Galact Iec
Galact Iec
2024/102
Protocol Version 1.0, 12 February 2024
Date 16-02-2024
To,
The Chairperson / Member-Secretary
Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC),
Dr D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Center
Department of Pharmacology
5th Floor, D Y Patil University School of Medicine
Sector-5, Nerul, Navi Mumbai – 400 706
Phone No: 022 2770 2218 Extn.: 166
Mail: [email protected] or [email protected]
Subject: Research Proposal and documents for review and approval by the IEC
Study title: Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Galact® Granules (Shatavari Formulation) as a
Galactagogue in Post-partum Women: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind,
Placebo-Controlled Study (Protocol No. Galactagogue-1089-2024-01)
Dear Sir/Madam,
With reference to the above subject and reference, please find attached the following study related
documents for review and approval by Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC):
Enclosed: As above
IEC Ref. No. 2024/102
Protocol Version 1.0, 12 February 2024
UNDERTAKING
I/We agree to abide by the ethical guidelines for biomedical research on human subject (As
per the ICMR guidelines) while conducting the research project being submitted for Ethical
Committee consideration:
1. Project is essential for the advancement of knowledge and for the benefit of all.
2. Only subjects who volunteer for the project will be included. Their informed Consent
shall be obtained prior to commencement of research project, and subjects will be kept
fully appraised of all the consequences.
3. Privacy and confidentiality of the subjects shall be maintained and without the
consent of subjects no disclosure will be made.
4. Proper precautions shall be taken to minimize risk and prevent irreversible.
adverse effects.
5. Research will be conducted by professionally competent people.
6. Research will be conducted in a fair, honest, impartial, and transparent manner.
7. Researchers will be accountable for maintaining proper records.
8. Research will be conducted keeping in view the public interest at large.
9. Research reports, materials and data will be preserved (as per institutional
guidelines). Result of research will be made known through scientific publications.
10. Professional and moral responsibilities will be of the researchers, directly or
indirectly connected with the research.
11. Only those drugs which are approved by the Drug controller of India for a specific
Purpose will be used in the research project.
Place: Nerul
Protocol #: Galactagogue-1089-2024-01
Version 1; dt. 12th February 2024
1. TITLE
CLINICAL STUDY PROTOCOL
PROTOCOL TITLE
Confidential Page 1 of 34
Protocol #: Galactagogue-1089-2024-01
Version 1; dt. 12th February 2024
CONTENTS
1. TITLE 1
2. SIGNATURE PAGE 5
3. CONTACT LIST 7
4. LIST OF FACILITIES 8
5. GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS 9
6. PROTOCOL SYNOPSIS 10
Early Withdrawal of Subjects ..............................................................................................12
7. STUDY SCHEDULE 15
8. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 16
9. PRODUCT INFORMATION 17
9.1 Dosage and Administration .......................................................................................................17
10. STUDY OBJECTIVES AND ENDPOINTS 17
10.1 Study Objectives........................................................................................................................17
10.1.1 Primary Objectives: ................................................................................................17
10.1.2 Secondary Objectives:.............................................................................................17
10.2 Study End-points: ......................................................................................................................17
10.2.1 Primary End Points: ...............................................................................................17
10.2.2 Secondary End Points: ............................................................................................17
11. METHODOLOGY 18
11.1 Selection of Study Population ....................................................................................................18
11.1.1 Inclusion Criteria ....................................................................................................18
11.1.2 Exclusion Criteria ...................................................................................................18
11.1.3 Early Withdrawal of Subjects.................................................................................18
11.1.4 Number of Subjects.................................................................................................19
11.1.5 Study Duration........................................................................................................19
11.1.6 Study Design ...........................................................................................................19
11.1.7 Study Overview .......................................................................................................19
11.2 STUDY ASSESSMENTS ............................................................................................................21
11.2.1 Demography ............................................................................................................21
11.2.2 Medical/Surgical History ........................................................................................21
11.2.3 Physical Examination..............................................................................................21
11.2.4 Vital Signs ...............................................................................................................21
11.2.5 Breast milk volume measurement ..........................................................................21
11.2.6 Time to noticeable breast fullness ...........................................................................21
11.2.7 Laboratory assessment ...........................................................................................21
11.2.8 Subjective satisfaction assessment ..........................................................................22
11.2.9 Self‐reported insufficient milk (SRIM) assessment by mother ..............................22
11.2.10 Episodes of infections in infants..............................................................................22
11.2.11 Infant weight measurement ....................................................................................22
11.2.12 Safety assessment- Adverse events..........................................................................22
11.3 STUDY TREATMENT ...............................................................................................................23
11.3.1 Investigational Products (IPs)/ Study Products ......................................................23
11.3.2 Assessment of Compliance for Dosing ....................................................................24
11.3.3 Prohibited Medications/Treatments .......................................................................24
11.4 ADVERSE EVENTS ..................................................................................................................24
11.4.1 Definitions (AE, SAE, Unexpected AEs, etc.) .........................................................24
11.4.2 Collection of AEs.....................................................................................................24
11.4.3 Follow-Up of AEs ....................................................................................................25
11.4.4 Serious/Unexpected Adverse Events .......................................................................25
11.4.5 Other Significant Adverse Events...........................................................................26
11.4.6 Expedited Safety Reporting ....................................................................................26
11.5 ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS..................................................................................................26
11.5.1 Ethics Committee ....................................................................................................26
Confidential Page 2 of 34
Protocol #: Galactagogue-1089-2024-01
Version 1; dt. 12th February 2024
11.5.2 Informed Consent ...................................................................................................26
11.5.3 Insurance for the Subjects ......................................................................................26
11.6 STATISTICAL METHODS AND DATA ANALYSIS ....................................................................27
11.6.1 Sample Size Consideration .....................................................................................27
11.6.2 Analysis Sets............................................................................................................27
11.6.3 Randomization ........................................................................................................27
11.6.4 Blinding and unblinding procedure........................................................................27
11.6.5 Baseline Definition ..................................................................................................27
11.6.6 Missing Data ...........................................................................................................28
11.6.7 Summary of Subject Disposition.............................................................................28
11.6.8 Demographics, Baseline Characteristics and Medical History ..............................28
11.6.9 Treatments compliance ...........................................................................................28
11.6.10 Efficacy and Safety Analysis ...................................................................................28
12. DOCUMENTATION 28
12.1 Supplementary Documentation ..................................................................................................28
12.2 Quality Assurance Audits ..........................................................................................................28
12.3 Accessibility ..............................................................................................................................28
12.4 Confidentiality of Data ..............................................................................................................29
12.5 Archives ....................................................................................................................................29
12.6 Publication Policy .....................................................................................................................29
13. ANNEXURES 30
14. REFERENCES 34
Confidential Page 3 of 34
Protocol #: Galactagogue-1089-2024-01
Version 1; dt. 12th February 2024
List of Annexures
Annexure 1: Case Record Form (CRF) ............................................................................................ 30
Annexure 2: Informed Consent Document (ICD) ............................................................................. 30
Annexure 3: Product profile: Galact granules ................................................................................... 30
Annexure 4: FDA license: Galact granules....................................................................................... 30
Annexure 5: Declaration of Helsinki (WMA)................................................................................... 30
Annexure 6: Study Schedule ............................................................................................................ 30
Annexure 7: Draft CTRI .................................................................................................................. 30
Annexure 8: Self‐reported insufficient milk (SRIM) assessment by mother ...................................... 30
Annexure 9: Subject Diary – Medication compliance ....................................................................... 30
Annexure 10: Expression (automatic) of breast milk: Procedure....................................................... 31
Annexure 11: Hand expression of breast milk: FAQs ....................................................................... 33
Confidential Page 4 of 34
Protocol #: Galactagogue-1089-2024-01
Version 1; dt. 12th February 2024
2. SIGNATURE PAGE
STUDY TITLE
INVESTIGATOR’S DECLARATION
I, the undersigned, have read and understood this protocol and hereby agree to conduct the
study in accordance with this protocol and to comply with all requirements regarding the
obligations of Investigators and all other Subject requirements of ICH-E6 R3 Guideline 2023
on ‘Good Clinical Practice’, New Drugs and Clinical Trials 2019, Declaration of Helsinki
(Taipei 2016) and any other applicable regulations.
I further agree to ensure that all associates assisting in the conduct of study are informed
regarding their obligations.
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
__________________________________ ____________________
Signature Date (DD/MM/YYYY)
Confidential Page 5 of 34
Protocol #: Galactagogue-1089-2024-01
Version 1; dt. 12th February 2024
I have reviewed the foregoing protocol for the study no. Galactagogue-1089-2024-01. To the
best of my knowledge, the protocol is accurate and complete.
I approve this version as the final copy and consider it acceptable for regulatory submission.
I agree to comply with all requirements regarding the Sponsor's obligations and all other
Subject requirements of ICH-E6 R3 Guideline 2023 on ‘Good Clinical Practice’, New Drugs
and Clinical Trials 2019, Declaration of Helsinki (Taipei 2016), and any other applicable
regulations.
Approved by
____________________________ ________________
Authorized Signatory Date
Confidential Page 6 of 34
Protocol #: Galactagogue-1089-2024-01
Version 1; dt. 12th February 2024
3. CONTACT LIST
Confidential Page 7 of 34
Protocol #: Galactagogue-1089-2024-01
Version 1; dt. 12th February 2024
4. LIST OF FACILITIES
Confidential Page 8 of 34
Protocol #: Galactagogue-1089-2024-01
Version 1; dt. 12th February 2024
5. GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS
AE Adverse Event
ANOVA Analysis of Variance
BMI Body Mass Index
CI Confidence Interval
COA Certificate of Analysis
CRF Case Report Form
CRO Contract Research Organization
EC Ethics Committee
GCP Good Clinical Practice
ICD Informed Consent Document
ICF Informed Consent Form
ICH International Council on Harmonization
IP Investigational Product
ITT Intent-To-Treat
OPD Outpatient Department
PP Per Protocol
SAE Serious Adverse Event
SD Standard Deviation
SOC Standard of Care
SOP Standard Operating Procedure
TEAE Treatment Emergent Adverse Event
TESAE Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Event
Confidential Page 9 of 34
Protocol #: Galactagogue-1089-2024-01
Version 1; dt. 12th February 2024
6. PROTOCOL SYNOPSIS
Confidential Page 10 of 34
Protocol #: Galactagogue-1089-2024-01
Version 1; dt. 12th February 2024
Confidential Page 11 of 34
Protocol #: Galactagogue-1089-2024-01
Version 1; dt. 12th February 2024
Confidential Page 13 of 34
Protocol #: Galactagogue-1089-2024-01
Version 1; dt. 12th February 2024
Confidential Page 14 of 34
Protocol #: Galactagogue-1089-2024-01
Version 1; dt. 12th February 2024
7. STUDY SCHEDULE
Visit Visit 2
Visit 1 (Day 3- Visit 3 Visit 4
Sr. (Baseline- 72 hours (Week 4 (Week 16
Activities day 1) after ± 4 days) ± 4 days)
delivery )
1. Informed consent process √ X X X
2. Inclusion/exclusion criteria (eligibility) √ X X X
3. Demography& medical history √ X X X
4. Physical examination and vital signs √ √ √ √
5. Breast milk volume measurement X √ √ √
Laboratory assessment (prolactin and X
6. √ √ √
physicochemical parameters)
7. Time to noticeable breast fullness X √ √ √
Subjective assessment for breast X √ √ √
8.
fullness
Self‐reported insufficient milk (SRIM) X √ √ √
9.
assessment by mother
10. Infant weight measurement X √ √ √
11. Episodes of illness since previous visit X X √ √
12. Study Medication Dispensing √ X X X
13. Concomitant Medication √ √ √ √
14. Compliance Assessment# X X X √
15. AE and SAE √ X √ √
16. Study Completion/Termination X X X √
#
Compliance will be assessed based on the medication (Capsule) count, and consumption of 80% or
more medication will be considered as compliant.
Confidential Page 15 of 34
Protocol #: Galactagogue-1089-2024-01
Version 1; dt. 12th February 2024
Confidential Page 16 of 34
Protocol #: Galactagogue-1089-2024-01
Version 1; dt. 12th February 2024
9. PRODUCT INFORMATION
9.1 Dosage and Administration
Subjects will be asked to consume 2 teaspoons powder of Galact granules (containing Shatavari
(Asparagus racemosus) 15 g, Vidari Kand (Pueraria tuberose) 1 g , Sowa (Anethum Sowa) 1
g, Gokhru Panchang (Tribulus terrestris) 2.5 g, Yashtimadhu (Glycyrrhiza glabra) 1 g, Jeera
(Safed) (Cuminum cyminum) 1 g, Ahliv powder (Lepidium sativum) 1 g, with Elaichi flavor)
or placebo/reference product (containing protein mixture without of Galact granules) twice
daily with one glass of milk for 16 weeks.
1. To evaluate the efficacy of Galact Granules in increasing breast milk output during
immediate post-partum period.
1. To evaluate the efficacy of Galact® Granules in increasing breast milk output during post-
partum period.
2. To evaluate the efficacy of Galact® Granules on improvement in milk quality during the
post-partum period.
3. To evaluate the efficacy of Galact® Granules on prolactin hormone level during the post-
partum period.
4. To evaluate the efficacy of Galact® Granules on subjective satisfaction by mother during
the post-partum period.
5. To evaluate the efficacy of Galact® Granules to prevent infections in infants during the
post-partum period.
6. To evaluate the efficacy of Galact® Granules on infant weight during the post-partum
period.
7. To evaluate the need for formula feed with the use of Galact® Granules during the post-
partum period.
8. To evaluate the safety of Galact® Granules during the post-partum period in women.
1. Total volume (ml) of breast milk produced on the third post-partum day; Measurement by
Breast pump (Manual/Automatic). [Time Frame: Day 3- 72 hours]
2. Mean time noticeable from birth to evident breast fullness after delivery. [Time Frame: Day
3- 72 hours]
1. Total volume (ml) of breast milk produced after breast fullness; measurement by breast
pump (Manual/Automatic) [Time Frame: Week 4, Week 16]
2. Mean change in protein content (albumin and globulin) and specific gravity in breast milk
during post-partum women after delivery. [Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 16]
3. Mean change in serum prolactin levels in post-partum women after delivery. [Time Frame:
Baseline, Week 4, Week 16]
Confidential Page 17 of 34
Protocol #: Galactagogue-1089-2024-01
Version 1; dt. 12th February 2024
4. Mean time (hours) to evident noticeable breast fullness after last breast feeding (measured
during daytime). [Time Frame: Week 4, Week 16]
5. Subjective assessments on time to noticeable breast fullness after delivery using five-point
Likert scale. [Time Frame: Day 3- 72 hours, Week 4, Week 16]
6. Use of infant formula feed. [Time Frame: Week 4, Week 16]
7. Self‐reported insufficient milk (SRIM) assessment by mother for their decision to wean
their infant. [Time Frame: Week 4, Week 16]
8. Proportion of infants developing infections. [Time Frame: Week 4, Week 16]
9. Mean change in infant weight after delivery. [Time Frame: Day 3- 72 hours, Week 4, Week
16]
10. Proportion of women experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). [Time
Frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 16]
11. Proportion of women experiencing Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events
(TESAEs). [Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 16]
11. METHODOLOGY
11.1 Selection of Study Population
11.1.1 Inclusion Criteria
1. Healthy women between 20-45 years of age
2. Women with uncomplicated full-term delivery (vaginal or LSCS).
3. Women who have accomplished antenatal breastfeeding promotion protocol
immediately post-partum or within three days of delivery.
4. Women able to understand the study requirements and follow other procedures
required by the study protocol.
5. Must have the ability and willingness to sign an informed consent and to comply with
all study procedures.
11.1.2 Exclusion Criteria
1. Post-partum women with contraindications to breastfeeding, such as HIV,
chemotherapeutic drugs, radioactive substances, and babies with galactosemia.
2. Post-partum women with unstable conditions (i.e., post-partum haemorrhage, sepsis).
3. Women with known allergies to Shatavari or other ingredients of Galact granules.
4. Women already using products that have galactagogue properties.
5. Women whose babies require phototherapy, women with insufficient glandular tissue
or breast surgery and any structural abnormality of the breast.
6. Women with a history of infertility, known hypothyroidism, women with twins, or
higher-order births.
7. Any known clinically significant endocrine, metabolic, hepatic, renal, cardiovascular,
gastrointestinal, respiratory, hematological, or neurological illnesses or the presence of
any current psychiatric disorders in women will be considered as exclusion criteria.
8. If any other investigational drug was used within three months before the entry in this
study or those who cannot be relied upon to comply with the test procedures or are
unwilling to give informed consent will be excluded.
11.1.3 Early Withdrawal of Subjects
Subject can be withdrawn from the study at any time for any of the following reasons:
- Voluntary withdrawal of consent
- Certain adverse events at the discretion of Clinical Investigator
- The discovery of an unexpected, significant, or unacceptable risk to the subjects enrolled
in the study
- Significant non-compliance with the study procedure by the subject
- Protocol violation
Confidential Page 18 of 34
Protocol #: Galactagogue-1089-2024-01
Version 1; dt. 12th February 2024
- Any other reason that may affect the outcome of the study or safety of the subjects
- Termination of the study
Reasons for the discontinuation by the subject from the clinical trial will be documented
appropriately, along with any referrals that are made. In case of premature treatment
withdrawal, the End of study procedures will be performed.
11.1.4 Number of Subjects
110 eligible subjects will be enrolled in a 1:1 ratio into two treatment arms (55 in each group).
11.1.5 Study Duration
Total study duration will be approximately 16 weeks for each woman participant.
11.1.6 Study Design
Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
11.1.7 Study Overview
The subject population consists of healthy women between 20-45 years of age fulfilling
eligibility criteria.
Participants will be enrolled into the study based on Inclusion & Exclusion Criteria, medical
history, and safety measures. The duration of each participant’s participation in the study will
be 16 weeks.
Visit 1 (Screening /Baseline- Day 1)
Visit 2 (Day 3- 72 hours after delivery)
Visit 3 (Week 4 ± 4 Days)
Visit 4 (Week 16 ± 4 Days)
Window period of ± 4 day is applicable for visit 2, 3, and 4.
