0 ratings 0% found this document useful (0 votes) 18 views 15 pages French Revolution - Compressed
Unit 2 discusses the French Revolution, highlighting its origins, key events, and ideological shifts that led to the overthrow of the Ancien Régime. It examines the economic crises, popular disturbances, and the role of the Estates-General in catalyzing revolutionary change, as well as the emergence of political parties. The unit emphasizes the importance of popular participation and the influence of Enlightenment ideas in shaping the revolutionary struggle for democracy and equality.
AI-enhanced title and description
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here .
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Go to previous items Go to next items
Save French Revolution_compressed For Later UNIT 2 _ THE FRENCH REVOLUTION
Structure
2.0 Objectives
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Revolutionary Overthrow of the Ancien Regime and Democratic Action
22.1 Economie Crisis and Popular Disturbances
2.2.2 Financial Collapse of the State and Political Criss
2.2.3 Revolt ofthe Notables and Parlements
Calling of the Estates General and the Coming of Revolution
Roles of Philosophers
Popular Participation in Overtirowing the Ancien Regime
iples of Legi
‘The Jacobin Republic and Terror (1792-94)
‘The Thermidorian Republic (1795-99)
24 Ideological Divisions and Contours of Party Politics
24.1 Consituionalists Vs Republicans
23
ation
242 Political Stuggle between the Girondins and the Montagnards
2.5. LetUs Sum Up
2.6 Key Words
2.7 Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises
2.0 OBJECTIVES
‘The French Revolution is generally considered as a major turning point in
European history which marked the end of despotism and beginning of modem
state, In this Unit we shall study the origins of the French Revolution and the.
significant features of the revolutionary period. After reading this Unit, you will
be able to explain:
‘© how the economic crisis precipitated the revolution,
© the issues which mobilized the urban and rural force,
‘+ the role of philosophers in providing an ideology,
‘* how the popular participation changed the course of revolutionary struggle,
‘* the democratic measures adopted by the national assembly and their
implication,
‘+ the principles of legitimation of the revolutionary government after the
destruction of the old order, and
‘© thenature of political struggle which gave birth to political parties in France.
2.1 INTRODUCTION
‘The French Revolution made France a trailblazer in the domain of political culture.
Itnot only established new principles of politics and democracy which continued
to influence the European mind subsequently, it provided a new vocabulary of
revolutionary action. The revolutionary doctrines of liberty, equality and fraternity
25History of Modern Europe-1
(C.1780 to 1939)
26
continue to hold a special place even today in democratic societies the world
‘over. In order to understand what led to the complete overthrow of the feudal
structure in France along with monarchical government, itis necessary to have a
brief background of the diverse social interests supporting or opposing the
Revolution. Besides studying the immediate causes of the Revolution, it is
necessary to know how the popular intervention of the menu-peuple (ordinary
people) at crucial moments not only saved the Revolution but also influenced its,
course, The democratic action of the Third Estate laid down new principles of
legitimacy. The crowd's direct action in 1792 pushed the Revolution towards a
democratic Republic and revolutionary ideology and politics led to the formation
‘of a rudimentary form of political parties.
2.2 REVOLUTIONARY OVERTHROW OF THE
ANCIEN REGIME AND DEMOCRATIC
ACTION
France was the most populous and powerful state of Europe in 1780s and majority
of its population lived in the countryside. What happened in the late eighteenth
‘century France that led to major political transformation in France needs to be
understood first? In the subsequent sub-sections you will learn about the forces
which prepared the ground for revolutionary change in France,
2.2.1 Economic Crisis and Popular Disturbances
For most of the eighteenth century the French economy was marked by moderate
growth and prosperity. However, its fruits were spread unevenly. There was a
distinct expansion of the oil industry, cotton manufactures, large Seaports, sugar
refinery and colonial commerce. From 1771-72, bad harvests led to an inevitable
increase in grain and bread prices which caused disturbances at several places.
