INSTITUTIONAL ASSESSMENT AND ACCREDITATION

(Effective from July 2017)

Accreditation - (Cycle - 1)

PEER TEAM REPORT ON

INSTITUTIONAL ACCREDITATION OF
CENTRAL UNIVERSITY OF JHARKHAND
Ranchi
Jharkhand
835205

NATIONAL ASSESSMENT AND ACCREDITATION COUNCIL

An Autonomous Institution of the University Grants Commission
P.O. Box No. 1075, Nagarbhavi, Bengaluru - 560 072, INDIA

Page 1/12 12-10-2020 09:09:05

Section I:GENERAL INFORMATION

1.Name & Address of the CENTRAL UNIVERSITY OF JHARKHAND

institution: Ranchi
Jharkhand
835205
2.Year of Establishment 2009

3.Current Academic Activities at

the Institution(Numbers):
Faculties/Schools: 9

Departments/Centres: 22

Programmes/Course offered: 43

Permanent Faculty Members: 95

Permanent Support Staff: 96

Students: 2409

4.Three major features in the 1. The first central university in the state of Jharkhand with 26 per
institutional Context cent tribal population
(Asperceived by the Peer Team): 2. Clean and green campus
3. University with Centre for excellence in green and energy
efficient technology awarded by MHRD
5.Dates of visit of the Peer Team From : 27-06-2019
(A detailed visit schedule may be To : 29-06-2019
included as Annexure):
6.Composition of Peer Team
which undertook the on site visit:
Name Designation & Organisation Name

Chairperson DR. PARAMJIT S JASWAL Vice Chancellor,RAJIV GANDHI

NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF
LAW PUNJAB
Member Co-ordinator: DR. SUMAN DHAR Professor,JAWAHARLAL
NEHRU UNIVERSITY
Member: DR. CHANDRAKANT Registrar,CENTRAL
YATANOOR UNIVERSITY OF KARNATAKA
Member: DR. DERRICK MARIO DENIS Professor,SAM
HIGGONBOTTOM
UNIVERSITY OF
AGRICULTURE TECHNOLOGY
AND SCIENCES
Member: DR. DEEPAK KUMAR SAHOO Director,BIJU PATNAIK
UNIVERSITY OF
TECHNOLOGY
NAAC Co - ordinator: DR. JAGANNATH PATIL

Page 2/12 12-10-2020 09:09:05

 Section II:CRITERION WISE ANALYSIS
Observations (Strengths and/or Weaknesses) on each qualitative metrices of the key Indicator under the
respective criterion(This will be a qualitative analysis of descriptive nature aimed at critical analysis
presenting strength and weakness of HEI under each criteria)

Criterion1 - Curricular Aspects (Key Indicator and Qualitative Metrices(QlM) in Criterion1)

1.1 Curriculum Design and Development
1.1.1 Curricula developed /adopted have relevance to the local/ national / regional/global developmental
QlM needs with learning objectives including program outcomes, program specific outcomes and
course outcomes of all the program offered by the University
1.2 Academic Flexibility
1.3 Curriculum Enrichment
1.3.1 Institution integrates cross cutting issues relevant to Gender, Environment and Sustainability,
QlM Human Values and Professional Ethics into the Curriculum
1.4 Feedback System

Qualitative analysis of Criterion 1

The University has clear and well defined vision and mission. Course curriculum is updated and revised
keeping in view the local/regional/national/global needs at regular intervals after discussing it at faculty level
and getting due approval of the competent bodies such as Board of Studies/School Board/Academic Council.
University offers courses in foreign languages like Chinense and Korean. ICT used in teaching methods.Field
studies done in relevant course curriculum. University needs to effectively implement MOOCs on Swayam
platform. The University has established the Centre for Endangered Language with Central Govt funding to
preserve the endangered languages of the state. It also has a distinct Centre of Contemporary and Tribal
Customery Law. Innovative areas such as Green and Energy Efficient Technology (GEET), Geoinformatics,
Water Engineering, Energy Engineering etc are part of the acdemic curriculum that has got the momentum
with the efforts of the faculties. The thrust on research and its outcome is visible in some departments like
Environmental Sciences, Geoinformatics, Chemistry, Physics and Life Sciences. The University has
introduced Choice Based Credit Systems (CBCS),

