Lecture 05-Handout
Lecture 05-Handout
Dynamic Analysis – Enable to identify certain types of response with certain types of load-
time functions, e.g.
• Effect of a suddenly-applied load vs. one which builds up slowly
• Effect of a decaying load vs. a constant load with time
• Duration of the applied load relative to the natural period of the
Prof. Michael Seica system
Department of Civil Engineering • General effect of damping
University of Toronto – Non-dimensional charts can provide response of SDOFs to certain
standardized load types
Dynamic Analysis Single Degree of Freedom Systems 3 Dynamic Analysis Undamped Systems 4
Free Vibration Free Vibration
• Letting • Solution for no external force
• After td, use the general equation for vibration, with initial
conditions at td and f(τ) = 0
– Superimposing the solution for free vibration (to account for effects of
initial displacement and velocity)
Constant Force with Finite Rise Time Constant Force with Finite Rise Time
• Response of one-degree elastic system • Maximum dynamic load factors
– If tr is larger than T, dynamic effect is negligible – If tr is less than about 1/4T, similar effect to suddenly applied force
– Shorter rise times may be ignored in practical design
– If tr is a multiple of T, similar response as if F1 is applied statically
Constant Force with Finite Rise Time Constant Force with Finite Rise Time
• Example • Example
– Spring constant defined as the midspan force to cause a unit – Maximum dynamic stress
deflection
– tr/T = 0.075/0.111 = 0.68 and – Time when the maximum stress occurs
• From chart on slide 32, DLFmax = 1.38
• From chart on slide 33, tm/tr = 1.23
• Free Vibration
– Damping, c ≠ 0, and F = 0
– System requires an initial disturbance
• Displacement, velocity or combination of both
– Solution of the equation of motion
– Following solutions are obtained for the constants
– Positive sign for Ff applies when and only the velocity is positive
– Any solution would apply during a time interval when the velocity sign
remains unchanged
– If a mass has an initial displacement, y0, and zero velocity
– Velocity is negative during the first half-cycle of response
– The first, negative peak is
Dynamic Analysis Pulsating Force, Undamped 53 Dynamic Analysis Pulsating Force, Undamped 54
Dynamic Analysis Pulsating Force, Undamped 55 Dynamic Analysis Pulsating Force, Undamped 56
Resonance Resonance
• For either solution • In the DLF equation, for Ω = ω, y = 0/0 (indeterminate solution)
– (DLF)max approaches 1 as Ω/ω approaches 0 (static load effect) – Using the l’Hospital rule
– (DLF)max approaches 0 as Ω/ω approaches ∞ (mass remains stationary)
– (DLF)max approaches ∞ as Ω ≈ ω (‘resonance’ condition)
Dynamic Analysis Pulsating Force, Undamped 57 Dynamic Analysis Pulsating Force, Undamped 58
Resonance Resonance
• In practice, exact resonance does not occur • Substituting the values of ωt into the (DLF)Ω = ω equation
– Systems are never completely linear
– For large distortions plastic deformations, etc. change the
characteristics of the system
– Or
– Deflections of structure become large and intolerable
• Amplitude of response after a number of cycles at resonance , where
– Maximize the DLF by differentiating it
• n = number of half-cycles after the beginning of the response
– Maximum deflection of an undamped system is
• π/2 times the static deflection after 1/2 cycle of loading
• π times the static deflection after 1 cycle of loading
• 3π/2 times the static deflection after 1-1/2 cycles of loading
– Therefore
• etc.
