Heinz 2007
Heinz 2007
(1) Net income in Fiscal Year 2007 includes a loss from discontinued operations of $5.9 million.
See Management’s Discussion and Analysis for details.
HEINZ’S FISCAL 2008
SALES WERE
THE HIGHEST
William R. Johnson
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer IN OUR HISTORY.
1
Performance Against Superior Value and Growth Plan
Organic Sales(1)(2) +6% ✓✓ Trade Spending -170BP(3) ✓✓ Op. Free Cash Flow(4) $1,774MM ✓✓
Emerging Markets Sales(1) +20% ✓✓ COGS Productivity $425MM ✓✓ CCC -7 Days ✓✓
Consumer Marketing +19% ✓✓ Plant Exits 20 ✓ Net Share Repurchases $1,003MM ✓
R&D +18% ✓✓ SG&A Productivity $120MM ✓✓ Dividend Per Share +12.5% ✓✓
(1) Adjusted for approximate impact of one percent for the extra week in FY06.
(2) Volume plus net price increases.
(3) Basis Points.
(4) Cash from operations less capital expenditures net of proceeds from disposal of PP&E.
Note: All percentage changes represent two-year Compound Annual Growth Rates (CAGRs). All financial information within this section reflects continuing operations, excluding special items.
Fiscal 2008 marked the conclusion of our two-year Superior a segment that declining consumer
sentiment. However,
Value and Growth Plan, which we announced in June 2006.
is growing at several significant
I am pleased to report that we met or exceeded virtually
every target for growth and productivity in our ambitious plan.
nearly twice the countervailing forces
exist today, including
We introduced hundreds of new products while increasing our industry rate. rapid growth in
investment in R&D and marketing by 39 percent and 42 per- Emerging Markets and
cent respectively over the two years. We fueled these invest- the accelerating consumer interest in higher-margin Health
ments with nearly $550 million in productivity savings made and Wellness foods.
possible by our tighter brand and category focus.
More consumers are opting for healthier lifestyles and are
The capstone of this plan was achieving the No. 1 position looking to food to help them achieve their goal. Our portfolio
in Total Shareholder Return versus our peer group for the is well suited to the opportunity, given our infant/nutrition and
two-year period. (See chart on inside front cover.) weight management capabilities, in addition to our leading
positions in tomato-based foods, beans, soups, and other
During this time, Heinz generated nearly $1.8 billion in operat-
inherently healthy products.
ing free cash flow, most of which we returned to shareholders
through the repurchase of more than $1 billion of our shares In the crucial area of infant/nutrition, we possess two leading
and a 27 percent increase in our dividend. In fact, since Fiscal brands — Heinz® and Plasmon® — and we are building
2003, we have returned in excess of $6.5 billion to our own- increased global R&D capabilities in this category with an
ers. Our approximately 60 percent dividend payout ratio, expanded R&D Center of Excellence in Milan, Italy.
meanwhile, remains among the highest in the Consumer
We are meeting consumer demand for great tasting and
Packaged Goods industry.
convenient nutritional meals with our Weight Watchers® Smart
HEINZ IS AT THE LEADING EDGE OF CONSUMER Ones® and Weight Watchers® from Heinz® branded products in
TRENDS TO DRIVE FUTURE GROWTH North America, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand. These
This is a time of significant challenge — and even greater two brands generate nearly $800 million in sales and are
opportunity — for the food industry. among the Company’s fastest growing equities.
Sales KC&S (B) Meals & Snacks (B) Infant/Nutrition (B) Sales $6.9B
8.5% $4.1 9.0% $4.5 13.3% $1.1
CAGR(1) CAGR(1) CAGR(1) $5.6B
Non-Core=30% $3.5 $3.9
$0.9
Core=70%
Pre-Del Monte
Spin-Off
Non-Core=4%
Core=96% FY06 FY08
FY06 FY08 FY06 FY08 FY06 FY08 (1) Adjusted for approximate
impact of one percent for
(1) Adjusted for approximate impact of one percent for the extra week in FYO6. the extra week in FY06.
Ninety-six percent of Heinz’s sales are now within its core categories of Ketchup and Sauces, Meals and Snacks, and
Infant/Nutrition. A tighter category focus has paid off as Heinz has reinvested against its leading brands to drive faster growth.
3
Heinz’s acquisition search is biased toward businesses that have a strong Health and Wellness platform. The acquisition
of Renée’s Gourmet, Canada’s leading maker of chilled dressings and toppings, is an excellent example of this
approach. Renée’s portfolio includes a line of Wellness dressings with reduced fat and fewer calories.
F O C U S O N C O N S U M E R N E E D S
Heinz classifies its Health and Wellness initiatives into four categories
based on how consumers view healthy food options:
Heinz Heritage progress here. Our U.S. Foodservice business, for example,
is developing reduced fat, salt, and sugar varieties of many
Our Health and Wellness strategy has been guided by an duction of Morning Express™, a line of on-the-go calorie-
internal model focused on food ingredients and our strong controlled breakfast sandwiches. The menu is also expanding
foundation of nutrient-rich potatoes, tomatoes, and beans. for Weight Watchers® from Heinz® in Europe, Australia, and
Through the work of the Heinz Health and Wellness Task New Zealand, with entries into new categories like soups,
Force established last year, the Company has evolved to a salad dressings, and desserts.
consumer-directed model built around four basic platforms: Our Health Management capabilities are focused today
Lifestyle, Children’s Nutrition, Weight Management, and in our Italian business under the Aproten® and Biaglut®
Health Management. brands, which address needs for gluten-free and low-
Through this approach, each of our major business units is protein products.
responding to Health and Wellness consumer needs within We expect to have many new things to report next year
their respective markets to add value for consumers. in our quest to deliver great tasting foods to consumers
that are also good for them.
5
Rapid Economic Growth Increasing Heinz Impact
GDP Growth (%) Key Emerging Markets GDP Growth (%) % of Company % of Company
11.8% Sales Sales Growth
10.5% 20%
10.2% 9.9% 9.3%
7.3%
6.3% 15%
13%
3.7%
~1 /4 ~1 /3
Average Average China Russia Indonesia India Poland L.America
Developed* Emerging 12.4% 14.6% 15.1% 12.8% 6.7% 11.7%
Packaged food per capita growth
FY08 FY10* FY13*
*U.S., Canada, UK, France, Italy, Germany, Spain, Australia, New Zealand, Japan *Target FY06-08 FY08-10E
Source: World Bank; IMF data from Euromonitor; Euromonitor
Economies in Heinz’s Emerging Markets are growing at Accelerating growth in Emerging Markets is resulting in a
nearly triple the rate of developed markets, with corre- rapid increase in their share of Heinz’s total sales and
sponding increases in the growth rate of packaged food. sales growth.
In India, our Complan® nutritional beverage brand had been (1) Adjusted for approximate impact of two percent for the extra week in FY06 and one less week in FY07.
growing modestly for several years until we began an ad Heinz has grown sales 40 percent in its Emerging Markets
campaign in Fiscal 2005 emphasizing Complan’s milk over the past two years. The introduction of Heinz business
processes, meanwhile, has led to double-digit operating
protein and other nutrients and their effect on the growth margins not far below the Company average.
of children. This has resulted in double-digit growth in each
For example, we have recently launched a range of Long
year since the campaign began.
Fong®-branded sauces in China, and in Indonesia, we are
THE BEST IS YET TO COME supplementing strong growth in our core ABC®-branded soy
While we are growing rapidly in these sauce and beverage businesses with new cooking pastes.
markets, we are only beginning to tap their We will also consider entering select new markets, given
full potential. We intend to continue investing our proven ability to iden-
for growth by expanding our strong brand tify, execute, and grow joint
equities into new categories. ventures and acquisitions
in the developing world.
7
Heinz eliminated more than 13 million pounds of
trans fat from its Ore-Ida® product line in Fiscal
2008 and continues to grow the brand with
exciting new innovations that expand beyond
fries, including new Steam n’ Mash™ potatoes.
$7.6
$269
9
Heinz Europe has launched a campaign heralding Heinz’s
tomato heritage under the slogan “Grown, Not Made.™”
The campaign includes a new clear bottle and label featuring
a red, ripe tomato on the vine. Although it is hard to
improve on perfection, the Heinz Europe team also
leveraged the Company’s tomato expertise to improve the
European ketchup recipe for an even thicker, richer flavor.
Grown, Not Made that meets the Company’s rigorous quality standards, while
improving the livelihood of farmers in these nations and
introducing sustainable farming methods.
H. J. Heinz played a pivotal role in introducing the tomato
Heinz also continues to fund studies
into the daily lives of Americans when he debuted his
into the health benefits of processed
recipe for tomato ketchup in 1876. Today, Heinz ketchup
tomatoes, which contain concentrated
is found in homes and on restaurant tables from
levels of Lycopene, a
Minneapolis to Moscow to Mumbai.
powerful antioxidant.
With products ranging from Classico® pasta sauces, to
Heinz® Cream of Tomato Soup (the UK’s biggest soup
brand), to supplying custom-made tomato sauces for
restaurants and pizzerias, Heinz continues to market
foods featuring all-natural tomato goodness.
Building a For example, with the launch of the new clear plastic
top-down ketchup bottle in Europe, we have reduced total
package weight by about nine percent, or roughly 340 tons
Sustainable Future of plastic per year.
Cogeneration in California
A one mega-watt natural gas-fired generator was
recently installed in a Heinz plant in California.
The energy-efficient generator not only produces
electrical power, but the thermal exhaust is used
to heat water for factory processes.
H. J. HEINZ COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
PENNSYLVANIA 25-0542520
(State of Incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
One PPG Place 15222
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive offices)
412-456-5700
(Registrant’s telephone number)
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:
Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $.25 per share The New York Stock Exchange
Third Cumulative Preferred Stock,
$1.70 First Series, par value $10 per share The New York Stock Exchange
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:
None.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes ¥ No n
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of
the Act. Yes n No ¥
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes ¥ No n
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained
herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¥
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer ¥ Accelerated filer n Non-accelerated filer n Smaller reporting company n
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell Company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes n No ¥
As of October 31, 2007 the aggregate market value of the Registrant’s voting stock held by non-affiliates of the
Registrant was approximately $14.2 billion.
The number of shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock, par value $.25 per share, outstanding as of May 31,
2008, was 312,559,006 shares.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on August 13,
2008, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the
Registrant’s fiscal year ended April 30, 2008, are incorporated into Part III, Items 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14.
Item 1. Business.
H. J. Heinz Company was incorporated in Pennsylvania on July 27, 1900. In 1905, it succeeded
to the business of a partnership operating under the same name which had developed from a food
business founded in 1869 in Sharpsburg, Pennsylvania by Henry J. Heinz. H. J. Heinz Company and
its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) manufacture and market an extensive line of food
products throughout the world. The Company’s principal products include ketchup, condiments and
sauces, frozen food, soups, beans and pasta meals, infant nutrition and other processed food products.
The Company’s products are manufactured and packaged to provide safe, wholesome foods for
consumers, as well as foodservice and institutional customers. Many products are prepared from
recipes developed in the Company’s research laboratories and experimental kitchens. Ingredients
are carefully selected, inspected and passed on to modern factory kitchens where they are processed,
after which the intermediate product is filled automatically into containers of glass, metal, plastic,
paper or fiberboard, which are then sealed. Products are processed by sterilization, blending,
fermentation, pasteurization, homogenization, chilling, freezing, pickling, drying, freeze drying,
baking or extruding, then labeled and cased for market. Quality assurance procedures are designed
for each product and process and applied to ensure quality and compliance with applicable laws.
The Company manufactures and contracts for the manufacture of its products from a wide
variety of raw foods. Pre-season contracts are made with farmers for a portion of raw materials such
as tomatoes, cucumbers, potatoes, onions and some other fruits and vegetables. Dairy products, meat,
sugar and other sweeteners including high fructose corn syrup, spices, flour and certain other fruits
and vegetables are purchased from approved suppliers.
The following table lists the number of the Company’s principal food processing factories and
major trademarks by region:
Factories
Owned Leased Major Owned and Licensed Trademarks
North America 22 4 Heinz, Classico, Quality Chef Foods, Jack Daniel’s*, Catelli,
Wyler’s, Heinz Bell ’Orto, Bella Rossa, Chef Francisco,
Dianne’s, Ore-Ida, Tater Tots, Bagel Bites, Weight Watchers*
Smart Ones, Boston Market*, Poppers, T.G.I. Friday’s*,
Delimex, Truesoups, Alden Merrell, Escalon, PPI, Todd’s,
Appetizers And, Inc., Nancy’s, Lea & Perrins, Renee’s Gourmet,
HP, Diana, Bravo
Europe 21 — Heinz, Orlando, Karvan Cevitam, Brinta, Roosvicee, Venz,
Weight Watchers*, Farley’s, Farex, Sonnen Bassermann,
Plasmon, Nipiol, Dieterba, Bi-Aglut, Aproten, Pudliszki, Ross,
Honig, De Ruijter, Aunt Bessie*, Mum’s Own, Moya Semya,
Picador, Derevenskoye, Mechta Hoziajki, Lea & Perrins, HP,
Amoy*, Daddies, Squeezme!, Wyko
Asia/Pacific 17 2 Heinz, Tom Piper, Wattie’s, ABC, Chef, Craig’s, Bruno, Winna,
Hellaby, Hamper, Farley’s, Greenseas, Gourmet, Nurture,
LongFong, Ore-Ida, SinSin, Lea & Perrins, HP, Star-Kist,
Classico, Weight Watchers*, Pataks*, Cottee’s*, Rose’s*,
Complan, Glucon D, Nycil
Rest of World 5 3 Heinz, Wellington’s, Today, Mama’s, John West, Farley’s,
Dieterba, HP, Lea & Perrins, Classico, Banquete
65 9 * Used under license
The Company also owns or leases office space, warehouses, distribution centers and research and
other facilities throughout the world. The Company’s food processing factories and principal prop-
erties are in good condition and are satisfactory for the purposes for which they are being utilized.
Competitive product and pricing pressures in the food industry could adversely affect
the Company’s ability to gain or maintain market share.
The Company operates in the highly competitive food industry across its product lines competing
with other companies that have varying abilities to withstand changing market conditions. Any
significant change in the Company’s relationship with a major customer, including changes in
product prices, sales volume, or contractual terms may impact financial results. Such changes
may result because the Company’s competitors may have substantial financial, marketing, and other
resources that may change the competitive environment. Such competition could cause the Company
to reduce prices and/or increase capital, marketing, and other expenditures, or could result in the loss
of category share. Such changes could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s net income.