The real economic crisis of the old regime began from 1775. Overproduction of
‘wine caused falling prices and low profits. The depression of wine trade lasted
seven to eight years. It was followed by a serious forage scarcity resulting in
significant livestock losses affecting almost one-third of the French population,
From 1787 a major cereal crisis followed catastrophic hail storms, harsh winter
and drought. The prices of grains and bread climbed between 50 and 100 percent.
‘The rural crisis also had repercussions on the industrial sector where sales began
to fall, affecting production and causing unemployment. The Franco-British trade
treaty of 1786 made French workers vulnerable as the import tariff of British
products in France was reduced. These caused popular disturbances and bread
riots in many French towns, notably in Paris. Rumours and speculation, stirred
especially by lively pamphlets fuelled fear and anger. In the countryside, peasants
reacted to the harsh burden of state taxation and tithe. Their anger was also
against bourgeois agents who set rules against common grazing rights in forests
and posed a threat to common lands, This made Georges Lefebvre to conclude
that the peasant revolution was both anti-feudal (against excessive seigneurial
exploitation, that is, by traditional landlords) and anti-capitalist (against the
appropriation of common land by the new landlords). Thus, under the impact of
economic crisis and political events, the peasant movement developed.2.2.2. Financial Collapse of the State and Political Crisis
‘The existing government was unable to curtail expenses and a defective taxation
structure caused financial collapse. With a deficit of 112 million livres
government's ability to raise credit was exhausted, France faced national
bankruptcy. Fiscal exemption granted to the nobility and clergy were causing,
resentment. The Controller-General of Finance, Calonne, tried to rationalize the
tax structure through @ new graduated land tax which would have undermined
the financial privileges of the aristocracy; but he failed in this attempt. Calonne
had a limited option. He could not depend on the Parlement of Paris for approval
because he expected violent opposition from its members. The summoning of
the national representative assembly, the Estates-General, would have implied
confession of state bankruptcy and would have rendered speedy action difficult.
So he recommended the calling of an Assembly of Notables.
2.2.3. Revolt of the Notables and Parlements
‘The Assembly of Notables met at Versailles, the royal palace near Paris, on 22
February 1787. Members made bitter and unrestrained attacks on Calonne’s fiscal
proposals, and the reforms were brusquely rejected. The Assembly of Notables
‘marked the beginning of the Revolution. The aristocracy was bitterly hostile to
the growing power of the royal government. The Notables declared that it was
beyond their power to consent to the levying of new taxes. A leading notable,
Lafayattee, argued that only a truly national assembly could assent to the drastic
tax reforms and that such an assembly was the Estates-General which had not
met since 1614
Brienne, the successor of Calonne, tried to push through a moderate programme
of reforms through the Paris Parlement in September 1787, but failed. The delay
in presenting the fiscal edicts by the government enabled the opposition groups
in the Parlement of Paris to organize their forces. The proposals of stamp duty,
and land tax were rejected, Numerous tracts and pamphlets were circulated to
seek popular support by propagating that Parlements were defending popular
hts against the despotism of the central government. This resulted in some
anti-government riots in Paris, against intendants (royal civilservants) in Brittany
and against the royal troops in Dauphine. Necker, who was again made the
Controller-General, had no option but to call the meeting of Estates-General to
get the reforms approved.
2.2.4 Calling of the Estates General and the Coming of
Revolution
The clash between the aristocracy and centralized absolutism soon turned into a
clash between the privileged and unprivileged orders when the government
summoned the meeting of the Estates-General. In 1788, the French government
had a debt of 4.5 billion livres and the king, Louis XVI, was compelled to seek
additional funds from the Estates-General which traditionally had the power to
grant new taxes to the crown, The Estates-General consisted of three groups
representing the three parts of French society. Each part was called an estate.
‘The First Estate, consisted of the Roman Catholic clergy, the Second Estate of
the nobility, while the Third Estate comprised commoners representing the bulk.
of French population who were unprivileged and shouldered the entire tax burden.
