Name of Project : SASEC DHAKA-SYLHET CORRIDOR ROAD INVESTMENT PROJECT

Package : DSCRIP : DS-3

(BORING NO. BH-1(A), CH 44+080Km, BH-2(B) CH 44+220Km (RHS), BH-3(C) CH 44+440 Km

(RHS), BH-4(D) CH 45+340 Km, BH-5 (E) CH 46+00 Km (RHS), BH-6 Km, CH 47+400 (RHS),
( TOTAL BORING = 06 NOS.)

REPORT ON
SUB-SURFACE SOIL INVESTIGATION WORKS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF
THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE AT NARSINGDI

CONSULTANT :
ICT-IRD-SHELADIA-ADSL-KSCL JV

CONTRACTOR :

HEGO- MIR AKHTER JV

Soil investigation  Rotary Piling  Cast-in-situ Piling  Load Test  Civil Construction
Flat – 5D, House-289/A, Road-15,Block-C, Bashundhara R/A, Dhaka - 1229, Bangladesh.
Mobile : 01713-046598, 01713-244290.
E-mail: [email protected]
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page No.

Abbreviation - - - - 1

Soil Classification Symbol - - - - 1

Disclaimer - - - - 1

1. Introduction - - - - 2

2. Scope of Work - - - - 2

3. Field Work - - - - 3

Collection of Disturbed Soil Sample - - - - 3

Collection of Undisturbed Soil Sample - - - - 4

4. In Situ Testing - - - - 4

5. Laboratory Test - - - - 4

- Particle Size Distribution - - - - 5

- Atterberg Limit Test - - - - 5

- Unconfined compression Test - - - - 6

- Natural Moisture Content - - - - 6

-. Direct Shear test of Cohesion less Soil - - - - 7

- One-dimensional Consolidation Test - - - - 7

6. Evaluation of Bearing Capacity and Soil Resistance - - - 8

- Evaluation of Skin and Tip Resistance of Pile Foundation - 9

- Shallow Foundation - - - 11

7. References - - - 12

8. Bearing Capacity of Soil - - - 13-14

9. Settlement Calculation of Shallow Foundation - - - 15-25

10. Liquefaction Potential Analysis - - - 26-36

11. Conclusion & Recommendations - - - 37

 ABBREVIATION

ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials

NMC Natural Moisture Content

PSD Particle Size Distribution

UCCT Unconfined Compression Test

ODCT One-dimensional Consolidation Test

Soil Classification Symbol

CL Clay with low plasticity
CH Clay with high plasticity

ML Silt with low plastic

MH Silt with high plasticity

OH Organic soil with high plasticity

OL Organic soil with low plasticity

SM Silty Sand

DISCLAIMER
All works i.e. drilling boreholes at site, collection of disturbed soil samples, field &
laboratory tests will be conducted under the compliance of ASTM standard. Borehole
locations were selected and set out by client’s representative.

The geotechnical parameters, information, suggestions, recommendations, computation

of bearing capacity and soil resistance for piles presented herein will be developed
utilizing the engineering properties of the soil information obtained from Standard
Penetration Test and laboratory tests conducted. This report only depicts the soil
conditions at the specific boring location at the specific time the boring was made. As
such, the soil conditions adjacent to the borehole locations could vary from those
encountered in the borehole.

The recommendations, suggestions presented herein are based on preliminary

information provided by the client. If deviations from the expected subsurface conditions
observed during construction, these deviations should be brought to the knowledge of
the geotechnical engineer before execution.
The scope of the report does not address any environmental issues relating to
contaminations of soils, surface water or groundwater.

Page 1
1. INTRODUCTION
Subsoil Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd. has taken on geotechnical investigation
work for Structure at BH-1(A), CH 44+080Km, BH-2(B) CH 44+220Km (RHS), BH-3(C) CH
44+440 Km (RHS), BH-4(D) CH 45+340 Km, BH-5 (E) CH 46+00 Km (RHS), BH-6 Km, CH
47+400 (RHS), Narsingdi. All work done in the field and laboratory will be summarized,
compiled, and submitted along with a soft copy.

100 mm diameter thirteen (6) uncased boreholes will be drilled at site up to maximum
depth of 18.45 m by wash boring method. Standard Penetration Test (SPT) will be
carried out using manual hammer in each borehole at an interval of 1.5 m up to
maximum explored depth. Disturbed soil samples will be collected from recovered soil
from each Split Spoon Barrel during Standard Penetration Test and undisturbed soil
samples will be collected by Shelby Tube sampler from cohesive soil strata only.
Entire SPT operation monitored and digitally recorded in the field by our representative.

All laboratory tests will be conducted according to ASTM standards (specific

standard mentioned as required) on selected soil samples. Complete grain size
analysis (sieve analysis), Atterberg limit tests, unconfined compression tests and direct
shear tests will be conducted, and the results are presented in the appendix of this
report.
Based on field and laboratory test results, bearing capacity of soil for shallow footings,
and pile carrying capacities will be evaluated and presented in the appendix of this report.

2. SCOPE OF WORK
Scope of work under the contract summarized below:
 Drilling boreholes.
 Conducting SPT and record N-value at intervals specified by the
client’s Engineer.
 Disturbed soil sample collection at specified intervals from Split Spoon Barrel.
 Undisturbed soil sample collection from each cohesive
layer byShelby Tube whenever possible.
 Classification of soil.
 Laboratory tests to determine physical properties of soil.
 Laboratory tests to determine the engineering properties of soil.
 Depiction of soil profile.
 Preparation of report.

Page 2
3. FIELD WORK

Field work includes drilling boreholes at locations as shown by client; conducting in-situ
tests like Standard Penetration Test (SPT); collection of disturbed soil samples;
undisturbed soil samples. The SPT activities will be captured by video camera, and still
photographs were taken for recovered split spoon. Soil samples disturbed and un-
disturbed will be sealed and stored. All relevant field data will be recorded in SPT sheet
and subsequently sent to laboratory. Boreholes will be drilled by percussion boring
method. The depth and location of boreholes is suggested by the client and shown in
sketch enclosed herewith.

Collection of Disturbed Soil Samples:

Soil samples collected from split-spoon sampler at intervals of 1.5 m & 3.0 m, up to the
maximum explored depth of the boreholes. The samples were collected from split
spoon just after conducting SPT, stored, sealed as disturbed sample and transported to
laboratory for testing. Reference code: ASTM D 1586

Page 3
Collection of Undisturbed Soil Samples:

Undisturbed soil samples were collected from cohesive soil. The samples were
collected using Shelby tube sampler —75 mm Ø—and subsequently sealed to prevent
moisture loss and carefully transported to laboratory for testing. Reference code:
ASTM D 1587

4. In-situ Testing

Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) will be conducted in the boreholes at intervals of 1.50m

& 3.00 m using a manually operated donut hammer weighing 63.5 kg by wash boring
method. Generally, SPT halted when a maximum of 50 blows counted for any
penetration but not exceeding 450 mm.

The number of blows required to penetrate the sampler 450 mm and blows required
to drive the sampler are recorded for penetration of each increment of 150 mm i.e., three
sets of blows are recorded. The SPT N-value is summation of last two set of blows
required to penetrate 300 mm (150 mm + 150 mm).

5. LABORATORY TEST
Relevant laboratory tests will be conducted on representative soil samples to determine
physical and engineering properties. Laboratory tests will be limited to Particle Size
Distribution, Atterberg Limit test; Unconfined Compression Test, Natural Moisture
Content and Direct Shear Test will be conducted on undisturbed cohesive soil samples.

Page 4
Particle Size Distribution

This test method covers the quantitative determination of particle size distribution as well
as fineness. The soil washed by No.200 sieve is used to determine the percentage of
fine and coarse particles and sieve analysis is done on soil quantity retained on
No.200 sieve Subsequently.
The resu ting data were acquired to obtain the particle resented in Size distribution and
the report. Reference code: ASTM D422-6

Atterberg Limit Test

This test method covers the determination of liquid limit, plastic limit and plasticity index
of soil. Hand operated Cassagrande apparatus was used to determine liquid limit. The
plastic limit was determined using the hand method. Reference code: ASTM 4318.

Page 5
Unconfined Compression Test

The unconfined compression tests were conducted on certain undisturbed soil

samples collected using a thin-walled Shelby tube sampler and results are shown in
the report. The data acquired were used to determine the unconfined compression
strength. Reference code: ASTM D 2166

Natural moisture content

12 mm diameter small tube inserted into the disturbed soil samples collected by split
sampler sealed both side by wax and sent to laboratory to obtain natural moisture
content. It was also determined for the soil samples collected in the Shelby tube.

Page 6
Direct Shear test of Cohesion less soil

The soil sample is deformed at a controlled strain rate on a shear plane—created

by using shear boxes at top and bottom of the specimen-under a pre-determined
normal load. Reference code: ASTM D3080-03

One-dimensional Consolidation Test

Selected cohesive samples were used to perform one-dimensional consolidation test
Reference code: ASTM D2435

Page 7
6. EVALUATION OF BEARING CAPACITY AND SOIL RESISTANCE

SPT N-value correction

It is very important both for the geotechnical and design engineers having the clear
idea about the factors that influenced the blow count and variation of N-values recorded
for same soil strata in the field. Factors which influencing the SPT N value are hammer
efficiency (type of hammer and release mechanism), borehole diameter, sampling
method, rod length (Skempton, 1986; Seed, et al., 1985) magnitude of energy ratio E r
(can vary from 30 to 90%) etc.

Standard practice now in many advanced countries is to express N-values to an

average energy ratio of 60 to 70% (N60 to N70). There is no guideline available in
Bangladesh. We are converting all field values to N60.

We have improved raw field SPT N-values by applying certain factors. We are converting
N- values recorded in the field to N70 (Skempton, 1986) as follows:

EHCBCS CR N
N60 =
0.60
Where, N60 = SPT N value corrected for field procedures

EH = Hammer efficiency

CB = Borehole diameter correction

CS = Sampler correction

CR = Rod length correction

Page 8
Evaluation of Skin and Tip Resistance of Pile Foundation

Ultimate unit skin and tip resistance can be computed for each segment of the soil
strata based on the equation given by AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Ninth
Edition, 2020:

The factored resistance of drilled shafts,

RR= ϕRn= ϕqpRp+ ϕqsRs

Nominal shaft tip resistance, Rp=qpAp (kN/m2)

Nominal shaft side resistance, Rs=qsAs (kN/m2)
Where,

ϕqp = Resistance factor for tip resistance

ϕqs = Resistance factor for side resistance

qp= Unit tip resistance (kpa)

qs= Unit side resistance (kpa)
Ap= Area of shaft tip (m 2)
As= Area of shaft side surface (m 2)

Drilled shaft resistance in cohesive soil:

Unit side resistance, qs= αSu
In which:

α= 0.55 for ≤ 1.5

Su
α= 0.55-0.1 (Su/Pa-1.5) for 1.5 ≤ P𝑎 ≤ 2.5

Where,
Su or Cu= Undrained shear strength, (Terzaghi & Peck, C u=6.25N, kN/m2)
α= Adhesion factor (dim)
Pa= Atmospheric pressure (2.12 ksf or 101.325 kPa)

Nominal tip resistance, qp=NcSu ≤ 80.0 ksf or 3830.4 kPa

In which,

Nc=6 1 + 0.2 ≤9

Where,
D=Diameter of drilled shaft (m)
Z= Penetration of shaft (m)
Su= Undrained shear strength (kN/m2)

11

Page 9
Drilled shaft resistance in cohesive less soil:
Unit side resistance, qs= β σ'v
In which,
’
β= (1-sinϕ’f) tan ϕ’f

Where,
β = Load transfer coefficient (dim)
ϕ’f = Friction angle of cohesion less soil layer (0)
σ'p= Effective vertical preconsolidation stress
σ'v= Vertical effective stress at soil layer mid-depth

The correlation for effective soil friction angle for use in the above
equations shall be taken as:
ϕ’f = 27.5+9.2 log[(𝑁 ) ]
Where,
(N1)60= SPT N-value corrected for effective overburden
stress
The preconsolidation stress through the correlation to SPT N-value. For sand:

= 0.47(N60)m

Where,
m= 0.6 for clean quartzitic sand
m= 0.8 for silty sand to sandy silts
Pa= Atmospheric pressure (2.12 ksf or 101.325 kPa)

For gravelly soils: = 0.15(N60)

Nominal tip resistance, qp=1.2 N60 (If N60 ≤ 50)

Where,
N60= Average SPT blow count (corrected only for hammer efficiency) in the
design zone under consideration (blow/ft)

Page 10
Shallow foundation

Terzaghi’s general equations of bearing capacity for shallow footing are used to compute

allowable bearing capacity of shallow footing. Hansen’s and Meyerhof’s modified

equation are also used for the purposes. Basic equation for bearing capacity is

Terzaghi’s bearing capacity equation:

qu = cNc + γDf Nq +0.5BγNγ

Where,

c = Cohesion

γ = Unit weight ofsoil

Df = Depth of footing

B = Widthof footing

Nc, Nq, Nγ = Bearing capacity factors

Page 11
 7. References

 ASTM D2488-17e1, Standard Practice for Description and Identification of Soils

(Visual- Manual Procedures), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017

 ASTM D2487-17e1, Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering

Purposes(Unified Soil Classification System), ASTM International, West
Conshohocken, A, 2017

 ASTM D6913 / D6913M-17, Standard Test Methods for Particle-Size Distribution

(Gradation) of Soils Using Sieve Analysis, ASTM International,West
Conshohocken, PA,2017

 ASTM D4318-17e1, Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and
Plasticity Index of Soils, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017

 ASTM D2166 / D2166M-16, Standard Test Method for Unconfined Compressive

Strength of Cohesive Soil, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016

 ASTM D2216-19, Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Determination of Water

(Moisture)Content of Soil and Rock by Mass, ASTM International, West
Conshohocken, A, 2019

 ASTM D3080 / D3080M-11, Standard Test Method for Direct Shear Test of Soils
Under Consolidated Drained Conditions, ASTM International, West Conshohocken,
PA,2011

Page 12
8. BEARING CAPACITY OF SOIL
Formula used for computation

Square footing :
For Cohesive Soil :
qult = CNCSC + gDf Nq + 0.5gBNgSg
(Ref: Foundation Analysis and Design by J.E. Bowles)
For Non-Cohesive Soil :
qa = 720 (N - 3 ) x ( B + 1 )2 R'w in psf for 1in. Settlement.
2B
(Ref : Foundation design by W.C. Teng )
Corrected ' N ' = Nfield { 50/(p+10) } in psi
Bore Hole Depth below the Nfield Corrected * qu Net allowable bearing capacity of soil for
No. existing ground (avg) N in KN/m2 Square Footing in KN/m2 (F. S used 3 )
level in meter
1.50 4 - 47.88 59.13
2.50 4 - 47.88 59.13
BH-1( A)
3.00 4 - 47.88 59.13
RL + 6.758m
3.50 7 - 83.78 103.47
4.50 11 - 131.66 162.60
1.50 1 - 11.97 14.78
2.50 1 - 11.97 14.78
BH-2( B)
3.00 1 - 11.97 14.78
RL + 4.160m
3.50 7 - 83.78 103.47
4.50 7 - 83.78 103.47
1.50 5 - 59.84 73.91
2.50 4 - 47.88 59.13
BH-3 (C)
3.00 4 - 47.88 59.13
RL + 4.20m
3.50 3 - 35.91 44.34
4.50 3 - 35.91 44.34
1.50 1 - 11.97 14.78
2.50 1 - 11.97 14.78
BH-4 (D)
3.00 1 - 11.97 14.78
RL + 4.00m
3.50 1 - 11.97 14.78
4.50 1 - 11.97 14.78
1.50 18 - 215.44 266.07
2.50 21 - 251.34 310.41
BH-5 (E)
3.00 24 - 287.25 354.75
RL + 11.171m
3.50 21 - 251.34 310.41
4.50 19 - 227.41 280.85
1.50 21 - 251.34 310.41
2.50 23 - 275.28 339.97
BH-6 (F)
3.00 25 - 299.22 369.54
RL +10.868m
3.50 16 - 191.50 236.50
4.50 7 - 83.78 103.47
* qu = Unconfined compressive strength of soil
1 tsf = 95.75 Kn/m2 1Kg/cm2 = 98.10 kn/m2

Page 13
 SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO.LTD.
Settlement Calculation of Embankment As per IRC:75 - 2015
Client: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH
Location: CH: 44+080 Km, DHAKA SYLHET CORIDOUR ROAD INVESTMENT PROJECT.
Structure Type: Embankment Bore Hole No: BH-1(A)
3
Size of Embankment H (m)= 8.0 B (m)= 56.0 Density of Embankment fill = 1.83 MT/m
EGL (m) 0.00 Ground Water Level (m) 0.00 Depth of Footing Df= 0.0 m
Required data for Settlement calculation Layer 01 Layer 02 Layer 03 Layer 03
Ht = Thickness of soil layer (m) 7.20 2.30 0.00 0.00
Type of soil in this layer Fat Clay silty Sand Lean Clay Lean Clay
eₒ = Initial Void Ratio 0.901
Cc= Compression Index 0.215
3 1.422 1.71
= Dry density of soil (MT/m )
Gs=Specific gravity of soil 2.689
sub=Submerged density (MT/m3)=(G-1) x /G 0.893

For Layer 01: (Soil Type: Fat Clay, and Layer Thickness: 7.20m)
Effective Overburden Pressure at Mid depth of soft clay layer, Stress due to 4m high embankment,
P̅0 = 0.893 x 3.6 ∆P = 1.83 x 4
= 3.22 = 7.32

Settlement Calculations (with no ground improvement adopted)

Settlement due to 4m high embankment,
0.215 3.22 + 7.32
Sc 1= x 7.2 x Log
1 + 0.901 3.22
S 1= 0.42 m or 419.7 mm > 150 mm

* NOTE: This settlement is more than the tolerable limits of 150 mm and hence it is not allowable. Here ground improvement
is required.

