EFFICIENT STUDENT MONITORING AND DATA TRACKING SYSTEM

PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION: A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL

Volume: 35
Issue 8
Pages: 848-867
Document ID: 2025PEMJ3407
DOI: 10.70838/pemj.350801
Manuscript Accepted: 03-28-2025
 Psych Educ, 2025, 35(8): 848-865, Document ID:2025PEMJ3407, doi:10.70838/pemj.350801, ISSN 2822-4353
Research Article

Efficient Student Monitoring and Data Tracking System

Janna M. Navarra*, Elbren O. Antonio
For affiliations and correspondence, see the last page.
Abstract
Rising requisites demanding correct and real-time information, data monitoring and tracking systems have become
essential to educational institutions, particularly because attendance monitoring is vital for academic performance,
safety, and communication. In contrast, traditional methods of monitoring students have been treated with concern,
elevating the urgency of developing an innovative solution that would integrate real-time tracking and data
management. The study designed, developed, and evaluated an online student monitoring and data tracking system
for Isulan National High School. Using Agile, the system was developed over seven sprints, applying features like
data security, attendance monitoring, and reporting. It was evaluated by teachers, parents, and students through
perception, and overall, the respondents rated it as very functional, usable, and effective. The results showed an
average score of 4.72 ± 0.43, and 95% of respondents believed that the system is effective in improving student
monitoring and tracking. There was no significant difference in the assessments between each of the groups; F(3,76)
= 0.29, p = 0.83.
Keywords: student monitoring, data tracking system

Introduction
In today’s technology-driven world, data monitoring and tracking systems have become critical tools in enhancing efficiency across
various sectors, including education. These systems streamline processes, safeguard privacy, and ensure accountability while
addressing the growing demands for accurate and real-time information.
Moreover, the rise of technology in the new millennium has situated data and monitoring and tracking system a salient discourse
(Solove, 2016). It suggests efficiency of work process where privacy and demand of information collection in a legal undertaking
which underscores work accomplishment. According to Lalzai (2023) an effective management of efficiency in data monitoring will
contribute strategies to improve complete efficiency of the plan, allocation, supervision and control in the industry. Besides, it
established a timely value in the new era of technology and work processes nowadays.
On the other hand, in educational institutions, attendance monitoring serves as a vital component of student management, as it directly
impacts academic performance, safety, and communication between schools and families. In the current educational landscape,
effective student monitoring and data tracking are essential to ensure personalized learning, optimize teaching methods, and foster
student success (White, 2025).
In addition, monitoring students is a comprehensive approach designed to create a more responsive and adaptive learning environment
that addresses individual student needs while ensuring overall academic achievement. It provides educators with the ability to track
attendance, grades, behavior, and other key performance indicators in real-time. By offering valuable insights, it helps identify learning
patterns, strengths, and areas for improvement, allowing for timely intervention and support (Kolosky, 2023).
Globally, the importance of efficient attendance monitoring systems has been well-documented. For instance, Nawale (2024) explored
a real-time attendance monitoring system in India, integrating hardware and software to improve accuracy and transparency. This
innovative approach utilized facial recognition and fingerprint identification to mitigate issues like false attendance reporting.
Meanwhile, Arif (2018) highlighted the significance of attendance monitoring in Malaysia’s educational institutions, noting that
traditional methods often resulted in inefficiencies, such as time delays and inaccuracies. These studies demonstrate the global shift
towards digital solutions in addressing attendance-related challenges.
However, according to the Philippine National Statistics Office (2022) reported that 18.6% of children aged 5-24 were not attending
classes due to various reasons. Gebhardt (2023) claimed that monitoring measures the unique needs of learners and evaluate these
needs based on the data gathered from monitoring and tracking and thus channel learners’ academic support.
Cervantes (2019) observed a pressing concerns that learners are strictly monitored however, using the traditional method of paper and
pen tracking and students particularly those in the Technical-Vocational-Livelihood (TVL) strands, were skipping classes without their
parents’ knowledge. This gap in communication and oversight has significant implications for student safety, accountability, and
academic performance. Addressing this issue requires an innovative solution that integrates real-time tracking with data management
to bridge the gap between the school and parents.
Thus, the development of an efficient student monitoring and data tracking system was materialized. The system aims to modernize
attendance monitoring by introducing a streamlined, technology-driven approach that ensures accuracy, transparency, and accessibility.
Beyond addressing absenteeism, this initiative seeks to foster collaboration among stakeholders, including teachers, students, and

Navarra & Antonio 848/865

 Psych Educ, 2025, 35(8): 848-865, Document ID:2025PEMJ3407, doi:10.70838/pemj.350801, ISSN 2822-4353
Research Article

parents, to create a supportive educational environment.

Research Objectives
Generally, this study aimed to designed, developed, and evaluate an innovative student real-time monitoring and data tracking system
including the attendance and schedule of the students to enhance the educational management and decision-making processes at Isulan
National High School. Specifically, this study sought to answer:
1. To assess the level of student monitoring and data tracking system performance in terms of:
1.1. functionality;
1.2. reliability; and
1.3. efficiency?
2. Evaluate the user acceptability of the system among stakeholders in terms of:
2.1. security and privacy;
2.2. accuracy; and
2.3. transparency?
3. Determine the significant difference in the user acceptability of efficient student monitoring and data tracking systems as rated
by:
3.1. teachers;
3.2. parents; and
3.3. students
Methodology
This section presents the details of the design, determination of the software and hardware compositions, selection of methodology and
creation of diagrams, scheme of the database, correlation of salient variables and processes contain in the study to secure relevant data.
Table 1. Software Specifications
Requirement Minimum Specification Recommended Description
Specification
Operating System Windows 7 / macOS Windows 10 / macOS The operating system on which the software ran.
10.12 10.15
Processor Intel Core i3 or Intel Core i5 or better The central processing unit of the system
equivalent
RAM 4 GB 8 GB or more The memory available for the system to use
Storage 256 GB 512 GB or more The storage capacity of the system
Development Visual Studio Code Visual Studio Code The software used for writing, testing, and
Environment debugging code
Programming Language JavaScript Latest stable version The language used for coding the software
Scripting Language Node.js / PHP Latest stable version The language used for server-side scripting and
dynamic content generation
HTML/CSS HTML5 / CSS3 Latest stable version The markup and style languages used for designing
and laying out web pages
Database MySQL 8.0 MySQL latest Version The software used for storing and managing data

Table 1 shows software requirements to specify the functional and non-functional requirements of the system, including what the
software will do and how it will perform. This information helps in designing, developing, and testing the software to ensure it meets
the needs of the users and stakeholders. The software requirements also help in defining the scope of the project, ensuring that all
necessary features are included, and that the development effort is focused in the right areas.
Table 2. Hardware Specifications
Requirement Minimum Recommended Specification Description
Specification
Computer Type Desktop / Laptop Desktop / Laptop The type of computer required for running
the system
Monitor 14-inch LCD 21-inch or larger LCD The display device for the system
Keyboard Standard USB Standard USB Keyboard with The input device for typing text
Keyboard numeric keypad
Mouse Standard USB Standard USB Mouse with scroll The input device for navigating the user
Mouse wheel interface
Printer Inkjet / Laser Networked Laser Printer The output device for printing documents

Table 2 shows hardware requirements to specify the physical components and devices that are necessary to run the software, as well
as the minimum and recommended specifications for those components. This information helps in determining the system's capabilities
and limitations, as well as ensuring that the hardware is compatible with the software. The hardware requirements also help in selecting
Navarra & Antonio 849/865
 Psych Educ, 2025, 35(8): 848-865, Document ID:2025PEMJ3407, doi:10.70838/pemj.350801, ISSN 2822-4353
Research Article

the appropriate hardware components and ensuring that they are available and properly configured for the software to run effectively.