As the retail grocery trade continues to consolidate, the larger retail customers of the Company could
seek to use their positions to improve their profitability through lower pricing and increased
promotional programs. If the Company is unable to use its scale, marketing expertise, product
innovation, and category leadership positions to respond to these changes, its profitability and
volume growth could be impacted in a materially adverse way.
Increases in the cost and restrictions on the availability of raw materials could
adversely affect our financial results.
The Company sources raw materials including agricultural commodities such as tomatoes,
cucumbers, potatoes, onions, other fruits and vegetables, dairy products, meat, sugar and other
sweeteners, including high fructose corn syrup, spices, and flour, as well as packaging materials such
Higher energy costs and other factors affecting the cost of producing, transporting,
and distributing the Company’s products could adversely affect our financial results.
Rising fuel and energy costs may have a significant impact on the cost of operations, including
the manufacture, transportation, and distribution of products. Fuel costs may fluctuate due to a
number of factors outside the control of the Company, including government policy and regulation
and weather conditions. Additionally, the Company may be unable to maintain favorable arrange-
ments with respect to the costs of procuring raw materials, packaging, services, and transporting
products, which could result in increased expenses and negatively affect operations. If the Company
is unable to hedge against such increases or raise the prices of its products to offset the changes, its
results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
The impact of various food safety issues, environmental, legal, tax, and other regulations
and related developments could adversely affect the Company’s sales and profitability.
The Company is subject to numerous food safety and other laws and regulations regarding the
manufacturing, marketing, and distribution of food products. These regulations govern matters such
as ingredients, advertising, taxation, relations with distributors and retailers, health and safety
matters, and environmental concerns. The ineffectiveness of the Company’s planning and policies
with respect to these matters, and the need to comply with new or revised laws or regulations with
regard to licensing requirements, trade and pricing practices, environmental permitting, or other
food or safety matters, or new interpretations or enforcement of existing laws and regulations, may
have a material adverse effect on the Company’s sales and profitability. Avian flu or other pandemics
could disrupt production of the Company’s products, reduce demand for certain of the Company’s
The need for and effect of product recalls could have an adverse impact on the
Company’s business.
If any of the Company’s products become misbranded or adulterated, the Company may need to
conduct a product recall. The scope of such a recall could result in significant costs incurred as a result
of the recall, potential destruction of inventory, and lost sales. Should consumption of any product
cause injury, the Company may be liable for monetary damages as a result of a judgment against it. A
significant product recall or product liability case could cause a loss of consumer confidence in the
Company’s food products and could have a material adverse effect on the value of its brands and
results of operations.
The failure of new product or packaging introductions to gain trade and consumer
acceptance and changes in consumer preferences could adversely affect our sales.
The success of the Company is dependent upon anticipating and reacting to changes in consumer
preferences, including health and wellness. There are inherent marketplace risks associated with
new product or packaging introductions, including uncertainties about trade and consumer accep-
tance. Moreover, success is dependent upon the Company’s ability to identify and respond to
consumer trends through innovation. The Company may be required to increase expenditures for
new product development. The Company may not be successful in developing new products or
improving existing products, or its new products may not achieve consumer acceptance, each of
which could materially and negatively impact sales.
The failure to successfully integrate acquisitions and joint ventures into our existing
operations or the failure to gain applicable regulatory approval for such transactions
could adversely affect our financial results.
The Company’s ability to efficiently integrate acquisitions and joint ventures into its existing
operations also affects the financial success of such transactions. The Company may seek to expand
its business through acquisitions and joint ventures, and may divest underperforming or non-core
businesses. The Company’s success depends, in part, upon its ability to identify such acquisition, joint
venture, and divestiture opportunities and to negotiate favorable contractual terms. Activities in
such areas are regulated by numerous antitrust and competition laws in the U. S., the European
Union, and other jurisdictions, and the Company may be required to obtain the approval of acqui-
sition and joint venture transactions by competition authorities, as well as satisfy other legal
requirements. The failure to obtain such approvals could materially and adversely affect our results.
The Company’s operations face significant foreign currency exchange rate exposure,
which could negatively impact its operating results.
The Company holds assets and incurs liabilities, earns revenue, and pays expenses in a variety of
currencies other than the U.S. dollar, primarily the British Pound, Euro, Australian dollar, Canadian
dollar, and New Zealand dollar. The Company’s consolidated financial statements are presented in
U.S. dollars, and therefore the Company must translate its assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses
into U.S. dollars for external reporting purposes. Increases or decreases in the value of the U.S. dollar
may materially and negatively affect the value of these items in the Company’s consolidated financial
statements, even if their value has not changed in their original currency.
The Company could incur more debt, which could have an adverse impact on our
business.
The Company may incur additional indebtedness in the future to fund acquisitions, repurchase
shares, or fund other activities for general business purposes, which could result in a downward
change in credit rating. The Company’s ability to make payments on and refinance its indebtedness
and fund planned capital expenditures depends upon its ability to generate cash in the future. The
The failure to implement our growth plans could adversely affect the Company’s
ability to increase net income.
The success of the Company could be impacted by its inability to continue to execute on its publicly-
announced growth plans regarding product innovation, implementing cost-cutting measures, improv-
ing supply chain efficiency, enhancing processes and systems, including information technology
systems, on a global basis, and growing market share and volume. The failure to fully implement
the plans could materially and adversely affect the Company’s ability to increase net income.
Item 2. Properties.
See table in Item 1.
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Information relating to the Company’s common stock is set forth in this report on page 33 under
the caption “Stock Market Information” in Item 7—“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and on pages 72 through 73 in Note 16, “Quarterly
Results” in Item 8—“Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
In the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2008, the Company repurchased the following number of shares of
its common stock:
Maximum
Total Total Number of Number of Shares
Number of Average Shares Purchased as that May Yet Be
Shares Price Paid Part of Publicly Purchased Under
Period Purchased per Share Announced Programs the Programs
The shares repurchased were acquired under the share repurchase program authorized by the
Board of Directors on May 31, 2006 for a maximum of 25 million shares. All repurchases were made in
open market transactions. As of April 30, 2008, the maximum number of shares that may yet be
purchased under the 2006 program is 10,366,192.
10
The following table presents selected consolidated financial data for the Company and its
subsidiaries for each of the five fiscal years 2004 through 2008. All amounts are in thousands except
per share data.
Fiscal Year Ended
April 30, May 2, May 3, April 27, April 28,
2008 2007 2006 2005 2004
(52 Weeks) (52 Weeks) (53 Weeks) (52 Weeks) (52 Weeks)
As a result of the Company’s strategic transformation, the Fiscal 2006 results from continuing
operations include expenses of $124.7 million pretax ($80.3 million after tax) for targeted workforce
reductions consistent with the Company’s goals to streamline its businesses and expenses of
$22.0 million pretax ($16.3 million after tax) for strategic review costs related to the potential
divestiture of several businesses. Also, $206.5 million pretax ($153.9 million after tax) was recorded
for net losses on non-core businesses and product lines which were sold and asset impairment
charges on non-core businesses and product lines which were sold in Fiscal 2007. Also during 2006,
the Company reversed valuation allowances of $27.3 million primarily related to The Hain Celestial
Group, Inc. (“Hain”). In addition, results include $24.4 million of tax expense relating to the impact of
the American Jobs Creation Act. For more details regarding these items, see pages 47 to 48 in Note 4,
“Fiscal 2006 Transformation Costs” in Item 8—“Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
11
12
Performance under the Fiscal 2007-2008 Superior Value and Growth Plan
Unless specifically noted, all amounts in this section represent figures over the two-year time
frame of the Plan (Fiscal 2007-2008). Also, all growth rates represent compounded annual growth
rates (“CAGR”) over this same two-year period, using Fiscal 2006 continuing operations, excluding
special items as the base (see table in “Fiscal 2006 Transformation Costs” which reconciles Fiscal 2006
reported amounts to amounts excluding special items).
On June 1, 2006, the Company presented its Superior Value and Growth Plan for fiscal years
2007 and 2008. Under this Plan, the Company set forth three key operational imperatives: grow the
core portfolio, reduce costs to drive margins and generate cash to deliver superior value. Under each
of these imperatives, the Company established financial and operational targets aimed at increasing
shareholder value. The Company has met or exceeded virtually all of the targets established in the
two year Plan and believes that it is well positioned for continued growth in Fiscals 2009 and 2010.
For the two years ending with Fiscal 2008:
• Net sales grew at a CAGR of 8%, to over $10 billion for the first time in the Company’s history,
driven primarily by strong volume and net pricing as well as favorable foreign exchange.
• Operating income grew at a CAGR of 8%, as strong top-line growth and productivity more than
offset higher commodity costs and incremental marketing investments, which grew at a
CAGR of 19%.
• Operating free cash flow in Fiscal 2008 (cash flow from operations of $1,188 million less capital
expenditures of $302 million plus proceeds from disposals of PP&E of $9 million) grew to
$895 million and was nearly $1.8 billion over the two-year Plan period.
• EPS grew to $2.63, an average annual increase of 12%.
The following is a detailed analysis of the Company’s overall performance against the three
imperatives under our Superior Value and Growth Plan.
13
14
Fiscal Year Ended April 30, 2008 compared to Fiscal Year Ended May 2, 2007
Sales for Fiscal 2008 increased $1.07 billion, or 11.9%, to $10.07 billion, reflecting growth in all
five business segments. Volume increased 3.6%, as continued solid growth in the North American
Consumer Products segment, Australia, New Zealand and the emerging markets were combined
with strong performance of beans, soup and pasta meals in the U.K. and Heinz» ketchup across
Europe. The emerging markets produced a 9.1% volume increase and accounted for over 24% of the
Company’s total sales growth for the year. These volume increases were partially offset by declines in
U.S. Foodservice. Net pricing increased sales by 3.3%, mainly in the North American Consumer
Products, European and U.S. Foodservice segments and our businesses in Latin America and
Indonesia. Divestitures, net of acquisitions, decreased sales by 0.2%. Foreign exchange translation
rates increased sales by 5.1%.
Sales of the Company’s top 15 brands grew 13.4% from prior year, led by strong increases in
Heinz», Smart Ones», Classico», Boston Market», Pudliszki», Weight Watchers» and ABC». These
15
Gross profit increased $288 million, or 8.5%, to $3.68 billion, benefiting from favorable volume,
pricing and foreign exchange translation rates. The gross profit margin decreased to 36.5% from
37.7%, as pricing and productivity improvements were more than offset by increased commodity
costs. The most significant commodity cost increases were for dairy, oils and grains.
SG&A increased $166 million, or 8.5%, to $2.11 billion. As a percentage of sales, SG&A decreased
to 21.0% from 21.6%. The increase in SG&A is due to a 14.9% increase in marketing expense, a 16.9%
increase in R&D and higher selling and distribution costs (“S&D”) resulting from increased volume,
higher fuel costs and foreign exchange translation rates. Additional investments were also made in
the current year for global task force initiatives, streamlining and system capability improvements.
These increases were partially offset by the benefits of effective cost control and prior year workforce
reductions and costs related to the proxy contest.
Operating income increased $122 million, or 8.5%, to $1.57 billion, reflecting the strong sales
growth, productivity improvements and favorable impacts from foreign exchange, partially offset by
increased commodity costs.
Net interest expense increased $32 million, to $323 million, largely as a result of higher debt in
Fiscal 2008 related to share repurchase activity. Other expenses, net, decreased $3 million to
$28 million, primarily due to an insignificant gain recognized on the sale of our business in
Zimbabwe.
The current year effective tax rate was 30.6% compared to 29.6% for the prior year. The current
year’s tax rate was higher than the prior year’s primarily due to benefits recognized in Fiscal 2007 for
reversal of a foreign tax reserve, tax planning completed in a foreign jurisdiction, and R&D tax
credits. Those prior year benefits were partially offset by lower repatriation costs and increased
benefits from tax audit settlements occurring during Fiscal 2008, along with changes in valuation
allowances for foreign losses.
Income from continuing operations was $845 million compared to $792 million in the prior year,
an increase of 6.7%, due to the increase in operating income, which was partially offset by higher net
interest expense and a higher effective tax rate. Diluted earnings per share from continuing
operations were $2.63 in the current year compared to $2.38 in the prior year, up 10.5%, which
also benefited from a 3.2% reduction in fully diluted shares outstanding.
During the first quarter of Fiscal 2008, the Company changed its segment reporting to reclassify
its business in India from the Rest of World segment to the Asia/Pacific segment, reflecting orga-
nizational changes. Prior periods have been conformed to the current presentation. (See Note 15,
“Segments” in Item 8—“Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for further discussion of the
Company’s reportable segments).
16
Europe
Heinz Europe sales increased $456 million, or 14.8%, to $3.53 billion, driven by new product
innovation and more focus on the key brands in the portfolio. Volume increased 4.5%, principally due
to strong performance of Heinz» ketchup across Europe, soup, beans and pasta meals in the U.K.,
Pudliszki» branded products in Poland, and Heinz» sauces and condiments in Russia. Volume also
benefited from new product introductions across continental Europe, such as Weight Watchers» Big
Soups in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Net pricing increased sales 3.3%, resulting chiefly from
commodity-related price increases on Heinz» ketchup and soup, the majority of the products in our
Russian market and Italian infant nutrition products. Pricing was also favorable due to promotional
timing on Heinz» beans. Divestitures, net of acquisitions, reduced sales 1.4% and favorable foreign
exchange translation rates increased sales by 8.5%.
Gross profit increased $135 million, or 10.9%, to $1.37 billion, and the gross profit margin
decreased to 38.8% from 40.2%. The 10.9% increase reflects improved pricing and volume and the
favorable impact of foreign exchange translation rates, while the decline in gross profit margin is
largely due to increased commodity costs and higher manufacturing costs in our U.K., European frozen
and Netherlands businesses. Operating income increased $71 million, or 12.4%, to $637 million, due to
higher sales and reductions in general and administrative expenses (“G&A”), partially offset by higher
commodity costs and increased marketing spending in support of our strong brands across Europe.
Asia/Pacific
Heinz Asia/Pacific sales increased $281 million, or 21.3%, to $1.60 billion. Volume increased
6.5%, reflecting significant improvements across the majority of the businesses within this segment,
particularly Australia, India and China, related primarily to new product introductions supported by
a 34.7% increase in marketing. Pricing increased 2.8%, due to increases on soy sauce and beverages
in Indonesia, LongFong» frozen products in China and nutritional products in India. Acquisitions,
net of divestitures, increased sales 1.6%, and favorable foreign exchange translation rates increased
sales by 10.4%.