During Screening, Day 1, informed consent will be obtained before any study procedures take
place. After the consent process, baseline characteristics such as medical/surgical history, will
then be documented, including the concomitant medications. All participants will undergo the
screening procedure to determine whether they are meeting the required inclusion and
exclusion criteria.
Following assessments will be recorded during this Visit 1: Screening and enrollment
(Baseline: Day 1)
− Informed consent process
− Inclusion/exclusion criteria (eligibility)
− Demography& medical history
− Physical examination and vital signs
− Laboratory assessment (prolactin and physicochemical parameters)
− Study Medication Dispensing
− Concomitant Medication
− Baseline Adverse Events (AE)
All eligible women participants (labelled as ‘subjects’ here onwards), will be given required
quantity of study medication for self-administration, sufficient till the Visit 4 (End of study
visit). Subjects will be randomized to either one of the two treatment arms. They will be
dispensed medications as per the randomized schedule in the following manner:
• Test product:
Confidential Page 19 of 34
Protocol #: Galactagogue-1089-2024-01
Version 1; dt. 12th February 2024
Each 100 gm of Galact granules contains extracts from: Shatavari (Asparagus racemosus)
15 g, Vidari Kand (Pueraria tuberose) 1 g , Sowa (Anethum Sowa) 1 g, Gokhru Panchang
(Tribulus terrestris) 2.5 g, Yashtimadhu (Glycyrrhiza glabra) 1 g, Jeera (Safed)
(Cuminum cyminum) 1 g, Ahliv powder (Lepidium sativum) 1 g, with Elaichi flavor. It
should be taken as 2 teaspoons twice daily with one glass of milk.
• Reference product:
The reference product contains protein mixture without of Galact granules that should be
taken as 2 teaspoons twice daily with one glass of milk.
Subjects will be asked to consume 2 teaspoons powder of Galact granules (containing Shatavari
(Asparagus racemosus) 15 g, Vidari Kand (Pueraria tuberose) 1 g , Sowa (Anethum Sowa) 1
g, Gokhru Panchang (Tribulus terrestris) 2.5 g, Yashtimadhu (Glycyrrhiza glabra) 1 g, Jeera
(Safed) (Cuminum cyminum) 1 g, Ahliv powder (Lepidium sativum) 1 g, with Elaichi flavor)
or placebo/reference product (containing protein mixture without shatavari) twice daily with
one glass of milk for 16 weeks. Subjects will be asked to visit the site for Visit 2 (Day 3- 72
hours after delivery), Visit 3 (Week 4), and Visit 4 (Week 16).
Following assessments will be done during this Visit 2: (Day 3- 72 hours after delivery)
− Physical examination and vital signs
− Breast milk volume measurement
− Time to noticeable breast fullness
− Subjective assessment
− Infant weight measurement
− Concomitant Medication
Following assessments will be done during this Visit 3: (Week 4 ± 4 Days)
− Physical examination and vital signs
− Breast milk volume measurement
− Time to noticeable breast fullness
− Laboratory assessment (prolactin and physicochemical parameters)
− Subjective assessment for breast fullness
− Self‐reported insufficient milk (SRIM) assessment by mother
− Infant weight measurement
− Episodes of illness in infants since last visit
− Need for infant formula feed
− Concomitant Medication
− AE and SAE
Following assessments will be done during this Visit 4: (Week 16 ± 4 Days)
− Physical examination and vital signs
− Breast milk volume measurement
− Time to noticeable breast fullness
− Laboratory assessment (prolactin and physicochemical parameters)
− Subjective assessment for breast fullness
− Self‐reported insufficient milk (SRIM) assessment by mother
− Infant weight measurement
− Episodes of illness in infants since last visit
Confidential Page 20 of 34
Protocol #: Galactagogue-1089-2024-01
Version 1; dt. 12th February 2024
Confidential Page 21 of 34
Protocol #: Galactagogue-1089-2024-01
Version 1; dt. 12th February 2024
Confidential Page 22 of 34
Protocol #: Galactagogue-1089-2024-01
Version 1; dt. 12th February 2024
Visit Visit 2
Visit 1 (Day 3- Visit 3 Visit 4
Sr. (Baseline- 72 hours (Week 4 (Week 16
Activities day 1) after ± 4 days) ± 4 days)
delivery)
1. Informed consent process √ X X X
2. Inclusion/exclusion criteria (eligibility) √ X X X
3. Demography& medical history √ X X X
4. Physical examination and vital signs √ √ √ √
5. Breast milk volume measurement X √ √ √
Laboratory assessment (prolactin and X
6. √ √ √
physicochemical parameters)
7. Time to noticeable breast fullness X √ √ √
Subjective assessment for breast X √ √ √
8.
fullness
Self‐reported insufficient milk (SRIM) X √ √ √
9.
assessment by mother
10. Infant weight measurement X √ √ √
11. Episodes of illness since previous visit X X √ √
12. Study Medication Dispensing √ X X X
13. Concomitant Medication √ √ √ √
14. Compliance Assessment# X X X √
15. AE and SAE √ X √ √
16. Study Completion/Termination X X X √
Confidential Page 23 of 34
Protocol #: Galactagogue-1089-2024-01
Version 1; dt. 12th February 2024
Administration of IPs
Participants will be given medications as per the randomization schedule in a 1:1 ratio.
After all baseline assessments and post randomization, all participants will be given enough
quantity of medication that will be sufficient till the end of treatment (16 weeks).
11.3.2 Assessment of Compliance for Dosing
Enrolled participants will self-administer with the study medications as mentioned in the earlier
section. They will be asked to get used and unused study medications at Visit 4, End of study
Visit (Week 16). Adherence to the assigned regimen will be assessed by the study personnel
by recording the quantity/number of medication dispensed to the subject and returned by the
subjects at each visit. This will help to check the dosing compliance. Unused amounts will be
documented in respective logs.
11.3.3 Prohibited Medications/Treatments
The use of the current medications, over the counter products, by the participant must be
informed to the Investigator. Subjects will not be allowed any other forms of dietary
supplements/multivitamins or disease-specific oral nutrition supplements during the study. The
Investigator will decide whether to continue further with the subject of the assigned study. It
will be the decision of the Investigator about which drugs/ treatment to be prohibited for the
study subjects.
Confidential Page 24 of 34
Protocol #: Galactagogue-1089-2024-01
Version 1; dt. 12th February 2024
Confidential Page 25 of 34
Protocol #: Galactagogue-1089-2024-01
Version 1; dt. 12th February 2024
Confidential Page 26 of 34
Protocol #: Galactagogue-1089-2024-01
Version 1; dt. 12th February 2024
Confidential Page 27 of 34
Protocol #: Galactagogue-1089-2024-01
Version 1; dt. 12th February 2024
Confidential Page 28 of 34
Protocol #: Galactagogue-1089-2024-01
Version 1; dt. 12th February 2024
Confidential Page 29 of 34
Protocol #: Galactagogue-1089-2024-01
Version 1; dt. 12th February 2024
13. ANNEXURES
Annexure 1: Case Record Form (CRF)
Annexure 2: Informed Consent Document (ICD)
Annexure 3: Product profile: Galact granules
Annexure 4: FDA license: Galact granules
Annexure 5: Declaration of Helsinki (WMA)
Annexure 6: Draft CTA
Annexure 7: Draft CTRI
Annexure 8: Self‐reported insufficient milk (SRIM) assessment by mother
Annexure 9: Subject Diary – Medication compliance
Confidential Page 30 of 34
Protocol #: Galactagogue-1089-2024-01
Version 1; dt. 12th February 2024
Milk volume will be measured after expression of breast milk from both breasts using a breast pump.
Device to be used:
LuvLap Electric Breast Pump with 3 Phase Pumping:
Massage
Stimulation
Expression
Rechargeable Battery
Manual Convertible Kit
Soft & Gentle
BPA Free
Confidential Page 31 of 34
Protocol #: Galactagogue-1089-2024-01
Version 1; dt. 12th February 2024
Confidential Page 32 of 34
Protocol #: Galactagogue-1089-2024-01
Version 1; dt. 12th February 2024
Confidential Page 33 of 34
Protocol #: Galactagogue-1089-2024-01
Version 1; dt. 12th February 2024
14. REFERENCES
1
Romano M, Cacciatore A, Giordano R, La Rosa B. Postpartum period: three distinct but continuous
phases. J Prenat Med. 2010 Apr;4(2):22-5. PMID: 22439056; PMCID: PMC3279173.
2
Lee S, Kelleher SL. Biological underpinnings of breastfeeding challenges: the role of genetics, diet,
and environment on lactation physiology. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Aug
1;311(2):E405-22. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00495.2015. Epub 2016 Jun 28. PMID: 27354238;
PMCID: PMC5005964.
3
Javan R, Javadi B, Feyzabadi Z. Breastfeeding: A Review of Its Physiology and Galactogogue Plants
in View of Traditional Persian Medicine. Breastfeed Med. 2017 Sep;12(7):401-409. doi:
10.1089/bfm.2017.0038. Epub 2017 Jul 17. PMID: 28714737.
4
Gupta M, Shaw B. A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial for Evaluation of Galactogogue
Activity of Asparagus racemosus Willd. Iran J Pharm Res. 2011 Winter;10(1):167-72. PMID:
24363697; PMCID: PMC3869575.
5
Alok S, Jain SK, Verma A, Kumar M, Mahor A, Sabharwal M. Plant profile, phytochemistry and
pharmacology of Asparagus racemosus (Shatavari): A review. Asian Pac J Trop Dis. 2013
Jun;3(3):242–51. doi: 10.1016/S2222-1808(13)60049-3. PMCID: PMC4027291.
6
Saleem M, Martin H, Coates P. Prolactin Biology and Laboratory Measurement: An Update on
Physiology and Current Analytical Issues. Clin Biochem Rev. 2018 Feb;39(1):3-16. PMID:
30072818; PMCID: PMC6069739.
7
Parihar, Shweta & Sharma, Devender. (2021). A BREIF OVERVIEW ON ASPARAGUS
RACEMOUS. 8. 959-975.
8
Birla A, Satia M, Shah R, Pai A, Srivastava S, Langade D. Postpartum Use of Shavari Bar ® Improves
Breast Milk Output: A Double-Blind, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study.
Cureus. 2022 Jul 13;14(7):e26831. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26831. PMID: 35974870; PMCID:
PMC9375125.
9
Whipps, M. D., & Demirci, J. R. (2021). The sleeper effect of perceived insufficient milk supply in
US mothers. Public Health Nutrition, 24(5), 935–941.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980020001482.
Confidential Page 34 of 34
Patient Initials: |__|__|__| Randomization No: |__|__|__| `Protocol No.: Galactagogure-1089-2024-01
Date: |__|__|/|__|__|/|__|__|
Study Title
Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Galact® Granules
(Shatavari Formulation) as a Galactagogue in Post-
partum Women: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-
blind, Placebo-Controlled Study
Clinical Study
Patient Initials: |__|__|__|
(Enter Patient Initials as three characters, If patient has only 2 Initials, enter dash (-) in the middle box)
INSTRUCTIONS
1. PLEASE ENTER THE PATIENT NO. AND INITIALS ON EACH PAGE OF THE
CASE RECORD FORM (CRF).
2. PLEASE TRY TO COMPLETE THE CRF AND DO NOT LEAVE ANY BLANK
SPACES.
3. OPEN BRACKETS AND DOTTED LINES ARE FOR ENTRY OF NUMBERS
AND TEXT AND CLOSED BOXES ARE FOR TICK-MARK.
4. PLEASE TICK () IN THE APPROPRIATE BOXES.
4. IF DATA IS NOT AVAILABLE OR NOT APPLICABLE, PLEASE ENTER N.A.
OR IF NOT DONE, ENTER N.D.
4. FOR CORRECTION OF ANY ENTRIES, STRIKE OUT THE INCORRECT
ANSWER AND ENTER THE CORRECT ENTRY ALONGSIDE, INITIAL AND
DATE IT. DO NOT RUB, ERASE OR USE CORRECTION FLUID, FOR
INCORRECT ENTRIES.
5. PLEASE ENTER ALL DATA WITH A DARK BLUE OR BLACK BALL-POINT
PEN.
6. USE ONLY STANDARD ABBREVIATIONS, IF REQUIRED.
7. USE DATE FORMAT AS DD / MM / YYYY
INCLUSION CRITERIA
Please check all statements and tick (√) the appropriate box
Yes No
5. Must have the ability and willingness to sign an informed consent and to
comply with all study procedures.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
Please check all statements and tick (√) the appropriate box.
Yes No
1. Post-partum women with contraindications to breastfeeding, such as HIV,
chemotherapeutic drugs, radioactive substances, and babies with
galactosemia.
2. Post-partum women with unstable conditions (i.e., post-partum
haemorrhage, sepsis).
3. Women with known allergies to Shatavari or oats, raisins, almonds, cocoa,
and honey.
4. Women already using products that have galactagogue properties.
5. Women whose babies require phototherapy, women with insufficient
glandular tissue or breast surgery and any structural abnormality of the
breast.
6. Women with a history of infertility, hypothyroidism, women with twins, or
higher-order births.
7. Any known clinically significant endocrine, metabolic, hepatic, renal,
cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, respiratory, hematological, or neurological
illnesses or the presence of any current psychiatric disorders in women will
be considered as exclusion criteria.
8. If any other investigational drug was used within three months before the
entry in this study or those who cannot be relied upon to comply with the
test procedures or are unwilling to give informed consent will be excluded.
Date of Consent: |__| |__| / |__||__| / |__| |__| Time of consent: |__| |__|: |__| |__| hrs. (24 hr.)
Patient Initials: |__||__| |__| Patient Screening No: |__| |__| |__|
Age: |__| |__| yrs.
Height: |__| |__| |__| cm. Weight: |__| |__| |__| Kg.
Parameter Results
LABORATORY ASSESSMENT
Physicochemical parameters
Yes No
If Yes, Randomization no. |__| |__| |__|
Date of visit: |__| |__|/ |__| |__|/|__| |__||__| |__|
Yes No
(If yes, please specify below)
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION
Parameter Results
Systolic Blood Pressure (mm Hg) |__| |__| |__|
Diastolic Blood Pressure (mm Hg) |__| |__| |__|
Pulse Rate (per min.) |__| |__| |__|
Body Temperature (0F) |__| |__| |__| . |__|
Respiratory Rate (per min.) |__| |__|
BMI (kg/sq.m2) |__| |__| . |__|
Date of delivery : |__| |__| / |__||__| / |__| |__| Time: |__| |__|: |__| |__| hrs.
Date of noticeable breast fullness: |__||__| / |__||__| / |__||__| Time: |__| |__|: |__| |__| hrs.
CONCOMITANT MEDICATION
Yes No
(If yes, please specify below)
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION
Parameter Results
Noticeable breast fullness date: |__||__| / |__||__| / |__||__| Time: |__| |__|: |__| |__| hrs. (24 hr.)
Breast milk collection: |__||__| / |__||__| / |__||__| Time: |__| |__|: |__| |__| hrs. (24 hr.)
LABORATORY ASSESSMENT
Physicochemical parameters
CONCOMITANT MEDICATION
Yes No
(If yes, please specify below)
Did the patient experience any of the following Adverse Events (AE)?
Yes No
(Please tick () in the appropriate column and fill the AE form on last page if answer is present)
Adverse event Date Severity
Time Mild Moderate Severe
Yes No
(If yes, please fill the SAE form last page)
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION
Parameter Results
Noticeable breast fullness date: |__||__| / |__||__| / |__||__| Time: |__| |__|: |__| |__| hrs. (24 hr.)
Physicochemical parameters
COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT
Please tick (√) the appropriate box
Medication Issued/ Return Record Form
Capsules
Visit Date Issued on this visit Returned Compliance1
4
Yes No Compliant non-compliant
CONCOMITANT MEDICATION
Yes No
(If yes, please specify below)
Did the patient experience any Serious Adverse Events (SAE)? Yes No
(If yes, please fill the SAE form last page)
STUDY COMPLETION/TERMINATION
No Adverse Event
CAUSALITY
In the doctor’s judgement, was Yes No Yes No
study treatment the most likely
cause of the AE?
If No, what was the most likely
cause of the AE? (Check one only)
______________ ______________
▪ Disease Under Study
______________ ______________
▪ Other Illness (specify)
______________ ______________
▪ Concomitant Treatment
(specify)
▪ Other (specify) ______________ ______________
Concomitant drug(s) [Exclude those used to treat the event; use second form in case of more than 5 drugs]
Drug Daily Route of Indication Therapy dates Causal relationship to event
Dose administrati from to
on
None Possible
None Possible
None Possible
None Possible
None Possible
Report type Date of this report Reporting Doctor's name & address Doctor's signature
Initial
Final
Section A
To be completed only for patients prematurely terminated. Primary reasons for premature termination:
Section B
I certify that the entries on all the pages of the case report form, accurately and completely represent
the results of examinations, tests, and evaluations performed on the dates specified.
Date: ___/___/___
1. Introduction:
The postpartum period begins soon after the delivery of the baby and usually lasts six to eight
weeks and ends when the mother's body has nearly returned to its pre-pregnant state.
Lactogenesis (milk production) is a complex neurophysiological process that involves the
action of a number of hormones, mainly prolactin. Prolactin is secreted by the anterior pituitary
gland in response to nipple stimulation. During the first six months of life, breast milk is the
optimal source of nutrition for babies. The most common cause of breastfeeding failure is
insufficient production of breast milk which is also known as lactational inadequacy.
Galactagogue medicines, such as metoclopramide, oxytocin, domperidone, chlorpromazine
and sulpiride, are among the current therapeutic strategies in healthy mothers. However, these
medications are associated with adverse effects, such as extrapyramidal symptoms, arrhythmia,
and iatrogenic hyperthyroidism in mother or infant. Therefore, alternative therapies have been
under investigation. Herbal medications have shown the potential for safe and effective
treatment for milk production in post-partum women. Shatavari is known as the “Queen of
Ayurvedic herbs”. It has a long history of use as a galactagogue in India and is also included
in the official ayurvedic pharmacopeia for this use. It is loaded with folic acid, vitamins A, C,
and K, and phytoestrogens; the hormonal effect of phytoestrogens is like estrogen in milk
production. A key regulator of prolactin production is estrogens which enhance the growth of
prolactin-producing cells and stimulate prolactin production directly, as well as by suppressing
dopamine. It also contains tryptophan, an essential amino acid that may stimulate prolactin
production, leading to increased milk production.
