2022 07 Tor Philippines Educ Forum
2022 07 Tor Philippines Educ Forum
TERMS OF REFERENCE
I. Background
5. Still, despite the reforms and investments, DepEd has yet to see
decisive gains in education quality. The performance of our students in our large scale
assessments, the National Achievement Test, which we administer for Grade 6, Grade
10, and Grade 12, gravitates towards the low proficiency levels especially in Science,
Math, and English. This was put in even sharper focus by the country’s results of the
2018 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA).
1
6. Thus, DepEd has identified quality to be the biggest challenge that
confronts Philippine basic education today. Complicating the challenge of meeting
current quality standards is the need for basic education to keep pace with the rapidly
changing social and economic environment brought about by technological innovation,
as well as disruptions caused by natural or man-made disasters. The standards of
quality are not be static; they are characterized by equally rapid and dynamic changes.
12. The mandate for the state to protect and promote the right of all
citizens to quality education at all levels converges with the Sustainable Development
Goal 4 and Ambisyon Natin 2040 to ensure inclusive and equitable quality education
2
and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all. These will guide the direction that
Educ Forum will take.
14. The unique and substantive contribution of the Educ Forum lies in
bringing together the experience, expertise and perspectives of each of the members to
further understand and address issues in education, particularly education quality.
Government
3
17.2 Facilitate collaborative research to inform both the sector
planning and implementation, as well as futures thinking, in
basic education; and,
18. DepEd shall invite to the Educ Forum relevant government agencies,
including, but not limited to: the Commission on Higher Education (CHED), Technical
Education and Skills Development Authority (TESDA), Department of Science and
Technology (DOST), UP National Institute for Science and Mathematics Education
Development (UP NISMED), select state Normal Universities or Colleges, and Local
Government Units and their leagues.
4
20.2 Promote a collaborative environment within the Educ Forum
to which members are well-represented for the discussion of
initiatives for on basic education reforms; and,
21. The private sector partners include business and/or private sector
partners, associations and networks, both local and foreign. These partners help support
the country’s education system by mobilizing resources through corporate social
responsibility to fill in education resource gaps to supplement or complement
government investments, as well as increasing the alignment between the productivity
and competitiveness goals of industry and government in light of DepEd’s priorities.
22.2 Advise on current and future labor market needs and labor
market challenges; and,
Development Partners
5
24.2 Provide meaningful and effective support to Educ Forum
initiatives, bringing technical expertise, innovation and
experience to address the complex challenges of delivering
education, with emphasis on quality education;
IV. Membership
V. Governance
6
strategies, (b) advocacy and communication, (c) financing, and (d) review, monitoring
and reporting.
28. The Educ Forum shall have three major categories of members in the
structure. The first is the Lead Convenor, which is DepEd. The next category of
members is the Executive Committee comprising the lead organization for each of the
major themes. Lastly, the members under each theme shall be called the General
Assembly.
Structure of the Philippine Forum for Inclusive Quality Basic Education (Educ Forum)
29. The Educ Forum shall adopt its internal rules and procedures to
govern its meetings and processes. Given that the status of the members are consultative
in nature, and that Educ Forum is not a decision-making body with respect to
government policies, programs, projects and activities, the roles and responsibilities of
Educ Forum and its members shall not affect or in any way override DepEd’s policy and
administrative mandates and procedures.
30. The Educ Forum shall ensure its continuity across administration
transitions in DepEd.
7
incoming or new DepEd leadership, and secure the continuation of DepEd as Lead
Convenor.
