The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries

between 2003 and 2008.Summarise the information by selecting and

reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The graphs indicate 4 different countries, namely India,Sweden,Morocco, and

Vietnam product 3 types of sources of electricity including fossil fuel, hydro, and
nuclear power from 2003 to 2008.
Overall, it is obvious that while India and Sweden product 3 different electricity,
hydro and nuclear power was product by Morocco and Vietnam.In additionally,
hydro power was used in Sweden and Morocco larger than in the others countries,
which used amount of fossil fuel.
Regarding to India and Sweden.Fossil fuel took up 82% and was highest in India but
that in Sweden was lowest with 4 percent.Moreover, Sweden using hydro power
accounting for 52% was 4 time higher than that in the other. Furthermore, the
percent of nuclear power in India was 11 time lower than that in Sweden.
Turning to Morocco and Vietnam. In morocco while the proportion of hydro power
consisting of 95% was highest, nuclear power which was product, was lowest with 5
percent. Additionally, the sources of electricity product by Vietnam was hydro and
nuclear power, constituting 44% and 56% respectively.
The charts detail the proportion of Australian secondary school graduates
who were unemployed, employed or further education in 1980, 1990, and
2000.

The graphs indicate the percentage of students who

graduated at secondary school in Australia were out of job,
employed or higher education in 3 different years.
Overall,it is obvious that while Australian students who were
employed experienced an upward trend, the opposite trend
was true for people continued further education over the
years given.
Regarding to during first 10-year, students in Australia saw
an slow increase by 2% from 10 percent to 12 percent. In
1980, people who pursued further education was the highest
accounting for a half of 100%. In additional,the rate of
employed dramatically rose by 10% between 1980 and
1990.
C1 1980, pp further education was highest
Employed có 1 sự tăng mạnh là 10%

Turning to the last years given,the proportion of further

education and unemployed was witnessed a slight increase in
the last decade given, 1% and 4% respectively.Whereas in
2000 these people hit the lowest point of 8% and 37%,
employed was the highest taking up 55%
Body 2 1990-2000
Further+ unemployed giảm nhẹ, lần lượt là…
While In 2000 unemployed and further là thấp nhất vs 8% và
37%, employed là highest 55%
The provided charts illustrate the proportions of Australian secondary school graduates who were employed,
unemployed, or pursuing further education in 1980, 1990, and 2000.
Overall, a clear upward trend is evident in the percentage of employed graduates, while the proportion of those
continuing their education decreased over the three decades. Conversely, unemployment fluctuated, showing a slight
increase in the final decade.

In 1980, a significant majority (50%) of graduates entered further education. Employment stood at 10%, while
unemployment accounted for 40%. Over the following decade, the employment rate saw a substantial rise to 20%, a
10% increase. Simultaneously, the percentage of graduates in further education experienced a slight decline to 48%,
and unemployment fell to 32%.

By 2000, the trend continued. The proportion of employed graduates reached its peak at 55%, a substantial increase
from previous years. In contrast, the percentage of graduates entering further education decreased slightly to 38%,
while unemployment, after a period of decline, rose to 37%. These figures represent the lowest point for further
education and the highest point for employment during the period shown.

The three charts present the distribution of Australian secondary school graduates across three employment
categories – employment, further education, and unemployment – for the years 1980, 1990, and 2000.

The data reveals a significant shift in the career paths of secondary school graduates over the two decades.
Employment among graduates experienced a marked increase, while the proportion choosing further education
showed a corresponding decrease. Unemployment rates fluctuated, experiencing a rise in the final decade.

In 1980, further education was the most popular option, with 50% of graduates pursuing tertiary studies.
Employment stood at a considerably lower 10%, and a substantial 40% were unemployed. By 1990, the employment
rate had doubled to 20%, demonstrating a strong upward trend. The proportion of graduates continuing their
education slightly decreased to 48%, while unemployment fell to 32%. This suggests a growing preference for
immediate employment.

The final decade witnessed further changes. By 2000, the percentage of employed graduates had climbed to a
dominant 55%, representing the highest figure across all years. Further education, while still a popular choice,
declined to 38%, indicating a continued shift towards direct entry into the workforce. Unemployment increased to
37%, representing a slight uptick from the previous decade, but remaining significantly lower than the 40% recorded
in 1980.
 The charts show the main methods of transport of people
travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009.
Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the
main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The graphs indicate the main ways for commuters to go to a

university in the years 2004 and 2009.

Overall,it is obvious that whereas walking and car using for

commuting university experienced an upward trend,the opposite
trend was true for the others over the period given. The percentage
of car and bus reached a peak but the others for walking and train
were the lowest.

In terms of car and bus,while going to university by bus witnessed

a significant growth from 33% in 2004 to 46% in 2009,the
proportion of car dipped by 23% in 5 years from 51%.Furthermore,
the year 2004 was in the first place taking up over half in the rate
of car but this rank was placed by bus in 2009 comprising 46
percentage.

Turning to the other transports,there was a slight increase in the

proportion of train and walking, accounted for 1% and 2%
respectively between 2004 and 2009.Additionally, the lowest rank
was train that was used 3% in 2004 and 4% in 2009.However,a
moderate rise the percentage of bike from 9% in 2004 to 16% in
2009.

1.