“The French Revolution
7History of Modern Europe-t
(C1780 to 1939)
28
Within the Third Estate however, vast differences existed in matters of occupation,
‘education and wealth, Separate elections were held for each estate and the voters
drew up their listof grievances for their representatives. These were called cahiers,
de doleances. Whereas the cahiers of the nobility stressed the recognition of
their traditional liberties, implying feudal rights and privileges, the cahiers of
the Third Estate were mostly written by members of the liberal professions
‘demanding individual liberty and a written constitution, They also wished to see
‘equality before law and the sharing of taxes by al the classes.
Itwas not simply the economic crisis or political issues which brought the people
together. The main problem was the growing contradictions in French society. A
small percentage of total population enjoyed all the privileges while the bulk of
the people shouildered the entire fiscal or tax burden of the state and faced social
discrimination, However, the steady growth of middle classes (called the
bourgeoisie) both in terms of wealth and social status began to challenge the
traditional order. The leadership came from this segment of society while the
‘masses were stirred to action by the prospects of radical reform. Together they
formed the Third Estate.
‘The Estates-General met on 5 May 1789 and matters came to head immediately
in the absence of any firm lead from the government. The goverment had doubled
the seats of the Third Estate because it represented the most populous segment
of society. The Third Estate suggested that instead of voting separately, the three
estates should vote together in a single body on the basis of one person one vote.
Though several members of clergy were prepared to come to some understanding
with the commoners, the nobility rejected these ideas and adopted an
uncompromising position, Consequently the commoners walked out and voted
itself a ‘National Assembly’ on 17 June 1789, calling themselves the true
representatives of the people. They decided to draw up a constitution for France
and bring about legal equality. In this way they reflected the Enlightenment ideas,
‘of popular sovereignty in place of a despotic government as suggested by Abbe
Sieyes in his famous pamphlet, ‘What is the Third Estate?" The Revolution was
not yet led by any well-formed party ot movement but by a general consensus of
ideas among a fairly coherent social group which imparted effective unity to the
revolutionary struggle. This group was the liberal bourgeoisie of professional
men like lawyers, doctors, writers, notaries and office holders, familiar with the
ideas of classical liberalism and Enlightenment, as formulated by philosophers
and economists.
‘The Tennis Court Oath
‘The National Assembly, considering that it has been summoned to establish
the constitution of the kingdom, to effect the regeneration of public order, and
to maintain the true principles of monarchy; that nothing ,can prevent it from
continuing its deliberations in whatever place it may be forced to establish
itself; and finally, that wheresoever its members are assembled, there is the
National Assembly:
Decrees that all members of this Assembly shall immediately take a solemn
‘ath not to separate, and to reassemble wherever circumstances require, until
the constitution of the kingdom is established and consolidated upon firm
foundations.
Source: ‘A Documentary Survey of the French Revolution’, ed. by John Hall
Stewart (Macmillan, New York,1951, p.88).History of Modern Europe-t
(C1780 to 1939)
30
of the country described as the Great Fear of late July and early August 1789. It
‘was rumoured that the nobility were plotting to overthrow the Third Estate and
seize power inalliance with grain speculators and hoarders by starving the people
into submission. As a consequence, the people began to arm themselves by
forming local militia or ‘peasant guards.’ Peasants began to attack their lords,
bum and destroy chateaux (country mansions of the nobility),destroy feudal
documents, and refuse to pay taxes and tithe.To pacify the peasants and restore
‘order, the National Assembly declared the abolition of the feudal regime along,
with seigneurial privileges and the old socio-political structure. The second major
‘work was the Declaration of the Rights of Man (proclamation of liberty, equality
and fraternity) which became a manifesto of freedom, It turned the royal subjects
into citizens of France and was provided legal equality. Thus politics was made
as much by pressures from outside the Assembly as by politicians withi
‘The Declaration of the Rights of Man August 27, 1789
1) Men are born and remain free and equal in rights; social distinctions may
be based only upon general usefulness.
2) The aim of every political association is the preservation of the natural
and inalienable rights of man; these rights are liberty, property, security,
and resistance to oppression.
3) The source of all sovereignty resides essentially in the nation; no group,
no individual may exercise authority not emanating expressly there from.