Total Settlement St = 2.6 mm

Correction Factors:
Rigitidy Correction Factor = 0.8
Depth Correction Factor = 1
St (Corrected) = 2.6 x 0.8 x 1
= 2.10 mm > 50 mm

Page 14
 SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO.LTD.
Settlement Calculation of Embankment As per IRC:75 - 2015
Client: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH
Location: CH: 47+400 Km (R/S), DHAKA SYLHET CORIDOUR ROAD INVESTMENT PROJECT.
Structure Type: Embankment Bore Hole No: BH-2(B)
3
Size of Embankment H (m)= 8.0 B (m)= 56.0 Density of Embankment fill = 1.83 MT/m
EGL (m) 0.00 Ground Water Level (m) 0.00 Depth of Footing Df= 0.0 m
Required data for Settlement calculation Layer 01 Layer 02 Layer 03 Layer 03
Ht = Thickness of soil layer (m) 3.50 3.00 0.00 0.00
Type of soil in this layer Fat Clay Fat Clay Lean Clay Lean Clay
eₒ = Initial Void Ratio 1.152 1.039
Cc= Compression Index 0.300 0.262
3 1.253 1.324
= Dry density of soil (MT/m )
Gs=Specific gravity of soil 2.680 2.685
sub=Submerged density (MT/m3)=(G-1) x /G 0.785 0.831

For Layer 01: (Soil Type: Fat Clay, and Layer Thickness: 3.50m)
Effective Overburden Pressure at Mid depth of soft clay layer, Stress due to 4m high embankment,
P̅0 = 0.785 x 1.75 ∆P = 1.83 x 4
= 1.37 = 7.32

Settlement Calculations (with no ground improvement adopted)

Settlement due to 4m high embankment,
0.300 1.37 + 7.32
Sc 1= x 3.5 x Log
1 + 1.152 1.37
S 1= 0.39 m or 390.9 mm > 150 mm

For Layer 02: (Soil Type: Fat Clay, and Layer Thickness: 3.00m)
Effective Overburden Pressure at Mid depth of soft clay layer, Stress due to 4m high embankment,
P̅0 = 0.831 x 1.5 ∆P = 1.83 x 4
= 1.25 = 7.32

Settlement Calculations (with no ground improvement adopted)

Settlement due to 4m high embankment,
0.262 1.62 + 7.32
Sc 2= x 3 x Log
1 + 1.039 1.62
S 2= 0.29 m or 286.0 mm > 150 mm

Total Settlment, Sc= S1+S2= 676.9 mm > 150 mm

* NOTE: This settlement is more than the tolerable limits of 150 mm and hence it is not allowable. Here ground improvement
is required.

Total Settlement St = 1.4 mm

Correction Factors:

Page 15
 SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO.LTD.
Settlement Calculation of Embankment As per IRC:75 - 2015
Client: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH
Location: CH: 44+440 Km (R/S), DHAKA SYLHET CORIDOUR ROAD INVESTMENT PROJECT.
Structure Type: Embankment Bore Hole No: BH-3( C )
3
Size of Embankment H (m)= 8.0 B (m)= 56.0 Density of Embankment fill = 1.83 MT/m
EGL (m) 0.00 Ground Water Level (m) 0.00 Depth of Footing Df= 0.0 m
Required data for Settlement calculation Layer 01 Layer 02 Layer 03 Layer 03
Ht = Thickness of soil layer (m) 16.00 2.30 0.00 0.00
Type of soil in this layer Fat Clay silty Sand Lean Clay Lean Clay
eₒ = Initial Void Ratio 1.107
Cc= Compression Index 0.285
3 1.281 1.71
= Dry density of soil (MT/m )
Gs=Specific gravity of soil 2.683
sub=Submerged density (MT/m3)=(G-1) x /G 0.803

For Layer 01: (Soil Type: Fat Clay, and Layer Thickness: 16.00m)
Effective Overburden Pressure at Mid depth of soft clay layer, Stress due to 4m high embankment,
P̅0 = 0.803 x 8 ∆P = 1.83 x 4
= 6.43 = 7.32

Settlement Calculations (with no ground improvement adopted)

Settlement due to 4m high embankment,
0.285 6.43 + 7.32
Sc 1= x 16 x Log
1 + 1.107 6.43
S 1= 0.71 m or 714.6 mm > 150 mm

* NOTE: This settlement is more than the tolerable limits of 150 mm and hence it is not allowable. Here ground improvement
is required.

Total Settlement St = 4.7 mm

Correction Factors:
Rigitidy Correction Factor = 0.8
Depth Correction Factor = 1
St (Corrected) = 4.7 x 0.8 x 1
= 3.79 mm > 50 mm

Page 16
 SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO.LTD.
Settlement Calculation of Embankment As per IRC:75 - 2015
Client: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH
Location: CH: 45+340 Km (R/S), DHAKA SYLHET CORIDOUR ROAD INVESTMENT PROJECT.
Structure Type: Embankment Bore Hole No: BH-4(D)
3
Size of Embankment H (m)= 8.0 B (m)= 56.0 Density of Embankment fill = 1.83 MT/m
EGL (m) 0.00 Ground Water Level (m) 0.00 Depth of Footing Df= 0.0 m
Required data for Settlement calculation Layer 01 Layer 02 Layer 03 Layer 03
Ht = Thickness of soil layer (m) 6.20 2.00 0.00 0.00
Type of soil in this layer Fat Clay Fat Clay Lean Clay Lean Clay
eₒ = Initial Void Ratio 1.162 0.944
Cc= Compression Index 0.303 0.229
3 1.247 1.390
= Dry density of soil (MT/m )
Gs=Specific gravity of soil 2.680 2.688
sub=Submerged density (MT/m3)=(G-1) x /G 0.782 0.873

For Layer 01: (Soil Type: Fat Clay, and Layer Thickness: 6.20m)
Effective Overburden Pressure at Mid depth of soft clay layer, Stress due to 4m high embankment,
P̅0 = 0.782 x 3.1 ∆P = 1.83 x 4
= 2.42 = 7.32

Settlement Calculations (with no ground improvement adopted)

Settlement due to 4m high embankment,
0.303 2.42 + 7.32
Sc 1= x 6.2 x Log
1 + 1.162 2.42
S 1= 0.53 m or 525.1 mm > 150 mm

For Layer 02: (Soil Type: Fat Clay, and Layer Thickness: 2.00m)
Effective Overburden Pressure at Mid depth of soft clay layer, Stress due to 4m high embankment,
P̅0 = 0.873 x 1 ∆P = 1.83 x 4
= 0.87 = 7.32

Settlement Calculations (with no ground improvement adopted)

Settlement due to 4m high embankment,
0.229 2.81 + 7.32
Sc 2= x 2 x Log
1 + 0.944 2.81
S 2= 0.13 m or 131.3 mm < 150 mm

Total Settlment, Sc= S1+S2= 656.3 mm > 150 mm

* NOTE: This settlement is more than the tolerable limits of 150 mm and hence it is not allowable. Here ground improvement
is required.

Total Settlement St = 1.4 mm

Correction Factors:

Page 17
 SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO.LTD.
Settlement Calculation of Embankment As per IRC:75 - 2015
Client: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH
Location: CH: 45+340 Km (R/S), DHAKA SYLHET CORIDOUR ROAD INVESTMENT PROJECT.
Structure Type: Embankment Bore Hole No: BH-5( E )
3
Size of Embankment H (m)= 8.0 B (m)= 56.0 Density of Embankment fill = 1.83 MT/m
EGL (m) 0.00 Ground Water Level (m) 0.00 Depth of Footing Df= 0.0 m
Required data for Settlement calculation Layer 01 Layer 03 Layer 03 Layer 03
Ht = Thickness of soil layer (m) 5.30 1.50 0.00 0.00
Type of soil in this layer Fat Clay Fat Clay Lean Clay Lean Clay
eₒ = Initial Void Ratio 0.883 0.757
Cc= Compression Index 0.208 0.166
3 1.427 1.530
= Dry density of soil (MT/m )
Gs=Specific gravity of soil 2.672 2.674
sub=Submerged density (MT/m3)=(G-1) x /G 0.893 0.958

For Layer 01: (Soil Type: Fat Clay, and Layer Thickness: 5.30m)
Effective Overburden Pressure at Mid depth of soft clay layer, Stress due to 4m high embankment,
P̅0 = 0.893 x 2.65 ∆P = 1.83 x 4
= 2.37 = 7.32

Settlement Calculations (with no ground improvement adopted)

Settlement due to 4m high embankment,
0.208 2.37 + 7.32
Sc 1= x 5.3 x Log
1 + 0.883 2.37
S 1= 0.36 m or 358.4 mm > 150 mm

For Layer 03: (Soil Type: Fat Clay, and Layer Thickness: 1.50m)
Effective Overburden Pressure at Mid depth of soft clay layer, Stress due to 4m high embankment,
P̅0 = 0.958 x 0.75 ∆P = 1.83 x 4
= 0.72 = 7.32

Settlement Calculations (with no ground improvement adopted)

Settlement due to 4m high embankment,
0.166 3.21 + 7.32
Sc 2= x 1.5 x Log
1 + 0.757 3.21
S 2= 0.07 m or 73.2 mm < 150 mm

Total Settlment, Sc= S1+S2= 431.6 mm > 150 mm

* NOTE: This settlement is more than the tolerable limits of 150 mm and hence it is not allowable. Here ground improvement
is required.

Total Settlement St = 1.3 mm

Correction Factors:

Page 18
 SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO.LTD.
Settlement Calculation of Embankment As per IRC:75 - 2015
Client: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH
Location: CH: 47+400 Km (R/S), DHAKA SYLHET CORIDOUR ROAD INVESTMENT PROJECT.
Structure Type: Embankment Bore Hole No: BH-6(F)
3
Size of Embankment H (m)= 8.0 B (m)= 56.0 Density of Embankment fill = 1.83 MT/m
EGL (m) 0.00 Ground Water Level (m) 0.00 Depth of Footing Df= 0.0 m
Required data for Settlement calculation Layer 01 Layer 02 Layer 03 Layer 03
Ht = Thickness of soil layer (m) 10.30 2.30 0.00 0.00
Type of soil in this layer Fat Clay silty Sand Lean Clay Lean Clay
eₒ = Initial Void Ratio 0.836
Cc= Compression Index 0.192
3 1.467 1.71
= Dry density of soil (MT/m )
Gs=Specific gravity of soil 2.679
sub=Submerged density (MT/m3)=(G-1) x /G 0.919

For Layer 01: (Soil Type: Fat Clay, and Layer Thickness: 10.30m)
Effective Overburden Pressure at Mid depth of soft clay layer, Stress due to 4m high embankment,
P̅0 = 0.919 x 5.15 ∆P = 1.83 x 4
= 4.73 = 7.32

Settlement Calculations (with no ground improvement adopted)

Settlement due to 4m high embankment,
0.192 4.73 + 7.32
Sc 1= x 10.3 x Log
1 + 0.836 4.73
S 1= 0.44 m or 437.2 mm > 150 mm

* NOTE: This settlement is more than the tolerable limits of 150 mm and hence it is not allowable. Here ground improvement
is required.

Total Settlement St = 3.4 mm

Correction Factors:
Rigitidy Correction Factor = 0.8
Depth Correction Factor = 1
St (Corrected) = 3.4 x 0.8 x 1
= 2.69 mm > 50 mm

Page 19
 Typical Computation of Liquefaction Potential by Simplified Method
Client: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH. Seismic Zone: Zone III
Project: DSCIRP: DS-3 Seismicity: Severe
Location: Chainage: 44+080 Km Zone Factor: 0.28
Type of Structure MJB
Water table assumed for Calculation (m): 0.00

BORE HOLE NO. 1(A)

Hammer Energy (70% for rope pully

NL=Non-Liquefiable, L=Liquefiable
Total overburden pressure (so), t/m
Stress reduction coefficient (rd)

2
Effective overburden (so), t/m
Sampler used was with liner

Submerged Density (t/m )

Observed SPT Value (Nm)
Magnitude of Earthquake
Borehole Diameter (mm)

Cyclic Stress ratio (CSR)

Depth below EGL, z (m)

Saturated density (t/m )

3

SPT corrected (N1)60

Fine Content ( % )
Type of Strata

Conclusion
CRRM = 7.5
system)

(N1)60cs

CRR

FOS
CN

CR
CB

CS
CE

β
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 1.5 Clay 4 1.937 0.937 99 0.99 2.9055 1.41 0.37 1.70 1.17 1 0.75 1 5.95 5.00 1.2 12.14 0.13 0.19 0.51 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 3 Clay 4 1.937 0.937 99 0.98 5.811 2.81 0.37 1.70 1.17 1 0.80 1 6.35 5.00 1.2 12.62 0.14 0.20 0.54 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 4.5 Clay 11 2.039 1.039 96 0.97 8.8695 4.37 0.36 1.51 1.17 1 0.85 1 16.50 5.00 1.2 24.80 0.29 0.41 1.16 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 6 Clay 7 2.039 1.039 97 0.95 11.928 5.93 0.35 1.30 1.17 1 0.95 1 10.08 5.00 1.2 17.09 0.18 0.26 0.75 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 7.5 Silt/Sand 20 1.835 0.835 36 0.94 14.681 7.18 0.35 1.18 1.17 1 0.95 1 26.16 5.00 1.2 36.39 NA NA NA NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 9 Silt/Sand 19 1.835 0.835 35 0.93 17.433 8.43 0.35 1.09 1.17 1 0.95 1 22.93 5.00 1.2 32.52 NA NA NA NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 10.5 Silt/Sand 14 1.835 0.835 37 0.89 20.186 9.69 0.34 1.02 1.17 1 1 1 16.60 5.00 1.2 24.92 0.29 0.42 1.23 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 12 Silt/Sand 17 1.937 0.937 77 0.85 23.091 11.09 0.32 0.95 1.17 1 1 1 18.83 5.00 1.2 27.60 0.36 0.51 1.59 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 13.5 Silt/Sand 15 1.937 0.937 76 0.81 25.997 12.50 0.31 0.89 1.17 1 1 1 15.65 5.00 1.2 23.79 0.27 0.39 1.26 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 15 Silt/Sand 19 1.937 0.937 75 0.77 28.902 13.90 0.29 0.85 1.17 1 1 1 18.80 5.00 1.2 27.56 0.35 0.51 1.75 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 16.5 Silt/Sand 28 1.835 0.835 34 0.73 31.655 15.15 0.28 0.81 1.17 1 1 1 26.54 4.93 1.19 36.46 NA NA NA NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 18 Silt/Sand 39 1.937 0.937 32 0.69 34.56 16.56 0.26 0.78 1.17 1 1 1 35.36 4.83 1.17 46.23 NA NA NA NL
Note: L= Liquefaction Occur, ,NL=Liquefaction not Occur

Page 20
 Typical Computation of Liquefaction Potential by Simplified Method
Client: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH. Seismic Zone: Zone III
Project: DSCIRP: DS-3 Seismicity: Severe
Location: Chainage: 44+220 Km (R/S) Zone Factor: 0.28
Type of Structure MJB
Water table assumed for Calculation (m): 0.00

BORE HOLE NO. 2(B)

Hammer Energy (70% for rope pully

NL=Non-Liquefiable, L=Liquefiable
Total overburden pressure (so), t/m
Stress reduction coefficient (rd)

2
Effective overburden (so), t/m
Sampler used was with liner

Submerged Density (t/m )

Observed SPT Value (Nm)
Magnitude of Earthquake
Borehole Diameter (mm)

Cyclic Stress ratio (CSR)

Depth below EGL, z (m)

Saturated density (t/m )

3

SPT corrected (N1)60

Fine Content ( % )
Type of Strata

Conclusion
CRRM = 7.5
system)

(N1)60cs

CRR

FOS
CN

CR
CB

CS
CE

β
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 1.5 Clay 1 1.937 0.937 98 0.99 2.9055 1.41 0.37 1.70 1.17 1 0.75 1 1.49 5.00 1.2 6.79 0.09 0.12 0.33 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 3 Clay 1 1.937 0.937 98 0.98 5.811 2.81 0.37 1.70 1.17 1 0.80 1 1.59 5.00 1.2 6.90 0.09 0.13 0.34 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 4.5 Clay 7 2.039 1.039 95 0.97 8.8695 4.37 0.36 1.51 1.17 1 0.85 1 10.50 5.00 1.2 17.60 0.19 0.27 0.76 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 6 Clay 7 2.039 1.039 94 0.95 11.928 5.93 0.35 1.30 1.17 1 0.95 1 10.08 5.00 1.2 17.09 0.18 0.26 0.75 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 7.5 Silt/Sand 17 1.835 0.835 40 0.94 14.681 7.18 0.35 1.18 1.17 1 0.95 1 22.24 5.00 1.2 31.68 NA NA NA NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 9 Silt/Sand 11 1.835 0.835 39 0.93 17.433 8.43 0.35 1.09 1.17 1 0.95 1 13.28 5.00 1.2 20.93 0.23 0.33 0.93 L
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 10.5 Silt/Sand 11 1.835 0.835 38 0.89 20.186 9.69 0.34 1.02 1.17 1 1 1 13.04 5.00 1.2 20.65 0.22 0.32 0.95 L
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 12 Silt/Sand 17 1.835 0.835 37 0.85 22.938 10.94 0.33 0.96 1.17 1 1 1 18.96 5.00 1.2 27.76 0.36 0.52 1.60 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 13.5 Silt/Sand 20 1.835 0.835 37 0.81 25.691 12.19 0.31 0.91 1.17 1 1 1 21.13 5.00 1.2 30.36 NA NA NA NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 15 Silt/Sand 20 1.835 0.835 36 0.77 28.443 13.44 0.30 0.86 1.17 1 1 1 20.12 5.00 1.2 29.15 0.42 0.60 2.02 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 16.5 Silt/Sand 25 1.835 0.835 36 0.73 31.196 14.70 0.28 0.82 1.17 1 1 1 24.06 5.00 1.2 33.87 NA NA NA NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 18 Silt/Sand 29 1.835 0.835 35 0.69 33.948 15.95 0.27 0.79 1.17 1 1 1 26.79 5.00 1.2 37.15 NA NA NA NL
Note: L= Liquefaction Occur, ,NL=Liquefaction not Occur