Error: Overall,it is obvious that whereas walking and car using for commuting university
experienced an upward trend,the opposite was true for the others over the period given.
Correction: Overall, it is obvious that whereas walking and car usage for commuting to the
university experienced an upward trend, the opposite was true for the others over the given
period.
Explanation: There were several issues in this sentence. First, "car using" should be "car
usage" to correctly use the noun form. Second, "commuting university" should be
"commuting to the university" to clarify the relationship between commuting and the
university. Lastly, there should be a space after "Overall," and "given" should be placed after
"the" for better flow.

2.
3.

Error: The percentage of car and bus reached a peak but the others for walking and train
were the lowest.
Correction: The percentages of car and bus reached a peak, but those for walking and train
were the lowest.
Explanation: "The percentage of car and bus" should be "The percentages of car and bus"
because we are referring to two different modes of transport. Additionally, "the others for
walking and train" is awkward; "those for walking and train" is clearer. A comma is also
needed before "but" to separate the two independent clauses.

4.
5.

Error: In term of car and bus,while going to university by bus witnessed a significant growth
from 33% in 2004 to 46% in 2009,the proportion of car dipped by 23% in 5 years from 51%.
Correction: In terms of car and bus, while going to university by bus witnessed significant
growth from 33% in 2004 to 46% in 2009, the proportion of cars dipped by 23% over 5 years
from 51%.
Explanation: The phrase shouldbe "In terms of" (plural) rather than "In term of." The phrase
"a significant growth" should be simplified to "significant growth" because "growth" is an
uncountable noun. Additionally, "the proportion of car" should be "the proportion of cars" to
match the plural subject. Finally, "in 5 years" is better expressed as "over 5 years" for clarity.

6.
7.

Error: Furthermore, the year 2004 was in the first place taking up over a half in the rate of
car but this rank was placed by bus in 2009 comprising 46 percentage.
Correction: Furthermore, in 2004, the car was in first place, accounting for over half of the
rate, but this rank was taken by the bus in 2009, comprising 46 percent.
Explanation: The phrase "the year 2004 was in the first place taking up over a half in the
rate of car" is awkward and should be rephrased for clarity. "Taking up" should be replaced
with "accounting for," and "the rate of car" should be "the rate of cars." "46 percentage" is
incorrect; it should be "46 percent," as "percent" is the correct term.

8.
9.

Error: Turning to the other transports,there was a slight increase in the proportion of train
and walking, accounted for 1% and 2% respectively between 2004 and 2009.
Correction: Turning to the other modes of transport, there was a slight increase in the
proportions of train and walking, accounting for 1% and 2%, respectively, between 2004 and
2009.
Explanation: "Transports" should be "modes of transport" for correct terminology. The
phrase "accounted for" should be "accounting for" to maintain parallel structure. Additionally,
commas should be added for clarity, particularly before "respectively" and after "2%."

10.
11.

Error: Additionally, the lowest rank was train that was used 3% in 2004 and 4% in 2009.
Correction: Additionally, the lowest rank was for the train, which was used by 3% in 2004
and 4% in 2009.
Explanation: The phrase "the lowest rank was train" should be "the lowest rank was for the
train" to clarify the subject. The clause "that was used 3% in 2004 and 4% in 2009" is
 awkward; it should be rephrased to "which was used by 3% in 2004 and 4% in 2009" for
clarity and grammatical correctness.

12.
13.

Error: However,a moderate rise the percentage of bike from 9% in 2004 to 16% in 2009.
Correction: However, there was a moderate rise in the percentage of bikes from 9% in 2004
to 16% in 2009.
Explanation: The original sentence is missing a verb. "There was" should be added to
indicate the subject of the sentence. Additionally, "the percentage of bike" should be "the
percentage of bikes" to use the correct plural form.

14.

SUA

The graphs indicate the main methods of transport used by commuters traveling to a university in the
years 2004 and 2009. Overall, it is evident that while walking and car usage for commuting to the
university experienced an upward trend, the opposite was true for the other modes of transport over
the given period. The percentages for cars and buses reached a peak, while walking and train usage
remained the lowest.

In terms of cars and buses, commuting to the university by bus witnessed a significant increase from
33% in 2004 to 46% in 2009. Conversely, the proportion of car usage decreased by 23% over the five
years, dropping from 51%. Furthermore, in 2004, cars held the top position, accounting for over half of
the commuting methods, but this ranking was overtaken by buses in 2009, which comprised 46%.

Turning to the other modes of transport, there was a slight increase in the proportions of train and
walking, which accounted for 1% and 2% respectively between 2004 and 2009. Additionally, train
usage remained the lowest, with 3% in 2004 and rising to 4% in 2009. However, there was a moderate
rise in the percentage of bike usage, increasing from 9% in 2004 to 16% in 2009.
 The pie charts indicate changes in the proportions of energy produced in
a country from 1983 to 2003.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features,

and make comparison

The graphs illustrate the percentages of energy produced, namely…….

change in one country between 1983 and 2003.
Overall, it is obvious that
The charts below show the proportion of people’s total spending in a
particular European country was spent on different commodities and
services in 1958 and in 2008

The graphs indicate the percentage of individual’s total using a particular European
country was spent on 6 separate categories in 2 years 1958 and 2008.