4) Law is the expression of the general will; all citizens have the rights to
concur personally or through their representatives in its formation; it must
be the same for all, whether it protects or punishes, All citizens, being:
equal before it, are equally admissible to all public offices, positions, and
employments according to their capacity, and without other distinction
than that of virtues and talents,
5) Nooneis to be disquieted because of his opinions; even religious, provided
their manifestation does not disturb the public order established by law.
6) Free communication of ideas and opinions is one of the most precious of
the rights of man. Consequently every citizen may speak, write, and print
freely, subject to responsibility for the abuse of such liberty in the cases
determined by law.
Source: A Documentary Survey of the French Revolution, ed. by John
Hall Stewart (Macmillan, New York, 1951, p.114),
Louis XVI temained inactive all this time in Versailles. He refused to promulgate
the decrees on the abolition of feudalism and the Declaration of the Rights of
Man. The Revolution was still not secure and the gains had to be fought for
again in October 1789. An acute shortage of bread, the arrival of the Flanders
regiment to protect Louis and his indifferent attitude towards the National
Assembly led to an active involvement of women in the revolution who set off
for Versailles in thousands. As an eye witness described, “detachments of women
coming up from every direction, armed with broomsticks, lances, pitchforks,
swords, pistols and muskets were followed by huge crowds and reinforced by
20,000 Paris guards under Lafayette, They forced the king and his family toleave for the Tuileries in Paris. As the king promised to rush food supplies to
Paris and accept the decisions of the Assembly, he was escorted by the jubilant
crowd with a cry ‘the baker, the baker’s wife and the baker’s boy” (meaning of
course the king, the queen and the heir to the throne, known as the Dauphin in
France).
From October 1789 until 1795 women participated in the Revolution in a variety
of ways, Olympe de Gouges became the principal spokesperson for the cause of
political rights for women, They demanded equality with men. They demonstrated
for bread and price controls and joined in the defence of their ‘Fatherland’. Women.
led soap riots caused by the rising price of soap which affected thousands of
laundry women. The Society for Revolutionary Republican Women composed
of working class women, remained extremely active during the early part of the
Revolution until it was suppressed. During the Terror, women opposed the
Revolution owing to the harm it caused to family life, the Church, and the supply
of consumer goods. But in a period of male domination women’s demands were
not taken up very seriously.
In the early phase of the Revolution, the National Assembly continued its attempts,
to reform the political structure into a constitutional monarchy but two events
brought about a radical shift in the progress of revolution after 1791. The first
‘was the religious issue. The Church was seen as a privileged order and supporter
of the feudal regime, The abolition of tithe was followed by the nationalization,
of all Church property and land which was put for sale, By the Civil Constitution
of the Clergy (12 July 1790), bishops and priests were to be elected by popular
vote and the clergy were tured into salaried state officials who had to take the
cath of allegiance to the constitution. Only 54 percent of the parish priests took,
the oath while the majority of the bishops refused it. This meant an end to the.
period of national unity. It created conditions for the civil war as the anti-clerical
issue split the nation along new lines. It brought about a realignment of counter-
revolutionary forces of staunch Catholics, royalists, emigres, etc. The second,
event was the flight of the king to join hands with the emigres who tried to defeat
the revolutionaries by seeking the help of foreign powers. This completely.
destroyed the cause of monarchy: France was declared a Republic in 1792 and
Louis XVI was tried and executed in January 1793.
Cheek Your Progress 1
1) Explain the major economic grievances of the peasants? Answer in 100
words,
2) Why did the economic reform proposals fail? Answer in 60 words.
‘The French Revolution
31History of Modern Europe-l 3) Discuss the various divisions within the French society and the problems
of the Third Estate. Answer in 100 words.
(C1780 to 1939)
4) Examine the role of philosophers in the French Revolution. Answer in 100
words.
2.3 PRINCIPLES OF LEGITIMATION
Recent writings on the French Revolution suggest that the Revolution was rooted
in the political culture that took shape in the last years of the old regime, as an
implicit contradiction, between absolutism and the polities of Enlightenment,
‘resulting in crisis. How the absolute monarchy saw itself, its relation to the society
‘within which it functioned seemed to be in glaring contradiction to the progressive
principles of the new political culture. This new culture furnished the basis of a
revolutionary discourse and raised the issue of legitimacy.