VII. Effectivity
ANNEXES
Annex 1: Terms of Reference for Educ Forum on Global Partnership for Education
Annex 2: Charter of the Global Partnership for Education (June 2019)
8
ANNEX 1: TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR EDUC FORUM
ON GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP FOR EDUCATION
I. Overview
2. By joining the GPE, DepEd and Educ Forum will be able to leverage
technical and financial resources, as well as take part in global knowledge exchange in
education reform. Because it will be a vehicle for joining GPE, Educ Forum will align its
objectives and organization to the requirements of GPE. (See Annex 2: Charter of the
Global Partnership for Education)
3. Educ Forum shall adhere to the GPE vision and shall be the
foundation for GPE’s operationalization and governance in the country. It shall
collectively work towards the development, endorsement and implementation of an
Education Sector Plan, which uses benchmarking and monitoring of progress against
output and outcome indicators.
9
4.3 Engage in the process of joining GPE, and in the process of applying
for GPE funding, including the selection of grant agent (GA) and
coordinating agency (CA);
4.5 Engage in the process of reporting to the GPE Board, through the
GPE Secretariat, on education sector progress and challenges.
Government
7.1 Produce a Situation Analysis and an ESP for the medium term (2020 to
2025) to complement the annual planning for the budget and the
ongoing development of the Basic Education Masterplan 2030;
7.2 Ensure the effective implementation of the ESP by creating, leading and
utilizing effective and inclusive mechanisms for policy, strategy and
activity development and implementation, securing adequate fiscal
resources, and monitoring implementation and outcomes based on
reliable and disaggregated education sector data;
10
7.3 Subscribe to the GPE Compact, act in accordance with the principles
of the Charter, and commit to achieving the SDG 4 and GPE goals
and objectives;
7.4 Engage with the GPE Secretariat and, where appropriate, develop
proposals for activities for financing by GPE in consultation within
Educ Forum, and ensure that GPE resources are managed in
accordance with GPE policies and grant agent policies and
procedures; and,
9.3 To the extent practicable, align their education projects with ESP
priorities;
9.4 Based on the results of the ESP appraisal, endorse it and, in doing
so, confirm that such plan is of good quality and responds
appropriately to the needs and challenges of the education sector in
the given context;
11
9.5 Promote transparency and proactively share evidence and lessons
learned within GPE;
9.6 Support progress towards the SDG 4 and GPE goals and objectives
through advocacy and dialogue on appropriate education policy
and implementation, with adequate financing as well as oversight
and accountability mechanisms; and,
9.7 Ensure that broad and representative voices are brought into the
discussions regarding development, implementation and
monitoring of the ESP.
10. The private sector partners shall help the government understand
what capabilities and capacities are available from the private sector to address specific
education system challenges.
Development Partners
12. The development partners shall take an active role in supporting the
government’s proposal for activities for financing by GPE.
12
13. The responsibilities of the development partners include:
13.3 Based on the results of the ESP appraisal, endorse such plan and,
in doing so, confirm that the plan is of good quality and responds
appropriately to the needs and challenges of the education sector
in the given context;
13.5 Align funding and program work with the needs and priorities
of the ESP;
13.6 Act in accordance with the principles of the GPE charter and
adhere to the GPE conflict resolution procedures; and,
13
16. The roles and responsibilities of the CA include:
16.3 Engage with the GPE Secretariat’s Country Lead to clarify how
the GPE works, the country-level roles and responsibilities, the
country-level process, and the added value of GPE;
16.5 Coordinate the application for the GPE Fund and foster open
and inclusive communication among DepEd and all members of
Educ Forum in the process of preparing the applications;
17. As for the GA, it shall support the government in the development,
implementation and monitoring of the GPE-funded education sector plan and
education sector programs. Furthermore, the GA shall also support the GPE in the
development and implementation of research, capacity development and knowledge-
sharing activities at the regional and global levels.
14
18.1 Support effective, inclusive partnership by engaging in the
broader GPE agenda as a partner and a member of the Educ
Forum – including in such areas as systems building, sector
planning and inclusive policy dialogue;
18.6 For reporting, keep the GPE Secretariat, DepEd and Educ Forum
through the CA informed of progress on implementation of grant
activities, notably to flag any issues that lead to delayed finalization
of the education sector plan, and submit the grant’s final financial
statements to the GPE Secretariat.