Shatavari is commonly available in the form of tablets, capsules, or powder. So far, studies
including randomized controlled trials support the use of shatavari as a galactagogue for 4-6
weeks. However, long term efficacy of shatavari for this indication has not been explored yet.
This study aims to investigate the potential benefits of Galact Granules (Shatavari Formulation)
as a Galactagogue in post-partum woman for milk production.
1
Signature/thumb impression of patient/Impartial witness
(To be executed in duplicate and one copy handed over to the subject/patient)
Study Code: Galactagogure-1089-2024-01 Informed Consent Document (ICD)
ICD-English, Version-1, dt. 15th February 2024 Patient Screening No: |__|__| − |__|__|__|
2
Signature/thumb impression of patient/Impartial witness
(To be executed in duplicate and one copy handed over to the subject/patient)
Study Code: Galactagogure-1089-2024-01 Informed Consent Document (ICD)
ICD-English, Version-1, dt. 15th February 2024 Patient Screening No: |__|__| − |__|__|__|
effects will be monitored during each visit of the study period. The study will be completed in
16 weeks.
4. Potential Risks of participating in the study
As with all new and old medicines there may be some unforeseen risks associated with this
treatment. Care has been taken to design the study to minimize any possible harm, with
appropriate screening tests and examinations by the doctor.
The doctor in-charge / attending doctor of the study would explain all other risks associated
with the study medication to you.
The efficacy and safety of shatavari has been well established and it has been used since ancient
times of ayurveda. Hence, it is unlikely that you may experience any side effects with the study
treatment in the dose that you would take in the study.
5. Benefits of the study:
The study therapy may benefit you for improving breast milk quantity and quality as well. It is
therefore possible that it may improve your symptoms as well. The study medication would be
provided free of cost to you by the Sponsor. However, no compensation will be given to you
for travelling to the study clinic / hospital and loss of wages / income because of your visit to
the clinic.
The knowledge gained from this study would be of benefit to many thousands of women in
their post-partum period.
6. Alternative treatments:
Milk production can be increased by relaxation techniques and psychological support, many
mothers tend to use medications or other products to increase their lactation.
7. Confidentiality of the record:
Your medical records that are related to this trial will be maintained in confidentiality. The
medical monitor and quality assurance representatives from Sponsor (Emcure Pharmaceuticals
Ltd., India.) may examine your medical records if your name cannot be identified from these
records.
Your records from this trial may be submitted by the Sponsor to the Government Authorities
who control the drugs in the state and the country, but your name will not be identified from
such records. No identity of any specific patient in this trial will be disclosed in any public
reports or publications.
The authority has the right upon proper judicial order to review pertinent medical records and
other data with your name identified. They are required by law; however, the information will
be handled in a confidential manner.
8. Your Participation in the Study and your Rights
Your participation in this study is voluntary and you may withdraw from the study at any time
without having to give reasons for the same. In any case, you will be given proper treatment
for your condition. Your refusal to participate will not involve any penalty in terms of
subsequent participation in research studies. You will agree to cooperate fully with the
attending doctor.
If at any time you feel worse or suffer any other illnesses, then please inform your attending
doctor. If the treatment appears to be unsuitable for you it will be stopped. It is possible that
the study could be stopped without your consent. Your doctor will tell you if any new
3
Signature/thumb impression of patient/Impartial witness
(To be executed in duplicate and one copy handed over to the subject/patient)
Study Code: Galactagogure-1089-2024-01 Informed Consent Document (ICD)
ICD-English, Version-1, dt. 15th February 2024 Patient Screening No: |__|__| − |__|__|__|
information becomes known during the study, which may affect your willingness to continue
in the study.
If you suffer from any treatment-related injury during the study, the Sponsor will pay the
medical expenses for the treatment of that injury. No other compensation is available from the
Sponsor.
9. If you have any queries related to the drug information and safety, you can contact
the medical monitor of the study.
Name : Dr Prajakta Wangikar, PhD
Address : Manager, Medical Services,
Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd.,
Oberoi Garden Estates, Yadav Nagar,
Chandivali, Powai, Mumbai 400072, Maharashtra.
Telephone : +91 97698 51047
E mail : [email protected]
10. If any problem develops, you can contact the investigator.
If any serious problems develop, you will receive prompt and appropriate medical attention. It
is agreed that the facilities of the above-mentioned hospital will be made available to you.
Reasonable medical treatment will be free when provided through the above-mentioned
hospital.
Financial compensation is not available for medical treatment elsewhere, loss of work, or other
expenses.
11. If you have any queries related to ethical issues & your rights, you can contact the
following from IEC Faculty.
Dr. Dnyanesh Belekar
Chairman IEC,
IEC for Biomedical and Health Care Research
D Y Patil Medical College & Hospital, Navi Mumbai
E-mail: [email protected]
Contact: 80822 88852
12. Financial consideration:
As part of our commitment to ensuring your protection, EmCure will provide insurance
coverage for any research-related injuries or unforeseen events that may occur during your
participation in this trial.
13. Obtaining additional information:
You are encouraged to ask any questions that occur to you at this time or to ask questions at
any time during your participation in the trial. You will be given a copy of this document for
your own information. If you desire more information later, you may call the investigator or
any member of the study team at the site.
14. Signature
I have read the above information and have had the opportunity to ask any questions and all
my questions have been answered.
I am also aware of my right to opt out of the trial at any time during trial without having to give
4
Signature/thumb impression of patient/Impartial witness
(To be executed in duplicate and one copy handed over to the subject/patient)
Study Code: Galactagogure-1089-2024-01 Informed Consent Document (ICD)
ICD-English, Version-1, dt. 15th February 2024 Patient Screening No: |__|__| − |__|__|__|
I the undersigned have fully explained in local language the relevant details of this trial to the
patient named above and/or authorized to consent for the patient. I am qualified to perform this
role.
(In Case of Illiterate Pts)
5
Signature/thumb impression of patient/Impartial witness
(To be executed in duplicate and one copy handed over to the subject/patient)
Study Code: Galactagogure-1089-2024-01 Informed Consent Document (ICD)
ICD-English, Version-1, dt. 15th February 2024 Patient Screening No: |__|__| − |__|__|__|
Patient
Sr.
Initials
I confirm that I have read and understood the information sheet for the above
1.
study and have had the opportunity to ask questions.
I understand that my participation in the study is voluntary and that I am free
2. to withdraw at any time, without giving any reason, without having any
medical or legal rights being affected.
I understand that the Sponsor of the clinical trial, others working on the
Sponsor’s behalf, the regulatory authorities will not need my permission to
look at my health records both in respect of the current study and any future
3.
research that may be conducted in relation to it, even if he/she withdraws from
the trial. I agree to this access. However, I understand that his/her identity will
not be revealed in any information released to third parties or published.
4. I agree not to restrict the use of any data or results that arise from this study.
6
Signature/thumb impression of patient/Impartial witness
(To be executed in duplicate and one copy handed over to the subject/patient)
अध्ययन कोड: Galactagogure-1089-2024-01 सूचित सहमचत दस्तावेज़ (ICD)
आईसीडी-अंग्रेजी, संस्करण -1, डीटी। 15 फरवरी 2024 रोगी स्क्रीचनंग संख्या: |__|__| − |__|__|__|
1
रोगी/चनष्पक्ष गवाह के हस्ताक्षर/अंगूठे का चनशान
(दो प्रचतयों में चनष्पाचदत चकया जाना है और एक प्रचत चवषय/रोगी को स प
ं ी जानी है)
अध्ययन कोड: Galactagogure-1089-2024-01 सूचित सहमचत दस्तावेज़ (ICD)
आईसीडी-अंग्रेजी, संस्करण -1, डीटी। 15 फरवरी 2024 रोगी स्क्रीचनंग संख्या: |__|__| − |__|__|__|
3
रोगी/चनष्पक्ष गवाह के हस्ताक्षर/अंगूठे का चनशान
(दो प्रचतयों में चनष्पाचदत चकया जाना है और एक प्रचत चवषय/रोगी को स प
ं ी जानी है)
अध्ययन कोड: Galactagogure-1089-2024-01 सूचित सहमचत दस्तावेज़ (ICD)
आईसीडी-अंग्रेजी, संस्करण -1, डीटी। 15 फरवरी 2024 रोगी स्क्रीचनंग संख्या: |__|__| − |__|__|__|
9. यतद आपके पास दवा की जानकारी और सुरक्षा से संबंतिि कोई प्रश्न िैं, िो आप अध्ययन के मेतडकल
मॉतनटर से संपकष कर सकिे िैं।
नाम : डॉ प्राजक्ता वांगीकर, पीएिडी
पिा : प्रबंिक, चिचकत्सा सेवा,
एमक्योर फामाास्युचटकल्स चलचमटेड,
ओबेरॉय गाडा न एस्टे ट्स, यादव नगर,
िांदीवली, पवई, मुंबई 400072, महाराष्ट्र।
दू रध्वनी: +91 97698 51047
ई मेल : [email protected]
10. यतद कोई समस्या उत्पन्न िोिी िै, िो आप अन्वेर्क से संपकष कर सकिे िैं
यचद कोई गंभीर समस्या चवकचसत होती है, तो आपको शीघ्र और उचित चिचकत्सा ध्यान चदया जाएगा। यह सहमचत
है चक उपयुाक्त अस्पताल की सुचविाएं आपको उपलब्ध कराई जाएं गी।
उपयुाक्त अस्पताल के माध्यम से प्रदान चकए जाने पर उचित चिचकत्सा उपिार मुफ्त होगा।
कहीं और चिचकत्सा उपिार, काम की हाचन, या अन्य खिों के चलए चवत्तीय मुआवजा उपलब्ध नहीं है।
11. यतद आपके पास नैतिक मुद्दों और आपके अतिकारों से संबंतिि कोई प्रश्न िैं, िो आप आईईसी
संकाय से तनम्नतलच्छिि से संपकष कर सकिे िैं।
नाम : डॉ. ज्ञानेश बेलेकर,
अध्यक्ष आईईसी,
पिा : जैव चिचकत्सा और स्वास्थ्य दे खभाल अनुसंिान के चलए आईईसी
डी वाई पाचटल मेचडकल कॉलेज एं ड हॉक्टस्पटल, नवी मुंबई
दू रध्वनी: 80822 88852
ई मेल: [email protected]
12. तवत्तीय तवचार:
आपकी सुरक्षा सुचनचित करने की हमारी प्रचतबिता के चहस्से के रूप में, एमक्योर चकसी भी शोि से संबंचित िोटों
या अप्रत्याचशत र्टनाओं के चलए बीमा कवरे ज प्रदान करे गा जो इस परीक्षण में आपकी भागीदारी के द रान हो
सकते हैं।
13. अतिररक्त जानकारी प्राप्त करना:
आपको इस समय आपके साथ होने वाले चकसी भी प्रश्न को पूछने या परीक्षण में आपकी भागीदारी के द रान चकसी
भी समय प्रश्न पूछने के चलए प्रोत्साचहत चकया जाता है। आपको अपनी जानकारी के चलए इस दस्तावेज़ की एक
प्रचत दी जाएगी। यचद आप बाद में अचिक जानकारी िाहते हैं, तो आप साइट पर अिेषक या अध्ययन टीम के
चकसी भी सदस्य को कॉल कर सकते हैं।
14. दस्िख़ि दे च्छिए।
मैंने उपरोक्त जानकारी पढी है और मुझे कोई भी प्रश्न पूछने का अवसर चमला है और मेरे सभी प्रश्नों का उत्तर चदया
गया है।
मुझे ऐसा करने का कारण बताए चबना मुकदमे के द रान चकसी भी समय मुकदमे से बाहर चनकलने के अपने
अचिकार के बारे में भी पता है।
मुझे सूिना पि और सहमचत फॉमा की एक प्रचत दी गई है।
4
रोगी/चनष्पक्ष गवाह के हस्ताक्षर/अंगूठे का चनशान
(दो प्रचतयों में चनष्पाचदत चकया जाना है और एक प्रचत चवषय/रोगी को स प
ं ी जानी है)
अध्ययन कोड: Galactagogure-1089-2024-01 सूचित सहमचत दस्तावेज़ (ICD)
आईसीडी-अंग्रेजी, संस्करण -1, डीटी। 15 फरवरी 2024 रोगी स्क्रीचनंग संख्या: |__|__| − |__|__|__|
मैंने, अिोहस्ताक्षरी, ने स्थानीय भाषा में इस परीक्षण के प्रासंचगक चववरण को ऊपर नाचमत रोगी और/या रोगी के
चलए सहमचत के चलए अचिकृत चकया है। मैं इस भूचमका को चनभाने के चलए योग्य हं।
(चनरक्षर पीटी के मामले में)
5
रोगी/चनष्पक्ष गवाह के हस्ताक्षर/अंगूठे का चनशान
(दो प्रचतयों में चनष्पाचदत चकया जाना है और एक प्रचत चवषय/रोगी को स प
ं ी जानी है)
अध्ययन कोड: Galactagogure-1089-2024-01 सूचित सहमचत दस्तावेज़ (ICD)
आईसीडी-अंग्रेजी, संस्करण -1, डीटी। 15 फरवरी 2024 रोगी स्क्रीचनंग संख्या: |__|__| − |__|__|__|
प्रोटोकॉल शीर्षक : पोस्ट-पाटष म मतिलाओं में गैलेक्टागॉग के रूप में गैलेक्ट ग्रैन्यूल (शिावरी
फॉमूषलेशन) की प्रभावकाररिा और सुरक्षा का मूल्ांकन: एक संभातवि,
यादृच्छिक, डबल-ब्लाइं ड, प्लेसबो-तनयंतत्रि अध्ययन
अध्ययन कोड : गैलेक्टागोगुर-1089-2024-01; संस्करण 1; डीटी। 12 फरवरी 2024
रोगी का नाम : ____________________________________________________
रोगी के
िमांक
आद्याक्षर
मैं पुचष्ट् करता हं चक मैंने उपरोक्त अध्ययन के चलए सूिना पि को पढा और समझा है और
1.
प्रश्न पूछने का अवसर चमला है।
मैं समझता हं चक अध्ययन में मेरी भागीदारी स्वैक्टिक है और मैं चकसी भी समय, चबना कोई
2. कारण बताए, चबना चकसी चिचकत्सा या कानूनी अचिकार को प्रभाचवत चकए वापस लेने के चलए
स्वतंि हं।
मैं समझता हं चक नैदाचनक परीक्षण के प्रायोजक, प्रायोजक की ओर से काम करने वाले अन्य,
चनयामक अचिकाररयों को वतामान अध्ययन और भचवष्य के चकसी भी शोि के संबंि में मेरे
3. स्वास्थ्य ररकॉडा को दे खने के चलए मेरी अनुमचत की आवश्यकता नहीं होगी, भले ही वह
परीक्षण से वापस ले ले। मैं इस पहुंि से सहमत हं। हालांचक, मैं समझता हं चक तीसरे पक्ष को
जारी या प्रकाचशत चकसी भी जानकारी में उसकी पहिान प्रकट नहीं की जाएगी।
मैं इस अध्ययन से उत्पन्न होने वाले चकसी भी डे टा या पररणामों के उपयोग को प्रचतबंचित नहीं
4.
करने के चलए सहमत हं।
5. मैं इसके द्वारा उपरोक्त अध्ययन में भाग लेने के चलए सहमत हं
मुझे रोगी सूिना पि में चवस्तार से उपरोक्त संदचभात अध्ययन की प्रचियाओं और यािाओं की
6.
संख्या के बारे में सूचित चकया गया है
7. मुझे संभाचवत जोक्टखमों और लाभों (रोगी सूिना पिक में) के बारे में समझाया गया है।
6
रोगी/चनष्पक्ष गवाह के हस्ताक्षर/अंगूठे का चनशान
(दो प्रचतयों में चनष्पाचदत चकया जाना है और एक प्रचत चवषय/रोगी को स प
ं ी जानी है)
स्टडी कोड: गॅलॅक्टागोर-1089-2024-01 सूचित संमती दस्तऐवज (आयसीडी)
आयसीडी-इं ग्रजी, आवृत्ती-१, डीटी. 15 फेब्रुवारी 2024 रुग्ण तपासणी क्रमांक: |_____| − |__|__|__|
1
रुग्ण/चिष्पक्ष साक्षीदारािी स्वाक्षरी/अंगठ्यािा ठसा
(डु प्लिकेट मध्ये अंमलात आणूि त्यािी एक प्रत चवषयाला/रुग्णाला सुपूदद करणे)
स्टडी कोड: गॅलॅक्टागोर-1089-2024-01 सूचित संमती दस्तऐवज (आयसीडी)
आयसीडी-इं ग्रजी, आवृत्ती-१, डीटी. 15 फेब्रुवारी 2024 रुग्ण तपासणी क्रमांक: |_____| − |__|__|__|
तिाचप, या संकेतासाठी शतावरीिी दीर्दकालीि कायदक्षमता अद्याप शोधली गेली िाही. या अभ्यासािे
उद्दीष्ट् दू ध उत्पादिासाठी पोस्ट-पाटद म मचहलेमध्ये गॅलॅक्टगॉग म्हणूि गॅलॅक्ट ग्रॅन्युल्स (शतावरी
फॉर्म्ुदलेशि) च्या संभाव्य फायद्यांिी तपासणी करणे आहे.
2. चाचणीचा उद्दे श:
प्लक्लचिकल संशोधि अभ्यास ज्यामध्ये आपला सहभाग प्रस्ताचवत आहे त्यािे उद्दीष्ट् पोस्ट-पाटद म
मचहलांमध्ये गॅलॅक्टगॉग म्हणूि गॅलॅक्ट ग्रॅन्युल्स (शतावरी फॉर्म्ुदलेशि) िी कायदक्षमता आचण सुरचक्षततेिे
मूल्यांकि करणे आहे: एक संभाव्य, यादृप्लिक, दु हेरी-अंध, िेसबो-चियंचित अभ्यास.
संभाव्य म्हणजे आपल्याला िेरपी चदली जाईल आचण अभ्यास िेरपी सुरू केल्यािंतर आम्ही िेरपीच्या
पररणामांिे चिरीक्षण करू.