A number of historians (e.g. Denis Richet, Gueniffy, etc.) point out that the
resolution voted on 17 June 1789 by the Third Estate to constitute itself into the
National Assembly was the first and the most profound revolutionary act. It
implied a fresh set of principles of legitimacy for the revolutionary goverment.
twas Sieyes who had stressed the importance of the Third Estate. Sieyes proposed
‘two revolutionary thesises: the identification of the nation exclusively with the
Third Estate and the claim that the nation alone had the power to give France a
constitution. Between May and August 1789, the entire ancien regime was
destroyed. The French had rejected their national past and opted for the principles
‘of the Revolution, When the National Assembly, after destroying feudal privileges,
set about framing the future constitution of France, it became the Constituent
Assembly. The decrees of 4th and Ith August abolished all personal privileges,
serfdom and tithe and created free and equal justice and freedom of employment
for all. Thus a new legal society had been established in France,
Two debates of the Constituent Assembly were crucial from the point of view of
the principles of legitimacy. Those were, (a) the Declaration of the Rights of
‘Man, and (b) the subject of sovereignty. By destroying the feudal regime, the
Constituent Assembly had redefined the French people as individuals who were
free and equal. Liberty, property, security and resistance to oppression were madesome of the basic rights. In short, the subjects of the French ruler were made
citizens of the nation. The Declaration of the Rights of Man brought about a
radical conception of society, and organized the new public authorities to protect,
these rights by way of a written constitution based on revolutionary doctrines.
The second debate beginning in September concemed the question of the nature
and attribution of sovereignty. The issue of ‘sovereign’ proved to be extraordinarily
difficult, The destruction of the society based on orders and privileges raised the
new issue of representation. The leaders realized that it was nearly impossible to
reconcile the sovereignty of the nation with the direct exercise of its rights by all,
the members of the nation. It was Sieyes who tried to provide a reasonable solution
to the problem of the exercise of sovereignty between the need for new institutions
and the claims of democracy. The unicameral Assembly became the only place
where the general will of the citizens could appear. It is angued by some writers
that such definitions led to a new kind of absolutism of the National Assembly in.
place of the monarchy. In the following years, a fundamental conflict developed
between the popular and parliamentary concept of democracy, each claiming,
indivisible sovereignty.
2.3.1. The Jacobin Republic and Terror (1792-94)
Louis XVI lost all authority and legitimacy to rule France as a constitutional
‘monarch when he tried to escape from Paris in June 1791. The radicals used the
threat of aristocratic reaction to ensure the success of revolution and declared
war on Austria in April 1792 because the Austrian Emperor Leopold II's
Declaration of Pillnitz threatened to restore the full authority of the French crown,
by force with the support of European powers. The radicals drew support from,
the Parisian mob as well as from extremist political action groups like the
Cordeliers and Jacobin clubs. They deposed the king and formed a National
Convention to draft a new republican constitution in August-September 1792. It
‘was chosen on the basis of universal male suffrage.