15
IV. Governance
19. As stated in the previous section, the Educ Forum shall adopt the
structure of the Steering Committee of SDG 4 – Education 2030, as well as having the
three major categories of members in the structure namely the Lead Convenor, which is
DepEd, the Executive Committee, and the General Assembly. Upon joining GPE, the
Educ Forum shall integrate in the structure the Grant Agent (GA) and the Coordinating
Agency (CA), as shown in the figure below.
20. The Educ Forum, as the country’s official local education group for
GPE-related engagements, and as the core of all levels in the planning cycle, shall be
guided by the country planning cycle framework of the Global Partnership for Education,
as illustrated in Figure 2, and adopt its own contextualized processes in accordance to
paragraph 17.
16
Figure 2. The Country Planning Cycle of the Global Partnership for Education
VII. Effectivity
22. This Terms of Reference of the Educ Forum for GPE shall become
effective upon approval by Educ Forum members in a general meeting.
17
ANNEX 2: Charter of the Global Partnership for Education (June 2019)
18
CHARTER OF THE
GLOBAL
PARTNERSHIP FOR
EDUCATION
The Global Partnership for Education (GPE) brings together developing and donor countries, multilateral
agencies and nongovernmental organizations (including international and local civil society organizations
[CSOs]), representatives of the teaching profession, the private sector and foundations supporting the
education sector in developing countries, with a particular focus on accelerating progress toward GPE’s
strategic plan adopted by the Board from time to time, is aligned with Sustainable Development Goal 4: Ensure
inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all, as determined by
the Board in connection with such GPE strategic plans.
The GPE Compact, established in 2002 following the development consensus reached at Monterrey, explicitly
links increased donor support for education to recipient countries’ policy performance and accountability for
results. The GPE Compact’s general principles are the foundation upon which the Board builds GPE strategic
plans as well as participation and accountability policies for GPE members.
1.1 The Global Partnership for Education is underpinned by principles set out in the March 2005 Paris
Declaration on Aid Effectiveness and globally reaffirmed in the Accra Agenda for Action adopted by the Third
High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness in September 2008. Through broad-based consultation, developing
country partners take the lead in designing and implementing education sector plans (ESPs), which use
benchmarking and monitoring of progress against output and outcome indicators. Sound ESPs emphasize
1.2 The Global Partnership for Education’s vision, mission, goals and objective are established in its
strategic plans, approved by the Board from time to time. GPE’s guiding principles are:
b) Focusing our resources on securing learning, equity and inclusion for the most marginalized
children and youth, including those affected by fragility and conflict.
d) Enabling inclusive, evidence-based policy dialogue that engages national governments, donors,
civil society, teachers, philanthropy and the private sector.
e) Providing support that promotes country ownership and nationally identified priorities, and is
linked to country performance in achieving improved equity and learning.
h) Acting on our belief that inclusive partnership is the most effective means of achieving
development results.
1.3 The Global Partnership for Education aims to accelerate progress toward each GPE strategic plan by
promoting:
a) Further development effectiveness and more efficient aid for education.
Globally, GPE also aims to promote mutual learning on what works to improve education outcomes and
advance progress for Sustainable Development Goal 4 and GPE strategic plans.
1.4 In subscribing to the GPE Compact, partners are called to give careful attention to aid effectiveness
and to promote transparency, clarity and trust. The Global Partnership for Education relies on a clear and
effective structure of governance and decision-making processes intended to make decisions that are in the
best interests of GPE and intended to help achieve GPE strategic plans. Broad participation by all partners,
including developing country partners, donors, multilateral organizations, nongovernmental organizations
1.5 This document, the Charter of the Global Partnership for Education, is intended to promote
transparency, accountability and effective support for GPE management. It emphasizes the centrality of
developing country partners and reflects the norms and practices developed to implement GPE’s goals and
principles. This document supersedes the Education for All Fast Track Initiative Framework document; any
inconsistencies between it and the Charter of the Global Partnership for Education are resolved in favor of
the latter.