Page 21
 Typical Computation of Liquefaction Potential by Simplified Method
Client: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH. Seismic Zone: Zone III
Project: DSCIRP: DS-3 Seismicity: Severe
Location: Chainage: 44+440 Km (R/S) Zone Factor: 0.28
Type of Structure MJB
Water table assumed for Calculation (m): 0.00

BORE HOLE NO. 3(C)

Hammer Energy (70% for rope pully

NL=Non-Liquefiable, L=Liquefiable
Total overburden pressure (so), t/m
Stress reduction coefficient (rd)

2
Effective overburden (so), t/m
Sampler used was with liner

Submerged Density (t/m )

Observed SPT Value (Nm)
Magnitude of Earthquake
Borehole Diameter (mm)

Cyclic Stress ratio (CSR)

Depth below EGL, z (m)

Saturated density (t/m )

3

SPT corrected (N1)60

Fine Content ( % )
Type of Strata

Conclusion
CRRM = 7.5
system)

(N1)60cs

CRR

FOS
CN

CR
CB

CS
CE

β
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 1.5 Clay 5 2.039 1.039 99 0.99 3.0585 1.56 0.35 1.70 1.17 1 0.75 1 7.44 5.00 1.2 13.93 0.15 0.22 0.61 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 3 Clay 4 1.937 0.937 97 0.98 5.964 2.96 0.36 1.70 1.17 1 0.80 1 6.35 5.00 1.2 12.62 0.14 0.20 0.55 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 4.5 Clay 3 1.937 0.937 98 0.97 8.8695 4.37 0.36 1.51 1.17 1 0.85 1 4.50 5.00 1.2 10.40 0.12 0.17 0.47 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 6 Clay 1 1.937 0.937 99 0.95 11.775 5.78 0.35 1.32 1.17 1 0.95 1 1.46 5.00 1.2 6.75 0.09 0.12 0.35 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 7.5 Clay 1 1.937 0.937 99 0.94 14.681 7.18 0.35 1.18 1.17 1 0.95 1 1.31 5.00 1.2 6.57 0.08 0.12 0.35 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 9 Clay 3 1.937 0.937 96 0.93 17.586 8.59 0.35 1.08 1.17 1 0.95 1 3.59 5.00 1.2 9.31 0.11 0.15 0.44 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 10.5 Clay 4 1.937 0.937 94 0.89 20.492 9.99 0.33 1.00 1.17 1 1 1 4.67 5.00 1.2 10.60 0.12 0.17 0.51 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 12 Clay 6 2.039 1.039 95 0.85 23.55 11.55 0.32 0.93 1.17 1 1 1 6.51 5.00 1.2 12.82 0.14 0.20 0.63 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 13.5 Clay 2 1.937 0.937 96 0.81 26.456 12.96 0.30 0.88 1.17 1 1 1 2.05 5.00 1.2 7.46 0.09 0.13 0.44 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 15 Clay 2 1.937 0.937 97 0.77 29.361 14.36 0.29 0.83 1.17 1 1 1 1.95 5.00 1.2 7.34 0.09 0.13 0.45 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 16.5 Silt/Sand 20 1.835 0.835 38 0.73 32.114 15.61 0.27 0.80 1.17 1 1 1 18.67 5.00 1.2 27.41 0.35 0.50 1.84 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 18 Silt/Sand 19 1.835 0.835 37 0.69 34.866 16.87 0.26 0.77 1.17 1 1 1 17.07 5.00 1.2 25.48 0.30 0.43 1.67 NL
Note: L= Liquefaction Occur, ,NL=Liquefaction not Occur

Page 22
 Typical Computation of Liquefaction Potential by Simplified Method
Client: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH. Seismic Zone: Zone III
Project: DSCIRP: DS-3 Seismicity: Severe
Location: Chainage: 45+340 Km (R/S) Zone Factor: 0.28
Type of Structure MJB
Water table assumed for Calculation (m): 0.00

BORE HOLE NO. 4(D)

Hammer Energy (70% for rope pully

NL=Non-Liquefiable, L=Liquefiable
Total overburden pressure (so), t/m
Stress reduction coefficient (rd)

2
Effective overburden (so), t/m
Sampler used was with liner

Submerged Density (t/m )

Observed SPT Value (Nm)
Magnitude of Earthquake
Borehole Diameter (mm)

Cyclic Stress ratio (CSR)

Depth below EGL, z (m)

Saturated density (t/m )

3

SPT corrected (N1)60

Fine Content ( % )
Type of Strata

Conclusion
CRRM = 7.5
system)

(N1)60cs

CRR

FOS
CN

CR
CB

CS
CE

β
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 1.5 Clay 1 1.937 0.937 98 0.99 2.9055 1.41 0.37 1.70 1.17 1 0.75 1 1.49 5.00 1.2 6.79 0.09 0.12 0.33 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 3 Clay 1 1.937 0.937 98 0.98 5.811 2.81 0.37 1.70 1.17 1 0.80 1 1.59 5.00 1.2 6.90 0.09 0.13 0.34 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 4.5 Clay 1 1.937 0.937 97 0.97 8.7165 4.22 0.36 1.54 1.17 1 0.85 1 1.53 5.00 1.2 6.83 0.09 0.12 0.34 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 6 Clay 7 2.039 1.039 95 0.95 11.775 5.78 0.35 1.32 1.17 1 0.95 1 10.21 5.00 1.2 17.25 0.18 0.26 0.75 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 7.5 Clay 6 2.039 1.039 96 0.94 14.834 7.33 0.35 1.17 1.17 1 0.95 1 7.77 5.00 1.2 14.32 0.15 0.22 0.64 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 9 Silt/Sand 16 1.835 0.835 40 0.93 17.586 8.59 0.35 1.08 1.17 1 0.95 1 19.14 5.00 1.2 27.97 0.37 0.53 1.53 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 10.5 Silt/Sand 15 1.835 0.835 39 0.89 20.339 9.84 0.34 1.01 1.17 1 1 1 17.64 5.00 1.2 26.17 0.32 0.46 1.36 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 12 Silt/Sand 18 1.835 0.835 37 0.85 23.091 11.09 0.32 0.95 1.17 1 1 1 19.94 5.00 1.2 28.93 0.41 0.59 1.81 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 13.5 Silt/Sand 18 1.835 0.835 36 0.81 25.844 12.34 0.31 0.90 1.17 1 1 1 18.90 5.00 1.2 27.68 0.36 0.52 1.67 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 15 Silt/Sand 22 1.835 0.835 35 0.77 28.596 13.60 0.30 0.86 1.17 1 1 1 22.01 5.00 1.2 31.41 NA NA NA NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 16.5 Silt/Sand 21 1.835 0.835 35 0.73 31.349 14.85 0.28 0.82 1.17 1 1 1 20.11 5.00 1.2 29.13 0.42 0.60 2.13 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 18 Silt/Sand 25 1.835 0.835 34 0.69 34.101 16.10 0.27 0.79 1.17 1 1 1 22.99 4.93 1.19 32.24 NA NA NA NL
Note: L= Liquefaction Occur, ,NL=Liquefaction not Occur

Page 23
 Typical Computation of Liquefaction Potential by Simplified Method
Client: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH. Seismic Zone: Zone III
Project: DSCIRP: DS-3 Seismicity: Severe
Location: Chainage: 46+000 Km (R/S) Zone Factor: 0.28
Type of Structure MJB
Water table assumed for Calculation (m): 0.00

BORE HOLE NO. 5(E)

Hammer Energy (70% for rope pully

NL=Non-Liquefiable, L=Liquefiable
Total overburden pressure (so), t/m
Stress reduction coefficient (rd)

2
Effective overburden (so), t/m
Sampler used was with liner

Submerged Density (t/m )

Observed SPT Value (Nm)
Magnitude of Earthquake
Borehole Diameter (mm)

Cyclic Stress ratio (CSR)

Depth below EGL, z (m)

Saturated density (t/m )

3

SPT corrected (N1)60

Fine Content ( % )
Type of Strata

Conclusion
CRRM = 7.5
system)

(N1)60cs

CRR

FOS
CN

CR
CB

CS
CE

β
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 1.5 Clay 18 2.039 1.039 94 0.99 3.0585 1.56 0.35 1.70 1.17 1 0.75 1 26.78 5.00 1.2 37.13 NA NA NA NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 3 Clay 24 2.039 1.039 93 0.98 6.117 3.12 0.35 1.70 1.17 1 0.80 1 38.08 5.00 1.2 50.70 NA NA NA NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 4.5 Clay 19 2.039 1.039 94 0.97 9.1755 4.68 0.34 1.46 1.17 1 0.85 1 27.56 5.00 1.2 38.07 NA NA NA NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 6 Silt/Sand 12 1.835 0.835 39 0.95 11.928 5.93 0.35 1.30 1.17 1 0.95 1 17.27 5.00 1.2 25.73 0.31 0.44 1.27 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 7.5 Silt/Sand 12 1.835 0.835 38 0.94 14.681 7.18 0.35 1.18 1.17 1 0.95 1 15.70 5.00 1.2 23.83 0.27 0.39 1.11 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 9 Silt/Sand 18 1.835 0.835 36 0.93 17.433 8.43 0.35 1.09 1.17 1 0.95 1 21.72 5.00 1.2 31.07 NA NA NA NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 10.5 Clay 13 2.039 1.039 95 0.89 20.492 9.99 0.33 1.00 1.17 1 1 1 15.17 5.00 1.2 23.21 0.26 0.37 1.12 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 12 Silt/Sand 17 1.835 0.835 37 0.85 23.244 11.24 0.32 0.94 1.17 1 1 1 18.70 5.00 1.2 27.44 0.35 0.51 1.58 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 13.5 Silt/Sand 19 1.835 0.835 38 0.81 25.997 12.50 0.31 0.89 1.17 1 1 1 19.83 5.00 1.2 28.80 0.40 0.58 1.87 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 15 Silt/Sand 20 1.835 0.835 36 0.77 28.749 13.75 0.29 0.85 1.17 1 1 1 19.90 5.00 1.2 28.88 0.40 0.58 1.98 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 16.5 Silt/Sand 26 1.835 0.835 35 0.73 31.502 15.00 0.28 0.82 1.17 1 1 1 24.77 5.00 1.2 34.72 NA NA NA NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 18 Silt/Sand 25 1.835 0.835 36 0.69 34.254 16.25 0.27 0.78 1.17 1 1 1 22.88 5.00 1.2 32.45 NA NA NA NL
Note: L= Liquefaction Occur, ,NL=Liquefaction not Occur

Page 24
 Typical Computation of Liquefaction Potential by Simplified Method
Client: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH. Seismic Zone: Zone III
Project: DSCIRP: DS-3 Seismicity: Severe
Location: Chainage: 47+400 Km (R/S) Zone Factor: 0.28
Type of Structure MJB
Water table assumed for Calculation (m): 0.00

BORE HOLE NO. 6(F)

Hammer Energy (70% for rope pully

NL=Non-Liquefiable, L=Liquefiable
Total overburden pressure (so), t/m
Stress reduction coefficient (rd)

2
Effective overburden (so), t/m
Sampler used was with liner

Submerged Density (t/m )

Observed SPT Value (Nm)
Magnitude of Earthquake
Borehole Diameter (mm)

Cyclic Stress ratio (CSR)

Depth below EGL, z (m)

Saturated density (t/m )

3

SPT corrected (N1)60

Fine Content ( % )
Type of Strata

Conclusion
CRRM = 7.5
system)

(N1)60cs

CRR

FOS
CN

CR
CB

CS
CE

β
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 1.5 Clay 21 2.039 1.039 92 0.99 3.0585 1.56 0.35 1.70 1.17 1 0.75 1 31.24 5.00 1.2 42.49 NA NA NA NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 3 Clay 25 2.039 1.039 94 0.98 6.117 3.12 0.35 1.70 1.17 1 0.80 1 39.67 5.00 1.2 52.60 NA NA NA NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 4.5 Clay 7 2.039 1.039 95 0.97 9.1755 4.68 0.34 1.46 1.17 1 0.85 1 10.15 5.00 1.2 17.18 0.18 0.26 0.76 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 6 Clay 11 2.039 1.039 94 0.95 12.234 6.23 0.34 1.27 1.17 1 0.95 1 15.44 5.00 1.2 23.53 0.27 0.38 1.12 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 7.5 Clay 6 2.039 1.039 95 0.94 15.293 7.79 0.34 1.13 1.17 1 0.95 1 7.53 5.00 1.2 14.04 0.15 0.22 0.64 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 9 Clay 8 2.039 1.039 96 0.93 18.351 9.35 0.33 1.03 1.17 1 0.95 1 9.17 5.00 1.2 16.00 0.17 0.25 0.74 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 10.5 Silt/Sand 12 1.835 0.835 39 0.89 21.104 10.60 0.32 0.97 1.17 1 1 1 13.60 5.00 1.2 21.31 0.23 0.33 1.03 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 12 Silt/Sand 14 1.835 0.835 40 0.85 23.856 11.86 0.31 0.92 1.17 1 1 1 15.00 5.00 1.2 23.00 0.26 0.37 1.18 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 13.5 Silt/Sand 18 1.835 0.835 38 0.81 26.609 13.11 0.30 0.87 1.17 1 1 1 18.34 5.00 1.2 27.01 0.34 0.49 1.62 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 15 Silt/Sand 16 1.835 0.835 37 0.77 29.361 14.36 0.29 0.83 1.17 1 1 1 15.58 5.00 1.2 23.69 0.27 0.39 1.34 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 16.5 Silt/Sand 20 1.835 0.835 36 0.73 32.114 15.61 0.27 0.80 1.17 1 1 1 18.67 5.00 1.2 27.41 0.35 0.50 1.84 NL
65-115 Yes 6.5 70 18 Silt/Sand 26 1.835 0.835 35 0.69 34.866 16.87 0.26 0.77 1.17 1 1 1 23.36 5.00 1.2 33.03 NA NA NA NL
Note: L= Liquefaction Occur, ,NL=Liquefaction not Occur

Page 25
11. CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS :
11.1 The proposed structure at BH-1(A), Ch 44+080KM, BH-2(B) Ch 44+220KM (RHS), BH-3(C)
Ch 44+440 KM (RHS), BH-4(D) Ch 45+340 KM, BH-5 (E) Ch 46+00 KM (RHS), BH-6 KM,
Ch 47+400 (RHS) where the location of 6 Nos.of bore hole points are shown on the site plan
attached in this report.

11.2 The Reduced level (RL) of the existing ground level of BH-1(A) is RL +6758m, BH-2(B) is RL
+4.160m, BH-3(C) is RL +4.20m, BH-4(D) is RL +4.00m, BH-5(E) is RL +11.171m. BH-6(E) is
RL +10.868m. The following computation has been done with respect to the existing ground
level of each bore hole.

11.3 The net allowable bearing capacity of soil for square footing at 1.50m, 2.50m, 3.00m, 3.50m
and 4.50m depth below the existing ground level of each bore hole has been furnished in item
no. 8 of this report considering a factor of safety 3.

► It is noted here that the design Engineer will take appropriate decision about the type,
depth and extent of foundation considering the economy and safety of the proposed
structure based on geological condition of the site and physical properties of the
underlying subsoil stratum as furnished in this report.

Page 26
 SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD.