An alliance between the Jacobins and the popular movement (particularly the
sans-culottes of the Paris communes) provided an essential foundation for the
revolutionary dictatorship under the leadership of Robespierre against the enemies
of ‘liberty’. The popular Parisian militants put into place a coherent set of ideas
and practices after 1792 leading to a direct government and installation of a
popular democracy as different from collective dictatorship of an assembly as
suggested by Sieyes or Marat’s notion of centralized dictatorship. Taking popular
sovereignty as a given absolute, the Parisians deduced the principles of autonomy,
the right to approve laws and to control and recall lected officials. Thus,
representative democracy, the base of Jacobin dictatorship, was replaced by direct,
democracy. Appointment replaced election. The evolution of revolutionary
committees is significant here — the most powerful was the Committee of Public
Safety. It concentrated all powers and portrayed itself as the representative of the
“general will’ and became the powerful executive of the convention. It carried
‘out the law of the General Maximum (establishing price controls of goods ranging,
from food and drink to fuel and clothing) as demanded by the radical working
class of Paris. The war hysteria against the enemies of liberty and the Republic
made the leaders engage in a Reign of Terror (January to July 1794) which
witnessed over 40,000 men and women (the king, queen, secret royalist
sympathizers, arch-Catholics, grain speculators and many others) beheaded by
“The French Revolution
33History of Modern Europe-1
(C.1780 to 1939)
34
the guillotine. Robespierre is regarded as both a tyrant and dictator, and a saint
‘of democracy who pointed the way to socialism. The Revolutionary government
soon lost touch with the masses and became dictatorial in character and
Robespierre lost his grip over the government,
2.3.2. The Thermidorian Republic (1795-99)
After the fall of Robespietre all fundamental problems re-surfaced and there was,
a fresh discussion in the convention on the Declaration of Rights, the sovereignty
‘of the people and on the principle of representation. The new declaration contained
‘the supremacy of law as an expression of general will but the rights of resisting,
“oppression (1789) or of insurrection (1793) disappeared. The Right to Equality
‘was accompanied by the declaration of ‘Duties’ aimed at avoiding the tension
between the unlimited nature of rights and the necessity for social order based
‘on law. The past experience of boundless power concealed within the democratic,
idea of sovereignty led to a rethinking on the subject. Here began a long tradition
of discourse on the concept of sovereignty to be found in Benjamin Constant,
Madame de Stacl, Royer-Collard and Guizot. Sieyes suggested checks on
sovereignty by creating a jurie constitutionnaire - a special body which would
have the task of exercising control over the constitutionality of laws and
administrative regulations. This was the first appearance of the notion of a
jurisdiction superior to the legislative power in French history. The new
constitution created a bi-cameral legislature representing the general will to be
exercised with restraint based on high property qualifications. A Directorate was
proposed with 5 Directors as the Executive. In practice the Directorial regime
achieved the thorough depoliticizing of France, and in particular of Paris. The
bulk of the petty bourgeoisie was barred from all offices, voting existed only in
‘name and polities was dominated by the oligarchs and professional administrators.
The force of this regime resided not in legitimation by elections but in police,
army and bureaucracy. Directory inaugurated social and political reign of notables
~a.class which dominated in the nineteenth century:
Check Your Progress 2
1) What were the new principles of legitimation after the abolition of the ancien
regime? Answer in 100 words.
2) Discuss the nature of power exercised by the Thermidorian Republic.
Answer in 60 words.2.4 IDEOLOGICAL DIVISIONS AND CONTOURS
OF PARTY POLITICS
‘The period of the Revolution was to see the emergence of numerous political
societies which carried their own internal battles for power. The most notable of
these was the Cordeliers Club (called after the abandoned Cordelier monastery
actoss the Seine where it held its meetings). It kept close contact with the activities
of the sans-culottes (small property owners including artisans, shopkeepers,
journeyman with militant ideas and a belief in direct Republican democracy)
‘and succeeded in enlisting and training the Paris mob into a highly effective
political force. Similarly, the Jacobin Club originated at the very beginning of
the revolution, At first it was moderate and offered a meeting place for the
constitutional and educated elements. However, with the progress of Revolution
it became increasingly radical and started creating branches all over France with,
a strong network. These clubs became a hotbed of republicanism.
When the Legislative Assembly met in October 1791 in accordance with the
provisions of the new constitution consisting of 745 members, there were no
sharp divisions among the members who passed back and forth from one group
to another, Party formations were slow and close party organization hardly existed.
However, many members of the assembly began to develop extreme views of
republicanism - ideas spread and nurtured by the Jacobin and Cordelier Clubs.
‘Most vocal groups were for the removal of the king and planned a demonstration.
The events at Champs de Mars in July 1791, where the demonstration was
organized and the firing ordered by Lafayette, led to a split when Lafayette and
the royalist faction left the Jacobins and formed the Feuillant Group. It was a
‘moderate breakaway element which favoured constitutional monarchy.