2.1.1 The Global Partnership for Education operates at two levels: (i) country and (ii) global. At the country
level, the local education group (LEG) forms the foundation for GPE’s governance. It comprises the
government of the developing country partner, donors present in the country, multilateral agencies,
nongovernmental organizations (including international and local CSOs), representatives of the teaching
profession, the private sector and private foundations, and others supporting the education sector. GPE’s
country-level process is supported by global-level processes, directed by a constituency-based Board of
Directors (the “Board”).
3.1.1 The local education group (LEG) lies at the heart of GPE and is founded on the principle of collective
support for a single country-led process toward the development, endorsement 1 and implementation of an
ESP. GPE’s intent is to strengthen country-owned coordinating structures and decision-making processes for
effective and inclusive policy dialogue. The LEG is therefore a collaborative forum for education sector policy
dialogue under government leadership, where the primary consultation on education sector development takes
place between a government and its partners.
Composition
3.1.2 Generally composed of the government, development partners and other stakeholders, the specific
composition, title and working arrangements of the LEG will vary from country to country according to
country-level circumstances and need.
1 The term “endorse” or “endorsement” in all GPE documentation means to offer public support. It does not imply formal approval or
decision-making
3.1.3 Through planning, monitoring, and review mechanisms and procedures that are both transparent and
inclusive, the LEG as a body is first and foremost accountable to the citizens of the country it serves, promoting
sector progress and transparent reporting of sector results, including on learning outcomes. The LEG is not a
decision-making body, but LEG members contribute to evidence-based education sector dialogue and keep
one another fully apprised of progress and challenges in the sector. The LEG as a group has the following roles
in relation to GPE-related processes:
a) Adopts and makes publicly available a clear partnership framework, or terms of reference.
c) Serves as a consultative forum for the government’s development of an education sector plan
(ESP) or transitional education sector plan (TEP).
d) Discusses the results of the independent appraisal of the draft ESP or TEP and, on this basis,
serves as an advisory forum for the government on adjustments for the finalization of the ESP or
TEP.
f) Engages in processes to apply for GPE funding, including the selection of a grant agent.
h) Contributes to compilation of reports to the Board through the Secretariat on education sector
progress and challenges, and on education sector financing from all sources, domestic and
external.
3.1.4 LEG members’ roles and responsibilities and their relationships in the GPE process are further
outlined below.
3.2.1 Governments of developing country partners subscribe to the GPE Compact, act in accordance with
the principles of this charter, and commit to achieving the SDG4 and GPE goals and objectives. They do this
through the elaboration of an evidence-based education sector plan of good quality that is embedded in the
country’s national development strategy.
3.2.2 The government is responsible for the development, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of
ESPs that promote equitable access to quality education for all. The government is primarily accountable to its
parliament and citizens, sharing the results of this accountability with the other members of the LEG and with
the GPE through the Secretariat.
a) Develops and implements an evidence-based ESP that is based on broad consultation and policy
dialogue, is credible and of good quality, and is focused on equity, efficiency and learning.
b) Ensures effective implementation of the ESP by creating, leading and utilizing effective and
inclusive mechanisms for policy, strategy and activity development, implementation and
monitoring based on reliable and disaggregated education sector data.
c) Prioritizes sufficient and equitable domestic financing for education and ensures transparent
reporting of budgets and expenditures.
d) Strengthens education management and information systems and prioritizes the compilation,
use and sharing of reliable and disaggregated education sector data, including on equity,
efficiency and learning outcomes.
e) Leads effective and inclusive mechanisms for policy dialogue that allow meaningful participation
by stakeholders, including representatives from line ministries, civil society, teachers, private
sector partners as relevant, and development partners.
f) Engages with the Secretariat and, where appropriate, develops proposals for activities for
financing by GPE in consultation within the LEG; ensures that GPE resources are managed in
accordance with GPE policies and grant agent policies and procedures.
g) Makes every effort to provide the necessary conditions to enable optimal implementation of GPE-
funded programs.
