Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
35 views6 pages

Solutions 2019

The document contains solutions to an exam on Galois Theory, covering topics such as minimal polynomials, Q-embeddings, Q-automorphisms, Galois groups, and separable extensions. It includes detailed explanations and proofs for various polynomial cases, the structure of Galois groups, and the Fundamental Theorem of Galois Theory. Additionally, it discusses radical extensions and solvability of groups in the context of field extensions.

Uploaded by

robjenkins208
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
35 views6 pages

Solutions 2019

The document contains solutions to an exam on Galois Theory, covering topics such as minimal polynomials, Q-embeddings, Q-automorphisms, Galois groups, and separable extensions. It includes detailed explanations and proofs for various polynomial cases, the structure of Galois groups, and the Fundamental Theorem of Galois Theory. Additionally, it discusses radical extensions and solvability of groups in the context of field extensions.

Uploaded by

robjenkins208
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

CCM326, Galois Theory May 2019 Exam Solutions


A1. Let α denote the complex number i 4 3, and let K = Q(α).
a) Find the minimal polynomial of α over Q.
Solution: Since α4 = 3, α is a root of X 4 − 3 ∈ Q[X], which is
irreducible by Eisenstein’s Criterion (with p = 3). Therefore the
minimal polynomial of α over Q is X 4 − 3.

b) Find the minimal polynomial
√ of α over Q( 3). √
Solution: Since α2 = − 3, α is a root of √ X 2 + 3, the other root
−α. Since neither root
being √ √ is real and Q( 3) ⊂ R, the polynomial
X 2 + 3 has no roots in Q( 3), and is therefore irreducible (since
√ it
is quadratic).
√ Therefore the minimal polynomial of α over Q( 3) is
X 2 + 3.
c) Describe all Q-embeddings from K to R.
Solution: By Artin’s Extension Theorem, the (Q-)embeddings from
K√to R are given by sending α to a root of X 4 − 3 in R, namely
± 4 3. Therefore
√ there are two embeddings
√ K → R; one determined
by α 7→ 4 3, the other by α 7→ − 4 3.
d) Describe all Q-automorphisms of K.
Solution: The (Q-)automorphisms of K are just the embeddings
from K to itself, so by Artin’s Extension Theorem again, these are
given by sending α to the roots of X 4√− 3 in K, which are ±α. (Note
that the other roots of X 4 − 3 are ±

4
3, which are not in K; indeed
4
if either were, this would imply Q( 3) ⊂ K, and since

[K : Q] = [Q( 6) : Q] = deg(X 4 − 3) = 4,
4


the Tower Law implies that K = Q( 4 3), contradicting α 6∈ R.)
Therefore there are two automorphisms of K; one is the identity and
the other is determined by α 7→ −α.
A2. For each of the following polynomials f in Q[X], determine the structure
of the Galois group Gal(Lf /Q), where Lf is a splitting field of f over Q.

a) f (X) = X 3 − 3X;
Solution:
√ Since f (X) = X(X 2 − 3), the splitting field is Lf =
Q( 3). Since [Lf : Q] = 2, the Galois group is isomorphic to Z/2Z.
b) f (X) = X 3 − 3X + 1;
Solution: By results from lecture, the only possible roots are ±1,
but f (−1) = 3 and f (1) = −1. Since f is cubic and has no roots, it
must be irreducible. The discriminant of f is −4(−3)3 − 27 · 12 = 81,
which is a square in Q, so Gal(Lf /Q) is isomorphic to A3 (or Z/3Z).

1
c) f (X) = X 4 − 9.
Solution: The polynomial factors as
√ √ √ √
(X 2 − 3)(X 2 + 3) = (X − 3)(X + 3)(X − i 3)(X + i 3),
√ √ √
so the splitting field is Lf = Q( 3, i 3) = Q( 3, i). Note that
√ √
Q ⊂ Q( 3) ⊂ Q( 3, i) = Lf
√ √
and [Q( 3) : Q] = [Lf : Q 3] = 2, so [Lf : Q] = 4 by the Tower
Law. Therefore Gal(L/Q)
√ is isomorphic
√ to either Z/4Z or (Z/2Z)2 .
Since E = Q(i), Q( 3) and Q(i 3) are all intermediate fields with
[E : Q] = 2, it follows from the Fundamental Theorem of Galois
Theory that Gal(L/Q) has at least 3 subgroups of index 2, so must
be isomorphic to (Z/2Z)2 .