TINS
H ED

EP

POND

TO VILLAGE AREA
Ananta Knitwear
44+800

44+700
EP

44+600

Mid: 43+8
IGNMENT

44+500

1
EXISTING ROAD AL
BOUNDARY WAL

44+400
BOUNDARY WALL ROW E P
L

ROW ROW EP
EP ROW POND

44+300
WALL ROW EP
EP
ROW EP
EP
ROW EP

EP ROW

44+000
EP
BOUNDARY WALL EP
ROW
EP

44+100
ROW
ROW EP

43+900
EP

KATCHA ROAD
ROW
EP ROW EP
EP ROW EP
EP ROW EP
ROW EP

0.92
SHO
P ROW
EP EP EP
ROW EP
PC CULVERT ROW
ROW
ROW EP
EP
EP

ST: 43+957.20
EP
ROW
ROW EP

CS: 43+897.20
EP
ROW
SHO
EP
P ROW EP
WALL ROW EP EP
ROW EP
ROW EP
EP
ROW EP
ROW EP
ROW EP
EP ROW EP
ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW EEPP
EP EP EP

43+800
EP EP EP EEPP EP
ROW EP

EP EEPP
EEPP
ROW EP
EP

EP EP
ROW EP EP

EP
ROW EP EP
EP

ROAD
ROW EP
SHO
EP EEPP EP
ROW
P

SHOP
EEPP
EP EP EP
EP
EP EP

EP
E
EP EP
EP P

EP EP

EP

EP
ROW
EP ROW
ROW
EP EP ROW
POND
ROW
POND
EP ROW
ROW
EP ROW
ROW
EP ROW
ROW
EP ROW
ROW
POND
EP
ROW
EP
EP ROW
EP EP BOUNDARY WALL ROW
EP ROW
ROW
EP
SHOP ROW
POND
BC - 20

44+400
5.64
FENC
ROW
POND
EP EP
POND
ROW
TIN SHED EP
ROW

SHOP
EP EP
ROW

44+300
ROW
EP ROW
EEP
ROW
P ROW KM:- 44+711.373
ROW
EP

SHOP
ROW
EP EP

44+200
EP ROW
ROW ROW
EP ROW
EP EE PP
ROW
EP
ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW L

KATCHA ROAD
44+100
ROW
ROW
EP
WAL TIN SHED
EP

LL

44+000
ROW EP
CULVERT EP

FENCE
ROW

43+900
WA
EP

FENCE

LL
ROW
PC - 19 WER POND
TO

AD
EP

WA
EP
POND
ROW EP
BILE BH: POINT= 03(C)

43+800
BC - 18 KM:- 44+140.420 MO
.342 EP

EP WAL
L BH: POINT= 02(B) EP
CH:-44+440

BOUNDARY WALL
BH: POINT= 01(A)

AGE RO
KM:- 43+829

BOUNDARY WALL
NR PLASTIC
EP

POND
CH:-44+220
5.45
FENC
CH:-44+080 EP

5.46
FENC

POND

Mid: 43+7
TO VILL

CS: 43+815.62
EP
EEP
P

EP
POND

ST: 43+885.62
POND

POND
BOUNDARY WALL
5.31
FENC

74.78
5.59
FENC

FENCE

1STD

Page 27
SE
M IP

45+1
UC
CA

00
ROW
SE

TO VIL
MIP

SC:
UC
ROW
EP
CA
E
P

ROW
EP

45+2
LAGE ARE
A
EP

7.28

ROW
E
P

45+2

00
EP
ROW

7.28

E
P

E
P

ROW

84.7

KATCH
EE
PP

ROW

2
EP

E
P

E
P
EP

E
P
ROW

A ROAD
45+3
EP
SUB-
ST
EP ROW

0
ATIO
EP
N-2

0
ROW

TO
SE
ROW
E
P
MIP

VIL
EP E
P
UC
E

LA
ROW
P
E
P
E
P ROW
CA TIN

GE
BRUS

TO VILLAGE AREA
H AREA
PC: 46+548.93

SH TIN
E
P
WALL

AR
ROW ED
E ROW E
P P
SH

EA
PT: 46+380.29

ED
Mid: 46+258.47

EP
SE
PC: 46+136.65

B.T.
ROW
MIP
E
C.L SE
P ROW

4 ST
E
P
E
MIP UC
P

45+2
UC CA

OR
KA
46+500

ROW C
ROW E
P
EP
TIN

T
TIN

00
E
A

45+500
TIN
P
E

45+800
45+900
P

45+700
TIN
46+400

E
P
46+000

SH

IED
TIN SH TIN
46+100

CH
SH
46+300

ROW E TIN TIN

45+400 Buildin
46+200

SH

A
ROW
SE D TIN ED SH ED SH

g
SH SH MO ED SH
ROW
EP
SH

45+600
MIP ED ED

RO
ED ED

BLD
SQ
EP

L
TIN OP
E E EP
P P
ED
EE
PP
Shop ROW
ROW ROW E
UC
E P

G
P E ROW
E P
SE UE
P

AD
ROW
BT

AL
SH
ROW ROW EP
E E ROW E
CA
P EP P P
E
P E
P
E
P
ROW E EEP
P
CL MIP TIN
E
P ROW ROW ROW ROW
E
ROW
WALL ROW
E
EP
E EP P EP EP E P

W
P E ROW ROW P P
ED
P E E ROW ROW E
ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW P E P ROW P E EP
ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW P ROW ROW EP ROW ROW E P
E EP ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW P E
P ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW EP P
E E
BT
P E EP E E P E E
P P
SH
EP E E EP P E EP P E E E P
E E P P P EP EP E P P E P
UC
P
EP
P E EP P EP E P
P E P
E E P
E

H.B.B. ROAD
P P
E E
CL
P P E E
P EP P
ROW 7.28

E
P
EP
E
P
EP EP
BT CA D

AD
EE
PP
E
P
E
CL
P

7.28

RO
E
P

A
ROW

TS:

H
45+3

TC
E
P
ROW

00

KA
45+2
E E
P P
ROW
EP

SC:
E E
P EP P
EP E
EP P
EP EP
E E
E P P
P
E
D

P
EP

39.3
E E EP
P P E
E EP P
P E
BOUNDARY WALL
P E EP
EE P P
P

2
ROW EP
OA

EP
E E
P E
EP P E
P P
EP E
P
R

EP

45+2
7.64
E
HED
P CCA
E
E P
TINS
12.000

P
.B.

ROW
7.64
SEMI PU

15.000
E
SE
P
SEM

99.3
45+400
MI
H.B

I PU

OP
EP

2
ROW
PU

PUCCA ROAD
46+500

E
P
HED CC CCA

SH
E
46+400

P
E
TIN TIN A
CA

ROW
P
TINS
46+300

EP S
E
P
46+200

E
P E
SH
EP P E
P
46+100

E
P
UC

ROW
SHOP ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW
ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW
ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW
ED HED SE ROW
ROW ROW ROW
ROW
IP

ROW ROW ROW

ROW ROW
ROW ROW ROW
ROW
MI
ROW
M

ROW ROW
ROW ROW
ROW ROW
SE PU
ROW ROW
ROW
TINSH MI
SE

ROW ROW
D

ED ROW
CC
P ROW
ROW A

Mid: 45+
ROW
UC

SHOP
OA

CA TIN
SH
ER

BC - 21 ED
G

BH:
P BC - 22

421.77
TIN
LA

KM:- 45+782.432 SHE

D
VIL

CH:- OINT= 0
45+3 4(D) KM:- 46+197.297
TO

40 BH: POINT= 05(E)

CH:- 46+000

TO VILLAGE ROAD
BRUS
H AREA

7.64

7.64
 SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD.

HIG
H
LA
ND
HIG
H
LA
ND
HO
US
SRISTIGHOR BAZAR AREA E

TO
E
AG
H

MO
L
O HO
U

D
KH
US

VIL
HO
HO SE E 1-S

RI

AR
E
US US

TO
E H
TD

EY
E

RO
US
O

HO

SE
U

AV
8.84

TO

HO

AD
U
US
E

SE

GR
VIL

HO
AG

HO

LA
HO

8.73
US
ILL

WALL
PC: 48+058.63

US

GE
Mid: 48+133.00
PT: 48+207.37

PT: 47+462.89

KA
E

PC: 47+363.80
Mid: 47+413.34
1-S HO
E

H US
TO

TC
TD FA E O E
U
US

1-S CT US HO
HOUSE 1-S

KATC
WALL

HA
OR HO SE
HO Y GA
E

TD
HO

E US
HO AP FEED MILLS FA TD

E
E
H.B

HO

KA

HA
HO US
SH

US LOW LAND RD

RO

FENCE
E US
US

SE
2-S CT
48+000
48+100

E HO SH
47+900

US US

47+700
47+800

US
47+600
48+200

47+500

U
47+400
TD HOHO

TC
E E EN
NURSERY BOUNDARY AREA E O
OP

PU
OR
UE

HO

47+300

AD
US 1-S

RO
HO
E

Y P

HO
E HO USUS

47+200
HO 3-STORED BLDG
.B. R

H
AR

HA
USE US HO HOUSE E E 1-S

47+100
TD

HO
SQ

CC
HO US
US

E
47+000
AD
E NURSERY BOUNDARY AREA HO US EA TD SHOP

46+900
US

RO

US
SH 1-STD HO E E

46+800
P
MO

E
HO
OAD

AR

US
WALL

E
ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW
SH OP
ROW ROW
ROW ROW SE ROW ROW

AD
ROW ROW EP E
P
E
P
ROW ROW ROW ROW
P
US
ROW ROW EP
E E E
P
ROW ROW ROW ROW E ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW
E E
SH
P P P ROW ROW ROW ROW
SH
ROW ROW P E P
EP ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW
E E P E E
OP U ROW

AD
TEXTILE BOUNDARY ROW ROW P
E P P P
O ROW E

OA
P
HOU
ROW EP

HO
ROW EP ROW O

8.84
SE ROW ROW E

P
EP
P
E ROW E EP E E E
ROWE P
E E E EP
OP
P EP E E EP
P P P P P P P
1-S E
ROW P P EP EP

D
E E E P E EP
ROW
ROW P EEP
P
EP
EP P
E
P
HO E
P
EP
P P EP EP
E
P
SH P

OP
OP
EP

SH
RO
ROW E
MO
ROW P
E E E
E
WALL P P
EP
P E

OP
ROW P P EP
TD
ROW E E
EP
P
FP

P
11.01

SH SH
ROW
ROW
SHOP ROW
HOU FENCE WALL SQ
E
EP
E
P EP EP
EP

ROW P
SHOP SE E

HA

SH
SH
ROW P E E

9.90

SHO OP
O SHOP ROW
HO P P

SH
ROW E
OP
ROW P
UE
EP E
P E
P
E
P P EP E
P
EP E EP EP E E
EP
E EP
P P E P
US
E E E E

TC
P EP
P P P P
E E E P E E
EP
EP EP
P E
P
E E
E
P
CULVERT EP
P P
EP
P P
EP P

13.08

FP
13.00
E E
P EP EP P

KA
FOOT PATH FOOT PATH B.T.C.L

PUCCA ROAD
EP

EP EE
E PP
E P
P E
P
EP
E
EP P
E
P

DITH
E
EP P E E
E EP
P P E E
EP P EP
P P
WALL

DITH
EP
E
SH
P E
E E P
P P E
P
E E
P P

E
E E
TO
P
OP
P P EP
PUC

DITH
E
WALL EP
E
EP
WALL EP
EP DITCH
HO PC - 23/A

DITH
10.000
P P

FP
HO

13.24

FP
FOOTPATH

13.11

FP
EP

13.23
E
FOOTPATH ILE
EP
P E
GR
EP E P
E
P
FOOTPATH
E
E
P
E
P
E
P
P T US

HO
P E
US
E

P
CA

E E AV
E
P
HO E 5-STD POULTRY FEED SHOP

P
DITH

US
US

GRAVEYARD SHOP

HO
BIO
HO

HO YA

E
US BLDG KM:- 47+995.536

OP
RO

DIT
H.B

HO

DITH

DITH
SHOP

DITH

OP
HO
E

P
PL G US
HO

SHOP RD

US

2-S
HO

US

MO SH SHOP AN AS US E

E
SHOP

SH
.B.

CH

Page 28
SHO
AD

US
E

T
U

SH
P
48+000

TD
OP SAHAJAHAN COMPANY

DITH

2-S
E
THE PEOPLE'S UNIVERSITY BOUNDARY AREA
48+100

SQ HO HO HO
48+200

DITH

SHO
OP
AL
DITH
SE

RO

1-S
UE US US

TD

OP
US

L
HO

47+200
E ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW E ROW ROW ROW

H.B
ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW
WAL

ROW ROW ROW ROW E ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW

47+100
ROW ROW

SH

1-S
ROW ROW

PU

OP
ROW
ROW
HO
L

47+000
AD

TD
ROW
HO

ROW ROW

US

SH
ROW

P
ROW

DITH

46+900
ROW

.B.
ROW ROW
PON

ROW ROW

E
ROW
US

46+800
ROW

TD
LL

ROW

O
ROW ROW

SH
CC
ROW ROW ROW E
US

ROW ROW ROW

ROW ROW ROW
ROW ROW
E

RO
ROW ROW
ROW

SH
ROW ROW
WA

ROW ROW
ROW

AR
ROW

OP
ROW

AD
2-S

OA

SH
1-S

SH
HO
TD

D
MO SH

WA

TD
L

OP
US
SQ OP

P
PON

1-S
E

O
UE BC - 23

TD
PU

SH
PO
TO

CC HIG ND
A
BH: POINT= 06(F)
PON

KM:- 47+680.492
VIL

RO HL
A A
LA

D ND
G

CH:- 47+400

OP
E

SH

SH
OP
PON

TO
KU
TIB
AZ
AR
 SUBSOIL ENGINEERING &
SUBSOIL CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. SOIL PROFILE
PROJECT :SASEC DHAKA-SYLHET CORRIDOR ROAD INVESTMENT PROJECT
CLIENT : ROADS & HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT (RHD)
LOCATION : CH : 44+080 Km

+10.0m +10.0m
BH--1 (A)
RL = + 6.758 m
Ch. 44+080 m BH--2 ( B ) BH--3 ( C )
RL = + 4.20 m BH--4 ( D )
4 RL = +4.160 m
Ch. 44+440 Km RL = + 4.00 m
+5.0m Ch. 44+220 Km (R/S) +5.0m
4 5 Ch. 45+340 Km
1 1
11 Fat CLAY (CH) 4
1 1
Fat CLAY (CH) Fat CLAY (CH)
7 3 Fat CLAY (CH)
0.0m 7 1 0.0m
20 1
7 7
Fat CLAY (CH)
silty SAND (SM) 19 1
17 6

Page 29
14
Fat CLAY (CH)
3
-5.0m 11 16 -5.0m
17 4
11 15
sandy SILT (ML) 15 6
17 18
19 2
-10.0m 20 18 silty SAND (SM) -10.0m
28 2
silty SAND (SM) 20 silty SAND (SM) 22
39 20 silty SAND (SM)
25 21
19
-15.0m 29 25 -15.0m

-20.0m -20.0m

Lean CLAY (CL) Fat CLAY (CH)

Soil Classification : ASTM D-2487 & D-2488
silty SAND (SM) sandy SILT (ML)
 SUBSOIL ENGINEERING &
SUBSOIL CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. SOIL PROFILE
PROJECT :SASEC DHAKA-SYLHET CORRIDOR ROAD INVESTMENT PROJECT
CLIENT : ROADS & HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT (RHD)
LOCATION : CH : 44+080 Km

+15.0m +15.0m
BH--5 ( E )
RL = + 11.171 m BH--6 ( F )
Ch. 44+000 Km (R/S) RL = + 10.868 m
Ch. 47+400 Km
18
+10.0m +10.0m
21
Fat CLAY (CH) 24
25
19 Fat CLAY (CH)
7
12 Fat CLAY (CH)
+5.0m +5.0m
11
12
silty SAND (SM) 6

Page 30
18
8
13
0.0m Fat CLAY (CH) 0.0m
12
17
14
19
18 silty SAND (SM)
silty SAND (SM) 20 silty SAND (SM)
-5.0m -5.0m
16
26
20
25
26
-10.0m -10.0m

-15.0m -15.0m

-20.0m -20.0m

Lean CLAY (CL) Fat CLAY (CH)

Soil Classification : ASTM D-2487 & D-2488
silty SAND (SM) sandy SILT (ML)
 CLIENT : ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH
BORE LOG
PROJECT :SASEC DHAKA-SYLHET CORRIDOR ROAD INVESTMENT PROJECT
Method of Boring: Percussion Method, Boring Dia. 100mm LOCATION : CH : 44+080 Km
Depth of Boring: 18.45 METER,
DATE :04-09-2024 TO 11-11-2023
ELEVATION R.L. ( + ) 6.758m, GROUND WATER TABLE : (+)6.050
CO- ORDINATE (BTM) : N = 579004.271, Y = 654233.979
BORE CHART OF BORE HOLE NO. BH - 1 (A )
S
THICKNESS IN

STANDARD PENETRATION
SCALE IN (m)

A
BLOWS ON SPOOM TEST

SYMBOLS
DEPTH IN

N- Value
M
Description of Soil Strata PER 15CM BLOWS /0.305 m. SOIL SAMPLE P
METER

METER

PENETRATION
L
15cm 15cm 15cm 10 20 30 40 50 60 E

EXISTING GROUND LEVEL (R.L. + 6.758m)

1.5
1 2 2 4 5.0
4 1.5 4 1.5m to 1.95m
D-1

U-1
3.0m to 3.45m
3.0
1 2 2 4 5.0
4 3.0 4 D-2
Brownish grey soft to stiff,
7.2
high plastic Fat CLAY (CH)
4.5
2 5 6 11
13.8 4.5 11 4.5m to 4.95m D-3
11
6.0
2 3 4 7
8.8 6.0 7 6.0m to 6.45m
7 D-4
7.2
7.5 25.0 7.5 20 7.5m to 7.95m
4 8 12 20 20 D-5

9.0 9.0 19
8 11 19 23.8 19
9.0m to 9.45m
4.4 Yellowish brown medium 3 D-6
dense silty fine SAND (SM)
10.5 17.5 ### 14 10.5m to 10.95m
4 5 9 14 14
D-7
11.60
12.0 21.3 ### 17
4 8 9 17 17 12.0m to 12.45m
D-8
13.5 Grey medium dense, 0.0 ### 15
13.5m to 13.95m
4.6 nonplastic fine sandy SILT, 6 7 8 15 15 D-9
trace clay (ML)
15.0 0.0 ### 19
15.0m to 15.45m
4 8 11 19 19 D-10
16.20
16.5 0.0 ### 28
16.5m to 16.95m
Yellowish brown medium 6 12 16 28 28 D-11
2.3 dense to dense silty fine
18.0
SAND (SM) 0.0 ### 39 18.0m to 18.45m
18.5 8 17 22 39 39 D-12

19.5 0.0 ### 33

0.0 ### 50
21.00

20 36 14 50 62.5 ### 50
DISTURBED SAMPLE UNDISTURBED SAMPLE CLAY SILT SAND CLAYEY SILT

Page 31
 CLIENT : ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH
BORE LOG
PROJECT :SASEC DHAKA-SYLHET CORRIDOR ROAD INVESTMENT PROJECT

Method of Boring: Percussion Method, Boring Dia. 100mm LOCATION : CH : 44+220 Km (R/S)
Depth of Boring: 18.45 METER,
DATE :04-09-2024 TO 11-11-2023
ELEVATION R.L. ( + ) 4.160m, GROUND WATER TABLE : (+) 3.56 CO-
ORDINATE (BTM) : N = 579137.802 Y = 654276.467
BORE CHART OF BORE HOLE NO. BH - 2 (B )
S
THICKNESS IN

STANDARD PENETRATION
SCALE IN (m)

A
BLOWS ON SPOOM TEST

SYMBOLS
DEPTH IN

N- Value
M
Description of Soil Strata PER 15CM BLOWS /0.305 m. SOIL SAMPLE P
METER

METER

PENETRATION
L
15cm 15cm 15cm 10 20 30 40 50 60 E

EXISTING GROUND LEVEL (R.L. + 4.160m)

1.5 Dark grey very soft,high

3.5 plastic Fat CLAY (CH) 1 0 1 1 11.3 1.5 1 1.5m to 1.95m
D-1

3.0m to 3.45m
3.0
3.5 1 0 1 1 11.3 3.0 1 D-2

U-1
4.5
Grey medium stiff, high 2 3 4 7
8.8 4.5 7 4.5m to 4.95m D-3
3.0 7
plastic Fat CLAY (CH)
6.0
6.50
2 3 4 7
8.8 6.0 7 6.0m to 6.45m
7 D-4