Definition
3.3.1 Development partners comprise local representatives from bilateral and multilateral development
partners and other donors (including private philanthropic foundations).
a) Support the government’s efforts to achieve SDG4 and GPE goals and objectives.
c) Facilitate the independent appraisal of the developing country partner’s ESP and participate in
the discussion of appraisal results, actively working to help ensure the sector plan is evidence-
based, of good quality, and focused on equity, efficiency and learning outcomes.
d) Based on the results of the ESP appraisal, endorse such plan and, in doing so, confirm that the
plan is of good quality and responds appropriately to needs and challenges of the education sector
in the given context.
f) Monitor and promote progress toward better harmonization and alignment of all financial and
technical support to the education sector.
g) Align philanthropy and program work with the needs and priorities of the ESP.
h) Inform the government about annual funding commitments and actual disbursements as well as
indicative rolling expenditure/implementation plans.
i) Promote transparency and proactively share evidence and lessons learned within GPE.
j) Engage in a transparent process of the selection of the grant agent for education sector plan
development grants (ESPDG) and education sector program implementation grants (ESPIG) that
includes discussion of alignment and scoping of the grant program; and, if eligible, able and
meeting agreed criteria, explore possibilities to take on this role.
k) Take an active role in supporting, as appropriate, the government’s proposals for activities for
financing by GPE, and provide continued support during the implementation of those activities.
l) Act in accordance with the principles of this charter and adhere to the GPE conflict resolution
procedures.
Definition
3.4.1 Civil society comprises nongovernmental organizations (including international and local CSOs, and
representatives of the teaching profession).
b) Participate in discussion of the results of the independent appraisal of the developing country
partner’s ESP, actively working to help ensure it is evidence-based, of good quality, and focused
on equity, efficiency and learning outcomes.
c) Based on the results of the ESP appraisal, endorse it and, in doing so, confirm that such plan is of
good quality and responds appropriately to needs and challenges of the education sector in the
given context.
d) Promote transparency and proactively share evidence and lessons learned within GPE.
e) Engage in a transparent process of the selection of the grant agent for education sector plan
development grants (ESPDG) and education sector program implementation grants (ESPIG) that
includes discussion of alignment and scoping of the grant program; and, if eligible, able and
meeting agreed criteria, explore possibilities to take on this role.
f) Take an active role in supporting, as appropriate, the government’s proposals for activities
financed by GPE, and provide continued support during the implementation of those activities.
g) Act in accordance with the principles of this charter and adhere to the conflict resolution
procedures.
h) Support progress towards the SDG4 and GPE goals and objectives through advocacy and dialogue
on appropriate education policy and implementation, with adequate financing as well as oversight
and accountability mechanisms.
i) Ensure that broad and representative voices are brought into the discussions regarding
development, implementation and monitoring of the ESP.
j) Engage in policy dialogue with a view to strengthen domestic policy and accountability gaps.
Definition
3.5.1 Private sector partners comprise national businesses or country offices of international corporations
where the predominant part of their strategy focuses on for-profit activities, as well as private sector
associations and networks.
a) Adhere to the Global Partnership for Education Corporate Engagement Principles and the
conflict of interest policy specific to the private sector.
b) Advise on current and future labor market needs and work with government to solve labor market
challenges.
c) Help country governments understand what capabilities and capacities are available from the
private sector to address specific education system challenges.
d) Align corporate giving with the needs and priorities of the ESP.
e) Bring technical expertise, voice, innovation, networks and experience to address the complex
challenges of delivering education.
f) Promote transparency, and proactively share evidence and lessons learned within GPE.
g) Act in accordance with the principles of this charter and adhere to the conflict resolution
procedures.
h) Support the government’s efforts to achieve SDG4 and GPE goals and objectives.
i) As members of the LEG, participate regularly, fully and meaningfully in country-led dialogue
mechanisms for planning, implementing, monitoring and evaluating the ESP.