2.4.1 Cons
nalists vs Republicans
The events at Champ de Mars brought about a swift division within the Third
Estate, There was a clear line of demarcation between those who sought
compromise with the king and those who did not. Many men who had been
patriots in 1789 felt threatened by the growing popular pressure from below and
fearing loss of property and political leadership, moved towards the supporters
of monarchy and Feuillants. Led by Bamave, Duport and Eameth, these moderates
attempted to make the constitution more favourable to the monarchy. Their number
in the assembly was about 260, Keen to bring the revolution to an end before the
middle classes were threatened by the menu-peuple, the Feuillants wished to
reconcile monarchy with the nation. In the Assembly their conservative campaign
for the revision of the constitution had a limited success.
Less numerous but far more active were the Left Wing deputies of the Jacobin,
Club. Their strength was about 140. Like the Feuillants the Jacobins had their
supporters in the electoral assembly and reflected two distinct political tendencies.
The extreme radicals formed the nucteus of the future republican party. They
‘were more powerful in the clubs than in the assembly. Their main leaders were
Merlin de Thionville, Chabot, Couthon. The dominating group of the left-wing,
deputies consisted of the followers of Brissot. Known as Brissotins in the
Legislative Assembly, they came to be known as Girondins under the National
Convention - because several of their best known representatives like Vergniaud,
Grangeneuve, Ducos, came from the department of Gironde. The Girondins were
‘The French Revolution
35History of Modern Europe-t
(C1780 to 1939)
36
staunch advocates of war against Austria and the allies from where the threat of
counter-revolution came. They believed that the war would forge national unity.
However, the flight of Louis XVI and his family from Paris to join the counter-
revolutionaries destroyed the cause of constitutional monarchy. With it the
Feuillants lost ground in French polities.
‘The coming of war in 1792 deepened the gulf between the moderates and the
extremists. It intensified fears and panics due to grain shortages, speculation and
‘black marketing and extemal threats of counter-revolutionaries. The war pushed
the lower section of Parisian society into prominence as voluntary armies
(Revolutionary amy) were created from the urban working population. Hence,
‘the war and economic difficulties swung the revolution to the left. The sans-
cculottes in Paris combined into a powerful force and attacked the Tuileries, (the
royal palace) on 10 August 1792. This brought about the downfall of the monarchy
and France was made a Republic. The National Convention was called on 20
September 1792 to frame a Republican constitution,
2.4.2 Political Struggle between the Girondins and the
Montagnards
Inthe National Convention there were three main political groups but the grouping
‘was quite fluid. The majority, but not very stable, was generally formed by a
great mass of independent deputies. They had no permanent commitments to
any particular programme or faction and were known as “Marais” or ‘Plain’ and
constituted the centre party. The Girondins (former Brissotins) were led by
Vergniaud, Brissot and Guadet. Though they were not in majority, they often
controlled the balance of voting and supplied most of the ministers. The third
important group or party was the Jacobins or Montagnard (Mountain), so-called
from the upper tiers of seats they occupied in the assembly. It was led by very
important personalities like Robespierre, Marat and Danton,
The political struggle between the Girondins and Montagnards tore apart the
Convention and lasted till the former were expelled by the invasion of the Parisian
‘crowd. There is a difference of opinion on the nature of this struggle - whether it
‘was based on personal rivalries and lust for power or a reflection of social and.
economic class struggle. Some writers regard Girondins a coherent party while
others see the idea of Girondin party a result of Montagnard propaganda. Even
Montagnards were also well organized whose tactics had often been concerted
in the Jacobin clubs, of which they gained complete control. The Girondins is
seen as a party of wealth representing the upper bourgeoisie while the
Montagnards had a social base in the lower middle class and the menu-peuple.
‘The Montagnards adopted policies geared to the needs of the masses and did not
hesitate in seeking popular support and adopt policies satisfying popular demands.