Gross profit increased $101 million, or 23.9%, to $526 million, and the gross profit margin
increased to 32.9% from 32.2%. These increases were due to increased volume, pricing, favorable mix
17
U.S. Foodservice
Sales of the U.S. Foodservice segment increased $3 million, or 0.2%, to $1.56 billion. Pricing
increased sales 1.7%, largely due to commodity-related price increases and reduced promotional
spending on Heinz» ketchup, frozen soup and tomato products, partially offset by declines in frozen
desserts. Volume decreased by 1.1%, as higher volume from frozen desserts sold to casual dining
customers was more than offset by declines in the portion control business, tomato products and
frozen appetizers. The volume reflected softness in the U.S. restaurant business as well as increased
competition on our non-branded products. Divestitures reduced sales 0.4%.
Gross profit decreased $47 million, or 10.0%, to $419 million, and the gross profit margin
decreased to 26.8% from 29.9%, as commodity costs continue to disproportionately impact the
foodservice business, despite gains on commodity derivative contracts. The declines also reflect
costs incurred in the current year in anticipation of a plant closure in the first quarter of Fiscal 2009,
partially offset by increased pricing and productivity. Operating income decreased $47 million, or
21.5%, to $170 million, all of which is due to the decline in gross profit. The Company is simplifying its
U.S. Foodservice business, while increasing the level of innovation in its foodservice brands, and
expects more profitable growth in this segment as macroeconomic conditions improve.
Rest of World
Sales for Rest of World increased $58 million, or 18.7%, to $368 million. Volume increased 6.3%
due primarily to increased demand for the Company’s products in Latin America as well as strong
performance across our Middle East business. Higher pricing increased sales by 13.6%, largely due to
price increases and reduced promotions in Latin America as well as commodity-related price
increases in South Africa. Divestitures reduced growth 1.7% and favorable foreign exchange trans-
lation rates increased sales 0.6%.
Gross profit increased $22 million, or 19.9%, to $133 million, due mainly to increased pricing,
higher volume and improved business mix, partially offset by increased commodity costs. Operating
income increased $6 million, or 15.1%, to $45 million.
Fiscal Year Ended May 2, 2007 compared to Fiscal Year Ended May 3, 2006
Sales for Fiscal 2007 increased $358 million, or 4.1%, to $9.00 billion. Sales were favorably
impacted by a volume increase of 0.7%, despite one less selling week in Fiscal 2007 compared with
Fiscal 2006. Volume growth was led by North American Consumer Products, Australia, New Zealand
and Germany, and the emerging markets of India, China and Poland. These increases were partially
offset by declines in the U.K. and Russian businesses. Pricing increased sales by 2.1%, mainly due to
our businesses in North America, the U.K, Indonesia and Latin America. Divestitures, net of
acquisitions, decreased sales by 1.6%. Foreign exchange translation rates increased sales by 2.9%.
Gross profit increased $300 million, or 9.7%, to $3.39 billion, and the gross profit margin
increased to 37.7% from 35.8%. These improvements reflect higher volume, increased pricing,
productivity improvements and favorable foreign exchange translation rates, partially offset by
commodity cost increases. Also contributing to the favorable comparison are the $92 million of Fiscal
2006 strategic transformation costs discussed below.
SG&A decreased $33 million, or 1.7%, to $1.95 billion and decreased as a percentage of sales to
21.6% from 22.9%. These decreases are primarily due to the favorable impact of the Fiscal 2006
targeted workforce reductions, particularly in Europe and Asia, and the $145 million of Fiscal 2006
18
19
Europe
Heinz Europe’s sales increased $89 million, or 3.0%, to $3.08 billion. Pricing increased 1.7%,
driven primarily by value-added innovation and reduced promotions on Heinz» soup and pasta meals
in the U.K and in the Italian infant nutrition business. Volume declined 2.4% as improvements in
Heinz» ketchup, Heinz» beans, Weight Watchers» branded products and Pudliszki» ketchup and
ready meals in Poland were more than offset by market softness in non-Heinz» branded products in
Russia and the non-branded European frozen business and declines in U.K. ready-to-serve soups and
pasta convenience meals. Volume was also unfavorably impacted by one less week in the 2007 fiscal
year compared to the 2006 fiscal year. The acquisition of HP Foods and Petrosoyuz in Fiscal 2006
increased sales 1.9%, while divestitures reduced sales 5.6%. Favorable foreign exchange translation
rates increased sales by 7.3%.
Gross profit increased $112 million, or 10.0%, to $1.24 billion, and the gross profit margin
increased to 40.2% from 37.6%. These improvements are due to higher pricing, favorable impact of
foreign exchange translation rates and $36 million of Fiscal 2006 transformation costs discussed
below. These improvements were partially offset by reduced volume and increased commodity and
manufacturing costs. Operating income increased $152 million, or 36.7%, to $566 million, due to the
increase in gross profit, the $112 million of Fiscal 2006 transformation costs discussed below, and
reduced G&A, partially offset by increased marketing expense. The decrease in G&A is driven by the
workforce reductions, including the elimination of European headquarters.
Asia/Pacific
Sales in Asia/Pacific increased $98 million, or 8.0%, to $1.32 billion. Volume increased sales 4.6%,
reflecting strong volume in Australia, New Zealand and China, largely due to increased marketing
and new product introductions, as well as market and share growth in nutritional drinks in India.
Higher pricing increased sales 2.3%, mainly due to commodity-related price increases taken on
Indonesian sauces and drinks. Divestitures reduced sales 0.3%, and foreign exchange translation
rates increased sales by 1.5%.
Gross profit increased $50 million, or 13.4%, to $425 million, and the gross profit margin
increased to 32.2% from 30.7%. These improvements were due to volume increases and higher
pricing, partially offset by increased commodity costs, most notably in Indonesia. Fiscal 2006 also
included a $19 million asset impairment charge on an Indonesian noodle business. Operating income
increased $49 million, to $150 million, largely reflecting the increase in gross profit and reduced
20
U.S. Foodservice
Sales of the U.S. Foodservice segment decreased $14 million, or 0.9%, to $1.56 billion, primarily
due to the impact of divestitures. Divestitures, net of acquisitions, reduced sales 2.1%. Pricing
increased 1.7%, largely due to Heinz» ketchup and tomato products, single serve condiments and
frozen desserts. Volume decreased 0.4%, as higher volume in Heinz» ketchup was offset by declines
resulting primarily from one less week in Fiscal 2007 and a decision to exit certain low margin
accounts.
Gross profit increased $29 million, or 6.6%, to $465 million, and the gross profit margin increased
to 29.9% from 27.8%, due to $8 million of Fiscal 2006 reorganization costs discussed below and a
$22 million impairment charge in Fiscal 2006 related to the sale of the Portion Pac Bulk product line.
In addition, increased pricing was offset by higher commodity costs. Operating income increased
$39 million, or 21.9%, to $216 million, largely due to the increase in gross profit and reduced S&D
expense as a percentage of sales resulting from productivity initiatives.
Rest of World
Sales for Rest of World decreased $0.9 million, or 0.3%, to $310 million. Volume increased 5.0%
due primarily to ketchup and baby food in Latin America and our business in South Africa. Higher
pricing increased sales by 8.9%, largely due to reduced promotions on ketchup and price increases
taken on baby food in Latin America. Divestitures reduced sales 11.8% and foreign exchange
translation rates reduced sales 2.3%.
Gross profit increased $17 million, or 18.4%, to $111 million, as increased volume and higher
pricing were partially offset by higher commodity costs and the impact of divestitures. Fiscal 2006
also included $8 million of asset impairment charges discussed below. Operating income increased
$38 million, to $39 million, due primarily to the increase in gross profit and the $30 million of Fiscal
2006 transformation costs primarily related to divestitures.
As a result of general economic uncertainty, coupled with restrictions on the repatriation of
earnings, as of the end of November 2002 the Company deconsolidated its Zimbabwean operations
and classified its remaining net investment of approximately $111 million as a cost investment. In
the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2006, the Company wrote off its net investment in Zimbabwe. The
decision to write off the Zimbabwe investment related to management’s determination that this
investment was not a core business. Management’s determination was based on an evaluation of
political and economic conditions existing in Zimbabwe and the ability for the Company to recover its
cost in this investment. This evaluation considered the continued economic turmoil, further insta-
bility in the local currency and the uncertainty regarding the ability to source raw material in the
future.
Discontinued Operations
During fiscal years 2003 through 2006, the Company focused on exiting non-strategic business
operations. Certain of these businesses which were sold were accounted for as discontinued
operations.
In the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2006, the Company completed the sale of the European Seafood
business, which included the brands of John West», Petit Navire», Marie Elisabeth» and Mareblu».
The Company received net proceeds of $469 million for this disposal and recognized a $200 million
pretax ($123 million after tax) gain which has been recorded in discontinued operations. Also in the
21
In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the
operating results related to these businesses have been included in discontinued operations in the
Company’s consolidated statements of income. The Company recorded a loss of $3 million ($6 million
after-tax) from these businesses for the year ended May 2, 2007, primarily resulting from purchase
price adjustments pursuant to the transaction agreements. These discontinued operations generated
sales of $688 million (partial year) and net income of $169 million (net of $90 million in tax expense)
for the year ended May 3, 2006.
In addition, net income from discontinued operations includes amounts related to the favorable
settlement of tax liabilities associated with the businesses spun-off to Del Monte in Fiscal 2003. Such
amounts totaled $34 million for the year ended May 3, 2006.
In executing its strategic transformation during Fiscal 2006, the Company incurred the follow-
ing associated costs. These costs were directly linked to the Company’s transformation strategy.
Reorganization Costs
In Fiscal 2006, the Company recorded pretax integration and reorganization charges for tar-
geted workforce reductions consistent with the Company’s goals to streamline its businesses totaling
$125 million ($80 million after tax). Approximately 1,000 positions were eliminated as a result of this
program, primarily in the G&A area. Additionally, pretax costs of $22 million ($16 million after tax)
were incurred in Fiscal 2006, primarily as a result of the strategic reviews related to the portfolio
realignment.
The total impact of these initiatives on continuing operations in Fiscal 2006 was $147 million
pre-tax ($97 million after-tax), of which $17 million was recorded as costs of products sold and
$129 million in SG&A. In addition, $11 million was recorded in discontinued operations, net of tax.
The amount included in accrued expenses related to these initiatives totaled $52 million at May 3,
2006, all of which was paid during Fiscal 2007.
The following (losses)/gains or non-cash asset impairment charges were recorded in continuing
operations during Fiscal 2006:
Business or Product Line Segment Pre-Tax After-Tax
(In millions)
Loss on sale of Seafood business in Israel. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rest of World $ (16) $ (16)
Impairment charge on Portion Pac Bulk product line . . . . . U.S. Foodservice (22) (13)
Impairment charge on U.K. Frozen and Chilled product
lines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Europe (15) (15)
Impairment charge on European production assets . . . . . . . Europe (19) (19)
Impairment charge on Noodle product line in Indonesia . . . Asia/Pacific (16) (9)
Impairment charge on investment in Zimbabwe business . . Rest of World (111) (106)
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Various (2) 1
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(200) $(177)
22
Also during the third quarter of Fiscal 2006, the Company sold its equity investment in Hain and
recognized a $7 million ($5 million after-tax) loss which is recorded within other expense, net. Net
proceeds from the sale of this investment were $116 million. During the third quarter of Fiscal 2005,
the Company recognized a $65 million impairment charge on its equity investment in Hain. The
charge reduced Heinz’s carrying value in Hain to fair market value as of January 26, 2005, with no
resulting impact on cash flows. Due to the uncertainty of realizability and executing possible tax
planning strategies, the Company recorded a valuation allowance of $27 million against the potential
tax benefits primarily related to the Hain impairment. This valuation allowance was subsequently
released in Fiscal 2006 based upon tax planning strategies that are expected to generate sufficient
capital gains that will occur during the capital loss carryforward period. See further discussion in
Note 7, “Income Taxes” in Item 8—“Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
The American Jobs Creation Act (“AJCA”) provided a deduction of 85% of qualified foreign
dividends in excess of a “Base Period” dividend amount. During Fiscal 2006, the Company finalized
plans to repatriate dividends that qualified under the AJCA. The total impact of the AJCA on tax
expense for Fiscal 2006 was $17 million, of which $24 million of expense was recorded in continuing
operations and $7 million was a benefit in discontinued operations.
The Company reports its financial results in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). However, management believes that certain non-
GAAP performance measures and ratios, used in managing the business, may provide users of this
financial information with additional meaningful comparisons between current results and results
in prior periods. Non-GAAP financial measures should be viewed in addition to, and not as an
alternative for, the Company’s reported results prepared in accordance with GAAP. The following
table provides a reconciliation of the Company’s reported results from continuing operations to the
results excluding special items for the fiscal year ended May 3, 2006:
23
For Fiscal 2008, cash provided by operating activities was $1.19 billion, an increase of $126 million
from the prior year. The increase in Fiscal 2008 versus Fiscal 2007 is primarily due to favorable
movements in accounts payable and income taxes, and cash paid in the prior year for reorganization
costs related to workforce reductions in Fiscal 2006. These improvements were partially offset by
higher inventories and receivables. The higher inventory levels were required to support customer
service demands created by the Company’s strong growth. The Company’s cash conversion cycle of
49 days in Fiscal 2008 was consistent with that of Fiscal 2007, as a two day improvement in payables
was offset by a two day increase in inventories. Days in inventory increased this year due to the volume
growth and related capacity constraints in a number of areas.
During the first quarter of Fiscal 2007, a foreign subsidiary of the Company revalued certain of
its assets, under local law, increasing the local tax basis by approximately $245 million. As a result of
this revaluation, the Company incurred a foreign income tax liability of approximately $30 million
related to this revaluation which was paid during the third quarter of Fiscal 2007. Additionally, cash
flow from operations is expected to be improved by approximately $90 million over the five to twenty
year tax amortization period.
Cash used for investing activities totaled $554 million compared to $326 million last year.