Dynamic Analysis Pulsating Force, Undamped 59 Dynamic Analysis Pulsating Force, Undamped 60
Resonance Damped System
• Initial stage of response at resonance • Consider a damped system with sinusoidal force of infinite
duration
– Equation of motion
Dynamic Analysis Pulsating Force, Undamped 61 Dynamic Analysis Pulsating Force, Damped 62
Dynamic Analysis Pulsating Force, Damped 63 Dynamic Analysis Pulsating Force, Damped 64
Resonance Elasto-Plastic Systems
• For critical damping (β/ω = 1) • Consider a single-degree of freedom system
– Maximum resonant deflection is half the static deflection – Bilinear resistance function
• Even when damping is very small, theoretical infinite – Suddenly applied, constant load
amplitudes do not occur at resonance
• The maximum dynamic load factor at resonance
, where
– Mp is the plastic bending moment based on 33 ksi yield stress
Dynamic Analysis Lumped Mass MDOF Systems 85 Dynamic Analysis Lumped Mass MDOF Systems 86
Dynamic Analysis Lumped Mass MDOF Systems 87 Dynamic Analysis Lumped Mass MDOF Systems 88
Beams with Several Masses Natural Modes of Vibration
• Are always far-coupled systems • Also known as ‘normal’ modes of vibration
– e.g. a deflection of mass 1, but not of mass 2, will cause a reaction • Number of natural modes equal number of DOF
force at support 3; accounted for by spring k4 • Each mode is characterized by two parameters
– Natural circular frequency (frequency, period)
– Characteristic shape
• Natural mode
– The system can vibrate freely in that mode such that the ratio of
displacements of any two masses is constant with time
– These ratios define the characteristic shape
• Complete motion of the system is obtained by superimposing
the independent motions of the individual modes
• First step in a dynamic analysis
– Determination of natural frequencies
– Determination of characteristic modes
Dynamic Analysis Lumped Mass MDOF Systems 89 Dynamic Analysis Lumped Mass MDOF Systems 90
• And rearranged
• During a given mode, displacements of masses are in the
same proportions
– i.e. all possible positions are geometrically similar
Dynamic Analysis Lumped Mass MDOF Systems 91 Dynamic Analysis Lumped Mass MDOF Systems 92
Natural Circular Frequencies Natural Circular Frequencies
• The left sides of all equations are identical • Substituting – ω2 in the equations of motion
– One can name
Dynamic Analysis Lumped Mass MDOF Systems 93 Dynamic Analysis Lumped Mass MDOF Systems 94
Dynamic Analysis Lumped Mass MDOF Systems 95 Dynamic Analysis Lumped Mass MDOF Systems 96
Modal Displacement Modal Equation of Motion
• For each mode, n, it is convenient to select a modal • Modal equation of motion can be derived
displacement, An
– All individual mass displacements may be expressed in terms of An
– An is taken as the displacement of one arbitrarily selected mass, r
– Similar form as that for a SDOF system
• ϕrn and ϕΔgn = normalized deflection coordinates for the nth mode
• Constants for a given mode
Dynamic Analysis Lumped Mass MDOF Systems 97 Dynamic Analysis Lumped Mass MDOF Systems 98
– cri = damping coefficient which applies to the ith velocity in the rth
equation of motion
Dynamic Analysis Lumped Mass MDOF Systems 99 Dynamic Analysis Lumped Mass MDOF Systems 100
Effect of Damping Structures with Distributed Mass and Force
• The modal equation for the nth mode • All structures are in reality distributed mass systems
– Massless springs are physically impossible
• Some structures can be closely approximated by lumped mass
systems
– Equation is similar to the equation of motion for SDOF systems – Mass of springs is small compared to mass concentrations at points
between the springs
– Critical damping in the nth mode is defined by
– e.g. multi-storey building frames
• Other systems may not be easily modelled as lumped-mass systems
– Must solve the equations based on the continuous-mass system
– And the damping coefficients can be calculated from – e.g. beams and slabs
• Continuous-mass systems have an infinite number of DOFs
– Each small element could be considered a discrete mass connected by
springs to the other
• Cn = ratio of actual to critical damping in the nth mode – Only a few lower modes have responses of significance practically
• For each of n modes there is one equation for each of the n masses – Natural frequencies and characteristic shapes will be determined
• Results in n2 equations and n2 damping coefficients to be computed – Modal responses are computed and superimposed
Dynamic Analysis Lumped Mass MDOF Systems 101 Dynamic Analysis Distributed Mass and Force 102
– The net load intensity on the element • EI = bending stiffness of the beam
• Partial derivatives are used since y is a function of t as well as x
– Solution of equation represents beam deflection as a function of time
and location along the beam
• Positive load is in the same direction as positive y
Dynamic Analysis Distributed Mass and Force 103 Dynamic Analysis Distributed Mass and Force 104
Solution of Equation of Motion Elasto-Plastic Analysis of Beams
• Shear deformation and rotation of element is ignored • Analysis can be very cumbersome
– For slender beams neither are important and can be neglected – Option 1: Step-by-step incremental analysis as plastic hinges form or
• Equation of motion can be rewritten load hinge rotation reverses
– Option 2: Replace the system by a lumped mass MDOF system
• Typically, a beam must be divided into at least 10 segments
– Results in nine DOFs
• And the solution is • Mass and load concentrated only at each mass location
• Plastic hinges may form only at each mass location
• Stiffness coefficients determined by unit deflections at each mass
point
• When a plastic hinge forms a pin is introduced and the stiffness
coefficients re-evaluated
– Φn(x) = amplitude of the characteristic shape for the nth mode – Option 3: Computer modelling
– Constants C1,...,C4 can be determined by consideration of boundary • Finite differences
conditions (deflection, rotation, curvature) at the ends of the beam • Finite elements
Dynamic Analysis Distributed Mass and Force 105 Dynamic Analysis Distributed Mass and Force 106
Dynamic Analysis Distributed Mass and Force 107 © Michael Seica (2010-2020)