यादृप्लिक म्हणजे आपल्याला यादृप्लिक पद्धतीिे िेरपी चदली जाईल, म्हणजेि संपूणद अभ्यास कालावधीत
आपल्याला 'गॅलॅक्ट ग्रॅन्युल्स पावडर' चकंवा 'समाि प्रचििे / िेसबो पावडर' चमळू शकते.
डबल-ब्लाइं ड िा अिद असा आहे की आपल्याला आचण आपल्या उपप्लथित डॉक्टरांिा आपल्याला
चमळालेल्या उपिारांिी माचहती िसते. या प्रकारच्या अंधत्वामुळे आम्हाला अभ्यासाच्या चिकालांमधील
पूवदग्रह आचण िुटी कमी होण्यास मदत होते.
िेसबो म्हणजे पावडरमध्ये शतावरी िसूि इतर काही चिप्लिय पदािद असतील. िेसबो वापरूि,
आपल्याला कळते की सकारात्मक पररणाम शतावरीमुळे आहेत की मािचसक र्टकांमुळे.
िेसबो-चियंचित म्हणजे आपण 'गॅलॅक्ट िेरपी' चकंवा 'िेसबो िेरपी'च्या पररणामांिी तुलिा करतो. अशा
प्रकारे , येिे िेसबो चियंिण चकंवा संदभादसारखे कायद करते ज्याशी गॅलॅक्ट ग्रॅन्युल्सिी तुलिा केली जाते.
या औषधािा तुम्हाला फायदा होईल, अशी अपेक्षा आहे. या अभ्यासात भाग र्ेण्यास सहमत िाल्यावर,
आपण जाणूिबुजूि अभ्यासाद्वारे आवश्यकतेिुसार अभ्यास चक्रयाकलाप आचण औषधोपिार वेळापिक
करण्यास सहमत आहात.
या अभ्यासातूि चमळालेल्या ज्ञािािा तुमच्याप्रमाणेि अशा प्रकारच्या वैद्यकीय प्लथितीिे िस्त असलेल्या
हजारो रुग्णांिा फायदा होईल.
3. अनुसरण करावयाची कायषपद्धती:
या अभ्यासामध्ये, एकूण 110 रूग्णांिी िोंदणी केली जाईल. सुरुवातीच्या भेटीत, संभाव्य चवषयांिा
अभ्यास, इचतहास आचण प्लक्लचिकल परीक्षेच्या आवश्यकतांच्या आधारे िाविोंदणीसाठी तपासणी केली
जाईल. अभ्यासाशी संबंचधत कोणतीही प्रचक्रया सुरू करण्यापूवी, आपल्याला अभ्यासाबद्दल तपशीलवार
समजावूि सांचगतले जाईल आचण या अभ्यासात भाग र्ेण्यासाठी आपल्याकडू ि लेखी संमती र्ेतली जाईल.
हा दस्तऐवज लेखी सूचित संमती प्रचक्रयेिा एक भाग आहे.
संबंचधत अटींसह तपशीलवार वैद्यकीय इचतहास िोंदचवला जाईल. कोणतेही असामान्य मापदं ड
पाहण्यासाठी सामान्य आचण शारीररक तपासणी केली जाईल. जर आपण पाितेिे चिकष पूणद केले तर
आपल्याला अभ्यासात प्रवेश चदला जाईल.
अभ्यासात िाविोंदणी केल्यािंतर, आपल्याला गॅलॅक्ट ग्रॅन्युल्सिी 2 िमिे पावडर (शतावरी (शतावरी
(शतावरी रे समोसस) 15 ग्रॅम, चवदारी कंद (प्युरेररया ट्यूबरोज) 1 ग्रॅम, सोवा (अिेिुम सोवा) 1 ग्रॅम, गोखरू
पंिांग (टर ायब्युलस टे रेस्टरीस) 2.5 ग्रॅम, यष्ट्ीमधू (ग्लायचसररिा ग्लॅब्रा) 1 ग्रॅम, जीरा (सफेद) (चजरे अम
सायचमिम) 1 ग्रॅम, अचहलीव पावडर (लेचपचडयम सॅचटव्हम) 1 ग्रॅम खाण्यास सांचगतले जाईल. इलायिी
िवसह) चकंवा िेसबो / संदभद उत्पादि (गॅलॅक्ट ग्रॅन्युल्सच्या सामग्रीचशवाय प्रचििे चमश्रण असलेले) 16
आठवड्ांसाठी दररोज दोिदा एक ग्लास दु धासह.
2
रुग्ण/चिष्पक्ष साक्षीदारािी स्वाक्षरी/अंगठ्यािा ठसा
(डु प्लिकेट मध्ये अंमलात आणूि त्यािी एक प्रत चवषयाला/रुग्णाला सुपूदद करणे)
स्टडी कोड: गॅलॅक्टागोर-1089-2024-01 सूचित संमती दस्तऐवज (आयसीडी)
आयसीडी-इं ग्रजी, आवृत्ती-१, डीटी. 15 फेब्रुवारी 2024 रुग्ण तपासणी क्रमांक: |_____| − |__|__|__|
संपूणद अभ्यासादरर्म्ाि आपले चिरीक्षण केले जाईल. प्रारं चभक प्लव्हचजट 1 (स्क्रीचिंग, बेसलाइि /
रें डमाइजेशि) (चदवस 1) िंतर, आपल्याला प्लव्हचजट 2 फॉलो-अप (प्रसूतीिंतर चदवस 3- 72 तास), भेट 3
पाठपुरावा (आठवडा 4) आचण अभ्यासाच्या 4 शेवटी (आठवडा 16) मूल्यांकिासाठी प्लक्लचिकला भेट
द्यावी लागेल. प्रोलॅप्लक्टि संप्रेरक पातळीसाठी रक्तािे िमुिे गोळा केले जातील आचण प्लव्हचजट 1 (स्क्रीचिंग
प्लव्हचजट / एिरोलमेंट प्लव्हचजट / बेसलाइि प्लव्हचजट - चदवस 1), प्लव्हचजट 3 (आठवडा 4) आचण प्लव्हचजट 4
(आठवडा 16) वर गुणवत्ता तपासणीसाठी आईच्या दु धािा िमुिा गोळा केला जाईल. आईच्या
मूल्यांकिाद्वारे स्तिाच्या पररपूणदतेसाठी व्यप्लक्तचिष्ठ मूल्यांकि आचण स्वयं-अहवाचलत अपुरे दू ध
(एसआरआयएम) मूल्यांकि केले जाईल. अभ्यास कालावधीच्या प्रत्येक भेटीदरर्म्ाि दु ष्पररणामांिे
परीक्षण केले जाईल. हा अभ्यास १६ आठवड्ांत पूणद होईल.
4. अभ्यासात भाग घेण्याचे सांभाव्य धोके
सवद िवीि आचण जुन्या औषधांप्रमाणेि या उपिारांशी संबंचधत काही अिपेचक्षत जोखीम असू शकतात.
डॉक्टरांकडू ि योग्य स्क्रीचिंग िािण्या आचण तपासणीसह कोणतेही संभाव्य िुकसाि कमी करण्यासाठी
अभ्यासािी रििा करण्यािी काळजी र्ेण्यात आली आहे.
अभ्यासािे प्रभारी डॉक्टर / उपप्लथित डॉक्टर आपल्याला अभ्यास औषधाशी संबंचधत इतर सवद जोखीम
समजावूि सांगतील.
शतावरीिी कायदक्षमता आचण सुरचक्षतता िांगल्या प्रकारे थिाचपत िाली आहे आचण आयुवेदाच्या प्रािीि
काळापासूि यािा वापर केला जात आहे. म्हणूिि, आपण अभ्यासात र्ेत असलेल्या डोसमध्ये आपल्याला
अभ्यास उपिारांसह कोणतेही दु ष्पररणाम जाणवण्यािी शक्यता िाही.
5. अभ्यासाचे फायदे :
आईच्या दु धािे प्रमाण आचण गुणवत्ता सुधारण्यासाठी अभ्यास िेरपी आपल्याला फायदे शीर ठरू शकते.
म्हणूिि हे शक्य आहे की यामुळे आपली लक्षणे दे खील सुधारू शकतात. प्रायोजकाकडू ि आपल्याला
अभ्यासािे औषध चविामूल्य प्रदाि केले जाईल. तिाचप, अभ्यास प्लक्लचिक / रुग्णालयात प्रवास केल्याबद्दल
आचण प्लक्लचिकमध्ये गेल्यामुळे वेति / उत्पन्न गमावल्याबद्दल आपल्याला कोणतीही भरपाई चदली जाणार
िाही.
या अभ्यासातूि चमळालेल्या ज्ञािािा हजारो मचहलांिा प्रसूतीिंतरच्या काळात फायदा होणार आहे.
6. वैकच्छिक उपचार:
चवश्रांती तंि आचण मािचसक समिदिाद्वारे दु धािे उत्पादि वाढचवले जाऊ शकते, अिेक माता स्तिपाि
वाढचवण्यासाठी औषधे चकंवा इतर उत्पादिे वापरतात.
7. रे कॉर्ष ची गोपनीयता:
या िािणीशी संबंचधत आपल्या वैद्यकीय िोंदी गोपिीयतेत ठे वल्या जातील. प्रायोजक (एमक्युर
फामादस्युचटकल्स चलचमटे ड) कडू ि वैद्यकीय मॉचिटर आचण गुणवत्ता आिासि प्रचतचिधी., भारत.) या
िोंदींमधूि आपले िाव ओळखता येत िसल्यास आपल्या वैद्यकीय िोंदी तपासू शकता.
या िािणीतील आपल्या िोंदी प्रायोजकाकडू ि राज्य आचण दे शातील औषधांवर चियंिण ठे वणार् या
सरकारी प्राचधकरणांकडे सादर केल्या जाऊ शकतात, परं तु अशा िोंदींमधूि आपले िाव ओळखले
जाणार िाही. या िािणीतील कोणत्याही चवचशष्ट् रुग्णािी ओळख कोणत्याही सावदजचिक अहवालात चकंवा
प्रकाशिात उर्ड केली जाणार िाही.
योग्य न्यायालयीि आदे शावर प्राचधकरणाला आपले िाव ओळखलेल्या संबंचधत वैद्यकीय िोंदी आचण इतर
डे टािे पुिरावलोकि करण्यािा अचधकार आहे. ते कायद्यािे आवश्यक आहेत; माि, ही माचहती गोपिीय
3
रुग्ण/चिष्पक्ष साक्षीदारािी स्वाक्षरी/अंगठ्यािा ठसा
(डु प्लिकेट मध्ये अंमलात आणूि त्यािी एक प्रत चवषयाला/रुग्णाला सुपूदद करणे)
स्टडी कोड: गॅलॅक्टागोर-1089-2024-01 सूचित संमती दस्तऐवज (आयसीडी)
आयसीडी-इं ग्रजी, आवृत्ती-१, डीटी. 15 फेब्रुवारी 2024 रुग्ण तपासणी क्रमांक: |_____| − |__|__|__|
आपले संरक्षण सुचिचित करण्याच्या आमच्या वििबद्धतेिा एक भाग म्हणूि, एमक्योर या िािणीत
आपल्या सहभागादरर्म्ाि उद्भवू शकणायाद कोणत्याही संशोधि-संबंचधत जखमा चकंवा अिपेचक्षत
र्टिांसाठी चवमा संरक्षण प्रदाि करे ल.
13. अहधक माहहती हमळवणे:
या वेळी आपल्याला उद्भवणारे कोणतेही प्रश्न चविारण्यास चकंवा िािणीमध्ये आपल्या सहभागादरर्म्ाि
कोणत्याही वेळी प्रश्न चविारण्यास प्रोत्साचहत केले जाते. स्वत: च्या माचहतीसाठी तुम्हाला या कागदपिािी
प्रत चदली जाईल. आपल्याला िंतर अचधक माचहती हवी असल्यास, आपण अन्वेषक चकंवा साइटवरील
अभ्यास कायदसंर्ाच्या कोणत्याही सदस्यास कॉल करू शकता.
14. स्वाक्षरी
मी वरील माचहती वािली आहे आचण कोणतेही प्रश्न चविारण्यािी संधी चमळाली आहे आचण माझ्या सवद
प्रश्नांिी उत्तरे चमळाली आहेत.
खटल्यादरर्म्ाि कोणत्याही वेळी कारण ि दे ता खटल्यातूि बाहेर पडण्यािा मािा अचधकारही मला
ठाऊक आहे.
मला माचहती पिक आचण संमती पिािी प्रत दे ण्यात आली आहे.
मी वर उल्लेख केलेल्या आचण / चकंवा रूग्णासाठी संमती दे ण्यास अचधकृत असलेल्या रुग्णाला या
िािणीिा संबंचधत तपशील थिाचिक भाषेत पूणदपणे समजावूि सांचगतला आहे. ही भूचमका पार
पाडण्यासाठी मी पाि आहे.
(चिरक्षर पी.टी.एस. च्या बाबतीत)
5
रुग्ण/चिष्पक्ष साक्षीदारािी स्वाक्षरी/अंगठ्यािा ठसा
(डु प्लिकेट मध्ये अंमलात आणूि त्यािी एक प्रत चवषयाला/रुग्णाला सुपूदद करणे)
स्टडी कोड: गॅलॅक्टागोर-1089-2024-01 सूचित संमती दस्तऐवज (आयसीडी)
आयसीडी-इं ग्रजी, आवृत्ती-१, डीटी. 15 फेब्रुवारी 2024 रुग्ण तपासणी क्रमांक: |_____| − |__|__|__|
रूग्ण
आद्याक्षरे
मी पुष्ट्ी करतो की मी वरील अभ्यासासाठी माचहतीपिक वािले आहे आचण समजूि
1.
र्ेतले आहे आचण मला प्रश्न चविारण्यािी संधी चमळाली आहे.
मी समजतो की अभ्यासात मािा सहभाग ऐप्लिक आहे आचण मी कोणत्याही वेळी,
2. कोणतेही कारण ि दे ता, कोणत्याही वैद्यकीय चकंवा कायदे शीर अचधकारांवर पररणाम
ि करता मार्ार र्ेण्यास मोकळा आहे.
मी समजतो की प्लक्लचिकल िािणीिे प्रायोजक, प्रायोजकाच्या वतीिे काम करणारे
इतर, चियामक प्राचधकरणांिा सध्याच्या अभ्यासाच्या संदभादत आचण त्यासंदभादत
भचवष्यात केले जाऊ शकणायाद कोणत्याही संशोधिाच्या संदभादत माझ्या आरोग्याच्या
3. िोंदी पाहण्यासाठी माझ्या परवािगीिी आवश्यकता िाही, जरी त्यािे / चतिे िािणीतूि
मार्ार र्ेतली तरीही. या प्रवेशाशी मी सहमत आहे. तिाचप, मी समजतो की तृतीय
पक्षांिा जारी केलेल्या चकंवा प्रकाचशत केलेल्या कोणत्याही माचहतीमध्ये त्यािी / चतिी
ओळख उर्ड केली जाणार िाही.
मी या अभ्यासातूि उद्भवणायाद कोणत्याही डे टा चकंवा पररणामांच्या वापरास प्रचतबंचधत
4.
ि करण्यास सहमत आहे.
5. वरील अभ्यासात भाग र्ेण्यास मी सहमत आहे.
वरील संदचभदत अभ्यासाच्या कायदपद्धती आचण भेटींिी संख्या याबद्दल मला रुग्ण माचहती
6.
पिकात सचवस्तर माचहती दे ण्यात आली आहे.
7. मला संभाव्य जोखीम आचण फायद्यांबद्दल स्पष्ट् केले गेले आहे (रुग्ण माचहती पिकात).
6
रुग्ण/चिष्पक्ष साक्षीदारािी स्वाक्षरी/अंगठ्यािा ठसा
(डु प्लिकेट मध्ये अंमलात आणूि त्यािी एक प्रत चवषयाला/रुग्णाला सुपूदद करणे)
Food & Drugs Administration (Maharashtra State)
Letter No: MH/TZ2/PRP/1104658
Food & Drugs Administration, KONKAN Division
OFFICE OF JOINT COMMISSIONER [K.D]
Additional Product Permission 4TH FL.ESIC BLD,WAGLE ESTATE
Thane - 400604
Fee Payment(s) : DB-Id: 454009 - 28/12/2022 (Amt: 200) (Paid by E Payment) Balance : COL-Colour, FLV-Flavour,PRV-Preservative,REA-Reagent
100
This License/Certificate is eSIGNED. Physical Signature is NOT Required
Division MFG ID No Type:Additional Product Permission PERMISSION No Issue Date
KONKAN (TZ2) 705794 PRP-218515-28/12/2022 1104658 15/02/2023
For online Third Party Approval Verification;Go to fdamfg.maharashtra.gov.in & Click TPAV bu Pg: 1 / 2 (21/02/23) N I C
Terms and Conditions
1) Licensee should comply with all the provisions of Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1940 & Rules 1945 as amended up to dt.
2) Licensee should comply with all the provisions of Drugs (Price Control) Order 2013 as amended up to dt (wherever
applicable).
3) Licensee should abide by all the provisions of Drugs & Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisement) Act, 1954 &
Rules 1955 as amended up to date
4) Licensee should not manufacture any drug/cosmetic by a name belonging to another manufacturer
5) Licensee should not manufacture or sell drugs/cosmetics even if it is included in the approved list of product, if it is or
as and when banned by Licensing Authority or Drugs Controller General of India or Government of India.
6) The permission is granted subject to the condition that, the product is safe, for use in context of pharmaceutical Aids,
Additions and excipient used in the formulation
7) Any addition thereto or any deletion therefore will not be carried out without permission of Licensing Authority
Fee Payment(s) : DB-Id: 454009 - 28/12/2022 (Amt: 200) (Paid by E Payment) Balance : COL-Colour, FLV-Flavour,PRV-Preservative,REA-Reagent
100
This License/Certificate is eSIGNED. Physical Signature is NOT Required
Division MFG ID No Type:Additional Product Permission PERMISSION No Issue Date
KONKAN (TZ2) 705794 PRP-218515-28/12/2022 1104658 15/02/2023
For online Third Party Approval Verification;Go to fdamfg.maharashtra.gov.in & Click TPAV bu Pg: 2 / 2 (21/02/23) N I C
Galact Capsule
Why Is There A Need of Galactagogue:
Mother's milk is considered as one of the most suitable supplements for the infant. Amid
the initial six months of kids' life, breast milk is the ideal source of nourishment for
them. Mother’s milk contains supplement proteins, non-protein nitrogen compounds,
enzymes, lipids, oligosaccharides, hormones, host defense agents, vitamins A, C, B,
lysozyme, antibodies, and in addition numerous different elements that assemble a solid
and healthy human being.
