Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
134 views23 pages

RAID LOG Template

The document is a RAID log that includes sections for risk identification, analysis, mitigation, assumptions, actions, and decisions related to a project. It outlines mandatory and optional fields for logging risks, their impacts, and mitigation strategies, as well as a classification system for risks and their likelihood and impact ratings. Additionally, it provides a framework for tracking actions and decisions made throughout the project lifecycle.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
134 views23 pages

RAID LOG Template

The document is a RAID log that includes sections for risk identification, analysis, mitigation, assumptions, actions, and decisions related to a project. It outlines mandatory and optional fields for logging risks, their impacts, and mitigation strategies, as well as a classification system for risks and their likelihood and impact ratings. Additionally, it provides a framework for tracking actions and decisions made throughout the project lifecycle.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 23

RAID Log

Last Modified:
File Identifier:
Version Number:

Revision History
Version Date of Revision Description of Change Reason for Change
(x.y)

Footer: Select the document classification as per the defined classification in the master list of documents’ for
RESTRICTED/CONFIDENTIAL>
Affected Sections Approved By

he master list of documents’ for your project <PUBLIC/INTERNALLY


IDENTIFY & LOG INITIAL RISK ANALYSIS RISK MITIGATION & CONTINGENCY

Consequence

Risk Rating
Likelihood
Risk Reserve Based on Estimated Cost of Mitigation

Initial
Quantified Impact Treat Risk? Risk Response

(1-6)
(1-6)
Risk ID # Raised By Date Raised Risk Description Risk Type Risk Scope Risk Impact Impacted Project(s) Risk Owner Likelihood Mitigation Plan(s) Plans Cost/Benefit Contingency Plan
($) (Y/N) Strategy
($) ($)

Internal
Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Optional Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Optional Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory
External
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00

845786541.xlsx
02/01/2025 3 of 23
Risk Log
Assumptions Log
Program Name
Customer
Program Manager

ID Date
Assumptions
# Raised
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
Impact if Invalid
Home

Action Log
Program Name
Customer
Program Manager

# Date Raised Raised By Description of Action Impacted Project(s) Action Impact Action Owner Due Date Resolution/ Comments
Date Closed
Home

Decision Ref Issues Planned for Decision Date of Decision Decision Making Technique
Analysis

* Evaluation criteria for each decision structure to be attached-to reflect the affected parties needs and the
Decision Log
Evaluation Criteria * Alternative Solutions

he affected parties needs and the basis for decisions. Rank the criteria where more than one criterion is available
Selected Solution with Rationale IDs of Risks Remarks
Associated with
Decision

ere more than one criterion is available


Risk Type
Economic and Political
Training
Financial
General management
Human Resources/ Skills
Legal and regulatory
Market
Natural Events
Partnerships / Outsourcing
Project Delivery
Security
Technology Selections for Risk Status
Open
Closed
Selections for Risk Treatment

Yes
No
Risk Impact
High
Medium
Moderate
Low

Selections for Likelihood Scale


1 Remote 0.01
2 Highly Unlikely 0.05
3 Unlikely 0.1
4 Possible 0.2
5 Likely 0.5
6 Almost Certain 1
Risk Response Strategy
Acceptance
Avoidance
Transfer
Mitigate
Contingency

Selections for Consequence Rating


1 Minor BAU
2 Moderate BAU with mitigation plans
3 Serious Minor Performance Degradation & Customer dissatisfaction
4 Major Performance degradation & Customer dissatisfaction
5 Critical Complete disruption of services
6 Catastrophic Legal Ramifications
Selections for Control Effectiveness Rating
1
2
3
4
5
adation & Customer dissatisfaction
n & Customer dissatisfaction

Effectiveness Rating
Excellent 0.1
Very Good 0.25
Good 0.5
Weak 0,8
Ineffective 1
Selections for Status of Application o
1
2
3
4
5
Selections for Status of Application of Controls
The Controls meet 5 Control exists
0.1
The Controls meet 4 0.25 Control is communicated
The Controls meet 3 0.5 Relevant people understand the control
The Controls meet 2 0,8 Supported by Management
The Controls meet 1 or less 1 Control performance is monitored
and the control

Selections for Status of Actions


Not Commenced
In Progress
Ongoing
Completed

Lookups for Residual Rating


30 Extreme
18 Severe
10 High
6 Medium
1 Low
Lookup table for risk ratings
Cons/Likel box no rating
11 1 Low
12 2 Low
13 4 Low
14 7 Low
15 10 Medium
16 13 Medium
21 3 Low
22 5 Low
23 8 Medium
24 14 Medium
25 17 Medium
26 20 Medium
31 6 Low
32 9 Medium
33 16 Medium
34 21 Medium
35 24 High
36 27 High
41 11 Low
42 15 Medium
43 22 Medium
44 26 High
45 29 Severe
46 31 Severe
51 12 Medium
52 19 Medium
53 25 High
54 30 High
55 33 Severe
56 34 Severe
61 18 Medium
62 23 High
63 28 High
64 32 Severe
65 35 Severe
66 36 Extreme
Lookup table for risk ratings (sorted)
box no rating
1 Low
2 Low
3 Low
4 Low
5 Low
6 Low
7 Medium
8 Medium
9 Medium
10 Medium
11 Medium
12 Medium
13 Medium
14 Medium
15 High
16 High
17 Medium
18 Severe
19 Medium
20 Severe
21 Medium
22 Medium
23 High
24 High
25 High
26 High
27 Extreme
28 Severe
29 Severe
30 Severe
31 Severe
32 Severe
33 Severe
34 Extreme
35 Extreme
36 Extreme

1. Impact to Client or Contracting Personnel


2. Natural Environment
3. Community
Damage/Impact/Social/Cult
ural Heritage
4. Financial Impact
5. Damage to reputation,Services Interruption,Customer Interruption
6. Breach of Law or Criminal Prosecution or Civil Action
7. Impact to Quality
8. Schedule Impact
ntracting Personnel

Services Interruption,Customer Interruption


inal Prosecution or Civil Action

IT New Development
IT Operations
Data Management
Enterprise Architecture
Release & Test Management
Operations Transition
Inter-Project
External
Customer
Wipro
Client

You might also like