7.5 21.3 7.5 17 7.5m to 7.95m

4 7 10 17 17 D-5

9.0 9.0 11
6 11 13.811
9.0m to 9.45m
3 5 D-6

10.5 13.8 ### 11 10.5m to 10.95m

3 4 7 11 11
D-7

12.0
11.95
Brown medium dense silty 21.3 ### 17
fine SAND (SM) 5 7 10 17 17 12.0m to 12.45m
D-8
13.5 0.0 ### 20
13.5m to 13.95m
3 7 13 20 20 D-9
15.0 0.0 ### 20
15.0m to 15.45m
4 8 12 20 20 D-10
16.5 0.0 ### 25
16.5m to 16.95m
3 10 15 25 25 D-11
18.0 0.0 ### 29 18.0m to 18.45m
18.45 7 13 16 29 29 D-12

19.5 0.0 ### 33

0.0 ### 50
21.00

20 36 14 50 62.5 ### 50
DISTURBED SAMPLE UNDISTURBED SAMPLE CLAY SILT SAND CLAYEY SILT

Page 32
 CLIENT : ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH
BORE LOG
PROJECT :SASEC DHAKA-SYLHET CORRIDOR ROAD INVESTMENT PROJECT

Method of Boring: Percussion Method, Boring Dia. 100mm LOCATION : CH : 44+440 Km (R/S)
Depth of Boring: 18.45 METER,
DATE :06-09-2024 TO 11-11-2023
ELEVATION R.L. ( + ) 4.20m, GROUND WATER TABLE : (+) 4.80 CO-
ORDINATE (BTM) : N = 579347.406 Y = 654344.566
BORE CHART OF BORE HOLE NO. BH - 3 (C )
S
THICKNESS IN

STANDARD PENETRATION
SCALE IN (m)

A
BLOWS ON SPOOM TEST

SYMBOLS
DEPTH IN

N- Value
M
Description of Soil Strata PER 15CM BLOWS /0.305 m. SOIL SAMPLE P
METER

METER

PENETRATION
L
15cm 15cm 15cm 10 20 30 40 50 60 E

EXISTING GROUND LEVEL (R.L. + 4.20m)

1.5
2 2 3 5 6.3
5 1.5 5 1.5m to 1.95m
D-1

3.0m to 3.45m
3.0
2 2 2 4 5.0
4 3.0 4 D-2

U-1
4.5
1 1 2 3 3
3.8 4.5 3 4.5m to 4.95m D-3

6.0
1 0 1 1 1
1.3 6.0 1 6.0m to 6.45m
D-4

7.5 1.3 7.5 1 7.5m to 7.95m

Grey to dark grey very soft 1 0 1 1 1 D-5
16.0 to medium stiff, high
9.0 plastic Fat CLAY (CH) 9.0 3
3 3.8
9.0m to 9.45m
1 1 2 3 D-6

10.5 5.0 ### 4 10.5m to 10.95m

1 2 2 4 4
D-7

12.0 7.5 ### 6

2 3 3 6 6 12.0m to 12.45m
D-8
13.5 0.0 ### 2
13.5m to 13.95m
5 1 1 2 2 D-9
15.0 0.0 ### 2
15.0m to 15.45m
1 1 1 2 2 D-10
16.0
16.5 0.0 ### 20
16.5m to 16.95m
5 8 12 20 20 D-11
2.45 Brownish grey medium
dense silty fine SAND (SM) 19
18.0 0.0 ### 18.0m to 18.45m
18.45 4 7 12 19 19 D-12

19.5 0.0 ### 33

0.0 ### 50
21.00

20 36 14 50 62.5 ### 50
DISTURBED SAMPLE UNDISTURBED SAMPLE CLAY SILT SAND CLAYEY SILT

Page 33
 CLIENT : ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH
BORE LOG
PROJECT :SASEC DHAKA-SYLHET CORRIDOR ROAD INVESTMENT PROJECT
Method of Boring: Percussion Method, Boring Dia. 100mm LOCATION : 45+340 Km
Depth of Boring: 18.45 METER,
DATE :05-09-2024 TO 11-11-2023
ELEVATION R.L. ( + ) 4.00m, GROUND WATER TABLE : (+) 3.90 CO-
ORDINATE (BTM) : N = 580198.511 Y = 654637.457
BORE CHART OF BORE HOLE NO. BH - 4 ( D )
S
THICKNESS IN

STANDARD PENETRATION
SCALE IN (m)

A
BLOWS ON SPOOM TEST

SYMBOLS
DEPTH IN

N- Value
M
Description of Soil Strata PER 15CM BLOWS /0.305 m. SOIL SAMPLE P
METER

METER

PENETRATION
L
15cm 15cm 15cm 10 20 30 40 50 60 E

EXISTING GROUND LEVEL (R.L. + 4.00m)

1.5
1 0 1 1 11.3 1.5 1 1.5m to 1.95m
D-1

3.0m to 3.45m
3.0
6.2 Dark grey very soft, high 1 0 1 1 11.3 3.0 1 D-2
plastic Fat CLAY (CH)
U-1
4.5
1 0 1 1 1
1.3 4.5 1 4.5m to 4.95m D-3

6.0 6.2
2 3 4 7
8.8 6.0 7 6.0m to 6.45m
7 D-4

2.0 Grey medium stiff, high

7.5 plastic Fat CLAY (CH) 7.5 7.5 6 7.5m to 7.95m
8.20 2 3 3 6 6 D-5

9.0 9.0 16
9 16 20.0 16
9.0m to 9.45m
3 7 D-6

10.5 18.8 ### 15 10.5m to 10.95m

3 7 8 15 15
D-7

12.0 22.5 ### 18

4 7 11 18 18 12.0m to 12.45m
D-8
Brown medium dense silty
10.25
13.5 fine SAND (SM) 0.0 ### 18
13.5m to 13.95m
4 8 10 18 18 D-9
15.0 0.0 ### 22
15.0m to 15.45m
5 10 12 22 22 D-10
16.5 0.0 ### 21
16.5m to 16.95m
4 9 12 21 21 D-11
18.0 0.0 ### 25 18.0m to 18.45m
18.45 5 11 14 25 25 D-12

19.5 0.0 ### 33

0.0 ### 50
21.00

20 36 14 50 62.5 ### 50
DISTURBED SAMPLE UNDISTURBED SAMPLE CLAY SILT SAND CLAYEY SILT

Page 34
 CLIENT : ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH
BORE LOG
PROJECT : SASEC DHAKA-SYLHET CORRIDOR ROAD INVESTMENT PROJECT

Method of Boring: Percussion Method, Boring Dia. 100mm LOCATION : 46+000 Km ( R/S)
Depth of Boring: 18.45 METER,
DATE :06-09-2024 TO 11-11-2023
ELEVATION R.L. ( + ) 11.171m, GROUND WATER TABLE : (+) 7.50
CO- ORDINATE (BTM) : N = 580750.880 Y = 655004.890
BORE CHART OF BORE HOLE NO. BH - 5 ( E )
S
THICKNESS IN

STANDARD PENETRATION
SCALE IN (m)

A
BLOWS ON SPOOM TEST

SYMBOLS
DEPTH IN

N- Value
M
Description of Soil Strata PER 15CM BLOWS /0.305 m. SOIL SAMPLE P
METER

METER

PENETRATION
L
15cm 15cm 15cm 10 20 30 40 50 60 E

EXISTING GROUND LEVEL (R.L. + 11.171m)

1.5
4 8 10 18 22.5 1.5
18 18 1.5m to 1.95m
D-1
5.3 Reddish brown very stiff ,
high plastic, Fat CLAY (CH) 3.0m to 3.45m
3.0
4 10 14 24 30.0 3.024 24 D-2

U-1
4.5
5 8 11 19
23.8 4.5 19 4.5m to 4.95m D-3
5.3 19
6.0
3 5 7 12
15.0 6.0 12 6.0m to 6.45m
12 D-4

7.5
5.0
Brown medium dense silty 15.0 7.5 12 7.5m to 7.95m
fine SAND (SM) 3 5 7 12 12 D-5

9.0 9.0 18
8 10 18 22.5 18
9.0m to 9.45m
5 D-6
10.30
10.5 16.3 ### 13 10.5m to 10.95m
1.5 Brown stiff, high plastic Fat
8 5 8 13 13
D-7

11.80 CLAY (CH)

12.0 21.3 ### 17
4 7 10 17 17 12.0m to 12.45m
D-8
13.5 0.0 ### 19
13.5m to 13.95m
5 8 11 19 19 D-9
15.0
6.65
Brown medium dense silty 0.0 ### 20
fine SAND (SM) 15.0m to 15.45m
4 7 13 20 20 D-10
16.5 0.0 ### 26
16.5m to 16.95m
5 12 14 26 26 D-11
18.0 0.0 ### 25 18.0m to 18.45m
18.5 5 11 14 25 25 D-12

19.5 0.0 ### 33

0.0 ### 50
21.00

20 36 14 50 62.5 ### 50
DISTURBED SAMPLE UNDISTURBED SAMPLE CLAY SILT SAND CLAYEY SILT

Page 35
 CLIENT : ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH
BORE LOG
PROJECT :SASEC DHAKA-SYLHET CORRIDOR ROAD INVESTMENT PROJECT

Method of Boring: Percussion Method, Boring Dia. 100mm LOCATION : 47+400 Km ( R/S)
Depth of Boring: 18.45 METER,
DATE :07-09-2024 TO 11-11-2023
ELEVATION R.L. ( + ) 10.868m, GROUND WATER TABLE : (+) 8.90
CO- ORDINATE (BTM) : N = 581880.115 Y = 655833.151
BORE CHART OF BORE HOLE NO. BH - 6 ( F )
S
THICKNESS IN

STANDARD PENETRATION
SCALE IN (m)

A
BLOWS ON SPOOM TEST

SYMBOLS
DEPTH IN

N- Value
M
Description of Soil Strata PER 15CM BLOWS /0.305 m. SOIL SAMPLE P
METER

METER

PENETRATION
L
15cm 15cm 15cm 10 20 30 40 50 60 E

EXISTING GROUND LEVEL (R.L. + 10.868m)

1.5
3 9 12 21 26.3 1.5
21 21 1.5m to 1.95m
D-1

3.0m to 3.45m
3.0
4 10 15 25 31.3 3.025 25 D-2

4.5
2 3 4 7
8.8 4.5 7 4.5m to 4.95m D-3
Reddish brown medium 7
10.3 stiff to very stiff , high
plastic, Fat CLAY (CH) U-1
6.0
3 5 6 11
13.8 6.0 11 6.0m to 6.45m
11 D-4

7.5 7.5 7.5 6 7.5m to 7.95m

2 3 3 6 6 D-5

9.0 9.0 8
8 10.0
9.0m to 9.45m
2 3 5 8 D-6
10.3
10.5 15.0 ### 12 10.5m to 10.95m
3 5 7 12 12
D-7

12.0 17.5 ### 14

4 6 8 14 14 12.0m to 12.45m
D-8
13.5 0.0 ### 18
13.5m to 13.95m
4 7 11 18 18 D-9
8.15 Brown medium dense silty
15.0 fine SAND (SM) 0.0 ### 16
15.0m to 15.45m
4 6 10 16 16 D-10
16.5 0.0 ### 20
16.5m to 16.95m
4 8 12 20 20 D-11
18.0 0.0 ### 26 18.0m to 18.45m
18.45 6 11 15 26 26 D-12

19.5 0.0 ### 33

0.0 ### 50
21.00

20 36 14 50 62.5 ### 50
DISTURBED SAMPLE UNDISTURBED SAMPLE CLAY SILT SAND CLAYEY SILT

Page 36
 CLIENT : ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST SITE : NARSINGDI
CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD.

BORE HOLE NO. 1(A) SAMPLE NO. U - 1 DEPTH 4.0 m TO 4.5 m BORE HOLE NO. 2(B) SAMPLE NO. U - 1 DEPTH 4.0 m TO 4.5 m

1.20 0.80

0.64
0.90
Kg/cm2

Kg/cm2
0.48
IN

0.60

IN
STRESS

0.32

STRESS
0.30
0.16

0.00 0.00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
PERCENT STRAIN PERCENT STRAIN

Unconfined compressive strength (Kg/cm2) 0.94 Unconfined compressive strength (Kg/cm2) 0.50
Percent strain of failure % 16.00 Percent strain of failure % 18.00
Moisture content % 27.28 Moisture content % 30.78
Dry density (gm/cc) 1.422 Dry density (gm/cc) 1.324

Page 37
 CLIENT : ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST SITE : NARSINGDI
CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD.

BORE HOLE NO. 3(C) SAMPLE NO. U - 1 DEPTH 4.0 m TO 4.5 m BORE HOLE NO. 4(D) SAMPLE NO. U - 1 DEPTH 4.0 m TO 4.5 m

0.80 0.20

0.64 0.16
Kg/cm2

Kg/cm2
0.48 0.12
IN

IN
STRESS

0.32 0.08

STRESS
0.16 0.04

0.00 0.00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
PERCENT STRAIN PERCENT STRAIN

Unconfined compressive strength (Kg/cm2) 0.44 Unconfined compressive strength (Kg/cm2) 0.13
Percent strain of failure % 18.00 Percent strain of failure % 20.00
Moisture content % 32.09 Moisture content % 36.18
Dry density (gm/cc) 1.281 Dry density (gm/cc) 1.247

Page 38
 CLIENT : ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST SITE : NARSINGDI
CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD.

BORE HOLE NO. 5(E) SAMPLE NO. U - 1 DEPTH 4.0 m TO 4.5 m BORE HOLE NO. 6(F) SAMPLE NO. U - 1 DEPTH 5.5 m TO 6.0 m

2.80 1.20

2.10 0.90
Kg/cm2

Kg/cm2
IN

1.40 0.60

IN
STRESS

STRESS
0.70 0.30

0.00 0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
PERCENT STRAIN PERCENT STRAIN

Unconfined compressive strength (Kg/cm2) 2.66 Unconfined compressive strength (Kg/cm2) 1.13
Percent strain of failure % 6.00 Percent strain of failure % 14.00
Moisture content % 18.58 Moisture content % 25.39
Dry density (gm/cc) 1.427 Dry density (gm/cc) 1.467

Page 39
 SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD.
NATURAL MOISTURE DETERMINATION

Client : ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.

Location: NARSINGDI

Date: 28.12.2015 Tested : Engr. Mohammad Fahad

By
Can No. N-4 F-82 D-2 F-614 T-130 N-9 D-55 SM-82

Hole No. 1(A) 2(B) 3( C ) 4(D) 5( E ) 6(F) 8 8

Sample No. U-1 U-1 U-1 U-1 U-1 U-1 D-23 D-28

Depth (Meter) 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 5.50 34.50 37.00

Wt. of Wet Soil + Can(gm) 170.25 170.50 171.20 173.00 168.40 154.35 143.20 141.50

Wt. of Dry Soil + Can(gm) 138.82 136.02 136.65 134.34 146.44 128.26 124.93 125.25

Wt. of Can (gm) 23.60 24.00 29.00 27.50 28.25 25.50 23.00 30.00

Wt. of Moisture (gm) 31.43 34.48 34.55 38.66 21.96 26.09 18.27 16.25

Wt. of Dry Soil (gm) 115.22 112.02 107.65 106.84 118.19 102.76 101.93 95.25

MOISTURE (%) 27.28 30.78 32.09 36.18 18.58 25.39 17.92 17.06

Page 40
 SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD.
Specific Gravity Test Results

Project : SASEC ROAD PROJECT.

Client : ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.

Location : NARSINGDI
Date of Testing :
Reference :

Location: DHAKA SYLHET CORIDOUR ROAD INVESTMENT PROJECT.

Hole No. 1(A) 2(B) 3( C ) 4(D)

Sample No. U-1 U-1 U-1 U-1
Sample Depth (Meter) 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
Bottle No. 1 8 4 5
Wt. of Bottle+ Water + Sample (W1), (gm) 173.2196 173.4900 170.6248 151.0448

Wt. of Bottle+ Water (W2), (gm) 157.7593 160.8733 160.6248 139.0448

Wt. of Bottle+ Dry Sample (P1), (gm) 67.9135 53.5234 58.8148 50.0068
Wt. of Bottle (P2), (gm) 43.3520 33.4627 42.9065 30.9055
Wt. of Dry Sample (Ws), (P1-P2) (gm) 24.5615 20.0607 15.9083 19.1013
0
Temparature, T ( C) 27 27 27 27

Sp. Gr. Of Water at ToC, GT 0.9965 0.9965 0.9965 0.9965

Specific Gravity of Sample, Gs 2.689 2.685 2.683 2.680

Fat CLAY(CH) Fat CLAY(CH) Fat CLAY(CH) Fat CLAY(CH)

Page 41
 SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD.
Specific Gravity Test Results

Project : SASEC ROAD PROJECT.

Client : ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.

Location : NARSINGDI
Date of Testing :
Reference :

Location: DHAKA SYLHET CORIDOUR ROAD INVESTMENT PROJECT.