Page 3/12 12-10-2020 09:09:05

 Criterion2 - Teaching-learning and Evaluation (Key Indicator and Qualitative Metrices(QlM) in Criterion2)
2.1 Student Enrollment and Profile
2.2 Catering to Student Diversity
2.2.1 The institution assesses the learning levels of the students, after admission and organises special
QlM programs for advanced learners and slow learners
2.3 Teaching- Learning Process
2.3.1 Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving
QlM methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences
2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality
2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms
2.5.4 Positive impact of reforms on the examination procedures and processes including IT integration
QlM and continuous internal assessment on the examination management system
2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes
2.6.1 Program outcomes, program specific outcomes and course outcomes for all programs offered by
QlM the Institution are stated and displayed on website and communicated to teachers and students
2.6.2 Attainment of program outcomes, program specific outcomes and course outcomes are evaluated
QlM by the institution
2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey

Qualitative analysis of Criterion 2

The University has devised the Academic Calender that it tries to adhere. The students are continuously
assessed and evlauated. Field studies are integrated part of the curriculum in some departments. However, it
needs to introduced in all the departments. University encourages advanced learners to compete in different
fields. The slow learners are also taken care of by organizing tutorials and special classes as per the needs. The
University has made project work and field studies as part of the academic requirements. The students are
encouraged to take internship in various organizations for hands on experience which is the need of the hour.
The students are shown the answer scripts after evaluation before finalizing the grades and to keep the
tranparency in the evaluation process. In spite of the limitation of the transit campus, the University has put
efforts to introduce ICT in teaching in some of the departments although it needs further improvements, The
examination system and practices needs further improvement.

Page 4/12 12-10-2020 09:09:05

 Criterion3 - Research, Innovations and Extension (Key Indicator and Qualitative Metrices(QlM) in
Criterion3)
3.1 Promotion of Research and Facilities
3.2 Resource Mobilization for Research
3.3 Innovation Ecosystem
3.3.1 Institution has created an eco system for innovations including Incubation centre and other
QlM initiatives for creation and transfer of knowledge
3.4 Research Publications and Awards
3.5 Consultancy
3.6 Extension Activities
3.6.1 Extension activities in the neighbourhood community in terms of impact and sensitising students
QlM to social issues and holistic development during the last five years
3.7 Collaboration

Qualitative analysis of Criterion 3

Some departments have focused thrust areas on research and innovation. Numerous extramural funded
projects have been received from various organisations like the Department of Science and Technology,
Department of Biotechnology, University Grant Commission etc. University organized various special
lectures to promote research culture in different schools/departments. The University provides financial
support to research scholars through non NET fellowships. Some students also qualify National Eligibility
Test (CSIR/UGC) and GATE and eran their own fellowships. The University departments have several
publications in high impact journals including Nature that highlights the quality of research undertaken by the
faculty.These publications have aquired sufficinet number of citations over the time. However, the space
constraints have become a real roadblock for further development. It is expected that shifting to the new
campus will resolve some of these issues. A Resaech and Development Cell has been established to facilitate
and monitor the research and innnovation activities. The University should devise mechanism to recognise the
extraordinary achievements in research activities for faculty as well as students. The University has attracted
Ramanujam and Ramalingaswamy fellows, which are very competitive fellowships and allow the researchers
to set up their laboratories with decent funding and salary support.

Page 5/12 12-10-2020 09:09:05

 Criterion4 - Infrastructure and Learning Resources (Key Indicator and Qualitative Metrices(QlM) in
Criterion4)
4.1 Physical Facilities
4.1.1 The institution has adequate facilities for teaching - learning. viz., classrooms, laboratories,
QlM computing equipment, etc
4.1.2 The institution has adequate facilities for sports, games (indoor, outdoor),gymnasium, yoga centre
QlM etc., and cultural activities
4.2 Library as a Learning Resource
4.2.1 Library is automated using Integrated Library Management System (ILMS)
QlM
4.2.2 Collection of rare books, manuscripts, special reports or any other knowledge resource for library
QlM enrichment
4.3 IT Infrastructure
4.3.1 Institution frequently updates its IT facilities including Wi-Fi
QlM
4.4 Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure
4.4.2 There are established systems and procedures for maintaining and utilizing physical, academic
QlM and support facilities - laboratory, library, sports complex, computers, classrooms etc.