Capital expenditures totaled $302 million (3.0% of sales) compared to $245 million (2.7% of sales) last
year, which reflect capacity-related spending in support of future growth and an ongoing investment
in improved systems. Proceeds from disposals of property, plant and equipment were $9 million
compared to $61 million in the prior year, representing the disposal of four plants in the current year
versus 16 plants during Fiscal 2007. In Fiscal 2008, cash paid for acquisitions, net of divestitures,
required $88 million, primarily related to the acquisition of the license to the Cottee’s» and Rose’s»
premium branded jams, jellies and toppings business in Australia and New Zealand, the Wyko» sauce
business in the Netherlands and the buy-out of the minority ownership on the Company’s Long Fong
business in China, partially offset by the divestiture of a tomato paste business in Portugal. In Fiscal
2007, acquisitions, net of divestitures, used $93 million primarily related to the Company’s purchase
of Renée’s Gourmet Foods and the purchase of the minority ownership in our Heinz Petrosoyuz
business in Russia. Divestitures in the prior year included the sale of a non-core U.S. Foodservice
product line, a frozen and chilled product line in the U.K. and a pet food business in Argentina. In
addition, transaction costs related to the European Seafood and Tegel» Poultry divestitures were also
paid during Fiscal 2007. During Fiscal 2008, the Company terminated the cross currency swaps that
were previously designated as net investment hedges of foreign operations. The notional amount of
these contracts totaled $1.6 billion, and the Company paid $93 million of cash to the counterparties,
which is presented in investing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows. In addition,
the Company paid $74 million in the current year and $41 million in the prior year to the counter-
parties as a result of cross currency swap contract maturities and such payments are presented
within other investing items, net.
The early termination of the net investment hedges described above and interest rate swaps
described below were completed in conjunction with the reorganizations of the Company’s foreign
operations and interest rate swap portfolio.
Cash used by financing activities totaled $758 million compared to $621 million last year.
Proceeds from commercial paper and short-term debt were $484 million this year compared to
$384 million in the prior year. Payments on long-term debt were $368 million in the current year
compared to $52 million in the prior year, representing the maturity and payment of the $300 million
6% U.S. Dollar Notes in the current year as well as the repurchase in Fiscal 2008 of a portion of the 6%
U.S. Dollar Notes due March 15, 2012. Cash used for the purchases of treasury stock, net of proceeds
from option exercises, was $502 million this year compared to $501 million in the prior year, in line
with the Company’s plans for repurchasing $1 billion in net shares cumulatively in Fiscals 2007 and
2008. Dividend payments totaled $485 million, compared to $461 million in the prior year, reflecting
24
25
26
The Company does not have guarantees or other off-balance sheet financing arrangements that
we believe are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes
in financial condition, revenue or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or
capital resources. In addition, the Company does not have any related party transactions that
materially affect the results of operations, cash flow or financial condition.
As of April 30, 2008, the Company was party to an operating lease for buildings and equipment in
which the Company has guaranteed a supplemental payment obligation of approximately $64 million
at the termination of the lease. The Company believes, based on current facts and circumstances, that
any payment pursuant to this guarantee is remote. In May 2008, the construction of a new frozen food
factory in South Carolina commenced. It is expected that the factory will be operational in approx-
imately 18 to 24 months and that it will be financed by an operating lease.
The Company is exposed to market risks from adverse changes in foreign exchange rates,
interest rates, commodity prices and production costs. As a policy, the Company does not engage in
speculative or leveraged transactions, nor does the Company hold or issue financial instruments for
trading purposes.
Foreign Exchange Rate Sensitivity: The Company’s cash flow and earnings are subject to
fluctuations due to exchange rate variation. Foreign currency risk exists by nature of the Company’s
global operations. The Company manufactures and sells its products in a number of locations around
the world, and hence foreign currency risk is diversified.
The Company may attempt to limit its exposure to changing foreign exchange rates through both
operational and financial market actions. These actions may include entering into forward contracts,
option contracts, or cross currency swaps to hedge existing exposures, firm commitments and
forecasted transactions.
The instruments are used to reduce risk by essentially creating offsetting currency exposures.
The following table presents information related to foreign currency contracts held by the Company:
Aggregate Notional Amount Net Unrealized Gains/(Losses)
April 30, 2008 May 2, 2007 April 30, 2008 May 2, 2007
(Dollars in millions)
Purpose of Hedge:
Intercompany cash flows . . . . . $1,110 $1,010 $25 $ (4)
Forecasted purchases of raw
materials and finished
goods and foreign currency
denominated obligations . . . 541 360 6 (3)
Forecasted sales and foreign
currency denominated
assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 136 — 8
Net investments in foreign
operations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — 1,964 — (73)
$1,708 $3,470 $31 $(72)
As of April 30, 2008, the Company’s foreign currency contracts mature within two years.
Contracts that meet qualifying criteria are accounted for as either foreign currency cash flow hedges
or net investment hedges of foreign operations. Any gains and losses related to contracts that do not
qualify for hedge accounting are recorded in current period earnings in other income and expense.
27
Interest Rate Sensitivity: The Company is exposed to changes in interest rates primarily as a
result of its borrowing and investing activities used to maintain liquidity and fund business oper-
ations. The nature and amount of the Company’s long-term and short-term debt can be expected to
vary as a result of future business requirements, market conditions and other factors. The Company’s
debt obligations totaled $5.18 billion (including $199 million relating to the SFAS No. 133 hedge
accounting adjustments) and $4.88 billion (including $71 million relating to the SFAS No. 133 hedge
accounting adjustments) at April 30, 2008 and May 2, 2007, respectively. The Company’s debt
obligations are summarized in Note 8, “Debt” in Item 8—“Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data.”
In order to manage interest rate exposure, the Company utilizes interest rate swaps to convert
fixed-rate debt to floating. These derivatives are primarily accounted for as fair value hedges.
Accordingly, changes in the fair value of these derivatives, along with changes in the fair value of
the hedged debt obligations that are attributable to the hedged risk, are recognized in current period
earnings. Based on the amount of fixed-rate debt converted to floating as of April 30, 2008, a variance
of 1⁄8% in the related interest rate would cause annual interest expense related to this debt to change
by approximately $2 million. The following table presents additional information related to interest
rate contracts designated as fair value hedges by the Company:
April 30, 2008 May 2, 2007
(Dollars in millions)
Pay floating swaps—notional amount . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. $1,642 $2,588
Net unrealized gains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. $ 95 $ 71
Weighted average maturity (years) . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. 4 9
Weighted average receive rate . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. 6.36% 6.37%
Weighted average pay rate . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. 6.15% 6.35%
The Company had interest rate contracts with a total notional amount of $177 million and
$108 million at April 30, 2008 and May 2, 2007, respectively, that did not meet the criteria for hedge
accounting but effectively mitigated interest rate exposures. These derivatives are accounted for on a
full mark-to-market basis through current earnings and they mature within one year from the
current fiscal year-end. Net unrealized gains related to these interest rate contracts were insignif-
icant as of April 30, 2008, and net unrealized losses totaled $2 million at May 2, 2007.
Effect of Hypothetical 10% Fluctuation in Market Prices: As of April 30, 2008, the
potential gain or loss in the fair value of the Company’s outstanding foreign currency contracts
and interest rate contracts assuming a hypothetical 10% fluctuation in currency and swap rates
would be approximately:
Fair Value Effect
(Dollars in
millions)
Foreign currency contracts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $177
Interest rate swap contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 21
However, it should be noted that any change in the fair value of the contracts, real or hypo-
thetical, would be significantly offset by an inverse change in the value of the underlying hedged
items. In relation to currency contracts, this hypothetical calculation assumes that each exchange
rate would change in the same direction relative to the U.S. dollar.
28
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(“FIN 48”), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in financial
statements. This Interpretation includes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the
financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a
tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties,
accounting in interim periods, and disclosures. See Note 7, “Income Taxes” in Item 8—“Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data” for additional information.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”, which defines
fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting
principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement applies when-
ever other accounting pronouncements require or permit assets or liabilities to be measured at fair
value, but does not expand the use of fair value to new accounting transactions. SFAS No. 157 is
effective for financial assets and liabilities in fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and for
non-financial assets and liabilities in fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company
will adopt SFAS No. 157 for its financial assets and liabilities on May 1, 2008, the first day of Fiscal
2009. The Company’s financial instruments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, receiv-
ables, accounts payable, short-term and long-term debt, swaps, forward contracts, and option
contracts. The recorded values of the Company’s financial instruments approximate fair value.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS No. 157 on its consolidated
financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit
Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statement Nos. 87, 88, 106 and
132(R).” SFAS No. 158 required that the Company recognize the funded status of each of its defined
pension and postretirement benefit plans as a net asset or liability in the consolidated balance sheet
and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which changes occur through com-
prehensive income. Effective May 2, 2007, the Company adopted these provisions of SFAS No. 158.
SFAS No. 158 also requires that employers measure plan assets and obligations as of the date of their
year-end financial statements beginning with the Company’s fiscal year ending April 29, 2009. The
Company does not expect the impact of the change in measurement date to have a material impact on
the consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations” and
SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—An Amendment
of ARB No. 51.” These new standards will significantly change the accounting for and reporting of
business combination transactions and noncontrolling (minority) interests in consolidated financial
statements. SFAS Nos. 141(R) and 160 are required to be adopted simultaneously and are effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. Thus, the
Company will be required to adopt these standards on April 30, 2009, the first day of Fiscal
2010. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS Nos. 141(R) and 160 on
its consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133”. This new standard requires
enhanced disclosures about how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, how derivative
instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related
interpretations, and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial
position, financial performance, and cash flows. This statement is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS No. 161 in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2009.
29
In the ordinary course of business, the Company has made a number of estimates and assump-
tions relating to the reporting of results of operations and financial condition in the preparation of its
financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates under different assump-
tions and conditions. The Company believes that the following discussion addresses its most critical
accounting policies, which are those that are most important to the portrayal of the Company’s
financial condition and results and require management’s most difficult, subjective and complex
judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are
inherently uncertain.
Marketing Costs—Trade promotions are an important component of the sales and marketing of
the Company’s products and are critical to the support of the business. Trade promotion costs include
amounts paid to retailers to offer temporary price reductions for the sale of the Company’s products to
consumers, amounts paid to obtain favorable display positions in retailers’ stores, and amounts paid
to customers for shelf space in retail stores. Accruals for trade promotions are initially recorded at the
time of sale of product to the customer based on an estimate of the expected levels of performance of
the trade promotion, which is dependent upon factors such as historical trends with similar
promotions, expectations regarding customer participation, and sales and payment trends with
similar previously offered programs. Our original estimated costs of trade promotions may change in
the future as a result of changes in customer participation, particularly for new programs and for
programs related to the introduction of new products. We perform monthly and quarterly evaluations
of our outstanding trade promotions, making adjustments where appropriate to reflect changes in
estimates. Settlement of these liabilities typically occurs in subsequent periods primarily through an
authorization process for deductions taken by a customer from amounts otherwise due to the
Company. As a result, the ultimate cost of a trade promotion program is dependent on the relative
success of the events and the actions and level of deductions taken by the Company’s customers for
amounts they consider due to them. Final determination of the permissible deductions may take
extended periods of time and could have a significant impact on the Company’s results of operations
depending on how actual results of the programs compare to original estimates.
We offer coupons to consumers in the normal course of our business. Expenses associated with
this activity, which we refer to as coupon redemption costs, are accrued in the period in which the
coupons are offered. The initial estimates made for each coupon offering are based upon historical
redemption experience rates for similar products or coupon amounts. We perform monthly and
quarterly evaluations of outstanding coupon accruals that compare actual redemption rates to the
original estimates. We review the assumptions used in the valuation of the estimates and determine
an appropriate accrual amount. Adjustments to our initial accrual may be required if actual
redemption rates vary from estimated redemption rates.
Investments and Long-lived Assets, including Property, Plant and Equipment—Investments and
long-lived assets are recorded at their respective cost basis on the date of acquisition. Buildings,
equipment and leasehold improvements are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated
useful life of such assets. The Company reviews investments and long-lived assets, including
intangibles with finite useful lives, and property, plant and equipment, whenever circumstances
change such that the indicated recorded value of an asset may not be recoverable or has suffered an
other-than-temporary impairment. Factors that may affect recoverability include changes in
planned use of equipment or software, the closing of facilities and changes in the underlying financial
strength of investments. The estimate of current value requires significant management judgment
and requires assumptions that can include: future volume trends, revenue and expense growth rates
and foreign exchange rates developed in connection with the Company’s internal projections and
annual operating plans, and in addition, external factors such as changes in macroeconomic trends
which are developed in connection with the Company’s long-term strategic planning. As each is
30
Retirement Benefits—The Company sponsors pension and other retirement plans in various
forms covering substantially all employees who meet eligibility requirements. Several actuarial and
other factors that attempt to anticipate future events are used in calculating the expense and
obligations related to the plans. These factors include assumptions about the discount rate, expected
return on plan assets, turnover rates and rate of future compensation increases as determined by the
Company, within certain guidelines. In addition, the Company uses best estimate assumptions,
provided by actuarial consultants, for withdrawal and mortality rates to estimate benefit expense.
The financial and actuarial assumptions used by the Company may differ materially from actual
results due to changing market and economic conditions, higher or lower withdrawal rates or longer
or shorter life spans of participants. These differences may result in a significant impact to the
amount of pension expense recorded by the Company.
The Company recognized pension expense related to defined benefit programs of $7 million,
$32 million and $77 million for fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, which reflected
expected return on plan assets of $227 million, $199 million and $169 million, respectively. The
Company contributed $60 million to its pension plans in Fiscal 2008 compared to $63 million in Fiscal
2007 and $65 million in Fiscal 2006. The Company expects to contribute approximately $80 million to
its pension plans in Fiscal 2009.
One of the significant assumptions for pension plan accounting is the expected rate of return on
pension plan assets. Over time, the expected rate of return on assets should approximate actual long-
term returns. In developing the expected rate of return, the Company considers average real historic
returns on asset classes, the investment mix of plan assets, investment manager performance and
projected future returns of asset classes developed by respected consultants. When calculating the
expected return on plan assets, the Company primarily uses a market-related-value of assets that
spreads asset gains and losses (difference between actual return and expected return) uniformly over
3 years. The weighted average expected rate of return on plan assets used to calculate annual
expense was 8.2% for the years ended April 30, 2008, May 2, 2007 and May 3, 2006. For purposes of
calculating Fiscal 2009 expense, the weighted average rate of return will remain at approximately
8.2%.