Hole No. 5( E ) 6(F) 3( C ) 4(D)

Sample No. U-1 U-1 U-1 U-1
Sample Depth (Meter) 4.00 5.50 4.00 4.00
Bottle No. FR-1 FR-2 4 5
Wt. of Bottle+ Water + Sample (W1), (gm) 173.7046 178.4820 170.6248 151.0448

Wt. of Bottle+ Water (W2), (gm) 159.2873 167.3683 160.6248 139.0448

Wt. of Bottle+ Dry Sample (P1), (gm) 72.1385 66.8784 58.8148 50.0068
Wt. of Bottle (P2), (gm) 49.1458 49.1829 42.9065 30.9055
Wt. of Dry Sample (Ws), (P1-P2) (gm) 22.9927 17.6955 15.9083 19.1013
0
Temparature, T ( C) 27 27 27 27

Sp. Gr. Of Water at ToC, GT 0.9965 0.9965 0.9965 0.9965

Specific Gravity of Sample, Gs 2.672 2.679 2.683 2.680

Fat CLAY(CH) Fat CLAY(CH) Fat CLAY(CH) Fat CLAY(CH)

Page 42
 CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
SUBSOIL ENGINEERING &
GRADATION CURVE
CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. SITE : NARSINGDI

SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

SIZE IOF OPENING IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH U.S STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN M.M

0.0015
0.0025
0.009

0.004
0.025

0.015

0.007

0.005

0.003

0.001
1 1/2

100
2 1/2

0.06
0.05

0.04

0.02
3/4

200

0.03
1/4
3/8
1/2

40

60
50
10

20

30
16
3

8
4

1
2

100 0

90 10

80 20
PERCE NT

WEIGHT
70 30
FINE

BY
60 40

COARSER
BY
% PASSING

50 50
WEIGHT

PERCE NT
40 60

30 70

20 80

10 90

0 100
38.1

0.42
0.5

0.1

0.06
0.05

0.004
2.0

0.002

0.001
0.01
3.5

0.005
63.5

50.8

0.08

0.04
3.0

0.149

0.074

0.008
6.35

0.2

0.006

0.003
30

10

7.0

0.6

0.09

0.03

0.0035
8.0

0.297
0.25

0.0015
9.0

1.0
76.2

25.4

19.1

12.7

2.38

1.19

0.7

0.015
0.84
90

1.5

0.02
100

0.9

GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS

COBBLES COARSE GRAVEL FINE GRAVEL COARSE SAND MEDIUM SAND FINE SAND FINES(SILT & CLAY) *
G R A V E L COARSE SAND FINE SAND SILT C LCLAY
AY**
SYMB. BORE HOLE SAMPLE DEPTH IN METER CLASSIFICATION GRAVEL SAND SILT/CLAY SP.GR. N.W.C L.L P.L P.I
1(A) D- 2 3.00 TO 3.45 Fat CLAY, high plastic, (CH) 1 99 59 30 29
1(A) D- 5 7.50 TO 7.95 Silty SAND, (SM) 64 36
1(A) D- 9 13.50 TO 13.95 Sandy SILT, (ML) 24 76
1(A) D - 11 16.50 TO 16.95 Silty SAND, (SM) 66 34

PLAN NO. :

Page 43
 CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
SUBSOIL ENGINEERING &
GRADATION CURVE
CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. SITE : NARSINGDI

SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

SIZE IOF OPENING IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH U.S STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN M.M

0.0015
0.0025
0.009

0.004
0.025

0.015

0.007

0.005

0.003

0.001
1 1/2

100
2 1/2

0.06
0.05

0.04

0.02
3/4

200

0.03
1/4
3/8
1/2

40

60
50
10

20

30
16
3

8
4

1
2

100 0

90 10

80 20
PERCE NT

WEIGHT
70 30
FINE

BY
60 40

COARSER
BY
% PASSING

50 50
WEIGHT

PERCE NT
40 60

30 70

20 80

10 90

0 100
38.1

0.42
0.5

0.1

0.06
0.05

0.004
2.0

0.002

0.001
0.01
3.5

0.005
63.5

50.8

0.08

0.04
3.0

0.149

0.074

0.008
6.35

0.2

0.006

0.003
30

10

7.0

0.6

0.09

0.03

0.0035
8.0

0.297
0.25

0.0015
9.0

1.0
76.2

25.4

19.1

12.7

2.38

1.19

0.7

0.015
0.84
90

1.5

0.02
100

0.9

GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS

COBBLES COARSE GRAVEL FINE GRAVEL COARSE SAND MEDIUM SAND FINE SAND FINES(SILT & CLAY) *
G R A V E L COARSE SAND FINE SAND SILT C LCLAY
AY**
SYMB. BORE HOLE SAMPLE DEPTH IN METER CLASSIFICATION GRAVEL SAND SILT/CLAY SP.GR. N.W.C L.L P.L P.I
2(B) D- 1 1.50 TO 1.95 Fat CLAY, high plastic, (CH) 2 98 57 29 28
2(B) D- 3 4.50 TO 4.95 Fat CLAY, high plastic, (CH) 5 95 52 26 26
2(B) D- 6 9.00 TO 9.45 Silty SAND, (SM) 61 39
2(B) D - 12 18.00 TO 18.45 Silty SAND, (SM) 65 35

PLAN NO. :

Page 44
 CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
SUBSOIL ENGINEERING &
GRADATION CURVE
CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. SITE : NARSINGDI

SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

SIZE IOF OPENING IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH U.S STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN M.M

0.0015
0.0025
0.009

0.004
0.025

0.015

0.007

0.005

0.003

0.001
1 1/2

100
2 1/2

0.06
0.05

0.04

0.02
3/4

200

0.03
1/4
3/8
1/2

40

60
50
10

20

30
16
3

8
4

1
2

100 0

90 10

80 20
PERCE NT

WEIGHT
70 30
FINE

BY
60 40

COARSER
BY
% PASSING

50 50
WEIGHT

PERCE NT
40 60

30 70

20 80

10 90

0 100
38.1

0.42
0.5

0.1

0.06
0.05

0.004
2.0

0.002

0.001
0.01
3.5

0.005
63.5

50.8

0.08

0.04
3.0

0.149

0.074

0.008
6.35

0.2

0.006

0.003
30

10

7.0

0.6

0.09

0.03

0.0035
8.0

0.297
0.25

0.0015
9.0

1.0
76.2

25.4

19.1

12.7

2.38

1.19

0.7

0.015
0.84
90

1.5

0.02
100

0.9

GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS

COBBLES COARSE GRAVEL FINE GRAVEL COARSE SAND MEDIUM SAND FINE SAND FINES(SILT & CLAY) *
G R A V E L COARSE SAND FINE SAND SILT C LCLAY
AY**
SYMB. BORE HOLE SAMPLE DEPTH IN METER CLASSIFICATION GRAVEL SAND SILT/CLAY SP.GR. N.W.C L.L P.L P.I
3(C) D- 2 3.00 TO 3.45 Fat CLAY, high plastic, (CH) 3 97 55 28 27
3(C) D- 4 6.00 TO 6.45 Fat CLAY, high plastic, (CH) 1 99 58 30 28
3(C) D- 7 10.50 TO 10.95 Fat CLAY, high plastic, (CH) 6 94 50 26 24
3(C) D- 9 13.50 TO 13.95 Fat CLAY, high plastic, (CH) 4 96 54 27 27

PLAN NO. :

Page 45
 CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
SUBSOIL ENGINEERING &
GRADATION CURVE
CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. SITE : NARSINGDI

SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

SIZE IOF OPENING IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH U.S STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN M.M

0.0015
0.0025
0.009

0.004
0.025

0.015

0.007

0.005

0.003

0.001
1 1/2

100
2 1/2

0.06
0.05

0.04

0.02
3/4

200

0.03
1/4
3/8
1/2

40

60
50
10

20

30
16
3

8
4

1
2

100 0

90 10

80 20
PERCE NT

WEIGHT
70 30
FINE

BY
60 40

COARSER
BY
% PASSING

50 50
WEIGHT

PERCE NT
40 60

30 70

20 80

10 90

0 100
38.1

0.42
0.5

0.1

0.06
0.05

0.004
2.0

0.002

0.001
0.01
3.5

0.005
63.5

50.8

0.08

0.04
3.0

0.149

0.074

0.008
6.35

0.2

0.006

0.003
30

10

7.0

0.6

0.09

0.03

0.0035
8.0

0.297
0.25

0.0015
9.0

1.0
76.2

25.4

19.1

12.7

2.38

1.19

0.7

0.015
0.84
90

1.5

0.02
100

0.9

GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS

COBBLES COARSE GRAVEL FINE GRAVEL COARSE SAND MEDIUM SAND FINE SAND FINES(SILT & CLAY) *
G R A V E L COARSE SAND FINE SAND SILT C LCLAY
AY**
SYMB. BORE HOLE SAMPLE DEPTH IN METER CLASSIFICATION GRAVEL SAND SILT/CLAY SP.GR. N.W.C L.L P.L P.I
4(D) D- 3 4.50 TO 4.95 Fat CLAY, high plastic, (CH) 3 97 56 28 28
4(D) D- 6 9.00 TO 9.45 Silty SAND, (SM) 60 40
4(D) D- 9 13.50 TO 13.95 Silty SAND, (SM) 64 36
4(D) D - 12 18.00 TO 18.45 Silty SAND, (SM) 66 34

PLAN NO. :

Page 46
 CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
SUBSOIL ENGINEERING &
GRADATION CURVE
CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. SITE : NARSINGDI

SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

SIZE IOF OPENING IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH U.S STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN M.M

0.0015
0.0025
0.009

0.004
0.025

0.015

0.007

0.005

0.003

0.001
1 1/2

100
2 1/2

0.06
0.05

0.04

0.02
3/4

200

0.03
1/4
3/8
1/2

40

60
50
10

20

30
16
3

8
4

1
2

100 0

90 10

80 20
PERCE NT

WEIGHT
70 30
FINE

BY
60 40

COARSER
BY
% PASSING

50 50
WEIGHT

PERCE NT
40 60

30 70

20 80

10 90

0 100
38.1

0.42
0.5

0.1

0.06
0.05

0.004
2.0

0.002

0.001
0.01
3.5

0.005
63.5

50.8

0.08

0.04
3.0

0.149

0.074

0.008
6.35

0.2

0.006

0.003
30

10

7.0

0.6

0.09

0.03

0.0035
8.0

0.297
0.25

0.0015
9.0

1.0
76.2

25.4

19.1

12.7

2.38

1.19

0.7

0.015
0.84
90

1.5

0.02
100

0.9

GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS

COBBLES COARSE GRAVEL FINE GRAVEL COARSE SAND MEDIUM SAND FINE SAND FINES(SILT & CLAY) *
G R A V E L COARSE SAND FINE SAND SILT C LCLAY
AY**
SYMB. BORE HOLE SAMPLE DEPTH IN METER CLASSIFICATION GRAVEL SAND SILT/CLAY SP.GR. N.W.C L.L P.L P.I
5(E) D- 2 3.00 TO 3.45 Fat CLAY, high plastic, (CH) 7 93 50 25 25
5(E) D- 4 6.00 TO 6.45 Silty SAND, (SM) 61 39
5(E) D- 8 12.00 TO 12.45 Silty SAND, (SM) 63 37
5(E) D - 11 16.50 TO 16.95 Silty SAND, (SM) 65 35

PLAN NO. :

Page 47
 CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
SUBSOIL ENGINEERING &
GRADATION CURVE
CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. SITE : NARSINGDI

SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS

SIZE IOF OPENING IN INCHES NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH U.S STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN M.M

0.0015
0.0025
0.009

0.004
0.025

0.015

0.007

0.005

0.003

0.001
1 1/2

100
2 1/2

0.06
0.05

0.04

0.02
3/4

200

0.03
1/4
3/8
1/2

40

60
50
10

20

30
16
3

8
4

1
2

100 0

90 10

80 20
PERCE NT

WEIGHT
70 30
FINE

BY
60 40

COARSER
BY
% PASSING

50 50
WEIGHT

PERCE NT
40 60

30 70

20 80

10 90

0 100
38.1

0.42
0.5

0.1

0.06
0.05

0.004
2.0

0.002

0.001
0.01
3.5

0.005
63.5

50.8

0.08

0.04
3.0

0.149

0.074

0.008
6.35

0.2

0.006

0.003
30

10

7.0

0.6

0.09

0.03

0.0035
8.0

0.297
0.25

0.0015
9.0

1.0
76.2

25.4

19.1

12.7

2.38

1.19

0.7

0.015
0.84
90

1.5

0.02
100

0.9

GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS

COBBLES COARSE GRAVEL FINE GRAVEL COARSE SAND MEDIUM SAND FINE SAND FINES(SILT & CLAY) *
G R A V E L COARSE SAND FINE SAND SILT C LCLAY
AY**
SYMB. BORE HOLE SAMPLE DEPTH IN METER CLASSIFICATION GRAVEL SAND SILT/CLAY SP.GR. N.W.C L.L P.L P.I
6(F) D- 3 4.50 TO 4.95 Fat CLAY, high plastic, (CH) 5 95 51 26 25
6(F) D- 6 9.00 TO 9.45 Fat CLAY, high plastic, (CH) 4 96 53 27 26
6(F) D- 8 12.00 TO 12.45 Silty SAND, (SM) 60 40
6(F) D - 11 16.50 TO 16.95 Silty SAND, (SM) 64 36

PLAN NO. :

Page 48
 SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO.LTD.
LIQUID & PLASTIC LIMIT TEST RESULTS
CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
LOCATION: NARSINGDI
Boring No.: 1(A) Sample No: D- 2 Sample Depth: 3.00 m TO 3.45 m
Specific Gravity : 2.680 LL= 59 PL= 30 IP= 29

Liquid Limit
No. of Blows 14 22 29
Container No. 23 27 46
Wt. of container, gm 42.10 42.94 42.21
Wt. of container + Wet Soil 67.06 68.27 67.11
Wt. of Container + Dry Soil 56.45 58.24 58.72
Wt. of Water, Ww in gm 10.61 10.03 8.39
Wt. of Dry soil, Ws in gm 14.35 15.30 16.51
Water content, Ws in % 73.93 65.58 50.79

80

70

60

50

40

30
→ Water

20
-->Number of Blows
10

0
0 10 20 30 40 50

Plastic Limit
Container No. S-8 S-18 S-24
Wt. of container, gm 28.45 28.97 29.41
Wt. of container + Wet Soil 36.99 37.69 38.28
Wt. of Container + Dry Soil 35.04 35.67 36.21
Wt. of Water, Ww in gm 1.95 2.02 2.07
Wt. of Dry soil, Ws in gm 6.59 6.70 6.80
Water content, Ws in % 29.57 30.09 30.41

Natural Water Content Liquid Limit (LL) Plastic Limit (PL) Plasticity Index (IP)
35.07 59 30 29

Page 49
 SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO.LTD.
LIQUID & PLASTIC LIMIT TEST RESULTS
CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
LOCATION: NARSINGDI
Boring No.: 2(B) Sample No: D- 1 Sample Depth: 1.50 m TO 1.95 m
Specific Gravity : 2.682 LL= 57 PL= 29 IP= 28

Liquid Limit
No. of Blows 12 21 27
Container No. 21 25 44
Wt. of container, gm 40.67 41.48 40.78
Wt. of container + Wet Soil 64.17 65.14 64.37
Wt. of Container + Dry Soil 54.11 55.80 56.25
Wt. of Water, Ww in gm 10.06 9.34 8.12
Wt. of Dry soil, Ws in gm 13.44 14.31 15.47
Water content, Ws in % 74.85 65.29 52.46

80

70

60

50

40

30
→ Water

20
-->Number of Blows
10

0
0 10 20 30 40 50

Plastic Limit
Container No. S-9 S-17 S-22
Wt. of container, gm 27.50 28.01 28.43
Wt. of container + Wet Soil 35.48 36.13 36.68
Wt. of Container + Dry Soil 33.70 34.30 34.82
Wt. of Water, Ww in gm 1.78 1.83 1.86
Wt. of Dry soil, Ws in gm 6.20 6.29 6.39
Water content, Ws in % 28.74 29.12 29.08

Natural Water Content Liquid Limit (LL) Plastic Limit (PL) Plasticity Index (IP)
33.85 57 29 28

Page 50
 SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO.LTD.
LIQUID & PLASTIC LIMIT TEST RESULTS
CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
LOCATION: NARSINGDI
Boring No.: 2(B) Sample No: D- 3 Sample Depth: 4.50 m TO 4.95 m
Specific Gravity : 2.686 LL= 52 PL= 26 IP= 26

Liquid Limit
No. of Blows 13 23 28
Container No. 16 20 39
Wt. of container, gm 37.10 37.85 37.20
Wt. of container + Wet Soil 56.42 57.61 56.64
Wt. of Container + Dry Soil 48.29 50.42 50.57
Wt. of Water, Ww in gm 8.13 7.18 6.07
Wt. of Dry soil, Ws in gm 11.19 12.57 13.37
Water content, Ws in % 72.63 57.14 45.40

80

70

60

50

40

30
→ Water

20
-->Number of Blows
10

0
0 10 20 30 40 50

Plastic Limit
Container No. S-7 S-16 S-23
Wt. of container, gm 24.66 25.11 25.49
Wt. of container + Wet Soil 31.07 31.64 32.12
Wt. of Container + Dry Soil 29.74 30.29 30.76
Wt. of Water, Ww in gm 1.32 1.35 1.36
Wt. of Dry soil, Ws in gm 5.09 5.18 5.27
Water content, Ws in % 26.00 26.02 25.84

Natural Water Content Liquid Limit (LL) Plastic Limit (PL) Plasticity Index (IP)
30.31 52 26 26

Page 51
 SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO.LTD.
LIQUID & PLASTIC LIMIT TEST RESULTS
CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
LOCATION: NARSINGDI
Boring No.: 3( C ) Sample No: D- 2 Sample Depth: 3.00 m TO 3.45 m
Specific Gravity : 2.684 LL= 55 PL= 28 IP= 27

Liquid Limit
No. of Blows 15 24 32
Container No. 19 23 42
Wt. of container, gm 39.24 40.03 39.35
Wt. of container + Wet Soil 60.86 62.06 61.08
Wt. of Container + Dry Soil 51.97 53.90 54.36
Wt. of Water, Ww in gm 8.89 8.17 6.71
Wt. of Dry soil, Ws in gm 12.73 13.87 15.02
Water content, Ws in % 69.84 58.88 44.71

80

70

60

50

40

30
→ Water

20
-->Number of Blows
10

0
0 10 20 30 40 50

Plastic Limit
Container No. S-6 S-15 S-21
Wt. of container, gm 26.55 27.04 27.45
Wt. of container + Wet Soil 34.00 34.63 35.22
Wt. of Container + Dry Soil 32.36 32.98 33.52
Wt. of Water, Ww in gm 1.64 1.65 1.70
Wt. of Dry soil, Ws in gm 5.81 5.94 6.06
Water content, Ws in % 28.22 27.79 28.07

