Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views8 pages

Resources

Laboratories must perform comparability studies for nonwaived instruments/methods at least twice a year, regardless of different reportable ranges, to define the relationship between results. Waived instruments are exempt unless specified by laboratory policies. Records of corrective actions are required when comparability criteria are not met.

Uploaded by

AngelMercySylus
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views8 pages

Resources

Laboratories must perform comparability studies for nonwaived instruments/methods at least twice a year, regardless of different reportable ranges, to define the relationship between results. Waived instruments are exempt unless specified by laboratory policies. Records of corrective actions are required when comparability criteria are not met.

Uploaded by

AngelMercySylus
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

Tip #1

When performing comparability studies, if the


analytes have different reportable ranges due to the
method and sample type, a method comparison is
still required. There is nothing in the guidance that
the instruments/methods must produce the same
results. The laboratory needs to define the
relationship between the different results
(acceptance criteria) and perform the comparison
twice yearly. CMS requirement 493.1281
Tip #2

Laboratories are not required to perform


comparability for waived instruments unless their
own policies state that they are to be done.
Tip #3

Laboratories should have records of action or


corrective action when the instrument comparability
criteria are not met.
COM. 04250

Comparability of Instruments and Methods -


Nonwaived Testing Phase II

If the laboratory uses more than one nonwaived


instrument/method to test for a given analyte, the
instruments and methods are checked against
each other at least twice a year for comparability
of results.

© 2016 College of American Pathologists. All rights reserved.


Summary

This requirement applies:


• To tests performed on the same or different
instrument makes/models or by different methods.
• Only for nonwaived instruments/methods
accredited under a single CAP number.
• NOT for calculated parameters or waived testing.

© 2016 College of American Pathologists. All rights reserved.


Additional reminders

• Quality control data may be used, but use of


human samples is preferred.
• If using quality control material:
– it must be the same instrument platform
– quality control and reagents must be of the same
manufacturer and lot number.

• The use of pooled patient samples is acceptable.

© 2016 College of American Pathologists. All rights reserved.


For Microbiology testing, this
requirement:
• Applies when two instruments (same or
different manufacturers) are used to detect the
same analyte.
• Does not apply to multiple analytical methods
(eg, antigen typing versus culture or detection
of DNA versus a biochemical characteristic)
designed to detect the same organism but not
the same analyte.

© 2016 College of American Pathologists. All rights reserved.


Single data collection systems

• Two or more detectors or incubation cells


connected to a single data collection, analysis and
reporting computer need not be considered
separate systems
• For example:
– multiple incubation and monitoring cells in a continuous
monitoring blood culture instrument,
– two identical blood culture instruments connected to a
single computer system, or
– multiple thermocycler cells in a real time polymerase
chain reaction instrument.
© 2016 College of American Pathologists. All rights reserved.

You might also like