‘The misconduct of foreign war and the daunting economic troubles within France
such as the falling value of the assignat (revolutionary paper money) and the
insoluble food problem was weakening the position of Girondins. Instead, they
‘concentrated on the counter-revolution and laws against the emigres. The decisive
blow to the Girondins came from the radically inclined militant groups from
Paris (sans-culottes) who invaded the Convention and brought Montagnards to
power on? June 1793. So, it was the combined force of Montagnards (numerically
small) and sans-culottes which brought about the coup.‘The Jacobins created a provisional revolutionary government in October 1793
leading to a virtual dictatorship and Terror. This government reflects an
inextricable binding up of democratic and tyrannical trends. The various excesses
of the Terror caused a reaction against the Jacobin Republic. On 27 July 1794.
Montagnards led by Robespicrre were eliminated by the conservatives who made
use of the excesses of the radical revolution.
‘The centre stage from 1795 came to be occupied by the Marais, the independents
of the earlier period or the centre party. It included revived Girondins, repentant
Montagnards, passionate republicans and even devoted Catholies. The members
‘were mostly upper elements of bourgeoisie and ex-nobles more interested in
expanding their own property than in any ideology. Sans-culottes were disarmed,
and the left groups were demolished. The last major episode of the French
Revolution was the Babeuf Plot in 1796 to implement the radical leftist ideas of
property distribution and an early form of communist idealism. Babeuf and his
associates were captured and mercilessly executed. The party movement remained
virtually suspended until the restoration of constitutional monarchy in 1815 when
the three major party divisions resurfaced.
Check Your Progress 3
1) _ Discuss the role of political clubs and societies in propagating the ideas of
Republicanism. Answer in 100 words.
2) What were the main ideas of the Feauillant party? Answer in 50 words.
3) Point out the chief elements of the rivalry between the Girondins and the
Montagnards. Answer in 50 words.
‘The French Revolution
37History of Modern Europe-t
(C1780 to 1939)
38
2.5 LET US SUM UP
In this Unit we have studied the impact of economic crisis on the common people
in the villages and towns. It is evident that the financial difficulties of the state
created social and political crisis leading to the French Revolution. You must,
have also noticed the role of philosophers in providing revolutionary language
and ideology. We have examined how the Third-Estate became the National
Assembly representing the citizens of France and not the subjects of the king.
This established new principles of legitimacy to replace the feudal structure of
the absolute state. We have also analyzed how the principles of legitimacy
continued to change with the shift in the nature of revolution. You would have
noticed how revolutionary politics gave birth to the political parties and political
ideologies.
2.6 KEY WORDS
Ancien Regime: A term invented in the 1790s for the way of life and
government in France which was destroyed by the
Revolution in 1789,
Cahiers + Lists of grievances drawn up by each of the three estates
or orders at the time of elections for the Estates-General in
1789,
Emigres + Those who had emigrated from France and were trying to
influence the foreign powers to suppress the revolution.
Estates 1 One of the three social orders into which France was
Divided; these were the clergy, the nobility, and the
‘common people.
Guillotine: A heavy slanting blade, mechanically raised to a great
height between two tall wooden supports, and then dropped
onto the neck of the prisoner. Owing to its weight and the
height from which it was dropped, it sliced through the
neck efficiently and also reduced the labour of the
executioner. It was invented by one Dr Guillotine.
Menu-peuple The common people.
Parlement Sovereign law court created in selected towns to administer
regional justice.
Tithe + A tax collected by the church which was levied on the
major crops like wheat, rye, barley and oats.
2.7 ANSWERS TO CHECK YOUR PROGRESS
EXERCISES
Check Your Progress 1
1) See Sub-see. 2.2.1.
2) Failure to cut governmental expenditure, defective taxation system, fiscal
exemptions of the nobility, ete. See Sub-sec. 2.2.2.3) See Sub-sec. 2.2.4
4) See Sub-see, 2.2.5.
Cheek Your Progress 2
1) Abolition of feudal privileges, establishment of equality and justice,
declaration of the rights of man, etc. See Sec. 2.3.
2) See Sub-sec. 2.
2
Check Your Progress 3
1) See See. 2.4.
2) See Sub-see. 2.4.1.
3) See Sub-see. 2.4.2,
‘The French Revolution
39