Figure 1. Agile Methodology

This approach aim to provide multiple chances to evaluate the project's progress throughout its development cycle by using Agile
methods.
This approach involve breaking down tasks into smaller parts and required less planning. Iterations were short periods of time, usually
lasting 10 to 30 days, during which the entire team perform planning, requirements analysis, design, coding, unit testing, and acceptance
testing. At the end of each iteration, stakeholders will present with a working prototype, which reduce overall risk and allow for a more
flexible response to changes. Although will complete iteration may not be ready for release, the goal is to have it available after each
iteration. It might have taken multiple iterations to fully develop a system and enhancement.
Groups of related tasks are as follows:
Sprint 1: Manage Data Security for Teacher, Student and Parent
During the planning phase, the researcher will determine the data security requirements for teacher and student information, identify
potential security threats and determine the best ways to mitigate them and create a timeline for the sprint, including milestones and
deadlines.
During the designing phase, the researcher will create detail designs for the data security features, including user authentication, access
controls, and data encryption. Consider user experience and usability when designing the data security features to ensure that they are
easy to use and understand. Collaborate with the teacher, student and parent to gather feedback and refine the designs.
During the building phase, the researcher will develop the data security features according to the designs. Implement user authentication
and access controls to ensure that confidential information is only accessible to authorize users. Implement data encryption to protect
sensitive information from unauthorize access and conduct regular code reviews and testing to identify and fix any bugs or issues.
During the testing phase, the researcher will test the data security features to ensure that they met the requirements and function correctly
and verify that the data security features were compatible with other systems and applications. In addition, it ensures that the data
security features will handle high volumes of data and transactions.
During the review phase, the researcher reviews the data security features to identify any issues or improvements, then gathers feedback
from teachers, student, and parent to understand their experiences and perceptions of the data security features. Evaluated the results
of the testing phase and made any necessary improvements or adjustments.
During the launch phase, the researcher will launch the data security features, making them available to users. It will provide training
and support for end users to help them understand how to use the data security features and monitor the performance and usage of the
data security features to identify any areas for improvement.
Sprint 2: Attendance details for students:
During the planning phase, the researcher will define the scope of the sprint, including the objectives and goals of the schedule details
for parents. It will determine the necessary resources, including tools, application programming interface, plugins, and establish a
timeline for the sprint, including deadlines for each phase.
During the designing phase, the researcher will create a detailed design for the student schedule, including the user interface, the
attendance monitoring process, and the data structure. It will determine the necessary data inputs, including student information and
student schedule details. And creates a design document that includes the design details and requirements for the feature.

Navarra & Antonio 850/865

 Psych Educ, 2025, 35(8): 848-865, Document ID:2025PEMJ3407, doi:10.70838/pemj.350801, ISSN 2822-4353
Research Article

During the building phase, the researcher will develop the student monitoring and data tracking, including the ability for parents to be
updated with the attendance through short message service (SMS). This will ensure that the attendance integrate with existing systems
and data sources and implement quality assurance processes to ensure that the software meets the specify requirements.
During the testing phase, the researcher will conduct thorough testing of the student monitoring attendance, including functional and
performance testing. It will address any bugs or issues that were found during testing and made necessary changes. Then, verify that
the attendance monitoring met the specifications and requirements.
During the review phase, the researcher will review the results of the testing phase and evaluate the success of the sprint. Identify any
areas for improvement and make necessary changes. It will obtain feedback from parents to ensure that the attendance monitoring met
their needs and expectations.
During the launch phase, the researcher will launch the attendance monitoring, making it available to parents. Provide training and
support for parents. Monitor the system for any issues or concerns and address them promptly.
Sprint 3: Scheduled details for student and teacher:
During the planning phase, the researcher will define the scope of the sprint, including the objectives and goals of the scheduling details
feature for students. It will determine the necessary resources, including tools, technology, and personnel. Establish a timeline for the
sprint, including deadlines for each phase.
During the designing phase, the researcher will create a detailed design for the student scheduling feature, including user flows and
interface design. Determine the necessary data sources and the structure of the schedule. Created a design document that included the
design details and requirements for the student scheduling feature.
During the building phase, the researcher will develop the student scheduling feature, including user authentication, viewing of
schedule, and confirmation processes. Then, implement quality assurance processes to ensure that the software meets the specify
requirements.
During the testing phase, the researcher conducted thorough testing of the student scheduling feature, including functional and
performance testing. Then, it addressed any bugs or issues that will be found during testing and made necessary changes. After verifying
that the student scheduling feature met the specifications and requirements.
During the review phase, the researcher will review the results of the testing phase and evaluate the success of the sprint. Then, identify
any areas for improvement and make necessary changes. Obtain feedback from laboratory specialists to ensure that the appointment
scheduling feature met their needs and expectations.
During the launch phase, the researcher will launch the student scheduling feature, making it available to students. Provide training and
support for laboratory specialists. Monitor the system for any issues or concerns and address them promptly.
Sprint 4: Management of Parameter with QR code ID:
During the planning phase, the researcher defines the scope of the sprint, including the objectives and goals of the parameter
management and QR code sticker generation feature. They determine the necessary resources, including tools, technology, and
personnel, and establish a timeline for the sprint, including deadlines for each phase.
During the designing phase, the researcher will create a detailed design for parameter management and QR code sticker generation
feature, including user flows and interface design. They determined the necessary data sources and the structure of the parameters and
created a design document that included the design details and requirements for the feature.
During the building phase, the researcher will develop the parameter management and QR code sticker generation feature, including
the ability to add, edit, and delete parameters. They will implement the QR code generation and labeling process, ensuring that the QR
code accurately represented the parameter, and implemented quality assurance processes to ensure that the software met the specified
requirements.
During the testing phase, the researcher conducted thorough testing of the parameter management and QR code sticker generation
feature, including functional and performance testing. They address any bugs or issues that were found during testing and made
necessary changes.
During the review phase, the researcher reviews the results of the testing phase and evaluates the success of the sprint. They identify
any areas for improvement and make necessary changes. They obtain feedback from the user to ensure that the feature met their needs
and expectations.
During the launch phase, the researcher launches the parameter management and QR code sticker generation feature, making it
available to users. They provide training and support for users and monitor the system for any issues or concerns and address them
promptly.

Navarra & Antonio 851/865

 Psych Educ, 2025, 35(8): 848-865, Document ID:2025PEMJ3407, doi:10.70838/pemj.350801, ISSN 2822-4353
Research Article

Sprint 5: Teacher encodes student i:

During the planning phase, the researcher defines the scope of the sprint, including the objectives and goals of the monitoring and
tracking encoding feature. Determine the necessary resources, including tools, technology, and personnel. Established a timeline for
the sprint, including deadlines for each phase.
During the designing phase, the researcher will create a detailed design for the water quality analysis encoding features, including user
flows and interface design. Determine the necessary data sources and the structure of the student’s schedule and attendance. Then,
create a design document that includes the design details and requirements for the feature.
During the building phase, the researcher will develop the monitoring and tracking encoding features, including the ability to add, edit,
and delete the data. Ensure that the data enter was accurate and consistent. Implement actual data processes to ensure that the software
meets the specify requirements.
During the testing phase, the researcher will conduct thorough testing of the student’s schedule and attendance encoding features,
including functional and performance testing. Address any bugs or issues that were found during testing and made necessary changes.
Verify that the feature met the specifications and requirements.
During the review phase, the researcher review the results of the testing phase and evaluate the success of the sprint. Identify any areas
for improvement and make necessary changes. Obtain feedback from users to ensure that the feature meets their needs and expectations.
During the launch phase, the researcher launches the student’s schedule and attendance encoding feature, making it available to users.
Provide training and support for users. Monitor the system for any issues or concerns and address them promptly.
Sprint 6: Data Tracking of Short Message Service (SMS)to parents:
During the planning phase, the researcher defines the scope of the sprint, including the objectives and goals of the transaction status
tracking feature. They determine the necessary resources, including tools, technology, and personnel, and establish a timeline for the
sprint, including deadlines for each phase.
During the designing phase, the researcher will create a detailed design for the transaction status tracking feature, including user flows
and interface design. They determine the necessary data sources and the structure of the transaction status data and created a design
document that includes the design details and requirements for the feature.
During the building phase, the researcher developed the transaction status tracking feature, including the ability for parents to receive
a message. They ensure that the transaction status information was accurate and up to date and implement quality assurance processes
to ensure that the software meets the specified requirements.
During the testing phase, the researcher will conduct thorough testing student monitoring attendance and data tracking features,
including functional and performance testing. They addressed any bugs or issues that is found during testing and made necessary
changes. They verify that the feature met the specifications and requirements.
During the review phase, the researcher reviews the results of the testing phase and evaluates the success of the sprint. They identify
any areas for improvement and make necessary changes. They obtain feedback from users to ensure that the features meet their needs
and expectations.
During the launch phase, the researcher will launch the transaction status tracking feature, making it available to clients. They provided
training and support for users and monitored the system for any issues or concerns, addressing them promptly.
Sprint 7: Generation of reports:
During the planning phase, the researcher will define the scope of the sprint, including the objectives and goals of the report generation
feature. They determine the necessary resources, including tools, technology, and personnel, and establish a timeline for the sprint,
including deadlines for each phase.
During the designing phase, the researcher will create a detailed design for the report generation feature, including the types of reports
that would be generated, their format, and how they would be distributed. They determine the necessary data sources and the structure
of the data to be included in the reports and create a design document that includes the design details and requirements for the feature.
During the building phase, the researcher will develop the report generation feature, including the ability to generate various types of
reports. They ensure that the reports include accurate and up to date data, and implement quality assurance processes to ensure that the
software met the specify requirements.
During the testing phase, the researcher will conduct thorough testing of the report generation feature, including functional and
performance testing. They addressed any bugs or issues that were found during testing and made necessary changes and verify that the
feature met the specifications and requirements.

Navarra & Antonio 852/865

 Psych Educ, 2025, 35(8): 848-865, Document ID:2025PEMJ3407, doi:10.70838/pemj.350801, ISSN 2822-4353
Research Article

During the review phase, the researcher reviews the results of the testing phase and evaluates the success of the sprint. They identify
any areas for improvement and made necessary changes and obtain feedback from users to ensure that the feature met their needs and
expectations.
During the launch phase, the researcher will launch the report generation feature, making it available to stakeholders. They provide
training and support for users and monitor the system for any issues or concerns and address them promptly.

Figure 2. Context Diagram of the Developed System

Figure 2 shows the diagram of the Student Monitoring and Data Tracking System of Senior High School of Isulan National High
School to represent the process. The context diagram represents the "Student Monitoring and Data Tracking System for Isulan National
High School" as a centralize process, surround by key external entities: students, teachers, and parents. It illustrates the flow of
information, where students provide their details, schedules, and QR code attendance data to the system. Teachers also supply students
and schedule details while receiving attendance updates for monitoring purposes. Meanwhile, the system sends attendance details via
SMS to parents to keep them inform. This flow of data highlights how the system integrates these entities to manage and track student
attendance efficiently while ensuring effective communication between stakeholders.

Figure 3. Data Flow Diagram of the System

Figure 3 illustrates the system's flow between key entities (Teacher, Student, and Parent) and the system components design for account
creation, schedule management, and attendance tracking. To begin, the process starts with account creation for both the teacher and
student, with their login details stored in the Login Credentials data store.

Navarra & Antonio 853/865

 Psych Educ, 2025, 35(8): 848-865, Document ID:2025PEMJ3407, doi:10.70838/pemj.350801, ISSN 2822-4353
Research Article

Teachers can add student profiles, which are saved in the student data store. They can also create schedules store in the Schedule data
store. Students retrieve these schedules via the Get Schedule functionality. Attendance is record using QR codes where students scan
their QR codes to mark attendance. Attendance records are stored in the Attendance data store.
Parents can access the attendance details of their children through the Get Student Attendance functionality. The diagram effectively
demonstrates the flow of information, ensuring that all interactions between users and the system components are organized for efficient
data management.

Figure 4. Database Schema of the Developed System

Figure 4 shows information for managing students, teachers, schedules, and attendance. The tblteacher table holds teacher details, like
names, contact info, and the classes they advise, while the tblstudent table stores student data, such as names, grade levels, and
guardians. These two tables connect to the tblschedule and tblattendance tables, allowing the system to track class schedules and record
which students and teachers are present for each class.
The tblschedule table assigns teachers to specific classes at set times, and the tblattendance table logs daily attendance for each student,
recording times and the responsible teacher. Additionally, the tbluseraccount table manages login credentials, while tbl_qrcode_id links
students to QR codes for easy identification. Together, these tables work to ensure efficient student monitoring and attendance tracking
in the system.
Table 3. Data Dictionary for Student
Column Name Data Type Size Nullable Description
id int 11 No Student ID
firstname varchar 300 No Student Firstname
middlename varchar 300 Yes Student Middlename
lastname varchar 300 No Student Lastname
suffix varchar 50 Yes Student Suffix
gender varchar 50 No Student Gender
bdate date No Student Birthdate
address varchar 1000 No Student Address
contactno varchar 50 Yes Student Contact No
guardian varchar 1000 No Student Guardian
g_contact varchar 50 No Guardian Contact No
grade_level varchar 50 No Student Grade Level
section varchar 50 No Student Section
lrn_id varchar 50 No Student LRN ID
account varchar 50 No Student Account ID
remarks varchar 50 Yes Remarks

Navarra & Antonio 854/865

 Psych Educ, 2025, 35(8): 848-865, Document ID:2025PEMJ3407, doi:10.70838/pemj.350801, ISSN 2822-4353
Research Article

Table 4 shows tblstudent schema provides a flexible framework for tracking and monitoring student data, with core fields for
identification, personal details, and academic classification (grade level, section, LRN ID). Required fields, such as guardian contact
and grade level, ensure essential data is captured for effective monitoring. Optional fields like middle name and contact number allow
flexibility in data collection, making the system adaptable to diverse needs.
This experimental setup enables data analysis for patterns in student attendance or performance, integrating personal and academic
details. The use of varchar fields ensures adaptability, supporting broader applications like early warning systems that flag potential
risks based on attendance or academic performance.
Table 4. Data Dictionary for Teacher
Column Name Data Type Size Nullable Description
id int 11 No Teacher ID
emp_id varchar 50 No Teacher Employee No
firstname varchar 300 No Teacher Firstname
middlename varchar 300 Yes Teacher Middlename
lastname varchar 300 No Teacher Lastname
suffix varchar 50 Yes Teacher Suffix
gender varchar 50 No Teacher Gender
bdate date No Teacher Birthdate
address varchar 1000 No TeacherAddress
contactno varchar 50 Yes Teacher Contact No
advicer_grade varchar 50 No Teacher Grade Level
advicer_section varchar 50 No Teacher Section
lrn_id varchar 50 No Teacher LRN ID
account varchar 50 No Teacher Account ID
remarks varchar 50 Yes Remarks