Natural Water Content Liquid Limit (LL) Plastic Limit (PL) Plasticity Index (IP)
32.74 55 28 27

Page 52
 SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO.LTD.
LIQUID & PLASTIC LIMIT TEST RESULTS
CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
LOCATION: NARSINGDI
Boring No.: 3( C ) Sample No: D- 4 Sample Depth: 6.00 m TO 6.45 m
Specific Gravity : 2.681 LL= 58 PL= 30 IP= 28

Liquid Limit
No. of Blows 14 23 31
Container No. 22 26 45
Wt. of container, gm 41.38 42.21 41.49
Wt. of container + Wet Soil 65.44 66.76 65.68
Wt. of Container + Dry Soil 55.38 57.26 57.97
Wt. of Water, Ww in gm 10.06 9.49 7.71
Wt. of Dry soil, Ws in gm 13.99 15.05 16.47
Water content, Ws in % 71.87 63.05 46.83

80

70

60

50

40

30
→ Water

20
-->Number of Blows
10

0
0 10 20 30 40 50

Plastic Limit
Container No. T-6 T-12 T-22
Wt. of container, gm 28.64 29.17 29.61
Wt. of container + Wet Soil 37.35 38.10 38.79
Wt. of Container + Dry Soil 35.33 36.03 36.65
Wt. of Water, Ww in gm 2.02 2.07 2.14
Wt. of Dry soil, Ws in gm 6.69 6.86 7.05
Water content, Ws in % 30.16 30.19 30.30

Natural Water Content Liquid Limit (LL) Plastic Limit (PL) Plasticity Index (IP)
35.29 58 30 28

Page 53
 SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO.LTD.
LIQUID & PLASTIC LIMIT TEST RESULTS
CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
LOCATION: NARSINGDI
Boring No.: 4(D) Sample No: D- 3 Sample Depth: 4.50 m TO 4.95 m
Specific Gravity : 2.683 LL= 56 PL= 28 IP= 28

Liquid Limit
No. of Blows 12 21 28
Container No. 20 24 43
Wt. of container, gm 39.96 40.76 40.06
Wt. of container + Wet Soil 62.36 63.67 62.68
Wt. of Container + Dry Soil 52.71 55.02 54.85
Wt. of Water, Ww in gm 9.65 8.65 7.83
Wt. of Dry soil, Ws in gm 12.76 14.26 14.78
Water content, Ws in % 75.64 60.65 52.98

80

70

60

50

40

30
→ Water

20
-->Number of Blows
10

0
0 10 20 30 40 50

Plastic Limit
Container No. T-10 T-13 T-25
Wt. of container, gm 26.93 27.43 27.84
Wt. of container + Wet Soil 34.61 35.31 35.92
Wt. of Container + Dry Soil 32.97 33.58 34.07
Wt. of Water, Ww in gm 1.64 1.73 1.85
Wt. of Dry soil, Ws in gm 6.04 6.15 6.23
Water content, Ws in % 27.23 28.20 29.69

Natural Water Content Liquid Limit (LL) Plastic Limit (PL) Plasticity Index (IP)
33.14 56 28 28

Page 54
 SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO.LTD.
LIQUID & PLASTIC LIMIT TEST RESULTS
CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
LOCATION: NARSINGDI
Boring No.: 5(E) Sample No: D- 2 Sample Depth: 3.00 m TO 3.45 m
Specific Gravity : 2.689 LL= 50 PL= 25 IP= 25

Liquid Limit
No. of Blows 14 22 29
Container No. 14 18 37
Wt. of container, gm 35.68 36.39 35.77
Wt. of container + Wet Soil 53.60 54.61 53.74
Wt. of Container + Dry Soil 46.18 48.30 48.14
Wt. of Water, Ww in gm 7.42 6.31 5.60
Wt. of Dry soil, Ws in gm 10.51 11.91 12.37
Water content, Ws in % 70.62 52.97 45.28

80

70

60

50

40

30
→ Water

20
-->Number of Blows
10

0
0 10 20 30 40 50

Plastic Limit
Container No. S-4 S-12 S-28
Wt. of container, gm 23.90 24.34 24.71
Wt. of container + Wet Soil 29.96 30.55 31.12
Wt. of Container + Dry Soil 28.77 29.27 29.82
Wt. of Water, Ww in gm 1.19 1.28 1.30
Wt. of Dry soil, Ws in gm 4.87 4.94 5.11
Water content, Ws in % 24.41 25.87 25.46

Natural Water Content Liquid Limit (LL) Plastic Limit (PL) Plasticity Index (IP)
29.49 50 25 25

Page 55
 SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO.LTD.
LIQUID & PLASTIC LIMIT TEST RESULTS
CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
LOCATION: NARSINGDI
Boring No.: 6(F) Sample No: D- 3 Sample Depth: 4.50 m TO 4.95 m
Specific Gravity : 2.687 LL= 51 PL= 26 IP= 25

Liquid Limit
No. of Blows 15 23 32
Container No. 15 19 38
Wt. of container, gm 36.39 37.12 36.49
Wt. of container + Wet Soil 54.99 56.11 55.18
Wt. of Container + Dry Soil 47.67 49.31 50.06
Wt. of Water, Ww in gm 7.32 6.80 5.13
Wt. of Dry soil, Ws in gm 11.28 12.19 13.57
Water content, Ws in % 64.90 55.74 37.76

80

70

60

50

40

30
→ Water

20
-->Number of Blows
10

0
0 10 20 30 40 50

Plastic Limit
Container No. 7 10 16
Wt. of container, gm 25.04 25.50 25.88
Wt. of container + Wet Soil 31.65 32.27 32.80
Wt. of Container + Dry Soil 30.31 30.85 31.30
Wt. of Water, Ww in gm 1.34 1.42 1.49
Wt. of Dry soil, Ws in gm 5.28 5.36 5.42
Water content, Ws in % 25.38 26.43 27.51

Natural Water Content Liquid Limit (LL) Plastic Limit (PL) Plasticity Index (IP)
30.88 51 26 25

Page 56
 CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
CONSOLIDATION TEST
SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & LOAD SETTLEMENT (eo-P) CURVE NARSINGDI
CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. SITE :
BORE HOLE NO. 1(A) SAMPLE NO. U-1 DEPTH 4.0m TO 4.5m

9 2
101

103
1.0
0.1

10
8
6
7
5

8
9

5
6

8
9
4

4
2

7
9

7
5

8
0.90

Specific Gravity ... 2.689

0.85 Dry Density (gm/cc) ... 1.414

Water content (%) ... 27.68

0.80 Natural void ration e0. . . . 0.901

Compression index, Cc. . . 0.215

0.75
VOID RATIO, e0

Load Void Ratio

kg/cm²
0.25 0.87
0.50 0.85
0.70 1.00 0.82
2.00 0.78
4.00 0.72
8.00 0.64
0.65 2.00 0.64
0.25 0.66

0.60

0.55
PRESSURE IN Kg/cm2 (P) PLAN NO :

Page 57
 CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
CONSOLIDATION TEST
SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & SITE : NARSINGDI
CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. ONE DIMENSION ANALYSIS
BORE HOLE NO. 1(A) SAMPLE NO. U-1 DEPTH 4.0m TO 4.5m

0.95
cv e0
0.90 mm²/min 0.875889
6.05 0.87
0.85 4.08 0.85
6.08 0.82
Void Ratio, eo

0.80
7.28 0.78
0.75 16.11 0.72
15.59 0.64
0.70

0.65

0.60

0.55
1 10 100
Coefficient of Consolidation, Cv (mm²/min)

3.00E-03
P av
Coefficient of Compressibility, av

Kpa m²/kN
2.50E-03
25 2.77E-03
50 2.49E-03
2.00E-03 100 1.25E-03
200 6.24E-04
(m²/KN)

1.50E-03 400 3.12E-04

800 1.56E-04
1.00E-03

5.00E-04

0.00E+00
1 10 100 1000
Applied Pressure, P (Kpa)

Page 58
 CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
CONSOLIDATION TEST
SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & ONE DIMENSION ANALYSIS SITE : NARSINGDI
CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD.
BORE HOLE NO. 1(A) SAMPLE NO. U-1 DEPTH 4.0m TO 4.5m

1.60E-03
P mv
Coefficient of volume Compressibility,mv

1.40E-03 Kpa m²/kN

25 1.48E-03
1.20E-03 50 1.33E-03
100 6.65E-04
1.00E-03
200 3.32E-04
8.00E-04 400 1.66E-04
(m²/kN)

800 8.31E-05
6.00E-04

4.00E-04

2.00E-04

0.00E+00
1 10 100 1000
Applied Pressure, P (Kpa)

1.00E-04
P k
Hydraulic Conductivity, k(mm/min)

9.00E-05
Kpa mm/min
8.00E-05 25 8.75E-05
7.00E-05 50 5.32E-05

6.00E-05 100 3.97E-05

5.00E-05 200 2.37E-05
400 2.63E-05
4.00E-05 800 1.27E-05
3.00E-05
2.00E-05
1.00E-05
0.00E+00
1 10 100 1000
Applied Pressure, P (Kpa)

Page 59
 CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
CONSOLIDATION TEST
SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & LOAD SETTLEMENT (eo-P) CURVE
CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. SITE : NARSINGDI

BORE HOLE NO. 2(B) SAMPLE NO. U-1 DEPTH 4.0m TO 4.5m

9 2
101

103
1.0
0.1

10
8
6
7
5

8
9

5
6

8
9
4

4
2

7
9

7
5

8
1.04

Specific Gravity ... 2.685

0.99 Dry Density (gm/cc) ... 1.317

Water content (%) ... 31.18

0.94 Natural void ration e0. . . . 1.039

Compression index, Cc. . . 0.262

0.89
VOID RATIO, e0

Load Void Ratio

kg/cm²
0.25 1.00
0.50 0.98
0.84 1.00 0.95
2.00 0.91
4.00 0.85
8.00 0.78
0.79 2.00 0.78
0.25 0.80

0.74

0.69
PRESSURE IN Kg/cm2 (P) PLAN NO :

Page 60
 CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
CONSOLIDATION TEST
SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & SITE : NARSINGDI
CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. ONE DIMENSION ANALYSIS
BORE HOLE NO. 2(B) SAMPLE NO. U-1 DEPTH 4.0m TO 4.5m

1.05
cv e0
1.00 mm²/min 1.005889
7.99 1.00
0.95 5.42 0.98
8.17 0.95
Void Ratio, eo

0.90 9.92 0.91

22.45 0.85
0.85 23.15 0.78

0.80

0.75

0.70
1 10 100
Coefficient of Consolidation, Cv (mm²/min)

4.00E-03
P av
3.50E-03
Coefficient of Compressibility, av

Kpa m²/kN
25 3.37E-03
3.00E-03
50 3.04E-03
2.50E-03 100 1.52E-03
200 7.60E-04
(m²/KN)

2.00E-03 400 3.80E-04

800 1.90E-04
1.50E-03

1.00E-03

5.00E-04

0.00E+00
1 10 100 1000
Applied Pressure, P (Kpa)

Page 61
 CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
CONSOLIDATION TEST
SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & ONE DIMENSION ANALYSIS SITE : NARSINGDI
CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD.
BORE HOLE NO. 2(B) SAMPLE NO. U-1 DEPTH 4.0m TO 4.5m

1.80E-03
P mv
Coefficient of volume Compressibility,mv

1.60E-03 Kpa m²/kN

25 1.68E-03
1.40E-03
50 1.52E-03
1.20E-03 100 7.58E-04
200 3.79E-04
1.00E-03
400 1.89E-04
(m²/kN)

8.00E-04 800 9.47E-05

6.00E-04
4.00E-04
2.00E-04
0.00E+00
1 10 100 1000
Applied Pressure, P (Kpa)

1.40E-04
P k
Hydraulic Conductivity, k(mm/min)

1.20E-04 Kpa mm/min

25 1.32E-04
1.00E-04 50 8.06E-05

8.00E-05 100 6.07E-05

200 3.69E-05
6.00E-05 400 4.17E-05
800 2.15E-05
4.00E-05

2.00E-05

0.00E+00
1 10 100 1000
Applied Pressure, P (Kpa)

Page 62
 CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
CONSOLIDATION TEST
SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & LOAD SETTLEMENT (eo-P) CURVE
CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. SITE : NARSINGDI

BORE HOLE NO. 3(C) SAMPLE NO. U-1 DEPTH 4.0m TO 4.5m

9 2
101

103
1.0
0.1

10
8
6
7
5

8
9

5
6

8
9
4

4
2

7
9

7
5

8
1.11

Specific Gravity ... 2.683

1.06 Dry Density (gm/cc) ... 1.273

Water content (%) ... 32.49

1.01 Natural void ration e0. . . . 1.107

Compression index, Cc. . . 0.285

0.96
VOID RATIO, e0

Load Void Ratio

kg/cm²
0.25 1.06
0.50 1.05
0.91 1.00 1.01
2.00 0.97
4.00 0.92
8.00 0.84
0.86 2.00 0.85
0.25 0.87

0.81

0.76
PRESSURE IN Kg/cm2 (P) PLAN NO :

Page 63
 CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
CONSOLIDATION TEST
SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & SITE : NARSINGDI
CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. ONE DIMENSION ANALYSIS
BORE HOLE NO. 3(C) SAMPLE NO. U-1 DEPTH 4.0m TO 4.5m

1.15
cv e0
1.10 mm²/min 1.071889
9.08 1.06
1.05 6.17 1.05
9.35 1.01
Void Ratio, eo

1.00 11.42 0.97

26.07 0.92
0.95 27.39 0.84

0.90

0.85

0.80
1 10 100
Coefficient of Consolidation, Cv (mm²/min)

4.00E-03
P av
3.50E-03
Coefficient of Compressibility, av

Kpa m²/kN
25 3.67E-03
3.00E-03
50 3.31E-03
2.50E-03 100 1.65E-03
200 8.27E-04
(m²/KN)

2.00E-03 400 4.13E-04

800 2.07E-04
1.50E-03

1.00E-03

5.00E-04

0.00E+00
1 10 100 1000
Applied Pressure, P (Kpa)

Page 64
 CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
CONSOLIDATION TEST
SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & ONE DIMENSION ANALYSIS SITE : NARSINGDI
CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD.
BORE HOLE NO. 3(C) SAMPLE NO. U-1 DEPTH 4.0m TO 4.5m

2.00E-03
P mv
Coefficient of volume Compressibility,mv

1.80E-03 Kpa m²/kN

1.60E-03 25 1.77E-03
50 1.60E-03
1.40E-03
100 7.98E-04
1.20E-03 200 3.99E-04
1.00E-03 400 1.99E-04
(m²/kN)

800 9.97E-05
8.00E-04
6.00E-04
4.00E-04
2.00E-04
0.00E+00
1 10 100 1000
Applied Pressure, P (Kpa)

1.80E-04
P k
Hydraulic Conductivity, k(mm/min)

1.60E-04 Kpa mm/min

1.40E-04 25 1.58E-04
50 9.67E-05
1.20E-04
100 7.32E-05
1.00E-04
200 4.47E-05
8.00E-05 400 5.10E-05
800 2.68E-05
6.00E-05
4.00E-05
2.00E-05
0.00E+00
1 10 100 1000
Applied Pressure, P (Kpa)

Page 65
 CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
CONSOLIDATION TEST
SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & LOAD SETTLEMENT (eo-P) CURVE
CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. SITE : NARSINGDI

BORE HOLE NO. 4(D) SAMPLE NO. U-1 DEPTH 4.0m TO 4.5m

9 2
101

103
1.0
0.1

10
8
6
7
5

8
9

5
6

8
9
4

4
2

7
9

7
5

8
1.16

Specific Gravity ... 2.680

1.11 Dry Density (gm/cc) ... 1.239

Water content (%) ... 36.58

1.06 Natural void ration e0. . . . 1.162

Compression index, Cc. . . 0.303

1.01
VOID RATIO, e0

Load Void Ratio

kg/cm²
0.25 1.12
0.50 1.10
0.96 1.00 1.07
2.00 1.02
4.00 0.97
8.00 0.90
0.91 2.00 0.90
0.25 0.92

0.86

0.81
PRESSURE IN Kg/cm2 (P) PLAN NO :

Page 66
 CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
CONSOLIDATION TEST
SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & SITE : NARSINGDI
CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. ONE DIMENSION ANALYSIS
BORE HOLE NO. 4(D) SAMPLE NO. U-1 DEPTH 4.0m TO 4.5m

1.20
cv e0
1.15 mm²/min 1.123889
9.99 1.12
1.10 6.80 1.10
10.33 1.07
Void Ratio, eo

1.05 12.68 1.02

29.11 0.97
1.00 30.96 0.90

0.95

0.90

0.85
1 10 100
Coefficient of Consolidation, Cv (mm²/min)

4.50E-03
P av
4.00E-03
Coefficient of Compressibility, av

Kpa m²/kN
3.50E-03 25 3.90E-03
50 3.51E-03
3.00E-03 100 1.76E-03
200 8.79E-04
(m²/KN)

2.50E-03
400 4.39E-04
2.00E-03 800 2.20E-04
1.50E-03
1.00E-03
5.00E-04
0.00E+00
1 10 100 1000
Applied Pressure, P (Kpa)

Page 67
 CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
CONSOLIDATION TEST
SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & ONE DIMENSION ANALYSIS SITE : NARSINGDI
CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD.
BORE HOLE NO. 4(D) SAMPLE NO. U-1 DEPTH 4.0m TO 4.5m

2.00E-03
P mv
Coefficient of volume Compressibility,mv

1.80E-03 Kpa m²/kN

1.60E-03 25 1.84E-03
50 1.65E-03
1.40E-03
100 8.27E-04
1.20E-03 200 4.14E-04
1.00E-03 400 2.07E-04
(m²/kN)

800 1.03E-04
8.00E-04
6.00E-04
4.00E-04
2.00E-04
0.00E+00
1 10 100 1000
Applied Pressure, P (Kpa)

2.00E-04
P k
Hydraulic Conductivity, k(mm/min)