A3. Suppose that K ⊂ L is a field extension.


a) State what it means for a polynomial f ∈ K[X] to be separable.
Solution: A polynomial f of degree d is separable it it has d distinct
roots in its splitting field over K.
b) State what it means for an element α ∈ L to be separable over K.
Solution: α is separable over K if it is algebraic over K and its
minimal polynomial over K is separable.
c) State what it means for the extension L to be separable over K.
Solution: L is separable over K if every element of L is separable
over K.
d) Give an example of a finite extension of fields which is not separable.
(You do not need to prove that it is not separable.)
Solution: Let K = (Z/pZ)(X p ) and L = (Z/pZ)(X).
A4. Let K ⊂ L be a finite extension of fields.
a) Suppose that a monic polynomial f ∈ K[X] splits completely over L,
so that f (X) = (X−α1 )(X−α2 ) · · · (X−αd ) for some α1 , α2 , . . . , αd ∈
L. Prove that if 1 ≤ i ≤ d − 1, then

[K(α1 , α2 , . . . , αi+1 ) : K(α1 , α2 , . . . , αi )] ≤ d − i.

Solution: Let Li = K(α1 , . . . , αi ). The f factors in Li [X] as

f (X) = (X − α1 ) · · · (X − αi )g(X)

for some g of degree d − i, and αi+1 is a root of g. Therefore the


minimal polynomial mαi+1 ,Li divides g, so

[Li+1 : Li ] = [Li (αi+1 ) : Li ] = deg(mαi+1 ,Li ) ≤ deg(g) = d − i.

2
b) Suppose that L = K(α) for some α ∈ L, and let n = [L : K]. Prove
that there is an extension M of L such that M is normal over K and
[M : K] ≤ n!.
Solution: Let f be the minimal polynomial of α over K, so f is
monic of degree n = [L : K]. Let M be a splitting field of f over L,
so
M = L(α, α2 , · · · , αn ) = K(α, α2 , . . . , αn )
where α, α2 , . . . , αn are the roots of f . Therefore M is also a splitting
field for f over K, so by a result from lectures, M is normal over K.
Considering the tower of extensions

K ⊂ L = K(α) ⊂ K(α, α2 ) ⊂ · · · ⊂ K(α, α2 , . . . , αn ) = M

and applying the result from part (a) and the Tower Law gives

[M : K] = [K(α) : K] · · · [M : K(α, · · · , αn−1 )] ≤ n(n−1) · · · 2·1 = n!

A5. Let K denote the field Z/2Z. Let f ∈ K[X] be an irreducible polynomial
of degree 2, and let g ∈ K[X] be an irreducible polynomial of degree 3.
a) Give an example of such a polynomial f , and of such a polynomial
g.
Solution: Let f (X) = X 2 + X + 1 and g(X) = X 3 + X + 1. Then
neither f nor g has a root in K, so being of degrees 2 and 3, must
be irreducible.
b) Let h = f g (the product of f and g in K[X]), and let L be a splitting
field of h over K. Determine the number of elements in L, and the
structure of the group Gal(L/K).
Solution: According to results from lecture, every extension of finite
fields is Galois with cyclic Galois group. Let E = K(α) and F =
K(β) where α ∈ L is root of f and β ∈ L is a root of g. Since E and F
are Galois over K, f splits completely over E and g splits completely
over F , so h = f g splits completely over K(α, β). Therefore L =
K(α, β). Since [E : K] = 2 and [F : K] = 3, the Tower Law implies
that [L : K] is divisible by both 2 and 3. On the other hand L = E(β),
so [L : E] ≤ 3, and the Tower Law implies [L : K] ≤ 6. Therefore
[L : K] = 6, so L has 26 = 64 elements and Gal(L/K) is isomorphic
to Z/6Z.
c) Let L be as in part (b), and let α be a root of f and let β be a root
of g. Determine the order of the element αβ in the multiplicative
group L× .
Solution: With notation as in the solution to (b), α ∈ E × , which is
a group of order 3, and α 6= 1, so α has order 3. Similarly β ∈ F × ,
so β has order 7. Since 3 and 7 are relatively prime, it follows that
αβ has order 21.

3
B6. a) State the Fundamental Theorem of Galois Theory for extensions of
finite degree. (You do not need to define what it means for an exten-
sion to be Galois.)
Solution: Let K ⊂ L be a finite Galois extension of fields, and let
G = Gal(L/K). Then
i) The maps E 7→ Gal(L/E) and H 7→ LH define mutually inverse,
inclusion-reversing bijections:
   
intermediate fields E,
←→ subgroups H of G .
K⊂E⊂L

ii) An intermediate field E, K ⊂ E ⊂ L, is Galois over K if and only


if the corresponding subgroup H = Gal(L/E) is normal in G, in
which case the restriction map σ 7→ σ|E induces an isomorphism
of groups

G/H −→ Gal(E/K).
b) Let L be a splitting field over Q of the polynomial f (X) = X 3 +
3X 2 + 3. Show that Gal(L/Q) is isomorphic to S3 .
Solution: First note that f is irreducible by Eisenstein’s Criterion
with p = 3. Therefore Gal(L/Q) is isomorphic to A3 or S3 accord-
ing to whether or not the discriminant of f is a square in Q. The
discriminant of f is the same as that of

f (X − 1) = (X − 1)3 + 3(X − 1)2 + 3 = X 3 − 3X + 5,

to which we can apply the formula

∆ = −4a3 − 27b2 = −4(−3)3 − 27(5)2 = −21 · 27 = −7 · 34 .