Qualitative analysis of Criterion 4

Presently, the University is running from the transit campus with working i nfrastructure consisting of 45
acres. Though University has got 500 acres of land to develop the new campus, the progress has been limited
due to various reasons including CBI enquiry at the initial stages of the establishment of the University. The
University has limited seats for boys and girls in the hostels in the transit campus. The central library of the
University is having more than 28000 books with limited e-resources. There is an urgent need of adding
quality e-journals and e-databases like Hein on line, Jstore, SCC online. Further, the library should be enriched
with more quality text and reference books. More seating space should be arranged for the library. The campus
is fully Wi Fi enabled. The University has a good Health Centre. Establishment of a pathology laboratory with
adequate trained paramedical staff is of utmost priority. The faculty should ensure availability of teaching
learning materials to all the students. The recently developed computer centre should be equipped with high
end computers accessible to all.

Page 6/12 12-10-2020 09:09:05

 Criterion5 - Student Support and Progression (Key Indicator and Qualitative Metrices(QlM) in Criterion5)
5.1 Student Support
5.1.5 The institution has an active international students cell to cater to the requirements of foreign
QlM students
5.2 Student Progression
5.3 Student Participation and Activities
5.3.2 Presence of an active Student Council & representation of students on academic & administrative
QlM bodies/committees of the institution
5.4 Alumni Engagement
5.4.1 The Alumni Association/Chapters (registered and functional) contributes significantly to the
QlM development of the institution through financial and non financial means during the last five years

Qualitative analysis of Criterion 5

The University has a strict anti-ragging policy. It also has language laboratory to strengthen the communcation
skill and employability of the students. Student support services like mentor-mentee and personalized
counselling need to be strengthened for the overall development of the students. The establishment of the
placement cell has helped various students to get jobs in various organizations. However, there is an urgent
need to create a corporate placement cell to help more students to get jobs in leading companies. Career
counselling and coaching centre for the students from marginalised community to prepare them for
competitive examination should be established with priority. The Internal Complaint Committee and
Grievance Redressal Committees are in place in the university.The University has a vibrant sports centre with
various indoor and outdoor sport activities. It has fetched several laurels and trophies in interstate and
intrastate competitions. However, it lacks experienced permamnet coaches that need to be hired with
immediate effect considering the interests of large number of students in various sports activities. At present
faculty with passion and interest in sports are volunteering in such activities.

Page 7/12 12-10-2020 09:09:06

 Criterion6 - Governance, Leadership and Management (Key Indicator and Qualitative Metrices(QlM) in
Criterion6)
6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership
6.1.1 The governance of the institution is reflective of an effective leadership in tune with the vision
QlM and mission of the University
6.1.2 The institution practices decentralization and participative management
QlM
6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment
6.2.1 Perspective/Strategic plan and Deployment documents are available in the institution
QlM
6.2.2 Organizational structure of the University including governing body, administrative setup, and
QlM functions of various bodies, service rules, procedures, recruitment, promotional policies as well as
grievance redressal mechanism
6.2.4 Effectiveness of various bodies/cells/committees is evident through minutes of meetings and
QlM implementation of their resolutions
6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies
6.3.1 The institution has effective welfare measures for teaching and non-teaching staff
QlM
6.3.5 Institution has Performance Appraisal System for teaching and non-teaching staff
QlM
6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization
6.4.1 Institution conducts internal and external financial audits regularly
QlM
6.4.3 Institutional strategies for mobilisation of funds and the optimal utilisation of resources
QlM
6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System
6.5.1 Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the
QlM quality assurance strategies and processes
6.5.2 The institution reviews its teaching learning process, structures & methodologies of operations
QlM and learning outcomes at periodic intervals through IQAC set up as per norms
6.5.5 Incremental improvements made during the preceding five years (in case of first cycle)
QlM
Post accreditation quality initiatives (second and subsequent cycles)

Qualitative analysis of Criterion 6

The University's vision, mission and objectives are in tune with the goals of the higher education. The
University monitors and evaluates its plans and policies and recommends for modifications wherever required.
Decentralization and delegation of power is excercised in the University. However, the engagement of large
number of younger faculty in the adminstration may become counter-productive in the long run. This may be
resolved with the appointment of more number of non teaching staff with adequate experience as per the
requirement.Competent authority should take necessary steps to fill up the vacant posts both at the teaching
and non teaching levels. It has been observed that Board of Studies and School Boards are meeting only
occassionally (sometimes once in two years). The Statutory Bodies should meet at least once in each semester
to resolve academic and adminstrative matters in timely manner. E-governance should be implemented in day-
to-day activities for faster movement of files and maintaining transparency. Training programmes may be
organised for noting and drafting to train the staff.