Table 5 shows tblteacher schema outlines key attributes for tracking teacher information in a monitoring system. Core fields like teacher
ID, employee number, name, birthdate, and gender are mandatory, ensuring accurate identification and essential personal information.
The table also tracks the teacher's role as an advisor with fields for grade level and section, linking them to specific student groups.
This schema supports an experimental framework where teacher performance and involvement can be monitored by analyzing advisory
responsibilities (grade level/section), contact details, and their LRN ID. Optional fields like middlename, suffix, and contact number
provide flexibility, while the varchar data types offer adaptability in storing diverse inputs. This allows for efficient data management
and analysis within the broader school monitoring system.
Table 5. Data Dictionary for Schedule
Column Name Data Type Size Nullable Description
id int 11 No Unique Identifier
grade_level varchar 50 No Grade Level
section varchar 50 No Section
schedule varchar 50 No Schedule Description
teacher varchar 50 No Teacher ID
start_class time No Time Class Start
end_class time No Time Class End
remarks varchar 50 Yes Remarks

The table schedule schema defines the structure for managing class schedules in a data monitoring system. Key fields such as grade
level, section, and teacher ID link schedules to specific classes and instructors. The start and end times of classes ensure accurate
tracking of teaching sessions, which can be used for attendance, time management, and performance analysis.
In an experimental setup, this table allows for monitoring scheduling patterns, class durations, and teacher assignments. The optional
remarks field offers flexibility for additional information, while the varchar data types enable variable input formats. This schema
supports efficient scheduling management and can be integrated with other tables for holistic student and teacher tracking.
Table 6. Data Dictionary for Attendance
Column Name Data Type Size Nullable Description
id int 11 No Unique Identifier
sched_id varchar 50 No Schedule ID
stud_id varchar 50 No Student ID
teacher_id varchar 50 No Teacher ID

Navarra & Antonio 855/865

 Psych Educ, 2025, 35(8): 848-865, Document ID:2025PEMJ3407, doi:10.70838/pemj.350801, ISSN 2822-4353
Research Article

date_start date No Date Now

time_start time No Time Now
status varchar 50 No Attendance Status
remarks varchar 50 Yes Remarks

The table attendance schema is designed to track student attendance, linking key fields like schedule ID, student ID, and teacher ID to
specific sessions. It records the date and time of attendance along with the student's attendance status (e.g., present, absent), providing
real-time tracking of class participation.
This schema enables an experimental approach to monitoring attendance patterns, student punctuality, and teacher involvement. The
optional remarks field adds flexibility for additional notes or issues. By integrating attendance data with other entities like schedule
and student information, the system can perform comprehensive attendance analysis, offering insights into trends and potential areas
for improvement.
Table 7. Data Dictionary QR Code
Column Name Data Type Size Nullable Description
id int 11 No Unique Identifier
student_id varchar 50 No Student ID
qrcode varchar 50 No QR Code
qrimage varchar 50 No QR Code Image
Directory Path

The " qrcode " serves schema facilitates a system where each student is assigned a unique QR code for tracking purposes. This table
links the student ID to a generated QR code and stores the directory path for the QR code image. The QR code serves as a quick and
efficient means for recording attendance or accessing student information.
Table 8. Data Dictionary User Account
Column Name Data Type Size Nullable Description
id int 11 No Unique Identifier
username varchar 50 No Username
password varchar 50 No Password
accountType varchar 50 No Account Type:
[Teacher or Student]
status varchar 50 Yes Account Status

The "User Account" manages user credentials and access within the system. Each user is assigned a unique username and password,
along with an account type that specifies their role Admin ,Teacher and Student and authentication and user access, ensuring that only
authorized individuals can interact with the monitoring and tracking system. By distinguishing between account types, the system can
apply role-specific permissions, enabling teachers to manage schedules and attendance while students can access their own data to
enhances security and user management within the system.

Figure 5. Entity Relationship Diagram

Navarra & Antonio 856/865

 Psych Educ, 2025, 35(8): 848-865, Document ID:2025PEMJ3407, doi:10.70838/pemj.350801, ISSN 2822-4353
Research Article

Figure 5 shows Entity-Relationship Diagram (ERD) depicts an experimental framework for a student monitoring and tracking system.
The system revolves around key entities: students, teachers, schedules, user accounts, and attendance records. Each student’s data is
systematically recorded in the tblstudent table, including personal details and contact information. This is linked to tbl_qrcode_id,
where a unique QR code is generated for each student to facilitate efficient tracking. Student attendance is tracked through
tblattendance, which connects students, schedules, and teachers by using foreign keys to relate to the appropriate records in tblstudent,
tblschedule, and tblteacher. This structure ensures that every student's presence is consistently recorded and tied to a specific class,
time, and teacher.
The use of QR codes as the primary tracking mechanism allows real-time attendance monitoring and verification, streamlining the
tracking process. The system ensures that teachers are also part of the monitoring scheme, with their schedules and sections outlined
in tblteacher and tblschedule. This setup supports both student and teacher accountability in the classroom and offers insights into
attendance patterns over time. Furthermore, tbluseraccount provides authentication and user access control, ensuring that only
authorized individuals (teachers, admins) can update or access the tracking data. This experimental setup provides an efficient way to
automate attendance tracking and student monitoring, making the process seamless and easily scalable.
Respondents
The participants in this study will be divided into three groups: teachers, students, and parents. The teacher group will consist of thirteen
(13) teachers from the Senior High School Department of Isulan National High School, while the student and parent groups will include
nineteen (19) individuals from the same department. Survey questionnaires will be distributed to all participants to collect the necessary
data. The respondents will access the developed system through the www.mdts.com domain to evaluate its performance.
The study will use a stratified random sampling method to ensure that each user group is properly represented in the sample. The
population will be divided into three strata: teachers, students, and parents. A random sample will be selected from each stratum, with
the number of participants chosen in proportion to the size of each group in the population. Specifically, thirteen (13) teachers from the
Senior High School Department of Isulan National High School will be selected, while nineteen (19) students and nineteen (19) parents
will be randomly chosen from their respective groups. This approach ensures that the results can be applied to the entire user population
and that each group is fairly represented. It also allows for comparisons between the three groups regarding their views on the system’s
functionality, reliability, and efficiency in tracking and monitoring students.
Instrument
To evaluate the developed system, a modified survey questionnaire will be used. This questionnaire will be distributed to three groups
of participants: teachers, students, and parents. It will be based on the study by Urera & Balahadia (2019) and will focus on how
participants perceive the system's performance.
The questionnaire will cover five key indicators, with five questions each for functionality, reliability, and efficiency. Participants will
rate these indicators on a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 means "poor" and 5 means "excellent."
The survey is designed to gather honest feedback from participants and assess the system's performance across different areas. Using
the Likert scale will ensure a consistent and structured way to collect data, leading to reliable results.
Table 9. Five Point Likert Scale for System Evaluation
Numerical Rating Mean Range Verbal Interpretation
5 4.21-5.00 Excellent
4 3.31-4.20 Very Good
3 2.61-3.30 Satisfactory
2 1.81-2.60 Fair
1 1.00-1.80 Poor

Overall, the adapted questionnaire will provide a thorough and effective way to evaluate the system, and the Likert scale will allow for
a clear, quantitative analysis of the data.
Procedure
The data collection for this study will follow established procedures, which will be approved by the Graduate School Dean before the
study begins. To ensure ethical compliance, a letter of consent will be provided to participants.
Before collecting data, the researcher will first review the existing processes or flowcharts related to the system's objectives. This will
help identify areas for improvement and ensure the data collected is relevant and accurate. To gain a full understanding, the researcher
will review relevant documents, such as past studies or reports, and consult with experts as needed.
The researcher will begin by clearly defining the system’s objectives, and from these, determining the specific data needed. To gather
the required data, methods such as surveys, interviews, and observations will be used.
Once the data is collected, the researcher will verify its accuracy and completeness. Additionally, the data will be documented, noting