However, the emission of milk from the mammary organs is controlled, to a greater
extent by the concentration of prolactin. There is sufficient evidence now to support the
conviction that the prolactin hormone is straightforwardly in-charge for promotion of
milk secretion and that abnormally low levels of this hormone is characteristic of
deficient lactation in mothers.
Product Profile:
Galact Capsule is enriched with Shatavari. Shatavari, or Asparagus racemosus, has
been utilized for quite a long time as a part of Ayurveda to support the female
1|Page
reproductive system, and as a support for the digestive system, particularly in instances
of excess pitta. Deciphered as "having one hundred roots"(1,2). Shatavari's name offers
reference to its traditional use as a rejuvenate tonic for the female reproductive system.
This traditional tonic is also thought to aid in improving hormonal imbalances, ease the
transitions through various phases of life (including menopause), and acts as a natural
enhancer for breast milk production
Composition:
Each capsule contains aqueous extract derived from:
Shatavari (Asparagus racemosus) Roots -1500 mg
Vidarikanda (Pueraria tuberosa) Tuber– 100 mg
Sowa (Anethum sowa) Seed– 96 mg
Gokshur panchang (Tribulus terresteris) Fruits – 250 mg
Yashtimadhu (Glycyrrhiza glbra) Roots– 100 mg
Jeera safed (Cuminum cyminum) Seed – 100 mg
Ahliv ( Chandrashur) (Lepidium sativum) Seed – 500 mg
Sugar q.s
Dose: As a herbal formulation for adults, take 1-2 Galact capsule twise daily with
milk or as directed by a healthcare practitioner
Indications:
2|Page
Contraindications: Individuals who are sensitive to ingredients listed in the formula
should avoid consumption
Side Effects & Special Precautions: Being an herbal product no serious Drug
interaction & Side effects have been reported till date.
Overdose: An intake of 2-3 times more than the recommended dose is generally well
tolerated. In the event of intake greater than prescribed dose, skip the next dose. If
digestion discomforts occur, consult your healthcare practitioner
Storage: Store in a cool & dry place away from direct sunlight. Keep out of reach of
children
Individual Ingredients:
3|Page
Sowa( Anethum sowa) :
Anethum sowa is a well-known galactagogue that is known to increase the flow of milk in
nursing mothers and will then be taken by the baby in the milk to help prevent colic (10).
4|Page
milk synthesis (9)
References:
2.Simon, David and Deepak Chopra. The Chopra Center Herbal Handbook. Three Rivers
Press, New York; 2000. 73-75.
3. Behera, P. C., Tripathy, D. P., & Parija, S. C. (2012). Shatavari: Potentials for
galactogogue in dairy cows. IJTK Vol.12(1) [January 2013]
4. A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial for Evaluation of Galactogogue Activity of
Asparagus racemosus Willd. Mradu Gupta and Badri Shaw
6. Dr. Asha Kumara, Dr. KM. Premvati Tiwari, A complete tretice on Ayurveda
Yogaratnakara, first edition Varanasi, 2010, 1170.
7. S, C., S, P., & Paul, R. P. (2018). Lactogenic activity of selected medicinal plants: A
review. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 8(5), 2479–2482.
https://www.phytojournal.com/archives/2019/vol8issue5/PartAS/8-5-11-489.pdf
8. Patil, A., Baghel, R., Nayak, S., Malapure, C., Govil, K., Kumar, D., & Yadav, P. K.
(2017). Cumin (Cuminum cyminum): As a Feed Additive for Livestock. Journal of
Entomology and Zoology Studies, 5(3), 365–369.
https://www.entomoljournal.com/archives/2017/vol5issue3/PartF/5-2-144-619.pdf
9. Kumar, S., Baghel, R., & Khare, A. (2010). EFFECT OF CHANDRASOOR (Lepidium
sativum) SUPPLEMENTATION ON DRY MATTER INTAKE, BODY WEIGHT AND
MILK YIELD IN LACTATING MURRAH BUFFALOES. Buffalo Bulletin, 30(4), 262–
266. http://ibic.lib.ku.ac.th/e-Bulletin/IBBU201104009.pdf
10. Kaur, G., & Arora, D. S. (2010). Bioactive potential of Anethum graveolens,
Foeniculum vulgare and Trachyspermum ammi belonging to the family Umbelliferae -
current status. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, 4(2), 087–094.
https://doi.org/10.5897/jmpr09.018
5|Page
Open Access Original
Article DOI: 10.7759/cureus.26831
© Copyright 2022
Birla et al. This is an open access article 1. Clinical Research, Act Lifesciences Pvt Ltd., Navi Mumbai, IND 2. Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. DY Patil Hospital
distributed under the terms of the Creative and Research Centre, Navi Mumbai, IND 3. Prenatal and Postnatal Care, NM Medical Center, Mumbai, IND 4.
Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., Gynecology, Dr. DY Patil Hospital and Research Centre, Navi Mumbai, IND 5. Pharmacology, Dr. DY Patil University,
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, School of Medicine, Navi Mumbai, IND
and reproduction in any medium, provided
the original author and source are credited.
Corresponding author: Amita Birla, [email protected]
Abstract
Background and objectives
Appropriate nutrition, along with the establishment of lactation, is of paramount importance for the feeding
mother and the growing neonate. Asparagus racemosus, a common name for Shatavari, is a well-known herb
that has been used as a galactagogue in traditional Indian culture. It is also referenced in Ayurvedic
medicine. Despite multiple formulations available, palatability has been a concern always as Shatavari is
very bitter. We have devised a palatable and nutritionally rich formulation of Shatavari with no artificial
ingredients. To understand the efficacy, we have conducted this double-blind, prospective, randomized,
controlled study to evaluate the effect of oral Shatavari formulation (Shavari Bar®) on breast milk output in
postpartum women.
Methods
A prospective, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted at two
centers in women with gestational age 37 weeks or more who intended to breastfeed. Hundred and four
women were screened, of which 78 were randomized to receive either bar containing Shatavari and oats
(n=39, study) or an identical placebo bar (n=39, control). All 78 women completed the study, 61 delivered by
a lower segment Caesarean section (LSCS), and 17 had a full-term normal vaginal delivery. Time to first
noticeable breast fullness was measured and expressed milk volume measurements were done 72 hours after
delivery or after consumption of four bars, whichever was later using a standardized breast pump.
Comparison between the two groups was analyzed using a t-test.
Results
Demography and baseline data of patients enrolled were similar in the two groups. The mean total milk
volume expressed was higher (p=0.008) with Shavari (64.74 ml) compared to placebo (49.69 ml). The time to
breast fullness was shorter (p=0.024) with Shavari (30.49 hours) compared to placebo (38.09 hours). No
adverse events were noted in either of the study groups. Global assessment of the satisfaction of mothers
with lactation, the well-being of the child, taste, and ease of use was better in the treatment arm than in the
placebo arm.
Conclusion
The use of the Shavari bar can be an effective option in postpartum women to establish early lactation and
build confidence in breastfeeding along with nonpharmacological intervention.
Introduction
Breast milk provides the ideal nutrition for the infant, and World Health Organization (WHO) recommends
exclusive breastfeeding for the initial six months. Breastfeeding is one of the most effective ways to ensure
child health and survival. Adequate milk production is not only critical, but the initial early milk production
has been shown to significantly affect milk production during the established lactation phase. However,
nearly two out of three infants are not exclusively breastfed for the recommended six months, a rate that has
surprisingly not improved in two decades despite multiple educational initiatives by the healthcare
professional (HCP) community [1]. Many women express concern about their ability to produce enough
milk, and insufficient milk production has been cited as a reason for supplementation and early cessation of
breastfeeding [2].
Shatavari (Asparagus racemosus), also known as "wild asparagus", is a plant native to the Indian
subcontinent and used in Ayurvedic medicine. It has a long history of use as a galactagogue in India and is
also included in the official ayurvedic pharmacopeia for this use [5]. The primary active constituents of A.
racemosus are steroidal saponins found in the roots [5]. It is loaded with folic acid, vitamins A, C, and K, and
phytoestrogens; the hormonal effect of phytoestrogens is like estrogen in milk production. A key regulator
of prolactin production is estrogens which enhance the growth of prolactin-producing cells and stimulate
prolactin production directly, as well as by suppressing dopamine. It also contains tryptophan, an essential
amino acid that may stimulate prolactin production, leading to increased milk production [6].
Shatavari is available in various forms like powder, granules, capsules, etc. However, many of these
formulations use a very high sugar content to mask the bitter taste of Shatavari. Also, most of these
products must be mixed with milk, so the palatability and taste are of concern. We have developed a unique
formulation of Shatavari, Shavari Bar®, which is a granola bar having Shatavari and oats along with dry
fruits, honey, and sweetened cocoa. It is natural and preservative-free. This study was conducted to evaluate
the product's efficacy and safety, and palatability in the postpartum phase for breastfeeding mothers.
Study participants
Pregnant women with the gestational age of 37 weeks or more who intend to breastfeed were invited to
participate in this study. Women who delivered by vaginal delivery or lower segment Cesarean section (LSCS)
delivery were enrolled.
Inclusion Criteria
Healthy women between 20-40 years of age who signed informed consent, with uncomplicated full-term
delivery (vaginal or LSCS), women who have accomplished antenatal breastfeeding promotion protocol
immediately postpartum or within three days of delivery, and women able to understand the study
requirements and can fill the study log diary, and follow other procedures required by the study protocol
were enrolled.
Exclusion Criteria
Study outcomes
The primary outcome was the total volume (ml) of breast milk produced on the third postpartum day (72
hours after delivery) or after taking four doses of the study medication, whichever is later, during 15 minutes
of pumping both breasts using a breast pump/manually two hours after breastfeeding.
Secondary efficacy outcomes were: i) time to noticeable breast fullness after delivery; ii) subjective
satisfaction of mother regarding the well-being and happiness of newborn; iii) subjective satisfaction of
mothers regarding the state of lactation; iv) subjective satisfaction of investigator regarding the well-being
of the mother, and v) subjective satisfaction of investigator regarding the well-being of the newborn.
Secondary safety outcomes were: i) proportion of patients experiencing treatment-emergent adverse events
(TEAEs), and ii) subjective satisfaction of patients with the taste and ease of use of the product. All
subjective assessments were assessed on a five-point Likert scale (very satisfied, satisfied, neutral,
unsatisfied, very unsatisfied).
Safety was assessed based on the spontaneous reports generated by the patients/clinicians. All adverse
events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported as per local regulatory guidelines.
Interventions
Control Group (Placebo): Group A
The control group received a placebo formulation (bar containing oats, dry fruits, honey, and chocolate-
flavored) not containing Shatavari. The placebo bar was identical in size, shape, and appearance to the study
formulation (Shavari Bar®). Women continued their routine postpartum care as per the hospital protocol.
The study group received oral supplementation with the study product (Shavari Bar®) for five days, starting
on day two after delivery (the first postpartum day). Shavari Bar® contained Shatavari, oats, dry fruits, and
honey and was chocolate flavored. Women continued their routine postpartum care as per the hospital
protocol. Figure 1 presents the CONSORT flowchart for patients in the study.
Study procedures
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained before starting any study-related procedures on the patients.
All participants underwent a complete clinical examination on enrolment to rule out any abnormalities. The
medical history of all the women was taken before study initiation. Vital parameters were reported (pulse,
blood pressure, temperature, and respiratory rate). Women underwent general and systemic examinations
(cardiovascular, respiratory, abdominal, nervous, and musculoskeletal systems).
Time to evident breast fullness is defined as the mean time from birth to evident breast fullness. The
participants were asked if they noticed their breasts were full, followed by the question: "When did you feel
breast fullness?".
Milk volume was measured after the breast milk expression from both breasts using a breast pump. An
electric breast pump with three-phase pumping, which includes massage, stimulation, and expression, was
used. Manual extraction was done in case of failure to use a breast pump.
Subjective Satisfaction
Subjective assessment for satisfaction by mothers regarding the well-being and happiness of babies and the
state of lactation were assessed on a five-point Likert scale: very satisfied, satisfied, neutral (neither
satisfied nor dissatisfied), unsatisfied, very unsatisfied. Subjective satisfaction of the investigator was
assessed on a five-point Likert scale, as noted above. Subjective satisfaction of patients on the taste and ease
of use of the product was on a five-point Likert scale, as noted above.
Compliance
Safety Assessment
Clinical safety was assessed by evaluating adverse events reported and/or observed during the study. The
patients reported adverse events during the follow-up or the clinical evaluation of patients.
Results
The complete set of data was analyzed, and also LSCS and normal delivery subgroup analysis was carried
out. In the total study population, 61 patients had undergone LSCS, and 17 were normal delivery patients.
The demographic baseline data of both arm A and arm B were comparable in terms of age, height, weight,
and body mass index (BMI). Vitals like pulse, blood pressure, and temperature are presented in Table 1.
FTND (n=17)
Time after starting drug (hours) 8 70.75 2.05 9 70.78 2.73 0.982
Time after starting drug (hours) 39 70.18 1.94 39 70.95 2.36 0.121
There was a significant increase in total volume (ml) of breast milk produced on the third postpartum day
(72 hours after delivery) or taking four doses of the study medication, whichever is later, measured after
breast milk expression from both breasts using a breast pump. An electric breast pump with three-phase
pumping, which includes massage, stimulation, and expression, was used for 15 minutes of pumping both
breasts two hours after breastfeeding. Similarly, the time to breast fullness was much lesser in the treatment
arm as compared to the placebo arm. The time to breast fullness was 38.09 hours and 30.49 hours,
respectively, in the placebo vs. treatment arm, and milk volumes were 49.69 ml and 64.74 ml, respectively,
FTND (n=17)
TABLE 2: Time to breast fullness and milk volume extracted after 72 hours after delivery
FTND - full-term normal delivery; LSCD - lower segment Caesarean section
In the global assessment of the satisfaction of mothers with lactation and the well-being of children in the
treatment arm, 85% of mothers were satisfied to very satisfied, and in the placebo arm, this was 74% (Figure
2).
Satisfaction of mothers with taste and ease of use in the treatment arm, 95% of mothers were satisfied to
very satisfied, and in the placebo arm, this was 72% (Figure 4).
Breast milk provides the ideal nutrition for the infant, and WHO recommends exclusive breastfeeding for the
first six months. Many women express concern about their ability to produce enough milk, and insufficient
milk is frequently cited as the reason for supplementation and early termination of breastfeeding [2]. A
longitudinal observational study that enrolled mothers who initiated breastfeeding after delivering healthy-
term infants found that the rate of discontinuation of breastfeeding was 37% by the second week [3]. Mothers
suffer from a feeling of failure and inferiority when they cannot produce sufficient milk for their babies.
Despite all the knowledge and guidelines, it is still a common problem, and top feeds are given early
postpartum due to insufficient breast milk production.
There is a high frequency of inadequate milk production in early lactation, which leads to the introduction
of water or top feeds in the first few days after delivery. If top feeds are given instead of breastfeeds, it could
have a negative impact on breast milk production. Milk supply in the first postpartum week is of critical
importance. In the current study, two important parameters were accessed. The time to breast fullness was
reduced in the treatment arm, and the quantity of milk produced increased. Early achievement of breast
milk production can have a positive impact on the confidence of the mother and lead to continued efforts
for breastfeeding.
Health care providers rely on non-pharmacological interventions and usually are in a dilemma as many
galactagogues are not backed up with robust evidence. Given the suboptimal rates of exclusive breastfeeding
and the availability and demand for medical and herbal lactation therapies, controlled trials and analyses
investigating these medicines are urgently warranted [7]. So, we conducted this randomized, double-blind
clinical study on the Shavari bar.
Our findings indicate that the Shavari bar increases breast milk production in nursing mothers more
effectively than a placebo. A statistically significant increase in breast milk volume was observed in the
study arm. It is worth noting that most of the subjects enrolled had undergone LSCS. Mothers undergoing
LSCS are less prone to breastfeeding and tend to delay breastfeeding initiation [8]. This was also observed in
placebo arms of the study, where there was significant variation in time to breast fullness among LSCS and
vaginal delivery placebo subgroups. The study arm showed a significant increase in milk volume.
Importantly, no maternal or neonatal adverse events were observed in the study. The use of pharmacological
galactagogues has been associated with side effects.
Also, this study found that Shavari bars reduce time to breast fullness and can help establish lactation early,
which can avoid the introduction of water and top feeds and benefit the mother and neonate. Another
strength of the current study was that it was a randomized placebo-controlled study regarded as higher
quality evidence. The measurement of milk for most patients was taken in a hospital setting using a
standard breast pump, so data variability was less, and variation due to differences in the method of milk
extraction was less.
In the current study, the treatment with Shavari bars resulted in a statistically significant and clinically
meaningful increase in milk production. This was in line with an earlier randomized, double-blind clinical
study of Shatavari. The galactagogue effect of Shatavari was evaluated in 60 mothers by recording changes
in their prolactin hormone levels [9]. The Shatavari group showed a more than three-fold increase in the
prolactin hormone level compared to the control group. There was a substantial increase in the weight of the
babies in the study group. Subjective satisfaction of the mother regarding the state of lactation and the well-
being and happiness of the child was many folds more in the Shatavari group.
Compliance is again a very important aspect. Shatavari is available in various oral dosage forms like powder,
granules, capsules, etc. However, many of these formulations have a very high content of sugar to mask the
bitter taste of Shatavari. Also, most of these products have to be mixed with milk, so the palatability and
taste are of concern. Shavari bar, the formulation that has been tested in the current study, is a granola bar
having Shatavari and oats along with dry fruits, honey, and sweetened cocoa. It is natural and preservative-
free. The study data showed that most of the patients gave satisfactory feedback about the taste. The global
feedback in the treatment arm was better than in the placebo arm.