Page 8/12 12-10-2020 09:09:06

 Criterion7 - Institutional Values and Best Practices (Key Indicator and Qualitative Metrices(QlM) in
Criterion7)
7.1 Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities
7.1.2 Institution shows gender sensitivity in providing facilities such as
QlM a) Safety and Security
b) Counselling
c) Common Room
7.1.5 Waste Management steps including:
QlM • Solid waste management
• Liquid waste management
• E-waste management

7.1.6 Rain water harvesting structures and utilization in the campus

QlM
7.1.7 Green Practices
QlM • Students, staff using
a) Bicycles
b) Public Transport
c) Pedestrian friendly roads
• Plastic-free campus
• Paperless office
• Green landscaping with trees and plants
7.1.18 Institution organizes national festivals and birth / death anniversaries of the great Indian
QlM personalities
7.1.19 The institution maintains complete transparency in its financial, academic, administrative and
QlM auxiliary functions
7.2 Best Practices
7.2.1 Describe at least two institutional best practices (as per NAAC Format)
QlM
7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness
7.3.1 Describe/Explain the performance of the institution in one area distinctive to its vision, priority
QlM and thrust

Qualitative analysis of Criterion 7

The University has tried to uphold the spirit of institutional value by establishing the Centre for Endengered
Languages. The University is following purchase procedure as per the GFR Rules and following the e-tender
process and GEM. The University is trying to make the campus plastic free by reducing botted waters,
disposables cup/plates etc. The University is also trying to inculcate the social responsibility among the
students by encouraging the projects like "Unnayan" that is helping students from maginalised sections for
their educational upliftment at the primary and secondary school level. The University is also focussing on
research but its expansion has a limitation of limited space till it shifts to the new campus.

Page 9/12 12-10-2020 09:09:06

Section III:OVERALL ANALYSISbased on Institutional strengths.Weaknesses,Opportunities &
Challenges(SWOC)(up to 500 words)
Strength
In spite of the limitation of the transit campus, the University has thrived for maximum utilization of the
resources for achieving the academic persuits. However, to maximize the potential of the University to
provide quality education, the vacant positions both at the teaching and non-teaching level should be filled
immediately. The overall enrolment of the students has decreased in the recent years that defy the very
purpose of the University in this area. This is a reflection of acute space crunch in the existing premise that
can only be resolved by shifting to the new campus. However, it seems there are several roadblocks for
completion of the new campus that need to be addressed by setting up a high level Committee representing
stakeholders that will coordinate with several regulatory and funding agencies for the completion of the
project. The Statutory Bodies of the University need to peep deep and make sincere efforts to ensure that the
University meets the challenges it has before it and achieve the objectives for which it has been
established.The research output of the University has been satisfactory in the recent years that can be seen
from moderate and good publication from various Departments that can be further improved by promoting
interdisciplinary research and encouraging the faculty.

Page 10/12 12-10-2020 09:09:06

Section IV:Recommendations for Quality Enhancement of the Institution
(Please limit to ten major ones and use telegraphic language) (It is not necessary to indicate all the ten
bullets)
The University should provide start up grant for the new faculties.

There should be more collaboration in the research and development front between Industry and the
academia.

Nearby good hospitals with cashless facility should be empaneled for the health benefit of the
University employees and students.

Full fledged Sports Department with experienced coach should be provided to the university

General insurance for the students and employees should be introduced

USIC and Central Instrument Facility with high end instruments should be established in the
University

Shifting to the new campus should take place after availability of the proper infrastructure and logistics

The University should hold the Convocation on regular basis.

Each Department should have its own library with requisite text and reference books.

NBA for Technical and Professional Courses should be obtained from Regulatory Authority.

A Corpus Fund should be generated from available resources.

A portion of the overhead charges from the grant should be available to the Principle Investigators of
the respective projects.

Integrated/undergraduate programme should be reinitiated as per subject specific requirements.

I have gone through the observations of the Peer Team as mentioned in this report

Signature of the Head of the Institution

Seal of the Institution

Page 11/12 12-10-2020 09:09:06

 Sl.No Name Signature with date
1 DR. PARAMJIT S JASWAL Chairperson
2 DR. SUMAN DHAR Member Co-ordinator
3 DR. CHANDRAKANT YATANOOR Member
4 DR. DERRICK MARIO DENIS Member
5 DR. DEEPAK KUMAR SAHOO Member
6 DR. JAGANNATH PATIL NAAC Co - ordinator

Place
Date

Page 12/12 12-10-2020 09:09:06

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)