Definition
3.6.1 The coordinating agency is selected by the LEG and facilitates the work of the LEG. The coordinating
agency acts in accordance with operational procedures as determined by the LEG. In cases where no
coordinating agency is in place, the LEG designates one.
a) Serves as the communication link between the government of the developing country partner, LEG
partners and the Secretariat.
b) Fosters and further develops the relationship between the development partners and the
developing country partner government, facilitates harmonized sector coordination and policy
dialogue that is collaborative, effective, and inclusive of nongovernmental organizations in the
work of the LEG, and helps mobilize development partners and, to the extent possible, other LEG
partners for meetings.
f) Supports GPE grant processes, including facilitating the selection of a grant agent, including LEG
engagement in ESPDG and ESPIG application processes, and LEG updates on progress with GPE
grants.
Definition
3.7.1 The grant agent supports (a) the government in the development, implementation and monitoring of
the GPE-funded education sector plan and education sector programs, and (b) GPE in the development and
implementation of research, capacity development and knowledge-sharing activities at the regional and global
levels. In the case of country-level education sector programs, in accordance with the Standard Selection
Process for Grant Agents, the government approves the final selection of the grant agent, endorsed by the other
LEG members. The Board, in consultation with the trustee, agrees an accreditation framework and approves
Grant Agents on the basis of that framework.
a) Develops a program for GPE financing at the country level — in close collaboration with the
government, consistent with the ESP, in consultation with the coordinating agency and other LEG
members, and in accordance with the grant agent’s policies and procedures and the GPE grant
guidelines — and supports the government’s proposal for financing by the GPE.
b) In the case of ESPs and programs, ensures disbursements from allocations, approved by the Board,
from the GPE trust funds for the implementation by the government of such plans and programs.
c) Provides fiduciary oversight and continued technical support and capacity-building as agreed in
the approved program and budget, and corrective action in support of the implementation by the
government of the ESPs and grant programs, ensuring effective implementation according to the
Board-approved grant application, the grant agent’s policies and procedures, and GPE policies.
d) Utilizes country procedures and systems where possible and as agreed upon with the LEG (at least
IV GLOBAL-LEVEL GOVERNANCE
4.1.1 Each of the partners subscribes to the GPE Compact, as presented in the Preamble. The Board and
committees established by the Board are the governing bodies of the Global Partnership for Education. The
partners fall into four categories: (i) developing country partners with an endorsed education sector plan or
transitional education sector plan (or, in countries with federal systems of government, an intention to
develop a sub-national education plans); (ii) donor partners; (iii) multilateral agencies and regional
development banks partners; and (iv) nongovernmental organizations, including local and international
CSOs, members of the teaching profession, the private sector and private foundations, and other stakeholders
working in education and involved in GPE’s discussions. All partners belong to a constituency.
Partnership Meetings
4.1.2 From time to time, the Board may call for high-level forum meetings in connection with replenishment,
consultation or strategic planning, or as otherwise thought necessary by the Board to inform and support the
work of achieving GPE’s strategic plans.
4.2.1 The Board is the supreme governing body of the Global Partnership for Education. It is responsible
for setting strategic direction, strengthening and growing the partnership, financial oversight, establishing
policies, acquitting fiduciary duties, evaluating performance, managing and mitigating risks and delivering
constant improvement.
4.2.3 The Board is composed of up to 40 members (one Board member and one alternate Board member
per constituency) who represent the 20 constituencies of the Global Partnership for Education, and a chair
independent of all partner organizations. Each Board or alternate Board member shall have one vote whether
participating in Board or GPE committees.
a) Twelve representatives from the developing country constituency category with an evidence-
b) Twelve representatives from the donor constituency category contributing financial and other
support to the Global Partnership for Education.
c) Six representatives from multilateral agencies or regional banks constituency categories: four
representative of United Nations agencies, and two representatives of multilateral and regional
development banks.
d) Six representatives from civil society organizations partners (CSOs) constituency category: two
representing international/northern CSOs; two representing CSOs from developing country
partners; and two representing members of the teaching profession. and
4.2.5 Each constituency may appoint an additional individual to serve in committees established by the
Board from time to time (“GPE committees”), with the technical competencies, experience and time required
to serve in GPE committees if the Board member and alternate Board member are not otherwise able to
commit the time or expertise necessary to serve.