Our study had certain drawbacks. The sample size was small. The time to breast fullness was not found to be
statistically significant among women with FTND in Shavari arm vs. placebo arm, possibly due to the smaller
sample size. There was a statistically significant increase in the amount of milk produced in Shavari arm vs.
the placebo arm (p<0.01); however, the same was not seen in the subgroup analysis, also possibly due to the
smaller sample size. The data on Shatavari needs to be generated in a bigger sample size. Also, there was no
Conclusions
The most crucial period for success or failure of breastfeeding is the first ten days after delivery, which is also
the most stressful period for mothers. Perceived milk insufficiency is the major impediment as it leads to
true milk insufficiency. It leads to a vicious cycle of top feeds, decreased sucking, and low milk production.
Breastfeeding is almost universally started but is stopped very soon due to this myth; therefore, it is
necessary to have various interventions to support breastfeeding in the initial few days postpartum. The
current study supports the consideration of using the Shavari Bar® as an effective option to support women
in the first few days of the postpartum period to establish lactation and build confidence in breastfeeding
along with nonpharmacological intervention.
Additional Information
Disclosures
Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Dr. DY Patil Medical
College, Navi Mumbai issued approval DYP/EC/15/2021. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that
this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE
uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have
declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial
relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the
previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other
relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear
to have influenced the submitted work.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge Act Lifesciences Pvt Ltd. for providing Shavari Bars® and placebos.
References
1. WHO: breastfeeding. (2022). Accessed: May 24, 2022: https://www.who.int/health-
topics/breastfeeding#tab=tab_1.
2. Foong SC, Tan ML, Foong WC, Marasco LA, Ho JJ, Ong JH: Oral galactagogues (natural therapies or drugs)
for increasing breast milk production in mothers of non-hospitalised term infants. Cochrane Database Syst
Rev. 2020, 5:CD011505. 10.1002/14651858.CD011505.pub2
3. Ertem IO, Votto N, Leventhal JM: The timing and predictors of the early termination of breastfeeding .
Pediatrics. 2001, 107:543-8. 10.1542/peds.107.3.543
4. Kent JC, Gardner H, Geddes DT: Breastmilk production in the first 4 weeks after birth of term infants .
Nutrients. 2016, 8:1-6. 10.3390/nu8120756
5. Alok S, Jain SK, Verma A, Kumar M, Mahor A, Sabharwal M: Plant profile, phytochemistry and
pharmacology of Asparagus racemosus (Shatavari): a review. Asian Pac J Trop Dis. 2013, 3:242-51.
10.1016/S2222-1808(13)60049-3
6. Hajela R: Understand lactation and lactation failure: fight the curse of insufficient breast milk . Sch J Appl
Med Sci. 2015, 3:3289-301.
7. Bazzano AN, Hofer R, Thibeau S, Gillispie V, Jacobs M, Theall KP: A review of herbal and pharmaceutical
galactagogues for breast-feeding. Ochsner J. 2016, 16:511-24.
8. Hobbs AJ, Mannion CA, McDonald SW, Brockway M, Tough SC: The impact of caesarean section on
breastfeeding initiation, duration and difficulties in the first four months postpartum. BMC Pregnancy
Childbirth. 2016, 16:90. 10.1186/s12884-016-0876-1
9. Gupta M, Shaw B: A double-blind randomized clinical trial for evaluation of galactogogue activity of
asparagus racemosus willd. Iran J Pharm Res. 2011, 10:167-72.
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Background
OPEN ACCESS
Galactagogues are substances thought to increase breast milk production, however evi-
Citation: McBride GM, Stevenson R, Zizzo G, dence to support their efficacy and safety remain limited. We undertook a survey among
Rumbold AR, Amir LH, Keir AK, et al. (2021) Use
Australian women to examine patterns of use of galactagogues and perceptions regarding
and experiences of galactagogues while
breastfeeding among Australian women. PLoS their safety and effectiveness.
ONE 16(7): e0254049. https://doi.org/10.1371/
journal.pone.0254049
Methods
Editor: Jane Anne Scott, Curtin University,
AUSTRALIA An online, cross-sectional survey was distributed between September and December 2019
via national breastfeeding and preterm birth support organisations, and networks of several
Received: May 4, 2021
research institutions in Australia. Women were eligible to participate if they lived in Australia
Accepted: June 19, 2021
and were currently/previously breastfeeding. The survey included questions about galacta-
Published: July 1, 2021 gogue use (including duration and timing), side effects and perceived effectiveness (on a
Peer Review History: PLOS recognizes the scale of 1 [Not at all effective] to 5 [Extremely effective]).
benefits of transparency in the peer review
process; therefore, we enable the publication of
all of the content of peer review and author Results
responses alongside final, published articles. The
Among 1876 respondents, 1120 (60%) reported using one or more galactagogues. Women
editorial history of this article is available here:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254049
were 31.5 ± 4.8 years (mean ± standard deviation) at their most recent birth. Sixty-five per-
cent of women were currently breastfeeding at the time of the survey. The most commonly
Copyright: © 2021 McBride et al. This is an open
access article distributed under the terms of the
reported galactagogues included lactation cookies (47%), brewer’s yeast (32%), fenugreek
Creative Commons Attribution License, which (22%) and domperidone (19%). The mean duration of use for each galactagogue ranged
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and from 2 to 20 weeks. Approximately 1 in 6 women reported commencing galactagogues
reproduction in any medium, provided the original
within the first week postpartum. Most women reported receiving recommendations to use
author and source are credited.
herbal/dietary galactagogues from the internet (38%) or friends (25%), whereas pharmaceu-
Data Availability Statement: Data cannot be
tical galactagogues were most commonly prescribed by General Practitioners (72%). The
shared publicly because the ethics committee
restricts secondary use of the data currently. Data perceived effectiveness varied greatly across galactagogues. Perceived effectiveness was
are available from The University of Adelaide highest for domperidone (mean rating of 3.3 compared with 2.0 to 3.0 among other
Human Research Ethics Committee (contact T: +61 galactagogues). Over 23% of domperidone users reported experiencing multiple side
8 8313 5137 | F: +61 8 8313 3700 | research. effects, compared to an average of 3% of women taking herbal galactagogues.
[email protected]) for researchers who
meet the criteria for access to confidential data.
Conclusions
Funding: GM was supported by an Australian
Government Research Training Program This survey demonstrates that galactagogues use is common in Australia. Further research
Scholarship. AK was supported by a National is needed to generate robust evidence about galactagogues’ efficacy and safety to support
Health and Medical Research Council Early Career
evidence-based strategies and improve breastfeeding outcomes.
Fellowship (GNT1161379). LG receives salary
support through a Mid-Career Research Fellowship
provided by The Hospital Research Foundation (C-
MCF-10-2019). LA, AR, GZ and LG were awarded a
Robinson Research Institute Engaging
Opportunities Grant 2019. The funders had no role
Introduction
in study design, data collection and analysis,
decision to publish, or preparation of the Breastfeeding is widely recognised to promote lifelong health for both the mother and infant
manuscript. [1]. International recommendations are exclusive breastfeeding until six months of age, with
Competing interests: The authors have declared ongoing breastfeeding for two years or longer [2, 3]. In Australia, evidence indicates that the
that no competing interests exist. majority of women initiate breastfeeding at birth; however, by six months of age, only 60% are
providing any breast milk, and 16% are exclusively breastfeeding [4]. This marked drop in
exclusive breastfeeding has been observed in many other high-income countries [5]. Previous
research shows that lactation insufficiency (also referred to as low breast milk supply), whether
real or perceived, is one of the most common reasons women discontinue breastfeeding [6, 7].
Lactation insufficiency can be caused by several factors, including insufficient mammary tis-
sue, irregular hormone levels, and ineffective milk removal from the breast [8].
The first-line management of lactation insufficiency involves non-pharmacological inter-
ventions, such as ensuring correct infant positioning and attachment [8, 9]. Where lactation
insufficiency persists, galactagogues—the term used to describe substances thought to promote
or increase breast milk production—may be used. Commonly reported galactagogues include
dietary or herbal supplements, for example, oats or fenugreek, and pharmaceutical treatments
such as domperidone [10]. Anecdotally, recent studies demonstrate widespread awareness and
use of there is increased promotion of dietary galactagogues such as lactation cookies [11, 12].
An examination of widely promoted recipes and commercially available products indicates
that lactation cookies contain highly variable combinations and quantities Internet searches
outline a variety of ingredients, including oats, brewer’s yeast and flaxseed.
A recent Cochrane review on the use of oral galactagogues for increasing breast milk pro-
duction in mothers of non-hospitalised term infants identified forty-one randomised clinical
trials [10]. The review found uncertain evidence that galactagogues improve breast milk vol-
ume or longer-term breastfeeding outcomes [10]. In contrast, several high-quality studies have
found domperidone effective in increasing breast milk production, specifically among mothers
of preterm infants [13, 14]. However, the use of domperidone remains controversial. Domper-
idone use at doses above 30 mg daily may present a risk of serious cardiac side effects [15].
However the relevance to breastfeeding women has been questioned as previous data on
increased cardiac risks mainly involved males and those aged over 60 years [16].
The considerable variation across studies concerning study population, intervention type,
and outcome evaluation has led to ongoing treatment uncertainties. This is reflected in the
recent guidelines issued by the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine, which state that there is
insufficient evidence to recommend one galactagogue over another [17].
Despite conflicting evidence regarding the benefits of galactagogues in clinical practice,
there is evidence that breastfeeding women commonly use galactagogues, and use may be
increasing. For example, a 2012 Australian survey of 304 breastfeeding women observed that
24% of respondents reported using a herbal galactagogue [18]. Estimates of uptake of the phar-
maceutical galactagogue domperidone appear more variable. Studies based on prescribing/dis-
pensing records from Australia, Canada and the UK show increasing trends in use, with
varying overall prevalence of use ranging from 2.7% to 20% [19–22]. In specific populations
such as following preterm birth, prevalence appears even higher, up to 30% [19, 21]. Further,
Grzeskowiak et al. examined queries relating to galactagogues at an Australian medicines
information centre from 2001 to 2014 that demonstrated a significant trend towards increased
phone calls regarding herbal galactagogues (0% to 23% of calls regarding galactagogues from
2001 to 2014) compared with a consistent interest in pharmaceutical galactagogues [23].
Unfortunately, the most recent studies evaluating galactagogue use only include data until
2015 and did not collect data on all types of galactagogues [12, 18–20]. Therefore, we sought to
undertake a survey to examine patterns of use of galactagogues, women’s experiences relating
to use, as well as their perceptions regarding effectiveness.
Methods
Ethics
This study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee at the University of Ade-
laide (approval number H-2019033934).
Survey administration
Women currently living in Australia and either currently breastfeeding or who had previously
breastfed were eligible to complete the survey. The survey was available online between 27 Sep-
tember 2019 and 12 December 2019. The survey consisted of part A, perceived safety and
knowledge of galactagogues, and part B, personal experiences and use of galactagogues, includ-
ing the self-perceived effectiveness, side effects and duration of use. If women had not taken
any galactagogues, they did not complete part B of the survey. This paper will focus predomi-
nantly on part B of the survey. Questions included in the survey covered the timing and dura-
tion of use of substances, sources of recommendation, side effects experienced and perceived
effectiveness. The perceived effectiveness of galactagogues was assessed using a 5-point Likert
scale from 1 (Not at all effective) to 5 (Extremely effective). The survey was tested for face
validity with two consumers and an academic breastfeeding expert. Only minor changes were
made to the survey before formal distribution through social networks (i.e. Facebook, Twitter,
email) of the Australian Breastfeeding Association [24, 25] (Australia’s national breastfeeding
support service, assisting more than 80,000 women each year, with over 1100 breastfeeding
counsellors available), Miracle Babies [26] (Australia’s leading organisation supporting prema-
ture and sick newborns, present in 143 Neonatal Intensive Care Units or Special Care Nurser-
ies in Australia), as well as research networks of the author’s respective institutions (e.g. The
Robinson Research Institute, and The University of Adelaide). Participants were encouraged
to share the survey and post links to the survey through their own social networks. The survey
was piloted with a small group of consumers (reviewed by representatives from the Australian
Breastfeeding Association and Miracle Babies) and academic experts in survey design, result-
ing in minor modifications before the final survey was launched. The complete survey is avail-
able as S1 File.
Study data were collected and managed using Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap)
hosted at The University of Adelaide [27, 28]. REDCap is a secure, web-based software plat-
form designed to support data capture for research studies, providing 1) an intuitive interface
for validated data capture; 2) audit trails for tracking data manipulation and export proce-
dures; 3) automated export procedures for seamless data downloads to standard statistical
packages, and 4) procedures for data integration and interoperability with external sources.
Only study investigators involved in the study had access to the data.
Completing the survey was voluntary, and no incentives were offered to participants.
Respondents had the opportunity to submit their responses anonymously or could choose to
include their contact details. When contact details were provided, respondents were
approached to participate in a separate qualitative study investigating women’s experiences of
using galactagogues. Only those who provided their contact details were able to withdraw their
responses, however none elected to withdraw their responses. A total of 2152 responses were
received, 7 responses were removed due to suspected duplicate entries based on identical
maternal characteristics provided in the entry section, and a further 90 were removed due to
births occurring outside of Australia.
Data analysis
Data were cleaned and analysed using STATA 14 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX). Graphi-
cal images were produced using GraphPad Prism version 9 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla Cali-
fornia USA) and R Upset Package [29]. Maternal demographic characteristics and data on use
and experiences of galactagogues were described using descriptive statistics. The most com-
mon combinations of galactagogues used were graphed using an UpSet plot. Differences in
maternal characteristics according to any galactagogue use were compared using Student’s T-
test for means and Pearson’s Chi2 test for categorical variables. Duration of use was reported
separately for each galactagogue according to those that were continuing use at the time of the
survey and those that had stopped using it prior to completing the survey. Descriptive statistics
were used to report the means and standard deviations. Where data were non-normally dis-
tributed, the median and inter-quartile ranges were used. Statistical significance was defined as
a P < 0.05.
Results
A total of 1876 women responded to the survey. Maternal demographic characteristics of sur-
vey respondents are presented in Table 1. Briefly, the average age of women who responded
was 31.5 years old, while most had completed secondary schooling or higher (92%) and almost
half were primiparous (47%). At the time of the survey, 1217 (65%) of women reported they
were currently breastfeeding their infant. For women who reported currently breastfeeding,
the average infant age at the time of survey response was 10.7 months (mean ± 10 months stan-
dard deviation). Women who reported having ceased breastfeeding before completing the sur-
vey discontinued at an average of 21 months (mean ± 11 months standard deviation). Almost
half of all respondents (49%) felt they could not produce enough breast milk for their child,
and 63% sought help from a lactation consultant or breastfeeding expert. Of women who had
stopped breastfeeding prior to completing the survey (35%), 19% reported stopping due to low
milk supply.
Galactagogue use
Overall, 60% of women (n = 1120) reported taking one or more galactagogues during breast-
feeding. Women who had preterm births, saw a lactation consultant, were primiparous, had
perceived low milk supply, had a Caesarean section, or required supplemental feeding with
infant formula were more likely to use galactagogues (Table 1).
Information on individual galactagogue use is presented in Table 2. The most commonly
used galactagogue included lactation cookies (47%), brewer’s yeast (32%) and fenugreek
(22%). The use of ‘Other’ galactagogues were reported by 7.3% (n = 137) of women, which
Table 1. Maternal characteristics according to any reported use of a galactagogue during breastfeeding.
Total survey population Did not use galactagogue Used a galactagogue P-value�
n (%) n (%) n (%)
N (Total = 1876) 2055 756 1120
Mothers age at delivery (years; mean ± SD) 31.5 ± 4.8 32 ± 5.2 31.2 ± 4.5 <0.001
Youngest child’s age at survey 0.005
0–< 6 months 560 (30) 223 (30) 335 (30)
� 6–< 12 months 370 (20) 124 (17) 246 (22)
� 12 months 936 (50) 405 (54) 527 (48)
State/Territory of youngest child’s birth 0.291
Australian Capital Territory 88 (5) 40 (5) 48 (4)
New South Wales 453 (24) 192 (26) 259 (23)
Northern Territory 23 (1) 9 (1) 14 (1)
Queensland 322 (17) 111 (15) 210 (19)
South Australia 378 (20) 150 (20) 225 (20)
Tasmania 43 (2) 17 (2) 25 (2)
Victoria 407 (22) 176 (24) 231 (21)
Western Australia 150 (8) 55 (7) 94 (9)
Completed secondary school 1887 (92) 698 (93) 1027 (92) 0.834
Primiparous 882 (47) 255 (34) 625 (56) < 0.001
Multiple birth 39 (2) 14 (2) 25 (2) 0.578
Preterm birth 218 (12) 66 (9) 150 (14) 0.002
Caesarean-section 621 (33) 192 (26) 426 (38) <0.001
Perceived low milk supply 928 (49) 162 (22) 761 (68) <0.001
Saw a lactation consultant 1184 (63) 381 (51) 798 (71) <0.001
Supplemented with infant formula 561 (30) 111 (15) 446 (40) <0.001
Any smoking during breastfeeding 66 (4) 23 (3) 43 (4) 0.358
�
Chi2 test between those that used and did not use a galactagogue.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254049.t001
included oats (n = 87; 4.7%), malt products (n = 42; 2.2%), and flaxseed or linseed (n = 13;
0.7%).
With respect to domperidone and metoclopramide, which are only available by prescrip-
tion, these were most commonly prescribed by general practitioners (76% and 67% respec-
tively), followed by obstetricians/gynaecologists (20% and 10% respectively). For the
remaining galactagogues, the most common recommendation source was the internet (rang-
ing from 28–50%) and friends (ranging from 15–45%). Healthcare professionals such as com-
munity pharmacists (2–6%), general practitioners (2–7%), and obstetricians/gynaecologists
(1–2%) were uncommon sources of recommendation. One in three women taking herbal or
dietary galactagogues reported using two or more recommendation sources.