Another significant assumption used to value benefit plans is the discount rate. The discount
rate assumptions used to value pension and postretirement benefit obligations reflect the rates
available on high quality fixed income investments available (in each country where the Company
operates a benefit plan) as of the measurement date. The Company uses bond yields of appropriate
duration for each country by matching to the duration of plan liabilities. The weighted average
31
Sensitivity of Assumptions
If we assumed a 100 basis point change in the following assumptions, our Fiscal 2008 projected
benefit obligation and expense would increase (decrease) by the following amounts (in millions):
100 Basis Point
Increase Decrease
Pension benefits
Discount rate used in determining projected benefit obligation . . . . . $(341) $392
Discount rate used in determining net pension expense . . . . . . . . . . $ (26) $ 29
Long-term rate of return on assets used in determining net pension
expense. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (29) $ 29
Other benefits
Discount rate used in determining projected benefit obligation . . . . . $ (22) $ 22
Discount rate used in determining net benefit expense . . . . . . . . . . . $ (3) $ 3
Income Taxes—The Company computes its annual tax rate based on the statutory tax rates and
tax planning opportunities available to it in the various jurisdictions in which it earns income.
Significant judgment is required in determining the Company’s annual tax rate and in evaluating
uncertainty in its tax positions. The Company recognizes a benefit for tax positions that it believes
will more likely than not be sustained upon examination. The amount of benefit recognized is the
largest amount of benefit that the Company believes has more than a 50% probability of being
realized upon settlement. The Company regularly monitors its tax positions and adjusts the amount
of recognized tax benefit based on its evaluation of information that has become available since the
end of its last financial reporting period. The annual tax rate includes the impact of these changes in
recognized tax benefits. When adjusting the amount of recognized tax benefits the Company does not
consider information that has become available after the balance sheet date, but does disclose the
effects of new information whenever those effects would be material to the Company’s financial
statements. The difference between the amount of benefit taken or expected to be taken in a tax
return and the amount of benefit recognized for financial reporting represents unrecognized tax
32
2008
First . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $48.50 $42.84
Second . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47.18 41.82
Third . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48.75 41.37
Fourth . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48.25 41.60
2007
First . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $44.15 $39.62
Second . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42.65 40.33
Third . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47.16 41.78
Fourth . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48.73 44.28
33
TABLE OF CONTENTS
34
35
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
June 19, 2008
36
37
38
* The preferred stock outstanding is convertible at a rate of one share of preferred stock into 15 shares of common stock. The
Company can redeem the stock at $28.50 per share. As of April 30, 2008, there were authorized, but unissued,
2,200,000 shares of third cumulative preferred stock for which the series had not been designated.
39
* Includes activity of the Global Stock Purchase Plan. Retained Earnings in Fiscal 2006 reflects the final settlement
associated with businesses spun-off to Del Monte in Fiscal 2003.
† Includes income tax benefit resulting from exercised stock options.
†† Comprised of unrealized translation adjustment of $529,228, pension and post-retirement benefits net prior service cost of
$(11,833) and net losses of $(586,986), and deferred net gains on derivative financial instruments of $8,501.
40
41
Principles of Consolidation:
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and entities in which
the Company maintains a controlling financial interest. Control is generally determined based on the
majority ownership of an entity’s voting interests. In certain situations, control is based on partic-
ipation in the majority of an entity’s economic risks and rewards. Investments in certain companies
over which the Company exerts significant influence, but does not control the financial and operating
decisions, are accounted for as equity method investments. All intercompany accounts and trans-
actions are eliminated.
As a result of general economic uncertainty, coupled with restrictions on the repatriation of
earnings, as of the end of November 2002 the Company deconsolidated its Zimbabwean operations
and classified its remaining net investment of approximately $111 million as a cost investment. In
the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2006, the Company wrote off its net investment in Zimbabwe. The
decision to write off the Zimbabwe investment related to management’s determination that this
investment was not a core business. Management’s determination was based on an evaluation of
political and economic conditions existing in Zimbabwe and the ability for the Company to recover its
cost in this investment. This evaluation considered the continued economic turmoil, further insta-
bility in the local currency and the uncertainty regarding the ability to source raw material in the
future. In Fiscal 2008, the Company sold this business resulting in an insignificant gain.
Use of Estimates:
The preparation of financial statements, in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America, requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Cash Equivalents:
Cash equivalents are defined as highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or
less.
42
Inventories:
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined principally under the
average cost method.
Intangibles:
Intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated
periods benefited, and are reviewed when appropriate for possible impairment, similar to property,
plant and equipment. Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized.
The carrying values of goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are tested at
least annually for impairment.
Revenue Recognition:
The Company recognizes revenue when title, ownership and risk of loss pass to the customer.
This occurs upon delivery of the product to the customer. Customers generally do not have the right to
return products unless damaged or defective. Revenue is recorded, net of sales incentives, and
includes shipping and handling charges billed to customers. Shipping and handling costs are
primarily classified as part of selling, general and administrative expenses.
Marketing Costs:
The Company promotes its products with advertising, consumer incentives and trade promo-
tions. Such programs include, but are not limited to, discounts, coupons, rebates, in-store display
incentives and volume-based incentives. Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Consumer
incentive and trade promotion activities are recorded as a reduction of revenue or as a component of
cost of products sold based on amounts estimated as being due to customers and consumers at the end
of a period, based principally on historical utilization and redemption rates. For interim reporting
purposes, advertising, consumer incentive and product placement expenses are charged to opera-
tions as a percentage of volume, based on estimated volume and related expense for the full year.
Income Taxes:
Deferred income taxes result primarily from temporary differences between financial and tax
reporting. If it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be
43
realized, a valuation allowance is recognized. When assessing the need for valuation allowances, the
Company considers future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies.
Should a change in circumstances lead to a change in judgment about the realizability of deferred tax
assets in future years, the Company would adjust related valuation allowances in the period that the
change in circumstances occurs, along with a corresponding increase or charge to income.
The Company has not provided for possible U.S. taxes on the undistributed earnings of foreign
subsidiaries that are considered to be reinvested indefinitely. Calculation of the unrecognized
deferred tax liability for temporary differences related to these earnings is not practicable.
44
Had compensation cost for the Company’s stock option plans been determined in Fiscal 2006
based on the fair-value based method for all awards, the pro forma income and earnings per share
from continuing operations would have been as follows:
Financial Instruments:
The Company’s financial instruments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, receiv-
ables, accounts payable, short-term and long-term debt, swaps, forward contracts, and option
contracts. The carrying values for the Company’s financial instruments approximate fair value.
As a policy, the Company does not engage in speculative or leveraged transactions, nor does the
Company hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes.
The Company uses derivative financial instruments for the purpose of hedging currency, debt
and interest rate exposures, which exist as part of ongoing business operations. The Company carries
derivative instruments on the balance sheet at fair value, determined by reference to quoted market
data. Derivatives with scheduled maturities of less than one year are included in receivables or
accounts payable, based on the instrument’s fair value. Derivatives with scheduled maturities
beyond one year are classified between current and long-term based on the timing of anticipated
future cash flows. The current portion of these instruments is included in receivables or accounts
payable and the long-term portion is presented as a component of other non-current assets or other
liabilities, based on the instrument’s fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a
derivative instrument depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging
relationship and, if so, the reason for holding it. Cash flows related to derivative instruments
designated as cash flow hedges are generally classified in the consolidated statements of cash flows
within operating activities as a component of other items, net. Cash flows related to the settlement of
derivative instruments designated as net investment hedges of foreign operations are classified in
the consolidated statements of cash flows within investing activities. Cash flows related to the
termination of derivative instruments designated as fair value hedges of fixed rate debt obligations
are classified in the consolidated statements of cash flows within financing activities.
45
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(“FIN 48”), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in financial
statements. This Interpretation includes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the
financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a
tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties,
accounting in interim periods, and disclosures. See Note 7 for additional information.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”, which defines
fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting
principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement applies when-
ever other accounting pronouncements require or permit assets or liabilities to be measured at fair
value, but does not expand the use of fair value to new accounting transactions. SFAS No. 157 is
effective for financial assets and liabilities in fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and for
non-financial assets and liabilities in fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company
will adopt SFAS No. 157 for its financial assets and liabilities on May 1, 2008, the first day of Fiscal
2009. The Company’s financial instruments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, receiv-
ables, accounts payable, short-term and long-term debt, swaps, forward contracts, and option
contracts. The recorded values of the Company’s financial instruments approximate fair value.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS No. 157 on its consolidated
financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit
Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statement Nos. 87, 88, 106 and
132(R).” SFAS No. 158 required that the Company recognize the funded status of each of its defined
pension and postretirement benefit plans as a net asset or liability in the consolidated balance sheet
and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which changes occur through com-
prehensive income. Effective May 2, 2007, the Company adopted these provisions of SFAS No. 158.
SFAS No. 158 also requires that employers measure plan assets and obligations as of the date of their
year-end financial statements beginning with the Company’s fiscal year ending April 29, 2009. The
Company does not expect the impact of the change in measurement date to have a material impact on
the consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations” and
SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—An Amendment
of ARB No. 51.” These new standards will significantly change the accounting for and reporting of
business combination transactions and noncontrolling (minority) interests in consolidated financial
statements. SFAS Nos. 141(R) and 160 are required to be adopted simultaneously and are effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. Thus, the
Company will be required to adopt these standards on April 30, 2009, the first day of Fiscal
2010. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS Nos. 141(R) and 160 on
its consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133”. This new standard requires
enhanced disclosures about how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, how derivative
instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related
interpretations, and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial
position, financial performance, and cash flows. This statement is effective for financial statements
46
issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS No. 161 in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2009.
3. Discontinued Operations
During fiscal years 2003 through 2006, the Company focused on exiting non-strategic business
operations. Certain of these businesses which were sold were accounted for as discontinued
operations.
In the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2006, the Company completed the sale of the European seafood
business, which included the brands of John West», Petit Navire», Marie Elisabeth» and Mareblu».
The Company received net proceeds of $469.3 million for this disposal and recognized a $199.8 million
pretax ($122.9 million after tax) gain which has been recorded in discontinued operations. Also in the
fourth quarter of Fiscal 2006, the Company completed the sale of the Tegel» poultry business in New
Zealand and received net proceeds of $150.4 million, and recognized a $10.4 million non-taxable gain,
which is also recorded in discontinued operations.
In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the
operating results related to these businesses have been included in discontinued operations in the
Company’s consolidated statements of income. The Company recorded a loss of $3.3 million ($5.9 million
after-tax) from these businesses for the year ended May 2, 2007, primarily resulting from purchase price
adjustments pursuant to the transaction agreements. These discontinued operations generated sales of
$688.0 million (partial year) and net income of $169.1 million (net of $90.2 million in tax expense) for the
year ended May 3, 2006.
In addition, net income from discontinued operations includes amounts related to the favorable
settlement of tax liabilities associated with the businesses spun-off to Del Monte in Fiscal 2003. Such
amounts totaled $33.7 million for the year ended May 3, 2006.
In executing its strategic transformation during Fiscal 2006, the Company incurred the follow-
ing associated costs. These costs were directly linked to the Company’s transformation strategy.
Reorganization Costs:
In Fiscal 2006, the Company recorded pretax integration and reorganization charges for tar-
geted workforce reductions consistent with the Company’s goals to streamline its businesses totaling
$124.7 million ($80.3 million after tax). Additionally, pretax costs of $22.0 million ($16.3 million after
tax) were incurred in Fiscal 2006, primarily as a result of the strategic reviews related to the portfolio
realignment.
The total impact of these initiatives on continuing operations in Fiscal 2006 was $146.7 million
pre-tax ($96.6 million after-tax), of which $17.4 million was recorded as costs of products sold and
$129.3 million in selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”). In addition, $10.5 million
was recorded in discontinued operations, net of tax. The amount included in accrued expenses related
to these initiatives totaled $51.6 million at May 3, 2006, all of which was paid during Fiscal 2007.
47
Of the above pre-tax amounts, $74.1 million was recorded in cost of products sold, $15.5 million in
SG&A, $111.0 million in asset impairment charges for cost and equity investments, and $(1.0) million
in other expense.
Also during the third quarter of Fiscal 2006, the Company sold its equity investment in The Hain
Celestial Group, Inc. (“Hain”) and recognized a $6.9 million ($4.5 million after-tax) loss which is
recorded within other expense, net. Net proceeds from the sale of this investment were $116.1 million.
During the third quarter of Fiscal 2005, the Company recognized a $64.5 million impairment charge
on its equity investment in Hain. The charge reduced Heinz’s carrying value in Hain to fair market
value as of January 26, 2005, with no resulting impact on cash flows. Due to the uncertainty of
realizability and executing possible tax planning strategies, the Company recorded a valuation
allowance of $27.3 million against the potential tax benefits primarily related to the Hain impair-
ment. This valuation allowance was subsequently released in Fiscal 2006 based upon tax planning
strategies that are expected to generate sufficient capital gains that will occur during the capital loss
carryforward period. See further discussion in Note 7.
There were no material gains/(losses) on divested businesses or asset impairment charges in
Fiscal 2007 or 2008.
5. Acquisitions
During the first quarter of Fiscal 2008, the Company acquired the license to the Cottee’s» and
Rose’s» premium branded jams, jellies and toppings business in Australia and New Zealand for
approximately $58 million. During the second quarter of Fiscal 2008, the Company acquired the
remaining interest in its Shanghai LongFong Foods business for approximately $18 million in cash
48
and $15 million of deferred consideration. During the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2008, the Company
acquired the Wyko» sauce business in the Netherlands for approximately $66 million. The Company
also made payments during Fiscal 2008 related to acquisitions completed in prior fiscal years, none of
which were significant.
During Fiscal 2007, the Company acquired Renée’s Gourmet Foods, a Canadian manufacturer of
premium chilled salad dressings, sauces, dips, marinades and mayonnaise, for approximately
$68 million. In addition, during Fiscal 2007, the Company acquired the remaining interest in its
Petrosoyuz joint venture for approximately $15 million. The Company also made payments during
Fiscal 2007 related to acquisitions completed in prior fiscal years, none of which were significant.
The Company acquired the following businesses during Fiscal 2006 for a total purchase price of
$1.1 billion:
• In August 2005, the Company acquired HP Foods Limited, HP Foods Holdings Limited, and
HP Foods International Limited (collectively referred to as “HPF”) for a purchase price of
approximately $877 million. HPF is a manufacturer and marketer of sauces which are
primarily sold in the United Kingdom, the United States, and Canada. The Company acquired
HPF’s brands including HP» and Lea & Perrins» and a perpetual license to market Amoy»
brand Asian sauces and products in Europe. During the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2006, the
Company divested the Ethnic Foods division of HPF for net proceeds totaling approximately
$43 million. In March 2006, the British Competition Commission formally cleared this
acquisition, concluding that the acquisition may not be expected to result in a substantial
lessening of competition within the markets for tomato ketchup, brown sauce, barbeque sauce,
canned baked beans and canned pasta in the United Kingdom.