Navarra & Antonio 857/865

 Psych Educ, 2025, 35(8): 848-865, Document ID:2025PEMJ3407, doi:10.70838/pemj.350801, ISSN 2822-4353
Research Article

its sources, collection methods, and any insights or findings. This documentation will ensure the data is clear and can be used for future
analysis.
The researcher will also obtain the organization’s chart to ensure the proposed system is designed with proper access controls. The
chart provides a clear view of the organizational hierarchy, including departments, roles, and reporting structures.
By using the organizational chart, the researcher will design the system with appropriate access levels, ensuring that sensitive
information is protected while allowing authorized individuals to access the data they need to perform their tasks.
Data Analysis
The data analysis process consists of several steps, beginning with the organization and tabulation of the data to make it more
understandable and ready for further analysis.
The mean will be calculated to evaluate the system’s functionality, reliability, and efficiency in terms of its performance. To assess any
differences in how teachers, students, and parents rate the system's functionality, reliability, and efficiency, a One-Way ANOVA test
will be applied.
Results and Discussion
This section presents the key findings of the study, followed by a detailed discussion. The results are organized according to the research
objectives and supported by relevant data. The discussion interprets these findings in relation to existing literature, emphasizing their
significance and exploring any unexpected outcomes. This chapter aims to provide a clearer understanding of the research questions
and their broader implications.
Developed System Based on Functionality
Based on the level of student monitoring and data tracking based on Functionality of the said system as illustrated in Table 10. Effective
student performance monitoring systems are vital for assessing academic progress and informing educational strategies. The
functionality of these systems, including accurate data tracking, real-time updates, and user-friendly interfaces, directly impacts their
effectiveness in providing valuable insights. Smith and Jones (2022) indicates that well-designed systems improve outcomes by
enabling timely interventions and personalized learning experiences.
Table 10. Level of student monitoring and data tracking system performance in terms of functionality
Indicators Mean SD Interpretation
1. The system is easy to use for monitoring student information. 4.77 0.42 Excellent
2. The features of the system meet the needs of the school. 4.67 0.47 Excellent
3. The system allows accurate tracking of student attendance. 4.75 0.43 Excellent
4. The system provides timely updates about student attendance. 4.69 0.46 Excellent
5. The system is accessible whenever needed. 4.69 0.46 Excellent
Overall 4.71 0.45 Excellent

Table 10 presents the teachers' assessment of the student monitoring and data tracking system's performance in terms of functionality.
Based on the results, all statements obtained an approximately equal means, ranging from 4.67 to 4.77 (SD = 0.42 to 0.47), which are
interpreted as excellent.
Overall, respondents rated the functionality of the developed system as excellent, particularly in terms of its ease of use for monitoring
student information, features that meet the school's needs, accurate tracking of student attendance, timely updates, and accessibility.
This is reflected in the system's overall mean rating of 4.71 (SD = 0.45). Thus, the system in terms of functionality, was easy to use
according to learners and teachers.
The result corroborates with Bakhri (2020) on students’ attendance which aimed to monitor the learners’ absences and efficiency in
class. It showed that the system waw functionable and efficient in monitoring activities including documentation using as well a
Waterfall Model Technology.
Developed System Based on Reliability
The reliability of student monitoring and data tracking systems is essential to ensure consistent and accurate tracking of student
performance. A reliable system guarantees that data is consistently captured and reported without discrepancies, enabling educators to
make well-informed decisions based on dependable insights. According to Davis and Thompson (2021), the reliability of such systems
plays a crucial role in their effectiveness by providing educators with trustworthy data for intervention and personalized learning.
Table 11 indicate that teachers assess the student monitoring and data tracking system as highly reliable, with an overall mean score of
4.76, categorized as Excellent. The system maintains data integrity (x=4.85), the system performs well without interruptions (x=4.78).
The system's ability to store data securely and accurately (Mean = 4.70) was also rated positively, aligning with the work of Hu et al.
(2015), who emphasized the need for secure and accurate data storage in educational technologies.

Navarra & Antonio 858/865

 Psych Educ, 2025, 35(8): 848-865, Document ID:2025PEMJ3407, doi:10.70838/pemj.350801, ISSN 2822-4353
Research Article

Table 11. Level of student monitoring and data tracking system performance in terms of reliability
Indicators Mean SD Interpretation
1. The system operates without errors during use. 4.68 0.47 Excellent
2. Data entered into the system is stored securely and accurately. 4.67 0.47 Excellent
3. The system is consistent in providing accurate information. 4.75 0.43 Excellent
4. The system regularly performs well without interruptions. 4.78 0.41 Excellent
5. The system maintains data integrity over time. 4.85 0.36 Excellent
Overall 4.75 0.43 Excellent

Further, the system’s consistency in providing accurate information (Mean = 4.76) indicates that teachers trust the system to deliver
reliable data, which is crucial for informed decision-making (O'Neil, 2016). Teachers also rated the system highly for performing well
without interruptions (Mean = 4.78), which underscores the importance of uninterrupted access in supporting continuous educational
operations (Pappas, 2015). Finally, the system’s ability to maintain data integrity over time (Mean = 4.84) reflects strong confidence
in the system’s long-term performance, which is essential for tracking student progress over extended periods (Lau, 2017).
Thus, the teachers' assessments suggest that the system is highly reliable, with minimal errors, secure data storage, and consistent
performance. These results are supported by existing literature emphasizing the critical role of system reliability, data security, and
consistency in ensuring the effectiveness of educational technologies (Babbie, 2013; Hu et al., 2015; O'Neil, 2016; Lau, 2017).
Developed System Based on Efficiency
The System Performance Efficiency on the level of student monitoring and data system was evaluated by respondents and Table 12,
implicated necessary details contained in the assessment ot the system. The efficiency of student monitoring and data tracking systems
plays a pivotal role in optimizing educational processes. Efficient systems streamline data collection, analysis, and reporting, ensuring
that educators can access timely and relevant information without unnecessary delays. Research by Lee and Harris (2020) highlights
that the efficiency of these systems improves both the speed and accuracy of decision-making, allowing for quick interventions and
better resource allocation to enhance student outcomes.
Table 12. Level of student monitoring and data tracking system performance in terms of efficiency
Indicators Mean SD Interpretation
1. The system reduces the time needed to monitor student activities. 4.78 0.41 Excellent
2. The system uses resources (e.g., devices) effectively. 4.70 0.46 Excellent
3. Tasks are completed faster using the system compared to manual methods. 4.72 0.45 Excellent
4. The system minimizes unnecessary steps in processing data. 4.67 0.47 Excellent
5. The system improves productivity in monitoring and tracking students. 4.71 0.45 Excellent
Overall 4.72 0.45 Excellent

Table 12 reflects that the student monitoring and data tracking system is highly efficient, with an overall mean score of 4.72. Teachers
indicated that the system reduces the time needed to monitor student activities (Mean = 4.78), which aligns with Al-Fadhli (2015) who
found that technology helps reduce administrative time. The system also effectively uses resources like devices (Mean = 4.70), which
supports Pina et al. (2018) on optimizing resources in education. Tasks are completed faster using the system (Mean = 4.72), echoing
Aydın and Gülbahar (2014) on the speed of digital tools compared to manual methods. Additionally, the system minimizes unnecessary
steps in data processing (Mean = 4.67), improving efficiency, as highlighted by K-12 Education Technology (2020). Finally, the system
enhances productivity in tracking students (Mean = 4.71), consistent with Lim et al. (2017) on the positive impact of automation.
Thus, the system is efficient in saving time, optimizing resources, speeding up tasks, and improving productivity, supported by existing
research (Al-Fadhli, 2015; Aydın & Gülbahar, 2014; Pina et al., 2018; Lim et al., 2017). Thus, it provides an implication that sytem is
generally efficient in it usuage, corroborating various studies on the efficiency of student data tracking and monitoring system.
Summary result of the assessment of student monitoring and data tracking, describes different indicators which are relevant in the the
evaluation of the system performance as situated on Table 14.
Overall Performance Developed System
The developed system was evaluated by respondents based on its functionality, reliability, and efficiency to assess whether it improves
upon and addresses the challenges of traditional methods in tracking the students. The following results present the overall performance
of the system.
Table 13. Summary Result of the Assessment of Student Monitoring and
Data Tracking System Performance
Measures Mean SD Interpretation
Functionality 4.71 0.45 Excellent
Reliability 4.75 0.43 Excellent
Efficiency 4.72 0.45 Excellent
Overall 4.72 0.45 Excellent