4.2.7 Each constituency of the Board shall notify the Secretariat of the nomination of its Board member,
alternate Board member, and/or committee members.
• Setting the vision, mission, goals and objectives of the Global Partnership for Education’s
strategy
• Driving and monitoring the performance of the partnership to deliver on GPE strategic plans
adopted by the Board from time to time, including goals and objectives at the country and
global levels.
• Approving all grants unless delegated to the Secretariat or a Committee and providing
strategic oversight of all grants.
• Tracking progress of the programmatic and financial performance of grants to ensure that
resources are being used in line with GPE’s strategic plans, including the goals, objectives and
policies in order to deliver on such strategic plans.
• Ensuring that the Global Partnership for Education is structured, governed and functioning
effectively and ethically in order to deliver on its mission.
• Overseeing the financial management of all GPE resources to ensure they are being managed
efficiently and effectively, and consistent with GPE’s mission, goals, objectives and policies.
• Monitoring and assessing the overall effectiveness and risks associated with GPE’s work and
implementing risk mitigation measures.
• Advocating for the Global Partnership for Education and for the delivery of quality education
to all children in developing countries.
• Mobilizing resources for GPE and advocating for increases to domestic and external funding
for education in developing countries.
• Ensuring that GPE is shaping and responding to the global debate on education.
• Exercising other powers as required to carry out the purposes of the Global Partnership for
Education.
4.2.9 The organization and decision-making processes of the Board, and for any committees approved by
the Board, may be amended from time to time by the Board
4.2.10 GPE committees undertake tasks as mandated by the Board, including maintaining oversight of
GPE’s fiduciary duties, risk management and performance in accordance with the strategic plan and
established policies and periodically recommending changes to policies, strategic direction and performance
4.3 Chair
4.3.1 The chair of the Global Partnership for Education is appointed by the Board and represents the Board
and the partnership as a whole. The chair shall act without prejudice in fulfilling his/her responsibilities and
does not participate in voting for decisions by the Board. In cases where the chair is selected from among the
then-current Board members or alternate Board members, such constituency shall nominate a new Board
member or alternate Board member, if required.
a) Providing political and intellectual leadership for the Global Partnership for Education, including
representing the partnership and the Board in political and public fora.
c) Convening and chairing meetings of the Board and, where necessary, other GPE meetings,
including preparation of meeting agendas, facilitating agreement on decisions and monitoring
their implementation.
d) Facilitating the provision of input by the Board to the annual performance review of the Chief
Executive Officer.
e) Exercising other tasks as required to carry out the purposes of the Global Partnership for
Education as decided by the Board.
4.3.3 The chair is selected by the Board through an open competitive process. Ordinarily, the Board will
appoint the Chair for an initial three-year term and would maintain the option of extending for a second three-
year term following a performance review process. In exceptional circumstances, the Board may extend for a
third term of up to three years if it so determines that doing so is in the best interests of GPE.
4.3.4 The chair is accountable to the Board and may be subject to a performance review by the Board from
time to time.
Chair Budget
4.3.5 A budget for the travel and other reasonable expenses of the chair shall be included in the operating
expenses budget for approval by the Board on an annual basis.
4.3.6 The Board may appoint a vice chair to assist the chair in fulfilling his or her duties.
Composition
4.4.1 The Secretariat carries out the day-to-day business of the Global Partnership for Education, serving
the interests of the partnership as a whole. The Secretariat is based in a donor or multilateral agency partner
organization, which promotes a working environment that facilitates the Secretariat’s fulfillment of its
responsibilities.
