Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

Scribd
Upload
29 views3 pages

Peer in English

The document is a Peer Observation Form used by Tribhuvan University Faculty of Education for evaluating student-teachers. It includes various criteria for assessing classroom appearance, lesson initiation, development, and closure, along with sections for comments and suggestions. The form also outlines the requirements for conducting peer observations, including the presence of an internal supervisor.

Uploaded by

kewenagatasecondaryschool
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
29 views3 pages

Peer in English

The document is a Peer Observation Form used by Tribhuvan University Faculty of Education for evaluating student-teachers. It includes various criteria for assessing classroom appearance, lesson initiation, development, and closure, along with sections for comments and suggestions. The form also outlines the requirements for conducting peer observations, including the presence of an internal supervisor.

Uploaded by

kewenagatasecondaryschool
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

TRIBHUVAN UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF EDUCATION

PEER OBSERVATION FORM

Name of the Student-Teacher : ……………......…….....… Grade : …...............…


School : ……………………….……………..……………… Date : …….………..…
Time : ……… Subject …………….………..…...............…..
Title : ………………..…….….………….. Period : …….......…….

1. Appearance in the Classroom Excellent Good Tolerable Poor Remarks


a) Cleanliness
b) Self-Confidence
c) Punctuality
d) Pleasantness
2. Initiation of the Lesson
a) Was the lesson objective clear to the students?
b) Was the lesson based on the previous one?
c) Were the students ready to learn?
d) Was the start of the lesson interesting?
e) Was the class arranged properly?
3. Development of the Lesson
3.1 Subject Matter and Sequence
a) Relevent to the curriculum
b) Relevent to the textbook
c) Relevent to the student's level & interest
d) Coverage of the subject matter
e) Teacher's command over subject matter
f) Was the presentation logical?
g) Was the presentation psychological?
h) Was the presentation haphazard?
i) Were illustrations appropriate?
3.2 Language
a) Fluency
b) Voice
c) Structure
d) Clarity
3.3 Instructional Materials
a) Size & clarity
b) Appropriateness to the lesson
c) Proper use
d) Pleasing
3.4 Student Participation
a) Listen attentively
b) Ask questions relatively
c) Answer teacher's questions
d) Participate in discussion
e) Follow directions
f) Experiment
g) Any other activity
3.5 Teacher's Activities
a) Lecture
b) Question
c) Answer to the students
d) Encourage students
e) Discourage students
f) Demonstrate
g) Disscuss with the students
h) Clarify student's points
i) Listen to student's opinions
j) Non-verval communication
k) Justify his/her own actions authoritatively
l) Solve disciplinery problems
4. Closing the Lesson
a) Was the lesson summarized?
b) Were the objectives achieved?
c) Was the lesson evaluated?
d) If yes, was it oral?
e) Was it written?
f) Was evaluation outcome satisfactory?
g) Was assignment given?
h) Was assignment appropriate?

Comments Suggestion
ons

Grading by Internal Supervisor: ……………


Signature of the Internal Supervisor: ………… Signature of the Observer/StudentTeacher:
Full Name : ...................................... Full Name: ……………………..
Campus: ……………………..……….. School/Campus:
………………..………..
Date: …………………….. Exam Roll No: ……………………..
Date: ……………………..

1. Read it carefully before you get into the class for observation.
2. Peer class should be observed in presence of the internal supervisor.
3. Each student teacher should observe at least 3 classes of his/her peers.

You might also like