Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views6 pages

Management Science 2

The document presents a decision-making analysis for Princess Bank using various methods including Expected Monetary Value (EMV) and Expected Opportunity Loss. It evaluates alternatives for establishing branches under different market conditions and calculates costs related to inventory management. The best actions determined through different criteria consistently point to establishing a full-blown branch as the optimal choice.

Uploaded by

dywrghtcy16
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views6 pages

Management Science 2

The document presents a decision-making analysis for Princess Bank using various methods including Expected Monetary Value (EMV) and Expected Opportunity Loss. It evaluates alternatives for establishing branches under different market conditions and calculates costs related to inventory management. The best actions determined through different criteria consistently point to establishing a full-blown branch as the optimal choice.

Uploaded by

dywrghtcy16
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Activity in Management Science

The payoff table of Princess Bank is presented as follows:


Alternatives Favorable Market Condition Unfavorable Market Condition
Establish a full-blown branch 300,000 -200,000
Establish a Branch-lite unit 150,00 -40,000
Not establish a full-blown branch 0 0
nor a branch-lite unit

The probabilities are 60% for favorable market condition and 40% for unfavorable
market condition.
Required. Using the Expected Opportunity Loss approach, determine which alternative
should be selected.
Alternative Favorable Unfavorable Maximum

Full Blown 300,000-300,000 (-200,000)-0 200,000

Branch-lite 300,000-150,000 (-40,000)-0 150,000

Not establish 300,000-0 0 300,000

DECISION MAKING
1. Expected Monetary Value
Variations: EMV with perfect informatiom
= (1st State of Nature*P1)+ (2 State of Nature* P2)...
EMV without perfect information
= (Max. Payoff of SON*P1)+(Max. Payoff of SON *P2)...
Case 1: Favorable Condition; 60%
Unforavorable Condition; 40%
1. EMV without perfect information
Alternative 1= (300,000*60%)+(-200,000*40%)
=180,000+(-80,000)
= 100,000
Alternative 2 = (150,000*60%)+(-40,000*40%)
= 90,000+(-16,000)
= 74,000
Alternative 3= (0)
EMV with perfect information
Alternative 1 = (300,000*60%)+(0*40%)
= 180,000+0
= 180,000
EMV of Perfect Information
EMV with Perfect Information-EMV without Perfect Information
= 180,000-100,000
= 80,000
Expected Opportunity Loss Approach
Alternative 1= (300,000*60%)+(-200,000*40%)
=180,000+(-80,000)
= 100,000
Alternative 2 = (150,000*60%)+(-40,000*40%)
= 90,000+(-16,000)
= 74,000
Alternative 3= (0)
ECONOMIC ORDER QUANTITY
1. Economic Order Quantity
2x50,000x80=8,000,000/2=4,000,000(SQ. ROOT)=2,000
2. Average Inventory Level
EOQ/2
= 2,000/2
= 1,000
3. Total Carrying Cost
= Average Inventory LevelxCarrying cost per unit
= 1,000x2
= 2,000
4. Total Ordering Cost
= (Annual Demand/EOQ) x Ordering Cost per unit
= (50,000/2,000) x 80
= 2,000
5. Total Annual Inventory Cost
= Total Carrying Cost + Total Ordering Cost
= 2,000 + 2,000
= 4,000
1. MAXIMAX CRITERION
Action 1= 25
Action 2= 23
Action 3=
Step 1: Maximax Criterion
Identify the maximum profit for each action.

For A₁: max(5, 10, 18, 25) = 25


For A₂: max(8, 7, 8, 23) = 23
For A₃: max(21, 18, 12, 21) = 21
For A₄: max(30, 22, 19, 15) = 30
The maximum of these maximums is:

Best action: A₄ with a value of 30.


Step 2: Maximin Criterion
Identify the minimum profit for each action.

For A₁: min(5, 10, 18, 25) = 5


For A₂: min(8, 7, 8, 23) = 7
For A₃: min(21, 18, 12, 21) = 12
For A₄: min(30, 22, 19, 15) = 15
The maximum of these minimums is:
Best action: A₄ with a value of 15.
Step 3: Equally Likely Criterion
Calculate the average for each action.

For A₁: (5 + 10 + 18 + 25) / 4 = 14.5


For A₂: (8 + 7 + 8 + 23) / 4 = 11.5
For A₃: (21 + 18 + 12 + 21) / 4 = 18
For A₄: (30 + 22 + 19 + 15) / 4 = 21.5
The highest average is:

Best action: A₄ with an average of 21.5.


Step 4: Criterion of Realism
Using a coefficient of optimism of 0.5, we compute the weighted values.

A₁: (0.5 * 25 + 0.5 * 5) = 12.5


A₂: (0.5 * 23 + 0.5 * 7) = 15
A₃: (0.5 * 21 + 0.5 * 12) = 16.5
A₄: (0.5 * 30 + 0.5 * 15) = 22.5
The highest weighted value is:

Best action: A₄ with a value of 22.5.


Final Answer
1. Best action using maximax criterion: A₄ (value 30)
2. Best action using maximin criterion: A₄ (value 15)
3. Best action using equally likely criterion: A₄ (average 21.5)
4. Best action using criterion of realism: A₄ (weighted value 22.5)

You might also like