Among those reporting galactagogue use, 27% took only one substance, while 46% used three
or more galactagogues. The maximum number of galactagogues used was 10. The most common
patterns of galactagogue use are represented in Fig 1. Lactation cookies featured in the top five
different combinations of galactagogues used, and were the most used sole galactagogue.
Table 2. Reported use of galactagogues and information sources from breastfeeding women (n = 1876).
Domperidone Metoclopramide Fenugreek Blessed Fennel Milk Ginger Brewer’s Lactation Combination of
Thistle Thistle yeast cookies herbs
Took substance (n 355 (19) 21 (1) 421 (22) 98 (5) 157 (8) 40 (2) 52 (3) 592 (32) 884 (47) 109 (6)
(%))
Mothers age at birth 31.8 ± 4.6 34.1 ± 4.2 31.7 ± 4.4 31.7 ± 4.3 31.5 ± 4.5 31.5 ± 4.5 31.2 ± 4.9 30.9 ±4.4 31 ± 4.4 32.1 ± 4.4
(years; mean ± SD)
Child’s age at survey�
0–6 months 110 (31) 2 (10) 105 (25) 29 (30) 44 (28) 13 (33) 19 (37) 158 (27) 264 (30) 42 (39)
6–12 months 79 (22) 4 (19) 86 (21) 18 (18) 43 (28) 8 (20) 16 (31) 135 (23) 210 (24) 23 (21)
12+ months 163 (46) 15 (71) 227 (54) 51 (52) 68 (44) 19 (48) 16 (31) 292 (50) 401 (46) 43 (40)
Maternal characteristics �
Primiparous 208 (59) 7 (33) 238 (57) 49 (50) 91 (58) 19 (48) 28 (54) 332 (56) 528 (60) 60 (55)
Preterm birth 74 (21) 7 (33) 70 (17) 17 (17) 22 (14) 9 (23) 7 (13) 85 (14) 125 (14) 14 (13)
Caesarean section 162 (46) 14 (67) 157 (37) 33 (34) 61 (39) 18 (45) 25 (48) 207 (35) 328 (37) 46 (42)
Perceived low milk 327 (92) 19 (90) 331 (79) 88 (90) 114 (73) 34 (85) 40 (77) 423 (71) 619 (70) 72 (66)
supply
Took only this 41 (12) 0 32 (8) 0 6 (4) 0 3 (6) 23 (4) 177 (20) 11 (10)
substance �
Two or more 57 (16) 1 (5) 168 (40) 34 (35) 43 (27) 15 (38) 14 (27) 272 (46) 421 (48) 27 (25)
recommendation
sources �
Who prescribed/recommended �
General Practitioner 271 (76) 14 (67) 30 (7) 5 (5) 3 (2) 1 (3) 3 (6) 22 (4) 21 (2) 2 (2)
Obstetrician/ 72 (20) 2 (10) 7 (2) 1 (1) 1 (1) 1 (2) 4 (1) 8 (1)
Gynaecologist
Midwife 41 (12) 2 (10) 67 (16) 14 (14) 8 (5) 3 (8) 3 (6) 65 (11) 87 (10) 6 (6)
Neonatologist/ 19 (5) 2 (10) 9 (2) 2 (2) 1 (0) 4 (0) 1 (1)
paediatrician
Internet search 119 (28) 30 (31) 54 (34) 20 (50) 17 (33) 278 (47) 356 (40) 34 (31)
Lactation consultant 90 (21) 26 (27) 18 (11) 6 (15) 3 (6) 76 (13) 117 (13) 9 (8)
Friends 87 (21) 15 (15) 28 (18) 11 (28) 12 (23) 211 (36) 395 (45) 26 (24)
Family 58 (14) 9 (9) 25 (16) 5 (13) 16 (31) 98 (17) 174 (20) 14 (13)
Child & family health 45 (11) 8 (8) 5 (3) 2 (5) 1 (2) 35 (6) 60 (7)
nurse
Naturopath 40 (10) 14 (14) 29 (18) 8 (20) 7 (13) 23 (4) 17 (2) 16 (15)
Neonatal nurse 36 (9) 5 (5) 7 (4) 4 (10) 3 (6) 30 (5) 54 (6) 1 (1)
Mother’s group 33 (8) 4 (4) 11 (7) 2 (5) 4 (8) 56 (9) 112 (13) 4 (4)
Social media 34 (8) 5 (5) 11 (7) 3 (8) 5 (10) 91 (15) 160 (18) 11 (10)
Blogs or online 24 (6) 4 (4) 6 (4) 1 (3) 5 (10) 56 (9) 77 (9) 4 (4)
discussion forums
Community 24 (6) 4 (4) 4 (3) 18 (3) 15 (2) 5 (5)
pharmacist
Breastfeeding helpline 10 (2) 2 (1) 1 (2) 12 (2) 20 (2) 2 (2)
Books 6 (1) 1 (1) 3 (2) 8 (1) 7 (1) 2 (2)
Podcasts 1 (0) 1 (2) 1 (0) 3 (0) 1 (1)
Other 15 (4) 2 (10) 18 (4) 7 (7) 14 (9) 3 (8) 1 (2) 21 (4) 44 (5) 14 (13)
�
(n (% of those who took each galactagogue)).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254049.t002
Fig 1. UpSet plot showing the use of different galactagogues and combinations thereof in breastfeeding women (n = 1120).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254049.g001
commenced within the first seven days. Timing of commencement varied considerably
according to the individual type of galactagogue used. The proportion of women reporting
commencing individual galactagogues within the first seven days postpartum, ranged from 4
to 67%.
Effectiveness
The perceived effectiveness of galactagogues is reported in Fig 3. The mean perceived effective-
ness for eight of nine galactagogues was rated as being between ’slightly’ (2) and ’moderately’
(3) effective (Fig 3), except for domperidone which users reported as having the highest per-
ceived effectiveness (3.3 ± 1.2; mean ± standard deviation).
Side effects
Side effects women experienced according to galactagogue use are presented in Table 3. Dom-
peridone had the highest proportion of women reporting one or more side effects (45%), com-
pared to less than 20% of women using herbal galactagogues. For domperidone and
metoclopramide, 9% and 19% of women respectively stopped taking the medication due to
side effects. Greater than 20% of domperidone users experienced two or more side effects.
Duration of use
The median reported duration of use for each galactagogue is presented in Fig 4. Overall, the
median reported duration of use was longer in women who were currently taking a galactago-
gue at the time of the survey completion. Median durations of use varied from 2 (ginger) to 7
(combination of herbs) weeks for those who had stopped using a substance, and 6 (milk this-
tle) to 19 weeks (ginger) for those who were continuing use at the time of the survey.
Recommendations
The percentages of women who would recommend a particular galactagogue to a friend is pre-
sented in Fig 5. Overall, 75% would recommend a galactagogue to a friend. There appeared to
be a strong correlation between the perceived effectiveness of a galactagogue and whether or
not women would recommend it to a friend. Of the 25% of women who would not recom-
mend to a friend, 71% indicated a perceived lack of effectiveness as a reason.
Fig 3. Perceived effectiveness of galactagogues used by women who were breastfeeding (n = 1120).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254049.g003
Table 3. Self-reported side effects for galactagogues used by breastfeeding women (n = 1120).
Domperidone Metoclopramide Fenugreek Blessed Fennel Milk Ginger Brewer’s Lactation Combination of
thistle thistle yeast cookies herbs
Took substance (N) 355 21 421 98 157 40 52 592 884 109
Any side effects � 159 (45) 6 (29) 72 (17) 8 (8) 7 (4) 4 (10) 3 (6) 65 (11) 110 (12) 5 (5)
Two or more side 80 (23) 5 (24) 22 (5) 4 (4) 3 (2) 3 (8) 1 (2) 12 (2) 15 (2) 0 (0)
effects�
Individual side effects�
Weight gain 88 (25) 2 (10) 10 (2) 1 (1) 2 (5) 1 (2) 20 (3) 79 (9) 1 (1)
Headache 59 (17) 3 (14) 9 (2) 1 (1) 1 (3) 1 (2) 4 (1) 4 (0) 1 (1)
Dry mouth 47 (13) 3 (14) 11 (3) 2 (2) 1 (1) 2 (5) 1 (2) 9 (2) 11 (1) 1 (1)
Fatigue 31 (9) 3 (14) 4 (1) 2 (2) 6 (1)
Irritability 22 (6) 3 (14) 2 (0) 1 (3) 3 (1) 4 (0) 1 (1)
Depression 20 (6) 2 (10) 3 (1) 3 (1) 3 (0)
Stomach cramps 14 (4) 17 (4) 3 (3) 3 (2) 16 (3) 13 (1)
Nausea 13 (4) 3 (14) 11 (3) 3 (3) 4 (3) 1 (3) 1 (2) 11 (2) 4 (0)
Heart palpitations 13 (4) 3 (14) 3 (1) 2 (0) 2 (0)
/racing heart
Dizziness /fainting 12 (3) 5 (1) 1 (1) 1 (3) 4 (1) 5 (1)
Involuntary 4 (1) 2 (10)
movements /jerking
Skin rash 2 (1) 2 (0) 1 (0) 1 (0)
Other 12 (3) 14 (3) 1 (1) 2 (1) 7 (1) 12 (1) 1 (1)
Body odour 11 (3)
Decreased supply 6 (1)
Gas/bloating 8 (1)
�
n (% of those who took each galactagogue).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254049.t003
Discussion
In this large contemporary survey of Australian women, galactagogue use was reported by
60% of women at some stage during their lactation. Women commonly reported using multi-
ple galactagogues, with median durations of use from 2–19 weeks or more and 50% of galacta-
gogues being commenced within the first four weeks postpartum. Galactagogues appeared to
be well tolerated, except for pharmaceutical galactagogues, where side effects were reported by
approximately 50% of women. The widespread utilisation and experiences of galactagogues in
postpartum women highlights the importance of future research aimed at (a) understanding
why women are using them in the face of limited evidence and guidance about their use, and
(b) improving evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of individual galactagogues to support
informed decision making.
The need to develop additional strategies to support breastfeeding mothers is reflected in
nearly half of our sample reporting that they felt they could not produce enough milk for their
child at some stage, with almost 1 in 5 women discontinuing breastfeeding due to concerns
about their milk supply. It is uncertain whether concerns related to breast milk supply were
real or perceived, determining which has been often recognised as a common challenge within
clinical practice settings [6]. The high proportion of women reporting concerns about their
breast milk production in our study (approximately 50%) is consistent with previous studies
from Australia (45%) and the United States (76%) [12, 30].
Fig 4. Duration of galactagogue use by women who had (a) stopped use and those who are (b) continuing use at the time of survey completion
(median, inter-quartile range, and 5th to 95th percentile whiskers).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254049.g004
Our data showed that women were more likely to take a galactagogue based on several preg-
nancy/birth characteristics such as primiparity, preterm birth or caesarean delivery, as well as
perceived low breast milk supply. These risk factors are consistent with those previously
reported in the literature, and commonly associated with breastfeeding difficulties [8, 22, 31].
Fig 5. Women’s recommendations of galactagogues to a friend and their reasons for not recommending.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254049.g005
A previous 2012 survey of women in Western Australia found that 24% of 304 respondents
reported using a herbal galactagogue during breastfeeding [18]. The most common galactago-
gues included fenugreek (18%), blessed thistle (6%) and fennel (5%) [18]. In comparison, a
2015 US survey of 188 women reported herbal galactagogue use in 46% of respondents [12].
The most common galactagogues were fenugreek (46%), fennel (16%) and milk thistle (13%)
[12]. However, the survey was restricted to women who reported using or intending to use
galactagogues. Notably, neither of these studies collected data regarding the use of the dietary
galactagogues lactation cookies or brewer’s yeast which were the most commonly reported
galactagogues in our survey. Regarding the use of herbal galactagogues, we observed similar
high usage of fenugreek, and lower but notable use of fennel [12]. The number of women
reporting using domperidone in our survey (1 in 5 respondents) was higher than initially
anticipated. A previous Australian audit of domperidone use in the postpartum period at a sin-
gle tertiary maternity teaching hospital from 2000 to 2010 reported a prevalence of 5% [19].
However, as the audit was restricted to domperidone supplied from the hospital pharmacy
department, it likely represents an underestimation of total use [19]. By comparison, interna-
tional studies evaluating domperidone use from 2011 to 2015 have produced widely varying
prevalence ranging from 2% in the UK [20] 2.7% in the US [12], and 20% in Canada [21].
Among high-risk subgroups, such as women with preterm birth, the prevalence of domperi-
done use increased to 30% [19, 21]. Such differences may reflect differences in inter-country
domperidone availability, clinical practice guidelines and prescriber/consumer awareness.
Domperidone had the highest perceived effectiveness rating but also had the highest pro-
portion of women reporting side effects. While previous meta-analyses provide moderate-
quality evidence to support the use of domperidone in managing lactation insufficiency fol-
lowing preterm birth [13], there is no such equivalent evidence that it is effective in mothers of
otherwise healthy term infants [10]. This represents a significant evidence-gap given wide-
spread uptake of domperidone use following term birth.
While fenugreek was the most commonly used herbal galactagogue and appeared to be
well-tolerated, a recent meta-analysis demonstrated that it seems to be no more effective than
a placebo in treating lactation insufficiency [10, 32].
The observation that a high proportion of women are taking galactagogues based on recom-
mendations from the internet is consistent with a 2015 survey conducted in the United States
demonstrated that 48% of women taking fenugreek sourced their information online. The
same study also found that up to 85% of women sought information from sources other than
their primary care provider or lactation consultants [12]. Frequent use of information sources
other than healthcare professionals raises concerns regarding whether or not women are being
provided with evidence-based information regarding the use of galactagogues to support
informed decision making. This is backed up by findings from an Australian survey of wom-
en’s attitudes to herbal medicine during lactation that found that while the internet was again
a common source of information, women often doubted the reliability of information from
the internet and cited the need for information and resources endorsed by reputable breast-
feeding organisations and healthcare professionals [30, 33]. The second highest source of
information was women’s friends, which may suggest that women prioritise others’ anecdotal
experiences over that of evidence-based resources or trained health care professionals.
The fact that 1 in 6 respondents started using various galactagogues within the first seven
days postpartum raises potential concerns, particularly given the challenge of assessing the
adequacy of breast milk production in the early postpartum period [34, 35]. These findings
may indicate that women may be turning to galactagogues prophylactically (without actually
having low breast milk supply) or using them as early treatments before trying non-pharmaco-
logical strategies. While 71% of women reported seeing a lactation consultant, we do not know
when this occurred relative to the commencement of galactagogues. The observation that 20%
of galactagogue use occurred after three months postpartum highlights the importance of con-
tinued breastfeeding support beyond the immediate postpartum period.
However, previous studies suggest the degree of error is likely to be small, with a 1-month
error in reporting among women recalling information from 1 to 3.5 years prior [37]. Further-
more, for women continuing to breastfeed and taking a galactagogue at the time of completing
the survey, it is not possible to correctly define the total duration of use or their complete set of
experiences. Lastly, we did not ask about galactagogue use before birth. Some women use
herbal galactagogues before birth to stimulate lactation initiation, which is of concern as some
popular herbal galactagogues such as fenugreek and milk thistle may cause uterine contrac-
tions [38].
Concluding remarks
This large online survey demonstrates that the use of galactagogues appears to be very com-
mon in Australia. Women seem to be using multiple galactagogues during breastfeeding, with
evidence of frequent initiation in the first week postpartum and long durations of use. The
incidence of side effects appeared higher for women taking pharmaceutical agents compared
to herbal galactagogues. However, a number of side effects were still reported by women using
herbal or food-based galactagogues, suggesting they are not completely benign. The high prev-
alence of women taking galactagogues based on recommendations obtained through the inter-
net or friends, rather than healthcare providers, raises concerns surrounding the potential
quality of the information they receive, particularly in light of the lack of evidence surrounding
the effectiveness and safety of most galactagogues. Overall, our findings highlight the need for
further high-quality research, particularly appropriately powered randomized controlled trials,
to generate robust evidence about the efficacy and safety of galactagogues to support evidence-
based strategies to improve breastfeeding outcomes.
Supporting information
S1 File. Boosting breast milk supply survey. All survey questions asked regarding women’s
use and experiences with substances to boost breast milk supply.
(PDF)
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: Gabriella Zizzo, Alice R. Rumbold, Lisa H. Amir, Luke E. Grzeskowiak.
Formal analysis: Grace M. McBride, Luke E. Grzeskowiak.
Funding acquisition: Gabriella Zizzo, Alice R. Rumbold, Lisa H. Amir, Luke E. Grzeskowiak.
Investigation: Grace M. McBride, Robyn Stevenson, Gabriella Zizzo, Alice R. Rumbold, Lisa
H. Amir, Luke E. Grzeskowiak.
Visualization: Grace M. McBride, Luke E. Grzeskowiak.
Writing – original draft: Grace M. McBride.
Writing – review & editing: Grace M. McBride, Robyn Stevenson, Gabriella Zizzo, Alice R.
Rumbold, Lisa H. Amir, Amy K. Keir, Luke E. Grzeskowiak.
References
1. Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJ, Franca GV, Horton S, Krasevec J, et al. Breastfeeding in the 21st cen-
tury: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet. 2016; 387(10017):475–90. https://doi.org/
10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7 PMID: 26869575
2. Kramer MS, Kakuma R. Optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2012(8):CD003517. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003517.pub2 PMID: 22895934
3. COAG Health Council. Australian National Breastfeeding Strategy: 2019 and beyond. Canberra,
Department of Health; 2019.
4. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. 2010 Australian National Infant Feeding Survey: Indicator
Results. 2011.
5. World Health Organization. Infant and young child feeding: World Health Organization; 2020 [updated
1 April 2020. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/infant-and-young-child-feeding.
6. Amir LH. Breastfeeding: managing ’supply’ difficulties. Aust Fam Physician. 2006; 35(9):686–9. PMID:
16969436
7. Australian Health Ministers’ Conference. The Australian National Breastfeeding Strategy 2010–2015.
Canberra; 2009.