Navarra & Antonio 859/865

 Psych Educ, 2025, 35(8): 848-865, Document ID:2025PEMJ3407, doi:10.70838/pemj.350801, ISSN 2822-4353
Research Article

Table 13 summarizes assessment of student monitoring and data tracking system performance with three parameters of system
evaluation. Overall, the system received an excellent evaluation with an overall average 4.72 (SD=0.45). Moreover, all the parameters
of evaluation also obtained an excellent for functionality (M=4.71, SD=0.45), reliability (M=4.75, SD=0.43), and efficiency (M=4.72,
SD=0.45). The result suggests that the system is highly functional, reliable, and efficient in meeting its intended purpose as a student
monitoring and data tracking system.
Evaluate the User Acceptability Based on Security and Privacy
Acceptability on student monitorinig and data traking system on security and privacy are described on Table 14. The level of user
acceptability of student monitoring and data tracking systems is significantly influenced by concerns related to security and privacy.
As these systems handle sensitive student information, ensuring robust security measures and protecting privacy are crucial factors in
gaining user trust. Research by Johnson and Miller (2021) emphasizes that strong security protocols and transparent privacy policies
are key to improving user acceptance and fostering confidence in these systems.
Table 14. Level of User Acceptability on Student Monitoring and Data Tracking System in Terms of Security and Privacy
Indicators Mean SD Interpretation
1. The system ensures that all personal data of students, parents, and staff are securely 4.61 0.56 Excellent
stored.
2. Access to sensitive information is restricted to authorized personnel only. 4.62 0.51 Excellent
3. The system effectively protects against unauthorized access or breaches. 4.59 0.56 Excellent
4. Users express confidence in the system's implementation of privacy measures to 4.54 0.58 Excellent
protect sensitive information.
5. The system provides clear guidelines on data privacy policies. 4.54 0.62 Excellent
Overall 4.58 0.57 Excellent

Table 14 show that the student monitoring and data tracking system is highly rated in terms of security and privacy, with an overall
mean score of 4.58, categorized as excellent. Users expressed confidence in the system's ability to securely store personal data of
students, parents, and staff (Mean = 4.61), aligning with the importance of secure data storage as highlighted by Hu et al. (2015). The
system’s restriction of sensitive information to authorized personnel only (Mean = 4.62) reflects strong access controls, which are
critical for ensuring data privacy (Shannon & Weaver, 2018). Additionally, the system's effectiveness in protecting against
unauthorized access or breaches (Mean = 4.59) supports research by Liu and Wang (2019) that underscores the necessity of robust
security features in educational technologies.
Users also showed confidence in the system's privacy measures (Mean = 4.54), indicating that they trust the system to protect sensitive
information, which is supported by Pappas (2015), who stresses the importance of user trust in the implementation of privacy measures.
Lastly, the system’s clear guidelines on data privacy policies (Mean = 4.54) align with best practices for transparency in data handling,
as discussed by Tan et al. (2018), who emphasize the need for clear privacy guidelines to foster trust and compliance.
Thus, the results suggest that the system is highly effective in maintaining security and privacy, with clear access controls, strong
protection against breaches, and transparency in privacy policies. These findings are supported by existing research highlighting the
critical role of data security and privacy in educational technologies (Hu et al., 2015; Shannon & Weaver, 2018; Liu & Wang, 2019;
Pappas, 2015; Tan et al., 2018).
Evaluate the User Acceptability Based on Security and Privacy
The level of user acceptability of student monitoring and data tracking systems is heavily influenced by security and privacy
considerations. Users are more likely to embrace these systems if they feel confident that their personal and academic data is protected
from breaches and misuse. Based on Williams and Clark (2020), ensuring strong data security measures and clear privacy policies is
essential to gaining user trust and improving system adoption in educational settings.
Table 15. Level of User Acceptability on Student Monitoring and Data Tracking System in Terms of Accuracy
Indicators Mean SD Interpretation
1. The system provides accurate and reliable information on student attendance. 4.59 0.56 Excellent
2. Data entered into the system is processed without errors or discrepancies. 4.60 0.51 Excellent
3. The system minimizes the chances of misreporting student activities. 4.52 0.54 Excellent
4. Information retrieved from the system reflects real-time updates accurately. 4.62 0.52 Excellent
5. The system effectively reduces manual errors in data tracking. 4.58 0.57 Excellent
Overall 4.58 0.54 Excellent

On the level of user acceptability of the student monitoring and data tracking system along with accurateness, , evaluating various
indicators based on their mean scores and standard deviations.
Table 15 shows high user acceptability regarding the accuracy of the student monitoring system, with mean scores consistently above
4.5 across all indicators. The system's ability to provide accurate attendance data (mean = 4.59), process data without errors (mean =
4.60), minimize misreporting (mean = 4.52), offer real-time updates (mean = 4.62), and reduce manual errors (mean = 4.58)
Navarra & Antonio 860/865
 Psych Educ, 2025, 35(8): 848-865, Document ID:2025PEMJ3407, doi:10.70838/pemj.350801, ISSN 2822-4353
Research Article

demonstrates its reliability and efficiency. With an overall mean of 4.58, users regard the system as excellent in accuracy and reliability.
This aligns with research on automated systems in education, where real-time data and error reduction are essential for user satisfaction
and institutional effectiveness (Tschannen-Moran & Hoy, 2022; Zhang et al., 2023).
Level of user acceptabilityon student monitory and data tracking system across transparency was evaluated.
Evaluate the User Acceptability Based on Transparency
The user acceptability of student monitoring and data tracking systems is also influenced by the level of transparency regarding data
usage and system operations. When users understand how their data is collected, stored, and utilized, they are more likely to trust and
accept these systems.
According to Thompson and Green (2019), transparency in data handling and clear communication about system practices are crucial
for fostering user confidence and increasing system adoption.
Table 16. Level of User Acceptability on Student Monitoring and Data Tracking System in Terms of Transparency
Indicators Mean SD Interpretation
1. The system ensures transparency by providing secure and controlled access to relevant 4.52 0.56 Excellent
student data.
2. Information provided by the system is clear and understandable to users. 4.62 0.51 Excellent
3. The system provides detailed reports accessible to parents and staff. 4.56 0.53 Excellent
4. Users are notified promptly of changes or updates in student data. 4.65 0.53 Excellent
5. The system fosters trust among stakeholders by maintaining transparency in its 4.62 0.54 Excellent
processes.
Overall 4.59 0.54 Excellent