1.80E-04
Kpa mm/min
1.60E-04 25 1.80E-04
1.40E-04 50 1.10E-04

1.20E-04 100 8.39E-05

1.00E-04 200 5.15E-05
400 5.91E-05
8.00E-05 800 3.14E-05
6.00E-05
4.00E-05
2.00E-05
0.00E+00
1 10 100 1000
Applied Pressure, P (Kpa)

Page 68
 CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
CONSOLIDATION TEST
SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & LOAD SETTLEMENT (eo-P) CURVE
CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. SITE : NARSINGDI

BORE HOLE NO. 5(E) SAMPLE NO. U-1 DEPTH 4.0m TO 4.5m

9 2
101

103
1.0
0.1

10
8
6
7
5

8
9

5
6

8
9
4

4
2

7
9

7
5

8
0.88

Specific Gravity ... 2.672

0.83 Dry Density (gm/cc) ... 1.419

Water content (%) ... 18.98

0.78 Natural void ration e0. . . . 0.883

Compression index, Cc. . . 0.208

0.73
VOID RATIO, e0

Load Void Ratio

kg/cm²
0.25 0.85
0.50 0.83
0.68 1.00 0.80
2.00 0.76
4.00 0.70
8.00 0.62
0.63 2.00 0.62
0.25 0.64

0.58

0.53
PRESSURE IN Kg/cm2 (P) PLAN NO :

Page 69
 CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
CONSOLIDATION TEST
SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & SITE : NARSINGDI
CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. ONE DIMENSION ANALYSIS
BORE HOLE NO. 5(E) SAMPLE NO. U-1 DEPTH 4.0m TO 4.5m

0.90
cv e0
0.85 mm²/min 0.857889
5.80 0.85
0.80 3.91 0.83
5.82 0.80
Void Ratio, eo

0.75 6.95 0.76

15.31 0.70
0.70 14.59 0.62

0.65

0.60

0.55
1 10 100
Coefficient of Consolidation, Cv (mm²/min)

3.00E-03
P av
Coefficient of Compressibility, av

Kpa m²/kN
2.50E-03
25 2.68E-03
50 2.41E-03
2.00E-03 100 1.21E-03
200 6.03E-04
(m²/KN)

1.50E-03 400 3.02E-04

800 1.51E-04
1.00E-03

5.00E-04

0.00E+00
1 10 100 1000
Applied Pressure, P (Kpa)

Page 70
 CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
CONSOLIDATION TEST
SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & ONE DIMENSION ANALYSIS SITE : NARSINGDI
CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD.
BORE HOLE NO. 5(E) SAMPLE NO. U-1 DEPTH 4.0m TO 4.5m

1.60E-03
P mv
Coefficient of volume Compressibility,mv

1.40E-03 Kpa m²/kN

25 1.44E-03
1.20E-03 50 1.30E-03
100 6.49E-04
1.00E-03
200 3.25E-04
8.00E-04 400 1.62E-04
(m²/kN)

800 8.12E-05
6.00E-04

4.00E-04

2.00E-04

0.00E+00
1 10 100 1000
Applied Pressure, P (Kpa)

9.00E-05
P k
Hydraulic Conductivity, k(mm/min)

8.00E-05 Kpa mm/min

7.00E-05 25 8.20E-05
50 4.98E-05
6.00E-05
100 3.71E-05
5.00E-05
200 2.21E-05
4.00E-05 400 2.44E-05
800 1.16E-05
3.00E-05
2.00E-05
1.00E-05
0.00E+00
1 10 100 1000
Applied Pressure, P (Kpa)

Page 71
 CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
CONSOLIDATION TEST
SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & LOAD SETTLEMENT (eo-P) CURVE
CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. SITE : NARSINGDI

BORE HOLE NO. 6(F) SAMPLE NO. U-1 DEPTH 5.5m TO 6.0m

9 2
101

103
1.0
0.1

10
8
6
7
5

8
9

5
6

8
9
4

4
2

7
9

7
5

8
0.84

Specific Gravity ... 2.679

0.79 Dry Density (gm/cc) ... 1.459

Water content (%) ... 25.79

0.74 Natural void ration e0. . . . 0.836

Compression index, Cc. . . 0.192

0.69
VOID RATIO, e0

Load Void Ratio

kg/cm²
0.25 0.80
0.50 0.79
0.64 1.00 0.75
2.00 0.71
4.00 0.66
8.00 0.57
0.59 2.00 0.57
0.25 0.59

0.54

0.49
PRESSURE IN Kg/cm2 (P) PLAN NO :

Page 72
 CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
CONSOLIDATION TEST
SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & SITE : NARSINGDI
CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. ONE DIMENSION ANALYSIS
BORE HOLE NO. 6(F) SAMPLE NO. U-1 DEPTH 5.5m TO 6.0m

0.85
cv e0
0.80 mm²/min 0.811889
5.19 0.80
0.75 3.49 0.79
5.17 0.75
Void Ratio, eo

0.70 6.13 0.71

13.37 0.66
0.65 12.43 0.57

0.60

0.55

0.50
1 10 100
Coefficient of Consolidation, Cv (mm²/min)

3.00E-03
P av
Coefficient of Compressibility, av

Kpa m²/kN
2.50E-03
25 2.47E-03
50 2.23E-03
2.00E-03 100 1.11E-03
200 5.57E-04
(m²/KN)

1.50E-03 400 2.78E-04

800 1.39E-04
1.00E-03

5.00E-04

0.00E+00
1 10 100 1000
Applied Pressure, P (Kpa)

Page 73
 CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
CONSOLIDATION TEST
SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & ONE DIMENSION ANALYSIS SITE : NARSINGDI
CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD.
BORE HOLE NO. 6(F) SAMPLE NO. U-1 DEPTH 5.5m TO 6.0m

1.60E-03
P mv
Coefficient of volume Compressibility,mv

1.40E-03 Kpa m²/kN

25 1.36E-03
1.20E-03 50 1.23E-03
100 6.15E-04
1.00E-03
200 3.07E-04
8.00E-04 400 1.54E-04
(m²/kN)

800 7.68E-05
6.00E-04

4.00E-04

2.00E-04

0.00E+00
1 10 100 1000
Applied Pressure, P (Kpa)

8.00E-05
P k
Hydraulic Conductivity, k(mm/min)

7.00E-05 Kpa mm/min

25 6.95E-05
6.00E-05 50 4.21E-05
5.00E-05
100 3.12E-05
4.00E-05 200 1.85E-05
400 2.02E-05
3.00E-05 800 9.37E-06

2.00E-05

1.00E-05

0.00E+00
1 10 100 1000
Applied Pressure, P (Kpa)

Page 74
 CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.

SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & SITE : NARSINGDI

CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD.
DIRECT SHEAR TEST

Bore Hole No. 1(A) Sample No. D - 7 Depth 10.50 m to 10.95 m Bore Hole No. 1(A) Sample No. D - 12 Depth 18.00 m to 18.45 m

1.5 1.5

SHERING STRESS IN Kg/cm2

SHERING STRESS IN Kg/cm2

1.0 1.0

0.5 0.5

0.0 0.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
NORMAL STRESS IN Kg/cm2 NORMAL STRESS IN Kg/cm2

SHEARING ANGLE Ø (degree) 30.40 SHEARING ANGLE Ø (degree) 34.50

COHESION C (Kg/cm2) 0.06 COHESION C (Kg/cm2) 0.02

PLAN NO.:

Page 75
 CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.

SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & SITE : NARSINGDI

CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD.
DIRECT SHEAR TEST

Bore Hole No. 2(B) Sample No. D - 8 Depth 12.00 m to 12.45 m Bore Hole No. 2(B) Sample No. D - 10 Depth 15.00 m to 15.45 m

1.5 1.5

SHERING STRESS IN Kg/cm2

SHERING STRESS IN Kg/cm2

1.0 1.0

0.5 0.5

0.0 0.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
NORMAL STRESS IN Kg/cm2 NORMAL STRESS IN Kg/cm2

SHEARING ANGLE Ø (degree) 30.80 SHEARING ANGLE Ø (degree) 31.00

COHESION C (Kg/cm2) 0.05 COHESION C (Kg/cm2) 0.04

PLAN NO.:

Page 76
 CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.

SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & SITE : NARSINGDI

CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD.
DIRECT SHEAR TEST

Bore Hole No. 3(C) Sample No. D - 11 Depth 16.50 m to 16.95 m Bore Hole No. 3(C) Sample No. D - 12 Depth 18.00 m to 18.45 m

1.5 1.5

SHERING STRESS IN Kg/cm2

SHERING STRESS IN Kg/cm2

1.0 1.0

0.5 0.5

0.0 0.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
NORMAL STRESS IN Kg/cm2 NORMAL STRESS IN Kg/cm2

SHEARING ANGLE Ø (degree) 31.20 SHEARING ANGLE Ø (degree) 30.80

COHESION C (Kg/cm2) 0.04 COHESION C (Kg/cm2) 0.05

PLAN NO.:

Page 77
 CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.

SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & SITE : NARSINGDI

CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD.
DIRECT SHEAR TEST

Bore Hole No. 4(D) Sample No. D - 7 Depth 10.50 m to 10.95 m Bore Hole No. 4(D) Sample No. D - 10 Depth 15.00 m to 15.45 m

1.5 1.5

SHERING STRESS IN Kg/cm2

SHERING STRESS IN Kg/cm2

1.0 1.0

0.5 0.5

0.0 0.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
NORMAL STRESS IN Kg/cm2 NORMAL STRESS IN Kg/cm2

SHEARING ANGLE Ø (degree) 30.50 SHEARING ANGLE Ø (degree) 31.40

COHESION C (Kg/cm2) 0.05 COHESION C (Kg/cm2) 0.04

PLAN NO.:

Page 78
 CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.

SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & SITE : NARSINGDI

CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD.
DIRECT SHEAR TEST

Bore Hole No. 5(E) Sample No. D - 10 Depth 15.00 m to 15.45 m Bore Hole No. 5(E) Sample No. D - 12 Depth 18.00 m to 18.45 m

1.5 1.5

SHERING STRESS IN Kg/cm2

SHERING STRESS IN Kg/cm2

1.0 1.0

0.5 0.5

0.0 0.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
NORMAL STRESS IN Kg/cm2 NORMAL STRESS IN Kg/cm2

SHEARING ANGLE Ø (degree) 31.00 SHEARING ANGLE Ø (degree) 31.60

COHESION C (Kg/cm2) 0.04 COHESION C (Kg/cm2) 0.04

PLAN NO.:

Page 79
 CLIENT: ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.

SUBSOIL ENGINEERING & SITE : NARSINGDI

CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD.
DIRECT SHEAR TEST

Bore Hole No. 6(F) Sample No. D - 10 Depth 15.00 m to 15.45 m Bore Hole No. 6(F) Sample No. D - 12 Depth 18.00 m to 18.45 m

1.5 1.5

SHERING STRESS IN Kg/cm2

SHERING STRESS IN Kg/cm2

1.0 1.0

0.5 0.5

0.0 0.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
NORMAL STRESS IN Kg/cm2 NORMAL STRESS IN Kg/cm2

SHEARING ANGLE Ø (degree) 30.60 SHEARING ANGLE Ø (degree) 31.80

COHESION C (Kg/cm2) 0.05 COHESION C (Kg/cm2) 0.04

PLAN NO.:

Page 80
 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST CLIENT : ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
SITE: NARSINGDI
RESULTS
IDENTIFICATION TEST CONCUCTED AND RESULTS

Sieve
Atterbegh Limit Density UCT Direct Shear Consolidation Test Parameters For UD Sample
Analysis

SP Gravity
Depth (m)

Soil Type

NMC (%)
Sample
BH NO

Pressure (kpa)

Cv (mm /min)
Wet (gm/cc)

qu (kg/cm )

Mv (m /KN)
Dry (gm/cc)

k(mm/min)
av (m /kN)
2

C (kg/cm )

Void Ratio
Sample ID
2
Strain %
Sand %
PL (%)

FC (%)
LL (%)

PI(%)

2
Cc

2
Φ
D-2 3.0 CH 59 30 29 1 99 25 0.87 0.215 6.05 2.77E-03 1.48E-03 8.75E-05
U-1 4.0 CH 27.28 2.689 1.810 1.422 88.73 16.00 0.94 50 0.85 4.08 2.49E-03 1.33E-03 5.32E-05
D-5 7.5 SM 64 36 100 0.82 6.08 1.25E-03 6.65E-04 3.97E-05
BH -1(A)

D-7 10.5 SM 30.40 0.06 200 0.78 7.28 6.24E-04 3.32E-04 2.37E-05
U1
D-9 13.5 ML 24 76 400 0.72 16.11 3.12E-04 1.66E-04 2.63E-05
D-11 16.5 SM 66 34 800 0.64 15.59 1.56E-04 8.31E-05 1.27E-05
D-12 18.0 SM 34.50 0.02

D-1 1.5 CH 57 29 28 2 98 25 1.00 0.262 7.99 3.37E-03 1.68E-03 1.32E-04

U-1 4.0 CH 30.78 2.685 1.7318 1.324 82.63 18.00 0.50 50 0.98 5.42 3.04E-03 1.52E-03 8.06E-05
D-3 4.5 SM 52 26 26 5 95 100 0.95 8.17 1.52E-03 7.58E-04 6.07E-05
BH -2(B)

D-6 9.0 SM 61 39 200 0.91 9.92 7.60E-04 3.79E-04 3.69E-05

U1
D-8 12.0 SM 30.80 0.05 400 0.85 22.45 3.80E-04 1.89E-04 4.17E-05
D-10 15.0 SM 31.00 0.04 800 0.78 23.15 1.90E-04 9.47E-05 2.15E-05
D-12 18.0 SM 65 35

D-2 3.0 CH 55 28 27 3 97 25 1.06 0.285 9.08 3.67E-03 1.77E-03 1.58E-04

U-1 4.0 CH 32.09 2.683 1.692 1.281 79.93 18.00 0.44 50 1.05 6.17 3.31E-03 1.60E-03 9.67E-05
D-4 6.0 CH 58 30 28 1 99 100 1.01 9.35 1.65E-03 7.98E-04 7.32E-05
BH -3( C )

D-7 10.5 CH 50 26 24 6 94 200 0.97 11.42 8.27E-04 3.99E-04 4.47E-05

U1
D-9 13.5 CH 54 27 27 4 96 400 0.92 26.07 4.13E-04 1.99E-04 5.10E-05
D-11 16.5 SM 31.20 0.04 800 0.84 27.39 2.07E-04 9.97E-05 2.68E-05
D-12 18.0 SM 30.80 0.05

Page 81
 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST CLIENT : ROADS AND HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, BANGLADESH.
SITE: NARSINGDI
RESULTS
IDENTIFICATION TEST CONCUCTED AND RESULTS

Sieve
Atterbegh Limit Density UCT Direct Shear Consolidation Test Parameters For UD Sample
Analysis

SP Gravity
Depth (m)

Soil Type

NMC (%)
Sample
BH NO

Pressure (kpa)

Cv (mm /min)
Wet (gm/cc)

qu (kg/cm )

Mv (m /KN)
Dry (gm/cc)

k(mm/min)
av (m /kN)
2

C (kg/cm )

Void Ratio
Sample ID
2
Strain %
Sand %
PL (%)

FC (%)
LL (%)

PI(%)

2
Cc

2
Φ
U-1 4.0 CH 36.18 2.680 1.6983 1.247 77.82 20.00 0.13 25 1.12 0.303 9.99 3.90E-03 1.84E-03 1.80E-04
D-3 4.5 CH 56 28 28 3 97 50 1.10 6.80 3.51E-03 1.65E-03 1.10E-04
D-6 9.0 SM 60 40 100 1.07 10.33 1.76E-03 8.27E-04 8.39E-05
BH -4(D)

D-7 10.5 SM 30.50 0.05 200 1.02 12.68 8.79E-04 4.14E-04 5.15E-05
U1
D-9 13.5 SM 64 36 400 0.97 29.11 4.39E-04 2.07E-04 5.91E-05
D-10 15.0 SM 31.40 0.04 800 0.90 30.96 2.20E-04 1.03E-04 3.14E-05
D-12 18.0 SM 66 34

D-2 3.0 CH 50 25 25 7 93 25 0.85 0.208 5.80 2.68E-03 1.44E-03 8.20E-05

U-1 4.0 CH 18.58 2.672 1.6919 1.427 89.03 6.00 2.66 50 0.83 3.91 2.41E-03 1.30E-03 4.98E-05
D-4 6.0 SM 61 39 100 0.80 5.82 1.21E-03 6.49E-04 3.71E-05
BH -5( E )

D-8 12.0 SM 63 37 200 0.76 6.95 6.03E-04 3.25E-04 2.21E-05

U1
D-10 15.0 SM 31.00 0.04 400 0.70 15.31 3.02E-04 1.62E-04 2.44E-05
D-11 16.5 SM 65 35 800 0.62 14.59 1.51E-04 8.12E-05 1.16E-05
D-12 18.0 SM 31.60 0.04

D-3 4.5 CH 51 26 25 5 95 25 0.80 0.192 5.19 2.47E-03 1.36E-03 6.95E-05

U-1 5.5 CH 25.39 2.679 1.8393 1.467 91.53 14.00 1.13 50 0.79 3.49 2.23E-03 1.23E-03 4.21E-05
D-6 9.0 CH 53 27 26 4 96 100 0.75 5.17 1.11E-03 6.15E-04 3.12E-05
BH -6(F)

D-8 12.0 SM 60 40 200 0.71 6.13 5.57E-04 3.07E-04 1.85E-05

U1
D-10 15.0 SM 30.60 0.05 400 0.66 13.37 2.78E-04 1.54E-04 2.02E-05
D-11 16.5 SM 64 36 800 0.57 12.43 1.39E-04 7.68E-05 9.37E-06
D-12 18.0 SM 31.80 0.04

Page 82
Page 83 CamScanner
Page 84 CamScanner
Page 85 CamScanner
Page 86 CamScanner
Page 87 CamScanner
Page 88 CamScanner