Since this is not a square, the Galois group is isomorphic to S3 .


(Alternatively, argue that f has only one real root, so the Galois
group has an element of order 2 which fixes it and exchanges the two
complex conjugate roots.
c) Let L be as above in (b). For each divisor d of [L : Q], determine the
number of subfields E ⊂ L such that [E : Q] = d.
Solution: Note that if E is a subfield of L, then Q ⊂ E and [E :
Q][L : E] = [L : Q] = 6 (the order of Gal(L/Q) ∼ = S3 ). By the
Fundamental Theorem of Galois Theory, the subfields E ⊂ L such
that [E : Q] = d, or equivalently [L : E] = 6/d, are in bijection with
the subgroups H ⊂ S3 of order 6/d. The subgroups of S3 are

{e}, {e, (12)}, {e, (13)}, {e, (23)}, {e, (123), (132)} and S3 ,

so there is one field with d = 6, three with d = 3, one with d = 2 and


one with d = 1.

4
d) Let L be as above in (b). Show that if E is a subfield of L and E is
Galois over Q, then E is either Q, L or Q(α) where α2 = −7.
Solution: By the Fundamental Theorem of Galois Theory E is Ga-
lois over Q if and only if the corresponding subgroup of S3 is normal.
The only normal subgroups are

{e}, {e, (123), (132)} and S3 ,

and these correspond to the fields with d = 1, 2 and 6. For d = 1,


the corresponding field is Q and for d = 6, it is L. By results from
lecture, we know that the quadratic extension is Q(δ) where δ 2 = ∆
is the discriminant of f . From the solution to part (b), we know that
∆ = −7 · 34 , so Q(δ) = Q(α) where α = δ/9 satisfies α2 = −7.
B7. Let K ⊂ L be a finite extension of fields of characteristic 0.
a) State what it means for the extension L to be radical over K, and
for the extension L to be solvable by radicals over K.
Solution: We say that L is radical over K if L = K(α) for some
α ∈ L such that αn ∈ K for some integer n ≥ 1.
We say that L is solvable by radicals over K if there is a chain of
extensions:
K = L0 ⊂ L1 ⊂ L2 ⊂ · · · ⊂ Lm
such that L ⊂ Lm , and for each k = 1, . . . , m, Lk is radical over Lk−1
for k = 1, 2, . . . , m.
b) State what it means for a finite group to be solvable, and for the
extension L to be solvable over K.
Solution: A group G is solvable if there is a chain of subgroups:

{e} = H0 ⊂ H1 ⊂ H2 ⊂ · · · ⊂ Hm = G

such that for each k = 1, . . . , m, Hk−1 is a normal subgroup of Hk ,


and Hk /Hk−1 is a cyclic group.
The extension L is solvable over K if there is a finite extension M of
L such M is Galois over K and Gal(M/K) is a solvable group.
c) Prove that if α is a root of the polynomial X 10 − 5X 5 + 3, then Q(α)
is solvable over Q.
5 2 10 5
Solution: Letting
√ β = α , we √ have β − 5β + 3 = α − 5α + 3 = 0,
so β = (5 ± 13)/2 ∈ Q( 13). We therefore have the tower of
extensions √ √
Q ⊂ L1 = Q( 13) ⊂ L2 = Q( 13, α)
showing that Q(α) ⊂ L2 is solvable by radicals over Q. By a theorem
from lectures, it is therefore solvable over Q.
d) Suppose that L is an extension of Q such that [L : Q] = 6 and L is
not solvable by radicals over Q. Prove that if E is a subfield of L,

5
then either E = Q or E = L.
Solution: We will suppose for the sake of contradiction that L has a
subfield E other than Q or L. Note that [E : Q] divides [L : Q] = 6.
If [E : Q] = 1, then E = Q, and if [E : Q] = 6, then E = L, so we
must [E : Q] = 2 or 3. By results from lecture, every extension of
degree at most 4 is solvable by radicals, so E is solvable by radicals
over Q. Similarly [L : E] = 3 or 2, so L is solvable by radicals over
E. By results from lecture, it follows that L is solvable by radicals
over Q, contradicting our assumption that it is not.

You might also like