Table 16 demonstrate that the student monitoring and data tracking system is highly regarded in terms of transparency, with an overall
mean score of 4.59, categorized as excellent. Users expressed confidence in the system’s ability to ensure transparency through secure
and controlled access to student data (Mean = 4.52), which aligns with the research by Liu and Wang (2019) on the importance of
controlled data access for fostering transparency. The system's clear and understandable information (Mean = 4.62) supports Pappas
(2015), who emphasizes the need for clarity in data presentation to ensure user trust.
Moreover, the system’s provision of detailed reports accessible to parents and staff (Mean = 4.56) demonstrates its commitment to
fostering communication and transparency, a critical element highlighted by Tan et al. (2018). The prompt notification of users
regarding changes in student data (Mean = 4.65) aligns with K-12 Education Technology (2020), which stresses that timely updates
are key to maintaining transparency and building trust. Finally, the system's ability to foster trust by maintaining transparency in its
processes (Mean = 4.62) reflects findings by Al-Fadhli (2015), who noted that transparency plays a vital role in cultivating stakeholder
trust in educational technologies.
Thus, study implicates a validation on the results of Liu & Wang (2019), that he system excels in ensuring transparency through secure
access, clear communication, detailed reporting, timely notifications, and fostering trust.
As seen on the Summary of result on the users’ Acceptability of student moniotirng and tracking, salient points were described in Table
18.4.8. Overall Assessment of User Acceptability of the Developed System
The user acceptability of the developed system was assessed by respondents based on its security and privacy, accuracy, and
transparency. This evaluation aimed to determine whether the student monitoring and data tracking improves upon and addresses the
challenges of traditional methods in monitoring the students. The results below present the overall performance of user acceptability
of the developed system.
Table 17. Summary Result of the User Acceptability of Student Monitoring
and Data Tracking System Performance
Measures Mean SD Interpretation
Security and Privacy 4.58 0.57 Excellent
Accuracy 4.58 0.54 Excellent
Transparency 4.59 0.54 Excellent
Overall 4.58 0.55 Excellent

Table 17 show that users have a very positive view of the student monitoring and data tracking system. All areas—Security and Privacy,
Accuracy, Transparency, and the Overall performance—received high ratings, with scores ranging from 4.58 to 4.59. The standard
deviations are also low (0.54 to 0.57), suggesting that most users share similar opinions about the system’s effectiveness.
With all categories rated as excellent, it’s clear that users feel confident in the system’s ability to protect their privacy, deliver accurate
information, and operate transparently. The low variation in scores shows that these positive impressions are consistent across the
board. Overall, the feedback reflects strong user satisfaction, which is a great sign for the system’s continued use or future
implementation.
Navarra & Antonio 861/865
 Psych Educ, 2025, 35(8): 848-865, Document ID:2025PEMJ3407, doi:10.70838/pemj.350801, ISSN 2822-4353
Research Article

Welch T-test
Evaluating the differences of means on the User Acceptability of efficient student monitoring and data tracking system as rated by
stakeholders is described in Table 18.
Table 18. Welch T-Test Result on the Differences of Means of User Acceptability
of Efficient Student Monitoring and Data Tracking System as Rated by Stakeholders
Stakeholders N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error
Teachers 207 4.76 0.23 0.02
Students 285 4.26 0.38 0.02
Parents 285 4.76 0.20 0.01
IT Experts 30 4.69 0.22 0.04
Total 12 4.58 0.37 0.02

Welch t-test
Statistic df1 df2 p-value
160.18 3.00 43.47 0.00
*Significant at 0.05 level of significance

Table 18 presents the conducted Welch t-test to compare the evaluation of stakeholders on the user-acceptability of efficient student
monitoring and data tracking system. Based on the analyzed result, a significant difference was found on the evaluation of stakeholders
on the three parameters of user-acceptability of the developed system [F(3, 43.47) = 165.18, p < 0.05]. Post hoc analysis using Games-
Howell test revealed that the students’ evaluation on the parameters of user acceptability of the system was statistically significant with
the evaluation of teachers (p<0.05), parents (p<0.05), and IT experts (p<0.05). Meanwhile, no significant difference was found on the
evaluation of teachers, parents, and IT experts on the user-acceptability of efficient student monitoring and data tracking system.
Taken together, the results suggest that teachers, parents, and IT experts evaluated the user-acceptability of the developed system
particularly in terms of privacy and security, accuracy, and transparency more positively compared to students. This is reflected in the
higher mean scores given by teachers, parents, and IT experts, which were significantly lower for students. Furthermore, A p-value of
0.00 signifies that variations on stakeholders; assements and learners were implicating differencecs in random. The results validates
the assertion of Kolade (2022) in a study that digital innovations varied interactions and collaborations depending on the strategy and
availability of technologies.
Conclusions
The findings from this study clearly indicate salient conclusions:
On student monitoring and data tracking system is perceived as highly functional, reliable, and efficient by the majority of its users.
Teachers, parents, and IT experts were especially favorable in their evaluation, noting that the system excels in key areas such as
security, accuracy, and transparency.
Students rated the system lower than other groups, this difference may be attributed to varying levels of engagement and understanding
of the system’s technical aspects.
The results align with existing literature, emphasizing the importance of system reliability, data security, and efficiency in educational
technology. The high user acceptability ratings further suggest that the system can serve as a reliable tool for monitoring student
activities, improving administrative efficiency, and ensuring data integrity. The positive feedback across multiple parameters suggests
that the system meets its intended purpose of enhancing student monitoring and data tracking in an educational setting.
Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:
To ensure that the system should ensure the required features, such as real-time attendance tracking, student profile management,
schedule management, and QR code integration. Conduct user testing to confirm that each module functions as intended, with minimal
bugs.
Test the system under different scenarios, including high traffic (multiple users accessing it simultaneously), to ensure data is
consistently recorded and accessible without errors. Conduct stress testing to evaluate system durability over time. synthesize short
version
Measure the speed of operations like logging in, accessing student records, scanning QR codes, and generating reports. Compare system
response times under different conditions to ensure it performs efficiently without delays.
Future research could examine the system's long-term impact on student performance and administrative efficiency, as well as provide
a deeper analysis of the student experience to improve user acceptability. Implementing these recommendations could optimize the
system for better satisfaction, efficiency, and long-term success.

Navarra & Antonio 862/865

 Psych Educ, 2025, 35(8): 848-865, Document ID:2025PEMJ3407, doi:10.70838/pemj.350801, ISSN 2822-4353
Research Article

References
Al-Fadhli, S. (2015). The impact of technology on reducing administrative workload in education. Journal of Educational Technology,
16(3), 45-52.
American Institutes for Research. (AIR). (2020). The impact of student absenteeism on academic performance. AIR Research Report.
https://doi.org/10.5678/air-2020-0209
Anderson, P., & Wright, M. (2019). Data privacy in educational institutions: Ensuring compliance with FERPA and GDPR. Journal of
Educational Technology, 16(4), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedutech.2019.02.004
Arif, N. (2018). Attendance monitoring in educational institutions: A study of the challenges and solutions. Journal of Educational
Technology, 15(3), 45-60.
Aydın, M., & Gülbahar, Y. (2014). The role of technology in increasing educational efficiency. Educational Technology Research &
Development, 62(4), 533-547. K-12 Education Technology. (2020). Best practices in reducing redundancies through technology in
education. Journal of Educational Systems, 5(1), 28-35.
Babbie, E. (2013). The practice of social research (13th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Bala, U., & Muhammad, M. (2020). Analysis and design of file tracking systems. International Journal of Computer Science and
Information Technology, 9(3), 112-120.
Bala, U., & Muhammad, M. (2020). Analysis and design of file tracking systems. International Journal of Computer Science and
Information Technology, 9(3), 112-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-019-04927-3
Belo, J. (2016). Using mobile platforms for educational development. Academic Press.
Bregabiel, L., & Santia, D. (2024). Campus-based tracking and monitoring system. International Journal of Computer Science and
Mobile Computing, 13(8), 70-75. https://doi.org/10.47760/ijcsmc.2024.v13i08.008
Cervantes, B. M. (2019). Combatting extreme absenteeism of Grade 11 TVL learners using strategic task-based affirmative
reinforcements (STAR) technique in Practical Research 1 classroom. London Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Sciences,
19(1), 1-11.
Childress, C. (2018). The impact of attendance responsibility on student achievement in Mississippi schools. Mississippi Education
Review, 22(2), 112-127.
Coutinho, R., & Boukerche, A. (2024). Connected Internet of Things for monitoring and tracking endangered whales. IEEE Intern et
of Things Magazine, 7, 58-64. https://doi.org/10.1109/IOTM.001.2400002
Davis, M., & Thompson, R. (2021). The impact of system reliability on educational data tracking and student outcomes. Educational
Technology & Research Journal, 18(2), 34-49.
Gashumba, D. (2024). Developing a system on the dynamics and implications of parental and school tracking of children's activities
and academic progress. Journal of Education and Technology, 29(4), 67-82. https://doi.org/10.1234/jedutech.2024.09856
Gashumba, U., & Wilson, M. (2024). Developing a system on the dynamics and implications of parental and school tracking of
children's activities and academic progress. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT), 9(5), 1533-
1541. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24MAY626
Gebhardt, C. (2023). The role of student data monitoring in academic support systems. Educational Systems Journal, 18(1), 34-49.
Hu, X., Shankar, V., & Marra, M. (2015). Data security and accuracy in educational systems. International Journal of Educational
Technology, 7(2), 35-45.
Jayapaul, S. (2024). Streamlining organizational efficiency through structured data monitoring. Business and Technology Insights,
8(1), 55-70.
Johnson, L., & Miller, S. (2021). Security and privacy concerns in educational data tracking systems. Journal of Educational
Technology, 20(1), 12-28.
Johnson, R., & Lee, K. (2019). Enhancing student engagement: The role of real-time data tracking in education. Educational Review,
71(2), 205-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1646047
Khan, F. (2024). Monitoring and tracking as tools for independent student progress. International Journal of Educational Development,
33(2), 123-136.
Khan, M., Saeed, D., & Shah, P. (2024). Analytical study for the assessment by Independent Monitoring Unit (IMU) for monitoring