• On April 28, 2005, the Company acquired a controlling interest in Petrosoyuz, a leading
Russian maker of ketchup, condiments and sauces. Petrosoyuz’s business includes brands
such as Pikador», Derevenskoye», Mechta Hoziajki» and Moya Sem’ya».
• In July 2005, the Company acquired Nancy’s Specialty Foods, Inc., which produces premium
appetizers, quiche entrees and desserts in the United States and Canada.
• In March 2006, the Company acquired Kabobs, Inc., which produces premium hors d’oeuvres
in the United States.
In addition, the Company made payments during Fiscal 2006 related to acquisitions completed
in prior fiscal years, none of which were significant.
All of the above-mentioned acquisitions have been accounted for as purchases and, accordingly,
the respective purchase prices have been allocated to the respective assets and liabilities based upon
their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. Operating results of the businesses acquired
have been included in the consolidated statements of income from the respective acquisition dates
forward. Pro forma results of the Company, assuming all of the acquisitions had occurred at the
beginning of each period presented, would not be materially different from the results reported.
There are no significant contingent payments, options or commitments associated with any of the
acquisitions, except as disclosed above.
49
The annual impairment tests are performed as of the last day of the third quarter of each fiscal
year unless events suggest an impairment may have occurred in the interim.
The Company finalized the purchase price allocation for the Cottee’s» and Rose’s» acquisition
during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2008. The Company also recorded a preliminary purchase price
allocation related to the Wyko» acquisition, which is expected to be finalized upon completion of
valuation procedures.
Trademarks and other intangible assets at April 30, 2008 and May 2, 2007, subject to amor-
tization expense, are as follows:
April 30, 2008 May 2, 2007
Gross Accum Amort Net Gross Accum Amort Net
(Thousands of dollars)
Trademarks . . . . . ... $200,966 $ (69,104) $131,862 $196,703 $ (63,110) $133,593
Licenses . . . . . . . . ... 208,186 (141,070) 67,116 208,186 (135,349) 72,837
Recipes/processes . ... 71,495 (19,306) 52,189 64,315 (15,779) 48,536
Customer related
assets . . . . . . . . ... 183,204 (31,418) 151,786 152,668 (19,183) 133,485
Other . . . . . . . . . . ... 73,848 (59,639) 14,209 70,386 (56,344) 14,042
$737,699 $(320,537) $417,162 $692,258 $(289,765) $402,493
Amortization expense for trademarks and other intangible assets subject to amortization was
$27.7 million, $25.7 million and $27.6 million for the fiscal years ended April 30, 2008, May 2, 2007
and May 3, 2006, respectively. The finalization of the purchase price allocation for the HP Foods
acquisition resulted in a $5.3 million adjustment to amortization expense during the second quarter
of Fiscal 2007. Based upon the amortizable intangible assets recorded on the balance sheet as of
April 30, 2008, amortization expense for each of the next five fiscal years is estimated to be
approximately $28 million.
Intangible assets not subject to amortization at April 30, 2008 totaled $996.9 million and
consisted of $825.2 million of trademarks, $135.3 million of recipes/processes, and $36.4 million of
licenses. Intangibles assets not subject to amortization at May 2, 2007 totaled $902.7 million and
50
consisted of $759.2 million of trademarks, $126.6 million of recipes/processes, and $16.9 million of
licenses.
7. Income Taxes
The following table summarizes the provision/(benefit) for U.S. federal, state and foreign taxes
on income from continuing operations.
2008 2007 2006
(Dollars in thousands)
Current:
U.S. federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 80,638 $ 89,020 $ 71,533
State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,323 9,878 14,944
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 258,365 181,655 225,498
354,326 280,553 311,975
Deferred:
U.S. federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,975 104,113 (54,957)
State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,381 5,444 3,015
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,187 (57,313) (9,333)
18,543 52,244 (61,275)
Provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $372,869 $332,797 $250,700
Tax benefits related to stock options and other equity instruments recorded directly to additional
capital totaled $6.2 million in Fiscal 2008, $15.5 million in Fiscal 2007 and $6.7 million in Fiscal 2006.
The components of income from continuing operations before income taxes consist of the
following:
2008 2007 2006
(Dollars in thousands)
Domestic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 268,450 $ 293,580 $ 87,409
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 949,344 830,819 606,052
From continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,217,794 $1,124,399 $693,461
The differences between the U.S. federal statutory tax rate and the Company’s consolidated
effective tax rate on continuing operations are as follows:
2008 2007 2006
51
The increase in the effective tax rate in Fiscal 2008 is primarily the result of benefits recognized
in Fiscal 2007 for reversal of a foreign tax reserve, tax planning completed in a foreign jurisdiction,
and R&D tax credits. Those prior year benefits were partially offset by lower repatriation costs and
increased benefits from tax audit settlements occurring during Fiscal 2008, along with changes in
valuation allowances for foreign losses. The decrease in the effective tax rate in Fiscal 2007 was
primarily the result of an increase in benefits associated with tax planning, a reduction in foreign tax
reserves, a prior year write-off of investment in affiliates for which no tax benefit could be recognized,
a decrease in costs associated with tax audit settlements and decreases to foreign statutory tax rates,
partially offset by increased costs of repatriation and changes in valuation allowances. The Fiscal
2006 effective tax rate was unfavorably impacted by increased costs of repatriation including the
effects of the AJCA, a reduction in tax benefits associated with tax planning, increased costs
associated with audit settlements and the write-off of investment in affiliates for which no tax
benefit could be recognized, partially offset by the reversal of valuation allowances, the benefit of
increased profits in lower tax rate jurisdictions and a reduction in tax reserves.
The following table and note summarize deferred tax (assets) and deferred tax liabilities as of
April 30, 2008 and May 2, 2007.
2008 2007
(Dollars in thousands)
Depreciation/amortization . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. $ 689,112 $ 634,192
Benefit plans . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. 33,719 43,632
Deferred income . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. 30,145 —
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. 56,160 39,377
Deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 809,136 717,201
Operating loss carryforwards .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. (40,852) (41,210)
Benefit plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. (248,808) (198,011)
Depreciation/amortization . . . .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. (69,909) (53,722)
Tax credit carryforwards . . . . .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. (12,998) (851)
Deferred income . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. (39,942) —
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. (96,618) (72,593)
Deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (509,127) (366,387)
Valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52,008 44,935
Net deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 352,017 $ 395,749
The Company also has foreign deferred tax assets and valuation allowances of $143.0 million,
each related to statutory increases in the capital tax bases of certain internally generated intangible
assets for which the probability of realization is remote.
The Company records valuation allowances to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is
more likely than not to be realized. When assessing the need for valuation allowances, the Company
considers future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. Should a
change in circumstances lead to a change in judgment about the realizability of deferred tax assets in
future years, the Company would adjust related valuation allowances in the period that the change in
circumstances occurs, along with a corresponding increase or charge to income.
52
The resolution of tax reserves and changes in valuation allowances could be material to the
Company’s results of operations for any period, but is not expected to be material to the Company’s
financial position.
The net change in the Fiscal 2008 valuation allowance shown above is an increase of $7.0 million.
The increase was primarily due to the recording of additional valuation allowance for state deferred
tax assets that are not expected to be utilized prior to their expiration date. The net change in the
Fiscal 2007 valuation allowance was an increase of $14.0 million. The increase was primarily due to
the recording of additional valuation allowance for state and foreign loss carryforwards that were not
expected to be utilized prior to their expiration date. The net change in the Fiscal 2006 valuation
allowance was a decrease of $39.3 million. The decrease was primarily due to the reversal of valuation
allowances of $27.3 million in continuing operations related to the non-cash asset impairment
charges recorded in Fiscal 2005 on cost and equity investments.
At the end of Fiscal 2008, foreign operating loss carryforwards totaled $125.2 million. Of that
amount, $70.9 million expire between 2009 and 2018; the other $54.3 million do not expire. Deferred
tax assets of $10.3 million have been recorded for state operating loss carryforwards. These losses
expire between 2009 and 2028.
The Company adopted FIN 48 on May 3, 2007. As a result of adoption, the Company recognized a
$9.3 million decrease to retained earnings and a $1.7 million decrease to additional capital from the
cumulative effect of adoption.
Changes in the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits are as follows:
(Dollars in
millions)
The amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate
was $55.7 million and $71.2 million, on April 30, 2008 and May 3, 2007, respectively.
The Company classifies interest and penalties on tax uncertainties as a component of the
provision for income taxes. For Fiscal 2008, the approximate amount of interest and penalties
included in the provision for income taxes was $10.7 million and $0.6 million, respectively. The total
amount of interest and penalties accrued as of May 3, 2007 was $55.9 million and $2.2 million,
respectively. The corresponding amounts of accrued interest and penalties at April 30, 2008 were
$57.2 million and $2.8 million, respectively.
It is reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by as much
as $24 million in the next 12 months primarily due to the progression of federal, state, and foreign
audits in process. In addition, it is also reasonably possible that during the next 12 months the
Company may reach a conclusion regarding its appeal, filed October 15, 2007, of a U.S. Court of
Federal Claims decision regarding a refund claim resulting from a Fiscal 1995 transaction. Upon
conclusion of the appeal, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by approximately
$43 million the benefit of which, if any, would be reflected through additional capital.
53
The provision for income taxes consists of provisions for federal, state and foreign income taxes.
The Company operates in an international environment with significant operations in various
locations outside the U.S. Accordingly, the consolidated income tax rate is a composite rate reflecting
the earnings in various locations and the applicable tax rates. In the normal course of business the
Company is subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout the world, including such major
jurisdictions as Canada, Italy, the United Kingdom and the United States. The Company has
substantially concluded all U.S. federal income tax matters for years through Fiscal 2005, with
the exception of the Company’s appeal of a U.S. Court of Federal Claims decision regarding a refund
claim. In the Company’s major non-U.S. jurisdictions, the Company has substantially concluded all
income tax matters for years through Fiscal 2002.
Undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries considered to be indefinitely reinvested
amounted to $3.3 billion at April 30, 2008.
During the first quarter of Fiscal 2007, a foreign subsidiary of the Company revalued certain of
its assets, under local law, increasing the local tax basis by approximately $245 million. As a result of
this revaluation, the Company incurred a foreign tax liability of approximately $30 million related to
this revaluation which was paid during the third quarter of Fiscal 2007. This revaluation is expected
to benefit cash flow from operations by approximately $90 million over the five to twenty year tax
amortization period.
8. Debt
Short-term debt consisted of bank debt and other borrowings of $124.3 million and $165.1 million
as of April 30, 2008 and May 2, 2007, respectively. The weighted average interest rate was 6.9% and
5.4% for Fiscal 2008 and Fiscal 2007, respectively.
The Company maintains a $2 billion credit agreement that expires in August 2009. The credit
agreement supports the Company’s commercial paper borrowings. As a result, the commercial paper
borrowings are classified as long-term debt based upon the Company’s intent and ability to refinance
these borrowings on a long-term basis. In addition, the Company has $1.1 billion of foreign lines of
credit available at April 30, 2008.
54
Long-term debt was comprised of the following as of April 30, 2008 and May 2, 2007:
2008 2007
(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial Paper (variable rate) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . $1,223,367 $ 673,604
6.00% U.S. Dollar Notes due March 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . — 299,824
6.226% Heinz Finance Preferred Stock due July 2008 . . . . .. . 325,000 325,000
6.625% U.S. Dollar Notes due July 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 749,668 749,563
6.00% U.S. Dollar Notes due March 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 598,301 632,201
U.S. Dollar Remarketable Securities due December 2020 . . .. . 800,000 800,000
6.375% U.S. Dollar Debentures due July 2028 . . . . . . . . . . .. . 230,101 229,842
6.25% British Pound Notes due February 2030 . . . . . . . . . . .. . 246,386 247,089
6.75% U.S. Dollar Notes due March 2032 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 449,855 449,779
Canadian Dollar Credit Agreement due October 2010 . . . . .. . 144,669 157,842
Other U.S. Dollar due May 2008—November 2034
(3.00—7.97)% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 56,136 59,216
Other Non-U.S. Dollar due May 2008—March 2022
(7.00—11.00)% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 37,360 21,675
4,860,843 4,645,635
SFAS No. 133 Hedge Accounting Adjustments (See Note 13) . . 198,521 71,195
Less portion due within one year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (328,418) (303,189)
Total long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $4,730,946 $4,413,641
Weighted-average interest rate on long-term debt, including
the impact of applicable interest rate swaps . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.90% 6.14%
During the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2008, the Company paid off $300 million of notes which
matured on March 15, 2008. During Fiscal 2008 the Company also repurchased $34.5 million of its
6.0% notes due 2012 and effectively terminated the corresponding interest rate swaps.
During Fiscal 2007, the Company repurchased $3.2 million of its 6.375% notes due 2028 and
$23.3 million of its 6.75% notes due 2032 and terminated the corresponding interest rate swaps.
The fair value of the debt obligations approximated the recorded value as of April 30, 2008 and
May 2, 2007. Annual maturities of long-term debt during the next five fiscal years are $328.4 million
in 2009, $1,226.5 million in 2010, $160.8 million in 2011, $1,389.7 million in 2012 and $1.3 million in
2013.
As of April 30, 2008, the Company had $800 million of remarketable securities due December
2020. On December 1, 2005, the Company remarketed the $800 million remarketable securities at a
coupon of 6.428% and amended the terms of the securities so that the securities will be remarketed
every third year rather than annually. The next remarketing is scheduled for December 1, 2008. If
the securities are not remarketed, then the Company is required to repurchase all of the securities at
100% of the principal amount plus accrued interest. The Company intends to remarket the securities
in 2008; therefore, the debt is classified as long-term at April 30, 2008.
H.J. Heinz Finance Company’s 3,250 mandatorily redeemable preferred shares are classified as
long-term debt as a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 150. Each share of preferred stock is entitled to
annual cash dividends at a rate of 6.226% or $6,226 per share. On July 15, 2008, each share will be
redeemed for $100,000 in cash for a total redemption price of $325 million.
55
* Includes obligations to sellers of $11.5 million, $2.0 million and $5.7 million in 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
A capital lease obligation of $51.0 million was incurred when the Company entered into a lease
for equipment during the first quarter of Fiscal 2007. This equipment was previously under an
operating lease. This non-cash transaction has been excluded from the consolidated statement of
cash flows for the year ended May 2, 2007.
56
estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R. All stock-based compensation expense is
recognized as a component of general and administrative expenses. Results for prior periods have not
been restated.
