 degrees) for crosshatch pattern.

Result in SolidWorks, small round pyramids are the markers.


Faro Freestyle
Relatively recent player in the market.
Seems more suited to body and building scans.
Accuracy at the 1 to 2mm range, rather than 1/10 of other models tested.
Fast scanning but poor software.

Modified in GeoMagic

Result in SolidWorks

You might also like