8. Amir LH. Managing common breastfeeding problems in the community. BMJ. 2014; 348:g2954. https://
doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g2954 PMID: 24821712
9. Morton J, Hall JY, Wong RJ, Thairu L, Benitz WE, Rhine WD. Combining hand techniques with electric
pumping increases milk production in mothers of preterm infants. J Perinatol. 2009; 29(11):757–64.
https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2009.87 PMID: 19571815
10. Foong SC, Tan ML, Foong WC, Marasco LA, Ho JJ, Ong JH. Oral galactagogues (natural therapies or
drugs) for increasing breast milk production in mothers of non-hospitalised term infants. Cochrane Data-
base Syst Rev. 2020; 5:CD011505. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011505.pub2 PMID:
32421208
11. Zizzo G, Amir LH, Moore V, Grzeskowiak LE, Rumbold AR. The risk-risk trade-offs: Understanding fac-
tors that influence women’s decision to use substances to boost breast milk supply. PLoS One. 2021;
16(5):e0249599. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249599 PMID: 33939738
12. Bazzano AN, Cenac L, Brandt AJ, Barnett J, Thibeau S, Theall KP. Maternal experiences with and
sources of information on galactagogues to support lactation: a cross-sectional study. Int J Womens
Health. 2017; 9:105–13. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S128517 PMID: 28280392
13. Grzeskowiak LE, Smithers LG, Amir LH, Grivell RM. Domperidone for increasing breast milk volume in
mothers expressing breast milk for their preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG.
2018; 125(11):1371–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15177 PMID: 29469929
14. Grzeskowiak LE, Wlodek ME, Geddes DT. What evidence do we have for pharmaceutical galactago-
gues in the treatment of lactation insufficiency?-A narrative review. Nutrients. 2019; 11(5). https://doi.
org/10.3390/nu11050974 PMID: 31035376
15. Sewell CA, Chang CY, Chehab MM, Nguyen CP. Domperidone for lactation: what health care providers
need to know. Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 129(6):1054–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002033
PMID: 28486375
16. Grzeskowiak LE. Domperidone for lactation: what health care providers really should know. Obstet
Gynecol. 2017; 130(4):913-. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002286 PMID: 28937559
17. Brodribb W. ABM Clinical Protocol #9: Use of galactogogues in initiating or augmenting maternal milk
production, second revision 2018. Breastfeed Med. 2018; 13(5):307–14. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.
2018.29092.wjb PMID: 29902083
18. Sim TF, Sherriff J, Hattingh HL, Parsons R, Tee LB. The use of herbal medicines during breastfeeding:
a population-based survey in Western Australia. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2013; 13. https://doi.
org/10.1186/1472-6882-13-317 PMID: 24219150
19. Grzeskowiak LE, Lim SW, Thomas AE, Ritchie U, Gordon AL. Audit of domperidone use as a galacto-
gogue at an Australian tertiary teaching hospital. J Hum Lact. 2013; 29(1):32–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/
0890334412459804 PMID: 23015150
20. Mehrabadi A, Reynier P, Platt RW, Filion KB. Domperidone for insufficient lactation in England 2002–
2015: A drug utilization study with interrupted time series analysis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018;
27(12):1316–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.4621 PMID: 30106193
21. Smolina K, Morgan SG, Hanley GE, Oberlander TF, Mintzes B. Postpartum domperidone use in British
Columbia: a retrospective cohort study. CMAJ Open. 2016; 4(1):E13–9. https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.
20150067 PMID: 27280111
22. Grzeskowiak LE, Dalton JA, Fielder AL. Factors associated with domperidone use as a galactogogue at
an Australian tertiary teaching hospital. J Hum Lact. 2015; 31(2):249–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/
0890334414557175 PMID: 25355785
23. Grzeskowiak LE, Hill M, Kennedy DS. Phone calls to an Australian pregnancy and lactation counselling
service regarding use of galactagogues during lactation—the MotherSafe experience. Aust N Z J
Obstet Gynaecol. 2018; 58(2):251–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12731 PMID: 29057459
24. Australian Breastfeeding Association. About the Australian Breastfeeding Association (ABA): Australian
Breastfeeding Academy; 2021 [https://www.breastfeeding.asn.au/aboutaba.
25. Australian Breastfeeeding Association. Australian Breastfeeding Association for Health Professionals:
Australian Breastfeeeding Association,; 2021 [https://abaprofessional.asn.au/about-us/.
26. Miracle Babies Foundation. Miracle Babies Foundation: Find a Hospital: Miracle Babies Foundation,;
2021 [https://www.miraclebabies.org.au/event-search.php?linkid=1394.
27. Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O’Neal L, et al. The REDCap consortium: Build-
ing an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019; 95:103208.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208 PMID: 31078660
28. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture
(REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research
informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009; 42(2):377–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
PMID: 18929686
29. Conway JR, Lex A, Gehlenborg N. UpSetR: an R package for the visualization of intersecting sets and
their properties. Bioinformatics. 2017; 33(18):2938–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx364
PMID: 28645171
30. Sim TF, Hattingh HL, Sherriff J, Tee LB. The use, perceived effectiveness and safety of herbal galacta-
gogues during breastfeeding: A qualitative study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015; 12(9):11050–
71. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120911050 PMID: 26371019
31. Brown CR, Dodds L, Legge A, Bryanton J, Semenic S. Factors influencing the reasons why mothers
stop breastfeeding. Can J Public Health. 2014; 105(3):e179–85. https://doi.org/10.17269/cjph.105.
4244 PMID: 25165836
32. Grzeskowiak LE. No evidence that fenugreek is more effective than placebo as a galactagogue. Phyt-
other Res. 2021; 35(4):1686–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.6914 PMID: 33089557
33. Sim TF, Hattingh HL, Sherriff J, Tee LB. Perspectives and attitudes of breastfeeding women using
herbal galactagogues during breastfeeding: a qualitative study. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014;
14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-14-216 PMID: 24985246
34. Kent JC, Gardner H, Geddes DT. Breastmilk production in the first 4 weeks after birth of term infants.
Nutrients. 2016; 32(12):756. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu8120756 PMID: 27897979
35. Neville MC, Keller R, Seacat J, Lutes V, Neifert M, Casey C, et al. Studies in human lactation: milk vol-
umes in lactating women during the onset of lactation and full lactation. Am J Clin Nutr. 1988; 48
(6):1375–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/48.6.1375 PMID: 3202087
36. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s mothers and babies 2018: in brief. Canberra:
AIHW; 2018.
37. Gillespie B, d’Arcy H, Schwartz K, Bobo JK, Foxman B. Recall of age of weaning and other breastfeed-
ing variables. Int Breastfeed J. 2006; 1:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4358-1-4 PMID: 16722521
38. Zapantis A, Steinberg JG, Schilit L. Use of herbals as galactagogues. J Pharm Pract. 2012; 25(2):222–
31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0897190011431636 PMID: 22392841
Original Article
294/3/1, A.P.C. Road, Kolkata 700009. bDepartment of Kayachikitsa, Institute of Post Graduate
Ayurvedic Education and Research, 294/3/1, A.P.C. Road, Kolkata 700009 , India.
Abstract
168
A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial for Evaluation of ...
of participation in the study. Written consent was hormone level before and after the treatment.
required before randomization. The research To that end, a 2 mL sample of blood was drawn
followed the guidelines of the declaration of from each subject to ascertain the initial and
helsinki and tokyo for humans. The institutional final level of prolactin hormone level during the
clinical research committee of the participating clinical study. The quantitative determination
center approved the study protocol. of prolactin hormone concentration (ng/mL)
in human serum of blood sample was done
Treatment allocation and blinding by Micro plate Immunoenzymometric Assay
Initially 70 subjects were selected for the (ELISA) technique at ashoka laboratory, kolkata
purpose of this study, out of which 60 were finally using the kit of monobind. Inc.
followed up. These subjects were randomly The secondary outcomes measured during
allocated to one of the two equal-sized treatment this study were the changes in mothers’ weight,
groups and received the treatment dose of 60 babies’ weight, subjective satisfaction of mother
mg Kg-1 body weight per day. The treatment regarding the state of lactation and the well-
groups included group R (research group) which being and happiness of babies. The mothers’
received the root powder of research drug (60 mg weight and babies’ weight were recorded just
Kg-1 body weight per day) and group C (control before and after the period of clinical trial. The
group) who were administered rice powder subjective satisfaction of mothers regarding
as placebo (60 mg Kg-1 body weight per day). the state of lactation and the well-being and
The treatment consisted of oral ingestion of the happiness of babies were rated on a graded scale
treatment drug in the form of capsules three times ranging from 1 to 5 (1 denoting unsatisfactory
daily with milk for 30 days. All the subjects were and 5 representing highly satisfactory).
advised to immediately discontinue the use of
the drug in case of any serious side effects. Statistical analysis
The study medication was provided in white The results were analyzed statistically using
paper boxes, numbered consecutively with a the student’s t-test. The values of p < 0.05 were
medication number. The treatment allocation considered statistically significant, p < 0.01 were
schedule was based on computer-generated considered very significant and the values of
random numbers. The treatment codes resided p < 0.001 were taken as highly significant.
with the principal investigator and the local
investigators were not aware of treatment Results and Discussion
assignments. No treatment code was broken
before the last follow-up visit completion. General information
All the subjects were advised to lead their A total of 60 subjects were randomized
normal lives with their family during the study and received trial medication after providing
period subject to the following conditions: the written agreement of their participation in
(I) no use of any contraceptive pills or steroid the trial. The mothers were of an average age
containing drugs which could affect the normal of 25.6 years while the average age of infants
hormonal balance, (II) normal feeding technique was 2.8 months. 79% of the patients belonged
and schedule for infants, (III) making sure of to the minority muslim community, while 71%
the babies’ burping after the feeding and (IV) resided in an urban or semi-urban area. There
avoiding any situation or events which could was no significant group difference with regard
cause abnormal anxiety or tension. Follow-up to distribution of age, community or habitat. A
visits were done on a weekly basis to undertake total of 10 patients, who did not participate in the
the physical examination of mother and child entire trial or did not turn up for regular follow-
and for analysis of their symptoms. up visits, were excluded from the study.
169
Gupta M and Shaw B / IJPR (2011), 10 (1): 167-172
Table 1. Mean percent increase in primary and secondary parameters during clinical trial.
Mean percent increase
Parameter
Group R Group C
Primary outcome:
Mean prolactin hormone level 32.87 ± 6.48 a 9.56 ± 4.57 a
Secondary outcomes:
Mean weight of mother 3.78 ± 0.68 a 1.37 ± 0.44 a
Mean weight of babies 16.13 ± 3.65 a 5.68 ± 2.57 a
Subjective satisfaction of mother 1.54 ± 0.28 a 0.48 ± 0.33 a
Overall well-being & happiness of babies 1.27 ± 0.45 a
0.29 ± 0.23 a
n = 20 a: p < 0.05 b: p < 0.01 c: p < 0.001
The obtained results proved to be statistically significant (p < 0.05) using the 2-tailed t-test.
170
A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial for Evaluation of ...
food circulates all over the body and gets the control group. The research drug was also
concentrated in the breasts of mother (4, 5). found to be quite safe from the viewpoint of
Deficient lactation can be caused by a number acute oral toxicity. The statistical analysis of the
of factors such as anger, grief, lack of affection results showed that the findings were statistically
towards the child and etc. Asparagus racemosus significant (p < 0.05).
Willd., has been described in many ancient
Ayurvedic textbooks regarding its galactogogue Conclusions
action. The administration of alcoholic extract
of its rhizome in adult pregnant female albino Evaluation of the galactogogue action
rats suggests an estrogenic effect of Shatavari of the roots of Asparagus racemosus Willd.
on the female’s mammary gland and genital during clinical trial on lactating mothers
organs (20). The extract of Shatavari has been having symptoms of deficient lactation
shown to increase both the weight of mammary exhibits significant galactogogue activity in
lobulo-alveolar tissue and the milk yield in comparison with the control group without any
animal experiments. This effect was attributed significant acute toxicity effect. A probable
to the action of released corticosteroids or reason for this galactogogue effect could be
an increase in prolactin. Shatavarins I-V, the the presence of steroidal saponins in this plant.
steroidal saponins, may be responsible for the This drug has been scientifically validated for
hormonal like effect of Shatavari and explain its galactogogue activity by using the modern
its traditional use as a reproductive tonic (21, parameters such as the prolactin hormone which
22). The presence of steroidal saponins and is biochemically responsible for the lactation
sapogenins constituents has been shown to and also other associated symptoms. The overall
directly contribute in the lactogenic effect of research findings corroborate and validate the
Asparagus racemosus (23, 24). Its galactogogue galactogogue activity of the research drug, which
activity was evaluated experimentally on rats, has been traditionally ascribed to it in the ancient
cows, buffaloes and goats, but there were no text Charak Samhita.
similar findings regarding its galactogogue
effects on human subjects (10-13). References
The results of the clinical study showed that
(1) Sharma P. Dravya Guna Vijnana. 6th ed. Chaukhamba
the oral administration of the research drug Bharati Academy, Varanasi (1982) 562.
had a definite positive impact on the primary (2) Satyavati GV, Raina MK and Sharma M. Medicinal
parameter, the prolactin hormone level in the Plants of India. Indian Council of Medicinal Research,
lactating mothers. The increase in the mean New Delhi (1976) 101-106.
prolactin hormone level of the subjects in the (3) Pandey GS. Bhava Prakash Nighantu. 6th ed.
Chaukhamba Bharati Academy, Varanasi (1982) 392.
research group was three times more than that
(4) Sharma RK and Dash B. Charak Samhita (Sutra
of the subjects of the control group (or more) Sthanam). 6th ed. Chaukhamba Sanskrit Series,
during the study period. The findings in respect Varanasi (1999) 1.
of the primary parameter are also corroborated (5) Shastri A. Susruta Samhita (Sutra Sthanam), Part I.
by the results in case of the secondary Chaukhamba Sanskrit Sansthana, Varanasi (1955) 141.
outcome measures. Thus, while the measured (6) Goel RK, Prabha T, Kumar MM, Dorababu M, Singh P
secondary parameters, namely the weight of the and Singh G. Teratogenicity of Asparagus racemosus
Willd. root, a herbal medicine. Indian J. Exptl. Biol.
mothers and the weight of the babies, showed (2006) 44: 570-573.
substantially higher increases in the research (7) Ahmad VU, Khaliq-uz-Zaman SM, Shameel S,
group as compared to the control group, the rated Perveen S and Ali Z. Steroidal saponins from
secondary parameters, namely the subjective Asparagus dumosus. Phytochem. (1999) 50: 481-484
satisfaction of mother regarding the state of (8) Jayashree J and Dev S. Chemistry of ayurvedic crude
lactation and the well-being and happiness of drugs. Indian J. Chem. (1988) 27B: 12-16.
(9) Guyton AC. Textbook of Medical Physiology. 8th ed.
babies, also showed a manifold increase in the Prism Books (Pvt.) Ltd., Bangalore (1991) 926-927.
overall ratings over the duration of the study in (10) Kumar S, Mehla RK and Dang AK. Use of Shatavari
the research group subjects when compared to (Asparagus racemosus) as a galactopoietic and
171
Gupta M and Shaw B / IJPR (2011), 10 (1): 167-172
therapeutic herb – A review. Agric. Rev. (2008) 29: Use of Human Milk. AAP Policy Statement. Pediatrics
132-138. (2005) 115: 496-506. doi:10.1542/peds.2004-2491.
(11) Sabnis PS, Gaitondi BB and Jetmalani M. Effect Available from URL: http://aappolicy.aappublications.
of alcoholic extract of Asparagus racemosus on org/cgi/content/full/pediatrics;115/2/496
mammary glands of rats. Indian J. Exptl. Biol. (1968) (19) Gartner LM, Morton J, Lawrence RA, Naylor AJ,
6: 55-57 O’Hare D, Schanler RJ and Eidelman AI. Breastfeeding
(12) Kaikini AS, Pargaonkar DR, and Dindorkar CV and the use of human milk. Pediatrics (2005) 115:
Studies on oestrus and oestrous cycle in nondescript 496-506.
(Native) Cows Proc. 1st Asian Congress on Fertility, (20) Down CS. Textbook of Obstetrics and Neonatology.
and Sterility, Bombay (1977) 19-24. Down’s Book, Calcutta (1987) 582-584.
(13) Patel AB and Kanitkar UK. Asparagus racemosus (21) Pandey SK, Sahay A, Pandey RS and Tripathi YB.
Willd. from Bordi as a galactogogue in buffaloes. Effect of Asparagus racemosus rhizome (Shatavari)
Indian Vet. J. (1969) 46: 718-721. on mammary gland and genital organs of pregnant rat.
(14) Vihan VS and Panwar HS. A note on galactogogue Phytother. Res. (2005) 19: 721-724.
activity of Asparagus racemosus in lactating goats. (22) Gaitonde BB and Jetmalani MH. Antioxytocic action
Indian J. Animal Health (1988) 27: 177-178. of saponin isolated from Asparagus racemosus Willd.
(15) Picciano M. Nutrient composition of human milk. (Shatavari) on uterine muscle. Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn.
Pediatr. Clin. North Am. (2001) 48: 53-67. Ther. (1969) 179: 121-129.
(16) WHO: Exclusive Breastfeeding. WHO: Child and (23) Joshi JDS. Chemistry of ayurvedic crude drugs: Part
Adolescent Health and Development: Breastfeeding. VIII: Shatavari: 2. Structure elucidation of bioactive
[serial online] 2010 Jan – Dec [cited 2008 Sep 22], shatavarin I and other glycosides. Indian J. Chem.
Available from URL: http://www.who.int/child_ (1988) 27: 12-16.
adolescent_health/topics/prevention_care/child/ (24) Goyal RK, Singh J and Harbans L. Asparagus
nutrition/breastfeeding/en/ racemosus an update, Review. Indian J. Med. Sci.
(17) WHO: The Use of Antimalarial Drugs, Part II: (2003) 57: 408-414.
Artemisinin and its Derivatives. http://rbm.who.int (25) Oketch-Rabah HA. Phytochemical constituents of
[serial online] 1030 h [cited 2010 Dec 22], [all page]. the genus Asparagus and their biological activities.
Available from URL: http://www.rbm.who.int/cmc_ Hamdard (1998) 41: 33-43.
upload/0/000/014/923/am2_1-8.htm This article is available online at http://www.ijpr-online.com
(18) American Academy of Pediatrics. Breastfeeding and the
172