UHID : 24-25/GGEC/02332 Order Date : 21/03/2025 12:10
Name : Mr. Sathish Kumar Referred By : Dr Beeresh
Age/Gender : 32 Year(s)/Male Collection Date : 21/03/2025 14:22
Bill No. : 24-25/EC/OPB/10618 Reporting Date : 25/03/2025
Consultant : Dr. OTHER Visit Type : OP
Speciality : Andrology
INVESTIGATION RESULT VALUE UNIT REFERENCE RANGE
LABORATORY REPORT
Semen Analysis - Level 1 - (Casa)
Microscopic Examination
Total number per ejaculate (mil/eja) 215 >=39 <=701
Agglutination NIL 1=isolated, 2=moderate,
Granular Debris Absent Present Absent
Sperm Conc. (mil/mL) 86 >=16 <=208
Macroscopic Examination
Volume (mL) 2.5 >=1.4 <= 6.2
pH 7.4 >=7.2
Appearance Gray opalescent Gray opalescent
Liquefaction (min) 15 Normal = 15 - 30
Viscosity Normal Normal or Abnormal
Aggregations NIL 0=None, 1=some,
VITALITY TEST
Eosin-Nigrosin test - >= 54% <= 97%
Lab Technician Signed By
SOUMYA Dr. POORNIMA RAGHUNATHAN
(Reg No. : TMN20150000688KTK)
PATHOLOGIST
UHID : 24-25/GGEC/02332 Order Date : 21/03/2025 12:10
Name : Mr. Sathish Kumar Referred By : Dr Beeresh
Age/Gender : 32 Year(s)/Male Collection Date : 21/03/2025 14:22
Bill No. : 24-25/EC/OPB/10618 Reporting Date : 25/03/2025
Consultant : Dr. OTHER Visit Type : OP
Speciality : Andrology
INVESTIGATION RESULT VALUE UNIT REFERENCE RANGE
CELLULAR ELEMENTS
Epithelial Cells (/HPF) NIL
Pus Cells (/HPF 1-2 <=1
RBCs NIL NIL
SPERM MOTILITY
Teratozoospermia index (TZI) 1.83
Slow progressive [b] (%) 27
Cytoplasmic droplets (%) 00
Tail defects (%) 42
Neck and Midpiece defects (%) 44
Head defects (%) 114
Normal Sperm (%) 03 >=4% <=39%
Immotile (%) 27
Total motility [a+b+c] (%) 73 >=42% <=90%
Non-progressive [c] (%) 21
Lab Technician Signed By
SOUMYA Dr. POORNIMA RAGHUNATHAN
(Reg No. : TMN20150000688KTK)
PATHOLOGIST
UHID : 24-25/GGEC/02332 Order Date : 21/03/2025 12:10
Name : Mr. Sathish Kumar Referred By : Dr Beeresh
Age/Gender : 32 Year(s)/Male Collection Date : 21/03/2025 14:22
Bill No. : 24-25/EC/OPB/10618 Reporting Date : 25/03/2025
Consultant : Dr. OTHER Visit Type : OP
Speciality : Andrology
INVESTIGATION RESULT VALUE UNIT REFERENCE RANGE
Total progressive [a + b] (%) 52 >=30% <=77%
Rapid progressive [a] (%) 25
INVESTIGATION
Date of collection 21.03.2025
Collected at GGEC
Collection method Masturbation
Abstinence period 04
The percentile value is obtained from reference data WHO manual 6th edition, 2021
5th and 95th Percentile value (Reference: Mary Beth Privitera. Applied Human Factors in Medical Device Design.
Academic Press; 2019, Chapter 7, page No. 89)
The 5th percentile is a value associated with the location within the data where 5% of data is below that value.
The 95th percentile is the value where 5% of the data has is a larger value.
Note:
The obtained values need to be clinically correlated.
If the liquefaction is not complete within 30 min or taking >60 min, this should be recorded in the impression.
Variation in the sperm concentration may be due to Pre-analytical (incomplete mixing of semen sample, pipetting
without calibration), Analytical (Makler chamber is not cleaned and incorrectly assembled, excessive time taken
between mixing and loading chamber, Microscope is not cleaned/aligned/incorrect magnification, assessing too
few rows on grid, misidentification of spermatozoa)
Lab Technician Signed By
SOUMYA Dr. POORNIMA RAGHUNATHAN
(Reg No. : TMN20150000688KTK)
PATHOLOGIST
UHID : 24-25/GGEC/02332 Order Date : 21/03/2025 12:10
Name : Mr. Sathish Kumar Referred By : Dr Beeresh
Age/Gender : 32 Year(s)/Male Collection Date : 21/03/2025 14:22
Bill No. : 24-25/EC/OPB/10618 Reporting Date : 25/03/2025
Consultant : Dr. OTHER Visit Type : OP
Speciality : Andrology
INVESTIGATION RESULT VALUE UNIT REFERENCE RANGE
Variation in assessing sperm motility may be due to improper mixing of semen sample, delayed semen analysis,
improper maintenance of temperature, Microscope is not cleaned/aligned/incorrect magnification, analyzing the
edges of the coverslip, too slow in assessing in the motility, subjective bias, waiting until the sperm swims into the
field or grid to begin analysis.
Variation in assessing sperm morphology may be due to Microscope is not cleaned/aligned/incorrect magnification,
subjective techniques without clear guidelines, poor smear preparation and staining technique, assessing the
spermatozoa on the edge, assessing the overlapped spermatozoa, not scoring the spermatozoa in the given field
but selecting the spermatozoa, using expired stains
Variation in assessing sperm vitality may be due Microscope is not cleaned/aligned/incorrect magnification,
improper staining, rehydration of dried smear, overestimation of dead spermatozoa, considering pink stained neck
spermatozoa as dead
Impression: Teratozoospermia
***End of Report***
Lab Technician Signed By
SOUMYA Dr. POORNIMA RAGHUNATHAN
(Reg No. : TMN20150000688KTK)
PATHOLOGIST
