DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
ENVIRONMENT & SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
ASSIGNMENT-2
ESIA CASE STUDIES
TEAM MEMBERS:
Kathirvel M (611222205018),
Lakshminarayanan P (611222205024),
Soundarajan A (611222205048).
1. Project Description
• Integrated MSW project in Guwahati includes door-to-door waste collection, transportation, RDF
plant (500 TPD), composting (50 TPD), power generation (6 MW), and landfill at Boragaon site
(24.12 hectares).
2. Legal and Regulatory Framework
• Falls under Category B (Item 7(i)) of EIA Notification 2006. Clearance required from MoEF as
SEIAA not formed in Assam.
3. Baseline Conditions
• Ecological: Air, water, soil quality assessed; some SPM exceedances noted.
• Social: Low population density, rural setup with limited infrastructure and mostly non-agriculture
jobs.
4. Alternatives Analysis
• Original plan revised by adding RDF and power plant for better feasibility and efficiency.
5. Environmental Impact Assessment
• Air: Stack emissions, dust controlled by ESP, filters.
• Water: Effluent treated before discharge.
• Noise: Controlled through enclosures and restricted timings.
• Land: Only 20–30% of waste goes to landfill.
• Ecology: Minor impact on nearby Deepar Beel mitigated.
• Socioeconomic: Positive—employment and services improved.
6. Public Consultation
• Not detailed in summary but stakeholder input considered in planning.
7. Environmental Management Plan
• Includes air, water, noise, waste control measures; greenbelt; use of treated leachate; fly ash
reuse; odor and vector control.
8. Risk Assessment
• Covers hazards, accident control, and emergency plans. Emphasizes safety training and disaster
preparedness.
9. Conclusion and Decision-Making
• Project is environmentally sound; reduces landfill use and produces green energy. Recommended
for implementation.
10. Documentation and Reporting
• Report structured with clear sections; follows MoEF and MNRE guidelines using data from IIT
Guwahati.
11. Review and Approval
• Submitted to MoEF for clearance; revisions and compliance addressed during review.
12. Post-Approval Activities
• EMP implementation, regular monitoring, audits, and public communication continue during
operation.
1. Project Description
• Project: 56.2 km of 6-lane ring road (Sections 2 & 3) near Chennai.
• Purpose: Improve connectivity, reduce congestion, and support industrial access.
• Key Features: Greenfield corridors, service roads, bridges, culverts, interchanges, ROBs.
2. Legal and Regulatory Framework
• Clearances: EIA Notification (2006) Category B1, CRZ, Forest, Water body, Tree felling.
• Laws: EIA Act, Forest Act, Air & Water Acts, Noise Rules, LARR Act, TN Highways Act.
• Financiers: AIIB compliance with its Environmental and Social Framework (ESF).
3. Baseline Conditions
Ecological
• Land: Agriculture dominant; Mannur RF (0.28 ha forest land affected).
• Air & Noise: Within CPCB limits.
• Water: Surface and groundwater suitable for drinking.
Social
• 26 villages affected. Mostly agricultural economy.
• 2,274 trees (Section 3) and 491 trees (Section 2) to be removed.
4. Alternatives Analysis
• Section 2 & 3: Realignments done to avoid settlements, reduce social impact.
• Result: Reduced land acquisition, tree felling, water body disturbance.
5. Environmental Impact Assessment
Impact Identification & Prediction
• Impacts during construction: Dust, noise, traffic, tree loss.
• Operation stage: Reduced congestion, improved air quality.
Evaluation & Mitigation
• Tree plantation (1:10), waste reuse, air & noise controls, buffer zones.
6. Public Consultation
• Consultations in 2014, 2018, and 2019.
• Feedback incorporated into design (e.g., bypasses, culverts).
7. Environmental Management Plan (EMP)
• Covers air, noise, water, biodiversity, solid waste.
• Includes monitoring, contractor responsibilities, training.
8. Risk Assessment
• Risks: Accidents, pollution, community safety.
• Mitigation: Safety norms, PPE, traffic management, grievance redress.
9. Conclusion and Decision-Making
• Impacts are manageable; EMP ensures mitigation.
• Long-term benefits include connectivity, reduced emissions, better infrastructure.
10. Documentation and Reporting
• Structured EIA with baseline data, EMP, consultation records.
• Monitoring reports and audit schedules included.
11. Review and Approval
• Environmental Clearance obtained (Aug 2018) from SEIAA.
• Other clearances (Forest, CRZ, Tree cutting) in process or obtained.
12. Post-Approval Activities
• EMP implementation, monthly monitoring reports.
• Contractor and supervision consultants responsible for compliance.
1. Project Description
• Project: 11.2 km elevated metro corridor from JLN Stadium to InfoPark with 11 stations.
• Purpose: Ease traffic, reduce pollution, promote public transport.
• Proponent: Kochi Metro Rail Limited (KMRL), funded by AFD (France).
• Completion: 2020–2024.
2. Legal and Regulatory Framework
• Key Laws: Environment (Protection) Act, Forest Act, Wildlife Act, Air/Water Acts.
• Rules Followed: Solid waste, plastic waste, noise, vibration, tree cutting, groundwater.
• International: AFD’s environmental and social standards also applied.
3. Baseline Conditions
Ecological
• Air, water, soil, noise: Monitored using primary and secondary data.
• Biological: Flora and fauna assessed; proximity to Manglavanam Bird Sanctuary noted.
Social
• Demographics: Dense population, high vehicle dependency.
• Land Use: Mix of residential, commercial, and institutional.
4. Alternatives Analysis
• With vs. Without Project: Metro reduces emissions, improves mobility.
• Route Options: Alignments analyzed for minimal displacement and environmental harm.
5. Environmental Impact Assessment
Impact Identification
• Construction Phase: Dust, noise, traffic disruption, tree loss.
• Operation Phase: Noise, energy demand, improved air quality.
Prediction & Evaluation
• Models Used: Noise and air dispersion models, fuel saving, and CO₂ reduction analysis.
Mitigation Measures
• Key Actions: Tree plantation (1:12 ratio), solar panels, LED use, dust suppression, STP installation.
6. Public Consultation
• Stakeholder consultations conducted.
• Concerns: Noise, traffic, tree cutting.
• Integrated into EMP and route planning.
7. Environmental Management Plan (EMP)
• Includes: Pollution control, green buildings, waste handling, noise barriers, disaster management.
• Monitoring: Regular audits and supervision defined in EMP budget.
8. Risk Assessment
• Risks: Construction hazards, traffic, fuel storage.
• Control Measures: Emergency plans, safety training, PPE, proper signage.
9. Conclusion and Decision-Making
• Findings: Metro has low environmental risk, significant social and transport benefits.
• Recommendation: Project is feasible with EMP implementation.
10. Documentation and Reporting
• Structure: Follows MoEF&CC and AFD guidelines.
• Reports: Detailed chapters, annexures, monitoring maps, baseline data, modeling results.
11. Review and Approval
• Not under EIA Notification 2006, but EIA done for AFD funding.
• Clearances Required: Tree cutting, wildlife, pollution control, water usage.
12. Post-Approval Activities
• Monitoring: Defined schedules and reporting.
• Responsibilities: KMRL and contractors to ensure ongoing compliance during construction and operation.