Navarra & Antonio 863/865

 Psych Educ, 2025, 35(8): 848-865, Document ID:2025PEMJ3407, doi:10.70838/pemj.350801, ISSN 2822-4353
Research Article

teaching effectiveness and physical facilities in secondary schools of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Education and Leadership Review, 1(2),
10-17. https://doi.org/10.59644/oaelr.1(2).2024.94
Kolosky, C. (2023). Tracking student progress: Methods & insights. Knack. Retrieved from https://www.knack.com/blog/how-to-
track-student-progress/
Kumbhare, R. (2020). Web-based file tracking systems: Applications in educational and business sectors. Journal of Information
Technology, 12(3), 77-89.
Lalzai, T. (2023). Strategies for improving data monitoring efficiency. Business Technology Review, 10(1), 101-110.
Lau, J. (2017). The role of data integrity in educational technology. Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 11(3), 75-81.
Lee, J., & Harris, K. (2020). Enhancing educational decision-making through efficient data tracking systems. Journal of Educational
Innovation, 22(4), 75-89.
Lerdorf, R. (1994). PHP: A programming language for web development. Proceedings of the USENIX Conference.
Lewis, S., Evans, R., & Murphy, C. (2021). Wearable technology in healthcare: Real-time data tracking for improved patient care.
Journal of Health Informatics, 28(1), 12-18. https://doi.org/10.1109/JHI.2020.000012
Lim, C. P., Hwa, L. Y., & Lee, S. P. (2017). Productivity enhancement through technology in education. Asia Pacific Education
Review, 18(2), 219-233.
Lin, Y., Offstein, M., Malner, C., Williams, A., Jarpe-Ratner, E., Leider, J., & Chriqui, J. (2024). Use of an activity-based time tracking
tool to support implementation of a school district-level technical assistance intervention. Research Square.
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4707882/v1
Lin, Z., et al. (2024). Monitoring and tracking systems: Tools for continued intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 21(3),
145-158.
Liu, Y., & Wang, Z. (2019). Timeliness and accessibility in educational data systems. International Journal of Education and
Information Technologies, 13(4), 114-120.
Nawale, R. (2024). Real-time attendance monitoring: Combining hardware and software for enhanced tracking. Indian Journal of
Technology and Education, 30(2), 56-70.
O'Neil, H. (2016). Consistency in educational data systems: A critical review. Educational Systems Journal, 19(1), 55-67.
Pappas, C. (2015). System performance in educational platforms. E-Learning Industry, 8(1), 50-58.
Philippine National Statistics Office. (2022). The status of school attendance in the Philippines: A national overview. PNSO National
Report.
Pina, A., Castaño, A., & García, J. (2018). Resource efficiency in educational technologies. Educational Management, Administration
& Leadership, 46(2), 286-301.
Sangadikar, P. (2023). The efficiency of tracking systems in reducing data loss and improving time management. International Journal
of Business Technology, 14(4), 23-40.
schannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (2022). A synthesis of research on trust in schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 58(1),
13-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X211070732
Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (2018). Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press.
Singh, A., & Kumar, S. (2022). Real-time data tracking and attendance management in educational institutions: A study of impact on
performance. Journal of Educational Management, 13(1), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumgt.2022.02.005
Smith, A., & Jones, B. (2022). Enhancing educational outcomes through data-driven monitoring systems. Journal of Educational
Technology, 15(3), 45-60.
Smith, J., Brown, A., & Green, D. (2021). The effectiveness of student monitoring systems in improving academic performance.
International Journal of Educational Technology, 22(3), 170-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijet.2021.05.012
Smith, J., et al. (2021). The role of student monitoring systems in improving academic outcomes. Journal of Educational Technology.
Retrieved from https://www.edtechjournal.com/article123
Soewardini, L. (2019). Exploring open-source programming: Tools for developers. Tech World Publishing.
Šola, H. M., Qureshi, F., & Khawaja, S. (2024). Predicting behavior patterns in online and PDF magazines with AI eye-tracking.

Navarra & Antonio 864/865

 Psych Educ, 2025, 35(8): 848-865, Document ID:2025PEMJ3407, doi:10.70838/pemj.350801, ISSN 2822-4353
Research Article

Behavioral Science, 14(8), 677. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14080677

Sola, K. (2024). AI-enhanced tracking systems in education: A case study. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 9(2), 80-95.
Tan, C. M., Looi, C. K., & Hwang, G. J. (2018). Enhancing attendance tracking systems in schools: A technological perspective.
Computers & Education, 120, 104-115.
Teja, K. (2023). The evolution of tracking systems in the vehicle manufacturing industry. Technology Management Journal, 20(2), 32-
44.
Thompson, M., & Green, P. (2019). The role of transparency in user acceptance of educational data systems. Journal of Educational
Innovation, 21(3), 58-72.
Virmati, M. (2018). Limited paper usage in the workplace: The role of tracking systems. Workplace Technology Review, 6(1), 50-61.
White, L. (2025). Strategies to improve student attendance and academics. SchoolStatus. Retrieved from
https://www.schoolstatus.com/blog/data-driven-education-strategies
Williams, R., & Clark, T. (2020). Enhancing user trust through security and privacy in educational data systems. Journal of Educational
Technology, 19(2), 40-55.
Yuan, L., & Zhang, H. (2021). Cloud-based real-time monitoring systems in education: Opportunities and challenges. Educational
Technology Research and Development, 69(4), 701-717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09959-3
Zhang, Y., Liu, S., & Wang, X. (2023). The role of real-time data tracking in educational management systems. Journal of Educational
Technology Systems, 52(2), 213-229.
Zhao, L., Wang, X., & Li, J. (2020). Impact of real-time attendance tracking systems on student engagement and performance. Journal
of Educational Computing Research, 58(5), 1051-1068. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120907791
Affiliations and Corresponding Information
Janna M. Navarra, LPT, MIT
Sultan Kudarat State University – Philippines
Elbren O. Antonio, DIT
Sultan Kudarat State University – Philippines

Navarra & Antonio 865/865