SFAS 123R also requires the attribution of compensation expense based on the concept of
“requisite service period.” For awards with vesting provisions tied to retirement status (i.e., non-
substantive vesting provisions,) compensation cost is recognized from the date of grant to the earlier
of the vesting date or the date of retirement-eligibility. The use of the non-substantive vesting
approach does not affect the overall amount of compensation expense recognized, but could accel-
erate the recognition of expense. The Company will continue to follow its previous vesting approach
for the remaining portion of those outstanding awards that were unvested and granted prior to
May 4, 2006, and accordingly, will recognize expense from the grant date to the earlier of the actual
date of retirement or the vesting date. Had the Company previously applied the accelerated method
of expense recognition, the impact would have been immaterial to the fiscal year ended May 3, 2006.
Stock Options:
Stock options generally vest over a period of one to four years after the date of grant. Awards
granted prior to Fiscal 2004 generally had a vesting period of three years. Prior to Fiscal 2006, awards
generally had a maximum term of ten years. Beginning in Fiscal 2006, awards have a maximum term
of seven years.
In accordance with their respective plans, stock option awards are forfeited if a holder volun-
tarily terminates employment prior to the vesting date. The Company estimates forfeitures based on
an analysis of historical trends updated as discrete new information becomes available and will be re-
evaluated on an annual basis. Compensation cost in any period is at least equal to the grant-date fair
value of the vested portion of an award on that date.
The Company previously presented all benefits of tax deductions resulting from the exercise of
stock-based compensation as operating cash flows in the consolidated statements of cash flows. Upon
adoption of SFAS 123R, the benefit of tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for
those options (excess tax benefits) are classified as financing cash flows. For the fiscal year ended,
April 30, 2008, $2.7 million of cash tax benefits was reported as an operating cash inflow and
$1.7 million of excess tax benefits as a financing cash inflow. For the fiscal year ended, May 2, 2007,
$10.4 million of cash tax benefits was reported as an operating cash inflow and $4.6 million of excess
tax benefits as a financing cash inflow.
As of April 30, 2008, 29,994 shares remained available for issuance under the 2000 Plan. During
the fiscal year ended April 30, 2008, 29,866 shares were forfeited and returned to the plan. During the
fiscal year ended April 30, 2008, 12,839 shares were issued from the 2000 Plan.
57
During Fiscal 2008, the Company granted 1,352,155 option awards to employees sourced from
the 2000 and 2003 Plans. The weighted average fair value per share of the options granted during the
fiscal years ended April 30, 2008, May 2, 2007 and May 3, 2006 as computed using the Black-Scholes
pricing model was $6.25, $6.69, and $6.66, respectively. The weighted average assumptions used to
estimate these fair values are as follows:
Fiscal Year Ended
April 30, May 2, May 3,
2008 2007 2006
58
The following summarizes information about shares under option in the respective exercise price
ranges at April 30, 2008:
Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
Weighted- Weighted- Weighted-
Average Average Average
Remaining Remaining Remaining Weighted-
Range of Exercise Number Life Exercise Price Number Life Average
Price Per Share Outstanding (Years) Per Share Exercisable (Years) Exercise Price
(Options in thousands)
$29.18-$35.38 . . . . . . 7,357 3.8 $33.32 7,326 3.8 $33.31
$35.39-$44.77 . . . . . . 9,506 3.1 40.46 7,965 2.8 40.71
$44.78-$54.00 . . . . . . 5,271 1.7 48.76 3,958 0.2 49.83
22,134 3.0 $40.06 19,249 2.6 $39.77
The Company received proceeds of $78.6 million, $259.8 million, and $142.0 million from the
exercise of stock options during the fiscal years ended April 30, 2008, May 2, 2007 and May 3, 2006,
respectively. The tax benefit recognized as a result of stock option exercises was $4.4 million,
$15.2 million and $6.7 million for the fiscal years ended April 30, 2008, May 2, 2007 and May 3,
2006, respectively.
A summary of the status of the Company’s unvested stock options is as follows:
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Number of Fair Value
Options (per share)
(Amounts in thousands,
except per share data)
Unvested options at May 2, 2007 . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. . 3,488 $6.98
Options granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. . 1,352 6.25
Options vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. . (1,886) 6.88
Options forfeited and returned to the plan . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. . (69) 6.98
Unvested options at April 30, 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,885 $7.07
Unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested option awards under the 2000 and 2003
Plans totaled $8.5 million and $8.8 million as of April 30, 2008 and May 2, 2007, respectively. This cost
is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.3 years.
59
$28.4 million and $32.8 million at April 30, 2008, May 2, 2007 and May 3, 2006, respectively. The cost
is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.3 years. The unearned compensation
balance of $32.8 million as of May 4, 2006 related to RSUs and restricted stock awards were
reclassified into additional capital upon adoption of SFAS 123R.
A summary of the Company’s RSU and restricted stock awards at April 30, 2008 is as follows:
2003 Plan
(Amounts in thousands)
Number of shares authorized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,440
Number of shares reserved for issuance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4,072)
Number of shares forfeited and returned to the plan . . . . . . . . . . . . 651
Shares available for grant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,019
A summary of the activity of unvested RSU and restricted stock awards and related information
is as follows:
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Number of Units (Per Share)
(Amounts in thousands,
except per share data)
Unvested units and stock at May 2, 2007 . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. . 2,025 $36.57
Units and stock granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. . 715 46.00
Units and stock vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. . (579) 35.94
Units and stock forfeited and returned to the plan .. .. .. .. . (74) 38.92
Unvested units and stock at April 30, 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,087 $39.88
Grants of restricted stock and RSUs were 364,112 and 708,180 for the fiscal years ended May 2,
2007 and May 3, 2006, respectively. Restricted stock and RSUs that vested during the fiscal years
ended May 2, 2007 and May 3, 2006 were 130,803 and 70,775, respectively. Restricted stock and RSUs
that were forfeited and returned to the plan were 21,476 and 60,054 for the fiscal years ended May 2,
2007 and May 3, 2006, respectively.
Upon share option exercise or vesting of restricted stock and RSUs, the Company uses available
treasury shares and maintains a repurchase program that anticipates exercises and vesting of
awards so that shares are available for issuance. The Company records forfeitures of restricted stock
as treasury share repurchases. The Company repurchased approximately 13.1 million shares during
Fiscal 2008.
60
During the two offering periods from February 16, 2006 to February 15, 2007, employees purchased
268,224 shares under the plan.
61
The following table sets forth the funded status of the Company’s principal defined benefit plans
at April 30, 2008 and May 2, 2007.
2008 2007
(Dollars in thousands)
Change in Benefit Obligation:
Benefit obligation at the beginning of the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,794,722 $2,601,229
Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39,832 42,886
Interest cost. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152,073 135,984
Participants’ contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,090 10,347
Amendments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,907 4,046
Actuarial (gain)/loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (89,838) 21,301
Divestitures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — (459)
Settlement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — (10,664)
Special termination benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — 3,188
Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (149,048) (143,298)
Exchange/other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67,437 130,162
Benefit obligation at the end of the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,843,175 $2,794,722
Change in Plan Assets:
Fair value of plan assets at the beginning of the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,888,780 $2,621,220
Actual (loss)/return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (79,759) 207,470
Divestitures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — (172)
Settlement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — (10,664)
Employer contribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59,799 62,505
Participants’ contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,090 10,347
Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (149,048) (143,298)
Exchange . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60,261 141,372
Fair value of plan assets at the end of the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,793,123 2,888,780
Funded status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (50,052) $ 94,058
Amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheet consists of:
Noncurrent assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........... . . . . . . . . . $ 191,079 $ 284,619
Current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........... ......... (19,826) (8,545)
Noncurrent liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........... ......... (221,305) (182,016)
Net amount recognized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (50,052) $ 94,058
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss consist of:
Net actuarial loss. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 802,738 $ 633,461
Prior service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,572 11,746
Net amount recognized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 828,310 $ 645,207
Amounts in accumulated other comprehensive loss expected to be
recognized as components of net periodic pension costs in the following
fiscal year are as follows:
Net actuarial loss. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 36,512 $ 42,921
Prior service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,567 (1,093)
Net amount recognized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 40,079 $ 41,828
The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans was $2,600.2 million at
April 30, 2008 and $2,561.1 million at May 2, 2007. The projected benefit obligation, accumulated
benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for plans with accumulated benefit obligations in
excess of plan assets were $656.7 million, $173.0 million and $430.5 million respectively, as of
April 30, 2008 and $607.4 million, $551.2 million and $437.8 million, respectively, as of May 2, 2007.
The change in other comprehensive loss related to pension benefit losses arising during the period is
$236.0 million at April 30, 2008. The change in other comprehensive loss related to the
62
reclassification of pension benefit losses to net income is $42.1 million at April 30, 2008. The change
in minimum liability included in other comprehensive loss was a decrease of $12.2 million at May 2,
2007.
The weighted-average rates used for the years ended April 30, 2008 and May 2, 2007 in
determining the projected benefit obligations for defined benefit plans were as follows:
2008 2007
The weighted-average rates used for the fiscal years ended April 30, 2008, May 2, 2007 and
May 3, 2006 in determining the defined benefit plans’ net pension costs were as follows:
2008 2007 2006
63
Plan Assets:
The Company’s defined benefit pension plans’ weighted average asset allocation at April 30,
2008 and May 2, 2007 and weighted average target allocation were as follows:
Plan Assets at Target
Asset Category 2008 2007 Allocation
The underlying basis of the investment strategy of the Company’s defined benefit plans is to
ensure that pension funds are available to meet the plans’ benefit obligations when they are due. The
Company’s investment objectives include: prudently investing plan assets in a high-quality, diver-
sified manner in order to maintain the security of the funds; achieving an optimal return on plan
assets within specified risk tolerances; and investing according to local regulations and requirements
specific to each country in which a defined benefit plan operates. The investment strategy expects
equity investments to yield a higher return over the long term than fixed income securities, while
fixed income securities are expected to provide certain matching characteristics to the plans’ benefit
payment cash flow requirements. Company common stock held as part of the equity securities
amounted to less than one percent of plan assets at April 30, 2008 and May 2, 2007.
Cash Flows:
The Company contributed approximately $60 million to the defined benefit plans in Fiscal 2008.
The Company funds its U.S. defined benefit plans in accordance with IRS regulations, while foreign
defined benefit plans are funded in accordance with local laws and regulations in each respective
country. Discretionary contributions to the pension funds may also be made by the Company from
time to time. Defined benefit plan contributions for the next fiscal year are expected to be approx-
imately $80 million, however actual contributions may be affected by pension asset and liability
valuations during the year.
Benefit payments expected in future years are as follows (dollars in thousands):
2009 . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . $168,750
2010 . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . $166,008
2011 . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . $168,318
2012 . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . $172,486
2013 . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . $171,284
Years 2014-2018 . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . $879,329
12. Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions and Other Post Employment
Benefits
The Company and certain of its subsidiaries provide health care and life insurance benefits for
retired employees and their eligible dependents. Certain of the Company’s U.S. and Canadian
employees may become eligible for such benefits. The Company currently does not fund these benefit
arrangements until claims occur and may modify plan provisions or terminate plans at its discretion.
64
The Company uses an April 30 measurement date for its domestic plans and a March 31 measure-
ment date for the Canadian plan.
The following table sets forth the combined status of the Company’s postretirement benefit plans
at April 30, 2008 and May 2, 2007.
2008 2007
(Dollars in thousands)
Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at the beginning of the year . . .. .. . .. .. .. $ 273,161 $ 273,434
Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...... .. .. . .. .. .. 6,451 6,253
Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...... .. .. . .. .. .. 15,626 15,893
Participants’ contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . ...... .. .. . .. .. .. 973 913
Amendments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...... .. .. . .. .. .. 1,001 —
Actuarial gain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...... .. .. . .. .. .. (5,523) (2,262)
Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...... .. .. . .. .. .. (20,386) (21,180)
Exchange/other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...... .. .. . .. .. .. 5,295 110
Benefit obligation at the end of the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 276,598 273,161
Funded status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(276,598) $(273,161)
Amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheet consists of:
Current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (19,547) $ (20,090)
Noncurrent liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (257,051) (253,071)
Net amount recognized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(276,598) $(273,161)
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss
consist of:
Net actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 50,329 $ 59,702
Prior service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (8,242) (14,019)
Net amount recognized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 42,087 $ 45,683
Amounts in accumulated other comprehensive loss expected to
be recognized as components of net periodic pension costs in
the following fiscal year are as follows:
Net actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,693 $ 4,549
Negative prior service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3,783) (4,766)
Net amount recognized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (90) $ (217)
The change in other comprehensive loss related to postretirement benefit gains arising during
the period is $4.6 million at April 30, 2008. The change in other comprehensive loss related to the
reclassification of post-retirement benefit gains to net income is $0.2 million at April 30, 2008.
The weighted-average discount rate used in the calculation of the accumulated post-retirement
benefit obligation at April 30, 2008 and May 2, 2007 was 5.9%.
65
The weighted-average discount rate used in the calculation of the net postretirement benefit cost
was 5.9% in 2008, 6.1% in 2007 and 5.5% in 2006.
The domestic weighted-average assumed annual composite rate of increase in the per capita cost
of company-provided health care benefits begins at 9.3% for 2009, gradually decreases to 5% by 2014
and remains at that level thereafter. The foreign weighted-average assumed annual composite rate of
increase in the per capita cost of company-provided health care benefits begins at 6.7% for 2009,
gradually decreases to 4% by 2016 and remains at that level thereafter. Assumed health care cost
trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for postretirement medical benefits. A
one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following
effects:
1% Increase 1% Decrease
(Dollars in thousands)
Effect on total service and interest cost components . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,581 $ 1,406
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $18,016 $16,284
Cash Flows:
The Company paid $20.4 million for benefits in the postretirement medical plans in Fiscal 2008.
The Company funds its postretirement medical plans in order to make payment on claims as they
occur during the fiscal year. Payments for the next fiscal year are expected to be approximately
$21.3 million.
2009 . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . $ 21,296
2010 . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . $ 22,624
2011 . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . $ 23,766
2012 . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . $ 24,733
2013 . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . $ 25,038
Years 2014-2018 . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . $132,239
Estimated future medical subsidy receipts are approximately $1.4 million annually from 2009
through 2013 and $8.4 million for the period from 2014 through 2018.
66
67
corresponding debt obligations (average of 22 years). SFAS No. 133 hedge accounting adjustments
related to hedged debt obligations totaled $198.5 million and $71.2 million as of April 30, 2008 and
May 2, 2007, respectively.