4.4.2 The Secretariat comprises staff recruited on the basis of expertise relevant to the implementation of
GPE strategies, policies and objectives as agreed upon by the Board. Employment conditions for the
Secretariat will be determined in line with human resource policies and procedures of the organization in
which the Secretariat is based. The organization in which the Secretariat is based provides human resources,
administrative and other support to the Secretariat.
4.4.3 The Board approves the budget and other expenses of the Secretariat. Partners may support the
delivery of the Secretariat work program through placement of secondees in the Secretariat, as agreed upon
with the Chief Executive Officer and subject to the Policy on Conflicts of Interest.
4.4.4 The Secretariat, led by the Chief Executive Officer, has the following roles and responsibilities:
a) Providing support to the partnership, the chair, the Board, Board committees, working groups
and task teams to help them fulfill their roles and responsibilities, including through the support
to the developing country partners constituencies, and maintain progress toward the strategic
objectives of the Global Partnership for Education and the Sustainable Development Goal 4, in
particular by:
ii. Providing guidance and information on GPE’s mission, vision, goals, objectives,
funding mechanisms and related processes.
iii. Providing oversight of the efficient and effective expenditure of GPE resources with
appropriate safeguards and accountability and reporting thereon, following up with
grant agents on any misuse of funds to ensure appropriate action and reporting thereon
to the Board.
iv. Providing monitoring of the results at the country and global levels, in line with GPE
strategies, objectives and policies.
v. Providing quality assurance review of grant applications and ensuring that partners
understand the applicable standards.
vi. Approving ESPDGs and program development grants (PDGs) and revisions thereof, and
vii. Providing oversight of the implementation of the risk management policy and
operational risk framework.
viii. Monitoring and evaluating GPE-funded grants, including grant agent adherence to the
minimum standards for grant agents, the financial procedures agreement, and the
approved grant applications, and engaging with the grant agent to ensure that
appropriate action is taken. Reporting on grant performance to the Grants and
Performance Committee on a regular basis.
b) Leading fundraising efforts for the GPE Fund, and supporting increases to domestic and external
funding for education.
c) Working with all partners to promote effective communication of education data and results
reporting at the global level and to the media.
d) Providing support to the LEG and coordinating agencies to strengthen the in-country process, in
particular in the following ways:
i. Taking the lead in collecting information on the country processes leading to ESP
endorsement, and sharing this with other GPE partners.
ii. Participating in and providing quality support that is needs-based as agreed in-country
to the planning process and monitoring results through joint sector reviews.
iii. Promoting and supporting LEG processes that include all categories of GPE partners.
e) Promoting and supporting effective exchange of knowledge and good practice across the
partnership.
f) Collecting, monitoring and sharing among partners global and country-level information on
education financing and sector progress.
i. Helping coordinate the efforts of GPE to address issues and priorities related to policy,
data, capacity and finance.
ii. Facilitating the sharing of lessons learned and data collected from developing country
partners within GPE.
iii. Exercising other tasks as required to carry out the purposes of the Global Partnership
for Education as determined by the Board.
4.4.5 The Chief Executive Officer is recruited through a competitive process, using a process for
recruitment agreed between the Board and the organization in which the Secretariat is based. The Chief
4.4.6 The Chief Executive Officer is accountable to the Board with regard to objectives and outcomes set
out in the job description or as otherwise directed by the Board, and to both the Board and the organization
in which the Secretariat is based with regard to the Secretariat work plan and personnel and budget
management. The Board shall conduct an annual performance review of the Chief Executive Officer with input
from the organization in which the Secretariat is based.
4.5.1 The Global Partnership for Education provides a global platform for mobilizing additional resources
for the education sector through:
a) Domestic resources.
b) Resources from bilateral, multilateral and other donors (including from the private sector and
foundations).
c) GPE trust funds, which are governed pursuant to their relevant fund governance documents.
5 AMENDMENT
This document may be amended, from time to time, with the approval of the Board.