Hedge Ineffectiveness:
Hedge ineffectiveness related to cash flow hedges, which is reported in current period earnings
as other income and expense, was not significant for the years ended April 30, 2008, May 2, 2007 and
May 3, 2006. The Company excludes the time value component of option contracts from the
assessment of hedge effectiveness.
Other Activities:
The Company enters into certain derivative contracts in accordance with its risk management
strategy that do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting. Although these derivatives do not qualify
as hedges, they have the economic impact of largely mitigating foreign currency or interest rate
exposures. These derivative financial instruments are accounted for on a full mark-to-market basis
through current earnings even though they were not acquired for trading purposes.
68
The following are reconciliations of income to income applicable to common stock and the
number of common shares outstanding used to calculate basic EPS to those shares used to calculate
diluted EPS.
Fiscal Year Ended
April 30, May 2, May 3,
2008 2007 2006
(52 Weeks) (52 Weeks) (53 Weeks)
(Amounts in thousands)
Income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $844,925 $791,602 $442,761
Preferred dividends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 13 14
Income from continuing operations applicable to
common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $844,913 $791,589 $442,747
Average common shares outstanding—basic . . . . . . . . 317,019 328,625 339,102
Effect of dilutive securities:
Convertible preferred stock. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 123 125
Stock options, restricted stock and the global stock
purchase plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,589 3,720 2,894
Average common shares outstanding—diluted . . . . . . 321,717 332,468 342,121
Diluted earnings per share is based upon the average shares of common stock and dilutive
common stock equivalents outstanding during the periods presented. Common stock equivalents
arising from dilutive stock options, restricted common stock units, and the global stock purchase plan
are computed using the treasury stock method.
Options to purchase an aggregate of 6.1 million, 9.1 million and 18.2 million shares of common
stock as of April 30, 2008, May 2, 2007 and May 3, 2006, respectively, were not included in the
computation of diluted earnings per share because inclusion of these options would be anti-dilutive.
These options expire at various points in time through 2014. The Company elected to apply the long-
form method for determining the pool of windfall tax benefits in connection with the adoption of
SFAS 123R.
The Company’s segments are primarily organized by geographical area. The composition of
segments and measure of segment profitability are consistent with that used by the Company’s
management. During the first quarter of Fiscal 2008, the Company changed its segment reporting to
reclassify its business in India from the Rest of World segment to the Asia/Pacific segment, reflecting
organizational changes. Prior periods have been conformed to the current presentation. Net external
sales for this business were $117.3 million and $104.2 million for Fiscal 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Operating income for this business was $14.4 million and $16.2 million for Fiscal 2007 and 2006,
respectively. Operating income excluding special items for this business was $14.4 million and
$14.1 million for Fiscal 2007 and 2006, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense for this
business was $1.7 million for Fiscal 2007 and 2006. Capital expenditures for this business were
$1.5 million and $2.3 million for Fiscal 2007 and 2006, respectively. Identifiable assets for this
business were $84.1 million and $69.9 million for Fiscal 2007 and 2006, respectively.
69
70
The following table presents information about the Company’s reportable segments:
Fiscal Year Ended
April 30, May 2, May 3, April 30, May 2, May 3,
2008 2007 2006 2008 2007 2006
(52 Weeks) (52 Weeks) (53 Weeks) (52 Weeks) (52 Weeks) (53 Weeks)
(Dollars in thousands)
Net External Sales Operating Income (Loss)
North American
Consumer Products . . . $ 3,011,513 $2,739,527 $2,554,118 $ 678,388 $ 625,675 $ 583,367
Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,532,326 3,076,770 2,987,737 636,866 566,362 414,178
Asia/Pacific . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,599,860 1,319,231 1,221,054 194,900 150,177 101,447
U.S. Foodservice . . . . . . . . 1,559,370 1,556,339 1,569,833 169,581 216,115 177,292
Rest of World . . . . . . . . . . 367,709 309,763 310,696 45,437 39,484 1,618
Non-Operating(a) . . . . . . . — — — (156,205) (151,098) (164,290)
Consolidated Totals . . . . . $10,070,778 $9,001,630 $8,643,438 $1,568,967 $1,446,715 $1,113,612
North American
Consumer Products . . . $ 678,388 $ 625,675 $ 589,958
Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 636,866 566,362 526,372
Asia/Pacific . . . . . . . . . . . . 194,900 150,177 126,563
U.S. Foodservice . . . . . . . . 169,581 216,115 212,053
Rest of World . . . . . . . . . . 45,437 39,484 31,609
Non-Operating(a) . . . . . . . (156,205) (151,098) (136,564)
Consolidated Totals . . . . . $ 1,568,967 $1,446,715 $1,349,991
Identifiable Assets
71
(a) Includes corporate overhead, intercompany eliminations and charges not directly attributable to
operating segments.
(b) Fiscal year ended May 3, 2006: Excludes costs associated with targeted workforce reductions,
costs incurred in connection with strategic reviews of several non-core businesses and net losses/
impairment charge on divestures as follows: North American Consumer Products, $6.6 million;
Europe, $112.2 million; Asia/Pacific, $25.1 million; U.S. Foodservice, $34.8 million; Rest of World,
$30.0 million; and Non-Operating $27.7 million.
(c) Excludes property, plant and equipment obtained through acquisitions.
(d) Includes identifiable assets not directly attributable to operating segments.
The Company’s revenues are generated via the sale of products in the following categories:
Fiscal Year Ended
April 30, May 2, May 3,
2008 2007 2006
(52 Weeks) (52 Weeks) (53 Weeks)
(Dollars in thousands)
Ketchup and sauces . .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. $ 4,081,864 $3,682,102 $3,530,346
Meals and snacks . . . .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. 4,521,697 4,026,168 3,876,743
Infant/Nutrition . . . . .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. 1,089,544 929,075 863,943
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. 377,673 364,285 372,406
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $10,070,778 $9,001,630 $8,643,438
The Company has significant sales and long-lived assets in the following geographic areas. Sales
are based on the location in which the sale originated. Long-lived assets include property, plant and
equipment, goodwill, trademarks and other intangibles, net of related depreciation and amortization.
Fiscal Year Ended
Net External Sales Long-Lived Assets
April 30, May 2, May 3,
2008 2007 2006 April 30, May 2, May 3,
(52 Weeks) (52 Weeks) (53 Weeks) 2008 2007 2006
(Dollars in thousands)
United States . . . .. $ 3,971,296 $3,809,786 $3,693,262 $2,393,732 $2,377,900 $2,359,630
United Kingdom .. 1,844,014 1,643,268 1,636,089 1,582,088 1,588,218 1,442,562
Other . . . . . . . . . .. 4,255,468 3,548,576 3,314,087 2,540,414 2,171,907 1,967,353
Total . . . . . . . . . . .. $10,070,778 $9,001,630 $8,643,438 $6,516,234 $6,138,025 $5,769,545
72
2007
First Second Third Fourth Total
(13 Weeks) (13 Weeks) (13 Weeks) (13 Weeks) (52 Weeks)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... $2,059,920 $2,232,225 $2,295,192 $2,414,293 $9,001,630
Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . ... 772,417 846,598 852,116 921,769 3,392,900
Income from continuing
operations . . . . . . . . . . ... 194,101 197,431 219,038 181,032 791,602
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . ... 194,101 191,575 219,038 181,032 785,746
Per Share Amounts:
Income from continuing
operations—diluted . . . ... $ 0.58 $ 0.59 $ 0.66 $ 0.55 $ 2.38
Income from continuing
operations—basic . . . . . ... 0.59 0.60 0.67 0.56 2.41
Cash dividends . . . . . . . . ... 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 1.40
Legal Matters:
Certain suits and claims have been filed against the Company and have not been finally
adjudicated. In the opinion of management, based upon the information that it presently possesses,
the final conclusion and determination of these suits and claims will not have a material adverse
effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
Lease Commitments:
Operating lease rentals for warehouse, production and office facilities and equipment amounted
to approximately $107.2 million, in 2008, $104.3 million in 2007 and $97.6 million in 2006. Future
lease payments for non-cancellable operating leases as of April 30, 2008 totaled $454.0 million
(2009-$68.8 million, 2010-$58.3 million, 2011-$48.4 million, 2012-$44.7 million, 2013-$42.8 million
and thereafter-$191.0 million).
As of April 30, 2008, the Company was party to an operating lease for buildings and equipment in
which the Company has guaranteed a supplemental payment obligation of approximately $64 million
at the termination of the lease. The Company believes, based on current facts and circumstances, that
any payment pursuant to this guarantee is remote. No significant credit guarantees existed between
the Company and third parties as of April 30, 2008.
In May 2008, the construction of a new frozen food factory in South Carolina commenced. It is
expected that the factory will be operational in approximately 18 to 24 months and that it will be
financed by an operating lease.
Advertising expenses (including production and communication costs) for fiscal years 2008, 2007
and 2006 were $339.3 million, $315.2 million and $296.9 million, respectively. For fiscal years 2008,
2007 and 2006, $118.9 million, $123.6 million and $148.9 million, respectively, were recorded as a
reduction of revenue and $220.4 million, $191.5 million and $148.0 million, respectively, were
recorded as a component of SG&A.
73
74
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters.
Information relating to the ownership of equity securities of the Company by certain beneficial
owners and management is set forth under the captions “Security Ownership of Certain Principal
Shareholders” and “Security Ownership of Management” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement
in connection with its Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held August 13, 2008. Such information is
incorporated herein by reference.
The number of shares to be issued upon exercise and the number of shares remaining available
for future issuance under the Company’s equity compensation plans at April 30, 2008 were as follows:
75
Information relating to the Company’s policy on related person transactions and certain rela-
tionships with a beneficial shareholder is set forth under the caption “Related Person Transaction
Policy” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement in connection with its Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be held on August 13, 2008. Such information is incorporated herein by reference.
Information relating to director independence is set forth under the caption “Director Indepen-
dence Standards” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement in connection with its Annual
Meeting of Shareholders to be held on August 13, 2008. Such information is incorporated herein
by reference.
Information relating to the principal auditor’s fees and services is set forth under the caption
“Relationship With Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Company’s definitive
Proxy Statement in connection with its Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on August 13,
2008. Such information is incorporated herein by reference.
76
77
78
79
80
81
H. J. HEINZ COMPANY
(Registrant)
By: . . . . . . . ./s/
. . .A . . . . . B.
. RTHUR ..W. . INKLEBLACK
...................
Arthur B. Winkleblack
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated, on
June 19, 2008.
Signature Capacity
. . . . . . . ./s/. . .W . . . . R.
. .ILLIAM . . .J.OHNSON
.............. Chairman, President and
William R. Johnson Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
. . . . . . /s/
...A . . . . .B.. .W. INKLEBLACK
. .RTHUR ................ Executive Vice President and
Arthur B. Winkleblack (Principal Financial Officer)
. . . . . . /s/ . . . . . J.
. . . .E. DWARD . .M
. .CM
. .ENAMIN
............. Senior Vice President-Finance and
Edward J. McMenamin Corporate Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
William R. Johnson Director
Charles E. Bunch Director
Leonard S. Coleman, Jr. Director
John G. Drosdick Director
Edith E. Holiday Director
Candace Kendle Director By: . . . . . /s/
...A . . . . .B.. .W. INKLEBLACK
. .RTHUR .............
Dean R. O’Hare Director
Arthur B. Winkleblack
Nelson Peltz Director
Attorney-in-Fact
Dennis H. Reilley Director
Lynn C. Swann Director
Thomas J. Usher Director
Michael F. Weinstein Director
82
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s
ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
A-1
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for
the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of such internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the
audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s
ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
A-2
A-3
A-4
* As of June 2008
A-5
200
H.J. HEINZ COMPANY
S&P PACKAGED FOODS
150 S&P 500
DOLLARS
100
50
0
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
A-6
A-7
A-8
Heinz: H. J. Heinz Company is one of the world’s leading BNY Mellon Shareowner Services, 480 Washington Bou-
marketers of branded foods to retail and foodservice levard, Jersey City, NJ 07310. (800) 253-3399 (within
channels. Heinz has number-one or number-two branded U.S.A.) or (201) 680-6578 or www.bnymellon.com/share-
businesses in more than 50 world markets. owner/isd.
Among the Company’s famous brands are Heinz, Ore- Auditors: PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 600 Grant
Ida, Smart Ones, Classico, Wyler’s, Delimex, Bagel Bites, Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219
Lea & Perrins, HP, Wattie’s, Farley’s, Plasmon, BioDie-
Stock Listings:
terba, Greenseas, Orlando, ABC, Honig, De Ruijter, and
New York Stock Exchange, Inc.
Pudliszki. Heinz also uses the famous brands Weight
Ticker Symbols: Common-HNZ; Third Cumulative
Watchers, Boston Market, T.G.I. Friday’s, Jack Daniel’s,
Preferred-HNZ PR
Amoy, Cottee’s and Rose’s under license.
The Annual Written Affirmation and the Annual CEO
Heinz provides employment for approximately Affirmation were submitted
32,500 people full time, plus thousands of others on a on August 21,2007.
part-time basis and during seasonal peaks.
TDD Services BNY Mellon Shareowner Services can be
Annual Meeting The annual meeting of the Company’s accessed through telecommunications devices for the
shareholders will be held at 9:00 a.m. on August 13, 2008, hearing impaired by dialing (800) 231-5469 (within
in Pittsburgh at The Westin Convention Center Hotel. U.S.A.) and by dialing 201-680-6610 (outside of U.S.A.).
The meeting will be Webcast live at www.heinz.com.
A-9
Presidents’ Council
Karen L. Alber
Vice President & Chief Information Officer
Stephen S. Clark
Chief People Officer
Stefano Clini
President, Heinz Italy
Nigel P. Comer
Managing Director, Heinz Watties New Zealand
Beth A. Eckenrode
Vice President & Chief Strategy Officer
Brendan M. Foley
President, U.S. Foodservice
Peter T. Luik
President & Chief Executive Officer, Heinz Canada
Jennifer K. McGurrin
Director, Office of the Chairman
Edward J. McMenamin
Senior Vice President, Finance & Corporate Controller
Daniel G. Milich
Vice President, Global Business Development
Margaret R. Nollen
Vice President, Investor Relations
Robert P. Ostryniec
Global Supply Chain Officer
Diane B. Owen
Vice President, Corporate Audit
Fernando Pocaterra
Area Director, Latin America & Caribbean
Mitchell A. Ring
Senior Vice President, Business Development
Roel van Neerbos
President, Heinz Continental Europe
Peter Widdows
Managing Director, Heinz Australia
David C. Woodward
President, Heinz UK & Ireland